Slashdot Mirror


High School Kids Beat MIT at Robotics Competition

An anonymous writer submitted a story saying "A bunch of bright high school kids from Carl Hayden Highschool beat out MIT in a Marine Technology Center's Robotics competition. Here are additional details of the competition."

597 comments

  1. Look out!! by beatdown · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here come the Aquadorks!

    1. Re:Look out!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! A blank CDR as an extra!

    2. Re:Look out!! by tloh · · Score: 1

      my favorite part of the story:

      ...Lorenzo prayed to the Virgin Mary. He prayed that the tampons would work but then wondered if the Virgin got her period and whether it was appropriate for him to be praying to her about tampons. He tried to think of a different saint to pray to but couldn't come up with an appropriate one.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  2. Future MIT students by gr8_phk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    must attend high school somewhere. Right?

    1. Re:Future MIT students by slughead · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was going to go to this high school. It's a dump but there were far more [gang] fights/shootings at the school I ended up going to (North HS), which was literally across the street from the Phoenix Country Club.

      Carl Hayden has a nice computer-oriented "magnet" program that attracts a lot of nerds, probably the same that won this competition.

    2. Re:Future MIT students by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 0

      More like the MIT-graduated or whatever engineer parents designed and built the thing while the high schoolers watched and maybe helped out with a few things, maybe. Thats how high school robotics teams work :D

    3. Re:Future MIT students by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      I have beaten MIT students before in a conference, though admittedly I was in University, but for a British University (Brunel Uni) to beat MIT on their home turf, with a product that actually works (rather than a bunch of clever technology that doesnt work together)

      The problem I saw with the MIT guys was that they are far too inclusive, and egos run riot. Each individual person was smart, but didnt nessasarily "interoperate" with each other. Whereas these high school kids, may have more social interoperation amongst each other, due to their so called "disadvataged status".

      And yes, the conference in which the Brunel Team I was in beat the MIT team was ironically in fact a Simulation Interoperativity Forum.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    4. Re:Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please RTFA.

    5. Re:Future MIT students by PoPRawkZ · · Score: 1

      I went to high school in the same district as Carl Hayden circa 1995-1999. During these four years there were numerous riots and gang fights that shut my school (Trevor G. Browne) and Carl Hayden down. Carl Hayden likes smack dab in the middle of an industrial district in downtown Phoenix.

      These kids laid the smack down on MIT. Their school distric is so underfunded its unbelievable that they even had a robotics program. They are the ONLY school in the distric to offer a marine biology program and thus are considered a "MAGNET" school. Absolutely unbelievable... All of these kids deserve scholarships.

      --
      peace,
      -Grokent
    6. Re:Future MIT students by chiapetofborg · · Score: 1

      must attend high school somewhere. Right? Yeah, they have to attend somewhere, but it doesn't have to be some border school where the kids learned ESL, and can't get into college because they are immigrants.

  3. Scholarships? by carninja · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think MIT should be sending these kids scholarships right about now if they wanna save any sort of face.

    1. Re:Scholarships? by leerpm · · Score: 5, Informative

      Read the article, these kids cannot even qualify because they are considered undocumented immigrants.

    2. Re:Scholarships? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      MIT gives no scholarships.

    3. Re:Scholarships? by carninja · · Score: 1

      read my comment, the key word was _should_

    4. Re:Scholarships? by caldaan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apparently, they should. But thats part of the problem with schools like MIT anyway.

      However, those MIT engineering students just learned the most important lesson any engineering student can learn. Engineering is about making the best, most cost effective solution to get the job done. In short it is about making money.

      The MIT students were behaving a lot more like scientists than engineers, and is likely why they lost. $800 vs $11,000 is a big difference.

    5. Re:Scholarships? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they should look to studying outside the US. What about going to Mexico or another spanish speaking country and doing a degree there? Anyone know what the state of university funding is in Mexico? Or the quality of the education? Or how about another english speaking country, the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc.

    6. Re:Scholarships? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to the University of Cincinnati and studied Mechanical Engineering. UC and many other engineering colleges have co-op programs where students work every other quarter in some kind of engineering office. I was able to easily pay all of my educational expenses. Also, after graduation many employers look favorably on the 6 or 7 quarters of work experience.

      I did live at home, so my expenses did not include room and board.

      Since then, college tuition has gone up a great extent. But a cursory check of tuition at UC (less than $3K/qtr for state residents) shows that I could still go there and pay my own way by working in the co-op program.

    7. Re:Scholarships? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, they can fucking fly to New Zealand.. why didnt' they think of that...

      idiots

    8. Re:Scholarships? by daniel_mcl · · Score: 1

      Qualify for what? If you're saying that they can't go to college because they're not U.S. citizens, think about that for a moment. Was everyone at your college a U.S. citizen? Probably not. International students are still eligible for financial aid, whether they're from Asia or Mexico.

      --
      I used to read Caltizzle. I was a lot cooler than you.
    9. Re:Scholarships? by elBart0 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and they would need student visas. Which they would need to leave the US to apply for. Their status as "undocumented alients" would almost certainly disqualify them from student visas.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    10. Re:Scholarships? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're smart enough and resourceful enough to build robots they ought to be smart enough to become citizens. The test isn't that difficult. If that doesn't work out, maybe they should try to get into college as foreign students on a proper visa.

    11. Re:Scholarships? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MIT doesn't give out merit based scholarships, the merit based part is getting in. If MIT functioned like you a lot of you are implying it should it wouldn't be MIT anymore.

  4. explanation by mmkkbb · · Score: 1, Funny

    MIT students have access to higher quality chemistry supplies anf facilities to synthesize their preferred extracurricular activity accelerators.

    --
    -mkb
  5. what's the news here? by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Talent" is not something exclusive to MIT people.

    1. Re:what's the news here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That colleges aren't all they're cracked up to be? That 90% of these kids will probably attend a public college after high school? That MIT is a "name" only? You might spend $30,000 a year on a n education at MIT and find that you could have gotten the same thing at the public college down the street for $10K/year.

      But then, many of us knew that. Another waste of time and money... 90% of college degrees are an effort in discipline, and most of the real learning is done "on the job". Other than the hard sciences, math, and computer programming, much of the stuff taught in college is outdated by the time you apply yourself in a real job.
      There's very little in college that's worth learning that wasn't taught in high school. But, the fluff that's offered in college has to be offered because the colleges say it's important. It's one of the reasons that college is so expensive. Someone has to subsidize all the Women's Studies majors. Someone has to subsidize all the fluff that really doesn't amount to much in the real world.

    2. Re:what's the news here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More important, the winners get to chant "I'm better than you-ou" while doing that butter-churning dance.

      If you can do that to the stuck-up pricks from some "name" university, it is totally swee-eet.

    3. Re:what's the news here? by Jakhel · · Score: 0
      More important, the winners get to chant "I'm better than you-ou" while doing that butter-churning dance.

      that's called the cabbage patch

    4. Re:what's the news here? by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      "Talent" is not something exclusive to MIT people.

      But schools like MIT do everything they can to segregate intellect. They only select the "brightest" and the "best". They pick through thousands of applications, looking for the best grades, toughest curriculum, and highest test scores.

      So, how come they failed against some high school kids? What happened to the Feynmans?

      The private university only has 1 true purpose for exsisting. It is a segregated place where the legacies of the rich and powerful can meet who they believe to be the brightest and best of the future, to start their collusions. The best jobs often go to these graduates, and the contacts they make seem to impact where they work and what they do. And for being so bright, they have no clue what's really going on. It is like the Firm- they get offered a ton of money and a Wall Street job, and before they know how they are impacting society, they are a cog in a bureaucracy forcing people to move out of housing or doing something as children they would have found reprehensible. Money really is the root of all evil, and it seems kids who had a geniune joy for robotics beat the mighty MIT team.

      But I am getting a good belly laugh that their formula for finding the "best" and the "brightest" was blown out of the water by a bunch of high school kids.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    5. Re:what's the news here? by iBod · · Score: 1

      >> Other than the hard sciences, math, and computer programming, much of the stuff taught in college is outdated by the time you apply yourself in a real job.

      That's odd. I would have said that the kind of computer programming learned at most colleges is *exactly* the sort of thing that is outdated (or worse, irrelevant) when you move into the commercial IT world.

    6. Re:what's the news here? by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Naw. Languages change, but concepts remain. If you know what a heap sort is or a linked list is, but you don't know java, you're in a better standing that someone who doesn't know the concepts but knows the language. Of course, the HR monkies wouldn't know that.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    7. Re:what's the news here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actual quote is the love of money is the root of all evil, much like in Franklin's those that sacrafice essential liberties for temporary security will receive and deserve neither most people fail to comprehend the word essential.

    8. Re:what's the news here? by iBod · · Score: 1

      Yes, concepts remain, but sort algorithms and linked lists are pretty simple concepts to grasp really.

      Do you honestly think the only way you can learn these simple ideas is by spending years at college tinkering with fragments of C or Lisp?

      Today's commercial developers have to get their heads around the (ever more) complex application bulding and delivery technologies that exist in the commercial world.

      I don't see what any of that has to do with HR monkeys (other than HR monkeys probably think MIT == GOODNESS).

    9. Re:what's the news here? by Fillymon · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point here. The point isn't that they beat MIT (per se), it's that a group of underfunded, disadvantaged high schooler's beat the "best and brightest" students that our colleges have to offer. MIT is just a symbol of our "best and brightest". No one is implying that there aren't plenty of intelligent people that do not choose to go to MIT.

      --
      P.S. - This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated.
    10. Re:what's the news here? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Today's commercial developers have to get their heads around the (ever more) complex application bulding and delivery technologies that exist in the commercial world.

      Only if you are unfortunate enough to work for a software company. For most internal software projects at non-software companies, they care if it works and advances the business needs of the company, not whether it uses the latest and "greatest" application building and delivery technologies. Unless the company care more about that stuff than the business at hand, in which case, the company likely will go bankrupt and everyone will get laid off anyway.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    11. Re:what's the news here? by John+Courtland · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm, this seems to be one of those "say what you mean, rather than "mean what you say" moments...

      Those things I tossed out were the first things that came to mind, you will certainly learn more difficult subject matter in any Data Structures and Algos course. And don't underestimate their complexity. A lot of people can't wrap their head around algebra, let alone linking schemes or big-O notation, etc...

      You can certainly learn anything you want outside of a college. I hate colleges, in fact. However, as an anecdotal example, a friend of mine is getting his Masters in CS right now and learning Bayesian network algorithms, deep tree searches, efficient methods of traversing graphs (OSPF, basically) etc. When will you have time to screw around with that in the real world, with real hard deadlines?

      Also, a lot of what I learned in college is very relevant to programming today. Who cares if I didn't learn how to use "delivery technologies"? That crap is dead simple compared to writing hard code. So your statement, "the kind of computer programming learned at most colleges is *exactly* the sort of thing that is outdated" stuck me as misinformed.

      And what I meant by the HR monkies comment is that they seem to care what languages you know vs what concepts you know, when any real programmer should be able to jump from language to language quickly.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    12. Re:what's the news here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They used to - but at some point around 2000, after the latest rash of suicides, the MIT administration decided that it might be easier to simply lower their standards a little and get more "normal" kids with "lives". The upshot is the MIT chicks are definitely better looking these days.

    13. Re:what's the news here? by citizenr · · Score: 1

      but money *IS*
      Have you seen those subs? MIT one looks like from SF movie, those kids made _something_ from broom sticks and won.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    14. Re:what's the news here? by AlaindeBotton · · Score: 1

      Amen, my brother! MIT is not a land of unfathomable genius. It is a good school full to the brim with students who test well, work their asses off, and pay an enormous amount of tuition for a great brand name. Don't get me wrong, there are smart people here, but the MIT brand name does not bestow special cognitive abilities to its students. It doesn't really surprise me that a group of motivated high school students could whoop some MIT ass. There are alot of very bright people in the world who never get a brand name education and yet still manage to make incredible contributions to society. Send these kids to a good state school for engineering and see what they can do!

  6. Wow! by cOdEgUru · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before this deteriorates in to a Pro/Anti Immigration flame fest, I cannot but feel awe for these four kids who braced odds to be where they are at now. And to know that the odds piled up against their favor include being alien, poor, living in gang infested streets and yet be capable of this?

    For one, I hope the media picks this up, not just Wired. I hope they get as much visibility as they can, on their plight, the lives they live and their achievements. We have all heard and read of ordinary people who surmounted amazing odds to claim their personal victories, but seemingly they happen far less and few in between. What this country need to know is despite poverty, crime and the potential to go wrong, not one, but four kids chose the right, but tough path. And they should be commended for that till kingdom come.

    But for what we have seen, the INS would pick them up next week and hand them back to a grateful Mexico.

    1. Re:Wow! by Cyclotron_Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I agree. It is important to mention that there are other outlets besides the MIT robotics competition for high school students of all backgrounds to accel. It may sound outdated and corny, but the Science Fair (particularly the ISEF provides students with this type of competition designed to show off their technical and scientific achievements, regardless of their backgrounds.

      It is nearly science fair season... I must dust off my judging clothes :)

    2. Re:Wow! by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      But for what we have seen, the INS would pick them up next week and hand them back to a grateful Mexico.

      One can always hope.

      Here's a new one for you to hand-wring over:
      Is this evidence of a Mexican "brain-drain" phoenomenon?

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    3. Re:Wow! by dos_dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Before this deteriorates in to a Pro/Anti Immigration flame fest...

      How could that possibly happen? Where do you think all those MIT students come from?

    4. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's sad that this case is being overwashed with Schiavo bullshit.

      This is the kind of thing that needs to be on CNN.

    5. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. I live in Phx. I want to hire these guys to do my drywall, landscaping and detailing my car.

      We need a latino version of Pimp My Ride, some of the cars around here are amazing (hydraulics, and
      lowererd rides aside)

      Thought the article was a great read, and an inspiration. Much better than reading about the latest gang related shooting over on the sw side of Phx!

    6. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, never mind the print media, I can imagine the Hollywood scripwriters pounding on the keys now. Casting ideas anyone?

    7. Re:Wow! by Zorton · · Score: 1

      I can't help but be amazed by these kids.

      Time and time again we see that adversity often brings out the best in people. When your dealing with blocks of stone instead of simple wooden structures a "looks big enough" eyeball measurement will not work. So you invent various mathematical ways of figuring out the exact dimensions to be used. Little wonder the pyramids amaze people today, they HAD to come up with a better way of building it, or else you could beat the slaves all you wanted yet nothing would get built. Why? Because once the slave moved the same stone up and down the building site for something like "just another few cuts" several times he would certainly wonder if a beating would be preferable. When it's not just your life on the line but the potential lives of millions creating something as awful as the atom bomb becomes more than just a "job" it becomes a goal and a driving force beyond any money you might be paid.

      These guys not only managed to trump the engineers but hopefully managed to show us all that simple is often better.

      I think all engineering schools should require that every student aspiring to graduate should spend a good portion of their time working on the physical aspect of whatever they are designing. If they are mechanical engineers then make them work on cars and turn wrenches for a summer. If they want to work as electrical engineers make them climb up the towers and hang antennas. Then they might be able to see that beyond the paper. There is quite the difference between a true engineer who thinks of the end result and someone who can only see their jobs and paycheck.

  7. Doesn't say much for education by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Interesting
    must attend high school somewhere. Right?

    Even granting that, it would indicate that said MIT education didn't make them any better. And think, all those student loans for nothing? ;)

    Obviously the entire story is somewhat facetious.

    1. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Going to college isn't to make you smarter, or more educated, it is to tell a future employer that you can put up with a bunch of BS for at least 4 years.

    2. Re:Doesn't say much for education by elgatozorbas · · Score: 2, Insightful
      it would indicate that said MIT education didn't make them any better

      ...at robot competitions. Maybe they have other talents.

    3. Re:Doesn't say much for education by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Depends on how seriously you took the education.

      Although I don't use (and in some cases understand :-) half the stuff they taught me, I feel like the act of trying to understand it increased my ability to understand a larger range of concepts - kind of like working out to increase muscle capacity.

      And the half that I _do_ use turned out be useful at occasionally very unexpected places. So I'm hopeful that I might be able to use some of the other half at some point in my future.

    4. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Mr.Dippy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      College hardly teaches you anything tangible(unless you major in something really technical). What college does is teach you how to think , solve future problems, and conduct research. All of these things are important for people not to be dumbasses in life.

      --


      -Dipster
    5. Re:Doesn't say much for education by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Even granting that, it would indicate that said MIT education didn't make them any better. And think, all those student loans for nothing? ;)

      This reminds me of Good Will Hunting. LOL. "You could have got your Harvard education for 10 cents in library late fee's".

      I agree, I have met many people from the MIT's of the world, and they don't really impress me as better human beings than I've met elsewhere. In some cases, they were complete asshats. The problem is, everyone in highschool knows the next best secret to getting in MIT, besides being rich. Get the best scores on tests, any way you can. Often, this means no social life, and people who have not developed fully as human beings. They think they know more about Humanity because they have read Hawthorn, although they have never done anything really stupid, for no reason, just because friends were doing it too.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    6. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget you also learn how to play Stump The Student (eg tests).

    7. Re:Doesn't say much for education by robertjw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would agree if we are talking about going to your local State university. Going to a university like MIT ( or Harvard, Stanford, CalTech, Carnegie Mellon, etc...) better make you smarter and more educated. These schools have reputations to live up to and charge a LOT of money.

      OTOH I think you can learn things in college. The ultimate goal may be just to have that piece of paper for your resume, but you do have to sit through classes and stuff. It's all what you make of it.

    8. Re:Doesn't say much for education by bynary · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, college didn't make me smarter, it taught me how to analyze things, think things through thoroughly, and how to build lasting relationships. I did become considerably more educated also. I did not know how to manipulate C++ data structures prior to CS202 and I didn't understand the intricacies of x86 Assembly prior to Dr. Korntved's amazingly boring but infinitely educational class.

      I do believe, though, that it comes down to the individual's desire to learn and interest in being successful. I graduated from a small school in Idaho; most of you have probably never heard of it, but it produces excellent computer scientists, electronics engineers, and mathematicians (among other things, but I highly doubt many of /.'s readers graduated with a degree in Theology or Social Work). It comes down to dedication and desire. One of the benefits of going to Carnegie Melon, Princeton, Yale, and etc. are the connections you make (the guy in the cube next to me graduated from Carnegie Melon, if that says anything about the two schools, and yes, he's very intelligent).

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    9. Re:Doesn't say much for education by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Funny

      they have never done anything really stupid, for no reason, just because friends were doing it too.

      That's not true - they went to MIT. ;-)

    10. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      And the half that I _do_ use turned out be useful at occasionally very unexpected places. So I'm hopeful that I might be able to use some of the other half at some point in my future.

      Half of the knowledge I use at work I learned in my hobbies that I did for fun in college (and weren't supported by the school). Half the home repair I do at home uses what I learned in college. Go figure. My college ed is used for repairing home equipment and my hobbies are what I use at my job. And my major is directly related to my job.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    11. Re:Doesn't say much for education by anonicon · · Score: 1

      "And the half that I _do_ use turned out be useful at occasionally very unexpected places."

      Like with a date?

    12. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Darby · · Score: 3, Funny

      Although I don't use (and in some cases understand :-) half the stuff they taught me, I feel like the act of trying to understand it increased my ability to understand a larger range of concepts - kind of like working out to increase muscle capacity.

      Exactly.
      I got my degree in math, and I doubt I'll use the fact that I not only understand, but can prove
      The generalized Stokes Theorem.

      However, the fact that I can read a sentence consisting of primarily goofy symbols even worse that the linked one makes me an excellent Perl programmer ;-)

    13. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Shaklee39 · · Score: 0, Troll

      STOP USING THE WORD SAID LIKE THAT YOU FUCKING TURD. HOW ABOUT SAYING "it would indicate that their MIT education didn't". I DON'T FUCKING CARE IF IT IS CORRECT YOU PILE OF SHIT. FUCK YOURSELF.

      Please try to keep posts on topic.
      Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
      Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
      Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated

    14. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have expected most people to know how to do that before they went to college. I think it's one of the first things they should be teaching kids to do.

    15. Re:Doesn't say much for education by dicepackage · · Score: 1

      Just remember girls dig guys with great computer hacking skills.

    16. Re:Doesn't say much for education by SunFan · · Score: 1

      Going to a university like MIT ( or Harvard, Stanford, CalTech, Carnegie Mellon, etc...) better make you smarter and more educated. These schools have reputations to live up to and charge a LOT of money.

      That's a popular misconception of prestigious universities. Having gone to one, there are only two things I can figure out were benefits: a really nice campus and the alumni network.

      The education itself was just a standard university treatment but with lots of regular kids who didn't need to be smart if their parents had a lot of pull.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    17. Re:Doesn't say much for education by pyite · · Score: 1

      Oh man, I had a professor once prove one of the theorems in that family (Green, Stokes, Gauss, I can't remember which) and I was amazed at my ability to sit there with a straight face through the whole thing. Fortunately, being an engineering major, while we do need to know about those things, none of us dare try to prove them (and we'd all be screwed if we tried, a lot of professors included).

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    18. Re:Doesn't say much for education by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      What college does is teach you how to think , solve future problems, and conduct research.

      That's certainly not what I was taught in college. I got history (most non-history classes are classes about history - even physics and math classes are just "this is how so-and-so solved this problem 100 years ago") and I was taught what society expects (if you are doing a research paper, you put in references in this manner, if you declare a new discovery, you are expected to release how you did it in sufficient detail that it can be replicated and tested, etc.).

      I already knew how to think. The manner in which I think is innate. Solving future problems is usually a matter of history and application of history. There are very few unique problems, and only a few people really tackle those unique problems. Most other problems have been solved before, or ones sufficiently similar have been solved. You only need be aware of the previous solution or the previous method and know how to apply it. History lessons are sufficient for that. Conducting research is mostly ethics and format. Well, that an a lot of grant applications. Sure, they will cover some "best practices" stuff, which again is strictly history lessons of what others have done before, but it is mainly format, not substance.

    19. Re:Doesn't say much for education by udowish · · Score: 1

      There have been numerous studies indicating that an Ivy league school's education can be worse than a non ivy league structure. Just because you paid alot for your education does not mean its any better than anywhere else....

      --
      when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
    20. Re:Doesn't say much for education by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't say going to the school I went to made me smarter, but I will say I learned a hell of a lot, and I had a lot of experiences that I couldn't have had at many other schools.

      But then, my school also doesn't suffer from rampant grade inflation like some "prestigious" schools... And I can tell you, I never met a single student who didn't deserve, intellectually, to be there. Some made you wonder sometimes, but then you'd find out they'd won Westinghouse in high school or had a 4.0 (virtually unheard of) or something else equally impressive.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    21. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that these kids probably did a fair bit of thinking, solving problems, and researching in order to build this thing.
      So what does the College bit add, again?

    22. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caltech, not CalTech. Thank you.

    23. Re:Doesn't say much for education by badmammajamma · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought the point was to learn how to use p2p software?

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    24. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It looks to me like this is a case of some ridiculously talented high school kids. They had some really good ideas and put them to use. The physics nerd really came in handy. :P

      On the other hand, it's also possible that there was a lower standard for a bunch of high school kids, whether intentionally or not. Let's face it, seeing some ghetto mexican kid spouting off about fluid dynamics and phase shift of helium aargon lasers is damned impressive -- much more so than a couple college students speaking at the same level, and that could certainly have been a factor.

      Anyway, considering that the MIT kids probably didn't start college as physics prodigies like christian or skilled in mechanics like the guy I'm too lazy to check the article for the name of, they certainly got their money's worth -- I know how to program reasonably well, does that mean that people who get compSci degrees are wasting their money? Others are great at electrical without schooling, does that mean that I'm wasting my money in EE? No. If it did, then we wouldn't have schools.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    25. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Fillymon · · Score: 1

      No one really needs college anyway. Everything that you learn in college can also be learned by simply reading a book. And if you want to argue about all of the social teachings of college, try going to a bar --no tuition required. Before you flame this, yes, I am fully aware of the fact that no employer will hire someone to fill a technical position who does not have a college diploma. In reality though, the diploma itself does not really mean very much. Anyone who decided to read the same books, and learn the material out of curiosity rather than at a professor's orders would be just as knowledgeable in the subject matter.

      --
      P.S. - This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated.
    26. Re:Doesn't say much for education by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      they have never done anything really stupid, for no reason, just because friends were doing it too.

      You say that like it's a bad thing...

    27. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I got my degree in math, and I doubt I'll use the fact that I not only understand, but can prove The generalized Stokes Theorem

      Hey, let's talk about you and how great you are!

    28. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Rostin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A prof from a pretty highly ranked department in my field (chemical engineering) once told a friend and me that we were better off at a state school as undergraduates. Top research schools are more likely to allow TAs to teach courses so that their professors can be off doing what brings in the grant money. I've since heard others say the same thing, and I know that at my very poorly ranked (as in, not even in the top 50) state uni, TAs never taught lecture courses.

      So, I'm honestly not certain what the extra $$$ gets for you, at least in engineering. It's probably somewhat easier to get into good grad schools (which does make all the difference in the world), but even that effect is not especially pronounced. Two people in my graduating class went directly into MIT's PhD program. Probably the main things are networking (both with profs and other students), ego, and atmosphere.

    29. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No one really needs college anyway. Everything that you learn in college can also be learned by simply reading a book.


      Ever try to "read" a book on differential equations? Okay, maybe you looked at the symbols.. but then did you try to APPLY it? Sure, reading it works for history and some other classes, but most subjects that requires substantial problem solving are much more learnable with a qualified and engaged prof in the room.
    30. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      College hardly teaches you anything tangible(unless you major in something really technical). What college does is teach you how to think , solve future problems, and conduct research.

      And how to PARTY - Whoooohoooo!!!

    31. Re:Doesn't say much for education by e133tc1pher · · Score: 1
      Going to college isn't to make you smarter, or more educated, it is to tell a future employer that you can put up with a bunch of BS for at least 4 years.
      So your saying the B.S. in Computer Science means something different than I first thought? : P
    32. Re:Doesn't say much for education by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1

      "I have met many people from the MIT's of the world, and they don't really impress me as better human beings than I've met elsewhere"

      Who ever said they were supposed to be?

      In some cases, they were complete asshats.

      Well, there's a shocker!...a sub-group of a group of people were annoying.

      everyone in highschool knows the next best secret to getting in MIT, besides being rich

      Before, I was serious/joking...But at this point in your post, I realized you no longer had any clue what you were talking about and stopped reading...

    33. Re:Doesn't say much for education by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Alright, here's my signals and systems, microelectronics and Network theory I and II books, I'm sure after you've read them cover to cover you'll know just as much electrical/computer engineering as i do.

      Only you won't, because I've had access to a lab, materials, a clean room (which I seriously doubt you have in your garage) and several professors and TAs which all have explained and added insights to the book material to increase my understanding of it. Reading text only goes so far, and while it may be far enough for some disciplines, for many it doesn't scratch the surface

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    34. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Darby · · Score: 1

      Well, little troll, that would only be true if you think that knowing that is great which I suspect most people don't.

    35. Re:Doesn't say much for education by hsteck_ylf · · Score: 1

      lol... to learn and teach others so you can get their stuff too :)

      --
      If you are expecting something here, I don't know what to tell you...
    36. Re:Doesn't say much for education by wan-fu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think you have it quite backwards and this is due to the current folklore surrounding colleges such as Harvard, Stanford, MIT, etc. The common folklore is pretty much what you stated: professors don't teach classes, TAs do, and that it's all about 'the name' of attending the school.

      I attend one of these 'highly ranked' institutions and it has been a great experience. I've never had a class taught by a TA. In fact, all of my classes are taught by the professor. The big name professors are even willing to teach small seminars. For example, at Stanford, Osheroff (physics Nobel) teaches a small seminar that's related to optics and photography (one of his hobbies). Outside of lecture, one may deal with the TAs more, but most of the questions one would ask are adequately answered by the TAs. If one requires the professor's assistance, it might take some effort to setup a meeting time, but I've always seen them try hard to make time for students.

      Here's how I view the difference between a 'top' institution and your typical state school: one will get the same education at both schools. There's a huge caveat to this, that being at a state school, one will probably have to expend a good amount of effort to ensure that he receives the same education. For example, at Caltech, the math core that all students must take is far beyond any typical math requirement at a state school, and if one attended a state school, he would have to spend more effort to find the correct difficult courses to take.

      So, why pay the exorbitant amount of money to attend a so-called prestigious university? One word: opportunity. The opportunities afforded at a top university are exponentially greater than other schools. The top professors within the field have lots of knowledge to share; there is a great chance to network with both the faculty and one's peers. Definitely, as you mentioned, atmosphere is key, because everyone at these schools went there as "overachievers" (not that they are all overachievers, but they all share some type of 'drive' - if you get my gist) and being in such an environment, simple conversations can lead to interesting studies. I feel that the big difference in the opportunities available at a big-name school is research at the frontier with lots of available resources. At a small state school, if one wishes to do research in any field, the odds of finding a professor with a similar interest who is at the cutting edge and has resources to share is significantly smaller than at a top university where there are more research dollars coming in and cutting edge work happening every day. In addition, having the most current research being conducted at one's school allows more opportunities to see the frontier and learn about it in class. Finally, there is a great opportunity to listen and learn from others that one could not do at a state school. Big-name schools can draw people like Howard Dean or Bill Clinton or [insert visionary/scientist/social mover/etc. here] to speak at the school. While it's possible for a small state university to do so, I doubt you'll see Fresno State or whoever pull in more than one or two of such speakers a year whereas at Harvard, such people would be coming in year-round.

