Offtpic used to mean "I don't agree with this post, but I'm too lazy, dumb or inarticulate to refute it". Since flamebait took over that role, it now scrapes a living as "I'm not interested in this".
The FBI got a warrant first. It's not an extension of illegal wiretapping.
Well that's no fun.
Can't we just pretend they didn't so all the ill-informed clowns can rant about the constitution this, entrapment that, yada yada ad nauseam like they usually do?
If there's anything guaranteed to get people talking about X (no, not that X) it's to say "Setting aside X", "Leaving X out of consideration" "For purposes of simplication, ignore X".
Slashdot Mirror
A button that switches the lights off?
I don't see the difference.
So you think driving while drunk is OK? If not, how would you test for it?
Offtpic used to mean "I don't agree with this post, but I'm too lazy, dumb or inarticulate to refute it". Since flamebait took over that role, it now scrapes a living as "I'm not interested in this".
4th September 1924?
Most people think an apostrophe means "look out, here comes an S". You seem to to think it means "oops, you just missed one".
Perhaps my neck elevation angle is insufficient, but if I was in a windowless basement how would I know what the lunar illumination situation was?
It depends on the temperature difference between the heat source and the heat sink; the higher the difference, the more efficient the conversion.
P.S. Ever heard of google?
Let me assure you that in grammatical application it does nothing of the kind.
Well that's no fun.
Can't we just pretend they didn't so all the ill-informed clowns can rant about the constitution this, entrapment that, yada yada ad nauseam like they usually do?
Why would they censor "wuck"? It's not even a word.
How is any comparison where the fonts are in different colours supposed to prove anything?
Uppercase are mostly straight lines and hence easier to carve.
You're just the kind of pedantic purist he was complaining about. Expecting people to use words with their actual meanings is totally unreasonable.
Nothing apart from the fact that it's completely unidiomatic, clumsy, and no educated native speaker would ever use it?
It doesn't matter if you sell at a loss, you can make up for it with volume.
Did you want something you couldn't buy, or was what you wanted not available to buy?
If they've done nothing wrong they've got nothing to hide.
In other words, "I've got X" (where X is something that basically makes you a 'tard) but I'm brilliant because 1% of brilliant people possibly have X.
Well I'm left handed!
I'd say about minus 2 years.
We kan haz baylowt?
The point is that the summary ipso facto faeces tauri est, and is so it's not necessary to RTFA.
I did reasd the title. And it was bullshit. Just like everything you write.
By the way, is there some part of "or" your having trouble with?
'nt start a sentence in the subject line and continue in the body of the post.
And he still has them all.
If there's anything guaranteed to get people talking about X (no, not that X) it's to say "Setting aside X", "Leaving X out of consideration" "For purposes of simplication, ignore X".
It's like trying to not think about elephants.