Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Technical Glitches at CES Explained

Thomas Hawk writes "Sean Alexander is one of the guys on the Media Center Team at Microsoft who was involved in the CES presentation with Bill Gates. Sean also runs a very interesting blog called Addicted to Digital Media. Gates and Microsoft have taken a lot of heat over the course of the last two days for the technical glitches in Microsoft's presentation at CES. Sean offers us the rare glimpse on why the glitches happened and what it's like to be backstage at the big Microsoft presentation at CES. Very good follow up on Sean's part." Update: 01/08 19:03 GMT by T : Hawk writes with a static link to Alexander's story.

428 comments

  1. Same machine by Bloater · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seems to be running his blog on the same machine as they used at the CES presentation.

    1. Re:Same machine by krymsin01 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are mistaken.

      "SERVICE UNAVAILABLE" is his report. Very good work. I wish we had people half as good as this guy at the company I work for.

      --
      stuff
    2. Re:Same machine by bigman2003 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wow...you must be fun at parties.

      The second poster was actually furthering the first posters joke.

      First poster "ha ha...the webserver doesn't work either"

      Second poster "he he...no, it's working...but the report only consists of the two words 'Service Unavailable', which sums up the problem"

      So now I'm in the asshat category for trying to explain it...oh well.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    3. Re:Same machine by Shulai · · Score: 1

      Oh! I was sure it was those OSS communists responsability.

    4. Re:Same machine by Aurix · · Score: 3, Funny


      Second poster "he he...no, it's working...but the report only consists of the two words 'Service Unavailable', which sums up the problem"

      First microsoft guy i've ever "met" that hasn't used a tonne of buzzwords and actually makes sense :P

    5. Re:Same machine by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      no he's blocking /. referers with the text Service unavailable.

    6. Re:Same machine by fshalor · · Score: 1

      He's a sleeper for SCO.

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    7. Re:Same machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The host appears to be webhost4life, the same one I use. You do not have to be slashdotted for this message to appear. This error happens almost daily on my sites hosted with them -- their servers are totally overloaded with budget accounts.

    8. Re:Same machine by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      Thanks .. Now could you explain "asshat"? I've never seen a hat for an ass, so I can't tell if it's good or bad. :(

      Oops, I'm OT. Oh well, I've got ACs to burn.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    9. Re:Same machine by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      From Urban Dictionary:

      http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=a ss hat

      1. asshat
      One who has their head up their ass. Thus wearing their ass as a hat. Asshat

    10. Re:Same machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what do you expect? Lame ass jokes in response to a lame-ass story. I saw a demo at ApacheCon crash - does that make the front page at slashdolt? No...we're only concerned with Gates and MS-bashing here, no matter how trivial. The TWO glitches during the keynote certainly weren't show-stoppers - the crash at ApacheCon WAS. Bunch of fucktard editors and commentors here.

    11. Re:Same machine by kv9 · · Score: 1, Informative

      or you have your alternate definition.

    12. Re:Same machine by Leffe · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but I have to make some jokes about monkeys only to be corrected by being told that chimps are actually apes.

      Yes, Discworld references sometimes do get modded Funny.

    13. Re:Same machine by mogalpha · · Score: 1

      That was informative!? People must have way too many mod points these days...

    14. Re:Same machine by Another+Mac+Guy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Bill Gates should hire Steve Jobs and Apple to run his demos in future.

    15. Re:Same machine by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Didn't you realize that Microsoft's new buzzword was software as Service?

  2. It's nice and concise... by Xpilot · · Score: 3, Funny

    The explanation we were all waiting for! Bill Gates' demo failed because...

    "Service Unavailable"

    That makes it all clear in just 2 short words! Great summary :)

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:It's nice and concise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well aren't most windows errors like that. You get a window that says something like "error in dll" and the program crashes. Good luck trying to figure that one out.

  3. Deja vu by Legion303 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember that video that was floating around of Win98 blue-screening during a presentation? Good times.

    1. Re:Deja vu by SCHecklerX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And notice that despite that, M$ still manages to be the software that is everyware.

    2. Re:Deja vu by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Don't forget:

      "UntstramanaBillGates! Mah mit pullon!" *smack in the face with a pie* (crowd gasps)

      (Hold off on moderation until seeing the video yourself - and if at all possible, could someone translate what that guy's saying in it?)

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    3. Re:Deja vu by murdoow33 · · Score: 1

      You mean this video? Bill looks almost human! Those big sweaters help to conceal his wrath.
      Windows 98 crashes during Gates' Comdex demo
      http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9804/20/gates.co mdex/

    4. Re:Deja vu by Xabraxas · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah it is sickening, isn't it.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    5. Re:Deja vu by DigiShaman · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Unlike Apple, Microsoft does not have tight control over the hundreds of thousands of parts that go into the development of a PC. At least Apple can maintain a high level of quality control over hardware along with their OS.

      I would say that almost always a BSOD is caused by a 3rd party device driver or bad RAM (or faultly memory timing). But that said, microsoft should have at least burned in that PC before using it in the presentation had it been a hardware/driver.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:Deja vu by DataPath · · Score: 1

      I'm no microsoftie by any stretch, but I'd just like to say, that as an engineer, having just completed a senior project and successfully demoed it, that anything that can possibly go wrong, will wait until the demo to do so.

      We got away with our demo looking like everything was working perfectly with a bit of smoke and mirrors, and arm waving.

      "See? Look at the little temperature chart go across the screen! No, don't notice that if it gets colder in here, the line will go up instead of down. Oh yes, and please ignore the fact that the text being transmitted isn't the same as what we input, and in fact is sometimes transmitted spontaneously"

      --
      Inconceivable!
    7. Re:Deja vu by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Unlike Apple, Microsoft does not have tight control over the hundreds of thousands of parts that go into the development of a PC.
      They do when giving a demo at a huge trade show.
    8. Re:Deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People need something to do.

      If you have all the problems solved, people get bored.

      It's the natural instinct of mankind to create a situation in which the appearance of purpose exists even though there's really nothing.

    9. Re:Deja vu by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, it is absolutely shocking that a beta product that was demonstrated live at a tech show crashed at all.

      I think all products that do this in the beta stage should be, by law, withdrawn from development and sale/distribution.

      On a related note, I once installed a release version RedHat from CD, and after the process, the RH installation could not recognise the CDROM drive at all (i.e. the one it had previously copied about 1Gb of data from). I await the withdrawal of all Linux-based distibutions from the world with excitement :)

    10. Re:Deja vu by Feztaa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unlike Apple, Microsoft does not have tight control over the hundreds of thousands of parts that go into the development of a PC. At least Apple can maintain a high level of quality control over hardware along with their OS.

      Ahhhh, that explains why Linux is so stable. Torvalds rules over the hardware manufacturers with an iron fist!

      (if you hadn't noticed, linux runs on much more varied hardware than windows does, and is much more stable. MS has no excuse anymore)

    11. Re:Deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow up you two--you seem like a childish 13 year old when you say M$. Regardless if you have a point or not, nobody (except hard-core OSS zealots) is going to respect a thing you say when you say that.

      (Obligatory PA Reference)
      http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php3?date=2002-07 -22&res=l

    12. Re:Deja vu by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      Bs.. bs... bs... I have tried to install Linux 3 times. Twice redhat, once Mandrake on win desktops (twice win2k, once winxp) and hardware that MSWin recognized out of the box failed to be recognized on them. I've given up. I run cygwin to get some of the tools I got used to using a remote Solaris box on my last job.

    13. Re:Deja vu by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      Didn't the Blue screen of Death happen on an XBox? That's tightly controlled by Microsoft.

    14. Re:Deja vu by IdleTime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow...

      So because you can't manage to install Linux or have hardware that for some reason is not supported by Linux (and I really would like to know if you are just trolling and what hw and problems you have had), you claim that the parent poster is wrong. Amazing!

      I have used Linux since kernel 0.91 and as my main OS since 1995. I have installed it on a wide varity of hardware. Problems, sure... Not been able to install it? Never. And in the past few years close to zero problems. Currently running Gentoo on 2 P4's and and AMD64 box. The 2 P4's are Dell's, the AMD64 a no-name box.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    15. Re:Deja vu by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      If by 'stable' you mean 'Linux either runs it (4 year old hardware very well) or it doesn't run it at all (latest multimedia hardware with features people really want).'

      There should be no doubt that a big rock out in the middle of a field is stable. Damned stable.

    16. Re:Deja vu by aichpvee · · Score: 1
      If they have a presentation with software that isn't presentable it is their own fault if people attack them for putting out crap. If this wasn't a semi-annual event for them (and a daily event for most of the users of their FINAL products) maybe people would let it slide a bit more.

      Just think of it in a similar way to how it is your fault your cdrom wouldn't work with redhat because you should have known better than to install it in the first place.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    17. Re:Deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There's never been a Blue Screen Of Death(tm) on ANY Xbox...

      You might be talking about the GSOD, though...

    18. Re:Deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be because the alternatives are as pleasant to use as getting a cactus up the ass.

    19. Re:Deja vu by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      What multimedia hard do you have that doesn't run in Linux? An ATi card?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    20. Re:Deja vu by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Beyond that.

      I read a story here on slashdot about laserik's or some chain of eye laser surgury offices using Windows 95!

      Worse one reader commented that error messages and gp faults appeared all over the place on the computer when his spouse did the surgury. The doctor just clicked on ignore and continued!

      Why on Earth does such a system need ms software? Its not like Word is going to run on it.

    21. Re:Deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this link better summarizes the average Slasbot retard.

    22. Re:Deja vu by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Hey, if I install WindowsXP on any new computer, it won't recognize half the hardware either! ...

      Check which release version you are using, (stable releases tend to not have all the latest goodies in them, some drivers may need to be downloaded separatly, the same as for WindowsXP!)

    23. Re:Deja vu by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "I think all products that do this in the beta stage should be, by law, withdrawn from development and sale/distribution."

      I might agree with you about the distribution WITHOUT further development part...

      Microsoft seems to forget that crashes mean "not ready for prime time"...

      Not to mention the common sense part that betas should never be publicly demonstrated...you're just asking for trouble.

      Of course, if hype and PR are running your company, it's no surprise when stupidly demonstrating a beta gets turned on you.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    24. Re:Deja vu by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Despite being a Linux promoter, I have to admit that I could not install Linux one time.

      The box was my old Compaq Deskpro 4000. The Linux OS's were Red Hat 7.3, Red Hat 8.0 and (IIRC) Mandrake 9.

      The problem was that no matter how I created the partition table - inside Linux, outside Linux using Partition Magic, Ranish Partition Manager or whatever - none of those distros could recognize the partition table even after they themselves had created and initialized it. Obviously there was something about the Compaq BIOS that simply didn't report the geometry of the Maxtor 30GB drive I was using correctly as far as the Linux kernel was concerned.

      HOWEVER...Red Hat 7.0 blows on the machine with absolutely no problem at all! Go figure...

      Oh, and Knoppix 3.6 won't boot on my other machine without using the noapic option, whereas Knoppix 3.3 has no problem at all. I hate it when later versions have more problems than earlier versions...

      I haven't installed Linux on much else so I can't comment on overall install success statistics but from what I read in the newsgroups, Linux can fail to install on occasion.

      Once you GET it installed, however, it's also FAR more stable than Windows. I had to reinstall Windows 2000 TWICE in the first month of using it because of registry corruption problems - one introduced by a third party software, another all by Windows lonesome self... Then I had to reinstall Windows XP (same machine, dual boot) after it hosed itself from a power failure WHEN IT WASN'T EVEN THE OS RUNNING...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    25. Re:Deja vu by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      I nominate the new Trademarked name:

      CSOD - Colored Screen of Death!

      Or how about: WSOD - Windows Screen of Death!

      Or how about: WMD - Windows Machine Death!

      Oh, wait, the last one is taken...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    26. Re:Deja vu by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      How about MicroShaft? MicroShit? MicroSucks?

      Does that help?

      "nobody (except hard-core OSS zealots) is going to respect a thing you say when you say that"

      Er, does this mean we OSS "zealots" are supposed to give a shit whether you Microsoft shills "respect" us? (Right - "I'll respect you in the morning" - does this ring a bell?)

      Gates doesn't respect ANYONE, as any biography of him clearly shows. He wants to call us "commies"! So fuck him - and fuck Microsoft shills.

      Have a nice day.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    27. Re:Deja vu by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Bs.. bs... bs... I have tried to install Linux 3 times. Twice redhat, once Mandrake on win desktops (twice win2k, once winxp) and hardware that MSWin recognized out of the box failed to be recognized on them.

      I've been running Linux for 12 years as my desktop. In that time I've gone through a half dozen motherboards, four laptops, and countless CPU upgrades. I've also run Linux on secondary computers that I use for personal servers; more than a dozen in total. I've also installed Linux on over 100+ computers for work-related purposes. I've never come across a hardware combo onto which I couldn't install Linux.

      I'm not doubting your story - I'm sure there are hardware combos that Linux installers have trouble with - but your experiences are not the norm.

    28. Re:Deja vu by ssimontis · · Score: 1

      I wish there was something we could do about it. What if a group got together and put up a website where you could submit suggestions on what should be fixed about Windows? Then, people could try to get Microsoft to notice it. If the site was advertised on Slashdot and a few other news sites, and enough e-mails were sent to Microsoft, perhaps Microsoft might just take a look at the site and listen to what their custoemrs want?

      --
      Scott Simontis
    29. Re:Deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What remote control do you use to control TV tuners, or DVD players with your Linux Box?

    30. Re:Deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys obviously care very deeply what Microsoft users think. You see this all over the internet. Whenever a MS story is posted on any message board, all of the zealot psychopaths stop masturbating to their computer and post a million mentally retarded, sociopath comments. Every single one of them drips with mental illness and insecurity. It's funnier than Bozo the Clown.

    31. Re:Deja vu by stormesj · · Score: 1

      I am not sure if you are trying to criticize Linux or yourself. Maybe you should clarify.

    32. Re:Deja vu by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So because you can't manage to install Linux or have hardware that for some reason is not supported by Linux (and I really would like to know if you are just trolling and what hw and problems you have had), you claim that the parent poster is wrong. Amazing!"

      To be fair, the anti-MS zealots use the same tactic. Evidently, if a version of Windows crashes on their machine, then everybody on the planet must be dealing with 14 bluescreens a day. Those of us, and there are a lot of us, who run Windows without these problems, are ignored or accused of working for Microsoft.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    33. Re:Deja vu by gwiner · · Score: 1

      Here-here! I agree - I am as anti-MS as the rest of the lot, and believe me I do some crazy shit with my PC that the "average" user would not (frequent driver updates, occasional warez, lots of un/installs, etc.). Despite this, I've had perhaps 4 blues screens in the last year (twice it was my fault as I overclocked my system too far, and the other two were driver issues due to beta or recent drivers), and no problems I have been unable to repair. The most severe problem took me about 20 min to resolve (most of that boot/cycle time). Granted I'm an IT guy and all, but I really don't see the unstability that is so widely critizied in XP! (And "yes": I reboot my machine regularly - once a month). Perhaps years of exposure to MS has made me tolerant of problems, but seriously - I've got little issue with that level of stability.

    34. Re:Deja vu by fuzzix · · Score: 1
      What remote control do you use to control TV tuners, or DVD players with your Linux Box?
      I use the serial remote I got with my Pinnacle TV card to control TV apps, mplayer and xmms.

      See lirc.org.
    35. Re:Deja vu by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      I don't try to say they are the norm. I'm sorta trolling, but I get tired of the continual "linux rox, everything Microsoft sucks" here.

      I'm a java programmer (converted Windows VB programmer) who really got to like some of the solaris tools working on a pretty good size J2ee project. I've really started to like some of the Open Source/Free Software projects. I use cygwin on a daily basis and before that, log in via x-windows or remote terminal onto a solaris box.

      All I know is, I've put together several systems. And like I said, trying Linux was a disaster. First time I could NOT get the video (XWindows) to output at a decent resolution/depth to use the desktop (I could use a terminal). This was Redhat 6 (a ways back, to be sure, you had to manually set the xwindows config, as I recall). I finally got it right, only to have the configuration file vanish off the file system completely. Starting over, it never worked. Later, I tried redhat 7 and could never get the ethernet card recognized. Was this a 3com or major brand? No, as I recall, but Windows 2000 recognized it out of the box. I know because the card is still in use in my Windows 2k Server I have at home. That install is only a couple years old, so I remember (incidentally, that is my file server/print server/web server, database (sql server AND mysql), and email (yes, exchange). It's slow (it's old hardware), but it has never, ever, ever, ever had an unscheduled reboot, downtime, virus infection, or security breach. I do run the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer (free) on it once a month.

      Last try was mandrake. Could NOT get the networking to work. It SAID it recognized the hardware, but I couldn't ever get internet connectivity, despite having the settings the same as they were on the windows side on the same box. Granted, I will be the first to admit I am not a networking guru, but I managed to set up a win2k domain just by googling a bit and reading MSDN articles. To be fair, I probably should have stuck with Mandrake, I liked what I saw, and I only mucked around with it for 3 or 4 days before giving up.

      My point is, I'm not an idiot. I make a (handsome) living programming them. I know java, a little c, python, jelly, vb, and a little C#. I can edit files in vi. I use cygwin utilities everyday. I run a home network with my own domain. But In three tries, I have not suceeeded doing with Windows 2000/XP does with very little trouble. So don't delude yourself that desktop linux is ready for the masses, if it hasn't worked out for me, a guy who would really, REALLY, REALLY, like to see it work.

    36. Re:Deja vu by nathanh · · Score: 1
      So don't delude yourself that desktop linux is ready for the masses...

      I don't think it is either. You are attributing me with beliefs that I do not have. I honestly couldn't care less if Linux never goes "mainstream" on the desktop.

      That said, you tried RedHat 6 (1999) and RedHat 7 (2000). You might like to try something more recent like Fedora Core 3. The hardware detection and driver support has dramatically improved.

    37. Re:Deja vu by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      thanks. I'm about to try again...

    38. Re:Deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goatse Screen of Death?

    39. Re:Deja vu by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well, try installing linux and windows on those solaris machines..
      The problem is, linux drivers are written by developers who have the hardware. Usually these developers are quite tech-savvy and will buy good quality hardware, so the cheaper and lower quality hardware tends to be more poorly supported. Also, in order for drivers to exist someone has to buy the hardware, then develop the drivers.. since the manufacturers wont do it. Thus you have a lag between hardware and driver availability.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    40. Re:Deja vu by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      It depends on what you mean by "runs". Quake3 with a soundblaster pro under redhat 6.2? No. Win98? Yes. Just one of many, many examples.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  4. Billy G as Donny T by phobos13013 · · Score: 1

    Poor Sean Alexander HAD to have gotten the Donald treatment with a big YOUR FIRED after that flub up... id put 10 bucks on it

    --
    ...and it should be known by now
    1. Re:Billy G as Donny T by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      id put 10 bucks on it

      You'd think they'd be higher rollers since they just released Doom 3.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    2. Re:Billy G as Donny T by BJH · · Score: 1

      At id, a "buck" is equal to one meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelion dollars of non-id currency.

    3. Re:Billy G as Donny T by Aard88 · · Score: 1

      Isn't it bad enough that Bill Gates didn't let Sean Alexander carry the ball one more time to get the NFL rushing record?

    4. Re:Billy G as Donny T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't spell...

      It's "YOU'RE FIRED".

      And english isn't even my native language...

    5. Re:Billy G as Donny T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you really think people on this board get that joke? (it was funny though)

  5. Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    [Disclaimer: the following comments are my own based on my own perception of events. Provided as-is and confers no rights]
    Wow, things have been so busy here at CES that I'm just getting around to blogging, starting with my promised behind the scenes of the Bill Gates CES 2005 Keynote. I've done a short version and a long version for those who have been emailing, asking me to follow up on my earlier post.

