the results were 4:1 because the one who tried the ad (you are referring to) did so by double-clicking on the banner, and later realized that even a single-click took him to the same location.. he was pissed at this misnomer
Sometime back, I stumbled upon this iphone+bluetooth+asterisk combo app (though works for any bt-phone) and was surprised by the power of asterisk.. From curiosity, How easy is it to set up an asterisk for personal purpose at home? Anyone implemented a setup and care to share some opinions?
this is for a piece/service that you PAID for! Seriously, the whole point of loving the customer (!) is to let the customer be free.. if their service is really that good (with least dropped calls, blah) then wouldnt I come back?
new users just aren't seeing Google's new offerings--such as increased storage options, additions to Google Maps, and tweaks to Google Image Search--right in front of their faces like they do with other sites.,br>
has anyone ever seen Google advertise its arsenal of products? except for this spoof commercial. Google's USP is that they have these details sneak in via various news items, and rest is left to the hype, and over zealous fans keep digging for minuscule details. Irony is that one of the largest ad agencies doesn't resort to (or believe in?) advertising (except for some adsense keywords)
what I am curious about is the computing resources required to process.. other than the algorithm, is this one of the reasons which is delaying the emergence of search in the field of images/music/video on a commercial level? riya made some strides, but is still "learning"
These companies will cave to whatever law enforcement agency has jurisdiction for the investigation quicker than the last Harry Potter book hit the torrents. The only possible exception would be those AV companies that are immediately outside of the grasp of the agency involved. I don't even think that those companies are safe because their own governments would likely bear pressure to comply.
true, but they could atleast try, like Google refused to turn-in the search queries. I know, not every company is a mammoth like Google and cant afford the wrath of Govt., but an initial refusal (and later caving in under pressure) might put them in a better light than complying right at the first request..
what is also interesting is that MS *must have* caved in sometime in the past (from their refusal to answer), and Vista's inbuilt spyware/malware detection makes it more likely to snoop on its users.. privacy concerns explode!
not sure that "paying" users (both corporate and average Joe sixpack) would be forced with these ads.. it seems (guess work) MS "might" come out with a free OS and bank on the ad-generated revenue to compete with Linux (and other OS) and reduce piracy in the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) nations. remember the ad-based OS launched in Brazil?
this might be the mother of all adware, but MS might get to say "who's your daddy?"
who cares, it was stolen from SCO
unless you are Nik, it might have been great to acknowledge the source of this post
Why is 10% "magic"? This number is significant because that's how many fingers we have?
Because it has reached double digit
and second, the stats are wrong
Answering to the heading/title, maybe the CNET link wasnt really worth
For Java, would reverse engineering the code to UML diagrams help? Any good open source tools one could recommend to understand a large code base?
Solution: Use any of the 64 percent of the pwds
the results were 4:1 because the one who tried the ad (you are referring to) did so by double-clicking on the banner, and later realized that even a single-click took him to the same location.. he was pissed at this misnomer
Sometime back, I stumbled upon this iphone+bluetooth+asterisk combo app (though works for any bt-phone) and was surprised by the power of asterisk.. From curiosity, How easy is it to set up an asterisk for personal purpose at home? Anyone implemented a setup and care to share some opinions?
that would kill the "in Soviet Russia.." meme
EU seems to show signs of hard of hearing or is Zonk having hard of seeing?
this is for a piece/service that you PAID for! Seriously, the whole point of loving the customer (!) is to let the customer be free.. if their service is really that good (with least dropped calls, blah) then wouldnt I come back?
http://org.slashdot/ or is it org.dotslash://http or org.dotslashcolon://http or.... ah, hippo it!
has anyone ever seen Google advertise its arsenal of products? except for this spoof commercial. Google's USP is that they have these details sneak in via various news items, and rest is left to the hype, and over zealous fans keep digging for minuscule details. Irony is that one of the largest ad agencies doesn't resort to (or believe in?) advertising (except for some adsense keywords)
it gets worse, the current version still uses at least two hard-coded passwords -- one is "diebold" and another is the eight-byte sequence 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 .
and God forbid if one mis-pronounces something, there would be a voice in a condescending tone with the "did you mean..?" question
For those who dont want to install and test, here is an OpenSuse based KDE Live CD
what I am curious about is the computing resources required to process.. other than the algorithm, is this one of the reasons which is delaying the emergence of search in the field of images/music/video on a commercial level? riya made some strides, but is still "learning"
According to his latest blog entry, he has been released after 8 hrs, and the reason for his temp detention was comments made on the website
PS: have the queues started yet? with waiting lines being "in", for xbox, iphone and HarryPotter books lately..
when God (Gates) specifically asked you NOT to eat the Apple (Inc), you should have listened :)
true, but they could atleast try, like Google refused to turn-in the search queries. I know, not every company is a mammoth like Google and cant afford the wrath of Govt., but an initial refusal (and later caving in under pressure) might put them in a better light than complying right at the first request..
what is also interesting is that MS *must have* caved in sometime in the past (from their refusal to answer), and Vista's inbuilt spyware/malware detection makes it more likely to snoop on its users.. privacy concerns explode!
and "A Department of Transportation spokeswoman said the agency couldn't find any indication of a security breach." awesome!
2) what if other companies join this bye-bye-piracy club?
this might be a ploy to prevent Google into entering the OS market (if it ever thought of this)
this might be the mother of all adware, but MS might get to say "who's your daddy?"