Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Asks: What's Your Preferred Music Streaming Service?

Spotify announced on Monday that it has hit 100 million users on its music streaming service, with over 30 million paid subscribers. The Swedish music company's service rivals with Apple Music, Pandora, and Google's Play Music. Apple's streaming service, which was launched last year, has over 15 million paid customers as of earlier this month. Amazon also reportedly plans to launch its music streaming service later this year. YouTube is also a stop for many music listeners, and so is radio.

How do you get your music? Do you still purchase CDs and DVDs? Anyone with a turntable in the audience?

316 comments

  1. MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative


     

    1. Re:MP3 by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For me as well. I actually buy music. I'm not interested in streaming services at all.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:MP3 by nucrash · · Score: 1

      It's the same aspect for me as well.

      In college I had thousands of MP3s, now that I am out of college and have a career, I have actually started to purchase more music.
      Not that I have a lot of money to spend, just that now that I am not living off of Ramen, I think it's fair to start opening up the wallet a bit more and support the arts.

      --
      Place something witty here
    3. Re:MP3 by hambone142 · · Score: 2

      When I buy music, I do it via Amazon (if you by the disc, they give you the MP3). I like the .mp3 format. I won't buy music via iTunes because of the proprietary format that won't play via USB stick in to my car stereo.

      For streaming, it's Pandora and TuneInRadio (I stream a station I like located far away.... radio is crappy in my locality).

    4. Re:MP3 by rossdee · · Score: 1

      Yep, I store my music collection on a microSD card in my phone
      I don't want to pay VZW for data overage.

    5. Re:MP3 by jenningsthecat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For me as well. I actually buy music. I'm not interested in streaming services at all.

      Yup. I rip my CD's to FLAC and play them off a computer. Occasionally I'll just play a CD. I have no interest in streaming. (Unless you count the canned music channels that come with our cable subscription as 'streaming' - we use those as background music sometimes). I DO listen to a lot of stuff on YouTube, and I've found quite a bit of new music there that I like. I'll download it from YouTube, then if I find I listen to it more than a few times, I'll buy the CD.

      When I want stuff that I can't find on CD, I have no qualms about using youtube-dl or BitTorrent. I'm happy to pay for music, (if it's in a lossless format), but if the music company sees fit not to make it available in some permanent, non-DRM'd format, then too bad, so sad, oh well - I can usually get what I'm looking for in some other way.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    6. Re:MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same, streaming is tracking you, producers are buying that data and creating new music to match your favorable reactions to existing music.

      So when you say it all sounds the same, get ready for a future of even more of that.

    7. Re:MP3 by Yvan256 · · Score: 0

      Your car stereo must be very old because even an old Nintendo DSi can play the music files from the iTunes store.

    8. Re:MP3 by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think people get confused by the name, but the AAC format is not a proprietary Apple format, nor was it even developed by Apple. If you have older hardware it might only support MP3 (which AAC was designed to replace) but almost any newer "MP3" player will support AAC. Apple originally sold their music with a closed DRM wrapper called FairPlay, but they (along with everyone else in the business) stopped selling DRM-encumbered music years ago.

      For what it's worth if you're going to buy music online you should probably get it in a lossless format (FLAC) so that if you format-shift it won't result in additional degradation beyond what the lossy codec would normally involve. In practical terms it doesn't matter that much since audio codecs aren't changing terribly often and almost everything is backwards compatible with the older formats, but if you re-encoded your lossy files enough they would eventually sound like garbage.

    9. Re:MP3 by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have actually started to purchase more music.

      Spotify is best for music that it's impossible to buy. I find out-of-print music on Spotify all the time.

      The real value of a service like Spotify is its back catalog.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:MP3 by cyberpunkrocker · · Score: 1

      Right, that's *exactly* what I'm doing, too. Besides, I still have LP's and a turntable - although I haven't used it for... say, five years.

    11. Re:MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, not that buying overpriced overproduced mesmerization-discs from multinational soul-steering conglomerates is much to support the arts, but it is a nice sentiment. I personally was much heavier into MP3 during high school. I always tried to get CD's to support my favorite groups, though. After a few years I found that the CD's were all unlistenable because of various surface defects and scratches (especially the ones I listened to in my car).

      Now, I have a collection of MP3's many of which were ripped from physical discs and encoded "to-taste" (for me, VBR with a target bitrate around 256), but this is what I consider to be my personal music archive. I wouldn't really feel secure unless I could duplicate this archive across multiple home servers and store backups in a variety of physical formats (SDHC, external HDD, USB flash drive, etc).

      CD's strike me as one of the most disposable media formats ever created.

    12. Re:MP3 by mlts · · Score: 1

      MP3 or AAC. I am in places with spotty to no cellular reception, and with a 128GB smartphone (or 128 GB SD card), I can shovel most of my music collection onto the device. Plus, downloading/purchasing ensures artists get some revenue, compared to streaming where the royalty per play is just insanely small.

    13. Re:MP3 by mlts · · Score: 2

      I've not bought a CD from a big label in years, unless you consider Cold Spring Records [1], Nuclear Blast Records, or Cleopatra Records big. Otherwise, I do buy the albums.

      [1]: R. I. P. Cold Meat Industries.

    14. Re:MP3 by mlts · · Score: 1

      I used to argue this over a decade ago, that AAC was Apple only. However, times have changed, with many other devices accepting this format. The days of WMA players are long gone, and virtually everything will play AAC. Ideally, one should purchase music in FLAC, and choose the best format for the device. For a high noise threshold car, 192kbps might be good enough. For listening with cans, might be best just to listen to the FLAC file directly for the best quality.

      Of course, most newer audio heads assume you have some device with Bluetooth and may not even bother with storage or CD/DVD slots.

    15. Re:MP3 by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Same here, my "streaming" service is my MP3 player.

      I rip from CD's bought at Garage Sales and used record stores....

      Or the rare CD bought directly from the artist for small time "unlabeled" singers/groups I like.

    16. Re:MP3 by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      This - this, right here.

      It goes doubly so for artists that are on indie labels (or their own labels), as well as long-forgotten one-hit-wonders that are on no RIAA catalog (anymore, anyway).

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    17. Re:MP3 by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Since I've never been a member of the Apple hive mind, I don't know if the average car stereo can play that format exclusively used by Apple or not. I simply don't need to care.

      Most of my music collection predates iTunes anyways.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    18. Re:MP3 by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      CDs for me. I don't buy much music anyway, and don't listen to much except when commuting. If I had a party (hypothetically) I could just turn on the TV and use one of the music services built into the roku, either free or a one month sub only (or maybe bring up youtube with the 24 hour looping Taking The Hobbits To Isengard, which will make the parties shorter so that I can get back to other stuff).

    19. Re:MP3 by macs4all · · Score: 1

      When I buy music, I do it via Amazon (if you by the disc, they give you the MP3). I like the .mp3 format. I won't buy music via iTunes because of the proprietary format that won't play via USB stick in to my car stereo.

      For streaming, it's Pandora and TuneInRadio (I stream a station I like located far away.... radio is crappy in my locality).

      Get a clue from the clue box.

      iTunes uses, and always has used, the Industry Standard Dolby AAC.

      It is your car stereo that needs an upgrade; not iTunes.

      Oh, and Apple Music sidesteps ALL of that, by allowing you to stream nearly the ENTIRE iTunes Catalog at your whim.

    20. Re:MP3 by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Since I've never been a member of the Apple hive mind, I don't know if the average car stereo can play that format exclusively used by Apple or not. I simply don't need to care.

      Most of my music collection predates iTunes anyways.

      Again, AAC is NOT "Exclusive to Apple". It is an industry-standard CODEC developed by Dolby Labs.

      That's why you can find it in PLENTY of Non-Apple software and hardware.

      No Hive Mind required.

    21. Re:MP3 by macs4all · · Score: 1

      or a high noise threshold car, 192kbps might be good enough.

      As someone who purchases music in 96/24 (or better) DVD-A format whenever possible (and has a DVD-A player), if you think you can hear ANYTHING above 128 kbps AAC (or probably even MP3) in a CAR, you're DELUSIONAL.

    22. Re:MP3 by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Same, streaming is tracking you, producers are buying that data and creating new music to match your favorable reactions to existing music.

      So when you say it all sounds the same, get ready for a future of even more of that.

      Good! I sure hope so; since I listen to little else but Prog Rock.

    23. Re:MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter if you stream or not. Ever heard of the "billboard top 40"?

      FFS, this stuff isn't new, it's just a lot more ubiquitous.

      CAPTCHA: predicts

    24. Re:MP3 by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth if you're going to buy music online you should probably get it in a lossless format (FLAC) so that if you format-shift it won't result in additional degradation beyond what the lossy codec would normally involve. In practical terms it doesn't matter that much since audio codecs aren't changing terribly often and almost everything is backwards compatible with the older formats, but if you re-encoded your lossy files enough they would eventually sound like garbage.

      AAC, when done right, will sound better than CD when created with a 24-bit source. Just make sure to buy without DRM.

      Anyway, if you're streaming, should you care? You don't own it anyway.

    25. Re:MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guy called macs4all claiming that AAC is not the Apple Audio Codec. lol

    26. Re:MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "that format exclusively used by Apple"

      Do you choose to be ignorant or something?

    27. Re:MP3 by operagost · · Score: 1

      Just to stick with the article topic, probably TuneIn local stations while I'm relaxing on the deck. But in reality, 99% of the time it's MP3s streamed off my Serviio media server to either my smart TV or Kodi media center. I've bought probably 100 CDs from thrift shops and flea markets over the last year for an average price of $1, and ripped them all.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    28. Re:MP3 by operagost · · Score: 1

      I bought my Kenwood because it had a rear USB socket (it's attached to a cable that easily snakes out of the dash for access). I spend enough time trying to keep the battery charged in my phone as it is. A 128 GB flash drive holds a lot of 256 Kbps MP3s, and it doesn't take much effort to periodically update it with your latest acquisitions. I guess if I used my phone as a media player for other purposes on a regular basis, have to copy to both would be annoying, but I don't.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    29. Re:MP3 by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Guy called macs4all claiming that AAC is not the Apple Audio Codec. lol

      Yoke's on you, dumbass.

      AAC stands for "ADVANCED Audio Coding", and it is an invention of a consortium of companies, of which Apple wasn't even a part.

      Next time, take the 500 ms. to do a little research before being outed as the idiot you obviously are.

    30. Re:MP3 by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      if you re-encoded your lossy files enough they would eventually sound like garbage.

      Not if you use a decent bit rate. For example, 192 kbps AAC can be re-encoded 10 times and still sounds great.

    31. Re: MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you are so edgy and cool

    32. Re:MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who purchases music in 96/24 (or better) DVD-A format whenever possible (and has a DVD-A player), if you think you can hear ANYTHING above 128 kbps AAC (or probably even MP3) in a CAR, you're DELUSIONAL.

      Untrue. Granted, I had a significantly upgraded system compared to what was available as a stock system, but I was easily able to tell when a song was at 128kbps or below. Oddly enough, I didn't read what you were replying to until now, but I was about to say that the cutoff in my car was 192kbps. That and above was next to impossible for me to hear a difference, but 128kbps was easy to spot.

      That being said, none of this matters to me these days. I'm driving a 95 Vovlo station wagon now and the cassette player in my car isn't terribly friendly with these MP3 and AAC things.

    33. Re: MP3 by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      Apple has sold music in the AAC format unencrypted since 2008. There is nothing proprietary about AAC. Apple had nothing to do with the creation or licensing of it.

      AAC has been supported by every platform for years and it's a required part of Android compatibility and BluRay. Every phone that I've used since 2005 has supported it. Including feature phones from Samsung, BlackBerrys, Windows Phones, etc.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding

    34. Re:MP3 by macs4all · · Score: 2

      As someone who purchases music in 96/24 (or better) DVD-A format whenever possible (and has a DVD-A player), if you think you can hear ANYTHING above 128 kbps AAC (or probably even MP3) in a CAR, you're DELUSIONAL.

      Untrue. Granted, I had a significantly upgraded system compared to what was available as a stock system, but I was easily able to tell when a song was at 128kbps or below. Oddly enough, I didn't read what you were replying to until now, but I was about to say that the cutoff in my car was 192kbps. That and above was next to impossible for me to hear a difference, but 128kbps was easy to spot.

      That being said, none of this matters to me these days. I'm driving a 95 Vovlo station wagon now and the cassette player in my car isn't terribly friendly with these MP3 and AAC things.

      I would challenge you to an A/B/X test in your car. I don't care how advanced your car system is, road noise, vibration causing intermodulation distortion products right in the air of the cabin, and other factors conspire to hide anything but the crappiest CODECs at above 128 kbps in AAC. Did I mention AAC as part of my "conditions"?

      Having said that, when I conducted my own (unscientific) tests before committing all my CDs to iTunes, I found that 160 kbps AAC was where I stopped being able to tell in a NON-mobile environment; so I encoded everything at 192. I would have done it at 256k if I'd been thinking straight, just because.

