Slashdot Mirror


Women Control the DVR

JeiFuRi writes "While men normally hog the remote, a new study commissioned by Lifetime suggests that women are more likely to be in charge of their DVRs . Results from a survey of 1000 married woman say that 48 percent made the decision to purchase a DVR on their own and 55 percent claimed they understood the system more than their husband. Three-quarters of the women surveyed said that the reason they fell in love with DVR is that they are extremely intuitive and much easier than a VCR." The study also found some interesting things about DVR users' ad-watching habits.

325 comments

  1. Really... by xerxesVII · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And a study commissioned by ESPN found that men control the dvr.

    --
    "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Really... by craXORjack · · Score: 0
      And a study commissioned by ESPN found that men control the dvr.

      Question: He is holding the TV remote and a can of beer. She holds the DVR remote. Now, who is really in control when he can just hit the "Source" button and switch the input to cable TV? Answer: She is, of course, if he ever wants another blow job again.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    2. Re:Really... by lastchance_000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's interesting is that the according to TFA, the study surveyed equal numbers of both men and women, but there is no sign of what the men thought about any question.

      Lies, damned lies and statistics after all...

    3. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look mac, if you define your relationship such that you allow a woman to control you with sex, you've lost before you've even begun.

      Learn to say no now and then.

    4. Re:Really... by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yeah, my guess is 100% of the men surveyed claimed that they understood the system more than their wives.

      Even if it wasn't true, how many men would admit it?

    5. Re:Really... by uberchicken · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? You have no trolls in your posting history that I can see.

    6. Re:Really... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Funny

      No.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    7. Re:Really... by empaler · · Score: 1
      Statistician: A man who believes figures
      don't lie, but admits that under analysis some of
      them won't stand up either.
      - Evan Esar
    8. Re:Really... by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 1

      In the real world, where men don't read womens mags, guys like this are called Whipped...

      --

      --
      "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

    9. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, moron, relationships aren't a contest. If you define your relationship such that you define a "winner" and a "loser", you suck at life.

    10. Re:Really... by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      And if you think watching TV is more important then sex, you have already lost too

    11. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " And if you think watching TV is more important then sex, you have already lost too"

      You sir must not be married, and if so not for very long.

    12. Re:Really... by Otter · · Score: 1

      This being a Lifetime survey, I'm just relieved they didn't provide the percentage of wives who have killed their husbands over the DVR...

    13. Re:Really... by BewireNomali · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You bring up a really interesting point about this being a Lifetime survey.

      Media in general is consumed and purchased disproportionately by women. Games are the exception, but women are catching up there too, although they tend to like non-combative games more.

      I freelance in media, mostly film, but some television. I've done some work for the Viacom empire, and I can tell you that programming for most television is preferentially geared to reflect that heterosexual women and gay men tend to overconsume television programming (viacom is actually preparing a channel devoted to gays). It's no surprise that women have a greater grasp of PVRs, since they are doing all the watching.

      Interestingly enough, Japanese men have this unholy obsession with little girls, really young, like 12-15. Schoolgirls. Psychologists thought that this was some kind of mass pedophilia movement, but after some research, it turns out to be something else. Japanese men are overworked, 80-90 hour weeks. They do not consume much media on average in a country where 4 hours each day are devoted to watching TV. So, what happens is that these men are culturally behind the times... they actually have no idea what's going on in their own country, in their own civilization. The working man has become the butt of a collective joke... they all wear the same suits, have no style or sense of individuality. They've effectively been emasculated by their women peers. The men respond by reacting to the women who still respond to their masculinity, namely by using their money to influence underage girls. Ironically enough, it's all because working Japanese men don't consume enough media and are hopelessly "out of touch."

      This is completely unrelated, but history, literature, and allegory all convey this same story. The man who swears his allegiance to a woman is emasculated for the world. Samson and Delilah, etc. Bill Gates, not the same since getting married. Paul Allen? Still hardcore. *shrugs*

      Average guy gets girlfriend and infrequent head, loses utter control over his PVR and becomes intimately acquainted with "Desperate Housewives" storylines. *shrugs*

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    14. Re:Really... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Look mac, if you define your relationship such that you allow a woman to control you with sex, you've lost before you've even begun."

      Yeah because if you had a chick, you'd make a totally risk a blow job to 'win'.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    15. Re:Really... by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      One vagina for the rest of my life? I don't think so!

    16. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      One vagina for the rest of my life? I don't think so! it's worked for you this long, I don't see a problem!

  2. My Mom by The+Lost+Supertone · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    My mom would probably say that she understands a DVR doesn't mean she does. My sister recently fubared the home network with a WiFi router, and claims that no it couldn't possibly cause a problem, with great authority. She doesn't even know what an IP address is. Women especially with technology if they use it enough to get by will claim they're experts.

    1. Re:My Mom by mboverload · · Score: 1

      Men are probably smart enough to say they don't know everything about a DVR.

      Try and ask a women how to extract the video data off of the hard drive.

    2. Re:My Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      wow this was especially sexist. the disturbing part is that it was modded interesting.

    3. Re:My Mom by countchoc12 · · Score: 0

      where are my mod points when i need them!

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Soviet Russia jokes make YOU!
    4. Re:My Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To be fair, a large number of men will also claim they are experts when they aren't.

      But, it is true that the entire "women can do anything" push over the last couple of decades has, on occasion, led to some individuals having more confidence in themselves then is warranted.

      I'd hazard a guess that there are probably just as many men as women who are likely to do this though - it may just be more noticeable since women have just recently reached the same level as guys in ego and self-confidence, irrespective of ability :)

    5. Re:My Mom by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I bought my parents a TiVo with built-in DVD burner last Christmas (it's their favorite present ever, btw). My Mom is fairly technophobic, but picked up on how to program the thing right away. I wouldn't say she controls it necessarily, but let's just say I'm guessing she's pretty adament about certain show's being high up on the ole priority list.

      Remember that old matra that was oft-spoke years ago: "someday the technology will be so advanced, it will be easy to use, and people will view their computers just like any other appliance"?

      Guess what? It's here, and it's called TiVo! For the relative complexity of what it does, I'd have to say that TiVo has one of the most brilliantly-designed user interfaces I've ever seen.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    6. Re:My Mom by binaryspiral · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Women especially with technology if they use it enough to get by will claim they're experts

      Whoa, reel in the sexism there spanky. I work in a office that has some of the smartest women I've ever met. Level 3 hardcore technowizbang smart women.

      Maybe you should work for a company that doesn't look for pants when they're hiring smart people. And dresses for receptionists?

    7. Re:My Mom by KillShill · · Score: 1

      any clueful woman will say "stay away from those DRM crippled dvr devices and use mythtv."

      no person likes to pay for the priveledge of being screwed over.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    8. Re:My Mom by Icehouseman · · Score: 0
      Women especially with technology if they use it enough to get by will claim they're experts.

      Agreed (my sister claims to be an expert on everything). However, being an expert on DVR isn't hard to accomplish. All it takes is about fifteen minutes of use and you got it down. How can there be people who can't figure out how it works? I mean we're not talking about how to program with Assembler, this is DVR. Find me someone who can't figure out DVR and either the person is over 65 or is the same person who can't figure out a microwave.

    9. Re:My Mom by The+Lost+Supertone · · Score: 1

      Oh please, this was not EXTREMELY sexist. This was a generalization based on sex. Sexist requires a discriminatory nature, or some sort of hate, essentially some sort of negative feeling toward the other sex. I do not have that, nor is that inherent in my comment. I was more stating a general observation. If I honestly have to think of all the people I know, I can only think of one woman I have met offline who I would genuinely say was technosavy. She had an iMac and used Photoshop, Quark, and wanted an iPod more because it could be a portable HD. Kinda hott actually. That said I have met some women who know how to use what they know, but who I wouldn't call technosavy. Then again perhaps my standards are high. But frankly you will find guys are almost always more willing to fiddle with a program to figure out how it can do what they went, than your average woman will. This doesn't mean that there are no women who know stuff, I'm just saying there are disproportional numbers when comparing genders.

    10. Re:My Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women especially with technology if they use it enough to get by will claim they're expert

      I'm just saying there are disproportional numbers when comparing genders.

      Where in the first line is there any mention of disproportional numbers?

    11. Re:My Mom by be-fan · · Score: 2, Funny

      LOL. Ask you average man how to extract the video data off the hard drive...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    12. Re:My Mom by robocrop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Interesting that it's only sexism when something is said about women. But when women start talking about how much smarter they are than men ... that's headline news.

    13. Re:My Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me about it!

    14. Re:My Mom by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      Interesting that it's only sexism when something is said about women. But when women start talking about how much smarter they are than men ... that's headline news.

      No... that's FOX news.

    15. Re:My Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dressing stereotypes are sexist, you pig.

    16. Re:My Mom by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should work for a company

      I think he needs to graduate high school first.

      And go back and learn grammar, so that he doesn't look like a complete idiot.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    17. Re:My Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the problem sentence:

      Women especially with technology if they use it enough to get by will claim they're experts.

      ie: Generally a woman will claim they are experts at any technology they use, even if they don't know it completely.

      Generalizations based on an entirely flawed sample set (your mom and your sister) are not an accurate basis to claim that everyone of that gender lacks in humility.

      I'm sure you don't think all women have this problem, but that *is* what you said, sorry to say. But that's ok, everyone makes mistakes. :)

    18. Re:My Mom by Dollar+Sign+TA · · Score: 1

      You're nuts. Men are far more likely to claim to know something that they don't - especially when it's a "manly" thing like technology. Men tend to be more boastful and to try to show off, whereas women are more likely to play dumb. (And before you call me sexist, I am female) But, the truth is, male or female, most people are scared of computers and scared to fiddle with programs. Go outside into that scary natural light, you'll find that it's true :-). Oh, and yes, that was sexist. And if you walk around with the attitude of women not being tech-savy, yeah, you'll have a tough time meeting one who is because you walk in assuming the worst.

    19. Re:My Mom by oldwolf13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So... it's ok for you to make an assumption about him, and where he works based on a simple comment, but it's not ok for him to say anything based on his experiences?

      How is that world you're living in, anyways?

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    20. Re:My Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Men are far more likely to claim to know something that they don't - especially when it's a "manly" thing like technology. Men tend to be more boastful and to try to show off, whereas women are more likely to play dumb. (And before you call me sexist, I am female)

      Curiously enough, being female doesn't make it impossible to be a sexist, just impossible to get into any real trouble for it. You've just made sweeping generalisations about both sexes, which is just as bad as the parent poster. (ie. not very)

      Saying 'more likely' doesn't really make a difference, I don't think any reasonable person would think he was saying every single woman everywhere will behave exactly as stated just because he didn't wrap his offhand statement in caveats.

    21. Re:My Mom by Dollar+Sign+TA · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree... What I have expressed is a correlation between gender and personality traits, whereas the parent has assigned a personality trait to a gender. That, I believe, is what defines sexism/racism/*ism: when you assign a trait to a person of that class. There is a difference, but there's also a huge gray area in between. Futhermore, technically, you can't really make a sweeping generalization about a class. If you somehow take an average of the probability of a man/woman claiming to know something that he/she does not, the male average must come out to a number, as must the female average. All I have expressed is that, in my opinion, the male average would be much closer to 1 than the female average. You can disagree with that comparison, but you can't disagree with the fact that men and women must "tend" to be one way or the other.

    22. Re:My Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using them... right... now!

    23. Re:My Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days saying "women can't produce sperm" is counted as sexist...

    24. Re:My Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, my point is that it's all semantics. He assigned a trait, you said that a trait is more common on one side. Presumably he understood that there are differences between particuar women and assumed that readers would too.

      I wasn't actually calling you sexist because I thought you were, I was just making a point that neither of you said anything that deserved the term. It has connotations beyond noticing that there are differences.

    25. Re:My Mom by lolocaust · · Score: 1

      Its easier to see it as an appliance, since it's benn designed for one specific task, just like a microwave or a washing machine.

      --
      Why does my post history abruptly stop? I want to laugh at the stupid things I posted as a kid.
    26. Re:My Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe you should work for a company that doesn't look for pants when they're hiring smart people.


      So these people should be in their underwear? I'm sorry, but all of the women I see applying for jobs at the university (co-op interviews) are wearing pants.

      Mr. Kettle, meet Mr. Pot. He says your black.
    27. Re:My Mom by Deeze · · Score: 1

      Stay away from those DRM crippled dvr devices and use mythtv.

    28. Re:My Mom by badmammajamma · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Actually, he's kinda got you there Spanky. There's TONS of reverse sexism (not just on FOX News) and it's considered totally OK (check almost any sitcom). Since most men these days are gonadless wimps too affraid to say anything to a woman I see this going on indefinitely (or even getting worse).

      In short, men are a bunch of pussies these days and society expects it or even demands it in some cases. Women expect to be obeyed now. This is why I will never again maarry another American woman.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    29. Re:My Mom by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1
      Because your wife will beat you up??? Gorw a pair, Nancy!

      /Gotta go... my wife is calling me...

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
    30. Re:My Mom by robocrop · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Because your wife will beat you up??? Gorw a pair, Nancy!

      It's brilliant how poetic that statement is. You've illustrated the problem perfectly. Men must accept, revere, and worship women. But if women do anything offensive and we complain, we're just too weak.

      The 'revenge feminism' angle is being played way too often. You can see it anywhere on TV if you have your eyes open. Men are consistently infantilized in entertainment and advertising. Since advertisements generally have less air time, they tend to be more egregious about it.

