Slashdot Mirror


Yahoo Purchases Konfabulator

NerdyPunk2ML writes "Macworld news has an article about Yahoo's acquisition of Konfabulator, which will be announced Monday. Yahoo company executives said they will be giving Konfabulator away for free, completely doing away with the US$19.95 currently charged for the product. The reason they purchased Konfabulator was they wanted an easy way to open up its APIs to the developer community and allow them easy access to the information on the Yahoo web site." From the article: "The acquisition of Konfabulator may not be the last Mac compatible product users see from Yahoo! While Schneider wasn't specific, he did say that there was interest in the Mac. 'There is a move at Yahoo! -- in addition to Konfabulator -- to move more onto the Mac,' said Schneider. 'We want to make sure we find a way to be more cross platform.'"

302 comments

  1. Cheap buy? by Chmarr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm sure the fact that Konfabulator's 'buy out price' went WAY down after Tiger, and Dashboard, were released has NOTHING, no, NOTHING AT ALL to do with this sale :)

    1. Re:Cheap buy? by aergern · · Score: 1

      If they didn't have a Windows version of this as well.. I'd say yes. :)

      Unless VISTA has Widgets like these.. then I'm not sure why Yahoo! spent this money.

      --
      Tell me what you believe...I'll tell you what you should see.
    2. Re:Cheap buy? by ceeam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder whether more Konfabulator copies were actually sold for Windows than for Macs?

    3. Re:Cheap buy? by ceeam · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unless VISTA has Widgets like these..

      Bwahaha! Thanks for a laugh. If ever Microsoft makes something like these I bet you whatever you wish it will NOT be a simple zip file format for widgets with resource images, xml configs and JS scripts in it. It will probably be a hecked up binary (they will provide a semi-documented interface to work with it. Maybe.) with uncompressed BMP images, UTF16 encoded strings, etc, etc. Expect at least 3-5 megs per widget. Of course only MS signed widgets will run without a hack. In short - see how they implemented Windows Themes for example. Oh, and you will need to install .NET 2.0 runtime and MSIE 7.0 of course!

    4. Re:Cheap buy? by Ilgaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well it was there all this time and code is so mature that there are Tiger owners buying it.

      If I liked things like Dashboard, I'd go for Konfabulator too.

      They went win32 in weeks after Apple included same functionality with the OS.

      Also don't forget one thing. We, geeks use latest and greatest OS when it ships but many people currently run 10.3 and even 10.2.8. It can run on them.

      Well I call this "Happy ending". I don't have spesific "hate" against Apple as zealots assume, I am an Apple user myself. Just I think they should make them a favor, not money or something, credit or a name mention.

      Just seek how EA (electronic arts) was founded, you will be surprised.

      This is happy ending I think. Everyone is happy including licensed customers of Konf.

      ps: For people jumping and saying "They didn't invent it!' etc, I was running Active Desktop at IE 4 times on win32

    5. Re:Cheap buy? by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Come on now, who can resist a product named.

      Konfabulatorahoo!

      This makes me happy, since I have been very unhappy with apples implementation. Many widgets such as iTunes widgets and weather widgets are pretty worthless when they don't say up all the time. Why bring up Dashboard to then get the itunes widget to click "next" when you could just click on itunes. Konfabulator had is right with widgets being able to stay on the desktop all the time.

    6. Re:Cheap buy? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      Unless VISTA has Widgets like these.. then I'm not sure why Yahoo! spent this money.

      Do you mean Vista the software company, or Windows Vista? wink, wink ;)

    7. Re:Cheap buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but if dashboard wasnt different, it wouldnt have been "innovative".

      I've never used dashboard, but i would hate to only be able to place widgets on top of windows. the best solution is to be able to choose whether you want to put them on the desktop or on top of your windows.

    8. Re:Cheap buy? by Mocenigo · · Score: 1
      Konfabulator had is right with widgets being able to stay on the desktop all the time

      Well, you can do the same with the Dashboard widgets too.
      The way of doing it is by activating Dashboards "debug mode", and has been described on countless forums on the net. You can find some information at the following site:
      http://www.tigerwiki.com/index.php/Dashboard

      If you are really lazy, there is a nice preference pane that activates this for you and more!
      http://www.ego-systems.com/Products/widgetsprefpan e.html

      Roberto

    9. Re:Cheap buy? by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unless VISTA has Widgets like these

      good idea!

      I officially declare VISTA the troll miscapitilization of Longhorn to counteract the MAC miscapitalization of Mac(intosh)

      on topic:
      Some early builds of longhorn had the stupid sidebar that took up 1/6 of a normal (1024x768) screen for things like a clock, and a webcam viewer... think of it as a separate area of the screen (like the taskbar) reserved for konfabulator widgets. It was hyped for a while too. (example)

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    10. Re:Cheap buy? by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Eh? MAC isn't miscapitalised, it's just wrong. It stands for Media Access Control.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    11. Re:Cheap buy? by computerdude33 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The "Official" new name is Yahoo! Widgets.

      --
      computerdude33's stuff: My blog of wonder.
    12. Re:Cheap buy? by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

      Why bring up Dashboard to then get the itunes widget to click "next" when you could just click on itunes

      It's nice to have if you want to go ahead and close the iTunes window (to save both desktop space and dock space...especially on something like a 12" PowerBook), while leaving it playing. That way instead of having to bring up the iTunes window (which I usually leave in full-size mode, rather than minimized) I can just bring it up in the dashboard.

      Not saying it's the most useful thing in the world...but there are situations where it is nice to have.

      Personally I think multiple desktops would be more useful...that is probably the feature I miss the most from Linux. I basically use the dashboard as a half-assed second desktop, and it would be really nice just to have the real thing.

    13. Re:Cheap buy? by Dominatus · · Score: 1

      Exactly, Windows themes...

      See how Apple dealt with Mac OS X themes for a counter example of MS's evil tyranny and massive slaughter of innocent children...

      Come on people...

    14. Re:Cheap buy? by bheer · · Score: 1

      If ever Microsoft makes something like these I bet you whatever you wish it will NOT be a simple zip file format for widgets with resource images, xml configs and JS scripts in it.

      Wo... for a minute I thought you were talking about the new Office file formats.

    15. Re:Cheap buy? by Khuffie · · Score: 2, Informative
    16. Re:Cheap buy? by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Trolls often refer to the Apple Macintosh/Mac as MAC.

      How many people have had people ask them a question about Apple, but they've asked it of Mac instead. ie. "Why don't Mac make OS X for PC?"

    17. Re:Cheap buy? by snorklewacker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Windows has always had the ability to add scriptable components to the desktop. I believe there was a great hue and cry about how evil and unstable this all was, and about how desktops weren't supposed to be playgrounds or HTML renderers and blah blah blah.

      You can still add such components, and script them in any language that implements the WSH interface.

      But of course Konfabulator widgets all run in a security sandbox and could never do anything malicious. Right?

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    18. Re:Cheap buy? by Chmarr · · Score: 1

      I'd like to point out that this comment did NOT deserve a "(Score:5, Interesting)"

      3 at the most, really :)

    19. Re:Cheap buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But most of us tried to hack XP only to install an acqua theme, so themes for OS X aren't really that necessary

    20. Re:Cheap buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By Widgets stay on top of the desktop at all times they eat up system resources. Run a check on how much resources Dashboard uses verses Konfabulator.

      And the idea of Widgets existed long before Konfabulator, they were even minorly used in NextStep.

    21. Re:Cheap buy? by grrrl · · Score: 1

      errr if you hide itunes, it takes up the same amount of space as if you close the window

  2. ugh by nthitz · · Score: 1

    I doubt this will leave a good taste in anyones mouth

    1. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I doubt this will leave a good taste in anyones mouth

      I left a good taste in your mom's mouth.

  3. fells like dvorak... by soapdog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heh, I know Google will now buy Apple to get hands on Dashboard, way better than konfab... /me fells insightfull

    --
    -- Por mais que eu ande no vale das trevas e da morte, meu PowerMac G4 Não Travará!!!
    1. Re:fells like dvorak... by UndyingShadow · · Score: 1

      Nah, Google will just start buying up all the monitor companies...can you say "Direct Overlay"

    2. Re:fells like dvorak... by gcnaddict · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "fells like dvorak..." Dvorak does fellatio? thats a thought that I dont really want to imagine...

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:fells like dvorak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot, GOOGLE cant afford APPLE, hell even SUN Micro cant afford APPLE, APPLE has become so expensive that even companies with a lot of money like IBM, would have to get loans to acquire them, APPLE is a $50 BLN company, for someone to want to buy them they have to cough up something like $40 BLN,

  4. Re:too lazy to google right now by soapdog · · Score: 1

    konfab is like dashboard and both are like desktop widget and I don't know why I feel that flamewars will start in couple minutes... Konfab x Dashboard: the prior art battle... almost like Vi x Emacs: How many keys can you press at the same time...

    --
    -- Por mais que eu ande no vale das trevas e da morte, meu PowerMac G4 Não Travará!!!
  5. highly doubt by akhomerun · · Score: 0, Funny

    with dashboard out, just like the article implies, i doubt yahoo will continue making its widgets for dashboard. of course, my comment is kind of an obvious statement...but hey it's 1 in the morning no one should notice.

    1. Re:highly doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by akhomerun (893103) on 25/07/05 17:37 :P

  6. Please, take me seriously! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And the CEO's new job title, "Director of Widget Technology"! What a step up.

    1. Re:Please, take me seriously! by Rellik66 · · Score: 5, Funny

      And I'll be the Director of Minor Widget Technology

      or DiMWiT for short

      --

      Too many zeros, not enough ones

    2. Re:Please, take me seriously! by AliasMoze · · Score: 1

      Lay off. Widget technology doesn't direct itself.

    3. Re:Please, take me seriously! by themoodykid · · Score: 1

      And I'll be the Director of Midget Technology.

    4. Re:Please, take me seriously! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chief Yahoo of Widget Technology"?

    5. Re:Please, take me seriously! by VolciMaster · · Score: 1
      And I'll be the Director of Minor Widget Technology

      You were so close! The real title will be Director of Midget Widget Technology.

  7. Great news for Yahoo users. by spooje · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is great news for Yahoo lovers. Konfabulator was a super easy for non-programmers to make great little apps for the Mac. I'd love to to see what these things can do if you're able to hook them into the full range of Yahoo information/services.

    I wonder if this is at the urging of Yahoo Japan? Here Yahoo is the most popular portal and search engine. I've heard Mac sales, not including the iPod, are way up so maybe there's some pressure to make things more cross platform?

    --
    Tea and kung-fu. Life is good. Rising Phoenix
    1. Re:Great news for Yahoo users. by Cocteaustin · · Score: 1

      Nope, this came from the new Y! Developer Network (my team, based in Sunnyvale). There's no pressure to make things x-platform, it's just the right thing to do.

    2. Re:Great news for Yahoo users. by Angostura · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Surely Yahoo is doing this the wrong way round though:

      You say:

      I'd love to to see what these things can do if you're able to hook them into the full range of Yahoo information/services.

      Surely what is needed is for Yahoo to publish a rich, well documented set of APIs, rather like Google* has done - this would let any desktop software (Konfabulator, Dashboard, Linux stuff, whatever) access the information.

      Instead it seems that Yahoo has decided against this and instead is insulating its core APIs by only giving access via a proprietary software layer (Konfabulator) sitting on the client. Seems a bit weird to me.

      *Yes, I'm aware of the restrictions that Google places on its API use.

    3. Re:Great news for Yahoo users. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      this came from the new Y! Developer Network (my team, based in Sunnyvale)

      Next time you run into the guy in charge of the chess applet can you get him to fix it up a bit? It's functional, but if someone spent an afternoon or two of clean up on it it could be a lot better.

    4. Re:Great news for Yahoo users. by carlivar · · Score: 1
      Surely what is needed is for Yahoo to publish a rich, well documented set of APIs

      Um, like this?

      --
      Vote Libertarian
    5. Re:Great news for Yahoo users. by jalefkowit · · Score: 1
      Surely what is needed is for Yahoo to publish a rich, well documented set of APIs, rather like Google* has done - this would let any desktop software (Konfabulator, Dashboard, Linux stuff, whatever) access the information.

      You mean like these?

      Yahoo offers APIs for a much wider range of their services than Google does.

    6. Re:Great news for Yahoo users. by Cocteaustin · · Score: 1

      What if we instead released a Games SDK so you could write your own or clean it up yourself?

    7. Re:Great news for Yahoo users. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      What if we instead released a Games SDK so you could write your own or clean it up yourself?

      That'd be very interesting. Is that being considered? As an aside, If you send the code for the current one I'll fix it up and send it back. My assumption is that there's little platform-specific code in there, and that things that look fine in Windows don't work out so well when the same applet is run on a Mac. Fonts and font sizes, for instance.

