NB: This is exactly the model that Apple also uses, in not providing newer versions of Mac OS X for hardware they are no longer manufacturing.
Actually, Apple supports it's Mac hardware with new versions of OS X for several years after it stops making it, and then continues to release bug patches and security releases for old OS's for awhile longer. And since it has adopted the strategy of making their old designs their low-end phones, old phone hardware lives for many years!
On the other hand, handset vendors that productize via carriers can't worry much about customer satisfaction with old devices, because they have no way to get carriers to release new versions for old handsets. So the situations aren't really parallel.
If I were an MS investor, I would take this as a sign that decision making at MS is not very impressive lately. So far they haven't made much progress breaking into online and mobile, and their old cash cows will dry up eventually. Maybe Windows 8 and Surface will be their big breakthrough in mobile, but I doubt it. Windows has a lot of momentum and so MS will probably get several tries at this, but I think they're going to have to make some difficult changes in business model and corporate culture to succeed.
The ad acquisition was intended to help their online businesses, which lost $2 billion in the past year, and is instead a complete write-off. They have several other big bets that could fail, including Bing and their Windows 8 move into mobile. If these fail, there will be more big write-offs.
Genetic patents are the ultimate software patents, since our genetic code is the program for building us. And these days there is no sharp distinction between software and hardware, since there is so much software that replaces what used to be done with hardware (electronic ignition, calculator, programmable gate arrays, firmware). So I think the real problem is the idea of a patent, period. In this technological age, it's unnecessary to award monopolies to encourage innovation, and secrets don't last long. The whole patent system should simply be shut down: no new patents, and twenty years from now it will be gone.
A patent troll is a non-practicing entity. I understand that you feel patents are a bad idea. I do too. But that doesn't make Apple a troll. Many other derogatory terms are available!
Objectively, it seems that Samsung has followed the very successful business strategy of making phones (and less successfully tablets) that look a lot like market leading Apple products. Apple has tried to use the patent system to prevent this, and this has been, I think, a PR disaster (and not very effective). Since this is exactly what all the billions spent on patents is supposed to enable, maybe big tech corporations will get sick of patents and patent wars and get the whole system abolished. One can hope!
I think the article is saying that this project is bringing accessibility for the blind to Android. They forgot to mention that blind accessibility for the iPhone is excellent and has been ever since the original model.
iPhone is the overwhelmingly common device in enterprise right now, largely because of BYOD. Ironically, some claim that Blackberry is slightly more secure than iOS because it is more obscure (less popular)! It is pretty universally acknowledged that Android currently comes in last when it comes to enterprise security.
The test is 99% reliable when performed correctly. Also, since condoms typically break or slip about 3% of the time, and don't cover the entire penis, the test will be a more effective method of preventing exposure to HIV for many people than a condom.
With enough energy, we could distill sea water. Therefore pure fresh water is not a finite resource that must limit the earth's population anytime soon. This is a myth. There is also not (in principle) an energy shortage -- just technical obstacles to using more of the solar and geothermal energy that are available in such staggering abundance (compared to our current energy usage).
There are some real differences. For one, the Republican view that government should redistribute money to the wealthy, and not the other way around, is winning. This continues despite a financial crisis caused largely by people with too much money and influence. Ironically, the rich have historically done much better on average when there has been less inequality.
And you're repeating very old stereotypes here. Democrats had a large budget surplus under Clinton, and there was a real danger that the US would pay off it's national debt. We were saved from that by Bush.
And finally, as a scientist, I am deeply disturbed by the conservative rejection of science. This has been extensively documented, and is driving the Republican party crazy. Evidence must matter, or we'll experience the dark side of the evolution they don't believe in.
My favorite Del Rey is The Runaway Robot, which I still find very readable. It's written from the viewpoint of a robot that is a companion/servant for a young boy and gets sold when his family moves back to Earth. It would still make a wonderful movie! Interestingly, this wasn't actually written by Del Rey, but just outlined by him and ghost written by Paul W. Fairman. Perhaps that's why Del Rey didn't republish it.
Completely agree. Apple is actually probably the best of the tech companies in terms of monitoring working conditions in China, but a bit of heat will make them try much harder. One piece of evidence that news media don't really care about the issues is the recent coverage of the workers who threatened mass suicide at a Chinese factory making Xbox's. This was almost universally reported as, "workers at Apple manufacturer Foxconn..." without even mentioning Microsoft.
I'm also dismayed at the way that this story is linked to bringing jobs home. Poor Chinese desperately need these shitty jobs to stay alive and to find a path out of poverty, and keeping the devices they make affordable has stimulated a lot of really good jobs here. For example, Apple has paid more than $2 billion in the past year to hundreds of thousands of software developers in their App store.
