Is it able to solve chess game?. "Solving" of the chess game like American Checkers was solved is not really a problem of computational speed (I mean it could be done by our civilization if we decided it would be worth it), but more of storage. There are more possible chess positions then there are atoms on Earth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon_numberhttp://pages.prodigy.net/jhonig/bignum/qaearth.html
That's a bomber, not a fighter. (Does it come with any Anti Aircraft weapons?)
From your link: Designation
Most modern U.S. military aircraft use post-1962 designations in which the designation "F" is usually an air-to-air fighter, "B" is usually a bomber, "A" is usually a ground-attack aircraft, etc. (Examples include the F-15, the B-2, and the A-6). The Stealth Fighter is primarily a ground-attack plane so its "F" designation is inaccurate.
Much like the bow shock of a boat, a "sonic boom"'s intensity is determined by the speed of the aircraft. GP's statement is flawed, it should read:
A sonic boom is produced when pressure waves compound near Mach 1.
It should be noted that all sound waves are pressure waves (with infinitesimal pressure increase), but not all pressure waves are sound waves.
If you want to learn more about the subject, stay away from Wikipedia and read a good book on the subject (anything from John D. Anderson jr. would be good).
Having both Wife and Girlfriend installed may cause serious problems. Although some people have reported long term success, there have been no definitive studies.
I especially liked this quote of Microsoft spokesman Rinsema, from Webwereld(in dutch):
'Je kunt open source zonder open standaarden hebben. Het lijkt dat ze onlosmakelijk met elkaar verbonden zijn, maar dat is niet zo.'
You can have 'open source' without 'open standards'. It may seem like they are inextricably linked, but that is not the case. If I only had a Microsoft memo on what "open standards" means, I could understand this statement.
They should have read the Babelfish terms of service, they're probably liable now.
6. MEMBER CONDUCT
(...)
You agree to not use the Service to:
(...)
o. translate any correspondence, of any kind, which could lead to diplomatic rows, a chilling of diplomatic relations, armed hostilities, and/or Global Thermal Nuclear War.
It looks like they allow mirroring and caching: http://www.cybertriallawyer.com/robots.txt
User-agent: *
Disallow:/Backup
Disallow:/Form
Disallow:/acl_users
Disallow:/MailHost
Disallow:/test
Disallow:/test1
From the response letter:
Instead of suing in Canada, why not bring suit in Tashkent? At least you'd get an exotic trip out of it and litigation in a totalitarian state would be more consistent with the view that the Internet makes it to easy for consumer criticisms to be heard . But Leonard won't bother to defend a lawsuit in either location. Ladies (as if) and gentlemen, we have found the lawyer hero that the US was so desperately craving for, his name is Paul Alan Levy.
You can sign over your copyright to the EFF (correct me if I'm wrong) and they will defend your code vigorously.
If you still have doubts as to why that relationship ended, I might have a few pointers for you.
As I understand it the NEN (Dutch Standards Orginisation) isn't a government organization. Any influence would therefore have to be indirect.
Isn't carbon-carbon a bit to brittle for use at lower altitudes (where birds fly)?
From your link:
Designation
Most modern U.S. military aircraft use post-1962 designations in which the designation "F" is usually an air-to-air fighter, "B" is usually a bomber, "A" is usually a ground-attack aircraft, etc. (Examples include the F-15, the B-2, and the A-6). The Stealth Fighter is primarily a ground-attack plane so its "F" designation is inaccurate.
It should be noted that all sound waves are pressure waves (with infinitesimal pressure increase), but not all pressure waves are sound waves. If you want to learn more about the subject, stay away from Wikipedia and read a good book on the subject (anything from John D. Anderson jr. would be good).
When he was co-writing the Vendrick motion? Because that's surely how Microsoft interpreted it.
Having both Wife and Girlfriend installed may cause serious problems. Although some people have reported long term success, there have been no definitive studies.
I love M$ bashing as much as the next guy. But Arjen... your company Gendo is likely to profit from this as well, isn't it?
... do you have any job openings?
On a completely unrelated note
3,000,000*0.000020778865=62.336595
3,000,000*0.000020778855=62.336565
There is no cent value in that range, I'm hoping that the GP will explain this conundrum.
I am Jack's desensitization to violence.
STARGATE.COM August 5 1986
... because you're still waiting for those security patches for Phoenix 0.1?
Also Roland doesn't play nice when it comes to photographs. Please compare http://www.scientificblogging.com/news_releases/helium_isotopes_may_uncover_new_geothermal_energy_sources with Roland's blog: http://www.primidi.com/2007/12/02.html#a2025. Btw van Soest has apparently been working on this subject for some time. Check out his publications list on his personal info page http://www-esd.lbl.gov/ESD_staff/van_soest/index.html
Click on "Terms of service" on this page and read it yourself.
6. MEMBER CONDUCT
(...)
You agree to not use the Service to:
(...)
o. translate any correspondence, of any kind, which could lead to diplomatic rows, a chilling of diplomatic relations, armed hostilities, and/or Global Thermal Nuclear War.
Remember kids, it's pronounced (using similar sounding english words): "pa-the-stool-an".
They were translating from Hebrew to English.
Why are these journalists, who should have had _some_ form of education, not able to write English? Is the most relevant question.
"Nothing in nature is a value, without something living that gives it that worth."
Or something that will live, I'm not saying that mining the moon is big no no. But we should consider the possible value for future generations.
You astroturf for the new TV show "Terminator: The Sarah Conner Chronicles" and this is the best you can come up with?
http://www.cybertriallawyer.com/robots.txt User-agent: *
Disallow:
Disallow:
Disallow:
Disallow:
Disallow:
Disallow:
Instead of suing in Canada, why not bring suit in Tashkent? At least you'd get an exotic trip out of it and litigation in a totalitarian state would be more consistent with the view that the Internet makes it to easy for consumer criticisms to be heard . But Leonard won't bother to defend a lawsuit in either location. Ladies (as if) and gentlemen, we have found the lawyer hero that the US was so desperately craving for, his name is Paul Alan Levy.
*Goes of to register paulalanlevy-fanclub.org*
Yeah, I was a bit angry. I should know better then to post such a rant on Slashdot.