to think highly of the British model. There was just a story hear about a custom iphone app for the PM that tells him the waiting list. I recall seeing lines for a dentist. I can't fathom either.
I used to use nvidia cards, but always assumed video card brand made no difference, since I'd never heard anything to that affect. I recently got my first Radeon card, a minor upgrade that was twice as fast as my old card but used the same wattage (cool, right?). About once an hour, the new card freezes for a full 2 seconds, and maybe 30 seconds later freezes again for half a second. Sounds like no big deal, unless you are playing modern warfare 2, because then you are dead, and your kill-streak is reset. Sometimes I come out of the 2 second freeze to see my avatar ran off a ledge and is falling to his death. Kinda funny, but not when it borks a kill-streak. Getting killed by your video card is just wrong.
I googled around for a solutions, and just found forums full of people lamenting the bad quality of drivers for those cards. It's fine for most games, and it's fine 99% of the time, but that other 1% can be a cruel bitch. Now you know.
I just got a check in the mail for one penny for an ebay motors class action settlement. Printing and mailing the check probably cost a dollar. Reminds me of the time my school sent me a bill (in the mail) for $19 cents.
What the 2nd amendment covers today is up to the whim of the 9 on today's court. The issue I raise is that people who would answer your cannon question don't then apply whatever logic they used to the other amendments. Instead, they first consider what answer they want for each individual issue, then selectively pick arguments to support their preference of "what the constitution covers."
BTW cannons are ordnance, not arms.
One thing I always found interesting about constitutional interpretation is that the same people who argue the 2nd amendment should only apply to muskets (on the basis that the writers of the constitution supposedly could not have imagined anyone ever designing what they all wanted... a gun that shoots faster and further), will turn right around and assert the first amendment has a wide reach with respect to electronic mass media. Electronic mass media... like that was easier for a colonist to see coming than a rifle upgrade.
Consider any project financially unsound enough that the locals would never pay for it. Then add matching federal funds so the cost is cut in half, and all of a sudden it gets the local vote to go ahead, now that it is half financed by distant federal taxpayers. Problem for the locals is, the distant taxpayers have some dumb project in their own backyard also. This is the way dumb things get justified all over the country.
Seriously. Meissner effect is old news, too. I mentioned to a friend how slashdot seemed to have gotten really dumbed down in the last year, and he made an interesting connection: ipads became popular.
... to most people. Single inconsistencies still outside today's understanding are fuel for people who come to be known as conspiracy theorists. Nano-thermite? Conspiracy! Odd terminal ballistics? Consiracy! Weeping statue? Divine intervention!
"Million monkeys generating shakespeare" was an argument against evolution, that randomness can't create complexity.
The rebuttal is that people making that first argument don't understand the replication part of natural selection. Evolution doesn't say atoms randomly come together to form each person. First they formed useful proteins, and those genes got replicated. Repeat and add one level of complexity each time, keep repeating 4 billion years... and you finally make complex organisms.
Back to the analogy of monkeys typing, the idea is once monkeys bash out a useful combination, a word, consider that word created (gene useful) and will replicate. Turns out, if you apply the analogy right, monkeys can bash out shakepeare pretty fast, so the monkey analogy is a bad argument against evolution.
Buying gas out of state is not cause to decline a card when there's a big charge from U-Haul on the same account. In fact, that's probably the worst time to decide to start declining your customer's charges.
http://poetrypages.lemon8.nl/life/roadnottaken/roadnottaken.htm
Robert Frost on his own poetry:
"One stanza of 'The Road Not Taken' was written while I was sitting on a sofa in the middle of England: Was found three or four years later, and I couldn't bear not to finish it. I wasn't thinking about myself there, but about a friend who had gone off to war, a person who, whichever road he went, would be sorry he didn't go the other. He was hard on himself that way."
I don't really get this line of thinking. Are you suggesting that we should infer that he is writing a poem about how his choice was inconsequential, but he is going to go forth and mislead people into thinking that it did have consequence?
The poem says "I shall be telling this with a sigh/ Somewhere ages and ages hence". Sounds like some distant future to me.
It's not that his choice was "inconsequential." It's that he had no basis for deciding one path or the other based on information available at the time.
Based on this interpretation, the thinking is: His choice was a random pick (not necessarily inconsequential) based on the available data, and he says long from now he's going to tell it with some.... embellishment.
How anyone can interpret the lines " I took the one less traveled by,/
And that has made all the difference." to mean that it made no difference which one he took, is totally beyond me.
pay attention to the narrative tense in the last stanza. The narrator isn't saying "I took a path that was different and important"; he's saying "I took one of two equal paths, and I think that IN THE FUTURE I'm going to tell people it was different and important".
currently stores low level waste at ambient temperature, like contaminated tooling. A special on TV said they are not equipped for the heat given off by nuke plant waste.
Slashdot Mirror
to think highly of the British model. There was just a story hear about a custom iphone app for the PM that tells him the waiting list. I recall seeing lines for a dentist. I can't fathom either.
the UV tolerant bugs evolving on this thing.