      For example, in Canada there is a commercial about stopping the spread of HIV. On this commercial a talk-show host - female - is paneling three 'guy' penis-shaped objects. The woman asks if they ever 'try for sex' on the first date, and the guys all hum and haw about how women aren't objects, they respect their spirituality ... and the woman instantly sneers at them and screams at the audience 'don't trust your date'. The audience, full of women, cheers raucously at this. End message: men are sex-obsessed pigs, and only women care about the spread of STDs.

      For me, true disgust with this odious gender bigotry pinnacled when I saw an episode of "Third Watch" (ok, it was a slow TV day) where a female detective rammed her gun into a guy's crotch and threatened to shoot off his toolkit. While this was happening heroic music was playing - see, the female cop was avenging the death of her sister, who OD'd on drugs bought from the male pusher. Hooray for justice!

      The odd thing is that this swing of attention - which is outright pandering to the female demographic - has actually infiltrated even the steadfastly male-dominated cultures. Yesterday I was watching 'Appleseed', an anime movie. The movie is set in a post-apocalyptic future in which mankind has formed a symbiosis with engineered beings. Every positive character in the movie is female. The Prime Minister is female. The doctor who invented the 'clones' is female. The hero is female. The men in the story are either war-obsessed genocidal maniacs or just there to spout anti-woman dialogue to justify the revenge feminist angle. And this is Japanese anime!

      Frankly as much as I find it offensive I also find it pathetic. There's a desperate neediness about the whole thing, which I don't believe truly 'equal' people would require in order to feel good about themselves. But to be fair, we've been suffering the 'white guys are lame, white guys can't dance, white guys can't jump, white guys can't play basketball' crap for years too. Hopefully it's all just a phase.

      And, hopefully, someday I'll be able to sit down to dinner without being assaulted by countless vignettes in which men are the goofy idiots and women the wise sages - or, at least, fewer commercials about feminine itch, odor, and leakage.

    31. Re:My Mom by kitty+tape · · Score: 1

      Wrong does not justify wrong.

      --
      ----- "Type theory is like pretzels on crack." -- random friend
    32. Re:My Mom by denissmith · · Score: 1

      Women, or young adult females between 12 and 25, are quite often the strongest characters in Anime, I wouldn't hinge any arguements about the "battle of the sexes" on Appleseed. Read Or Die, I think, supports your thesis much better :) Your overarching point about males being told to 'accept, revere and worship...', well, its sort of a one sided perspective. Guys make equally lame comments about women. See the rest of the /. comments on this topic if you don't believe me. The fact is their are thin percentages of difference. I am male, and a pacifist. My mother is, I believe, female, but she hasn't met a US military intervention that she hasn't liked. Individual cases are never to be generalized from aggregate data. On average some % of women are more/less likely than some % of men to engage in a specific behavior, but these things are seldom outside of 55/45 splits. Now, throwing a baseball, there is a topic for some good old sexist fun!

      --
      I have nothing to hide. So, why are you spying on me?
    33. Re:My Mom by robocrop · · Score: 1
      Guys make equally lame comments about women

      But this isn't the point. Of course some men say stupid things about women. Everyone says something stupid sometime. It's the only universal truth.

      The point is that we are being conditioned to believe that women are better than men - despite ample evidence to the contrary - by our society and media. From television programs which foist this point-of-view on us, to commercials, to headlines whenever a female in any area does anything (Wie almost makes the cut, it's headlines. A female race car driver finishes like 15th and it's headlines). Focus groups are conducted about how to artificially introduce more women into fields they do not usually enter - not because there's any objective benefit to this, but because everything has to be at least 50% male and 50% female or it's sexist. Women have special female-only scholarships and funds to get them into the sciences. Women have private clubs, and if men have one (e.g. The Masters) it's considered tantamount to a Nazi death camp. On and on.

      Don't delude yourself, there is a double standard. Most men ignore/tolerate it, most women think it's justified because they want revenge for sexism which, ironically, most of them weren't even around to experience.

    34. Re:My Mom by Neoncow · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? GP just said that it was interesting. Not that it was justified.

    35. Re:My Mom by coopex · · Score: 1

      sexism
      1 : prejudice or discrimination based on sex; especially : discrimination against women
      2 : behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex

      So while I see you mean to use defn 2, the word stems from analogy with racism, whose etymology is originally in the context of Nazi theories, so it's really crappy communication to use sexism for anything but 1, because of its negative connotations.

      As to generatlization about people (or anything for that matter), yeah, it sucks, but that's how the brain evolved to work effectively in a world with a low S/N ratio.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    36. Re:My Mom by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      its not only sexism. its racism. and just about all the other big "ism"s out there that get the reverse treatment :P

      Rediculous disproportion of male domestic violence claims. Well guess who are more likey to hit thier partner and statisticaly does so more. The wife is.

      "hate crime" cruft and media circus stuff as well.

      somehow i started writing this with a point but it vanished. Oh wait there isnt one. Its just another stupid thing about humans.

      If the disabled guy cuts in line i cant complain cause hes disabled. well sod off cause i damn well should have the right to.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    37. Re:My Mom by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Hehe. I metamoderated the "Interesting" mod as "Unfair".

      Everyone who can should M2. Dealing with abuses like that can be much more interesting than spending mod points.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  3. In related news... by iamnafets · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Women also say they are the smarter sex. Since when does it matter that they "say" they know the DVR better. Everyone knows guys are television experts.

  4. Slanted a little... by kschawel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While 99 percent of women say they use their DVRs to zap through commercial spots, 76 percent reported that they stopped for ads that are entertaining or relevant to their own interests. Women are also more likely to pause for TV and movie promos.

    "DVRs give them a mechanism to find commercials that are relevant, and that's a big message," Brooks said. "It's not that people don't want commercials, it's irrelevant interruptions that turn them off."


    Ok, that is a big hint to the tv industry. Women do not want irrelevant commercials, but are willing to watch and advertisement that they are interested in. Unfortunately for the tv industry, I don't think men want commercials at all...

    Also FTA:

    The study, which was commissioned by Lifetime,

    Lifetime, the network for women, is saying, "ADVERTISE HERE! WOMEN WATCH COMMERCIALS!"

    See, there's a slant to everything.

    Keith

    1. Re:Slanted a little... by Bodrius · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I doubt men are that repelled by advertisements...

      I'd think men want anything that has sex in them, and are generally receptive to scenes that promote tribal behavior, if pop-culture is any indication.

      Hence the popularity of memes originating in beer commercials.

      I'd like to think people in general are receptive to clever amusement, advertising included; although that is a bit less substantiated, people do share such advertisements as interesting memes in spite of their corporate message.
      E.g.: I'm currently not looking for a backup solution, but If I ever do, a company that hires John Cleese is more likely to get my money.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    2. Re:Slanted a little... by dasdrewid · · Score: 1

      Some men do. I collect commercials, personally. I've used my eyetv to record a good many commercials, and have a little over 1 gb in my collection. Of course, I am a) weird and b) studying film.

      --
      No trespassing. Violators will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    3. Re:Slanted a little... by oldwolf13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      >> I'd think men want anything that has sex in them,,,

      I resent that.

      I want violence too.

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    4. Re:Slanted a little... by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      >> I've used my eyetv to record a good many commercials ...

      For some reason I thought that said eyetoy..

      was trying to figure out wtf?

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    5. Re:Slanted a little... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, post got truncated...
      c) queer as a three dollar bill

    6. Re:Slanted a little... by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No commercials for me. No beer, no sex, no violence please. I just like to be left alone.

    7. Re:Slanted a little... by waferhead · · Score: 1

      "Unfortunately for the tv industry, I don't think men want commercials at all... "

      Close.

      Men want commercials with big, bouncy BREASTS.

      This may be funny, but also insightful ;-) ...And TRUE.
      Please moderate to hell.

    8. Re:Slanted a little... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if they're uncovered. Internet porn has set a very high standard that broadcast TV simply can't live up to.

    9. Re:Slanted a little... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if they [breasts] are uncovered. Internet porn has set a very high standard that broadcast TV simply can't live up to.

      Speak for yourself; most "big" porn breasts nowadays are obvious fake silicon monstrosities that look about as convincing as an inflated balloon stuck in there.

    10. Re:Slanted a little... by endy64 · · Score: 1

      "...a company that hires John Cleese is more likely to get my money."

      Heh, except when he annoys a whole nation: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/237243.st m :

      "The number one ad that had 17% of the 1000 people interviewed reaching for the off switch was the Sainsbury's supermarket campaign featuring the comic actor John Cleese."

    11. Re:Slanted a little... by lbmouse · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was wondering if "Lifetime" was the same as the Lifetime TV channel. If you want your ego/libido/esteem to take a hit and you are male, watch this channel for a solid day.

      They should change their name to "The Man Bashing Channel" or maybe "Dead-Beat-Dad TV".

    12. Re:Slanted a little... by BlogPope · · Score: 1
      "The number one ad that had 17% of the 1000 people interviewed reaching for the off switch was the Sainsbury's supermarket campaign featuring the comic actor John Cleese."

      It also listed an add featuring Claudia Schiffer stripping as beeing one of the most annoying. So clearly there's a gap between me a these interviewees...

      --
      My other car is a Popemobile
    13. Re:Slanted a little... by Jarn_Firebrand · · Score: 1

      Or how about "All-Men-Are-Pigs TV"

  5. Good trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This surprises me because among my friends with DVRs, it was the guys who decided to get it, and who hog that remote too. Maybe my friends are the exception? But I'm glad to hear that more women are getting into technology. It's for everyone, so everyone should enjoy it.

    First post?

  6. DVRs? by gcnaddict · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I guess this means that they dont control their PVRs... hmm are they both the same thing? I would assume they are. Anyways, i know my woman doesnt control my DVR, as she doesnt know much about controlling a computer :P

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:DVRs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digital Video REcorder vs. Personal Video Recorder

    2. Re:DVRs? by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

      arent they both the same thing though? I mean... they both record video for me

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:DVRs? by Babbster · · Score: 1
      I differentiate between PVRs and DVRs this way (my own personal use, of course): A DVR is any device that uses a hard drive to record broadcast/cable/satellite TV. A PVR is a DVR which can do things like monitor its guide for particular shows, keep track of reruns (and not record a specific program that has already been recorded recently), record shows based on general preferences, etc. So, in my lexicon, TiVo and ReplayTV would be DVRs and PVRs with their enhanced ability to "personalize" the device's general functionality, while something like the DishPVR (which is essentially a VCR that records to a hard drive) would be a DVR but not a PVR.

      In general use, of course, the two terms are used interchangeably with most people calling all such devices DVRs.

  7. It makes sense by matt21811 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This doesn't surprise me at all.

    My wife and I have had cable for the last 6 years. I noticed and interesting difference in viewing patterns between us. I found that I tend to watch channels but she watches programs. I'll turn on the TV and watch news, documentary or sports channels and I'm not too fussy, I'll surf between the 4 documentary channels until I find something interesting and watch it. Her viewing decisions are made from looking at the program guide, the clock, recommendations from her friends and womens magazines and then decide what and when to watch. She will actually plan to watch a particular program (amazing I know). I don't think I've done that in years. A PVR would only improve her viewing convenience but it would make no difference all to mine.

    It doesn't seem surprising to me that women would then control the PVR.

    1. Re:It makes sense by xmda · · Score: 1

      In that case, I am a woman in a man's body... :) I do the exact same thing: record the shows I want to see so that I can see them when *I* want, not when the networks decide to show them. Skipping the commercials is of course a bonus.

      Speaking of "surfing the tv", my girl friend tend to do that more than me. Just sitting down, see what is on and just stick to some program. I guess she is a man in a woman's body then...

    2. Re:It makes sense by Seumas · · Score: 1

      This study is stupid. All it shows is that most women THINK they control the Tivo. Just like MOST women probably will tell people they bring home the bacon, they do all the house repairs, they do all the work, they blah blah blah.

      Whether they really do or just think they do are two completely different things.

    3. Re:It makes sense by pla · · Score: 1

      She will actually plan to watch a particular program (amazing I know).

      Gotta agree, I suspect these results come from something along the very lines you propose.

      VCR not intuitive? A VCR has basically the same sort of interface as a PVR, with the PVR quite a lot more complex. Biggest difference? You set a VCR to record by time, not by program.


      Though, I have to admit that my viewing habits more closely resemble females ones, at least in that I watch specific programs, not just pick a channel and watch it. But fear not, my testosterone-laden brethren, I still loathe all commercials (It drives me batty when my SO stops to show me "that cute commercial [she] tried to tell [me] about"), and I still can't stand "chick" programming.

    4. Re:It makes sense by montyzooooma · · Score: 3, Funny

      You realise it's going to cost a fortune in surgery to sort your relationship out? :-)

    5. Re:It makes sense by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      I haven't had that good of a laugh in years...

      Thank you, mod parent up.

    6. Re:It makes sense by Talla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      VCR not intuitive? A VCR has basically the same sort of interface as a PVR, with the PVR quite a lot more complex. Biggest difference? You set a VCR to record by time, not by program.

      On a PVR, you can just click record when you want to record something. When you want to view it, you look at the list of what you have recorded, and select what you want.

      With a VCR, you first have to find a tape, check that there's nothing on it you want to keep, and then start recording. If you want to keep whats on the second half of the tape, but not the first, it's a mess. Trying to plan for this can be difficult, because you may not know what you want to keep until you've watched it.

      Then, when you want to watch something, you first have to find the right tape, then you have to fast forward until you find it. You might say this is intuitive, but it's a lot more work, which in my opinion makes it feel less intuitive.

