Slashdot Mirror


Archos PMA400 Linux Based Media Portable

freitasm writes "The new Archos PMA400 is a Linux based portable- entertainment/PDA/DVR/Internet device. It comes with wireless and ethernet LAN connections, plays Mophun and Qtopia and supports Microsoft DRM protected files (WMV, WMA). The company will release a SDK on its dedicated website sometime before the end of January 2005. The device will retail for around US$800."

132 comments

  1. I recommend getting an Archos... by garcia · · Score: 3, Informative

    The display is a 3.5" TFT transflective touch screen (QVGA) 320x240 pixels, 262,000 colors and TV output. Archos says it can play up to 4 hours for video playback or 9.5 hours for music. A removable battery option is available. The unit is approximately 125 x 78 x 20 mm (4.9" x 3.1" x 0.8") and weighs 280 g (9.9 oz).

    I have an 80GB Archos AV400 that I received for a Christmas present this year. A couple of things annoy me about the unit but that would happen with anything... The UI takes about 15 minutes to get used to as I really haven't encountered anything like it. Even after having it for three weeks I still find myself fumbling with the keys. The player display is very simple and tells me what I need to know but I would really prefer options to repeat one track/all tracks/etc right on the player screen itself rather than having to go into the setup each time to change these options.

    The AV400 doesn't seem to have a removable battery which is worrisome as in my experience batteries start losing their charge after a year and if I am not able to replace it that would suck, bad. As far as length of play... The AV400 seems to easily get 15+ hours to a charge for music. I haven't been able to give it thorough testing on video playback and battery life yet though.

    I love the fact that you can record *and* playback to TV. I am currently waiting for Tivo2Go's Tivo update to come down to my unit but until then I use the "Record to VCR" option on my Tivo to play the episodes and I use the Archos to record them. It's nice because I can watch the Tivo'd episodes anywhere in the house or bring them along with me.

    It does play WMV DRM media and that's what it uses when you record a DVD to it. It's a bit annoying that you can't record a DVD and play it back elsewhere (it physically disabled the TV-out when you try) but other than ripping to AVI you really have little choice.

    I haven't tried to use it to connect to my satellite receiver but knowing the issues I had trying to use the IR channel changer from Tivo I could only imagine the Archos wouldn't interface well either.

    The LCD screen is nice on mine but it gets finger smudges all the time. I'd really like to see how well this Archos unit handles being a touchscreen. It might get ugly. I have one bad pixel (which is common) and I only notice it when playing movies but for the screen size it's pretty annoying. Maybe Toshiba can back these units too? :)

    The AV400 comes with a CF expansion slot, currently used for picture retrieval, but I really wish they would allow for some wireless CF card integration. It would be VERY cool to be able to network via wifi instead of USB and surf the web and check email as the newer unit allows :(

    All in all, I'm impressed with my Archos and I would recommend it to anyone that's looking into a portable media player that does more than just play music and display photos.

    1. Re:I recommend getting an Archos... by davidmat · · Score: 2, Informative

      av420 has a removable battery, av480 doesn't just nitpicking...

    2. Re:I recommend getting an Archos... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      The not ripping DVDs and allowing TVout is anoying.

      I was looking to get one soley for bringing my DVD collection with me to Hotels.

      Oh well, I still have rentals and a portable DVD player.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:I recommend getting an Archos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AV480 does allow playback to a TV for rips from non-macrovision protected DVD's.

      When macrovision protection is detected on the AV-In, it limits the resolution of the recording to the resolution of the LCD screen and disable Video-out for that video. Otherwise, higher-res recording is available and TV-out works without any problems.

    4. Re:I recommend getting an Archos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About recording from a DVD... you can do it. I have the same product, and here's all you have to do: DVD players protect copyrights, tv's don't. Put the thing into your TV-Out instead of your Line-Out on your DVD player, and there ya go. Happy recording, my HDD is corrupted after 28 days of use. Great quality!

      Oh, PS: If you take the sticker off of the back with the serial # on it, the warranty's void... make sure to keep it stuck on there. ;-)

  2. Well if it's anything... by Bin_jammin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Like my old Jukebox Multimedia 20, it will be overly large, have horrible horrible build quality, require ripping movies in bizzare formats with hard to find utilities, and have just enough battery life to turn on before turning off again. Not to mention buggy firmware, slow product support, incompetent technical support (when the actually respond) and a slew of vaporware... have fun with your toys kids.

    1. Re:Well if it's anything... by garcia · · Score: 0

      Like my old Jukebox Multimedia 20, it will be overly large, have horrible horrible build quality, require ripping movies in bizzare formats with hard to find utilities, and have just enough battery life to turn on before turning off again.

      Well considering that the more recent units (I can only speak of the AV400 series) handle AVI just fine I can't see them moving back to any "bizarre" format for future models.

      Not to mention that I get 15+ hours of MP3 playback. I guess it takes you 15 hours to turn on and off the unit? I wouldn't know, my firmware doesn't seem buggy.

    2. Re:Well if it's anything... by Bin_jammin · · Score: 1

      It played AVI, but only if it had been ripped for 340x200 so it would play on the 2" display. You can read the bugfixes for the firmware on Archos' site, and battery life was ~2 hours in average weather, 20 minutes in cold weather, and 4 hours in hot weather.

    3. Re:Well if it's anything... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I hear you. While I do like having a 20 gig media player that I can take anywhere and play MP3 and DivX, I find that the battery life blows chunks. I bought mine because it offered a huge capacity and the ability to download content from Flash media (like CF) and could either rip just JPGs or all content on the CF card. This was bliss with my digital camera; I could listen to music and shoot pictures, then download to my HDD and re-use the CF card, without lugging a notebook around.

      The downside of all this:
      The connector is flimsy. If you so much as look at it funny, let alone touch it, while it is transferring you were screwed.
      While I still use it, if I had it to do over I would have waited and bought a better notebook with the extra $500 I would have had.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:Well if it's anything... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      [recent models] handle AVI just fine

      AVI is a container format, not a media format.