      The built-in radio/cassette player in my 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo Wagon (GOD I loved that car!) actually sounded REALLY good with the stock speakers/amps. They obviously tuned the system to work together, like Bose does with their stuff (not that I'm a Bose fan; I'm not).

      If the FM section still works in your Volvo radio (mine didn't), I would suggest an FM modulator to pump tunes from your phone/PMP to your Volvo's car stereo; or if your FM is kaput (because of a protection diode in the antenna input that gets fried from static in the air), then you can get one of those cassette-adapter thingys to do the same thing. That's what I did, and it sounded damned good, actually. You just have to be careful not to turn up the volume of your phone/PMP too high, or you will start saturating the magnetic core of the tape-head that they have in the "cassette" adapter, and it will start mudding-out and distorting. Turn your phone DOWN to about halfway, then turn the car stereo UP to get the volume you desire. THEN play around till you get a good balance between "I can go as loud as I want" and "Ick, that's horrible!"

      Or, if you are handy, you can find cable assemblies online that will let you use the outboard Power Amps in your Volvo, and pump the audio straight from your phone/Player right into the business-end of your Volvo's car stereo.

    35. Re:MP3 by adolf · · Score: 1

      Dynamic range, contrary to what you say, has never been a limiting factor in the audio quality compact disc.

    36. Re: MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup.
      If it ain't on my hard drive, I ain't listening to it. Besides, I seriously doubt any system could figure out what i want to hear without annoying the crappie out of me with wrong guesses.

    37. Re:MP3 by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Not that I have a lot of money to spend, [...]

      I don't have enough money to justify spending it all on blowing my Australian mobile data cap. Since I do most of my listening while commuting, this means I can't afford a streaming service. MP3s and podcasts for me.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    38. Re:MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...ripped from CD (oh, and movies ripped from DVD). Physical media make for great backups, and not being tethered to a streaming/spying service rocks.

    39. Re:MP3 by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 1

      I used iTunes itself to convert my purchases to MP3 years ago.

    40. Re:MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > AAC, when done right, will sound better than CD when created with a 24-bit source.

      "Better" is subjective and can't be measured, so....

      I propose you demonstrate that anyone can do better than chance at telling the difference between the two, before making such assertions.

    41. Re:MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Ubiquitous' means it's everywhere. You're saying it's a lot more everywhere than before?

      Try to avoid using big words for a few days.

    42. Re:MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      similar here...and I can't remember when I used BT for tunes. I prefer internet radio over youtube.

    43. Re:MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitive proof that you're not just a disgusting Apple zealot (fuck you for that, by the way. You force a mac on me and I'll slit your throat will a rusty saw-blade), but a stupid motherfucker as well! I'm sure you've noticed that many of your fancy 96kHz/24-bit files sound better than their 44.1kHz/16-bit equivalents, but I guarantee you're not smart enough to know that the reason has NOTHING to do with either the sampling rate or the bit depth. The HD music you're purchasing is often mastered differently than what's released on standard CDs. Meaning, they don't use excessive dynamic range compression and aren't clipped to shit. Rip any of your DVD-A shit (it's worth pointing out that only a dumbfuck audiophile dipshit would actually own a DVD-A player) and then use Adobe Audition to resample down to 44.1/16-bit. Don't even use dithering. Then run a standard ABX test. If the results show you can detect a difference between 96kHz/24-bit and 44.1kHz/16-bit from the same master, then you're the delusional one.

      Obviously, because Apple pushed AAC so hard, you'll claim it's the best. I doubt you even have a car. No doubt your ideal form of transportation is sitting on Tim Cook's dick while he carries you around and titillates you with Apple propaganda, but in a modern car with a decent sound system 128 kbps AAC or MP3 often doesn't cut it. By the way, this is really going to piss you off. A new audio codec, Opus, is taking off. I can already play these files on my Android phone. Apple, no doubt, will never fucking support it, because they only support the formats they can make money from. But, it beats AAC, and you can't use it. Eat that, you extremist asshole!

    44. Re:MP3 by whopub · · Score: 1

      I have an internet connection since 1997, I'm nuts about music, and I can proudly say I've never even tried music streaming. I do have a collection of 150 thousand songs on my computer which neither Apple nor any other service will ever mess with, or even know of.

    45. Re:MP3 by whopub · · Score: 1

      *15 thousand. I'm not THAT nuts.

    46. Re:MP3 by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Definitive proof that you're not just a disgusting Apple zealot (fuck you for that, by the way. You force a mac on me and I'll slit your throat will a rusty saw-blade)

      Kind of a over-the-top reaction to someone's PERSONAL CHOICE of Computing Platform, Music Media Type, and CODEC, don'tcha think?

      Why don't you log on and fight like a man, rather than hiding behind your AC status, you sniveling COWARD?

      I DO understand that studio production and mastering techniques (most notably the INSANE "volume wars" compression that so many "popular" albums employ) have a LOT to do with the quality of the final product; but I tend to listen to Progressive Rock, which (thankfully!) never fell victim to the soul-and-quality-sapping "everything pushed to 11" techniques; so that's not (entirely) it, at least for the music I tend to like.

      Not that I have to explain myself to the likes of you; but I bought a USED Oppo DVD player for $125 offa eBay, not because I am an audiopile (in fact, I laugh at those people too), but because it happens to support nearly EVERY recording format known to man (not talking about data formats; but rather "disc" formats). In fact, it was the only brand of player under around $1000 I could find that supported BOTH SACD and DVD-A, as well as everything from CD up.

      I purchase DVD-As whenever I can (at least to an extent) for two reasons:

      1. As time goes on, having the music sampled/resampled onto 24/96 (or above) Masters helps "future-proof" that musical material.

      2. These DVD-As tend to have 5.1 remixes of material that was originally only available in stereo, and although I don't have a surround setup right now (because I'm too lazy to deploy some rear speakers), I do have a nice Arcam 7.1 capable A/V receiver (which was recently GIVEN to me by a friend that works for a repair-shop, so again, not an audiopile-purchase), for when I get around to putting together rear speakers and a sub.

      Obviously, because Apple pushed AAC so hard, you'll claim it's the best. I doubt you even have a car. No doubt your ideal form of transportation is sitting on Tim Cook's dick while he carries you around and titillates you with Apple propaganda, but in a modern car with a decent sound system 128 kbps AAC or MP3 often doesn't cut it.

      So, let me get this straight: On the one hand, you are lambasting my decision to purchase (some) music in DVD-A format, and even owning equipment capable of playing back anything mastered at above 44/16 as being "audiophile shit", and claiming "If ... you can detect a difference between 96kHz/24-bit and 44.1kHz/16-bit from the same master, then you're the delusional one", and then turning RIGHT AROUND and claiming "but in a modern car with a decent sound system 128 kbps AAC or MP3 often doesn't cut it.". So which is it? "Golden Ears", or not???

      As I sit here at work typing this, I never claimed AAC is "the best"; only that it is better than MP3 (at a given bitrate). That's what it was designed for by the CONSORTIUM of companies (none of which was Apple, BTW) that developed it.

      And yes, I really DO believe that 128k AAC is sufficient for ANY "mobile" application. NOT for "home" or "broadcast" use; but for bombing around with your earbuds, or playing through your car stereo (and I really don't care HOW "advanced" your car stereo is. NOW who's the "audiopile"?). There are just too many external factors (road noise, vibration shaking the speaker-cones, causing intermodulation distortion), insufficient instantaneous power supply (either by too-small wiring and/or just plain running out of power-supply current capability) causing clipping, that conspire against making your car stereo, and the environment it is in, anywhere CLOSE to equivalent to listening at home.

      And as far a

    47. Re: MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah right  don't use or have used ever any streaming services for music. just movies

    48. Re:MP3 by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      iTunes/Apples AAC format is easily converted into MP3, facepalm.
      And most players will play it anyway!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    49. Re:MP3 by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You force a mac on me and I'll slit your throat will a rusty saw-blade
      Wow!
      You don't like the finest OS on the planet, and are threatening people with a horrible death?

      The problem in the US are not gun laws but that people like you are not spotted by the (non exiting) health care system and put into custody.

      I hope you find a nice rope and hang yourself before you kill someone else.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    50. Re:MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you do belong to the dumb fuck hive mind.

      AAC is not a proprietary Apple format. It is stands for Advanced Audio Coding and was developed in 1997 by the Motion Pictures Experts Group (MPEG), the same group that came up with MP3, as a replacement for MP3. It is also an ISO standard.

    51. Re:MP3 by Meski · · Score: 1

      Spotify have that model as well, sort of. Tick the 'save to your library' and it's on your device. Playable at locations without internet coverage. Spotify's problem is shuffle play. I've got probably thousands of songs/music on it, and it does a woeful job of shuffle playing them.

    52. Re: MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also never claimed it was a proprietary format...

    53. Re:MP3 by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      Dynamic range was up until the late 90s.

      Then someone invented noise shaping, which basically improves dynamic range where the ear is sensitive, and reduces it where the ear isn't as sensitive. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....

      Basically, the tradeoff is that a small amount of high-frequency hiss is added where you can't hear. A CD (or 16-bit Flac) will have dynamic range problems when noise shaping isn't used.

    54. Re:MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thatsthejoke.jpg

    55. Re:MP3 by adolf · · Score: 1

      I maintain that dynamic range was never an issue for CDs.

      Noise-shaping (or Sony's incarnation called "Super Bit-Mapping," or even the HDCD debacle where the "extra" bits are created literally by expansion at playback to counter intentional compression in the mastering phase, though the HDCD is a completely different farce) is old news to me.

      That noise-shaping is definitely measurably useful, and the tradeoff is measurably increased spurious noise at frequencies and amplitudes you can't hear, also means that the dynamic range of a CD was fine to begin with:

      If the least-significant bit doesn't matter enough that it's fine if we reduce it to essentially white noise ("noise shaping,"), then we were fine with 96dB of dynamic range to begin with.

      And yeah, I grossly over-simplified that last paragraph. I recognize that noise shaping allows things to extend to down below -96dB, and still be audible, as noise shaping is literally doing PWM of the LSB. It's inherently low-passed in the frequency domain, and the low-pass gets lower as the amplitude decreases, but substantial improvements can be had in very low-level audible sound given sufficient playback gain*.

      *: But it doesn't matter, because there are very few mixtures of ears, systems, and environments which can actually discern that level of quiet without the listener's ears being rather immediately damaged by the 0dBFS which is also available from the same 16-bit PCM CD.

      **: Which gets into mastering techniques. It's fine for a digital recording to be on the quiet side, but there's no excuse for any digital recording to not use the MSB for at least singular sample. We have more to gain from proper normalization (note: not loudness-war compression), than we do of noise-shaping, when it comes to lively and dynamic recordings.

      ***: And we don't need both.

      ****: Sign me the fuck up for 24-bit in the recording process, because quantization errors can be cumulative and they're always ugly.

      *****: And then mixing it down to 16-bit PCM is still fine, because people can't survive intact well enough to hear the dynamic range with musical material -- even if the environment/equipment can measurably support it (most can't, but some can).

      ******: Dude, these are 30-year-old arguments. Are we done yet?

    56. Re:MP3 by adolf · · Score: 1

      ***********: We're talking ants on a twig, vs a rock band with a moderate PA.

      ************: nobody cares about the ants, and we wouldn't hear them anyway without amplification (as in, literal gain).

    57. Re:MP3 by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      So then why do people claim they could hear quantization error? Was it bad mastering?

    58. Re:MP3 by adolf · · Score: 1

      Because during the mixing process, gains are adjusted. Dynamic range is fucked with. Things change, a lot, and an unintentional side effect is that it can be easy to end up with 8 or 10 bits worth of dynamic range from what was originally 16-bit source material, making it much easier to hear quantization errors.

      Of course, much of this can be alleviated by doing the maths in 24- or 32-bit space instead of 16-bit space, but if you're already doing all of the the math you might as well use real data instead of filler data.

  2. Me, Myself, and I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a guitar and learn to play it.

    1. Re:Me, Myself, and I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't think that would work well for me, since I use these services while driving. I'm just not that coordinated.

    2. Re:Me, Myself, and I by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      You could try the theramin. Kind of like with piano where you play the right hand first, then add the left, you want to start with automatic transmission before going to manual.

  3. Spotify ftw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spotify seems to work best for me. Have tried Apple Music - didn't like it at all.

    1. Re:Spotify ftw by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Spotify seems to work best for me. Have tried Apple Music - didn't like it at all.

      How were you using Apple Music? Were you listening to the "curated" "Stations", or doing what I do, and simply Searching and Streaming whatever I want, whenever I want, wherever I want, from the ENTIRE iTunes Catalog?

      Because that's the way I use Apple Music. And if I find myself going back again and again to the same album/song, I will either buy it from iTunes, or buy the physical media from wherever.

      For me, Apple Music serves two functions:

      Music to listen to while at work, without the hassle of loading it onto my phone.

      As an "Auditioning" service; where I can "live" with music before committing to adding it permanently to my collection.

      Yes, there are a few SONGS that aren't available for Streaming; but those are in the "Current Radio Hits" category, and I personally don't mess with teenager-music anymore. Plus, those tend to appear on Apple Music's "Stations", if I wanted to listen to new-fashioned "radio" broadcasts.