      Being able to do cutting edge work while learning in an atmosphere geared toward higher education and having the interaction with great professors and people is the difference. Whether or not one thinks it's worth it to pay big bucks to get that difference is an individual choice.

    37. Re:Doesn't say much for education by hsteck_ylf · · Score: 1

      You can say that again. My college had one course releating to the web. I was a computer major and learned nothing that I currently use in my job as the Director of Information Technology. However my hobby (being web-development) is something that I use just about every day. The only thing college was good for was finding my wife.

      --
      If you are expecting something here, I don't know what to tell you...
    38. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can. A lot of people don't really *need* to be taught how to think. They already know. Most of what I learned in college I would have learned in life anyway, just because I'm observant and introspective.

      To be frank, the critical thinking skills that were taught to me in high school served me far better than the shovel-loads of generic essays I had to write in college.

    39. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, little Darby, that's exactly why you wrote about it in your post--because you thought that it would impress people. Otherwise, you would have just said that you learned things that you won't use. The fact that you responded only proves that the arrow hit its mark.

    40. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republican Morality: Mass murder good. Loving a person Evil. What sick fucks.

      Liberal Morality: Mass murder (abortion) good. Loving a person Evil (except if the definition of love includes two people of the same sex with a gerbil). What sick fucks.

    41. Re:Doesn't say much for education by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "kid spouting off about fluid dynamics and phase shift of helium aargon lasers is damned impressive "
      espcially after the MIT team said laser would be too difficult.

      they scored better in the engineering side them MIT did. as well as almost everything else.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    42. Re:Doesn't say much for education by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      Never mind the math, I barely understood the english on that site...

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    43. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      "but most subjects that requires substantial problem solving are much more learnable with a qualified and engaged prof in the room."

      Which has what to do with most colledges?
      Just thinking of a college instructor or two I've had. One wouldn't speak above a wisper (half the class insisted on thier money back) another was so anoying more than half the class wanted to be paid to be there.
      Though I did have one really good one, got 2/3 of the way through his class and realized he'd only taught me a couple things, or so I thought till I actually tried to summerize those few things and found out how much C I had learned. It just seemed like we hadn't done all that much. Really good ones sneak the info into you while you're kinda having fun.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    44. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      One could argue that's because the books are incomplete.
      The truth is people learn in different ways. I'd probably learn more from reading those books than talking to those people. The reason being I simply don't learn anywhere near as well from the spoken word as I do from the written. Having the labs would be good though, I do get some benifit there.
      The three main learning styles are visual (mine) auditory(definately not mine) and practice. I suspect most people are practice and few don't learn that way to some degree.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    45. Re:Doesn't say much for education by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Just be glad I named your stupid school in my post.

    46. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have yet to see positive results of your college education - if you've had one...

    47. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Nutria · · Score: 1

      girls dig guys with great computer hacking skills.

      I thought chicks dig giant robots.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    48. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      "Conservative": Childish, arrogant cynic who thinks the rich can do no wrong.

      "Liberal":Childish, arrogant optimist who thinks the rich can do no right.

      Stupid: believing that there are only two sides to any given issue, point of view, or belief -- even binary logic has a "no mans land" between high and low.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    49. Re:Doesn't say much for education by stuktongue · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I like your post; I think it hits the nail fairly squarely on the head. I'll add my slight spin on things....

      I went to Camelback High School (Boo, Carl Hayden!) and then MIT. I was valedictorian of my high school but, like many, only a member of the rank and file at MIT. My point is, like Dirty Harry once said, "A man's got to know his limitations." I certainly learned mine at MIT; I wonder if I would have at ASU.

      Continuing in that direction, I'll recall the firehose analogy. Getting an education at MIT has been described as being like drinking from a firehose (I'm sure this has been used at other schools, too). One can drink as much from a water fountain, I suppose, but with a firehose, you can't help but get wet in the process. I think "getting wet", in an academic sense, can be counted as a plus. For better or for worse, you certainly walk away feeling impacted.

      My MIT experience was my own, and I am reluctant to assume that anyone else's was at all similar; we each get different things out of such circumstances. I think parents would be wise to counsel their kids on what to expect from their college experiences, but I wonder how many really do. My overall experience was 60/40 good/bad, but I'm glad I went, anyway.

      To each his own.

    50. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you want to argue about all of the social teachings of college, try going to a bar

      Ahh... but what of those under 21? That's when college parties come in. Or at least knowing someone in the dorm who can get a hold of a fake...

      But seriously, college (especially mathematics) should in theory be about learning new ways of learning and thinking. That and seeing if the field you are aiming for is actually what you want to get into. There are also a few facts, terms and related minutae that should be taught in college that are necessary to begin to understand some of the more technical fields.

    51. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had mod points, I'd give you +1: getting pissed at indignant academics. But for some reason the acount of Anonymous Coward doesn't get mod points.

    52. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an undergrad, I would say you're better off going to a liberal arts college if you want to learn. The professors are there to teach. At the big schools, the professors are there to do research.

      This is what I was told when I visited Caltech for grad school. It's a research driven school, and you're better off being a grad student there than an undergrad. The undergrads learn because they know what they need to do to learn, not because the professor is teaching well. If that's what you want, more power to you, but I'd rather save my money. I'm paying to be taught, not to teach myself.

      I went to a state school for undergrad, but was accepted to both Caltech and MIT for grad school. In the end, I decided on going to a state school that has one of the top programs in the field, with smaller groups and just as many resources. I don't know if I would have considered going to a state school for grad school if I went to a prestigious school for undergrad, which would have been a shame because I've enjoyed my time here.

      Posted anon because some people seem to freak out when you mention "Caltech" or "MIT".

    53. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Smiffa2001 · · Score: 1
      So, I'm honestly not certain what the extra $$$ gets for you, at least in engineering.
      I've gotta say, attending one of the less well-known (and probably more laughed at) Universities in the UK, I have to agree...

      Talking to other people attending the "better" UK institutions, they are often amazed that the simple act of knocking on a lecturers/professors door and asking for some advice on some thorny programming issue is so easy. Whilst it's true that even guys at this level disappear with other tasks, they WILL and DO bring their experiences home to us and share it. Not only that but we also manage to get lectured by them and get to chat to them on a regular basis.

      If I had to do this all again, I'd pick the same institution and same lecturers. With the UK Universities able now to charge higher rates, I'd want to know I can get more for my £'s spent, which means speaking to a lecturer/professor and getting those insights.
      Lastly, I know a couple of TA's and they've been pretty miffed when they've been left to take undergrad classes. Not attacking these guys/gals, generally not their fault...
    54. Re:Doesn't say much for education by MutantHamster · · Score: 1
      Liberal Morality: Mass murder (abortion) good. Loving a person Evil (except if the definition of love includes two people of the same sex with a gerbil). What sick fucks.

      Sweeping Generalizations Morality: Thank God somebody invented some opinions for me to adhere to!

      --
      My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
    55. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweeping Generalizations Morality: Thank God somebody invented some opinions for me to adhere to!

      I guess the following, which is from the parent, isn't a 'sweeping generalization':
      Republican Morality: Mass murder good. Loving a person Evil. What sick fucks.

      It's interesting how one-sidedly objective you are and still able to take such a superior tone.

    56. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it's also possible that there was a lower standard for a bunch of high school kids, whether intentionally or not.

      It's hard to advance when people feel this way. If you do shitty, it's because you're an idiot. If you do somewhere in the middle, it's because you're just average. If you do great, the judges were overcompensating.

      I don't know and can't prove that the judges weren't overcompensating. I do know, however, that virtually everyone who succeeds as something really tough does so with at least a little bit of luck. Unless there's an unfair, consistant advantage that we can point at, most people I know ignore that luck part and just flat out give credit to people who achieve great things.

      Super Bowl champs are always champs, even if the other team's star quarterback was hit by a drunk driver the night before the big game. The spelling bee champ is still champ, even if he misspoke and got a word right that he should have gotten wrong. The gold medal figure skater is still the best, even if her position last in the schedule gave her an edge in the judging.

      These guys won. Unless you know first hand that there was some bias, put all that overcompensating judge crap right out of your mind. They're winners, champs, best of bread, etc. and deserve every accolade that goes with it.

      TW

    57. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what everybody too dumb or scared to finish college says.

    58. Re:Doesn't say much for education by racermd · · Score: 1

      Huge disclaimer - I'm not college educated. I took a few courses at a local university, but I found the format, structure, and content of them to be below my minimum threshold of B.S. (and they wouldn't allow me to "test" out of those basic-level courses). It left a bitter taste in my mouth to this day, and I refuse to give money away to an institution that isn't interested in teaching me anything but to tolerate red-tape and bureaucracy.

      From the side of the fence I'm on, college really doesn't seem to be much of an advange, intellectually, unless you're the type of person that's willing to go in to get the most out of it. And unless you know what you want out of it, it's impossible to get the maximum return on that investment, both in terms of time as well as money. Unfortunately, what to get out of it isn't exactly clear to most of those going in. In addition, the cost of a "quality" education (again, for those that know what they want out of it) is often prohibitively expensive.

      It's pretty evident (to me, at least) that most college students are there for a few simple reasons:

      1: It's expected of them by parents/peers.
      2: Their friends are doing it.
      3: It'll look good on their resume.
      4: It might open up a network of people that will help them advance their careers.
      7: They need to learn to count.

      None of those reasons are why college is truely important. In high school, ideally, we re-learn how to ask, "Why?". (Remember that, in developmental childhood years, the question, "Why?" is vital to learning about the world around us and is fairly instictual.) In college, we should continue to ask, "Why?", but also form new concepts on our own and ask, "Why not?" It should be a continuation of the learning we've already done.

      It is my opinion that college should be about the free exchange of ideas and concepts. Learning how things were done in the past is certainly important, but it should not be the end of all knowledge. Many truely great discoveries are not made by following established convention, but rather by going against it. Just because someone *said* something couldn't be done, doesn't make it so. It just proves that they were *unable* to do so. It's often pre-pended with the question, "What if?"

      Which brings this post on-topic. I think it's great that a bunch of kids from the desert were able to put this together and win the competition. It certainly makes a good story, if nothing else. But these kids were underdogs from the start, and were not only able to put together a well-rounded machine, but were able to explain why they chose certain parts or configured their machine in a particular way in such a confident, knowledgable manner. They took the assignment and asked themselves, "What if?" and, "Why not?". Then they went out and did it. None of these kids has a college education, but they're clearly very smart. It's already impressive that they won the competition. It's even more impressive that they won it on an $800 budget. No matter how you slice it, these kids deserve some recognition for their work. They didn't know they weren't supposed to win...

      It also goes to show you that a college education doesn't mean that you're smart. There are other, more meaningful measures of intelligence than a piece of paper that says you successfully enrolled in a sufficient number of classes and didn't say the wrong things to the professors. Intelligent people will always be intelligent, and they'll find ways to expand their knowledge of the world around them, even if college isn't an option. It is precisely these people that should be in college, however, and not the everyday, "me-too" types that are often found at the typical 4-year university.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    59. Re:Doesn't say much for education by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      College hardly teaches you anything tangible(unless you major in something really technical). What college does is teach you how to think , solve future problems, and conduct research. All of these things are important for people not to be dumbasses in life

      Only if they can actually apply them to....well... LIFE!

      While it's neat to know all sorts of esoteric stuff, it's really not useful unless you can actually DO SOMETHING with it.
      If someone comes out of college with a head full of knowedge, but no way to apply that information to their life, they can still end up being quite a dumbass.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    60. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alright first of, I want to say I was at this competition. I was with CRLS, and I know some of the kids on the MIT team.

      That being said, this was not a case of lower standards. MIT is full of smart boys and girls who now there share of physics and mechanics. You don't get into MIT if your not good at science or engineering. Trust me I do mean good, some of these undergrads at MIT are prodigies. The freshman know how to pull their share of hacks.

      However MIT does have a problem with hurbius some times. One of the kids on the team was from my highschool. His teammates, not all of whom had done much building before, would suggest 6 axis arms, 3D underwater vision, and much worse. He would have to get kids like that back onto a realistic track.

      Meanwhile these highschool kids where good. Trust me, MIT didn't just turn down the laser idea for nothing. Those kids worked very hard, and very long. That is half of what won them that competition. The other half is because they had skill.

      The article is one big feel good story. None the less those kids have my respect.

    61. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Fillymon · · Score: 1

      I also have an electrical engineering degree. I will grant you that the labspace is very beneficial because it would be next to impossible for the average person to be able to afford to buy a single network analyzer to put in their garage, let alone all of the other equipment that you have access to in a college atmosphere. I still do not think that you need to have a professor around to learn the material however. It may help some to learn the material faster, but it is not required.

      --
      P.S. - This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated.
    62. Re:Doesn't say much for education by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      makes you wonder why they call them anonymous cowards...

    63. Re:Doesn't say much for education by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that all the useful stuff I learned at college was learned in a classroom...

    64. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      A single victory means absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things. Especially in a case like this, where the deck is so obviously stacked somehow. One genius and a group of random kids versus teams from engineering schools -- you can argue that they won, but you can't argue that they are neccessarily the best.

      Competing against people who have spent years of their lives deeply immersed in the study of their fields, the high school students may have, under normal circumstances, managed to get a few edges in a few categories, but the fact that they managed to dominate in nearly every category is extremely suspect.

      If you think I'm being hard on these kids, you should see how hard I am on myself.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  8. not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "High School Kids Beat MIT..."

    I would think the MIT crowd would be used to beatings by now.

    1. Re:not surprised by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      I think a certain Mr. Freeman was able to take care of that problem.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  9. Re:Kids ? by carninja · · Score: 1

    Probably a parent, coach or teacher/sponsor.

  10. That will teach them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That will teach MIT not to let high school kids compete in the future.

  11. Yeah but this is college... by rawyin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean seriously, how many marshmellows can these kids shove up their nostrils?

    Lets do some real college science. MIT is too busy building the worlds tallest and most complex beer bong. Now THAT'S cool.

    1. Re:Yeah but this is college... by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      More pot smokers need to go into engineering based on the fact alone that they can imagine how to turn anything into a bong including a Cuisinart or a pencil sharpener.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    2. Re:Yeah but this is college... by garcia · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can see the magnetic bumper sticker now:

      My ex-gang member high-school electronics whiz can beat your MIT graduate student in Battle Bots!

    3. Re:Yeah but this is college... by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      pure genius man, pure genius. Keep it up.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    4. Re:Yeah but this is college... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      MIT is too busy building the worlds tallest and most complex beer bong.

      You think a bunch of MIT guys can beat these (particularly this one)? Good luck to them!

    5. Re:Yeah but this is college... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points for your comment. I'd bump it up another point.

      It was really inspirational to read this. It made me wish I had a foundation to get these and kids like them swept up and put into a think tank. I'd get them going on a project to right-size government and force the mass cleanup of some rotten underbelly of the infrastructure.

      I hope thesee kids can come up with a way to or find an inspiration to help clean up some of the 200,000,000 land mines that the US and others have sewn, strewn and flung across the Earth. In the UK, I heard on NPR/PRI, a firm came up with a plan that uses FIRE to defuse or, hehe, FUSE, the land mines in place. How many of you know that every 20 (TWENTY) minutes there is a "casualty", a person, that a landmine mutilates or kills? That probably doesn't even take into account the local economic damage when fear deters farmers from going back to otherwise useful land, nor does it likely include a destroyed cow or farm animal that was the planned source of income...

      Maybe these kids will come up with a magneto/plasti-sniff device that will find and eradicate the USA's latest PLASTIC mines that are meant to avoid detection (and, maybe some rust when planted in swamps, marshes and other wet jungle type areas...)

      I guess we won't learn until somebody replaces Botts dots with landmines. That'll make ANY country learn, REAL fast...

      Maybe, then, various governments will also take the article to show that not all inbound foreigners lacking degrees would be a drain on the local infrastructure, and could, in fact/theory, give back more.

      I am really curious, though, how in the living HELL a student in JROTC since the 9th grade can be ignored for FOUR YEARS!

      FTA:

      "Oscar Vazquez was a born leader. A senior, he'd been in ROTC since ninth grade and was planning on a career in the military. But when he called to schedule a recruitment meeting at the end of his junior year, the officer in charge told him he was ineligible for military service. Because he was undocumented - his parents had brought him to the US from Mexico when he was 12 - he couldn't join, wouldn't get any scholarships, and had to start figuring out what else to do with his life. Oscar felt aimless until he heard about the robot club from Ledge, who was teaching his senior biology seminar. Maybe, he thought, engineering could offer him a future."

      I ask this question because unless the kid weirdly was ignorant of prior official denials or had some legal issues other than immigration, then either the SCHOOL failed him or the DOD uniformed recruiters failed this kid. There is NO CREDIBLE WAY a 4-year, or even 1- or 2-year cadet to be passed over for mailers, campaigns, and downright urban-vacuuming that recruiting offices undertake to keep their monthly quotas high or on target. I KNOW, I had the USMC, USAF and US Army vying for me, offering my USN recuriter 3 to 4 of their own named-quotas JUST FOR ME. Sometimes it's count, sometimes quality. But, from Texas to California, Navy recruiters knew I was going to the Navy, and didn't even have to campaign me. I even took the ASVAB, as so many if not all students have to take, since they're receiving federal funding...

      But, I am wondering why in 4 years Oscar was apparently not informed that he would not be allowed to join the US services. JROTC is not there to keep kids busy, it's there to help the DOD find promising candidates and convince them to become recruits, and possibly future military leaders (assuming they don't get blown to bits after a short stint in uniform...), and even civilian leaders in government or in community. SO, what recruiters passsed up, ignored, or failed to inform Oscar? The only good thing, it seems to me, is that Oscar took it in stride and, undaunted, redirected his talents to something that paid off better. Sure, he could have had a shot at a guaranteed paycheck, but now, hopefully, these kids are in the international spotlight. Their skills are not applicable to just findin

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  12. Tough Competition by aendeuryu · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, you can't blame MIT for getting intimidated. These kids sound rough. Cape Fear Community College came in third.

    1. Re:Tough Competition by bots · · Score: 1

      Front Street Uiniversity has been making underwater robotics for a while now. They always get funding somehow...

  13. Re:Kids ? by uberjon · · Score: 1

    looks like he's a ringer

    --
    Dick Laurent is dead.
  14. Before you all yell "DUPE!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please remember Rob is going through a divorce. He's not entirely focused on his work at the moment.
    Some of you will take glee in this but I'm hoping the bulk sympathize.

  15. Last Laugh. by darkmeridian · · Score: 0

    Wait until the high school kids try to get into MIT...

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    1. Re:Last Laugh. by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Wait until the high school kids try to get into MIT...

      What, do you think that this sort of achievement won't win them entry into one of the top schools? MIT is not the only thing out there nor is it necessarily the best for your purposes.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:Last Laugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (shrug) At least MIT's admissions process is completely need-blind (or so I understand it); they probably have a better shot there than anywhere else. Still, two times zero is still zero.

      I can't really imagine MIT being so petty as to change their acceptance decision for these kids out of spite. The "respectful competition" culture there is very strong.

    3. Re:Last Laugh. by RikF · · Score: 1

      Erm, if you read the article you'll discover that this sort of achievement will earn them exactly squat as far as further education opertunities are concerned. Their legal and financial status will prevent them from progressing which, imho, is a terrible pity.

      --
      In Soviet Russia you own your cat
  16. Not suprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I manage a team of 10 to 20 engineers, the number depends on the work load. In the past few years, I have had 5 engineers on my team that graduated from MIT. The MIT's were usually the first engineers to be replaced, I have not been impressed!

    1. Re:Not suprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they're still working off sleep deprivation from freshman year

    2. Re:Not suprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the parent doesn't say is that when he says "replaced", he doesn't mean "fired." He means that the MIT grads left to go do something interesting because his project sucked.

    3. Re:Not suprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No, I've heard this sort of stuff before, where in a lot of companies, being too geeky is not a good thing.

  17. Start making them citizens by goldspider · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "The four teenagers who built it are all undocumented Mexican immigrants who came to this country through tunnels or hidden in the backseats of cars."

    These kids are exactly the kind of people we should be encouraging to come to this country; smart, clever, hard-working, creative.

    Yet they are here illegally, and something needs to be done about that. If these kids are as smart as the article suggests (and I have no reason to believe otherwise), attaining citizenship shouldn't be particularly taxing.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Start making them citizens by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Funny

      This would be great iff we could boot ignorant, dimwitted, lazy, and whiny native borns at the same time..

      (then again, maybe I shouldn't ask too loud ;)

    2. Re:Start making them citizens by jasonmicron · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Their technical knowledge isn't lacking but their common sense definitely is. And even a criminal can be a genius in his/her field.

    3. Re:Start making them citizens by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      When it comes down to how I feel about everyone entering this country, they are all at the very least hard-working, and how they get into this country at least implies creativity bordering on self-sacrifice (read the biyearly stories about Mexican thieving 'coyotes').

      It just so happens Americans (and thus, politicians) need to figure out what the policy is going to actually be regarding illegal immigrants. Because at some point, all of the following are true:

      1.) they don't generate tax revenue for the services they are receiving... and what they are paid is woefully inadequate by U.S. standards
      2.) they are generally capable workers
      3.) they are generally putting themselves at great bodily danger to risk later eviction
      4.) most states have stopped servicing immigrants.

      In spite of the fact that in those same states, the immigrants are doing the jobs that Americans won't take.

      So we have demand for work that goes undone, supply in the form of willing workers, and ridiculous policies in the middle that reinforce all four points above.

      Can you tell I'm in favor of a cross-border working program?

    4. Re:Start making them citizens by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Yet they are here illegally, and something needs to be done about that.

      Well, we could try arresting them.

      In all seriousness, don't make a law that you don't intend to enforce. There are good reasons for restricting immigration. Sure, there could be exceptions for bright/hard-working people, but these should also be in the laws.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    5. Re:Start making them citizens by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 1

      Just as FYI the process to gain citizenship is neither easy or quick unless you are seeking political asylum or some other unusual circumstance. Its like a 5 year process and due to the fact that they are here illegally (if that is true) then they probably won't even be eligible for citizenship because they didn't follow proper procedures for applying. Also the org that handles this is no longer INS it is called USCIS.

      --
      News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
    6. Re:Start making them citizens by goldspider · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "In spite of the fact that in those same states, the immigrants are doing the jobs that Americans won't take."

      I'm afraid I have to throw the flag on that.

      Those aren't "jobs that Americans won't take". Those are "jobs that companies won't pay Americans to do".

      Companies pay illegal immigrants peanuts because they are allowed to; because law enforcement doesn't go after companies that hire illegal immigrants.

      If the FBI (or whomever handles these issues now) would actually crack down on companies that exploit illegal immigrants, companies would have no choice but to hire Americans and pay them a fair wage.

      It's a shame that our current president's loyalty to both corporations and the Hispanic voting bloc prevent him from honestly trying to solve the problem.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    7. Re:Start making them citizens by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      Those aren't "jobs that Americans won't take". Those are "jobs that companies won't pay Americans to do".

      You missed the word `over' from just before `pay'.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    8. Re:Start making them citizens by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Those aren't "jobs that Americans won't take". Those are "jobs that companies won't pay Americans to do".

      It's basic economics. If I can make $4 an hour revenue by hiring someone to do a certain job, I won't hire anyone to do that job, and the demand will stay unfilled, because it would cost me far more than $4/hour to hire someone.

      This creates economic efficiency, because the job goes undone, the demand goes unfilled.

      It doesn't matter if there is someone willing to do the job for $2 or $3 an hour, the government forbids us from making such a mutually beneficial transaction.

      So the person willing and able to work stays unemployed, and my demand goes unfilled.

      How is that good again?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    9. Re:Start making them citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had enough common sense to know that a tampon could soak up the water leaking into the robot. Cheap and effective solution. What would the MIT students have rigged up, and how complicated and expensive would their solution have been?

    10. Re:Start making them citizens by goldspider · · Score: 1

      Let's pretend, for the moment, that companies didn't hire illegal immigrants to work on these farms, and that Americans are doing the work instead.

      It is guaranteed that the Americans would demand a higher wage than what current illegal immigrants are paid; at least minimum wage, and likely more since they would almost certainly be be unionized.

      So that means that the operating cost of the farm are higher. Does that mean that the company that owns the farm has to go belly-up? No! They simply raise the price of their goods to compensate for the higher cost of producing them.

      Yes, food would be more expensive for consumers. But personally, I would rather pay more for food knowing that Americans are being employed, and illegal immigration isn't being encouraged.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    11. Re:Start making them citizens by ILikeRed · · Score: 1

      There are good reasons for restricting immigration. - penguinoid

      Personally, I prefer The New Colossus

      Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame, With conquering limbs astride from land to land; Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame. "Keep ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!" - Emma Lazarus

      But maybe I am too old fashioned. Guess nobody told your ancestors they were not good enough for the US, more's the pity.

      --
      I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress -J Adams
    12. Re:Start making them citizens by xtracto · · Score: 1

      But personally, I would rather pay more for food knowing that Americans are being employed, and illegal immigration isn't being encouraged.

      And here is where you fail, these companies wont expend more to know that americans are being employed.

      You see, here at Mexico there are really intelligent and capable people. Unfortunatley we dont have the same salaries that you have, but thats what triggered outsorcing in the first place. Indian engineers work for $5 hour while US engineers wont do it.

      And, in the same way, there ARE jobs that US citizens wont to for a certain price, I think it is qute simple, for example the market specifies that a gardener should get $5 an hour, but, in US the only ones to do it may kids or teens.

      I remember reading in another /. story about how someone complained being paid $5 hour for a job, and other told him that that was what her sister got for childcare.

      Now, if you put that into a monthly payment it is like $5*8(hours a day)*5(days a week)*4(weeks a month) = 800 dollars monthly. Do you think it is low? well, guess what, I used to work as a software developer at a company in Mexico, well, they payed me like $600 a month (more or less, it was $6000 MXN on 2004). The company was from some US ppl, and well, guess what, they sell they software IN dollars, and pay people in Mexico in Pesos.

      Now, I could bitch a lot about that (more than i have done already) but, let me tell you, I think their idea is great, because, I was just out of the University, and I got employed immediatly (because of my programming skills) and for Mexico's standards $6000 MXN is a good monthly fee, if you live alone (or better in you moms house.) it is because of that that I dont care and i hope they are employing more graduates (and some undergraduates for what I know).

      Well, those are my 2 cents, I just wanted to show the other side of the coin. What pisses me off are comments like "you see, there are intelligent people in x or y place" come on, lets just see the picture of the average Joe US citizen, and as another poster wrote, where do you think MIT ppl come frome?? maybe not everyone are from 3rd world countries but, shurely they are not 70% US...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    13. Re:Start making them citizens by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is that some jobs wouldn't be done at all otherwise.

      Take for instance the story on NPR of people working for $1 a day in India, sorting through garbage to pick out recyclables.

      Obviously such work benefits the environment, and the worker.

      If there were a $5 an hour minimum wage for these workers, no one would be able to do that job, it wouldn't ever be worth it. It's cheaper just to throw it all away and bury it under. The worker would have less job options, maybe being forced to crime to be able to eat.

      These people are willing to work for $1 a day, and obviously they have no better job option, so who is the government to say they aren't allowed to work?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    14. Re:Start making them citizens by johnjay · · Score: 1

      You obviously have no Indian-computer-geek friends living in the US on visa ;-) It seems to take FOREVER to get citizenship in the US. I don't know for sure (not being personally invested in the process), but I think there's a mandatory 5-year residency requirement. So, even if these kids' applications were expidited, they wouldn't be eligible for scholarships until they were 23.

    15. Re:Start making them citizens by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So the person willing and able to work stays unemployed, and my demand goes unfilled.

      Yup. The only thing that scares politicians and economists more than a depression is deflation. Massive unemployment and shortages are preferable to deflation. If all prices were free-market, then there may be deflation, temporary or otherwise.

      Also, the rules of supply and demand indicate that there would be some price that people would pay. You would always be able to meet the demand. However, the price you would have to charge would be higher, so the demand would be lower than if you hired slave labor.

      Oh, that brings me to the next point. Some people equate non-living wages (the $5000 per year that could be paid out to such seasonal migrant workers in a free market) with slave labor. They can't live on it, but they also can't find anything else. They have no "real" choice other than to continue to provide nearly free labor. There are people that object to such a system on humanitarian reasons.

    16. Re:Start making them citizens by MacDork · · Score: 1
      1.) they don't generate tax revenue for the services they are receiving... and what they are paid is woefully inadequate by U.S. standards

      Well gee, if you don't pay taxes, then the wage is a lot less inadequate, isn't it? Also keep in mind that a dollar goes a lot further than a peso in Mexico. Hence, illegals will work for less.

      In spite of the fact that in those same states, the immigrants are doing the jobs that Americans won't take.

      Americans won't take the jobs because the wage is too low. The wage is low because illegals are willing to do the work for less. It's simple supply and demand. With all the bitching about outsourcing on /. it boggles my mind how you got modded insightful.

    17. Re:Start making them citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here.

      Because of health reasons I needed someone around the house to call 911 in case I got sick again.

      By coincidence, a Mexican friend of mine asked me if I was interested in renting a room to a couple from Mexico. Sure, why not?

      Over the last 14 months they have been great, I can trust them with anything. I've been adopted in as part of the familia ("Tio"), I don't have to worry about the house being empty when I go to work, and I get some incredibly awesome home-cooked Mexican meals.

      Raul leaves the house at 8:30 in the morning and gets home a little after 10 at night, six days a week. He works as a cook/dishwasher at a local restaurant. No one can accuse him of being lazy.

      In the summer Susanna sits out on the porch waiting for Raul to get home. Not something you see every day in America.

      They plan on saving up for few more years and then moving back to Mexico to start their own business. So they won't be here forever (I'm not looking forward to that).