      To play video reliably on a recent-generation Archos, you need to make sure all of the following are true about your AVI file:

      1. The video is encoded in a DivX-compatible dialect of MPEG-4
      2. The video must not be encoded using bi-directional filtering
      3. The video resolution is no more than 702x480 (for AV400 series) or 640x400 (for Gmini 400)
      4. The video framerate is no more than 30fps
      5. The audio is encoded in IMA ADPCM or MP3 format
      6. MP3 audio must not be encoded at 320kbps or less
      7. CBR audio is preferred; VBR can cause sync problems

      They include a awkward front-end for VirtualDub with the device that will take care of some of these for you, as long as your content was an AVI file or MPEG-1 file to begin with. Those of you who want to convert DVD's, Quicktime files, OGM files, or older AVI files using VFW codes will have to find other methods.

    5. Re:Well if it's anything... by Bin_jammin · · Score: 1

      Boy howdy, you're not kidding when you're talking flimsy. There are a few pages on the net on how to repair battery terminals inside the unit, because they were soldered out of place from the factory and wouldn't make proper contact. The upper battery contact can become bent out of shape so as to not make proper contact on the terminals. The hard drives are prone to sudden death (and fun to change, what with the body being soldered together. (I changed mine twice) Of course I must admit I use and abuse my portable media player by actually taking it places, thereby engaging the portability functionality of the unit. I never dropped it, never slammed it, and it was always babied, it was just a fragile piece of garbage. Fragile... must be Italian.

  3. No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i liked it until i read about the...

    "and supports Microsoft DRM protected files (WMV, WMA)."

    1. Re:No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Supporting the DRM crap doesn't preclude you from using plain ol MP3.

    2. Re:No Thanks by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      no, but it means it will come with a Microsoft EULA for those DRM components... which means that they can force download updates on you and they'll probably want it checking in with the mothership at regular intervals or else it'll sulk and stop playing them...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    3. Re:No Thanks by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      else it'll sulk and stop playing them...

      So? You weren't going to play wma files anyway, were you?

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. Re:Full text, no ad revenue for me! by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
    The submitter's review is a link back to his own site in the time honoured tradition of Roland Piquepaille(sp?)

    He's like Roland in more than one way. His "review" reads more like an advertisement. Why am I not surprised?

  6. more and more ... by xlyz · · Score: 1

    ... hardware companies realize that they don't need to pay the m$ tax

    1. Re:more and more ... by Nakago4 · · Score: 2

      except that they probably paid a Microsoft tax to include Windows Media Player DRM support.

    2. Re:more and more ... by phobos13013 · · Score: 1

      But the question is why doesnt this fact show up in the price tag...?

      --
      ...and it should be known by now
  7. Slightly OT, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hymn project is great for converting itunes music to MP3. Does anybody know of a similar solution for protected WMA files? Even something like a virtual CD to pretend to burn/rip to.

    I would rather not buy music from Apple... Thanks..

  8. Wowee! Windows Media files! by TooMuchEspressoGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    supports Microsoft DRM protected files (WMV, WMA)

    It kind of figures that one of the major product features of a Linux-based handheld is that it supports a media standard championed by MS, doesn't it? I mean why not support open-source standards like OGG?

    --
    Many Bothans died to bring you this sig.
    1. Re:Wowee! Windows Media files! by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you want them supported for political reasons?

      Archos is making its decisions for commercial reasons.

    2. Re:Wowee! Windows Media files! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite simply because anyone who has ever heard of OGG could not possibly afford one of these. Unemployed hippies living in their parents basement do not have much of a voice in the market. You know, the real world?

    3. Re:Wowee! Windows Media files! by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      I mean why not support open-source standards like OGG?

      It will. There will be a Qtopia SDK and surely it won't be long before OGG is playable.

    4. Re:Wowee! Windows Media files! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, so why aren't they promoting AAC and MP3 instead? WMV is as fringe as Ogg.

    5. Re:Wowee! Windows Media files! by dbacher · · Score: 1

      Napster, MS Music Store, Real, Rhapsody and virtually every music store other than Apple's sells WMA format.

      Apple doesn't license their DRM scheme to anyone.

      --
      If your code is acting bloated, and is running rather slow, it's likely and predicted that some loops you will unroll.
    6. Re:Wowee! Windows Media files! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "It kind of figures that one of the major product features of a Linux-based handheld is that it supports a media standard championed by MS, doesn't it? I mean why not support open-source standards like OGG?"

      You don't think that the 10's of millions of Windows computers out there that can readily play the format aren't a compelling reason?

      If you're saying support both, fine, great, but if you're saying don't support WMV... what business sense would that make? That'd be sorta like designing an American car using the metric system for its speedometer. Yeah, it might be a better system, but it'd bite you in the butt on the road here.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Wowee! Windows Media files! by killjoe · · Score: 1

      What you mean people will enjoy crippled content?

      --
      evil is as evil does
    8. Re:Wowee! Windows Media files! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are more than happy to just everyone else thinks they should give it away when they pay out the ass for M$'s.

  9. Catch up with the times Archos... by }InFuZeD{ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This thing looks really cool... I mean awesome, except for two things.

    First, it's $800. Second, it has a 320x240 screen. Who wants a screen that small anymore? You get better resolution on any $100 Palm now...

    1. Re:Catch up with the times Archos... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I would expect a VGA screen.

      While it isn't pocket sized, but I bought a used 14" SXGA+ laptop for less than that, with over a year left on the warranty. Heck, there are a few new laptops that are cheaper than that if you look.

      Not that I'm trying to rain in Archos' parade, a very compact hard drive media player, I personally wouldn't put up with video from a screen small enough to fit in any of my pockets.

    2. Re:Catch up with the times Archos... by VidEdit · · Score: 1

      Well, 320x240 makes for easy scaling from 640x480. As for the price, Well, finally there is a portable media device that only costs as much as a full fledged laptop!!! Load it with VLC for $500 and we'll talk...

