Slashdot Mirror


Popcorn-Popper -> Coffee Roaster Mod

the-few writes "Tom Gramilas (Toms-roaster@columbus.rr.com) created a computer-controlled coffee roaster using an old West Bend Poppery I popcorn-popper (popular among home roasters with a modding mindset), a few thermocouples, and an old DOS computer. The code he wrote to control it is available from his site on request, and uses a flexible control algorithm to control roasting segments. Pictures and roasting profiles included."

169 comments

  1. Java? by ParadoxicalPostulate · · Score: 4, Funny

    The code better be Java.

    1. Re:Java? by PacoTaco · · Score: 1

      Judging from the article title, I think they're using C++. (Apparently they don't have the popcorn-popper themselves but they know how to find it.)

    2. Re:Java? by ProstheticSwan · · Score: 0

      It certainly sounds like it could become pretty popular

    3. Re:Java? by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

      Why Java?
      Why not Coffee?
      Coffee was a programming language too. Seriously. I havs some code on punch cards along with a printout to prove it, from a quick glance, it seems sorta like PASCAL. I think it was used on Burroughs Mainframes, although it could have been on IBMs.

    4. Re:Java? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they used Turbo C v2.01!! (circa 1989) a C compiler. Turbo C++ didn't come out until 1991 according the linked to Borland website.

    5. Re:Java? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      I think I bought my copy of Turbo C++ in January 1990. Borland's website is wrong. A quick google search of Turbo C++ 1990 turns up a lot of people who were working with Turbo C++ in 1990.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  2. i don't get it by hjf · · Score: 1, Funny

    who would want a coffee roaster which runs DOS?

    if it ran Linux (or BSD) I'll take it...

    btw fitrs tsop

    1. Re:i don't get it by mschoolbus · · Score: 1

      who would want a coffee roaster which runs DOS?

      if it ran Linux (or BSD) I'll take it...


      I would hope you could port DOS code to Linux...

    2. Re:i don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when he releases the code, take it upon yourself to rewrite it for Linux. Can't be hard at all.

    3. Re:i don't get it by hjf · · Score: 3, Funny

      nah, I'd wait a few days till some geek does it and releases it as a kernel patch.

    4. Re:i don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Linux-based toaster running a DOS? Nah.. never gonna happen. (remember to keep ssh and sendmail up to date though..)

    5. Re:i don't get it by hjf · · Score: 1

      sendmail? i run exim, you insensitive clod!

    6. Re:i don't get it by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, there's probably a NetBSD port in the works...

      One step closer to NetBSD/Toaster!

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    7. Re:i don't get it by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      if it ran Linux (or BSD) I'll take it...

      Shouldn't you be saying, "If it doesn't run Linux (or BSD), I'll make it."? Isn't that supposed to be the way of our world?

      --
      What?
    8. Re:i don't get it by jarich · · Score: 1
      nah, I'd wait a few days till some geek does it and releases it as a kernel patch.

      That's ~horrible~!!!

      Someone mod him funny! :)

    9. Re:i don't get it by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is, this whole project should be running on a 68HC11 processor.

      This big monster, with full PC, Multimeters with GPIB interface, etc. strikes me as a 'first concept' mockup. The whole thing should be doable in an 'HC11 or one of the PIC controllers that has onboard A/D hardware.

      I'm surprised that something this 'thrown together' made it to the Slashdot front page.

    10. Re:i don't get it by hjf · · Score: 0

      even a PIC10F would do :D

    11. Re:i don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same thing.

  3. Website Caches Please? by AbbyNormal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dear Slasdot Editors,

    Please setup caches before posting stories running off of home cable modem website spaces.

    The story is irrelevant/pointless in most cases, if TFA cannot be read to begin with.

    Thanks,

    Slashdot Reader

    --
    Sig it.
    1. Re:Website Caches Please? by AbbyNormal · · Score: 0, Troll

      Dear Slasdot Reader,

      Please use spell checker and "Preview" next time before quickly posting.

      Thanks,

      Slashdot Editor

      --
      Sig it.
    2. Re:Website Caches Please? by UnCivil+Liberty · · Score: 1

      MirrorDot mirror (just in case)

      --
      Distributed proteome folding @ WorldCommunityGrid.org
      Team Slashdot - Members:#1 Run Time:#1 Points:#1 Results:#1
    3. Re:Website Caches Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Website Caches Please? by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      don't know what your moaning about this time... I came upon it shortly after you and had no problems at all... even the two large images came in fast...

      anyway, I'm gonna refresh the page a few times and watch the counter soar... it was at 5751 when I loaded it first... it's now 6183 merely a few short minutes later... holding up fine... now 6282... still holding fine... this guy's worked wonders proofing his home site... hmm 6324

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    5. Re:Website Caches Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd better post as an anonymous guy, mister.

    6. Re:Website Caches Please? by W2k · · Score: 1

      It seems to be working quite well, actually - it's just a plain HTML page with two small images. It might actually stand the Slashdot effect... but here is the Coral cache copy if anyone needs it.

      --
      Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
    7. Re:Website Caches Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You read the articles?

      You're new here, aren't you?

    8. Re:Website Caches Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cache? Surely you can't be serious! The FAQ says that they can't do that because we can't wait 6 hours for a "cool breaking story" while they ask permission to cache.

      Of course, the fact that the page was published back in 1998 is completely irrelevent, right?

    9. Re:Website Caches Please? by skweegee · · Score: 3, Informative

      Too bad the site isn't ran off of a home cable modem. It's ran off of Road Runenr's webspace for it's home users.

    10. Re:Website Caches Please? by skweegee · · Score: 1

      oops I meant Runner's not Runenr's.....

    11. Re:Website Caches Please? by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      HAHAHA! Irony is SO ironic sometime!

      This "TROLL" is a reply to my own comment! I realized that I misspelled my post horribly, and was going for amusing. Oh well, tis the moderation system in all of its glory!

      --
      Sig it.
  4. Was I the only one... by Tamerlan · · Score: 3, Funny

    to read it "porn-popcorn"? Another freudiam slip. Nevermind.

    1. Re:Was I the only one... by MutantHamster · · Score: 1

      No, I did too. For a minute I though I had been slashdotted, but no. :-(

      --
      My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
    2. Re:Was I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I read that "popcorn-pooper". :P

    3. Re:Was I the only one... by Big+Mark · · Score: 1

      I read it as porncorn

    4. Re:Was I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you where. And why would it be "funny" anyway?

    5. Re:Was I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I read it as "poopcorn-popper coffee rooster". :P

  5. Now that's a first.. by PresidentKang · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've heard of Irish Cream, Hazelnut and Vanilla flavoured coffee, but I must say when Starbucks starts offering their butter/"topping" flavoured coffees I'm leaving the country.