  4. Family Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went with Google Play Music for the family plan. Maybe when Spotify brings family plans to Canada I might switch if there is enough price difference. I've used both and have not found a decisive factor for me to choose between the two other than potential price difference. They both have all the music I have wanted, offer offline listening and have good reliable service. Google offers a family plan in Canada, that's the only edge for me.

    1. Re: Family Plans by lucm · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pandora > Google play music (songza) > Spotify > A tape mix done by my gf in 5th grade > Apple Music.

      But no Pandora in Canada I think.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re: Family Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you're right.

    3. Re: Family Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple Music>>A tape mix done by my gf in 5th grad>Pandora > Google play music (songza) > Spotify

      Fixed that for you.

    4. Re:Family Plans by steveg · · Score: 1

      I guess you could say I use Google Play -- but it's all my own music. When they first announced Google Music, I uploaded all my music to their cloud, and it's now available to play where ever I have an internet connection. They used to periodically pitch me on signing up for their paid service, but I think they've given up (or maybe I just don't notice anymore.)

      If I do get new music, I buy the CD and rip it to flac. Google Play uploads it and converts it to whatever format they're using. I keep a secondary mp3 repository (converted from the flac) for my car. Those high-capacity, low profile USB drives are great.

      I'm mostly done converting all my LPs to digital format. The ones that were in bad shape I bought replacement CDs, but mostly I listen to the digitized copy.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  5. I play my own music by dbialac · · Score: 1

    My preferred instrument is the mouse organ. Here's a performance by an early pioneering mouse organist:

    https://entertainment.slashdot...

    1. Re:I play my own music by JDHannan · · Score: 1

      I, uh, don't think that was right

  6. Google by H3lldr0p · · Score: 2

    I got in on Google's at the very beginning of it's service, so I have the legacy price. I've yet to be able to stump it in terms of not being able to access my choice of music but that doesn't mean it has everything.

    As for purchasing...those have always been few and far between for me. I've done more KS albums for smaller bands in the past few years (shout out to the DoubleClicks!) than I've purchased from any storefront.

    1. Re:Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Similar... I got in on Google's "$5 gift" for a month of service. I gifted myself the maximum time allowed (until 2/28/2021). I actually use YouTube Red more than Play Music but it's nice to be able to hear something and have Google play it later.

    2. Re:Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've done more KS albums for smaller bands in the past few years

      Yay Kansas!! Leftoverture was a great album.

      Wait, KS means something else?

    3. Re:Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, you're old!

  7. Pandora and Amazon for me by mamono · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pandora (paid) for radio-type streaming and Amazon Prime Music for purchased music and playlist type stuff. I would get rid of Pandora but it's the only streaming service out there that still plays Tool.

    1. Re:Pandora and Amazon for me by mamono · · Score: 1

      I used to stream Pandora everywhere but it doesn't like to work all the time when I'm on 4G. Now I either listen to Amazon in the car or SiriusXM.

    2. Re:Pandora and Amazon for me by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Back when I finally started rethinking my resistance to the idea of paying for streaming music, I kept reading about how Pandora had "only" a million songs, while Spotify and Apple Music had somewhere around 30 million. But when I was listening to Apple Music in the genres I often like to play in the background (jazz, swing, blues), I was hearing a lot of repeats - so I did some testing.

      This is obviously subjective, but - I felt like I heard fewer repeats on Pandora than on either Spotify or Apple Music. And Apple Music was by far the worst when it came to playing the same songs, over and over. And Pandora certainly trains well. So... I'm now a Pandora customer, and paying 1/2 of what Apple or Spotify charge.

      I'm sure there are cases where those huge Spotify/Apple catalogs actually matter... but it doesn't seem to be the case with the music I stream.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Pandora and Amazon for me by cloud.pt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The reason those big catalogs don't matter is exactly why you get so much repeats: most labels only allow Spotify/Apple use their artists if they agree to constantly bomb you with their hidden "sponsored" content - artists and songs they'd prefer you to hear. Why do you think Spotify is a "curated playlist"-service, and they bury Discover in the browse section and only update it weekly. Pandora basically only has Discover, and it never is a static, weekly list. It not only trains to offer you music you WANT to listen due to your "likes", instead of forcing you to just listen to the most popular thing of any genre/artist you happened to give a like last YEAR, but it will also train by song structure in order to keep providing you stuff outside your common genres/artists. That is one of the main reasons why Pandora is reported to pay less per song/artist than other services: they just don't repeat that much. of course they also don't force you to subscribe for anything other than clearing up the commercials, unlike Spotify does, for instance. This is also one of the reasons I feel sad every time I remember my current workplace doesn't allow me to use VPNs and listen to Pandora - I live in Europe, and we don't have "legal" Pandora here.

    4. Re:Pandora and Amazon for me by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I think hearing repeats has more to do with algorithms than it does to do with amount of content available. I was on Spotify on 2 different trial periods spaced over a year apart, and both times I ended up cancelling because it just played too many repeats, even though I know it had more content available. Choosing 90s or some other huge category seemed to only have some list of 100 songs, even though it was supposed to be a dynamic list. It would also pick things that specifically weren't from that decade.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Pandora and Amazon for me by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is obviously subjective, but - I felt like I heard fewer repeats on Pandora than on either Spotify or Apple Music.

      I can speak to the Spotify part of this. Their algorithm for shuffle and radio are just awful. If you've got a 10,000 song playlist and put it on shuffle, you're going to hear the same 50 songs over and over. There has been a complaint thread in the Spotify support forums about this since at least 2012.

      If you like jazz, swing and blues, the nice thing about Spotify is that you can find records that are out-of-print and impossible to buy anywhere. But you have to be prepared to do a lot of fiddling with your playlists to hear the songs you want.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Pandora and Amazon for me by mamono · · Score: 2

      I agree, after being a Pandora listener for about eight years now my stations are very well trained and I get the variety of music I like to listen to. I always used to listen to the plain old radio because if I only listened to my own music collection it was harder to get introduced to new stuff. With Pandora I get the best of both worlds. I can cull out music I don't like, seed in what I do, and still get cool stuff I've never heard of before. I listen to everything from hard rock and gangsta rap to showtunes and Celtic. The single genre stations that come with satellite radio just don't cut it and I find myself constantly switching between stations to find something. As much as I don't really want to pay for it, I really do like Pandora.

    7. Re:Pandora and Amazon for me by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Pandora with their "music DNA" seems to have the music streaming service option far better figured out than any of their competitors. Apple is particularly bad at suggesting things to you based on what it already knows about you and your collection/preferences.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:Pandora and Amazon for me by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Pandora (paid) for radio-type streaming and Amazon Prime Music for purchased music and playlist type stuff. I would get rid of Pandora but it's the only streaming service out there that still plays Tool.

      Hmmm. You may be right. I looked on iTunes, and there is NO Tool ANYWHERE.

      Must be the Artist's decision. Probably influenced by Tool's close association with Robert Fripp of King Crimson. He HATES digital distribution (no KC on iTunes, either).

    9. Re:Pandora and Amazon for me by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I use Apple Music differently than most people, I think.

      I completely ignore the "Stations", and just use it as a gigantic Music Server, where I can simply Search and Stream WHATEVER is in their ENTIRE Catalog.

      To me, that's what makes Apple Music a standout among Streaming Services. I can tell IT what to play; IT doesn't tell ME what to listen-to.

    10. Re:Pandora and Amazon for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use prime music also along with youtube(I know horrible quality), It meets my needs i Have purchased many mp3's form amazon, it hosts well, its app works well enough. I used to use ZUNE (which was great but that shows that I am just now with the times (still have my brown zune btw, works well enough with amazon music)

    11. Re:Pandora and Amazon for me by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Choosing 90s or some other huge category seemed to only have some list of 100 songs, even though it was supposed to be a dynamic list. It would also pick things that specifically weren't from that decade.

      Well, "90s" is a broad term - it'd still be legitimate for them to play you some Nirvana, some Pearl Jam, and some John Philip Sousa.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  8. Subsonic.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I stream my own music via excellent Subsonic.org app running on a raspberrypi at home.

    1. Re:Subsonic.org by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      This is what I do as well. Nice software, but I wish it supported song ratings rather than just stars.

      Now, Subsonic is no good at all for discovering new music. For that I generally use YouTube, Spotify, and Pandora. Each has it's strengths. I don't pay for anything, so one of the weaknesses of Spotify is it is not free on mobile. Pandora is excellent but the playlists tend to get repetitive without frequent attention. YouTube has the poorest automatic playlist selection algorithm, uneven audio quality, and it eats bandwidth - but you can find almost anything and it is easy to queue stuff up for later.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Subsonic.org by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

      Just here for a "me three." Love Subsonic! Sadly, don't know that anyone else could even set it up other than nerds.

    3. Re:Subsonic.org by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, anything that starts with: step 1 - pick your java servlet engine...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re: Subsonic.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never heard of it until now, but subsonic looks like something worth testing out. Thanks!

  9. Subsonic & iSub by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subsonic server running on an old desktop serves up more than enough tunes to me and a few of my friends. We use iSub for iphone/ipad or the equivalent app for android phones. My music collection (ripped cds and downloaded discographies) plus the collections of those same few friends thrown in.... and we have over 100K songs (in nice full albums).

    It's great... we add new music at will, stream at as high of bitrate as we want, and zero monthly fees!

    1. Re: Subsonic & iSub by belgianpainter · · Score: 1

      No fees? According to the website it's $1 per month.

  10. I don't seek out music anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, turn of the century it got a lot easier to find music I like. Previously I had to go down to the music store, hunt down a CD in the genre I wanted, and gamble that I liked any of the songs on it.

    But that was before Napster, before the lawsuits, before the DMCA ruined everything. I have a collection of ripped CDs from the late 90s and that's it for the foreseeable future.

  11. I listen to a free service... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Radio.

    1. Re:I listen to a free service... by jhecht · · Score: 1

      Radio's simple and easy, and we've got a few good broadcast FM stations. It still works.

    2. Re:I listen to a free service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not free, it just doesn't cost money. You have ads and if you're travelling, you're at the mercy of regional taste. You also can't skip the songs you don't like and you have to wait for them to play your favourite song. So there is a cost.

    3. Re:I listen to a free service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dude, radio's only free because they don't stop beaming it at your head when you turn off the receiver.

      And tinfoil hats ain't cheap.

    4. Re:I listen to a free service... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You also can't skip the songs you don't like and you have to wait for them to play your favourite song.

      Your radio only gets one station? I feel sorry for you.

    5. Re:I listen to a free service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its also simple and just plays music (between ads) with out having to mess around with it.

      Personally I hate having to choose stuff to listen to. FM radio = press a button, music comes out the speakers. Ads? So what, turn the volume down for a few minutes. Really dont like that song or the jabbering jockey? turn it off or choose one of 5 other stations I have preset on the 6 easily to access station preset buttons.

    6. Re:I listen to a free service... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It's not free, it just doesn't cost money. You have ads

      You might, but I don't.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    7. Re:I listen to a free service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I listen to a lot of radio too. Often the online streams from radio stations outside of my country. Being nearly 40 I still enjoy radio. Maybe it's an age thing? But I just never could get into streaming music services.

    8. Re:I listen to a free service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did I fucking say I only get one station? Your snark is beyond fucking stupid. What fucking radio stations let you skip a song? That's right none do, you changed the fucking station, you didn't skip the song. And what is your genius solution to having to wait for your favourite song. What other idiocy are you going to post and try to pass off as something intelligent?

    9. Re:I listen to a free service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rural Midwesterner here, I can get two radio stations (and zero television stations since the HDTV thing happened, I use to be able to get PBS). Country and Polka, I'm not very much into either.

    10. Re:I listen to a free service... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      What other idiocy are you going to post and try to pass off as something intelligent?

      I'm 46YO, 5'-10" and 350 pounds. Here's my pic. Enjoy!

      http://www.cdreimer.com/images/cdreimer_350.jpg

    11. Re:I listen to a free service... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Country and Polka, I'm not very much into either.

      My father's truck only has two radio stations when I was growing up in Silicon Valley: country and talk.

      Everything else was off limits. I don't listen to country anymore but I still listen to talk.

    12. Re:I listen to a free service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radio is all I'll ever use, streaming sucks balls and so does the internet. Mostly I just hate the internet.

    13. Re:I listen to a free service... by yusing · · Score: 1

      When I'm actively listening, I play from my library. But when I'm doing something else, there are *thousands* of radio stations streaming on the internet - in all genres. Many of them are advertising-free; lots have live DJs at some hours.

      --

      "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

    14. Re: I listen to a free service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi! Have a nice day!

    15. Re:I listen to a free service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look out! We have an internet tough guy here! Fuck I'm scared now. That's your response? "Look at all my fat jammed into a tiny teeshirt! I'm going to make internet threats!" Fucking retard.

    16. Re:I listen to a free service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm 46YO, 5'-10" and 350 pounds. Here's my pic. Enjoy!"