    7. Re:It makes sense by cecille · · Score: 1

      I haven't owned a VCR in many years, but when I was younger, the biggest problem I found wasn't the tape thing, but the weird way VCR's dealt with channels (just as a side note, this VCR was OLD...I'm sure they're way better now, but I've moved on). Anyway, we had cable (pretty normal), and different cable companies had different numbers for their channels. Just to make things a bit more fun, the VCR for some reason, operated on different channel numbers than the TV. Just to make it a little bit MORE fun, you could program the VCR channels to be different TV numbers, BUT they reset themselves what seemed to be rather randomly, and programming the channels was hardly intuitive since you basically had to guess what channel you were setting and then check it after. Since we didn't usually tape a bunch of shows, when we DID want to tape something, the routine basically consisted of trying to set the channels on the VCR, and then running a test tape though for 1 minute to make sure the channel was correct. Even then, every once in a while, you'd get home and realize you had a half hour of some show you'd never seen before in your life. Stupid VCR...I hated that thing.

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
    8. Re:It makes sense by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      So you don't plan to watch "Battlestar Galactica" or "Firefly" or "Simpsons" or "Futurama" or ?

      You are willing to accept whatever crap happens to be on?

      Wacky.

    9. Re:It makes sense by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      PVR quite a lot more complex
      You obviously don't have a Tivo. OMG it's so unmeasureably obvious that you don't have a Tivo.

      I set my Tivo to record new episodes of Chappelle's show over a year ago. I entered 'chap', selected chappelle's show, and told it 'get a season pass'. I never have to set it again unless it changes to a new channel or name. It will record every new episode that ever comes out, season after season, no matter how often it changes time slots. No matter how much it gets delayed by production 'difficulties'. If there's something else on that I want to record, it will find another time slot of chappelle's show to record. The only show I watch on FX is The Shield. I don't have to keep track of when the new season starts; I'll know it when the new episodes start showing up on my Tivo. My Tivo will record every new episode of Battlestar Galactica that ever airs until the day it's over. I can effortlessly save up an entire season of 24, and then watch it in one long 'real time' marathon.

      No keeping track of what shows on each tape I've seen. No more daily video tape shuffle. No having to run multiple VCRs to overcome the 8 hour time limit. No more replacing worn out tapes. No having to buy yet another VCR to watch programs while shows are recording. No more recording over unwatched shows by accident. No more watching whatever is on the tape next, just because it's a nightmare to do it any other way. No more recording re-reuns. No more missing the second half of the special hour long episode. I don't miss even a single show when I go on vacation for a week.

      Does your VCR automatically record shows while you watch them so you can rewind during the show? Nascar is actually fun to watch, now that I can watch the crashes over and over, and then fast forward through the boring drive fast, slow down, turn left, repeat 500x.

      The only time I've touched any of my VCRs since getting Tivo was to archive a show once and to give a friend a copy of something his vcr missed because the show got moved.

    10. Re:It makes sense by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      Most VCRs have in them their own tuner. This is why you are able to record one channel while watching another: the VCR's applying its own tuner to the incoming signal and then passing it through to another socket which is then connected to your TV which also has a tuner.

      It sounds, though, like either your VCR was defective or you just didn't understand how to tune it! The first few VCRs I owned had mechanical tuning dials on the top under a cover. Later on as technology got more sophisticated they started having an integrated computer which controlled the tuner, meaning the tuning could be managed from an on-screen display. The last few had the ability to "auto-tune", though this meant that the channels ended up in broadcast order and not in the conventional numbering order.

      I think the main thing I like about a VCR is its simplicity. There's very little that can go wrong with it. I once tried to do a fancy visual display at an event I was running using a modded XBox hooked up to a video projector with videos playing from a DVD and remote control over bluetooth from the other side of the room. Needless to say, on the night the DVD drive started to struggle with the DVD for whatever reason and the video began to stutter, until eventually it just froze up altogether. The next time I kept it simple and just took a VCR and a video cassette containing what I wanted to show. I lost the real-time control over the progression, but it actually worked flawlessly and I was able to stop and resume playback in response to unexpected events without going through a major ordeal.

      I have similar issues with DVDs. If I'm watching a video and I'm interrupted, I can stop playback and remove the cassette, place it back in its box and forget about it for a while. When I come back later and put it back in it'll be exactly how I left it. With a DVD player, I have to sit through a few minutes of intros that my DVD player won't let me skip and then try to find the closest chapter point to where I was in the ever-useless menus. Once there, I inevitably end up re-watching several minutes of the programme because the chapter point didn't coincide with where I halted playback.

      (...and yes, I'm British.)

    11. Re:It makes sense by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Congratulations. Your TiVo is lying in bed for you to use as you please :P

      Get over it.

      Your utter adoration of your particular brand of item is totaly meaningless and utterly blind.

      1st things... That sounds like it does an awful lot of complicated stuff for you. Wether its complicated for you to make it do that doesnt matter in the context of the parent post.

      2nd thing... TiVo isnt the only thing out there.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  8. After having a Tivo for about five years now... by cowmix · · Score: 4, Funny

    I could of told you this without any 'fancy' study..

    Yeah.. my Tivo is filled with my wife's crap... :(

    1. Re:After having a Tivo for about five years now... by spiderworm · · Score: 1

      I put together a MythTV box for my wife for Christmas. She loves it; it records several shows a day for her while we are off at work. I don't use it, but then again, I've never been a big fan of watching TV; I use the TV for video games.

    2. Re:After having a Tivo for about five years now... by doormat · · Score: 1

      make your tivo bigger...

      http://www.weaknees.com/

      and share the spacee.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    3. Re:After having a Tivo for about five years now... by kassemi · · Score: 1

      Nothing's worse than when "Mansquito" or the jaws Myth Busters cuts to "Roseanne" or "The Nanny" or "Degrassi" or "Any Day Now" or "Grace Under Fire" for recording, and there's hell to pay if you change the channel back...

      --
      What the hell's a "gewie?"
    4. Re:After having a Tivo for about five years now... by crunchly · · Score: 1

      The only way I can watch one of my shows on Tivo is to pick the recording that runs somewhere between 2am and 5am and get it moved to my computer before 7am, which must be when my wife "cleans out the junk".

    5. Re:After having a Tivo for about five years now... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a personality problem, not a relationship problem. I know my wife made sure I was ready and available to watch the jaws mythbuster and that I was in my couch with a beverage and a pillow.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    6. Re:After having a Tivo for about five years now... by karnal · · Score: 1

      I built a SageTV box for our house, and told my wife that she could put in her daytime soaps.

      Now, she's one more to sit down on the couch and start channel-surfing. But, she told me she doesn't want to start "taping" the soaps, because then she'd never get off the couch...

      I've found that out of the shows I do record, I now spend a lot less time watching them than I did with the VCR. Finding the shows is easier, and FF/REW through commercials - or even slow parts - is 10X quicker. Even better - I can determine through the software the "timings" for ff, rew, and with the remote I have, I even have a second set of fast-skip buttons (set to 2.5 minutes each)...

      Wonderful stuff, whether it be Myth, Sage, or Tivo. It definitely changes the way you consume TV.

      --
      Karnal
    7. Re:After having a Tivo for about five years now... by sootman · · Score: 1

      "The only way I can watch one of my shows on Tivo is to pick the recording that runs somewhere between 2am and 5am..."

      I recommend Cinemax Late Nite. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    8. Re:After having a Tivo for about five years now... by sootman · · Score: 1

      Yup... I've got two 120 GB drives in my TiVo, probably 75% full of chick movies, 20% things we both like, and less than ten shows just for me.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    9. Re:After having a Tivo for about five years now... by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      my Tivo is filled with my wife's crap
      I think 'your' tivo is now hers. Time to get your own. My wife and I each have our own Tivos, and now she can't possibly blame me for her shows not getting recorded. And I don't have to flip past pages of Leno, Queer Eye and Murder She Wrote episodes. Worth every penny.

  9. Irritatingly true. by dourk · · Score: 2, Funny

    She has to rewind every single time she misses the most miniscule piece of irrelevent dialog. Can't we just watch the show thru one time first?

    --
    Wake up.
    1. Re:Irritatingly true. by NoCrash · · Score: 1

      it's either that or turn on subtitles

      --
      Living at the edge--of a continent?
    2. Re:Irritatingly true. by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      What your not watching undubed japanese anime with the subtitles?

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  10. Ad execs: read up! Blipverts! by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    "While 99 percent of women say they use their DVRs to zap through commercial spots,"

    Goes to show you how many people actually watch ads. I bet the percentage for men is the same. Slobbering ad executives still won't get it.

    "A full 94 percent of those who said they fast forwarded commercials said they could still recognize brands and products as they zapped through the spots." ... or maybe they will, and they'll finally invent the Blipvert! I'd tolerate blipverts if it meant that less time per show was spent on ads. Currently it's about 15-19 minutes per hour.

    It's that whole "electrically charged exploding dude" side-effect that kinda worries me..

    1. Re:Ad execs: read up! Blipverts! by DerelictMan · · Score: 1
      ...or maybe they will, and they'll finally invent the Blipvert! I'd tolerate blipverts if it meant that less time per show was spent on ads. Currently it's about 15-19 minutes per hour.

      It's that whole "electrically charged exploding dude" side-effect that kinda worries me..
      Oooh, nice obscure reference there. I wonder how many people will catch it. Lifetime: The network that puts you right... where they want you to be. ;)
    2. Re:Ad execs: read up! Blipverts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goes to show you how many people actually watch ads. I bet the percentage for men is the same. Slobbering ad executives still won't get it.

      Ofcourse they dont. They're ad people, they should know better than anyone else how to do advertising, because, well, they're ad people.

      If they stepped back from their egos for a little while, they might figure out that most consumers find their ads boring as batshit.

    3. Re:Ad execs: read up! Blipverts! by say · · Score: 1

      Ah, you should come to Norway. Here, the networks are regulated (to get a frequency), and they aren't allowed more than 5 or 6 minutes per hour, and never commercials in the middle of shows. It's nice. And, of course, we have the national network, with real quality tv without ads (though you pay through your license, if the license controllers can find you).

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    4. Re:Ad execs: read up! Blipverts! by Aeiri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Currently it's about 15-19 minutes per hour.

      It's easier to think of it in terms of fractions, a little over a third of all TV programming is commercials.

      30 minute shows usually end up being 20-22 minutes long, 1 hour shows usually end up being 40-44 minutes long.

      I only watch "real" TV for one show a week at a time, maximum, now. BitTorrent rules (don't even have to remember to hit record, I can get shows as far back as the 1970s!).

    5. Re:Ad execs: read up! Blipverts! by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't exagerate. A little under a third of programming is commercials.

      or a little over a quarter.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re:Ad execs: read up! Blipverts! by BVis · · Score: 1
      Oooh, nice obscure reference there. I wonder how many people will catch it.
      Where did I leave that Rebus tape...

      In a similar vein, now that the TV industry is fighting our ability to fast-forward through advertising, how long will it be before they start to lobby for the outlawing of off buttons?

      (This comment brought to you by Zik-Zak)
      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    7. Re:Ad execs: read up! Blipverts! by robert899 · · Score: 0

      or about half if it's TBS.

    8. Re:Ad execs: read up! Blipverts! by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes. I do love bittorrent. Especially since I can't just add the Sci-Fi channel. I'd have to upgrade to Digital cable, schedule Comcast to come out and give me a box for it, *and* my new cable rate would be nearly $80/mo. It's only $44 now. Oh, but.. when i call comcast, they tell me that digital cable isn't available in my area and there's no way that I could add Sci Fi channel anyway. I can't even get the Comcast DVR where I am! (I'm in the Silicon Valley, about a mile away from flippin NASA.)

      So, back to bittorrent I go.

    9. Re:Ad execs: read up! Blipverts! by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
      Here, the networks are regulated (to get a frequency), and they aren't allowed more than 5 or 6 minutes per hour
      The US used to be close to that before the 80's. Then Reagan set the conditions which made US television what it has become. Just make sure that your country doesn't do to its high quality programming what your old neighbor on the other side of the fells did... They used to have as good or better programming on their national networks until an about face in priorities and goals 5 years ago.
      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  11. this is obvious, isn't it? by Naikrovek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    forgive me, some will think this is "sexist" but deep down you all know its true:

    Men hunt, women gather.

    Give women the opportunity to browse and pick the best [whatever] and they'll do it better than any man. A DVR does this. You can schedule things in advance, wait for them to come in, and pick the fruit when its ripened.

    channel surfing without a DVR is similar to hunting. you browse, you pick a target, and you strike at it by putting the remote down. decision made, decision executed, finality. man stuff.

    mod me down if you disagree, but before you do, give it some thought. its not as wrong as society would like you to believe.

    1. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by techrunner · · Score: 1

      Seems a little far fetched to me.

      Men watch more sports and news. And women watch more dramas. You can miss half of a game, and still enjoy it. Since missing half of the drama makes it worthless, a women needs the TIVO.

      Now, maybe guys prefer sports to drama because they were orignally hunters.

    2. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by bsdrawkcab · · Score: 4, Interesting

      forgive me, some will think this is "sexist" but deep down you all know its true:

      You make it sound as if you're about to say something controversial when you're really just repeating conventional wisdom and pop psychologists. I do happen to find your attitude sexist, but it's an attitude that pervades our culture. Please don't portray hegemonic views as persecuted beliefs.

      Men hunt, women gather.