    1. Re:Now that's a first.. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Who cares what crappy flavor Starbucks offers? No matter what they call it, it's still going to be burnt, bitter and over-roasted crap. More proof, it it were needed, that you can fool the average person into buying crap if you tell them often enough how great it is.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Now that's a first.. by dfn_deux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It never ceases to amaze me how people bag on Starbuck's coffee so much. I find that most of the competitors' coffee is over roasted and either brewed watery to compensate or just served up syruppy think like roof tar. Starbucks employs some of the most highly trained buyers and roasters in the coffee industry and consistantly brings a greater variety of quality beans to the public than was previously available without living in a major metropolitan and having a good sense of where to look. My only problem with starbucks is the number of wierd nutmeg/eggnog/carmel/fudge "latte" creations they serve means that many times the barrista serving you is not going to be accustomed to making proper espresso beverages such as a plain ol' macchiato or cappucino. But, then again they are just meeting a demand. If the American palate increasingly demands sweater richer flavours to satisfy an unhealthy desire to get fat, bloated, and lazy it's just business providing products which meet that demand.

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    3. Re:Now that's a first.. by tricops · · Score: 1

      Hmm, let's see... Strangely flavoured coffees.... Mmmm jelly donut, or mmmmm beer? I wonder if either of those would be remotely passable? Ha. Of course, I've heard of mixing beer with coke before. Maybe there is a palatable beer/coffee combination?

      --
      (\(\
      (^v^)
      (")")
      This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
    4. Re:Now that's a first.. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      Starbucks employs some of the most highly trained buyers and roasters in the coffee industry and consistantly brings a greater variety of quality beans to the public than was previously available without living in a major metropolitan and having a good sense of where to look

      That they do, but they over-roast the coffee to the point that it's burnt and bitter. I've never had a Starbucks that was drinkable without adding at least one more sugar for the size than I normally use, and I like strong coffee. I've also spoken to a number of other people who know coffee, and they all agree: Starbucks coffee is consistantly over-roasted, burnt and bitter. Not only that, the equipment in the shops is almost always dirty on the outside, and if that's true, imagine what the inside is like!

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:Now that's a first.. by macshit · · Score: 1

      ... many times the barrista serving you is not going to be accustomed to making proper espresso beverages such as a plain ol' macchiato or cappucino.

      If you order cappuccino at starbucks, you're gonna get a "starbucks style cappuccino" anyway, a single shot of espresso with 2,682 gallons of foam/milk. You can barely taste the coffee.

      This particular little detail drives me nuts, because I often want something a little more foamy than a macchiato, but I don't want a glass of milk. Other large cafe chains, like Segafredo seem to be capable of making a great cappuccino that's exactly the right foaminess, but no amount of bitching at starbucks employees has gotten me anything anywhere near acceptable. [Some cafes, like Intelligentsia now even serve both "Traditional cappuccino" and "American-style cappuccino".]

      I don't know WTF is wrong with all these people complaining that "starbucks coffee is burnt" either -- it's not the best there is, but it's decent, and of course about 5 billion times better than traditional American coffee. Maybe the starbucks near them are sub-par or something, but starbucks in general seems to be a pretty reasonable "minimal standard" cafe chain, for when you can't find anything better. Mind you, it's a creepy corporate borg-like entity, but hey, when you need caffeine, you need caffeine. :-)

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    6. Re:Now that's a first.. by DJCF · · Score: 1
      If you order cappuccino at starbucks, you're gonna get a "starbucks style cappuccino" anyway, a single shot of espresso with 2,682 gallons of foam/milk. You can barely taste the coffee.

      So why dont you ask for it with a double -- or tripple -- shot of espresso, eh?

    7. Re:Now that's a first.. by macshit · · Score: 1

      I have. There's so much damn foam in the standard SB cappuccino that it doesn't seem to make all that much difference (and of course they charge a lot more for multiple shots). Another thing that doesn't seem to work is asking them to put less foam/milk in -- I've done this, and they've fucked it up every time (e.g., they reduce the foam, but increase the milk to compensate, despite my asking them not to).

      I don't know what exactly the proportions used by cafes that make a better cappuccino are (is a typical "real" cappuccino always two shots?) but starbucks employees seem fundamentally incapable of using them unless maybe you hold a gun to their head or something.

      Hmmm, now there's an idea...

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    8. Re:Now that's a first.. by MemoryAid · · Score: 2
      I don't know WTF is wrong with all these people complaining that "starbucks coffee is burnt" either -- it's not the best there is, but it's decent, and of course about 5 billion times better than traditional American coffee.

      Many of the fiercest arguments I've heard revolve around 'which is better.' Of course, coffee is a matter of taste, so different people will like different brews. Likewise, different coffee beverages are appropriate at different times; breakfast and after dinner are two different occasions that call for different brews, in my opinion.

      My father-in-law likes Budweiser, while I prefer Sam Adams. Of course, a long-term drinking event and a NASCAR race each call for a lighter beer, as does breakfast. Similar differences can be found in wine.

      Generally, it seems that it is the people who use their beverage preferences to make up a large part of their personal identities who argue most vehemently in favor of their preferences. Better would be to sample widely, try what the locals drink, and don't look down on people because of their [fucked-up] tastes.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    9. Re:Now that's a first.. by DJCF · · Score: 1

      The thing is that the espresso machine measures out exactly the same amount of coffee every time into a short glass. Milk gets steamed for a minutue or so until it's, what, 70 degrees C? The machine then turns off automaticly. You ask for a tall latte, they'll pour in a single shot of espresso, add milk, and use a large spoon to make sure the foam doesn't go in with it. When you ask for a cappuchino, it's the same process, only the spoon is used to make it roughly 50% milk, 50% foam.

      SO really the problem is, as the only variables that can be changed are foam or milk, if you ask them for less foam, they have to give more milk. And vice-versa.

      I'm not sure where you live, but here extra shots are 15p per shot... (45 cents maybe?) Myself, I always hate to give customers a single shot because I always think the coffee looks terribly weak. I ussually try to give them a little extra, but sometimes that's not possible.