      You're only just average height, middle aged and you are over weight! What was the point of your post?

    17. Re:I listen to a free service... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Troll bait. Thanks for clicking.

    18. Re:I listen to a free service... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      "Look at all my fat jammed into a tiny teeshirt! I'm going to make internet threats!"

      That's a 2XL t-shirt I'm wearing quite comfortably. I could also wear an XL but that would emphasized my man-boobs and get too many ACs excited.

      Fucking retard.

      Thanks for clicking on the troll bait.

    19. Re:I listen to a free service... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      If that is really a picture of you, the only thing "ugly" (for my lack of finding a good english word) is your double chin.

      There are plenty of places on a the world where you/the guy on the picture, would be swarmed by girls because they find him "lucky" or "beautiful" ... e.g. Asia, Thailand, Vietnam, that area, but also China, obviously.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  12. FM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No static at all.

    1. Re:FM by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      I use a low power FM transmitter at my house to broadcast streaming internet radio. I can turn on any radio at the end of the band to hear the music. Works great. Bought the transmitter on Amazon.

  13. I'm old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Music streaming = FM radio. I like the concept of files. They are in my device. That's it. Not complicated at all.

    1. Re:I'm old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto, except I tend to listen to internet radio rather than FM these days, there are not many decent FM or DAB stations in my area. But the radio station concept - find a station you like, listen to it - works just fine for me when I don't feel like listening to my own collection.

  14. Still CDs. by SumDog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I buy a lot of CDs are bars when I see bands. I rip them to FLACs and sync them to my phone/work.

    I also use Bandcamp because they only take 10~15%.

    If a band I like has no other options and they're not playing in my city any time soon, I might use Amazon MP3 or CDBaby, but I don't like it.

    I haven't bought off Apple/google ever. They use to take ~30%, but I think some of that may have change. It's till too much. They have the volume that they could easily take 5%, still turn a massive profit and give more to the artists.

    I don't use Spotify and never want to. I prefer to own my music, not rent it.

    Main stream artists I torrent if I want them. If you already have a million in sales, there are artists out there who tour out of vans with better music than your shit. Just because you got lucky with a label since your music is generic enough to reach a wide audience without offending anyone doesn't entitle you to as big a peace of the pie as you have. Things haven't really changed since Metallica and Napster. Also, all my Metalica CDs are pirated.

    1. Re:Still CDs. by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      Same here, still buying CDs. Though I will buy one-off mp3 songs from Amazon.

      I see Internet streaming as no different than having a radio, except more expensive. You don't own the music in the end and you lose any library music when you change providers, so you'll never build up a music collection. I'd rather have music that I can listen to whenever I want and not have it tied to a subscription service.

    2. Re:Still CDs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Main stream artists I torrent if I want them. If you already have a million in sales, there are artists out there who tour out of vans with better music than your shit. Just because you got lucky with a label since your music is generic enough to reach a wide audience without offending anyone doesn't entitle you to as big a peace of the pie as you have. Things haven't really changed since Metallica and Napster. Also, all my Metalica CDs are pirated.

      Wow. Entitled much?

    3. Re:Still CDs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you tell if someone rips their music to FLAC?

      They'll fuckin tell you!

    4. Re:Still CDs. by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      Me too! :-) I buy CDs from bands and the store and also have a small stack of LPs but haven't (re)purchased a turntable. Heck I don't own a CD player anymore - used to have a very high quality model but it died. And I have 4 HA CDs that I've played through the blu-ray player to "just to do it" - but it is a PITA and can only listen on the main stereo so isn't used often. If only I could RIP and place on my NAS for Sonos to pull from in all their HA glory.

      But streaming still plays an important role. I use Pandora mostly to expand my collection, I can't afford to buy all known CDs. But it is like Netflix to me - rent what I don't want to own - entertain me now! Usually around Christmas to listen to a wider selection of holiday music or dinner time to listen to Frank Sinatra like music. Or styles of music to inflict taste on my kids as they get older - again to augment my music collection. And I've used the Pandora feature "buy on Amazon" more than once.

      Pandora also for finding "new to me" bands when local tour stops are announced. I type in the band name and listen to the first track and whatever music "they" mix in to build a station. Then decide if I like the music before purchasing tickets. I see lots of bands I've never heard of this way - and then buy a Signed CD at the show.

      At home my Sonos system plays from the high-quality CD rip - but most of my music listening is compressed on the phone. I ask myself why buy CD when 99% of listening is compressed? Then realize if I switched from say "Apple" to "Google" my music collection is transportable. I own it. Plus having a physical CD is nice just for the joy of sifting through them and looking at the pictures (hence why I still have some favorite LPs - I gave away most of them when CDs became the rage). I plan to let my kids touch them someday - the way I used to sift through my father's giant LP collection. Just pop them in and listen and explore.

    5. Re:Still CDs. by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      The benefit for me for the streaming is that the algorithms find me music I'd like so I don't have to make any effort into finding new bands. I came across Clutch this way, who had not gotten much of any radio airplay in my area (at least prior to when I stopped listening to radio much, anyhow). I then bought a bunch of their CDs as I found myself wanting to listen to them more. Other more ephemeral songs that lose their interest to me I would've regretted buying so I don't mind if they vanish in the ether.

    6. Re:Still CDs. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Main stream artists I torrent if I want them. If you already have a
      million in sales, there are artists out there who tour out of vans with
      better music than your shit. Just because you got lucky with a label since your music is generic enough to reach a wide audience without offending anyone doesn't entitle you to as big a peace of the pie as you have. Things haven't really changed since Metallica and Napster. Also, all my Metalica CDs are pirated.

      Wow. Entitled much?

      only if he doesn't patronize those guys in vans with the better music.

      Although most stuff should be in the public domain anyways. That certainly applies to any of Metallica's relevant works.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:Still CDs. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I always like compilation albums as they would offer much the same experience. They were always popular in the industrial music scene so I got to find a number of other artists if there were a couple on the album I liked already. Also a good number of industrial bands would put a couple of tracks on their album that were remixed by other artists so there was exposure there as well.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    8. Re:Still CDs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I buy a lot of CDs are bars when I see bands. I rip them to FLACs and sync them to my phone/work.

      I also use Bandcamp because they only take 10~15%.

      If a band I like has no other options and they're not playing in my city any time soon, I might use Amazon MP3 or CDBaby, but I don't like it.

      I haven't bought off Apple/google ever. They use to take ~30%, but I think some of that may have change. It's till too much. They have the volume that they could easily take 5%, still turn a massive profit and give more to the artists.

      I don't use Spotify and never want to. I prefer to own my music, not rent it.

      Main stream artists I torrent if I want them. If you already have a million in sales, there are artists out there who tour out of vans with better music than your shit. Just because you got lucky with a label since your music is generic enough to reach a wide audience without offending anyone doesn't entitle you to as big a peace of the pie as you have. Things haven't really changed since Metallica and Napster. Also, all my Metalica CDs are pirated.

      I'm assuming you're referencing indy artists because regardless of how much the streaming/MP3 service takes the record label will take that much more :(

  15. Where is the cowboy neal option? by planckscale · · Score: 1

    I wanted to vote for a change

    --
    Namaste
  16. So what are we all moving to after Spotify goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    out of business? They are in serious trouble. They recently added full screen ads you can't close to their iOS app that makes it unusable. They're trying to shed load by breaking their app. That shows they don't even have enough money to support the users they have, and users cost them money instead of making them money so they hate us and want us to stop using them. LinkedIn did the same thing a few months ago in order to get rid of users.

  17. Free streams ripped to mp3s by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    I usually use a ripper to grab tracks from various free streams and store them as mp3s.

  18. Ol' fuddy-duddy here by Qzukk · · Score: 2

    I buy my music on CD, rip it to FLAC, add it to my library (QuodLibet FTW), then transcode the best tracks to mp3 for on-the-go playing in my car or at the gym.

    I listen to what I want, when I want, without worrying about bandwidth or ads or monthly fees or internet access.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    1. Re:Ol' fuddy-duddy here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I buy my music on CD, rip it to FLAC, add it to my library (QuodLibet FTW), then transcode the best tracks to mp3 for on-the-go playing in my car or at the gym.

      I listen to what I want, when I want, without worrying about bandwidth or ads or monthly fees or internet access.

      Same here, except there's a (Linux based) media server holding the library.

    2. Re:Ol' fuddy-duddy here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I listen to what I want, when I want, without worrying about bandwidth or ads or monthly fees or internet access.

      Yep, you only need to worry about going out and buying the CD or waiting for it to arrive. Oh, and also making sure the CD is still being made or tracking down a second hand copy. But yeah, what you want, when you want outside of those very real limitations digital delivery doesn't have.

  19. My own server by DogDude · · Score: 1

    My plain ol' server sitting in my closet. Buy a CD. Rip it. Sync to devices.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  20. $3/mo ain't bad by bhcompy · · Score: 1

    Slacker has a solid catalogue and has local caching for multiple channels, both curated and self-created playlists/custom channels, for offline listening.

    Outside of Slacker, Amazon Music allows me to listen to my own catalogue from basically anywhere on basically any device, which is very useful and less of a hassle than having to transfer files manually, and since you can stream it you don't need to take up storage space in these newfangled devices without expandable storage. Their selection of streamable music isn't nearly as robust as other services, but I don't pay anything extra for it, so I'm okay with that.

  21. My own: by nult · · Score: 1

    Home Plexmedia server, serves my needs.

    1. Re:My own: by WallyL · · Score: 1

      Yep, plex. Radio to discover, and plex for repeat.

    2. Re:My own: by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      Plex is fantastic but it does not transcode audio (like it does for video). This means when I am on a dodgy 3G signal my phone cannot play my FLAC audio from my server at home.

  22. Still buy CDs for audio quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still buy CDs for better quality. After working my way up to some 1990's Klipsch Heritage series speakers and a backing power amp for transients, it's clear as a bell even at preferred low volumes, and the streaming compressed services just don't even compare. ouch.

      I also like to own and not rent my collection.

    1. Re:Still buy CDs for audio quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still buy CDs for better quality.

      No, you don't. You've convinced yourself that you're an "audiophile" as a way of justifying to yourself exorbitant expenditures on fancy audio gear. This expenditure is worthwhile for you, not because you can actually hear the difference, but because you feel that being an "audiophile" makes you a special snowflake, and you can look down on the rest of the plebs who don't have your extraordinarily good taste and sensitive ear apparatus.

      After working my way up to some 1990's Klipsch Heritage series speakers and a backing power amp for transients, it's clear as a bell even at preferred low volumes, and the streaming compressed services just don't even compare. ouch.

      So yeah, like I said...

    2. Re:Still buy CDs for audio quality by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You don't need audiophile equipment to detect inferior audio streams.

      A more useful quality of physical media is the fact that it is subject to the first sale doctrine. Whatever gets printed is available forever. Even if Disney decides to put something back in the vault, it's still out there. You just have to find it and be willing to pay for it.

      "streaming media" can disappear on a whim. Some material may never exist in that form due to artist stupidity or the work being ignored by whomever keeps your particular gate.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  23. Slacker and Youtube by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    I use Slacker and Youtube. The former since I could cache stations for offline listening, although I believe others do that now, too. So perhaps just inertia. It was the first free streaming site I was introduced to and has the cheapest subscription. When I'm home and want a specific song I usually just use Youtube since I'd need the more expensive Slacker plan to pick any song at will. I still give and receive CDs and DVDs as gifts. They become MP3s/MP4s easily enough and feel more tangible than e-media gifts. I have given and received e-books since it is harder to digitize books oneself.

  24. I'm more into streaming talk.... by the_other_one · · Score: 3, Insightful

    CBC Radio One

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
    1. Re:I'm more into streaming talk.... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      CBC Radio One

      Agree. I have the SiriusXM app, so CBC Radio One + NPR.

      For music, my wife likes CBC Radio Two and CBC Radio Three.

    2. Re:I'm more into streaming talk.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dig it, bruh. I'll also say that Q got way more enjoyable once they removed that serial rapist pretty boy from behind the mic, too.

    3. Re:I'm more into streaming talk.... by shakah · · Score: 1
      And you can always fall back to CBC Radio 3 for some music!

      http://music.cbc.ca/#!/radio3

    4. Re:I'm more into streaming talk.... by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      I'd rather just get the podcast versions of the shows. Unfortunately, there's too much to listen to. I've got, like, 10 episodes of Ideas in the queue.

  25. My challenge by geek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My challenge is finding new music. I'm not young anymore, approaching 40. My time is spent primarily with my wife and son and some co-workers. Music never comes up with us so discovering new music these days is harder for me. Spotify has opened me up to new stuff I wouldn't otherwise have known about. That's why I maintain a Spotify account.

    I have a lot of music that I've collected over the years but frankly, I'm bored of it. It's also cheaper to just stream off Spotify than buy multiple CD's a month.

    1. Re:My challenge by Nunya666 · · Score: 4, Informative

      My challenge is finding new music. I'm not young anymore, approaching 40. My time is spent primarily with my wife and son and some co-workers. Music never comes up with us so discovering new music these days is harder for me. Spotify has opened me up to new stuff I wouldn't otherwise have known about. That's why I maintain a Spotify account.

