So why did they go to the trouble of writing the bit that starts with 'but upon probable cause...'?
If they'd meant no warrants shall issue, period - no, not even little tiny ones, then it'd have been a lot easier to just end the sentence right there.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The last bit seems to list a set of preconditions which, if met, do allow it.
I didn't know that there was a cellphone network in Haiti BEFORE the disaster... Otherwise, it's not DR, it's INSTALLATION.
It'd be a pretty pointless installation absent a large number of handsets in circulation.
One must therefore presume that:
1) there were the aforementioned handsets already in circulation;
2) therefore, there was already a supporting infrastructure (or nobody would've bought the handsets);
3) Out of you and Trilogy International, exactly one has the IQ of a drunken marmoset;
and last but not least:
4) the entity referred to in 3) above isn't Trilogy International.
Perhaps they were Sony laptops and the intention was that they'd eventually end up in the hands of Senor Castro (senior or junior).
It's probably the only assassination method the CIA haven't tried yet.
His obligations to them ended as soon as they fired him. He's under no obligation to work for free. As to the stealing things analogy, the network is still there, isn't it?
Slashdot Mirror
The resources you spend on unnecessary innovation - working round the patent - could be spent on useful innovation - creating something new or better.
The French.
Will this module work with a real crew, or one that are made of flesh and bone?
So why did they go to the trouble of writing the bit that starts with 'but upon probable cause...'?
If they'd meant no warrants shall issue, period - no, not even little tiny ones, then it'd have been a lot easier to just end the sentence right there.
The last bit seems to list a set of preconditions which, if met, do allow it.
This is particularly puzzling because that wasn't where they lost it.
Did I hear him say, around 0:15, Napoleon the Third?
There's one lone single historical fact in the whole diatribe and he can't even get that right.
I bet he stinks of piss.
It'd be a pretty pointless installation absent a large number of handsets in circulation.
One must therefore presume that:
1) there were the aforementioned handsets already in circulation;
2) therefore, there was already a supporting infrastructure (or nobody would've bought the handsets);
3) Out of you and Trilogy International, exactly one has the IQ of a drunken marmoset;
and last but not least:
4) the entity referred to in 3) above isn't Trilogy International.
How about mules? Bonus - they're edible!
Maybe there are different levels of debunkedness?
If you can have "most unique" I'd say anything's possible.
So does it go up to 11?
What you said is not what the comic says. Learn to read.
Can someone explain what "maximum average" means in the link above?
The Chinese have already pirated it?
I'm not sure it technically is one since it joins the separate phrases with conjunctions, which is one of the standard fixes: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/598/02/
But perhaps when a sentence spans six lines one would expect slightly more than one comma.
I herd u like sandboxing, so I put a sandbox in your sandbox so you can run in a sandbox when you're running in a sandbox.
vi
Depends how dangerous - and which people you have in mind...
Perhaps they were Sony laptops and the intention was that they'd eventually end up in the hands of Senor Castro (senior or junior). It's probably the only assassination method the CIA haven't tried yet.
His obligations to them ended as soon as they fired him. He's under no obligation to work for free. As to the stealing things analogy, the network is still there, isn't it?
That's why I included two alternatives, with "or" in between. It still doesn't mean you can say "they is" or "it are".
What is it then, asshat?
It's either "has released its" or "have released their".
If you were the sysadmin, you could rightly claim it was a security exercise specifically targeting the wetware.
Because he means approximately a quarter past eight in the evening.