  8. Kon... fa... bulator... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I think Yahoo bought this instead.

    1. Re:Kon... fa... bulator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow ur fat

    2. Re:Kon... fa... bulator... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Kiss my faq, you fat-loving retard!

  9. Re:too lazy to google right now by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Funny

    pointless javascript based desktop junk.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  10. Too bad by FlameSnyper · · Score: 0

    It's just too bad Apple didn't do this. I mean, Dashboard's cool and all, but some widgets just work better _on_ the desktop.

    1. Re:Too bad by rebug · · Score: 3, Informative
      --

      there's more than one way to do me.
    2. Re:Too bad by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      Nice to see that, now if only apple will hurry up and do this so dashboard works the way it should have in the first place.

    3. Re:Too bad by FlameSnyper · · Score: 1

      Yes, but my point still stands... if Apple had bought Konfabulator, Apple's widgets could go on the desktop without a third-party plug-in... and without having to dance around the "Large vendor kills small vendor's shareware app" problem.

      Thanks for the linkage, though. I'll try it out.

    4. Re:Too bad by FlameSnyper · · Score: 1

      Bad form and all, replying to myself, but...

      Amnesty is $20. If Yahoo hadn't just bought Konfabulator and made it free... maybe.

      So, Dashboard widgets in their place, and Konfabulator (now free) on my desktop.

  11. I'm not dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "While Schneider wasn't specific, he did say that there was interest in the Mac."

    Maybe someone should do a big piece about the resurgence of the Mac?

  12. Re:New Package, Same Old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Aren't these already available as an extra cost upgrade for Firefox?

    Extra cost? Idiot. Firefox doesn't cost anything in the first place, unless you're kind enough to order a cd. And no, these have nothing to do with Firefox.

    This post's chaptcha: haggle

  13. Konfabulator ?? by Jeet81 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Took me some time to figure out what Konfabulator actually is.

    After fiddling around with the website I found this:
    Konfabulator is a JavaScript runtime engine for Windows and Mac OS X that lets you run little files called Widgets that can do pretty much whatever you want them to.

    Hope that helps someone.

    1. Re:Konfabulator ?? by rm999 · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I went on the internet and gave up trying to figure out what the hell it is after about 10 minutes. Can't an executable pretty much do anything you want them to?

    2. Re:Konfabulator ?? by plaxion · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you weren't the only one who was konfabulated by it ;)

    3. Re:Konfabulator ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wikipedia article on Konfabulator:

      Konfabulator is a shareware JavaScript runtime engine for Mac OS X and Windows which runs small applications called Widgets. It combines this engine with an XML document structure that can be used to author custom Widgets. In addition to those created by Arlo Rose & Perry Clarke, the authors of Konfabulator, Widgets created by Konfabulator's users are also available to download and install. Mac OS X v10.4 contains a feature similar to Konfabulator called Dashboard.

      Originally a Mac-only application, Konfabulator for Windows was released on November 8, 2004. Its main commercial competitor on the Windows platform is DesktopX, developed by Stardock. Other programs offering similar functionality include Kapsules (for Windows), gDesklets (for GNOME/Linux), and SuperKaramba (for KDE/Linux).

      The JavaScript engine used by Konfabulator is the Mozilla SpiderMonkey implementation, and currently conforms to Mozilla JavaScript version 1.5, (equivalent to ECMAScript 262 edition 3, with Mozilla extensions).

      Konfabulator version 2.0 was released on May 18, 2005.

      Konsposé

      Konfabulator provides a feature called Konsposé, which is patterned after Mac OS X's Exposé. Activated (by default) by pressing the F8 key, this causes all Widgets to be brought to the foreground, and all other applications to be dimmed. Widgets can be set to be Konsposé-only, meaning that they'll only appear when Konsposé is activated.

      Konfabulator authors

      * Arlo Rose * Perry Clarke
      (Quoted to avoid Wikipedia trollery.)
    4. Re:Konfabulator ?? by aarku · · Score: 1

      Octojebus forbid you to RTFA. I mean, the Konfabulator link is the 10th word in the linked article. Oh wait, "RTFA? Welcome to /. You must be new here"

    5. Re:Konfabulator ?? by fodi · · Score: 2, Informative

      You spent 10 minutes and failed? you need help. I typed "Konfabulator" into Google and took the first link, which came up with the quote in the parent post....

    6. Re:Konfabulator ?? by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How are you supposed to figure out if you want to RTFA or not if the summary doesn't contain a description of what the hell it is TFA is talking about. The "editors" are supposed to reject shit summaries like this one.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:Konfabulator ?? by aarku · · Score: 2, Informative

      True, but most /. summaries don't explain what they are talking about. Take the previous story about FreeBSD for an example. Then it just comes down to a point of view about what the vast majority of readers already know about. So, that's just like, your opinion, man.

    8. Re:Konfabulator ?? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      How so? The previous story at least had a link to the summer of code story so people could get the back history. Just a link to the "about Konfabulator" page would have helped.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    9. Re:Konfabulator ?? by ArcticCelt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well if you go on the web site the description is clear. First the tag line: "Whatever you want it to be"

      Then : "Konfabulator, runner of widgets, this is what you need. Seriously."

      It couldn't be more clear than that, how can you not understand?

      Its a watchyamacallit for Smurfing Marclars!!!

      //I did want to beat up the submitter too.

      --

      Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    10. Re:Konfabulator ?? by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      You're confusing confabulate with confounded.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    11. Re:Konfabulator ?? by dyefade · · Score: 1

      Thanks, yeah. (Well it would've if I hadn't looked for myself.)

      Wouldn't take much for the submitter/editor to have put a basic intro in the blurb though. Oh wait...

    12. Re:Konfabulator ?? by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1
      Pfft... I choose to guess at what TFA is all about. That said, I have no idea why this is a big deal... getting a fabulator thingy is an emplyee benefit. We have older employees and have had one for ages with people trained in restarting hearts. You young pups can huff and puff all day but you'll get old some time too and'll be thankful people took the time to make the workplace safe!

      It makes me so freaking angry when everyone just looks out for themselves and... GAH... pain... oh crap... it's a KONfibulator? What the hell's that?

    13. Re:Konfabulator ?? by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      You may have a five-digit ID, but ... you're new here, aren't you?

      Since when have the editors ever selected anything on the basis of the writeup quality, newsworthiness, or even whether the identical story has recently run, even on the same day?

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    14. Re:Konfabulator ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...you failed in 20 seconds what he failed in 10 minutes? I guess that's impressive...

    15. Re:Konfabulator ?? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Since when have the editors ever selected anything on the basis of the writeup quality

      Early on the level of editorial quality (and apparently, effort) was much higher than it is today.

    16. Re:Konfabulator ?? by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Every time you write about some obscure bit of technology, you need to address the needs of people who have never heard of it. Which means asking yourself "What is it?" and answering yourself with a simple one-sentence description like that one. Alas, that takes more mental effort than most Slashdot submitters can spare.

      I've tried Konfabulator. Lost interest when I realized it was for people who like to have messy desktops with lots of little apps open. (And transparent windows so you can see them all!) Which pretty much describes the standard MacOS desktop, and the working style of a lot of Windows and Linux geeks. But that only works if you have a high capacity for divided attention. Most people don't.

    17. Re:Konfabulator ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because YOU don't know what Konfabulator doesn't mean the editors don't. Should they run everything by you first?

      "Gee, I don't know if we should post this story on hard drives. QuantumG might not know what they are. He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer, you know."

    18. Re:Konfabulator ?? by daeley · · Score: 1

      You probably had to read Slashdot uphill both ways in the snow back then, huh? ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  14. Re:too lazy to google right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's actually pointless XML based desktop junk :-)

  15. Re:too lazy to google right now by uprock_x · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Konfabulator == widgets; desktop thingys made from *ml, javascript etc.

    Apple later came up with Dashboard, created the mother of all smokescreens about Desktop Accessories to plead that it was not inspired by Konfabulator and the rest is history.

    Apple's behaviour apparently wasn't breaking any law as such but it was the equivalent of some kid leaning over your shoulder and copying your homework. I expect the Dashboard apologists will appear shortly pointing to a piece of FUD called daringfireball, but the question remains:

    would Dashboard have existed in the form it does, using the underlying technologies it does, trying to serve the purpose it does and look how it does if Konfabulator never had existed ?

    answer: um...ah....oh

    I say good luck to Konfabulator, hope they got a good price from Yahoo

  16. Good press begins with the Mac by aftk2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While Schneider wasn't specific, he did say that there was interest in the Mac. 'There is a move at Yahoo! -- in addition to Konfabulator -- to move more onto the Mac,' said Schneider. '

    I don't find this surprising. Lately, it seems that Yahoo has been getting some of the positive internet buzz that used to be reserved solely for Google. I imagine that releasing products specifically for Mac users is aimed at garnering similar buzz.

    While Macs have a relatively small share of the market, they are, however, well represented among popular bloggers, technorati (ugh) and the mavens of the web: inform or impress these folks, and you will begin to inform and impress the rest of the web. This is a move to grab mindshare.

    --
    concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    1. Re:Good press begins with the Mac by jesterzog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't find this surprising. Lately, it seems that Yahoo has been getting some of the positive internet buzz that used to be reserved solely for Google.

      They're definitely providing at least a couple of services which I'm surprised that Google isn't heavily involved in just yet.

      One of them is YahooGroups, for running mailing lists (along with several additional group-like features latched on). I guess Yahoo picked up a lot of this market by default, especially after Listbot was shut down by Microsoft. The other is Yahoo Calendar, which I'm admittedly only just starting to play with, but I'm finding it useful.

      The biggest reason that I'm surprised Google hasn't touched these areas is that they're both very search-oriented, or can be. Just about everything Google's done in the past has been based around some kind of searching, or generally helping people to find things. That's where Google's expertise is.

    2. Re:Good press begins with the Mac by Cocteaustin · · Score: 1

      That's all true, but we didn't do this deal to impress the blogosphere. We did it because Konfabulator is a kickass software development platform and it will enable us to bring more Yahoo! goodness to Windows and the Mac.

    3. Re:Good press begins with the Mac by undef24 · · Score: 1

      Have you heard of Google groups?

    4. Re:Good press begins with the Mac by kevcol · · Score: 1

      It would help the perception even more if they'd finally update Yahoo IM for crap sake (currently 2 years old software with a hobbled feature set).

    5. Re:Good press begins with the Mac by jesterzog · · Score: 1

      Good point. Until checking just now, I hadn't realised that they'd extended it to anything more than a wrapper around Usenet.

    6. Re:Good press begins with the Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, now go get a cup of coffee and wake up.

      I'll gloss over the impress the Mac crowd and you impress the world delusion with a simple, lol, and get on to your major malfunction.

      First of all, Konfab hasn't been Mac only since Apple screwed them over and stole their idea so that they could 'innovate'. The Konfab folks were none too pleased with Apple and announced they were going to focus on Windows.

      More erroneously however is the mindshare idea. This is obviously nothing more than a vehicle for adware and spyware installation. They couldn't care less that it runs on Macs. They are having an increasingly hard time getting people to install their infested tool crap as people are starting to wise up to malware. Konfab will give them a fresh start in infecting PCs across the globe.

      The Konfab folks should be ashamed of themselves.

    7. Re:Good press begins with the Mac by jiushao · · Score: 1

      Google Groups non-usenet functionality is quite a bit younger than Yahoo Groups though (quite old community solution really). Also Google Groups features a quite confusing interface ever since the remake (and the remake was what added the non-usenet groups).

    8. Re:Good press begins with the Mac by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      More erroneously however is the mindshare idea. This is obviously nothing more than a vehicle for adware and spyware installation. They couldn't care less that it runs on Macs. They are having an increasingly hard time getting people to install their infested tool crap as people are starting to wise up to malware. Konfab will give them a fresh start in infecting PCs across the globe.

      A little acerbic, but accurate. I was thinking that the recent shutting of yahoo chat rooms (you know, the ones with titles like, "old dirty men and underage girls 4 REAL") is the most recent press yahoo has gotten. Until Recently I was convinced that yahoo was just a bunch of computers left over from the .com era running themselves, with maybe a skeleton crew dusting the place now and then. The chat rooms are about 80% drones and bots, and the ads and content all come from somewhere else anyway.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    9. Re:Good press begins with the Mac by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Google groups is still just a wrapper around Usenet, it's just that you can create newsgroups that don't appear on anyone else's NNTP server. Google doesn't offer any of the other features of Yahoo Groups, like file/picture storage, a calendar, polls, and so on.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    10. Re:Good press begins with the Mac by obirt · · Score: 1

      If they want to be "more onto the Mac" they could start by updating YIM more than once every two years. Even MSN messenger has them beat for the moment.

      --

      I use to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure.
    11. Re:Good press begins with the Mac by jesterzog · · Score: 1

      Also Google Groups features a quite confusing interface ever since the remake (and the remake was what added the non-usenet groups).

      I found the new interface very confusing compared with the old one, but just today I was looking at it, and noticed the "Browse all of Usenet..." link in the lower right corner of the page.