      I have a lot of music that I've collected over the years but frankly, I'm bored of it. It's also cheaper to just stream off Spotify than buy multiple CD's a month.

      I have a similar issue, and I'm 50. I like Pandora for similar reasons. I like the multiple "stations" feature that Pandora has. It makes it easy to find both older music that I had forgotten about, and newer music that I've never heard of. For example, listening to the Bon Jovi station also played Aerosmith. And listening to Elle King (I really like her hit single "Ex's & Oh's") also played Gin Wigmore.

    2. Re:My challenge by hambone142 · · Score: 2

      I'm in the same demographic. I listen to "adult rock" kozt.com They have a person there who actually scouts out new music and does a reasonable job at it. When I hear something I like, I write it down and buy it online. It's not a "classic oldies" station FWIW. It works for me.

    3. Re:My challenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd really recommend trying out the radio station in Seattle, KEXP. It's streamable in several formats and doesn't have any ads. Their programs are great.

    4. Re:My challenge by Hazelnut · · Score: 1

      I find that Spotifys discover weekly is a great way to discover new music. Usually get a few songs I like from the list each week - sometimes a dozen. I then listen to each artists back catalog to see if I like anything else. Often I don't but sometimes I do, and 9 times out of 10 I've never heard of them.

      I now have a 600+ song playlist after 6 months or so, containing none of my usual suspects - which I am generally bored of.

      Now if only they would improve their Linux & Android apps!! But the breadth of music is really good.

    5. Re:My challenge by houghi · · Score: 1

      Try http://bandcamp.com/ that will have music you never heard for cheap and sometimes free,

      Streaming is free.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:My challenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.triplejunearthed.com/

      TripleJ Unearthed

  26. I'm pretty old school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I download the occasional hit song from Amazon mostly, but for albums I usually buy CDs whilst still being able to download them from Amazon.
    I don't listen to much new music, so I don't mind paying for something I like, plus I feel a little less guilty about "not paying for it."

    I used to have no moral compunction against Napster, etc, and loathe the RIAA, but once you remove the profit motive completely from the equation, society starts to go down the wrong path, and the logical conclusion -- in my mind -- is something akin to anarchy.

    I also like having a physical item that "I own" and no one can take away from me.

  27. Local by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer streaming my own pre-selected MP3s from the local storage to whatever physical or bluetooth playback device is connected.

  28. Slacker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Slacker, great catalog, curated genre stations, along with customized stations, pick individual songs or albums. After personally reviewing all of the services, I personally feel that Slacker is one of the best services out there.

  29. My preferences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't buy as much music as I did 20 years ago (in college), but I still prefer to purchase downloads from the artists I like, buying physical copies only when the packaging is impressive (e.g. Bowie's latest).

    Streaming is the future, but I don't think downloads and hard copies will ever go away. When streaming, Pandora is my go to service because it allows me to build a playlist around pieces that I already know and like.

  30. Rdio :( by mrvis · · Score: 1

    Rdio was my jam. I suffer with Spotify these days.

    Music has become too social for me to go back to buying. Same reason Google Music is useless to me. I look at what my friends are listening to, frequently.

  31. Rhapsody by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    I've been a Rhapsody customer for quite a while now. I chose it because it has both a smartphone client and a desktop client. I thought both did a decent job of helping me find new stuff to listen to.

    I recently started with Youtube Red. It's early for me to properly review but I do like the music-video angle of it. More importantly, no more ads on Youtube.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  32. 'Streaming' is just another form of 'rental' by kheldan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even if you're not paying for it, you're paying for it, in the form of being subjected to commercials.

    I personally don't believe in 'streaming' services over the internet. I've tried them, and I don't like them one bit. If I want to listen to music for free and not have a choice in what I'm hearing, I'll turn on an FM radio, and mute it/turn down the volume/change the station when there's a commercial block. Otherwise I want to own copies of the music I want to listen to. Likewise I don't like or believe in 'The Cloud', since anything you're paying for that exists in 'The Cloud' isn't ever really yours, it's only available to you until someone else decides you're not entitled to it anymore. Nope, no thanks, I'll keep my own copies of media, or at least files, on a local piece of hardware that I own, that nobody else has the rights to examine, alter, or delete.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:'Streaming' is just another form of 'rental' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidently you're terrible at looking. There are hundreds, probably thousands of internet radio streams that are either totally free or listener supported and don't have advertisements (besides the occasional "please donate", if that).

      My own personal list of internet radio consists of OEM radio, several stations from Soma FM, the 1920s Radio Network, and ABN Antioch OTR. None of these play advertisements (okay, the 1920s Radio Network and the OTR station both play "vintage" advertisements, but that's part of the experience). Several of them say "please give us money" sometimes. One of them never does.

    2. Re:'Streaming' is just another form of 'rental' by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Evidently you're good at jumping to conclusions. Shoutcast used to be a Thing, but the broadcast industry and the recording industry both more or less ruined it with all their licensing and royalties crap. It drove the best ones out of business, and what's left is more or less the same as broadcast radio. So I don't usually bother with it anymore. Besides which I'm not always somewhere i have an Internet connection and computer anyway, and I don't have or want a smartphone (and if I did I wouldn't want to use up my very limited, overpriced dataplan on that) so it's a non-starter for me anymore anyway. If I'm at a computer and want music I'll listen to my own music.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    3. Re:'Streaming' is just another form of 'rental' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What cloud services don't allow you a local copy? I use iTunes Match and have local copies of my stuff.

      Either way, for some people "renting" makes sense. Some people like music but not to the point where they're going to reference a lot of an older collection. For them the listening experience is more transient in nature. Not that I agree, I own about 1500 albums in various formats, but I can understand where they come from. Some of the first music I've ever purchased is still on heavy rotation today and a few albums I can honestly say I only ever listened to a handful of times. I've been a music buyer for over 25 years and there's always something new out there and since the music I listen to is mostly niche genres I can appreciate non-permanent formats like podcasts and streaming to find new music as well.

      To each their own, I guess.

    4. Re:'Streaming' is just another form of 'rental' by swillden · · Score: 2

      Otherwise I want to own copies of the music I want to listen to.

      That's what I always thought, until I tried a "rental" service (I have a Google Music subscription), but the freedom of being able to listen to whatever I want without having to think about price is so great I can't imagine going back. I probably spend about the same on music as I did before, but now I listen to a lot more -- and a much wider variety -- of music than would have been possible by buying music.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:'Streaming' is just another form of 'rental' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoutcast is dead. It has become "Radionomy" with commercials that start after about 20-30 minutes of streaming, repeating the same garbage every 10 minutes or so. I've given up on streams that went there.

      VLC Player has access to IceCast (includes some former Shoutcast and a lot of other stuff) and Jamendo in the default UI. Worth a little "dial" hopping once in a while.

      "Streaming" is a form of music (and video) delivery. While it has become more or less synonymous with Spotify and other for-pay services, it doesn't have to be. Since it mostly resembles radio, IMO it should be free, with or without commercials (I can tolerate a low level of commercials if the programs are worth it); paying for streaming is like getting your FM radio from cable TV.

    6. Re:'Streaming' is just another form of 'rental' by kheldan · · Score: 1

      The issue the recording industry had with Internet Radio was over royalty payments. A traditional, over-the-air broadcast radio station has a listening area defined by the geography of the region it's in, and it's broadcast power, and therefore there is a defined number of people living within that market. ASCAP fees are based on that defined number of people living within that market. However with Internet Radio your 'market' is anywhere on the planet where there is Internet connectivity and people with computers to connect to it. Therefore their royalty structure didn't work, or so they claimed, and the new royalty structure imposed upon Internet Radio stations, even if they were operated out of the spare room in someone's house and operated at a loss every month because they had exactly zero revenues, bankrupted the vast majority of them and drove them off the Internet. I remember there being a drive by some of the more popular stations to accept donations, and the ones that still exist play lots of commercials, but due to the money-grubbing behavior of the recording industry, it's now a dead in the water, as you say. Which is very sad. Naturally that's when the 'official' streaming services started popping up, properly monetized by the recording industry. And they're crap, so far as I'm concerned. Therefore, I'll just stick to what I own copies of, or FM broadcast radio, or what I can get from alternative sources.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  33. Spotify FREE on the desktop. USB on the move. by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

    ...and I might use Spotify app on Android (still with a free account) if I'm feeling sadistic for a random playlist, although my lifestyle and current car stereo choices save me the necessity of buying premium - I don't need to listen much in streaming devices that do not support Spotify's free music selection on the web player. And I use a USB drive on my car. But if I did have to pay for a service to let me select any song from a catalog, you know, for instant, non-random play, I'd probably go with Google Music, because besides that ability, I also get to store and stream all my FLAC stuff in the cloud. At least I know those tracks will never be removed due to licensing issues (Google doesn't care if you upload stuff you don't own or they don't have on the catalog - they pay record labels for that liability). And I hear you can pretty much "share" Google Music accounts. Oh and did I mention you also get to listen to Youtube songs on Android WITH THE SCREEN OFF if you have a Music subscription? Yeap! Google had the nerve to only let you do that for them premium users of their services.

  34. FM by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Works everywhere I go. Every car I'm in has it, no subscription needed. If I don't like it, I just turn it off.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  35. Bittorent and iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No commercials, service fees. Does not use data plan. ALAC lossless files so good sound quality. Works everywhere

  36. I don't stream music. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I'm too old. At 39, I don't like the concept of streaming music. Seems quite stupid to me. Before moving overseas 6 years ago, I ripped my entire collection of around 200 CDs to FLAC. At home I listen to everything on the PC in my living room. Anything I want to listen to on the go I compress with Vorbis (q6) for playback on my Android phone, which currently stands holds 155 albums plus a collection of singles with 16 gigs still free to add more. Where I live, CDs are hard to come by, so any album I want I pirate via BitTorrent, again in FLAC format. I suppose the only time I would use YouTube might be to preview a new song, but I can't recall ever doing that.

  37. Google Play Music by wardrich86 · · Score: 2

    By far the best option in Canada. Most music, best mobile and webapp layouts, AND you get 10% off the Play store.

    1. Re:Google Play Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus they give us Canadians a family plan, Spotty don't

    2. Re:Google Play Music by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      They don't really *give* it to us. It costs like $15/mo or something like that.

  38. Google music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't resist the throbbing pulse of the music up my bum while giving Google all my personal information.

  39. Digitally Imported by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only streaming site I subscribe to is di.fm. I prefer CDs for certain artists. When I buy digital, I prefer sites that offer DRM free FLAC options. When that is not an available option, I will go to DRM free MP3s on Amazon.

    1. Re:Digitally Imported by ewhac · · Score: 1

      DI.fm is still the first thing I think of for streaming music, since it's been around for nearly 20 years.

      However, you must admit the service has become much more hostile lately. Once upon a time, Ari had a Web page with a handful of URLs. Copy-paste them in to your streaming app -- any streaming app, not just DI's proprietary one -- and start enjoying music. Then they started demanding you create an account if you wanted to use their proprietary Android app. Then the streaming URLs started getting rotated for no reason; you had to go back to the Web site to get the latest ones. Then the streaming URLs disappeared off their page entirely, replaced with a ( crap ) in-browser Flash-based player -- you had to practically Wireshark the site to get the streaming URLs out so you could listen with your preferred player.

      Now, they've broken the open streaming URLs entirely, and have imposed a limit of 30 minutes listening time for non-registered listeners. And they still spray ads at you.

      It was much more fun when Ari was running the whole thing himself. Every so often in the early days, the playlist would stop (!?), and cut over to an open mic -- you could hear Ari working on something in the background. One time, I sent him an email telling him the stream had died. A few seconds later, I heard the Outlook Bell, then a few keystrokes, a couple of mouse clicks, and the stream started up again.

  40. Only free streaming. by jmanforever · · Score: 1

    I do not pay for streaming, I will not pay for XM, and I will not pay for digital files.

    If I am looking for a one-off song listen, I go to YouTube, or SoundCloud. If I want to listen to a random playlist that I like, I go to my local Alternative Rock FM radio station. They also stream. They also break in for local weather and local emergencies. If I get tired of my local Alt station, then I can also stream KRBZ out of Kansas City, or KNDD from Seattle.... all for free. (Yes, Advertising supported)

    If I am going to PAY for music, then it will be a LIVE show, or on physical media - preferably vinyl LP records, but I do collect CDs as well.

    If I am not around an area with a good radio station, then I use Folder Player on my phone to play my own collection that I have recorded from my vinyl & CDs.

  41. LPS and CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still got a lot of LPs from the 70 and 80s. All the newer music on CD, and much of the music I own on LP on CD as well - for convenience. Buying a CD is still the most hassle-free way of paying the artist. Listen to a lot of music on Youtube, and if I like it, I get the CD.

    I also listen to the radio a lot. You can discover a lot of new music that way, if you know which stations to listen to, especially for classical music. If I like something, I order the CD.

    Guess this makes me really old-fashioned.

