Slashdot Mirror
Big Screen Viewing Effect For Mobile Phone Videos
Clarinase writes "Cellular phone subscribers can now view TV, movies, photos and broadband Internet content with a big screen viewing effect with Kopin CyberDisplay video eyewear from MicroOptical. This sleek eyewear allows users to privately view large-size video or pictures equivalent to a 12-inch screen as seen from three feet away, delivering crisp, full-color video with a 17-degree field of view. This eyewear is connected to a cell phone through a thin cable, and allows up to five hours of video with three AAA batteries. Since it accepts composite video input (NTSC or PAL), the eyewear can be plugged into other devices with composite video outputs such as portable DVD players."
No thanks. I'd rather have a cable that doesnt snap under any tension, especially when paying this much.
I've lost far too many earbuds and headphones due to weak cables.
Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
Greg
Start a happiness pandemic
Does anyone else think that 12inches is overkill to see the number youre dialing?
You'd rather have a huge coax going to your head? If you want I'm sure you can find some conduit or whatever to run it though if you're that scared.
autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
you are immediately qualified to be Chief Engineer of the USS Enterprise-D!
And I thought people using cell phones while driving was a menace before...
This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
In my state, South Carolina, having a video screen (tv, dvd, etc) is illegal to have in your car if you can see it from the driver seat. Would this make talking on cellphones illegal while driving? I know there are enough idiots around here driving while talking on TWO cell phones. Yes, there are a lot of lawfirms around here.
Big Screen Viewing Effect For Mobile Phone Videos
France Telecom's wireless unit, Orange SA, will soon roll out a new mobile video service that will let cellular phone subscribers view TV, movies, photos and broadband Internet content with a big screen viewing effect using Kopin®-enabled video eyewear from U.S.-based MicroOptical Corp. Kopin Corp. (Nasdaq: KOPN - News), the largest U.S. manufacturer of microdisplays for mobile consumer electronics and military applications, has received an order for CyberDisplay® 230K microdisplays from MicroOptical for this application.
Orange SA, one of the world's leading wireless companies with 52 million customers in 16 countries, will bundle a MicroOptical binocular video eyewear with Samsung's SGH-D600 cell phone as part of its new "Orange World" wireless multimedia service. The bundled package, unveiled in June 2005 at the European Research and Innovation Exhibition in Paris, is scheduled to be available to Orange subscribers in October 2005.
MicroOptical's video eyewear contains two of Kopin's full-color, QVGA-resolution (320 x 240) CyberDisplay 230K microdisplays. The sleek eyewear allows users to privately view large-size video or pictures equivalent to a 12-inch screen as seen from three feet away, yet simultaneously view their surroundings thanks to the small size of the frame and MicroOptical's patented optics which allow the user to see around the screen. Europe's AFP news wire service called the bundled technology "a sure fire hit," saying that the eyewear's "big screen effect" is stunning, especially when combined with built-in stereo earpieces.
"Kopin CyberDisplays are becoming the standard microdisplays of choice for mobile video applications thanks to their ability to provide the highest video quality in the smallest footprint and with very low power consumption," said Dr. Mark Spitzer, MicroOptical's founder and CEO. "We are very happy with our partnership with Kopin and really excited about being a part of Orange's multimedia wireless service. We are ramping up the production to meet the initial customer demand."
"The mobile video revolution is unfolding in the cellular phone market as we speak," said Dr. John C.C. Fan, Kopin's president and CEO. "Consumers want to be able to watch movies, music videos and TV, browse the Web and check their e-mail on their cell phones on the go. But the phone's small screen has inhibited widespread consumer adoption. MicroOptical's innovative video eyewear is enabling the big screen capabilities that consumers demand, and yet is very lightweight and similar to eyeglasses."