      That link points here, which is very similar to the old group browsing interface that they had, and one that I can use to find what I'm looking for much more easily.

      I can kind of understand why they've been trying to change the interface, even though I don't like the new one as much. Anyone who's unfamiliar with Usenet will probably be much more familiar with the standard web catalogue format, where things are placed into nice, plain categories with clear titles, rather than systematic dot-separated hierarchical names. I prefer the second way, but a lot of beginners wouldn't have a clue what the difference is between alt., comp., rec., soc., and all the others.

  17. Re:too lazy to google right now by KillShill · · Score: 1

    widgets isn't a new phenomenon. and frankly, just about everything in modern personal computers isn't either.

    we as a people have been copying things from each other since the begining. it is only natural and in fact recommended.

    give up those old robber baron notions of "intellectual property" before we get into a really bad situation, like software patents or using holding companies solely to bring lawsuits as a business model. oh wai....t.

    the right to have rights. i hear something...

    is that you louis armstrong?

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  18. Re:too lazy to google right now by mad.frog · · Score: 1

    who the hell modded this "interesting"? if you want to give an informed, reasoned response as to somethings junkitude, fair enough. but no way should this get modded up.

  19. Clutter by TheStonepedo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't see the purpose of a weather function on the desktop or perhaps a news ticker. All of the clutter of widgets cannot be worth the slight gain in functionality. A well-organized homepage with links/bookmarks should do the trick. A click or two to launch and use a browser are worth saving desktop real estate on a low-res (1024x768) LCD like mine.

    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
    1. Re:Clutter by spooje · · Score: 1

      Well my father likes to listen to German radio over the net while watching the weather chanel all night, now he can turn off the TV.

      --
      Tea and kung-fu. Life is good. Rising Phoenix
    2. Re:Clutter by enjoilax · · Score: 1

      Well it does have a seperate "konspose" layer that is hidden (i think F8 is the key) Anyways, this minimizes clutter, i ran my calculator, note pad, calender, etc. in that layer, on my desktop i only had wi-fi meter, and digital clock (easier to read).

    3. Re:Clutter by coldmist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've played around with it a bit. I have it on my laptop. The widgets are showing battery (much, much nicer than the stupid default windows one), wifi stength, disk usage, and weather.

      Of these, only the weather one "could" be shown through a browser.

      I have mine set to only be seen as part of the background, so none of the widgets are on top of any windows. But they are visible if all windows are minimized

      My only complaint is the memory footprint (20MB just for the engine, plus 1-5MB per widget), and some widgets are CPU hogs, causing my battery to drain faster than usual (one of the battery monitors!) and cpu to stay hotter.

      --
      Don't steal. The government hates competition.
    4. Re:Clutter by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      I like using the battery and wireless signal strength widgets, set to 10% opacity and small up in the corner, for example...

    5. Re:Clutter by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Depends on how you configure it. You can also set it up to be active with a hotkey press, meaning it doesn't take up desktop real estate unless you want it to. I've found that certain apps are pretty damn useful, now if only there were a decent Amtrak widget, I'd be a happy kitty.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    6. Re:Clutter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone with a windowless office, I found Konfabulator's Weather dingus extremely helpful, as it gave me a constant, almost-subconscious link to what the weather was like outside in the way that having a real-life window in your peripheral vision does.

      I was excited when Tiger came out with Dashboard's Weather dingus, but it's not the same... I have to move the mouse to the corner of the screen, and even then there's some delay as it loads in. Also, I can't see the weather change in real-time, something that I came to appreciate.

      Yes, my desktop real-estate is precious, but that was one of the few things that was useful enough to warrant the space (iTunes being the only other one to achieve that status).

    7. Re:Clutter by tgrimley · · Score: 1

      That's so weird.

    8. Re:Clutter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just use ForecastFox, and spare the desktop clutter...

    9. Re:Clutter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lo-res? mine is a 320x240 plasma.

    10. Re:Clutter by azpenguin · · Score: 1

      At work, I'm not allowed to surf that much. If I have a browser window open when the boss walks past, I may have some 'splaining to do.
      However, I do try to keep up with the news, baseball scores... things like that. Widgets on the desktop would be very handy for that. And I won't have the boss wondering why I'm surfing when I should be working.

  20. I just bought Konfabulator by aarku · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bought it about a week ago. It's nice, but this blows. How do I look on the bright side of this? I could use that $20.

    1. Re:I just bought Konfabulator by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 5, Informative

      if you read the damn article you'd notice they were giving refunds to people who bought it in the past 2 months. reading is fundamental and i don't think half the fucking population can do it anymore.

    2. Re:I just bought Konfabulator by Tim_F · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you really needed that $20.00 then you wouldn't have bought the software. What a stupid question.

    3. Re:I just bought Konfabulator by aarku · · Score: 1

      Okay, relax everyone! Yahoo says I get a refund! (And you do too if you bought it in the last two Months) Take that, luck!

    4. Re:I just bought Konfabulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA. You're getting a refund.

      Why did you buy Konfabulator last week?

    5. Re:I just bought Konfabulator by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Luck still wins. After postage, handling, and taxes, you'll probably get a bill from Yahoo for their time. :P

    6. Re:I just bought Konfabulator by aarku · · Score: 2

      It's much more fun to just react to the first few lines of the article! I saw the refund thing a tad later and got a good laugh. Lighten up! :)

    7. Re:I just bought Konfabulator by aarku · · Score: 1

      I need every bit of money of mine that isn't well spent. :) If you have some extra cash for a poor college student with your fancy 5 digit uid, send it this way. At least I didn't pirate it.

    8. Re:I just bought Konfabulator by phalse+phace · · Score: 3, Funny
      "if you read the damn article... reading is fundamental and i don't think half the fucking population can do it anymore."

      You must be new here.

    9. Re:I just bought Konfabulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reading is fundamental and i don't think half the fucking population can do it anymore.

      Not only reading. Also the correct use of the [SHIFT] key has been lost by most.

    10. Re:I just bought Konfabulator by Strolls · · Score: 5, Funny
      reading is fundamental and i don't think half the fucking population can do it anymore.
      This is Slashdot - most people here are members of the non-fucking population, YIC.
    11. Re:I just bought Konfabulator by silverdr · · Score: 1

      Looks like you never really used the Konfabulator...

      --
      Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
    12. Re:I just bought Konfabulator by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      It's been my experience that it's not so much that people don't read, it's that they skim things so fast they don't have time to actually process what they're zipping through. I can't begin to count how many emails I've sent out to clients and people in my own workplaces that have gone maybe 1/4 read.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    13. Re:I just bought Konfabulator by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      reading is fundamental and i don't think half the fucking population can do it anymore.
      No kidding. Oh, how I wish it were half of the non-fucking population that couldn't do it -- then we might be rid of them eventually!
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  21. Lately Submissions Suck! by ImaLamer · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I hate complaining, but this is the submission:

    "Macworld news has an article about Yahoo's acquisition of Konfabulator, which will be announced Monday. Yahoo company executives said they will be giving Konfabulator away for free, completely doing away with the US$19.95 currently charged for the product. The reason they purchased Konfabulator was they wanted an easy way to open up its APIs to the developer community and allow them easy access to the information on the Yahoo web site." From the article: "The acquisition of Konfabulator may not be the last Mac compatible product users see from Yahoo! While Schneider wasn't specific, he did say that there was interest in the Mac. 'There is a move at Yahoo! -- in addition to Konfabulator -- to move more onto the Mac,' said Schneider. 'We want to make sure we find a way to be more cross platform.'"


    It should be like this:

    "Macworld news has an article about Yahoo's acquisition of Konfabulator, which will be announced Monday. Yahoo company executives said they will be giving Konfabulator away for free, completely doing away with the US$19.95 currently charged for the product. The reason they purchased Konfabulator was they wanted an easy way to open up its APIs to the developer community and allow them easy access to the information on the Yahoo web site." From the article: "The acquisition of Konfabulator may not be the last Mac compatible product users see from Yahoo! While Schneider wasn't specific, he did say that there was interest in the Mac. 'There is a move at Yahoo! -- in addition to Konfabulator -- to move more onto the Mac,' said Schneider. 'We want to make sure we find a way to be more cross platform.'"


    I know it is silly - but we always linked on the verbs, and I think we should try to do that more. Then, maybe at least one link to a relevant site is needed to help out the clueless. If we are being shown RAID 101 stories, are we expected to know every piece of software out there?
  22. Re:too lazy to google right now by Cocteaustin · · Score: 1
  23. Re:too lazy to google right now by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    I agree, but it's not like had any say in the matter.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  24. Re:too lazy to google right now by ceeam · · Score: 1

    Well, mostly yeah, you are right. Unless you have a permanent Internet connection (and that's a big "unless"). Then things get interesting and you can actually save yourself a lot of browsing and stuff.

  25. Microsoft is missing out. Again. by melted · · Score: 0, Troll

    This could be THE perfect vehicle to get people to actually use MSN. As a bonus, if they bought Konfabulator, they could release it without worrying that someone might blame them for ripping off Apple, because Apple themselves ripped off the Konfabulator. Please, someone at MSN, I'm a shareholder and I want to hear heads roll.

    1. Re:Microsoft is missing out. Again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, someone at MSN, I'm a shareholder and I want to hear heads roll.

      Just go out with Gates or Ballmer one night. Word is, they routinely go bowling... with human heads!

    2. Re:Microsoft is missing out. Again. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Where's the difference between "Konfabulator" and Active Desktop? So far it sounds pretty similar.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  26. I just bought Windows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not any different than buying Windows, and Linux suddenly coming along and blowing it away.

    I'm certain all those Windows users could have used that $80.

    ---
    The "are you a script" word for today is quixotic.

    1. Re:I just bought Windows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that by the time that happens $80 won't buy you a cup of coffee.

    2. Re:I just bought Windows. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      I'm sure that by the time that happens $80 won't buy you a cup of coffee.

      Is coffee really that expensive in Seattle?

  27. Re:too lazy to google right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure the success of Konfabulator does play into Dashboard's existance and current , but I do remember this story on folklore.org about some early ideas for MacOS. It may have been someone at Apple looking at Konfabulator and saying "hey, this is actually doable now."

  28. Re:too lazy to google right now by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Funny

    At what point did MS steal the idea for Active Desktop?

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  29. Will it make a difference? by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When Apple makes it transition to x86 will it make a difference if Yahoo has G5 compatible software?

  30. Re:too lazy to google right now by johnbeat · · Score: 4, Informative

    >would Dashboard have existed in the form it does, using the
    >underlying technologies it does, trying to serve the purpose it
    >does and look how it does if Konfabulator never had existed ?

    Meanwhile, other posters are complaining that Dashboard *doesn't* copy Konfabulator and requires (barring developer mode) looking at all of them at once.

    Yes, Dashboard would have existed without Konfabulator. Dashboard is based on WebKit. WebKit is part of OS X. WebKit is what powers Safari and Mail's HTML rendering (and probably most other third-party HTML renderers at this point).

    http://webkit.opendarwin.org/

    Dashboard came at the same time that Automator did; Apple appears to be trying to ensure that their technologies are easy to automate and script into small, useful apps. After AppleScript, Automator, and the various scripting languages on the command line, it made perfect sense to build a javascript/HTML development tool based on WebKit.

    I suspect that the only thing that would have changed if Konfabulator did not exist is that Apple would not have called their widgets "gadgets" for a few days.

    Jerry

  31. Great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Dashboard came out, I immediately though of Konfabulator.

    This is a great move for Arlo and crew.

  32. Re:Allah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    biased arent you? thats like saying "bar mitzvah" and pressing the red button

  33. Daring. by Xenex · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here it is.

    I don't think you understand what FUD means.

  34. From the konfabulator webpage. by Lithus · · Score: 1

    Title: The Day Before The Big News
    Tomorrow, Konfabulator will enter its next phase of life.
    It's not a major new version, or a fancy new set of widgets.
    It's the beginning of something big.
    When you'll hear us say...
    "Excellent!"
    "Woot!"
    "Hooray!"
    "YAHOO!"



    Website

    1. Re:From the konfabulator webpage. by Pete · · Score: 1

      I thought the little comic storyline was really cool too. Made me laugh out loud quite a few times. :)

  35. Yahoo! is the greatest by CarbonBasedSoda · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Honestely... name another service with so much free stuff (that's actually useful). There's email, fantasy sports, chat, IM, photo storage, stocks, streaming stocks for $10 a month, and the list goes on and on. Konfabulator is awesome, if MicroSoft had released it, it would cost $69.95 in the form of an OS update. Praise Yahoo!!

    1. Re:Yahoo! is the greatest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I wouldn't be so blind as to praise them, I do agree that Yahoo has an excellent bundle of web services. I'm not aware of any other one company that could provide a better data source for desktop widgets and I think this is a fantastic move.

      Although I still question how useful desktop widgets would be... (although I have no excuse not to try them now...)

    2. Re:Yahoo! is the greatest by kf6auf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Konfabulator is awesome, if MicroSoft had released it, it would cost $69.95 in the form of an OS update.

