Considering the fact that being a lawyer in today's political climate gets you only 48% of the popular vote in the US, i think we need him on the SC where as Mr J. Stewart pointed out, "the only oversight is the icy finger of death".
ps-I hope America the book doesnt sue me for quoting them, i didnt wait for the response to my email about whether or not i could. Also, if you enjoyed this post, please send $19.99 to 1 happy St; Pueblo, CO 55515. Thank You.
Jez, at those prices i in the mindset of a car jacker would never consider stealing a $20,000 vehicle... the economies of scale just dont overwhelm the cost-benefit ratio enough.
I go with this mentality as well. Its COINTELPRO, with Mac filter and 128 WEP. Im sure somebodys gotten on it by now and read my directory of all the stolen COINTELPRO papers from the Weather Underground.
Well fact is name one PMP or DAP or PDA or etc that is engineered for linux? I cant think of any. I think developers on the corporate level just think thats what the 'community' is for. What really sucks is that altho it runs on Qtopia, it seems only specifically written software will run on it, nut just any zaurus app for instance.
One of the bigger tech hurrdles to pass is the rate of speed of a user. Switching from tower to tower is not noticable usually when yr say driving down the highway. But in a plane at that speed towers would have a considerably more difficult time transferring from tower to tower especially over a long range flight covering many states. And trans-atlantic or pacific flights are probably SOL anyway. All this could be muted if a cell tower was actually placed on the plane, but i dont know how concievable that is at the moment...
Uh if taking sides with the opposition to President Bush as all-pervasive as that is then fine, yea i take sides. When Clinton was president he was not my president either, if Gore was president he wouldnt have been mine and if Kerry had been he wouldnt have been mine. Democracy is not getting to chose between two autocrats to tell you what to do for the next four years.
As for whose religious views are more fucked up,i'd go with the Talebans but they dont exist as a ruling body anymore, we cant say that for this country. So what are you advocating, accepting rule of these religious beliefs here, or usurption of the Administration that yields them?
Also your misunderstanding of verifiability suggests why you take issue with my use of the word. GWB had evidence that was corroborated by the people who gave it to him... thats like a co-author of a research paper on cold fusion using results from someone in the same research group as evidence of its existence. What you do is have someone independent of the group verify the evidence, like say the IAEA which showed that evidence was FORGED! Or you could rely on someone in your own group who told you that it was fake (Joe Wilson). But of course the intelligent response would be to tamper with the whistleblowers evidence and claim that you had found cold fusion anyway.
You dont have to verify to _my_ satisfaction, you verify to the standards satisfaction. Especially in the case of all out war.
Im not the one who called you a jesusland idiot but you love putting words in my mouth. I feel very sorry you think the way you do, many people are dying because of it. And repression exists all around the world because of it. But dont worry, i know im just at fault as well. I do what i can.
BTW I thought you jesusland idiots didnt like big guvment wiping yr ass at the crapper that was one of the heinous problems with them demorats, maybe i misundersood you guys after all...
That joke always bugged be because it lacks a differential after the integrand.
I knew i was going to get sucked into some geek-speak here but well i avoided that pitfall by using the Z which was meant as a summation rather than an S which _kinda_ looks like the Calc I pictorial thing they use...
Mentality of MPAA shoot the messenger bag not the messenger. I dont hear any complaints from air travelers for getting patted down everytime they get on a plane whether or not their toting explosives. Im sure they would give right in to a pat down at ye olde cineplex even tho they probably arent toting a cam.
This thing is going to be on the streets here in the US by early next year, just got released in Asia last week. The usage is geared more towards mobile TV then cellphone use. If there was more functionality as a phone, it might be appealing.
by the way what you and your kind who use language as a tool to divide, by calling me 'two-faced'. I call devils advocate. I dont take sides. I criticism every side always. Thats the only way to authentically get the truly correct position. It is become im a scientist, a postivist, who requires verifiability, not arrogant one-sidedness.
