And I thought they successfully bribed the government. Heh, apparently there are still honest people in there! Now just let's hope Mandriva doesn't screw it and their machines actually work:) There goes 400k for bad publicity for M$.
Lets see:
incidental infringement - oh well, it was an incident, you can remedy it by either revoking your stuff containing GPL, or just adhere to GPL. You won't pay 750$ per copies.
personal use - you are already allowed to do it
indexing - you can already do this
Besides some detection methods rely on the time a planet goes around its sun, so the further the planet from its sun, the longer the detection takes. Planets like Earth need 3 years of continuous watching, even if their size matches Jupiter. So, the sentence would be: every year we detect planets farther and father from their sun, and we just reached the necessary time of finding planets in the habitable zone.
Even if you avoid firefox and dells, google.com is still there. Try it with IE! They somehow bypass the IE security, but eventually Microsoft will solve this problem.
I agree that correlation does not equal causation. But at least this study shows that people who download, will still buy CDs. And people who don't buy CDs are less likely to use p2p too. So, simply people who like music will get it, be it CD or P2P.
"This technique will be very useful to disinfect all the viruses, known or unknown," Tsen said. "This will make blood transfusion very safe."
Do you see the BS? They say here: UNKNOWN. Lets suppose, you can calibrate the laser against a known virus without harming human cells/tissue/whatever. How do you calibrate this magic laser to several unknown viruses at the same time?
There are people who boost their ego by counting the pages they managed to wipe. Considering that these people are permanent visitors to wikipedia, while those who could defend a page are not necessarily, this is a slightly uphill battle.
On the other hand, who said wikipedia must have an exhaustive list+synopsys of all webcomics, films, etc.
Maybe the problem is that it isn't clear what wikipedia must have.
Slashdot Mirror
If you don't know then simply move along, nothing to see here.
I hope you never killed a mosquito with it :)
Copyright doesn't require proof of damages, but damages could be calculated from the sold copies of the book.
Google's distributed search stuff is well documented for years, why would they wait up until now?
Nah, a patent troll is a patent troll is a patent troll. But it fills us with glee if M$ has to pay some cash :)
Apparently this is one of those problems.
I just wonder why do you tell your 'super method' to the masses. Won't it break your scheme?
What? MS Developers write 1000 lines a year? What lazy bastards! I'm pretty sure i do that in a lazy month.
Poor Da Vinci. With modern technology, he could have hidden a whole symphony in a picture, not just a dozen simple tunes.
And I thought they successfully bribed the government. :)
Heh, apparently there are still honest people in there!
Now just let's hope Mandriva doesn't screw it and their machines actually work
There goes 400k for bad publicity for M$.
So i just imagined that you don't like the proposal because it 'weakens' copyright?
And therefore it will somehow weaken the GPL?
Lets see:
incidental infringement - oh well, it was an incident, you can remedy it by either revoking your stuff containing GPL, or just adhere to GPL. You won't pay 750$ per copies.
personal use - you are already allowed to do it
indexing - you can already do this
How this proposal will weaken GPL?
Besides some detection methods rely on the time a planet goes around its sun, so the further the planet from its sun, the longer the detection takes. Planets like Earth need 3 years of continuous watching, even if their size matches Jupiter.
So, the sentence would be: every year we detect planets farther and father from their sun, and we just reached the necessary time of finding planets in the habitable zone.
I don't want Facebook either, so it is even.
Why would you answer and confirm your email address to someone who is about the same as a spammer?
Even if you avoid firefox and dells, google.com is still there.
Try it with IE!
They somehow bypass the IE security, but eventually Microsoft will solve this problem.
What's worse, google comes preinstalled!!!
I agree that correlation does not equal causation.
But at least this study shows that people who download, will still buy CDs.
And people who don't buy CDs are less likely to use p2p too.
So, simply people who like music will get it, be it CD or P2P.
Try it!
Normally i'm fond of SI, but i don't think it is the 'SI folks' that want kB as 1000.
It is HD manufacturers. And only because it favours them.
Add 'buy' and 'download' to the search terms.
"This technique will be very useful to disinfect all the viruses, known or unknown," Tsen said. "This will make blood transfusion very safe."
Do you see the BS? They say here: UNKNOWN. Lets suppose, you can calibrate the laser against a known virus without harming human cells/tissue/whatever. How do you calibrate this magic laser to several unknown viruses at the same time?
Haven't you heard about authorized crimes?
There are people who boost their ego by counting the pages they managed to wipe.
Considering that these people are permanent visitors to wikipedia, while those who could defend a page are not necessarily, this is a slightly uphill battle.
On the other hand, who said wikipedia must have an exhaustive list+synopsys of all webcomics, films, etc.
Maybe the problem is that it isn't clear what wikipedia must have.
Cool, action point based combat :)
This really sounds promising as i hate real time combat.