    10. Re:Now that's a first.. by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is. Try a pint Black Butte (from the Deschutes Brewery) with about a half cup of cold espresso.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    11. Re:Now that's a first.. by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      Hmm, it seems a quick coffee lesson is in order...
      Cappucino - generally speaking a cappucino is espresso and equal portions foam and steamed milk. A smaller cup say 12.oz is generally made with 2 shots of espresso.
      Machiato - is espresso with foam and no steamed milk. These tend to be made with more espresso in my experience, but not necessarily extra shots, but sometimes longer shots...
      Latte - is espresso and steamed wilk topped with a small dollop of foam. These tend to be made with shorter espresso shots, but the number tends to be 1-2 shots per 12oz of completed drink.

      When ordering cappucinos a good barrista should serve it as outlined above, 50/50 foam/steamed milk. If you wish for more foam and less milk it is usually (although dialectical differences in some regions may cause confusion) apropriate to ask for it more "dry" and if less foam and more milk is desired usually it is requested as "wet". If you want less foam and not more milk, then perhaps ordering a smaller size would suit you better. At any rate Starbucks does have one thing going for it that most small cafes do not have, customer comment cards. These cards are submitted to the corporate office which can request retraining for less than competent barristas and further more, if you are totally unsatisfied with your drink simply asking for a complimentary drink coupon from the supervisor in the store will usually be met with a warm apology and a coupon for any free drink at any Starbucks.

      As for all the comments about how "burnt" or "over roasted" Starbucks coffee tastes, I'd like to point out that chains like Peets which are direct competitors to Starbucks roast all of their beans darker than comparable varieties from Starbucks. If anything I'd say that some of *bucks lighter blends could do with a bit more of a roast, especially some of the latin American blends which seem to taste a bit too bright on the palate.
      Lets not forget also that less than 20 years ago the standard American cup of joe was comprised largely of freeze dried instant coffee made primarily from low grade robusto beans and was stored in non-purged cans where the oils from the coffee were free to go rancid on store shelves and in warehouses for months, years, or decades before being brewed.
      Alas, I must confess I did work for Starbucks for a short time, but was and am and avid coffee fan prior to my engagement there. I did find that the training was adequate and the methods of preperation were well in line with everything I had read prior to my employment. As for the comment about the machines being dirty I encourage you to fill out a comment card if this has been your experience; In the store that I supervised, all machines were stripped and cleaned at the end of the night, tested for appropriate temperature and pressure several times during the shifts and regularly adjusted by qualified professionals.
      YMMV

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    12. Re:Now that's a first.. by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      Bah, slashdot borked my post, the cappucino definition should say "a smaller cup say, less than 12oz..."

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    13. Re:Now that's a first.. by Digital+Autumn · · Score: 1

      The problem is you can't use the same size cups for lattes and cappucinos, unless you're going to change espresso shot size. A small latte should be about the size of a large cappucino.

    14. Re:Now that's a first.. by temojen · · Score: 1

      Starbucks espresso roast is burnt. Espresso roast should have the natural sugars carmalized, not burnt. If straight espresso tastes of burnt sugar it is burnt. A properly done espresso should be sweet, not bitter; bitter espresso is burnt, run too long, or both. Also a properly done cappuccino should be equal parts milk, espresso, and foam, in layers, served in a clear glass mug. A macciato is espresso with one espresso spoon of foam dropped on top (not stirred in)

      Yes, I did work in a really snobby coffee shop for a while... you should have seen what we had to do to serve tea.

    15. Re:Now that's a first.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason that so many of us complain that SB coffee is burnt is BECAUSE IT IS BURNT! I, for one, am damned tired of the 45-seconds-too-long-in-the-#$%^ing-roaster syndrome that has plagued coffee for the last ten years. Helpful hint: A sure sign that your beans have been burnt is that your stores all smell of wet skunk. And every SB I've ever passed by (can't enter because of the mind-numbing burnt bean stench) stinks like wet skunk.
      Do I know and roast green coffee beans? Youbetchyerass.

    16. Re:Now that's a first.. by dfn_deux · · Score: 2

      Hmm.. I'm not sure that your contention that a cappucino should be served in a clear glass mug, that it should contain equal parts espresso, foam and milk, nor that your proportions for a macchiatto are correct.
      Not only, from my personal research done while writing a paper concerning many aspects of coffee from growing, proccessing, and roasting to drink preperation and social aspects of "coffee culture", as well as my personal experience as a barrista for 2 years. But, in my travels in Italy I never once experienced either a Cappuccino that was server in a clear glass mug nor a macchiatto that was made with less than what appeared to be a metric ton of foam atop a small portion (perhaps two short pulls) of espresso and served in a large bowl like ceramic cup.

      I find that those "snobby coffee shops" often have spent so much time codifying how things should be, that they seem to neglect to actually ensure that their techniques were accurate(true to the origin) to begin with...
      As to your contention about how "sweet" espresso should be. In Italy it usually served with two lumps of turbonado sugar and a twist of lemon zest. The roast often does have a carmel like flavor cue, but the sweetness of a traditional espresso is usually from the sugar added after the shots are pulled...

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
  6. Behold: The Boredom Machine! by dauthur · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes. This is exactly what one needs.

    100 MHZ + Coffee + Anyone = World domination

    This guy's a genius!


    But seriously, that's a good idea if you've got the time to show the world exactly how bored you are.

  7. All things aside... by RU_Areo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Do you really need a computer to pop popcorn? The technology and innovation is appreciated but come on...it's popcorn. We're hardly going to solve the worlds problems if the main focus of computing in engineering is a popcorn machine.

    1. Re:All things aside... by Storlek · · Score: 2, Funny

      Suppose some terrorist regime threatens to nuke us if we don't give them popcorn. The very fabric of our lives may well depend on whether or not we can efficiently make popcorn! /me imagines a RAID of popcorn poppers

      --
      Bears don't normally eat things that talk and move backwards.
    2. Re:All things aside... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      Mr. President, we cannot allow a popcorn gap!

    3. Re:All things aside... by slorge · · Score: 1

      It's a popcorn popper thats been modified to be a computerized coffee bean roaster.

      --
      Some people are like slinkys. They're useless, but it puts a smile on your face to push them down the stairs.
    4. Re:All things aside... by Chasuk · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, but this article is about the construction of a computer-controlled COFFEE ROASTER.

      Notice:

      created a computer-controlled coffee roaster...

    5. Re:All things aside... by ettlz · · Score: 5, Funny

      If the ends justify the beans, yes.

    6. Re:All things aside... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      You must be in possession of that mythical toaster that actually produces consistently browned slices, whether or not it's already warmed up. And has presets for bagels, brown, and white bread. Personally I can easily see applications for computers in cooking things. Haven't you ever burned something, or baked something that came out doughy in the middle?

