it only works for trust-fund babies like Richard Stallman. It's pretend communism for the privileged and prevents programmers from being paid for their work.
I was looking stuff up and found that studies on the effects are CONTRADICTING EACH OTHER.
I would take the one that says that being on a ketogenic diet causes diabetes with a HUGE grain of salt - it's backwards of the others for instance.
Also there's a huge difference between being low carb and out of ketogenesis and low carb IN ketogenesis.
And there's a difference between relying on oils or fats or meat...
The fact is that we don't really have good information on the effects of macronutrient balance - doctors and the government have been making assumptions for years, but those assumptions were wrong. It turns out that you can't infer things in biological systems you can only measure.
that they spent YEARS trying to design and manufacture extremely low power displays with new (and admittedly more reliable than current stock) light source designs.
Yes those displays were innovative. They were also extremely over-designed and unnecessarily sacrificed readability for power efficiency.
But the big problem is that using current stock displays would have allowed machines on the market instantly and cheaply, while inventing a new technology required years of wasted time and limited manufacturing and source options.
Over the years commodity stock displays overtook the OLPC screen technology in price and in some of the capabilities by extreme amounts anyway. The choice to create a new technology looks ever worse.
To get an idea of how weird the OLPC display was, instead of using light colored by filters and led peak colors, they used prisms that spread light from a white power source. And instead of choosing to use the three narrow color bands that are optimized for the peaks of the human visual system and are the only way to get saturated colors, they instead chose to use 4 color bands and use all the light, not just the peaks. Sure that probably improved the light efficiency by a large factor, but the result was an entirely novel display technology that looked horrible and would have no market outside the OLPC.
Similarly the fact that the display could also work in a reflective mode in black and white was innovative, but was all this worth adding 3 or 4 years to the development time and limiting manufacturing sources and driving up the price?
The choice of LEDs as a light source also made the light source more reliable than what was in use at the time. But stock display technologies eventually caught up with that.
"In Russia, mixed phage preparations may have a therapeutic efficacy of 50%. This equates to the complete cure of 50 of 100 patients with terminal antibiotic-resistant infection. The rate of only 50% is likely to be due to individual choices in admixtures and ineffective diagnosis of the causative agent of infection."
I've said this all along. Say Spotify gets $10 a month from you, they take $5 for themselves and their expenses then they just divide the other $5 up evenly between whatever artists you listened to weighted by number of songs and time. Don't "pay per play" instead "pay what's available". If you only listened to one artist in that month, that artist would get all $5, even if you listened to only one song.
Then Spotify is simply guaranteed $5 a month, and royalty fees take care of themselves.
What they SHOULD say is "of course our autopilot system is supposed to be able to detect that a truck has turned in front of you, we don't know why the system failed but we will put every effort into improving it so that nothing like this ever happens again.
Instead of trying to find ways to blame the driver and pretend that autopilot means no one will never take their eyes off the road they should say "mea culpa - our system failed, we take responsibility and we will fix it - and we will pay damages"
What is more important to deal with autopilot the way it will be used in the real world and protect public trust or to protect themselves from ONE count them ONE little lawsuit
They're idiots. They will not sell more cars. They don't deserve to.
Slashdot Mirror
it only works for trust-fund babies like Richard Stallman. It's pretend communism for the privileged and prevents programmers from being paid for their work.
no standards, no ideals.
So it's not surprising that our corporations have lost all of their morals too.
A couple things.
I was looking stuff up and found that studies on the effects are CONTRADICTING EACH OTHER.
I would take the one that says that being on a ketogenic diet causes diabetes with a HUGE grain of salt - it's backwards of the others for instance.
Also there's a huge difference between being low carb and out of ketogenesis and low carb IN ketogenesis.
And there's a difference between relying on oils or fats or meat...
The fact is that we don't really have good information on the effects of macronutrient balance - doctors and the government have been making assumptions for years, but those assumptions were wrong. It turns out that you can't infer things in biological systems you can only measure.
