Solaris (and the defunct opensolaris) has the exact same issue when scaling up the cores per CPU. this badly written article was about cache constrained shared memory usage.
besides, Solaris doesn't scale as Linux does, despite the hype. Solaris doesn't scale *down* to the PDA level nor *up* to the monster NUMA architectures Linux does.
Oracle imagines they can make a unified IBM or Unisys type mainframe vertical stack with it now. But that won't work as commodity hardware in clusters can run Oracle's main applications faster and more cheaply than any ultrasparc box.
you don't think the U.S. government would try to monopolize all communication with the aliens?
By the way, the real conspiracy running this planet isn't a government one, it's just a small bunch of power and money-grubbing rich assholes doing what power and money grubbing assholes have always done.
I've heard propaganda like that, but hard proof of lines like "Saddam gassed his own people" that Bush spewed is hard to come by. Meanwhile, there were some 600,000 to 800,000 Iraqis killed by our destruction of their country.
I disagree that the Founding Fathers didn't see the possibility of what we have. Looking past the superficials of technology, they indeed knew of "secret police" and "domestic spying". The western banking cartels (still the most powerful of our mega-corporations) had already been in power for over a hundred years. They certainly knew of the dangers of war and so defined a system of checks against war-mongering. What they didn't account for was blatant unconstitutional behavior and high treason going unchecked and unpunished.
no, the point is gold can be sold for whatever currency is in use at the time of sale, or used directly as money (which I can assure you in smarter regions of the plane it can be)
that would be true except our Federal Reserve has put us on a non-sustainable game plan, to pump currency through primary dealers to buoy markets. This might work for six months to more than a year, barring major war.
our government has already proven itself to be an abuser, maimer, and murderer. It has already shown it desires the power to deprive its citizens of life, liberty, and finances without trial or due process. Why should we give such an evil monstrosity another tool?
should have pointed out you lost the argument with "imposed democracy".
only a fascist would believe that is possible. forcing a government upon the people which the the people don't want nor trust by threat and use of force is of course not real democracy. it's a sham, a lie.
Our soldiers are not fighting those who attacked america. but rather every disgruntled afghan. disgusted with foreign invaders, who takes up a rifle is being labeled as "Taliban". We create new enemies and kill them along with civilian bystanders and claim it is part of the "war on terror".
Funny your first linked article talks about NATO forces mowing down citizens as part of the death toll. funny like a heart attack. maybe you should have read it before linking.
You also used the phrase "imposing democracy". yes indeed, not by those people's choice but us ramming our murderous justice and way and approved leaders down their throats by use of force and mayhem.
Instead of a known enemy, we are fighting those who did not attack us, and creating new enemies. Our elite line their pockets with wealth and gain power from this fight. That's all this "war" is about.
But enough americans believe the lie, such as you, that this is somehow about bringing democracy, fighting terrorism, ensuring our freedom...blah, blah,blah.
we also believe the first half, a "well regulated militia" (well regulated meaning properly functioning in 18th century) of course being every able-bodied citizen.
sorry, but the aliens made a klemperer rosette of their inhabitable planets and left their home star millenia ago. their industrial waste heat is sufficient to keep them warm.
our soldiers are mass murdering innocents in the ratio of over ten civilian deaths to one soldier's death. your argument would be laughable if blood wasn't running like a river
that's a video driver problem, not an Unbuntu one
agreed, what we need to find though is the master boner length gene.
it will by the turn of the century. the 22nd century will be the century of Linux on the dozens-of-cores desktop.
that is average across all U.S. female citizens. 5-8" is average for "white" women.
Solaris (and the defunct opensolaris) has the exact same issue when scaling up the cores per CPU. this badly written article was about cache constrained shared memory usage.
besides, Solaris doesn't scale as Linux does, despite the hype. Solaris doesn't scale *down* to the PDA level nor *up* to the monster NUMA architectures Linux does.
Oracle imagines they can make a unified IBM or Unisys type mainframe vertical stack with it now. But that won't work as commodity hardware in clusters can run Oracle's main applications faster and more cheaply than any ultrasparc box.