      If you ask me, as a nation, we will be poorer when people like this leave our country (and that goes for any nation).

      BTW, some of the stereotypes are true, from time to time I have to make pointed requests that the stray primo (cousin) hits the road. And what's up with cooking steak until it's one step up from cremation?

    18. Re:Start making them citizens by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1
      It's not 'bitching' -- it's an argument that this status quo we've gotten ourselves into isn't good enough.

      Taxes in my tax bracket approach 35% of income. In lower brackets, it's 20% or less. This is a concept I'm sure most currently illegal aliens would be willing to accept in exchange for the current illegal immigrant exploitation that takes place now.

      Start a program, increase the penalties of illegal immigrant exploitation ten-fold to discourage the now-common practice, and stop trading the lives of low-wage workers in an excuse to justify the current conditions of workers that risk more than they have to. That's all.

    19. Re:Start making them citizens by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "Some people equate non-living wages (the $5000 per year that could be paid out to such seasonal migrant workers in a free market) with slave labor. They can't live on it, but they also can't find anything else"

      They can't equate it with slavery. One is the free exchange of work for pay. The other is being owned by someone. The term "living wage" should be factored out entirely: this is subjective. If you have a large migrant family where 3 or 4 of the members make this $5000 a year and they don't waste it on DVDs, they are already above the designated poverty level.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    20. Re:Start making them citizens by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      One is the free exchange of work for pay.

      Indentured servitude is equated with slavery, and most laws that dealt with one included the other. Having a non-binding financial lock on people may be argued to not be significantly different from a binding agreement because the effects are similar.

      If you are allowed to do one and only one job, and you can't earn enough money to live without that job, you have as many choices as an indentured servant...

  18. These are not Future MIT students by RichMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    RTFA, unless someone with $ steps up to the plate these are not future MIT students. They are currently in manual labor jobs and likely to stay there.

    These students come from disadvantaged backgrounds and are unable to get into MIT. Half of them have graduated and they are not getting further education as they cannot afford it.

    1. Re:These are not Future MIT students by RichMan · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the article (it is good, I suggest you read it) there are links to a scholarship fund for these 4 as well as comments in general on a proposed federal act. These families probably cannot even afford the 3% interest.

      ----
      Oscar wipes the white gypsum dust from his face. It's a hot Tuesday afternoon in Phoenix, and he's hanging sheetrock. He graduated from Carl Hayden last spring, and this is the best work he can find. He enjoys walking into the half-built homes and analyzing the engineering. He thinks it'll keep him sharp until he can save up enough money to study engineering at Arizona State University. It will cost him approximately $50,000 as an out-of-state student. That's a lot of sheet-rocking.

      Luis also graduated and is filing papers in a Phoenix Social Security Services office. Cristian and Lorenzo are now juniors. Their families can barely support themselves, let alone raise the money to send their kids to college. Last summer, Cristian's hopes flagged even further when his family was forced to spend $3,000 to replace the decrepit air-conditioning unit in their aluminum trailer. Without AC, the trailer turns into a double-wide oven in the desert heat.

      ----
      And they're not alone. Approximately 60,000 undocumented students graduate from US high schools every year. One promising solution, according to Cameron and other advocates for immigrant kids, is the Dream Act, federal legislation that would give in-state tuition and temporary resident status to undocumented students who graduate from a US high school after being enrolled in the States for five years or more. The bill, which was introduced in 2003 and is slated to be resubmitted this spring, aims to give undocumented students a reason to stay in school. If they do, the act promises financial assistance for college. In turn, immigrants would pay taxes and be able to contribute their talents to the US.

      Some immigration activists don't see it that way. Ira Mehlman, the Los Angeles-based media director for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, successfully lobbied against the legislation last year. He says it will put citizens and legal immigrants in direct competition for the limited number of seats at state colleges. "What will you say," he asks, "to an American kid who does not get into a state university and whose family cannot afford a private college because that seat and that subsidy have been given to someone who is in the country illegally?"

    2. Re:These are not Future MIT students by killmenow · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that MIT is actually doing something to help people in situations like this. All they need is Internet access and they can go to MIT, sort of. They'll earn no degree, but they could still get an education.

    3. Re:These are not Future MIT students by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So, why is it they can't apply for citizenship?

      Seriously, if they were legal citizens, I know there are lots of scholarships out there for hispanics particularly, and probably particularly for engineering too. MIT would be well within reach if they were legal citizens.

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    4. Re:These are not Future MIT students by faloi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All things considered, and I'm sure I'll get flamed for it, if they're undocumented they probably shouldn't have access to the same opportunities at public expense. I realize they're incredibily bright, but let them get documentation allowing them to be in the country legally before we spend public money on them. Private money is another matter, obviously, but they shouldn't have access to some of the federally and state funded programs that citizens (or documented persons) have access to.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    5. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Whafro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apparently you haven't heard about how top schools handle their financial aid nowadays. The top tier of schools in the country have what is called "need-blind" admissions, where they will accept anyone who is qualified to attend, regardless of their ability to pay the full tuition. Once someone is accepted, their full financial need is met completely, and in a way that doesn't put them in debt up to their eyebrows.

      At MIT in particular, more than 75% of students receive financial aid, and ALL of it is based on their financial need. Scholarships, in the merit-based sense, do not substantially exist at MIT--or most top schools. The barrier for attending these schools, at least for those who have managed to overcome barriers they have faced before the admissions process, is a merit-based barrier, and not a financial one.

      What schools, such as MIT as well as the college I attend, figure is that anyone who has demonstrated that they should be accepted to the institution has demonstrated that they deserve a "scholarship," so the funds go to those who need it most. It's not like at a large state school, where there is a tier of smart kids, and a tier of not-so-smart kids. If you can get into MIT, you're smart, and choosing scholarship recipients based on merit would involve splitting hairs.

    6. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're here illegally, you're breaking the law and therefore can't apply for citizenship. They could go back to their own country for a while, then apply using the proper channels.

      Sucks to be these kids though, their parents probably dragged them along as little kids when they decided to break the law themselves.

    7. Re:These are not Future MIT students by james3v · · Score: 0

      you do know that the whole point of a loan is that you aren't supposed to pay it back until later, right?

      so the whole "i can't afford it" claim is koinda pointless to make. someone's dumb....

      (and its not me) :)

    8. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do have other options.
      http://www.mexonline.com/univrsty.htm

    9. Re:These are not Future MIT students by TykeClone · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'd rather see a bright, talented, and driven "undocumented" person attend college than a lazy and unmotivated citizen.

      Same goes for illegal immigrants - if they are here because they want to work and do a good job and stay off of the public dole, more power to them and I have no problem with that.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    10. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "What will you say," he asks, "to an American kid who does not get into a state university and whose family cannot afford a private college because that seat and that subsidy have been given to someone who is in the country illegally?"

      "Study harder next time, dickhead."

    11. Re:These are not Future MIT students by damsa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Illegal immigrants generally can't apply for citizenship. They can apply to get permament resident status but that's a little tricky because it opens up the chance you can be deported. Also you need to have permanent resident status and if you are male register with the selective service to apply for Federal Financial aid. Illegal immigrants is good for America coz they provide cheap Wal*Mart labor and without the ability to go get a higher education, can't compete with other permament residents/ citizens for higher paying jobs.

    12. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd rather see a bright, talented, and driven "undocumented" person attend college than a lazy and unmotivated citizen.

      That's fine, just don't do it on my tax dollars.

    13. Re:These are not Future MIT students by faloi · · Score: 1

      I'm not wild about lazy unmotivated citizens taking up slots in college either. But I don't think it's our responsibility to pay for undocumented students any more than I expect to be able to head over to Finland for free education in their colleges. Much as I'd like to...

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    14. Re:These are not Future MIT students by DarkSarin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is very true.

      Additionally, and on topic, I think that there should be one set of rules concerning those who immigrate as adults under their own volition, and those who came as minors with their families and are trying to be productive.

      As far as I'm concerned, these kids deserve a chance--as do any others. I think they should be allowed to become citizens with a minimum of hassle--as long as they aren't in trouble for breaking other laws. Here's what I would suggest be the criteria:

      1. Be employed or in school with a 2.5+ GPA.
      2. No criminal record (other than illegal immigration) in the past three years.
      3. English Fluency (spoken and written).
      4. Immigrated as a minor with family (eg--not just to run away or something).
      5. No affiliations with terrorist/anti-US groups (sorry I can't see letting future mad-bombers into the country).

      If a kid can meet those criteria, then they should be allowed "conditional citizenship" for a period of time. If they can stay employed or in school with a good GPA, pay taxes, and stay out of trouble for a grace period (say 5 years), then they are granted full citizenship. During the conditional perioud, they would be eligible for federal student aid and similar help, thus giving them the benefit of going to school.

      If, at any time, they break those conditions (excepting, of course, breif gaps in employment or minor violations, such as a speeding ticket), the time starts over and they get one or more points against them. If they ever accumulate more than, say, 50 points, then they are deported and told to apply for citizenship the hard way.

      The upshot of this is that those who want to make it all work would be able to, and the US would gain. The only downside? Mexico (or whatever other country) would lose a lot of bright young folks.

      Oh, and BTW, the parents would need to given resident alien status, with the agreement that they leave if their kid screws up. They then have to keep INS informed of their whereabouts every quarter, without fail.

      I can't condone ripping the families away, but nor should they be allowed to stay without penalty. The parents, should they desire to stay past the point where the kid leaves home, would have to pay back taxes (prohibitive for most), and demonstrate a good work history. Otherwise, for better or worse, they have to leave, but are allowed to return if they want to apply for citizenship the normal way.

      The goal is to give kids a chance without making it a burden on the US or kids whose parents are legal citizens. In no case should a student be edged out because someone needs to "make room" for an illegal alien. Merit alone, boys and girls, merit alone.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    15. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well don't count on the nerds to give them any money . They are too busy donating to more worthwhile causes, like saving mediocre fictional tv shows. :/

    16. Re:These are not Future MIT students by delta_avi_delta · · Score: 1

      Well, no. You see, a lending institution is going to want collateral on a loan, and "My kid is really bright, he'll have a great job in no time" is not going to cut it.

    17. Re:These are not Future MIT students by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

      I remember how top colleges viewed financial need back in my day, extremely unrealistically. Compared to many families, they had very different ideas of how much burden and debt a student and the student's family should assume.

    18. Re:These are not Future MIT students by CrayzyJ · · Score: 1

      If you let 4 kids in, then you have to let them all in. If they are undocumented, they don't pay taxes, and we could be letter terrorist in.

      I say, send them back. If they are that smart, they can find a may back LEGALLY. Pay taxes like the rest of us.

      --
      Holy s-, it's Jesus!
    19. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Illegal immigrants is good for America coz they provide cheap Wal*Mart labor and without the ability to go get a higher education, can't compete with other permament residents/ citizens for higher paying jobs.

      Only in america! While there are geniuses who would LOVE to get a citizenship and study in a famous college, high-tech jobs are running away to other countries for outsourcing.

      And I say DOH!!! Can't they see that they have in the US just what they need?

      (Only in America...)

    20. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fine, just don't do it on my tax dollars.

      Yeah, we need those to pay for other stuff. Garnish his wages instead.

    21. Re:These are not Future MIT students by zentinal · · Score: 1

      BRILLIANT!

    22. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Hyecee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't tell whether or not you're trolling or actually believe that. Nothing will be good for the United States if it involves a lowering or loss of human rights. Sure, those hopelessly poor illegal immigrants won't be competing with more well off US citizens for higher paying jobs and educations paid for by citizens' taxes, but they will just end up in a cycle of poverty and all the troubles associated with it.

      The United States would be forever improved by accepting immigrants, making them citizens (gotta have those taxes), allowing them to become educated (not the same as just giving them an education; that's a whole other can of worms I do not wish to open) and helping them to become successful in our nation. There will ALWAYS be poorer or uneducated US citizens and immigrants to "provide cheap Wal*Mart labor", for a variety of reasons. You can look at it as a renewable workforce. This way, at least, there will be less competition for AVAILABLE low-end jobs for both groups with the possibility of making your way up the ladder through hard work. Poorer families won't be stuck in a poverty cycle, and can better their situation, or at least the situation for their descendants, and their position will be filled by others when they leave, be it a native citizen who's fallen on hard times, or another immigrant-turned-citizen.

      My point is, after that long-winded argument, is that the US will be better improved through aid and human rights than by a self-perpetuating low-income slave class of illegal immigrants.

      "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me. I lift my lamp beside the golden door."

    23. Re:These are not Future MIT students by joggle · · Score: 1

      I don't see why point 4 is necessary. If the kid is able to maintain a 2.5 gpa, stay out of trouble on their own and become fluent in English, why would he/she need their parents to come with them to the US?

    24. Re:These are not Future MIT students by krysith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's fine, just don't do it on my tax dollars.

      How about on theirs, then? It's not like illegal immigrants don't pay sales tax, the primary source of state funding. You know, the state funding that supports state colleges. I'm sure that they likely don't pay federal income tax, but then, many citizens in their tax bracket get more back than they pay in, due to tax credits and such.

      Chances are, they pay more taxes than citizens of equal means, without getting nearly as many benefits. Did you mean that you didn't want citizens to go to college on your tax dollars, either?

    25. Re:These are not Future MIT students by ifwm · · Score: 1

      You are aware that that US benefits more from outsourcing than it loses. Specifically, more companies outsource their stuff to the US than the US sends them.

    26. Re:These are not Future MIT students by DesertKat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ASU Foundation funds Hispanic students 3:1 over any other students in 50 different grants...and it makes no difference if they are legal or illegal. They even have their own graduation ceremony. If a Hispanic is willing to do the work, there is no reason why s/he cannot get an education.

    27. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They probably do pay federal income tax, using a fake SSN, and have the taxes witheld from their paychecks. Which means that not only do they pay the tax, they don't always get to file a return.

    28. Re:These are not Future MIT students by j0217995 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Right on... Any illegal should go back right over the board. They are not disadvantage students they are ILLEGAL students. I read something that California's Health Care System is falling apart because of treating Illegals. Why don't they treat them and then arrest them for breaking the law. Thne send them back over the border.

      Better yet, lets deal harshly with the goverment of Mexico that is producing a guide on how to bypass the border patrol in COMIC book form so illegals that can't read know how to make it to America. President Bush needs to get tough on immigration and no more pardons for ILLEGALS

    29. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Make sure your tax dollars are ONLY used to produce lazy, fat and stupid citizens and finance the downfall of our nation. The lazy, fat and stupid don't deserve anything just because they were born here. If I've ever heard ANYTHING more contrary to the American spirit, I can't recall it.

    30. Re:These are not Future MIT students by anonicon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "That's fine, just don't do it on my tax dollars."

      Hear hear! God knows our tax dollars shouldn't be used to support the demonstrably smart, hard-working children of illegal immigrants when it can go to people who haven't done anything to merit it besides being born in the right borders.

    31. Re:These are not Future MIT students by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The ironic thing is these kids did nothing wrong, their parents did, further more if they had been born in the US, even their parents status wouldn't matter because they'd be US citizens, natural born

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    32. Re:These are not Future MIT students by damsa · · Score: 1

      By being here in America, undocumented illegal immigrants do not have the same rights as permanent residents do. They also do not have the same obligations, one being selective service registration among other things. You can choose to give illegal aliens same rights as residents, which happens when aliens choose to change their status to permanent resident status when certain criteria is met.
      The question isn't, should we as a society give benefits such as low interest loans to illegal immigrants so they can attend higher education because it's good idea. I think so, who knows if the next Einstein or whatever come out of it. But rather my comment is whether citizens, older immigrants will be affected by granting more competition for those who are of non documented status. If there are more college educated people, then there are more competition for those jobs requiring degrees. If you keep a certain sector of the population under educated then you don't have that problem. In a lot of people's minds, undocumented aliens should not get the same advantages as those who are presently in the country legally.

    33. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Apparently you didn't RTFA because it mentions that these kids are "undocumented" (their parents are illegals) and are disqualified from loans, grants, subsidies, scholarships, financial aid, etc.

      Most of us here are intimately familiar with the workings (inner and outer) of financial aid and have significant loan-payback obligations. Hell, sometimes I wished I didn't get a job during my college years so I would've qualified for a grant, but such is life.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    34. Re:These are not Future MIT students by ninthwave · · Score: 1

      I agree in general but the investment in these students would have returns especially if the degree had terms of contractual work with oh say the Navy for a set time afterwords.

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    35. Re:These are not Future MIT students by eechuah · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently YOU haven't heard that this only applies to US citizens... since these boys are illegal aliens (what INS calls them!), they wouldn't qualify.

      I received a letter from Cornell informing me of this fact when I was applying for undergrad there. It makes sense, since if they didn't have a separate pile for US citizens & foreign students, more than half their intake would be foreign students.

      So, they have two standards; one for US citizens, and one for foreign students.

    36. Re:These are not Future MIT students by nadamsieee · · Score: 1

      So, they have two standards; one for US citizens, and one for foreign students.

      Which is how it should be considering that we are talking about a US school...

    37. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless someone with $ steps up to the plate these are not future MIT students. They are currently in manual labor jobs and likely to stay there.

      With offshoring getting worse, MIT students will probably end up there also.

    38. Re:These are not Future MIT students by srb123 · · Score: 1

      You can't just apply for citizenship and expect to be accepted. If that where the case, then half of latin america would be citizens here. A long list of reasons make getting a citizenship here for anyone from latin america nearly impossible. And, if they can, its an incredibly long, painful and expensive process. Most Mexican's can't even get visa to visit here. The only way they can visit legally is to be accepted to a foreign study program, be sent here for work from a multinational company, or prove they have over $25,000 in the bank that will remain in Mexico. My wifes parents can't come here to visit us, or see their grandchildren. Of course, if they were from Germany, etc., it would be no problem. -Stephen

    39. Re:These are not Future MIT students by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      You're right about financial aid. MIT has had need-blind admissions far longer than most other top-tier schools, it's always been a big deal there. 16% of MIT students' families make less than it costs to go there each year. I was one of them, and I had no problem getting the aid I needed.

      These kids' problem wouldn't be affording it (I guarantee you that MIT would want them badly enough to find a way for them to afford it); their illegal immigrant status seems to be the main roadblock. But I'm expecting MIT to find a way around that as well. They drool over kids like this.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    40. Re:These are not Future MIT students by srb123 · · Score: 1

      There is no possible means for a poor or middle class Mexican citizen to get citizenship here, let alone a visa to visit legally. If they could, don't you think they'd do it? They would be here in droves - legally.

    41. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my own experience as a middle class Mexican:

      In 94 I graduated from one of the most reputed high schools in Mexico, and placed in the top 5% in SAT1 and SAT2 Physiscs and Math, as well as getting an almost perfect TOEFL score.

      I got "need blind" admmited to several US colleges, including my 2nd choice, UPENN. I was on the MIT waiting list, my 1st choice.

      At the time tuition was about $30K US, with books, insurace, plane tickets, medical tests and paperwork, it went up to almost $40K.

      My mother owned her own house, so financial aid bureaucrats could not beleive she was only making $13K a year as a high school teacher. And they seemed not to realize that in just three months the peso had lost 66% of its value in front of the dollar.

      I got financial aid, for $12K (including loan), and another $2K for student work, which meant I would have to pay 'only' $26K, if I could live of licking walls and drinking tap water.

      Being Mexican, I was not elegible for Federal Aid or several other private scholarships. What would be the luck of an US citizen in my situation?

      So it may be true that top tier universities grant a lot of loans and financial aid, while it is also true that their financial aid departments have a very skewed view of life in the 3rd world.

    42. Re:These are not Future MIT students by izomiac · · Score: 1

      Hence the reason I chose not to applied there. Their need-based financial aid isn't exactly generous. My mom makes (I think) $36,000, and is about to retire, and my Dad is retired. Estimated family contribution... $26,000. So that definitely influenced my decision to go to a school that did offer merit-based aid. If you're poor then this policy rules, and if you're rich it doesn't matter. The only people that suffer are the middle class.

    43. Re:These are not Future MIT students by tsch · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good, but I don't remember seeing anywhere in the article where the students talk about wanting to go to MIT. Instead, I remember them talking about wanting to go to an in-state (Arizona) school. That's where the problem is.
      And don't tell me that they need to "set their sights higher" or some other bullshit. There are practical and cultural reasons for wanting to stay in Arizona, close to their respective families.

    44. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Whafro · · Score: 1

      Not true. I don't know about illegal aliens specifically, but international students at all of the schools with which I'm familiar are cared for quite generously.

      Obviously many components of extra-institutional aid may or may not be restricted to citizens, as determined by the overseeing organization. However, the funds operated by the colleges themselves are fully able to give large amounts of financial aid.

      I'm personally familiar with two cases, one a citizen of Bulgaria and the other a citizen of [South] Korea, and both get far more aid than do I, a US citizen.

    45. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Right, because these kids whose parents brought them to America ten years ago are less American than you and I. Right?

      These guys have proven engineering talent, and they're hanging sheetrock. Hell, if I were the professor in charge of the MIT team, I'd have handed these four kids scholarships on the spot.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    46. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      State schools cost something like $5,000/year and provide a pretty decent education for the cost. You can finance more than half of that cost on loan from the government, with no need for existing good credit. Moreover, if you're poor the loans bears no interest while you're in school (and only ~3% when you're done) and has up to a 30-year payback period.

      Similar private loans are available as well, if you couldn't come up with the $200/month you'd need your first two years. The interest rates aren't as nice, but there are many companies willing to loan money to college students with no credit history.

      So stop telling me that poor kinds can't go to college. I agree that it's easier for rich kids to go to college, because they don't have to get anything out of it, but anyone who wants to go college can do so.

    47. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >>Either that or you fit their affirmative action profile.

      Just because you fit into an affirmative action profile does not exclude you from being "smart"

    48. Re:These are not Future MIT students by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Yes, god forbid our tax dollars get used on something that would benefit all of us, like for example allowing some really bright kids get good education in this country.

      What do you thing taxes are for? If I had the choice, I would opt for giving my tax money to those kids instead of all the other government funded bullshit that's going on all over the place.

      Who in the world moded the parent as "insightful"? It has about as much insight as a bucket of excrement!

      --
      AccountKiller
    49. Re:These are not Future MIT students by faloi · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. They're probably hired as "independant contractors" so it becomes their responsibility to pay federal income taxes. The business that hires 'em doesn't have to worry about withholding tax dollars.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    50. Re:These are not Future MIT students by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1

      Once someone is accepted, their full financial need is met completely, and in a way that doesn't put them in debt up to their eyebrows.

      You were all most completely right in this post, except for the "debt up to their eyebrows" part... ;)

    51. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

      It's not like illegal immigrants don't pay sales tax, the primary source of state funding.

      ... property tax, state income tax, township/city tax, fed income tax, insurance ... illegals help drive all those costs up. There are proper channels that an illegal can take to become legal, either with a green card or citizenship.

    52. Re:These are not Future MIT students by GarryOwen · · Score: 3, Informative

      I disagree, the guy next to me from Boliva was just naturalized Monday along with a girl from Guatemala who is in the same building. Both had a rather easy process of becoming citizens. How did they do it? They joined the military. Give up 3 years in your favorite branch and you get out with citizenship and a massive college scholarship(40-70k).

    53. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that that US benefits more from outsourcing than it loses. Specifically, more companies outsource their stuff to the US than the US sends them.

      Umm, I don't know about that. Historically, foriegn companies have expanded into the US, but that is different. For example, Honda and other asian automakers own factories in the US and employee US workers. However, I've never seen any indication that they've closed existing plants elsewhere and moved their work to the US plants wholesale.

      Oh and by the way, the slip with "companies" rather than "countries" is deliciously ironic, if probably unintentional.

    54. Re:These are not Future MIT students by krysith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      illegals help drive all those costs up

      So do poor citizens. Yet I don't hear you complaining about them. Do you honestly think that illegal aliens are illegal because of the tax benefits? That all those people are just trying to avoid filing their 1040EZ?

      There are proper channels that an illegal can take to become legal, either with a green card or citizenship.

      Yeah, we make it so easy. Just pop on over to the INS on a Thursday afternoon and pledge allegiance to the flag. Ask anyone who has become a US citizen how many years (or decades) it took and how many thousands of dollars it cost them. Then talk to the people who waited years and paid the money and were still turned down. How many illegals do you think applied for citizenship and were turned down or got tired of being told 'Maybe Later'?

      Lower the barriers to becoming a citizen and the vast majority of illegals will become citizens. Then you can stop worrying about how much they drive your costs up, as they will be under the same tax law that you are. Or is equality not good enough for them?

    55. Re:These are not Future MIT students by sideshow · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good if there is enough money to go around so that the bright, intelligent, US citizens get their chance first.

      --

      Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    56. Re:These are not Future MIT students by darkonc · · Score: 1

      I think that the intent is to be nice to 'innocent' illegal immagrants -- who didn't really have a choice about being brought into the US.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    57. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can join the military to pay for school, at which time wealthy MIT students will show their appreciation:

      http://mit.edu/thistle/www/v16/1/resistance.html

    58. Re:These are not Future MIT students by KingJoshi · · Score: 1

      I'm an illegal immigrant. Graduated high school salutatorian (year early) while my sister graduated valedictorian the same year. My parents worked (legally) for years, paid sales tax, income tax, etc, and guess what? No aid in any public institution. No legal recourse for me to become legal. Loans? Not possible. You need to be a citizen or US resident.

      My sister got full tuition scholarship at a private institution. I went to a community college for a couple years, then transfered to a private institution. My dad came to the US to do graduate work but my parents worked multiple jobs as parking booth attendants and cook at fast food restaurant and SAVED money to afford our education. We lived cheap. My mom could feed our whole family of five with good cooking for $200-$250 a month. You get a 2 bedroom apt and all expenses (including utilities, car insurance, etc) is under $1K a month. And you save like mad.

      Most people can't afford to do that (or aren't wise enough to be extrememly cheap). I know some Mexicans that had to pay A LOT of money to just get into the US. And they work 12 hour days on low wages to pay off people as well as make by. And they have to ship money back home to family. My parents stressed education and wanted us to have a better life. But one problem is that they didn't and still don't know about legal or financial opportunities.

      That's part of the crux of the matter. People from poor backgrounds (regardles of legal status) don't know what kind of help is available, much less how to look for it. And trying to search online is confusing, especially if you're an adult with poor English who works all day and has little time left anyhow.

      About taxes. A decent percentage of people here that work illegally even pay income tax. They get a SSN (maybe a dead person or someone who used to be here legally and left). They work off of that number and pay all the normal taxes. If/when they leave, they can give/sell that number to someone else. So many illegal immigrants pay both sales tax and income tax. They contribute to the economy. Most jobs they take are those that used to be done by high school students. But now, many HS students do extra curricular activities, prepare for college and don't have time to work. A recent article in the NY Times about that.

      There are over 11 million immigrants and reforms are needed. But it's such a difficult problem (like medicare and medicaid) that politicians barely deal with it. And most people that look at it tend to be too ideological from one side or the other (isolation, complete amnesty).

      For me, I'm tired of living my life in fear of INS and being illegal. I'm tired of not being able to completely honest. I'm tired of not being able to get a job in the industry due to legal status. I couldn't take the offers of TA or RA for graduate school but my parents have supported me through that as well. I'm tired of always needing support. I'm finishing my master's degree this summer and I'm leaving the US. One country's loss will be another's gain (probably Canada, in my case).

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    59. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats why he said or and not xor

    60. Re:These are not Future MIT students by geekoid · · Score: 1

      nobody gets more out then they put in on taxes,however They may get everything back.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    61. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One affords an education by working.
      I did.

      Tell me this.
      Where is the line that separates advantaged and disadvantaged?

      If I can work and afford in-state tuition but have the brains to go to Princeton, which side of the line am I on.

      If I'm a dumbass and my dad buys my way into Princeton and I get hooked on speed trying to keep up with the 'real' brains, which side of the line am I on?

    62. Re:These are not Future MIT students by ninjagin · · Score: 1
      I love hearing that good ol' "(J)ust don't do it with my tax dollars." You hear that one from conservatives all the time, though there are a few liberals that use it, too.

      Here's a few other things that are already being done with your (and everyone else's) tax dollars which (presumably) you must like:

      • Millions of local tax dollars every year to protect neo-nazis and white supremacists when they hold their yearly rallies
      • Tens of millions of dollars to conduct and write bogus DOE studies supporting Yucca Mountain as a long-term nuclear storage facilities.
      • Tens of billions of dollars for post Sept. 11 airport security systems that still cannot prevent gun- and knife-toting passengers on commercial airplanes.
      • More than a hundred billion of federal tax dollars every year to protect the poppy fields and opium farmers in the nation that supplies 75-80% of the world's heroin (Afghanistan).

      Maybe you're okay with these, but I confess to being less-than-thrilled.

      I'm all for people paying attention to where taxes go, but subsidizing college education for academically-resourceful yet economically-challenged high school kids (even if they are undocumented) is a far better allocation of resources, imho. It's been proven time and time again that foreigners (whether here illegally or not) who attend high school and college in the US become successful and productive members of our society.

      Here's a Rand study about immigrants and education:

      http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR718/

      Here's another (a little dated, but applicable) paper from the IRDA that touches on economic topics:

      http://www.idra.org/Newslttr/1996/May/Abel.htm

      As a (somewhat unrelated) side note, the conservative folks who seem to want to pick and choose where their tax dollars go (not to undocumented illegal alien (read: Mexican) lawbreakers!) are oddly also the same people that don't want to document them so that they CAN become taxpayers that stay here. Great. What you get then is an "Envios a Mexico" money-sending station in every taco stand, tire store and boteria in the Latino parts of town -- where are those American dollars going? Yup, down to old Mexico.

