Downside: you have to pay them more. Not in this economy. There are too many unemployed and underemployed tech workers. Google and the others need to stop making hiring decisions based on stereotype and start evaluating the existing talent pool based on ability.
that makes me glad that I do not have a television. It is easy to ignore the stupid on the internet. There is plenty of stupid on the internet, but it is easy to ignore it.
does the FBI have adequate control over its hacker informants? For example, an FBI informer riding in the car that carried the killer of Viola Liuzzo. And who else is running hacker informants?
Slashdot Mirror
I am increasingly of the view that Richard Stallman is correct, living in freedom means using free software.
Downside: you have to pay them more. Not in this economy. There are too many unemployed and underemployed tech workers. Google and the others need to stop making hiring decisions based on stereotype and start evaluating the existing talent pool based on ability.
this is madness.
that Stallman is correct, living in freedom requires that we use free software. On the other hand, this is being written on a Mac iBook.
that makes me glad that I do not have a television. It is easy to ignore the stupid on the internet. There is plenty of stupid on the internet, but it is easy to ignore it.
my account of Stallman's appearance at the Yorktown HS computer club.
that masking tape over the camera aperture would fix this?
it is so surprising that a company with a horrible record on labor conditions also has a horrible record on enforcing business law.
the response to corporate lawlessness is not citizen lawlessness.
did anyone NOT see this coming?
check out Google News on News Corp, plenty of people know about this. Social Mention indicates that online sentiment regarding LulzSec is mostly neutral, with positive larger than negative.
under color of journalism is a crime, as Murdoch & Co will soon discover. Much was destroyed by hacking, privacy, the sense of security and safety.
but it is certainly true that News Corp has always been a pirate corporation http://berlin.ccc.de/~andy/CCC/TRON/material/nds/20020415-afr.html
when your server is hacked and people are cheering. It is all part of the fall of the house of hubris.
Murdoch is a pirate http://it.slashdot.org/story/08/03/31/0145241/Murdochs-Hacker-Speaks-Out
the means determine the ends. Vigilante justice is not the path to the rule of law.
I think that this time News Corp will be held responsible. No need for vigilante justice. http://technoflak.blogspot.com/2011/07/fall-of-house-of-hubris.html
until it happens to you. Righteous lawlessness stinks out loud.
and I have to say, very effective FUD and self-promotion.
does the FBI have adequate control over its hacker informants? For example, an FBI informer riding in the car that carried the killer of Viola Liuzzo. And who else is running hacker informants?
but not solar power laptop has been made commercially available. I would luv one.
it isn't a data breach, Google has uncovered a campaign to steal passwords. Well done Google.
and Microsoft is no longer the borg
good catch
where a hedge fund manager made a change of management in a large publicly held company and that company got better?