The Kopin CyberDisplay 230K's tiny size (0.24-inch diagonal) enabled MicroOptical to design a featherweight (2.5 oz.), comfortable and stylish video eyewear solution for Orange SA. MicroOptical's binocular video eyewear delivers crisp, full-color video with a 17-degree field of view. The eyewear is connected to a cell phone through a thin cable, and allows up to five hours of video with three AAA batteries. Since it accepts composite video input (NTSC or PAL), the eyewear can be plugged into other devices with composite video outputs such as portable DVD players.
Built with nanotechnology, the CyberDisplay 230K with approximately 230,000 pixel dots in 0.24 diagonal is the highest resolution transmissive display of its size. In addition to displaying standard text and graphics, the display operates at traditional video speeds and consumes only five milliwatts of power. Kopin's power-efficient CyberDisplay 230K is ideal for a range of portable consumer and industrial applications such as video eyewear and viewfinders for digital cameras and camcorders.
Remember when your Mom told you not to sit too close the the TV or you'd wreck your vision. Well it's time to start listening to your Mom's advice.
I won't be surprised when devices like this start wearing out people's eyes.
And can you imagine the first car wreck from someone using their cell phone in this new manner? And you thought cell phones caused accidents now!
Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
Head tracking.
It would be great to have something this small and lightweight if I could use it with games and 3D environments. My current head mounted display with motion tracker weighs several pounds.
A wireless version would be nice as well as one that well.. didn't make you stand out as much in a crowd.. last thing one needs in a big city is to draw more atttention to the fact that you're wearing a pretty expensive toys...
Now I have to worry about people having a cellphone stuck to their EYE when driving?
I can just see the legislators wetting themselves now.
pictures equivalent to a 12-inch screen as seen from three feet away,
It's much better than a standard cellphone screen, but it's not what I'd call "big screen". What's more, 320x240 on a 12-inch equivalent screen promises to be grainy...
They should market those things to the Star Trek crowd. Lots of geeks will pay top $ to have a 'functional' visor so they too can look like Geordy. ... All kidding aside, I would rather have a single eye-piece then this wrap-around your head design.
"The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
Five minutes and it's slashdotted already?
Yes, because I like looking like a prick. Seriously, make them look like normal glasses or no-one will buy it. Not that I trust wearable screens anyway, it just seems a tad too potentially eye-damaging so I think I will wait for a few years of people burning in the technology..
This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
Fatal error: Call to undefined function: get_bloginfo() in /home/views101/public_html/digitalcamera/wp-includ es/wp-db.php on line 304
Does it mean we can now watch Internet porn while riding public buses and trains? Woohoo!
this device will fail for the same reason any number of similar devices have failed: everyone has a different set of eyes with different focusing characteristics.
Unless diopter, eye relief, astigmatism, distance to pupil are completely adjustable (making the device unacceptably expensive) this product will literally result in a big headache as your own focussing mechanism attempt to force themselves to adjust.
Five hours with your eyes focused at two inches away? No thanks.
This space available.
Since when is a twelve inch screen from three feet considered big?
Sometimes, size does matter. This sounds like a disappointment in the making.
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Great, now people will be watching movies on their cell phones while driving to work!
Crunch!
if only it was green and made of light.... of course then you'd have to deal with the fact that it could kill you if you werent careful. oh well
Only if they're wearing the glasses... at which they've got worse visibility problems than getting distracted by a movie out of the corner of their eye.
This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
I really would like to see a study on how this will effect long term vision. I haven't been able to find anything (although, I haven't really tried) on the effects of CRTS vs LCDs in computer use and now the multitude of TV formats. With rapidly changing lights being emitted directly in front of your eyes, this must deal out some serious wear and tear. Any thoughts?
~ marko Savic
I think this may result in the extinction of the human race. This looks so geeky that wearer will never get a date; male or female.
Image mirror: http://img349.imageshack.us/img349/3162/microoptic al2gj.jpg
France Telecom's wireless unit, Orange SA, will soon roll out a new mobile video service that will let cellular phone subscribers view TV, movies, photos and broadband Internet content with a big screen viewing effect using Kopin®-enabled video eyewear from U.S.-based MicroOptical Corp. Kopin Corp. (Nasdaq: KOPN - News), the largest U.S. manufacturer of microdisplays for mobile consumer electronics and military applications, has received an order for CyberDisplay® 230K microdisplays from MicroOptical for this application.