    7. Re:All things aside... by mrjb · · Score: 1

      Not reading TFA is one thing, but if you miss the *title* you could really use a cup of coffee.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    8. Re:All things aside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...me imagines a RAID of popcorn poppers

      Wouldn't that be a Beowolf cluster?

    9. Re:All things aside... by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Can it pop coffee? That would be cool - undiluted caffeine.

    10. Re:All things aside... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Modded Interesting...Yes...Veerrry iinnteresting...but shtupid! In other words can the lecture, all right? We'll solve the world's problems tomorrow. I'll fire up my "Solvetheworldsproblems@home... when I'm done making some popcorn..er..coffee. Sheeesh. What a downer. So you think that this guy represents the entire computer engineering population? Should we all quit our jobs to devote all our time "solving the world's problems"? Besides, you got it wrong. He's using to roast coffee. Big difference. Maybe the world needs a computer controlled coffee maker. How do you know it doesn't? See? He solved a problem. Good coffee for all, AND he saved a computer from the land fill. So he solved TWO problems(the second one being quite valid). How many have you solved?

      --
      What?
    11. Re:All things aside... by Storlek · · Score: 1

      Beowulf clusters are old news. RAID is trendy now.

      --
      Bears don't normally eat things that talk and move backwards.
    12. Re:All things aside... by uncoveror · · Score: 2, Informative
      While popcorn is easy, roasting coffee is what this one is for, and that is a bit more complicated. You can make the same variety of coffee taste many different ways if you control the roasting process carefully enough.

      The hardest part about this setup is finding a working original West Bend Poppery. You will probably only find the Poppery II, which has only 1200 watts, not 1500 and no on/off switch. I use those with only one mod: A hole drilled in the lid to accomodate a thermometer. Monitoring temperature that way is a bare minumum to control the process. You need one that goes up to 550 degrees fahrenheit. Most don't.

      Fresh roasted coffee is the best kind you will ever have. Even people who thought they didn't like coffee can change their minds. Unlike at Starbucks where they burn the coffee until it all tastes the same, you can roast any way you like, and taste the difference between one coffee and another if you do it yourself.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    13. Re:All things aside... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      most air poppers will do, provided the air is blown sideways, and not vertically through the bottom.

      my air popper is rather simple and I don't think it's possible to wire it to a computer, so I rely on my brain, my eyes and my nose to see when the coffee beans are ready...

      if I screw up, no problem, because the amount of beans can safely I roast at a time is just about the same amount I can grind and put in my stovetop espresso maker.

      And since I like my coffee roasted Full City, it's pretty easy to tell when it's ready.

      There's tons of other coffee information in the site I've linked too.

    14. Re:All things aside... by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      How many older DOS boxes end up landfilled? There's some pretty environmentally unfriendly chemicals, such as lead in monitors, Poly-Chlorinated Bi-Phenyls or related compounds in power supply capacitors, and so on. Just about anything that gets a few more years use out of an old box for just the cost in electricity is a likely to be a good idea in that sense. It might even give the local society time enough to implement recycling or incineration for on all those old PC type hazardous materials.
      Yes, depending on what else that box could handle, there may be better uses. Keeping a box networked to run protein folding models might be better, especially if it isn't adding much to the user's net access costs. I suppose it's possible even Seti at Home might work out. But coffee making (not popcorn, as others have pointed out), is still much better than junking the box while there's life left in it.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    15. Re:All things aside... by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Do you really need a computer to pop popcorn?
      Once you've worked out how to do it with a general purpose machine a cheap PIC controller or similar could be used to do it the same way.
      We're hardly going to solve the worlds problems if the main focus of computing in engineering is a popcorn machine.
      Funny thing is about all I can remember from a 1986 open day at a university chemical engineering department was the hot air popcorn popper they had rigged up as a demonstration of a fluidised bed heating system. I believe they actually had a simple analogue computer (op-amps and patch leads) controlling it. I think they did solve some of the worlds problems with it - they applied the findings to more than just popcorn.
    16. Re:All things aside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Neopets - the best free game on the Internet. [neopets.com]

      Here's an alternate in case it's Slashdotted. (Don't worry, it still has your referal.)

    17. Re:All things aside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was casus beani. This beans war!

    18. Re:All things aside... by Entropy+Unleashed · · Score: 1

      Now - Popcorn-Popper -> Coffee Roaster Mod

      Yow! - Popcorn-Roasted -> Coffee Popper Mod

      --

      "I would give my right hand to be ambidextrous."
  8. Does the coffee roaster have a web interface? by Dark$ide · · Score: 1

    If you're going to the bother of building an automated coffee roaster. It should be runnning Apache2 on Linux (or OpenBSD) and have a fully-fledged CGI interface to control it. WDNNS DOS and Borland C programs.

    --

    Sigs. We don't need no steenking sigs.

    1. Re:Does the coffee roaster have a web interface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that Linux doesn't have any open source drivers for this coffee machine.

      Then again the DOS TSR driver isn't much better since it has to fit into the first 640K. This is a problem because you have to have enough space for your toaster, blender, and slice n' dice drivers.

    2. Re:Does the coffee roaster have a web interface? by Ashtead · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Did you read TFA at all? The interfacing is through GPIB to the converter units, two to read the temperatures and one to control the power to the heaters. He evidently has got his GPIB card to work with Turbo C under DOS, and a similar device driver can be made or obtained for Linux, I'm quite certain.

      However, this whole thing is a proof-of-concept as it stands. Professional grade equipment, which is what is being used here, even under Linux, would be way too expensive for the average coffee-lover.

      I think he's done an excellent hack, and from how I understand TFA, I guess the next step would be refining and integrating the various units.

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
    3. Re:Does the coffee roaster have a web interface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No I didn't RTFA, I really thought that you needed to load a coffee machine module into the Linux kernel or load a DOS resident driver in order for the coffee machine to work with your PC's coffee machine port. Sheesh

    4. Re:Does the coffee roaster have a web interface? by Dark$ide · · Score: 1

      Yes I did read the F***ing article. I think the computing part of that set-up should include a webserver so that you can easily see what stage of the process is running. It has precisely nothing to do with GPIB interface to the expensive measuring kit.

      --

      Sigs. We don't need no steenking sigs.

    5. Re:Does the coffee roaster have a web interface? by DJCF · · Score: 1

      I'd go for NetBSD myself, but whatever OS you use it really won't do any good unless you use HTCPCP - that protocal was really designed for this kind of application...

