"This Churchill guy is a hypocrite. He wants to fight the Germans, but gets so angry when you suggest we appease them instead. I mean, fighting the Germans means we don't get destroyed by them, and appeasement also means we don't get destroyed by them."
I don't know where you studied history and logic, but you should ask for a refund.
Fighting the Germans doesn't mean you won't get destroyed by them. Beating them does.
People make false positives all the time, too, and presumably these are double-checked by the actual cops making the arrest, the prosecutor bringing the case, and the judge and jury involved in assessing his guilt.
*golf clap* Nice one. For a moment I thought you were serious.
How do they do that? Do they have multiple foveas?
That aside, if I was writing a summary about something that's quite similar to something else I'd add a sentence explaining why it's different, but I'm a bit eccentric sometimes.
Of course if it looks like it'll save money then it'll get applied to problems which aren't suitable. There will be tears; whether they're of sadness or laughter, we know not yet.
Slashdot Mirror
X as taught in high school is not the same as X defined at the collegiate/university level.
Isn't that rue for all X?
Mistake isn't there in the original. The editors can't even copy and paste properly.
They have parachutes?
Wouldn't work? It doesn't even parse.
Don't worry, this year's climbers will probably be next year's lamers.
If you don't have a smart watch it's right where it always was - outside.
They aren't even tolerant of each other. Maybe they could start by agreeing on what the exact definition of a woman is.
Like, it has two graces?
Assuming he knows about it, of course.
I don't know where you studied history and logic, but you should ask for a refund.
Fighting the Germans doesn't mean you won't get destroyed by them. Beating them does.
Stupid answer: in Soviet Russia, country of origin masks YOU!
Slightly less stupid answer: it won't work. They'll find some flaw, bodge, frig or loophole.
> unless you want the ground crews and mechanics to die of radiation exposure.
Right, because suits aren't an actual thing.
*golf clap*
Nice one. For a moment I thought you were serious.
I've heard of peripheral vision. That's how I know it's not the focus of attention. It's only really good for motion detection.
Talking to to yourself? First sign of madness, that.
Basketball is pretty racist then.
FTFY.
Actually, I'm not sure about the black holes.
Lost me there. Is it from Zero Wing?
How do they do that? Do they have multiple foveas?
That aside, if I was writing a summary about something that's quite similar to something else I'd add a sentence explaining why it's different, but I'm a bit eccentric sometimes.
So you might die, and it would cost somebody his bonus to prevent that.
It's the Ford Edsel all over again.
The morale of the story? Employ editors who are actually literate.
Michael Jackson?
Of course if it looks like it'll save money then it'll get applied to problems which aren't suitable. There will be tears; whether they're of sadness or laughter, we know not yet.
It's amazing how many people don't write like that.I find it very annoying,don't you?
Perhaps they don't want to admit they made a mistake hiring him?
As opposed to having disabled system-wide ASLR protection turned on, or enabled system-wide ASLR protection turned off...?
Were you not taught to write "Its height is six feet" or "It's six feet high" and not "Its height is six feet high" when you were in primary school?