Orange SA, one of the world's leading wireless companies with 52 million customers in 16 countries, will bundle a MicroOptical binocular video eyewear with Samsung's SGH-D600 cell phone as part of its new "Orange World" wireless multimedia service. The bundled package, unveiled in June 2005 at the European Research and Innovation Exhibition in Paris, is scheduled to be available to Orange subscribers in October 2005.
MicroOptical's video eyewear contains two of Kopin's full-color, QVGA-resolution (320 x 240) CyberDisplay 230K microdisplays. The sleek eyewear allows users to privately view large-size video or pictures equivalent to a 12-inch screen as seen from three feet away, yet simultaneously view their surroundings thanks to the small size of the frame and MicroOptical's patented optics which allow the user to see around the screen. Europe's AFP news wire service called the bundled technology "a sure fire hit," saying that the eyewear's "big screen effect" is stunning, especially when combined with built-in stereo earpieces.
"Kopin CyberDisplays are becoming the standard microdisplays of choice for mobile video applications thanks to their ability to provide the highest video quality in the smallest footprint and with very low power consumption," said Dr. Mark Spitzer, MicroOptical's founder and CEO. "We are very happy with our partnership with Kopin and really excited about being a part of Orange's multimedia wireless service. We are ramping up the production to meet the initial customer demand."
"The mobile video revolution is unfolding in the cellular phone market as we speak," said Dr. John C.C. Fan, Kopin's president and CEO. "Consumers want to be able to watch movies, music videos and TV, browse the Web and check their e-mail on their cell phones on the go. But the phone's small screen has inhibited widespread consumer adoption. MicroOptical's innovative video eyewear is enabling the big screen capabilities that consumers demand, and yet is very lightweight and similar to eyeglasses."
The Kopin CyberDisplay 230K's tiny size (0.24-inch diagonal) enabled MicroOptical to design a featherweight (2.5 oz.), comfortable and stylish video eyewear solution for Orange SA. MicroOptical's binocular video eyewear delivers crisp, full-color video with a 17-degree field of view. The eyewear is connected to a cell phone through a thin cable, and allows up to five hours of video with three AAA batteries. Since it accepts composite video input (NTSC or PAL), the eyewear can be plugged into other devices with composite video outputs such as portable DVD players.
Built with nanotechnology, the CyberDisplay 230K with approximately 230,000 pixel dots in 0.24 diagonal is the highest resolution transmissive display of its size. In addition to displaying standard text and graphics, the display operates at traditional video speeds and consumes only five milliwatts of power. Kopin's power-efficient CyberDisplay 230K is ideal for a range of portable consumer and industrial applications such as video eyewear and viewfinders for digital cameras and camcorders.
"The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
College was already a headache having to listen to people using their brand new cellphones with the latest song from Evanessence(I know I probably hacked the name) as a ringtone alarm clock cranked up to max volume. I hear people still using downloaded songs turned all the way up on their phones that sound like shit with the current quality.
I have very little hope that video is going to be anything other than the visual equivalent thereof. But at least with this, people can keep it to themselves until they bump into me on the bus.
Perfecting Discordia
www.stevenvansickle.com
Is there any reason why this stuff can't go in something that doesn't make me look like some kind of wacko? If they could put this stuff in a normal-looking set of shades, I could watch Spongebob during my graduate classes!
I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
The other thing it's missing is resolution. At 320x240, that's not really enough to see the visual details you'd want if you're going to play the game well.
Presumably that's part of the reason it is so much smaller and lighter than your present unit (in addition to the lack of motion tracking.)
They could have saved a lot of development work if they had just used a Fresnel lens out of a Crackerjack box instead...