Solaris dying, OpenSolaris is dead.
and then they replaced the pale shitter monkey with a taller darker one.
short? the average height of women in the USA is 5'4".
no problem, travel to some place money is scarce. bring some money. you will be found attractive and have women.
those elections where districts had 200% to 600% turnout, and those groups that didn't want to participate declared "taliban" and "terrorists"
imposing our idea of democracy with death and force, our founding fathers would be so proud.
you don't think the U.S. government would try to monopolize all communication with the aliens?
By the way, the real conspiracy running this planet isn't a government one, it's just a small bunch of power and money-grubbing rich assholes doing what power and money grubbing assholes have always done.
I've heard propaganda like that, but hard proof of lines like "Saddam gassed his own people" that Bush spewed is hard to come by. Meanwhile, there were some 600,000 to 800,000 Iraqis killed by our destruction of their country.
right, try and gall
but in the Iraqi war it's mostly hundreds of thousands of civilians that have died.
we're doing it right? if you mean lining the pockets of power and money grubbing scum while mass murdering, then yes, we're doing it right.
you went off on a tangent
I disagree that the Founding Fathers didn't see the possibility of what we have. Looking past the superficials of technology, they indeed knew of "secret police" and "domestic spying". The western banking cartels (still the most powerful of our mega-corporations) had already been in power for over a hundred years. They certainly knew of the dangers of war and so defined a system of checks against war-mongering. What they didn't account for was blatant unconstitutional behavior and high treason going unchecked and unpunished.
no, the point is gold can be sold for whatever currency is in use at the time of sale, or used directly as money (which I can assure you in smarter regions of the plane it can be)
that would be true except our Federal Reserve has put us on a non-sustainable game plan, to pump currency through primary dealers to buoy markets. This might work for six months to more than a year, barring major war.
our government has already proven itself to be an abuser, maimer, and murderer. It has already shown it desires the power to deprive its citizens of life, liberty, and finances without trial or due process. Why should we give such an evil monstrosity another tool?
should have pointed out you lost the argument with "imposed democracy".
only a fascist would believe that is possible. forcing a government upon the people which the the people don't want nor trust by threat and use of force is of course not real democracy. it's a sham, a lie.
"We removed their government, and imposed democracy so the people can choose their new government. "
it would appear too many of the people don't like our choice of government for them.
Al Qaeda and the Taliban that hosted them fled long ago. we are not fighting them with our soldiers. We are fighting insurgents.
Nor are we fighting the Saudi government (friends of the Bush family) who for years contributed money to Al Qaeda.
This war is without purpose, and is only creating new enemies.
then as now, the people had to procure their own weapons.
At the time the second amendment was written, arms were handguns, rifles, cross-bows, muskets, swords, spears, cannons, etc.
I'm saying our soldiers should be brought home
Our soldiers are not fighting those who attacked america. but rather every disgruntled afghan. disgusted with foreign invaders, who takes up a rifle is being labeled as "Taliban". We create new enemies and kill them along with civilian bystanders and claim it is part of the "war on terror".
Funny your first linked article talks about NATO forces mowing down citizens as part of the death toll. funny like a heart attack. maybe you should have read it before linking.
You also used the phrase "imposing democracy". yes indeed, not by those people's choice but us ramming our murderous justice and way and approved leaders down their throats by use of force and mayhem.
Instead of a known enemy, we are fighting those who did not attack us, and creating new enemies. Our elite line their pockets with wealth and gain power from this fight. That's all this "war" is about.
But enough americans believe the lie, such as you, that this is somehow about bringing democracy, fighting terrorism, ensuring our freedom...blah, blah,blah.
we also believe the first half, a "well regulated militia" (well regulated meaning properly functioning in 18th century) of course being every able-bodied citizen.
sorry, but the aliens made a klemperer rosette of their inhabitable planets and left their home star millenia ago. their industrial waste heat is sufficient to keep them warm.
our soldiers are mass murdering innocents in the ratio of over ten civilian deaths to one soldier's death. your argument would be laughable if blood wasn't running like a river