      As much as I don't care for it, it so happens that my rep is THE Tom Tancredo, and he'd rather lock down the border and shoot those fence-jumpin' spanish-jabbering brown-faced sonsa-bitches than find a way to make 'em taxpayers. I find it kinda ironic, actually, since he claims to be a fiscal conservative, too.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    63. Re:These are not Future MIT students by inburito · · Score: 1

      Apparently YOU haven't heard that MIT is one of the few schools that actually gives full need based financial support for foreign students also!

      You can apply in as a foreign national, and if you get admitted in, have your visa processed with relative ease, get all your expenses paid for (if necessary) and be in the country legally attending one of the best schools around.

    64. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Untrue. Child tax credits (Additional Child and EITC) are applied after determination of taxes paid, and are treated as tax payments. See lines 65a and 67 of form 1040.

    65. Re:These are not Future MIT students by ifwm · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a slip. It was intentional.

      As far as the rest, it's true, just look around a little. There was a great article in the Orlando Sentinel (I think) that cited the facts. Please don't make me look it up.

      And to be honest, when I read it I went "Huh?" but the facts check. Sometimes it's the hype I guess.

    66. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Doubt all you like.

      In the meantime, though, refer to the Arizona-Mexico Commissions 2001 report, "Labor Shrotages and Illegal Immigration: Arizona's Three-pronged strategy." There's a special fund within the social security system for fund withheld without valid SSNs. As of the report, that fund held over $265 billion, and was growing at a rate of about $17 billion a year. Those are funds that the illegal immigrants put in and can not get back.

      The report can be found here.

    67. Re:These are not Future MIT students by SunFan · · Score: 1


      Just because you fit into an affirmative action profile does not exclude you from being "smart"

      I never said that it did, but sometimes schools go too far in ensuring political correctness.

      One school I know of, a state science/technology-focused high school, went to such extremes to ensure that rural students, for example, got a chance that for some students they just admitted them and disregarded their academic history. There was a high burnout rate at that school among these students, which undoubtedly caused a lot of undue stress. This is unfair to them, IMO, because the school is basically being dishonest but the students pay the price. Now they're burnt out, their self esteem is shot, and that is a good thing? They make a poster child out of the occasional success story, but we never hear about the kids who go back home with a year basically taken from their life.

      Now that I'm older, I can look back and see how overrated schools like that are. At the time, I thought the school was doing good work, but now I understand it is just another feel-good drug for the state's politicians.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    68. Re:These are not Future MIT students by RhadamanthosIsChaos · · Score: 1
      Well, at least at the college I go to, most of that is US Govt based aid.

      Which these kids can't get. Because they're illegal immigrants.

      So - either those colleges have better aid programs than my college (likely anyway), or the kids are still SOL.

      --
      +++OUT OF CHEESE ERROR+++ REDO FROM START +++
    69. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA. One of the students was in ROTC until he was kicked out and told he was inelligable to join the millitary.

    70. Re:These are not Future MIT students by memnacirema · · Score: 1

      I talked some kids at my high school that told me that recruiters told them that they couldn't join the military without permanent residency or citizenship. People who are able to get visas in Latin America usually are people with money or connections. I wonder from what socioeconomic background those two people you spoke of come from.

    71. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, somebody won the lottery! Getting rich must be easy!

      The citizens and legal immigrants I know worked hard to get there...it can take a *long* time.

    72. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Zentakz · · Score: 1

      This is entirely incorrect. The notion that these schools are impossible to attend without money is a bit outdated. Universities like Harvard and Princeton have moved to debt-free tution policies. MIT does not guarantee a debt-free graduation but it accepts many people from disadvantaged backgrounds and makes it possible for them to go to school. My family was extremely concerned about being able to afford MIT after I got in, but they made it possible for me. It is a shame to think such brilliant kids should be discouraged by the somewhat deceiving pricetags.

    73. Re:These are not Future MIT students by GarryOwen · · Score: 1

      Non-citizens can't become commissioned or warrant officers, hence my stating to enlist.

    74. Re:These are not Future MIT students by ScarKnee · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. My wife's Hispanic, her grandparents came here legally and resent the illegals. I am personally disgusted by the way people on my side of the debate are made out to be racist when all we are trying to do is have the law enforced to protect our borders. No medicare, social security, public schools, or anything like unto it if you are illegal. Immigrate legally and I'm all for welcoming any individual here.

      President Bush has shown he is too weak-willed to do anything about the illegals. We don't need the illegals to come here to pick our fruit or dig our ditches (both of which are honorable and honest jobs), we have millions of homeless men throughout the USA who could do the job. Americans have just gotten fat and lazy and too full of pride to think that working with their hands (other than typing) is an actul option. I'm sure I'll get a response like, "How are we going to pay a worker $2.50 per hour if he's from this country? Won't food prices go up?" and so on. My answer to that would be, "I'm not sure". I do know that health care in California (and many other border states) would be much less expensive if the paying populace didn't have to foot the bill for every illegal who didn't pay (I know there are citizens who don't pay either).

      As an aside... I've been to Mexico (Cozumel & Cabo) recently and I don't blame any of the people there who try to get here any way they can. It's amazing what a totally corrupted government can do to a place that could so very productive. Beautiful lands and intelligent people going to waste.

    75. Re:These are not Future MIT students by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      you are so incredibly lucky to be born where you were and not a few hundred miles south or you'd likely be singing a different tune.

      Yes, your wifes parents came to the states legally, but as you may have noticed it has become a lot harder in recent years to immigrate legally and quite a few people are so desperate that they try the illegal route.

      not that that kind of desperation would mean anything to you with your 'spanish wife', as if that's an excuse to be a jerk...

      Wished you had to live for a couple of years in Mx or Colombia or so and we'll see what you think about illegal immigration, you just might find yourself on a little boat trying to do just that (or sneaking across a border at night).

    76. Re:These are not Future MIT students by ScarKnee · · Score: 1
      Sorry about the delayed reply, been busy.

      Yes, I am lucky and blessed to have been born a citizen of the United States of America.

      I didn't intend to come off like a jerk, but if that's the way you take it, so be it.

      I live in an area that is literally being overrun by illegals.
      I work in the banking industry and see several loan applications each week with invalid (stolen, "borrowed") social security numbers, applicants that can't prove income because they're paid under the table. The applicants (who are illegally here) throw a fit when I deny them service and then tell me, in Spanish, than I am racist and discriminating against them. Others come in from a local drywall company and cash $4000 checks each week only to go outside and pay others without social security or tax IDs cash out of that check. It's saddening to think of the local, legal worker that is missing out of his or her check because some drywall company is dishonest and keeps paying illegals through whatever channels they can because it's so much cheaper - no OSHA problems, no matching social security deposit, no payroll taxes to track, no unemployment insurance, etc.

      Had you read my post you'd have seen that I understand why they want to come here, I just don't believe a blind eye should be turned to their ever-growing presence here. I don't want them here expecting to get a handout from the government (public schools, health care, etc) if they got here illegally. The laws are in place and need to be enforced.

      Wished you had to live for a couple of years in Mx or Colombia or so and we'll see what you think about illegal immigration, you just might find yourself on a little boat trying to do just that (or sneaking across a border at night).


      I don't need to live somewhere else to know that it's better here. I stated in my original post that these people come from beautiful places with ample room for opportunity, but their own leaders have screwed it up and corrupted the place. For the most part they are hard-working people and will do whatever it takes to put food on their families' plates.

      Regardless of my respect for their desires and situations, the illegals have no right to be here and should not be allowed to stay and benefit from our public services.
    77. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not true.

      My last year of college I had:
      • Bush's tax "cut"
      • Lifetime Learning Credit
      • Child Tax Credit
      • Additional Child Tax Credit
      • EITC
      Which meant that:

      (income tax return) > (taxes witheld) - (federal income tax)
      Look up the definiton of "tax credit" if you don't believe me.
    78. Re:These are not Future MIT students by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      And the ones that don't pay any taxes (instead of taxes on fake names) get paid less and probably would have been eligable for a refund at the end of the year anyway.

      Anyone who thinks 'undocumented' aliens want to remain 'undocumented' is crazy.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    79. Re:These are not Future MIT students by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      City tax? What city tax is there besides sales tax?

      And illegal aliens do pay propery taxes, you lunatic. I can't even imagine how you think they wouldn't.

      As for insurance...uninsuranced people drive the cost of car insurance up. Uninsuranced people drive the cost of health insurance up. Absolutely none of that has anything to do with their legality, it has to do if they're dirt-poor or not. Blaming the problems in health insurance and car insurance on them being here illegally is idiotic.

      Income tax...you'd be amazed how many illegals get fake SS numbers and pay federal, state, and social security taxes through withholdings. Many for them pay too much and end up having a refund, which of course they can never collect. (Nor can they ever collect the social security they put in, even if they do become citizens.)

      And, no, there are no risk-free channels to becoming a citizen. Drawing attention to yourself from the INS is a good way to be immediately deported.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    80. Re:These are not Future MIT students by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      At least the 'lock the border' people are honest, if very stupid. The influx of dirt-poor hardworking people helps America, so locking them out is just dumb.

      But it's a lot more honest than what we have going on now, where most people who winge about illegals go off on rants about income taxes and whatnot. Here's a free clue: Almost none of those people make enough to pay income tax, and certainly not in any large amount, and they'd be happy to pay it.

      What we need to do is take over Mexico. Yeah, I'm serious. Let's open the borders full, let everyone across for 500 dollars, which they have two years to pay off. Anyone already in the US gets the same deal.

      But, and this is the key, we ask them to bring their whole families. No more sending money back home, you bring everyone here. (We can do some sort of tax incentive thing here.) We can build communities in, say, New Mexico (I don't think anyone uses that state, and the name works.) Instead of working in California and sending money to Mexico, they send it to New Mexico.

      Plenty of land, plenty of food, everyone is happy. After ten years here they'll own an HDTV and be middle management at a carpet factory in New Mexico, where they hire new arrivals from Mexico. After thirty years their kids will be wearing their baseball caps backwards and not knowing how to speak Spanish, and doing embarassing well on their SATs.

      In fifty years Mexico will be almost dead. We politely make overtures towards them joining the US.

      No more illegal immigration.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    81. Re:These are not Future MIT students by ninjagin · · Score: 1
      Yunno, you might have something there, though as far as mexican immigrants not paying income tax you've forgotten about Medicare and Social Security taxes, which are not federal income taxes. Regardless of whether your income bracket says you have to pay State/Federal taxes or not, an employer must pay the Social Security and Medicare taxes and these are not subject to any refund when tax returns are filed.

      Social Security and Medicare are pretty big expendiatures, so the added cash flow for those programs would no doubt be welcome.

      My ex father in-law is from Brownsville, TX, which shares the border with the Mexican city of Matamoros. It's common practice for pregnant women in Matamoros to cross the border to have their kids in Brownsville and return to Matamoros once the kid's been hatched. It gives the kid citizenship, which makes it much easier for him/her to negotiate the border in the future. The odd thing is that many of these families choose to stay in Mexico, not necessarily because it's so great down there but because that's their home, where the family and all the relatives are. From a cultural standpoint, it's just more commfortable, too.

      There's an unmentioned fact in all this hullabaloo, too. There are a great many businesses that are started here in the US by Mexican nationals, and not all of them comply fully with business regulations -- partly out of fear of being discovered, shut down and deported -- partly also in order to operate outside of the view of the IRS and state departments of revenue. My uncle, who's in the garment business, once tried to sell apparel to some of the mexican clothing shops here in the Denver area. He found that many (more than half) of those he called on did not have a license to collect taxes. A few of those who did were sporting forgeries (they had ID numbers that were either not real or had been assigned to other businesses). So after a couple days of having most of the shop owners he visited agree to buy goods and then pull out fist-sized rolls of cash to pay for them (which is NOT the way legitimate retailers buy their goods in this country), he got the idea and never went back to that part of town.

      What I'm driving at is that while it's important to legitimize folks that come over here to work from Mexico, it'd double the power of the legitimization effort if Mexican-owned businesses could be brought into the fold as well. The people part is easier, but the business part is equally important, imho.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  19. Carl Hayden High School BBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the 90's... There MUST be other /.ers that called back in the day. It's been a tech magnet school for a while.

  20. article says MIT 1st; high school 3rd by peter303 · · Score: 0

    But it was a fanstastic showing from a minority kid igh school!

    1. Re:article says MIT 1st; high school 3rd by The+Hobo · · Score: 4, Informative
      Check the second link in the story, click final standings, you'll see the high school ranked first place in the explorer class, the first thing on the PDF. First, not third.
      EXPLORER CLASS FINAL RANKING
      Carl Hayden High School 1
      MIT 2
      Cape Fear Community College 3
      --
      There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
    2. Re:article says MIT 1st; high school 3rd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably best to read the entire article before you comment. MIT placed better in the actual exercises themselves but the overall winner of the competition came from a combination of performance and judges' analysis and awards. These young engineers snagged themselves a first place finish.

    3. Re:article says MIT 1st; high school 3rd by jayloden · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't...read the entire article and you'll see that though they came in third in the events, they won the overall, as well as the design and technical writing awards, and a special award for achievement.

      -Jay

    4. Re:article says MIT 1st; high school 3rd by thelazyone · · Score: 1

      If you go back and look at the standings for the last 3 years you will see that Cape Fear Community College has won once overall and has been consistently in the top 3.

      If you watch Discovery or The History Channel you might get to see CFCC's research vessel, the RSV Dan Moore, Doing recovery work. I recently watched a special about the Queen Anne's Revenge that used CFCC's boat to haul up various cannons.

      Yes, I'm an employee of CFCC, and this is a shameless plug. We offer many programs like this and have a good transfer rate to various 4 year schools in NC as well.

      http://cfcc.edu

    5. Re:article says MIT 1st; high school 3rd by joggle · · Score: 1

      Then I bet your group was pretty shell-shocked when they lost to these high school kids :).

  21. VERY cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I went to this very school for their computer program from 1986 to 1990. Must, say, I think this is awesome. At that time, the robotics work was only in "special projects" class, and consisted of a small robotic arm hooked up to an Amiga. They've certainly come a long way.

    At the time, the school was part of a "Magnet Program," a program designed to desegregate the schools and attract more of us "white boys" to the school. We had labs of true IBMs and Compaq PCs, and had classes available for learning programming like BASIC, Pascal, and towards the end C. They had a "State of the art" 3com ethernet, that to see any changes on the server you had log out and back in again. They even had a VAX/VMS system. Quite advanced for a High School, probably even by todays standards.

    They're responsible for keeping me from having to work some boring regular job. Now I get to listen to users all day! :P The teacher mentioned in the article Allen Cameron was most definately my favorite as well. Very cool guy. Congrats!

    1. Re:VERY cool! by Rainbird98 · · Score: 1

      Very cool indeed. I graduated from Carl Hayden in 1959 (yes, us old guys read Slashdot too). At that time the high school was in a mostly white blue collar area. Many of the families worked at the Reynolds Aluminum plant about a mile away. I guess the demographics have undergone a significant change. In the late fifties Carl Hayden High School was on the very west edge of Phoenix. Now it could be considered almost intercity.

    2. Re:VERY cool! by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      I went to a magnet school ( Gompers Secondary, in San Diego ). This was '78 to '82. We had dec pdp 11 equipment, curriculum included basic, fortran, assembly, pascal, and a data structures course culminating in writing a compiler.

      Made a huge difference in my life.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    3. Re:VERY cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to Carl Hayden from 1997 to 2001. I took Allan Cameron computer science classes and Fredi Lajvardi normal science class. Both great teacher, Some of the best out there.

    4. Re:VERY cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I bet the job you have now is very fufilling and so ...not boring....

  22. Re:Flea Market by dfn5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Man, is it Flea Market season already?

    Actually, yes. April 17th. Don't miss the first one. It has the best crap.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  23. The kids' future by kneecarrot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What is rather sad is that these kids have very few prospects for their future. The end of the article explains how, because of their undocumented status, they can only attend University or College as out-of-state students. This drastically increases the cost.

    Yes, I know they are illegal immigrants. But, they are still kids with hopes and dreams.

    --

    I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

    1. Re:The kids' future by goldspider · · Score: 1

      If they became citizens before applying for college, that would be one less obstacle to overcome.

      Yes, I know that there a lot of legal hoops to jump through to attain citizenship, but it gives them the best chance to succeed.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:The kids' future by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Yes, I know they are illegal immigrants. But, they are still kids with hopes
      > and dreams.

      Yeah yeah yeah. I want three seperate groups, ok? I want poor, hungry and huddled masses over there there and there, ok?

    3. Re:The kids' future by zentinal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why the emphasis on hand wringing on their inability to get into MIT (or Cal Tech, or Harvey Mudd or...). Those are all great schools, but are they necessarily the best in the world? Now, IMHO, If we as a nation can't see fit to somehow get them into such schools, perhaps we don't deserve to have them in our schools, and don't deserve to profit from their services when they are working engineers. There are engineering schools all over the globe. Hopefully they'll be snatched up by one of them.

    4. Re:The kids' future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " What is rather sad is that these kids have very few prospects for their future."

      I am amazed at how many people think these kids have no prospect for a future. America is the land of opportunity! I come from a poor background, was a drug addict, and went to prison. It took me ten years after I got out to overcome the obstales I had created for myself. Through hard work and determination, I will earn six figures this year through legitimate means. It is true these kids will never have much of a future as illegals. I didn't have much of a future as a criminal either. But if they will get legal status and work within the system, the opportunities are limitless.

    5. Re:The kids' future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For people like this I like to propose a university with which I have had great success:

      UNISA (The University of South Africa).
      http://www.unisa.ac.za/

      They are
      a) a correspondence university, no travel required
      b) cheap (one year of full study, including books, about $2000)
      c) fully accredited and internationally respected
      d) accept SATs as evidence of academic fitness for admission
      e) their average student is female, black, 30 years old, studying part time while working, and living somewhere in the third world
      f) while their course catalogue isn't all-encompassing, it is huge and varied
      g) their student body is very large (>150 000) and varied, and their facilities are designed to make it possible for all these students to succeed
      h) they offer online mechanisms for submitting assignments, forum discussions and getting in touch with lecturers
      i) they offer courses up to and including doctoral levels

      I went to them because I could transfer credits to them, because I wouldn't have to go into debt to study with them, and because I'm working full-time and can't attend lectures. I'm still with them because they are an excellent academic institution that makes these things possible.

      I have every respect for those mexican kids. It sucks not to get many breaks. However, necessity is the mother of invention (as they demonstrated!) and I'm quite sure that they realise that they don't have to go to some university to drink thirty kegs of beer apiece, just to get a degree. There are other options.

    6. Re:The kids' future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you and die.

    7. Re:The kids' future by krysith · · Score: 1

      If they became citizens before applying for college, that would be one less obstacle to overcome.

      Um, you do know that becoming a citizen can take longer than getting a PhD, right? I have a Romanian friend who has been here through junior high, high school, college, working at IBM, and now sysoping at an ISP. He's still waiting on his citizenship. He's a second generation green card holder.

      It bugs the heck out of me, as a US citizen, that many of my fellow citizens gripe about illegal immigration, but discourage any attempts to make legal immigration easier. The best solution to illegal immigration is legal immigration. I mean, we've already got the immigration part of it - how does making it difficult or illegal help the situation?

    8. Re:The kids' future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you wouldn't say you had a sense of humour, then?

  24. selection bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which subgroup of MIT students compete in such an event? The best and brightest? The dregs? I don't know, I'm just throwing out the possibilty that they are not average or typical MIT students.

    1. Re:selection bias by Divide+By+Zero · · Score: 1


      If you actually look at the final scores, it was very close for the title - less than two points.

      At some point, somehow, these kids DID get into MIT. Even the dregs at MIT had to prove themselves. I'm hoping (for their sake) that the MIT kids phoned in the tech writing and display - they could have won Overall on either of those.

      --
      Dare to Hope. Prepare to be Disappointed.
  25. Yep... by beaviz · · Score: 1

    It's always fun to beat up smart kids...

  26. bleh by ronsta · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Not to be a /. /snob, but this story was on the boingboing.net and wired.com websites for a while before slashdot picked it up.

    Slashdot should just set up an RSS feed from boingboing and rebroadcast it in the Slashdot template.

    respek!

    1. Re:bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but this story was on the boingboing.net and wired.com websites for a while before slashdot picked it up.

      And your point is?

    2. Re:bleh by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

      Yeah and just yesterday Boingboing picked up the story about the robot alarm clock that was on Slashdot a while ago. So read more than one source and you'll get up-to-date news.

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    3. Re:bleh by BigGerman · · Score: 0, Troll

      what is going on, Slashdot routinely spoon-feeds recycled Wired stories. It typically starts about 2 weeks after paper edition is out and continues for another 2 weeks or so. All the major Wired stories from the paper issue apear on /. spread evenly. They gots smarted now by not mentioning Wired in the text blurb and linking other sources in.

    4. Re:bleh by ronsta · · Score: 1

      it's good to see someone is doing their reading =P

    5. Re:bleh by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      Up to date news like there's no archaelogical evidence of the book of Mormon? Particularly the lost tribe of Israelites in North America?

  27. return of the mac by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    this picture should be titled return of the mac

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. This.... by Null537 · · Score: 1

    ....reminds me of the US FIRST Robotics Competition .

    The engineers did the work, but the kids and the sponsor(s) reap the benefits. This isn't much different but at least it is giving kids a place to go after school, and pushing more people into the engineering field, which is something we may not need.

    1. Re:This.... by schleyfox · · Score: 1

      My school participates in FIRST. I had the pleasure to attend several of the build meets (I couldn't join the team because of other obligations). I don't know about other places, but our team did all of the building, programming, and testing. We had a few helpers but their function was to fill out paperwork and the one engineer was just the "Is this physically possible?" guy. The students had to do it all. Granted our team got absolutely owned in the face, probably by teams that "real" engineers did the work. Anyway its a pretty cool program that I hope to work with sometime during my high school experience.

    2. Re:This.... by CoolQ · · Score: 1

      As a member of my school's FIRST team, I have to say that you are DEAD WRONG.

      We spent 4 hours every night for 6 weeks designing and building our robot from scratch. The few engineers we had didn't even show up half the time. About the only thing they did was a bunch of force calculations (that later turned out to be wrong).

      FIRST is about STUDENTS doing the work.

      --Quentin

  30. experts vs. newcomers by elmartinos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Often newbies are better than experts. An expert is stuck with the knowledge and experience gathered over time, it is difficult to think outside this box. A newcomer instead can have fresh, unconvential ideas that most experts probably would laugh about but sometimes produce amazing results.

    On the other side, this may just be an excuse for my laziness ;-)

    1. Re:experts vs. newcomers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on that premise there should be non-governmental actors putting together speace crafts beating nasa at their own game... oh... wait...

    2. Re:experts vs. newcomers by Jonas+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      For example: They had a very small leak. They didn't have time to fix it, so their solution? They threw a tampon in to soak up any water so it wouldn't short out the electronics.

      That's brilliant.

      --
      Everything seemed to be going so nice
      'till the end of all beings punched right through the ice
    3. Re:experts vs. newcomers by dr.octogonocologist · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think you're right. I majored in economics but entered our Robot Competition (Northwestern) a few years back. We were given a budget and the majority of the Tech students spent all on impressive components. We kept about half the budget, took a fairly unconventional (read simple) approach and spent the other half on beer & Franzia for our "display table" It got pretty funny as recruiters would ask us about our robot while drinking a fine Busch Light. Finished 3rd out of 32. Though never heard from a recruiter after that day :)

    4. Re:experts vs. newcomers by robbo · · Score: 1

      Though never heard from a recruiter after that day :)

      No wonder-- you served them Busch Light!

      --
      So long, and thanks for all the Phish
    5. Re:experts vs. newcomers by MasterOfUniverse · · Score: 1
      Often newbies are better than experts.

      Thats not true. Rarely newbies are better than experts. Its just that media often picks up on these kinds of rare stories. Of the thousand times when experts beats newbies, no one reports that. But once a newbie beats expert its in the news. So we only here newbie beating experts all the time.

      --
      "There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people."--Howard Zinn
    6. Re:experts vs. newcomers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Often newbies are better than experts.


      It's often that applied folks are more skilled at actually building something in other than ideal (real world) conditions than the theorists.

      While in the army as a component level electronics tech, we had contract engineers with BSEE and MSEE degrees running around our site. After a grand total of three months (and well over a mill in equpment damage) they were forbidden from touching test equipment, soldering irons, and anything with sharp edges. The engineers were told: go to your corner, design your stuff, bring it to the techies and craftsman, we'll suggest changes, hand it back to you, you review and tweak, and then we'll (techs and craftsman) build it. No, I'm not making this up. I've seen some incredibly smart people who couldn't change a flat tire to save their life.

      Ever see the result of a car that was designed without the input of a mechanic? I have. It was called a Chevy Monza, and you had to lift the goddamned engine block to replace the spark plugs.
  31. Re:Kids ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    RTFA

    Thats teacher Allan Cameron, the other bearded guy is also a teacher Fredi Lajvardi.

  32. Re:I call Shenanigans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFA.

    If you do, you will see that he was a teacher that started the whole thing, but that the ideas and work came from the team. One of the guys on the team seemed to be very smart.

  33. Those kids being in the US is good for the US by wiredog · · Score: 0

    and bad for Mexico.

    1. Re:Those kids being in the US is good for the US by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not in the long run.

      Mexico is a less class-mobile society than the US. These kids aren't just Mexican - they're poor. If they had been born in the middle- to upper-middle classes in Mexico, they could go to a decent shool, and then on to Monterrey or UNAM, and get great jobs. But they aren't in the middle class - they'd have little chance of getting those opportunities in Mexico. Their parents came to the US because they couldn't support their families at all back home.

  34. Sad by dos_dude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Really sad. Not that some high school kids can build better robots than the MIT. But that they beat the MIT in the 'Technical Report' category is really sad.

    I also find it amusing that the MIT would enter a competition that seems to be targeted towards high schools. Or should I find that sad too?

    1. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The competition had levels for both High School and Colleges; the high school kids were allowed to enter the college level competition if they wanted. The advisor of the team in question felt it would be more instructive for the kids to lose in upper level competition than in the lower level catagory.

    2. Re:Sad by jayloden · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the competition has two categories..."Explorer" and "Ranger". Explorer class is almost all colleges and universities, while Ranger is for the high school students. These kids competed in the Explorer class because the teachers assumed they'd lose, so they might as well lose to some good teams...go figure -Jay

    3. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, MIT actually did build the best robot (they won the physical contest). I get the feeling that the subjective part of the grading was a little biased.

    4. Re:Sad by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      I hope you don't think you are in the majority. Most people don't even have jobs that have anything to do with their degree.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    5. Re:Sad by kyojin+the+clown · · Score: 1
      i dont think that having a degree you don't use at work is a waste of time. my degree was japanese, and now i'm a sysadmin for a recruitment company. however i dont feel i wasted my time at uni; it made me a wiser, more rounded person, i had fun, and i have a skill tha may well come to be useful in the future. my alcohol tolerance is way up.

      also, i can tell my idiot lusers to suck my balls just as much as i like, and they don't have a clue. yay crazy languages!

    6. Re:Sad by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I hope you don't think you are in the majority. Most people don't even have jobs that have anything to do with their degree.

      Could have if they'd wanted. If you didn't want an overlap there, then no problem. I'm just bored with people whining about it and claiming college is worthless. It's worth what you put into it. If you get nothing out, well, that should say something.

      Education, learning, and knowledge can't be spoon fed. Just made available.

    7. Re:Sad by 2obvious4u · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since you read the results you should notice that MIT scored a 48 on mission objectives. Thats 15 points more than the winner (32) and 8 points better than the next closest (40 - third place). What this says is that if MIT controlled the space program they would get us to the moon and back, whereas this high school that "beat MIT" in a robotics competition couldn't even get out of the atmosphere. Ok, so the high schoolers actually did the busy work (papers and science fair project back board), this just proves that they are set for the factory work that so many people said they would be doing in previous posts.

    8. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, because you managed to like what you took and happened to find a job related to it, means everyone will, right?

      Time to go back and take a course on REALITY.

      Things don't work out perfectly for everyone, you know.

    9. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      knowledge can't be spoon fed. Just made available.

      That's the point of college, isn't it? It's not like they have access to secret books or anything.

      College = People with no initiative paying someone to stand over them and strike the whip.

    10. Re:Sad by dude__hi · · Score: 1

      Your theory is full of holes. and your irragants is thick. First of all MIT would have failed at getting the contract to go to the moon because they couldnt sell themselves to the judges. If this was real. Also in the competition MIT could not bring back a sample of stuff that was in the the pool. So Even they got to the moon their would be no info to study because they couldnt bring any back. If MIT cant write a technical report than they should not be able to be engineers. They on the team worked hard for what they got and they deserve what they are getting and people that are jealous and they have to pick it apart should not have axcess to a computer. If you think you can do better i woulod like to see you can contact me at DrRichope@aol.com. So please tell me i would appreciate it because intill then all i see is talk with no smarts to back it.

    11. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's the point of college, isn't it? It's not like they have access to secret books or anything.
      They have access to research libraries. They have access to a community of scholars.
      College = People with no initiative paying someone to stand over them and strike the whip.
      It is unfortunate if that is an accurate description of your college experience. Not everyone is without initiative though.
    12. Re:Sad by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      Really sad. Not that some high school kids can build better robots than the MIT. But that they beat the MIT in the 'Technical Report' category is really sad.

      I also find it amusing that the MIT would enter a competition that seems to be targeted towards high schools. Or should I find that sad too?


      It is really sad, but Cristian explained how he compensated 30 degrees for laser beam refraction while MIT just gave up. So who do you think is going to produce more excellent technical information?