      I don't buy it. Your analogy doesn't even make sense. When hunting you have some target. You have to have a particular target in order to set the PVR. When browsing particular channels, on the other hand, you trust that certain memorized areas will bear fruit. Sounds like a gatherer's approach to me. [Of course this is an equally fatuous comparison. I make it only to demonstrate how easily expectations can be fulfilled, no matter their validity.]

      mod me down if you disagree, but before you do, give it some thought. its not as wrong as society would like you to believe.

      Since when has it ever been wrong to express such views in American society? I find it to be factually wrong and harmful to the extent that it's prescriptive, but I strongly doubt that I am in the majority here.

      --
      Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago. -Bernard Berenson
    3. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a teenager is fun, isn't it?

    4. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Siniset · · Score: 1

      wow, this was one of the most intelligent, thought out comments to a slashdot article i've read in a long time. Nice job.

    5. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by learn+fast · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not a matter of disagreeing, it's a matter of falisifiable science rather than generalizating from trite, vacuous proverbs like "Men hunt, women gather." Pretty much any behavior could be described as either hunting or as gathering, and there is no way to resolve disputes as to whether an activity counts for sure as hunting or as gathering. Hence unscientific, astrology-like stuff.

      We could also say that men don't use the DVR as much because they are lazy, and women do because they are compulsive. Or maybe we could say that men are poor relaters and women like the interaction-like experience of using the DVR. Or maybe women use the DVR because they have exacting, varied tastes and men don't because they are generalizers and don't really care.

      And it would probably all be complete bullshit. Which is why we try to make simple, scientific hypotheses and test them in a way that could falsify them without requiring metaphor or analogy.

    6. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Atario · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you saying a PVR can replace a wife? That's just ridic-- I mean, it's...uh...

      Hmmmm.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    7. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I thought it was women that were supposed to be illogical? One of the guys below did a pretty good job of showing why your argument was asnine, so I'll concentrate on this "it's not as wrong as society would like you to believe". That's a logically flawed point in and of itself. The fact that society might or might not have a particular bias one way or the other doesn't change the fact that your argument , objectively, makes no sense. There could even be a fast left-wing feminist conspiracy, and you'd still be wrong...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    8. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I just feel somehow that you posted this only to show that you are a smart ass.

      I don't like that slashdot has become a pack of hunters that hunt every mistake you made or any shade of uncertenty... the guy made an interesting observation I think there's no need to be smart ass about it.

      Prescriptive? what's prescriptive about his/her observation?

      Sexist? You know there are differences between men and women, do you?

      "Please don't portray hegemonic views as persecuted beliefs." I'm not so sure anymore, PC is killing common sense and freedom of speech.

    9. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      Well if you didn't put up your "I disagree so I won't think about it" walls, you'd see he was using "hunt" to symbolize the pursuit of a paycheque to pay the bills, and "gather" as in take core of the home.

      Now while these positions don't hold true these days in the literal sense, they did for thousands of years. Do you not think this could possibly change the way we think and behave? I bet you think male and female emotions are the same too, huh? This may change with time, but whether it offends you or not, people are different... and gender plays a big role in this.

      Just because we are different in no means makes one better or worse, but to think we are the same is pure folly.

      The original poster too also did not mean anything in a condescending way, but I see some of the responses took it that way.

      I saw in another response something about "when has it ever been wrong to express views in american society"

      Well for one, I guess it needs to be said again, we're not all americans here. Gee, you must be very egotistical to say such a thing

      For two, it is wrong... you're ostracized for believing what is unpopular... racism, sexism, strong christian beliefs, and the republican/democratic bullshit that goes on. I'm not saying these views are right, I'm simply saying they can have some major consequences if you express them. Be they mental, physical, financial, whatever.

      I don't think anywhere really has a true "free speach" society. Possibly humanity won't allow it.

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    10. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, and please guys, don't forget to freak out on me for my typo of care (core).

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    11. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Men hunt, women gather.

      Regardless of the sexism, it's just plain false. For most of human history humans got 90% of their calories from gathering and only 10% from hunting. On the whole, humans were lousy hunters. The whole "human-as-mighty-hunter" thing was a myth disproven decades ago, but it still manages to perpetuate itself in popular culture.

      I guess guys just like to think that they're 'naturally' brave warrior types genetically suited to running down large mammals and eating them raw. In fact, most of the time the only thing a man 'ran down' was a carrot or apple.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    12. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      Men watch more sports and news. And women watch more dramas.

      I'm male, and I don't get the whole sports thing. At all. It just completely eludes me. I also don't get the crap that gets masqueraded as a show on networks such as Lifetime or Oxygen. Those shows are ALWAYS (I mean, ALWAYS) about a woman getting screwed by her husband. Why would a (hopefully happily) married woman want to watch that? Do they WANT to get ditched by their husband?

    13. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by 0xygen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do they WANT to get ditched by their husband?

      No, they just need to feel better about their crappy lives by seeing others in a worse position.

    14. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should that be in the same post where I freak out about your spelling of 'speach' or should I lump it in with the post berating your lack of capitilisation?

    15. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What on earth does your post have to do with its parent?

    16. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when has it ever been wrong to express such views in American society?

      It's wrong in current American society to express ideas that are unpopular. At best you are made to look like a fool, at worst you're a terrorist.

    17. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I don't get the sports thing either. I rarely watch sports. I love to play sports, but for the life of me, can't bother sitting down for the hours it takes to watch most games. I find that most sports are actually pretty boring to watch. I also don't get the whole devotion to the team thing. It doesn't really affect anything, or matter at all who wins. Your life is not any different if your home town has a winning basketball team. The only thing it means is that the tickets are more expensive.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    18. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *capitalization :P

      To quote the old proverb, "Those who live in glass houses should not throw bricks."

    19. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      I don't really care about whether the parent poster could be seen as condescending or not. "Men hunt, women gather" is an unscientific astrology-like explanation. Any form of "symbolism" is as well: it cannot be falsified.

      I don't care whether men and women are really different or not, I do not have to claim this in order to show that the original poster was wrong. There are indeed plenty of perfectly scientific ways to show that men and women are different in some predictable ways, but subjectively interpretting slippery proverbs like "men hunt, women gather" is not one of those things. An argument against one theory is not necessarily an argument for any particular competing explanation that people want to have.

      And certainly this has nothing to do with free speech. He has every right to think and express whatever he wants. I also have the right to say if I think something he says is unscientific. I am not censoring him by doing so.

    20. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you believe that we actually can scientifically study human behavior. Psychology is a psuedoscience not a science. Good luck in your adventure on this... I hope your proofs and studies are bulletproof or someone might not agree.

      Good luck with that

    21. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's wrong in current American society to express ideas that are unpopular. At best you are made to look like a fool, at worst you're a nazi/bigot.

    22. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Your analogy doesn't even make sense. When hunting you have some target. You have to have a particular target in order to set the PVR.

      Yet another example of how any metaphor usage is invariably wrong.

      When you hunt, you don't necessarily have one target. When a deer hunter goes out for the day, he doesn't have the photo or his chosen deer on a wanted poster. He has an objective - get the biggest, best deer he can. That's why it's more like channel surfing than using a DVR. When you're channel surfing, you don't have a specific target at all. You have an objective. Find the best show that's on, and watch it.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    23. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      I dont get the whole "compeditive" thing with teams... im a fan of racing, and a lot of other individual sports. But most team sports mean nothing to me... Except perhaps rugby... Something about the "thud" noise they make when hitting eachother sounds nice ;)

      Im just waiting for them to Televise multi angle HLTV footage on a channel... but no... alas they would probably get attacked for "promoting violent behaviour" by a tidal wave of bible bashing child smothering luddites pulling the Video Games Cause Violence Monolith of doom.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    24. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Im planning on steadfastly ignoring PC right till i die.

      Remove the warning lables, and bring back lawn darts.

      Im going to file a discrimination lawsuit against a university some day for not having male only scholarships to match their female only ones.

      Just cause your black/female/disabled doesnt make you any less of a person, so ive got every right to get pissed off and complain about what you do.

      I reserver the right to swear and use four letter words in the place of common adjectives on a 1 in 4 basis.

      Damn PC to hell

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  12. The reason is simple by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

    Due to a strange mis-wiring in thier brains, women are only able to watch one television show at a time.
    A shocking handicap, I know, but true.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:The reason is simple by PigIronBob · · Score: 1

      No Doubt you refer to the mystical attribute women claim to have: meaning the ability to multi-task. Men have that ability as well, but instead we're told we can't fucking concentrate on one thing at a time.

      --
      You never catch me alive
    2. Re:The reason is simple by Magus2501 · · Score: 1

      Ironic that women can engage in full-duplex conversation, while men are restricted to half-duplex.

      Or should I put the analogy in terms of TCP (men) and UDP (women)?

      Not a perfect analogy, but it makes you wonder about the multi-threaded nature of the sexes' thought process.

    3. Re:The reason is simple by dasdrewid · · Score: 1

      Fuck that. I can't watch *just* one show at a time. I often have picture in picture up, one show in the window and one on the main screen. When I'm at the computer, I have my tuner to get cable on the desktop while I'm reading slashdot. And when I'm playing gta on the good tv, I'll turn on the tv in the next room to a show I wanna watch and just crank the volume (admittedly, the gta radio is good, but there's only so many times you can listen to the full soundtrack).

      --
      No trespassing. Violators will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    4. Re:The reason is simple by Schmelvic · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's the reason why women don't get men. They listen, but if something gets lost in the communication process, they never ask for clarification!

    5. Re:The reason is simple by End11 · · Score: 1

      As Jerry Seinfeld decribes it, "men hunt, women nest".

      --

      Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
    6. Re:The reason is simple by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

      The BBC are doing a series on the mental differences between Men and Women called Secrets of the Sexes and to say the least , its really fascinating.

      Get the Cap here.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    7. Re:The reason is simple by gid · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, but that site requires a login and the signup is closed.

  13. Yeah.. I'm trolling.. by dustinbarbour · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Women control the DVR 'cause us guys are out working while they're watching 'Oprah.' Then they use the DVR to catch 'Ellen' when they're napping.

  14. My DVR... controls the DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You all know what I am talking about -- these DVRs have minds of their own. They are becoming sentient.

  15. Skewed? by SDMX · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Commissioned by Lifetime? As in the Lifetime channel? As in the only place you can find back to back shows about brave women escaping from the oppression of absuive husbands and self-empowering talk programming about taking back the household by asserting your interior decorational dominance?

    Lifetime... Television for Women? That Lifetime? And they say that women now control DVR? You don't say!

    I certainly tries to remain objective, but Lifetime releasing a study like this seems about as ridiculous as their programming. What kind of a polling sample is 1,000 people on a NATIONAL basis

    1. Re:Skewed? by neverkevin · · Score: 4, Informative
      I agree this is probably a flawed/biased study, however the sample size is not the issue. 1000 people is common for a national wide poll. See http://www.gallup.com/help/FAQs/poll1.asp :


      To be sure, there is some gain in sampling accuracy that comes from increasing sample sizes. Common sense -- and sampling theory -- tell us that a sample of 1,000 people probably is going to be more accurate than a sample of 20. Surprisingly, however, once the survey sample gets to a size of 500, 600, 700 or more, there are fewer and fewer accuracy gains that come from increasing the sample size. Gallup and other major organizations use sample sizes of between 1,000 and 1,500 because they provide a solid balance of accuracy against the increased economic cost of larger and larger samples. If Gallup were to -- quite expensively -- use a sample of 4,000 randomly selected adults each time it did its poll, the increase in accuracy over and beyond a well-done sample of 1,000 would be minimal, and generally speaking, would not justify the increase in cost.
    2. Re:Skewed? by ytm · · Score: 1

      That's a convoluted way to say that confidence interval (thus error) doesn't get significantly smaller with increasing sample size. With most such surveys you are interested only in xy.z% precision.

  16. Once again demonstrating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't matter how big your hard drive is, it's how you use it.

  17. Lifetime's other studies by BBrown · · Score: 5, Funny

    Last time I checked, Lifetime also conducts studies in order to improve the veracity of their television shows. According to their studies, 90% of married women are beaten by their husbands and 10% of those women kill/brutally maim their husbands and/or steal the children and run away.

    Hmmmm.

    Why does Lifetime care anyways? All their shows are the same so nobody really bothers recording them.

    1. Re:Lifetime's other studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ahh, yes. Lifetime: Television for Victims.

  18. Of course! by hobotron · · Score: 1


    Because they didnt check the hidden system folder with all the videos the husband has.

    "Honey why does our recording thingy say it is out of space" "Oh you know those hard drives arent built like they used to be, must be uh, bad sectors , Ill move all of my I mean ill move in another hard drive."

    --
    There is truth in humor.
  19. I'm missing something. by bsdrawkcab · · Score: 4, Informative

    Namely, the other half of the numbers. 48% of women asserted x. 55% of women responded y. Okay, interesting, but what does this have to do with sex differences? The study included men and women in roughly equal proportions, but no comparison is made to the men.

    If someone could dig up the whole story, your efforts would be appreciated.

    --
    Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago. -Bernard Berenson
  20. No kidding by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, between the PBS sewing shows, hospital dramas, and all 42 variants of CSI... I'd say my wife pretty much controls our Tivo.

    Then this spring I bought a second one for the spare room, but now my daughter has managed to fill that one with her stuff! I can't win...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:No kidding by rthille · · Score: 1

      Just setup the parental control password and keep it to yourself...
      That's what I do^did^ with my wife^ex-wife^

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    2. Re:No kidding by karnal · · Score: 1

      Well, sounds like you don't need that parental control password anymore :)

      --
      Karnal
  21. DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Dildo Vibrator Reamer) That's what a woman is in charge of. Making me feel so inadequate about my human sized member...member of the club....I'm cutting it off now. Girl (myself)....I'll be a woman soooon!