      That's nothing. If Apple released it, said OS update would cost $129. Oh, wait a sec...

    3. Re:Yahoo! is the greatest by teksno · · Score: 1

      yeah except now its gonna be bundled with the yahoo toolbar... granted it only gets installed by tools... but never the less annoying

    4. Re:Yahoo! is the greatest by Cocteaustin · · Score: 1

      You are making this up, and you are also wrong. But thank you for playing!

    5. Re:Yahoo! is the greatest by freeplatypus · · Score: 1

      Well, yes. But they could finally stop sticking adds to e-mail's (yes, I know, I can pay, but there are milions of free e-mail suppliers that do not stick their adds). Nevertheless, Yahoo! gives pretty complete web environment (I like My Yahoo!).

  36. What cool/geeky ones exist? by antdude · · Score: 1

    I know some of you use this product already. What are cool widgets you're running on? I am curious what's out there.

    I still run Mac OS X 10.2.8 on my old PowerBook G4 so I wonder if I am missing out with these goodies.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  37. Re:too lazy to google right now by Cocteaustin · · Score: 1

    No need to press a key to use a Konfabulator widget, that is one of the big usability advantages over Apple desktop widgets.

  38. Incredibly annoying. by Time+Doctor · · Score: 1

    They post this PR, and won't let you download the damn product. The downloads page on the main site sends you to the index of the main site when you click on the download links. I'm trying to download your stupid widget factory, not look at the cartoon of how awesome you are for re-doing widgets on the desktop, you insensitive clods!

    --
    Check out ioquake3.org for a great, free, First-Person Shooter engine!
    1. Re:Incredibly annoying. by Durf · · Score: 4, Informative
  39. Re:too lazy to google right now by ryanov · · Score: 1

    I personally thought that it was part of KDE without RTFA'ing. Turns out it's a desktop widget thing. Chris Pirillo must be thrilled!

  40. Re:too lazy to google right now by dr.badass · · Score: 1

    Apple's behaviour apparently wasn't breaking any law as such but it was the equivalent of some kid leaning over your shoulder and copying your homework.

    Actually, it's more like being assigned the same problem and coming up with a similar solution. And there's no law against fair competition.

    I expect the Dashboard apologists will appear shortly pointing to a piece of FUD called daringfireball, but the question remains:

    "FUD" does not mean what you think it means. Also what on earth is a "Dashboard apologist"?

    would Dashboard have existed in the form it does, using the underlying technologies it does, trying to serve the purpose it does and look how it does if Konfabulator never had existed ?

    Maybe not, but some other product filling the same need, likely in a similar way, would have. Likewise, people wouldn't call foul if someone other than Apple had released Dashboard. People love a David-and-Goliath story, even after David gets bought by Yahoo.

    --
    Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  41. looks like the semantic web is taking off by mstone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I don't care much about Konfabulator per se, it's interesting to see how popular non-browser, web-based mini-apps are becoming. Looks like the first little frothy bit on the wave of the semantic web has arrived. It'll be interesting to see if this ends up generating as much buzz as the last few Next Big Things.

    It certainly has the potential to. It's a platform-independent application framework, just like Java-on-the-browser was supposed to be, but this iteration is free from the one-size-fits-all constraints that browser-based development imposed (plus, widgets don't have to be stateless). In fact, this has all the earmarks of a disruptive technology, with the added advantage that it's based on well-deployed standard technologies.. i.e.: stuff Microsoft can't mess with as easily as Java.

    1. Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a platform-independent application framework, just like Java-on-the-browser was supposed to be, but this iteration is free from the one-size-fits-all constraints that browser-based development imposed (plus, widgets don't have to be stateless)

      Say what? That's a lot of buzz-word fluff for: "download info and display it".

    2. Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off by Decker-Mage · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I believe you are on to something here. Frankly, I won't do Flash, I won't do Java, and I certainly WON'T do ActiveX. With the exception of ActiveX, all involve rather large, separate downloads whereas Javascript is just there. Also look at Ajax. It just works without anything special being added and it works very well.

      Now admittedly, Javascript as a language sucks rocks but you can depend on it working cross-browser, cross-OS, cross-dang-near-anything, and the user doesn't have to do a thing to get it to work. That meets the Grandmother standard that I use these days for measuring user utility. [Not to put down Grandma's. My 76 y.o. mother rocks at programming!]

      [Actually, it's rather funny that I figured out how to do Ajax back in 2000 while mucking around in the MSDN's I had and stumbled across XMLHTTPResponse(). I posted what I found all over the place and nobody did a damn thing with it. Now it's the hot tamale. Weird world.]

      That's just my $.02, FWIW.

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
    3. Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off by mstone · · Score: 3, Interesting
      • platform independent - the same widget will run on a Mac or a PC.

      • application framework - Konfabulator (or Dashboard) does some of the work, so you don't have to slog through Mozilla-we've-created-our-own-version-of-every-dat a-class-in-the-universe hell.

      • one-size-fits-all constraints - you "download info and display it" when you play Halo, but nobody freaks out because they can't use Halo to read Slashdot or order books from Amazon. Halo can just concentrate on being Halo, rather than trying to be Halo, plus a web browser, plus Everquest, plus the Sims online, etc. Much the same way, a widget can concentrate on doing one thing well, without having to put up with the IE/Firefox/Mozilla/Opera/Safari windows, toolbars, menus, and other associated cruft.

      • doesn't have to be stateless - a widget can download and display information, then keep using that information while some of the other information changes.. as opposed to a web browser, which has to pass the same damn package of data back and forth every time the user goes to a new page, or play all sorts of stupid games with cookies, session keys, database storage, and so forth.

    4. Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off by mstone · · Score: 1

      Now admittedly, Javascript as a language sucks rocks ...

      No argument there..

      I cherish a hope that if this whole thing really does become popular, we'll start to see drop-in modules for other languages. Then people will be able to use Perl, Ruby, Java, Python, or whatever they already like best. Most of the popular interpreted languages today already have pretty good cross-platform support, and it wouldn't be too painful to find subsets that are safe, but replace Javascript.

    5. Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off by Decker-Mage · · Score: 1
      No argument there from me. Perl is usually one of the first things to go on my systems here, Windows or whatever, right after a fresh install. I'd like to see Python and Ruby as well, although I haven't done much with either yet. I really do like them from a purist and hacker context.

      As for Java, well you can take it out and nuke it for all I care. It doesn't come near any of my systems, period. Not due to security concerns, although there have been some concerns in the past, and some still remain. Just on general principle. I'm agnostic about a lot of things but that language, as with anything designed by a committee, is a horror. Speaking as a software engineer, among other things, even .NET is better designed!

      Just don't bring PHP to the party until version 5 settles out and they clean up their security act. And before anyone jumps me, {grin}, I like it as well.

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
    6. Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off by ffdixon · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The web is great, but it has two faults: it requires manual effort to monitor updates to content you care about, and when web browser is closed, a web site (such as Yahoo) can't alert you to updates other than by flooding your inbox with more e-mail.

      RSS is helping this, but it's only providing the content. I think people are missing an important point on these Web-based desktop applications: it lets a web site (such as Yahoo) provide content-specific logic with their data to increase traffic.

      RSS: "Here is our feed; we hope you find it valuable and come back."

      Web-based desktop applications: "Here is our feed PLUS a script-based program that increases its value by letting you personalize your awareness to our content."

      Such applications let you offer content + content-specific logic to users. Not only can you offload some of the processing on your server, but more importantly give users a way to personalize their awareness, which leads to more traffic.

      I think Konfabulator provides great eye candy, but is a bit too unstructured for corporate deployment. Corporations (and users) like consistency in an interface. If you want to see an example of a consistent interface for monitoring and alerting to changes in XML or HTML-based content, check out Serence KlipFolio. It has a JavaScript run-time engine and built-in APIs that make putting the business logic on the desktop easy.

      Regards,... Fred

      --
      Life is NP-Complete

      --
      Life is NP-Complete
    7. Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off by 2008 · · Score: 1

      "It's a platform-independent application framework, just like Java-on-the-browser was supposed to be, but this iteration is free from the one-size-fits-all constraints that browser-based development imposed (plus, widgets don't have to be stateless). In fact, this has all the earmarks of a disruptive technology, with the added advantage that it's based on well-deployed standard technologies.. i.e.: stuff Microsoft can't mess with as easily as Java."

      Sure, but how is that different to any other application? The only difference I can see is that porting is a little easier on supported platforms (harder off them?), and you don't have to get the users to install python or compile a binary yourself for each platform - neither of which is all that tricky, really.

      --
      I quit!
    8. Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off by mstone · · Score: 1

      One, 99% of the people who use computers don't compile their own software, and don't want to. If you think they should, feel free to take it up with them individually.

      Two, making software work consistently across multiple platforms is a lot harder than you seem to think. There are a lot of Linux RPMs out there that won't even compile on the various *BSDs, to say nothing of the various Mac and Windows OSes.

      Three, Konfabulator and Dashboard supply all the GUI code for their widgets. That isn't a small contribution. It's huge. Use the framework and you get display primitives, an event model, cut-and-paste, drag-and-drop, etc, etc, etc, for free, and working according to the native standards of every platform. Roll your own, and you end up in Mozilla-we've-created-our-own-...-hell.

    9. Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off by mstone · · Score: 1

      Excellent point anout content-specific logic. Kudos for insightful though.

      WRT Konfabulator's maturity, disruptive technologies have a habit of starting off too puny to be taken seriously. Early hydraulic systems were pathetically weak compared to the cable systems they replaced. Micro-mills originally had just about enough capacity to produce rebar, and had no hope of producing the tight-tolerance materials used in cars like the huge, sprawling foundries did. Honda entered the US motorcycle market selling mopeds.

      Thing is, once you give those pathetic little technologies a market, they mature. Then they start looking for bigger and more interesting challenges.

      The Innovator's Dilemma by Clayton M. Christensen lays out the whole process is wonderful detail, with play-by-play summaries of how disruptive technologies have taken over several different markets.

    10. Re:looks like the semantic web is taking off by 2008 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't suggesting users compile anything, that's the maintainer's job (though for small apps you could hide it behind an "installing" progress bar easily enough). The user just downloads whichever version is compiled for their OS.

      But I'm mostly familiar with python and pyqt, which is portable with basically zero effort so long as you avoid doing anything obviously OS-specific. That's what I'm comparing widgets too without seeing the advantage - you get all the GUI stuff if you just use the libraries. (yeah, yeah getting qt on windows is a bit of a pain till qt4 is out.)

      --
      I quit!
  42. I tried Konfabulator a few months ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And uninstalled it a few days later. It had lots of nice looking widgets that show you stock ticker, calendar, weather, time, etc. However, as mentioned before, all this stuff can be found on your home page, or messnger client, and who needs more stuff on an already cluttered desktop.

  43. Keeping up with Mr&Mrs Jones... by Shipwack · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that Google will buyout Stardock Systems for its Object Desktop? http://www.stardock.com/products/odnt/

  44. And it's good for Windows users too by moriya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People seem to be looking at this from one side. And that's the Mac side. The first batches of comments seem to stem from folks who are keeping up with the Apple/Mac side of things.

    While the acquisition of Konfabulator and its removal of the pricetag is great news for all users of the program, do note that Konfabulator, while originating on the Mac, also has a competitor on the Windows side. That side has been dominated by Stardock's own DesktopX application where it's been around for quite a while now.

    The news of Yahoo buying up Konfabulator will benefit both sides of the OS platform. Windows users can soon use Konfabulator for free as an alternative to Stardock's DesktopX which costs about US$15 to register/purchase.

    1. Re:And it's good for Windows users too by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      Yup. I -highly- doubt Yahoo bought this because they care about MacOS. They really started to focus on Windows development after Apple started pushing Dashboard.

      Dashboard has been a smash hit on MacOS, owning the rights to a Windows equivalent could be a powerful asset.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    2. Re:And it's good for Windows users too by Decker-Mage · · Score: 1

      And that's the big question I have from RTFA. No mention of what is going to happen on the Windows side and I just started using Konfabulator here 15 days ago (just go my registration warning). Personally I like it a lot more than DesktopX, both in terms of the widgets and in terms of programming accessibilty, but I that's my preference. I just hope the Windows version will be free. We'll see tomorrow (later today, actually).

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
  45. Cross-platform? by vga_init · · Score: 1
    I thought yahoo was cross platform. Java applets, HTML, etc...the usual web browser stuff.

    Maybe Mac in this case simply means not Window, which could imply linux is included?

    1. Re:Cross-platform? by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      I just installed gDesklets and I have to say it's pretty cool. It's not limited
      to gnome and runs fine on my KDE desktop.

    2. Re:Cross-platform? by Icicle509 · · Score: 1

      In a lot of ways Yahoo isnt cross platform. For example, everyone in our work fantasy football league can use "custom avatars" for their team logo, but nope, not mac users, for some strange reason I cant figure out I get a message saying this feature is not compatible with Macs yet..... Im not sure what gives on that one......

