if the tube breaks, not only can you use the shards for lighting for the next hour or so, you can also easily dispose of the shards too (well duh, theres no lighting and all the pieces of the tube are glowing:P)
Start.com has been known for ages. Its a sandbox experiment, and theyve already released 1 and 2 already, along with "My web"
Editors messed up again? o.O
If anyone can give actual provable examples of the US government abridging Constitutionally protected free speech, I'd love to hear it.
search CNN my friend
I can give plenty of examples when the US government violated privacy. The biggest one is the phone tapping power the DoD seems to have. Terrorism happens, and no matter what one tries to do, as unfortunate as it may sound, the terrorists are determined enough that they will find a loophole. We should be spending our time not eavesdropping on our muslim neighbor's conversations (I know it happens. Dont tell me it doesnt) and fix up our crime issues, get rid of drunk driving, among other things.
Free speech and privacy are violated all the time in this country in order to "secure our country" from some vague and obscure threat.
I think the point was that a person in bullet-time can get a five second slow-down advantage (so that he can, say, dodge a bullet) and the person shooting the bullets wont notice the slowdown - theyll just notice that they missed.
but the point is that this is lethal for about 25% of the people hit by it for more than five seconds. they will likely die a slow and painful death later in their lives from a disease which usually is caused by factories, the sun, and nuclear powerplants, not by the government.
Im going by the fact that there is some skin which is being burned and generally, EM burns (UV rays, microwaves, anything which burns the skin via light) can lead to cancer:P
Ive heard of this earlier (a guant satellite dish which uses mwaves to burn 1/64th of the skin... I think it was discussed on ABC about 3 years ago)
Its not a bad concept but now that I think about it, it will likely trigger some sort of massive health crisis once everyone in Iraq gets cancer from this thing:( I think its too inhumane for use.
Weve got sound based fusion reactors nearing break-even, AND we have what could be an easy way to generate hydrogen from water using sodium. Now, with this in mind, tell me why ethanol is needed?
I guess this means that they dont control their PVRs... hmm are they both the same thing? I would assume they are. Anyways, i know my woman doesnt control my DVR, as she doesnt know much about controlling a computer:P
ever heard of ripping from a live stream? :P its not exactly hard
an almost legal source for pirating TV shows...
if the tube breaks, not only can you use the shards for lighting for the next hour or so, you can also easily dispose of the shards too (well duh, theres no lighting and all the pieces of the tube are glowing :P)
If you mean getting caught talking nasty to your intern on a cell phone then all bets are off. thank god you saw the hidden meaning :P
I wonder how many government officials in DC using insecured headsets will be caught off-guard by this?
Start.com has been known for ages. Its a sandbox experiment, and theyve already released 1 and 2 already, along with "My web" Editors messed up again? o.O
I know ;) I told him to search CNN for it. However, other posts mentioned the patriot act, which is a huge example.
If anyone can give actual provable examples of the US government abridging Constitutionally protected free speech, I'd love to hear it. search CNN my friend I can give plenty of examples when the US government violated privacy. The biggest one is the phone tapping power the DoD seems to have. Terrorism happens, and no matter what one tries to do, as unfortunate as it may sound, the terrorists are determined enough that they will find a loophole. We should be spending our time not eavesdropping on our muslim neighbor's conversations (I know it happens. Dont tell me it doesnt) and fix up our crime issues, get rid of drunk driving, among other things. Free speech and privacy are violated all the time in this country in order to "secure our country" from some vague and obscure threat.
Im willing to bet that that idea wasnt considered by apple until you (parent post) wrote about it here :P
Either its a deja-vu, or its a dupe. I cant find the link, but Im 100% positive this was slashdotted once already, and a long time ago too.
Cant we just stick to regular telephones? I dont want my 911 call to be interrupted by a denial of service attack...
1) got owned, and 2) ticked someone off big time. If he didnt spam people, he probably wouldve been fine.
"fells like dvorak..." Dvorak does fellatio? thats a thought that I dont really want to imagine...
I think the point was that a person in bullet-time can get a five second slow-down advantage (so that he can, say, dodge a bullet) and the person shooting the bullets wont notice the slowdown - theyll just notice that they missed.
as of about 7 minutes ago: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2005/jul0 5/07-22LHMA.mspx
but the point is that this is lethal for about 25% of the people hit by it for more than five seconds. they will likely die a slow and painful death later in their lives from a disease which usually is caused by factories, the sun, and nuclear powerplants, not by the government.
Im going by the fact that there is some skin which is being burned and generally, EM burns (UV rays, microwaves, anything which burns the skin via light) can lead to cancer :P
I meant Giant, not guant :( I hate shifty mice
to make sure this post is not offtopic: I found this link: http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/Microwave-Crowd-Di spersal.htm
Ive heard of this earlier (a guant satellite dish which uses mwaves to burn 1/64th of the skin... I think it was discussed on ABC about 3 years ago) Its not a bad concept but now that I think about it, it will likely trigger some sort of massive health crisis once everyone in Iraq gets cancer from this thing :( I think its too inhumane for use.
http://www.mirrordot.com/stories/46bab61809b5dd911 6621ef0e8bf4d92/index.html
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/1 3/2322254&tid=99&tid=14
Get some of that and some water and there you have it. it would be far more dense than gaseous H2, even after you offset it with the sodium
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/1 3/2322254&tid=99&tid=14
Weve got sound based fusion reactors nearing break-even, AND we have what could be an easy way to generate hydrogen from water using sodium. Now, with this in mind, tell me why ethanol is needed?
arent they both the same thing though? I mean... they both record video for me
I guess this means that they dont control their PVRs... hmm are they both the same thing? I would assume they are. Anyways, i know my woman doesnt control my DVR, as she doesnt know much about controlling a computer :P