  22. Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'd like to know what makes the DVR so much easier to program than a VCR. I haven't used a DVR myself but I'm wondering if this apparent difference is simply that VCRs are 20-year-old technology and the user interface stagnated in 1985, whereas DVRs are new and manufacturers can play with new modes of interaction.

    Of course, the fact that a DVR doesn't have any tape to rewind wouldn't be relevant, right?

    1. Re:Hmm. by uberdave · · Score: 1

      DVRs are typically boxes that are provided by the cable or satellite company. The company provides the DVR with a list of shows (program guide), and keeps the clock synchronized. So, you browse through the program guide, using the arrow keys on your remote to point to the show you wish to record, and you press the record button. The DVR is now programmed. It picks up the information about the time the show starts, the time it ends, and the channel the show is on from the data fed to it from the broadcaster. You don't need to worry about any of that. It's basically point and click.

      With a VCR, you have to look up the show in a program guide, and make note of the start time, end time, and channel. Next, you have to program the start and end times into the VCR (or is it the start time and duration?). You also have to program the channel. Oh, and you also have to make sure that the time on the VCR is correct.

    2. Re:Hmm. by arose · · Score: 1

      Even a blinking twelve is correct twice a day...

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    3. Re:Hmm. by uberdave · · Score: 1

      It would be a wonderful world indeed, if that were true. Unfortunately, you are neglecting the AM/PM indicator, which would be flashing right along with the rest of the time.

  23. as they so succinctly put it themselves... by KillShill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lifetime

    Propoganda for Women.

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    1. Re:as they so succinctly put it themselves... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Oxygen. TV for stupid people...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:as they so succinctly put it themselves... by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      I'm uhh.. not exactly sure where you were going there... but kudos for making me giggle anyways :)

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    3. Re:as they so succinctly put it themselves... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Oxygen is a TV network for women. It's like less respectable version of Lifetime...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  24. Damnit... by Vorondil28 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I used my last mod point not more than 2 minutes ago and the Flamebait-potential of this story is astronomical. ;)

    I'll have my fun yet!

    --
    This sig rocks the casbah.
  25. I knew it by gadzook33 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Damn, two weeks spent trying to set up MythTV and all I had to do was ask my mom.

  26. Women are smarter by foxfyre · · Score: 1

    Men can't think straight when they have hard-ons. Women were naturally selected to bear offspring and nurse them.

    --
    -- Not a /. dude.
    1. Re:Women are smarter by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      Men can't think straight when they have hard-ons

      Are you trying to say that man are sexually excited by DVRs? You hang out with some weird men.

    2. Re:Women are smarter by tedrlord · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yay, fun gender-bashing time! Men are controlled entirely by sexual urges! Women are emotionally unbalanced and can't think logically! Men are violent, dangerous brutes! Women are weak, timid sheep! Men never ask for directions! Women can't drive!

      Don't miss next week's episode of Idiotic Generalizations: Liberals vs. Conservatives!

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
    3. Re:Women are smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And women can't think straight when a pair of nice shoes go on sale.

    4. Re:Women are smarter by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Funny

      "You hang out with some weird men."
      Or some sexy DVRs

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    5. Re:Women are smarter by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      nah, it's just the anticipation of all the pron we're planning to save using the DVR...

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    6. Re:Women are smarter by approx · · Score: 1

      You must be new here ..

      --
      There, behind you! A public health care system .. run for your life!
    7. Re:Women are smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, someone who RTFA. Thanks for the clear synopsis!

    8. Re:Women are smarter by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Men can't think straight when they have hard-ons

      Uh, yeah, whatever - there may be some truth to that, but OTOH, women can't think straight all the time.

  27. Doesn't surprise me at all. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 5, Funny

    My wife has like 4 or 5 directivos, 3 dish500s, a motorola DCT-5200 digital cable pvrs, and a few standalone tivos hooked up to 4dtv satellite recievers. Not to mention the DVB-S card in our home server. She even wrote special software, so they would all coordinate with each other, and not try to record something another DVR was already recording. With a terabyte fibre channel backend. It's kinda scary. She's even thinking of doing an episode guide database ala imdb, just so she can have better descriptions in the slice info.

    Oh wait, that's me. She can't turn the tv off with the universal remote.

    1. Re:Doesn't surprise me at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really need to get out more.

      Really.

    2. Re:Doesn't surprise me at all. by egriebel · · Score: 1
      This is by far the best post on slashdot in a long time, where's my Mod points when I need them!

      Too true about the universal remotes. I can usually pick up a friends universal and figure out how to at least turn on the tv and change channels, even one of those damn Sony remotes with a thousand buttons and a dozen modes. Most women I know look at a remote and go "duh..." and kick it old skool and walk over to the TV.

      --
      ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
    3. Re:Doesn't surprise me at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Oh wait, that's me. She can't turn the tv off with the universal remote.

      Turn off? How do you mean turn off? It can be turned off? What a silly feature!

    4. Re:Doesn't surprise me at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How fat is your wife?

    5. Re:Doesn't surprise me at all. by BiOFH · · Score: 1

      It's not our fault you hang out with stupid people.
      What are you, like their king or something?

      --
      - I am made of meat.
    6. Re:Doesn't surprise me at all. by egriebel · · Score: 1
      It's not our fault you hang out with stupid people. What are you, like their king or something?

      LOL! Hmmm, to be an angel in Heaven or the king of Hell...
      --
      ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
  28. Probably true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Not only (or perhaps at all) because of inherent technical aptitude, but because of how they would understand the question.

    Suppose a man and a woman have the exact same knowledge of a DVR. Ask the woman if she "understands" it, and she'll take it to mean if she can use it the way it's intended to be used.

    The man is more likely (IMHO) to interpret "understand" as knowing how the machine works: filesystems, video codecs, operating systems, I/O, etc etc. People are less likely to know that.

  29. It's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I set up a MythTV box last year. When I was explaining how cool this was going to be, the response from the wife was the same as most technical topics: 2 seconds of attention span followed by yawning and "yes, dear, whatever you say...".

    It was a steep learning curve, but within a few weeks I was recording shows like a big dog. Eventually, my recording tapered off to a low level after the novelty wore off.

    However, once she realized the power of the PVR, my wife really got into the thing. Within a couple of months, she became a wizard at navigating and scheduling programs. Now she schedules at least 80% of the shows.

    Meanwhile, I'm getting a taste of life as a sysadmin. Now if that box ever goes down, the disk runs out of space, or the MythTV backend gets hosed, it's got to be fixed ASAP. Sure she could revert to the old VCR, but all of a sudden, using it has become archaic and inconvenient.

    I used to boast about how many hours of video we'd be able to crunch to MPEG4 and store on DVDs; now I'm stuck proving that statement by saving out every hour of figure skating competition that happens anywhere on the planet.

    Oh well, at least I'm appreciated as the provider of this cornucopia of video clips.

    1. Re:It's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      mod parent up! so true.

      all work and no play and having to waste 20 seconds of my life to post make me... something something

    2. Re:It's true by ivp · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the club man.

      Maybe it's time to do some patches to mythtv to make sure that at least 1 Star Trek recording gets through, can't be that hard to get the damn thing to figure out which recordings are mine and which are hers and do some load balancing...

  30. This is surprising? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

    The study also found some interesting things about DVR users' ad-watching habits.

    From TFA:
    While 99 percent of women say they use their DVRs to zap through commercial spots, 76 percent reported that they stopped for ads that are entertaining or relevant to their own interests. Women are also more likely to pause for TV and movie promos.

    This is in some way surprising? 99% of respondents saying they don't want to watch ads on TV they're paying for? That 76% of them say they watch commercials they find amusing? That people are more likely to watch commercials that flog products they would actually use?

    I don't get how this is in any way unexpected....

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  31. I am the master of my castle by jhylkema · · Score: 1

    And I have my wife's permission to say so!

  32. How valid are such results? by Drnyc23 · · Score: 1

    Interesting finding, the question is how high is it in terms of external validity...can we generalize it to the entire population that owns DVRs? In the beginning my wife thought that having a DVR ( I was one of the first customers to get one from TWCNYC) was just another manifestation of my nerdiness, however in less than a week my wife felt in love with the DVR ...as of this writing she still says that it baffles her or how we were able to live with it :-)

  33. Oh Noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    55% of the gender more likely to remain home during the day know more about the DVR!!! This was worth the $x spent determining it.

  34. Torrents... by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 1

    Yeah girls may be using DVR's but thats because the guys have figured out BitTorrent. We are really one step ahead!

    1. Re:Torrents... by Mantus · · Score: 1

      No doubt.

      I dunno about men vs women stats on bittorrent use but I almost considered getting a DVR at one point before I started torrenting. Now, I have no need for a DVR. Bittorrent is great because if someone says "there was this great show on last night" that I had no idea even existed I can still get it. DVR assumes you already know what you want.

  35. TV Advertising by jcnnghm · · Score: 2, Informative

    There has been a lot of concern about DVRs destroying the advertising model TV is based on. I don't think that will happen. I did take the time to reprogram my comcast dvr remote to add the 30 second skip feature (http://dcortesi.com/2005/05/04/motorola-dct6412-c omcast-dvr-30-second-skip/) but I watch a LOT more TV now then I did before I got a DVR, and while I regularly skip the commercials, I don't every time and I'm pretty sure the extended amount of time I spend in front of the TV more than makes up for the number of commercials that I do skip.

    --
    You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
  36. That's because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    women are smarter than men.

    Well, in general at least.

  37. aww but you forget by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most idiots don't have a clue but claim they do. That's why so many people get hurt or ruin things doing DIY. Where as the true experts who do know what they are doing get so sick of the idiots they end up not caring for what they know about.

    So sure Mrs. Smith might claim she knows how something works, but I claim to know how a clock works yet have no clue beyond "cogs and stuff" (to put it as simple as possible).

    To claim knowledge does not mean you have it. It means you claimed it.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:aww but you forget by rugger · · Score: 1

      > That's why so many people get hurt or ruin things doing DIY

      How true .... (nurses the sore sholder that had an air conditioner land on it after he helped a friend pull it out of the wall and not realise it weighted at least 80kg)

      My lesson was .... if you want to move anything built in the 70's (or earlier) ... use a crane.

    2. Re:aww but you forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My lesson was .... if you want to move anything built in the 70's (or earlier) ... use a crane.

      Too expensive. Use your moron friend to take the brunt of the weight, then everyone else can take it from there.

  38. Women control the marriage... by codergeek42 · · Score: 1

    ...news at 11.

  39. A real quote from TFA: by plover · · Score: 2, Funny
    55 percent of the wives claim they understood how to interface with their unit's myriad features better than their husbands.

    Now, what features do their husbands have that these women DON'T understand how to interface with?

    --
    John
    1. Re:A real quote from TFA: by Associate · · Score: 1

      Brain, penis, ears, mouth, shall I go on?

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
  40. Apparently I'm the only woman here... by Sharik · · Score: 1

    My first instinct is to say, well naturally, we control everything... But I don't control a DVR, I don't even have one. I much prefer my capture card.

    --
    "Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind." Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Apparently I'm the only woman here... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      I don't control a DVR, I don't even have one. I much prefer my capture card.

      Capture card, eh? Whats it capture, video? I'm sure it doesn't do that digitally! And capture isn't another term for recording?

      Maybe I hit sarcasm and my detectors are mal-tuned...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:Apparently I'm the only woman here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think the capture card she is refering to is one that connects to the computer and sends the signals to the computer instead. So you can record all your programs on your computer instead of a tivo.

      correct me if i'm wrong.

    3. Re:Apparently I'm the only woman here... by Sharik · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's an HD capture card, so yes it's digital. Also, I'm quite capable of finding and downloading Bit torrents. Women are not technologically challenged, but we do sometimes avoid places that discuss technology due to the attitude of little nerd boys that have never as much as smelled a woman...

      --
      "Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind." Albert Einstein
    4. Re:Apparently I'm the only woman here... by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      Can I smell your hair?

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    5. Re:Apparently I'm the only woman here... by Sharik · · Score: 0

      Absolutely, and for only $3.99 per minunte...

      --
      "Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind." Albert Einstein
    6. Re:Apparently I'm the only woman here... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Why not just say all the guys here have "inferior equipment"? Seems you're not far from doing that.

      And leaping there after someone points out that recording digital video is very close to what a Digital Video Recorder does (since you seem to be defending some difference there) is pretty juvenile.

      Funnily enough you are cheering about your techinical understanding, in spite of the fact that if you had said "tivo-thingie" instead of "DVR" there wouldn't be any room for my you said "I don't have A, I have A!" statement.

      This isn't about man versus woman, I'd be making the same argument if you were male. This isn't CuSeeMe, the text we bat around doesn't scream male or female. Think of it as one of those technical details you've mastered and try not to introduce sexually based insults into a conversation after preaching of sexual equality. I recognize the ground is relatively even, but by sabotaging the case you make after inventing a reason to persue it, you just aren't helping.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  41. I'm guessing these are the other numbers by PxM · · Score: 1

    From TFA: In a national survey of 1,000 DVR users divided equally by sex, 48 percent of married women say the decision to purchase a DVR was their own, while 55 percent of the wives claim they understood how to interface with their unit's myriad features better than their husbands."

    My guess at what the men said: "48 percent of married men say the decision to purchase a DVR was their own, while 55 percent of the husbands claim they understood how to interface with their unit's myriad features better than their wives."

    Why don't the numbers add up to 100%? Because the husbands and wives don't always agree on what exactly happened in any given situation.