    Summary
    Wednesday night, Bill Gates hosted the 2005 CES Opening Keynote along with his surprise guest, Late Night's Conan O'Brien. Overall I think things went well, but as can happen with live events with so many variables, there were a couple of technical issues noted by sites like Engadget. The key thing for me that I could have done a better job on-stage pointing out is that despitea small glitch with a remotecontrol (IR) receiver, a single Media Center ran all theMedia Center demos andwe kept rolling despitethe hiccup. According to the postmortem, it appears a 2nd IR receiverrun over to Bill's seat failed, so the Media Center never got the signal. It could have been all the IR interference in the venue- cameras and plasma displays and lights, or the powered USB booster - a piece of equipment that gets a USB signal over a long-stretch. The production team also handled a small power outage exceptionally well in the minutes leading up which might have contributed. These things happen and the team pulled it out despite some obstacles out of their control.

    Below is my account of what was happening back stage.

    Rehearsals
    Setup and runthroughs went great the day before and day of.We did about a half-dozen individual runthroughs and 3-4 end to end runthroughs. Everything was running great except for an intermittent Internet bandwidth issue. We replaced a router and that appeared to solve part of the problem but bandwidth continued to be intermittent as I noted in my previous entry.

    15 Minutes Till Showtime: Makeup
    Yes, we had to wear makeup. I sat in a chair next to Conan and we discussed our Irish roots and he was cracking jokes. The night before, I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity to have dinner with Conan and a few folks from his Late Night team at Nobu in the Hard Rock Hotel. What a great guy, a great storyteller and super-funny. I can see why he's been announced as the next host of The Tonight Show when Jay steps down.

    Showtime!
    For the account below, here are my own thoughts and the timing is approximate thanks to Engadget :)

    6:30pm - Everyone is charged up and ready to go. Gary Shapiro, President of the CEA (host of CES)is getting ready to go on-stage. But firsta little background - in order to drive the slides and overall production coordination, a sort of "Mission Control" is set up backstage to drive the technical systems - slides, prompters, timers etc. We're settling in for Conan's monologue when two electrical engineerswalk behind themain operations tables to check a piece of equipment. From my vantage point, one the UPSes (Uninterruptable Power Supplies) has been triggered and they're troubleshooting.

    6:31pm - Everything is still running- troubleshootingis going onin the dark with flashlights, more engineers and members of the production crew are working methodically, as the UPS is running down, tracing connections, circuits. I'm standing clear w/ my team going over what I want to say. I find out later the presentation systems are all on the same UPS- slides moved to backup and systems are being powered down.

    6:40pm - The UPS is going. The Xboxes for the Forza Racing game sneak preview demos (which we had back stage due to space restrictions on stage) lost power. It appears the main demo systems on-stage weren't affected except for Xbox from what I can tell. Their bringing their demosback up.

    6:41pm - Keynote starts. We're looking good- the power circuit is back but the production team decidesto continue on backup PPT cuing systems as best I can tell. The show must go on. :)

    1. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK...how exactly did u get this? I get a SERVICE UNAVAILABLE.

      Oh wait! You wouldn't happen to be SEAN ALEXANDER would u???

    2. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Perhaps the guy has a subscription? (Slashdot has made slashdotting into a business model! :-)

    3. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't, I just hit reload a couple of times. There is a difference between a slashdotting where the site disappears off the net, and one where you get a 503.

    4. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 4, Funny
      It could have been all the IR interference in the venue

      Next time, Microsoft had better attendees frisked for rogue remote controls! Damn GNU hippies! :-)

      --
      -------
      Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
    5. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by Khan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Excuse my ignorance but, wouldn't it have been better to use a RF remote as oppose to an IR one?

      --

      "Klaatu, verada, necktie!" -Ash

    6. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by Zorilla · · Score: 1, Troll

      Damn GNU hippies! :-)

      That's GNU/Hippies, GNU/dammit!

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    7. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by BJH · · Score: 1

      Next time, Microsoft had better attendees frisked for rogue remote controls! Damn GNU hippies!

      Try it and I'll tear you a GNU/asshole, MS slaveboy! :-)

    8. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by Momoru · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The UPS is going. The Xboxes for the Forza Racing game sneak preview demos (which we had back stage due to space restrictions on stage) lost power.

      Random note...this same thing happened when Microsoft was going to demo the Xbox on The Apprentice...the xbox must suck some serious juice, or these road show teams just don't understand how much power one circuit can handle!

    9. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by Keebler71 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wait... does this mean that the slashot story coverage claiming that the "Media Center PC Presentation Crashed" was an exageration? Say it isn't so...

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    10. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by sangreal66 · · Score: 1

      That would be GNU/hippies or GNU+hippies

      Thanks

    11. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guess next time they'll try bluetooth.

    12. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by FigWig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was more likely due to the large plasma TVs they were also powering from the same generator.

      --
      Scuttlemonkey is a troll
    13. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by BinBoy · · Score: 1

      So simple my mom could do it.

    14. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by batemanm · · Score: 1

      Probably, but they were demonstrating products, I guess that no one makes an RF remote for MS media centre so they couldn't demo one.

    15. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In my experience, stage tech crews are the most frightening "electricians" one will ever meet. Wires are often too small, circuits too small, and their solutions typically involve bringing out one mega-size extension cord (like 6 or 8 gauge wire when 12 is best) and just move the mess of octopus connections to the other side of the room.

      And then the put on the 60hz hum remover, and pretend like everything's been fixed because you can't hear it.

    16. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      "the xbox must suck some serious juice"

      For the record, I just checked my v1.0 Xbox and the power supply is rated for just over 200 watts. The newer ones are supposedly more power-efficient, but I don't have one around to look at.

      I'd check my actual power draw during a game of Halo 2, but I have a 7200RPM HD, a faster DVD drive, and the fan speed turned up, so mine draws more power than the average Xbox.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    17. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by one_n_only_wildcat · · Score: 1

      IR interference makes some sense. It's too bad someone didn't think to bring a few media center remotes (or clones) and really play with them. ;) When I was a kid I had a remote control car that took off every time the blender was turned on.

      --
      "Something unknown is doing we don't know what." - Sir Arthur Eddington
    18. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, from what I heard, Microsoft couldn't afford a real electrician...

    19. Re:Behind the Scenes at the CES Keynote by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Yes, from what I heard, Microsoft couldn't afford a real electrician...

      Not done many trade shows, have you?

      You use the union guy who works for the facility. You don't get to pick who does the work.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  6. Blooper Video by antdude · · Score: 5, Informative

    Click here to view a streaming video. It shows Conan O'Brien easing the tension with his classic humor as Bill Gates encountered problems with his remote control while demoing the Windows Media Center.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Blooper Video by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Just in case you were curious, this video is hosted on The Internet

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    2. Re:Blooper Video by spac3manspiff · · Score: 1

      "Right now about 9 people are getting fired"

      That was great! I wonder if they got fired.

    3. Re:Blooper Video by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That would be pretty lame to get fired for a remote not working. Though it was Bill G. and he was in the spotlight.

      I would like to know if there was any testing done? I didn't think the remote not working was a big deal, remotes break, batteries die, etc.

      What I thought looked bad was the big BSOD on the XBox in the middle of a game.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    4. Re:Blooper Video by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      The terms, "Conan O'Brian" and "classic humour" should never be combined.*

      Conan, Leno and Letterman are crap compared to Johhny (see below), John Stewart is my favourite "late night guy" and I'm not even homosexual! Maybe you were thinking of John William Carson. He's an old dead guy that no one has heard about. I think he acted in some of those silent films in the early '20s.

      One of his quotes: "Married men live longer than single men. But married men are a lot more willing to die."

      * Except for his having contributed to certain hilarious Simpsons episodes

    5. Re:Blooper Video by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The terms, "Conan O'Brian" and "classic humour" should never be combined.*

      True. Humor spelled with a 'U' is French, and Conan is not. Coincidentally the British also spell it in the French manor, I can only imagine because I think they're proud of being once taken over by the Normans.

    6. Re:Blooper Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conan O'Brien; while his humor isn't "classic", it's occasionally funny, in a low-brow and/or self-deprecating manner. Especially the latter. He's pretty good at making fun of himself.

      As for Carson, everybody except the extremely young or out-of-touch have heard of him. If not for anything else, as Leno's predecessor. I regret having seen so little of him.

      Jon Stewart is funny, but also smart, which makes him better suited for a somewhat more intelligent audience who has plenty of common ground with him.

      Sadly, many people don't want to see smart, they want to see something that's just silly and non-threatening.

    7. Re:Blooper Video by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      Alright, who said Brits could moderate?! :P

    8. Re:Blooper Video by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Jon Stewart is funny, but also smart, which makes him better suited for a somewhat more intelligent audience who has plenty of common ground with him.

      I think it's more that Stewart (by using comedy) can expose things as a comedian that other "interviewers" cannot, and guests on his show already know that they're not there just to plug their latest product (even though they really often are).

  7. Mirror here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  8. MS IT Forum - Copenhagen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta say that approx 40% of MS demos during presentations I attended at the forum above failed to work 100%. Was a little disappointed in that.

  9. Any karma whores out there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody grab the text? Slashdotted w/ only 8 comments on the story.

  10. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this will change your mind: AMD and Linux: Reaching for the 64-bit Trophy

  11. Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It must've been all the extra IR interference, because everyone knows that MS products always work flawlessly.

  12. IIS - that explains it! by Hamstij · · Score: 3, Informative
    Wow - not even half a dozen posts and his website is already down.

    But Netcraft (and "What's that site running?") goes a long way to explaining why!

    blog.seanalexander.com Windows 2000

    1. Re:IIS - that explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called bandwidth you fucking tool

  13. some folks never learn by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is interesting. If I hit it in Mozilla, I immediately get service unavailable. If, however, I just telnet in, I get the page after a few minutes of waiting.

    Well, try again and I don't:

    mdchaney@fractal:~/taxi$ telnet blog.seanalexander.com 80
    Trying 66.226.14.131...
    Connected to blog.seanalexander.com.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    GET / HTTP/1.1
    Host: blog.seanalexander.com

    HTTP/1.1 503 Service Unavailable
    Content-Type: text/html
    Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 14:49:42 GMT
    Connection: close
    Content-Length: 28

    Service UnavailableConnection closed by foreign host.

    1. Re:some folks never learn by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      I didn't have any problems and I'm using Mozilla 1.7.5.

      I even tried using the UserAgentSwitchers, and for all browsers (IE, Firefox, Opera) and all OSes, the site worked fine.

      Could just be a coincidence?

  14. Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by JPyObjC+Dude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Has anybody ever seen an OSX box crap out on Steve? I have not heard of this or seen it.

    Hmmmm.

    Good excuses are still just good excuses.

    JsD

    1. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by justforaday · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, I used to work with a Steve. There was this one time where his machine had a kernel panic. So it can happen. Just cos you're named Steve doesn't mean you're immune...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by peechdogg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      and i don't think i've ever heard of a Solaris box dumping on McNeally either. but when practical matters are taken into consideration, most folks can't even afford the hardware to run these OS'es, much less find the tools and apps they want to. i know Sun is working to make Solaris usable on x86, but that's a long way from being widely usable.

      i don't have any difficulty finding several cars that meet my needs. getting the combination of good hardware and software seems darn near impossible.

      i don't thing we're near as technically advanced as we would like to believe.

      --
      I live my life committing witty sigs to my personal belief system.... Carpe Diem = The fish is dead. Right?
    3. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by kristofme · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here is just one of many examples (from a while back).
      Of course, keep in mind that he gives demos all the time, and more so than Gates, so it's bound to happen now and then..

    4. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Literally happens to everyone. I've never seen a presentation NOT have some technical glitches of some kind. There was an old Times editor who said "I'd wager there's not been a single copy of The New York Times that hasn't had some kind of error".

    5. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

      There is a difference between a typo and having the paper catch fire while you are reading it.

    6. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'd wager there's not been a single copy of The New York Times that hasn't had some kind of error"

      That's rather optimistic. I would wager there has not been a single article in the New York Times that has not had some kind of error.

    7. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nor an OS/2 box on David Barnes...remember the shootout in texas? He mopped the floor with windows NT.

      M$ has always been inferior, yet they are still on top. Hopefully it will change soon with the uprising of linux and osx.

    8. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure it happens but the original poster said "OSX box". the Mac Observer article was from 1999. isn't OSX only 4 years old or so?

    9. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good excuse are still excuses, true. If you don't want to hear them don't subject yourself to them by reading. Some people *are* interested in postmortems and finding out why things may not have functioned as intended.

      Hate to break it to you Apple-fanboi but they aren't perfect either.

    10. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by zakath · · Score: 1

      I'd wager there's a difference in Gates' demo not working 100% and his PC catching fire too...

      --

    11. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by SilentChris · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's also a big difference between a paper catching fire and an IR remote signal getting confused by flashbulbs going around it. If you read the blog, you'd see they just went ahead with the slideshow manually. The Xbox game was kind of unexcusable, though (although, Bungie did pull off an impressive demo during E3 last year, so it kind of makes up for it).

      As far as I know, Steve Jobs has resorted to trickery for most of us presentations. The original iBook that had Airport used a custom external wireless video interface to display on the main screen (it cost more than the iBook itself). Steve claims he's used "Keynote" for most of his presentations (even before it was released), but the fact that it caused kernel panics on ATI hardware makes me question that. That's why he referred to as a "master showman" and not a "master presenter".

    12. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How come this crap gets modded up? Are modders stupid?? A person makes a comment based on zero research and it gets modded as "insightful". Of course it has happened to Steve Jobs .. When it happens to steve it doesnt get as much media play apparently cause you never heard of it.

    13. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      I've seen Steve Jobs have computer glitches onstage during keynotes. The only difference being that he was smart enough not to have wisecracking Conan O'Brian there to draw even more attention to it... :-D

    14. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      M$ has always been inferior, yet they are still on top.

      Market share speaks for itself. Ever notice how there's NEVER any Linux based tradeshows with RMS or Linus demonstrating a full-on loaded media presentation all running on one PC? If you knew anything of the complexity of what was beging accomplished, you'd be awed and admit that Linsux is a loooong way from being able to accomplish that. The internet hiccup discussed in the story was probably a Linux/Apache error.

    15. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all right, my name is Bill and I never see any pro
      [NO CARRIER]

    16. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making stuff up is SilentChris' job. That's why he works for Microsoft.

    17. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Can you explain about the custom wireless video on the iBook? I was just watching that presentation the other day and it looked completely legit. As far as I recall, he never showed any of the iBook's video on the main screen except by having somebody point a camera at it. Which bit was "faked"?

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    18. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always heard he was a "Master Bater"

      LOL!

    19. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by rufo · · Score: 1

      Just curious where you saw this - I don't recall which expo it was but I saw it live via the stream when it happened, and would like to see it again if you have a link handy.

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    20. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but Sun has never had anything to demo anyway.

    21. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because an iMac with iTunes, iMove, iPhoto, iDVD and GarageBand is SO much more expensive than a PC Media Center.

      Sir, you are an asshat.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    22. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by kupci · · Score: 1
      That's why he referred to as a "master showman" and not a "master presenter".

      And Bill is a "master presenter"? I'll buy that. According to Robert Cringely, in his book Accidental Empires, Gates had an innate ability to steer around various major known and unknown bugs (the BSOD sort). Probably this was nothing supernatural, just his excellent instinct and experience with software, having done a fair bit of coding himself unlike Jobs. But apparently he's gotten a little out too far from the code nowadays.

    23. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by schmaltz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Steve Jobs has resorted to trickery for most of us presentations

      Ah, that's good, make up some bitter anti-Apple FUD when your own platform gets some bad publicity. So defensive! When Microsoft already dominates computing into the high nineties percentage, in ways both good (broad market for those who create software, peripherals), and bad (poor security, rampant virii/trojans, many exploits), why is it so hard to accept criticism?

      When a figurehead from MS has a very public failure, everybody focuses on it - it's as though it was a symbol for MS's other failures (security etc.) It gives people an outlet, where they otherwise feel they have no control over those situations where they feel victimized by MS's failures.

      So, relax! MS will continue to dominate, and criticism will continue to flow. Just ignore it, think of it as primal therapy for hackers.

      --
      Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
    24. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, every Steve i've ever met were unreliable, acid-dropping neohippies.. they experience PC problems like anyone else

    25. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      You can grab it from http://mod.carnet.hr/hr/carnet/rdlab/conf/apple/mw ny1999.mov. Beware, the quality is really low, but it's a great show. The first few minutes are especially cool.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    26. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Hopefully it will change soon with the uprising of linux and osx.

      I just knew those BSD demons were going to form skynet and take over the world! Did you think that one of the military's most advanced weapons programs and the world's most popular webserver share the same name for no reason?

    27. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1

      This report is from 1999. Did OSX even exist then? Was that demo to demonstrate a preview version of OSX or was it a demo of OS9?

    28. Re:Never seen Steve Jobs in this situation by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      From the article:
      What happened is that Microsoft Explorer crashed in a most unfortunate situation, and Mr. Waldman had to scramble under pressure. It was reported that he bashed the new G3's. That was taken out of context. He did say that the "machines" must not be working right, in an attempt to absolve Explorer of any fault. He shouldn't have done that. It looked bad.

      So, what happened from what I gathered is that a Microsoft product for the Mac crashed, and Steve Jobs looked bad in an attempt to save Microsoft's face.

      Doesn't really seem like a bad thing for Apple, after all... =)

  15. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oh man what a troll. Do you even check your 'facts'?

    1) There IS 64 bit Linux. (e.g. RedHat Enterprise 3 64 bit version)

    2) The analog to a start menu was in the first Apple Mac GUIs, WAY before Windows.

    3) Popup blockers have been around a LONG time in mozilla/firefox etc. IE has just finally got a very poor implementation of it.

    4) 3 button mice were on many Unix Workstations as standard at least 15 years ago, At that time you couldn't even buy a 3 button windows mouse. Middle mouse button usage is stil far better integrated into the X window/Unix/Linux world than Windows.

  16. The Problem... They used Windows by hey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Things would have gone better otherwise.

    1. Re:The Problem... They used Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How does using Windows stop a remote control working?

    2. Re:The Problem... They used Windows by BJH · · Score: 1

      Bad karma...

  17. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by DJBanaan · · Score: 0

    Left behind, eh? http://www.windows-longhorn.org/ for details on being left behind.

  18. It's encouraging... by RealBeanDip · · Score: 4, Funny

    to see BG's machine craps out when he needs it the most just like mine does when I do.

    Unfortunately for me, I don't have anyone to fire.

    --

    You know you're a geek if you've ever replied to a tagline.

    1. Re:It's encouraging... by bonzoesc · · Score: 0

      Yourself maybe? My machines are rock solid except for that time I dropped my old powerbook and it landed right on the 802.11g card.

    2. Re:It's encouraging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right, the whole tech support and customer support concept is just a big scam. Nobody ever has problems, they just have no one to talk to so they call someone for $39.99 per incedent of being bored.

      Are problems always the users problem? You live in a dream world if you think all software and hardware is 100% perfect and never fails under any circumstance.

    3. Re:It's encouraging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fire Bill!

      Use Linux :)

  19. Service Unavailable by freaksta · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Seem Sean must be running Media Center to host his blogs.

    --


    Hrrm... I usually just sign my name.
  20. come together by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The most interesting part of this story is that Alexander still has all his fingers left to type a report on the debacle.

    The other most interesting part of this whole story is that the rest of us don't have Alexander, the MS Media Center Team, or the Windows source code. So when we get the BSoD, we're left scratching our heads. That's why we use Linux: with Open Source, we're as privileged as Bill Gates, to whom Windows is Open Source, because he's got the keys to the vault. His CES debacle should open everyone's eyes to the difference. Especially the "communists" in the global IT community who'd rather not spend more on Gates' closed source, and get less - and get hung out to dry with a crashed Windows app thousands of times a day, around the world.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:come together by Hinhule · · Score: 0

      Well, in this case, I believe the "communists" are the "good guys", and the "capitalists", who want to profit from their innovations by using closed source, are the "bad guys".

      So you my friend, are the bloody commie bastard. Kinda makes you think doesn't it.