      Also, from the article, the Hayden HS team entered an advanced college level competition.

      rd

    13. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Water Sample was one of many tasks. MIT still completed many more tasks than any other team, even in skipping that one.

    14. Re:Sad by peetm · · Score: 1

      I hope you don't think you are in the majority. Most people don't even have jobs that have anything to do with their degree. I know a few in the UK ... they took degrees that are worthless, or 'soft', or both ... Media Studies for example - what bloody use is that! Hey, we're even getting degrees in things like Football Management coming alone now! We're living in a time where the government thinks that a better educated society is one in which any dumb ass can get a degree - and, they're right these days - dumb asses *can* now go to college, and get a degree - but it still doesn't change them from being dumb asses. No wonder then that there are more and more 'shelf fillers' with degrees these days!

      --
      @peetm
  35. Suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That MIT is the only well-known university in this competition...is it Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or some other MIT?

  36. Future news. by NanotechLobster · · Score: 1

    In retaliation, MIT has constructed a nuclear submarine and blown up Carl Hayden Highschool.

    1. Re:Future news. by deadhammer · · Score: 1

      You shoulda read TFA. There's two sections to this competition, the high schooler division and the college division (the one that MIT entered). Their teacher decided that, rather than losing to the high schoolers, they should at least show up for the college division. Of course, they exceeded everyone's expectations and proved themselves more than worthy of getting every scholarship and student loan dollar they can. This isn't MIT entering a high school contest, this is high schoolers beating the pants off of college engineering professionals.

      --
      I'll be honest, we're throwing science against the wall to see what sticks. -Cave Johnson
    2. Re:Future news. by deadhammer · · Score: 1

      Ooops, this was meant for the comment above. Damn me and my distractions!

      --
      I'll be honest, we're throwing science against the wall to see what sticks. -Cave Johnson
  37. Re:article says MIT 1st; high school 3rd - NOPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read it again. They were 3rd after the first round (completing tasks in pool), but other factors (best technical solutions, best technical paper) was also taken into account in deciding the over-all winners.

  38. Ockham's(Occam's) Razor by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    as we learn more ,we tend to like to complicate things when sometimes a far easier explination or device would suffice.
    They simplified many of the concepts in the design , to finaly produce a much sleaker robot with a greater performance .The simple idea of having onboard power and a lighter tether was a great advantage which threw the game in their favour .
    The design seems wonderuflly direct and simple , a good example of occam's razor in the eveloution of robots "dont add more than you need
    PS:"i apoligise if i missed something TFA is loading at a snails pace for me

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:Ockham's(Occam's) Razor by Ibag · · Score: 1

      The score breakdown is:
      Engineering Eval:
      Carl Hayden: 53.17
      MIT: 44.67
      Tech Report:
      Carl Hayden: 20.25
      MIT: 17
      Team Display:
      Carl Hayden: 13.5
      MIT: 8
      Mission Task:
      Carl Hayden: 32
      MIT: 48
      Total:
      Carl Hayden: 118.92
      MIT: 117.67

      While MIT lost by a hair, at the mission task, they scored 50% more points. The majority of the points for the competition were *not* based on the ability of the robot to accomplish its goal, and the Carl Hayden robot was not just a better robot. It would be nice to say "Simplicity is always better" but it would seem, in this case, that simplicity only gains you points in the things that do not matter in the end. Unless you are in management.

    2. Re:Ockham's(Occam's) Razor by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Having read the rest it seems aparent that some of it may indeed be a victory for Chattons theory .However this is stil split . Just because this shows favour to the complex beast , does not prove Chattons anti razor

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  39. Best Quote from the Article by cOdEgUru · · Score: 5, Funny

    Swean (head of the Navy's Ocean Engineering and Marine Systems program) nodded. He eyed their rudimentary flip chart.

    "Why don't you have a PowerPoint display?" he asked.

    "PowerPoint is a distraction," Cristian replied. "People use it when they don't know what to say."

    "And you know what to say?"

    "Yes, sir."

    DAMN!!! :)

    1. Re:Best Quote from the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hello My name is Richard and am currently attending Carl Hayden High school as we all have read the article it is pretty sweet and some exageration but we wont get in to that, right now besides our rov team we won our regional FIRST robotics chairmans award the highest in the competition and are now trying for the national title. We have the first and longest running electric vehicle program in the nation where we build electric cars. Its preety sweet. We also compete in a high school pumpkin throwing catapult competition. We've helped the city of scottsdale design and build a electric train based on our electric vehicles. This train carries hundreds of kids over a one mile course around McCormick-Stillman space park. We host the state lego robotics championships and mentor 6 teams from the community in that competition. We do over 30 presentations to different organizations yearly. Also with that comment about the gangs and the fights is not accurate it may have been in the past but has cleaned up these past few years.

    2. Re:Best Quote from the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I read this article in WIRED and that comment grabbed me. Amazing!

  40. Re:You are all idiots. Look at the date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I believe it to be you who is the idiot. The latest issue of Wired actually contains the hard copy of the article so maybe you should return to your post as Overlord of Dairy Queen.

  41. Re:blackjack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, you know that the MIT blackjack players LOST money, don't you?

  42. Followup by saddino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This article from the Washington Post follows-up the story in Wired. In short (and I suppose unsuprisingly), college isn't an option due to their illegal status (no loans, no in-state tuition). Of the two who have graduated high school: One of them is hanging drywall, and the other files papers at a Social Secuirty office.

    1. Re:Followup by forand · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod this as "funny" seriously all the bitching about illegal aliens and where is one working" The Social Security Office! Priceless.

    2. Re:Followup by Urusai · · Score: 0

      They still have better jobs than me with my fancy Computer Science degree and tens of thousands of dollars of debt. Cry me a storm.

    3. Re:Followup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B.S. You could march yourself right over to the Social Security office and apply to file papers for minimum wage. But you won't because you have made that choice. You see, you can decide to sit on your ass and wait to get a better job. They don't have that luxury, nor that choice.

      Cry me a "storm" indeed.

    4. Re:Followup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really are full of BS, you're much worst than underwage people taking their ass off for slavery

  43. Not quite as cool by TheFlu · · Score: 0, Troll

    "A bunch of bright high school kids from Carl Hayden Highschool beat out MIT in a Marine Technology Center's Robotics competition."

    That's pretty cool, but not quite as cool as if a bunch of retarded high school kids had beat them instead.

  44. Forget ExxonMobil by The-Bus · · Score: 5, Funny

    These kids should be sponsored by O.B.!

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Forget ExxonMobil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your sub is leakin
      you better be seekin
      O.B.

  45. They could be. by LWATCDR · · Score: 0

    Click the link and give some cash. If enough people do that they will get to go to college. Okay Bill pony up some bucks.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  46. Competition scores by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    http://www.mpcfaculty.net/jill_zande/Explorer_scor es.pdf

    Interesting scores.

    The MIT team gets 3rd lowest score on engineering, but the highest score on actually performing the competition tasks.

    The illegal immigrants' team gets 2nd highest score on engineering and highest score on technical report.

    How does a bunch of spanish speaking illegal immigrants write a better technical report than MIT students?

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    1. Re:Competition scores by uberjon · · Score: 2, Funny

      They where the kids that wrote all those reports that you outsourced...

      --
      Dick Laurent is dead.
    2. Re:Competition scores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How does a bunch of spanish speaking illegal immigrants write a better technical report than MIT students?

      This is going to be a ridiculous anecdote, however when I was in high school I worked as a pizza boy, making pizzas at a local Mother's Pizza (in St. Thomas, ON).

      One of the things that I noticed is that a couple of the stoner employees would check in late and check out early, doing a half-assed job, and eventually they would quit or be fired. It mostly went without comment.

      Inexplicably, though, the managers would pick on me for every minor transgression - they'd comment that I put too much green pepper on a pizza, or that my break was during too busy of a period, or whatever. One of the days it really irritated me, so I asked "Why is it that I win the laughable `employee of the month' award virtually every month, yet you're endlessly nitpicking in a way that you don't for other employees?"

      The answer stuck with me because it's true throughout life - they held me to a higher standard. While I was doing the same job as others, they saw many of them almost sympathetically, or as lost causes, so they were much more likely to overlook deficiencies or gaps.

      Whenever there is subjective rankings, expect the dominant player to be graded much more critically. Expect the underdog to much more liberally have problems and mistakes overlooked.

    3. Re:Competition scores by hugg · · Score: 1

      How does a bunch of spanish speaking illegal immigrants write a better technical report than MIT students?

      One can assume that for the Spanish speaking folks, English is a second language. For the MIT student, English is fifth or sixth, right behind FORTH...

  47. Re:You are all idiots. Look at the date by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    Actually, I believe it to be you who is the idiot. The latest issue of Wired actually contains the hard copy of the article so maybe you should return to your post as Overlord of Dairy Queen.

    Let me guess- the latest issue is the April edition? And, as we all know, Wired is above pulling April Fool's pranks. But since you bravely posted as Anonymous Coward, I expect that you'd conveniently vanish if I proved you wrong.

  48. Re:your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So ... a ceasefire somehow leads to more deaths? You, sir, are a fucking moron.

  49. Artificial Intelligence for Robots - Source Code by Mentifex · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mind.Forth for Robots is free AI source code that high-schoolers may download, play around with, and possibly get a leg up on outdoing MIT and all the other minds-wide-shut adult AI enterprises. (There is an implicit contest involved here of who can keep the date-stamped robot AI Mind running the longest, as if for the Guiness Book of World Records.)

    The Theory of Cognitivity is the basis of the free source code for artificial intelligence. Any high-schooler interested in an AI or robotics career may start working on AI theory immediately.

    Dr. Ben Goertzel of the Novamente AI project has evaluated the AI theory offered here.

    ACM Sigplan Notices 33(12):25-31 "Mind.Forth: Thoughts on AI and Forth" was a 1998 evaluation by the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).

    ACM Sigplan Notices 39(12):11-16 "Forth and AI Revisited: BRAIN.FORTH" is a more recent (December 2004) follow-up by the ACM on the robot AI project.

  50. Re:Kids ? by dietrichw · · Score: 0

    Haha, thats why you read the article and not just look at the pictures. The white bearded man is Allan Cameron, and is the computer science teacher there at the high school. I don't understand why people are knocking the students because they had help from Mr. Cameron. Obviously it took alot of dedication from the students to make this project. Besides, who has never been mentored in their life before? Nobody. These kids did a great job.

  51. Typical of Engineers by jvandervort · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the standings here are the breakdowns:

    Engineering Eval:
    Carl Hayden: 53.17
    MIT: 44.67
    Tech Report:
    Carl Hayden: 20.25
    MIT: 17
    Team Display:
    Carl Hayden: 13.5
    MIT: 8
    Mission Task:
    Carl Hayden: 32
    MIT: 48

    Total:
    Carl Hayden: 118.92
    MIT: 117.67

    MIT lost because they didn't care enough about their display:)

    Apparently they were a little too myopic about the task.

    As an engineer myself, it figures:)

    1. Re:Typical of Engineers by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      I can understand that - in a robotics competition, who cares about the report, display, or whatever the engineering evaluation consists of? It's not like they were trying to design and SELL the thing. They were just working on a proof of concept, and 48 >> 32 when it comes to that.

    2. Re:Typical of Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You apparently missed this:


      Engineering Eval:
      Carl Hayden: 53.17
      MIT: 44.67


      Whatever engineers were judging liked the construction on their sub more than MITs. My first guess would be that it is related to the HUGE budget difference. Given that the high school students built something for about $800, and the MIT students had $11,000 there was an expectation that there should have been something like $10,200 of extra performance, and they apparently didn't have it.

    3. Re:Typical of Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, that is a lame excuse. What about the fact that MIT had 5K and the high school kids had 800. fact the high school team matched MIT with 1/5 the funds shows the kids had talent and passion. The only thing this shows is the MIT team was a bunch of slackers. If you're not entering to win, or think you're going to win because you're from MIT, then it's just laziness and stupidity.

    4. Re:Typical of Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>As an engineer myself, it figures:)

      Oh boy! You said it.

      Talk about not seeing the wood for the trees!

      How much did the MIT brats have to spend?

    5. Re:Typical of Engineers by amabbi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Mission Task: Carl Hayden: 32 MIT: 48

      So the real story is, MIT beat the high school kids by 50% in the only objective scoring category of the competition. Why is this news?

    6. Re:Typical of Engineers by taustin · · Score: 1

      While you have a point, I'm sure the MIT team were entirely aware of the scoring categories, and how they'd be judged. They were in it to build a robot, rather than compete in the contest. That's their call, but they have nothing to complain about.

    7. Re:Typical of Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the real story is, MIT beat the high school kids by 50% in the only objective scoring category of the competition. Why is this news?

      I doubt the difference in resources was only 50%. If you combine their higher Engineer Eval. with the difference in funding levels, it would imply the high schoolers did far more with less. If you have the resources to spare, brute force solutions will ususally do the actual job better than elegant hacks. However, engineering is also about trade-offs and working within your limitations. This kids demonstrated they had this capacity, even though they technically "don't belong here".

    8. Re:Typical of Engineers by amabbi · · Score: 1
      I doubt the difference in resources was only 50%. If you combine their higher Engineer Eval. with the difference in funding levels, it would imply the high schoolers did far more with less. If you have the resources to spare, brute force solutions will ususally do the actual job better than elegant hacks. However, engineering is also about trade-offs and working within your limitations. This kids demonstrated they had this capacity, even though they technically "don't belong here".

      See, that's simply an indictment of the flawed criteria of the competition, and not of the engineering abilities of the MIT students vs the high schoolers. (OK, I admit it, I'm an MIT alum).

      I mean, suppose you have a task where you need to pump water from one place to another. If you have the resources, the simplest thing to do would be to buy a water pump. Sure, you could design and build one yourself, and you'd probably get props for that. But that doesn't mean that your design is better or that the engineering is superior.

    9. Re:Typical of Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this was a real world situation and we were competing for the job we would have won it.Having a good robot is not anough alone you have to have people who care. Our motto is The easy part is building the robot, its building the real engineer is the hard part. Its all intertwined in the competition.

    10. Re:Typical of Engineers by drew · · Score: 1

      actually the MIT team had $11,000. The $5,000 was just from one company (Exxon).

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    11. Re:Typical of Engineers by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm...I wonder if engineers have to be good at satisfying non-objective criteria.

      Oh yeah, they do. Right. When you're an engineer, you have to solve the whole problem. When you're in a competition like this, the scoring sheet is a much better specification of the problem than you're ever likely to get in industry.

      I'd have been SHOCKED if the raw performance of the MIT robot weren't head and shoulders above the Carl Hayden machine. It cost more than ten times more, and was built by a large team of talented engineering students.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    12. Re:Typical of Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this is an indication of the engineering abilities of the MIT students.


      "How'd you make the laser range finder work?" Swean growled. MIT had admitted earlier that a laser would have been the most accurate way to measure distance underwater, but they'd concluded that it would have been difficult to implement.


      So again, these are kids who even solved problems the MIT students gave up on.

      More than that, an engineers job isn't just to solve problems in the simplest way. Engineering isn't objective except in VERY limited cases where you can even talk about optimization, you almost always have to balance different criteria. We don't know if the MIT students made good use of their funds, or blew it on things that were far out of proporion with their needs. However, if I was managing a project, and was brought two solutions to a problem, and one cost almost 14 times more than the other, you can bet I would expect that it would do a LOT better.

    13. Re:Typical of Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't think the "Engineering Eval" scoring section was objective? (MIT also got a lower score in that section.)

    14. Re:Typical of Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Did you read their answer to how their range finder worked?

      "We used a helium neon laser, captured its phase shift with a photo sensor, and manually corrected by 30 percent to account for the index of refraction."

      Er, OK. Sure you could do that. To capture the phase shift of a laser signal with a photo sensor, you'd need some sort of heterodyne signal.. which they didn't bother to mention. Using the phase shift to calculate distance works... but only to fractions of the wavelength of light... which for a HeNe would be less than a micron.

      Look, I don't mean to detract from what these guys did. But, from what I've read, they must have had outside help, and their scores in the subjective categories such as presentation and technical report undoubtedly were boosted because of who they were.

    15. Re:Typical of Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and was built by a large team of talented engineering students. ...hence they should have won?

    16. Re:Typical of Engineers by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "Using the phase shift to calculate distance works... but only to fractions of the wavelength of light... which for a HeNe would be less than a micron"

      Wow. Because it's very important to have sub-micron positioning in an undersea ROV, right? These kids from Arizona apparently came up with an elegant, functional hack, and all you can do is dog on 'em because they should have done it YOUR way. Whatever, dude.

      "Look, I don't mean to detract from what these guys did"

      So don't.

      "But, from what I've read, they must have had outside help", because there's no way four Mexicans could have possibly beaten the team from MIT fairly. Uh huh. Sour grapes much?

      The "subjective" categories were part of the design specification. If you do not satisfy the design specification, you do not get the contract. These guys satisfied the design specification better than the MIT team.

      By any metric, the accomplishment of ANY high-school team that can go toe-to-toe with the elite technical universities and win is an impressive achievement. Seeing the situation these students are in, makes it MORE impressive, not less.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    17. Re:Typical of Engineers by zooblethorpe · · Score: 2, Insightful
      MIT lost because they didn't care enough about their display :) Apparently they were a little too myopic about the task. As an engineer myself, it figures :)

      I catch your wry humor, but I also note a number of comments elsewhere in the thread along the lines of "if it works, who cares about the display [i.e. documentation]?"

      This, I think, cuts right to the problem in a number of areas, including a lot of FOSS projects. If you can't explain what it is you've done, your accomplishments aren't worth much. Sure, I understand the argument that "you can read the source code" if there's no or shoddy documentation (or in the case of physical objects like the robot in the article, "you can mess with it to see how it works", or "open it up and poke around"), but frankly, this is not an acceptable answer for most of us. The simple point is, while I could read the source code of an application or reverse-engineer a robot project, it would be a much more efficient use of my time to read well-written documentation that tells me exactly what I need to know.

      Good documentation is an integral part of any complete project. Telling people to "just mess with it" or to "look into the internals to find out how it works" is disingenuous and just plain lazy.

      --
      "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
      "A four-foot prune."
    18. Re:Typical of Engineers by Qwerty0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I spoke to one of the girls on MIT's team -- she pointed out that getting 15 students and a robot from Massachusetts to California and renting hotel rooms for the duration doesn't come cheaply, so the lion's share of this $11000 budget disappeared there, leaving the team with a bot budget in the same order of magnitude as the Hayden team...

    19. Re:Typical of Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow. Because it's very important to have sub-micron positioning in an undersea ROV, right? These kids from Arizona apparently came up with an elegant, functional hack, and all you can do is dog on 'em because they should have done it YOUR way. Whatever, dude.

      You didn't even bother to read my response, did you. The way that they said they did it would allow you to measure distances in the sub-micron scale. THAT's HOW THEY SAID THEY DID IT, not how I said I would do it. But that's probably too complicated for you to understand.

      This is why I said I think they had outside help. They obviously got a laser rangefinder to work, but they don't understand how it works. Otherwise, they would have explained it clearly.. which they didn't.

      Second, in terms of outside help, I'm also referring to the fact that on the subjective metrics on this task (the presentation, the engineering eval, the technical report) it is highly likely that they got extra points because these were high school kids competing against college kids. On the only objective criteria, how the robots performed, they were smoked.

  52. Mod parent into oblivion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent down. If Rob is getting a divorce, he and his wife seem very nonchalant about it :-)

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/~CmdrTaco/journal/

    Read his damn journal people. Don't just believe AC rhetoric.

  53. Interesting to note, however by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

    From the Article on Wired:

    ...he phoned Frank Szwankowski, who sold industrial and scientific thermometers at Omega Engineering in Stamford, Connecticut. Szwankowski knew as much about thermometer applications as anyone in the US...

    "You know," he (Frank Szwankowski) said, "I think you can beat those guys from MIT. Because none of them know what I know about thermometers."

  54. The truth... by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Before this deteriorates in to a Pro/Anti Immigration flame fest, I cannot but feel awe for these four kids who braced odds to be where they are at now.

    I also can't help but think what a loss to their original country they are. America has a way of luring the smartest and most hard working people here with the hopes of a better life. And the country where they came from losses one more leader, one more person who could have had an impact.

    It is like the USA is the Yankee's of world baseball. We don't have to grow our own talent. We can buy it elsewhere. And then, what do we give back to other countries? We open HUGE factories where we move jobs, like when GM closed the plants in Michigan and moved them to Mexico because people there would work for pennies on the dollar.

    What does this say about how the world is being organized?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:The truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>It is like the USA is the Yankee's of world baseball.

      Wow!

      You mean there are other countries involved in 'world' baseball apart from the US and Canada?

      If the Yankees are the USA, who is Canada? and which countries are all the rest of the 'world' baseball teams?

    2. Re:The truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Stretching a little bit for a reason to bash America there don't you think?

      "America has a way of luring the smartest and most hard working people here with the hopes of a better life"

      Luring? Maybe the smartest and hardest working people are smart enough to realize that, if they're willing to work hard, America offers them the best chance to have a better life.

    3. Re:The truth... by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      You mean there are other countries involved in 'world' baseball apart from the US and Canada? If the Yankees are the USA, who is Canada? and which countries are all the rest of the 'world' baseball teams?

      Canada would be the Cubs. They sometimes make some noise, but in the end, they don't really do anything. Nobody expects they ever will do anything. Mexico is the Pittsburgh Pirates. Their best day is opening day, because that is the highest in the standing's they will ever be. They always sink to dead last, and their players try anything they can to get traded to better teams. France is like the Braves. They do it the time-honored way, they get every drop out of pitching they can. And they always seem to be invloved in determining who wins, they are in the race until the last day. Russia is like the Mets. They used to be the best competition, 2 decades ago, but they have fallen to second fiddle to the Yankees. They make bad deals trying to reclaim what they lost, but each deal sinks them deeper. And China, they might be like the twins. The smallest payroll, but the smartest managment of assets. They can't hold on to talent, because as soon as someone makes a name, they find their way to the Yankee's. But they seem to have an endless supply of young people with potential.

      See, everything boils down to baseball.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    4. Re:The truth... by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      Luring? Maybe the smartest and hardest working people are smart enough to realize that, if they're willing to work hard, America offers them the best chance to have a better life.

      Best chance to have a better life? Define better life. What America does is sell false hope to the young in other countries. It might be the reason we are hated and the source of jelousy. America flashes something bright and shinny, and says you can be rich too. Big TV's, sound systems, and cars. This can all be yours too...

      Real wealth has nothing to do with money. It is good friends, family, feeling connected to a place with history, enough food and drink; and everything else will work itself out. What the USA does is go into foriegn countries and lure the smartest out. It is like Google with their puzzle, if you figure it out quick enough, you get to apply for a job. But what is different with the USA, is when we pull out a smart kid from Kenya, that country loses the guy who might have had the imagination or talent or intellect to make the country a better place. And that kid could have worked within his system, within his culture, and it would have been his countries pride.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    5. Re:The truth... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, they were probably from a poor background in Mexico, so they wouldn't have gotten the same oppurtunities they got in their American school. I don't know what kind of college system or financial aid they have in Mexico, but the ones who can afford college there are probably not the ones sneaking across the border.

      I'm not saying the America is a paradise for immigrants, but a lot of countries have more restrictive education systems than the US. I know a woman from Japan who came to college in the states because it was easier to get into school here than to get back into college in Japan after she dropped out for a while.

    6. Re:The truth... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "What does this say about how the world is being organized?"

      It says capitalism has got to go or the world must unite under a common currency, one or the other. How countries dollar value is determined is sheer BS and allows this economic exploitation in the first place.

    7. Re:The truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you guys talking about? They teach you this "Everyone wants to live in America" at school or something? You might want to consider traveling a bit around the world to see what people really think about your country... (well, there is that tiny margin of people that moves to the US, but I wouldn't pull too much conclusions from that)

  55. Well? by p0 · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I guess I, for one, welcome the high school students beating MIT folks in robotics overloads!

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
  56. "Illegal" Immigration by Concern · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't believe it's offtopic, considering how much attention the article devotes to the topic, to consider for a moment the scale and scope of illegal immigration in the U.S..

    If you don't live anywhere near the border, it is probably impossible for you to imagine what has happened over the past two decades in this country. Without any honest debate or policy making, we have entirely, almost formally abdicated the southern border of the United States. Literally millions of "visitors" from other countries now live here. The debate is no longer whether to try to "strengthen the border" but whether or not to give their children driver's licenses and scholarships.

    What we have done is create a de-facto second class of U.S. citizen, a "sub citizen" that provides a convenient array of features to business in the southern U.S..

    Now the avalanche of "issues:" xenophobia, debates about free trade and freedom of movement, patriotism and racism, classism, corny high-school economic ideologies and horse-and-barn-door-ism. The person writing this article seems to have a clear conclusion, after having spent some time in the midst of the issue: these kids are Americans, and we should treat them like Americans. The thing it makes me think of is that many of our reasoned beliefs (especially those coming from farther up in the chilly north) about what we should do about the "illegal immigration" problem - whether they are principled, right, wrong, or crazy - are often a bit divorced from reality, and most ultimately lead to perpetuation of the status quo: the institutional ghetto, the second-class citizen, and the end of what we love, these days, to lionize as the American Dream.

    --
    Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    1. Re:"Illegal" Immigration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well after some idiot in the north abolished slavery the south had to renew their cheap labour from somewhere...
      Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled masses... we need the low-wage labour pool to compete with China.

    2. Re:"Illegal" Immigration by bloodstar · · Score: 1
      What I would want to see are Provisional Work Permits given. Specificly, I think anyone who is willing to brave the dangers involved in getting into the US, who is then able to find work, and then able to show themselves to be capable of supporting themselves and/or their family. Should be able to stay in the US.

      In a way the system creates an 'indentured servitude' of sorts (I know I'm not using the term quite right, but tough), The problem is, there is no way to get out and become legal. Why do I consider that a problem? Because honestly, anyone who is willing to risk their very lives to come to the US, and then toil at risk and adversity for years, should be able to stay. They should no longer fear the INS will come knocking on the door to drag them off.

      Would it be difficult to implement? Yes, because you would have to find a way to track 'illegals' without having the information used against them. ie, having law enforcement or the INS use the information.

      Why does it take something spectacular just to make people realize the obvious truth? That the people who come to the US, are among the brightest, most determined, and hardest working people. We as a country need that kind of initative and drive.

      The Kids in the article should have earned their permanent residence by their performace. But their very exposure leaves them vulnerable to being sent out of the US back to a country they probably don't know. And what makes it worse, there are plenty of people who think that's the 'right' thing to do.

      --
      "The bass, the rock, the mic, the treble. I like my coffee black, just like my metal" - Mindless Self Indulgence
    3. Re:"Illegal" Immigration by huckamania · · Score: 1

      What most Americans forget is that there are two sides to the border. Not everything bad that happens because of that border happens to the Americans.

      There is crime committed in Mexico by Americans every year. Americans fuel the illegal drug trade, prostitution and human trafficking. Not everyone who crosses the border is Mexican. Many are from South and Central America and Mexico has similiar problems from illegal immigration that the US has in that not everyone ends up crossing the border. Americans cross the border to drink and party which fuels vandelism, drunk driving and petty crimes.

      The border also splits families. My wife has 4 younger brothers and two are U.S. citizens by birth and the other two are SOL. Their father crossed the border, got naturallized and they haven't heard from him since. The mother-in-law is left with the children and no way to find the dead beat dad. The two brothers who are U.S. citizens live with us and go to school here, but only get to see their mother rarely and it's expensive/impossible to get a visa for the other two.

      There are two sides to the border and it doesn't take a genius to figure out which side has benefited the most. We like to look down on Mexico and blame them for problems that essentially we created and continue to perpetuate.

    4. Re:"Illegal" Immigration by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "The debate is no longer whether to try to "strengthen the border" but whether or not to give their children driver's licenses and scholarships."

      Where have you seen this seriously debated? Probably few aside from Pat Buchanan seriously want to take away rights from American citizens because their parents are illegals....and you ARE talking about American citizens here (born in this country). There is plenty of debate over citizenship and licenses for foreigners, however.

      But what do I know. I am a Political Troll (tm)

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    5. Re:"Illegal" Immigration by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "Well after some idiot in the north abolished slavery the south had to renew their cheap labour from somewhere...

      It is not so much "cheap labor" as better labor. Certainly they are better if they are not as overpaid and lazy as the typical American (Norte Americano). Also, some jobs are worth less than the minimum wage. Instead of having loopholes where illegals work these jobs for the real value, why not get rid of the government-mandated minimum wage? Make it above-ground.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    6. Re:"Illegal" Immigration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two sides to the border and it doesn't take a genius to figure out which side has benefited the most. We like to look down on Mexico and blame them for problems that essentially we created and continue to perpetuate

      Exactly. Ever hear of Molotov?

      http://www.anysonglyrics.com/lyrics/m/molotov/frij olero.htm

  57. I want to go to college too! by drewzhrodague · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am a US Citizen, severely underemployed, and I cannot afford college either. While I applaud these kids for their efforts, I don't see why illegal aliens can get federal funding to go to college, and I cannot!

    Seriously. When I tried to get financial aid, I was awarded $200 in work-study, which doesn't even cover books for half a semester. It is difficult to apply for school, when you can't even pay your rent!

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:I want to go to college too! by LibertineR · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I call Bullshit.

      What state do you live in? In most states, if you spend two years at an ALMOST FREE Community College, you are granted automatic admission into a 4yr school. Do you have any idea how much Grant/Loan money for higher education goes un-used every year?

      I suggest you are not trying hard enough. Getting an education in America is easy, provided you are willing to work your ass off to get it done.