3. ipad (1 & 2). Really good PDF rendering and pages turn fast. Downsides are: a) No easy way to transfer documents. Some may consider iTunes easy to work. I do not. b) Lower resolutio and physical size of the display when compared to Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 and other similar Android devices.
You don't need to use iTunes to transfer PDFs. There are several hundred PDF readers written specifically for the iPad. I've only tried a few of them but my favorites are Papers, GoodReader and AirSharing, none of which require you to use iTunes for transferring files. Direct access to servers, including mail servers and dropbox, is common. Did you actually try an iPad?
Outsourcing iPad manufacturing to low wage workers in China is hardly the problem. According to iSuppli, each iPad 2 costs $9 to assemble. This is only 3% of the overall manufacturing cost -- the rest is in parts that are made all over the world.
The US benefits at least as much as anyone else from the availability of cheap electronics -- both for consumers and for industry. Unless we are prepared to make all electronics dramatically more expensive, we have to let the market decide who makes the parts that go into our devices. If we're designing the device, and writing software for it, and building new companies and industries around it, that seems like a pretty good contribution to the US economy.
For some reason a lot of people are ignoring the obvious: the iPod touch (and old iPhone's given to kids). Away from consoles, I mostly see kids playing with these (and with their parents iPhones). One friend's kid plays with his Android phone, but she's just 1 and mostly chews on it.
Apple's been fighting to have WiFi enabled because that makes the iPhone experience much better (and hence more saleable). I expect that WiFi will only be turned off in the firmware and the hardware will be the same as is used in the rest of the world: if so, this latent capability could be enabled in the future.
So the XP layer helps users run those applications, while also letting Microsoft actually *improve* their OS in the way that Apple and Linux (systems who don't give half a whit for backwards compatibility) can.
When OS X was introduced it included an OS 9 VM for years ("classic mode"). After the switch to Intel OS X included a PPC VM ("Rosetta") which still allows all PPC programs to run on Intel Macs. In fact, with 3rd party software (e.g., VMWARE Fusion and a copy of Windows XP), a Mac is exactly as compatible with old Windows programs as a PC is.
The EFF article just quotes the iLounge article as its source -- it is certainly not independent confirmation of anything. The guys at http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/03/14/we-found-the-chip-in.html have pictures of an actual chip under the switch in the cable, but this also proves nothing about DRM. You presumably need circuitry in the cable to make this thing work: unlike the iPhone or iPod touch, this iPod reuses the earphone connector to sync the iPod!! My guess is that one of the functions of the chip in the cable is to simply identify what has been attached to the connector. I've seen no evidence that there's DRM involved.
This poster is absolutely right: the article is a hit piece that misquotes and completely contradicts what the Japanese journalist Hayashi has actually been writing! Mod kalel666 up! Take a look also at http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/20290/ on why the Japanese don't hate the iPhone.
Of course it's all Clinton's fault. Bush has just been clearing brush for the past eight years. The fact that he was the most incompetent president this country has ever had, and put political considerations and ideology ahead of competence and experience in nearly every appointment are irrelevant to the current mess. Heck of a job Bushie!
Tax cuts don't help much if they are saved, which is likely. The banks don't need more deposits -- they are afraid to lend even though the Fed rate is at 0%. I think our leaders should forget about the stimulus and just nationalize insolvent banks. This is a way to let the insolvent banks go bankrupt without causing too much disruption to the financial system. This would instantly restore the credit markets and then the government could control credit using fiscal policy again. They can re-privatize the banks later, as was done in Sweden when they had their credit crisis.
Republicans have no basis for posing as fiscal conservatives at this point, having overseen a 10 to 20 trillion dollar expansion in the US debt. Given an economy that is collapsing, losing jobs at the rate of 600,000 per month currently, there is really nothing else to try right now other than government spending: the Fed overnight rate is at 0% so we've run out of fiscal policy. Giving tax cuts to people that they save in the bank will do nothing to stimulate demand. Banks don't need more savings -- they already have free credit from the Fed and are still afraid to lend! The fact that the Republicans insisted on removing $40 billion from the package that was aid to the financially strapped states is incomprehensible to me! This is obviously money that is ready to be spent, which is exactly what a stimulus is about! As GDP drops, government revenues also drop, and so not providing a stimulus could easily cost the government more than doing it!
There is also some real urgency here. Overstimulation of the housing market should not bring down the whole economy, but uncontrolled leveraging and hedging have made that a real possibility. If financial blood flow is not restored soon chunks of the economy will die needlessly and a large portion of the workforce will lie idle and unpaid.
Slashdot Mirror
NB: This is exactly the model that Apple also uses, in not providing newer versions of Mac OS X for hardware they are no longer manufacturing.
Actually, Apple supports it's Mac hardware with new versions of OS X for several years after it stops making it, and then continues to release bug patches and security releases for old OS's for awhile longer. And since it has adopted the strategy of making their old designs their low-end phones, old phone hardware lives for many years!