You caught me. But thanks for telling me what i would do if Rush Limbaugh wrote a book like that. I was really curious. First the study by berkely isnt a 'lie'. If anything its bad science. But to you its some vast liberal conspiracy apprently. Corporate America is completely responsible for the corruption in our governemnt, period. Is academia responsible for it too? Dont think so. The post on the berkely study was a total experiment to see if the mods are biased. It doesnt seem to be so or they knew that one was a total trolling. This last one was complete cynicism. I have given up on political discourse. Especially here. When i posted my thoughts on why this election looks as corrupt as 2000, i get burned for it. Totally unfair but thats life, im more than willing to deal with it. And regardless of your name calling and demeaning of me personally and all that i have gotten from people like you on here, i still love all of you and just want a decent and positive life for you as well. Its what i fight for in my activism and will always. Regardless of what conservatives try to do to this country.
Speaking as one of those people who do know how to speak and say nuclear, i am wholesale against the use of nuclear power. As a matter of fact i work in radiation safety, that is my job. I know that trying to protect the public from the dangers of radiation is a full-time job. Why should the public be exposed to the POSSIBILITIES of such wholesale destruction of the environment. We have Chernobyl as a most known worst-case scenario. We have Hanford as a less known worst-case Ameican scenario. The idea of technology should be to make people's lives better not expose them to more danger. I know it is totally possible to run a reactor safely, but nothing is guaranteed and you are operating with the MOST toxic chemicals in the world. Why would you want to take the chance? If we spent the money on developing the most non-toxic forms of energy like solar or wind, we would be living in the cleanest world possible. Instead we have to live with the most difficult, dangerous and inefficient technology as an energy source. As for fusion to remain on-topic there is even LESS of an advantage. Yes it runs more efficiently, but it is even MORE difficult to extract that energy. Yes you get less thermal neutron flux but at a much higher cost. Why are we moving towards more and more difficult methods of extracting energy when we have it shining on and blowing by us every minute?
We need the liberal lies of American Academia to counter the conservative lies fed to us from Corporate America. You understand that much surely? Its only fair.
Its very simple, this is a call to make electronic voting open source. Thats all there is to it. The source should be inspected before being compiled by as many independent sources as possible. Now if this story is true, then the 200 election was a fraud, whos to say the system hasnt been extended to this election into even more states with shady republican governors? In Ukraine when this kind of thing happens the people show up in force to get new elections to occur. Here? They accept the corruption and move on. America doesnt seem to be cut out for democracy...
This report would be much more credible if it had been performed at University of Texas - Austin or Bob Jones University. The liberal bias from that bastian of socialism that is Berkeley stains the whole idea of the study!
Ok so i RTFBrief & RTFBlog and i jus wanna make sure i understand, the only reason the FCC claimed my TV and possibly computer was so as to not allow ppl to record shows watched on TV? This is merely to justify their implementation of the Broadcast Flag system? So the FCC defered to corporations that want their programming watched only when they want to broadcast it? Well hasnt this been happening for years with VCRs? Why didnt they do something about that? Or is just because we have the technology to do it now, and filesharing is such a problem? Well in a world where everything has a price, this is what happens. Nothing is free any more folks, accept it and change the channel because you wont get to see this program every again, unless the 5:00am slot is looking a little bland tomorrow.
As i feel im being relegated to the extreme leftist sloganeer in this group im going to concur and point out that bluetooth is a corporate monopoly on bandwidth in and around 2.4 GHz! This must end for the betterment of the people. Its OUR spectrum anyway, damn the FCC. Further, bluetooth has been increasing in power over the years from the mere 1mW when it was hardly a concern to a WHOPPING 100mW!!!!! This increase cannot be tolerated! DOWN WITH BLUETOOTH!!!!!
that is all
Slashdot Mirror
This might have been funny if there was a freetreos.com and freeducttape.com site. Oh well, better luck next time.