    2. Re:come together by cojsl · · Score: 1, Interesting

      RTFA, the issues were glitches w/ a USB repeater and a flaky Internet connection, not the system itself, nothing to see here. I would guess you've not done many presentations if you haven't experienced facilities related tech glitches of this sort. OTOH, let me offer a comparitive XP vs Fedora usability story about the notebook I'm typing this on now. I'm a Windows consultant, so problem solving w/ PCs is my job, my skills in this dept are far better than an average user. In the process of teaching myself Linux as a project, I decided to make this machine dual boot FC3 and XP, which I accomplished without trouble. The problem came with tying to get my wireless card running. At my local Linux user's group meeting, they helped my discern that my existing card wasn't Linux compatible, so i picked up a Netgear WG511 before the next meeting. At the next meeting, prism54.org is down, and I can't find the firmware I apparently need anywhere else. Guess It'll have to wait again. Another day I get the fware, and follow a guide to config the card to (hopefully) connect to my home WIFI, no luck... summary: after 3 weeks owning the card, I primarilly boot to XP because FC3 makes it to much of a pain to connect to any of the 3 WIFI networks I need to use regularly. XP OTOH remebers WEP keys for them all and connects right up. Linux is great for the Firewall, FTP and web servers I run, but for the above, and several other reasons, it's far from ready for prime time for the small businesses I support.

    3. Re:come together by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Except that I'm not a communist, I don't even share chinese food very well, and I've made a fortune exploiting the surplus value of my IT workers in the software game (with their delighted complicity, of course). That "commie" talk is just as stupid about open source as it is about national healthcare: we're all capitalists, we just know the benefit of syndicating our labor for maximum value, rather than the fascist control of the governing monopolies. Did that make you think, you bloody bastard?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:come together by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm a Windows consultant, so problem solving w/ PCs is my job

      So your vested interest lies in fixing the buggy nightmare that is Windows. You make your living off BSoD crashes. If it worked, you'd have to get a lot more creative than installing a patch rebooting 'til it kinda works. The OS shouldn't crash when running a USB repeater and/or a flaky Internet connection - that's a crappy OS at work.

      Your Windows bias lets you excuse that prison in which we all work, while complaining that a specific Linux distro doesn't support a specific piece of hardware, or that a dinky little ".org" website is down at some particular time. If Windows didn't control the market though nontechnical superiority, more HW would be tested for Linux compatibility due to market demand, unconstrained by monopoly competition. And if you were a more experienced presenter yourself, as am I after 28 years in your business, starting when facilities often didn't even have 3-prong power outlets for grounded equipment cables, you'd have prepared a lot better. Gates, of course, has no excuse, except that monopoly makes you complacent, and sometimes you wind up with pie on your face.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:come together by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I think he was refering to this interview in which Bill Gates refers to people who disagree with him on IP issues as "communists" repeatedly.

      Is there a scummier human being on the planet then Bill Gates? Well maybe the guy who raped a tsunami survivor but even then it's close.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    6. Re:come together by weicco · · Score: 1

      You mean you have whole Linux development team in your garage when your box throws another kernel panic? Man, you're lucky :)

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    7. Re:come together by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

      Sounds a lot like MS finger-pointing to me, and you're trying, but failing miserably, to justify it.

      --
      Karma Schmarma
    8. Re:come together by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      *I* am referring to that interview. When Hinhule posted "So you my friend, are the bloody commie bastard.", I'm sure they were referring to *me* as a commie, a ridiculous assertion in line with Gates' fascist slur.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:come together by Trelane · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm sorry Linux isn't working out for you as well as Windows. From what you've posted thus far, it sounds like it's really close; it's just hardware compatibility you're having a problem with.
      Another day I get the fware, and follow a guide to config the card to (hopefully) connect to my home WIFI, no luck.
      I don't know what to tell you here, due to lack of info. I use Linux to connect my cisco 802.11b card and the ipw2100 card to connect to my AP without issue; my guess is that you're missing a configuration detail. The folks at your lug may help you out here if you give them the details.
      because FC3 makes it to much of a pain to connect to any of the 3 WIFI networks I need to use regularly.
      I don't think this is FC3's fault here; sounds like you're missing some config detail that is keeping you from connecting.
      XP OTOH remebers WEP keys for them all and connects right up.
      FC3 remembers a variety wep keys as well, so I don't believe that XP is unique in this regard.
      or the above, and several other reasons, it's far from ready for prime time for the small businesses I support.
      Quite possibly, depending on your small businesses and their needs. OTOH, I think Linux is ready for a great many applications than it's currently given credit for (e.g. helpdesks, some secretaries (depending on the apps they need), etc.) I don't know your clients and their needs, however. Generally, I'd say that saying "Linux isn't ready for the desktop at all" is incorrect as a blanket statement; it highly depends on what the users need.
      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    10. Re:come together by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do: they're on the mailing lists at kernel.org and elsewhere, and their code is all in CVS when they're sleeping. That's the entire point of open source - you don't have to own the company to access the developers. It might take longer to get the original author than "Mr. Gates is paging Joe Vijaram to the conference room", but anyone can get Joe's code and fix it themselves.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:come together by David+Gould · · Score: 1


      in which Bill Gates refers to people who disagree with him on IP issues as "communists" repeatedly.

      Don't know the origin of this, but I think I got it from a Slashdot sig:

      Linux is as much about "Communism" as is the phrase "Of the People, By the People, and For the People".

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    12. Re:come together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A team is useless. One knowledgeable person is much more useful for solving problems like that.

      Personally, I've been developing software on various platforms, using various libraries, and whenever problems have extended outside the code I was working on, open source has been much better; I've been able to track things down to the kernel (*BSD, Linux) or libraries and solve them in a reasonable amount of time. Whenever using closed source, I've run into a wall very often, requiring far more time and effort to solve problems.

      With closed source, I can sometimes figure out what the bug is, but I'm unable to change it. People have suggested binary patches when I complain about not having the source...while I could do that, with some effort, I think it's a bad enough kludge that I'd rather not.

      Either I'm an exceptional guru (entirely possible), or making open source useful requires far less than an entire team of programmers.

  21. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by Zorilla · · Score: 1

    Oh man what a troll.
    a) Good observation

    Do you even check your 'facts'?
    b) Did you check your first sentence?

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  22. Bill Gates by szyzyg · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed, he'd be... oh wait never mind

    1. Re:Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a penny would be sufficient. I myself have contributed $1268.34, and that was just this morning.

    2. Re:Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, okay well I'm an MS advocate and even I thought this was funny... congrats.

    3. Re:Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see...

      $50 billion / $0.05 = 1 trillion times

      I'm not going to speculate as to whether that's a reasonable figure... I just wanted to do the math. heh.

    4. Re:Bill Gates by Spunk · · Score: 0

      I would like to see a study done on this, to see how close that claim really is. It would win an Ig-Nobel for sure :)

    5. Re:Bill Gates by MaynardJanKeymeulen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, assume 800 million computer out there running.
      Don't know how reliable this is, it was the first thing I found while googling.
      (while looking at that page, take a look at the "previous question" too, quite funny)
      Let's underestimate and say that 500 million of those run some form of MS Windows.
      Each user uses his computer 1 hour a day (again underestimating I think)
      this gives 500 million hours of computer time a day.
      Windows lasts (for the sake of simplicity, don't forget a lot of those computer might still use Win9x)
      50 hours before Bsod'ing, which gives 10 million Bsod's a day,
      so It would take mr Gates 280 centuries.

      Conclusion: he must be very old.

      --
      "The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they make a vacuum cleaner."
    6. Re:Bill Gates by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting putting ads on the windows reboot screen?

      That's the most genious business model I've heard of in a long time.

    7. Re:Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Linus had a nickel for every major application that isn't available for Linux, he'd be... oh wait never mind

      If Linus had a nickel for every piece of new hardware that takes a year to be fully supported in Linux, he'd be... oh wait never mind

      If Linus had a nickel for every piece of software that had a massive security hole in Linux, he'd be... oh wait never mind

      If Linus had a nickel for every Linux user who has no idea how to use Windows correctly, he'd be... oh wait never mind

  23. Uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    From Microsoft Legal, Slashdotters need to remember to properly attribute Microsoft intellectual property when such attribution is due:
    "Service Unavailable TM" is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation. Copyright 2004-2005. Other registered marks that Slashdotters may not use without appropriate attribution include:
    • Brute Force: as in "it is easy to obtain access to any Windows server via Brute Force(TM)"
    • Devastator: as in "Microsoft products are often called the Devastator(TM) of network integrity and reliability."
    • Fist of the Lotus: as in "after we had our customer database stolen via the latest MS SQL Server exploit, I felt as if the CFO crammed the Fist of the Lotus(TM) up my ass."

    Please see the Microsoft Trademarks website for additional details.
    1. Re:Uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn you Microsoft, "Fist of the Lotus" is SCO's INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY! Pay us $699 NOW!

      Hugs and kisses,

      - Darl -

    2. Re:Uh-oh by isecore · · Score: 1

      Devastator

      That's the new hollywood-flick right? The one about a rebellious force of sysadmins who have to fight against a machine intelligence that has taken over the world and is hell-bent on killing off all the humans?

      --
      I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
    3. Re:Uh-oh by zonker · · Score: 0

      yeah and it is available on the new microsoft iptv service. that is if it doesn't crash on you...

    4. Re:Uh-oh by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Lotus? LOTUS?

      That's IBM's property!

      Somebody call the Nazgul!

      Oh, wait, I forgot - SCO owns all of IBM...

      Oh, wait, the Nazgul are proving that's not true!

      Call the Nazgul!

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  24. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent troll. You brought the zealots out in force.

  25. But did the demos actually work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Perhaps the enjoyment of poking fun at M$ would be noticably reduced by taking note of the fact that the demos on the Media Center at CES actually worked...or did you all forget to read the full blog article?

    (Yeah, so I don't have a /. account and I'm too cowardly to create one - sue me)

    1. Re:But did the demos actually work? by CoolSilver · · Score: 1

      I won't sue but the RIAA will! :P

    2. Re:But did the demos actually work? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny
      or did you all forget to read the full blog article?
      Most of us got treated to the "executive summary version" - you know - "Service Unavailable"
  26. Re:Unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to be implying that MS is this major innovative force in the industry. I hate to break it to you, but Apple does a lot more engineering work/innovation than MS does.

  27. Here we go again... by curious.corn · · Score: 1

    ... doesn't this "digital hub for your digital (i)Life" stuff sound familiar? Sigh, copycats... and bad at it too! Shame though that people will buy this crap en masse and still sneer at the poor Apple-ite... I'm worried though; today people have Office because it's the "stadrard" for business, bla, bla... tomorrow, will we all have to own "Home" to watch the DRMd pics & vids of the latest addition to the family?

    The only good thing is the fun granted by future worms spilling true amateur porn over the net. You see a hot chick across the street? p2p to check if she's worth the effort ;-)

    --
    Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    1. Re:Here we go again... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      It's not a new trend. MS has made their money by creating cheap, fragile knockoffs of Apple for 15 years or so.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Here we go again... by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      I am getting sick of this. It used to be that one could get away from the bullshit by putting the line:

      127.0.0.1 apple.slashdot.org

      in the /etc/host file. Now you shills and shucksters have spread out and taken over the whole site.

      Can't you go back to your cheerleader fansites and leave us geeks alone?!?

    3. Re:Here we go again... by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      Except the fanboy wasn't spouting bullshit: in 2002 the "I have young kids and wouldn't it be great to collect one million digital photos of them and have them everywhere?" meme was all over the Mac scene.

      "Here we go again..." does indeed sum up the repetitive cycle of others do it first, Microsoft commoditizes it.

      As for your "you shills and shucksters have spread out and taken over the whole site," I've seen FAR more of your pro-Microsoft sympathizers around here lately. Perhaps the the Apple fanboys have to be zealot-like because they are massively outnumbered by the Apple haters.

      Pity I can't 127.0.0.1 microsoft-is-good-enough-for-me-don't-rock-my-comf ort-zone.slashdot.org

    4. Re:Here we go again... by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      I've seen FAR more of your pro-Microsoft sympathizers around here lately.

      Yikes! They're not mine. Really, they're not.

    5. Re:Here we go again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what do you call the iPod - others do it first, Apple commoditizes it. Sure, Apple did it better than everyone else and so it became mainstream. Just like Microsoft does many things better than they were done before and they become mainstream.

    6. Re:Here we go again... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I don't even own an Apple. I guess that disqualifies me from fanboy status. It's pretty clear though that MS copied Apple, and many Linux desktops copied MS and Apple, when it comes to GUI windowing interface elements.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  28. Slides located "here"? by ansak · · Score: 4, Informative
    As in here.

    fwiw: I got into the page after 15 tries, myself.

    cheers...ank

    --
    Still hoping for Gentle Treatment...
    1. Re:Slides located "here"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ha ha! I got into it in 9 tries. Does that mean I win Slashdot?

      Better luck next time, friend.

  29. Re:Unrelated by cybrthng · · Score: 1

    show me one place where Apple has been more "innovative" in creating something that hadn't existed before?

    The only thing i can think of was the apple newton - but even then there were others with similar products.

  30. With 30 billion.. by NfoCipher · · Score: 1

    .. there should be no glitches, security holes, blue screens or rebooting on every patch.

    --
    I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of how awesome I am.
    1. Re:With 30 billion.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With thousands of OSS code reviewers, there should be no kernel/browser security holes and need for kernel recompilation and REBOOT!

    2. Re:With 30 billion.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats correct,

      Luckily indeed that is the norm for linux boxes.

  31. Torrent by mnordstr · · Score: 1

    The third time I post this comment, but here goes (worth the download):

    Torrent of the entire show on my blog.

  32. Read the article before bashing! by Chemisor · · Score: 0

    The problem was with the IR receiver; a hardware failure, not a software crash. Read the article before you start saying how everyone gets "hung out to dry with a crashed Windows app thousands of times a day" because "rest of us don't have Alexander, the MS Media Center Team, or the Windows source code". You might discover that it doesn't further your communist agenda after all.

  33. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My XT PC had a three button genius serial mouse and that was at least 15 years ago. It was one of the ugliest looking mouse I ever had, and came with a very hard green platic mouse pad that could be used as a cutting board.


    Granted this XP was not using Windows 3.11, but good old MS Dos, Display Write (old word processor) and a few other very simple games.


    But agree with everything else.. ;)

  34. Actually, WinXP 64bit runs like crap... by adamgeek · · Score: 1

    you talk about "middle mouse button" .. does your box even recognize more than 2 button mice? more than 3? seriously, the overall lack of drivers and peripheral support, combined with some pretty major bugs (multiple installs of mine failed to run notepad, outlook express, windows media player, windowsupdate, etc). I dont generally feed trolls, i'm more posting this as a commentary to anyone who is considered building a 64bit windows box.. perhaps you would like to read about my experiences with WinXP64 beta.

    1. Re:Actually, WinXP 64bit runs like crap... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      The RC1 seems a bit better (haven't crashed notepad yet) but there's still no drivers...

      The beta recognised my graphics card, but the RC1 doesn't any more, so I was left running in 800x600. Still no network drivers so no network.

      At the moment it's little more than a toy, but I'm sure they'll get there before the release (they'll have to, otherwise it'll be the first MS OS to actually fail utterly).

    2. Re:Actually, WinXP 64bit runs like crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Still no network drivers so no network."
      Finally, MS got some sense and designed a Windows version that is safe & secure.

    3. Re:Actually, WinXP 64bit runs like crap... by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Versions of Windows that have failed utterly:

      Windows NT 3.5 for MIPS processors
      Windows NT 3.51 for Power PC processors
      Windows NT 4.0 for Alpha processors
      Windows XP for the Itanium processor

      Why? No one would write any software for these NEW NON-Intel compatible hardware platforms. Not even MS Office. Yes there was one version of Office for a RISC platform, Office 4.2 for the Alpha.

      --
      Your Average Joe
    4. Re:Actually, WinXP 64bit runs like crap... by x-caiver · · Score: 1

      I replied on your web page, but here is my response so the people that read /. can see it:

      If you are a part of the x64 beta program you probably posted your Windows Update question to the support group already, but in case you have not had time I will fill you in. (I work at Microsoft)

      The 'not an admin' error was a known issue with an incorrect error message being returned. The Windows Update service was not set up to support the x64 beta but didn't have an appropriate error message to return. That has since been corrected.

      As for why you were getting errors about the patches not installing 'when in fact i did [have the correct operating system]'... Actually, you don't. :)

      The error message was correct, because the OS you are running is a 64-bit one, which will require 64-bit versions of patches instead of 32-bit versions that the 'old' XP required. The error message also could have been indicating that you don't have the correct version, which is also correct. You are running a pre-release build of an operating system that is not the same version number as the previously released XPSP2. A 32-bit XPSP2 patch will not install on a 64-bit pre-release XP x64 product for both of those reasons.

      Also, I'm not sure what patches you were trying to install, but none are available for this x64 build because none are currently needed.

      As for our other problems, It sounds like there is something really wrong with your install. You should post to the beta support group for assistance, and so that we can find any actual OS issues and fix them.

      If there was a problem where neither notepad nor Outlook worked at all it would have been noticed. Those two apps are on my 'short list' of apps I require to be able to do my daily work. Media Player too, that team (as with all the Windows components) were required to run extensive test passes before the RC could be released. I can't comment on your specific scenario, but again I would suggest you post to the support group, possibly including one of the audio files that you find crashes your system.

      Oh, and build 1289 actually isn't a 'beta' it was the first 'Release Candidate'. The beta was build 1069, provided to the beta program participants in 2003.

    5. Re:Actually, WinXP 64bit runs like crap... by x-caiver · · Score: 1

      There are tons of 'in box' drivers, and a bunch of 3rd party drivers available.

      What particular pieces of hardware are you having trouble with? Support for some old video cards was removed between the Beta and RC1, I could check on your particular card.

    6. Re:Actually, WinXP 64bit runs like crap... by adamgeek · · Score: 1

      x-caiver.. thanks for your indepth reply. to expand a little bit more on what you covered:

      I never posted a question to any support group.. i did however google somewhat extensively and found that I was not alone. Issue #1 with windows update was the "admin" privs issues. After I tried a dozen different sneaky methods to get into windowsupdate (different user profiles, different windowsupdate urls, whatever) and failed, I started manually using one of my 32bit boxen (win2k) to download patches that said they were WinXP64 beta specific.. i dont have any of the patches handy at the moment, but i googled really quickly and they were all similar to this one..

      64bit patch

      ..in that they specified WinXP64 bit as the operating system; i was careful not to attempt to install 2003 server 64 stuff. nontheless, despite being labelled on windows update as for the operating system, they always produced an error on install.. perhaps they were mislabelled or I am unclear as to the official name of the OS I was running.

      The issues I experienced with outlook and notepad and windows media were all very severe. I do video production for a living, and my goal was to use the dual opteron running XP64 as my primary editing/effects box.. somewhat difficult if i can't preview/proof assets in WMP. Windows media player would NEVER play any files, nor would notepad ever open (would crash on opening), nor would outlook express open (same deal as notepad). I could live with driver issues, afterall i can't expect ever single manufacturer to immediately support my desired OS.. but i couldnt deal with simple things like notepad and oe not working, I use notepad too often to write code, and wmp too often to proof video.