  42. None of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want full albums. I want to listen when I have no internet connectivity, like in a tunnel or when travelling. I want to have files I could pass down to someone, so that relatively obscure music isn't lost. Aside from mining recommendation lists on Pandora, there's nothing about streaming music services that provides any value to me whatsoever.

  43. a bit of old tech, a bit of new by emorphien · · Score: 1

    I still buy CDs of music/bands I really like and want to support, I also still buy DVDs/BluRays for movies or shows under similar circumstances.

    Occasionally I will also buy vinyl, but mostly used, as I do have a decent turntable.

    All that being said, I use my Google Music/YouTube Red subscription to listen to certain things I don't care enough to own, or if I want to discover new music or have some background sound. Otherwise, I do listen to a fair bit of terrestrial radio and some internet radio stations (like WFMU or Radio Paradise usually).

    --


    Presently here, but not there.
    1. Re:a bit of old tech, a bit of new by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty much all vinyl these days. Not because I'm going to claim it sounds better (although I do have some records that sound pretty great), but because it's fun for me to mess around with records.

      I had gotten to a point where I had all but quit listening to music. I don't drive, so no music in the car. I don't walk around with headphones on because I don't like the sensation of being cut off from the sounds of what's around me, and it feels kinda unsafe. And while I might have downloaded stuff and listened to it on my computer, that always felt like some kind of background noise kind of thing. I might download a new album and listen to it two or three times and forget about it ... or in some cases I'd never make it through the whole thing. That way of relating to music just made music seem disposable, like whatever is playing on the TV at a bar.

      When you're playing records, on the other hand, that's pretty much what you're doing. It's an activity that you're engaged in. Every 20 minutes or so, you have to get up and flip the record if you want to keep listening. And then you're engaging with this physical thing -- it's just a piece of plastic, but maybe it's colored or it has a cool label or something -- and then there's the sleeve, and the art's big enough to really pay attention to, and so on. I didn't find I really got all of that from CDs (before I quit buying them). The result is that I just feel more connected with the music I've bought on records. I've listened to the albums more intently, I've paid more attention to them, I think about them in different ways.

      It's a drag that they're so expensive these days, for sure. But for me it's worth it. It helps me enjoy music more.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  44. Spotify for streaming, vinyl for owning by mouse_8b · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use Spotify for streaming. The curated playlists are good, and the native chrome cast support is super helpful. As others pointed out, it is renting your music, but there is a lot more music that I want to listen to than I want to own. When I need to own a physical copy of the music, I go for the vinyl. Most new vinyl releases include a download code for digital files, which gets the best of both worlds.

  45. CDs and Pandora by ftldelay · · Score: 1

    I buy CDs mostly and rip them out to MP3 format for listening in the car or at work (where I spend the most time listening). I use Pandora (free) on my iPhone with a Bluetooth speaker to stream music while showering.

  46. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seems like the new owners of Slashdot have no idea what that "digital" logo is from, or for.

    1. Re:LOL by Koen+Lefever · · Score: 1

      Seems like the new owners of Slashdot have no idea what that "digital" logo is from, or for.

      Probably the previous owner, who also had no clue, explained it to them.

      --
      /. refugees on Usenet: news:comp.misc
    2. Re:LOL by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Right, this has been discussed before. I think the overall conclusion is, "fine, re-assign the tag. But at least change the icon!!"

    3. Re:LOL by Koen+Lefever · · Score: 1

      Right, this has been discussed before. I think the overall conclusion is, "fine, re-assign the tag. But at least change the icon!!"

      I have a suggestion for the new Digital icon.

      --
      /. refugees on Usenet: news:comp.misc
  47. Concerts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nothing else pays the artists more and the RIAA less.

  48. TIDAL by Buchenskjoll · · Score: 1

    When I was looking for a streaming service there was Spotify and Wimp. Spotify required facebook login at the time, so Wimp it was. I later found that Wimp had much more Danish music than Spotify. Then JayZ bought Wimp and called it TIDAL, so now I'm on TIDAL. Here in Denamrk only old ladies buy CD's.

    --
    -- Make America hate again!
    1. Re:TIDAL by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

      And Tidal has a lossless tier.

      Better quality for the win

  49. A streaming service doesn't know my mood... by gosand · · Score: 1

    I have a pretty good MP3 collection and I have bought maybe 5 albums over the past 10 years. I have rediscovered some older music/artists that I have really enjoyed lately. Radio is awful. Burn MP3s to CDs and listen to them in the car during drive time. Since there are many styles of music, I am mainly talking about hard rock stuff - Clutch, Monster Magnet, The Sword, Orange Goblin. I have some friends in bands, and they turn me onto some local/indie bands that can produce really good stuff (Resident Kings).

    Honestly, I've tried last.fm and spotify... I just haven't been able to latch onto services. I want what I am in the mood for... some days it's old Sabbath, some days Queen, other days old Metallica (pre-Black) or The Black Crowes. A service can't tell my listening mood.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  50. Pandora via pianobar by craters · · Score: 1

    Pandora via the pianobar client at https://github.com/thedmd/pian.... Simple, works, doesn't use a lot of resources.

  51. Don't really stream, the way you mean it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I "stream" by reading files over NFS.

    Most music is acquired by CDs in the snailmail, though some are bought as files.

  52. mpd by the_pouar · · Score: 2

    mpd

  53. Twonky by YuppieScum · · Score: 1

    A huge stash of FLACs & MP3s and Twonky works well at home. Add in a VPN when I'm out and have WiFi, and a 32GB microSD card when there's no WiFi. Renting music and paying by the MB for cellular data to hear it is for the deluded and credulous.

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
  54. Apple radio by I4ko · · Score: 1

    Apple radio used to be great, and they effed it up last year in august when they started requiring to be enrolled into Apple music to use it. Since then I stream my own music from iCloud with iTunes match.

  55. WFMU.org and KEXP.org by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 2

    Intelligent, independent free-form radio never died. If anything, it just became easier to distribute.

    --
    --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
    1. Re: WFMU.org and KEXP.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried WKRP.org, but was disappointed I had to read instead of just listen to groovy tunes.

    2. Re:WFMU.org and KEXP.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the wfmu! Tuned in and got turned on to The Mermen.

  56. CDs and Youtube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CD's I own ripped into iTunes or, very occasionally, old CD player and youtube. Turntable has expired. May get another or finish winnowing my vinyl. Don't like the rest of the services except my experiences with friends satellite radio accounts.

  57. Spotify and CDs by azcodemonkey · · Score: 1

    I only use Spotify because the rest of my band uses it to share playlists of songs we might cover. Otherwise, it's my music collection. I still buy CDs.

  58. All My Favorite Bands Are In A Giant Warehouse by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

    I keep in the back. When I want to hear a cool song, I go wake them up and they play it for me. Sometimes one of them dies and I have to find a Chinese copycat. I highly suggest it. You just cant have my bands here.

  59. Amazon by Thelasko · · Score: 3, Informative

    Amazon Prime Music was included in my Prime subscription. Not only can I listen to "Stations", I can pick from thousands of songs and albums to listen to whenever I want.

    The only drawback is the algorithm they use to recommend new music sucks. It's constantly recommending songs I hate. With that regard, Pandora is the king.

    However, there are a lot of other things I don't like about Pandora. One of which is that the app's permissions are ridiculous. It doesn't need to access everything on my phone. I suppose Amazon already knows everything about me, but I don't need another company doing that too.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Amazon by evendiagram · · Score: 1

      The google play music algorithm also sucks if anyone was going to choose it over alternative service. I'd hoped that they would put some resources into making good music discoverable but it seems to make recommendations based on a static graph. Guess I'll just have to wait for Facebook Music /s

    2. Re:Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Android being lame. On my BB it doesn't require squat.

    3. Re:Amazon by Hazelnut · · Score: 1

      I've not used Pandora for 15 years (since it got restricted to US only) but I now find Spotify discover weekly is as good if not better.

  60. I Miss Shoutcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's still around but has way less stations then it used to, it was where I found the only decent industrial music station online and listened to for many years before they died off. Bought a lot of music because of that station. I still prefer good ol' WinAmp for listening to music on my computers as well.

  61. Not a big name streaming service but... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... Radionomy via Xiph (using streamtuner2 + audacious) has satisfied my music streaming needs for a while.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  62. Harmon-Kardon Turntable by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 2

    Harmon-Kardon turntable running through H-K amp and Advent speakers. I do copy the vinyl albums to cassette tape for when I just want music playing in the background. Playing the vinyl is for when I just want to sit in a chair and listen to the music. Some of it is ripped to MP3 for portability, but I am not the kind of person who goes around outdoors with headphones on. I want to hear the birds and the oncoming train.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:Harmon-Kardon Turntable by BabaChazz · · Score: 1

      I've got a Dual and a Technics turntable which I still use. Preamp, amp, and speakers are ancient audiophile brands that nobody has heard of (Adcom? Haybrook?) Driving music is FM, sometimes CD. Walking music is whatever's happening in the real world. I do have some tracks on MP3 that I listen to when doing chores...

    2. Re:Harmon-Kardon Turntable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Advent.. HK... I use Linn and Quad since I am not a pleb.

    3. Re:Harmon-Kardon Turntable by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      Techniques turntable, Marantz 2285B, JBL L40's.

    4. Re:Harmon-Kardon Turntable by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I have a Quad 33/303 setup.

      I have an AR turntable, but it was built for the wrong voltage/frequency (it uses a synchronous motor) for where I live now.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:Harmon-Kardon Turntable by russbutton · · Score: 1
      I don't stream at all. I listen to a lot of bebop, big band jazz and classical. Tidal doesn't have a lot of the artists I like. Doesn't matter how good they are if they don't have the artists you want.

      I'm an Old School Audiophile. I run a Linn LP12 turntable with a Rega tonearm and Denon cartridge. I have about 500 LPs left (pitched about half of 'em out a few years ago). I ripped about 1000 CDs to flac format and play them off of my Ubuntu laptop. I use both the JRiver and Banshee music servers. JRiver allows me to do digital EQ based on curves generated through Room EQ Wizard.

      My playback system consists of a Peachtree DAC for both the laptop and my CD player, which along with the turntable feed into a tube preamp. The loudspeaker system is an integrated design from Siegfried Linkwitz which has a 3-way active crossover. The loudspeaker itself is an open baffle design with tweeters facing front and rear, an open baffle mid-range driver and two bass drivers open baffle. There are separate 60 watt amp channels for each bass driver, the mid-range driver and the tweeters, for a total of 8 channels for both sides.

      I use 14 gauge zip cord for speaker wire and interconnects I got from Parts-Express. No need for exotic cables. It's a wonderful system. Everyone who hears it leaves my home with envy. I will put my system up against any system, at any price.

      The Linkwitz designs are all for DIY folks and are thus affordable. Total expense for all of my gear comes in at a bit under $8000. The current hi-end design from Linkwitz, the LX521, is not surpassed by any loudspeaker on the planet and you can build the system for less than $5000. In the world of extreme hi-end audio, that's an incredible bargain. His LXmini system is perfect for apartment dwellers and can be put together for about $1000.

    6. Re:Harmon-Kardon Turntable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This! The other thing about cassette tape is that it works better in a car than CD. CD skips on bumps, but it takes some fairly extreme maneuvering to affect the tape player even a bit. Yes, I have an old car, too (head unit plays both tape and CD). Car is a good place for mp3s from the phone, though (newer one in the family with BT capability).

  63. iPod/Pad/laptop by kschendel · · Score: 1

    Music is all or nothing for me, I don't care to listen to it as background music. If I want to put everything else down and listen, these days it will be off an iPad/iPad or the laptop, lossless audio files.

    I sold the turntable and associated playback equipment a couple years back; the speakers needed $$$ rework and I didn't want to put the money into it.
     

    1. Re:iPod/Pad/laptop by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Music is all or nothing for me, I don't care to listen to it as background music. If I want to put everything else down and listen, these days it will be off an iPad/iPad or the laptop, lossless audio files.

      This. I sometimes DJ at society/staff parties, and it's always great fun when somebody asks me to use Spotify or something to get their favourite track if I don't have it. First, I wouldn't install any of that closed software on my personal machine, let alone a closed OS to use it. Second, my idea of DJing involves playing complete songs uninterrupted by adverts or buffering... buffering.. buffering.

      Also, I think streaming is dumb from a technical standpoint, especially over cell networks. I guess the rental aspect keeps bean counters happy, but it's such a waste of tech.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  64. Sirius XM, YouTube/Hyper and Vevo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a Sirius XM subscriber, and listen to certain channels, where I know what is playing at any time, thanks to the name of both song & artist on the display. After the trip, when I get home, I look for the same thing on YouTube and use something like Hyper to download those music videos. I've gathered quite a collection that way

    The other service I have considered using is Vevo. It's cross platform - there on iOS, Android and Windows 10. Only that the above solution has so far never failed me, so I've had no reason to go Vevo. But I would, if those dried up or if there came a moral obligation to BUY the music in question. I have bought certain songs & videos from the Apple Store, but plan Vevo going forward.

    As an aside, why is DEC's old logo showing up for this story?