    1. Re:I'm guessing these are the other numbers by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Because the husbands and wives don't always agree on what exactly happened in any given situation.
      Probably should be:
      Because the husbands and wives don't agree on what exactly happened in any situation.

    2. Re:I'm guessing these are the other numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't the numbers add up to 100%? Because the husbands and wives don't always agree on what exactly happened in any given situation.

      No, the numbers do add up to 100%. 48% of married women say that the decision was theirs and 52% say that it wasn't.

      55% of them understand the interface better and 45% of them don't.

      Besides RTFA, you need to understand TFA.

    3. Re:I'm guessing these are the other numbers by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      55% of them "claim" they understand the interface better. The real number is probably off in one direction or another.

      During any given time, at least 55% of people in the US probably claim that they could do a better job at governing the country than the Government. People tend to think they know better than "the other person".

  42. true... by ivp · · Score: 1

    but I'm still the only one with root passwd on my mythbox.

  43. But by mcc · · Score: 1

    What does Nickelodeon think???

    1. Re:But by ceeam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Spongebob controls the DVR, of course!

  44. alright... by theheff · · Score: 1, Insightful

    so is it me... or do these statistics seem normal? i mean, the results are 50% men and %50 women, when taking the margin of error into consideration.

  45. more news at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as usual slashdot proves to be the boys club that it is. you little sexists need to grow up. its not funny you ignorant pricks. sexism actually affects people. step outside yourselves for once (i know its hard to do in the hyper-individualist and egocentric geek culture)

    p.s. this is not a troll. im serious.

  46. Except this one... by Fastball · · Score: 1
    For Sale.

    /shameless plug

  47. *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    While this was a legit news article, posting it on Slashdot seems to bring out the worst in the misogynist pigs. Really, what worth does it have on Slashdot? There are plenty of technically literate women, and those of us who have made careers out of IT, a male dominated field, take offense to comments like "Women only use DVRs because they're not smart enough to use BitTorrent like their husbands."

    1. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      preach on, sista!

      Bottom line, there are women (myself included) that are just as capable as men in the tech field. and just because they run tech companies does not mean that there are men behind them doing the work while they pose for photos.

      I don't have DVR because I travel a lot. Doesn't mean I can't program one or figure one out. To catch up on my tv when I'm away, what do I use? Oh yeah, BitTorrent.

  48. Bad grammar or deep truth? by Ellen+Spertus · · Score: 4, Funny

    > "55 percent claimed they understood the system > more than their husband." I understand my current DVR (DirecTivo) at least as well as I understand my husband, but the previous system I maintained (MythTV) turned out to be almost as bewildering to me as women are to some Slashdotters. Ellen

    1. Re:Bad grammar or deep truth? by oldwolf13 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Can I smell your hair too?

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    2. Re:Bad grammar or deep truth? by emcmanus · · Score: 1

      Dude that's pretty weird.

    3. Re:Bad grammar or deep truth? by drew · · Score: 1

      almost as bewildering to me as women are to some Slashdotters. ...not to mention almost 50% of non-slashdotters.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  49. The nature of "understanding" by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think a lot of people are confusing the intent of the article when it speaks of woment "understanding" the technology. Whenever you speak of a particular product, keep in mind there are nearly an infinite layers of "understanding" one might have.

    To a user, "understanding" means knowing how to fully unitilize a product's features. This is not a completely illegitimate point of view. Software engineers think that they understand the DVR because they know how the code works. I'm guessing that hardware engineers could make a pretty good case that, compared to them, the software engineers don't really "understand" the machines either. It's also a pretty good bet that marketing and advertising executives think that they "understand" the DVR, since they know how it's positioned in the marketplace, etc, etc.

    You get the point... Understanding is in the mind of the beholder.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    1. Re:The nature of "understanding" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very true. My mother can understand a television because she can push a few buttons and turn it on. But she can't understand it enough to fix it if something goes wrong with the satellite signal. That's left up to my dad and I. She can work a computer but she couldn't tell RAM from a graphics card. There are certainly different levels of understanding and it is not all encompassing. So really, most of those women probably know how to program the DVR and set things up and know how to use it but many of them wouldn't crack it open and know how it actually worked. But this also doesn't mean that men automatically do. There are a lot of tech-illiterate men out there and many of them are just as capable of having no clue what actually goes on inside a DVR.

  50. 55% by xihr · · Score: 1

    55% means women control it? Who failed math?

    1. Re:55% by gte910h · · Score: 1

      Well you know who Lifetime is run by. Are you that suprised?

      --
      Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
  51. interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while 55 percent of the wives claim they understood how to interface with their unit's myriad features better than their husbands.

    Wow. 55 percent of women say they "inferface" better with their DVR than they do with their husbands?

  52. well what about that post on slashdot... by atari2600 · · Score: 1

    ...that said that a good percentage of studies conducted in the last few years are all lies. There are three kinds of lies dear boys and girls:

    1. Lies
    2. Damn lies
    3. Statistics

  53. Get the info right... by danon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your post says 1000 MARRIED women while the study says 1000 DVR users divided equally by sex.

    This is a key point here:
    a. You're surveying both men and women (which might seem obvious, but not from your post) - which is important because you're trying to claim to compare men and women habits - right? You can't do that if you only survey women.

    b. You're surveying a specific slice of people: those who bought DVRs - this already profiles the people you're surverying: certain income range, certain education, affiliation with technology, and so on...

    What's my point? Your post suggests that you can deduce on women vs men in general (see 'hunter-gatherer' post above...) - which is wrong: the target slice in society your "studying" is a specific group with very specific characteristics, and I don't think you can project from it on the whole group. The conclusions the survey makes can only be safely applied to DVR owners.

    What your post suggests is quite different than the origianl article.
    Dan

  54. This seems only natural. by RossTheHayes · · Score: 1

    While men are at work, their wives are likely at home recording their husbands favorite shows for them. And everyone said that technology would make a woman's work easier, imagine that.

    1. Re:This seems only natural. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      While men are at work, their wives are likely at home recording their husbands favorite shows for them.

      The days when women could remain out of the work force because hubby made enough to support the entire family are long past for most of America. Ozzy-and-Harriet land exists only for a small percentage of the population now.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  55. My habits by TooncesTheCat · · Score: 1

    Yea, cant afford cable right now. But watching network TV sucks except for Fox just for their primetime shows. But yea, I watch programs and channels basically the same amount. When I did have cable, my remote has a surf button that is basically like preset's on a radio. I had the presets set to : The History channel, The Discovery Channel, G4TechTV, Comedy Central, TLC, SpikeTV, and ESPN. And I would just watch stuff in between those channels, and if nothing good was on ( or their were reruns, which happens in the daytime with cable ) I would flip to the movie networks. Now that I cant afford cable right now due to the lack of a job, I have to sit back and watch network TV, for which the most part sucks.

  56. too true by dark+grep · · Score: 1

    I hear you brother. There is no doubt about it, the VCR was mine, now my wife is hassling me to get a DVR, and she will own it. Maybe it would still be the case with VCR's if there were no DVR technology - maybe it just took women 12 years to figure out how to use it. If I had time to think about it I am sure I could figure out the answer, but right now I have to get back to washing the clothes and doing the dishes.

  57. Should we even allow these women to have DVR's? by pappy97 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Three-quarters of the women surveyed said that the reason they fell in love with DVR is that they are extremely intuitive and much easier than a VCR.""

    Think about it. Women (And many Americans, male and female), back in the day of the VCR, couldn't figure out how to set the clock. (P.S. I wonder if this is why most DVD's players don't have a clock. Sure you don't need a clock on a DVD player

    If given a TV properly hooked up to a VCR, and the remote for the VCR, and nothing else, you should be able to SET THE CLOCK within five minutes. If you can't, you should be shot.

    And we are giving these people MORE technology? I think there is a strong argument that people don't deserve to get the new tech toys if you can't understand simple things like setting the clock on the vcr.

    I remember back in the day when I used to watch a lot of the Annenburg-CPB Channel (Sue me. I can't get enough of The Mechanical Universe and its simple HS level calculus applied to physics AND Mireille in "French in Action."),

    They used to advertise a show and the clip they showed was interesting and I always got a kick out of it:
    A bunch of college grads (All disciplines), at graduation, were handed a simple light bulb, ONE wire, and a battery, and asked to light up the bulb (basically create a very basic circuit).

    All but one showed couldn't do it. They even said it was impossible. After we saw one guy figure it out, they'd cut to a professor asking (paraphrasing),
    "If college educated graduates don't even understand the basics of electricity, what does that say about a society that tremendously relies on electricity?"

    I am even suggesting that most people should be allowed near a computer, until they get a good understanding of it (hardware and software). That, however, would have the impact of putting Best Buy's rip off techies, "The Geek Squad," out of business.

    1. Re:Should we even allow these women to have DVR's? by radish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sigh. The reason people don't set the timer on their VCRs is not that they are dumb, or unable to deal with technology. It's that the timers are very poorly designed, with arcane interfaces, and most people simply don't care or have time to futz with them. Flip your argument around. If a regular, intelligent adult can't set a clock on a VCR within 5 minutes, the engineer who created the clock should be shot.

      This is precisely why we should be giving people DVRs - not just MORE technology but BETTER technology. Technology that is hard to understand and use serves nothing but a few geeks' egos.

      If college educated graduates don't even understand the basics of electricity, what does that say about a society that tremendously relies on electricity?

      It says that people who do understand electricity will be valued and well paid. Our society depends on lots of things - medication (but we're not all doctors), air travel (but we're not all pilots), oil (but we're not all geologists or petrochemical engineers), etc. Whilst basic skills like changing light bulbs, fuses etc will make people's day to day lives easier and are worth learning, I fail to see how not being able to make a circuit as described will affect most people. My GF is an english teacher, she loves video games, DVDs, all that electronic goodness. She has (despite my attempts to educate) very little idea how any of it really works, just like I have remarkably little knowledge of Shakespeare or Pepys.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Should we even allow these women to have DVR's? by BiOFH · · Score: 1

      Dear mods,

      What exactly about this are you finding 'interesting'? The fact that there's still a crotchety old man posting sexist shite to Slashdot (despite all the contributions to tech that women have made) or the fact that he's dissing women wholesale for preferring a good design (but back-peddling slightly after the subject line by throwing in an occasional 'and other people')?

      *nerd pushes up taped glasses and snorts* "They jusht don't underschtand how to build a Linuxsch DVR from spare kitchen parts. Schtupid girls. They want their leisure tech to be easy to use and intuitive. *snort* Schtupid. They have cootiesch too, it's schientifically proven."

      It's like that old tired argument that says that people who bitch about Windows being problematic just aren't 'tech' enough [and, therefore, less worthy than the chest-puffing boffin making the statement]. That grandma should learn about IRQ conflicts instead and stop bitching about her email app crashing every couple of hours. None of which makes Windows a better product and just continues to make the aforementioned chest-puffing boffin feel superior.

      Signed,
      A woman with plenty of tech savvy who doesn't need some guy to help her with her frakkin' Tivo or her VCR

      --
      - I am made of meat.
  58. PVR? by E8086 · · Score: 1

    I have the PVR I built myself, women can claim to be experts on the simpler DVR, I think they were designed to be female proof. If by expert they mean turn on/off and adjust the volume level and fast forward through the commercials.
    Guys can care less about the commercials, we don't need tv advertisements to tell us which products we need/want. When's the last time you saw a commercial for AMD or Maxtor or Acer notebooks? Never? It's Intel and their blue people and gateway with their running delivery staff and Dell with their $400 plain black towers and cheap 60Hz flat pannels(monitor not included).

    --
    F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    1. Re:PVR? by Concertina · · Score: 1
      I have the PVR I built myself, women can claim to be experts on the simpler DVR, I think they were designed to be female proof.

      Ahhh, FEMALE proof. I guess that's supposed to be a polite euphamism for "idiot proof." Nice.

      Furthermore, what the hell is your point about building a PVR yourself? I've built a mythtv pvr myself with rather questionable hardware, and it's hardly rocket science, despite the expenditure of countless hours debugging and fiddling with X drivers to make things work flawlessly. In fact, the only difficult thing it's brought about for me is making me question the wisdom of using my time so inefficiently, when I could just purchase a PVR and be done with it. But since I enjoy tinkering anyways, this doesn't amount to much of an existential crisis, so I deal. What is building a PVR supposed to prove?

  59. overextending the metaphor by mbius · · Score: 4, Funny

    When hunting you have some target.

    I get up before dawn, put on Woodland pajamas, douse the living room in consumer urine, power on the telly and sit for hours, silent and motionless behind the couch, waiting to spot that elusive creature: the ten-point news program.

    My weapon of choice? A Sony Universal with rechargeable AA Ni-MH rounds at 1.5V.

    And an eight-inch call that goes "market share! market share!"

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
  60. Soaps by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    My wife digs certain soap opera's and follows them religiously. Since they are on during her working hours, time-warping is the only way to see them. They are like a drug.

  61. Ask Oprah by rworne · · Score: 4, Funny

    I could not believe my ears when I was at Fry's one day and my wife asked me about TiVo and why we didn't have one.

    So I asked her to repeat herself and she did. She then wondered if I had ever heard of one and I replied that I certainly did know what one was - but with the lifetime service and the cost of the unit, it would be nearly $500 when we were done with it.

    She seemed disappointed. I was again in shock. Why the hell was she interested in a piece of "geek gear"? The answer was: Oprah talked about it one day and said how neat it was.

    I then replied "Did Oprah talk about how cool those new 2.5GHz Powermacs are? The ones with the new huge cinema displays?