"We're opting for a total TV experience in a portable unit that weighs only thirty pounds." Theodore W. Stench-Higgins, president and founder of Crapola Technologies 2005 says. "This won't be like the Internet-connected brassiere that I released just before the Dot-Com bubble. I sure don't want to spend three years in prison for stock fraud again!"
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
Hm... I wonder why they don't use a form factor more like the EyeTap. It's far less bulky and you still have one of your eyes available.
Doesn't any one think that 320*240 is way to coarse to watch videos on? And 12 inches at 3 feet? My screen here is 17 inches at about 2 ft. It doesn't seem "Large" to me.
Trouble, a mistake or fun, your choice
Here's the PDF press release that shows a different view of the headset and some pictures of the Samsung phone. It's in French but pretty easy to understand IMO.
As this is a PAL/NTSC input device, it'll probably work fine with other phones with video output like the Sharp 902 for viewing videos off its SD card or playing games.
They look just like Geordi Laforge's glasses from Star Trek!
I will wear them when I am driving my Segway.
Look out chicks, here I come.
Is this company working on a solution that will have the cell phone to project the movies on the inside of my windshield in my car? It would make a pretty good widescreen display to add cinema to the driving experience.
Where were you when the voynix came?
I dunno. I know a fair amount of girls who'd state that it was. Heck a handful of them only had room for about 5...
A 12" screen at 3 feet is equal in apparent size to a 2" screen from 6". Personally, my 2" screen cell phone does not look terribly impressive from 6".
Of course, resolution matters, but if they can fit a higher resolution in this tiny display, why not put it on a cell phone?
mugging is up 500%, as many don't even see the attacker coming...
No one would notice that you have the dorkiest looking eyewear ever constructed if it wasn't for that blasted cable.
These things better be peril-sensitive to block out all the ass kickings you'd get wearing them in public.
But when the first guy who can figure out how to do porn spam for this comes along, I do not want to be anywhere near the roads. On the other hand when this happens I probably won't be leaving my apartment anyway.
Cameras, streaming music, web browsing, PalmOS, txt chat, games ... and now, television. But I wonder how good it is at being an actual phone? You know, the kind we use to make calls.
I was on campus for a meeting today, and had to make a call on my all-digital phone/camera/appliance. The quality was pretty bad (it would go silent for brief periods, so I missed part of the conversation.) This while I was outside, with 5 bars of signal!
When I look at all the cool stuff you can do with a mobile phone these days, I'm unimpressed. I just want something that lets me make a clear, uninterrupted phone call.
But when the first guy who can figure out how to do porn spam for this comes along, I do not want to be anywhere near the roads. On the other hand when this happens I probably won't be leaving my apartment anyway.
Made me laugh!
-kgj
-kgj
With all the new features, you'd think they could improve reception to something reasonable all the time.
Having larger than life moving pictures in front of me makes me really motion sick.
I'm guessing that these things will have similar effects.
Has anyone thought of what electric fields do to your body?
I mean, there are scientific studies out there that already say using a cellphone will give you cancer. So if we pair our cellphone with the tv set that you wear on your face along with our ipod and laptop over our shoulder plus interference from metal detectors and WAPs...How much can the body take before it melts back into primordial goo?
Besides, didn't these inventors ever have mothers yelling that they were sitting to close to the television and that they would go blind but still have to go to school and explain to their teacher that they didn't complete their spelling words because He-Man was on?
And how many car accidents do we think this will cause? Anyone care to wager if it will outdo AIDS or Drunk-Driving related deaths?
Monday, July 13, 2015
Ocular Biometrics and Mobile Hemogony proudly announce Private Video Viewing, an enhancement to Ocular Biometrics's patented computer-vision-lens implant techology. Private Video Viewing allows broadcast of highly-encrypted ultra-def television directly to the eye.
