Ideally, the context of your page would make the function obvious. The ability to change it to fit any page style is the major benefit. Sure it's nice to see the standard checkbox, but if it completely messes up an otherwise "clean" or different looking interface why not change it?
Upon closer inspection of the article, it looks like Hardley Earley is not doing any suing. I think part of the confusion comes from the fact that Health Advocate and Healthcare Advocates seem to be 2 different companies, as explained (poorly) in the article.
I wouldn't trust my PowerBook to the cardboard backing on a desk.
Not to mention the fact that he seems to have attached the brackets over part of the cardboard that is perforated so it can be popped out to fit a monitor. I imagine after a bit of strain from typing, this will fall apart.
As described in the page you linked (http://www-video.eecs.berkeley.edu/~frueh/3d/), that is done by merging the street level data gathered from drive-thrus with aerial data gathered from fly-bys. You can see a picture on the same page where only street level data was used and what the result looks like.
They're not "a corporation". It's a collection of news sources. If one's biased, you can find many other articles on the same topic. THat's not to say that all bias is removed, there's just less of it, and certainly less opinion being touted as news.
As for the/. posters, I was addressing the top parent's comment that the posts on Slashdot weren't insightful. This is not an opinion I agree with, but it's what made me make that suggestion.
It's a suggestion, and nothing more. After all, I'm still on Slashdot.
My "zing" was referring to the same person you were addressing, who is presumably without a business plan, as otherwise it does not seem like such a problem would arise to begin with.
Sure, it sounds great. And there's even a working prototype and cost estimate for a 40" model. But how far off is that possibility? No mention in the article.
Slashdot Mirror
Ideally, the context of your page would make the function obvious. The ability to change it to fit any page style is the major benefit. Sure it's nice to see the standard checkbox, but if it completely messes up an otherwise "clean" or different looking interface why not change it?
Upon closer inspection of the article, it looks like Hardley Earley is not doing any suing. I think part of the confusion comes from the fact that Health Advocate and Healthcare Advocates seem to be 2 different companies, as explained (poorly) in the article.
I wouldn't trust my PowerBook to the cardboard backing on a desk.
Not to mention the fact that he seems to have attached the brackets over part of the cardboard that is perforated so it can be popped out to fit a monitor. I imagine after a bit of strain from typing, this will fall apart.
I don't know what's new, but you can forget putting on pants:
1 433079/qid=1121201474/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_ur_1/104-9 677738-3943110?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/020
Fool! My cubicle is covered in tinfoil!
I believe at E3 they announced that playing Revolution games online would be free.
Yeah, but "Leaked Screenshots Show Netflix Logon Screen" is hardly sensational news.
With all the new features, you'd think they could improve reception to something reasonable all the time.
mugging is up 500%, as many don't even see the attacker coming...
Not when you're dialing with Picture-In-Picture :)
As described in the page you linked (http://www-video.eecs.berkeley.edu/~frueh/3d/), that is done by merging the street level data gathered from drive-thrus with aerial data gathered from fly-bys. You can see a picture on the same page where only street level data was used and what the result looks like.
I ended up trying a FireWire attached storage enclosure and using an older 80GB drive I had in my closet from a dead PC.
:)
You must have a lot of skeletons in your closet
In Soviet Russia, road forks you! Peter: "Man, that gets old fast."
When Google takes over the world, we can get rid Step 1 (and maybe even 3).
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083658/
They're not "a corporation". It's a collection of news sources. If one's biased, you can find many other articles on the same topic. THat's not to say that all bias is removed, there's just less of it, and certainly less opinion being touted as news. As for the /. posters, I was addressing the top parent's comment that the posts on Slashdot weren't insightful. This is not an opinion I agree with, but it's what made me make that suggestion.
It's a suggestion, and nothing more. After all, I'm still on Slashdot.
Well, there is no mention of any proposed methods that failed, or alternatives that might have been considered, but that's just a wild guess.
My "zing" was referring to the same person you were addressing, who is presumably without a business plan, as otherwise it does not seem like such a problem would arise to begin with.
Sure, it sounds great. And there's even a working prototype and cost estimate for a 40" model. But how far off is that possibility? No mention in the article.
Zing!
Why not try this? http://news.google.com/?ned=us&topic=t
It actually covers many of the headlines seen recently on Slashdot, but without the dupes, and generally without the bias.
Welcome to Slashdot, you must be new here.
Lets just hope segment 10 wasn't eaten by fthe Martians!
Yeah, those fthe Martians. They're the worst kind...
By the way... Analysists? droped? Spellcheck!
:P
Oh, please....they clearly misspelled it Analyists
alias humor "lame joke"