I used to use nvidia cards, but always assumed video card brand made no difference, since I'd never heard anything to that affect. I recently got my first Radeon card, a minor upgrade that was twice as fast as my old card but used the same wattage (cool, right?). About once an hour, the new card freezes for a full 2 seconds, and maybe 30 seconds later freezes again for half a second. Sounds like no big deal, unless you are playing modern warfare 2, because then you are dead, and your kill-streak is reset. Sometimes I come out of the 2 second freeze to see my avatar ran off a ledge and is falling to his death. Kinda funny, but not when it borks a kill-streak. Getting killed by your video card is just wrong. I googled around for a solutions, and just found forums full of people lamenting the bad quality of drivers for those cards. It's fine for most games, and it's fine 99% of the time, but that other 1% can be a cruel bitch. Now you know.
That would be awesome.
unfair to the rats, and they deserve better.
Expensive.
They received a bunch of broadcasts containing our political debates, and
... their preemptive strike in en-route.
When is the last time you sat down and introduced yourself to a rat?
There was this one town hall meeting...
I just got a check in the mail for one penny for an ebay motors class action settlement. Printing and mailing the check probably cost a dollar. Reminds me of the time my school sent me a bill (in the mail) for $19 cents.
What the 2nd amendment covers today is up to the whim of the 9 on today's court. The issue I raise is that people who would answer your cannon question don't then apply whatever logic they used to the other amendments. Instead, they first consider what answer they want for each individual issue, then selectively pick arguments to support their preference of "what the constitution covers." BTW cannons are ordnance, not arms.
One thing I always found interesting about constitutional interpretation is that the same people who argue the 2nd amendment should only apply to muskets (on the basis that the writers of the constitution supposedly could not have imagined anyone ever designing what they all wanted... a gun that shoots faster and further), will turn right around and assert the first amendment has a wide reach with respect to electronic mass media. Electronic mass media... like that was easier for a colonist to see coming than a rifle upgrade.
I'd really love to get my head around this one day lol.
then you should read http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/kenny/papers/bell.html
Consider any project financially unsound enough that the locals would never pay for it. Then add matching federal funds so the cost is cut in half, and all of a sudden it gets the local vote to go ahead, now that it is half financed by distant federal taxpayers. Problem for the locals is, the distant taxpayers have some dumb project in their own backyard also. This is the way dumb things get justified all over the country.
Seriously. Meissner effect is old news, too. I mentioned to a friend how slashdot seemed to have gotten really dumbed down in the last year, and he made an interesting connection: ipads became popular.
This alone is not enough to disprove it. .
... to most people. Single inconsistencies still outside today's understanding are fuel for people who come to be known as conspiracy theorists. Nano-thermite? Conspiracy! Odd terminal ballistics? Consiracy! Weeping statue? Divine intervention!
The rebuttal is that people making that first argument don't understand the replication part of natural selection. Evolution doesn't say atoms randomly come together to form each person. First they formed useful proteins, and those genes got replicated. Repeat and add one level of complexity each time, keep repeating 4 billion years... and you finally make complex organisms.
Back to the analogy of monkeys typing, the idea is once monkeys bash out a useful combination, a word, consider that word created (gene useful) and will replicate. Turns out, if you apply the analogy right, monkeys can bash out shakepeare pretty fast, so the monkey analogy is a bad argument against evolution.
Buying gas out of state is not cause to decline a card when there's a big charge from U-Haul on the same account. In fact, that's probably the worst time to decide to start declining your customer's charges.
I wonder if the republicans will block this anti-hollywood bill passed by democrats. What a strange turn of events.
a guide on how foxes should properly care for henhouses.
and monetize this asset anytime?
at which "drinking water safe" fraking is done?
http://poetrypages.lemon8.nl/life/roadnottaken/roadnottaken.htm Robert Frost on his own poetry: "One stanza of 'The Road Not Taken' was written while I was sitting on a sofa in the middle of England: Was found three or four years later, and I couldn't bear not to finish it. I wasn't thinking about myself there, but about a friend who had gone off to war, a person who, whichever road he went, would be sorry he didn't go the other. He was hard on himself that way."
"hence" means from now on, not just some future.
I don't really get this line of thinking. Are you suggesting that we should infer that he is writing a poem about how his choice was inconsequential, but he is going to go forth and mislead people into thinking that it did have consequence?
The poem says "I shall be telling this with a sigh/ Somewhere ages and ages hence". Sounds like some distant future to me.
It's not that his choice was "inconsequential." It's that he had no basis for deciding one path or the other based on information available at the time.
Based on this interpretation, the thinking is: His choice was a random pick (not necessarily inconsequential) based on the available data, and he says long from now he's going to tell it with some.... embellishment.
How anyone can interpret the lines " I took the one less traveled by,/ And that has made all the difference." to mean that it made no difference which one he took, is totally beyond me.
pay attention to the narrative tense in the last stanza. The narrator isn't saying "I took a path that was different and important"; he's saying "I took one of two equal paths, and I think that IN THE FUTURE I'm going to tell people it was different and important".
currently stores low level waste at ambient temperature, like contaminated tooling. A special on TV said they are not equipped for the heat given off by nuke plant waste.