      Also, to elaborate, I installed the OS at least 2 seperate times; once from a torrent file, and then a 2nd time after my beta CD arrived from MSFT. If you'll link me to the support group, i'm willing to do a 3rd install on a spare drive and try to address some of the issues (assuming they replicate themselves).. perhaps a bad piece of hardware was causing the issues, although I can't imagine what it would be, as i'm running the exact same hardware on this box now with an SP4'd win2k build and it's smooooove as butter, although it's annoying that my compositing work is done using only 1 of the processors, in 32 bit mode :( :( :( ...guess I could always lease a Quantel EQ ;) ..seriously though, I really do have future hopes for XP64.. I'm at the point where either windows and 3rd party compositing/effects/nle software need to work together to effectively support multiple procs + 64bit, or I'll have to make the jump to linux apps fairly soon.. we're about switch to HD over SD (standard definition) content, which will increase render times almost exponentially for any effects or finishing work I do.. and I can't quite afford that Quantel box yet (although i got to play with an EQ @ NAB in '04 and it was fast as hell) ;)

    7. Re:Actually, WinXP 64bit runs like crap... by x-caiver · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see the patches you found. Yea, that is just a problem with naming. This new x64 product is called Windows XP Professional x64 Edition. The older itanium product was just called like Windows XP 64-Bit Professional or something like that. All the naming issues on the various external web pages will be cleaned up by the time we ship so that there is no confusion. (BTW, that patch you linked to said "Date Published: 5/28/2003" on it... I'm pretty confident that in the year and a half since that patch was released that we managed to get the fix in to the core code base )

      I thought you had meant you were in the beta program, where you would have some beta ID and some password to provide your beta feedback. If you just got the disk from torrent or the customer preview program you won't have those. You could try posting in one of the public newsgroups, but those are not monitored quite as much as our beta forums of course.

      You could try getting the RC1 bits when they are released later this month to the general public and try again. In the mean time it may, or may not, be reassuring to know that notepad, outlook, and media player are used trillions of times a day within the Windows development team. Notepad is super useful, Outlook we couldn't do our jobs without (email, calendaring, etc), Media Player is even used as a critical business app (it could be argued that listening to music is 'critical', but really all of my voice mail messages are delivered to me as media files in my inbox).

      One of the things that I oversee if signoff on all of the builds that we release externally (for Server SP1 & x64), and we have never released one that couldn't launch notepad or Outlook (I wouldn't be able to send the 'okay, release it' mail otherwise, heh).

      Do you work for yourself or something where you can switch machine configurations at will for something as important as video production? Digital content creation (ack, buzzword, sorry) is going to get a huge boost when we release x64. Ignoring all the other benefits and just focusing on the addressable RAM one, man, being able to manipulate huge images in memory is going to rock. I remember how my use of Photoshop changed when I was able to upgrade from 64 megs to 1.5 gigs of RAM, and this 64-bit increase is going to be so huge it is going to make entirely new things possible.

      I'd like to know a little more about what apps you are using and stuff, so why don't you shot me an email.

    8. Re:Actually, WinXP 64bit runs like crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I'd like to know a little more about what apps you are using and stuff, so why don't you shot me an email.


      too lazy to login (on one of my 32bit AMD boxes right now).. so sorry for the AC post.. but your address is not publically viewable, and the whois for your site lists your msft.com address (which i'm going to guess is probably not what you use for personal email heh). Post whatever address you want to be emailed at, or drop me an obviously-non-spam email (i get about 5000 emails a day.. so even though spam bayes tries it's best, ambiguous subjects and short bodied emails tend to get marked spam and autodeleted) @ my adamgeek.com address.

    9. Re:Actually, WinXP 64bit runs like crap... by x-caiver · · Score: 1

      this is 'work related enough' that I don't mind it going there.

  35. Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by lildogie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Explaining what went wrong in the demo, and how environmental factors contributed to the glitch/crash, misses the point that the audience so obviously got:

    Microsoft products have problems with crashing. Everyone who uses them knows that. Conan knows that. Bill knows that.

    The amusement factor is that even the leader of the company knows that and experiences it in the most sensitive moments.

    If you need software to run critical proceses in a nuke plant or an airplane, would you use Microsoft products?

    1. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by AllNicksWereTaken · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't, but I once read this story of this surgery that was performed somewhere in the USA and it involved a Win95 box with the surgery software or whatever.

      I forgot if it involved lasers or not, but the PC was an essential part of the whole thing, and it turns out that eventually it bluescreen'ed half-way through it, their patient consequently died, and they went to jail under murder charges.

      Sucks.

    2. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by imroy · · Score: 1
      If you need software to run critical proceses in a nuke plant or an airplane, would you use Microsoft products?

      I believe the the EULA specifically rules out the use of MS software in those sorts of situations. But it's for exactly the reason you specified: everyone including MS knows that their software is unreliable.

    3. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by sangreal66 · · Score: 1

      This poor excuse for a troll is insightful? You didn't even RTFA. The software did not experience any problems, making the entire argument of your point irrelevant.

    4. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyone who's written any moderately long or complex piece of software knows the potential for bugs. Perhaps MS, being the large and deep-pocket corporation they are, don't wish to incur the liability and probable billion-dollar lawsuits should their software be used and an unrelated error cause massive loss of life. I'm not aware of any Linsux computers used in these situations either. Most nuclear power plants don't use commerical OS's for critical operations. Commerical OS computers (there are MANY Windows based systems) are used to perform non-critical data collection and monitoring.

      Computers that run critical operations are backed up by operator-visible guages and emergency overrides that are hard-wired.

    5. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by dirk · · Score: 1

      No, wouldn't use an MS product to run an nuke plant or airport. Of course I wouldn't use Linux or any OSS either. I would use something specifically designed for that purpose and extremely well tested for that purpose. Of course that doesn't prove anything one way or another. Windows crashes. Linux crashes. Software crashes. OF course when is happens to MS people take pride in the fact when it crashes, and when it happens to OSS people say "but it doesn't crash as much as MS".

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    6. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by JJahn · · Score: 1

      No, and I wouldn't run Linux, Mac OS, FreeBSD, or any other general purpose operating system in a nuclear plant or an airplane either.

    7. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by slashrogue · · Score: 1

      No you wouldn't, and I'm pretty sure there are disclaimers in the licensing mumbo jumbo to the effect that Windows should not be trusted for life critical applications.

    8. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by MrWa · · Score: 1
      If you need software to run critical proceses in a nuke plant or an airplane, would you use Microsoft products?

      No, but people are willing to use it at home because - for the most part - it works as intended when you start it up. The same can not be said most other home computer products (Apply excluded.) THAT is what the home user wants. As soon as you start adding in more configuration or more choice, the eyes glaze over and the desire goes away.

    9. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by schmaltz · · Score: 1

      That's right! Microsoft products neeeeever have problems, yup! Just not possible!

      Oh shit, why is my cable connection so slow lately? Maybe my Windows needs upgrading...

      --
      Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
    10. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...would you use Microsoft products?

      Unfortunately that is exactly what IS happening. Just google "navy ms windows":

      http://www.gcn.com/archives/gcn/1998/june29/navy _d efines_a_plan_for_lans_.htm
      http://www.gcn.com/ar chives/gcn/1998/july13/cov2.h tm
      http://digitalcity.com.com/2100-1001-208692.ht ml?l egacy=cnet
      http://www.microsoft.com/resources/cas estudies/Cas eStudy.asp?CaseStudyID=11608
      http://www.google.ca /search?q=cache:DJzwFb_m680J:w ww.mkssoftware.com/docs/cs/cs-usnavy-0698.pdf+navy +ms+windows&hl=en
      http://www.findarticles.com/p/a rticles/mi_m0FOX/is _15_5/ai_65859250
      http://www.nwfusion.com/news/20 03/0819navy.html
      http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~sue/475 /XP-defense.html
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/200 4/11/05/mod_oks_wi n2k_warships/
      http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/200 0/0807/news-nav y-08-07-00.asp

    11. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      My W2K machine hasn't crashed for weeks (is that good?). I keep it clear of spyware and viruses though.

      It started acting flaky a couple of months ago and went crashy but that was due to one of the Athlon CPUs overheating because of a CPU fan failure (the stock fans are not up to running 24/7 in a "high-traffic" area - AKA my computer room). It kind of pissed me off that the other CPU didn't see this happening and disable the non-working one plus notify me of the problem.

      I wonder how many machines are replaced just due to one faulty part or spyware infection.

      Critical processes for aircraft and nuke plants, etc, are very carefully designed and dedicated, don't worry too much. Do you know what a HAZOP is? It's a killer for those are fast and loose with proper engineering and construction procedures.

    12. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by SunFan · · Score: 1

      My W2K machine hasn't crashed for weeks (is that good?).

      My Solaris 9 box has never crashed in two years, except for one X Windows glitch over a year ago. I only shut down my computer when leaving town or there is a power outage. Is this also good?

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    13. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by Ezel · · Score: 1

      The software did not experience any problems,

      Eeeh?
      So the Bluescreening Xbox and the racing-game running at 2 fps isn't qualified as "problems"?
      If a bluescreen isn't a "problem" by your standards I guess you also can setup a Commodore64 to beat Kasparov in chess without "problems".

      --
      Prosp long and liver.
    14. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by lullabud · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculous. Linux and FreeBSD are completely OSS, giving you the option to customize them all you like, rather than build a proprietary OS from the ground up just for your purpose. In a metaphor, you're essentially saying "No, I wouldn't have an important business housed in a building made of freely available materials that I can pick and choose as I please, made from tools that are commonly used to make a huge array of buildings for just about every purpose you can think of" with an implied "I'll design and forge my own tools, mill my own lumber and mine my own stones rather than buy them from any widely trusted supplier." It is the height of arrogance for anybody to theorize that they alone have what it takes to create a better OS, for any specific purpose however broad or narrow, than a team of hundreds of thousands of programmers who come from every country and culture around the globe.

    15. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      People still use windows for critical situations however, they might not of read the EULA however.

    16. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Do the fans suffer because of it? Is there an advantage in leaving it on all the time? I usually leave my lame W2K box on all the time because it takes so long to reboot. Overall, I find it to be pretty stable for what I do with it.

    17. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by SunFan · · Score: 1

      Do the fans suffer because of it?

      Other than dust collecting, there isn't any disadvantage to leaving it on all the time. The fans all have dual-ball bearings, the hard drive is a 5-year-warranty Ultra320 SCSI unit, the RAM has ECC, and my UPS handles power irregularities. This baby is set for years.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    18. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree with you, would it comfort you to know that (at least some) nuclear plants run things like Windows for high-level control and extremely unreliable, untested software for low-level control? (The latter having been written by friends of mine who I would never trust to write decent software)

      Personally, I'd like to see nuclear plants held to NASA and/or military-like standards, where certification is required, and Ada is the most common language. It's not the best programming language (by a long shot, I prefer ML-variants), but it does enable some strict discipline if you make use of the appropriate features.

    19. Re:Post Mortems of the demo miss the point by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      "Hard Drive" by David Pogue is a novel involving a computer virus that causes files to be deleted, and due to poor application design (rather than abort with an error, it returns data from a different file instead), a hospital patient dies because the doctor was responding to incorrect test results.

      It's a good book, though obviously a little dated now. It discusses something VERY similar to the Spotlight technology in Mac OS X 10.4.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  36. Re:Unrelated by NullProg · · Score: 1

    Apple isn't known for being innovative in bringing NEW technologies - they're inovative in refigning existing technologies. Kind of like BASF "we don't make the products, we make them better"

    Yes because ADB, META Files, HPFS, IWM, just to name a few. were all ripped off from someone else.

    Enjoy,

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
  37. CES keynote, a bad infomercial at 2am? by webdev · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Fake questions, with broken demos? Gates must of had a stong drink back at the hotel that night. I was laughing just like I do at those bad 2am infomercials where the blender doesn't work.

    All year I read about how Bill Gates is the wealthiest, most successful businessman in the world. I don't want to hear about internet access challenges when you are showing off technology that uses the internet. At that point in the keynote I began to wonder why is Microsoft even at the show (nevermind the keynote address)? Shouldn't the keynote be given by a person from Sony/Apple or some other vender that can deliver reliable hardware and software?

    The Forza Motorsport demo should have been a slam dunk. Who wants their console gaming experience to be more like a pc experience? With the Xbox Microsoft is introducing unreliability in the gaming console market. Bravo.

    They should only have a small booth in the back of CES in my opinion.

    1. Re:CES keynote, a bad infomercial at 2am? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They should only have a small booth in the back of CES in my opinion.

      That's probably the way it was originally, and then Microsoft bought out the Company was was supposed to deliver the keynote...

    2. Re:CES keynote, a bad infomercial at 2am? by jnelson4765 · · Score: 1
      With the Xbox Microsoft is introducing unreliability in the gaming console market. Bravo.

      Heh - ever tried doing XBox Live through a router? I even downgraded my Linksys to the factory firmware to no avail.

      Ah well, at least my *nix boxen are better behaved.

      --
      Why can't I mod "-1 Idiot"?
    3. Re:CES keynote, a bad infomercial at 2am? by burns210 · · Score: 1

      The beta-quality game crashed. It happens. How is this Microsoft's fault?

    4. Re:CES keynote, a bad infomercial at 2am? by webdev · · Score: 1

      If Microsoft doesn't have a specific demo Microsoft can Rely on 2-3 months before the release date, I suggest Microsoft spend more time on the game and less time marketing it.

  38. "asshat" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now I'm in the asshat category for trying to explain [the joke]...oh well.

    Don't worry dude, it's not the only reason! :)

  39. Re:Unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    FireWire (IEEE1394)

    a hot swappable power carrying serial bus (I'm referring to ADB, which is what USB is essentially a newer implementation of)

  40. I doubt... by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    ...any Slashdotters will be convinced. Afterall, we are talking about Microsoft, one of the richest companies anywhere!

  41. Interesting blogs at microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have always wondered what it was like to knowingly work for a criminal enterprise.

  42. Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll?
    The parents parent says, 'we're not particularly competent at what we do', the parent takes note of this.

  43. That's live theatre, folks by Dammital · · Score: 4, Insightful
    While I get a chuckle every time Microsoft is hoist by their own BSOD petard, in this case the production staff is due some kudos for staying cool under fire.

    In my other life I do tech for a local community theatre group. Folks, anything can happen during a live performance. No matter how much you might prepare, stuff happens, and it happens in front of everybody. Power can fail, body mikes can break, lamps burn out, RFI can wreak havoc. You can't prepare for every eventuality, but you can handle the situation with grace.

    It sounds to me like the Microsofties did fine.

    1. Re:That's live theatre, folks by AllNicksWereTaken · · Score: 0

      I was once part of this show at school, and I sang, and in various rehearsals my microphone failed to work.

      Thing is, I did not own the company that created it, and 30 million had not been involved in its development, so it's not near as funny as Bill's shit failing live on stage. :P

    2. Re:That's live theatre, folks by oGMo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You can't prepare for every eventuality, but you can handle the situation with grace.

      You can also write software that doesn't suck. You can write programs that don't crash. You can make things that are secure. These are things you can control.

      Things like mics breaking, lamps burning out, and other physical things happen, yes. Physical things break down, and you can swap them out during a presentation. But software is not one of these things.

      Everyone who is making excuses needs to face it: the software is what they were presenting, and it broke down in the middle of a big presentation. Not someone else's hardware. The software. Their software.

      Even if it was hardware, would it be excusable? If Intel was presenting their latest chip, and it melted during the presentation, wouldn't you be worried about its viability? If a manufacturer of hospital IV machines did a presentation, and in the middle their hardware died and stopped delivering IV fluid, would you consider purchase? Why then, with something that's not hardware, that's more fully controllable, do we make excuses?

      We shouldn't. This is just another problem in a long line of problems from a vendor who is notorious for problematic software.

      Don't make excuses.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    3. Re:That's live theatre, folks by aralin · · Score: 1
      In my other life I do tech for a local community theatre group. Folks, anything can happen during a live performance.

      Well, in my other life I write software and I tell you, nothing must happen when we go life. There are two reasons, why you don't select Microsoft products for anything mission critical. They will go down and there is nothing you can do about it.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    4. Re:That's live theatre, folks by bushidocoder · · Score: 1

      As far as this demo goes, their software seemed to do a pretty good job. The game crashing was a complete failure, and should be noted as such, but if everything this blogger says is true, Windows Media Center continued to run flawlessly in its own right despite numerous power outages. Its not the fault of an IR remote that the signal can't get through in that sort of situation, although its very much the fault of the presentation team that they thought they could use an IR remote without problems with that much interference around.

    5. Re:That's live theatre, folks by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      You can also write software that doesn't suck. You can write programs that don't crash. You can make things that are secure. These are things you can control.

      What you can't control, obviously, is staying on topic. There's no software that crashed in the topic article. But with people like you here, I'm sure we can transform this into a gigantic hate-Microsoft rally.

    6. Re:That's live theatre, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take your pill, dear.

    7. Re:That's live theatre, folks by dourk · · Score: 1

      This wasn't a leko going out, it was the one of the main characters falling down dead on the stage.

      --
      Wake up.
    8. Re:That's live theatre, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt Bill Gates owns the company that created the IR receiver.

  44. The blog is down! /.ted! by raeldc · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is this news meant to bring down the blog site? because i think it went down! /.ted! http://blog.seanalexander.com/PermaLink,guid,586ba c82-e272-44f7-a439-a3d1e6176aef.aspx it says "Service unavailable" when I visited it.

  45. mirrordot by digit · · Score: 1

    Just go to mirrordot.org

  46. Sean's Post by Thomas+Hawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Say what you will about Microsoft but I think it's really great the amount of communication that they are sharing with the public through blogs and posts like this. I think that to work somewhere where you can post a blog entry about technical glitches at CES and not get fired is pretty cool. Microsoft's most famous blogger, Robert Scoble, is often offering up posts that many might find to have "anti Microsoft" tones and he can do so without fear of losing his job. Sometimes criticism, even self criticism, can be a good thing and allows us all to improve. What impressed me the most about Sean's post is that it was allowed to happen at all. It adds a very human element to Microsoft and opens up a way for Microsoft and the public to directly communicate. I think the tollerance that Microsoft has and the willingness to be open about problems and issues with their software is refreshing and will make the company and the software that much better in the long run. Kudos to Sean and his team. They did a great job and pulled off a great recovery in one of those awkward technical moments that we've all been through ourselves in the past.

    1. Re:Sean's Post by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      I think that to work somewhere where you can post a blog entry about technical glitches at CES and not get fired is pretty cool.

      I'm not impressed--this blog is pure spin, to excuse the issues that were encountered. I would be much more impressed if there were no issues on stage, but a blog entry that discussed how the performance was carried off by the skin of their teeth.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    2. Re:Sean's Post by bushidocoder · · Score: 1
      I agree - after the infamous Win98 demo at Comdex where BillG's presentation blue screened when they plugged in a scanner, Microsoft fired four Win98 product managers and about 15 developers. This time around, I haven't heard of anyone getting fired yet (although the people who set up the presentation to use an IR remote should definitely go) and the technical people behind the scenes are allowed to blog about it.

      I'm not sure if the blogging will continue, though - alot of MS execs are worried that the level of transparency into the company is altering their release dates. I read somewhere recently that WinFS was never expected to be available in the Longhorn release timeframe - they were just hoping it'd be ready by then, but they were predicting a SP1 release. After WinFS was previewed at PDC and the blogosphere sunk its claws into it, Microsoft lost control of the story and it became "common knowledge" that WinFS would be available when Longhorn was released, which ultimately embarassed Microsoft when they had to announce the later release date.

      I hope the more reasonable voices in Microsoft keep the movement towards transparency alive. They're not where the world needs them to be, but they're making steps, and whatever OS you choose to use, everyone is benefitted by a more open and honest Microsoft. Keep up the good work, guys - I know that reinventing corporate culture isn't easy to do in a short amount of time, and I know that no company your size has ever turned around as quickly as you're trying to, but you're making good steps. Just don't think you're done yet.

    3. Re:Sean's Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would also be more impressed if Sean managed to be less of a suck-up and at least tried to keep his tongue out of Conan's ass.

    4. Re:Sean's Post by Cyno · · Score: 1

      I think that to work somewhere where you can post a blog entry about technical glitches at CES and not get fired is pretty cool.

      I think that we even have the expectation of getting fired for flexing our constitutional rights says a lot about the state of our nation. Something is very deeply wrong here.

      What, exactly, do you think it is? What is at the root of our social problem?

    5. Re:Sean's Post by neitzsche · · Score: 1

      Conversely, I think it's sad that microsoft started out NOT being transparent, and that it's taken them over twenty years to get that clue.

      I do agree that this is an encouraging trend. But they still have an incredibly long way to go.

