Slashdot Mirror


Three Planets Racing this Weekend

William Robinson writes "This report asks you to keep your eyes on the skies this weekend, when a rare triple-planetary alignment is going to happen. It promises a stellar show for star-gazers. Scott Young of the Manitoba Museum Planetarium says the planets in question -- Mercury, Venus and Saturn -- are all big enough to be seen without a telescope."

164 comments

  1. All planets aligned .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Time to go and dig some mummies in Egypt

    1. Re:All planets aligned .. by KronusOverlord · · Score: 1

      and I was goung to post "cue occult references"

      Meanie.

    2. Re:All planets aligned .. by raider_red · · Score: 1

      Just be careful, or you'll get sucked into an alternate universe with androids, fascists, and bad 80s haircuts.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    3. Re:All planets aligned .. by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I blame this rare planetary alignment for my suddenly hirsute visage and the complaints my neighbors filed about me howling out on the deck last night. I suppose it could have been the pitcher of martinis and that I didn't shave this morning . . . nah, it's gotta be the planets.

  2. That's no Moon! It's uh, um.. by Mulletproof · · Score: 5, Funny

    " And while star-gazers will be able to obscure all three planets simply by holding their outstretched thumb to the sky, Young reminds them appearances can be deceiving.

    "In reality, the planets are millions of kilometres apart," he said. "They only appear close in the sky because of our perspective. Saturn is actually over a billion kilometres behind Mercury."


    Oh thank God. I thought they were all going to crash into one another, showering the earth with deadily meteors or something. THANK YOU for thet reminder, Mr. Young.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:That's no Moon! It's uh, um.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that was foolish. God's crystal spheres the planets are mounted on are controlled by God, and He would never let that happen...

      [This is a JOKE, people! Laugh at religion, not with it!]

    2. Re:That's no Moon! It's uh, um.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think you have the "journalist" to thank for that one. Everything must be sensationalized!

    3. Re:That's no Moon! It's uh, um.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to remember, this article is written by the Winnipeg Sun, which is a horrendous tabloid. Those things that we find silly in the article are still probably questions the reporter asked. The only good thing about the newspaper is the sports section, which is far superior to the Winnipeg Free Press.

  3. Planet spotting by tolkienfan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Mercury is actually quite hard to see because it's close to the sun - you can only catch it at certain times of the year and only ever close to dawn and dusk.

    Venus is similar - but less so.

    Saturn is often in the sky, and is a beautiful sight through a telescope.

    I can't wait to see them all so close together - Let's hope for clear skies!

    1. Re:Planet spotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Although I can't admit to being much of a stargazer, I thought Venus was visible all but year round... Isn't that how it got the whole Morning Star, Evening Star reputation?

    2. Re:Planet spotting by qurk · · Score: 1

      It does switch between evening/morning star, but in between times, while the planet is either directly in front of the sun relative to us, or behind the sun, or when it is so close to the sun that it's glare usually drowns it out, then you're not going to be able to view it. Mercury switches between morning/evening as well, even faster than Venus.

    3. Re:Planet spotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's hope for clear skies!

      Even if the skies were clear I think there's no chance for me. :-(

      Danged mountains to the west!

  4. I'm going to buy a telescope! by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This event has convinced me to buy a telescope! I must see this first hand. What sort of telescope would be ideal for an amateur astronomer such as myself to view such a planetary event?

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:I'm going to buy a telescope! by Renegade+Lisp · · Score: 2, Informative
      What sort of telescope would be ideal for an amateur astronomer such as myself to view such a planetary event?

      The event itself (meaning the triple-constellation) is probably best observed with the naked eye, or a simple pair of binoculars, because any decent telescope will have a smaller field of view than the area the three planets will be spread out over.

      Even with binoculars (when mounted to a tripod), you will be able to see a faint indication of Saturn's rings (indicated by the fact that it doesn't look like a symmetric blob, but just a little stretched along the horizontal axis. Galileo, when he first saw this with similar equipment, thought he was seeing three bodies right next to each other). You will also see some of Saturn's moons, and the current phase of Venus.

      Real astronomer's equipment can of course get you much much further.

    2. Re:I'm going to buy a telescope! by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I too must see this first hand. Except last time I was checking out some bizarre astrological alignment, I was disappointed to observe nothing.

      How about some more info? Is there a site that says what time U.S time zone the alignment might appear on. What exact direction on a compass? You know, something a noob can follow. I got my binoculars and camera ready, but that's all I have. Please help.

    3. Re:I'm going to buy a telescope! by Quirk · · Score: 1

      DYI it's easy and you get geek points.

      --
      "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
      Cohen
    4. Re:I'm going to buy a telescope! by ZappaSoft · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dobsonian telescopes are very easy to use, beginner models are not very expensive and at the same time, you get the most bang for your buck, because the morror sizes on dobsonian telescopes tend to be a lot bigger than on refractors you would get at department stores for the same price. You can get a 4.5" Orion SkyQuest dobsonian telescope for $199 and really see a lot with it, tyr this url http://www.telescope.com/shopping/product/detailma in.jsp?itemID=364&itemType=PRODUCT&iMainCat=4&iSub Cat=9&iProductID=364. You might find these at a near by planetarium. If you are in a big city, even a very big telescope won't help you much because of all the light pollution. But on clear skies in the middle of nowhere, the 4.5" dobsonian will really let you see lot's of things. Tonight, you should be able to see all three planets really well with a 35mm or 45mm eyepiece. If you don't want to spend the money on a telescope, get some binoculars, but a telescope is a lot more fun once you get into it. Also, before you go, open up KStars, if you have Linux, that will help you with finding where things are at in the sky. Good luck!

