the Quesiton is.. who is making money from it.. that will tell you who wanted it and who is doing it .
and if they arn't making money jsut providing free adds.. then all i have to say is why the fucking hell . someone should find that coder and beat him with his own keyboard
i just modified the code and tested it it will work with https.. It shows
https://www.google.com/ in the address bar BUT does not use ssl you do not get the lock in IE.. and also if you try and use it with a domain other than the one the link is on it causes a full redirect and you get the right adress in the bar same happens if you try it on a site that is using ssl
jsut an fyi.. one of the screwy ways you can help protect your stuff is when you send out DHCP packets including a custom routing table that forces everything to run through your network..
then on your router block access to the networks that are rogue (if they are routable) and then watch to see who is trying to send to them and go shut them down.
if you have a computer (windows and mac) with two interfaces and one is dhcp and gets a static routing table for all subnets to it's gateway then when something trys to connect on the rogue interface it will ack back on your interface..
so unless someone can exploite a UDP hole on the computers rogue interface they can not establish a connection.
i do this in our small office just so that i can asure people are going out the right router when they go some where but it has the nice sideeffct of screwing the other interfaces while they are on the network.
Personaly i have seen way to many software vendors that use it as their back end when distrbuting software and do not inform people that they need to install patchs for the MSDE or they don't bother to rereleast the patchs them selfs..
doesn't any one remember slammer? and the fact that most of the infections were out there (and still out there) are MSDE installs that people don't know they have
if it turns out to be anything like the MSDE2000 then it is nothing more than a nightmare waiting to happen.. and no one should write a book about how to use it.
on the other hand>>
another slashdot book review with score 8... nothing to see here
not to be mean but the word "gay" also means happey so the fact that every time you see it you think it means bad - well - that is a personal issue for you
i understand that if they are looking to move to Outlook and exchagne the price tag for 6000 users is huge but if they are already there then they should already have what they are looking for and might not know it.
all i am saing is that if they already have outlook/exchange and it isn't a boched setup then they might be looking the wrong direction..
you also have to look at the man hour cost of migration to a completely new system vs fixing what they have.
I wondered about this too.. if they have 6k users and are currently using Exchange then unless they are using 5.5 or older any server they have that can support that many users comes with OWA.
the only expensive thing i can see for OWA if they are already on exchange is if they want to run front and back end servers. But then again if they have 6k users and are running Exchange then they more than likely have paid this cost already, or they have a botched setup.
and some one will have to remind me because i don't think you can even run Exchange 2000 or 2003 without AD.
From the words in the question it almost seems they don't know what they are looking for. That needs to be better celarified first.
the funny part is is ms just releases a patch that lets web designers use js to click the button for people.. it is quick and elegent and good god a security nightmare.. Still it would be funny
you know ihad the same talk with my dad.. he agreed with me and i kept up my D&D..
he also played CS with me for a few years.. he would be on BF2 but his laptop can't handel it.
guess i got the lucky parent
was about to do it but people beet me to it
funny they are dumb enough to annoy their readers with crap like that but they still don't realize that we can still see the source
the sad part is they arn't even clever enough to do it them selves as this Quote shows
"* Disable select-text script- © Dynamic Drive (www.dynamicdrive.com)"
"You also have to make the machine overheat"
/.
well first thing is get it's link on the front page of
but then getting any packets into it is going to be the trick
funny i remember much smaller areas beating the crap out of that stat http://www.ncsu.edu/news/dailyclips/1002/103102.ht m - Just search for laptop
this is just normal OEM options.. for a while there Intel offered crap like that to it's OEM's .. it wasn't jsut dell that used that crap.
when you order borads by the millions you can say i want the front pannal conector to be like this because that is what is cheapest.
intel just quickly reprograms their setup equipment and makes it.. it really takes not time at all for them to do this
but i am glad they stopped doing that (for the most part)
My question is if it is encrypted everywhere even in the chip..
how the hell do you proccess encrypted assembly --- for this i am at a lost.