      Heard of Google? I suggest you get busy, or stop BS'ing us about how hard it is to pay for College. You are not trying hard enough. If you are in a situation where you cant, or can barely pay your rent, you can probably end up in a Community College FREE OF CHARGE. So, get on it.

    2. Re:I want to go to college too! by Duhavid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know how you feel.

      Junior College, and get a better paying job. I worked in bike shops, then moved up to a computer system operator job ( initially, it was not a move up in pay, but later, it was... ).
      Save like mad.

      I made it thru Mesa ( junior college here in San Diego ), then transfered to UCSD for my "junior" and "senior" years ( I had to go part time, as I had to continue to work "thanks, Pete Wilson, for the tuition spike just as I entered UCSD", so those "years" were about 4 in total... ).

      It is possible. Do the Junior college thing first, and keep looking for a better job.

      Stop looking for assistance. Doesnt look like it is coming. Get up and start moving. I know, easier said than done.

      If you are considering JC as "not good enough", I would suggest that what you learn is much more dependant on you than on the college. You can transfer to something more prestigious later and save a bundle. I wasted a lot of time thinking the same thing myself. Dont let yourself get caught up in it.

      Also, while I am rambling, it will take a while to get thru college on the "pay as you go" system. I did not graduate college until I was 30. Just keep things moving forward, dont give up. You can make it.

      Good luck.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    3. Re:I want to go to college too! by corporatemutantninja · · Score: 1
      Not only that, but the poster obviously didn't read very carefully: these illegal alien kids are NOT getting Federal Funding. That's the whole point; despite their hard work and success there are still no funding options for them.

      Maybe he didn't get funding because he didn't read the application forms carefully, either.

      --
      Actually, I was trying to be Insightful, not Funny.
    4. Re:I want to go to college too! by zentinal · · Score: 1

      So, what are you willing to do to go to university? I worked full time while attending full time (CSULA, Class of 1994). Not the most prestigeous school, but it fit my needs and budget and was a great springboard to grad school.

      No, I wasn't living at home, I rented. Yes, my spending on everything not related to rent, food & school plummeted to near 0. Yes, I got loan after loan after loan (now totally paid off). True, I had no social life. Yes, I kicked ass in my classes.

      I'd say, given the determination that they've exhibited so far, that these guys have a pretty good shot.

      I don't know you from Adam. I have no knowledge of your personal/scholastic/financial situation. But the question still stands, what are you willing to do to go to school? What are you doing right now to further that goal?

    5. Re:I want to go to college too! by chrisatslashdot · · Score: 1

      I see this type of complaint on various message boards quite often. The truth is that if you really want to go to school you can. Decide that you are going to go to school then make it happen. Be creative and resourceful.

      I literally dug trenches for a couple of years to support my wife and kid while I went to community college. The good grades and recommendations that I earned in community college got me a decent internship when I transfered to a 4-year school. I worked 40 hours a week while taking 16 to 21 hour semesters and slept very little for most of 6 years. I graduated magna cum laude with a double major and now I have a job that I love and make lots of money. Looking back it wasn't that hard. We always had decent housing, food, clothes and two vehicles. If I hadn't been married to a stay-at-home mom and had kids it would have been even less dificult.

      If you want an education in the U.S. you can get one. The only people without educations in this country are the people that choose not to have educations.

      --


      Simple people talk of people, better people talk of events, great people talk of ideas.
    6. Re:I want to go to college too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's good to see you can afford your own website. At least you have your priorities straight.

      If you were really in need, you could work your way through school like I did. The one time I applied for financial aid, I was approved for a $1000 *loan*--then denied it because I hadn't actually "officially" declared my major, so I had to write an appeal letter, which was accepted since it was a last minute reversal. I spent years paying that off. Sounds like you're just a lazy, vain, whiner. I for one would be overjoyed to see these hard-working kids get a chance to overcome adversity. It's better than having them steal your identity, no?

    7. Re:I want to go to college too! by taustin · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I don't think you're as smart as these kids.

    8. Re:I want to go to college too! by Arbin · · Score: 1

      I am also a U.S. Citizen, underemployed and cannot afford college. Yet I'm making it, I'm attending the local community college for the first two years and not spending in excess. (God, I hate Ramen... Bleck!) Every extra dime I have after living expenses (rent, electricity and basic internet cable) goes either to savings, or paying for my current tuition. I work two jobs, attend school fulltime, and will be graduating this term with highest honors. I already have several grants / scholarships that will enable me to complete the remaining two years for the term beginning this fall. Stop complaining and do what you have to do. Complaining gets you no where.

    9. Re:I want to go to college too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see why illegal aliens can get federal funding to go to college, and I cannot!

      Because you're lazy and stupid and they are some freaking geniuses?

    10. Re:I want to go to college too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In AZ right now, there is legislation to make it a requirement that you must have a Soc. Sec. Number , proof of citizen ship to go to a university. Junior college may be affected next if this passes! What then High school. These kids did not ask or have a choice to be here.
      Oscar I beleive the article said is in junior college now part time but will not be able to go further until his situation is rectified.
      Would it not be better for all these 60,000 kids graduating every year to get an education and pay taxes rather than being a burden on our society? If we are not willing as a nation to enforce immigration violations, because we want the cheap labor then, this is the situation we have created.

    11. Re:I want to go to college too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you really wanted to go to college you would find a way because they are scholarships,grants, and the one the illegal immagrant cant get a loans. you need to stop worring what little federal their getting (its very little and hard to get because of their status)and start working towards you goal of college.

    12. Re:I want to go to college too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...easy, provided you are willing to work your ass off to get it done.


      You insensitive CLOD!! I actually HAVE a huge ass, and working it off is most definitely NOT easy!
    13. Re:I want to go to college too! by sideshow · · Score: 1

      Do you live in California?

      Yeah, then school is "almost free". Other states have different rules.

      NV charges almost twice as much for community college and it is much harder to get money to pay for it.

      --

      Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    14. Re:I want to go to college too! by Xavier+CMU · · Score: 1

      You don't really even have to work your ass off to get a degree from a community college. I would say that the rigor of the courses at most of these places is comparable to classes that you would encounter your junior year at an average high school. Furthermore, even if you were to loan the (relatively) measly 2k per year that it takes to pay the full tuiton at most community colleges, you're statistically probable to make at least twice that much more every year after graduating. If you intelligently apply your degree then your returns will be much greater than that even.

    15. Re:I want to go to college too! by Boxcarwilli · · Score: 2, Informative

      I call "watch your step". University Of Washington has said it will not accept Community College transfers for 2 years (2005/2006). I cant remember if it was becuase of costs, competition, overload or what, but the point is, Community College isnt all to great these days if you plan on transfering credits eaisly.

    16. Re:I want to go to college too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do you have any idea how much Grant/Loan money for higher education goes un-used every year?"

      Quite a lot of it -- there just aren't enough Black Asian Pacific Jewish Lesbians who are over 35, divorced, have 3 kids and are members of the local Masonic lodge and Foreign Legion studying ancient Sumarian Literature to collect all of the scholarship money available.

      I'm trying to pay for my wife's education at a private institution as she's completed her associate's degree at the local CC. Without going into debt, we can afford 2 classes a semester. We could go for a cheaper education (not what she wants), go into debt (not what either of us want), get a divorce so I don't show up on her FAFSA (not what either of us wants), or have her spend more than 40 hours a week for all of January filling out scholarship applications (which she did last year and got a whopping $0 between need and merit).

      Don't tell me that quality education is cheap -- I'm footing the bills. Not only for my wife, but probably for a goodly portion of the rest of the student body at her school who would say that education is cheap, too.

    17. Re:I want to go to college too! by Zyrill · · Score: 1

      There's other countries where you can actually study for free - Germany for example... We have lots of Chinese students coming here for their education because it's 1) Very good 2) Very cheap and 3) You can even take courses in English at most universities Think about it - one semester costs you as a foreign student about 600 or 800$, depending on where you want to study - and I know quite a lot of students who don't have any money, get no scholarship and work all through the year so they can afford to pay rent etc. and they still have free time and can easily do their studies... Oh and another thing: I don't know how it is in America but here we have libraries so you don't need to buy one single book. But then again I don't think you should get into university because clearly, if you havn't got the wits to figure out where you could study you don't belong in one anyway...

    18. Re:I want to go to college too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I call Bullshit ... Do you have any idea how much Grant/Loan money for higher education goes un-used every year?
      • Loans have to be paid back.
      • Degrees don't guarantee employment.
      If I had it to do over again, I would have gone straight into the workforce and gotten the same non-college job I have now. Not only would I be free of debt, I would have had the 4 years of earnings potential that I wasted fucking around getting a useless degree. By the time my college educated self graduated, my non college educated self would have saved enough to start my own business.

      Four years after high school, where would you rather be? Begging for work in a 'jobless recovery' or hiring desperate college grads who are buried in loans to do your grunt work? I will have my own business soon, but it will be about 6 years later than it had to be, thanks to college.

  58. Soap series? by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
    What kind of magazine is this "Wired"? No trolling intended, but I find it personally a rather tiring read, because the article is packed with 'couleur locale' and how everything is so diffucult for these poor boys etc. Please talk about their achievement, not about how hard it was etc.

    FTA: "He wasn't used to approaching women, let alone well-dressed white women. He saw apprehension flash across her face. Maybe she thought he was trying to sell magazines or candy bars, but he steeled himself..."

    Not quite in "news for nerds"-style...

    1. Re:Soap series? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you suggesting that most slashdotters are used to approaching women?

  59. Re:I call Shenanigans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sad troll.

    Do you think the MIT guys (and every other team) had a little help from their profs. That's help, not that the teacher did the project themselves. Kind of the point in having teachers.

    Isn't it just possible these are a smart bunch of guys with a talent for hacking together machines? I say well done, and good luck to them.

  60. This article was in the current print issue... by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

    This article was in the current print issue of Wired and is a good read. It is unfortunate that they are not able to afford college, MIT or not.

    -Slashdot Junky

    --
    .
    Landfill Mining Co.
    Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
  61. Re:Artificial Intelligence for Robots - Source Cod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, please, please mod Mentifex's postings as either Troll or Funny. If people think his stuff is informative, there will be a lot of messed up AI implemented over the next couple of years. This guy is nothing but a troll, and should be treated as such.

    Now *this* is informative:

    http://www.nothingisreal.com/mentifex_faq.html

  62. the secret for winning by wwwillem · · Score: 1

    Great article, go read it, even if you normally don't!!

    Why did these kids won? The other teams were probably so nerdy, they didn't even know tampons existed. :-) I think OB together with Hooters (RTA) should give these guys a scholarship.

    The most fascinating (or humilating) thing of this competition is of course that finally they won because their engineering was just on par, but then their technical documentation was superior over all the others. Kudos to their teachers!!

    --
    Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
  63. imagine that by micromuncher · · Score: 1

    Doesn't everyone know that formal education kills imagination?

    --
    /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  64. Re:Flea Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    They had to limit the number of people they took with them to 14... they only had one car.

  65. Reputations alone don't always cut it. by cocoamix · · Score: 1

    Martha Stewart was beaten in a holiday decoration contest by some other inmates while she was in prison.

    What's next? Gary Kasparov beaten at Chess by a NASCAR fan?

  66. The question on everyone's mind... by Captain_Carnage · · Score: 1

    Which one of the guys is schtupping the girl?

  67. Fuck MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our spanish speaking illegal immigrant overlords!

    1. Re:Fuck MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>I for one welcome our spanish speaking illegal immigrant overlords!

      Get used to it.

      US corporations have pretty much outsourced most of their commercial innovation and research.

      Result is that US population will become deskilled and too expensive to hire.

      What goes around comes around buddy.

      Welcome your new spanish speaking illegal immigrant overlords!

  68. Educate Crimaliens by spicydragonz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The radio talk show hosts usually use the term crimaliens when ever talking about illegal aliens. This story puts a face on those "immigrants who are stealing my white child's spot in state college." Personally, I think that smart people should get the most help to succeed. Think about the loss that our economy/society is suffering by having this young man put up dry wall instead of engineering.

    1. Re:Educate Crimaliens by spicydragonz · · Score: 1
      This is a bigger problem than my $2, $20, $200 will fix.

      Perhaps the states could allow aliens instate tuition if they show accedemic excellence.

      Passing the high school (MCAS in Massachusetts) exam in the top %20, performing excellently in scholastic competition, etc. . .

      This needs a legislative solution.

    2. Re:Educate Crimaliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps illegal aliens should get proper visas or become citizens. What is the big hangup with that??

    3. Re:Educate Crimaliens by overseerbrian · · Score: 1
      This story puts a face on those "immigrants who are stealing my white child's spot in state college."
      I have never really understood why people take this as a race issue. It seems like to most people the my child would be the much more important part. If anything it seems like it is more a selfishness issue than anything. I mean when there used to be a problem with irish immigrants they where white.
    4. Re:Educate Crimaliens by Nopal · · Score: 1

      Which talk show hosts are those? I listen to talk radio pretty much all day, and while I've occasionally heard from nutjob "vigilante" caller types, and the ocassional misguided host, I've never heard anyone use the term "crimaliens" anywhere. From what I've listened, I would say that the pro and con conservative hosts on this issue are roughly divided into 50-50 camps (you've got hosts like Prager, Medved and Hewitt on one side, and Ingraham, Limbaugh, and Schlessinger on the other). For the record, I was also at one point an illegal alien. Now I'm a US citizen, and I live in California.

    5. Re:Educate Crimaliens by Nopal · · Score: 1
      The hangup is that nine times out of ten, illegal aliens can't get visas and that's why they become illegal aliens. Visas are very limited in number, and they aren't often awarded to the most deserving.

      The visa system is a joke and should be overhauled, and though that's no excuse for breaking the law, you must admit that it takes huge cojones to risk you neck in order to sneak into a foreign country illegally, learn a new language, and hit a home run like these kids did. Ironically, very few things capture the American spirit of individualism, hard work, risk-taking, and a pick-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps attitude like stories such as this one.

  69. Link to scholarship fund by Sanity · · Score: 1

    Here. Its a shame it wasn't linked in the main text of the article :-(

  70. Stop complaining and do something! by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a link to donate money for these kids to go to college.
    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.04/donate.ht ml
    Want to make a difference. Click the link give the amount you spent on that iPod, Xbox, PS2, or any even GTA. If evey one that posted a message gave $200 there would be 20,000 dollars already in the account.
    Even if you can not pony up the $200 how about 20?
    If you think "somebody" should help these guys be somebody.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Stop complaining and do something! by hyfe · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Stop complaiing and do something!

      [troll]And by doing something you mean giving these four kids money?

      That is on par with the logic of starving a hundred thousand iraqui children to death through sanctions and not giving a flying f*ck, while the same happening to one braindead woman causes the whole country to stop.[/troll]

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    2. Re:Stop complaining and do something! by clueless123 · · Score: 1

      Hear Hear! They should set up a Paypal Donation site for this. BTW, I *will* be sending a check.

    3. Re:Stop complaining and do something! by clueless123 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the world *is* messed up. Yes, the media plays the "feeling" button to sell us crap. Do that means that I should not help someone who inspires me and others ?
      We can't solve *all* the problems on the world, but we *can* put our small grain of sand to make a dream reality.

      BTW, helping on this one cause, does NOT mean that I can't be active on many others.
      By your logic, we should stop helping any non life-and-dead cause (like collaborating to open source projects) and focus 100% to "world tragedies" only.


      A beach is made from many grains of sand.

    4. Re:Stop complaining and do something! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Troll is right but I will bite. I hear this but the Army in Iraq was feed. Sadam ate. Banks in France made a bundle on the oil for food program. Seems that the then government of Iraq had at least a tiny bit of blame in the matter.
      Not only that but will kicking these kids $20. Starve any kids in Iraq? Will it hurt any illegals in the US. Or will these kids change some hearts and minds?
      As I said. STOP COMPLAINING AND DO SOMETHING! Change what you can.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Stop complaining and do something! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear this but the Army in Iraq was feed. Sadam ate.

      Whoa. Is that a typo, or a depraved metaphor?

    6. Re:Stop complaining and do something! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erm, how about donating to my college fund? i am smart. my tuition is cheaper too since i am an american.

      strike

  71. Re:Soccer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pick lettuce?

  72. Highschool kids often under-rated by JawzX · · Score: 1

    My High school fencing team beat Harvard and Yale.

  73. MIT on a downward spiral??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    First a novelty alarm clock. Then a high school ass whooping. What's next??? http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/ 25/0017259&tid=222&tid=137

  74. Just a suggestion by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

    Three people I know became US citizens (2 Canadians and one from Chile) and received money for college. It wasn't handed to them. They joined the coast guard. They won't be sent to Iraq and they will earn more money than most illegals could. They applied and got US citizenship while serving. They received training while in and got life insurance, health care coverage and the Montgomery G.I Bill. It is not for everyone. But it is a way to move forward. I got my C.S. degree via the Air Force and the G.I. Bill. I was able to take classes and earned most of my credits while in so it only took a couple of semesters after I got out. I wouldn't suggest regular service now unless going to Iraq is something you want to do.

    1. Re:Just a suggestion by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1
      As a followup to my post. My friend from Chile advised me, you need a green card. His suggestion is as follows:

      You can get a green card INS Form I-151/551. But you have to do it through the US embassy in your native country. An adult relative in the country can assist without it being flagged to to the Immigration Service that your here already. You do have to go back to take care of the paperwork. But if your turned down, or it looks likely to be rejected, they don't know your already here. So you have nothing lose.

    2. Re:Just a suggestion by Darby · · Score: 1

      And, of course, everybody who filed their application starting 4 months *after* my wife (who is from England of all terrorist haunts) filed hers got put on a fast track meaning if you file today, you'll still probably get your green card before she will.

      INS bastards.

    3. Re:Just a suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republican Morality: Mass murder good. Loving a person Evil. What sick fucks.

      Liberal Morality: Mass murder (abortion) good. Loving a person Evil (except if the definition of love includes a gerbil inserted into the rectum). What sick fucks.

  75. Re:I call Shenanigans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try RTA before you make stupid comments that only show your own shortcomings.

  76. Re:You are all idiots. Look at the date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  77. Re:Artificial Intelligence for Robots - Source Cod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I _am_ the mentifex guy and I just want my ideas to be given some respect in the marketplace of ideas. How will we ever get anywhere if a mob of anonymous cowards jumps all over people who try to come up with new ideas? Please mod parent up.

    There must be some hidden agenda going on here. Whenever mentifex posts, a gang of naysayers tries to squelch him. What would happen to the young Albert Einstein if he were born around 1980 and he tried to say that E = mc^2 for the first time ever on Slashdot?

    Whom do you trust more, the ACM or all these anonymous cowards? Show your vote by modding UP or DOWN.

  78. The long pround geek history of CHHS by Talondel · · Score: 1

    Older geeks from the Phoenix area should remember that Carl Hayden (referred to locally as CHHS) has a long history of 'geek' accomplishments. In the early 90's students from CHHS ran one of the largest free BBS systems in the region. I don't recall how many phone lines they had running at once there, but I do recall them having one of the best Trade Wars 2000 games. CHHS was a popular virtual hangout for computer geeks from throughout the Phoenix metro area. My wife and I (yes, some geeks get married) were both CHHS members and actually met at a weekly GT that was comprised largely of CHHS users.

    Just like this story suggests the kids at CHHS that made the BBS go did so with limited funds, and little external support. It's ashame to see that little has changed for today's students. Anyone else that remembers the CHHS BBS may want to drop by here: http://www.bbsmates.com/XQ/ASP/id.98859/QX/viewbbs .htm

  79. Magnet Programs by DeionXxX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As another poster has mentioned, Carl Hayden used to be a magnet program (I believe they were disbanded 5-7 years ago). All of the technology, programming, networking classes were taught at Carl Hayden. I would've loved to go there but Carl Hayden is probably one of the ghettoest around (and I went to a pretty ghetto one myself ... you know with race riots and gang warfare on school grounds).

    This is a great article because it shows that if you pour money into education, no matter what the background of the students, they will excell. Ofcourse when I graduated highschool in the Phoenix Union HS District (same as Carl Hayden), the statistics were against any HS graduates actually graduating from college. (As far as I understood it, out of the 5-10% that went to college, only 1 in 10 would graduate... this was from a long time teacher in the PUHSD) Sure we got scholarships, but very very few of us were prepared for the amount of reading, writing, and studying required for college. There were plenty of people like me that were competent in our respective fields, but could not handle the rest of the classes (the humanities for me).

    As the article mentioned, most of the graduates of this school go on to become day laborers or work in a warehouse, and even if they do go to college, their chances of getting a degree are slim to none. I hope the federal and state governments take a tougher stance on school funding and realisticly look at what is needed to make sure every student has the opportunity to succeede.

    Almost all of the PUHSD schools focus on getting the bottom more towards the middle then the middle up towards the top. Which leaves us with a weak middle, which in turn creates a less educated middle class. /rant

    1. Re:Magnet Programs by dude__hi · · Score: 1

      To people that care about the content of the article rather than the opportunity to voice their opinions I'd like to clear someting up. The students who participated in the MATE ROV Competition are not A+ students. These are not the high school brains that outshine everyone else. The one with the highest grade among the group will not be the High School Valedictorian when he graduates. He will lose out to a kid with an Asian background. As much as poeople would like to put a specific label on these kids, which they are, keep in mind that they are average high school students that like to learn and work hard. It was their drive to succeed and loyalty to the team and each other that enabled them to reach their victory. Next time you see a short Mexican kid with baggy shorts and deep back hair think of me. I'm the 4th kid from the right.

    2. Re:Magnet Programs by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      The one with the highest grade among the group will not be the High School Valedictorian when he graduates. He will lose out to a kid with an Asian background. As much as poeople would like to put a specific label on these kids, which they are, keep in mind that they are average high school students that like to learn and work hard. It was their drive to succeed and loyalty to the team and each other that enabled them to reach their victory.

      Which, really, is what drives the Asian students to a high success rate. :-)

    3. Re:Magnet Programs by DeionXxX · · Score: 1

      Congratulations for your achievements and hard work. What are your plans for future? Are you elligble for in-state tuition or scholarships / grants? Do you already have offers to go out of state to bigger name schools ( MIT , etc )?

      Are you part of Academic Decathlon? You seem to be very gifted and could get a lot of recognition / scholarship offers if you did well. I went to Trevor Browne in the late 90's and Carl Hayden had a strong Aca. Dec. team and a great coach. I remember the teacher well, I can't remember his name but he was a middle-aged looking man with gray hair.

      I hope you keep your goals high and continue to break through the barriers that are constantly being thrown at you.

      Your team should really put up a site where you can accept donations (paypal or something like that), so the tech community can support great projects like the ones you're working on.

      Email me alex.petrescu@gmail.com when you do or if you guys need help with anything IT related (programming questions, website, databases, etc).

      -- Alex

    4. Re:Magnet Programs by ro_coyote · · Score: 1

      As another poster has mentioned, Carl Hayden used to be a magnet program (I believe they were disbanded 5-7 years ago).

      I'm not so sure about that. I myself am a Carl Hayden graduate (May 2000), and went there solely for the reason of taking advantage of its computer science magnet program (about 7 miles away from where I live). It was alive and well when I arrived in the fall of 1996, and still doing well when I left it four years later (and beyond, as my younger brother also attended Hayden for the same reason and graduated May 2003). I don't know how successful it is nowadays, but I know I came out with quite a bit after my CS run at Hayden, including some college credit.

      I would've loved to go there but Carl Hayden is probably one of the ghettoest around

      And ghetto? Dunno about that. Certainly the neighborhood around it isn't the best in the world, nor is the school as great as others in the Phoenix Union High School District, but it really isn't that bad. In fact, it has evolved quite a bit since my Senior year there up to this very day, with things remodeled all over campus, including a new two-story building completed my Senior year mainly for the computer science, marine biology (another Hayden magnet), math, and science departments.

      Yeah, occasionally there was a gang fight every now and then, but honestly it wasn't all that common nor that large of a catastrophe when one occurred (I know of schools in the PUHSD that've had far worse records, with gunplay not being uncommon enough)... I never had a single incident with a gang member aside from having a stryofoam cup filled with ice thrown at the back of my head as a Freshman.

      Your first paragraph aside, I agree with you 100%. Hayden still has its problems despite its evolutions and successes, much like the majority of schools in this country, but if only that funding where there... seeing that large 200-pound robot that could ram the crap out of me in motion that my brother and the rest of the robotics team in 2003 had built is evidence enough for me. It's amazing to see what a bunch of kids who mostly initially knew almost nothing about robots or computers (of any background) can do who if they're just given the right opportunities and chances.

    5. Re:Magnet Programs by dude__hi · · Score: 1

      I'm not part of the academic decathlon. The robotics team takes up all my free time during the weekdays and on Saturdays I take college courses at a community college through the program ACE, at the moment we're working on the ROV for this year's competition (I can promise there will be a few very innovative features on this year's ROV) and we are getting ready for the FIRST( For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology, usfirst.org) National competition the 20-23 in Atlanta. If you are serious about doanting money to our college funds the district approved setting up a paypal account so contact me on Monday for the account, I don't know the account number yet, sorry. dude__hi@netzero.net

  80. Sad by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Going to college isn't to make you smarter, or more educated, it is to tell a future employer that you can put up with a bunch of BS for at least 4 years.

    Sounds like you wasted 4 (or more likely 5-6) years. If you didn't learn anything you didn't know after high school and you don't use at a job you wasted your time. I use my degrees every day at work.

  81. Re:your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My take on it exactly. The fact that someone had to provide the 'modern guns, landmines and bombs' to the Maoists, or that the Maoists are to blame for it all to begin with is apparently irrelevant to Mr Rocket Scientist. Nope, someone actually trying to facilitate peace is the REAL guilty party here. Jesus wept.

  82. Re:Artificial Intelligence for Robots - Source Cod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    e=mc^2 is something that can be discussed and seen to be correct by anyone who takes the time to do so.

    Your writings are a load of pretentious, self-aggrandising gobble-de-gook. They make no sense, they have no intellectual merit, and quite frankly appear to be the work of a disturbed mind.

    You can not seriously compare yourself with Einstein - his work was/is quite clearly beneficial and based on empirical results. You have not been willing to discuss your ideas, you just seem to post them wherever you can find a (tenuous) link. If, like Al, you are willing to discuss your work, start here:

    You claim to have "solved" AI. What, in one paragraph, is the problem you have "solved"? Have other subjects, such as mathematics, been "solved"?

    Your AI is a random word generator, nothing more, nothing less. While I dislike the fact that I am responding to a troll, I can't let stupidity like this continue unabated.

    There is no hidden agenda against you. You are a scurge on the internet, and should be treated as such, you annoying bastard.

  83. my highschool already beat MIT by cyberwave · · Score: 1

    My highschool, Milton Academy, already beat MIT in a robotics competition. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5353014 Suck on that!

    1. Re:my highschool already beat MIT by Hawkxor · · Score: 1

      Interesting that it's underwater robots again?

      Actually the Ocean Engineering department was just dissolved here at MIT. And I've never met anybody in Ocean Engineering. Who wants to do Ocean Engineering?

  84. I agree by cOdEgUru · · Score: 1

    We have in our power the ability to change these four lives. We have in our hands the chance to lift them up and give them better lives. We have the power to let them know that 15 seconds of fame were not all that they received, that we recognize them, respect them for what they have achieved.

    And if we do, one day, when what they achieve with their four extraordinary lives, we might have improved the quality of living for us and for everyone in some way. If we help, we just might have made sure that these minds do not go wasted, do not wither and die, but to let their dreams soar. Imagine the power of $20 to change the world.

    1. Re:I agree by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "We have in our hands the chance to lift them up and give them better lives"
      No we do not. What we have is a chance to reward them. They will lift them up themselves and give themselves a better life. And who knows maybe give us a better life as well. Think of them as high school football players. We are just the booster club and Alumni.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:I agree by RhadamanthosIsChaos · · Score: 1
      You, sir or madam, have hit the nail on the head.

      I will also be sending a check.
      I do wish they had an electronic way to do it - its easier to not be lazy about, and this is a cause people shouldn't be lazy about...

      --
      +++OUT OF CHEESE ERROR+++ REDO FROM START +++
  85. Petition for scholarships by GodLived · · Score: 1

    Attention college students, if you read through to the end of the article you'll see that these kids don't have any means to go to college.

    One way we can help as a community is to petition the heads of our local Comp Sci/EE departments and see if there's any sort of grant or scholarship they might be willing to give them.

    You must admit, this is an exceptional story.

  86. robert reich would dispute that... by airdrummer · · Score: 0

    "Scholarships, in the merit-based sense, do not substantially exist at...most top schools." r.r. was just on npr this a.m. stating that most schools have largely abandoned needs-based discounts (aka: scholarships;-) for the express purpose of competing for "star students" to boost their usn&wr ranking...

    1. Re:robert reich would dispute that... by Whafro · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose this starts to become circular, but the colleges that don't need to boost their rankings are the "top-tier" ones I was eluding to. If a school is #4 or #5 on one of the two national lists (universities and liberal arts colleges), while they do want to improve their ranking, they aren't going to drastically alter their principles to do so.

      Most of these top tier schools consider themselves as "taking the high road" with their financial aid procedures. As I go to present at an Admissions Information Session at 2:30 today, this will be one of the biggest points I make-- if you want to come to Bowdoin, and you are smart and talented enough to come, we will make sure that you are able to do so to the best of our abilities.

      In fact, Bowdoin (my college, if you haven't picked that up) is currently in a $250 million endowment campaign, and almost all of that has been earmarked as being beneficial toward financial aid. Figure in a good year, with an 8% return, that's $20 Million per year, or enough to subsidize $40,000 per year to 500 students.