      --
    3. Re:Catch up with the times Archos... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " Who wants a screen that small anymore? You get better resolution on any $100 Palm now..."

      I can think of a few reasons:

      1.) It's $800, like you said. Do you really want to spend $900?

      2.) The nice thing about 320 by 240 is that it's half of 640 by 480, which nearly all videos run at. (Not sure what it captures at, so bear with me...) 640 by 480 screens in that size are still quite rare. At 480 by 320 (correction please?) that Palm runs at is a little more common, but the resizing artifacts would be annoying. Even capturing at that oddball resolution would be a little weird, not to mention the increase in size.

      3.) The screen is small. If you're reading an e-book or somethihg that's one thing, but most of us who do a little too much porn surfing know that 320 by 240 is more than acceptable. Heck, you're lucky if you can practically exceed that with TV.

      4.) There are probably rebuttals to each of my points. They're not the strongest in the world, so I won't take offense to them. But you have to understand that a company designing these things has to make these considerations. Though I'd like a higher res screen, too, there are other concerns such as price and practicality. That's really what my point's about. Not so much about whether they're right or wrong, or whether they made the right choice overall. Personally, from what I read, I think they did fine.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Catch up with the times Archos... by ecloud · · Score: 1

      Yes it should have VGA, although if you know where to get a $100 palm with greater than QVGA resolution you should have posted a link...

      I was thinking this is basically a Zaurus with a hard drive and video-in, but actually it is inferior due to the display. And the SL-6000's can be found for under $500 now, and were $700 new rather than $800. If it had the same marvelous screen as the 6000 it would perhaps be worth the price.

      They should not have left out the camera either. Big, big mistake. I talked to the guy in the booth at the show, and he said they decided to leave cameras to the camera manufacturers. But even a lower-quality camera (one-megapixel with a tiny lens) like the high-end phones have now is better than nothing, and plenty good enough for basic video. But I suppose you could carry along a separate video camera, of the surveillance variety, and plug it in. Sigh.

      They also left out a memory slot. I think it should have at least an SD slot, perhaps CF as well.

  10. Look at the Price!! by allden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can get powerful laptops at this price.

    1. Re:Look at the Price!! by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      you can buy a sharp zaurus with far better screen and a handfull of high capacity compact flash or SD cards for this kind of money and get a much more interesting device which would only be half toy. The battery life won't be as good though.

      IMHO, these mmedia portables are really just overblown mp3 players, you've had to be pretty desperate to watch whole movies on such a tiny screen (I guess regular long distance flyers might disagree, but then you're crazy anyway!)

      A brand new zaurus 6000L go for less than US$500 on ebay now.. the SL-C3000 with the internal hard drive is pretty much the same price and has so much to offer.

    2. Re:Look at the Price!! by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

      The video playback on the archos device is heaps better than any Zaurus device. Not only that, you can record video and mp3 with it as well.

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
    3. Re:Look at the Price!! by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      yeah, but surely any serious geek would find it easier to use his/her home theatre PC running mythtv to down-convert from HDTV source to xvid at 640x480 before loading onto the zaurus?

      --
      Here's a smiley I prepared earlier :-)

  11. Re:Sigh... another ad by grub · · Score: 1

    Heh, good one.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  12. $800? by Daniel+Ellard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    That seems a bit pricey. That kind of money will get you a decent laptop...

    Is there a market for a device that's more capable than a $100-200 PDA and less capable than a $1000 laptop? Of course I want one, but does anyone need one of these?

    --
    Disclaimer: I work for a company, but I don't speak for them.
    1. Re:$800? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    2. Re:$800? by JAFSlashdotter · · Score: 1
      Well, it does seem a little high, but it fits in your pocket and it can do do digital video recording, which is a combination it may be tough to find in an $800 laptop.

      Maybe it's better to compare it to a high-end PDA that also has DVR capability? Maybe if the apps are there.

      I think I'm with you, though, I'd probably buy the laptop.

      --
      We apologize for the preceding message. All those responsible have been sacked.
    3. Re:$800? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      It's hard to just whip my laptop out on a bus to watch spongebob for 10 minutes while I wait.

      And I don't want to compromise laptop specs for convenience, ie; get one with a teensy screen just so it'll be easier to watch video. Plus this has no clamshell, etc, it's designed to be easy, quick and private.

      I wouldnt buy one for the price, but give them a few years to get these under 200 bucks, and they'll have something.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  13. Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but does it run Lin... oh, wait, nevermind.

    Seriously, My 2-year old Sony Clie has a 320x480 screen, and I can't see viewing video on a screen with 1/2 that resolution. And my Clie was 1/2 the price. Other than that, it sounds sweet. Hard drive, Linux, video in and out. Wish I had those. I wonder why nobody can seem to get ALL the cool features into one device, and do it for a decent price?

    1. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think with all the unemployed engineers out there it would be easy!

  14. Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The fine print on the product page is interesting:

    PC: Pentium® III 800 MHz or higher, Windows 98 SE (with driver downloaded from ARCHOS web-site), ME, 2000 or XP. 64 MB RAM (128 MB recommended) with USB port and CD-ROM drive Mac: 9.2 or X (10.2.4) USB Manager version 1.2 or higher with USB port and CD-ROM drive

    So no sneaky using your new Linux gadget with Linux. Of course I'd imagine you could make it connect to the storage just fine, especially if it does USB Mass Storage.

    1. Re:Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux by phobos13013 · · Score: 1

      Well fact is name one PMP or DAP or PDA or etc that is engineered for linux? I cant think of any. I think developers on the corporate level just think thats what the 'community' is for. What really sucks is that altho it runs on Qtopia, it seems only specifically written software will run on it, nut just any zaurus app for instance.

      --
      ...and it should be known by now
    2. Re:Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux by Chuckaluphagus · · Score: 1

      Every previous Archos product I've used or heard of works as a USB Mass Storage, even the ones that play /record video. I have an Archos Gmini 400 that I can plug into a Linux box just as easily as I can on a Windows PC. It possible that Archos is changing their normal behavior for this new product, but it's also possible they just don't want to try supporting the product on Linux computers.