    5. Re:I'm going to buy a telescope! by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      Is there a site that says what time U.S time zone the alignment might appear on. What exact direction on a compass?

      There are lots of astronomical programs. One small, simple and free one is Starcalc. Just set it up with your latitude and longitude and it'll show you the sky at any time past present or future. Anyway, this shows that this is not a brief duration event like an eclipse but the three planets are very close over several days.

    6. Re:I'm going to buy a telescope! by Vitamin+P · · Score: 0

      That depends on what you want to use the telescope for when you are not looking at this event. A dorm room of the appropiate sex is one possible alternate idea.

  5. Light pollution by sckeener · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Considering I live in Houston, I doubt I'll be seeing anything. Light pollution is atrocious. When I want to see the night sky, I have to go camping.

    --
    "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    1. Re:Light pollution by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Considering I live in Houston, I doubt I'll be seeing anything. Light pollution is atrocious. When I want to see the night sky, I have to go camping.

      Posh. I live in Clear Lake (far SE side of Houston for non-locals) and I could easily see saturn and venus last night. Driving a half hour longer would get me a full view.

  6. Planet Racing? ... by GreatRedShark · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want to know what odds the people in Vegas are giving to Mercury. I've got a lucky feeling about that planet!

    1. Re:Planet Racing? ... by EnderWigginsXenocide · · Score: 1

      With the light polution that Vegas pumps out I don't think they can even see Mercury (except the ones in the parking buildings.)

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups. -- 0 1 My two bits
    2. Re:Planet Racing? ... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Careful. Last century Mercury was called for cheating. Luckily Einstein was able to get him off, but there's just something dodgy about that planet and god of thieves.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  7. Longhorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Next year, the planets will all align themselves to spell out the word, Longhorn, to kick off Microsoft's new advertising campaign for the upcoming version of Windows. This of course, all depends if thier wireless networks can't be hacked again while they are sending the signals to the planets.

    1. Re:Longhorn by raider_red · · Score: 1

      Actually, this was the planetary allignment they were going to use for the kickoff. They are, of course, late again.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  8. Disharmonious Noncordance by amstrad · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some people are idiots. Other people are not.

    1. Re:Disharmonious Noncordance by Adelbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love how "Some people are idiots. Other people are not" gets modded "3, Informative".

      I have some others: some people are conservative, others are not. Some people eat meat, others do not. Some people read Slashdot, others have a social life.

      Come on mod points. I'm ready for you!

      Seriously though, if you haven't seen Bad Astronomy, do. Go to it. It rocks.

    2. Re:Disharmonious Noncordance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here ya go!!

      -3 Sour Grapes

  9. Even A stopped clock. by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    " "What we're seeing is the clockwork of the solar system," Young said." ...Which is what we see 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. But thanks for pointing out the obvious. I'm still trying to decide who is responsible for this innane conversation, that Young guy or the person asking him to expound on the alignment.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Even A stopped clock. by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      You go to school for 7 years, get an advanced degree, and work hard in your field. Then answer stupid grade-school science questions from someone who doesn't believe that we went to the moon, thinks the earth was created in 144 hours, believes that their cat was abducted by aliens six times (thus explaining her six litters), and doesn't remember which way the heliocentric vs geocentric affair turned out. Repeat every two or three days for several years. Let's see if you don't start talking down to people.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    2. Re:Even A stopped clock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      365.25 days. Dumbass.

  10. Binoculars would be ideal by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Informative
    If you are just starting, get some binoculars.

    Binoculars and a star chart.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Binoculars would be ideal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... get some binoculars.

      They will also help you see all of those young nubile Wiccas dancing around naked for this event!

      Hmmmmm, naked Wiccas!

    2. Re:Binoculars would be ideal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's WiccaNs, actually... ... and not all of us practice Skyclad.

    3. Re:Binoculars would be ideal by basilpronoun · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, get the book 'Nightwatch: A Practical Guide to Viewing the Universe' by Terence Dickinson.

    4. Re:Binoculars would be ideal by joNDoty · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you are just starting, it might also help if somebody told you where to look:
      I'm new to stargazing but I downloaded Celestia (free) and flew over to the upper hemisphere of earth and set the date to tonight (June 25). You can find the planets by watching where the sun sets. The planets will set at that same spot about 2 hours later. They will be moving down and to the right at almost exactly a 45 degree angle to the horizon. So that means that after sundown, you can look up and left of that spot to find the planets. Look relatively low in the sky.

    5. Re:Binoculars would be ideal by res+ipsa+loquitur · · Score: 5, Informative

      " If you are just starting, get some binoculars."

      As someone who has used both binoculars & telescopes as an amateur, I would like to second this advice. Here are some specific reasons why:

      Movement. Telescopes all seem to have at least one direction reversed (in other words, to move the field to the right you need to move the telescope to the left. Or up/down is reversed.) This is not something that you get used to after 5 minutes - it's an ongoing frustration. And it's important because of:

      Field of vision. Telescopes tend to have a smaller field of vision, often something like 2 degrees (I'm going from memory here.) That may not sound bad, but in practice it can become a major hassle as you have to constantly move the telescope to keep things in your field of view. Also, you often want to view larger areas of the sky at one time without having to move your telescope. And given the movement problem (above), you will find yourself adjusting the telescope the wrong way about half of the time. Stupid? Yes. Frustrating? Double-yes.