Friday, July 11, 2025
Bioneural Telecom proudly FDA approval of Very Private Video Viewing, a broadcast television service directly to the brain using a very small implant. Implantation takes about 15 minutes, with starting prices of $5000 per implant. Prices should fall over the next few years.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
Butterfly in the sky
I can go twice as high
Take a look
It's in a book
A Reading Rainbow
I can go anywhere
Friends to know
And ways to grow
A Reading Rainbow
I can be anything
Take a look
It's in a book
A Reading Rainbow
A Reading Rainbow
"When the solution is simple, God is answering." -- Albert Einstein
I recently finished William Gibson's Bridge Series and have been thinking, "Why can't I have a head mounted display like those eyephones for my laptop instead of a screen?"
The answer is of course, money, resolution and power. I did, however, find one HMD that looks like it has some potential. http://www.emagin.com/3dvisor/html/LearnMore.htm 800x600 resolution,relatively low power consumption (powered by the USB port), and relatively cheap (900 bucks, out of my range, but it's better than a lot of HMDs out there).
In some ways HMD's make more sense than standard LCD screens. OLED displays for both eyes would (I think) take less power than a full 12-17 inch LCD screen, plus give you better immersion with whatever you're doing (VR desktops anyone?). If they can get the resolution on these up to 1024x768, 24 bit color, and about 500 bucks, I won't be suprised if I start seeing them around in lieu of LCDs.
"a big screen viewing effect"
/. embedding ads in the context now?
"sleek eyewear"
"large-size video"
"delivering crisp, full-color video"
"thin cable"
"up to five hours of video with three AAA batteries."
Clarinase has a knack for marketing speak. This was an AD, not a story. Is
Holy s-, it's Jesus!
Built with nanotechnology
Is this the birth of yet another buzzword?
Adventure, Romance, MAD SCIENCE!
Although I only fly 1 or 2 times per year, much to my annoyance the latest trend, at least on the Southwest Airlines run between Oakland and Houston last weekend, is to have multiple cheapo DVD players, the kind that look like little laptops, and play them at FULL BLAST through the F***ING SPEAKERS. There were at least two of these things going within earshot on each leg of the trip.
Please make these glasses cheap and easily affordable as soon as possible for these retards.
On the other hand, brand new 737s with 33 inch seat pitch. Yee haw!
Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
slashdot is officially the biggest tech PR firm there is. Who screens these submissions?
borg?
Other devices have failed because they're bulky, expensive, and crappy. This pair doesn't look bulky, although there is little comment on price and the resolution isn't great, so we'll see.
Yes, despite an operating budget of millions and multiple engineers on the job, I'm sure they've overlooked what a random anonymous slashdotter came up with 9 minutes after the post.
Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
If you could devise a way to send a slightly different image to each screen I bet you could get some wicked cool 3D images..
I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.
Unless that thing folds up to a pocketsize (like those Sony over the head headphones), why would anybody carry this around? What's the point of watching video on your cellphone using a goggle piece when the goggle is almost as big as a portable PMP that you can carry around?
Let's see how funny you think this is when you turn 40.
Seems like forever away, doesn't it? That's just what it wants you to think and the suddenly; Wham! You are the old codger that you always ridiculed.
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/1 0/1543214&tid=126&tid=14
You will then be grateful for the technology, if only to block your field of view...
Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
Is it just me or does any one worry about the long term effects on your eyes? I mean no knows the effects and I cannot imagine that it's good for the eyes.
Thalasar
- First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
I remember when this was supposed to be the next big thing for portable video games. Probably around the same time that the whole 'virtual reality' thing was big.
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -Hunter S. Thompson
These could have some real military applications. Imagine if this kind of stuff were aboard the helo that was shot down in Afghanistan last week. Those guys could have had 3-D, 360-degree situational awareness.
It's a freakin' shame that with all the lives being risked to rescue expensively-trained operatives that there doesn't appear to have been any satellite tasking to link the helo and the extraction team to the terrain imagery.
Yes, I know the "birds" have limited fuel and such, but with the US presence in the ME so intense, what's the added expense of a dedicated bird?
Gee whiz, this technology has, on the whole, been around for over a decade. The Virtual iGlasses did this way back when with the same resolution (in stereo!) and optional head-tracking. I'll grant that these are about 1/4th the weight and size, and run on less power - but I seriously expected we'd have near 10x the pixels displayed from a 1cc unit clipped to my glasses frame by now, and that for about $100.