    3. Re:Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux by dbacher · · Score: 1

      It has 802.11b support.

      Do you really care what they say it supports? Get it close, copy the file, and you're done. They're shipping virtual dub and whatever with it, with windows configurations, but if you've got Linux running, you most likely don't need a poorly written front end to set up virtual dub for you.

      --
      If your code is acting bloated, and is running rather slow, it's likely and predicted that some loops you will unroll.
    4. Re:Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux by afedaken · · Score: 1
      Well fact is name one PMP or DAP or PDA or etc that is engineered for linux?


      YOu don't engineer hardware for linux, you silly gooose. You re-engineer linux for new hardware. :-)

      If it isn't supported at launch, someone will buy one and write support for it, and then we'll all be happy. That's how it's supposed to work, right?
      --
      If there's a castle floating upside down in the sky, then there's a castle floating upside down in the sky.
    5. Re:Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux by theKry · · Score: 1

      Being a mass storage device, all Archos hard drive players are compatible with Linux. I have mounted my Jukebox Multimedia 20GB player many times to a Fedora Core 2 system.

      Any non-compatibility is with the software that comes included with the player, but who cares. Any serious Linux user is savvy enough to know how to find and use the any open source tools needed to convert both CDs and DVDs for playback on the device.

      I personally recommend GordianKnot available on sourceforge.net for decrypting, ripping, and encoding your DVDs to DivX(mpeg4 based codec) with an MP3 soundtrack. CDex is a good CD ripper/MP3 encoder, also available on sourgeforge.net.

    6. Re:Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux by theKry · · Score: 1

      One thing I failed to mention is that GordianKnot is a Windows frontend/rip-pack that ties many open source tools together. You can also find the linux versions or equivilent substitutes to accomplish all of your video encoding needs.

  15. Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they mean bluetooth or wifi?

    With an SDK, and p2p wifi, I got some nifty tricks in mind...

  16. Re:Does anyone care about these.... by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
    This must be the 5th one of these to surface in about as many days.

    Get back to work, Johnson!!

  17. Editorial Content i.e. advertising by Eberlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a difference between advertising and endorsing. When there's an MS banner up top, that's advertising. When Taco posts what is clearly a product "review" it seems more of an endorsement. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but it'd be nice if folks are a little more forthcoming with it.

    As a tech, when I talk about certain products, it kind of carries some weight...like I prefer that product over its competitors.

    On a somewhat related topic, I used to post web pages for a place that offered paying advertisers "editorial" content on their web site. Disguised as reviews, they were no more than actual press releases from the advertisers. I always thought it was a bit misleading.

    Now if they say something like "I got a PDA out of this deal -- Taco" I'd understand and be more accepting. :)

  18. Ahhh... by Squatchman · · Score: 3, Funny

    but will it run Windows Mobile ?

    1. Re:Ahhh... by Knightfall · · Score: 1

      I think the humor of your post was lost on this crowd. If I had some points I would've given you a +1 :-)

      --


      Knightfall
  19. Its what they DON'T say... by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    Internet access allows users to browse web sites and use services like POP3/SMTP and IMAP4 e-mail.


    Ever notice how none of these network-enable gadgets ever say, "Internet access allows users to browse gopher sites and use services like IRC,Unsenet and FTP?

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    1. Re:Its what they DON'T say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever notice how none of these network-enable gadgets ever say, "Internet access allows users to browse gopher sites and use services like IRC,Unsenet and FTP?

      They are trying to appeal to the public. Not a bunch of geeks. The public doesn't know what gopher, IRC, usenet, or FTP are.

  20. it may run on linux but it doesn't work with linux by bdbolton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "System requirements: PC: Pentium® III 800 MHz or higher, Windows 98 SE (with driver downloaded from ARCHOS web-site), ME, 2000 or XP. 64 MB RAM (128 MB recommended) with USB port and CD-ROM drive Mac: 9.2 or X (10.2.4) USB Manager version 1.2 or higher with USB port and CD-ROM drive "

    ...runs linux but requires windows/mac. :(

  21. Ok... by Syberghost · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Who's managing the pool for betting when the first article is published bitching about some minor, easily-corrected GPL violation?

  22. Wireless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not lame.

  23. Your .sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignore this joker's sig. Go to dreamhost.com and use promo code 777 and you get that hosting plan for $0.77 per month, no strings attached.

  24. They killed off the hi-res screen by hirschma · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here is what it was SUPPOSED to be: Prototype with hi-res screen

    Look at the proto's screen res - 704x480. Could be used as a notebook replacement easily enough.

    This version is not worth $800.

    JH

  25. Re:Full text, no ad revenue for me! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What the hell does it matter?
    <rant>
    I don't give a damn who posts what, or who makes money from something.
    If something interests me, I'll have a look.
    Its not like I have to get my credit card and sign my life away.

    Adverts are all around you, do you spend time cutting evil adverts out of newspapers before you read them?
    Do you close your eyes whilst driving past billboards?

    Your just an arrogant tosser who can't see the wood for the trees. Slashdot is built JUST like Roland or anyone elses "advert supported blog", except slashdot editors dont even find the articles, they leave it upto the readers.

    At least people like Roland seem to have their finger on the pulse, and find decent interesting articles for the rest of us to discuss.
    </rant>

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  26. Re:it may run on linux but it doesn't work with li by Zardus · · Score: 1

    Ok dude, what devices DO clearly state they support Linux? That was a rhetorical question, by the way. I know some devices exist that list Linux as a supported OS (for example, a lot of nVidia cards have Linux listed on the box), but just because something doesn't list Linux doesn't mean it doesn't work with Linux.

    For example, my digital camera has that same list of supported OSes, but guess what? I can use it in Linux. Same with my USB stick, my mouse, my keyboard, the wireless card, and the DVD burner. Hell, I'm sure my mouse pad didn't even list Linux, and it seems to work just fine!