  46. oh c'mon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When google buys something:
    "what a great idea!"
    "wow, and it's now free! how great is that?!?"
    "google is making all the right moves!"

    When yahoo buys something:
    "wow, that's an terrible and useless buy"
    "that's incredibly annoying, who would even use that?"
    "that's already a product found in firefox!"

    looking at the majority of posts in this story seems to confirm this... sad really.

    1. Re:oh c'mon! by atoms · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      but what if it happens to be true?

  47. Why use a computer monitor? by RKBA · · Score: 1

    I'm safe then, because I use a 1280x1024 front-screen video projector and a projection screen as my computer monitor! Right now I'm reclining in my Barcalounger easy chair typing on the wireless keyboard on my lap and using the wireless mouse to my right as necessary. The image of SlashDot I'm viewing is about four feet tall by five feet wide and is about eight feet directly in front of my easy chair. It's great. The high resolution HDTV capable projector I'm using (NEC LT10) cost less than $2,000. I'd recommend this type of setup to everyone. Now, if I pass out from exhaustion while using my computer, instead of falling out of my chair onto the floor - I can simply push back on the recliner, lie back, and fall asleep. :-)

    1. Re:Why use a computer monitor? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait. You spend all this money on some penis enlarging theater system and you don't even have any real life friends you can show it off to and brag about it to? You have to come on Slashdot to do it? We can't even see it.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    2. Re:Why use a computer monitor? by RKBA · · Score: 1

      Actually it's purely for my own personal comfort, and $2,000 isn't a lot of money. Funny you should mention not being able to see it, because I was thinking of taking some pictures of my computer room/study/den/library/whatever at night because I have so many toys that with the main room lights dimmed it's almost like a miniature light show at night. There must be "a thousand points of light" in the room because everything from external hard drives to VOIP interface boxes and even the variacs that control my desk lamp brightness and the temperature of the heating pad for my feet has some sort of indicator light on it. Maybe we could have a SlashDot contest (with pictures, naturally) to see who has the most equipment packed into their home office?. Note: In case you're wondering, I'm using my retirement time to advance the art of luxury and comfort to a new zenith so that I can wallow in sybaritic splendor! ;-)

      You're right about real life friends however. Ever since I retired and don't have engineer friends around me constantly anymore, I hunger for someone to talk with about the things that interest me (Verilog synthesis, numerical analysis, factorization techniques, new technology, etc). The people I meet in normal day-to-day life don't even know what those terms mean. :-(

      P.S.
      If anyone buys an NEC LT10 projector, be sure to get one of the newer models that have a vertical keystone adjustment as well as a horizontal keystone adjustment (mine only has a horizontal adjustment).

    3. Re:Why use a computer monitor? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Just a note on keystone correction--many video cards (I know for sure modern NVidia cards) have keystone correction capabilities built-in. On an NVidia card go to nview properties and then the tools tab and click enable keystone correction. You can then get to a menu to do all the adjustments. The keystone correction in your projector is going to be cropping pixels as well so it really doesn't matter if you do it on your card or on the projector.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  48. I tried to like Konfabulator by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...but in the end, I just never found anything that useful.

    A weather checking widget? Check. But I have a web browser with a tab to my local weather up at all times anyway.

    A package tracking widget? You bet. But I only have one or two packages to track every year. I always have a tab open to that page.

    A calculator widget? Of course. But it's still slower than asking google, since my web browser is always open.

    Konfabulator (and Dashboard) can do some pretty interesting things, as long as you don't have any other utilities on your machine. Unfortunately, it's unable to consolidate and replace the bunch of utilities that you already have, since you're unlikely to give up big things like your web browser.

    I'm sure there are a bunch of people out there that really like it, and find it super useful. That's awesome. I'm glad someone appreciates the hard work that the Konfabulator (and Dashboard) guys did. I just can't find a single useful widget that isn't better implemented or accessed somewhere else.

    1. Re:I tried to like Konfabulator by vykor · · Score: 1

      Actually, for me, Dashboard is pretty convenient. It means I don't have keep all those tabs open and pick around in a browser. Hit F12, glance at the widgets' output, use, click anywhere to make it go away, and go about my business.

      It's more personal preference, really. All of the widget functions are done better elsewhere, but it saves a lot of clicks when you just want to glance at the 5-day weather outlook or look up a definition in the dictionary, all the while without switching out of the foreground word processor or Xcode or whatnot.

    2. Re:I tried to like Konfabulator by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      A weather checking widget? Check. But I have a web browser with a tab to my local weather up at all times anyway.

      Screw that. I live in Los Angeles, where the weather's the same all the time anyways.

    3. Re:I tried to like Konfabulator by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 2, Funny

      A weather checking widget? Check. But I have a web browser with a tab to my local weather up at all times anyway.

      Wow. Slashdotters are the only people that when you say "open the window" to they immediately turn to their computers.

    4. Re:I tried to like Konfabulator by FortranDragon · · Score: 1

      What I like about Dashboard (I don't know if Konfabulator does this as well) is that if I push the F12 key and *hold it* everything pops up until I release the F12 key. That's great for a quick glance at things.

      Also, I have multiple weather and clock widgets up. Since I chat with a number of friends around the world the clocks are quite handy to immediately know what time of day it is for them. The weather widgets are for a bit of fun in conversations.

      So, for me, multiple widgets is just more convenient than having multiple tabs in my browser. I don't use precious browser space (that is, a whole tab/web page) for information that can be contained in a little widget. My browser stays focused on the content I'm currently looking at. If I need a quick look at something, say a dictionary definition or a Wikipedia look up that is just a single keystroke away.

      If using your browser fits the way you work best, go for it. For me, Dashboard/Konfabulator compliment my browser and the two together allow me to work better. it is more fun, too. Yeah, people complain about the gee-whiz stuff, but hey, I like to enjoy using my computer. :-D


      --
      "All the darkness in the world can not quench the light of one small candle."
  49. Re:too lazy to google right now by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ah, there's your problem. You're not supposed to press Esc, v, j, j, j, E, ", +, y, Shift-Down, e, *damn*, k, ", +, g, P and i all at the same time! (Relax, I use it too when I can't use Kate or Textpad or Scintilla or EDLIN.)

  50. A Better News Article on Konfabulator Sale by Sundroid · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is a better article on the news: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/aptech_stor y.asp?category=1700&slug=Yahoo%20Konfabulator

    It says Konfabulator has only three employees!!! Now we know which three households have champagnes popping tonight.

  51. Yahoo? by ryanov · · Score: 0

    1. Aquire widgets.
    2. ???
    3. Profit!!

  52. Yahoo! goodness? Hahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go back to ten years ago when you didn't suck.

    Real sorry google came and ownt your ass, but maybe if you weren't so busy trying to figure out where else to jam giant flash ads on your pages you wouldn't have fallen behind.

    Go hang out with Excite and Lycos in the also-ran room.

  53. How about a decent Yahoo Messanger! for Mac by Bright_Steel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm really disappointed Yahoo has left Yahoo messanger to rot on the vine.
    No Supermode
    No Audibles
    No new features for years now.

    Yahoo, when are you going to update Messanger for the Mac.

    1. Re:How about a decent Yahoo Messanger! for Mac by phalse+phace · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you tried Adium? It's compatible with AIM, MSN, Jabber, Yahoo, and more.

    2. Re:How about a decent Yahoo Messanger! for Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Yahoo, when are you going to update Messanger for the Mac."

      You Macintosh persons! Stop whining! "We" bought Konfabulationer. WTF more do you want from us?!"

      Anonymous Yahoo Coward Person

    3. Re:How about a decent Yahoo Messanger! for Mac by zephc · · Score: 1

      Adium is cool, but it seems to only support the basics, i.e. no Yahoo Chat (which is full of dolts these days anyway), webcam, voice chat, etc

      Yahoo's own client has webcam support, though there are many ways to crash it while you are serving video, and while doing so, the video tends to stall consistently within 10-15 minutes; voice chat isn't supported at all, as Yahoo uses a Windows-only voice protocol.

      It's a cool multiclient with fun stuff like tabbed IMs, but not ready to replace most other clients for anything other than simple chat.

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    4. Re:How about a decent Yahoo Messanger! for Mac by techwolf · · Score: 1

      Obviously an updated Yahoo Messenger for Mac.

      --
      I don't do this for karma, I do it for cash. It's much better.
    5. Re:How about a decent Yahoo Messanger! for Mac by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Hell, how about a decent Yahoo Messenger for Windows? My (small) company has standardized on YM for some reason and this is the worst application I've ever seen in my life. Pressing ESC closes a chat window? Non-searchable chat archives stored in a binary format? Non-native window styles (I've told XP to use the "Windows Classic" theme yet YM still has an XP-style title bar and buttons)? How did this thing pass quality assurance or usability testing?

      Not coincidentally, today is the day I announce the Jabber server I set up to replace this piece of shit.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  54. Re:too lazy to google right now by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

    Oh god, how trollishly unfunny WAS that? I'm going back to bed. Sorry. :wq!

  55. Just started using Konfabulator yesterday... by Greg_D · · Score: 1

    Works great for the Windows desktop as well, although it's not THAT practical with the exception of Konpose' or whatever the Expose function is called. I don't know about other people, but the majority of the time I use my desktop, I use it with a maximized window. Probably the reason Microsoft's Active Desktop never caught on.

    I have a buddy who wants a Mac (mostly for desktop aesthetics) but is about 3 years away from getting one due to his wife's stranglehold on the checkbook. WinOSX added drop shadows, the icon bar, changed some control panel icons, added menu transparency, changed the window theme, and made the taskbar look sorta like a Mac's, and Konfabulator does the trick with the widgets. Doesn't have all the functionality of a Mac, but whatcha gonna do?

  56. Re:New Package, Same Old by pipingguy · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Thanks for the advice, AC. I remember when I had my first beer, enjoy!

  57. Huh? by jizmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Apple's behaviour apparently wasn't breaking any law as such but it was the equivalent of some kid leaning over your shoulder and copying your homework.

    What? I know that Slashdotters aren't all on the same page, but most people here generally agree that software patents are bad. Especially the vague, hazy, and overbroad ones that look like obsfucated user manuals (claiming entire kinds of software or user interfaces) rather than looking like nice detailed technical USENIX conference papers. Only Konfabulator wasn't patented.

    Now you're saying that even though Konfabulator wasn't patented, wasn't a trade secret, Apple isn't a monopolist, and no part of the Konfabulator code was used by Apple, Apple should be barred from making a similar product? Pray tell, what is this argument based? Should Apple's product suck just so that these small fry can make a couple bucks? Are you saying Apple should do it just to be nice? (It would be nice if Apple sent me a check for $50k so I could buy a Lexus. Just to be nice.) Comparing the free market of the software industry to an elementary school math test is a little facile, eh?

    Surely you know, since you pointed to the daringfireball website, that there was nothing in Konfabulator, other than the general idea of JavaScript desktop accessories, that would have been useful to Apple. The reason Apple chose to write Dashboard from scratch is that it could save a lot of system resources and make a more polished product by leveraging existing parts of OS X like Web Kit. Konfabulator was a monstrously heavyweight framework based on Mozilla -- each desktop accessory was bigger than many Mac applications. The people at Apple aren't stupid. If buying Konfabulator would have saved them time and money, they would have done it, just like they bought SoundJam.

    Konfabulator made a lot of money on Windows, as well as Mac, and now they got their payday from Yahoo!. No tears shed there, I'm sure.

    --
    With great power comes great fan noise.
    1. Re:Huh? by Zenki · · Score: 1

      But you do have to realize that by releasing Dashboard, Apple has effectively closed the Mac market for Konfabulator. Kind of like what MS did when they released Media player and subsequently killed the streaming media market for Windows. (Well, Real brought that upon themselves.)

      Granted Apple is not in a monopoly position, but by bundling more features into their product they are cannibalizing their own developers and eating up the market that a few loyal devs have been sustaining while Windows ated up the PC market.

      Sadly enough, in this aspect MS has been slightly better recently, probably due to attempts to keep a lower profile against antitrust suits. ZIP folders in Windows is so shitty that I'm more than happy to register WinRAR. MS's antispyware package costs money and isn't bundled with windows.

  58. Re:too lazy to google right now by AliasMoze · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it difficult to look at Konfabulator's widgets and look at Apple's widgets and believe that Konfabulator doesn't have something big to do with Dashboard.

    It may or may not make perfect since for Apple to develop a javascript/HTML tool based on Webkit, but one that looks and feels almost identical to Konfabulator? Let's face it. If Windows had done Dashboard, Mac users worldwide wouldn't be able to shut up about how Windows ripped off poor Konfabulator.

    On the flipside, if Dashboard's popularity made the Yahoo deal happen (which, come on, it probably did), then Konfabulator probably just made out better than they'd ever imagined.