  9. Home appliances future by Fox_1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Kinda neat, kinda bizarrely geeky, however the fact is that many kitchen appliances are getting wired. Microsoft is spending tons on the automated home (i've seen one of their model homes). There is that crazy fridge now with the tv built in, and for a long time now there have been appliances with various levels of programability - microwaves that read cooking instructions from the UPC, fridges with inventory lists, etc. Just as we hack other netpliances - phones, pda's... - we will be hacking these wired wonders of the kitchen.

    --
    The rock, the vulture, and the chain
    1. Re:Home appliances future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and for a long time now there have been appliances with various levels of programability...

      Heh, I read that as, "...and for a long time now there have been appliances with various levels of pornography".

    2. Re:Home appliances future by dbIII · · Score: 1
      There is that crazy fridge now with the tv built in
      I thought it was crazy until I was told the target market - people in truly tiny apartments where you can see the fridge from anywhere.
    3. Re:Home appliances future by Mr.+KFM · · Score: 1

      * has a vision of someone cracking into his insecure refridgerator through Google, interfacing through http and a webrowser, and toying with the settings.

      --

      If all else fails... RTFM

  10. Roast your own by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

    Where can you buy unroasted beans?
    If it is possible to actually sell unroasted beans to people, have them roast and grind the beans themselves-- this guy could make some money off this.
    Starbucks could be selling people unroasted beans+the roaster+the grinder+the coffee maker. --Control freaks and Coffee aficionados beware!

    1. Re:Roast your own by Fox_1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a local organic coffee co-operative near where I live. They actually do the roasting just outside town so when you come off the highway all you can smell is coffee. I imagine they would have unroasted beans there for sale with the right conversation. And no I don't live in columbia, but canada of all places - though I think the beans are shipped from south america - some sort of ethical trade thing.

      --
      The rock, the vulture, and the chain
    2. Re:Roast your own by rhild · · Score: 1

      Lots of people roast their own coffee. I have been for a couple years.
      Here's one of the better sources for unroasted coffee beans: Sweet Maria's

    3. Re:Roast your own by Nerftoe · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm glad you asked:

      Sweet Marias.

      I have ordered from them on three occasions. They have a review on everything they sell which describes in great detail on what each tastes like.

      I use the Heat Gun/Dog Bowl method of roasting myself. Works every time.

    4. Re:Roast your own by phillymacmike · · Score: 1

      Sweet Marias Coffee is the best place to look for green beans.

      Google and you'll find more. But if you're really interested in coffee, alt.coffee is the best source of information and conversation.

      -- Mike

      --
      _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _>8
      Too many errors in one post (make fewer).
    5. Re:Roast your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Been buying green beans from http://www.sweetmarias.com/ for years. And years. And, roasted coffee with a West Bend Poppery II for years. Use an Alpenrost now - but plan on a BBQ setup using an RK Drum. Yeah - do a google for green coffee and you'll come up with a few sites. The difference between this and the sludge from stores is nothing short of remarkable - no bitterness, tastes kinda like it smells - what coffee should be like.

    6. Re:Roast your own by phillymacmike · · Score: 1

      Hey, Tom's going to be slashdotted. I hope he gets some business from this....

      --
      _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _>8
      Too many errors in one post (make fewer).
    7. Re:Roast your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair trade coffee is the term I believe. The idea is that you pay a little more and it's supposed to go to the small farmers who often get shafted by market conditions but really don't have a lot of alternatives to taking the market price.

    8. Re:Roast your own by caulktel · · Score: 1

      I but mine from http://www.coffeewholesalers.com/
      They ship real quick and have good cutomer service.

    9. Re:Roast your own by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

      Everyone that replied- you've been really helpful... I love coffee- and I think I am ready to plunge into the world of roasting my own.

    10. Re:Roast your own by cot · · Score: 1

      "The difference between this and the sludge from stores is nothing short of remarkable - no bitterness, tastes kinda like it smells - what coffee should be like"

      While I'll buy that the self-roasted beans make better coffee than Folger's, is it really better than the coffee that you go down and buy from Peet's or whatever? Any idea why?

      I mean, I can honestly say I'm in better shape than say, Louie Anderson, but what exactly does that tell you? (other than that I'm too old to know any young fat guys to refer to)

      --

    11. Re:Roast your own by jgordon7 · · Score: 1

      Sweet Maria's has been my source of green beans for about a year now. Great beans, and great people who run it.

      Roasting your own beans is simple and can be inexpensive.

  11. Mokneuys1! by Leffe · · Score: 3, Funny

    and uses a flexible control algorithm to control roasting segments.

    Eh, I want a genetic algorithm that generates the ultimate taste by feeding roasted beans to monkeys and having them rate it by bashing buttons.

    1. Re:Mokneuys1! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I want a cup of the stuff that made the monkey explode. Sugar, no cream, thank you.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  12. Close but no cigar! by Nathonix · · Score: 1

    This is a nice start, but seeing as the page was created two years ago, I wonder if hes updated it to actually brew the coffee too? Then all I'd need to do is have it add my cup of sugar, and a bit of creamer, and I'd be good.

    --
    Soap box, Ballot box, Jury box, Ammo box. Use in that order.
    1. Re:Close but no cigar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The images are datestamped 1998. The site was last updated in 2003. Either way, it's not exactly news.

    2. Re:Close but no cigar! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Spider Robinson's apres-Callahan's Bar stories have The Fount, which is probably close to what you'd want. (Alcohol if you want it, mug washer, roaster, grinder, whipped cream, user preferences, etc.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  13. Did it with a simple microcontroller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
  14. Last Updated by Nosferatu+Alucard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have a feeling nobody cared much about this when he first developed it. It says updated 8/29/03.

    Or maybe he didn't care, since he said in the code part that he would try to figure out how to post his code when he figures out how.

    It's still kind of cool nonetheless.

    1. Re:Last Updated by Storlek · · Score: 1

      Updated 8/29/03, but the dates on the pictures are from 1998. Pretty darn old. (That keyboard doesn't even have Windows keys on it!)

      It is a bit of a disappointment, though. I'd like to know if this got developed further.

      --
      Bears don't normally eat things that talk and move backwards.
  15. TC hookup is non-standard by deacon · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From TFA:

    I actually have four thermocouple in the rig: each of the TC's in the roaster has a reverse connected TC attached to it, This helps to eliminate stray thermoelectric voltages, and is, I'm told, the most accurate way to use a thermocouple. Because of the reverse junction thermocouples, the voltmeters sense the difference between room temperature and the temperature of the sensor. The use of high quality voltmeters here, with low DC offsets, is important since the TC's generate only 22uV or so of signal per degree F.