XOR because a pointer address and you just foobared your proccess which you can't read..
what is the over head on this thing.. Not only does it sound too good to be true but it sounds too good to even work
if you say so shure.. else it is just the government in action again
Nothing to see here please move along..... oh and PAY US..
ok so it is the affiliats that yahoo pays to host their overture suctomera adds that are reselling them
i see the money trail now. but in the end yahoo makes money but advertizers now have ads in popups which any respectiable company doesn't want..
only click fraud that i have experenced is yahoo randomly advertizing my company on key words that we didn't ask for..
the Quesiton is .. who is making money from it .. that will tell you who wanted it and who is doing it .
and if they arn't making money jsut providing free adds.. then all i have to say is why the fucking hell . someone should find that coder and beat him with his own keyboard
it looks like it made it.. and first on the list :)
i just modified the code and tested it it will work with https.. It shows
https://www.google.com/ in the address bar BUT does not use ssl you do not get the lock in IE.. and also if you try and use it with a domain other than the one the link is on it causes a full redirect and you get the right adress in the bar same happens if you try it on a site that is using ssl
jsut an fyi.. one of the screwy ways you can help protect your stuff is when you send out DHCP packets including a custom routing table that forces everything to run through your network..
then on your router block access to the networks that are rogue (if they are routable) and then watch to see who is trying to send to them and go shut them down.
if you have a computer (windows and mac) with two interfaces and one is dhcp and gets a static routing table for all subnets to it's gateway then when something trys to connect on the rogue interface it will ack back on your interface..
so unless someone can exploite a UDP hole on the computers rogue interface they can not establish a connection.
i do this in our small office just so that i can asure people are going out the right router when they go some where but it has the nice sideeffct of screwing the other interfaces while they are on the network.
the sad part is i read yor post just fine then noticed it was sdrawkcab
no that would be more like every 6 months to flease more money out of people for no good reason and killing trees..
wait.. now i see the forest..
yea your right it is like a textbook upgrade
Personaly i have seen way to many software vendors that use it as their back end when distrbuting software and do not inform people that they need to install patchs for the MSDE or they don't bother to rereleast the patchs them selfs..
doesn't any one remember slammer? and the fact that most of the infections were out there (and still out there) are MSDE installs that people don't know they have
if it turns out to be anything like the MSDE2000 then it is nothing more than a nightmare waiting to happen.. and no one should write a book about how to use it.
on the other hand>>
another slashdot book review with score 8... nothing to see here
"OK so what if I go out and patent queueing at a shop checkout to pay for goods"
it is called a cart and i think it is patented already....
not to be mean but the word "gay" also means happey so the fact that every time you see it you think it means bad - well - that is a personal issue for you
all in all it still comes from a pig.. and personaly i would rather have killer scavenger eagles run the place than hungy dirty pigs..
i for once would like to be able to get an itemized listing of every cent i pay in taxes and where it goes.
I was thinking the same thing.. jsut wait till someone sticks it in there pants and is jsut constantly trying to make people bored...
i understand that if they are looking to move to Outlook and exchagne the price tag for 6000 users is huge but if they are already there then they should already have what they are looking for and might not know it.
all i am saing is that if they already have outlook/exchange and it isn't a boched setup then they might be looking the wrong direction..
you also have to look at the man hour cost of migration to a completely new system vs fixing what they have.
I wondered about this too.. if they have 6k users and are currently using Exchange then unless they are using 5.5 or older any server they have that can support that many users comes with OWA.
the only expensive thing i can see for OWA if they are already on exchange is if they want to run front and back end servers. But then again if they have 6k users and are running Exchange then they more than likely have paid this cost already, or they have a botched setup.
and some one will have to remind me because i don't think you can even run Exchange 2000 or 2003 without AD.
From the words in the question it almost seems they don't know what they are looking for. That needs to be better celarified first.
the funny part is is ms just releases a patch that lets web designers use js to click the button for people.. it is quick and elegent and good god a security nightmare.. Still it would be funny
i Hate my eyes.. they will randomly switch dominance..
this is why am good at shooting left or right handed.. i just focus for a min and now that eye is the dominant one.
it is quite annoying when they randomly switch on their own