Optics just hasn't kept up with computing. Some breakthrough is needed to give a 1" display a 3' eye relief just 1/2" from the eye - and do it in 0.5oz.
Head-mounted displays are just stuck on something. Lots 'o bucks to whoever figures out and solves it.
Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
I've seen at least 6 or 7 different video glasses advertised since the late 90's (there's one currently in SkyMall too), but the real question for me is, are any of them halfway decent?
My primary application would be using my laptop on an airplane or at a Starbucks without having everyone around me seeing whats on my screen.
I think GOOD video glasses should:
- give me at least 800x600 res in 16bit color
- VGA, SVIDEO, and composite inputs
- simulate a screen size of at least 30"
- have option for opaque or translucent background
- not look completely ridiculous
- price point under $600
I've seen glasses that do some of the above, but I've never seen a pair that matches all of my criteria.
Has anyone had experience with devices like this? Any recommendations?
Is it morally wrong to trip some asshole wandering around with one of these things stuck to their face?
mmmmm....no.
Boo! Hiss!
This crap isn't any better than what I could buy ten years ago. Quarter VGA? Blow me Kopin.
Remember the VR craze around 1995? I worked with Kopin and other HMD products ten years ago that were the same experience and they sucked back then too.
Where's the 1920x1080 headmounted displays that also wrap the video around to create that truely immersive viewing experience.
Why do these display companies actually think consumers are giong to buy this stuff if they keep rehashing it without making real imporvements?
Two thumbs down!
You too can look like Jordy LaForge with Kopin CyberDisplay video eyewear!
And you will instantly qualify for lifetime dork status.
sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
now I can watch pron in private on the subway.
I'm looking at the pictures and I don't see how you'd wear these with glasses. Approximately 1/3 of Americans wear glasses, so I'd think this would be a consideration.
So they're not entirely goggles, but it's still cumbersome. Not to mention you have to take off any prescription spectacles to use it. A fool and his money..
Basically, cell phones are morphing into wearable computers. When the resolution on the head-display increases, and the speed of the cpu increases, we'll see everything through a mediated heads-up display.
Now that's one inventor that was too influenced by lt. laforge in star trek: the next generation.
What next? cybernetic eyes that can play video inside your retina? what if it skips?
Which brings me to the point: What is it with low-res devices? 320x200 is bearly enough to run a simple contact manager, let alone do any useful work. If your eyes are too bad to see a 2.5" screen at 320x200, get glasses! Or, just enlarge the font. It looks more crisp and easy to read anyway.
And stop buying low-res devices, or that's all companies will produce!
How many 640x480 PDAs are there these days? 3? 4?
A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
Slap one of these into a Sony OQO, running linux. Get rid of the star trek look to them (I am sure they can be engineered to look like shades) and allow you to view past the display area, you could have an instant on viewer/HUD.
That would rox0r! lets hope they give these away for free if you buy into some ludicrous DRM'd tie in packages, and someone hacks them to give us great on the fly experiences.
I would use one of these instead of a monitor or LCD... just sit in a large leather sofa, with two handheld 'keysticks' (or joyboards) which allow full 104 key input with just your digits on both hands (like playing a sax, or clarinet... or some weird hybrid geek keyboard).
Not wearable computing, no, that is a ghey word, but ERGONOMIC computing. Don't sit at your desk, bring your desk to you. I think hands free was the first baby step in this whole thing.
#hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
Anyway, it gives the effect of a 12" screen, it will look old sk00l, I'd like to play DoTT on this.
No worries about people driving with these on - they can just have google minimap, combined with yahoo traffic, in a small window alerting them if they need to break or change lane. Should be safe... erp.
fuck-tard.
#hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
As if we didn't already have enough problems with people driving and talking on their cellphones, let's find more ways to distract people driving 2 tons of steel rolling at 55+ mph.
How much?