  65. Noobs, The Lot Of You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first rule of <ANCIENT_PROTOCOL> is that you do not mention <ANCIENT_PROTOCOL>.

    The second rule of <ANCIENT_PROTOCOL> is that you DO NOT mention <ANCIENT_PROTOCOL>.

  66. YouTube. by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Radio / cassette / few CDs become mod(and s3m, xm, ..) become mp3 become digitally imported become last.fm become YouTube.

    I've done a huge down-grade in variety from the Internet radio or even last.fm suggestions but it's a legal way to get the track I want to listen to (but sadly misses out on a lot of other things.)

    ItÂs worse but legal :/, stupid surveillance.

  67. 8-track tapes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use 8-track tapes in my AMC Gremlin.

    1. Re:8-track tapes... by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      Red licorice dispenser on the headliner?

    2. Re:8-track tapes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Black licorice. You have to be careful not to eat too many at one time or it comes out the other end hot, dark, liquid, and stinky.

  68. Re: So what are we all moving to after Spotify goe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LinkedIn had to get rid of almost 20% of their users to keep the lights on. That's why they made their app unusable.

  69. Spotify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Discover Weekly is awesome. They are in my head, reading my thoughts. They know me better than I know myself.

    They must be part of the NSA, but that's okay, because of Discover Weekly.

  70. Az-px-gl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon, PLEX and google.

  71. BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said.

  72. Pandora, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked Pandora while I could get it, but it's been US-only for too long now. Nowadays I use Amazon with my Prime subscription instead.

  73. Never been better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ruined everything.

    Downloading music has never been easier than it is right now. You can find FLAC and MP3 versions of almost any release available on both torrents and filelockers using nothing more than a normal search engine.

    RuTracker going public has been an especially big windfall.

  74. MAFIAA by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    When the RIAA started their jihad against technology and user rights, I said I would stop funding the industry until it settled. It settled, users lost, and I choose not to fund an industry that actively attacks my rights. I have enough CDs and if I buy any more, usually local or indy artists, I make sure they are not part of the MAFIAA. If they are, they don't get my money and I don't get their music but I also don't fund the evil ones.

    So far it hasn't killed me, you can choose not to consume the shit that hurts you.

  75. Napster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got all the music I'll ever need already...

  76. Google Play for international music by TimTucker · · Score: 1

    Have compared a few so far -- Rhapsody, Pandora, & Amazon Music all seem OK if you're primarily interested in mainstream pop music from the US.

    Last.fm was much better for international music (the user-defined tags made things much easier to find).

    Now that they're gone, Google Play seems to have the widest catalog worldwide that I've found so far. (What's not available via Google Play can usually be played through the YouTube Music app, which comes free with the subscription).

  77. Tunein, and purchased MP3s by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    When I want to stream music, I use Tunein.

    But I rarely stream music anymore. If I want to listen to something, I buy it as an MP3. I avoid the Apple Music Store and look for alternative places that sell unlocked MP3s and don't require me to use iTunes to buy it.

    Most of the time, I don't listen to music but instead to audiobooks or audio plays. This makes my drive to/from work go a lot faster. I got addicted to audiobooks when I had a regular three hour drive (I worked that far away from home) and just kept at them. If you like audiobooks and you like Doctor Who, I highly recommend Big Finish Productions which has the license for Doctor Who (new and classic series), Blake's 7, Survivors, Torchwood, and a bunch of other great stuff, including spinoffs (Dalek Empire, UNIT, Counter-Measures, Jago and Litefoot, etc). Even better, they do their audio plays with the original cast!

  78. Streaming music? Free FM/AM radio by davidwr · · Score: 1

    For local-copy music, I don't have a favorite but my top 3 are digital downloads, MP3s ripped from other media, or CDs.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  79. SubSonic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out a server app named SubSonic, It installs a simple web server and you point it at your local library of music files for instant streaming of your music. Setup Dynamic DNS and a port forward and your all set. Its open source too! great app for a build your own cloud type folks.

    1. Re:SubSonic by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      How does it compare to Plex?

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    2. Re:SubSonic by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

      From what I just read on Wikipedia about Plex (not at all familiar with it otherwise), Subsonic would be a lot less fully-featured in comparison. From what I gather, Plex is a fork of the old XBMC? Something like a complete media center? Subsonic is more focused on streaming your own music library (and making podcasts, video is supported too). Someone will correct me, if I'm wrong, I'm sure. HUGE Subsonic fan here :)

    3. Re:SubSonic by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      More of a fork of xbmc on the frontend and actualy putting a real backend. So for music it can automatically transcode for the device (I rip to flac) and pause on one device play on another. It's big downside right now is it can not synchronize between multiple devices as in play on them all at the same time like a party setting.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
  80. MP3/CD is my streaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all "radio me" plays all the songs I love and doesn't require me to continually pay to ensure I maintain access to them.

  81. Streaming services have sucky music by surd1618 · · Score: 1

    If you want a pleasant background noise, the aural equivalent of a Glade Plugin, and you never actually pay attention to it, then the streaming services should do the trick. But if you like music, then in my experience, you have to do something else. I think that the services push garbage. If I make a station on one of them, any of them, it starts out playing the music I want to hear (if they have it, which is often not the case). But it rapidly drifts into canned garbage. No matter the genre or style or whatever, they suck. So I download music illegally, or buy it sometimes, or get tapes from my friend who makes tapes. I don't have a record player at the moment, but they work good too. Honestly the illegal services are the fastest and best way to find most stuff.

  82. Tidal, vinyl + flac/mp3, Google Music sync by Knuckles · · Score: 1

    Tidal Hifi for most streaming needs, when I find that I listen a lot to an album I usually buy the vinyl (which these days gets you the flac or mp3 files as well).

    Because Tidal is great in may ways but its offline mode SUCKS (it needs at least a slow data connection for DRM verification at all times even if you downloaded the data in advance, and therefore fails on planes and in areas w/o coverage) I also use the free Google Music to sync my mp3 files for emergencies.

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  83. Spotify obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're honest about their goals and struggles, the numbers, the artists, and they're not trying to break the competition other than by being as good as they can. More than you can say about their competitors. Excellent quality, great and stylish client, everything just works, and if I don't want to pay then I can still listen at a lower but acceptable quality, FOR FREE.

  84. Rhapsody by steveha · · Score: 1

    I've been using Rhapsody for nearly a decade, and I have a whole bunch of stuff bookmarked.

    I've found some music I really like by browsing the Rhapsody link structure. For example, look up a band I like and then click on some of the "related" links, or look up a category I like and then click on some of the "most popular" links. It's how I found Zero 7, for example.

    I tried using Spotify and I didn't see any real advantage to Spotify over Rhapsody, so I stayed with my bookmarks.

    But I have an Android Auto car stereo unit now, and Google Play Music works seamlessly with that. I really wish Rhapsody would update their Android client to work with Android Auto so I could use that when driving around.

    P.S. I guess Rhapsody is changing its name to Napster, but their web site still says Rhapsody on it.

    http://www.rhapsody.com/

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  85. Buy CD DVD from the artists by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I mostly buy CDs and DVDs from the artist at performances at music festivals, where they get 50 percent of the cost.

    The rest I listen to on podcasts. If I like them, I buy their music when they're in town at their performance.

    Forget the middleman

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Buy CD DVD from the artists by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I should point out I do use Spotify, but only to identify music I might not have heard. Mostly through the artists like the one I bought the CD or DVD from.

      Sometimes I just like one song I find that way. If I end up liking more than 2 or 3, I make sure I buy their CD or DVD when they perform next.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  86. CD/mp3 by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'm one of those people who still buy a CD and rip it to mp3s. Why, I've lost many an mp3 to a corrupted drive. Plus, I can listen to my music wherever I am, whether there is internet access or not and my listening habits aren't being sold for others to profit from at the expense of my personal privacy.

  87. dubtrack.fm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a successor to the ill-fated Turntable.fm. It allows you to queue and intermix youtube and Soundcloud playlists and listen to others play their playlists. The communities that have formed are really good at music selection, from 80s and 90s to chillout to progressive trance.

    Also, the frontend is open source and they actively are looking for participation: https://github.com/dubtrack/www-dubtrack-fm

  88. "digital" logo means Digital Equipment Corporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this article tagged with the logo for Digital Equipment Corporation? Using this logo for completely unrelated stories seems to be a trend lately on Slashdot.

    Editors, PLEASE note that the "digital" logo applies to a specific company, and many of your readers have been around long enough to know that. Using the logo incorrectly suggests that the editors are not in touch with the topics we're interested in reading about.

  89. cranky old fart by swschrad · · Score: 1

    turntable, reel tape, cassette, CD, iThingies. used to listen to radio before it became all-airheads with all-asshats in studio.

    I do NOT stream. I pay for my content, so I know the artist is supposed to get their share.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  90. Paid & Downloaded Files by eepok · · Score: 1

    I pay for music and receive either non-DRM digital downloads or CDs that I rip myself. I play music on a non-networked pure music player with its own long-lasting battery (not a phone or iPod touch). I don't pay for a streaming music service, but will use a free one every so often.

  91. WinAmp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While it worked...

    1. Re:WinAmp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New version soon, check the website.

  92. No streaming by Pukku · · Score: 1

    I'm not really a streamer. I buy CDs, or from the iTunes Music Store. I also listen to a bit of radio in the morning. Sometimes I buy downloadable files from an artist's website.

    --
    ----- Pukku
  93. How old are the Editors by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    I mean why is this topic in 'Digital' with DEC's logo? Seriously

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:How old are the Editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay. Glad I wasn't the only one who noticed this. I guess that makes my preferred streaming service OpenVMS. TOPS-20? *ducks*

  94. MOD PARENT UP! by HighOrbit · · Score: 2

    Was getting ready to post something similar to the parent AC's comments myself. The logo is for DEC (bought by Compaq/HP), not "digital" in the broader sense like digital music. By this standard, stories about solar power will soon be tagged with the Sun MicroSystems logo. Makes me wonder what they will do with the old Wang logo.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me wonder what they will do with the old Wang logo.

      That got me to laugh. Well played. :)

  95. Pandora/Spotify/Sonos by b0bby · · Score: 1

    I went with a Sonos system a couple of years ago, and we use Pandora (paid) and more recently Spotify (also paid) even more than our library of CDs I so painstakingly ripped to FLAC and then to mp3s. I may ditch the paid Pandora at some point. If I'm buying mp3s I usually use Amazon, though often I can get a CD for less than the download so I'll just rip the CD myself.
    Despite (or maybe because of) having a universe of music available at the click of a button, my teenager just got me to dig out a turntable; my rants about what a PITA vinyl is had no effect. Kids today!

  96. Digital?! (And CDs) by ngrier · · Score: 1

    For all the trolls and ranters here, no one's picked up on the fact that this has absolutely nothing to do with the long-lost Digital/DEC? Alas, I am showing my age. As for the question at hand: CDs ripped to mp3/AAC/... Lost enough of my mp3 collection in the Napster days to hard drive failures to not rely on a solely digital collection. I also like to know what it is I have and know that if I stick it on random I will pretty much get a song that I like. And I don't have time to be tracking down new artists/albums to be seeding streaming services (nor to be constantly picking a song/album when I want to listen to something if it's not autoprogrammed.)

    1. Re:Digital?! (And CDs) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's been pointed out on many past articles where that icon has been misused. I guess people have got bored of complaining about it, it's clear that the editors don't care.

    2. Re:Digital?! (And CDs) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent. I clicked on this article not for the article itself but to see if anyone else noticed that. Good catch.

      Oh, and MP3 / YouTube. Being able to see recorded live performances is fanstastic.

    3. Re:Digital?! (And CDs) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot to mention records at the local flea market. Some really cheap music out there if you can tolerate flipping textured laserdisc..

  97. Turntable by eskayp · · Score: 1

    Bought a inexpensive 2016 version of a turntable for digitizing my collection of hissy, scratchy, 60's & 70's albums. Teeny Bopper daughters wore out our Sears portable record player & half wore out my Rock'n'Roll and Folk albums 5 decades ago. All those LPs on something smaller than a finger. Computers that looked so futuristic on StarTrek (TOS) now look hopelessly quaint. Our imaginations just couldn't outguess Moore's Law.

    --
    I didn't desert Windows; Windows deserted me: BSOD
  98. Live365 by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    Live365 was far and away my favorite service. Eclectic stations programmed by individuals. Alas, the massive increase in licensing feeds killed it back in January.

  99. Radium by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

    I use the Radium app for iOS to listen to real radio stations from around the world for free. My current favorite is "SuomiPop", a Finnish Pop and Rock station that plays what sounds like some pretty generic pop, but in Finnish!

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  100. Aha radio anybody??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised NOBODY has mentioned Aha radio. It is coming with the new HK radios (mostly Japanese models). Oodles of "stations" to choose from. I'm not sure if it a pay service for non-HK radio owners, but the app didn't ask when I downloaded to my phone. Note, the radio has it on there stock (Android OS radio).