    (disclaimer: typing this in Tiger)

  59. Now Steve Jobs might be thinking that... by ruyon · · Score: 1

    he should have compensate Konfab people reasonably by buying their codes up. Now backed by Yahoo, which I think has more clue than Sun (bought and pointlessly ditched Watson), Konfab can certainly be way more popular than it used to be, even more so than Apple's Dashboard now is. In perception, there's one less Mac OS X EXCLUSIVE killer feature.

    I know there's enough TECHNICAL diffirences between Konfab and Dashboard, but I think the idea is the same. Apple admittedly came up with better implementation, yeah I know.

  60. I like dashboard better... by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...because the widgets only update when the dashboard is visible.

    I share your concern over the need for some widgets when web or utilities work fine. (Wikipedia widget, I'm looking in your direction!)

    There's a dashboard widget called SysStat -- pretty much the same as 'top' or 'Activity Monitor' -- but unlike those, it only uses CPU when dashboard is showing. I use this thing an awful lot...

  61. Vista by bakerstreet · · Score: 1

    Makes sense that the Konfabulator people would be making a move about now, given Vista's desktop architecture is going to have "gadget" capabilities built in.

    People have already been talking in the desktop customization community that gadgets are going to destroy widget apps.

    Why Yahoo! would pick this time to invest in a technology that MS is going to "absorb" is a bit confusing, though. Probably another Sonique-style, short-attention-span acquisition.

  62. Re:Allah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when do Jews blow themselves up to kill others? Could Mr. Towelhead care to bring some examples?

    Jews may steal, cheat and barter you down to the last cent, but they don't blow up subway trains.

  63. +5 Informative here I come! by NegativeOneUserID · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Did you look in the obvious place first?

    1. Re:+5 Informative here I come! by AlephNot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't see you getting +5 informative since not only did someone beat you to the punch, that someone even included the Wikipedia content in their comment. Sorry. :-)

      --
      "Feel a glory in so rolling / on the human heart a stone" --E. A. Poe, "The Bells"
    2. Re:+5 Informative here I come! by NegativeOneUserID · · Score: 1

      I was trying to be ironic ..... posts that just link to wikipedia deserve an informative mod about as much as a post saying "Hey everyone, water is wet" deserve an informative mod.

  64. Maybe they will fix it... by youta · · Score: 1

    Maybe with the Yahoo bankroll they will fix the process and memory bloat that made me throw it away the first time.

  65. Oh well by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A while back I'd tried Konfabulator after hearing some Mac folks rave about it. Basically (explaining for the non-Mac crowd) it was these eye-candy-ful little widgets that would sit on your desktop all the time, showing you the weather, info about an RSS feed, or somesuch stuff. This seemed pretty pointless, since most of the time my desktop is hidden behind all the apps I've got open pretty much whenever my computer is running - but you'd be amazed at the number of Mac users who apparently just leave a blank desktop open so they can stare at it and drool.

    Well, anyway - then along comes Tiger, and Apple announces Dashboard. It's Konfabulator done right - the widgets can be brought into view whenever you actually need them rather than having them hiding back on your desktop. Of course after this announcement, it wasn't long before the Konfabulator guys copied the idea of (gasp!) not having the widgets hidden back there - what a concept!

    But you know what? Even Dashboard seems pretty pointless. I've got a web browser open all the time, so it's just as fast to click on my weather bookmark, or go to ups.com to track packages, or leave a tab open to my gmail account all the time (after all, if I get a new message I'm going to have to open it anyway). While Dashboard certainly seems to be a better implementation than Konfabulator, but it's still basically an idea that is of no practical use to me. At least the price is right, either way now...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Oh well by Greg_D · · Score: 1

      Konfabulator has the ability to bring widgets to the forefront as well. All ya hafta do is hit f8 in Windows.

    2. Re:Oh well by thomasscovell · · Score: 1

      Konfabulator has a bunch of options for where the widgets lay, e.g. "top most" to floatabove whatever windows you have open.

    3. Re:Oh well by TERdON · · Score: 2

      Uhm, I suppose they use Exposé to show the desktop. That's what I do - normally my desktop is totally covered, but when pushing F10, all windows automagically fly away. And for Windows, the closest equivalent would be hidden under the shortcut Windows+D. BTW, I do agree that having the apps on the desktop isn't perfect. It's better like it works in OS X with a separate app desktop...

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
    4. Re:Oh well by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

      I tend to hide/minimize apps when I'm not interacting with them, so konfabulator works well for the way I use computers because when I get up it's always my desktop showing. So when i come back i can see any RSS or weather updates and whatever else I'm monitoring.

      Some other useful 'widgets' are system monitors. For example I can see all the IP addresses and ports I'm connected to or are connected to me through a widget on my desktop. I also use iPulse (an independent piece of software) to cover all kinds of other system activity.

      I agree though, most widgets are rather pointless and sometimes slower than another method that could be used.

    5. Re:Oh well by ToastyKen · · Score: 1

      I agree.. Same reason I never bought into Sherlock: I just find it easier to use the actual web page.

      The only Dashboard widget I really use is the one for the Oxford American Dictionary, and that's because it's not available (for free) on the web.

    6. Re:Oh well by John+Siracusa · · Score: 2, Informative
      Of course after this announcement, it wasn't long before the Konfabulator guys copied the idea of (gasp!) not having the widgets hidden back there - what a concept!

      First, Konfabulator widgets could always be layered along with other windows. They were never "stuck on the desktop" (although that is one of the layering options; layering settings are per-widget).

      Second, Konfabulator planned what came to be called "Konsposé" long before anyone knew about Dashboard. It just so happened that Dashboard shipped first. When the Konfabulator "Heads Up Display" feature (as it had been known within the company since Konfabulator 1.0 was planned) finally shipped, the Konfabulator guys named their feature "Konsposé" as an homage to Mac OS X's Exposé feature.

      (This information is straight from Arlo Rose, BTW...as opposed to the sensational speculation based solely on release dates and misinformation demonstrated in the post quoted above.)

    7. Re:Oh well by argent · · Score: 1

      It's Konfabulator done right - the widgets can be brought into view whenever you actually need them rather than having them hiding back on your desktop.

      You could always use Expose' to do that. Trust Apple to come up with a new scheme that makes it impossible to have a widget that you want to keep an eye on sitting around all the time.

      Ah well, hopefully someone will come up with a Dashboard/Konfabulator "Amnesty" hack that will let you use both kinds of widgets from whatever interface you want. There's already the Amnesty Widget browser that lets you free Dashboard widgets from the Dashboard... but unfortunately they tend to be CPU hogs...

  66. Re:WAIT A MINUTE by Durf · · Score: 1

    If you want more information (as in a free download of the whole shebang), go get it directly from Yahoo. They've got it uploaded and ready to go, Windows and Mac.

  67. mod up! by eshefer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "On the flipside, if Dashboard's popularity made the Yahoo deal happen (which, come on, it probably did), then Konfabulator probably just made out better than they'd ever imagined"

    Yup. sometime getting copied in the software business is a GOOD thing. I, for one, never heard of konfabulator untill apple announced dashboard.

  68. Re:too lazy to google right now by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If Windows had done Dashboard, Mac users worldwide wouldn't be able to shut up about how Windows ripped off poor Konfabulator.

    Actually, Windows did do "Dashboard" back in 1998, but the widgets were stuck to your desktop, and your PC only had 64MB of RAM, and the stock widgets seemed to be mainly spamish RSS-type newsfeeds, so it didn't seem all that. But it was the same basic idea.

    The MS widget list is here:
    http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/previous/galle ry/default.mspx
    (Wow, there's a grand total of 3 which still work, I'm amazed.)

    It was interesting for about 10 minutes and then forgotten (much like I expect Dashboard and Konfabulator to be). As for Mac users, they've shown that they are totally immune to things Windows implemented years before Apple did.

    --
    Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  69. Rivalry/Adoption by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not hard to see Yahoo dropping support for their Dashboard widgets now that they have Konfabulator. The question is which one will become the better?

    Konfabulator will be free and cross platform. Dashboard is part of OSX. Running both just seems real redundant to me. Konfabulator may attract a much larger following of developers simply because it's available to Windows users, and the fact Yahoo's widgets will at some point only run on Konfabulator (not that someone else could probably come up with an unoffical one).

    If a converstion tool is made to transfer Dashboard Widgets to Konfabulator Widgets, you may soon see people moving over to Konfabulator. Will the original third party product find itself overbearing the one in your system you can't remove (for Mac users)? Then again, Dashboard widgets run as separate processes (each one) so an empty dashboard prolly uses little if any system resources. It's also a possibility someone will write a converstion tool to move Konfabulator Widgets back to Dashboard.

    It will be interesting to see how much malicious widgets become a problem on the Windows side once Konfabulator becomes free and adopted more widely.

    1. Re:Rivalry/Adoption by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      It's also a possibility someone will write a converstion tool to move Konfabulator Widgets back to Dashboard.
      I think that already exists, actually...
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  70. Quite hard to write too! by ego.no · · Score: 2

    Writing and capitalizing is also hard. Apparently.

  71. OT: Why use a computer monitor? by capmilk · · Score: 0
    The high resolution HDTV capable projector I'm using (NEC LT10) cost less than $2,000.

    What's so HDTV capable about 1024x768?

    1. Re:OT: Why use a computer monitor? by RKBA · · Score: 1

      Open your eyes. I said "1280x1024"

    2. Re:OT: Why use a computer monitor? by capmilk · · Score: 1

      Oh well, that's interpolated. Since the projector's native resolution is 1024x768, I wouldn't call it HD ready, but let's leave it at that. We're OT already.

    3. Re:OT: Why use a computer monitor? by RKBA · · Score: 1

      No, the projector operates just like a regular multi-sync monitor does and adapts to whatever resolution signal it's receiving up to a maximum of 1280x1024. Whenever I reboot my computer, it goes through about four different resolution changes and displays the resolution and refresh rate on the screen briefly each time it changes (I had no idea the BIOS runs the screen at 640x350 resolution instead of 640x480 for example).

    4. Re:OT: Why use a computer monitor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why I followed this stupid path, I don't know.

      But you need to read the specs on your projector. It may take a 1280x1024 input, but all you get out is 1024x768. That's the "native resolution" of the NEC LT1. So with only 1024 pixels from left to right, anything higher is just going to be downsampled.

      Here's the spec:
      http://www.projectorcentral.com/pdf/projector_spec _2311.pdf

      Oh, and with a 2k hour lamp life, you'll get 5.4 hours per day of use in it's first year. Be ready to pay $300 plus for a new lamp.
      http://www.superwarehouse.com/NEC_Replacement_Lamp _for_LT10/LT10LP/p/354946

      Why use a computer monitor? For better quality picture, lower cost to buy, longer life.

    5. Re:OT: Why use a computer monitor? by stephentyrone · · Score: 1

      yeah, and even if it could display 1280x1024, it still wouldn't be proper HD (1920x1080). so many people get ripped off by "high definition" stuff these days.

  72. Re:too lazy to google right now by aichpvee · · Score: 1
    Also what on earth is a "Dashboard apologist"?

    An apologist is someone who engages in "apologetics".

    From wikipedia: "Apologetics is the field of study concerned with the systematic defense of a position."

    Dashboard is obviously the OSX widget thing.

    So from this we can come to understand that a "dashboard apologist", while maybe a bit sketchy on the usage, is one who makes a systematic defense of the position that Dashboard isn't a ripoff of Konfabulator. This is in line with modern usage of the word "apologist", but you already knew that.

    Maybe not, but some other product filling the same need, likely in a similar way, would have. Likewise, people wouldn't call foul if someone other than Apple had released Dashboard. People love a David-and-Goliath story, even after David gets bought by Yahoo.

    And this might be a decent analogy if we were talking about portable digital audio players, but Apple is hardly a "Goliath" in the desktop market, or even the useless desktop widget market. For the former Microsoft is the only "Goliath" and the latter I'm not sure there's even enough of a market to have a dominant player, though if there is Apple has certainly not been at it long enough to default to the position.

    Who really cares though? This is just another useless flamebait thread on Slashdot. I'm still not sure what real use there is for these things other than milking all those unused clock cycles.

    --
    The Farewell Tour II
  73. ...to place widgets on desktop: by k2r · · Score: 4, Informative

    defaults write com.apple.dashboard devmode YES
    killall Dock

    Any widget you hold with the mouse while switching from dashboard to desktop will end up as a normal window.

    And vice versa.

    k2r

    Or install the devMove widget.

    1. Re:...to place widgets on desktop: by zuzzabuzz · · Score: 1

      It will show up as a normal window, yes.
      But it will be a window that is ALWAYS on top of other windows, so you essentially lose the screen space to the widget. It's nice that Konfabulator offers different window levels (6) as well as opacity options.

      --
      -buzz
  74. downloading konfabulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found the link for those of you who are interested in downloading it before it comes available from yahoo. mac version http://a191.g.akamai.net/7/191/1560/1/widgetgaller y.com/downloads/Konfabulator2.dmg windows version http://a191.g.akamai.net/7/191/1560/3/widget.tempo rary.com/downloads/Konfabulator2.zip

  75. the name by kwoff · · Score: 1

    What confabulates me is that this isn't a KDE app.