    --
    You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
  27. Who wants to shell out $800 for a PDA by elecngnr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am more than happy with my $90 Palm. It syncs with my address book and iCal on my Mac....and fits in my pocket. And, if something bad happens to it during my travels, I am out $90...not $800. I just think these PDA's are getting crazy.

    I am also confused why it is a linux PDA, yet you have to have windoze or a mac to sync with the thing. That sucks. If I am a linux guy I want a linux PDA that will work with my computer...

    --
    Having done so much with so little for so long, I now can do anything with nothing at all.
    1. Re:Who wants to shell out $800 for a PDA by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      God, did you even bother to read the posting?! It is MORE than a PDA. Does your "$90 Palm" have a 30 gig hard drive? Can you rip DVDs to it and play them while on the subway? Can you store and play several weeks of music on it?

      I'm not saying the price is worth it. I certainly won't buy one. But it costs more than your Palm because it does a heck of a lot more.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:Who wants to shell out $800 for a PDA by m50d · · Score: 1

      I do. I use a laptop from about, say, 8 years ago, 650mhz celeron with 64mb ram, which does everything I want. Wort processing, surf /., read email, instant messaging, play mp3s and videos, and python coding in idle although it's starting to show the strain there a little. A modern PDA is equivalent in terms of processor, hard disk etc. and a helluva lot more portable. And as soon as I have the money, I'll be getting one.

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:Who wants to shell out $800 for a PDA by Squegie · · Score: 0

      I am also confused why it is a linux PDA, yet you have to have windoze or a mac to sync with the thing. That sucks. If I am a linux guy I want a linux PDA that will work with my computer...


      It's a linux pda because quite frankly, linux simultaneously supports just about all modern hardware known to man while having a massive amount of applications already written for it. Furthermore, it has an extremely attractive price per seat licensing arrangement (roughly free).

      So yes, they used linux, but probably aren't so concerned about the linux crowd, as this is not their primary audience.

    4. Re:Who wants to shell out $800 for a PDA by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

      Qtopia Desktop runs on linux as well as windows and mac.

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
    5. Re:Who wants to shell out $800 for a PDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong! Linux is chosen for embedded systems simply because that's what it's best suited for. Plain, dumb I/O, resource manager are all these systems and routers and other "appliances" need. They don't need the power/applications of a server or workstation. Using Linux just keeps the engineers from having to spend $ developing software. These tasks used to be handled in microcode, but with the arrival of packages like BusyBox, it's easy to patch in a simple-minded OS.

  28. An $800 ultraportable? I'd like to see that! by cvdwl · · Score: 1
    1) Let's see you find:
    • an $800 laptop you can fit in your pocket.
    • a $200 PDA with video and MP3 playback and 30GB of storage
    Ok, so it's not perfect, but if it's capable enough, it might be a great travel device. Plays lots of tunes, edits text, goes wireless for email in coffee shops and fits in a pocket.

    Seriously, I'd love a small, cheap, underpowered laptop, just enough to fire up mozilla, xmms and thunderbird. Even my 800MHz P3M can't handle video on battery (speed stepped down to 700 + funky video chipset).

    As the proud owner of an Archos Studio 10... well, ok, it's shite, but it still works and makes a decent USB drive (though it has never worked off the plug), I can sort of recommend Archos. I'll keep my wallet in my pocket for now.

    --
    ... grumble, grumble, grumble, mutter, mutter, Millenium... Hand... Shrimp, I tol' 'em, I tol' 'em.
    1. Re:An $800 ultraportable? I'd like to see that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheap laptop that's small and good you say?

  29. Re:Sigh... another ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, does anyone know when slashdot will return to its regular ipod ads?

    I am guessing the next one will be within 3 stories .

  30. Zaurus Compatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any opinions on whether the Qtopia environment is Zaurus compatible? Seems like a nice HW upgrade for any Zaurus B-XXX or 5xxx users out there...

    1. Re:Zaurus Compatible by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

      It should be compatible. At the most it would be a recompile.

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
  31. hmm by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    how is this any differnt form my $150 ipaq running opie ( the opensource fork of qtoipa) and xine? I have a wireless card on it too. I dont see why it shoudl cost $800.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:hmm by smart.id · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article? Does your ipaq have a 30 gigabyte hard drive? USB host capabilities? How about the ability to display on the TV, and record from it as well?

      By the way, which ipaq can you get for $150?

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
    2. Re:hmm by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      ipaq 3600s all go for that much

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    3. Re:hmm by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

      You can record mp3 and video with this archos device. and it has superior framerates for video than any zaurus or ipaq device that can run opie.

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
  32. Ugh by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


    If the quality is anything like previous Archos products,

    I bought an Archos Gmini 400 last fall, just about as soon as it was available in the US. For the first few months, it worked great. Then it started having problems where during music playback, the controls would go unresponsive and the hard disk would seek for a minute or more before I could do anything again. Ultimately, the drive click-of-death'ed on me and the device won't even completely boot up any more.

    I suspect it's just a faulty hard drive and swapping in a working one will solve the problem, but Archos customer service has yet to respond to my inquiries. And after reading horror stories about warranty service from other Archos users, I'm beginning to think I'm better off just cracking the case open and doing it myself.

    Maybe they've changed their ways with this device -- but I doubt it. It looks like they've just kitbashed some new stuff into an existing AV400 design.

    (See, Archos? This is what happens when you spend all your time trying to cram useless features into your device and neglect QA and customer service. I used to recommend your Gmini400 to everyone who was considering an iPod, and now I'm advising them all to stay away.)

    1. Re:Ugh by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      This is interesting...

      I've been thinking of purchasing an Archos Gmini 220 not for playing music, but for it's small size and for the ability to unload photos off my CF card while in the field. Should I avoid everything archos, or is the 220 a quality product?

      Thanks.