      Ease of use. Telescopes require setup time. Binoculars require removal of the lens caps. This is one of those things that doesn't seem like a big deal in the store, but in real life it will quickly become a major issue (unless you leave you telescope planted in one place all of the time, which I don't think is an ideal situation for an amateur.) You want to be able to scan the sky with your bare eyes & then _immediately_ use your magnifying device to look at something specific. You do _not_ want to mess around with tripods and sighting scopes just to see the latest thing that caught your fancy. Binoculars win big here. Don't underestimate the usefulness of binoculars' quick reaction time. In my view, this is the most important factor to consider; if it isn't easy to use, you won't use it.

      For the record, I'm an amateur who has owned and used both inexpensive binoculars and an inexpensive telescope. I would _hands down_ recommend the binoculars. Get practical experience, and _then_ shop for a telescope.

      One more thing. Binoculars are much more kid-friendly than telescopes, so if you're a parent trying to interest your children in astronomy, add that to the above reasons.

      I hope this helps.

    6. Re:Binoculars would be ideal by lorelorn · · Score: 1
      Excellent advice for anyone, in fact advice I'm following myself right now!

      The other thing I would add it that you should check for astronomy clubs in your local area. Many of them have public viewing nights, where the club members set up their telescopes for the general public to come and view.

      I've been to a few now, they are always worthwhile, plus all telescopes are set up to view object like Saturn or Jupiter, or star fields, nebulae. All you have to do is queue up and look.

      Great way to start when you are in the 'pre-binocular' stage.

  11. Correction by QuickFox · · Score: 3, Funny

    It promises a stellar show for star-gazers.

    I'm afraid you've misunderstood this. It's not a stellar, it's planetary.

    --
    Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    1. Re:Correction by SleepyShamus · · Score: 0

      What do youe expect from a newspaper that doesn't know the difference between astroNOMERs and astroLOGERs!

      From TFA:
      Young describes Mercury as an "elusive planet," noting most people, astrologers included, have never seen it.

    2. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better: "Young describes Mercury as an "elusive planet," noting most people, astrologers included, have never seen it."

      _astrologers_ ?!

      The scary bit is that Young may know his audience.

      --dungeness

    3. Re:Correction by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      It is actually funny really. My grandmother taught astronomy and astrology at a number of universities.

      She had a student once who failed her class and came back and asked her why he had failed his astrology classes. She said "That's why" and left it at that.

      BTW, she (Georgann Caughlin) was co-author of the important paper known as FCZ (Fowler, Caughlin, and Zimmerman) on nuclear astrophysics for which Fowler ultimately won the nobel prize.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    4. Re:Correction by Stankatz · · Score: 1

      Damn, you beat me to it. By the way, have you jumped over any lazy dogs lately?

    5. Re:Correction by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      By the way, have you jumped over any lazy dogs lately?

      That was ages ago! It's amazing how long people remember important events.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    6. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It promises a stellar show for star-gazers.
      I'm afraid you've misunderstood this. It's not a stellar, it's planetary.

      I'm afraid you, sir, are mistaken...star-gazers will be too caught up in the stellar show to see the planetary show. Perhaps you're referring to the planet-gazers? Ah, what the hell...
  12. Big or small moon? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Funny

    When aligned, the planets will fit into a piece of sky the same size as a full moon.

    Is that the low hanging moon or the smaller moon?

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Big or small moon? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      That's smaller than a dime at arm's length regardless of which one.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Big or small moon? by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

      Bigger than a knat on a rat's ass?

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
  13. you mean I have to do something? by fiftyLou · · Score: 1


    To catch the show, go outside after sunset today and find a spot with a clear view of the western horizon,...

    man that sounds like alot of effort. How about if I just bookmark the 'planet' tag over at Flickr?
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/planet/

  14. US Race Fans Widely Dissapointed by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 5, Funny

    After a six car US F1 GP, only three planets racing this weekend?

    1. Re:US Race Fans Widely Dissapointed by haystor · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you step back just a bit you can get the earth into view also.

      --
      t
    2. Re:US Race Fans Widely Dissapointed by Chris_Mir · · Score: 1

      Actually 4 planets. Earth is part of the alignment also. So we are into the race ourselfs. No GP can beat that, eh?

  15. Re:All right.. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    Sir,

    For most people, those "uranus == your anus" jokes went out of style by the time the person was five or six years old. You, sir, are a pathetic cockfool.

    Sincerely,
    CyricZ

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  16. Are there any simulations available for viewing? by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    Are there any simulations of this event that we can view online? Indeed, I would even enable Flash to watch such a simulation!

    Or is this the sort of thing you need a Cray and hundreds of thousands of lines of Fortran to model accurately?

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  17. Thats what I call "flamebait" by bohemian_observer · · Score: 0

    Does anybody still can see anything in the night? I mean I can hardly see what is 10 meters from me (as most of the shortsighted PC addicts).

    1. Re:Thats what I call "flamebait" by Adelbert · · Score: 1

      If you were trying to make a joke out of this for the /. audience, I'd have gone with "you insensitive clod". Obviously, though, you shun memes. They do that it Soviet Russia, too, only its slightly different over there...

  18. Am I the only one wondering by sholde4 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Time could be helpful...

    1. Re:Am I the only one wondering by tomlouie · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the article: "To catch the show, go outside after sunset today and find a spot with a clear view of the western horizon, Young said. As the sky darkens, Venus will be the first astral body to emerge, as it's the brightest object in the heavens after the sun and moon. Mercury and Saturn will show themselves soon afterward -- both being about as bright as the other, and shining with a pale, yellowish light."

      Tom

  19. An accurate story ... by busman · · Score: 2, Informative

    For some informative information on this "rare" event have a look
    at http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/conjunctio n_mercury_venus_saturn.html?2362005/

    --
    __
    Sigs are like arse-holes, everybody has one ;-)
  20. Astronomers NOT Astrologers by Reverend528 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From TFA: Young describes Mercury as an "elusive planet," noting most people, astrologers included, have never seen it.

