yeah, good idea. So that when you have no network, you won't be able to do a single calculation. not to mention you restrict it to the people who have flat or big data rates (not that many).
oh,yeah! Asia 97, the good old times. Remember when back then, the US of A said that the asiatic governments should not bail out those banks? Because it would be interventionist and would hinder the free market?
And now it blows in its own face and remembers nothing of the good advice from 9 years ago.:) Go USA, GO!
Why does Thunderbid not implement encryption from the start I will never understand. A license problem it ain't. They are perpetuating a status quo that is unacceptable.
you can do more. private property is not just the yard, it is the whole complex too. go in their offices and make the pics. it is private property aswell.
google and for that matter any other company/individual can not invade a private property. if this lawsuit fails, i could just walk into googleplex and make pretty pictures.
The point being, same pay for the same job is not conclusive evidence of no gender discrimination.
i was like WTF!? for a second, than i realised you could be right. it is no evidence of gender discrimination but it is evidence against the gender wage gap (myth).
but according to the gp, that someone is losing nothing since there is no physical property involved in this case. i know it is absurd but i was trying to make a point:)
Dubai, 2007. Set point for youzhny against nadal. Youzhny hits the ball wide (the mark was visible), but Hawkeye rules it in. The point is Hawkeye may be better where no marks, or evidence is left. But on courts like clay or certain kinds of hardcourts, humans will outperform hawkeye every time.
And what does the umpire do when the mark is wide but hawkeye rules it in?....they rely on hawkeye, a simulation rather than a ballmark, which is a reality.
For the more methodological oriented among us, carbon dating needs to be calibrated because of the inconsistent levels of atmospheric c14 throughout the ages. And it is calibrated using among others dendrochronology. See where I am going? Dendrochronology has its major faults and one error in one measure will lead to measurement errors in the other.
This is one major argument for the missing 300 years in history. For the conspiracy theory lovers here: Phantom Time.
So don't take everything at face value. Someone could bring the deciding evidence for something you never believed in.
And scientists and people in general are a bunch of weirdos. When someone contradicts "scientific consensus", they are just about ready to lynch that person. Including the Congress of USA. See the Rind et al. controversy.
This is why I am very very weary when it comes to "scientific consensus."
Slashdot Mirror
yeah, good idea. So that when you have no network, you won't be able to do a single calculation. not to mention you restrict it to the people who have flat or big data rates (not that many).
oh ,yeah! Asia 97, the good old times. Remember when back then, the US of A said that the asiatic governments should not bail out those banks? Because it would be interventionist and would hinder the free market?
:) Go USA, GO!
And now it blows in its own face and remembers nothing of the good advice from 9 years ago.
You are reading too much Popper :). If the above were true, it would still be unfalsifiable and true at the same time.
I don't get this: first post and it gets modded redundant? Leave it to Slashdot to understand logic.
this is mental!
you ignorant fool: it is the library of congress that matters! does the Mars R.Orbiter fit in the library ? :)
oh no, here we go with the gun again....
To point no.1: imagine a 500.000 people city going hunting.....what could possibly go wrong?
I find your ideas intriguing, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
PS: i have a psychology degree :) so could you explain more why corn and wheat are more damaging to the land?
Yeah, you don't even need gas if you catch the draft of passing jets since the only direction you are going is down. :)
Why does Thunderbid not implement encryption from the start I will never understand. A license problem it ain't. They are perpetuating a status quo that is unacceptable.
backwards compatibility? who are you working for? Microsoft?
you can do more. private property is not just the yard, it is the whole complex too. go in their offices and make the pics. it is private property aswell.
google and for that matter any other company /individual can not invade a private property. if this lawsuit fails, i could just walk into googleplex and make pretty pictures.
I wonder if that would be ok for google.
i would rather then type google into google.
The point being, same pay for the same job is not conclusive evidence of no gender discrimination.
i was like WTF!? for a second, than i realised you could be right. it is no evidence of gender discrimination but it is evidence against the gender wage gap (myth).
http://www.iwf.org/campus/show/18948.html
this is the source. and the study comes from the IWF (independent women's forum!).
to sum it up, they found that when controlled for all the variables above, women make about 98% of what men earn.
Apple's own hardware? ....i thought i bought it. It can't be that simple though, could it?
oh man you are sooo uninformed. Everybody knows that Booker T. is more powerful than George H.W. Bush.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=lSnWhsmlGec&feature=rec-fresh
is this english?
but according to the gp, that someone is losing nothing since there is no physical property involved in this case. i know it is absurd but i was trying to make a point :)
plagiarism = ok?
The point is question on youtube. Nadal vs. Youzhny, Dubai 2007.
Dubai, 2007. Set point for youzhny against nadal. Youzhny hits the ball wide (the mark was visible), but Hawkeye rules it in. The point is Hawkeye may be better where no marks, or evidence is left. But on courts like clay or certain kinds of hardcourts, humans will outperform hawkeye every time.
....they rely on hawkeye, a simulation rather than a ballmark, which is a reality.
And what does the umpire do when the mark is wide but hawkeye rules it in?
For the more methodological oriented among us, carbon dating needs to be calibrated because of the inconsistent levels of atmospheric c14 throughout the ages. And it is calibrated using among others dendrochronology. See where I am going? Dendrochronology has its major faults and one error in one measure will lead to measurement errors in the other. This is one major argument for the missing 300 years in history. For the conspiracy theory lovers here: Phantom Time.
So don't take everything at face value. Someone could bring the deciding evidence for something you never believed in.
And scientists and people in general are a bunch of weirdos. When someone contradicts "scientific consensus", they are just about ready to lynch that person. Including the Congress of USA. See the Rind et al. controversy.
This is why I am very very weary when it comes to "scientific consensus."
Flame away.