      It should also be pointed out that even if you're a student paying full tuition, you're still heavily subsidized at most schools. Again, I can use Bowdoin as my authoritative example. Bowdoin spends about $70,000 per student per year, but full tuition is around $40,000. Everyone, no matter who you are, essentially receives a $120,000 grant upon matriculation.

      If my school, with about 1,600 students, and a rather small alumni base, can manage to give an average of $28,000 in actual grants to about half of the student body, then the larger universities should be able to do far more than that.

  87. Please understand by aztennenbaum · · Score: 1

    Something people don't seem to understand it that it was not the choice of the students to become illegal immigrants. It was the choice of their parents, who are the ones at fault. Therefore, it would be unfair to treat the students as illegal immigrants, as they have done nothing wrong

  88. MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i think majority of the student in MIT are not all that brillant. its just the name MIT that makes them feel intelligent.

  89. Scooby plotline by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    "Why, my shark-mounted laser robots would have won this competition if it hadn't been for you meddling kids!"

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  90. Not true for foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need-blind admissions only applies to US Citizens and permanent residents. Aliens - even legal - are barred from benefiting from federal government funds which are included in the "need-blind" financial aid packages. Some schools reserve a small portion of private funds to award as merit scholarships to international students, but the competition for these scholarships is unreal. You pretty much need to be on your country's international math olympiad team (or something analogous in your field) to even have a chance at a top school like MIT.
    On the other hand, considering how smart they are, I'm sure that there are smaller private institutions that will offer thema free ride. It may not be MIT, but if they choose wisely, they can get quality education out of it.

  91. No kidding by beavis88 · · Score: 1

    I think I'm going to send this article around the office, and highlight that particular sentence. Genius!

    *cleaning out desk in 3...2...1*

  92. Patron Saints by Ugmo · · Score: 1

    At one point in the article a student prays to Mary and wonders what a better patron saint would be for underwater robotics.

    I checked here and found that, though there is no patron saint of robotics there is a saint of the Internet, computers and computer technicians (Isidore of Seville)

    A good saint for them to pray to next time (or maybe MIT can pray to) would be Erasmus who is listed as the saint for watermen, sailors, mariners and seasickness.

  93. Hilarious by solomonrex · · Score: 1

    I think the kids won because they trashed PowerPoint. Think the NASA guys read /.?

  94. Movie? by flood6 · · Score: 1

    They look like the cast from Lean on Me.

  95. Thinking outside the box ... "Like a tampon?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, oh why, could I not think like these kids in high school? Now I'm stuck writing VB code and reading slashdot. Such a waste.

    An image from television flashed through Lorenzo's mind. "Absorbent?" he asked. "Like a tampon?"

  96. Reletivistically Speaking.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A bunch of bright high school kids from Carl Hayden Highschool beat out MIT

    Maybe MIT has Special Ed. classes too?

  97. Wait... by solomonrex · · Score: 1

    " It is unfortunate that they are not able to afford college, MIT or not."

    You mean the high school kids or the Wired authors?

    1. Re:Wait... by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

      The kids of course, but you knew that already. It would be great to seem them all if someone would step up and pay their way through.

      -Slashdot Junky

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
  98. MIT aint a public school by Ironsides · · Score: 1

    As undocumented immigrants they are ineligible for state and federal government grants/scholarships. MIT is a private school. They can offer them anything they want.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  99. I read this in Wired by ifwm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And came away with the same feeling I had when I read the headline. That is, that it's a great feelgood story, but they didn't really "beat" MIT. They were handed the competition because they scored better in the subjective parts. I KNOW part of that was because they were underprivileged kids who weren't expected to do anything. They essentially rose so far above expectations that they were given the competition as a result.

    But it's still a great story.

    As an aside, shouldn't someone with some money to throw around help these kids pay for college? As illegals, they aren't eligible for financial aid (nor should they be, but wouldn't this be a great situtation for someone like Mark Cuban?

    1. Re:I read this in Wired by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Did they win?
      then they beat MIT. This coming up with excuses for losing is really sad.

      ON a side note, you are right they shouldn't get financial aid. We certianly don't want bright kids from over there to work outside the service industry.
      Matter of fact, what are they doing using any public service? why don't that become migrant workers like there supposed to.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I read this in Wired by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Whoa there buddy. You're making a rather big leap there.

      Sure, the guy didn't sound good saying that they got bonus points for being underpriveleged. I'm not going to comment about that, since I don't know.

      That said, he certainly didn't make any statements about how they should live out their lives. He just stated an opinion that's fairly popular. They're illegal immigrants... why do we owe them money? There is a fairly solid argument to be made for that. If I just crossed the boarder to Canada and started asking for freebies from them, would you think it appropriate?

      I think that it's absolutely tragic that these kids aren't in college. I'm not going to state an opinion on who should or shouldn't give them money, but flaming up like that is why people are afraid to discuss these social issues rationally. The second that someone says what he did, someone comes along and calls them a biggot. All he said is that if they're not here legally, they should probably not get aid packages.

      Just to raise the question, what do you think is appropriate for an illegal immigrant to receive? Drivers licenses? Voting priveleges? Social Security benefits? Welfare?

      Here's another question. Have you ever considered that perhaps, rather than providing many privileges to illegal immigrants that are traditionally reserved for citizens, that perhaps we should consider why illegal immigrants are coming to the country illegally rather than legally. Perhaps, rather than changing laws to give illegal immigrants rights as citizens, we should be looking at what is preventing them from coming here legally, and consider changing the requirements if they are inappropriate.

    3. Re:I read this in Wired by ifwm · · Score: 1

      First of all, I wasn't snide, so why were you?

      Second, I don't consider an inferior effort awarded to a less deserving team a victory. Did they win? Yes, but they didn't "beat" MIT. MIT was better, as noted by the fact that their robot was better. Or did you miss that part?

      As to how I know, or to be fair, VERY strongly suspect, consider this. If I am a judge, and a high school kid gives me the same work as an MIT student, who is more impressive? I go with the high school kid, because an MIT student SHOULD be good at what they do. It doesn't make the work better, but it's a perfectly valid reason to award them the competititon. There was a very obvious (to me) undertone in the story that suggested as much. Read it again, especially the section on the judging specifically, and you'll see what I mean.

      As far as the rest, take your stuff somewhere else. I would never consider it a good idea for an illegal immigrant to get financial aid and shut a citizen out. I really can't see a valid argument for the other side, especially with how hard it can be for students to get into school. That doesn't mean they can't go to school, just that they have to pay for it. From the article, some of them are in the process of doing just that. I say good, because it will be that much sweeter when they make it.

      You put in the rest, the ridiculous part about migrant workers blah blah. When was the last time you got some, it seems like you need it. I wish you luck with that.

    4. Re:I read this in Wired by Noose+For+A+Neck · · Score: 1
      I KNOW part of that was because they were underprivileged kids who weren't expected to do anything.

      If by "underprivileged" you mean "did nearly everything MIT did on less than 1/10 of the budget", then you would be correct. That's good engineering, plain and simple. Of course MIT got more points in the objective category, they had all the money in the world to throw at a working solution. But that's not engineering, that's more like science.

      --

      Software piracy is victimless theft.

    5. Re:I read this in Wired by peacefinder · · Score: 1

      I've seen a couple comments suggesting that Carl Hayden was "handed the competition" in part "because they were underprivileged kids who weren't expected to do anything." Looking at the scores, I don't think that theory is well supported by the facts.

      Yes, MIT scored the best in the Mission Task category, and Carl Hayden scored third. But in the so-called "subjective" categories, MIT really stank up the joint. They placed ninth (of 11) in Engineering Evaluation, tied for eighth in Technical Report, and were ninth again in Team Display. MIT placed behind several community colleges and at least two high schools in every category but Mission Task.

      In contrast, Carl Hayden's third place in Mission Task was their worst showing in any category. They won outright the Technical Report category, and placed second to two different teams in the other "subjective" categories.

      I suspect that every team knew the scoring rules and weighting, and every team had the opportunity to choose their strategy.

      The final point spread between Carl Hayden and MIT was 118.92 to 117.67. Had the MIT team bothered to put even a little more effort into any one of the other three categories, they would have won outright. They only needed 1.25 more points to tie. With their staff, budget and education, you'd think the MIT team could have managed to out-document some ESL highschoolers... but they didn't. They weren't even close.

      These kids from Carl Hayden paid attention to all the categories, and it won them an honest victory.

      (Now let's hope it wins them some scholarships.)

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    6. Re:I read this in Wired by dude__hi · · Score: 1

      "They were handed the competition because they scored better in the subjective parts. I KNOW part of that was because they were underprivileged kids who weren't expected to do anything. They essentially rose so far above expectations that they were given the competition as a result." That is downright false. At the competition several different judges judged each part of the competition without referring to anyone else about the scores. Each panel of judges came to the conclusion for scores without the guidence of the others. I don't believe they all came to the conclusion telepathically that we were a poor school that deserved pity. I happen to know for a fact that a few of the judeges weren't on Carl Hayden's side at the competition.

    7. Re:I read this in Wired by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      Perhaps, rather than changing laws to give illegal immigrants rights as citizens, we should be looking at what is preventing them from coming here legally, and consider changing the requirements if they are inappropriate.

      I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks this. I haven't heard anybody else making this obvious suggestion. The Democrats want to push even more illegal social spending and the President wants to enact what amounts to amnesty.

      Streamlining the immigration process is a very reasonable idea that nobody wants to consider. I suspect it's because the government employees in the INS are unionized and don't want to see a simpler process (read: fewer jobs) for getting good people into this country.

    8. Re:I read this in Wired by ifwm · · Score: 1

      I don't know what "facts" you claim to have looked at, but I saw nothing that even remotely indicates you are correct. The only "facts" in this case regarding the outcome are the OBJECTIVE scores, where MIT was better. The rest is VERY open to the judges bias. Why are you trying so hard to avoid admitting that? Why do SO MANY of you try so hard to avoid admitting that? Subjective categories in judging means that "facts" are irrelevant anyway. Point to the subjective scores and try to claim they are "facts" then get laughed out of the building by people who know better. If you were a judge in this competition, I find it IMPOSSIBLE to believe their backgroud didn't even moderately change the outcome.

    9. Re:I read this in Wired by ifwm · · Score: 1

      Um, no offense, but you can't possibly know what you claim to, unless the judges TOLD you they weren't on CH's side. They didn't, so you are a liar, and the rest of your post is moot.

    10. Re:I read this in Wired by peacefinder · · Score: 1

      "I don't know what "facts" you claim to have looked at [...]"

      I presume that the link on the final standings pdf on the official contest website (which is itself the second link in the Slashdot article) is authoritative. All scores I mentioned are transcribed from the official score pdf, although I generated the rankings myself. Of course I could have made errors in transcription or ranking. You are welcome to check my work.

      "Point to the subjective scores and try to claim they are "facts" then get laughed out of the building by people who know better."

      The scores themselves are factual. Their generation may have been subjective, but the official results are now facts in themselves.

      "The rest is VERY open to the judges bias."

      Sure it is open to judge's bias. I have no problem admitting that. Two things, though. These judges were themselves engineers, and engineers make a carreer of sticking to the technical issues; bias may be a factor, but it's not like the contest was judged by Al Sharpton. Second, perhaps you can explain to me how the judges' alleged bias in favor of Carl Hayden caused MIT to place no higher than eighth of eleven in three of the four judged categories?

      What you are failing to get here is that this was not a product performance contest. This was an educational engineering contest. The scoring in any such educational contest must include not only the raw performance of the engineering product, but also must include an evaluation of the students' understanding of their work and their ability to communicate that understanding to the judges. This evaluation was worth fully half the possible points. Anyone who entered the contest would have known this if they had read the rules.

      You can see that TFA talks about this, when the Carl Hayden teachers wait outside the room whilst the kids are grilled on their product by the judges. Grilling the students without their mentors present ensures that it is the students themselves, not just their mentors, who understand the engineering principles behind their work.

      If you actually look at the scores with an open mind, you'd see that MIT did very poorly on this aspect, placing ninth in that half of the contest. In fact the team which scored the lowest in the Mission Task (Palm Beach Lakes High School) beat MIT in every other category. That high school team evidently was better able to communicate their product's engineering to the judges than MIT, even though their vehicle wasn't nearly as capable.

      If anything, the raw scores indicate to me that the MIT either blew off the judged parts of the contest, got lucky on the Mission Task, or had too much help from their mentors. The most charitable explanation is that they blew it off.

      "I find it IMPOSSIBLE to believe their backgroud didn't even moderately change the outcome."

      Sure, it may have had a moderate effect. But that's a far cry from saying the contest got handed to Carl Hayden out of sympathy. No matter how you slice it, these kids did very well. Only five teams scored over 10 on the Mission Task; Carl Hayden placed third among these. Even by your narrow standard, they won third place outright. That's nothing to sneer at.

      Why are you trying so hard to avoid admitting that? :-)

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    11. Re:I read this in Wired by dude__hi · · Score: 1

      No offense but they did tell me so. Does "there's no way they can win," mean what I think it means? Be careful when you call people liars because I was there and I wasn't making an assumption when I wrote that. You were, from where I stand you're the liar and said so yourself.

  100. Stand and Deliver by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Hey this story JUST reminded me of what happened in Garfield HS about 20 years ago... Jaime Escalante, latino professor in LA, went to a high school filled with losers (the worst of the worst), and decided to teach the kids calculus.

    His method was revolutionary - their students ended up applying for scholarship, and their grades were so high that they raised suspicions of cheating (racism, anyone?)

    So they applied for the test again, and succeeded.

    The rest, is history.

  101. Yes, they do by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 2, Informative
    MIT gives no scholarships.
    Not true. MIT gave me many scholarships when I was there and I they continue to give scholarships as well (they explicitly list scholarships as a category that alumni can donate to when they run fundraising drives, so they haven't stopped the practice). I didn't get the scholarships because I was particularly bright, but rather because of financial need. Financial need alone is enough to get you a scholarship once you are admitted, though I have a feeling that might not apply to people who aren't US citizens (or maybe it applies to a lesser extent), so the kids in the article may be out of luck, but MIT does indeed give scholarships.
    1. Re:Yes, they do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Instead of scholarships, how about they drop the tuition from the bazillion $$$ a year that it is now?

      I remember when my school was proud to advertise that their tutition was increasing only (ONLY!) 7% per year, because other universities were increasing at double digit rates!

  102. Something for Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, so we have a bunch of illegal immigrants, meaning neither they nor their parents pay taxes, attending a state-run high school, competing in a government-funded contest. Can we please spend a little more money on people who don't contribute anything here? :P

  103. MIT is overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Getting a bachelor or master at MIT is the same as getting one just about anywhere else. MIT used to be a great place for technology students to study, but they backed off on the quality of their undergraduate programs and now you basically only go there if you are a doctoral student.

  104. Try posting as your real username first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do people posts as Anonymous Coward when they want to talk shit? I guess they have nothing to lose.

    2 can play at that game, AC.

  105. Phoosiers by epine · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    l0ameness f1odder la2meness fo3dder lam4eness fod4der lame5ness fodd5er lamene6ss fodd6er lamene7ss fodde7r lamenes8s fodd9er lameness9

  106. it is good, I suggest you read it by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    I lost interest at that bit where it started talking about what a mess the rain makes of West Phoenix. It's completely irrelevant and is the kind of filler people write to dilute stories with technical subject matter to make them more palatable to the masses who, let's face it, want to patronisingly talk about how smart these Mexican kids are without actually bothering to find out what they did. Someone point me to an article that tells me what they actually did and how they did it.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:it is good, I suggest you read it by Mr_Matt · · Score: 1

      Someone point me to an article that tells me what they actually did and how they did it.

      No. If you can't be stuffed to read one *whole* page of the article (they get into details pretty quickly) then I sure as hell am not going to hand you the relevant bits on a silver platter. Christ.

      Perhaps the reason that four motivated immigrants can beat MIT at a robotics contest is simply because they worked harder. With a country filled with lazy, "I'm too good for this" shirks like parent poster, it's almost inevitable that barely literate Mexicans will soon be doing our robotics work.

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
    2. Re:it is good, I suggest you read it by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      With a country filled with lazy, "I'm too good for this" shirks like parent poster...
      You, sir, have an amazing ability to make inferences from the tiniest scraps of information. Unfortunately you need to learn to make correct inferences.
      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  107. An obvious piece of advocacy journalism. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What we have here is an obvious piece of advocacy journalism:

    - Over four pages of coverage of an extrordinary accomplishment by four extraordiarily talented and hard-working undocumented immigrant children.

    - Most of the fifth page lamenting their financial handicap and plugging a particular federal bill to give MILLIONS of illegal-immigrant children a place at the federal tit and an entitlement to further boost the drain on the taxpayers pocketbooks - with a hefty chunk of the cashflow siphoned off to pay for more beaucrats.

    - A copule sentences on how such a program would rip college opportunities out of the hands of other children who are citizens - whose parents are already being taxed - sometimes into poverty - to pay for the institutions and scholarships that would be transferred to the illegals.

    Yes it stinks for the kids who built the 'bot - and others like them. But how many similar stories DIDN'T get told about rural-poor US citizen kids who performed similar feats, with similar lack of resources?

    It's NOT rare. For starters, if you hang out at NASA for any length of time you'll notice that a LOT of "rocket scientists" are from such backgrounds. Many have such stories to tell. (And in NASA's heyday the educational opporiunities for a kid who was rural, southern, or (horrors!) both were comparable to those of these kids.)

    Creating a new entitlement program will redistribute the resources differently but not increase them overall. Further, with the mismanagement and overhead typical of government programs, it's likely to destroy far more opportunities than it creates.

    Children who are US citizens are already at a signficant disadvantage to immigrants and student-visa holders. The latter tend to get financial aid as grants - even if they are children of the rich - while the former are left with mostly loans which must be paid off at interest or suplemented by low-paid jobs that take time from study. Tuition has become so astronomical that in many fields the citizens are just dropping out, as the lifetime benefit of the education is exceeded by its unsubsidized cost.

    Are we to believe that these four are typical, rather than extrordinary? (There are extrordinary individuals in all large populations.) Are we to believe the children of illegal immigrants are so much MORE competent than the children of citizens that more good than harm will come from from transferring educational opportunites from the latter to the former, dropping a bunch of them through the cracks on the way?

    In order to press for a government solution, the story carefully ignores (except to belittle in passing) private sector aid. There are an enormous number of private scholarship programs and private charatable foundations with scholarship programs, with an explosion of criteria for who they will help. (The tax system makes it profitable to create them, and has for decades. And people whos story is like that of these kids who finally make it often create leg-up funds for others like themselves.) They're not well known. But for kids with track records like these there are likely to be hundreds of them that might fund them through school.

    IMHO the real tragedy here is that the educational institution (with the gleeful aid of the media) did NOT help these kids dig up private funding. Instead it left them in low-paying jobs and is using their plight to push for legislation to feather its own nest.

    Meanwhile, the MIT administration really ought to be busting their butts to dig up scholarship money for these kids. (Especially if they remember what the Model Railroad Club wrought.) Four children of migrant workers who, while still in highschool, beat their team with $800 to buy balloons, tampons, and PVC pipe should be the star recruits for their next freshman class.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:An obvious piece of advocacy journalism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, it's just a very good story. Lighten up.

    2. Re:An obvious piece of advocacy journalism. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Man, it's just a very good story. Lighten up.

      Pages one through four are just a very good story.

      Page five is political propaganda - with pages one through four as setup.

      I call 'em like I see 'em.

      As for lightening up: When the government establishment is staging yet another massive ripoff of people like you and me, it's not a "lighten up" issue.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:An obvious piece of advocacy journalism. by CyBlue · · Score: 1

      The article says that the Dream Act will give them In-state tuition eligibility and temporary residency status. This doesn't divert funds or create much more beauracracy, it just gives them the same college cost as anyone else who has been residing in the state. I'm very much against illegal immigration to the point that I wouldn't protest against a minefield along the border. However, in most cases the kids of illegal immigrants didn't make the choice to come here and they can't just decide to go back to Mexico. Denying them an equal chance at an education is unfair in the same way that providing them with special funding is unfair to US Residents. The only exception to this that I see is that it might encourage Mexican families to move here in order to procure a better life for their children.

    4. Re:An obvious piece of advocacy journalism. by SeiRyu · · Score: 0

      Children who are US citizens are already at a signficant disadvantage to immigrants and student-visa holders. The latter tend to get financial aid as grants

      I think you don't know what you're talking about.

      First of all, do you know how much these "student-visa holders" pay per year for tuition? At least 2 to 10 times what a US citizen would pay. For example, at a community college, a US citizen would pay (for those that didn't or couldn't get financial aid and have to pay) 11 dollars per unit, while a "student-visa holder" would pay 120 dollars PER UNIT. And at a public 4-year institution, it's 15k vs. 40k/year.

      In addition to that, "student-visa holders" are NOT allowed to work. They can obtain ON-CAMPUS work permit ONLY IF they can prove financial difficulties. And guess what, as true as "not all American students are rich", not all international students are rich either. And even if they are, the fact is the currency exchange rate almost ALWAYS favors the Dollar.

      These students are here to study, and they do just that. They are NOT eligible for financial aid at most public institutions, a lot of times they don't qualify for loans either, because they don't have a social security number to apply for any credit (for students after, I believe, 2000, only those authorized to work oncampus would get a ssn).

      There are more to it than what I just said. But the point is you should check your facts before typecasting any group of people.

    5. Re:An obvious piece of advocacy journalism. by RhadamanthosIsChaos · · Score: 1

      It should be noted that MIT gives NO merit-based scholarships of any kind. Period. Ever.

      Private organizations, or affiliated organizations, might, but MIT is pretty anal about it.

      So, these kids are pretty much out of luck, unless some company, college or Foundation want to pick them up.

      --
      +++OUT OF CHEESE ERROR+++ REDO FROM START +++
    6. Re:An obvious piece of advocacy journalism. by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I think the problem with this thinking is that one must think that College must cost uber amounts of money in our society.

      And while at a convention I talked with a Norwegian who said that in her home country that you only have to live there to get free college with plenty of persons from the UK there doing so (with minimal Norwegian she added).

      Of course one must accept Socialism as an alternative. You know like higher taxes... And Socialized health care. Which isn't going to happen in the States.

      But if I really wanted that myself I could move to Norway.

      Barring that the only other solution would be to stop having children (see China's one child policy).

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  108. This is not a flame by Hyksos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just can't resist this opportunity to say how much I prefer the colleges in my country (Finland) when it comes to money matters. Essentially, universities in Finland are free of tuitions, leaving only the cost of books (which can be bought used or sometimes even found in the library, if you can't afford new ones.) Of course this is one of the reasons why we pay more taxes over here, but since they all go to things like free healthcare and education, I don't really mind. It's like every citizen in Finland was donating a little to help people like those guys get into school (among other things).

    Long story short, the Finnish system gives a chance to everyone who's smart enough to pass the entrance exam. (Oh, and just because our schools are free doesn't mean that they're crap :))

    PS: Just one drawback to my glorious portrayal of my country: if you are an unregistered immigrant you would probably be on a plane back home if you attracted attention like that :-/

  109. WaPo weighs in by starrsoft · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I read about this the other day in the Washington Post. They have an interesting perspective. Basically, despite their winning, they still can't get any real success in life (not their fault). Read it (Get a un/pw):
    Their moment of triumph was sweet but short-lived.

    Vazquez and Aranda graduated from Hayden last spring, but they're not in college now, Davis writes, because they're illegal immigrants and thus ineligible for student loans or cheap in-state tuition. Vazquez is hanging drywall and Aranda is filing papers at a Social Security office. Santillan and Arcega are still at Hayden, Davis says, but their prospects for college also look dubious.

    It also had a pretty funny part:
    mmediately, they had a problem: When Aranda lowered Stinky into the pool, they realized they had a leak. Not only did they have to re-solder every wire in the machine overnight, Vazquez told his teammates, but they also had to find something absorbent to keep moisture away from the circuitry.

    "Absorbent?" Santillan asked, recalling countless TV ads. "Like a tampon?"

    Soon, Santillan was in the nearest supermarket, trying to work up the courage to ask a young woman for advice on which brand of tampons might work best in an underwater robot.

    The woman laughed and made her recommendation. "I hope you win," she said.

    --
    Read my blog: HansMast.com
  110. kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new hormone-overloaded overlords

  111. Not everyone can make that choice ## by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As salaries go up, so would prices, and relative earning power would be unchanged. If grape-pickers make $14 per hour, but a bunch of grapes costs $20, how has the problem been solved?

    In a capitalist economy there will always exist a large number of jobs at the bottom of the economic spectrum. Most Americans with college or graduate degrees who do not have jobs, do not consider such bottom jobs when considering employment. Instead they live off of unemployment, savings, and credit as they search for a job "in their field."

    BTW, unemployment is historically low right now. There does not exist enough unemployed Americans, at any economic class, to fill all the job openings that would develop if we were able to somehow expel all illegal immigrants.

  112. MIT's Motto - Mens et Manus - Mind AND Hands by 2centplain · · Score: 3, Insightful
    MIT's motto is "Mens et Manus", meaning "Mind and Hands." http://libraries.mit.edu/archives/mithistory/seal/

    As the cost of an MIT degree continues to spiral above inflation, does MIT continue to attract students that have the "Manus" part?

    The article says:

    Over the past four months, Lorenzo had flourished, learning a new set of acronyms and raising his math grade from an F to an A. He had grown up rebuilding car engines with his brother and cousin. Now he was ready to build something of his own. The team had found its mechanics man.

    I would argue that Lorenzo's hands-on experience was a key factor in his team's success.

    I wonder how many of MIT's students arrive as freshman with hands-on skills? I would guess that this number has been declining over the years.

    When I was a freshman at MIT, I remember fixing an old stereo on my desk. One of my eletrical engineering classmates, an absolute math genius, who had already aced the intro eletrical engineering class, asked, "Hey, what are those little things with stripes on them that you've got there?" I said, "You're kidding, right? Those are resistors, you know, "R" in all the problems you've been doing." "Oh", he said, "I'd never seen a real one before."

    Mens ET Manus -- Gotta have both to be a world-class engineer. Congratulations to the "La Vida Robot" team for having what it takes!

    1. Re:MIT's Motto - Mens et Manus - Mind AND Hands by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      They're in the process of converting (or maybe have finished) all 8.01 & 8.02 classes to a hands-on kind of version. I hated it, but then I was just trying to finally pass those classes to graduate.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    2. Re:MIT's Motto - Mens et Manus - Mind AND Hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a freshman at MIT, I remember fixing an old stereo on my desk. One of my eletrical engineering classmates, an absolute math genius, who had already aced the intro eletrical engineering class, asked, "Hey, what are those little things with stripes on them that you've got there?" I said, "You're kidding, right? Those are resistors, you know, "R" in all the problems you've been doing." "Oh", he said, "I'd never seen a real one before."

      It's stories like these which remind me why I went to an engineering college (www.kettering.edu) where the co-operative educational program was integral to the core curriculum. You can't graduate without spending over a year and a half actually working in your field of study, in addition to class and labwork.

    3. Re:MIT's Motto - Mens et Manus - Mind AND Hands by MagicDude · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a story I heard from one of my professors. A guy who was a super genius in electrical engineering graduates college and is hired by the army to do R&D. His first project was design a handheld radio system (This was in the early 70's). He did the calculations and drew the circuit diagrams and double checked everything and believed he had a working circuit for one of the components, so he had the diagram sent to the workshop to have a prototype built. The workshop sent the circuit back saying it wasn't a feasable design, mainly because he had designed the circuit to include a 1 farad capacitor. That one capacitor would have been bigger than the entire system he was trying to design.

    4. Re:MIT's Motto - Mens et Manus - Mind AND Hands by Hawkxor · · Score: 1

      You mean 8.01X, 8.02X, for eXXXperiments? It sucks - apparently in 8.02X they do tons of lame circuit experiments and don't even teach Maxwell's equations. Want to learn circuits, then take 6.002!

    5. Re:MIT's Motto - Mens et Manus - Mind AND Hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8.01x and 8.02x are dead, replaced with TEAL. Viva remote controls.

    6. Re:MIT's Motto - Mens et Manus - Mind AND Hands by Hawkxor · · Score: 1

      I see. TEAL is cool in it's own way, but is pretty easy I hear, and encourages laziness. I only took 8.022, though so I'm not speaking from experience.

    7. Re:MIT's Motto - Mens et Manus - Mind AND Hands by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Nope. I took 8.01X and 8.02X, they've been around for a couple decades I believe. This is a new deal called TEAL, they started it my senior year. You actually do the experiments in class, and it's not just a bunch of soldering.

      You actually seem to be a current student - you've never heard of TEAL? They seem to have now completely converted regular 8.02 over to the TEAL format, though they still offer both regular 8.01 and 8.01T. I'm pretty sure they're wanting to switch it all over to TEAL eventually.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  113. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  114. MIT at FIRST by mkcheme · · Score: 1

    Back when I did FIRST (formerly US FIRST) in high school, the team that MIT sponsored was consistently among the worst. There was a team in the next town over from me that was only sponsored by Key Bank that was always much better and with far less apparent technical expertise.

  115. Re:Living in a factory... by karnal · · Score: 3, Funny

    po'

    Come on, man! If you can't afford the o and the r, why are you splurging on an apostrophe?

    Think of the children!

    --
    Karnal
  116. Send the Teachers to MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a great article; it brought tears to my eyes... until I got to the political message and plea for money at the end.

    Then I went back and reviewed it again only to realize that the teachers were the "magnets" not the students. Did the teachers really build this robot and the students get the credit?

    Think about it. These students had no experience in robotics before, but after a short time they're experts. Then after graduation they are working manual labor jobs. Not a programmer among them?

    Something stinks with this article and it starts with all the political crap at the end of it.