      --
      "God is dead." - Frederik Nietzsche
  47. Not IR remotes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    In conferences, it's more likely to be the focus bracketing IR beams on cameras. These can cause havoc as they spread over a wide area - a high-end SLR may have as many as 7 or 15 beams used to determine focal distance. If you have an IR viewer you can get some really neat pictures in conferences as people snap away - hundreds of beams lancing all over the place as the autofocus kicks in.

    While I would say that they should have anticipated this, the actual risks wouldn't have been easy to test or replicate beforehand - you'd pretty much need a room of random model cameras snapping away while you tried your remote. In most cases, I'd go for a wired remote over anything else - remember a conference is a concentrated gathering of devices you can't control, rendering Bluetooth, WiFi and IR risky at best.

    Having said all that, the continuous outage looks more to be a kit failure (as mentioned in the article) - an autofocus would give you a split second blast of IR which would cause a momentary glitch.

    1. Re:Not IR remotes... by Ian+Jefferies · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've seen IR sensors saturated by bright sunlight fail to capture signals. On a live stage those overhead lights would probably have the same effect.

      What happens is that the IR sensor signal is analysed for changes in amplitude (delta) rather than absolute signal level. If bright light saturates the dynamic range of the sensor then delta changes become smaller and smaller in absolute size and a delta falls below detection threshold.

      Putting something over the IR sensor to cast a shadow would probably have been good enough.

      Ian.
      --
      People are hired who build doghouses, then given cranes and expected to build skyscrapers. We're then surprised when they fail.

      --
      A physicist is an atom's way of thinking about atoms
    2. Re:Not IR remotes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse, I've seen IR sensors that have reacted to bright sunlight.

      I used to have a car with a stereo that had an IR remote that could be attached to the steering wheel. While it was nice to have those controls on the steering wheel, it was far less nice that occasionally, when the sun would shine on the IR sensor on the stereo, it would skip tracks, change channels, mute, or do something else funny.

  48. Rigged demos? by Tony+Hammitt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whatever happened to running rigged demos for trade shows? Heck, Bill ran a rigged demo _during_ the antitrust case _in_court_. Are we to believe that they have forgotten how to do a rigged demo in recent years? Why would they put themselves through all this ridicule?

    I know a salesman that tells a story of running a rigged demo every 45 minutes for 2 days straight during a trade show in order to sell pharmacists on the idea of getting a computer system. It's not all that uncommon a thing to do.

    Sure, media center is a little complicated to rig a demo for, but it's a lot easier than putting up with the aftermath of 3 BSoDs. I'd rather have something approaching a slide show than have Conan O'Brien make fun of me. (too bad they don't have any rich-media slideshow software to write this in, like Hypercard or something)

    But that's their problem. I really don't care. Any "media" PC that has DRM is something I don't care to buy. If it comes to not being able to buy some movie or whatever that won't run without DRM telling on me when I do so, I'll just pop in a VHS tape or a commercial-stripped DVD and enjoy myself anyway.

  49. No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Windows is crap, no surprise there.

    But what I want to know is why you can walk around the show floor at LinuxWorld in the morning, before it's open to the public, and see so many Windows logos on the big projection screens they use for presentations. This always boggles my mind.

    1. Re:No surprise by fontkick · · Score: 1

      Maybe because Windows 2000/XP is not crap. I was productive for years on Mac OS 8/9 and now use Windows 2000 Pro, which is more stable than OS 8/9 or OSX (which is slow as hell, has more application crashes, and awful driver support compared to Windows).

      Peripheral support matters a lot, and I would guess that most of the highend custom multimedia hardware requires Win2000 or XP and runs just fine.

      I just don't get why people can't stabilize their Windows install. I love Win2000, more than any OS I've used. Dreamweaver, Photoshop, Illustrator, etc. work really well on it.

  50. RTFA you moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From the macobserver article:

    "The most disturbing report was that Steve Jobs, after his Mac OS X Server demonstration went awry, was obviously angry, cut his speech short, and left the stage so abruptly, that when the demo began working, he was long gone."

    1. Re:RTFA you moron! by lordDallan · · Score: 1

      Uh, yeah - you left out the next sentence from TFA. :

      "This is not what happened."

      So the complete version of the paragraph you quoted reads:

      "The most disturbing report was that Steve Jobs, after his Mac OS X Server demonstration went awry, was obviously angry, cut his speech short, and left the stage so abruptly, that when the demo began working, he was long gone. This is not what happened."

      In other words, Mac Observer wrote that Mr. Jobs didn't storm off the stage and that they don't understand why Jason O'Grady (whose report is the one being mentioned) claimed that he did.

  51. Re:Unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've said this before many times... Apple isn't innovative, they are an early adopter. With a good track history of picking the right things to adopt.

    Apple was the early adopter in the GUI/mouse controlled interface, 32-bit systems, 24-bit color displays, laser printing, powered serial bus, CD-ROM in every system, the sacking of the floppy, Combo driver (DVD read/CD writer) in every system, network capability in every system, 64-bit systems...

    In none of these cases did Apple invent the technology, nor were they the first to market. In all cases Apple implemented the technology in their systems well before the technology/ideas started to be implemented elsewhere in the PC industry.

  52. Re:Unrelated by Megane · · Score: 1

    Firewire, man, sheesh, how can you forget that one? At least name one that actually gets used on non-Apple machines!

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  53. I'm just going to say... wow... by ndnet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is directed toward Sean. Great explanation of the events leading up to the hiccups. All-in-all, it sounds like you guys did a bang up job. I'm a bit curious, however: Roughly how long was that USB extension, and how much did the USB repeater cost? I've been a bit interested in that. And, as said above, cell phone fan is being, at a minimum, unduly harsh. I could almost understand a post like that if the reason for a failure was "we forgot to test" or "the media center PC had spyware". It was a live show. I've done live shows and demos, I've taught multiple classes, and I know how things love to go wrong. (Ugh... that senior citizen's MS Office class.... bad memories...) None the less, it sounds like you and your team handled it gracefully, with a witty ad-lib recovery (which, I might add, was appropriate because of Conan's presence). And right now, you're doing what Microsoft as a whole should be doing: being open and transparent, and explaining everything that could get wrong.

    1. Re:I'm just going to say... wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...being open and transparent, and explaining everything that could get wrong."

      Sou..nevermind, fop. Do carry on, do, you're cracking us up here. Grouphug?

    2. Re:I'm just going to say... wow... by ndnet · · Score: 1

      *sigh* Openness and transparency are primary responsibilities of any organization. If a company, etc. doesn't practice these standards, then it is hard to maintain any sense of accountability to investors, customers, and others. While I agree that it is not the popular standard, it is the moral one.

  54. So it is due to a hardware problem? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine that. I wonder if they have contacted their hardware vendor.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  55. It's unwise to use IR or RF in presentations by Morgaine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whatever the reasons why the presentation failed in this particular case, in general it is a bad idea to use non-wired technologies for important presentations where reliability needs to be assured.

    Infrared and bluetooth and wifi are great for use at home where the environment is stable and controlled, but in a major international event like CES, the conditions are exactly the opposite. If one could see in the IR band, I bet the CES stage would have appeared swamped in a blizzard of unwanted IR confetti from numerous sources.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
    1. Re:It's unwise to use IR or RF in presentations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's a bad idea to use IR to demonstrate an IR-based device.

      Sometimes you have to do things that are a "bad idea."

    2. Re:It's unwise to use IR or RF in presentations by starfishsystems · · Score: 1
      Here's the thing. When you decide to put together a demo, you decide what it is that you want to present, and how to present it. Nobody is holding a gun to your head.

      As Mark Knopfler wrote, "When you point your finger cause your plan fell through, there's three more fingers, pointing back at you."

      --
      Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    3. Re:It's unwise to use IR or RF in presentations by tshak · · Score: 1

      I agree with your statement regarding IR, but RF is used succesfully all the time on stage. Musicians regularly use RF mics which require a much stronger signal than a simple controller. I use logitect's bluetooth presenter for controlling slides remotely and it works great. If the signal gets a little weak (which it never has) all I have to do is walk closer to the reciever and hit the button again. I suppose someone could maliciously try and disrupt my bluetooth signal, or try to hack my bluetooth interface (it is protected with a passcode), but to me the benefits of "stage freedom" far outweigh the risks.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  56. Grow a brain before typing! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sure, the BSoD onstage was the IR receiver taking over Windows in a unique, unexpected way... nope. Windows is so unstable that an IR receiver can take down the kernel? That's a serious flaw in Windows.

    Fuck you, fascist, with your insane "commie" talk, to a person richer, smarter, and with more Windows programming experience than you. Microslave.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Grow a brain before typing! by beuges · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      only on slashdot can an infra-red receiver not working because of too much light interference become mishmashed into 'windows being so unstable that an IR receiver can take down the kernel'. you really are an idiot. the machine worked fine. sean alexander used the same machine to do his presentation. bill gates was simply using another IR receiver so that he didnt have to twist around and point his remote at the setup on the other side of the stage. if you read the article, you'd notice sean mention that as he walked on stage to do his presentation, he unplugged bill's IR receiver, just to make sure that it didnt cause any other problems. there was absolutely nothing wrong with the software during the presentation. how many /. readers actually know that no software crashed during the show? i'd imagine very few, after the great big 'haha media center crashes during bill gates presentation' article the other day. go back to your cave, troll, until you provide proof of the IR receiver taking down the kernel, as you implied. i think you are the one who should grow a brain before typing.

    2. Re:Grow a brain before typing! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your brain is not getting the message that the OS needs to be stable enough to handle changes like that. The proof of the kernel crash is the BSoD, regardless what caused it. What happens to the thousands of home users who do something like that, call Alexander? It's not acceptable to peddle something that fragile to unsophisticated users who just want to watch their movie in their darkened living room. Especially when they will *have* to use that piece of crap, because their movie is sold with DRM forcing them to play it on a Microsoft rig. Drop the baseless Microsoft apologies, flamer, and leave the "troll" accusations for mods who can't even post a hollow attack like yours.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Grow a brain before typing! by beuges · · Score: 0, Redundant

      no sir, your brain is not registering that THERE WAS NO BSOD AT THE DEMONSTRATION. did you even watch the video of the presentation? can you tell me at which point the machine blue-screened? ok, maybe you didnt watch the demo. did you read the article? in which sean alexander, who was actually on stage and CONTINUED USING THE VERY SAME BOX THAT YOU CLAIM TO HAVE BSOD'd explains why bill gates's remote control had no effect on the presentation? thanks to /.'s sensationalist headline and article, everyone now thinks that gates' media center box crashed. IT DID NO SUCH THING. he tried to navigate the box using his remote, and it didnt respond. go and read the article and sean alexander explains why. now, please go and download that video, and point me to the exact point where the machine bsod'd, and i will post a retraction to what i said above.

    4. Re:Grow a brain before typing! by slobbargoat · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but how is the above post flamebait? Any modders please re-read the posts, and also RTFA because it seems like no one has any idea wtf actually happened.

    5. Re:Grow a brain before typing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your brain is not getting the message that the OS needs to be stable enough to handle changes like that. The proof of the kernel crash is the BSoD, regardless what caused it.

      People modding this up know that there never was a BSOD, right? The box kept on working, one remote not (interference from camera IR focus systems would be a likely suspect on an event like this).

      Why do we mod clear factual errors and lies about what happened as "insightful". This really baffles me. Is our "cause" so weak that it needs it?

    6. Re:Grow a brain before typing! by obender · · Score: 1

      Towards the end of the video there is a blue screen in the XBox demo.

    7. Re:Grow a brain before typing! by EddWo · · Score: 1
      It wasn't Media Center that bluescreened, it was an XBox. The Media Center PC ran fine throughout the presentation, it just wasn't getting any signals from Bills remote.
      The XBox was running an unreleased preview of a game due out in April. I think it was a debug build because the error that appeared was an Assertion.

      The screen read:

      Assertion Failure
      Out of System Memory. If you are loading, try decreasing your...

      File: \mainHeap.cpp
      Function: SimpleHeap::Alloc
      Line: 355
      Version 1.04.12.14.47..
      PERF Build

      Press A for a mini-dump
      Press B to continue
      Press X to break.


      I've never done any XBox development, but it appears that type of error is caused by a problem in user code rather than a kernel failure. Sure they ought to fix it before the game is released, but it doesn't seem like a major problem. How often do Xboxes bluescreen in the real world running a release build?
      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
    8. Re:Grow a brain before typing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In one memorable 14hour blitz of playing Halo with three others we crashed the Xbox three times, and a power loss KO'd it once. Granted the X-boxes we had were running damn near constantly for almost 4 months at that point. And Kabul isn't necessarily the best enviroment for electronics.

    9. Re:Grow a brain before typing! by EddWo · · Score: 1

      I don't have an xbox, so what happens when it crashes? Do you get a bluescreen like this, or does it just freeze up or reset?

      I'm not saying xbox games can never crash, but I didn't think they bluescreened like this. This was just because it was playing a prerelease debug build with the assertions left in.

      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
    10. Re:Grow a brain before typing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of them, just like you, is wrong about saying there was no BSoD and the other is wrong about saying it was on the Media Center. The thread was initially general enough to include anything that happened in the presentation, however, which includes the BSoD.

    11. Re:Grow a brain before typing! by HHumbert · · Score: 1

      Journalistic fairness demands that both sides be heard: those who claim that the BSOD actually occurred have as much right to represent their side of the debate as does the other side. Really, it's a n honored tradition in the American way of life.

      As further examples, think of Creation Science in the schools and the SwiftBoat Veterans ads in the recent campaign.

  57. Are we even slightly surprised it's down? by v1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $ telnet blog.seanalexander.com 25
    Trying 66.226.14.131...
    Connected to blog.seanalexander.com.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    220 dedi312 Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 6.0.3790.211 ready at Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:00:47 -0800

    (I didn't feel like checking to see if it was also an open relay, that would just have completely topped it)

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:Are we even slightly surprised it's down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I didn't feel like checking to see if it was also an open relay, that would just have completely topped it)

      It was a quick trip to abuse.net's open relay test page to check, and lo and behold, blog.seanalexander.com fails one of the tests.

      Since the tester doesn't actually send mail, someone will have to determine if it is an open relay by attempting to use it. And that's what I don't feel like doing. Anyone? Anyone?

    2. Re:Are we even slightly surprised it's down? by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      Must be the same kind of problem as the frequent "Service Unavailable" pages I get on Slashdot. ;)

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    3. Re:Are we even slightly surprised it's down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, failing a test that says, This can report false positives, hosts that appear to be open relays but actually aren't

      Good job, please submit your name to be a slashdot editor.

      BTW, It's most likely a local spooler server.

    4. Re:Are we even slightly surprised it's down? by rohanl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      $ blog.seanalexander.com 25
      Trying 66.226.14.131...
      Connected to blog.seanalexander.com.
      Escape character is '^]'.
      220 dedi312 Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 6.0.3790.211 ready at Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:12:10 -0800
      helo
      250 dedi312 Hello [203.45.93.121]
      MAIL From: bill@microsoft.com
      250 2.1.0 bill@microsoft.com....Sender OK
      RCPT To: test@xxxxxx.com
      550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for test@xxxxxx.com

  58. I've just one question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...can I dual boot my favorite Linux distro, SuSE?

  59. Bubble Boy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went to college with this guy, Sean Alexander. His nickname was "Bubble Boy". Funny to see where people end up...

  60. Bill G is a success like Darth Vader is a success by tallbill · · Score: 1

    Being Head drone of an evil empire is not success in my point of view.

    At least Vader eventually overcomes the evil that controls him.

    Money and power are not success. They help, they are necessary, but they do not equal success.

  61. Obviously the operating system's fault! by mattgreen · · Score: 1

    Hee hee, this will be a great discussion! Our favorite operating system would have never done this! Even if it did, it would be a hardware glitch, and not the actual fault of the OS. Microsoft doesn't have that luxury, however, because they made lots of money and weren't always nice! I'm so bitter about them I write "M$" as an abbreviation, isn't it clever?!

    1. Re:Obviously the operating system's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't cry little girl. A large company with billions in the bank refusing to fix their products won't mean you won't get your warm milk tonight. So there-there little girl. Calm down. Look! Here's Teddy!

    2. Re:Obviously the operating system's fault! by FLAGGR · · Score: 1

      Your a moron. I think humour should be banned from /., because obviously some people just dont get it.

  62. I would use an MS mouse or keyboard by tallbill · · Score: 1

    Oh, did you want to know if I would use their software?

  63. Service Unavailable by canuck57 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I click on the link and get "Service Unavailable". Both humourous and typical given this discusses the presentation crashing.

  64. Re:Unrelated by NullProg · · Score: 1

    Firewire, man, sheesh, how can you forget that one? At least name one that actually gets used on non-Apple machines!

    I didn't. Firewire should be considered a descendant of ADB.

    Enjoy,

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
  65. Short-term memories by teknoflip · · Score: 0

    This is not a defense for MS or BG, just a straight wake-upper for the zealots out there leaning any way (read: my opinion). First, remember computing before Windows. Remember DOS. Second, remember how Windows opened up third party options. And lastly, remember how welcoming each and every third party vendor into Windows is also an invitation for Murphy. I like Windows, Mac, open source. My world is a better world because of all of them. We can't change the past, and we can't erase BG's role in it, much as we'd like to shape history to each and everyone's preference. So the man looked like a fool. Big deal. Raise your hand if you've never looked like one or if you swear you never will.

    1. Re:Short-term memories by mbone · · Score: 1

      First, remember computing before Windows.

      Yeah, I remember. I used a Mac at home and Unix at work in the late 1980's. I still use Macs at home and Unix / Linux at work. What, exactly, did Windows do for me ? I do not see it as a technology source, rather as a sink.

      I do, however, appreciate the perverse nature of live demo's. My favorite peeve here are the software / hardware faults that only happen to the CEO. This has happened often enough to me that I think it should be an addition to Murphy's Law.

    2. Re:Short-term memories by teknoflip · · Score: 0

      It's a perfect example. I hear and read you right between your lines. We can't shame the unshameabale, can we? (wink!)

  66. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by canuck57 · · Score: 1

    Left behind, eh? http://www.windows-longhorn.org/ for details on being left behind. [ Reply to This ]

    Interesting to see netcraft.com says the site is running...

    "http://www.windows-longhorn.org was running Apache on Linux when last queried at 8-Jan-2005 16:15:53 GMT "

  67. Re:You are so full of shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That absolutely never happened, but sounds like the kind of FUD that Linsux users and /. is known for spreading. Rather than posting any stupid story that you might have heard, please cite a credible reference.

  68. Read the article before flaming by Chemisor · · Score: 0, Troll

    > Sure, the BSoD onstage was the IR receiver taking over Windows

    If you had read the article, you'd know that there was no BSoD. The presentation simply did not respond to Bill's remote control; it happened because the IR receiver at his seat malfunctioned. It could have been a hardware failure or interference from the environment. If Bill were using OpenOffice on Linux, the exact same thing would have happened, so your bashing is quite unfair.

    > Fuck you, fascist, with your insane "commie" talk

    Why is it that most Open Source advocates are so foul-mouthed? Calling the "Open Source" philosophy "communist" is not insane, but rather accurate. Communism is based on the "from each by ability, to each by his need" idea, and free software is simply a direct application of this idea. According to Stallman, each programmer should work on software for his own personal enjoyment and give it to the community. Then the community will pay him back with modifications and the rich people will pay him money, generously satisfying all his needs because he's just such a great and unselfish fellow.

    > to a person richer, smarter, and with more Windows
    > programming experience than you. Microslave.

    Ha, ha, ha! Even calling me a Microsoft employee as a final insult :) (FYI, I left Microsoft four years ago, but I am sure most of the smart people I knew there still are) Oh, this is rich! Now wait, weren't we supposed to be criticising Windows here? Even if I were the Devil himself, Bill's problems would still have been with the IR receiver.

