Navy doesn't care about green. They care about aircraft having fuel to fly.
OK, so, let me rephrase this in light of the green initiatives prompted by various forces: The Navy's primary consideration here is not being green, it is making certain they have fuel for the aircraft and turbine powered surface vessels.
Forgive me, but I fail to appreciate your rephrasing in light of the fact that I was commenting on the statements made by a non-Navy chemist, at a non-Navy University, with no relation to the Navy, in reference to a chemical process currently in development.
Thanks for your open-minded appreciation of what was actually being said though. Dude.
'The idea of using CO2 as a carbon source is appealing,' says Philip Jessop, a chemist at Queen's University adding that to make a jet fuel that is properly 'green', the energy-intensive electrolysis that produces the hydrogen will need to use a carbon-neutral energy source
Okay, maybe 'sequestered' is the wrong word in this instance, my bad. But removing carbon from the sea and blasting it into the air where it'll compound existing problems, including reabsorption back into the sea, and using large amounts of energy to do so, still doesn't strike me as environmentally-friendly in particular...
This is what I don't understand - they're taking sequestered carbon out of seawater and burning it back into the atmosphere as jet fuel, at a huge additional energy cost during the conversion.
An 'opt-out' lends an air of legitimacy to the spam, while allowing a spammer to confirm an active address, which can then be sold on to more spamming twats for a higher price than an unconfirmed one... a 'known good' address is still worth more on sale to another spammer (hey, your penis might be gigantic and therefore unworthy of v14gr4, but that's not to say you don't *NEED* an RC car kit, right?!)
Haven't used it in a while, but I'm sure DVDShrink can be set to compile a single.iso file and clear the intermediate output files at the end of the process.
"Spaced" was first broadcast in 1999 if I remember right, although I'm pretty sure the line wasn't meant to exclude even-numbered ones - just to note the more obvious pattern;o)
K, I kinda screwed up the focus of the sentence there - I'll rephrase:
How many of us are a presidential candidate's running mate, who's being shown to be conducting governmental business in a way that is unethical and, quite possibly, illegal ?
How many of us would like random email subpoenaed? How many of us use language that while acceptable in context could be misconstrued if widely disseminated? While I understand the desire to preserve memos (and emails) for the sake of historians, there is a certain Heisenberg quality, knowing that it is monitored/will be made public skews what makes it into emails. How many of us would speak in person a lot more if all of our phone conversations at the office were recorded or if our email were to be scrutinized by hundreds of people at a later date?
How many of us are the running mate of a presidential candidate who's being shown to be conducting governmental business in a way that is unethical and, quite possibly, illegal ?
Nah, it's more likely to be a trap placed there to entice intelligent life to its doom by warring aliens thousands of millenia ago - as shown in Alastair Reynolds' historical documentary 'Revelation Space'.
If you're running Opera, adding the string "*myminicity*" to the Blocked Content list works well - the browser will just refuse to load anything originating from there:o) Not sure how it works in Firefox, but I'm sure there's something similar...
Slashdot Mirror
Forgive me, but I fail to appreciate your rephrasing in light of the fact that I was commenting on the statements made by a non-Navy chemist, at a non-Navy University, with no relation to the Navy, in reference to a chemical process currently in development.
Thanks for your open-minded appreciation of what was actually being said though. Dude.
Okay, maybe 'sequestered' is the wrong word in this instance, my bad. But removing carbon from the sea and blasting it into the air where it'll compound existing problems, including reabsorption back into the sea, and using large amounts of energy to do so, still doesn't strike me as environmentally-friendly in particular...
This is 'green'? Have I missed something...?
"Sorry, the rights on that payment have expired. Would you like to supply more goods in exchange for another one?" :oD
An 'opt-out' lends an air of legitimacy to the spam, while allowing a spammer to confirm an active address, which can then be sold on to more spamming twats for a higher price than an unconfirmed one... a 'known good' address is still worth more on sale to another spammer (hey, your penis might be gigantic and therefore unworthy of v14gr4, but that's not to say you don't *NEED* an RC car kit, right?!)
True - a week of early shifts has narrowed my sense of context down to only the post I was replying to... :o(
Haven't used it in a while, but I'm sure DVDShrink can be set to compile a single .iso file and clear the intermediate output files at the end of the process.
"Spaced" was first broadcast in 1999 if I remember right, although I'm pretty sure the line wasn't meant to exclude even-numbered ones - just to note the more obvious pattern ;o)
"Sure as eggs is eggs, sure as night follows day, sure as every odd-numbered Star Trek movie is shit."
Perhaps you're thinking of The Truman Show?
K, I kinda screwed up the focus of the sentence there - I'll rephrase:
How many of us are a presidential candidate's running mate, who's being shown to be conducting governmental business in a way that is unethical and, quite possibly, illegal ?
How many of us would like random email subpoenaed? How many of us use language that while acceptable in context could be misconstrued if widely disseminated? While I understand the desire to preserve memos (and emails) for the sake of historians, there is a certain Heisenberg quality, knowing that it is monitored/will be made public skews what makes it into emails. How many of us would speak in person a lot more if all of our phone conversations at the office were recorded or if our email were to be scrutinized by hundreds of people at a later date?
How many of us are the running mate of a presidential candidate who's being shown to be conducting governmental business in a way that is unethical and, quite possibly, illegal ?
Nah, it's more likely to be a trap placed there to entice intelligent life to its doom by warring aliens thousands of millenia ago - as shown in Alastair Reynolds' historical documentary 'Revelation Space'.
Article-reading for the win. Still, the blurb was misleading. Disregard, cocks etc.
Er... Shouldn't that be the 'Norwegian Blue'? :o\
Fix'd
A website from almost exactly three years ago says the same thing here, too...
I have mod points, but as a UK citizen I genuinely can't decide if this is 'funny' or 'insightful' :o(
If you're running Opera, adding the string "*myminicity*" to the Blocked Content list works well - the browser will just refuse to load anything originating from there :o) Not sure how it works in Firefox, but I'm sure there's something similar...
And they say satire's dead.
And which of those predecessors would be best-placed to finish the current war? Clinton? Bush Sr? ...Reagan perhaps?
Yeah but according to the cult of the FSM pirates are cool and the lack of them is causing global warming. That's "Intelligent Defrosting" to you. :oP
Thinking about it, the phrase 'This call may be recorded' could always be interpreted as permission for you to do so...
The British Broadcasting Corporation isn't generally considered subject to US court decisions...