    It does address an interesting issue though. If these students are as smart as alleged in the article they certainly should be allowed to go to college. But I smell a rat... that this article was politically motivated. The story was modified to fit the political message.

    It's clear that these two teachers beat the MIT students. The teachers should be given scholarships to MIT.

    John D.
    Texas

    1. Re:Send the Teachers to MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Im Lorenzo and no the teachers didnt build the robot. The teachers were only there to guide us and see if we had any problems they could help with. And not only we compete in the M.A.T.E competition we also compete in the F.I.R.S.T competition which is an acronym for(For Inspiratiopn and Recognition of Science and Technology) in the past the we helped with the building of an electrical train for kids. Also we build full size electrcal cars in which we also competed with other Universities. Not only we compete, we meet profesionals that help us and guide us. This shows that the teachers not always have the answers we need. My experince in the robotics team has been great i learned alot like it said in the article i could have been doing some thing not so great. My grades improved from D's and F's to my current Grades which are A's and
      B's. As for the R.O.V (remotley operated Vehicle)Us the students did all of the building, wiring and coming up with innovative ways of fixing our problems with a LOW budget. In the competition not only we had to make an rov but we also had to write a technical report and a poster display.

    2. Re:Send the Teachers to MIT by Tyrna · · Score: 1

      Well I agree that you having read that article you might have gotten that impression on how it was political and all. But Ill let you know that in truth the teachers did NOT I repeat NOT build the ROV the teacher are mentors and as any mentor they share ideas. I myself attend Carl Hayden and I find it hard to belive that people think that we are not capable of creating such a thing like the ROV. Just because our school is 92% hispanic and was considered a Under Performing school dosent mean that we arent capable of building a robot. This year beeing the 4th year that the robotics club has attended the FIRST competition http://www.usfirst.org/ and thats were we get our experience from not from letting our teachers build the teams robot and for the students to take fame in. As for the Job issue it ties in with the money our school dose have programming courses but 1 hour a day for the school year dosent allow you to learn and master Java or C++ plus you might say that they can studdy at home shure they can but on what not all the students have the abillity of buying a computer all the studying will be on paper dont get me wrong all programs have to be writen first on paper but what happens when they want to test it out and no computer to try it on students just loose interest

    3. Re:Send the Teachers to MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi I am one of the teachers of the Falcon Robotics ROV team. Not to discredit your theories, the kids did build it, and they did not learn how to do robotics in a few months, try a few years. The team has been participating in FIRST for 4 years and has gained a lot of knowledge which gets passed down from student to student. The team has also built ROVs in the past for the Marine Science Magnet program. The team did however raise all the money, no school monies, and build all the robots they ever built. Our school does have the lowest standardized test scores in the state. Our student population faces many more obstacles than most. Despite all this, we still should not have beaten MIT. But we did. I have a general Science education degree and the other teacher has a phd in education. Not really your engineering types, But we do know how to learn and how to teach the kids to learn. The fact that you disbelieve all they we have done, it a testiment to our success. Thank You.

  117. Ha! by rdwald · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ha!

    Sincerely,
    Caltech

  118. The Bush administration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems one of the biggest problem is money, for both legal citizens and illegal immigrants to the good old US of A. Money is needed to build programs to help illegal immigrants to become legal citizens, and to provide american kids (legal or otherwise) with a higher education.

    Problem is, the american government priority is to invade other countries and spending millions of tax dollars while doing so, while american people struggle to get a proper education.

  119. You sure? by Khyber · · Score: 1

    "What state do you live in? In most states, if you spend two years at an ALMOST FREE Community College, you are granted automatic admission into a 4yr school." I graduated from Quad-C in Plano (Collin County Community College) with a 3.8 and got no offers for admission to any school, whatsoever. Neither did my father, who did community college when he was 39 years old. But maybe Quad-C was a different thing altogether? Doubt it, though.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:You sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I graduated from Quad-C in Plano (Collin County Community College) with a 3.8 and got no offers for admission to any school, whatsoever. Neither did my father, who did community college when he was 39 years old. But maybe Quad-C was a different thing altogether? Doubt it, though.

      Depending on how long ago this was, it might be worth your time to contact state universities in your area. Just because the schools didn't automatically offer you admission, doesn't mean they won't take you or that they won't offer extra finicial aid. Not everyone, even if they did well, in community college goes on to four-year colleges.

  120. Probably beating a dead horse by TheLoneGundam · · Score: 2, Informative

    but so is this article - if you're going to report on geek news, something which Slashdot has done well in the past, then you need to report on it _early_ - as in, go to the contest, report that Carl Hayden won over MIT, when it happened. It's not "news" to get this _after_ the Wired magazine is already out in the mail.

  121. Nope by cOdEgUru · · Score: 1

    Where does the article mention that they were handed the competition because of where they came from?

    They won because they did a better job.

    But coming from poverty made their victory all the more sweeter. We cheered even harder when SpaceshipOne with limited resources beat Nasa with seemingly endless resources in coming up with a viable option for space travel that is cheaper.

    1. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the article, look at the other link. MIT scored the highest in actually acheiving the task but got modest scores for the report etc. (And the difference between the two teams was minimal, like anything else where many come out so close to distinguish between them is utterly pointless)

    2. Re:Nope by ifwm · · Score: 1

      Which was exactly my point, even if I didn't state it clearly. In a competition where there are essentially 2 equals, who wins? I go with the kids, because just hanging in with MIT deserves serious recognition.

  122. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  123. Great quote... by dantheman82 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "You're very comfortable with the metric system," Swean observed.

    "I grew up in Mexico, sir," Oscar said.

    Swean nodded. He eyed their rudimentary flip chart.

    "Why don't you have a PowerPoint display?" he asked.

    "PowerPoint is a distraction," Cristian replied. "People use it when they don't know what to say."

    "And you know what to say?"

    "Yes, sir."


    These guys would be a huge asset in any good college because they have more desire to learn this stuff than many students I've seen combined together. I seriously doubt they'd waste their time playing CounterStrike if given the chance at a good Engineering school. Maybe I'll mention their names to my school.

    Very interesting story...

    --
    This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
  124. I smell movie rights! by ZoomieDood · · Score: 0

    I hope these kids can milk whatever studio comes to them for movie rights on this.

  125. Do it on my tax dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an H1-B worker, and I pay a lot taxes/money for social security etc which I am never goin to realize (unless I want and get a green card - which I do not).

    So, I definitely do not mind letting my money (and not the US citizens' money) go to these kids who have shown potential and are in dire need - if the US citizens are more willing to fund War then education.

    Yeah.

  126. DARPA by Atario · · Score: 1

    And people thought it was silly to have that high school team in on the DARPA Grand Challenge.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  127. Stop that... by Jack+Johnson · · Score: 1

    If people actually educated themselves about these things they'd have no venomous indignation left to fuel their ignorant, bigoted cliches.

  128. your knowledge of accounting is pitiful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm sure that they likely don't pay federal income tax, but then, many citizens in their tax bracket get more back than they pay in, due to tax credits and such.

    tax credits don't mean the goverment pays you money. you just get to subract that amount from the taxes you would otherwise have to pay. at best, you don't pay any taxes.

    Chances are, they pay more taxes than citizens of equal means, without getting nearly as many benefits.

    <sarcasm> yes, given that they earn money in the lowest tax bracket, they definitely spend enough money on purchases to make up for in in sales tax. they pay even more in sales tax than americans earning similar amounts, in spite of not having to pay federal or state income taxes. </sarcasm>

    i'm not sure what is worse: your lack of any insight, or slashdot's rating of the post as insightful.

    1. Re:your knowledge of accounting is pitiful by krysith · · Score: 1

      AC, I take it you use H&R Block.

      I also take it you've never been poor enough to get the EITC.

      Yes, actually the Earned Income Credit can result in you receiving more money from the Federal Government than you paid in income taxes. This usually occurs in households where the income is low and there are a large number of children.

      I know this because I grew up poor, and my Mom used to get it.

      As far as my supposition that illegal aliens might end up paying more in taxes than a similarly poor family, I was excluding state income taxes from that analysis. Of course, since state income taxes are deductible from federal income tax, it is a wash, presuming the family would get the EITC.

      As an accountant, I'm sure you knew that.

  129. Academics != education != real world effectiveness by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I pity the MIT students in any comparison because they face a tide of academic overheads that they must swim against.Unforntunately, most university education is about nbeing a good academic, not necessarily a good engineer etc. Writing up a good report with references, footnotes etc (correctly formatted references are worth 10% of the term paper) is more important than practical output.

    I see the results in the people I deal with in industry. As a generalisation, most of the PhDs I deal with are less productive than their non-PhD collegues because they approach problems as academic problems instead of practical problems. As a result, a lot of effort gets spent investigating stuff that does not matter in the real world, or making impractical assumptions.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  130. You should really read the article by so1omon · · Score: 1

    These kids are not "nerds" by any normal definition. They certainly were not inticed to attend Carl Hayden by its computer program. These kids are "undocumented" immigrants from Mexico. At least one of them was a former gang member.

    These kids, with an $800 dollar robot and some creativity, beat out MIT's $11,000 dollar entry. The submission summary doesn't do any justice to the actual accomplishment here.

    --
    i'm the jedidiahmarkfoster your parents warned you about
    1. Re:You should really read the article by HanClinto · · Score: 1
      Most of them aren't, but what about Cristian?

      Ever since his younger sister demanded her own room four years ago, Cristian Arcega had been living in a 30-square-foot plywood shed attached to the side of his parents' trailer. He liked it there. It was his own space. He was free to contemplate the acceleration of a raindrop as it leaves the clouds above him. He could hear it hit the roof and slide toward the puddles on the street outside. He imagined that the puddles were oceans and that the underwater robot he was building at school can explore them.

      Cameron and Ledge, as the students called Lajvardi, formed the robotics group for kids like Cristian. He was probably the smartest 16-year-old in West Phoenix - without even trying, he had one of the highest GPAs in the school district. His brains and diminutive stature (5'4", 135 pounds) kept him apart at Carl Hayden. That and the fact that students socialized based on Mexican geography: In the cafeteria, there were Guanajuato tables and Sonora tables. Cristian was from Mexicali, but he'd left Mexico in the back of a station wagon when he was 6. He thought of himself as part American, part Mexican, and he didn't know where to sit.

      I think that defines "nerd". Perhaps the robotics club is one of the "magnet" programs that he was talking about?

      --clint

  131. Hey MoroN LibertineR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might want to re-check your brain.
    There might be un-used aid money, but qualifying for it is a WHOLE 'NOTHER MATTER!

    You would need to move out of Mom and Dad's house for at least a year, have income of less than $20,000 and PROVE it to get financial aid. And then, most likely, it will NOT be grant money, it'll be loans. And the loans will typically stay aroudn $4000 per year. Try and go to school on that. I worked almost full time, made enough to keep an apartment, eat, and drive a $500 car, and I got NOTHING in grant money. Low interest loans is what they give you. And if you think that's enough to get you through school, think again. If you live in your parents' house, they use your parents' income to do the financial aid calculation, and they look at the value of your parents' home and vehicles. If you think you're getting aid while living at home, think again. It's not happening. Your parents are expected to mortgage their home to put you through college. Financial aid (grants) is given to the extremely needy (disabled, minorities, financially destitute, large families with single parents and small incomes, etc.) And there's nothing that Google is going to do to change that.

  132. They should make a movie out of this. by TheGuano · · Score: 1

    This is just like Bring It On, just not as pretty.

    1. Re:They should make a movie out of this. by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      It's a TRUE underdog story. My god, those are some bright kids.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:They should make a movie out of this. by TheGuano · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Totally. I think we should send this story to all those Southern/conservative politicians trying to deny public education and benefits to children of illegal immigrants.

  133. What about MIT's engineering failures? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "MIT's ROV motored smoothly down and quickly located the 5-gallon drum inside the plastic submarine mock-up at the bottom of the pool. But as the robot approached the container, its protruding mechanical arm hit a piece of the submarine frame, blocking it from going farther. They tried a different angle but still couldn't reach the drum. The bot wasn't small enough to slip past the gap in the frame, making their pump system useless. There was nothing they could do - they had to move on to the next assignment."

    Thats BAD engineering.

    AND

    "Engineering Eval:
    Carl Hayden: 53.17
    MIT: 44.67"

    That over 8 points right there.
    Don't use that "We lost for subjective reasons " crap here, bucko.

    Sounds to me they probably got so much money(11,000), they got carried away with features.
    As an engineer, I would say thats a typipical Jr. Engineer mistake.
    Of course, that's speculation on my part.
    It owuld be truly interesting if the teams wrote a 'lessons learned' paper. I would love to see what the MIT team thinks of their design and the contest in hind-sight.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  134. Oh, boo-fuckin-hoo; Asshole. by LibertineR · · Score: 1

    Fuck, if we could harness the energy some people use into explaining why they CANT make it, we could fly to fuckin' MARS.

    1. Re:Oh, boo-fuckin-hoo; Asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice retort based on logic and holding true to the argument at hand.

      Oh, wait, it wasn't. You couldn't think of a valid response to that post, so you just decided to be a little bitch instead.

  135. Overlooked. by karn096 · · Score: 1

    I think the one thing everyone tends to overlook when the topic is regarding immigration is the fact that America was built on immigrants. Mexicans are some of the hardest working people i've ever met, and will go through anything for their family. More power to them for the fact that a group of kids with supposedly no future did this. Its unfortunate so many americans are raised to be lazy.

  136. to note they were mostly illegal immigrants... by NAACPsupporter · · Score: 1

    This is a great day for minorities!

  137. You gotta play both sides of the issue. by sideshow · · Score: 1

    If the California government actually followed through with the policy they publicize then our economy would collaspe instantly. They are 100% percent aware of this.

    The thing is, if they change the policy to reflect their real intentions they would all be voted out of office.

    Our government knows immigration is a good thing but the avg voter (I'm talking both sides of the aisle here) is retarded so the government has to be two faced about it.

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    1. Re:You gotta play both sides of the issue. by Hyecee · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. The government is a really smart entity. All those research folks actually DO stuff. The problems is, even though they could fix so many things, it would go against the xenophobic (or, homophobic, terrorphobic, (n)phobic...) tendencies of a part of their voting base, and they'd all lose their jobs.

      It's too bad preservation of self is more important to everyone than preservation of the whole.

  138. Reminds me of Discovery Channel's Depth Charge by NapalmCheese · · Score: 1

    Ahhh, the good old days when I got to help whoop up on the navy.

    http://www.mpcfaculty.net/jill_zande/Team_MATE.htm

  139. Incorrect by geekoid · · Score: 1

    They just can't get state/federal funding, and the have to pay the out of state cost.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no in state cost at MIT..

  140. Out of State Tuition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They wouldn't have to pay out-of-state tuition in Mexico.

    Doesn't Mexico have any colleges?

  141. That's your view of the truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America has a way of luring the smartest and most hard working people here with the hopes of a better life. And the country where they came from losses one more leader, one more person who could have had an impact.

    That's because the US is the country where they can maximize their potential. They might have helped their own home countries a bit if they stayed but they can help their homeland a lot more by maximizing their own opportunities and then helping out after they've achieved something. That's exactly what's wrong with buying talent analogy - only a little of it is bought. The US expends a lot of resources developing a lot of the raw talent that comes here.

    I'm an immigrant and part of an extended family of immigrants (38 in the US and 28 in Canada). We send more money back to Vietnam per year than all of our relatives (in the hundreds) in Vietnam have made in their entire time in Vietnam (and we all worked hard for what we've achieved). I sorta have a problem with people telling me how I should've lived my life. If you're really concerned with helping unfortunate countries develop, you can always volunteer with the Peace Corps, donate money yourself or even move there.

    And then, what do we give back to other countries? We open HUGE factories where we move jobs, like when GM closed the plants in Michigan and moved them to Mexico because people there would work for pennies on the dollar.

    Poverty has declined the most in the countries that have integrated the most into the global economy. http://papers.nber.org/papers/w8933 (National Bureau of Economic Research). So it seems the US is 'giving' quite a bit back. Unless you're trying to say that poor people in foreign countries don't want jobs. My relatives in the Nike factories are better off than they were before. They don't have the same standard of living as we do in the US but then it's an entirely different situation.

    What does this say about how the world is being organized?

    It's getting more efficient and we're making progress.

  142. You mean by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Aquadorks, Teen force!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  143. Racist prejudice! Mod this down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see the magnetic bumper sticker now:

    My ex-gang member high-school electronics whiz can beat your MIT graduate student in Battle Bots!


    It's not funny, it's racist and prejudiced!

    1. Re:Racist prejudice! Mod this down! by Neoncow · · Score: 1

      If you're harping about the 'gang' part, apparently one of the team members was in a gang, but quit after too many gang members were getting arrested.

  144. The influx of people makes the USA great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    also can't help but think what a loss to their original country they are. America has a way of luring the smartest and most hard working people here with the hopes of a better life.

    This is what makes the US of A great, the influx of people. This is something racist rednecks and other uniformed American masses fail to understand. There are particular set of historical conditions that were "just right."
    USA's superiority began after World War II. This is a country that reaped great benefit from that conflict, in two ways: by developing industries, boosted by the war effort in another continent, accumulating capital like no other country; and by receiving the influx of immigrants. All those scientists and mathematicians from abroad landed at Princeton, MIT, Harvard, Berkeley, etc. And the cheap labor. These things were a great boon.

    A fact often overlooked by racists is that non-whites are smart, too. :-) I laugh because I sincerely believe white America is severly prejudiced to this day and suffers from superiority complex (that allows you to invade "brown-skinned" country, like Iraq, and be proud of it).

    1. Re:The influx of people makes the USA great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA's superiority? At what? Having the biggest army?

  145. *YOUR* tax dollars? (Re: These are not Future MIT by Laebshade · · Score: 1

    No, he probably meant he didn't want them going to college on his tax dollars because he's probably one of those people who refers to hispanics/latinos as "wetbacks".

  146. Re:Academics != education != real world effectiven by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    Very well said! Every PhD person I ever worked with just deal with things in such a round-about unconventional way, it's no coincidence. Great for research labs, lousy for the every day office environment.

  147. Unfortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me your tired, your sick, your poor.

    This was what America was founded on. What went wrong?

  148. Benefits AND Cost? by Neoncow · · Score: 1
    With any cost-benefit analysis, one must rememeber to factor in both the cost AND the benefit.
    Parent post shows the results of both projects, but neglects the

    Haven't read the article, but I'm sure some friendly slashdotter will find out how much both projects costed.

  149. I'm the 4th kid from the right. by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    Hey! As an amateur robot builder myself I'd love to see some details of what you did. Any chance that you'll be putting together a web site with pictures and maybe writing up a little about what you had to do to make your robot work?

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:I'm the 4th kid from the right. by dude__hi · · Score: 1

      There is a website up from last year's competition but it hasn't been updated in a while. The site is the one you can reach from marinetech.org for the Explorer class competition. Unfortunately we haven't had time to update anything but there are a few OTHER projects we are a part of. Throughout the year we take part of several other projects through the Carl Hayden Robotics Club. It isn't as if the ROV is our one and only success which seems to be what people are most familiar with.
      Dr. Allan Cameron started a HAM Radio Club at school. Any members from the robotics club are part of the Ham Radio club. Several of us even have Ham licenses. We also take part of a pumpkin chunkin' trebuchet competition. This year's model was 20 ft tall. If you don't already know what a trebuchet is look it up online. They are awesome!!
      Another competition we take part in is the FIRST Competition (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Engineering). This is the competition we take part in every year and is the one where learned most of the ideas we used for the ROV. In this competition we face the best high schools in the country and many from around the globe. One of the regionals this year was hosted in the Middle East (I'm not sure which one). The site for this one is www.usfirst.org. The one teams regularly use is chiefdelphi.com. --Check it out, LOOK FOR TEAM 842.
      Throughout the whole year we do presentations and mentor other teams to show them that just because we come from central Phoenix doesn't mean we're bums. We mentored 6 lego teams this year and hosted the Arizona Lego League Regional Championships at our school for the second year in a row. firstlegoleague.org
      Just a few weeks ago I made a presentation to the governor of Arizona on what our program is and why more schools should take a part in programs like we do. As usual I wasn't informed I'd present until ten minutes before it was our turn to speak.
      If you would like to have more information please send me your e-mail at cristianatme@yahoo.com, thanks.

    2. Re:I'm the 4th kid from the right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:I'm the 4th kid from the right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://members.cox.net/falcon842/TechnicalReport.p dfats there needs to be a space between Technical Report

    4. Re:I'm the 4th kid from the right. by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

      Excellent job you guys did, Cristian, and thank you for speaking up here on /. I am duly impressed, and wish you all the best of luck. :D

      --
      "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
      "A four-foot prune."
  150. Next year Roosevelt Roughriders will win by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    My son Ian's going to be on their team and they can just surf the UW auctions for spare parts.

    Hey, if we can't win the Apple Cup, at least we can win in BattleBot!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  151. Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not to take anything away from the high school kids but I think we need to keep in mind that the MIT students have to deal with an MIT workload while digging up the time to do this on the side. The high school kids on the other hand have an essentially INFINITE amount of time to dedicate to the project. (seriously... think about how much time the average high school guy has if you subtract the time they spend masturbating and playing xbox and counterstrike)

  152. Whoops redundant. by Neoncow · · Score: 1

    Looks like the point was trying to bring up is being discussed under this comment

  153. Another quote by Neoncow · · Score: 1
    "Excuse me, madam," he began ...
    "Could you help me buy the most best tampons?"

    Keep in mind this is coming from Lorenzo, toughest looking guy in the team. (second from the left in the team photo)

  154. Response to the anonymous simpleton. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > You claim to have "solved" AI. What, in one paragraph,
    > is the problem you have "solved"? Have other subjects,
    > such as mathematics, been "solved"?

    The Decision-Tree of Mind-Design shows what Mentifex has solved -- how to integrate sensory input with the conceptual mindgrid.

    AI is a large, to-be-solved monolithic problem; mathematics is not.

    "Anonymous cowards" who attack new ideas without bothering to read and understand them are intellectually dishonest. If people want to refute the Mentifex AI proposal, let them counter it with ideas and logic, not with flaming and name-calling.

  155. Not what you know, but where you're going by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1
    College hardly teaches you anything tangible(unless you major in something really technical).

    Perhaps I'm just the exception. I studied something very un-technical, upon which I've built my career -- while my stated major was international relations, a large part of that was languages, and I now work as a Japanese-to-English translator.

    But then, I knew roughly what I wanted to do before I even got to university. I think that might be key here. If you don't know where it is in life you want to go, it's perfectly natural that you won't get much of anywhere. A good number of my friends from university didn't have a rat's arse of an idea about what to do with their lives, and university provided an excellent means for them to explore different options and try to figure out their futures. And in that, at least, I think their time spent in uni is a good thing.

    It sounds like the four kids in the article already have a pretty good idea of what they want to do, thanks to a couple teachers taking them seriously, and as such they will no doubt get a lot of useful learning out of university -- the trouble for them lies in the financial and legal barriers between them and higher education. Anyone who cares about education would do well to find out how they can help, either by donating any extra cash, or by getting in touch with their own local schools to see what assistance they might provide. Pass along what you've got, because you can't take it with you when you go.

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  156. Find what you want, find your path by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1
    Most people don't even have jobs that have anything to do with their degree.
    Could have if they'd wanted.

    Precisely.

    The biggest part of the problem with jobs and degrees is knowing what you really want to do. If you've got a fire in your belly to do X, chances are, you'll find a way to do it. If you kinda sorta maybe like X, and a job doing Y pays better and is easier to get, you'll probably wind up doing Y.

    Me, I knew I wanted to build a career using my language skills. I studied Japanese, German, and Spanish in high school, continuing my studies in university and adding a smidgen of Chinese for variety :). Since I knew what I wanted, I found a way to make it work, and I am now gainfully employed as a Japanese-to-English translator.

    Once you know what you want, what you really want, then it's simply a matter of making that real. If you have no clue what you want in life, you have no real path, no real direction, and as such it should not be surprising if you go through life adrift on the seas of social whim.

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  157. Don't be your own biggest obstacle. by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1
    Fuck, if we could harness the energy some people use into explaining why they CANT make it, we could fly to fuckin' MARS.

    Reminds me of an old proverb in Chinese.

    Those who say it is impossible should get out of the way of those already doing it.

    All I can say is, damn straight. It may not be an easy row to hoe, but it's there for the hoeing. Set to it or get out of the field.

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  158. Pride before the fall, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They still have better jobs than me with my fancy Computer Science degree and tens of thousands of dollars of debt.

    So what's stopping you from hanging sheetrock or filing papers? Oh, I guess that'd be your pride. Well, at least your username is accurate -- urusai can mean stfu in Japanese.

  159. Re:Academics != education != real world effectiven by MPR+At+UW · · Score: 1

    Well of course ((Academics != education) != (real world effectiveness)) is true!!!! Everyone knows that (Academics != education) is 1 and (real world effectiveness) > 1.

    Stop abusing C SYNTAX!!! From your friendly syntax nazi. :)

  160. ## Mod parent up ## by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    It takes two to tango, and lord knows the US doesn't make the most graceful of dancing partners...

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  161. "Crimaliens" on the radio by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    A quick google search shows a number of possibilities. Reading through a couple makes me very sad that people are so scared. The most relevant link would seem to be down, but the google cache still has a copy.

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:"Crimaliens" on the radio by Nopal · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the link. However, the link still says nothing about who uses that word except of it's mention in conjunction with AM radio.

      I'm just curious as to what kind of person would use a word such as that.

  162. ## Mod parent up ## by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1
    Ironically, very few things capture the American spirit of individualism, hard work, risk-taking, and a pick-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps attitude like stories such as this one.

    The sad fact is that most of the Boomer generation folk currently running the show didn't really have to work that hard to get where they are, and have become dull and complacent as a result. They then try to keep down the ones that do have to work their asses off, the ones that are harder, stronger, sharper, and smarter for having to really use their talents on a regular basis just to survive.

    It's these folk, the underdogs, that form the foundation of much of the American myth of identity, and yet it's these same salt-of-the-earth types that are denied at every opportunity.

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  163. Not in Ohio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try going to any school in this state cheap.... it doesn't happen! Try to get any funding from the state... good luck!

  164. This is not about money. by pacemkr · · Score: 1

    This is not about money, it is about the opportunity.

    People say "let them legalize". Believe it or not, it's not an option for most of these kids. Have you ever thought about how hard it is for these kids to legalize in this country being illegal aliens? Well for most it's impossible.

    Why? Because the Dream Act doesn't exist and there is simply no other way for some.

    They were brought here by their parents. Studied... graduated. Now what? People say "let them go back". Go back where? They GREW UP HERE!! This country IS their home. Go back and risk never coming back to their HOME country?

    People call them "criminals". Really? What is their crime? Being forcefully brought here to live a life of manual labor never to realize their full potential? Does that ring a bell in our history? How is that a crime? Their parents are criminals, but calling these kids criminals is plain stupid. Let's consider this situation. A couple of people have a baby; 1 to 15 years later they illegally enter the US and remain here. The kid is now a criminal for the rest of his/her life? Some people speak of these kids with disgust, even hatred. Why?! They haven't done anything.

    Maybe people are afraid of loosing their tax dollars? You think these kids want the money? They pray for the opportunity to become citizens of the country they consider home. They pray for a chance to exercise their full potential. In fact if you told them pay full tuition, maintain a high GPA and then you will have a chance at citizenship, they would accept that with gratitude.

    Maybe people are afraid of loosing their jobs? In what country, in what part of history, did more educated people result in loss of jobs? This is absurd. America is the most powerful economy in the world because of competition. This country's education is getting worse. (This is a fact, if you want proof I'll be happy to provide) Why? Not enough competition. Some people would say I'm stupid for saying this. I say, it is incredibly easy to get into college in this country. I cannot emphasize this enough. I know people who finished high school with a 60 average, they attend a community and city colleges not paying a cent. On the other hand, I know people who excelled in every subject and now they work illegally for $4 an hour sometimes 20 hours a day. Lack of Dream Act forces these kids to work illegally once they realize that there is no opportunity for them in their own country (Which IS the US do not forget!). Although they feel horrible for breaking the law and working illegally, there is simply no other way for them. Would you starve to obey the law?

    These kids are undocumented Americans not criminals. There is a reason why the Dream Act includes the 5 year minimum residency and a maximum age of 16 at entry. The Dream Act is just the right thining to do. I urge everyone to sacrifice a minute of your time and support the Dream.

    http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/49186085 7?1111344266&ltl=1111344286
    http://www.unionvoice.org/alert-description.tcl?al ert_id=977777

  165. There still illega!!!! by jmrust · · Score: 1

    First off I commend them on their intelligence and striving to succeed in a racist and stereotypical society. It's an amazing story to read about! I am a bit perturbed; however, that we are sitting here writing articles about how wonderful these illegal immigrants are! They are consuming our tax dollars for medical care and education whilst occupying job slots. There are far to many intelligent, hard working people all over the world crying for their chance to get into this country LEGALLY!!! There is a reason that California's taxes, vehicle registration, and vehicle insurance are ridiculously high! The root of the evil falls on our heads as US Citizens! We did it to ourselves by being greedy. First off most of us don't want to pick strawberries for a living, or be a gardener. Secondly, most of us don't want to pay $10 for a bag of American (obviously including legal immigrants) picked oranges when a $3 bag of Mexican picked oranges is sitting beside it. The most blatant case of this economic tragedy would be Walmart who sends the majority share of their business to Asia in order to maintain "Everyday Low Prices"... again it's our fault for shopping there. All in all putting our foot down on illegal immigration, and spending our income on domestic products would greatly help our economy and everyone who resides here legally!!!!!!!! My $.02