Slashdot Mirror


User: j1bb3rj4bb3r

j1bb3rj4bb3r's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
101
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 101

  1. Re:It's a microkernel. on Coyotos, A New Security-focused OS & Language · · Score: 1

    what the hell is the mod down for redundant???
    did you read the whole thread?

  2. Re:It's a microkernel. on Coyotos, A New Security-focused OS & Language · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Only if you pass the proper message to the correct mailbox.
    And even then only if you have permissions.

  3. Re:Like the "Linux is Obsolete" flame war of 1992? on Flame Wars, Forks and Freedom · · Score: 1

    That was awesome... I like this quote:

    "Of course 5 years from now that will be different, but 5 years from now everyone will be running free GNU on their 200 MIPS, 64M SPARCstation-5." - AST

    ... and the one about how Linus wouldn't get a very good grade in Tanenbaum's class.

  4. Re:Bashdot? on Gentoo Announces OpenSolaris Port · · Score: 1

    libel with a heaping side of slander anyone?

  5. Re:Internal Combustion? on Ethical Questions For The Age Of Robots · · Score: 1

    Don't worry... if you can afford a robot butler, it will have a nice 1.8T 4-cyl and sound like an Audi A4 rather than a two-stroke engine that sounds like your lawnmower.

  6. Re:Market on Ethical Questions For The Age Of Robots · · Score: 1

    refer to teh sexy replicant post above...

    hrmmm... one could consider a vibrating device of satisfaction a robot...

  7. what? on Ethical Questions For The Age Of Robots · · Score: 2, Insightful

    4. Should robots eat? There are proposals to allow robots to gain energy by combusting biological matter, either food or waste items. If this mode of fuel becomes popular, will we really want to compete for resources against our own technological progeny?

    I hate to tell you Mr. University Professor, but any robot that does something uses energy, and that energy comes from somewhere. Whether my tin-man friend eats its energy via food or gets it from a battery, it's still competing for resources with me. This is a dumb question to ask, unless you want to make a point about anthromorphizing robots.
    Dammit, I want a professorship... my job is too hard... wait I'm just reading /. all day. Nevermind.

  8. Re:I don't get it.... on Dispute Continues Over Posthumous Yahoo! Mail · · Score: 1

    You never send yourself an email to keep as a note? My guess is that's probably what he was doing. Makes sense to me... you're in the desert with no computer or storage of your own, so you write emails to yourself and store them on your webmail account. His intention was to probably get them when he got back (and, yes, while you know you might die, you don't believe it... you wouldn't make a good soldier if you were convinced you were already dead).

  9. micromachines man on One-Man Lord of The Rings Comes to Chicago · · Score: 0

    How the hell does he do this? Does he talk like the micro machines man (ok, now I'm showing my age).

  10. Re:dropping the parts onto Earth doesn't work on B612 Foundation and 2004 YD5 Asteroid Capture? · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lawyer-seeking containers. Problem solved.

  11. Re:"Solaris/x86 is a joke" on Torvalds on Opening Solaris · · Score: 1

    Solaris/x86 will not be a joke with Solaris 10. Sun is putting alot of resources into making it work. Linus is also missing the point when he says Solaris/x86 will not work on all sorts of hardware that Linux does. This is, and will remain, true. Sun isn't concerned with running Solaris on any combination of x86 hardware. They are concerned with running it on *their* hardware. That's why they don't talk about Linux in general, but Red Hat Linux specifically when they talk about competitors. The market they are going for is the server market, and they are giving away Solaris so they can sell servers and service contracts.
    Disclosures: Yes, I work for Sun. No, I don't work in the Solaris group. I don't actually know how Solaris 10/x86 is doing, but I do know they are putting a lot of time and energy into it.

  12. maybe not so stupid on Virtual Island Sells For $26,500 · · Score: 1

    Everyone is ripping on the buyer for spending that much money on it, but think about it... the buyer may actually be quite smart. If he/she can sell off the individual pieces for 'reasonable' amounts (say $100 for a beachfront property, $200 for mining rights, etc.), he/she could stand to make a significant profit. Is the enjoyment of those pieces of property worth a hundred or so dollars to a gamer?... maybe. It's not that he/she purchased 'fake' property but rather the rights to use the digital manifestation.
    I for one would probably have done it, too, if I had $26,500 to invest in what could possibly provide a huge windfall.