    That's an unusual way to hook up TCs, unless you put the extra TC in an ice bath (for the ice point). All TC meters (as opposed to generic voltmeters) have an artificial ice point voltage generator inside.

    In the design of this roaster, the extra TCs shold be in an distilled ice/water bath, otherwise the roaster temp depends on room temp, which is not what you would want. The roaster temp should be independant of the room temp variations (that is the whole point of a control system.)

    The other choice would be to use a surplus ISA based TC meter board (which has it's own ice point) in the PC, then you would only need 2 TCs and these would read the temp directly.

    Still, I think I speak for all of /. when I say that this project deserves praise and admiration for not only its pointless complexity, (really, a requierment of any GOOD project) but also for the use of very expensive and obscure (GPIB voltemeters and an A_D converter? WTF?) components.

    Sort of reminds me, in spirit anyway, of the weed burner I made out of an oil burner for a house furnace, and the snowblower made from the front half of a subaru station wagon...

    1. Re:TC hookup is non-standard by lakeland · · Score: 1

      When I looked into coffee roasting a couple years ago, I found that very little technical equipment was needed. Indeed, the principal reason that an ordinary oven was considered unacceptable is it would leave your house uninhabitable for several hours afterwards.

      Back then, the use of popcorn machines was fairly common, but all the instructions I read just used unmodified machines with quite precise timing controls.

      It looks like this guy has managed to take a simple project and make it extremely complicated. I guess that's kinda cool, but I think I'll stick to just using the gas campfire myself...

    2. Re:TC hookup is non-standard by tom_gram · · Score: 1

      "In the design of this roaster, the extra TCs shold be in an distilled ice/water bath, otherwise the roaster temp depends on room temp, which is not what you would want. The roaster temp should be independant of the room temp variations (that is the whole point of a control system.)"

      But its alot easier to read a thermometer and tell the computer what the ambient temperature it is, than to assemble an ice bath every roast.

      It was pretty hard to find a reasonable tc meter, board, chip, etc, that getsthe right answer at 400+F with ambient anywhere between 20 and 95F. (winter/summer) And pretty good stability and precision is necessary, as some stages of the roast ramp the bean temperature at a tenth of a degree F per second.

  16. Can it talk to my toaster? by karl.auerbach · · Score: 1

    We did a couple of SNMP controlled toasters back in 1988. (A lot of folks think they are apocryphal but I can assure you that they were real and made real toast. I've got photos somewhere.)

    In one of the episodes of Ruby (the Gallactic Gumshoe) she's in a room with appliances that talk about what they are doing.

  17. Anyone interested in roasting coffee or coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you are interested in roasting coffee, or in making high quality coffee, here are some sources for information:

    http://coffeegeek.com/
    http://www.sweetmarias.c om/
    http://www.greencoffee.coop/index.php

    and alt.coffee on news.

  18. Doesn't this guy know about I2C ADC's? by jlseagull · · Score: 2, Informative

    He's an engineer, not an embedded systems guy. Two HP power supplies with GPIB and an internal NI GPIB card are about $1500 worth of hardware. I2C ADC's and a Coldfire would have cost him about $30.

    Classic system though.

    --
    'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    1. Re:Doesn't this guy know about I2C ADC's? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      He's an engineer, not an embedded systems guy. Two HP power supplies with GPIB and an internal NI GPIB card are about $1500 worth of hardware. I2C ADC's and a Coldfire would have cost him about $30.

      Sounds like he's a engineering manager actually...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Doesn't this guy know about I2C ADC's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could have done that with a single chip microcontroller (about $1) with an external 20 to 24-bit DeltaSigma ADC for the thermal couple.

    3. Re:Doesn't this guy know about I2C ADC's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His actual name is Tom Gramila (no "s"), and
      he is professor of physics at Ohio State.
      I happen to know the guy.

    4. Re:Doesn't this guy know about I2C ADC's? by tom_gram · · Score: 1

      The hard part isn't the hardware, its the control algorithm.

      The overall project was a "proof of principle" effort and made use of gear that was "on hand", to try to get to the algorithm tweaking stage as quickly as possible.

      While the hardware has stayed more or less unchanged, the control approach has changed alot to get repeatability "in the cup", even while the ambient temperature varies from 95F to as low as 20F (roasting is done outside)......

  19. In a nutshell... by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

    Yes.

  20. Hmmm....... by t0ny747 · · Score: 0

    Code:

    I plan to make the code that I use available here, once I learn how make a link for this. -- In the meantime, send email if you want a copy.


    He did all that and he can not release the code???

    --
    Taco?
  21. Source of Green Beans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a completely anal importer who only buys the best:
    http://www.sweetmarias.com/
    This guy cups every lot he's interested in. If he doesn't like it, he doesn't buy it. And after 5 years, he's never let me down.

    1. Re:Source of Green Beans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This guy cups every lot he's interested in
      I'm a little more concerned that they call this guy "Sweet Maria."
  22. Coral cache by Nik13 · · Score: 1

    Coral Cache version (although it's not dead *yet*).

    Just like the home brwer temp control setuptaht was submitted not long ago, it's not that hard to do things like that (for anybody with any kind of basic eletronisc skills). The setup is usually quite ugly and sometimes can get fairly expensive and time consuming for a "hobby" project or simple task.

    I never tried roasting my own coffee, but I can buy some half decent stuff without having to bother with all this, and it's not really expensive either. Besides, this won't make me espresso pods, which is most of what I'm drinking lately :(

    --
    ///<sig />
  23. Porch? by sH4RD · · Score: 1

    Pictures below show the computer and roaster set up on my back porch.

    Um.....rain?

    --
    WASTE - The Secure P2P
    1. Re:Porch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's one of those screened-in roofed porches.

  24. Standards compliant? by Nuskrad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does it use HyperText Coffee Pot Control Protocol, as defined in RFC 2324

    1. Re:Standards compliant? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I think they've extended that for P2P (pot-to-pot) transfers. See paper by Drs. J. Valdez & Don Key. Tests with torrents, while initially promising, have been disappointing: slow drip rate, and not good to the last drop.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  25. Intriguing but... by kilodelta · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Who wants to blow 3Kw in electricity to roast coffee? What would be cooler is if he did some robotic manipulation, ie. take the output of the roaster and dump into a grinder.

    But it's cool just the same.