Considering the fact that being a lawyer in today's political climate gets you only 48% of the popular vote in the US, i think we need him on the SC where as Mr J. Stewart pointed out, "the only oversight is the icy finger of death".
ps-I hope America the book doesnt sue me for quoting them, i didnt wait for the response to my email about whether or not i could. Also, if you enjoyed this post, please send $19.99 to 1 happy St; Pueblo, CO 55515. Thank You.
sure, just enter 'emerge unix10.1'.
Jez, at those prices i in the mindset of a car jacker would never consider stealing a $20,000 vehicle... the economies of scale just dont overwhelm the cost-benefit ratio enough.
I go with this mentality as well. Its COINTELPRO, with Mac filter and 128 WEP. Im sure somebodys gotten on it by now and read my directory of all the stolen COINTELPRO papers from the Weather Underground.
Poor Sean Alexander HAD to have gotten the Donald treatment with a big YOUR FIRED after that flub up... id put 10 bucks on it
Well fact is name one PMP or DAP or PDA or etc that is engineered for linux? I cant think of any. I think developers on the corporate level just think thats what the 'community' is for. What really sucks is that altho it runs on Qtopia, it seems only specifically written software will run on it, nut just any zaurus app for instance.
But the question is why doesnt this fact show up in the price tag...?
One of the bigger tech hurrdles to pass is the rate of speed of a user. Switching from tower to tower is not noticable usually when yr say driving down the highway. But in a plane at that speed towers would have a considerably more difficult time transferring from tower to tower especially over a long range flight covering many states. And trans-atlantic or pacific flights are probably SOL anyway. All this could be muted if a cell tower was actually placed on the plane, but i dont know how concievable that is at the moment...
Uh if taking sides with the opposition to President Bush as all-pervasive as that is then fine, yea i take sides. When Clinton was president he was not my president either, if Gore was president he wouldnt have been mine and if Kerry had been he wouldnt have been mine. Democracy is not getting to chose between two autocrats to tell you what to do for the next four years.
As for whose religious views are more fucked up,i'd go with the Talebans but they dont exist as a ruling body anymore, we cant say that for this country. So what are you advocating, accepting rule of these religious beliefs here, or usurption of the Administration that yields them?
Also your misunderstanding of verifiability suggests why you take issue with my use of the word. GWB had evidence that was corroborated by the people who gave it to him... thats like a co-author of a research paper on cold fusion using results from someone in the same research group as evidence of its existence. What you do is have someone independent of the group verify the evidence, like say the IAEA which showed that evidence was FORGED! Or you could rely on someone in your own group who told you that it was fake (Joe Wilson). But of course the intelligent response would be to tamper with the whistleblowers evidence and claim that you had found cold fusion anyway.
You dont have to verify to _my_ satisfaction, you verify to the standards satisfaction. Especially in the case of all out war.
Im not the one who called you a jesusland idiot but you love putting words in my mouth. I feel very sorry you think the way you do, many people are dying because of it. And repression exists all around the world because of it. But dont worry, i know im just at fault as well. I do what i can.
BTW I thought you jesusland idiots didnt like big guvment wiping yr ass at the crapper that was one of the heinous problems with them demorats, maybe i misundersood you guys after all...
That joke always bugged be because it lacks a differential after the integrand.
I knew i was going to get sucked into some geek-speak here but well i avoided that pitfall by using the Z which was meant as a summation rather than an S which _kinda_ looks like the Calc I pictorial thing they use...
well i dont know _LaTex_ or anything but uh, that should be something more joke-killing like
Z(e^x) = f(u_n)
for thinking the internet is free -- a lawsuit.
Mentality of MPAA shoot the messenger bag not the messenger. I dont hear any complaints from air travelers for getting patted down everytime they get on a plane whether or not their toting explosives. Im sure they would give right in to a pat down at ye olde cineplex even tho they probably arent toting a cam.
This thing is going to be on the streets here in the US by early next year, just got released in Asia last week. The usage is geared more towards mobile TV then cellphone use. If there was more functionality as a phone, it might be appealing.
qwerty
works everytime. Try to crack THAT one!
by the way what you and your kind who use language as a tool to divide, by calling me 'two-faced'. I call devils advocate. I dont take sides. I criticism every side always. Thats the only way to authentically get the truly correct position. It is become im a scientist, a postivist, who requires verifiability, not arrogant one-sidedness.