    I don't see how this is so unusual, since it's an astrologer's job to look into the future, not to look into space (that would be an astronomer's job).

    1. Re:Astronomers NOT Astrologers by m50d · · Score: 1
      It's their job to look into the future by looking at the positions of the stars and the planets. You put Mercury on a birth chart and use it to work out personality traits, and conjunctions of it with something else are of course important

      /IANAA

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Astronomers NOT Astrologers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically speaking, they're actually looking into the future by pulling guesses out of their ass and pretending it's scientific.

      Minor distinction there.

    3. Re:Astronomers NOT Astrologers by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >> It's their job to look into the future....

      Not exactly a job...unless one considers palm and tarot readers to be valid jobs as well.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    4. Re:Astronomers NOT Astrologers by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      noting most people, astrologers

      Maybe the astronomer was taking the piss out of astrologers. He must get pretty tired of questions related to that and was implying thy have no idea of what's in the real sky (such as the actual postions of the planets, which are hundreds of years out of phase with their "houses").

    5. Re:Astronomers NOT Astrologers by m50d · · Score: 1

      Why not? Advertising executive is a valid job. If you can get paid enough to live on doing it, it's a job.

      --
      I am trolling
    6. Re:Astronomers NOT Astrologers by m50d · · Score: 1

      That may be what they /actually/ do, however the /job/ is to use the position of the stars and planets to predict the future.

      --
      I am trolling
    7. Re:Astronomers NOT Astrologers by mollymoo · · Score: 1
      It's their job to look into the future by looking at the positions of the stars and the planets.

      They look at the positions of the stars and planets, but they don't actually look at the stars and planets themselves. Why bother when the motions are so highly predicatable? I don't think I've even seen mention of actual observation as part of astrology.

      Astronomers are the ones who observe the stars and planets; astrologers wear brightly coloured clothes, have poor taste in home furnishings and exploit the weak of mind to make a living.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  21. Three planets are aligning? by chriswaclawik · · Score: 2, Informative
    Looks like it's time to cue "Also sprach Zarathustra," by Richard Strauss.

    (for the ill-informed, it's the music from 2001: A Space Odyssey that goes: duhhhh....duhhh....DUHHHHHH... [dun dun dun dun dun dun])

    --
    A guy walks into a bar... well, I forgot the joke, but the punchline is that he's an alcoholic.
    1. Re:Three planets are aligning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      duh

  22. Not online, but.... by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 1

    Celestia rocks for all your astronomy needs, if you have a decent video card. Accept no substitutes.

  23. Re:I DON'T THINK YOU COULD CAST WITH THAT SHIT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leeroy, you're an idiot.

    Why do you this?

    Yeah, thanks Leeroy.

    At least I got chicken.

  24. Re:Are there any simulations available for viewing by RobertF · · Score: 1

    I admit that I'm a lazy sod, but even I can be arsed enough to get out of my chair and go outside to see it!

    --
    And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be bannana-shaped.
  25. Re:Are there any simulations available for viewing by Junta · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not specifically for this event, but a really awesome simulator for astronomy stuff in general is celestia. http://www.shatters.net/celestia/

    Click on the earth, hit g (actually celestia starts you at earth), you can hit o to mark orbits to make it easier to find the planets (hit p to show labels to identify the planets themselves.)
    I hit shift-g to go to the surface of earth and then find the planets. Can give you a good idea where to look really. Being on the surface isn't particularly important at first, don't want the planet being between you and your destination until you are sure it wouldn't be.

    It doesn't always much like things really do, especially with atmospheric simulation not being particularly complex in celestia, but it is cool none the less. Particularly to click on one of the three planets close together, hit g, then look at everything from their perspective.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  26. Re:Are there any simulations available for viewing by Junta · · Score: 1

    I meant ctrl-g, not shift g, a really cool app, for those playing around, hitting 'h' selects sol, then you can hit g to get back to familiar territory.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  27. Triple or quadruple by AntiCopyrightRadical · · Score: 1

    I assume the phrase triple alignment arises because we see three planets near each other in the sky, but this really means that four planets (counting Earth) are nearly in line with each other.
    It's probably not so uncommon for three planets to be nearly colinear, it's just rare that we are in a colinear position to see them.

    --
    Abolish Copyright. Restore Freedom.
    1. Re:Triple or quadruple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm

      If you're going to count earth, I think you can find two planets in a line (including earth) pretty often :)

  28. WE DO HAVE A SOUL STONE UP, DON'T WE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you do this shit, Leeroy?

    I'm trying. It's not my fault.

    Whose Soul Stone?

    We do have a Soul Stone up, don't we?

    (inaudible) Warlock.

    Oh god
    Oh for...sigh

    (inaudible)

    Leeroy you are just stupid as hell.

    (inaudible)

    At least I have chicken.

  29. Re:All right.. by BetterThanCaesar · · Score: 1

    Scientists renamed Uranus in 2636 to end that joke, once and for all.

    Now it's called Urectum.

    --
    "Stop failing the Turing test!" -- Dilbert
  30. Need a starchart? by lethalwp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hello,

    If you need a good starchart to find stars/constellations/planets, i have one big recommendation for you, it's called skymap:
    http://skymap.com/products.htm

    you can use it in a demo version which is already very useful for a starter.

    Way to go! =)

    1. Re:Need a starchart? by quasi_steller · · Score: 1

      Or, if you want, you can try XEphem a program written for X-windows (and hence will run on Linux!). It is free (as in beer) for non-commercial use. The license isn't GPL or anything like that, for you purists, however, when it comes to ephemeris software, I don't think there are enough options out there to be too picky about the license.