On the other hand, handset vendors that productize via carriers can't worry much about customer satisfaction with old devices, because they have no way to get carriers to release new versions for old handsets. So the situations aren't really parallel.
If I were an MS investor, I would take this as a sign that decision making at MS is not very impressive lately. So far they haven't made much progress breaking into online and mobile, and their old cash cows will dry up eventually. Maybe Windows 8 and Surface will be their big breakthrough in mobile, but I doubt it. Windows has a lot of momentum and so MS will probably get several tries at this, but I think they're going to have to make some difficult changes in business model and corporate culture to succeed.
The ad acquisition was intended to help their online businesses, which lost $2 billion in the past year, and is instead a complete write-off. They have several other big bets that could fail, including Bing and their Windows 8 move into mobile. If these fail, there will be more big write-offs.
Genetic patents are the ultimate software patents, since our genetic code is the program for building us. And these days there is no sharp distinction between software and hardware, since there is so much software that replaces what used to be done with hardware (electronic ignition, calculator, programmable gate arrays, firmware). So I think the real problem is the idea of a patent, period. In this technological age, it's unnecessary to award monopolies to encourage innovation, and secrets don't last long. The whole patent system should simply be shut down: no new patents, and twenty years from now it will be gone.
A patent troll is a non-practicing entity. I understand that you feel patents are a bad idea. I do too. But that doesn't make Apple a troll. Many other derogatory terms are available!
Objectively, it seems that Samsung has followed the very successful business strategy of making phones (and less successfully tablets) that look a lot like market leading Apple products. Apple has tried to use the patent system to prevent this, and this has been, I think, a PR disaster (and not very effective). Since this is exactly what all the billions spent on patents is supposed to enable, maybe big tech corporations will get sick of patents and patent wars and get the whole system abolished. One can hope!
I think the article is saying that this project is bringing accessibility for the blind to Android. They forgot to mention that blind accessibility for the iPhone is excellent and has been ever since the original model.
iPhone is the overwhelmingly common device in enterprise right now, largely because of BYOD. Ironically, some claim that Blackberry is slightly more secure than iOS because it is more obscure (less popular)! It is pretty universally acknowledged that Android currently comes in last when it comes to enterprise security.
The test is 99% reliable when performed correctly. Also, since condoms typically break or slip about 3% of the time, and don't cover the entire penis, the test will be a more effective method of preventing exposure to HIV for many people than a condom.
With enough energy, we could distill sea water. Therefore pure fresh water is not a finite resource that must limit the earth's population anytime soon. This is a myth. There is also not (in principle) an energy shortage -- just technical obstacles to using more of the solar and geothermal energy that are available in such staggering abundance (compared to our current energy usage).
There are some real differences. For one, the Republican view that government should redistribute money to the wealthy, and not the other way around, is winning. This continues despite a financial crisis caused largely by people with too much money and influence. Ironically, the rich have historically done much better on average when there has been less inequality.
And you're repeating very old stereotypes here. Democrats had a large budget surplus under Clinton, and there was a real danger that the US would pay off it's national debt. We were saved from that by Bush.
And finally, as a scientist, I am deeply disturbed by the conservative rejection of science. This has been extensively documented, and is driving the Republican party crazy. Evidence must matter, or we'll experience the dark side of the evolution they don't believe in.
My favorite Del Rey is The Runaway Robot, which I still find very readable. It's written from the viewpoint of a robot that is a companion/servant for a young boy and gets sold when his family moves back to Earth. It would still make a wonderful movie! Interestingly, this wasn't actually written by Del Rey, but just outlined by him and ghost written by Paul W. Fairman. Perhaps that's why Del Rey didn't republish it.
Completely agree. Apple is actually probably the best of the tech companies in terms of monitoring working conditions in China, but a bit of heat will make them try much harder. One piece of evidence that news media don't really care about the issues is the recent coverage of the workers who threatened mass suicide at a Chinese factory making Xbox's. This was almost universally reported as, "workers at Apple manufacturer Foxconn..." without even mentioning Microsoft.
I'm also dismayed at the way that this story is linked to bringing jobs home. Poor Chinese desperately need these shitty jobs to stay alive and to find a path out of poverty, and keeping the devices they make affordable has stimulated a lot of really good jobs here. For example, Apple has paid more than $2 billion in the past year to hundreds of thousands of software developers in their App store.
I have to agree, especially in this economy, people who need a functional device for 200 or less is a growing barely tapped market.
iPod Touch is $199 and much more functional than the Fire, though much smaller.
3. ipad (1 & 2). Really good PDF rendering and pages turn fast. Downsides are: a) No easy way to transfer documents. Some may consider iTunes easy to work. I do not. b) Lower resolutio and physical size of the display when compared to Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 and other similar Android devices.