...allows users to privately view large-size video or pictures equivalent to a 12-inch screen as seen from three feet away...
So?
My current phone does this, I simply hold the screen 3" from my eye. Works perfectly, but it does look a little funny.
-Styopa
The Orange SA/Kopin displays look stylish, have to see them in person to give em a real Human Factors review. The wearability of Head Mounted Displays (HMDs) has been one of their major downfalls in the past. These seem pretty light weight, etc. May not need *much* behind the ears to hold em in place.
The QVGA resolution is a drawback - sure this is near what the PSP does, but that is hardly a 12" screen. True viewable quality remains to be seen (siggraph?)
What really tweaked me on this is calling it 'nanotechnology'. High density AMLCD is a neat tech, but is this really working at the nanometer scale?
For a year of two after that I wondered why those glasses still hadn't shown up for sale anywhere, until I found out that a significantly large percentage of users developed splitting headaches after a while of using them, so much so that Sony pulled them from the market. I don't know if these will fare any better.
(Maybe I'll check ebay to see if any of those old Sony classes have shown up there; I'm willing to take the risk.)
We apologize for the inconvenience.
By a funny coincidence, I received my Icuity M920-Video monocular today, it's supposed to be giving you a 17" screen size 11 feet away.
I like it a lot, but the whole 'equivalent to N inches X feet away' is a bit misleading... Sure, if you compare sizes directly to a physical device, you'll get that size, but when you use it, it actually looks like what it is, a tiny screen looked at up close (although of course you're not focusing just a few inches away, that'd be quite unusable).
If you have a use for this kind of devices, then by all means, get one, you will not be disapointed, but if you're hoping to replace your laptop screen with it, think again, I'd watch a movie on my laptop over one with the eyewear anytime.
This being said, monocular and binoculars are quite different things, and it's probably easier to watch a movie on a binocular simply because your entire field of vision is taken by the image, rather than shared between it and the real world (which is what I needed), so perhaps this thing works great. On the other hand, if I'm going to sit down anyway, I'll use my laptop, that'll give me great picture quality and I wont be oblivious to what's happening around me. The concept of using a device that forces you to remain stationary and blocks your entire field of vision, along with a cell phone seems a bit silly to me.
lone.
Wow ... go from one to 12 inches at a distance of three feet?
The Luddites were ahead of their time.
Yes, if only the military had heard of this technology sooner. They would never think of something as complex as helmet mounted displays on their own.
r y.php f m?ARTICLE_ID=231330&p=32
http://www.ascension-tech.com/applications/milita
http://mae.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.c
And really, building this display unit and launching the "bird" is the only hard part. Integrating 3D satellite imagery with the flight control and display system in combat situations and high RF jamming environments is childs play, so these low-res consumer grade glasses are the missing piece that the military has been waiting for!
Let's send a few of these glasses over to the boys in Afghanistan to prevent any further crashes!
When you're out of room, you're out of room.
*thump*
Girl: "Ouch! My cervix!"
You can buy doughnuts that slip around the shaft to shorten the available length for this reason.
Nice article, but it would have been nice if they had included the projected cost. I'm willing to be this will be, yet another, in the long line of failures from the technology industry where wearble displays are concerned. Personally, I won't be interested until it has the following features:
1. 1900x1400 resolution
2. 32-bit colour
3. Five day battery life (in sleep mode) with a charging cradle
4. Bluetooth connectivity to anything (look ma, no wires!)
5. 5.1 surround sound
6. Contact lens form factor (with audio interface through eyes via vibration)
7. Augmented Reality overlay features
8. $299.95 at NewEgg.com
Until then, I'm happy with a laptop. (Oh yeah... I HATE cell phones. Why have all those useless features in a phone when they still can't f*cking hold a phone conversation with decent audio quality!!)
-"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
An open and widely adopted standard for interfacing cell phones to cars for information interchange specifying methods, fields, quantities, etc. You drop your phone in a cradle made for it that interfaces to your nav computer and the windscreen HUD shows only what is necessary, nothing to distract.