      --
      ...interesting if true.
  31. Low tides/Earthquakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It may just be something I have notice but with the extreme low tides and the numerous quakes lately but there may be a connection?

  32. Horizons and light pollution by jfengel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At least camping is an option. I live on the East Coast, and real darkness is many hours away. And even then the horizons are usually obscured by trees. But even I can see the conjunction.

    I'm sure the light pollution is pretty bad in Houston, but Saturn and Venus are easily visible even against that, and given those indicators it's not hard to find Mercury. You may have to go to the 'burbs rather than in the city proper, but I bet you could find it on top of a large building. The planets are pretty bright, and the problem in a city is more about horizon than light pollution.

    1. Re:Horizons and light pollution by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      At least camping is an option. I live on the East Coast, and real darkness is many hours away.
      For those unfamiliar with the East Coast (of the US), the above poster is exaggerating - quite a bit. I can think of half a dozen places on the East Coast where real darkness is no more than two hours away, and usually less. (I suspect the parent lives somewhere in BosWash and confuses that with the rest of the Coast.)
    2. Re:Horizons and light pollution by coopex · · Score: 1

      This doesn't really invalid your post at all, but the GP's point about darkness being hours (as you point out 2 hours for non-BosWash) still stands, and it's disappointing that there's so much light pollution in North America and most of the first world countries from energy, astronomy, and crimals standpoint.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
  33. Re:Are there any simulations available for viewing by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
    Or is this the sort of thing you need a Cray and hundreds of thousands of lines of Fortran to model accurately?

    If you have a Linux box with KDE, it might have come with KStars, which is a very nifty program. I just pulled it up, and the three planets are really close together.

  34. Re:FP by Genin · · Score: 1

    weeaboo?

    --
    I am forced to conclude you are the master of the obvious. May others take heed of your wisdom.
  35. Astronomy over Astrology, Please by PingXao · · Score: 2, Informative

    I almost fell out of my chair when I RTFA. "Mercury is a planet few people, even astrologers, have ever seen." WTF? Is this Slashdot or the Nancy Reagan hotline? There's a better article at Sky and Telescope without any of the mumbo jumbo.

    1. Re:Astronomy over Astrology, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it wasn't a mistake, since astrology has everything to do with the position of the planets relative to each other and to constellations. Way to jump the phaser, nerd boy.

    2. Re:Astronomy over Astrology, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it wasn't a mistake, since astrology has everything to do with the position of the planets relative to each other and to constellations.

      Due to the precession of the equinoxes, the table of dates and zodaical constellations that astrologers use is around 2000 years out of date.

      linky.

      Of course, most astrologers don't care. But those who do care claim that it is the orientation of planets with respect to the earth's orbit around the sun and the earth's axial tilt that mystically influence events, and that the orientation of the planets with respect to the stars is actually not that important after all.

    3. Re:Astronomy over Astrology, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without astrology there would be no astronomy, or any Science at all. The development of science was a side effect of the government sponsored effort to predict the future. Although most astrological assertions do not appear to have statistical significance, it is in fact the attempt to achieve astrology that gave us the tools to notice that astrology does not really work.

      Throughout history only two things have mattered to the supporting agencies -- all "science" is a result of these. The two things are the attempt to fortell the future (astrology) and military technology. We Scientists should try not to be too smug.

  36. About that ticking noise... by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

    The first stage of the alignment has started! It only happens once every five thousand years, and evil people are ready to find the triangle and take over the world if someone doesn't stop them!!!!

    Out of curiosity, does a full alignment of the planets only happen once every 5,000 years?

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
  37. Old news! by mister_llah · · Score: 1

    My cult and I have known about this for years, we're having a Kool-Aid party in honor of our impending transformation.

    I trust you all will marvel at our new godhood!

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    1. Re:Old news! by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      Man, a post like that takes balls. Oops, nevermind.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  38. k, am I the onlyone who notices... by 5plicer · · Score: 1

    that Earth is BETWEEN Saturn and Venus, there fore the only planet's we'll see lined up are Mercury and Venus?

    --
    The bits on the bus go on and off... on and off... on and off...
    1. Re:k, am I the onlyone who notices... by 5plicer · · Score: 1

      oh wait... never mind... I was thinking that they'd be lined up with the sun as well. I'm a dolt :p

      --
      The bits on the bus go on and off... on and off... on and off...
    2. Re:k, am I the onlyone who notices... by close_wait · · Score: 2, Informative
      that Earth is BETWEEN Saturn and Venus, there fore the only planet's we'll see lined up are Mercury and Venus?

      No, Saturn is currently on the opposite side of the sun from us, so we are not between them.

    3. Re:k, am I the onlyone who notices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Lost a planet, Master 5plicer has. How embarassing, how embarassing.
      Overview of our current solar system: http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y252/CaseGvtgj/so larsytem.gif

    4. Re:k, am I the onlyone who notices... by irchs · · Score: 1

      It is still possible, the line-up will not be perpendicular to the sun obviously, but it is still possible.

      Think about it again :)

      Jan

      --
      Jan
  39. Science for non-scientists by jfengel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thing is, the conjunction isn't really all that interesting, scientifically. It's interesting mostly because it's rare, and it's a way to get the vigorously nonscientific to actually watch the planets move across the sky. Go out on two successive nights and you can watch them move relative to each other.

    No biggie for your college-educated, Slashdot-reading brain, but a lot of people are bored stiff by science. Turn on Jeopardy some day and watch as the board clears of every category except Science. Not always, but too often.