    1. Re:Read the article before flaming by Trelane · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Communism is based on the "from each by ability, to each by his need" idea, and free software is simply a direct application of this idea.
      First off, while both Communism and Free Software may be derived from the same base class (more on this in a sec), that does not imply that they are the same class, to put it in Object-oriented terms. :)
      According to Stallman, each programmer should work on software for his own personal enjoyment and give it to the community.
      Incorrect. Stallman simply claims that end-users should have the right to modify software as they need, and re-distribute the changes as they need. That is the basis of all other claims. You may be interested in borrowing Free Software, Free Society from your local library and reading it. While even I don't agree with everything he says (and you most certainly won't if I don't), some things may strike a chord with you, as it's definitely interesting thoughts, even if wrong. Simply discarding the other side as too simplistic/naiive (or fascistic, on the other side of the fence) is almost always a bad idea.
      Then the community will pay him back with modifications and the rich people will pay him money, generously satisfying all his needs because he's just such a great and unselfish fellow.
      Well, this is the way things work, your apparent cynicism aside (if I read things correctly; facial expressions and vocal tone is hard to read from html ;). Well, only partially. The community does indeed provide bug reports, bug fixes, documentation, web site support, new code, and so forth. But not only rich people give money to the developers; companies do when they buy software from companies that employ FOSS developers, end-users do in gratitude or because they want to support the development, and so forth. Charity works; many people are employed and benefit from charity, without being forced to pony up. (This also apparently depends on your definition of "rich", as those with little or no money can still benefit from FOSS without having to pay up, or they can give two cents if they want (see also, the widow's two pennies). There's a lot more subtlety to the business model than you seem to be giving it credit for.

      You have apparently drunken deep from the Microsoft Kool-Aid during your tenure at Redmond; it'd be well worth it to also take a draught from our pitcher as well (i.e. look at it with an open mind).

      No insults, just friendship. Sorry the other guy offended.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    2. Re:Read the article before flaming by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      "Why is it that most Open Source advocates are so foul-mouthed?"

      I don't they are any more foul mouthed than any other group in society, fair enough you are replying to one of the minority in your post but on the whole the answer to your question is that they aren't.

      I think when Bill uses the word "communists" he is referring to some kind of negative force against which we need to fight rather than any politically informed meaning. OSS is not a political organisation and to describe it in any kind of political light such as it being a capitalist or a communist system is pointless.

    3. Re:Read the article before flaming by nitehorse · · Score: 1

      If you had read the article, you'd know that there was no BSoD. The presentation simply did not respond to Bill's remote control; it happened because the IR receiver at his seat malfunctioned. It could have been a hardware failure or interference from the environment. If Bill were using OpenOffice on Linux, the exact same thing would have happened, so your bashing is quite unfair.

      Am I the only one who finds it amusing that Microsoft's still using IR with their products? I mean, come on. Line of sight tech is so 90s. It's all about RF - Bluetooth is the new hotness.

      Seriously. If Bill's remote had used Bluetooth instead of IR I'd be willing to bet that the entire situation would never have happened. Too bad they're still using such shitty tech. (I bet if Apple had a media center, the remote would be Bluetooth. ;)

    4. Re:Read the article before flaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why is it that most Open Source advocates are so foul-mouthed?

      Actually, I have always felt that way on windows site. They are quite foul-mouthed, even when not being baited.

      Calling the "Open Source" philosophy "communist" is not insane, but rather accurate. Communism is based on the "from each by ability, to each by his need" idea, and free software is simply a direct application of this idea. According to Stallman, each programmer should work on software for his own personal enjoyment and give it to the community. Then the community will pay him back with modifications and the rich people will pay him money, generously satisfying all his needs because he's just such a great and unselfish fellow.

      Communism. Funny word that one. While you describe the real one, there is a classical American definition (one that is considered an insult). That is what USSR and China did. And they did a command economy.

      So what is a command economy? It is one where a small privilaged group of ppl decide what products to make and how much they will costs. They are protected by the state by a number of laws from any real compition. USSR and old China showed it for what it was. That is the products were everywhere, but they were a joke. They were expensive, quite poorly built, and had poor support. The largest of the companies would routinely take over the smaller ones, either by virtue of their size, or by using state laws. In fact, they were the butt of a number of jokes. Think of the traubant (a ussr favorite) vs GM/Ford/Plymouth/Toyota/BWM etc. who would coloborate on a number of technologies. the troubant was a major polluter, it was unecnomical, and it was unsafe. The economy part was funny in that they company would try to say that it had better milage/better service than American cars (neither was true). In terms of safety, well, you died if they crashed. hummmmm....

      True American historical capitalism (Americana) was quite different. The vast majority of transactions were done via barter. That is no money changed hands directly. Ppl would trade goods/service for other goods/service. I am sure that you have heard the term "house raising" or "Barn raising". The local communities would band together and create a house or barn. There was no money that traded. But in the future, these folks would be expecte to help their neighbors with the same. It was a sign of bad faith to not participate if you were capable. In fact, to not participate routinely excluded the family from the community. In addition, our fore-fathers worked on the concepts of patents and copyrights. A number of them objected to these, as they would stifle innovation. They settled on allowing these for short periods so as to allow one to produce the idea, but not stifle the future (I think that most of them would like view many of the patent pushers as being traitors to America). Ben Franklin moved many of his innventions into the public domain to help encourage industry. He wanted many companies manufactuering his ideas and competeting to improve it. This not only strenghten America, but it always improved the products.

      So, I am curious. Which is really communist and which is true-American capitalists as well as patriots?

      Windbourne

    5. Re:Read the article before flaming by LO0G · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth?

      Um... Ever tried to use a bluetooth remote control in your LIVING ROOM?

      We're talking about a technology that has a 3 foot range here, I suspect your S/O might be a SMIDGE upset if they had to stand 3 feet from the TV to use the remote control.

      IR is cheap and it works just great in the living room.

    6. Re:Read the article before flaming by nitehorse · · Score: 1
      And I quote:

      Bluetooth is the name for a short-range radio frequency (RF) technology that operates at 2.4 GHz and is capable of transmitting voice and data. The effective range of Bluetooth devices is 32 feet (10 meters). Bluetooth transfers data at the rate of 1 Mbps, which is from three to eight times the average speed of parallel and serial ports, respectively.


      Granted, 32 feet isn't terribly far. However, I can't see the text on my TV from 30 feet away... I doubt I'd want to use the remote like that. And 32 is a damned sight farther than 3.
  69. Re:It's official, MS does what Linux has been doin by teknoflip · · Score: 1

    Boy, read up on your PC history. You're one perfect example of what I meant when I used the word zealot.

  70. Should have made Bill do pushups by putaro · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I was at Apple, if you were doing a demo in front of a large group and something crashed, the cry would come up from the audience "push-ups, push-ups!" with the presenter supposed to do push-ups on stage until the demo got fixed by the rest of the crew.

    The best demo ever, though, was when the QuickTime crew was demoing some new stuff on Mac OS 7. They're going along, and suddenly the screen jumps into MacsBug (the old low-level debugger - this was what you got instead of the bomb screen if you had MacsBug installed). We all start yelling "push-ups, push-ups" and the presenter goes "Well, let's see if we can look a little deeper into this" and clicks the mouse. The MacsBug screen peels off and we get this video of guys banging around with hammers inside the machine. What a great setup.

    1. Re:Should have made Bill do pushups by teknoflip · · Score: 0

      Thank you for the anecdote. The Apple has always been a comfort nook, and today look where it is. Sure, we can all hate wealthy men who profit. So what does that say about us?

  71. When did you last run Windows, anyway? by Chemisor · · Score: 0

    > Your brain is not getting the message that the OS
    > needs to be stable enough to handle changes like that.

    Changes like what?

    > What happens to the thousands of home users

    Nothing much. The thousands of home users don't get blue screens on a regular basis. In fact it's been many years since I've seen one. I've had many other problems with Windows, but they were usually caused by misconfiguration and were easily fixable after a brief Google search. I should say at this point that configuration problems are far more common on Linux and their solutions tend to be considerably more complicated and hard to find.

    > It's not acceptable to peddle something that fragile to unsophisticated
    > users who just want to watch their movie in their darkened living room.

    Such users usually buy a DVD player. Only hardcore geeks have computer projection systems to watch movies. And as for fragility, most software is anyway. Linux software is just as fragile and can easily be made completely unusable with a misplaced # in the configuration file.

    > Especially when they will *have* to use that
    > piece of crap, because their movie is sold with
    > DRM forcing them to play it on a Microsoft rig.

    I don't know about you, but I've never seen a DVD player "crash". Most problems with consumer electronics come from people not knowing how to use them. (I would say "too dumb to figure 'em out", but I really shouldn't, since my mother is one of them :)

    1. Re:When did you last run Windows, anyway? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You'll be seeing lots more DVD players crash when MS DRM is bundled with the next generation of DVDs. And all those home users of Windows for their DVDs will become familiar with the next generation of crashes, too. My DVD player, a Playstation, doesn't crash at all, and it's not even as simple as a dedicated unit. The home market is much more demanding of stability than office desktops, even more than the server market, where MS gets whipped whenever there's any opening in their monopoly strategies for an alternative, like Linux. I'm not comparing Linux DVD players to Gates' demo - I'm comparing the dedicated units that he's targeting for competition. The Linux products you mention, as they appear, will probably be much more stable than Windows, due mainly to their lack of a protective monopoly to compete, and the ability for any programmer to fix any bug and share it with everyone else: the Open Source superiority.

      When was the last time I ran Windows? Right before I posted this comment, as I struggled with getting a Win2K desktop to connect to a WinCE iPaq, which it did correctly 10 minutes ago, before I installed a commercial WinCE app. Now it's all failing silently, with no code or tracing possible. Maybe I'll just install Linux on the iPaq, and do it the easy way.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:When did you last run Windows, anyway? by j.bellone · · Score: 1

      How about you fix the configuration instead of blabbing on about how you're too much of an idiot to do so? Seriously; most of the problems with Windows harbor from people not knowing how to properly maintence their computers.

      This machine hasn't been; nor has it needed to be rebooted in a few weeks. I've only sustained one BSoD and it was becuase of a the wrong printer driver.

      How many times have you seen the Dreamcast crash? How many times has your Playstation crashed? How many times has your Xbox crashed? I've *never* seen my Xbox crash, my Playstation has done it several times.

      On these embedded Linux devices are we going to need to recompile the kernel each time there is an update to the device?

      --
      I'm f#$king magic!
    3. Re:When did you last run Windows, anyway? by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      > You'll be seeing lots more DVD players crash when
      > MS DRM is bundled with the next generation of DVDs

      I doubt it. Implementing DRM is not difficult, and a form of it is, in fact, already in present day DVD players in the form of zone selection.

      > where MS gets whipped whenever there's any opening in
      > their monopoly strategies for an alternative, like Linux

      I don't know any normal people running Linux desktops at home. Whenever you hear about Linux on the desktops it is usually from big companies who want to cut costs and don't care what their employees thing about it.

      > I'm not comparing Linux DVD players to Gates' demo -
      > I'm comparing the dedicated units that he's targeting for competition.

      What exactly do you mean by a "dedicated unit"?

      > the ability for any programmer to fix any bug and share
      > it with everyone else: the Open Source superiority.

      "Any programmer" doesn't have time to fix your bugs. I do it sometimes, if the fix is easy to track down and requires changing only a few lines, but if it involves more than that, I usually just remove the application and move on to something that works. Sometimes it even means taking an extra minute to reboot into Windows. There's your Open Source superiority. Sure, someone can fix it, but most people don't want to. Normal people are not programmers, and programmers have better things to do than wade through somebody else's horrible buggy code just to print a letter.

      > I struggled with getting a Win2K desktop to
      > connect to a WinCE iPaq, which it did correctly
      > 10 minutes ago, before I installed a commercial WinCE app.

      No need to blame Microsoft here, it's your "commercial WinCE app" that probably shipped with outdated libraries and didn't bother to check version numbers before overwriting your current configuration. This happens on Linux too, but most people can avoid it by only installing packages that came with their distribution. It happens to me all the time, since I often download and compile stuff. Only last week I upgraded my X server to X.org 6.8.1 and it no longer switches modes with Ctrl+Alt++. Why? I have no idea. It only happens with the fbdev driver, so I switched to the nv driver. It makes startup slower, but it works. Sure, I probably could build a debug version of the server and step through the keyboard handler to figure it out, but why bother? I have better things to do.

    4. Re:When did you last run Windows, anyway? by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1

      "Any programmer" doesn't have time to fix your bugs. ... most people don't want to. ... programmers have better things to do than wade through somebody else's horrible buggy code just to print a letter.


      Well, sure. But FOSS wins by the very same effect that keeps spammers going. "Nobody" answers spam, but "nobody" is enough to keep at least some spammers going. If only one in a thousand users is willing and able to fix a particular class of bug, then an application with an installed base of 50,000 will have 50 people willing to hammer on at least one of those bugs.


      I can't count the number of times I've waited six months and reloaded a crappy FOSS project to find all my major peeves fixed. LyX, GIMP, OpenOffice, Kontact, FireFox, Xine, and BlueFish are all examples.

  72. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why in the name of Zeus's bunghole were they using an IR-based remote system? That doesn't make any sense when IR devices require almost line of sight and boosters and repeaters, etc. in order to function properly. Whoever was in charge of designing the demo logistics should be fired for being an idiot and not using an RF-based system that has longer range and does not require line of sight. Hell, I've got one I'll donate to the bonehead (Bill Gates)!

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Whoever was in charge of designing the demo logistics should be fired for being an idiot and not using an RF-based system that has longer range and does not require line of sight."

      The candidates that would have thought of RF didn't make it through the interview gauntlet at MS. Instead they selected people that could come up with quick solutions in hour rather than spending more time thinking of a better solution.

    2. Re:Why? by ThePlague · · Score: 0

      Would RF remotes really have been a better solution? If you used RF, you would have to worry about interferrence from a much longer distance, not to mention someone hi-jacking the controls from an out of sight position.

  73. Microsoft's Technical Glitches at CES Explained... by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0
    This just in: MS products stink!

    Let's see. We're up to version 6.X of IE. Safari is only at version 1.2.4 and Firefox is only at version 1.0. Yet both are far superior products to IE. This is just an example, but it's pretty much par for the course regarding anything MS. Regardless, MS drones' rationalizations will continue. Yeah, let's blame it on the hardware. Typical MS BS.

    --
    Karma Schmarma
  74. Config by Chemisor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    > I don't think this is FC3's fault here; sounds like you're
    > missing some config detail that is keeping you from connecting.

    Well, of course it is! "Missing some config detail" is what pretty much all Linux problems come down to. And it's really sad that Linux programmers still have not figured out how to default sensibly (for a desktop user, not a server guru) nor how to write options dialogs. So all Linux programs have their ugly text configuration files which require hundreds of manual pages to describe every possible configuration option without giving a single example of what should be the most common setup (a home user on a personal desktop).

    1. Re:Config by Trelane · · Score: 2, Informative
      Your entire posting is factually incorrect, imho. The defaults for most things I see on my Linux desktop are correct and usable (e.g. by default, there is no WEP key or essid set; one can connect to any open AP). You sound like you either have little experience with Linux, or are very experienced with Windows and expected Linux to be just like Windows, which is next to impossible, and saw enough to convince you that your pre-concieved notions were right. From your postings below, I see that you're a former Microsoft employee, so that is quite likely the case.
      So all Linux programs have their ugly text configuration files which require hundreds of manual pages to describe every possible configuration option without giving a single example of what should be the most common setup (a home user on a personal desktop).
      This is also quite incorrect. Linux distributions aimed at non-geeks all feature highly usable graphical user interfaces for both installation and configuration, and should be usable with only a little help if the user is inexperienced in Linux. They do store the information you choose in a text-based configuration file, which you may use in lieu of the graphical interface if you so choose (similar to the Windows Registry, which you could also edit directly instead of dealing with the graphical user interface, if you had manual pages to guide you). Of course, if the user is coming from another operating system, it will likely take a little adjustment to get used to the new locations and phrasings, but this should have minimal impact, if the user is not hostile to the change.

      "all Linux programs", "ugly text configuration files", "require hundres of manual pages to describe every possible configuration option". These are all phrasings which are not only incorrect, but which are hyperbolic, intended to distort perception and which are the hallmarks of either high emotion or trolls. Hopefully, you are the former, not the latter, and I may talk to you after you've calmed down a bit. But for now, for my own sanity, I wont' discuss things like this with someone who's hostile to them.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  75. 3 simple words by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

    we build crap.

    Need a longer explanation? we build overpriced crap.

    auf deutsche? wir machen sheize.

    Translated by Microsoft's marketing spin doctors? Our asses innovate.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  76. David and Golith by Tangwei · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not that I'm a fan boy of M$ (never.. uh "owned" a MS product), but show me one distro/setup of *nix that comes close to doing what Media Center can do... out of the box with Joe SP plugging it in. Not to mention the fact that I bet my left test that not a one of you can honestly say that you've never had an "o sh*t" moment during a presentation.

    1. Re:David and Golith by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

      Yup. Sounds like another rationalization to me.

      --
      Karma Schmarma
    2. Re:David and Golith by teknoflip · · Score: 0

      Amen. Zealots, pls.

    3. Re:David and Golith by Amorya · · Score: 1
  77. Get some proportion before squawking. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    When I get flamed, I have no compunctions about flaming back. I'm glad that I outed you as a former MS employee, when I really was just insulting your slavery to the MS Way - topnotch marketing spin in defense of the monopoly built on crappy software. Who knew that you actually produced that crappy software? Talk about rich. I hope *you* are, because otherwise you're just selling your developer soul to the beast for nothing. To complete the picture of a MS certified programming lightweight, you don't even know that the only universal language among programmers is "profanity". Which is no surprise, when you don't even realize that Stallman, who actually *is* a communist, doesn't speak for all of us in the commercial, yet open, software biz. Calling me a communist gets you a "fuck you" on Slashdot, and worse in person, should you be so unwise to test it. Here's a clue: since MS source code is as open within an MS corporate project as is any GNU code to anyone, does that make the MS Redmond campus some kind of "commune", and Gates a Lenin with (bad) hair? Of course not. So drop the obnxoius "communist" rhetoric that betrays your fascist attitude. Plenty of capitalists like me are secure enough in our own powers that we prefer open source to make our money, rather than the monopoly fascism that you're defending from your ex-boss. Send Alexander's postmortem spin to the home users left hanging when they're just trying to watch a movie that requires Bill's latest monopoly gristle, and they were foolish enough to unplug the remote without a Media Center Team support crew standing by to explain to their date.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Get some proportion before squawking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CONGRATURATION!
      YOUR A FAGOT!

      Important Stuff # Please try to keep posts on topic. # Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

  78. Half Life 2 by SteveXE · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If i remember correctly...and I do, the Half Life 2 demo at E3 kept crashing and look how that turned out. Of course since this is Microsoft everyone will blow the situation out of proportion.

    1. Re:Half Life 2 by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

      I would say that there is quite a big difference between having an OS work properly and a game.

      --
      Karma Schmarma
    2. Re:Half Life 2 by EddWo · · Score: 1

      Thats exactly what happened in this case, a pre-release game failed to work properly. The BSOD was a debug assertion on an xbox.
      What would you expect to happen when you hit a user-mode software error in a development release of a console game?
      It didn't actually crash the whole system, just stopped running and gave you three options, mini-dump, continue or break.

      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
    3. Re:Half Life 2 by SteveXE · · Score: 1

      Yea there is a big difference, you would expect the game which is simple by comparison to work, even more so when its been in development for so long, an OS on the other hand is incredibly complex...it wasnt even the OS that crashed.

    4. Re:Half Life 2 by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

      Still rationalizing after all these years. Frankly, it doesn't matter what crashed. The fact is, MS should learn from past experience with technical problems, that their software is crap and, as a result, should be MUCH better prepared for a live demo...of anything.

      --
      Karma Schmarma
    5. Re:Half Life 2 by SteveXE · · Score: 1

      When you make something better you give me a call and ill send you a check.

  79. Re:Microsoft's Technical Glitches at CES Explained by teknoflip · · Score: 0

    You obviously have no idea how the PC and Windows came about. Have you ever seen a DOS screen and that's all you have?

