Yes. A better example would be when Bushitler threw Michael Moore in a federal 'pound me in the ass' prison (and Mikey has a lot of ass to go around).
How else can you explain Moore's silence in the weeks following the election? I'm 97% sure that his recent TV appearances were all faked in a bunker located in Area 51.
I've got the new intellimouse pro 2.0. i think the old optical intellimouse pro shut the light off but it was so imprecise because of it. Moving the mouse a pixel or two to the left after the light had turned off was pretty mich impossible because it took too long for it to start sampling again.
Anyway, my mouse goes for months on a pair of batteries. Remember not to use rechargables -- only alkalines. NiCADs can supply huge currents (which isunnecessary for a mouse) and don't hold their charge for very long (certainly not months).
Cause that's a stupid idea (although it sounds good). You will have all the disadvantages of a ball -- needing a hard straight surface, cleaning (yes you still need to clean it), expense and mechanical failures. My Microsoft cordless mouse goes for *at least* 3 months (that's as long as I've had it and I haven't changed the batteries yet) on one set of batteries and I use it all the time. The mouse can also run on only one AA battery (rather than two) if needed. I really don't think having to change your batteries every 3 months is a chore.
Is it just me or is it that the more info that is dug up about the 20 billion dollar france/euro/iraq oil-for-food scam, the more people clasp their hands over their ears and yell BUSH KILLS FOR OIL", BUSH KILLS FOR OIL?
Yes. Did you know that divine spiders from Allah are defeating the Americans in Fallujah to such an extent that they're having to drop body bags (of soldiers) from planes into lakes.
If it wasn't for the internet, we wouldn't have been informed of this!
Yes. The evil vast right wing conspiracy has brainwashed innocent normal geeks who believe in conspiracy theories left right and centre and replaced them with rational thinkers.
I think the fact that you still think liberals argue mostly from fact and rebublicans do it from emotion really demonstrates an extreme bias in you that causes you to search for "evidence" to support it. The fact is, a lot of liberals, including Franken *spin*. They make it look like facts when in fact it isn't (I have a video of Franken making a fool of himself in front of a live audience doing exactly that).
I don't think you'll find many republicans running around carrying signs comparing Clinton to Hitler...
You can't just tell me media is conservative without providing any proof. I provided you the CBS fraud. Hell, I remember BBC the day after the election; they showed videos of people sleeping on the floor of the reagan convention centre and said "These people waited for their man to come and greet them - he didn't *even* bother" -- then switch to bush laughing in the whitehouse. It was very, very mooorish style propaganda. The truth was Bush was waiting for Kerry to concede before making an official announcement himself but that didn't get in the way of BBC trying to make Bush look like an asshole. And then there's the frontpage of Netscape's CNN page which had a victory photo of Bush. The JPG of Bush was named "asshole.jpg". I could go on and on and on.
I agree with you that fahrenhype wasn't very powerful. It was mostly opinion and sorely lacking in facts. However, the online papers are *full of facts*. I suggest you read this.
listened to an Al Franken Podcast the other day, and they asserted a huge problem on the left side of politics. The right-wing nutjobs usually won't back down, even if they have been proven wrong with evidence. I think it was Hannity that had made an innane statement about Kerrys career, a blatant lie that was proven wrong again and again. Yet, after a week, he presented it as a fact in his show as if nothing had happened. This puts lefties in an akward dilemma, as they tend to follow the backed-up-by-evidence high road
Hello???? Mc Fly???????
Does Michael Moore mean anything to you? What about Dan Rather? What about the draft scare? What about "Bush is doing it all for oil"? What about "Republicans are evil liars"? Yeesh.
The fact that you got modded up on slashdot is even sadder.
Face it, both sides lie, and to assert that republicans lie more is just a lie propagated by the liberal media. Hell, you even quoted Al Fraken *spew*.
Ha, I think the ridiculousness of the michael moore crowd and people like you are the reason Bush won. You live in this fantasy where you can't understand that intelligent people can and do disagree with you.
You think the EXIT POLLS are more accurate than the ACTUAL ELECTION RESULTS and that Bush winning is evidence of fraud. HAHAHAHA What a FUCKING RIOT.
I hope you and your kin continue with this self denial and guarantee the republicans more wins for decades to come.
They can't just "ammend" the consitution like that and do you think that Bush could get reelected for a third term after doing that?
The truth is, Bush will end his second term and go back to his ranch in Texas and all you guys crying about how he's hitleresque will go on to demonize the next republican president.
Oh, and if your neighbour breaks your WIFI encryption key then he has every right to use your credit card numbers, passwords and anything else he snoops because they were transmitted into his house....
If you beam electrons into my house, I have a right to do as I see fit with those electrons within the confines of my house
If you mirror your GPL-ed source code on my server or make the source code freely available on the internet then I have a right to do as I see fit with that source code.
Hell, if you're on the same subnet as a mirror, you're getting the source coast broadcasted (effectively) to you.