    All that got me was a dirty look. Still, by the end of the month we had a new TiVo. And TiVo - it's TV HER way.

    --
    I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    1. Re:Ask Oprah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She then wondered if I had ever heard of one and I replied that I certainly did know what one was - but with the lifetime service and the cost of the unit, it would be nearly $500 when we were done with it.

      Let me guess: you kept on telling her about MythTV and how that you just needed one more weekend to finsh the product and that it would blow the socks off of that service and best of all it would be free.

      Perhaps she got tired of hearing that for a year? :)

    2. Re:Ask Oprah by samsonov · · Score: 1

      I expect that Oprah will have a show and voila - there will be TiVo's under everyone's chair ala how she gives other crap away during her shows.

      Oh yeah - don't argue with the significant other. They usually get their way... :>

      --
      "You killed my yogurt!" --Fred Fredburger
    3. Re:Ask Oprah by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I got my wife a TiVo for her birthday several years ago. My boss, a 50-something professional with a 1950s-style wife was incredulous that I would get a consumer electronic item for my wife's birthday. He was certain it would be a flop.

      Well, my wife likes TV. When properly motivated, she can do computers. Not fix them when I'm around, mind you - that would be too much work on her part. And yet she managed to get 6 NT stations up and running as well as order and help intall a T-1 line which synced her new CA office with servers in MD, with no local tech support. Lazy bitch...but I digress.

      Anyway, I set up the box, did the startup call, and put a bow in the remote and the manual. I didn't figure out how to use it, because If I didn't know, then she'd have to learn on her own. By the next day, the TiVo was filled with suggestions she liked and a wishlist that took 20 minutes to prioritize. The current one is filled with her stuff. I'd say the demographics are correct.

      I'm still not sure my boss believed me when I told him that it was the best gift ever.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Ask Oprah by rworne · · Score: 1

      No, but I did have another "worthless project" that turned into gold for her.

      She likes to watch Japanese programming: comedies, dramas and music programs. We can't get them here in the states - that was until we discovered Bittorrent. Now the TiVo won't cooperate there, but those two XBOXes sure would after I slapped XBMC on them.

      Now I have someone who used to use computers for web, email and office apps now cruising the torrent sites, running Azureus, downloading her files while maintaining a proper ratio, copying them over to the share, and running XBMC.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  62. Whoa whoa whoa by Dread+Pirate+Shanks · · Score: 1

    Here we have a Slashdot article about women, and nowhere in here does it mention how I can get a date? What the hell is this??

  63. Meaningless by ebuck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well after reading the article, I'd say that this does nothing to prove or disprove anything.

    Taking a statictic on a person's opinion is not scientific in the least, heck it might not even be proper measurement.

    I'm suprised that only 55% of women believed that they knew more about thier DVR than thier husbands. That number seems a bit low to me, after all, this isn't a compentency test, it's a test about belief. I'd wager that 100% of all women believe that they can navigate to and from the grocery store quicker than their husbands, even though they both live in the same house, know where the nearest grocery store is located, and probably would take the exact same route.

    It doesn't even matter what the men thought, because it's still playing around with perception testing, which is interesting if you want to gather information about a perception. However, perceptive information isn't consistent amonst members within a population (even a very homogenous population) so I doubt this information will have any pratical application other than sensationalisim.

    1. Re:Meaningless by DrLex · · Score: 1
      so I doubt this information will have any pratical application other than sensationalisim.
      ... like 99% of all articles of which the title/abstract boils down to: "{men/women} outperform {women/men} in some way". Although these 'studies' often reach the front page of magazines and newspapers, in practice they are totally useless for anything, except for giving pseudo-scientific justifications for sexism.

      Moreover, this is a rare case where I see actual numbers. Most of these articles say nothing about the margin at which men/women 'outperform' their counterparts (actually, neither does this article, but at least it contains some numbers). I bet it's because "are better than" sounds more impressive than "in a 1/1 mixed population of men and women, there is 23% chance that, considering skill X, the women beat the men by 4% above chance level".
    2. Re:Meaningless by walueg · · Score: 1
      Moreover, this is a rare case where I see actual numbers.
      Who cares about seeing the numbers? What were the questions? When do we EVER see the questions when someone publicizes an opinion poll?
      --
      You are either part of the solution or part of the precipitate!
    3. Re:Meaningless by tolkienfan · · Score: 1
      It's a good point.

      It does however indicate that women feel more comfortable with their DVRs than with their VCRs.

      That's a whole lot more interesting and useful than comparing how a woman feels about her remote than how a man does.

      Still, it'll probably lead to DVRs being "positioned" more for women than they have been up to now. Take a next to worthless statistic and turn it into Marketing Magic TM.

    4. Re:Meaningless by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      My ex had no concept of a DVR, and had to be walked through its operation multiple times before she got it. Then, she kept the disk full at all times with shows about nazis and lesbians (sometimes both). I mostly gave up watching TV because it was futile - she was either recording or watching something constantly.

  64. what's really insightful are the men's numbers by mbius · · Score: 1

    Results from a survey of 1000 married woman say that 48 percent made the decision to purchase a DVR on their own and 55 percent claimed they understood the system more than their husband

    In a survey of 5,000 men, approximately 0% admitted to not understanding how a DVR system works, even those who had never heard of it before.

    Similarly, 100% of men made the decision to purchase a DVR on their own. 98% then asked their wives' permission to spend the money and/or have that ugly thing be on the entertainment center.

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
  65. study on vcr would be interesting... by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    i would like to see a study on what percentage of scheduled vcr recordings are done by women. my mom would used to always record tv dramas and soap operas on tape so that she can watch them later. for me, i just watched whatever's available on tv at the moment and hardly ever use the vcr to record and watch later.

  66. I believe you're looking for this by mbius · · Score: 2, Funny

    nowhere in here does it mention how I can get a date?

    Whoa there, cowboy. Let's not get ahead of ourselves. First you'll need a shower, then we can work on that habit of saying "nyrrrrrr" between phrases. Then another shower just to be on the safe side. Then you get to decide which of Excelsior, Enterprise, and Exeter gets disconnected from the network so we can move it to a closet.

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
  67. Just Call Her "Tivo Queen" .. by NoCrash · · Score: 1

    ..and pass her the remote while you're at it.

    --
    Living at the edge--of a continent?
  68. gender roles by mbius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lifetime says most women understand their Tivo system better than their husbands.

    I wonder what percentage of these take-charge independent wives feigned absolute helplessness at the prospect of hooking the unit up.

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
    1. Re:gender roles by Concertina · · Score: 1

      Dude, if your partner has set sacred, inviolable laws like "Do not touch these cables EVER! I've spent the last five hours setting up the perfect home theatre system! If you change anything. you'll break it, and I will never let you hear the end of it!", I sincerely doubt you would want to hook up a new piece of equipment to said setup. Or even touch the existing equipment. Regardless of your technical competence.

      Furthermore, would you hold the same level of implied contempt for a husband who "feigned helplessness" at the idea of cooking a meal suitable for company?

    2. Re:gender roles by mbius · · Score: 1

      You say "suitable for company" as if cup-o-noodles don't fit the bill.

      Cooking's a lost art, I think, and awesomely sexy. Where I become useless is the mall.

      --
      you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
      Prime UID Club
    3. Re:gender roles by Concertina · · Score: 1
      You say "suitable for company" as if cup-o-noodles don't fit the bill.

      Touche. Yeah, I've got a stick up my butt sometimes. Thanks for taking it in good humor.

      It's true about cooking being awesomely sexy. Of course, I find most geeks incredibly sexy, be they gourmet geeks or artist geeks or tech geeks, so my opinion probably counts for jack shit.

      And malls ... well ... malls are just evil.

  69. Please! No more Dr Phil or Oprah!!!! by MarkTina · · Score: 1

    My wife has control of my DVR and all I find on it are episodes of Dr Phil and Oprah!!! Please help me!!!!!!!!!

  70. finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    something that you can get a women to use
    something that they can work out for themselves

    naturally - i aint going to tell my misses that i know how to use the freeking thing - next she will have me programing in the next 6 months of 'fiends' for recirding - i was more then happy to forget to record that stuff with the vcr - if its really important she will remember to record it herself!

  71. UIs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is quite simple. a vcr is the absolute worst in UI. therefore, to do more than play, stop etc, one must read this strange beast called the manual. DVRs provide relatively well though out GUIs that are reasonably straight forward. therefore, it is easy to do 99% of tasks. ask those women how to swap/format/defrag the harddrive and they're stumped. dvrs have just raised the level of the bleeding obvious to the point where hte average user does nothing else

  72. Unwinding men and women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice to see that about a third of the posts so far comprise men bashing women or women bashing men.

    Thank goodness for the recent craze of collecting data by gender, race, etc. Nothing better to forge a difference where none significant had existed, generalise it to every member of the group, and use it as a platform to further something silly.

    (Or you can just not take it seriously...)

  73. The real question is... by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

    ...does the lovely Kathleen Taco agree?

    --
    This sig rocks the casbah.
  74. Ha. by True_Requiem · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Results from a survey of 1000 married woman say that 48 percent made the decision to purchase a DVR on their own and 55 percent claimed they understood the system more than their husband." I'm sure that those 55% also claim they understood having a penis better than their husband as well. The things women claim they know and what they DO know are two entirely different things.

  75. Sky+ by payndz · · Score: 1
    A friend of mine and her boyfriend just bought their first flat, rather than renting. One of the first things on the agenda (before they even moved in!) was installing satellite, with a Sky+ DVR and a setup that allows different channels and recordings to be watched in different rooms.

    In a week and a half, my friend has gone from practically tech-illiterate to Mistress of Sky+, so that she can watch every episode of Most Haunted the box can find in one room while her boyfriend watches sport in the other. He was the one who wanted Sky+ in the first place, but she's the one making the most use of the box!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  76. A wise man once said... by raehl · · Score: 1

    It may take a woman to ask for directions, but it takes a man to understand them.

  77. Ack, Lifetime! by TheHornedOne · · Score: 1

    Up next on Lifetime.. "True Stories of Cancer Babies in Danger from Mad, Unfaithful Husbands"

  78. Not true at all! by raehl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that I know this, I would like a lot more commercials about:

    - Feminine products that reduce the frequency of menstraul cycles
    - Public service announcements regarding the importance of the low oil pressure indicator light
    - The How-To's of toilet use: Look at toilet before use. If the seat is up, lower it, without comment.
    - Getting what you want by actually saying what you want
    - Weight Loss Success with the Microwaveable Frozen Food diet
    - Beer: The new Slim Fast
    - Top 10 Health Benefits of Breast Implants
    - New Cure for Erictile Dysfunction: The Silent Treatment

    I mean, since I'm fast forwarding through these things anyway, might as well give relevant information to the people actually watching the commercials.

  79. Where's my channel? by raehl · · Score: 1

    Anybody got a documentary on how to get your wife to steal the children and run away?

    1. Re:Where's my channel? by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the kill/maim bit. Still want to go through it ?

  80. Relevancy as measured by (wo)men by Gopal.V · · Score: 1
    > Women do not want irrelevant commercials, but are willing to watch and advertisement that they are interested in. Unfortunately for the tv industry, I don't think men want commercials at all...

    What ! ?... I too care about relevant commercials - like how drinking Vud Blight beer will make Jay Leno look like Angelina Jolie. Or how I can overcompensate for the size of my ..uhmm.. nose with a new SUV which I can drive through two blocks to my office.

    But yeah, I don't want to watch another AD on bathing soap or toothfloss... They're just not relevant.

    Not to be sexist or anything, life of a housewife is often one of reaction rather than plans and action. Just when my mother sits down to watch TV, my sister asks for help with her homework or I fall down off a tree or bicycle (this is about 9 years back.. btw). I can understand if she had more say in buying a DVR :)

  81. Title by JeiFuRi · · Score: 1

    Haha I submitted the article with the title 'Women control the Magic Wand in Most Relationships', i guess the editors didn't like that :P

  82. Yeah the 5 second back button is really cool by kbjnash · · Score: 0

    Until she uses it 10 times in a row to try to make out that ONE WORD she keeps missing!

  83. Quick! make a geek-version! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Make a geek version quick! Make it difficult to understand, use buzzwords .. instead of "record video" it should be "register video on hdd" and instead of "play" it should be "play file now", that should scare them from alienating your DVR !

    Act now, write now to your favorite DVR maker!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  84. Personality Differences by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    While we don't have a DVR, we do have an AVR, or Analog video recorder. Also know as a VCR. My girlfriend uses it all the time to tape shows that she doesn't want to miss. I on the other hand don't worry so much about missing shows, and rarely tape anything. I like some shows and watch a fair amount of TV, but I generally don't care if I miss an episode.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  85. yeah, ok.... by Daytona955i · · Score: 1

    A study by Lifetime is going to show a bias towards women.

    Now I can tell you that my wife probably uses the PVR more than I do but I built it (mythtv) so I think I understand it a little. I just have less time to sit in front of the TV and watch anything.

  86. Not suprised... by pastpolls · · Score: 1

    "Honey, tape the game for me.... then go get me a beer... and then make me dinner." Seems to me like their in control of the DVR. //just kidding, karma killing

  87. 100% Agree by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 1

    Amazingly enough I went ahead and got a DVR so I could record all my Sci-Fi and Comedy Central stuff and what not and I was amazed at how quickly her General Hospital recordings filled up the entire thing! And I have found that deleting any of those said GH recordings has severe consexquences!

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
  88. So she thinks by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

    She may be the operator of the DVR, but I have root on it.