    There's an awful lot of people who don't really get how the planetary orbits work, and probably DO think that they would collide. I bet you know at least some of them. Take them out and show them the conjunction. Take them out on successive nights and describe how we can figure out the heliocentric universe from the observations.

    1. Re:Science for non-scientists by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 5, Funny

      Take them out on successive nights and describe how we can figure out the heliocentric universe from the observations.

      "After our first date I couldn't get a hold of her. I even left a message telling her how I would teach her how to figure out the heliocentric universe from our observations. Hmmm, she must have left town for an emergency, but lost my number and couldn't call. Let me sit by the phone and wait."

      --

      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    2. Re:Science for non-scientists by rxmd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Take them out and show them the conjunction. Take them out on successive nights and describe how we can figure out the heliocentric universe from the observations.
      The funny thing is by the same "taking someone out and showing them", you can explain geocentric or sphere-based universes to them just as well, and they would believe it, too. And if anything remotely bad happened this weekend, they'd probably be gullible enough to believe it's because of the planets.
      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    3. Re:Science for non-scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take them out on successive nights and describe how we can figure out the heliocentric universe from the observations.

      The universe is not even heliocentric either! You mean the solar system.

    4. Re:Science for non-scientists by jfengel · · Score: 1

      True enough. You have to talk about things like Mars and its weird movement in a geocentric universe, which is hard to observe without taking a lot of time. But the conjunction at least gives you an opportunity to talk about how the measurements are made. It gives you the opportunity to make the planets real, more so than just pointing to one particular point of light and saying, "Hey, that one's Jupiter".

    5. Re:Science for non-scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heliocentric??!

      No way man, circles within circles.

    6. Re:Science for non-scientists by Ira+Sponsible · · Score: 1
      There's an awful lot of people who don't really get how the planetary orbits work, and probably DO think that they would collide. I bet you know at least some of them. Take them out and show them the conjunction. Take them out on successive nights and describe how we can figure out the heliocentric universe from the observations.

      And be sure to explain that since the planets will collide that WILL ALL DIE BURNING HELLISH DEATH when the pieces of the planets come raining down on us.

      --
      1.Netcraft confirms:In Soviet Russia all your base welcomes a beowolf cluster of CowboyNeal overlords. 2.? 3.Profit!!1!
    7. Re:Science for non-scientists by pionzypher · · Score: 1

      2 weeks later.....

      While walking through the mall...

      Tom: Hey, isn't that your ex?

      Bean: No.... can't be... She said she was moving to china...

      Tom: But I'm sure it's her, look. She's looking at you, trying to hide.

      Bean: But... China....

      --
      I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
    8. Re:Science for non-scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > There's an awful lot of people who don't really get how the planetary orbits work, and probably DO think that they would collide. I bet you know at least some of them.

      I do, and by chance they all happen to be American!

    9. Re:Science for non-scientists by coopex · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. And what's all this rubbish about a non-flat earth? I mean, where do people come up with this stuff!

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    10. Re:Science for non-scientists by coopex · · Score: 1

      Yup. Thos damn Amer... hey wait... I'm American. Oohh, if I ever find out where you live Mr. AC, I'm gonna, aw hell, lets just say you're French.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
  40. Astrologers versus astronomers by pomakis · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    Young describes Mercury as an "elusive planet," noting most people, astrologers included, have never seen it.

    Surely the article meant astronomers. Since when have astrologers ever taken an interest in actually looking at the night sky (other than to determine, of course, what tomorrow's horiscope brings)?

    1. Re:Astrologers versus astronomers by Elf-friend · · Score: 1
      ...other than to determine, of course, what tomorrow's horiscope brings
      Even then there would be no point. Mundane astrology (the kind concerned with horoscopes) has never accounted for the precession of the equinoxes. Therefore, the tables (which are based on tables from Babylonia over two-thousand years old) have long since ceased to have any relation to the actual positions of the stars.

      Perhaps they mean natural astrology, which, IIRC, is an old term for astronomy.

      While were at it, though others have probably noticed as well, the reason we can see these planets is not because they are "big enough," it's that they are close enough. Uranus and Neptune are much bigger than Mercury, but we don't usually notice them with the naked eye (though it is possible under ideal conditions).

    2. Re:Astrologers versus astronomers by flood6 · · Score: 1

      Well, the "Winnipeg Sun" just got crossed off my list of respectable news sources.

    3. Re:Astrologers versus astronomers by David+Off · · Score: 1

      I would be surprised if there are astromers out there who haven't taken a look at Mercury... I suspect the article did mean astrologers but they could easily have said "firemen"

  41. Imagine the orbits... by mister_llah · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, assuming we are all in a straight line, 2D model... but not all orbits move on the same speed, and our only view of the heavenly sky isn't a direct path to the sun...

    So imagine looking up from earth, towards the sun, then to the sun's 11:15, let's say... we have a line up...

    They aren't all at the same "position" in their orbits, but they may line up...

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
  42. Re:Are there any simulations available for viewing by eclectro · · Score: 2, Informative

    To see what it looks like you could go to APOD, which is good for your little daily Astronomy fix/news.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  43. A coincidence by drsquare · · Score: 1

    Literally just before reading this story, I was playing 'Elite II' and trying to navigate to Mercury. If course Elite II isn't the best game in the world, and the task was impossible, as I flew up and down, each time missing and ending up 1+ AU on the other side. Apparently the designers didn't think to give you proper control over your accelerators, nor to give you your speed relative to your destination, but instead to some arbitrary object. So when going to Mercury, my speed was relative to Jupiter, making both the speed controller and indicator completely worthless. At one point, the flow of the stars were showing me going forwards, but Mercury right in front of me was moving AWAY from me! And sometimes I could deccelerate almost instantly, and some times it would take ages until I was right back where I started, making reaching other planets a complete impossibility.