Cost effective Wind Power (Kilowatts/Construction costs) would mean the end of middle east conflict
yes, because all the radical islamists want is a cost effective windmill. maybe that's why they're now attacking the dutch? the dutch make great windmills!
If the producer of that TV show decides that they only want to allow it to be watched when they want it to (which would be the case if they flagged that bit) then I you have a choice to follow their rules or just don't watch their show -- you don't have a right to watch their show. If you don't like their conditions then tough -- don't watch it. I should note that this is like the GPL. Nothing forces you to follow the GPL but the GPL states that you only have right to use the source under the given conditions. If you break those conditions then you have no right to use source in that way because it would be considered stealing. The source's copyright is owned by the author and they can grant ot revoke its usage under their own conditions and you can't complain because it's not yours to complain about. Why do you think you have a *right* over other people's property?
the FCC order explictly says it doesn't forbid you to tape things off the TV to watch them later
Unless your mechanism for doing so is a PC capture card. In which case it does.
Geez. So don't use the capture card. You aren't forced to use a capture card that responds to that bit and the manufacturers are perfectly free to add a check for that bit. If you don't like it, tough. You don't have a right to own a video card that doesn't read that bit and private companies aren't obliged to provide you with one. If you don't like any "no copying" rules set by the industry then you're perfectly free to not consume any of their media.
I'm not saying everyone who drops out of highschool isn't as smart as someone who graduates college. I'm talking about *averages* here which is perfectly valid because we're talking about how smart the *average* Bush voter is. I know a few high school drop outs who are, imho, smarter than average.
All of this is pointless anyway because as I've already shown, even if you include post grads (who give Kerry an advantage), more college graduates voted for Bush.
Getting a college degree (read: needed to get a decent job) but not a post grad degree (read: not needed to get a decent job) is not on the same scale as graduating high school and dropping out of highschool.
Let me get this straight. You're comparing the difference between high school drop outs and college grads as the same as between college grads and post grads?
lol. ok.
Drop out of high school -> Sucky job College degree -> High paying job Post grad degree -> Couldn't/Won't get job but potentially can lead to a higher paying job if you're lucky.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes. A better example would be when Bushitler threw Michael Moore in a federal 'pound me in the ass' prison (and Mikey has a lot of ass to go around).
How else can you explain Moore's silence in the weeks following the election? I'm 97% sure that his recent TV appearances were all faked in a bunker located in Area 51.
Hmm, so can you find any Home and Away torrents? :)
I've got the new intellimouse pro 2.0. i think the old optical intellimouse pro shut the light off but it was so imprecise because of it. Moving the mouse a pixel or two to the left after the light had turned off was pretty mich impossible because it took too long for it to start sampling again.
Anyway, my mouse goes for months on a pair of batteries. Remember not to use rechargables -- only alkalines. NiCADs can supply huge currents (which isunnecessary for a mouse) and don't hold their charge for very long (certainly not months).
Cause that's a stupid idea (although it sounds good). You will have all the disadvantages of a ball -- needing a hard straight surface, cleaning (yes you still need to clean it), expense and mechanical failures. My Microsoft cordless mouse goes for *at least* 3 months (that's as long as I've had it and I haven't changed the batteries yet) on one set of batteries and I use it all the time. The mouse can also run on only one AA battery (rather than two) if needed. I really don't think having to change your batteries every 3 months is a chore.
and thus being smart enough to 1. know how messed up he is and 2. feel more dimensions of pain.
So the animal will be a teenager (or a 5 - 40 year old geek) from day one?
He told us that building his Star Trek environment was therapy for him, after going through a break-up with his wife.
Hmm...are you sure you've got that the right way round?
Is it just me or is it that the more info that is dug up about the 20 billion dollar france/euro/iraq oil-for-food scam, the more people clasp their hands over their ears and yell BUSH KILLS FOR OIL", BUSH KILLS FOR OIL?
Damn, got the link wrong (it's all Bushitler's fault).
Transcript
Video
Yes. Did you know that divine spiders from Allah are defeating the Americans in Fallujah to such an extent that they're having to drop body bags (of soldiers) from planes into lakes.
If it wasn't for the internet, we wouldn't have been informed of this!
Damn the USSA and Bushitler!!!!
ROFL
Yes. The evil vast right wing conspiracy has brainwashed innocent normal geeks who believe in conspiracy theories left right and centre and replaced them with rational thinkers.
I think the fact that you still think liberals argue mostly from fact and rebublicans do it from emotion really demonstrates an extreme bias in you that causes you to search for "evidence" to support it. The fact is, a lot of liberals, including Franken *spin*. They make it look like facts when in fact it isn't (I have a video of Franken making a fool of himself in front of a live audience doing exactly that).
I don't think you'll find many republicans running around carrying signs comparing Clinton to Hitler...