    And I have root on her.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
  89. Pedantic correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...with rechargeable AA Ni-MH rounds at 1.5V."

    NiMH chemistry is a nominal 1.2 volts per cell, not 1.5 volts (as alkaline would be, for example).

    1. Re:Pedantic correction. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Which is why I choose lithium AAs, clocking in a 1.7V. And last for freakin' ever. No sense taking a chance that the remote goes dead while I'm surfing and the channel gets stuck on Lifetime until I can find a new set.

      (BTW - Of the 40 hours on my stock DirecTiVo, currently, I have a 30 minute Alton Brown Good Eats, my 3 year old daughter has 4 hours of Dora the Explorer, plus 2-3 hours of other kids fare, and the remaining space is taken up by my wife's stuff. Before my 120hr died, the mix was even more lopsided, as the kid and I had about the same number of hours as we do now.)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Pedantic correction. by tolkienfan · · Score: 1

      Can you explain your sig? I don't get it.

  90. Spike TV by lbmouse · · Score: 1

    ...and in other news, a new study commissioned by Spike TV suggests that men are better than women.

  91. Who said women know how to use technology by ballsmccoy · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm sure the women is only in control of the functions the man has showed them how to use(several times)....

    Look honey....it just won't record "Not without my daughter part 6: Afganistan" because the title is too long.....honest....

  92. Really? by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

    This wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that more women stay home than men, would it? She's better with the DVR because she's with it all day.

  93. sooo biased by akhomerun · · Score: 0

    study shows that 1/3 of studies are nonsense

    here on /.

    i mean, sorry if this redundant, but this IS Lifetime holding this study here. That's like OSDN running a study finding that 70% of Internet users use Linux.

  94. honest women. by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Funny

    55 percent claimed they understood the system more than their husband.

    And I'm sure we can take them at their word.

    1. Re:honest women. by BiOFH · · Score: 1

      Yes. Or you can sleep on the couch.

      --
      - I am made of meat.
  95. Bad Survey by fupeg · · Score: 1

    They obviously didn't interview anybody with kids! If you have kids, then it's not man or woman who rules the DVR, it's the kids. Sure one of you might do the grunt work on the DVR to set it to record, but you'll be setting it to record Sesame Street or Dora the Explorer. And there's a good chance you won't even be trusted to do that. Once their a couple of years old, they can do it much better than you can. Their superior hand-eye coordination also allows them to fast forward through commercials at maximum speed without ever having to rewind because they went to far.

  96. The end of society as we know it! by teneighty · · Score: 1

    From the summary:

    "48 percent [of women] made the decision to purchase a DVR on their own"

    Who allowed these women to make decisions for themselves? Next thing we know they'll be allowed to drive. Or vote. Mark my words, this is the start of a terrible slide into a bottomless pit of immorality.

    Well, I hope so anyway.

  97. In my small sample (one)... by PMCausey · · Score: 1

    ...She Who Must Be Obeyed bought me a Tivo for Christmas this year. She really liked it....soon the only shows on the to do list were hers....I just bought her her own Tivo (so I can possibly get mine back).

    Put a Tivo in front of a woman, give her five minutes of operating instructions, and stand back. She'll have the disk full before you know it.

    --
    I'm not really a CPA, I just play one on TV
  98. contextual quotes? by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

    "Marriage is like a cage; one sees the birds outside desperate to get in, and those inside desperate to get out." -- Montaigne

    minutes after I post a rambling entry, the above is the slashdot quote. i'm impressed.

    --
    un burrito me trampeó.
  99. This is really going overboard... by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1
    but I have Karma to burn, so I'm going to explain the grandparent's thought process with the analogy anyway.


    When hunting you have some target. You have to have a particular target in order to set the PVR.
    When browsing particular channels, on the other hand, you trust that certain memorized areas will bear fruit. Sounds like a gatherer's approach to me.


    Actually, when hunting you don't have a single target in mind. You just have a single category. Such as when "Bear Hunting" you're setting your eyes on a specific species but not necessarily a specific breed (Could wind up with a Black Bear, Grizzly, or Brown Bear...just an i.e.). When I turn on the TV for channel surfing, I'll shoot for a category, such as "News". With "Bear Hunting," using experience, I know where the bear are going to tend to gather for food, shelter, etc. Likewise, I know that CNN, MSNBC, different local stations, etc all have news, some 24 hours a day, some at specific times... Based on the time of day and channel location I may be able to get a specific "breed" of news. So surfing between the news chanels if one hops over to a subject that I like, I have the target. If the subject turns to something I couldn't care less about, I resume the "hunt" for more of the subjects that intrest me.

    Using the DVR Method, however, is more like running a farm. You can schedule all your programs to record for the week, like timing the seeds to all bear fruit at the same general time for harvest. Then on the weekend (or any other day you have off) you can 'harvest and gather' the shows you recorded during the week. With this method, you know exactly which show you are getting. Like you'd be getting the same Red Delicious Apples you planted and not Granny Smiths.


    I'm not sure if this'll clarify the analogy for you any, or if there was realy any point in me breaking it down this way, but I'm just bored as hell at work waiting for a customer, and had no better things to do. Sad, Isn't it.

  100. Explains my experience with Mythtv by nothingx · · Score: 0

    I needed a fun summer project, so I built myself a Mythtv box out of some spare hardware. After getting everything together and working I showed my girlfriend what it could do and she stole it from me. I'd say 80% of the shows recorded on there are her doing. Then one day I tried upgrading to a new version of software and some dependencies broke. I didn't hear the end of it until I got it back up and running again. So, now my fun summer project is the "do not touch" box.

  101. How to save your marriage in two easy steps: by Trixter · · Score: 1

    In our house we have a simple system: I program the DVR, and she chooses what to watch when we sit down together. That way we're both watching something that we want: I only program the DVR with shows that would appeal to me.

  102. I love surveys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sure that there is no hidden agenda behind Life Time Networks conducting a survey in which it shows that women control the PVR in the household. Tune in to Lifetime sometime and see what their programmering is like. The honest truth is that all of us have agendas. All companies, interests groups, and politico types conduct polls/surveys and present them in the most positive light (Microsoft).

    As much as these surveys can be interesting to draw a conclusion about the mindset of a populous off from such limited research is silly. All statistics are manipulated for the purpose of gaining an edge. I would love to see the independent study group that logged the raw statistics so we could at least have an honest look at the raw numbers. The problem is there likely wasn't any such group.

  103. Re:Meaningless - it proves a LOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, considering 48% of women said they bought it themselves, it represents a market for technology that's often ignored. The question of how you tap into that marked could be answered with "by making it simple enough that they *feel* they understand it well"

    Who cares if they did or didn't understand it at all, much less better than their husbands. . . what's important is that they were happy with a product, and we engineers ought to learn from that.

    As an aside, I wanted to know what % of these were Tivo brand DVRs. I got a DVR from Dish (since the HD-Tivo is $1k) and the software to schedule recordings or search through recorded content is atrocious. So many little things* I had loved about Tivo without even knowing it! It pains me that my Tivo stock is in the toilet, when it's so far ahead of the competition as to be ridiculous.
    (*Like the ability to move from one page showing a shows detail to the next in the list without going back to the upper level menu. Or the few second skip back when stopping FF. Or the recording of suggested shows based on preferences.)

  104. Expensive Toys by violentvinyl · · Score: 1

    "...48 percent made the decision to purchase a DVR on their own..."
    More like LET their husbands buy more home theatre equipment.

  105. Re:You CAN WIN! NEVER GIVE UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cut out the middle man my friend.

    Let the girls have their tivo/set top box to record shows. If you have broadband internet go to:

    http://thepiratebay.org/ for your shows
    snarf-it is good (google it)
    tv.com will give you lists of stuff
    azureus is a great bit torrent client (source forge has it, again, google azureus and yer set)

    torrentreactor.net has amazing stuff (/w some p0rn! :D)
    and lastly, since this is slashdot, www.homemadeporntorents.com has some stuff that isin't AS faked as mainstream p0rn. :)

    women filling their boxes? no problem! Get down with downloading and embrace the digital world of bit torrent.

  106. Dwindling selection for guys by ^_^x · · Score: 1

    I have a DVR (Bell/Echostar PVR-5100... crap!) It gets about 300-ish satellite channels. It also sits under my PC desk and collects dust, being fired up once or twice a week at most.

    Just as there are fewer female gamers in NA because there are no games for girls, the male TV segment is plummeting because it's turning more and more into reality TV, gimmicky gameshows, and godawful sitcoms. Lessee.... "Fear Factor" or GTA:SA? "Survivor XVIII: Delaware" or surfing the net? Tough choice...

  107. Lifetime did this study? Aw, come on! by Zerbey · · Score: 1

    Before Oxygen and WE came along, Lifetime was catering to that precious "bored housewife who likes weepy movies" demographic (have you watched this channel.. it's one of the most depressing things I've ever seen!). Of course they will conclude that women control the DVR.

    A quick scan of the stuff recorded or scheduled on my DVR reveals an even match between my shows (mainly revolving around either baseball or stuff on Discovery), the stuff my wife watches (stuff on Discovery and a few shows on MTV [noticeable lack of WE/Oxygen/Lifetime), stuff my mother-in-law likes (Big Brother) and stuff my son watches (PBS kids).

    It should be noted that I'm the only one who knows how to hook it up in our household... :)

  108. not bad, incomplete by tinkerton · · Score: 1

    While the previous generation got kids so finally someone would be able to program the VCR, women finally wisened up. The VCR got set allright, but to the wrong program. Now the DVR does to this generation what the anticonception pill did to the previous generation. Independence.

    The next step is parthenogenesis. Human males are now entering their last century before extinction.

  109. And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The men married to the women who took part in this survey are bitches.

  110. I'm amazed at the sexism by BiOFH · · Score: 1

    I'm just amazed at the level of sexism I see in some of the comments. Do we need to put up a big sign out front "Remember, there are women on Slashdot too!" ????

    I'd like to see a study on what percentage of Slashdot readers are sexists dickheads... and how we could get them to go away and stop giving everyone else a bad image.

    --
    - I am made of meat.
  111. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    While this kind of thing could be argued back and forth until the end of time (but on this show/network...blah blah...movies...blah...tit-for-tat, etc.), it's still important to recognize that this kind of pandering is WRONG, regardless as to which side is doing it.

    Oh, and just as a fun jab at the 'other side':

    Maybe the reason there isn't any outrage over this kind of thing (feminism) is because Men don't feel threatened at all, and expect their weak, little-women to want fluff like this just to puff up their fragile egos. Men don't need the support of their peers to feel valid, while women go around creating support groups for every little thing under the sun. ;-D

    DISCLAIMER: Hey, it's just a fun poke. Don't take it seriously. There's a ripple of truth, buried under an attitude of sexism. I'm just trying to fit in here on /.

    Machoism and Feminism are equally repugnant. I'm sick of this culture of guilt that demands that for every wrong somebody/group performs against another person/group, the tables must be entirely reversed for several *generations* just to break even. The idea of holding the sons responsible for the sins of the fathers makes my blood boil, especially since I can't stand my father, and have never gained anything (except my wonderful genetic code) from his works. There is no justification for holding people responsible who had nothing to do with the initial problem.

    My family never owned slaves, or benefitted from them. They were immigrants who made their own way via work using their own hands. I owe nothing in reparation.

    I have never 'oppressed' a woman, and in fact come from a family full of strong women. I owe nothing to the opposite gender, and will never take any responsibility for their "plight."

    I'm a white male who has never wronged an entire race or gender, and refuse to apologize (I've already made my peace with the people I have wronged personally). So if somebody has a problem with my race or gender, they can get stuffed.

    Political Correctness is a symptom of the guilt-culture we live in, and I will never have any part of it. Those that do can keep the hell out of my life.

  112. Re:You are a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am serious, you really are a fucking moron. Do you known how many studies have been done to prove your point and how many have been done to counter it. Why not actually look the research up rather than typing it out verbatim.

  113. TV Programming. by generic · · Score: 1

    Generally there is _nothing_ on tv for me to watch, except for the history channel, and mythbusters. Oh malcom in the middle is funny too. Everything else is for women. My wife sometimes will watch some crap on lifetime or WE, and will get mad at me when I laugh about some stupid trajedy that just occured on her show. Why do women need to cry? or watch something so depressing about a mother with a brain tumor and four sickly kids. Whose pilot husband is having an affair with three different women. I should just cancel the cable and let my wife watch them euthanize unwanted puppies at the ASPCA.

    --
    Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
  114. Role Call by milimetric · · Score: 1

    If you're a lady and can control a DVR with some amount of skill, please post a reply to this with a short sentence showing us you know what you are talking about.

    This is very important as it will facilitate great advances in pick-up line artistry:

    "Hey baby... wanna come to my place and check out my TiVo?"

    But seriously, I'd like to know if the article is bullshit or real.

  115. The 10 gb's of Oprah on my machine. by toddmaloy · · Score: 1

    My wife hardly every used the computer until I got a DVR, now she uses it all the time. At least now she's more willing to let me spend the money on a bigger hard drive.

  116. I've got no by yormas · · Score: 1

    women you insensitive clod!

  117. Wife controls, hell the 4 year old recorded 90g of by skeptictank · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ed, Edd and Eddy.

  118. Series Recording... by macserv · · Score: 1

    ...seems to now be managed by her. Even though I brought the DVR home, and probably have a better understand of everything it can do, she's jumped all over the series recording functions, as well as occasionally browsing the Guide to find stuff she thinks we'd like. I'm fine with letting her have fun with the software; we wind up with a lot of good stuff to watch. And it's all about the hardware anyway, right? :D