  26. A great idea by fawlty154 · · Score: 1

    Coffee roasting at home using one of these popcorn poppers is a great idea, and anyone serious about having access to good coffee should look into it.
    Personally, I got completely sick of the taste of Starbucks, so I started looking online for some better beans. Coming accross some newsgroups, I found that many people would buy unroasted beans online, then simply roast them at home with a crude device, such as a popcorn popper. People were reporting tremendous results, and I just had to give it a shot
    Truth be told, the worst tasting coffee that I have ever roasted by myself tasted leaps and bounds better than what I could get at my local startbucks. Not to mention that its the absolute cheapest way to get coffee.

  27. As an amature coffee roaster by espressojim · · Score: 2, Informative

    I always went by sound of the beans (first and second crack), and look. I have something similar to an air popper, an IRoast

    I find that for each batch of beans, the ambient conditions, exactly how much I put into the roaster, and any number of random factors contribute to how well the roast comes out. No matter how much control I have over the interior of the roaster (and my roaster lets me set up to 3 different temperature points to achieve during the roast), I always wind up programming the last stage of roast to go longer than I need to. I do this because the roasts are easier to measure by eye/ear for 'doneness'. I can guestimate approximately when it will be done by time, but it never seems to come out the same.

    I wonder if all the TC's, etc, really get you a better roast, or if it's just cool to say "Look what I did!"

  28. Interesting by MsWillow · · Score: 1

    We use a Poppery II to roast our coffee, and do it all manually. There are so many variables in each batch that I'd be hard-pressed to even try to measure them. First crack? In most cases, easy to tell when, but in the Costa Rican Terrazu La Minita, was so subtle it was hard to tell when it happened. The Nicaraguan Maragogype, tho, has a very robust first crack. The Ethiopian Yergacheffe is rather subtle, too.

    Then it's second crack time, and general "doneness" of the beans. The Yergacheffe is really bad here, because it varies widely in size. It's very hard to get an even roast with it - you'll have some dark-roasted beans along with the lightly-roasted ones.

    What I'd add in the way of controls in the popper would be something to shut off the heating elemnt, and just pump lots of air through the batch to cool it (and help remove the chaff, too, which is a real problem with Ethiopian Horse beans). Hmm, and if I wanted a computer-controlled unit, I might try hacking an old digital camera, and measure the average degree of roast. Now there's an idea :)

    I'll have to discuss this with Vikki. She has a real old camera, and lots of Atmel AVR chips. With her litterbox gadget working fine, she might enjoy a new challenge :)

    --

    Lemon curry?
    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a professional coffee roaster who carries La Minita (and has been to the farm twice) I have to wonder if the beans you are using are recent crop. First crack on that is really pretty easy to and has been for the five or so years I've been roasting it, even if we're 100g samples in a home roaster. I've yet to see a home roasting setup where controllability comes near what is available on commercial small batch drum roasters and without the ability to really control time/temperature/airflow reliably, it's going to be difficult to obtain optimal roasts over such a wide variety of coffees. If you like yrgacheffe but find it difficult to get just right, there are some really good lots of Uganda AA with similar flavor characteristics and very uniform beans this year.

    2. Re:Interesting by MsWillow · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I'll keep an eye out for Ugandan AA. I need something bright to liven up my usual blends.

      --

      Lemon curry?
  29. Sure but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But think how this kind of techno-chique will make your coffee-lounge look!

  30. cluster!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol...imagine a cluster of popcorn-poppers!!!

    brutal popcorn horsepower!!

    I hope he adjusted the salt proportion...

  31. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We report it last.

    (updated 8/29/03)

  32. holodeck by bluewee · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is it just me or does his setup look like it is in a holodeck?

    --
    [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
  33. Tom Gramila by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    His actual hane is Tom Gramila (no "s") and
    he is professor of Physics at Ohio State.

  34. I use a corn popper to roast my coffee as well. by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 4, Informative

    While I do not use the computer setup, I do use a $10.00 corn popper, and high-quality green coffee beans.

    If you are looking around for green coffee beans, just ask at coffee shops that are not like Starbucks. You will eventually find one that roasts their own beans.

    When you buy green beans, they will usually be less expensive than the pre-roasted variety. Also, remember that during roasting the beans double in size.

    Note: the popcorn popper should be of the "swirl" type. That is, the vents at the bottom of the roasting container should cause the beans or popcorn to "spin" while roasting. Do not use one that channels the air straight through.

    Fill the "butter warmer" so that it is level with green beans, then pour these beans into the popper.

    Plug the popper in.

    Now - one warning - roasting coffee beans produce LARGE volumes of smoke, and most of the smoke occurs during the end of the roasting process. You cannot put the roaster outside unless it is a very warm day (the air will not be warm enough to roast the beans properly if the incoming air is cold). So, you need to keep the roaster at room tempurature. What I do is open a window, and stick the output part of the popper out the window, while keeping the rest inside. You can also use the fume hood of your stove.

    Once you turn the popper on, the beans will begin to spin. After a min or so, the "chaff" (bean covering) will begin to fly out of the popper. Collect this in a bowl to prevent a mess, or do as I do and point it outside.

    At 3-4 min, the beans will have gone from green to red or yellow, and from there they begin to progress to brown.

    During this process you will start to hear the beans cracking and popping. This is called "First crack" and is entirely normal. Finally, as the beans get darker, monitor them so that you can stop the popper when the beans are the roasting color you desire. (For me, this is about 8-10 min total). Finally, near the end of the roasting process, the beans will begin to pop and crack again, (known as second crack) and small round discs will flake off the beans. (Due to escaping moisture I belive). This is around the time that most people consider them well roasted.

    Now - unplug the popper (IT IS VERY HOT NOW! BE CAREFUL!!!) and dump the beans into a container. I use a glass jar. They will still be smoking. I cover the container with saran-wrap and let it sit 24 hours. I have read that the CO2 "gassing out" from the beans can break mason jars that are sealed in with hot roasted beans in them. (It could be myth, I dont know, never saw it myself).

    You can use the beans right away, but I reccomend that you wait a few hours to grind them. About 24 is best. (Freshly roasted beans don't yet have a full flavour - they are very "flat" waiting 24 hours greatly improves the experience.) The beans will keep their excellent flavour for about a week - after that, the oils will start to evaporate, and you will end up with basic storebought beans.

    This sounds complex, but it is pretty simple. And in the end you have incredible coffee - and it costs less!

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:I use a corn popper to roast my coffee as well. by OldPossum · · Score: 1

      Try dumping your hot beans into a basket strainer and shake it around. The chaffe and stray flakes fall out and your beans cool off quickly.