You caught me. But thanks for telling me what i would do if Rush Limbaugh wrote a book like that. I was really curious. First the study by berkely isnt a 'lie'. If anything its bad science. But to you its some vast liberal conspiracy apprently. Corporate America is completely responsible for the corruption in our governemnt, period. Is academia responsible for it too? Dont think so. The post on the berkely study was a total experiment to see if the mods are biased. It doesnt seem to be so or they knew that one was a total trolling. This last one was complete cynicism. I have given up on political discourse. Especially here. When i posted my thoughts on why this election looks as corrupt as 2000, i get burned for it. Totally unfair but thats life, im more than willing to deal with it. And regardless of your name calling and demeaning of me personally and all that i have gotten from people like you on here, i still love all of you and just want a decent and positive life for you as well. Its what i fight for in my activism and will always. Regardless of what conservatives try to do to this country.
Speaking as one of those people who do know how to speak and say nuclear, i am wholesale against the use of nuclear power. As a matter of fact i work in radiation safety, that is my job. I know that trying to protect the public from the dangers of radiation is a full-time job. Why should the public be exposed to the POSSIBILITIES of such wholesale destruction of the environment. We have Chernobyl as a most known worst-case scenario. We have Hanford as a less known worst-case Ameican scenario. The idea of technology should be to make people's lives better not expose them to more danger. I know it is totally possible to run a reactor safely, but nothing is guaranteed and you are operating with the MOST toxic chemicals in the world. Why would you want to take the chance? If we spent the money on developing the most non-toxic forms of energy like solar or wind, we would be living in the cleanest world possible. Instead we have to live with the most difficult, dangerous and inefficient technology as an energy source. As for fusion to remain on-topic there is even LESS of an advantage. Yes it runs more efficiently, but it is even MORE difficult to extract that energy. Yes you get less thermal neutron flux but at a much higher cost. Why are we moving towards more and more difficult methods of extracting energy when we have it shining on and blowing by us every minute?
We need the liberal lies of American Academia to counter the conservative lies fed to us from Corporate America. You understand that much surely? Its only fair.
Its very simple, this is a call to make electronic voting open source. Thats all there is to it. The source should be inspected before being compiled by as many independent sources as possible. Now if this story is true, then the 200 election was a fraud, whos to say the system hasnt been extended to this election into even more states with shady republican governors? In Ukraine when this kind of thing happens the people show up in force to get new elections to occur. Here? They accept the corruption and move on. America doesnt seem to be cut out for democracy...
it's just going to be a long time before those people finish compiling Assuming you WANT to install KDE...
Thats the new marketing campign actually!
This report would be much more credible if it had been performed at University of Texas - Austin or Bob Jones University. The liberal bias from that bastian of socialism that is Berkeley stains the whole idea of the study!
Ok so i RTFBrief & RTFBlog and i jus wanna make sure i understand, the only reason the FCC claimed my TV and possibly computer was so as to not allow ppl to record shows watched on TV? This is merely to justify their implementation of the Broadcast Flag system? So the FCC defered to corporations that want their programming watched only when they want to broadcast it? Well hasnt this been happening for years with VCRs? Why didnt they do something about that? Or is just because we have the technology to do it now, and filesharing is such a problem? Well in a world where everything has a price, this is what happens. Nothing is free any more folks, accept it and change the channel because you wont get to see this program every again, unless the 5:00am slot is looking a little bland tomorrow.
As i feel im being relegated to the extreme leftist sloganeer in this group im going to concur and point out that bluetooth is a corporate monopoly on bandwidth in and around 2.4 GHz! This must end for the betterment of the people. Its OUR spectrum anyway, damn the FCC. Further, bluetooth has been increasing in power over the years from the mere 1mW when it was hardly a concern to a WHOPPING 100mW!!!!! This increase cannot be tolerated! DOWN WITH BLUETOOTH!!!!!
that is all