You can't just tell me media is conservative without providing any proof. I provided you the CBS fraud. Hell, I remember BBC the day after the election; they showed videos of people sleeping on the floor of the reagan convention centre and said "These people waited for their man to come and greet them - he didn't *even* bother" -- then switch to bush laughing in the whitehouse. It was very, very mooorish style propaganda. The truth was Bush was waiting for Kerry to concede before making an official announcement himself but that didn't get in the way of BBC trying to make Bush look like an asshole. And then there's the frontpage of Netscape's CNN page which had a victory photo of Bush. The JPG of Bush was named "asshole.jpg". I could go on and on and on.
I agree with you that fahrenhype wasn't very powerful. It was mostly opinion and sorely lacking in facts. However, the online papers are *full of facts*. I suggest you read this.
listened to an Al Franken Podcast the other day, and they asserted a huge problem on the left side of politics. The right-wing nutjobs usually won't back down, even if they have been proven wrong with evidence. I think it was Hannity that had made an innane statement about Kerrys career, a blatant lie that was proven wrong again and again. Yet, after a week, he presented it as a fact in his show as if nothing had happened. This puts lefties in an akward dilemma, as they tend to follow the backed-up-by-evidence high road
Hello???? Mc Fly???????
Does Michael Moore mean anything to you? What about Dan Rather? What about the draft scare? What about "Bush is doing it all for oil"? What about "Republicans are evil liars"? Yeesh.
The fact that you got modded up on slashdot is even sadder.
Face it, both sides lie, and to assert that republicans lie more is just a lie propagated by the liberal media. Hell, you even quoted Al Fraken *spew*.
Ha, I think the ridiculousness of the michael moore crowd and people like you are the reason Bush won. You live in this fantasy where you can't understand that intelligent people can and do disagree with you.
You think the EXIT POLLS are more accurate than the ACTUAL ELECTION RESULTS and that Bush winning is evidence of fraud. HAHAHAHA What a FUCKING RIOT.
I hope you and your kin continue with this self denial and guarantee the republicans more wins for decades to come.
But the greatest irony is that evidence is growing that Bush stole the election -- that the exit polls were in fact correct.
Evidence or conpiracy theories?
The election looked pretty conclusive to me. The republicans took additional seats in house and the senate. Did they steal those too?
You guys are just wackos.
They can't just "ammend" the consitution like that and do you think that Bush could get reelected for a third term after doing that?
The truth is, Bush will end his second term and go back to his ranch in Texas and all you guys crying about how he's hitleresque will go on to demonize the next republican president.
Oh, and if your neighbour breaks your WIFI encryption key then he has every right to use your credit card numbers, passwords and anything else he snoops because they were transmitted into his house....
If you beam electrons into my house, I have a right to do as I see fit with those electrons within the confines of my house
If you mirror your GPL-ed source code on my server or make the source code freely available on the internet then I have a right to do as I see fit with that source code.
Hell, if you're on the same subnet as a mirror, you're getting the source coast broadcasted (effectively) to you.
Duh, no -- that was my point.
Cost effective Wind Power (Kilowatts/Construction costs) would mean the end of middle east conflict
yes, because all the radical islamists want is a cost effective windmill. maybe that's why they're now attacking the dutch? the dutch make great windmills!
If the producer of that TV show decides that they only want to allow it to be watched when they want it to (which would be the case if they flagged that bit) then I you have a choice to follow their rules or just don't watch their show -- you don't have a right to watch their show. If you don't like their conditions then tough -- don't watch it. I should note that this is like the GPL. Nothing forces you to follow the GPL but the GPL states that you only have right to use the source under the given conditions. If you break those conditions then you have no right to use source in that way because it would be considered stealing. The source's copyright is owned by the author and they can grant ot revoke its usage under their own conditions and you can't complain because it's not yours to complain about. Why do you think you have a *right* over other people's property?
the FCC order explictly says it doesn't forbid you to tape things off the TV to watch them later
Unless your mechanism for doing so is a PC capture card. In which case it does.
Geez. So don't use the capture card. You aren't forced to use a capture card that responds to that bit and the manufacturers are perfectly free to add a check for that bit. If you don't like it, tough. You don't have a right to own a video card that doesn't read that bit and private companies aren't obliged to provide you with one. If you don't like any "no copying" rules set by the industry then you're perfectly free to not consume any of their media.
Being free doesn't guarantee you the right to steal from others.
Wow, are we one for broad generalizations.
I'm not saying everyone who drops out of highschool isn't as smart as someone who graduates college. I'm talking about *averages* here which is perfectly valid because we're talking about how smart the *average* Bush voter is. I know a few high school drop outs who are, imho, smarter than average.
All of this is pointless anyway because as I've already shown, even if you include post grads (who give Kerry an advantage), more college graduates voted for Bush.
Getting a college degree (read: needed to get a decent job) but not a post grad degree (read: not needed to get a decent job) is not on the same scale as graduating high school and dropping out of highschool.
Get it?
Let me get this straight. You're comparing the difference between high school drop outs and college grads as the same as between college grads and post grads?
lol. ok.
Drop out of high school -> Sucky job
College degree -> High paying job
Post grad degree -> Couldn't/Won't get job but potentially can lead to a higher paying job if you're lucky.