Better yet would be advanced speaker-independent voice recognition. So far, my phone is inaccurate more then 75% of the time.
If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
Calling the blue element a pixel is fraudulent, pure and simple.
Look, I don't know where the article submitter, or for that matter, the editors have been living, but in my world, even a 32" screen from six feet away is hardly "large".
But then again, at the stated resolution (320 x 240), I'm not really sure I want to see this on any size of display!!
------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
Jeez, that's hardly impressive size wise.
Take your 15" laptop and set it 3 feet away from you. Does that look impressive to you? Hardly... and that's with a display that's 3" larger than what this thing claims to do.
P.
"That's exactly what I said, only different."
Yes, the resolution sucks when compared to $2k-4k USD headset versions, but what will the cost of the phone and headset be?
;-). Transflash based (up to 512mb) so $40 USD/256MB card is not too bad (are 512mb Transflash even available?). So the phone will not be entry-level, but again what is the cost?
The SGH-D600 phone is basically a 80MB mp3/video player with a 2MP camera and a cell phone in there somewhere also
If we are talking less then $500, then I'll be trying to import one to the US (unlocked of course, it's tri-band so T-Mobile, etc......), $500 to a grand, I'll wait for them to show up on ebay, over a grand and I just don't see the EU market buying the package or me...
Orange had released press info on this like two weeks ago, and one of the EU-based write-ups stated they are looking at selling a million of these things (over what time frame?) but I still really would like to see the euro sticker price is going to be...
So I guess 'nanotechnology' is now a marketing buzzword?
Personally, I prefer a Fresnel lens on an adjustable frame attached to my phone. At least you only have to turn your head when driving. Wearing "Geordi" goggles on the trek to work looks dangerous to me.
I had a pair of Sennheisers that I tried this with, with disastrous results.
... the really thin cord once left me with a bright purplish-red birthmark-looking thing all the way around my neck. It looked like someone tried and failed to decapitate me, which I guess is true enough.
... the other thing that happens often with a really light, thin wire is that it snaps. You sit down on a bench, it's dropping down a bit, someone walks by, it snags on their coat and *chik* NO AUDIO AAAAAAAAGH M###ER F###ER[1]!!!
Firstly
Secondly
I think that a REAL innovation -- and maybe this exists, but if so it's not widespread -- would be elastic audio cables. Stretchy cables. Why aren't these common? Assuming sufficient stretchability, I have to believe that such cables would all but eliminate both of the problems listed above.
_______
[1] MOTHER FATHER, guttermind.
I remember when we bought these things 20 years go, and called them 'vrglasses'.
Sure, a bit more advanced. But it goes to show you, the more we think we change, the more we repeat history.
---- Booth was a patriot ----
"...the equivalent of a 105-inch movie screen viewed at 12 feet." http://www.emagin.com/3dvisor/
This + Real Life Tron! I can see it all now... '...Hundreds of geeks on bicycles have been hit by cars playing real life tron...'
but ironically, those glasses will never be touched by anybody that good-looking.
Anyone remember those - they were pretty neat for their time (~ 5 years ago, IIRC). Either 640x480 or 800x600. Pretty pricey, but one would have hoped that with the rest of advances in tech, packaging would have become more sleek, features improved, and prices would have come down ...
...
I made the comment a while back that these things would probably be a boon for laptop battery life
Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
The majority of potential users are slashdotters, most likely wearing glasses to begin with. How will they address the problem without demanding everyone to switch to contacts?
QVGA 24FPS 16bpp is 29Mbps - MPEG might put that to under 3Mbps. Can the new Bluetooth handle that bandwidth? Maybe if they used a VNC "delta" type protocol...
--
make install -not war
I'm sitting with a 12" laptop 3 feet away from me and I'm fine...
When having sex with your partner, why just imagine the partner you'd rather be having sex with? Though considering the usual slashdot crowd, it makes a great PPDD (portable porn display device).
"Where's my other sock?" - A. Einstein