Slashdot Mirror


User: MutantHamster

MutantHamster's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
242
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 242

  1. Re:Mr President, Dr. Evil is on the line... on Hole Drilled to Bottom of Earth's Crust · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure, everyone's all excited about drilling a hole now, but as soon as they accidentally drill into the Earth's hollow interior and drain the entire ocean, they'll be nothing but excuses.

  2. A neight feet tall and six feet wide phototype... on The House Building Machine · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's amazing! It makes me feel naight beeg doow wop wohah!

  3. Ah...! on Broadband Life and Internet Anxiety Disorder · · Score: 1
    Nothing like a bunch of bullshit to waste my time one!

    This is what passes for an article these days?

  4. Re:Water spectacular?! on Water Spectacular in Episode III? · · Score: 0, Troll

    And 60 years ago people wouldn't hit black women because their "lips were big" or their "skin was dark." Get with the times, you racist!

  5. Re:Doesn't say much for education on High School Kids Beat MIT at Robotics Competition · · Score: 1
    Liberal Morality: Mass murder (abortion) good. Loving a person Evil (except if the definition of love includes two people of the same sex with a gerbil). What sick fucks.

    Sweeping Generalizations Morality: Thank God somebody invented some opinions for me to adhere to!

  6. Re:/dev/null on FBI Demands Logs From Radical Website · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You are a dumb, stupid person. Read the entire post, try and figure out what his point was, then kindly shut the fuck up.

  7. Re:How this impacts evolutionary theory on Plants May Be Able To Correct Mutated Genes · · Score: 1

    While the question is interesting, the objective statement reminds us that whatever impact it may have theoretically, must be empirically proven, and considering that right now the opposite has been empirically proven (there are documented cases of plants switching around their entire DNA sequence, as well as observed speciation) already. Despite what this discovery suggests, it doesn't change the fact that plants have clearly mutated before.

  8. Re:So what happens to gentically modified plants? on Plants May Be Able To Correct Mutated Genes · · Score: 0

    Seriously, ewe knead two get won of those "Type-and-Speak" programs. Yule never half two worry about making errors again.

  9. Re:AFP will be the ones to lose on French News Agency Sues Google News · · Score: 1

    Sure, they should have the right. We should all have the right to be a dumbass.

  10. Re:Why Stop? on Lucas To Redo Star Wars In 3-D · · Score: 5, Funny
    now, if only they'd also show outtakes in #d as well (rumour has it, that thing had a hard time staying on) *grin*

    Yes! You may finally find out what a breast looks like!

  11. Re:They came, they saw.... on AOL Changing IM Terms of Service · · Score: 1
    The only way to keep your sensitive data and conversations private on the web is to encrypt them; any statement of privacy over plain-text media is at best erroneous, and at worst dangerously misleading.

    Encrypt them? Why does that sound familliar? Hmm... RTFA comes to mind.

  12. Am I the only one dissapointed... on Gaiman Naming Auction · · Score: 1
    ...That it says to name a "Gaiman" and not "Caiman." Naming a small member of the crocodillian order would be awesome, and I don't even know what the hell a Gaimain is.

    I'd name it "Snappy."

  13. Re:New Terms in A Nutshell on AIM's New Terms Of Service · · Score: 1

    That's not a definition. That's an explanation of how sound works. Here's a bombshell buddy, all waves that are not electromagnetic are a series of compressions and rarefractions. That's not what makes sound sound. And all electromagnetic waves have crests and peaks, which is basically the same thing. If that were how we, or you, defined sound, then there would be no difference between "wave" and "sound." If we didn't have ears there wouldn't be sound, but there'd still be waves.

  14. Re:New Terms in A Nutshell on AIM's New Terms Of Service · · Score: 1

    Wrong. A sound is the sensation of converting a vibration into a message in our brains using our ears. If a tree falls in a forest and there's no one there to hear it, it makes a vibration. Not a sound.

  15. Re:tagging on The Return Of The Pop-Up Ad · · Score: 1
    maybe we can put pop up ads on THEIR tivos....

    This is beginning to sound like some kind of double-entendre that I don't even want to try to figure out.

  16. Re:I don't see a problem here... on The Return Of The Pop-Up Ad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, you naive web-user. They already know that nobody likes pop-ups, at this point they're just doing it out of spite.

  17. Re:Well then... on The Return Of The Pop-Up Ad · · Score: 5, Funny
    What good is a shotgun going to do? What are you going to do? Keep a log of all of the sites that use pop-ups, looks up who's personally responsible and then track them down by yourself in a vigilante style vendetta killing spree?

    I'm coming too. I'll go get my shotgun.

  18. Re:Why do we need a lawsuit? on Blockbuster Sued Over Late Fees Claim · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I mean come on! They don't have late fees anymore! They just make you pay a fee if the movie is returned late, what the Hell? It's so simple you damn idiots. No shit you can't just buy a movie for five bucks, but a lie is a lie.

  19. Re:Was I the only one... on Popcorn-Popper -> Coffee Roaster Mod · · Score: 1

    No, I did too. For a minute I though I had been slashdotted, but no. :-(

  20. Take this "Next Gen" Bullshit and shove it on Xbox 2 to Release in Fall of This Year · · Score: 1

    I hope this thing bombs like Donald Rumsfeld. Unless it's fucking photorealistic I don't care. I don't need a "new" thrown at me just for the sake of making a "new" console.

  21. This just in.. on Random Number Generator That Sees Into the Future · · Score: 1

    And if you call the number at the bottom of your screen you can have it tell your future for just $5.95 for the first 3 minutes, and $2.95 for each additional minute!

  22. Re:Uh... no. on Climbing up the Search Ladder · · Score: 1

    Yeah but what I'm saying is, your index differs depending on the terms. If you select a large enough portion of unique text from any site that's been Googled, and search for it in quotation marks, it will be the first thing that comes up. For dramatic increases in traffic you have to get high ranks for the words that the most people search for. The 10th result for "porn" probably gets more hits than the 1st result for "foot fungus."

  23. Uh... no. on Climbing up the Search Ladder · · Score: 1

    Being on the "first page of results" doesn't mean shit. My page is the very first result for MutantHamster but my traffic still sucks.

    It depends on the search term, anybody can be on the first page of something.

  24. Re:Dumbest. Editor. Evar. on Carbon Dating & The Shroud of Turin · · Score: 1

    Is that why it entitles freedom of religion too? It doesn't have anything to do specifically with the government, you tool. It's not unconstitutional to be "rude" or "mock" anyone, so shove it up your ass, you big jerk.

  25. Re:Give me a break. on Carbon Dating & The Shroud of Turin · · Score: 1

    Uh... science already has answers for all of those.

    What century are you in, man?