  33. Hey Roland, whats up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice rant.

  34. For the misinformed masses by brunes69 · · Score: 1
    For these people posting "800$! I can get a laptop that can do this for that!"

    Aside form the fact that this thing is about 1/8 the size of any laptop, your claim is totally bogus. Show me where I can buy a new laptop with the Archos specs (30 GB, 802.11B, everything) that also has a TV input (can't be external, that'd make it useless) for $800. I can't even find a used one on ebay for anywhere near that price.

    For these people posting "Why would I want a $800 PDA?" / "iPod is Better"

    This thing is not an iPod. It's essentially a TiVo+iPod+PDA that you can carry in your pocket. It's like the ultimate tool for the road warrior - killer in the back of a cab or on a plane or bus. It is not for you to carry with you 24/7, it is to take on trips to watch those shows you missed.

    1. Re:For the misinformed masses by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "Show me where I can buy a new laptop with the Archos specs (30 GB, 802.11B, everything) that also has a TV input (can't be external, that'd make it useless) for $800."

      OK, you got me on the TV input. Otherwise, Gateway is selling a Celeron-D 2.8MHz laptop crammed with shit for $650 after mail-in rebates. Add cardbus wifi from newegg for ~$25 (802.11g, even). Comes with a DVD-ROM/CD-RW drive.

  35. But wait, there's more... by HomerNet · · Score: 1

    The new Archos PMA400 is a Linux based portable- entertainment/PDA/DVR/Internet device. It comes with wireless and ethernet LAN connections, plays Mophun and Qtopia and supports Microsoft DRM protected files (WMV, WMA). ...it also makes Julian fries, will comb your hair, you'll forget all about that silly "sliced bread" nonsense, will completely redefine the wheel, and cure cancer!

    *sigh* Another day, another "iPod Killer." Honestly, how many people, walking down the street, would honestly say, "I sure could use a tiny, low-resolution screen to distract me from the onerous task of not wandering into traffic."

    These devices make no real sense to me whatsoever.

    --
    I have no tag line
    1. Re:But wait, there's more... by isbhod · · Score: 1

      These devices make no real sense to me whatsoever.

      No i until i realized that in mass population centers mass trasit is teh way to got and for peopel to find afforable living they must live 1 to 2 hours of mass transit time away from their respective jobs, so if i was sitting ona seat waiting to get to work i could catch up on the tv shows i missed from the previous day (mainly becasue i cannot watch these shows as they are on as i am on the mass transit ride home)downloaded form my media center (insert favorite setup here tivo, replay, mythtv, etc) on to one of these devices. So there is one reason to get one, it's a rather specific situation, but one that is shared by millions and that's all it take to turn the profits needed to green light production.
      My issue is being the pig that i am is i'd probably fill these things up with more pr0n than god ever intended there to be on one. So i would need a way to watch these shows without the possiblity of underage kids looking over my shoulder, for while i am a pig, i am socialy conscience one, and those heads up displays aren't cheap.

      Any way there is my $0.02

  36. I already have a cool media player by aka_big_wurm · · Score: 1

    My HP iPac4155 will play WMA files MP3 ect...

    I can even stream them from my PC over WI FI, and it was only around $500.00.

  37. PSP looks like it will be the killer media player by aka_big_wurm · · Score: 1

    Looking at the info out on the PSP (PlayStation Portable) it looks like it may become the dommant Portable media player, if Sony does things right. It will be cheap too, they are taling less than $200

    Sony did something like this with DVD's in Japan. Before the PS2 DVD held a low market share now DVD are perfered over what they had before

  38. I Like My Archos MMJ 20 by nightwing2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This looks pretty good. I bought the Multimedia Jukebox 20 when it came out, and I still love it - crappy quality, dying batteries, and all - because it beats lugging a laptop around on vacation to download my digital camera pictures. I've found it's simpler to just snap away and off-load later. So far, this is still cheaper that buying several gig of cards to last me over a vacation... and when the next generation of 10Mpixel cameras come out, we're going to need that much more space!

    I looked at an iPod a few months ago and it still doesn't measure up. With the Archos I can look at the pictures ("Yes, they did copy" I distrust technology since the days of floppies) and it works as just a plain old external hard drive without Apple-retentive silly library management crap for my MP3's. Video? Who uses that anyway - although I did see someone using it once. By the time you convert your MP2, you might as well have just sat down and watched it.

    This new device might be OK teamed with a PC-based DVR function; the current concept is nice, but what good's a "VCR" that you also have to disconnect and take with you? What's going to stay home and record shows while you're on the road?

    They've finally conceded that replaceable batteries are needed. Good!

    The "master USB" function is a good idea. It saves them having to build proprietary camera card readers, if any off-the-shelf USB card reader will do the trick.

  39. you don't need high res on a 3-4" screen by pocopoco · · Score: 2

    I have a Zaurus with a 640x480 screen. It took me a long time to dig up a version of mplayer with hardware accel for whatever chip is in there so it could handle videos of that res, but after I did it turned out to be pointless.

    The screens on these things are so small that QVGA is more than ample. I've been watching anime fansubs lately, which ever since the process went digital have been using these tiny font size subtitles (more suited to monitors than TVs), but even they read fine at 320x240 at the size we're talking about.

    1. Re:you don't need high res on a 3-4" screen by hirschma · · Score: 1

      Forget video - what if I want to, say, do word processing on this thing, too?

      JH

  40. US$799.95 in the U.S. and EUR 799.9 by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm getting one of ebay.com and risking the tax man for the sake of $255.

    At todays rate

    $799.95 = EUR606.61
    EUR 799.99 = $1054

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:US$799.95 in the U.S. and EUR 799.9 by CavemanKiwi · · Score: 1

      You will notice that the European price includes VAT or sales Tax which can run at 20% in some coutries . Plus currency rates do change and the company has hedge their bets.