You don't need to use iTunes to transfer PDFs. There are several hundred PDF readers written specifically for the iPad. I've only tried a few of them but my favorites are Papers, GoodReader and AirSharing, none of which require you to use iTunes for transferring files. Direct access to servers, including mail servers and dropbox, is common. Did you actually try an iPad?
Outsourcing iPad manufacturing to low wage workers in China is hardly the problem. According to iSuppli, each iPad 2 costs $9 to assemble. This is only 3% of the overall manufacturing cost -- the rest is in parts that are made all over the world.
The US benefits at least as much as anyone else from the availability of cheap electronics -- both for consumers and for industry. Unless we are prepared to make all electronics dramatically more expensive, we have to let the market decide who makes the parts that go into our devices. If we're designing the device, and writing software for it, and building new companies and industries around it, that seems like a pretty good contribution to the US economy.
For some reason a lot of people are ignoring the obvious: the iPod touch (and old iPhone's given to kids). Away from consoles, I mostly see kids playing with these (and with their parents iPhones). One friend's kid plays with his Android phone, but she's just 1 and mostly chews on it.
In the most recent quarter reported, Apple (with a tiny share of the market) was already making more profit on its iPhone than Nokia was on all of its handsets combined -- both dumb and smart phones. Also, AAPL's market cap is about four times that of NOK. So I'm not sure I agree with your conclusion about who is the big guy in this battle.
Apple's been fighting to have WiFi enabled because that makes the iPhone experience much better (and hence more saleable). I expect that WiFi will only be turned off in the firmware and the hardware will be the same as is used in the rest of the world: if so, this latent capability could be enabled in the future.
So the XP layer helps users run those applications, while also letting Microsoft actually *improve* their OS in the way that Apple and Linux (systems who don't give half a whit for backwards compatibility) can.
When OS X was introduced it included an OS 9 VM for years ("classic mode"). After the switch to Intel OS X included a PPC VM ("Rosetta") which still allows all PPC programs to run on Intel Macs. In fact, with 3rd party software (e.g., VMWARE Fusion and a copy of Windows XP), a Mac is exactly as compatible with old Windows programs as a PC is.
The EFF article just quotes the iLounge article as its source -- it is certainly not independent confirmation of anything. The guys at http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/03/14/we-found-the-chip-in.html have pictures of an actual chip under the switch in the cable, but this also proves nothing about DRM. You presumably need circuitry in the cable to make this thing work: unlike the iPhone or iPod touch, this iPod reuses the earphone connector to sync the iPod!! My guess is that one of the functions of the chip in the cable is to simply identify what has been attached to the connector. I've seen no evidence that there's DRM involved.
This poster is absolutely right: the article is a hit piece that misquotes and completely contradicts what the Japanese journalist Hayashi has actually been writing! Mod kalel666 up! Take a look also at http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/20290/ on why the Japanese don't hate the iPhone.
Of course it's all Clinton's fault. Bush has just been clearing brush for the past eight years. The fact that he was the most incompetent president this country has ever had, and put political considerations and ideology ahead of competence and experience in nearly every appointment are irrelevant to the current mess. Heck of a job Bushie!
No, the inflation rate is currently around 0% or slightly negative. See http://www.inflationdata.com/inflation/Inflation_Rate/CurrentInflation.asp.
Tax cuts don't help much if they are saved, which is likely. The banks don't need more deposits -- they are afraid to lend even though the Fed rate is at 0%. I think our leaders should forget about the stimulus and just nationalize insolvent banks. This is a way to let the insolvent banks go bankrupt without causing too much disruption to the financial system. This would instantly restore the credit markets and then the government could control credit using fiscal policy again. They can re-privatize the banks later, as was done in Sweden when they had their credit crisis.
Republicans have no basis for posing as fiscal conservatives at this point, having overseen a 10 to 20 trillion dollar expansion in the US debt. Given an economy that is collapsing, losing jobs at the rate of 600,000 per month currently, there is really nothing else to try right now other than government spending: the Fed overnight rate is at 0% so we've run out of fiscal policy. Giving tax cuts to people that they save in the bank will do nothing to stimulate demand. Banks don't need more savings -- they already have free credit from the Fed and are still afraid to lend! The fact that the Republicans insisted on removing $40 billion from the package that was aid to the financially strapped states is incomprehensible to me! This is obviously money that is ready to be spent, which is exactly what a stimulus is about! As GDP drops, government revenues also drop, and so not providing a stimulus could easily cost the government more than doing it!
There is also some real urgency here. Overstimulation of the housing market should not bring down the whole economy, but uncontrolled leveraging and hedging have made that a real possibility. If financial blood flow is not restored soon chunks of the economy will die needlessly and a large portion of the workforce will lie idle and unpaid.