  13. Hrmmm on Hacking the iPod Firmware · · Score: 1

    I tried this awhile ago with my own iPod (I was trying to hack it to turn WMA support on in the chip). Once I got past the checksum problem, I realized I would need an ARM disassembler to have anyh hope of finding the right register to change to enable that support. Hopefully someone (with access to the chip specs and an ARM disassembler) is working this.

  14. I don't know... on How to Fix U.S. Patents · · Score: 1

    if we do away with patent law, we'll just have a bunch of unemployed lawyers on the streets. I, for one, don't want to see some guy in a grimy, torn Armani suit standing in my way in traffic with a sign that says "Will Sue For Food".

    That reminds me of that joke... what's the difference between a dead lawyer and a dead dog in a road...

  15. Re:No big deal on When Malware Authors Combine Efforts · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to come up with a clever joke to poke fun at your wanton cruelty but I think I'll let your post speak for itself.

  16. Paradigm on Portable Firefox and Thunderbird · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would like to see this done for many different apps (browser, email, IM, blah blah), basically anything that requires user preferences... package a small binary and the preferences together such that they can run off the USB drive. With more and more people owning/working with multiple machines, this would be really useful.

  17. Re:well summed up: on Lycos Pulls Vigilante Anti-spam Campaign · · Score: 1

    well, it was only the dumbest thing he's heard *this* week.... can't be that bad, then, can it?

  18. Top 3 on Nintendo Eyeing the Big Screen · · Score: 1

    of my wishlist for movies based on Nintendo games: 1. Metroid : aimed for late teen/young adults... horror splashed with action and sexual innuendo (no waiting till the end of the game for that helmet to come off). 2. Mega Man : ohmygod this is it. Think of all the characters in this game. The voice actors could have a field day. Make it campy. 3. Legend of Zelda : unfortunately Xandir has ruined any chance at me being able to take this seriously. I'll just be yelling at the screen "admit you're gay already!!! you can just go home!!!"

  19. Re:Pfft! on Will Open Source Solaris Kill Linux? · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Solaris in it's current and past incarnations on x86 hardware is slow and stupid. The Solaris x86 project at Sun never had any backing before Solaris 10. Now, Sun plans on selling Solaris (support licences) on their hardware which, guess what, isn't going to be just SPARCs, but also x86 servers. So, the Solaris engineers (who are still some of the brightest people left at Sun), have done a lot with a lot of support to make Solaris for x86 a viable platform.
    Yes, I do work for Sun. No I don't work in the Solaris group. No, I don't particularly like Sun, especially the upper management. But Solaris is a top notch OS, and if Solaris 10 works as well as I've heard it does (from engineers at Sun... not marketing), then I for one am happy that they are going to release it under some sort of "open" license. I don't expect it to beat Linux, but I think if it's done properly, the curiousity of all those geeks out there will get the better of them, and they'll be pouring over the source as soon as possible.

  20. Re:Still can't see how Sun will survive on Sun-isms Debunked · · Score: 1

    ... and thank god for the .com bust so that the space and power to operate that extra iron is cheap and available.

  21. Re:my impressions on Sun-isms Debunked · · Score: 1

    you moded that as Funny? I don't think he was joking :).

  22. Re:my impressions on Sun-isms Debunked · · Score: 1

    what positive reviews?

  23. Re:Sun doesn't 'Get It' on Sun-isms Debunked · · Score: 1

    They're a server company. They don't give a damn about those markets for Solaris. They want Solaris on their hardware in the Enterprise. Solaris being open sourced is a part of that strategy.

  24. Re:Still can't see how Sun will survive on Sun-isms Debunked · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because they are going to sell cheaper x86 hardware that run Solaris. They're going after the whole solution I think... sell the hardware, give away the OS, sell the support and integration characteristics. It also gives them a way to support their existing Solaris customer base (whcih is still their cash cow, but I'm sure they realize that it's dwindling). I think that with the acceptance of Linux in the marketplace, the OS for server systems became commodity. The dollars had to be made from service. Sun still wants to be a server hardware company (high and low end), but realizes that x86 has beaten the pants off of SPARC (and the chips have become commodity as well). If they can migrate their existing customer base to x86 running Solaris at a low cost, they will get a boost in the service market. They'll try and move in on existing Linux/x86 systems (offering Linux on their x86 hardware), but will push Solaris so they can get the support contract. I'm not sure if it will save them, but I understand what lucrative markets they could be targeting.

  25. Re:my impressions on Sun-isms Debunked · · Score: 1

    what company hasn't? that's called competition. Show me a CEO or other frontperson of any company that doesn't attack their competition (sometimes well and sometimes not).