  41. Looks more like a Zaurus, than an iPod... by revoke · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of comments complaining that this device is too expansive, too big, not open enough (because it supports DRM), too small of screen, etc. I've also seen this compared to the iPod for some reason. Why? To me this looks like an extension of Archos popular (but flawed) AV400 with a Sharp Zaurus feature set added. It could be a Linux-hacker's dream (if affordable).

    The main Pro to adding the Zaurus-like Qtopia here is that it will probably (or hopefully) be easy to port all the software over from the now dead Zaurus SL-5x00 series (which also has the same 240x320 screen resolution).

    The other obvious pros are the 30gb drive and the Tivo-like ability. Can your PDA do that? I currently have a Sharp Zaurus SL-C700 with the 640x480 screen. It's an awesome device when paired with a CF connectivity card and a large SD card, but SD cards just do not provide enough storage for all my files. 30gb sure would. And the ability to push button record movies... that would save a lot of work with current PDA solutions.

    There are negatives too however. (1) Archos support is questionable. (2) The screen. Why skimp on the screen? If you compare this device to the Sharp SL-C3000 with the 4GB mini HD it prices out about same, yet the C3000 has 640x480. (3) These devices that try to do everything ultimately leave you wanting more.... I've been through about 15 different PDAs, and 20 different mini-laptops. Still searching. (4) no integrated keyboard. If you put WiFi on a device, a keyboard sure is nice.

    So many arguments,
    -Should a PDA play music, take pictures, mix drinks, or just do PIM?
    -Should a travel mini-computer need to run a full OS (like XP on the flipster and OQO)? Or should it be stripped down, cheaper, and have instant-on?
    -The feature-price-performance riddle will probably never be solved. What is right for one person, will just annoy the heck out of someone else. For example, next people will complain that this device does not have a phone.

    END OF RANT. Cliffs-notes version: cool and tiny Linux device to keep the all that Zaurus software living on a little bit longer (if people buy it).

    --
    (void) signal(SIGALRM, (alarm_fired=1)); if (alarm_fired) printf("Revoke is clueless!\n");
  42. Re:America sucks by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

    Basicly, so whats your point?

  43. sounds much better than PC palmtops by jeif1k · · Score: 1

    This sounds much better than, say, the Oqo or other palmtop computers: it has a longer battery life, it's much cheaper, and it has video I/O. If they don't screw up in some way and if it is actually an open device, this could be a huge success.

  44. Re:America sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you be a little more specific: Do you mean North Americans or South Americans? If you mean North Americans: Do you mean those living in Mexico, USA, or Canada? If you mean South America... well, you get the point. Oh, and I'd watch the use of capitalization, otherwise someone might label you as a "dumbass"... oops, too late.

  45. Re:it may run on linux but it doesn't work with li by reclusivemonkey · · Score: 1

    ...yeah but give it a couple of weeks as soon as the right person gets their hands on it. OpenARCHOS anyone?

  46. Re:it may run on linux but it doesn't work with li by superpeach · · Score: 1

    ...Windows 98 SE (with driver downloaded from ARCHOS web-site), ME, 2000 or XP...

    A lot like the requirements for USB flash drives, which are all USB mass storage devices. They work fine with any newish OS with USB support, but you need to install a driver for 98. If the only thing you connect this thing to your PC for is to copy files back and forward then it probably will work (as a usb storage device).

  47. hmmm by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    I'm glad they've finally decided to add in removable batteries. I have an Archos AV120, and after a year's usage, the battery started to crap out. Its battery life is much shorter now.

    About the only other complaint I have about Archos is their GUI. It's just not very pretty nor is it very user friendly. Takes some getting used to.

    With that said, this device looks to be awesome! I mean, having wireless access, being able to connect to the net. Nice!

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  48. Re:it may run on linux but it doesn't work with li by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    That is exactly the case, as stated in the product manual. It just looks like any other USB hard drive.

  49. Left handers by statichead · · Score: 2

    Just once I would like to see one of these companies design with ergonomics in mind. Left handers must be loving these things because they can use the pen in their left hand and push the buttons and hold the unit with the right hand. My tablet pc is the exact same way. Sure I can rotate the screen but the buttons are all backwards. XP tablet edition did not like fliping back and forth so I gave up and installed linux on it. Tablet pc as a form factor would get a lot further if manufactures would make them easy to hold and operate. A bios selection that allowed the device to be one way or another would be a plus.

    Why don't we design stuff with attention to detail anymore.

    1. Re:Left handers by stienman · · Score: 1

      Left handers must be loving these things because they can use the pen in their left hand and push the buttons and hold the unit with the right hand.

      Message from the manufacturers:

      We don't care about your 10% of the population until we've saturated the market and need your money.

      That goes double for you color blind people.

      Nevermind people with disabilities.

      -Adam

  50. Microsoft DRM on the Linux platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall when the little company I work for tried to place any open-source software within 100miles of our WinCE license a jet full of lawyers were all over us. Lots of FUD about giving away everyone's IP, etc. So I'm really suprised Archos can get a license from M$ to use their DRM on a GNU/Linux platform.

  51. Re:it may run on linux but it doesn't work with li by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

    My SyncMaster 710N (LCD panel) from Samsung came with some half-baked instructions for configuring X11. Hey, at least they tried..

    (FWIW, I plugged it in, pressed "autosync", and it worked perfectly from day one. No xorg.conf hacking necessary.)

  52. Qtopia by arodland · · Score: 3, Informative

    It doesn't play Qtopia; it runs Qtopia. Qtopia isn't a media format but rather a smallish environment, meant for handhelds, based on Qt/Embedded.

  53. Re:Full text, no ad revenue for me! by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

    not that I entirely disagree with you, but he didn't "find" the article, he wrote it. Also, the review is basically a press release and the slashdot link could and frankly should have just linked to the archos site.

    That said, at least he didn't get slashdotted, thanks in part to the granparent poster.

  54. Re:Full text, no ad revenue for me! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "I don't give a damn who posts what, or who makes money from something.
    If something interests me, I'll have a look.
    Its not like I have to get my credit card and sign my life away."