      I put my coffee roaster in a large metal bowl in cold weather. The heat from the roaster pre-heats the intake air and I can still get 6-8 minute roasts in 35 degree weather.

      I also use a transformer to tweak the AC voltage.

  35. Roasting at Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been roasting at home for a year now. When I first tried it, I thought I was a "creamer" kinda guy. It turns out that it was just the coffee I'd been drinking. I'd been using the creamer to cover the god-awful taste of Starbucks coffee. I *never* use creamer with my home-roasted coffee and I love the taste. And the last time I had Starbucks I gagged: it was that bad.

  36. WOwwwW! by dbretton · · Score: 1

    I buy mine at Peets.

  37. or, you can buy the i-roast by SailFly · · Score: 1

    I used to use a corn popper when I started home roasting my coffee beans (I also get my green coffee beans at sweetmarias.com) until last Christmas, when I got the i-roast I recommend it for somebody interested in home roasting, but not handy with a soldering iron.

    However, I'm getting ready to hack my i-roast to make it talk with my laptop. Much easier to store and retrieve roast profiles, keep notes, etc. Plus I just can't ignore how cool it would be to use my laptop to roast coffee :-)

  38. Thermocouples? by ZorMonkey · · Score: 1

    I had the same idea, but I couldnt find any thermistors or other temperature sensing bits that were rated for high enough temperatures (at least 500F) without being crazy expensive.

    I was excited to see this article to see what they used, but of course they dont mention what specific temperature sensor they're using. Initial Googling for "thermocouple" brought up a couple solutions that cost more than a whole automatic coffee roaster.

    But I dont know a lot about electronics anyways, so I'm probably better off.

    1. Re:Thermocouples? by Eatmorecake · · Score: 1

      try the roaster's own therm. If that isn't accurate enough, you shouldn't be roasting coffee.

      --
      Don't you mean.. BIZZARO! ..Signature?
    2. Re:Thermocouples? by ZorMonkey · · Score: 1

      The poppers (at least the type I have, a Poppery II) don't have a thermocouple, just an unadjustable bimetallic strip. The cheap mod some people use is to short out the thermostat, because they tend to open before the popper gets hot enough. Mine doesnt get hot enough, I've had beans not hit first crack after 20-30 minutes. After that, you can manually adjust the temp using a switch on the heating element while watching a meat thermometer. All thats missing from that is a way to wire the meat thermometer to a computer - and maybe an adjustable bimetallic strip so you dont burn down your house when your PC crashes.

  39. Good overview, thanks! by MsWillow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just a few things to add - try your local thrift stores for hot-air popcorn poppers. We got ours for generally under $3 each. We use a measured half-cup of beans per batch - more tends to spit beans out, and less goe slowly as the beans do far more spinning than roasting. Cover the "butter" holder - we used some old circuit board :) With this open, most of the air vents through it, and roasting takes longer. Use a burr-style grinder, instead of a blade grinder like the Krupps. Burr grinders produce a far more controllable and uniform size of ground coffee. Oh, and you just might want to throw away your creamer and sugar once you get into roasting. Real coffee doesn't need "enhancement."

    A few good sites to check out:

    Sweet Marias has beans, equipment and instructions. Very good.

    Coffee Bean Corral has equipment, beans, and some software they call the coffee matrix, to help you choose the perfect bean for your needs.

    Coffee Wholesalers has beans and equipment. A good place to start buying beans online.

    Hope you have fun! And you'll never tolerate stale, bitter, lifeless coffee again.

    --

    Lemon curry?
  40. its really breaking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    site last updated: 8/29/03

  41. hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any attempt to brew coffee with a teapot should result in the error code "418 I'm a teapot". The resulting entity body MAY be short and stout.

  42. Re:Roast your own (in Canada) by Willard+B.+Trophy · · Score: 1
    I get mine from Merchants of Green Coffee in Toronto. I don't need fancy stuff to roast it, either -- 15 minutes in a 230degC oven on a baking tray does it for me.

    There's also Birds and Beans, too. I've never bought their wares, but they seem a little less expensive.

  43. Why DOS? by op00to · · Score: 1

    What drives people to do cool things like this, and then run the damn thing under DOS? Is it actually easier to hack on that old OS than Linux or INSERT FAVORITE OS HERE?

    1. Re:Why DOS? by absurdist · · Score: 1

      For the same reasons that DOS is still used in so many embedded applications. Such as it's much easier to hack hardware when you can bang on the bare metal without dealing with hardware abstraction layers and the like. The right tool for the job and all that.

    2. Re:Why DOS? by op00to · · Score: 1

      What 'bare metal' was the author actually banging on? Seems to me he was just banging on a DOS GPIB device driver. Not much different than this Linux GPIB device driver.

  44. OO title throw anyone off? by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    Popcorn-Popper -> Coffee Roaster Mod
    [~BorgCopyeditor]$ gcc Roast.m
    Roast.m:82: warning: `Popcorn-Popper' may not respond to `-CoffeeRoasterMod:'

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  45. This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the site it was last updated on 8/29/03 so how is it news? or better yet why does it matter?

  46. If You Love Coffee by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    rule 1 is "Friends don't let Friends go to starbucks"

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  47. Try ordering just an espresso... by temojen · · Score: 1

    Most of the coffee shops here will make an Americano (run it VERY long... to fill the cup) if you order an espresso. The annoying thing is if you make it long the bitterness comes out.

    1. Re:Try ordering just an espresso... by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's one of my peeves. I always have to make sure I order my espresso as short pulls otherwise less informed barristas are always trying to "be nice" by giving me a longer shot. Luckily, most of the high volume Starbucks are switching to automated espresso machines which always pull a regular shot as long as they are correctly calibrated regularly.

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
  48. How about chocolate beans? by OpenGLFan · · Score: 1

    I'm not a huge coffee drinker, but I just watched the chocolate episodes of Good Eats. Does anyone here roast their own chocolate beans? Would a popcorn popper be good for that?

    (PIC programming is fun...)

  49. Sorry, hate me. To add: by Eatmorecake · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I forgot to say where to find them. I ordered one from a dump/scrapyard place in Northern California for about $85. (I was just installing a backup thermometer in an existing roaster) The two therms have always been off by about 2 degrees, which is good because one is at the top of the barrel, the other is toward the bottom.

    --
    Don't you mean.. BIZZARO! ..Signature?
  50. This makes no sense by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    What do you need the popcorn popper for if you have a Pentium?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"