    I suppose that's what happens when game designers let technical aspects and graphics get in the way of the interface and playability. The documentation only mentions using the autopilot, but my ship doesn't come with an autopilot! And even when it does, it often crashes me right into planets!

    Actually come to think of it, when is someone going to make a PROPER space game? Like Elite, but done properly so it's actually enjoyable to play?

    1. Re:A coincidence by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      I was playing 'Elite II' and trying to navigate to Mercury ... the task was impossible, as I flew up and down, each time missing and ending up 1+ AU on the other side.

      What part of 'elusive planet' was unclear?

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    2. Re:A coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Vega Strike is about halfway there. Its flight model is fantastic, and its trading system is functional. Its combat system is realistic and yet playable, though you'd better save money for an auto-tracking unit right off the bat. Ah, if only the universe didn't sound like it was written by a /. troll.. (By this I mean things like "Newsflash! Liberal Space Pussies at it again! Godless commies of the Socialist Faction repulsed at Rigel by the fleet of the way-cool Internet-Brain-Implant Techno-Guys Faction!")

    3. Re:A coincidence by drsquare · · Score: 1

      It's not just that, it's every planet. The whole game's unplayable. But I suppose that's what happens when you write something in assembly.

    4. Re:A coincidence by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      It's a real shame. I used to play the original Elite on an Apple ][e. Vectorish-graphics aside, it was enthralling.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    5. Re:A coincidence by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I dunno, maybe in 1984 that was relatively decent entertainment. But when you think about it, the game consists of flying up and down selling things just to get enough money to buy a couple of missiles because they're the only way of killing pirates, because despite the technology for inter-steller travel, your space-ship can only shoot directly ahead, and has no way of easily-aiming the laser at an opponent. Although your opponents have no problem hitting you every single time no matter where you are. And it's five against one. And the help files make it as simple as aiming at them and pressing 'fire', and then spiralling to avoid them, even though it doesn't work. Damnit!

    6. Re:A coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today, things aren't that much better. All we get is hordes of bad guys that charge at you, and you shoot at them.

      That's what passes for entertainment these days.

  44. My money is on Mercury... by gunner800 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It has the inside track.

  45. Re:Are there any simulations available for viewing by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

    I found some simulation images:

    Here is photo1: ...

    Here is the zoomed in annotated version:

    Mercury Venus
    \ /
    o o o
    \
    Saturn

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  46. A good discription by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

    For a better discription, especially for newbies watch This . I cannot figure out how to Coral catch the video so try to only watch the 1 min version to save their server.

    --
    Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    1. Re:A good discription by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      I figured it out. Coral catch of the 5 Min. Real video

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
  47. Celestia URL by Junta · · Score: 1

    cel://syncorbit/Sol%3AEarth/2005-06-25T17%3A49%3A0 8.00000?x=sbsIqCwAe9e+DA&y=DhVf7tVWGQ&z=ZSnBOVkXLQ UQ&ow=0.249240&ox=-0.207134&oy=-0.047122&oz=-0.944 857&select=Sol:Earth&fov=32.524258&ts=0.000000&ltd =0&rf=71571&lm=2
    This is a view from Earth's surface (US East coast) of the three planets. As always, beware of spaces/line breaks in the URL (alt-g to open arbitrary URL).

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  48. Try viewing from... by tolkienfan · · Score: 1
    ...the moon!

    ok ok stop throwing things!

    Seriously, I'll bet the view from the moon or other Earth orbit, would be spectacular.
    Imagine: Mercury, Earth, Venus and Saturn together in the sky...

    Oh to be an astronaut...

  49. Not yet.... hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DANGER Will Robinson, DANGER!

  50. Re:Are there any simulations available for viewing by borl · · Score: 1

    Yes, see below.

    . . . *time passes* ... *time passes* .

  51. A race? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My money is on Mercury.

  52. I've got $10 on satern. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sure mercury's on the inside track, and venus has got a lot of spirit, but scientifically speaking, satern's rings make it go faster.

  53. between this and the full moon by Fishstick · · Score: 1

    made for some interesting star gazing the other night.

    Friend of mine has a boat on a little lake in northern Illinois (Bangs lake in Waconda), we were out Thursday night and had a good time throwing back some beers and watching the sky.

    Just after sunset, I mentioned that I thought it was supposed to be a full moon but it was strange that it hadn't risen yet. I had my bearings turned around and was looking west and couldn't figure out if I was looking at a helicopter light or what -- it must have been Venus, but I've never seen it look that bright.

    Over the next 20 minutes or so we watched the moon rise. I don't think I've ever seen it look that big and orange.

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    1. Re:between this and the full moon by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

      Home of the staypuff marshmellow man idea that almost desroyed the earth .And now mentioned on slashdot.I think it was the lake in the blues brothers movie also.

    2. Re:between this and the full moon by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I remember that from Blues Bros, and that swim area they show, IIRC, is Phils beach right next to the place where my friend has his boat slip.

      Don't remember the ghost busters reference though.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    3. Re:between this and the full moon by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

      Camp waukanda is where Ray spent the summers when he was a child.He never thought that something as inocent as the staypuff marshmellow man.Egon mumbles cross the streams.But you said crossing the streams was bad ,says peter. Many years ago I spent 3 months at childrens memorial while my son recovered from brain surgery.We watched the movie atleast a hundred times while he recovered .His highschool graduation party is today.