  80. How about YOU RT(entire)FA! by caveat · · Score: 1
    The entire article is about the mis-reporting of that particular event; your quote becomes totally different when it's put in context:
    The most disturbing report was that Steve Jobs, after his Mac OS X Server demonstration went awry, was obviously angry, cut his speech short, and left the stage so abruptly, that when the demo began working, he was long gone. This is not what happened.

    I did not have as good of a view as Mr. O'Grady did, so it possible that he did pick up a look of frustration on Mr. Jobs' face. He would have seen that on my face as well, if my grand finale failed to work. But, that notwithstanding, Mr. Jobs was a complete professional. He remained completely in control, explained that he did not know why the demo was not working now, but that it does "work really well". He then wrapped up his speech, and politely thanked and bowed to the crowd, then walked off stage. Why did he walk off the stage? Because the demo was his grand finale. He was done.

    How do I know all of this? Because I watched the entire keynote once it was finally posted at ZDNET. I invite you to watch the keynote, and decide for yourselves if the keynote was a disaster or not.
    The kenynote link doesn't seem to be working for me, but YMMV so I threw it in there.
    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  81. Full Video? by ols22 · · Score: 1

    Is there a full video somewhere? It would be nice to see it from start to finish...

  82. +4 INSIGHTFUL FOR UNINFORMED LIES? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE WAS NO BSOD YOU FAGOTS. WHY IS THIS MORON BEING MODDED UP FOR POSTING DRIVEL? THE ONLY INSIGHT HE HAS IS THE SIGHT IN HIS ASS WHICH IS WHERE HIS HEAD IS STUCK. AND THE MODS FOLLOW THE MICROS^H$OFT BASHER JUST TO BE COOL. DO YOU EVEN READ THE POSTS YOU BLINDLY MODERATE?

    Important Stuff

    # Please try to keep posts on topic.
    # Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
    # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
    # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.

  83. This is getting tiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have been a regular reader of slashdot for years but these instant reactions to anything MS are just plain childish and ill-considered (or is this the issue, slashdots become full of kids/immature adults who rarely have a considered view?).

    I can remember the schoolyard, "look he's wearing reebok!", "Hey, shitty trainers" etc. Eventually people grow up and realise a pair of trainers are just a pair of trainers, thats all. If you're serious about a sport though you'd get a pair that were suitable to it, you following this?

    MS has its place (btw its ahead of the rest IMHO!), but its just an OS, an OS which my parents can use easily. To be honest they would rather have an OS which was simple but broke down occasionaly than an OS which was ... less used, hence complex and never crashed!

    Perhaps what I would like to see is a Slashdot for professional, employed and intelligent people with real world experience (is that not what it was started for?), as the comments from anyone else are of absolutely no concern to myself.

    Grow up and get a job you close minded OS bigots!

    BTW: I'm a very experienced and well paid long-time IT Pro.

    1. Re:This is getting tiring by teknoflip · · Score: 0

      Amen to that! :D

    2. Re:This is getting tiring by PenGun · · Score: 0

      An MCSE no doubt ... wow ;).

      PenGun
      Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    3. Re:This is getting tiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe me, I'm much more than an MSCE, unless of course thats Master of Coding and Sexual Encounters ;)

      Grow up & get a life and job = Lots of women :)

    4. Re:This is getting tiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be "Master of Sexual Coding Encounters" ?

  84. Re:Microsoft's Technical Glitches at CES Explained by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0
    Obviously?

    I cut my teeth on DOS and Windblows. That's how I know what a POS anything MS produces is.

    --
    Karma Schmarma
  85. Re:Microsoft's Technical Glitches at CES Explained by teknoflip · · Score: 0

    Jeez. DOS = Disk Operating System POS = Point Of Sale YOU = jeez. letstartover No offense. I don't like bitches so please don't be one.

  86. didn't anyone else when reading that think ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • "Sean Alexander is^H^Hwas one of the guys on the Media Center Team at Microsoft who was involved in the CES presentation with Bill Gates. Sean also runs^H^H^H^H used to run a very interesting blog called Addicted to Digital Media. ..."
    1. Re:didn't anyone else when reading that think ... by teknoflip · · Score: 0

      And your point is?

  87. BSOD by codepunk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It was my understanding that the machine suffered a BSOD. If it did not in fact BSOD and only had ir pointer problem then what is the big deal. I hate MS as much as anyone but I am not going to bust anyones chops over a ir pointer gone haywire. On the other hand if it did BSOD or suffer a shell reset then they deserve every bit of criticism they get.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:BSOD by OwlWhacker · · Score: 1

      Excatly.

      I don't think that the issue explained in the blog was anything worth bothering with anyway.

      The BSOD is where the meat is at, and it would be far more interesting/informative to know why that occurred.

      Actually, having said that it would be interesting/informative, if it was modded here at slashdot it would probably be Offtopic/Insightful. Honestly, slashdot mods, sheesh.

    2. Re:BSOD by EddWo · · Score: 2, Informative

      It wasn't Media Center that bluescreened, it was an XBox. The Media Center PC ran fine throughout the presentation, it just wasn't getting any signals from Bills remote.
      The XBox was running an unreleased preview of a game due out in April. I think it was a debug build because the error that appeared was an Assertion.

      The screen read:

      Assertion Failure
      Out of System Memory. If you are loading, try decreasing your...

      File: \mainHeap.cpp
      Function: SimpleHeap::Alloc
      Line: 355
      Version 1.04.12.14.47..
      PERF Build

      Press A for a mini-dump
      Press B to continue
      Press X to break.

      I've never done any XBox development, but it appears that type of error is caused by a problem in user code rather than a kernel failure. Sure they ought to fix it before the game is released, but it doesn't seem like a major problem. How often do Xboxes bluescreen in the real world running a release build?

      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
    3. Re:BSOD by codepunk · · Score: 1

      Ok I will bite on this one and for the uninformed listen closely. In a real operating system a user mode application should never ever be able to cause a kernel failure. I don't care if it is a badly behaved application or not the only thing that should be able to panic the kernel is a major hardware fault not a crappy coded game.

      I guess I was correct after all and there was a bsod caused by a user level application, I call a turd a turd.

      --


      Got Code?
    4. Re:BSOD by EddWo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First this is a games console, not a general purpose computer.
      A console typically allow much closer access to the hardware for performance reasons. So code running on a console does not have the same protections as code on a general purpose computer.

      Second, this is not a kernel faliure, it is an Assertion caused by a low memory condition. The console OS is still running and is still accepting user input, hence "mini-dump", "continue", or "break".

      An xbox doesn't have a general purpose windowing system underneath, so it can't display a nice polite error message, it just writes directly to the screen.

      If you were developing and debugging a console game and you hit an assertion failure what would you expect it to do?

      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
    5. Re:BSOD by Dahan · · Score: 1
      Ok I will bite on this one and for the uninformed listen closely.

      You're the uninformed one. What makes you think there was any sort of kernel failure? Do you cry "kernel failure!" every time some app on your Gentoo Linux box dumps core?

      $ cat>assertfailed.c
      #include <assert.h>
      int main(void){assert(0);return 0;}
      $ cc -o assertfailed assertfailed.c
      $ ./assertfailed
      assertion "0" failed: file "assertfailed.c", line 2, function "main"
      Abort (core dumped)

      OH NOES! MY KERNEL FAILED! LOONIX IS TEH SUX!!11!ELEVENTYONE!1

    6. Re:BSOD by Nikker · · Score: 1

      The thing that I found funny was not the magnitude of the problem it was the fact that a company worth trillions when left to their own devices could not complete the goal. And as many of us here know that is really what it is all about.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
  88. How appropriate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Service Unavailable :)

  89. You'll get beat up some day, you know... :) by Chemisor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    > I'm glad that I outed you as a former MS employee,

    I don't recall hiding it. I'm happy to tell anyone who asks about Microsoft and how little basis there is for bashing it.

    > Who knew that you actually produced that crappy software?

    Excuse me, but I did not produce any "crappy software". In fact, it was all pretty damn good, considering what it had to do. I don't know how long it's been since you've actually used any Microsoft software, but it must have been decades, since everything made by Microsoft on my machine is functioning very well, thank you. Any crashes I've seen were caused by third party software, mostly by games. Furthermore, I've seen no OS crashes since I've left Microsoft, where I had to run all those "buggy" daily builds of W2K, which in reality were more robust than the Linux developer branches.

    > selling your developer soul to the beast

    If that's how you say "making a living", you have my condolences.

    > you don't even know that the only universal
    > language among programmers is "profanity"

    I would clarify that "profanity" is the universal language of bad programmers. Good programmers don't curse as much because our code usually works, and we don't put profanity in it because we respect our coworkers and, generally, have good manners.

    > when you don't even realize that Stallman, who actually *is*
    > a communist, doesn't speak for all of us in the commercial, yet open, software biz.

    Oh goody! Stallman is a communist now, but you are not? Would you be so kind as to outline your disagreements? You seem to be in the same boat to me so far.

    > Calling me a communist gets you a "fuck you" on Slashdot, and worse in person

    Is that a threat? :) Oh dear, I think I'll be turning my tail and running now. The great "Doc Ruby" is after me! It's too bad he didn't even bother to find out whether I can fight.

    > Here's a clue: since MS source code is as open within
    > an MS corporate project as is any GNU code to anyone

    No, it isn't. You get only your group's source code, and only because you need it. You certainly do not get write access to any code that you are not directly working on. Although you can ask for the code from another group, it is not a common practice and I don't recall any instances where that happened.

    > does that make the MS Redmond campus some kind of "commune"

    More like a college, really.

    > So drop the obnxoius "communist" rhetoric that betrays your fascist attitude.

    Perhaps you could clarify your meaning of the word "fascist"? I am getting an impression that you use it as "someone who doesn't agree with me".

    > rather than the monopoly fascism that you're defending from your ex-boss.

    One of the reasons Microsoft has a monopoly is that nobody has written anything better. I don't consider OpenOffice as good as MSOffice, and OpenOffice seems to be the only noteworthy competitor. There's KOffice, and a few other copies, but nothing substantial. Why don't you write one, if you are so "secure in your own power"?

    > the home users left hanging when they're just
    > trying to watch a movie that requires Bill's
    > latest monopoly gristle, and they were foolish
    > enough to unplug the remote

    Oh, you poor thing. Your remote is broken :( Now you'll actually have to get off your lazy butt and walk ten feet to the DVD player and press the PLAY button. Such torture! How did people ever survive without remote control?

    1. Re:You'll get beat up some day, you know... :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BeOS was better, trouble was MS killed it with its licensing deals before it could take off.

  90. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

    It was one of the ugliest looking mouse I ever had, and came with a very hard green platic mouse pad that could be used as a cutting board.

    *sigh* Memories. I remember my dad bringing home a PC he used for work. Had a 3 button mouse, and a *gasp* EGA monitor. I quickly played through all my games to see them in all their 16 color glory.

    I remember the cutting board mouse pads too.

  91. Live and Continuing Failure. by twitter · · Score: 1, Troll
    In my other life I do tech for a local community theatre group.

    I do a free software demo once a month. I've had problems, but nothing like a BSoD. My machines, like all the other demos at CES, stay up even if pieces fail.

    It sounds to me like the Microsofties did fine.

    I'm not sure how you can say that. Gates was obviously pissed and did not play well with other's who tried to help him. It was a classic display of lack of cool. The aftermath is this pathetic spin piece that could be summarized in two sentences but was not. The guy is falling on his sword and trying to blame hardware for what was obviously buggy and graceless software. A poor performance followed by a lie, how sorry can you get?

    Let me clearly distinguish the differences between your world and a technical demonstration.

    People go to the theater to be entertained. You are supposed to suspend your disbelief. When some gadget does not work, people are entertained anyway. In fact, it can be more fun that way. No one reasonable feels cheated.

    People go to a tech demo to see what you have. When what you have fails, you've seen all you need to know. You might feel cheated if you let someone blow smoke on you and you then go buy the buggy junk because you think it's not really broken. On the rare occasion something does not work at one of my demo's, I tell my audience right there and then. I don't try to hide the problems or blame shift or charge people money for something afterward.

    The whole thing is just Microsoft. They made something so buggy they could not even demo it this time. They hyped it before hand and they will continue to hype it. The spin is best characterized by the phrase that was repeated in the article:

    ... the team pulled it out despite some obstacles ... how they kept things moving ...

    I don't want to have that kind of problem with something I pay for that supposed to just work. Microsoft is supposed to make things easy, but they don't.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  92. Damage Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article looks to me like unofficially sanctioned damage control. And they suckered Slashdot into spreading it.

  93. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 2, Informative

    Linux was ported to the 64 bit DEC Alpha, one of the first ports of Linux (first by Linus anyway, but there were earlier ports to, I think, m68k by others), over a decade ago.

    Linux has been 64 bit for ten years. Before many *proprietary* OSes!

    (NT for Alpha was not 64 bit, it was a 32bit port.).

    --
    I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
  94. Re:Unrelated by angrist · · Score: 1

    ADB was NOT hot swappable.

    It had the nasty ability to fry the controller on the mobo if you hot-plugged things. Granted this didn't happen every single time, but it would certainly mess up your day when it did happen

  95. the point is .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TV-mode version:
    Our guest tonight is Sean. Sean is employed at MS and will now explain how Gates got BSOD-ed...
    oops, correction, this just in, Sean was employed at MS, he's been canned.
    hmm well... Sean also runs an excellent blog..
    opps, correction Sean used to run a blog, it's been slashdotted
    Tomorrow Sean will explain in detail at what time and how exactly his blog died of slashdot

  96. Good Idea! by twitter · · Score: 1
    Whatever happened to running rigged demos for trade shows?

    It was rigged, it just did not work.

    They should have used a full screen movie on a Mac.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Good Idea! by Amorya · · Score: 1

      Oh wait - you can't, unless you buy Quicktime Pro.

      Here's to hoping Apple put fullscreen back in the free version at Macworld SF!

  97. IR interference and a bridge to sell you by ArtDent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's an interesting explanation, but I'm having a lot of trouble buying it.

    My Myth box has a PS/2 keyboard connector, as well as several USB ports. I can easily connect a keyboard to it. If my remote control were to stop working for any reason, I'd still be able to control the system. I notice that the Alienware Media Center systems all have USB ports, too.

    Given that they had set up a USB-based IR receiver with a powered USB booster, surely they were aware of the fact that relying on IR could be tricky. It's very difficult to believe that no one thought it might be a good idea to have some kind of backup input device that someone off stage could have used to kick off the damn slide show.

    From the FA: "Sure, we could have had two Media Centers, but we wanted to show it all running off the same Media Center as a hub." This strikes me as classic misdirection. Like it would be utterly impossible to have one Media Center with two different input devices.

    As I see it, either something more went wrong and this story was concocted to cover it up, or the whole team behind the presentation deserves to be fired for missing something so pitifully obvious.

    I rather suspect the former.

    I did enjoy watching Bill sit there all hunched over in his big cushy chair pecking away at the remote control. His plastic smile unwavering, even through Conan's "who's in charge of Mircosoft" comment. And then that weird comment about only having one remote control? No, Bill, it wouldn't be worse to have serveral remote controls, if they were for devices that actually *worked*.

    1. Re:IR interference and a bridge to sell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that they simply didn't account for the amount of heat and light involved in a TV set. I would not expect an IR receiver to work properly with a studio light shining right on it any more than I would count on it to work correctly in bright sunlight.

    2. Re:IR interference and a bridge to sell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me ask you this.

      Have you ever tried to build something? If not, stop here: you're already a hypocrite.

      Now: Have you ever been called on to demonstrate that thing you built, where you only have one shot at getting it right before you're mocked endlessly? If not, stop here: you're already a hypocrite.

      Now, in any of your demos, have you ever had some minor technical problem that made things look much worse than they were?

      If so, why can't you accept that this might have happened here instead of coming up with a tinfoil-hat story about this blog all being "concocted" (to use your word) as a "cover-up"?

      If not, well, you're pretty lucky! Welcome to the real world.

  98. a lot of heat by jeif1k · · Score: 1, Interesting

    We are used to Microsoft's demos and software crashing: nobody gives a damn.

    The thing that they should take heat for is to call "communist" people who want to revise IP law. Microsoft deserves to take heat for that in particular because they are a convicted monopolist and the primary reason we don't have a free and competitive market in PC software.

  99. Re: Hot-swappable ADB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the 90's, I watched a left-handed co-worker decide to hot-move the mouse from one side of the Mac ADB keyboard to the other while preparing to begin her segment of a demo. Before I can think to cry out "Nooooooooooo!!!!!" she had crashed the machine in front of the entire auditorium audience. Thank god ADB was dumped for USB.

  100. FOSS and communism by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    > Communism and Free Software may be derived from
    > the same base class (more on this in a sec) :) I would put it more like this:

    template class Communism;
    class FreeSoftware : public Communism

    > Incorrect. Stallman simply claims that end-users
    > should have the right to modify software as they
    > need, and re-distribute the changes as they need.

    Yes, but I was describing it from the developer's point of view. To normal people, free software simply means that they don't have to pay for it; as a previous Slashdot article mentioned, users don't really care about modification. Because of this, it is largely irrelevant to them whether the software is under the GPL, BSD, or a public domain license.

    The developer has a different point of view. GPL is specifically written to prevent programmers from making money from their work. Yes, you can make money from support, or custom modifications, but that's not the same thing.

    When you make money from support, people pay you for the personal attention and for being the scapegoat for their troubles. They don't pay you for the program you are supporting. You didn't even have to write it in the first place; you can run a company supporting Microsoft products. When you make money from customization, you are selling the custom code you write for your customers. You are not selling the original program. You didn't even have to write it in the first place; you can run a company creating custom frontends for Microsoft Access.

    Because of this, there really are no companies making money from free software. The free software is really free. I would also equate "free" with "worthless"; no, not to the end user, but to the developer. Once he puts his program under the GPL, that's the end of the program. That the GPL allows him to sell it anyway is irrelevant, since nobody will buy it when it is available for nothing. And if he can't sell it, he can't make money from his work, for that program is his work too, not just the support for it he might provide, or any additional code he might write in the future.

    How will he eat? From charitable contributions, of course. Let's talk about that.

    > Simply discarding the other side as too simplistic/naiive

    There's nothing simplistic or naive about the philosophy of charity. That doesn't make it any less evil.

    > Well, this is the way things work, your apparent cynicism aside

    The cynicism is real, because things don't work that way most of the time.

    > The community does indeed provide bug reports,
    > bug fixes, documentation, web site support, new
    > code, and so forth.

    Yes, but not much. Having authored a few OSS projects myself I can say that this does indeed happen, but I can also say that the contributions are miniscule. It's not something you rely on, and it's not something that will advance your project in any significant way. You might find some developers to help you work on the project, who will do so to avoid writing the same thing from scratch, but most of the time the project is your own and you carry it on your own back. I don't think this is a bad thing, but it's something OSS advocates don't often mention.

    > But not only rich people give money to the
    > developers; companies do when they buy software
    > from companies that employ FOSS developers,
    > end-users do in gratitude or because they want
    > to support the development,

    And finally, we come to talk about charity. Yes, charity does work for some people. Linus himself is being paid for working on something that is given away for nothing. The problem with charity is that it makes your life dependent on other people's good will, and only on other people's good will. When dealing with a trader, you give value for value, your program for his food. You are giving him something he wants in exchange for something you want, bargaining until you are both satisfied with the transaction.Thi

    1. Re:FOSS and communism by Trelane · · Score: 1

      template class Communism; class FreeSoftware : public Communism

      We'll have to agree to disagree with this one, I suspect.

      The developer has a different point of view. GPL is specifically written to prevent programmers from making money from their work.

      Incorrect here. If you read the preabmble of the GPL, it states

      When we speak of free softare, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.

      That is, to rephrase, the GPL is designed to ensure that end-users are given the rights Stallman believes they should be given (namely, modification and redistribution).

      When you make money from support, people pay you for the personal attention and for being the scapegoat for their troubles. They don't pay you for the program you are supporting.