Maybe if you have some horrible laptop with no base and crackly highs you might hear Yanny.
that they spent YEARS trying to design and manufacture extremely low power displays with new (and admittedly more reliable than current stock) light source designs.
Yes those displays were innovative. They were also extremely over-designed and unnecessarily sacrificed readability for power efficiency.
But the big problem is that using current stock displays would have allowed machines on the market instantly and cheaply, while inventing a new technology required years of wasted time and limited manufacturing and source options.
Over the years commodity stock displays overtook the OLPC screen technology in price and in some of the capabilities by extreme amounts anyway. The choice to create a new technology looks ever worse.
To get an idea of how weird the OLPC display was, instead of using light colored by filters and led peak colors, they used prisms that spread light from a white power source. And instead of choosing to use the three narrow color bands that are optimized for the peaks of the human visual system and are the only way to get saturated colors, they instead chose to use 4 color bands and use all the light, not just the peaks. Sure that probably improved the light efficiency by a large factor, but the result was an entirely novel display technology that looked horrible and would have no market outside the OLPC.
Similarly the fact that the display could also work in a reflective mode in black and white was innovative, but was all this worth adding 3 or 4 years to the development time and limiting manufacturing sources and driving up the price?
The choice of LEDs as a light source also made the light source more reliable than what was in use at the time. But stock display technologies eventually caught up with that.
Uhm then you're using the wrong language.
Lua and scheme have tail call optimization.
"In Russia, mixed phage preparations may have a therapeutic efficacy of 50%. This equates to the complete cure of 50 of 100 patients with terminal antibiotic-resistant infection. The rate of only 50% is likely to be due to individual choices in admixtures and ineffective diagnosis of the causative agent of infection."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Never got popular because it's harder than a pill and so no one puts the effort in to get it past the FDA
because in the first non-blurred print, the models looked too fake. So slight blurring restored the sense of reality.
Usually I would say %330 as fast meaning 3.3 times the speed. or 1/3 the time to transmit the same data.
Does "faster" usually mean a different thing than "as fast".
who could be elected president. His fan base are white racists - they have no other options.
She's been IN porn.
It's all hypocrisy, what did you expect from Republicans?
http://assets.nydailynews.com/...
The artist got beat up a couple times for this.
So much for being the cool candidate.
Yep. You can disable it in the group policy editor if you have pro, or in the registry editor if you don't.
Prozac isn't so pleasant. There's no high at all. It can cause anxiety.
You're confused about antidepressants and what they're for.
I've said this all along.
Say Spotify gets $10 a month from you, they take $5 for themselves and their expenses then they just divide the other $5 up evenly between whatever artists you listened to weighted by number of songs and time. Don't "pay per play" instead "pay what's available". If you only listened to one artist in that month, that artist would get all $5, even if you listened to only one song.
Then Spotify is simply guaranteed $5 a month, and royalty fees take care of themselves.
What they SHOULD say is "of course our autopilot system is supposed to be able to detect that a truck has turned in front of you, we don't know why the system failed but we will put every effort into improving it so that nothing like this ever happens again.
Instead of trying to find ways to blame the driver and pretend that autopilot means no one will never take their eyes off the road they should say "mea culpa - our system failed, we take responsibility and we will fix it - and we will pay damages"
What is more important to deal with autopilot the way it will be used in the real world and protect public trust or to protect themselves from ONE count them ONE little lawsuit
They're idiots. They will not sell more cars. They don't deserve to.
aac, and apple music won't even run on my phone.
I've lost Mog and Beats Music - if I lose Tidal Music I'm going to start pirating.
How would you know that?
asked for it. Jesus.
And Tidal has a lossless tier.
Better quality for the win
that prevents kids from coding on the ipad and sharing the code? If not he needs to shut up! It's his fault that his product can't be used that way!
Or that your name is Christopher Poole. And still get hired, apparently!
automatically converts and runs JRE files in Android?
I don't believe it.