  54. Viewing in the SF Bay Area with the hills? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

    Anyone familiar with the BA topography with an idea of where I can see this from, clouds permitting of course? Obviously going to the Marin headlands and Mount Tamalpais would be preferrable but that's not a possibility for tonight. I'm in the east bay and hoping I can go up to the Laurence Hall of Science or maybe just Indian Rock (in north Berkeley) and see close enough to the horizon, without the peninsula and Mt. Tam blocking the view.

  55. A better planet race by Forthan+Red · · Score: 1
    Boring.

    Not boring.

  56. Wow by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

    No wonder I'm in a good mood for a change.

    --
    http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
  57. Re:Are there any simulations available for viewing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where's the earth and the sun?

  58. Probably. Interesting, I just found this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    REUTERS

    Scientists discover new planetary Super Mass

    Space experts at NASA have discovered a new stella mass of enormous proportions situated in the nether regions of space in the X11R6.8.2 galaxy.

    The gigantic blob of matter which moves incredibly slowly has been named as KDE341 by scientists at NASA's space facility.

    Experts predict that the curious mass has been just floating in space and going nowhere since the beginning of the universe.

    "It just eats up more matter all the time" said one expert. "It's growing at enormous rate and seems to be turning slower and slower"

    The X11R6.8.2 Galaxy has long been a curious menagerie of strange old space debris to scientists who have deduced that it is about 200 trillion light years away from Earth and represents how the universe looked in ancient times.

    As well as KDE341, the old X11R6.8.2 galaxy contains a strange grey green cloud of what experts call 'ugly matter' which is has been given the name GN0M3.2.10

    Experts predict that sometime in the next millenium X11R6.8.2 will finally implode completely destroying KDE341 and GN0M3.2.10. However because the galaxy is so far away from modern Earth's space/time scientists have told us not to be alarmed.

    "Nobody will notice" said one expert we spoke to.

  59. Cool by daniil · · Score: 1

    And yet you still found time for surfing porn sites and FP-ing? Sir, you are an inspiration to all of us.

    --
    Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
  60. Great Conjunction by quokkapox · · Score: 1
    When single shines the triple sun
    what was sundered and undone shall be whole
    The two made one
    By gelfling hand or else by none

    Like all prophecy, this is subject to interpretation. What could it mean? Longhorn will be released this summer with a Linux core?!? Google will buy Apple??! Brad and Jen getting back together?!! Oh, the possibilities...

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
  61. And now for Android Poetry... by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

    Data's Eighth Poem

    Written By: Brannon Braga

    Then we sat on the sand for some time and observed,
    How the oceans that cover the world were perturbed
    By the tides from the orbiting moon overhead.
    How relaxing the sound of the waves is, you said.

    I began to expound upon tidal effects
    When you asked me to stop, looking somewhat perplexed.
    So I did not explain why the sunset turns red
    And we watched the occurrence... in silence... instead.

    --
    "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  62. For Y'all's Information... by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

    http://skyandtelescope.com/observing/article_1534_ 1.asp

    The above URL will take you to the Sky and Telescope web page that covers this event.

    --
    "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    1. Re:For Y'all's Information... by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

      I've been interested in astronomy since I was in the second grade back in the mid-60s, so interested that I did my masters thesis in binary star photometry.

      In the four decades that I've been reading Sky and Telescope it seems to me that every 2 to 4 years there's a planetary alignment of some kind. There's generally some talk of the rarity of this event, and there won't be another such for x-hundred years.

      I've gotten to where these events don't excite me. The one virtue of these events is that they are useful to kids with new telescopes that are having a hard time finding planets to observe with their new scopes. You get three very bright objects in the same small portion of the sky and it's much easier on the novice astronomer to find them with the naked eye and then with their shiny new mirrors.

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  63. Re:Are there any simulations available for viewing by glitch23 · · Score: 0

    Once the calculations are performed an animation can be produced thus saving every single person who wants to view the motions from having to calculate all the points of travel on their own. Assuming someone has made an animation then you could see it without having to crunch the numbers yourself. Or if someone has saved all the points as raw data and then you use that to create your own animation.

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  64. Re:All right.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as are the /. immaturati who seem to enjoy posting with the damned "In Soviet Russia", "Old Korean men", GNAA, and others. They're proof that the human gene pool is in desperate need of some chlorine.

  65. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Young describes Mercury as an "elusive planet," noting most people, astrologers included, have never seen it.

    Astrologers! What the fuck???

  66. Re:All right.. by vsprintf · · Score: 1

    We had a discussion about those jokes over here. You should have just posted "2636", and picked up the funny mods.

  67. Where are the Zeta-loons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the ZetaKooks will use this event to predict more doom and gloom?

  68. Watch the whole thing from Uranus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best viewing of the 3 planetary alignment will be from the backside of Uranus...

  69. Size matters? by onemorechip · · Score: 1
    It promises a stellar show for star-gazers. Scott Young of the Manitoba Museum Planetarium says the planets in question -- Mercury, Venus and Saturn -- are all big enough to be seen without a telescope.

    I always thought it was more of a question of how bright they are, than how big.

    --
    But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
  70. Alignment? by MaDeR · · Score: 1
    This is loose gathering in one place on sky, not any damn alignment.

    Of course, real alignments NEVER occur, and if even occurs, in no way can cause any f*** disasters.

    --
    What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
  71. L for moron, and N for PhD. by MadCow-ard · · Score: 1

    Young describes Mercury as an "elusive planet," noting most people, astrologers included, have never seen it.

    I guess AstroLogers see Mercury on the Queen of Cups card all the time. But I would guess that most AstroNomers have seen Mercury at least once. Give me a break.

  72. Re:All right.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the human gene pool is in desperate need of some chlorine.

    I think they call that "Iraq".