      Incorrect. Support houses, in all likelyhood, are also development houses. See, with the GPL, the line is very blurred between who is development and who is a user/helper. With commercial software, one company makes the software, and the others hope they have enough information to support that software. With the GPL, support houses are also likely to be development houses (since you have to be familiar with the program to support it), and all compete for support on equal footing--the original publisher has no more advantage (aside from name) than any other company.. Yes, this is both a benefit (all compete evenly and development is shared) as well as a drawback (makes it hard to make a 100% software development company). Note, however, that few software companies are only software companies--most software companies charge you for the software and then again for help with the software.

      You didn't even have to write it in the first place; you can run a company creating custom frontends for Microsoft Access.

      There is nothing precluding you from doing this for a FOSS application either. In fact, since the underlying system you depend on for your livelyhood if you build a program on top of another one, if the original developer wants to get into your market (as MSFT has been known to do), they have no more advantage in this new market than you (again, aside from name), since they can't put in "hooks" in the underlying program that you can't use!

      Because of this, there really are no companies making money from free software.

      Incorrect. At least Red Hat is turning a profit. Dell and IBM are certainly making a profit in FOSS. I believe SuSE/Novell are as well, and Mandrake is now prifitable, too.

      For the rest of that quote, you're still locked in to the developer-as-a-monopoly model. While certainly a lone developer of a small project won't likely make much money, people do pay developers to work on Free software, just like they pay developers to work on commercial software, so you can get paid for writing your software! Note also that the exact same thing can be said for a small commercial developer--a small commercial developer won't generally make much money either!

      There's nothing simplistic or naive about the philosophy of charity. That doesn't make it any less evil.

      Umm, so you're saying charity is evil?!

      To normal people, free software simply means that they don't have to pay for it; as a previous Slashdot article mentioned, users don't really care about modification. Because of this, it is largely irrelevant to them whether the software is under the

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    2. Re:FOSS and communism by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      > Incorrect here. If you read the preabmble of the
      > GPL, it states "When we speak of free softare, we
      > are referring to freedom, not price."

      While in theory you can charge for your free software, in practice it is not possible. Once everyone has the right to resell your software, and it really only takes one other person, its sale price must necessarily go to zero. Furthermore, if they do indeed manage to sell it for something other than zero, they would be getting that money unfairly, since it costs them nothing to produce. You, on the other hand, will have paid the price for making the software in the first place (because although it may not have cost you any money, it has certainly cost you in effort), and received nothing in return for it. That's how communism works, and while you might not call it that, I am still surprized that you consider it a good thing.

      > Incorrect. Support houses, in all likelyhood, are also development houses.

      They are also businesses that make up for the losses in one department with gains in another. They lose money on free software (since they give it away, while having to pay the programmers), but make up for it on support, which is an entirely different profession. I would like to emphasise this one more time: companies like RedHat are not making money from software. They are making money from supporting software. It is a completely different business. A tech support person can't just go and become a programmer and a programmer can't just become a tech support person. Because of this, the programmers employed by such a company are really on charity, since they are actually a net loss to the company. So:

      > people do pay developers to work on Free software,
      > just like they pay developers to work on commercial
      > software, so you can get paid for writing your software!

      But because the produced software can not be sold, you will not be producing anything of value to the company. Therefore, it is simply charity.

      > Umm, so you're saying charity is evil?!

      Absolutely. Charity means giving something away and getting nothing in return. If you waste away your wealth in this fashion, you will inevitably become a beggar just like those beggars to whom you gave it away in the first place. Because you see, there is not enough of anything in the world to let everyone live like a rich man. People breed beyond the natural capacity of the land, just as animals do, and there will always be more people than there are resources. The only question is how to distribute these resources.

      In my view of life, the resources must be distributed according by ability, because it is the men of ability who can produce and make the society prosper, while the men who are able to do nothing are of no use to society and should get only that which nobody else wants. I call this good because this maximizes the society's wealth and production, which in turn allow for their happiness and well-being.

      In the philosophy of charity, the resources are distributed to those most in need of them, and such people usually come from the "men who are able to do nothing" category. Poverty is a bottomless barrel; the more you give them, the more they need. The poor stay poor not because they have nothing, but because they can produce nothing and thus can not earn their living. Hence the philosophy of charity, propagated mostly by those who want more than they have earned, by those who want to get riches with no effort, who want to content themselves with a delusion of self-worth. The delusion of self-worth, created by your charity because while they proclaim that giving value for value is wrong, they themselves believe otherwise and rationalize their hope that you give not out of charity but in recognition of their value.

      I call this evil, because it gives the limited resources to those most capable of wasting them. Evil, because when the society's wealth is squandered and destroyed, every one of its members will be a

  101. Teleprompter? by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

    Having watched the video (ironic, really -- I just watched an 80 minute M$ promo video because I hate them), I can't help but feel that Gates was working off of a teleprompter buried in the floor in front of him -- he seems to regularly look down at the floor while he's talking. Could be just his demeanor, but ...

    Anyone agree/disagree?

    1. Re:Teleprompter? by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Funny
      this is an ooooooold joke from back when soviet russia was the funniest thing around:
      http://books.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=71358&ci d=6647090


      Q: How can you tell an extroverted computer geek from an introverted computer geek?
      A: The introverted computer geek will look at his shoes while he talks to you. The extroverted computer geek will look at your shoes while he talks to you.

      Q: How do you tell if an Extroverted computer geek is Russian?
      A: His shoes look at you while he is talking.

      I about died laughing when i first saw this, but your mileage will vary.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Teleprompter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bills demeanor through the whole thing was very plastic and seemed very uncomfortable with Conan.

      I've seen a number of his presentations both live and recorded and he's one of the most incharismatic presenters I've seen.

      The SBC presentation of IPTV was much more enthusiastic and much easier to watch.

  102. Re:Unrelated by Amorya · · Score: 1

    It was designed to be hotswappable. They didn't market it as such because it was temperamental. However, a freeware app called Mouse Jolt cleared up problems if you swapped anyway.

    (I've swapped keyboards and mice between old Macs while running, and they worked for me. YMMV.)

  103. Is that you, Mr Gates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, sir, we have some guys at Marketing to do that. Do not bother to invent some lame-ass story about Apache whenever our systems crash. Your time is far too valuable for that!

  104. Service Unavailable for both links? by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

    Sorta makes you wonder how much pocket change that cost Bill.

    --
    Cheers, Gene

  105. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by mangu · · Score: 1
    My XT PC had a three button genius serial mouse and that was at least 15 years ago


    So, what was that middle button's utility? In X-Window, you click the middle button to paste whatever is selected in any window. Just one click, instead of the four keystrokes (control, c, control, v) needed to paste something in MS-Windows.

  106. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except, if I recall, Solaris.

  107. Re:coincidence by one_n_only_wildcat · · Score: 1

    Might have been a traffic problem. I got to both of them on Firefox 1.0 with no problem.

    --
    "Something unknown is doing we don't know what." - Sir Arthur Eddington
  108. Re:Unrelated by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

    I think you mean HFS

    HFS, HFS+, and Journaled HFS are used in modern versions of Mac OS.

    HPFS is OS/2's filesystem, and has support in NT 3.51 and partially in NT4

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  109. Massve cover up! by Cow007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How does a power failure cause a blue screen of death and how does a usb booster cause infrared interference? His "explanations" really don't make any sense at all and seem to be distracting blame from the products that failed onto things that had little to nothing to do with it. Don't fall for this blog article it is obviously part of a coverup as to what really happened.

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
    1. Re:Massve cover up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should actually try reading the linked article.

  110. You run windows too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you're running Windows as well it might explain why your machine craps out as often as BG's does.

    Try Linux instead. :)

  111. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

    Nope.

    Linux was 64bit before Solaris. The first Solaris/SunOS release to run on a 64bit platform was Solaris 2.5 on UltraSPARC I in 1995, but TTBOMK it was still a 32bit port (TTBOMK).

    I dont think Solaris was fully 64bit capable until Solaris 7, released in 1998, when it gained ability to export 64bit VM to userspace (on UltraSPARC only, and, IIRC, hardware problems with some early UltraSPARCs precluded ability to run 64bit userspace on those CPUs).

    See, eg: http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/solaris/versions/solar is/

    --
    I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
  112. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately a long time ago. Please note that I was not running windows 3.1 only dos. So I take the third mouse button was for games and running Geniuses own mouse configuration test (could test all three buttons). I am not to sure if Display Write 4 used the middle button (not a bad word processor in its day).

  113. A Wedding Story by Dan+East · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Speaking of technical glitches when it matters most, here's a quick story of a wedding I was running sound for (not something I normally do, but I was drafted).

    I had the various wedding songs in mp3 format on my Dell notebook. I'd been given the cue that the bride was ready to make her entrance, so as soon as I started the Bridal March she would enter. I was just about to click Play on my notebook when it gives a siren-like sound (not out of the soundcard / line out, but out of some internal speaker) and turns itself off.

    Now fortunately (extremely) for me I had copied the songs onto a CF card, so I popped it into my Pocket PC, plugged it into the soundboard, and the wedding began. There was maybe a 20-30 second delay which no-one even noticed.

    After the wedding I found the problem. The HDD was somehow not well seated, and the alarm was the BIOS saying the HDD had failed. I popped it out and re-seated it and everything was fine.

    I had used that notebook at least 8 hours a day, every day, for 3 years and it had never done that before.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  114. Re:Unrelated by NullProg · · Score: 1

    Your right. I stand corrected.

    Thanks,

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
  115. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by DJBanaan · · Score: 0

    Did you even bother to check the content of the site?

  116. Steve Jobs would never let this happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Apple's CEO goes on stage, he always has someone waiting backstage running a secondary machine that he can switch over to in case something goes wrong.

    I can't believe MS would use an actual Passport account over a live internet connection. When SJ demoed .Mac it was running on a server backstage, not on the actual .mac servers. Which was kinda a BS demo since it ran 10x faster that it really would over the internet, but seriously, you wouldn't want to have your demo go bad just because somebody in the convention center started hogging all the bandwidth.

    You wonder if MS actually plans these things or BG just gets up there and wings it...

  117. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2) The analog to a start menu was in the first Apple Mac GUIs, WAY before Windows.

    The first Mac did not have have a start menu. Just the icons on the desktop UI.

    mwm and fvwm did have a start menu, and this predated Win95 by many years, although the start menu for most early X11 systems was a popup menu rather than a taskbar. NeXT has a taskbar though.

  118. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by Crouchy · · Score: 1

    Alas I had a CGA (at least not a monochrome Hercules )

  119. They should just play a video feed of it working. by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    It seems this happens often enough that they shouldn't risk actually demonstrating it live.

    ...but I guess media player would crash.

  120. The Cause by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

    Come on, don't you guys watch Xena? It's always Evil Wizards!

  121. Re:Bill G is a success like Darth Vader is a succe by yabos · · Score: 1

    "At least Vader eventually overcomes the evil that controls him."

    Sure but then he dies heh.

  122. On socialism by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    > there is a classical American definition (one that is considered
    > an insult). That is what USSR and China did.

    USSR has never claimed to be a communist society. It was a goal to reach in the future, but certainly not the reality. USSR stands for Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and none of its citizens ever called its government system "communism". It was called socialism, and it is indeed exactly what you describe: a centrally controlled, planned economy.

    > It is one where a small privilaged group of ppl decide
    > what products to make and how much they will costs.
    > They are protected by the state by a number of laws
    > from any real compition.

    You are missing the point. There was no competition because there was no such thing as a "company". Competition existed, but only between different factories in the same industry, and consisted mostly of "overachieving the plan"; competing on quantity rather than quality. It's not that increasing quality was beyond them, it's that quality is more difficult to measure when the only way to do so is with quality inspectors.

    > They were expensive, quite poorly built, and had poor support.

    I'd agree on the last two, but not the first. If anything was plentiful in USSR, it was cheap stuff.

    > The largest of the companies would routinely take
    > over the smaller ones, either by virtue of their size, or by using state laws.

    You are thinking of the United States. USSR didn't have companies. (Not until Gorbachev, anyhow)

    > it had better milage/better service than American cars.
    > In terms of safety, well, you died if they crashed. hummmmm....

    Nonsense. You obviously haven't seen the Volga; (the second most popular model after Zhiguli). That beast was made of steel so thick, you could drive in Iraq in it. In fact, I remember seeing some neat commercials where it was walked on by elephants, dropped from a three story building, and still started fine and drove away. When you have a planned economy and don't have to pay for the steel, you can use as much as the boss thinks is necessary.

    > Ppl would trade goods/service for other goods/service.
    > I am sure that you have heard the term "house raising" or "Barn raising".

    These are entirely different practices. When you barter, you get something you believe to be equally valuable to what you gave away. When you do "barn raising", you are doing community service, where you give away something of value, thinking that you might get something back later. Barter is a trade, with a buyer and a seller. Money just makes the process easier. Community service is not a trade, it's indentured servitude, because you are not guaranteed to get equal value for what you give.

    > It was a sign of bad faith to not participate if you were capable.
    > In fact, to not participate routinely excluded the family from the community.

    Same in the USSR under socialism. Boy, I can sure remember washing those floors as a kid...

    > A number of them objected to these, as they would stifle innovation.

    And they do, as numerous Slashdot articles argue.

    > to allow one to produce the idea, but not stifle the future

    With the result that nobody ever looks into the Patent database in fear of "willful infringement". So how is this better than just not telling anyone?

    > So, I am curious. Which is really communist and which
    > is true-American capitalists as well as patriots?

    Well, gosh darn it, you have nearly convinced me. I'd never thought I would have to agree that the United States is a communist country.

  123. Doesn't explain Blue Screen! by BoldAndBusted · · Score: 1

    Hey, what a bait and switch this is! The remote control problem was funny, yes, but the BSOD that happend during the game demo - THAT'S what I want to see "explained"! I can't believe that either a) this guy just "failed to mention it" or b) the Slashdot editor didn't tone down the exhberance in the headline. The headline should have been "One of Two glitches at MS CES Demo Explained" or something similar. Sheesh.

  124. Steve works in more scripted/controlled environ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Has anybody ever seen an OSX box crap out on Steve? I have not heard of this or seen it.

    Steve J's demos are more heavily scripted and polished, like an informercial. Remember Steve J was the business/sales guy, Steve W was the technical genius. You need both sides for success but it helps to keep your Steve's straight. Steve J is a superior pitchman and puts on better shows, part of this is to work in much more highly controlled environments. Onstage/backstage of Conan is quite different than MacWorld Expo.

  125. The machine running Forza BSOD'd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The machine that was running Forza was the one that had a BSOD. It wasn't running on an X-Box because the X-Box doesn't have a BSOD, it has a green screen of death. Either that or some developer thought it was funny to make errors in the game look like a BSOD, in which case he picked the wrong time for a joke :)

  126. Just like windows by cgenman · · Score: 1

    Just a quick aside here, people who specialize in any given OS are far more likely to see the deep, advanced benefits of that system and compare that to what little they can discern about a competing OS in the week that they have used it.

    For example Mac OS7 had an incredible file system which had abstracted out all file positioning activities away from the actual position on the drive or even the system's perception of the file position on the drive. Searches were instantaneous, as things were indexed in the background. In addition, one's applications never needed to explicitly define a file path, they could do everything symbolically (this folder, the mac folder, etc), by name, by ID, by handle, etc, with no performance hit. The end-user can rename almost anything, and move almost anything anywhere, and all applications will keep running happily. I knew this pretty intimately, and came to rely upon that sort of advanced knowledge. When using Windows or Linux for the first time, this is what I was comparing them to, and they felt backwards and half-assed. Why Can't I just move photoshop to a folder called "Graphics Applications" and not have everything just work? What does any of those millions of extra files lying around in Linux DO? On the other hand, now that I'm a more experienced Windows user, I look back on OS7's memory management scheme and cringe. From a Linux perspective I look at file permissions systems as a tremendously powerful defensive line as opposed to the silly holdover inconvienience it once struck me as.

    Any "switch" stories you hear will be colored by these perceptions. "What do you mean I have only one interface choice?" "Where is my ActiveX scripting on BeOS?" "I see type, but how does Debian know the creator app?" That's why these OS debates usually degrade so quickly: Person A is comparing a high-level knowledge of OS 1 to a superficial knowledge of OS 2, and person B is comparing a very high-level knowledge of OS 2 to a superficial knowledge of OS 1.

    That doesn't mean that such comparisons are impossible, that just means that you need an intimate knowledge and years of use on multiple systems including the ones in question before you're qualified to do a comparison. "Switch" stories and grandstanding from people with a favorite OS fall down for this reason.

  127. When did you last run UN*X anyway? by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1

    I should say at this point that configuration problems are far more common on Linux and their solutions tend to be considerably more complicated and hard to find.


    Hmmm. That hasn't been my experience at all.
    In general I use a mix of bleeding-edge and ancient hardware. It's true that it seems to take about six months before a bleeding-edge product gets a custom Linux driver, but OTOH Fedora, Mandrake, and even OpenBSD seem to find my USB drives, ATI graphics cards, NVIDIA on-board graphics chipsets, miscellaneous sound cards, dual CPUs, ancient SCSI scanners, DVD burners, PS/2 mice, USB mice, keyboards, trackpads, and parallel ZIP drives just fine, thank you. No configuration required.

    On the other hand, I can't count the number of times my colleagues, wife, and friends have complained that installing some WidgetDriver 5.x gave them a semipermanent BSOD on a losedows machine. My wife manages IT for a Losedows business, and relies on frequent fresh system installs to keep everything running. I've NEVER had to re-install from scratch to repair any Linux system.

    So, er, I call bullshit. I know, IHBT. IWHAND.

  128. Mod parent up! by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1
    Yup. I'd definitely mod you up (Insightful) if I hadn't already posted in the thread.


    Reminds me of a BoingBoing story a while ago about a guy who was crowing about the convenience using a wireless switch to control his garbage disposal. Works great until you stick your hand down there just as your neighbor tries out his wireless switch controlled garage door...

  129. Apologies in advance ... but this was one huge adv by rixster · · Score: 1

    I downloaded the BT. It was phenomenally sad. Think the words Microsoft, experience, media, consumers and all those horrid things. If you dont believe me watch the vid. It is truly one big commercial. Well done MS.

    --
    Two wrongs may not make a right, but three ....
  130. It should be embarrassing. by Ophion · · Score: 1
    It should be embarrassing that someone who is trusted to go on stage with Bill Gates to help explain things has atrocious spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

    The Sad State of Writing and Editing

  131. Better colours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  132. Is Bill Gates shrinking? by tentimestwenty · · Score: 1

    Next to conan, he looks like a 12 year old kid.

    1. Re:Is Bill Gates shrinking? by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      AFAIK Conan is about 6'4". Not quite the Irish Leprechaun.

  133. Half the projectors run Windows CE... by mangee · · Score: 1
    I see so many Windows logos on the big projection screens they use for presentations

    Half the bigger projectors run Windows CE as their OS.. you could probably get a BSOD from that during a linux presentation too. Bugger if your project caught a CE virus

  134. Re:Bill G is a success like Darth Vader is a succe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly, money and power are the things used as the definition of success today.

    I agree that the accumulation of money and/or power is not in any way admirable, but the sad truth is, they matter more than anything truly valuable in today's world.

    Myself, I appreciate creativity and intelligence above other things. I have to make up my own mind about who I respect and admire, and those people are mostly relatively unknown.

    Perhaps I'm overly cynical, but I don't expect things to change.

  135. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

    Ah white, cyan, and magenta (or yellow, red, and white)... 320x200... makes me feel like dusting off Alleycat...

  136. Re:Is that so? by Feztaa · · Score: 1

    Well, lets see... debian runs on all these different platforms. That's not "frothing groupthink", that's FACT. Windows runs on 2 of them, and 1 of those only recently (IA32 and IA64).

    I'm just sick of this "Windows is less stable because they can't control the hardware they run on" crap. Linux supports more, and more varied forms of hardware, hands down.

  137. Re:Up and running Win XP 64 build 1289 by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    The first Mac did not have have a start menu. Just the icons on the desktop UI.

    Presumably by "analog to a start menu" he meant the Apple Menu, which has indeed existed since the original Mac.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;