    [To grammar nazi's, yes I know that's not the meaning of confabulate. To Brits, yes I know you have a different sense of "humour".]

    1. Re:the name by delGrey · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be nazis? Glad you can spell humor properly.

    2. Re:the name by argent · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      To grammar nazi's

      Grammer nazi's what?

      Surely you wouldn't inadvertently use an inappropriate apostrophe when flaming about grammar, would you? That must have been teh deliberate.

    3. Re:the name by anglozaxxon · · Score: 1

      Hey, dickhead, 'grammar' has two A's in it. Take your own advice.

    4. Re:the name by argent · · Score: 1

      It's teh rule. Every grammer flame has to have teh speeling error, and every speeling flame has to have teh grammer violin, eh.

    5. Re:the name by kwoff · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean for my comment to be a flame. I guess it's ironic that a comment intended to ward off grammar Nazis (there, I even managed to capitalize it) ended up attracting some. ;) Now who will let me know that I didn't use the word "ironic" correctly? :)

  76. link to the yahoo site by stuegg · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:link to the yahoo site by argent · · Score: 1

      One hopes they turn off the registration code soon. :)

      Also, not specifically related to Konfabulator...

      Once the download finishes, a disk image will be mounted automatically.

      I hope that everyone has already disabled automatic mounting of downloaded disk images, along with all other "open safe files after download"-style actions. :)

  77. yahoo and konfab... by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 0

    YEs the big get bigger !

    --
    Chris ,
    Php Programmers.
  78. Kind Of Funny by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

    "'There is a move at Yahoo! -- in addition to Konfabulator -- to move more onto the Mac,' said Schneider."

    Which is kind of funny to me, since Konfabulator seemed to be making a slow move from the Mac to Windows since Dashboard was so similar. Still, Konfabulator is a nice piece of software (although its name makes it sound like it should be part of KDE), and free is always nice. Let's hope that Yahoo is good about maintaining it.

  79. Duhoo! by rinoid · · Score: 1

    Yahoo! wants to be cross platform???!

    Oh, when that happens pigs will fly. They notoriously are not only single platform but actually do really stupid things.

    Their music service, launched oh... in the last few months!!! tells Macintosh users that they must use Netscape 4.7 in order to use Yahoo! Music Limited!

    Check this out:
    http://rino.bowdoin.edu/wordpress/archives/2005/06 /yahoo-music-unlimited

  80. long time coming... by johnrpenner · · Score: 3, Informative


    in the pre-OSX days, arlo was known by millions of macintosh
    users for making 'Kaleidoscope' - it basically let users of
    above-average graphic skill to theme the entire mac OS
    interface down to the pixel without a lot of programming
    knowledge. this was way ahead of anything that was done
    in windows or linux. millions of mac users had custom UIs
    because of this man.

    but such a theme manager was closely tied with OS9,
    and so when time came time for OSX, arlo started an even
    more clever hack -- konfabulator.

    now this was already very close to what apple always had with
    desk accessories, but it was javascriptable (whereas DAs required
    a separate development environment to compile); they were
    internet enabled (desk accessories only lived in the time before
    the internet); and they also had a really nice photoshop-able
    front end (DAs couldn't utilize quickdraw as nicely as OSX's
    incredible quartz graphics); and because CPUs were finally
    fast enough, you could run them interpreted instead of
    compiled.

    these factors made konfabulator really nifty for quick, beautiful,
    useful little utilities. but they fell too closely to apple's own revival
    of the desk accessory concept, and so it looked like all of arlo's
    hard work had all the chance of a netscape against a bundled browser.

    so now yahoo buys them up, they all still got jobs, and it opens up
    possiblities for them better than they ever had before -- this is a
    good fate for these amazing mac developers. they have long been
    a credit to the mac community. its great to see that they've come
    across good fortune at this time. congratulations arlo & team!!
    we love ya!
    j.

    1. Re:long time coming... by Apotsy · · Score: 1
      millions of mac users had custom UIs because of this man.

      One important point: before he wrote Kaleidoscope, he worked at Apple on the Mac OS Appearance Manager, which Kaleidoscope relies on heavily. If it weren't for that inside knowledge, he would never have been able to make it work.

  81. Great! But... by Cinematique · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll leave the debate over Konfabulator vs. Dashboard to the other kids... here's what I'm upset about...

    "The acquisition of Konfabulator may not be the last Mac compatible product users see from Yahoo! While Schneider wasn't specific, he did say that there was interest in the Mac. 'There is a move at Yahoo! -- in addition to Konfabulator -- to move more onto the Mac,' said Schneider. 'We want to make sure we find a way to be more cross platform.'"

    OK, great. So start by making it possible to browse everything on Yahoo from a Mac! It's really annoying getting a message that my browser (nay, platform) isn't supported by a website. It's not like I'm using an obscure operating system like OS/2 or something.

    Furthermore, I'm a cross-platform guy. I grew up using Macs & PCs, though I definitely prefer OSX. Recently, I've found a new love for my old Dell Latitude simply because of the awesomeness that is Yahoo Music Unlimited. What sucks is that I can't use it on my iBook.

    For those who don't know, for less than the cost of a case of beer every month, Y! Unlimited is, essentially, a music on-demand system with DRM that's easy to live with. Personally, it's not very important that I "own the music." What's important to me is that I've discovered new music in a way I've missed since the original Napster was destroyed. Only LAUNCHcast and Y! Unlimited is WAY better than everything out there that's currently like it (I'm looking at you remixed Napster and Rhapsody.)

    Sure, the download catalog isn't as deep as iTunes Music Store... but I'm sure the gap will eventually shrink. Yahoo is a large company with enough resources to make that happen.

    LAUNCHcast, Yahoo's "radio" service, lets me rate music then taylors future songs to my preferences and tastes. It basically serves songs up on the fly without ads. It's really fucking slick.

    At any rate, I wish they'd offer Y! Unlimited (or more to the point, Yahoo Music Engine) for OS X, but since it uses WM9 and whatever portable management system requires WinXP, I'm guessing that a port to Macs will probably never materialize. Which is too bad. I'd love to be able to use YME with Airfoil so I could stream it to my Airport Express... without Virtual PC.

    A guy can dream...

    1. Re:Great! But... by Cinematique · · Score: 1

      So much for proofing for spelling mistakes. D'oh.

  82. Apple's implementation is better? by John+Straffin · · Score: 1

    I haven't examined both from the coding standpoint (I can't imagine they'd be *that* different there), but Konfabulator's display options put it at least a *few notched above Apple's Dashboard. I find the "floating" option especially useful, with the widget showing up on to of every program *BUT* without actually interfering with the programs below , i.e. if you (right-)click on the widget, you are actually (right-)clicking on the window below. K's new "Konspose'" layer mimics Apple's Expose layer (the *only* place you can see Apple widgets), and you can decide where to display widgets on a widget-by-widget basis. Konfabulator is *definitely* a better implementation, at least from a usability and flexibility standpoint...
    (This text refers to the Windows edition.)

    --
    My contempt for the behavior and beliefs of the two major political parties cannot be adequately expressed in 120 chara
    1. Re:Apple's implementation is better? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only way Dashboard is "better" is that all the widgets run in one process, instead of forking a process for each widget like Konfabulator does. It's probably an order of magnitude better in terms of performance.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Apple's implementation is better? by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um... Widgets are all launched by the Dock controller process, but if you open Activity Monitor or run Top you'll see that each open Widget has its own process. You can kill them individually.

  83. Ugh, wrong? by matt+me · · Score: 1

    My GNOME weather applet not only tells me the weather (neatly, what to wear today before i open), but also verifies my net connection is up (else the weather is giant question mark), thus I know whether it's worth launching my browser to check all those other sites.

    I am on a 1024*768 LCD, but I have room for a 128*128 Firefox icon on my desktop, which helps me (you can't really miss) and anyone else using my computer.

  84. Cross platform by christurkel · · Score: 1

    How about a decent Yahoo Messenger or letting launch.yahoo.com video works on a mac?

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
  85. Homepage as Desktop by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1
    Some want the best of both, and set their homepage (or something similar) as their desktop. I've never had great luck with them, myself. But, setting something like Yahoo or Googles homepages as your desktop background would take care of the functions you just mentioned.

    Either way, I think that clutter is only a secondary problem. The primary problem, imo, is running a browser/interpreter in the background all the time. This stuff is for "teen chat queens" (AOL commercial reference), but not for gamers.

    But, you know, this all boils down to being a direct move against Google in the API space. They're just countering Google's API popularity for Google Maps and other AJAX goodies. So, Yahoo just went out bought a JS company. Yeah, take that Google, Yahoo now has javascript API's too! Uhh.... let me guess, next, the companies will battle over
    <layer> versus <div>
    if memory serves me correctly.
    --
    I8-D
  86. Re:New Package, Same Old by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

    I don't run OSX or Windows, is this Konfabulator like Superkaramba for KDE where you can have little Python applets on the desktop?

    --
    Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
  87. ornaments by nfinteractive · · Score: 1
  88. Re:Allah... - Why do jews wear those small caps ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe muslims wear a towelhead coz their brains are too big...and maybe jews wear those puny little small caps coz their brains are too small ? jews don't blow themselves up...directly...but they do everything to make sure they piss everybody else off so that they blow them off. Pissed Hitler and the germans, didn't you ? Look what you got, half of you small cap wearing thugs got bombed. Now you pissed off the muslims and keep bombing and occupying them. Guess what, some of 'em are pissed and are blowing you up. And they are a billion, while you jews are one of the smallest gangs on the planet, just a few million. Yet you cause so much trouble. And you cry 'anti-semitism' ? You get what you deserve, and you dragged us americans into this bullshit as well.

  89. Re:...to place widgets on desktop with opacity by saddino · · Score: 1

    Or use Amnesty to get mutliple window levels (not just floating) for Dashboard widgets, plus settable opacity, auto-updating, virtual dashboard spaces, etc.

    Bonus: runs on Panther too.

  90. Karamba, SuperKaramba and GDesklets by vhogemann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All those existed before both Konfabulator and Dashboard...

    Yes, it's true kids!! Apple is copying Linux this time!

    --
    ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
  91. Ironic... by h2d2 · · Score: 1

    It's so nice how you guys are ripping this small company, and praising Dashboard, without mentioning once how Apple completely ripped their idea without a single credit.

    P.S. Please don't stop unrelatedly bashing MS due to my comment.

    --
    Mozilla stole tabs from NetCaptor. So what? Right?
    1. Re:Ironic... by argent · · Score: 1

      Ironic how you missed the comments about Dashboard being a CPU hog and how it'd be nice to have one program that could run any widget...

      But of course you coudln't get your backhanded slap in if you actually read the comments before adding your own...

    2. Re:Ironic... by h2d2 · · Score: 1

      Ooooh, I missed one comment because it was under my threshold.

      --
      Mozilla stole tabs from NetCaptor. So what? Right?
    3. Re:Ironic... by argent · · Score: 1

      You need to set your threshold lower than five, dude.

    4. Re:Ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  92. You dont get it. by Viewsonic · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You say you have all these tabs open in a browser. The entire idea of dashboard is to have all this info available to you at a single glance. When I hit F12 on my Mac, my dashboard pops up and I have an animated weather map, a doppler radar, all the latest earthquakes overlayed on a world map, a current listing of the gas prices in a 5 mile radius of me, current CNN and Slashdot headlines, and a complete rundown on all my vital system statisics.

    I get all this current information the second I hit F12, it takes me a few seconds to scan it, then I hit F12 again and im back to working again.

    You're trying to tell me your tabs are doing all this? You dont have to load them up every time you boot into the OS? I'm sorry, but the entire idea, again, is all this personalized info at a touch of a button, that appears and disappears as quick as you want. Always updates, all the time.

    1. Re:You dont get it. by argent · · Score: 1

      The entire idea of dashboard is to have all this info available to you at a single glance.

      But it's not.

      It's available to me about 3-5 seconds after I hit F12. Konfabulator widgets are available to me just by flicking my eyes to the corner of the screen where I have them "floating", all the time. That's a "glance".

    2. Re:You dont get it. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but do I need to have all that crap available at a single glance? Talk about information overload. Some things I can just leave a tab open, like slashdot or the weather page (both of which are a lot more useful as a webpage than a widget if you ask me). For things like gas prices, I might want to look at it once every couple of weeks, so why do I need that cluttering up my computer chewing up resources all the time?

      I can see why some people would like it, but just because some people don't like it doesn't mean they "don't get it".

  93. Yahoo Purchases Konfabulator thinga ma gig.... by ChainsawJackson · · Score: 1

    Intel + Apple + Yahoo = very interesting Mr. Bond. Me thinks Microsoft once again is in someone sights. More to come I'm sure.....