    Glad somebody was finally modded up for this point. The whole reason advertising is such a big business is that a lot of businesses come up with interesting products and services, but they can't sell them if people don't know that they even exist.

    I really don't care if Slashdot actually does use articles for advertising. If it's interesting, how you heard about it isn't important. If you're worried about how well a product/service stands up to the claims they're making, that's totally understandable, at least you know what it is you want to do research on.

    Advertising is not a sin.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  55. If you travel a lot, it's useful. by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    I have the 480 model, and it's great in the hotel room. I can plug it into the TV and watch my movies and shows at full frame rate. I record all my shows at 640x480 - Plenty of resolution for a TV set.

    I have the 80 gig model, so I can cram a lot of video onto it.

  56. AAachos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AAAAachos.........

    Bless you..................

  57. Sure, HOURS after I buy an iRiver! by Jethro · · Score: 1

    The device will retail for around US$800."

    Ok, nevermind.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  58. Re:Full text, no ad revenue for me! by freitasm · · Score: 1

    Thanks for your concern dubiousmike. Even though the granparent poster was there, that was the second /. article pointing to our domain in the same day. So, regardless of the cited post, there was already a heavy traffic on the server anyway. It just happens that it didn't get slashdotted (even with two /. articles!) due to the hosting infrastructure (I beter thank my provider!)

    As per the content, as someone else pointed out, the site is presenting the news. Most time the PR are sent out a day or so before company's sites are updated. This means that sometimes the breaking news are posted, nothing exists in the company website, but when visitors start seeing the articles then they have the impression that it's redundant. If this was the case then who would need the IT news sites? Just wait for all companies to update their sites and then someone will link to then. Ah, wait a minute, that's what IT news sites do anyway...

    As per advertising, this is a business model. How many times I've posted things on Geekzone, saw that going to news.google.com just to be shown next to a link to other site that says "Subscription required". Why are they charging for the information I'm making freely available? Or better still, how can I make the information available for free, if someone else charges for it? You're right, because I (and so many other websites) have advertising.

    Please support the model, otherwise everyone would have to pay to read on-line.

    Perhaps this should be an Ask Slashdot new article?

  59. A misunderstanding by jeti · · Score: 1

    The PMA430 was never planned with a hi-res screen. It supports video playback with up to 704x480 pixels. But you can only profit of the resolution if you connect the device to a TV screen.

  60. MPEG4-ASP? by flex941 · · Score: 1

    It still won't play MPEG4-ASP profile media files? No qpel, gmc extensions?

    Dooh, this was the reason I waited for AV500 (now this unit).

    I feel somewhat betrayed.

  61. Ah crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was really looking forwards to the AV500 but they killed two of the most important featuures with the renaming.

    1. No MPEG 4 Advanced Simple Profile. Means I have to mess about recoding everything JUST for this. Can't just download stuff because it probably won't work.

    2. (Maybe) The screen. I have an AV300 and while the screen isn't bad I was REALLY looking forwards to the high-res one.

    Damn...

  62. Re:Full text, no ad revenue for me! by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

    after reasing you comment, I looked back and tried to find the word "review" somewhere in the Slashdot introduction and couldn't find it.

    It is news and this would seem the only way for me to retract my statement. I don't have a problem with what your site posted.

    My mistake.

  63. Sharp Zaurus anyone ? by vlad_petric · · Score: 1

    It does work with Linux, but rather poorly. It's easier in fact to synchronize a PocketPC device with Linux (multisync).

    --

    The Raven

  64. Supports Microsoft DRM? by loyukfai · · Score: 1
    ...supports Microsoft DRM protected files (WMV, WMA)...

    Just wonder, does Archos do it with the blessing of Microsoft (and does it bare the PlaysForSure logo)? Will it become incompatible when MS tweaked the implementation?

    If it's done via reverse-engineering, wouldn't that put Archos up for DMCA lawsuits? Also, what it means for MS that its DRM system is publicly hacked?

    I've heard some companies have licensed to port Windows Media to Linux but couldn't remember MS approving the DRM stuff.

  65. linux as a pda os by Squegie · · Score: 0

    Not to start an argument, but how is that really different than what I said? I mean, I see you added the line "because that's what it's best suited for" which is true, but doesn't contradict what I said.

    As I said, linux (in which I'm referring to the kernel) supports most modern hardware, so with the exception of writing a module or two and compiling it, support for whatever hardware they've shoehorned into a small package is already there.

    I didn't mention anything about a server, I said applications. Plenty of applications already exist for linux, which implies they don't have to develop it themselves, which you stated yourself.

    I'm not trying to pick a fight, but I'm trying to figure out what you mean when you say I'm wrong. I could be wrong... it happens. But when you tell me I'm wrong and then repeat most of what I just said without negating anything I said, I have to dig deeper, so I may unlearn my wrongness and learn the rightness.

    So, AC, what did I say that you disagree with?

  66. Archos durability by kevaiken · · Score: 1

    Here's a quick nod to Archo's durability: I have a 20G Recorder. Several months ago, my wife and I were cleaning out the car and she put it on top of the car. We got in the car to drop my daughter off at a neighbor's house, which is across the neighborhood. Apparently, it flew off the roof when we took a corner and a kind man returned it to me while waiting at the friend's house. The top panel had come open, but after closing it, it started up fine and I haven't had a problem since! It may be clunky, but with Rockbox, it sure gets the job done.

  67. No Ogg Vorbis Support! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It maybe linux based, but I doesn't support Ogg Vorbis like their other products! These guys are using opensource code to make products that are helping to kill non DRM software! Do Not Support Archos!

  68. I like the idea by dizzysky · · Score: 1

    I can not find any information about the hardware specs. I emailed Arcos sales to find out what kind of processor and memory is in it.
    Here is the reply:

    "Dear Sir,
    This is the operating system Linux Qtopia(TM) with embedded ARCHOS multimedia applications , I am sorry but we do not have specific specification of the processor or the board."

    That information would be nice.