  94. Would it have killed you... by Snaller · · Score: 1

    ... to explain what konfabulator IS, in the story so people know at a glance instead of having to RTFA.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  95. Re:too lazy to google right now by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

    I find it difficult to look at Konfabulator's widgets and look at Apple's widgets and believe that Konfabulator doesn't have something big to do with Dashboard.

    I'm agreeing with you, but you gotta remember that konfabulator widgets kinda look like OSX... and of course apple's gonna use their own [liquid plastic] look for their own product.

    If Windows had done Dashboard, Mac users worldwide wouldn't be able to shut up about how Windows ripped off poor Konfabulator.

    actually, I remember when dashboard was first demo'd. Konfabulator users everywhere were going nuts about how apple ripped off konfabulator.

    personally, I like konfabulator's implementation better, and widgets also seem to have a little more control over the system, from looking at the widgets.

    I played with konfabulator when it first came out, and followed the hype before it was actually shown off (it was quite the mystery product before it was officially announced), but the price was way too high for me to justify buying, especially since I didn't really have a true use for it.

    I don't even really use dashboard except for the fact that I can hit F12 and have access to a calculator; that's the only widget I keep open.

    if I used konfabulator, the only widget I'd use would be a UPS and/or FedEx package tracker. It'd be nice to see when packages arrive in real-time.

    --



    ...spike
    Ewwwwww, coconut...
  96. And the obligatory Linux version is... by hacker · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those asking the obligatory question: "But does it run on Linux?", the answer is "No, but..".

    Linux (and BSD) have gDeskLets which provides the exactly the same/similar functionality with arguably more applications available for it.

    It is these two exact projects which spurned the creation of Apple's "Dashboard" product available in Tiger.

    1. Re:And the obligatory Linux version is... by josepha48 · · Score: 1

      Actually I was hoping this would run on a PDA too. It would be cool if someone ported Konfabulator to Linux, BSD / other UNIX's and and the palm. Or maybe port to gtk+ or some other toolkit which runs under the *nix's.

      --

      Only 'flamers' flame!
      Does slashdot hate my posts?

    2. Re:And the obligatory Linux version is... by gxw · · Score: 1

      The full answer is "not yet, but..." it is in the plan, according to the Director of Widget Technology, as quoted in some of the press releases.

      Dashboard will likely fade into obscurity. I already turned it off on my Mac. Why bother depending on desktop tools that I can only use when I am on my Mac when there are alternatives available for all my computers?

      Dashboard will remain a part of OS X for the Mac fan(boy)s, but Konfabulator is (and soon will even more so be) the Widget engine for everyone. Most people work/play on multiple platforms. Tying yourself to functionality available only on one, is...well...silly.

      By the time Microsoft announces their innovative (read: complete ripoff) Widget engine for Vista, Konfabulator will already be ubiquitous. Mac, Windows, Linux, cell phones...

    3. Re:And the obligatory Linux version is... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      Careful who you are calling fanboys, fanboy.

      I speak as someone who was a registered user of Konfabulator on the mac since before 10.3 came out.

      Konfabulator has a really slow javascript engine which is based on spidermonkey from the Mozilla project. It also is quite resource intensive.

      The decision to use XML instead of HTML is also holding them back since they offer no development environment and you cannot use a browser to test your widgets out.

      I still have Konfabulator on mac but never use whereas I use Dashboard on a daily basis on my mac. You don't use dashboard and that is your choice but to say that it will fade into obscurity is hyperbole at its best.

      Take a look at the amount of dashboard widgets available from third parties like the ones here or here. Now consider how long these sites have been around compared with konfabulator.com.

      For a while, after dashboard came out, there were very few contributions being added to the konfabulator widget gallery. Don't get me wrong, I think it's great and wish them all the best but I don't have a compelling reason to use it on a daily basis now that I have Dashboard.

      I definately plan on using it work on my windows box for sure.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    4. Re:And the obligatory Linux version is... by binarytoaster · · Score: 1

      It is these two exact projects which spurned the creation of Apple's "Dashboard" product available in Tiger.

      ObPedantry: "spurred", not "spurned", as "spurned" has a much different meaning.

  97. New conspiracy theory... by argent · · Score: 1

    I doubt Microsoft will license WM9 without the kind of OS support for strong DRM that's in NT kernel. That's easy to do in embedded devices, but it's not likely to happen on Mac OS X with its open-source kernel.

    [insert conspiracy theory about Microsoft being responsible for getting Apple to switch to Intel to support WM9 DRM ... it's no stranger than some of the ones that have been tossed around in /.]

  98. Desktop Accessories by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    The idea that people must die off before perspectives change must be true! No, I'm giong to point to the /. discussion... which is of course based upon the DF post. (Because people shouldn't be allowed to endlessly discuss biased opinions without evidence.)

    This old /. post discusses the origins of Widgets. What is new is using JavaScript and network technologies.

  99. Troll of the day by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
    The "editors" are supposed to reject shit summaries like this one.

    No, the editors (and I do use the word loosely) are supposed to post "shit summaries like this one" two or three times and then light their cigars with a $100 bill, relaxing after a hard day's work well done.

    --
    That is all.
  100. Re:too lazy to google right now by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    Um, I wasn't joking. I don't know when Konfabulator was first introduced but it seems very much like Active Desktop. I was indirectly asking if there's a chance MS had it first and didn't notice.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  101. Does anyone else find this humorous? by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    "We want to make sure we find a way to be more cross platform."

    Gee, that's a swell idea. Yahoo! is working hard to make the Web more "cross platform" than it was before. ;-)

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  102. Download it! by Wilwayco · · Score: 1

    It's out now! Download it people!

  103. Widgets are pointless by iSearch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not to be a naysayer, but am I the only one who doesn't quite see the purpose of widgets?

    These are essentially small applications running within a hidden desktop, each additional widget takes up additional resources, and so many of these widgets are redundant. A widget to control your system volume? Isn't that what the volume menu item is for?

    Does anybody really need to check traffic so often that it is necessary to have an application running continuously?

    I gave widgets the benefit of the doubt when they came out, but found that the actual Widget system in Tiger significantly slowed down our systems and that it was actually more accessible to simply keep my address book or calculator open but minimized rather than having to use key combinations to make a terribly scaled down version of each of those apps (you can't copy and paste from widgets to other applications).

    Who knows though, maybe I'm just an old geezer who really doesn't understand the purpose or the actual usefulness of widgets like "Mosquito... A little Widget that displays the mosquito conditions within your zip code for today and tomorrow. " or "Nascar: RSS feed of Nascar news, choose from several feeds including Nextel Cup, Busch Series and Truck Series. Feed time interval settings available also."

    Sigh.

    1. Re:Widgets are pointless by argent · · Score: 1

      These are essentially small applications running within a hidden desktop

      Except in Konfabulator they're not.

      the actual Widget system in Tiger significantly slowed down our systems

      Konfabulator is much more efficient.

      you can't copy and paste from widgets to other applications

      I just tried this with some K2 widgets and they work fine.

      I'm just an old geezer who really doesn't understand the purpose or the actual usefulness of widgets like "Mosquito..."

      Have you looked at the regular apps listed on Macupdate? I can't figure out why anyone would bother with 90% of the applications out there. Widgets are just another application platform, really...

  104. Re:too lazy to google right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just tried using the JTrack item, and I get an error message: Internet Explorer doesn't support synchronizing this type of URL.

  105. Yahoo does not care about Macintosh by wealthychef · · Score: 1
    'There is a move at Yahoo! -- in addition to Konfabulator -- to move more onto the Mac,' said Schneider.

    Yeah, right. When was the last time they upgraded Yahoo Instant Messenger? Look at the difference between the mac and windows clients. They obviously have a Mac team of about zero people.

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
  106. The REAL new name is... by HotButteredHampster · · Score: 1

    The! real! new! name! for! this! product! is...

    Konfabulator!

    HBH

    --
    "Smart is sexy." -- D. Scully ("War of the Coprophages")
    1. Re:The REAL new name is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks!

  107. Re:too lazy to google right now by lightningrod220 · · Score: 1

    Actually, there have been a few sites out there that have covered the story of the original Macintosh, where they developed a way that users could have "desktop accessories", like a calculator, clock, etc... Dashboard brings this back. The only thing that Apple would have taken from Konfabulator is the fact that people actually cared about these things. .... or Steve Jobs tried to make it seem like people do. The thing that I don't like about Dashboard is that you can't easily put the widgets anywhere you want, and even with the hack, they remain on top of all other windows, which isn't cool.

  108. Yahoo! is following Google's lead by chia_monkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let's take a closer look at this. Yahoo! started as a portal and search engine. Remember the search engine wars? Then Google came along. Back then it was just another search engine (that kinda rocked). However, while we saw search engines come and go (shall we list all the search engines that came to be...and how most of them are gone?) Google didn't sit on it's laurels. They found a profitable way to make money from its searches. Not content with that, they went into other services (maps, blogs, Picasa, toolbars, etc) so people will think of Google for more than searches (sort of like their own "halo effect"...Google is always on their mind). More success for Google. More obscurity for Yahoo. Yahoo, once the Internet's poster child, is not pleased with this and certainly doesn't want to go the way of the other dotcoms, figures adding a whole slew of new features (toolbar, Konfabulator, etc) and mimicking Google is a good way to go. Thus, a new era of "wars" is born.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    1. Re:Yahoo! is following Google's lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uhh... I suggest you go take a look at the list of services Yahoo provides (try looking at http://help.yahoo.com/ for a short list) and then try to list the services Google provides. Yahoo has more users and more brand recognition than Google has ever had. It's just not "cool" enough for the Slashdot crowd.

      Yahoo has been buying and investing in other companies to enhance it's services since before Google even existed (hence Yahoo's original investment in Google which has so far netted Yahoo hundreds of millions of dollars in sale of Google shares over the last year), and have been making money from it's searches since before Google existed as well.

      Way to try to rewrite history.

  109. 'Yahoo! Widgets' Already Up and Running by king_pigeon · · Score: 1

    A quick check of http://widgets.yahoo.com/> shows that they've already got a batch of Yahoo! Branded Widgets planned, although they aren't available at the moment. The 'Widget Gallery' link just takes you to the existing Konfabulator Gallery.

  110. If They cared about the Mac Community ... by adzoox · · Score: 1

    Yahoo would do something about the ENTIRE mac auction section being 100% fraudulent auctions.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  111. i wonder.... by jurv!s · · Score: 1

    Funny- I just sent yahoo an email about my displeasure that some of their services were Windows only (I was tweaked specifically by not being able to use Yahoo! Avatar). Imagine my surprise to discover today that perhaps their response that they were working on it was not just lip service. Is this squeaky wheel really gonna get the oil? Here's hoping fewer companies treat non-Windows platforms as second-class citizens...

    --
    sigs are for fools and trolls. no signature is *always* appropriate. you should turn them off in your preferences.
  112. Ain't nothing for free by crawdad62 · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for the mandatory Yahoo Advertisement Widget.

  113. Brilliant Strategy! by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 1

    This is a brilliant strategy. You see Microsoft doing their thing, you see Google doing their thing. MS has whatever they have (Active X) and Google doing Ajax...and Apple doing Dashboard widgets.

    Want to merge the two and bring cool tools to your service? But Konfabulator. You give jobs to the development team and get all the Konfabulator Krazies developing new tools for your service. You can be as beta as you want, just build tools for us. We can call the whole thing YahooOS.

    --
    "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
  114. Re:too lazy to google right now by dr.badass · · Score: 1

    And this might be a decent analogy if we were talking about portable digital audio players, but Apple is hardly a "Goliath" in the desktop market, or even the useless desktop widget market.

    Or maybe, if, you know, Apple had ~10,000 employees vs. ~5 and effectively owns the ground that Konfabulator walks on.

    You must've reached far into the depths of your own lack of understanding to want to bring up "the desktop market" and Microsoft in a story that has absolutely nothing to do with either.

    Who really cares though?

    Obviously you do. Why would you even enter into a thread that you don't know anything about, don't understand, and claim to not care about? Does "trying to build a high quality foes list" really require you to such pointless crap?

    Go ahead, foe away. And once you're done purifying your environment so you never have to be exposed to ideas that you don't agree with, maybe then you can learn how to post a meaningful comment.

    --
    Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  115. Damning with faint praise by TechStuff.ca · · Score: 1

    from the announcement
    So, we're excited. You should be too. We're in good hands at Yahoo!,
    I mean, they acquired Flickr, right? How bad can they be?


    Google - "Don't Be Evil."
    Yahoo! - "How Bad Can We Be?"

  116. Well honestly it's not for you. by halr9000 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, Konfabulator or DesktopX or Kapsules or Active Desktop or let's see if I can think of any more... Anyway, all of these I am certain have an audience. You have the skinning scene, the graphic artists, and basically Joe and Jane User who just like a "pretty" computer.

  117. Great Buy!! by jamesjames · · Score: 0

    I think this was a very smart strategy for yahoo to buy this company. Look for Google to counter with a purchase real soon.