  101. I still have a turntable by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    I use my turntable a couple times a week. It's mostly because I want an excuse to get up from the computer to walk around while I flip the record, and because I like the artwork. New vinyl costs about $30 an album, so I only buy it when I really want it. Vinyl's really a crapshoot for audio quality, though. The modern digital remasters of anything printed before 2000-ish sound better than the original vinyl. A shibata stylus will reproduce the full human frequency range of hearing, although with more surface noise. (Humans can hear up to 28khz, but streaming services will limit it between 15-20khz.)

    For streaming, I use either Amazon Prime or Youtube. I still like having my collection of music; but I know its days are numbered.

    One thing that I'd like is an audiophile grade streaming service. There's evidence that humans can hear up to 28khz; although lossless 24/96 is overkill.

    1. Re:I still have a turntable by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      The modern digital remasters of anything printed before 2000-ish sound better than the original vinyl.

      Disagree strongly. I'm very, very leery of those. I bought one of the Led Zep remasters and was NOT impressed. And when I read the reviews of the remastered version of Nas "Illmatic" (basically, remastered means compression and loudness) I went with an original pressing. I've got records I found in the bargain bin that light up the room with their dynamic range. No reason to mess around with albums just for the sake of selling everyone a new copy.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:I still have a turntable by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      I'm currently listening to III that I bought used about 15 years ago. (I haven't listened to the remaster yet.) I assume the pressing is from the '70s.

      "Out of the Tiles" really suffers from inner groove problems. The highs are so blurry and limited, it sounds like someone downsampled a CD to 22050 hz. Even my MP3 sounds crisper.

  102. Slacker (RIP Rdio!), Plex and vinyl by litecola · · Score: 1

    Pandora and other streamers just didn't have enough vintage and foreign music for us, and we've been working on digitizing our hundreds (and hundreds) of vinyl records gradually, and merging them into our digitized CD collection. Working out genres has been a rough process though...

  103. I still use Records by teknosapien · · Score: 1

    Love the full rich sound that digital doesn't provide.
    if I need to take Music on the road with me I either record to mp3 or I still have a tape deck
    Streaming sounds like garbage and ruins the experience

    --
    no matter how good it is, it is human nature always wants to make things better
  104. local NAS by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    files saved on my nas, reachable via wired and wifi at home, played by via rasp pi players (recent i2s sound cards are pretty good).

    one thing that I am glad I did; there was a short time I was listening to streaming music that I discovered via the old logitech slimserver stuff. I found some nice background music that was low key and worth having for various reasons.

    I found a ripper - 'streamrip' - and it would sit there on a network stream (of the right type) and pretty well id the songs and name them as separate .mp3 files in a folder you pointed it to. let it run for days or weeks and come back to scoop up all the files. you then find so many dupes, too! but that's also kind of funny - you see what they 'played' lots of.

    the best part of the CSB is: since I saved them, I have them. weeks worth. I would not notice if such a long playlist repeated a song. and you guessed it, the 'station' went off the air and now its gone, gone for good, most likely.

    I have thousands of songs from that 'station' and its great bg 'working' music. if I had simply trusted the cloud, I'd have nothing now. instead, I grabbed mirror copies and I'm in good shape.

    its also why I run youtube-dl to view YT videos. if its worth watching, I will save a local copy and watch from that.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  105. Pandora as a library expander by tommyjcarpenter · · Score: 1

    I have my own ~60GB library that I listen to. In addition I pay for Pandora, because it is excellent for finding new bands. I'll put on an obscure metal band I like, like Insomnium, Pandora creates a station with similar artists, and throughout the next 8 hours (work day) it's almost guaranteed that it plays me a song by an artist that I've never heard of but love. Then I go look them up, buy their stuff, and repeat. Pandora is a great library expander. I guess in the long run I would exhaust all possible bands I like but I still learn about bands on at least a weekly basis from Pandora.

  106. Streaming Radio by DERoss · · Score: 1

    I listen to streaming radio, plus one non-broadcast source. These are mostly classical streams; but I also listen to Greek, big-band, Irish, and news streams. A list of streams is near the bottom of my Web page at http://www.rossde.com/music.ht....

    I listen to streams without capturing them. Depending on the characteristics of the stream, I use RealPlayer, VideoLAN, or Winamp. To me, Windows Media Player® is an abomination; I do not use it. On vary rare occasions, I go to YouTube; sometimes I capture a YouTube stream and save it on my PC.

    I have a large collection of vinyl, cassettes, and CDs. Sometimes, I play the CDs on my PC. The others I can only play when my wife is not watching TV since the cassette deck and vinyl turntable share speakers with the TV. I also listen to a classical radio station (KUSC) or a news radio station (KNX) in my car, but hills surrounding my house make radio reception inside my house problematical.

    As for those who claim to be old (e.g., in their 40s), I will be 75 in less than two months.

  107. Re:"digital" logo means Digital Equipment Corporat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh Heh, i first saw the article label & was wondering when DEC got into streaming audio. Please mod parent up. Then stop being lazy & create a new icon for digital stuff. that shouldn't apply to any more than 60% of the articles. or better yet create a streaming logo, or something equally quaint.

  108. Spotify and Google by guanfenglin · · Score: 1
    1. Spotify has a lot of songs that Google play don't have.
    2. Spotify foreign language songs have proper titles, compare to Google play only have English version titles.
    3. Spotify has clients for all popular operating systems, and Google play only have web version on Mac (there is free okay-ish third party one)

    However I stopped paying for Spotify because of Youtube red includes free google play subscription.

  109. "We're Stars" available there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If so, I am in! The different copyright holders squabbling over who gets how big a slice have prevented re-issuing of this song/album for too long.

  110. Other peoples' music playlists by rwa2 · · Score: 2

    I could never get into Pandora, but probably because my musical tastes are strange. I mostly listen to parodies, so when I insert stuff like Weird Al or Monty Python Sings or Capitol Steps or even King Missile, they really confuse the genre classification engine.

    These days I mostly listen to curated streams, because I can't be bothered to come up with my own playlists. So usually SomaFM.com (Groove Salad, Lush, and sometimes Secret Agent or Defcon). I also like to hit http://sleepbot.com/ambience/b... on occasion , it can be really weird sometimes.
    Also I'm a bit surprised to find I have a soft spot for "female vocal dubstep" on youtube, but maybe that has something to do with the wallpaper pr0n.

    Anyways, I used to use streamtuner + streamripper to, uh, "timeshift" a few hours' worth of streaming radio feeds so I could listen to them in the subway. These days, I usually just find the things I really like on youtube and download them with Tubemate, and then buy albums on Google Play if I really really like certain artists. But the only reason I spend money on Google Play is because I don't want to install any other music store app, and I can't fully remove Google Play.

    Can't stand the Google Play auto streams that they throw at me, though.

    1. Re:Other peoples' music playlists by skids · · Score: 1

      Honestly I don't believe Pandora has done much of anything to improve the classification engine, which is supposedly their core product, since they started. If they had, you'd think new options would have appeared for tweaking. They seem to have been entirely focused on making apps for every conceivable platform.

    2. Re:Other peoples' music playlists by max99ted · · Score: 1

      Thanks for reminding me of King Missile. Need to root through some boxes in the basement to find the CD again.

      "I wanna be different.. just like everybody else"

      --

      Please stop APK.. you're only hurting yourself.

  111. Local by Vlijmen+Fileer · · Score: 1

    storage. Streaming robs me of rights and (future) options about what I can do with my music, because it never becomes my music.

  112. Jango by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So far 225 comments and no mention of Jango.

    I listen to Jango because it doesn't require a subscription, and the API is easy to use if you want to build your own frontend for fun.

  113. Google Play + Vinyl by grimfate · · Score: 1

    I use Google Play Music because it offers pretty much everything: Unlimited streaming, MP3 store, ability to upload your own MP3s (for your own personal use; much better than "music match" feature!), web-based player, mobile app. (I think Microsoft's service might offer the same stuff too.) Also, you get YouTube Red with it, which is nice. My only gripe is that there is no official desktop app for Windows or OSX. I also buy vinyls. I started because I was told they have the best audio quality, but I think I like it because it encourages me to just sit down and listen to the music, rather than essentially using it as background noise while doing something else. Also, if an album has great cover art, it's pretty awesome having it full size, instead of tiny like with a CD. Not sure I would actually recommend vinyls, though; it's a pretty expensive venture. I also buy the occasional CD, partially because I like having a hard copy of stuff (still a little afraid of my digital libraries suddenly vanishing) and partially because my car only takes CDs and mini-discs.

  114. Aux in depends on how new your car is by tepples · · Score: 1

    Plug one end of the audio cable into your DSi's headphone jack and the other into what? A lot of especially older car stereos have no aux in. Some have no tape deck, or they have one like my aunt used to own that ejects tape adapters. So you're stuck with an FM transmitter, if your country's radio regulator even allows them. (The US does.)

    1. Re:Aux in depends on how new your car is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can bypass the stereo completely and go straight into the car's power amp. A friend of mine had such a setup for an HDD based MP3 player some years ago - he used one of those 3.5mm jacks with mechanical bypass switches inside so that the radio works normally until you plug the aux cable in, which cuts it out.

  115. Deezer and Spotify by moss1956 · · Score: 1

    Until recently I have been very happy with Deezer elite on my Sonos. It sounds great. Lately though, more and more content is not available on Deezer so I use Spotify. I tried Apple Music in the beginning, and found it wasn't curated as well as Deezer and Spotify. I like both services for discovering new music.

  116. DC++? by ajyand · · Score: 1

    How about DC++, for rare and less known music?

  117. A simple oversight by lucm · · Score: 1

    Yeah it was a mistake, right before Apple Music I should have included the "Attention K-Mart Shoppers" mp3s from archive.org that were discussed on Slashdot a while ago. See, those tapes were shipped to a store in Illinois instead the 80s and 90s, yet they have survived to this day, while it's a known fact that many people lose their music when they subscribe to Apple Music.

    K-mart 1, Apple 0.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  118. Google Music by butchersong · · Score: 1

    Google music for its painless syncing of offline content, family plan and the included youtube red is a nice bonus.

  119. MOG by nbritton · · Score: 1

    My favorite music service was MOG, this was before Beats bought it and turned it into Beats Music and Apple then bought Beats and turned Beats Music into Apple Music. Along the way they really neutered the service into a pile of crap. I'm currently an Apple Music subscriber, but I don't enjoy the service as much as I did its predecessor MOG.

  120. YouTube by Trogre · · Score: 1

    I'm not kidding. I don't use anything else to stream music.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  121. My Method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really love listening to and making music.I find a lot of new music I like by listening to radio, streaming radio stations online (e.g di.fm, radiotunes.com, Ministry of Sound Radio, and even local radio stations that stream online like abc.net.au and novanation). The Apple Music Trial was a good way to also find songs but after the free trial was ended I decided to save my money and not keep going and find new music by streaming from free sites online.

    As for buying music I buy most of mine from iTunes as I was an early adopter. I've bought a few tracks from Google Play because it's cheaper. I have a large collection of CD's which I've imported into iTunes. I sync my itunes library to an ipod and listen to this and a few radio stations in the car. I also have a few friends that buy me CD's for birthday's and Christmas which I listen to in the car. The CD's in the car sound way better as I only have an FM transmitter in my car. At home I listen to streamed music on my Apple TV or streaming radio stations.

  122. Free Internet Radio by kbahey · · Score: 1

    I don't subscribe to any music service. All I listen to is Internet radio.

    You have a desktop Linux, right? Start by going to vTuner station line up, and search for the stations/genre/language that you want. Click on the "Play" link, and save to a file. In that file, there will be the stream to that station. You can then take that and stick it in your music player. I use Clementine.

    No desktop Linux? Okay, you must have a Raspberry Pi then. Just install Kodi:

    sudo aptitude install kodi

    Then configure the Radio addon, and you will find more or less the same channel line up as in vTuner.

    Then add this to your crontab:

    @reboot sleep 45; /usr/lib/kodi/kodi.bin --standalone -fs &

    But, there is OpenELEC you say. But, Kodi runs on Windows you say. Yes, of course, but this is Slashdot ...

    1. Re:Free Internet Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows? VLC works in my Windows Phone!

  123. Google Play by unimind · · Score: 1

    Pandora pissed me off with the ads and skip limits (even if you pay), and it was terrible at matching music for my taste (pretty much just matched mainstream genres, from what I could tell). Tried Rhapsody, crappy catalog. Amazon Prime music also had a crappy catalog last time I checked. Admittedly, I haven't tried Spotify, and well... fuck Apple. I was impressed with Google Play music when I found it to be the best at associating artists I like with artists I haven't heard of. But I'm a musician and am generally looking for progressive jazz or world music, so I realize my criteria may not be the norm. I gladly pay 9.99/mo. to listen to anything I want whenever I want and easily (and gladly) buy a song or album when I find something I want to own. The only limitation I've come across so far is Prince's music, but I know he kept his stuff locked down and I respect that. I wish Google pushed their streaming service more, cause I think it kicks the crap out of the others. All I seem to hear about is Pandora, Spotify, and crApple.

    --
    The following statement is true: The previous statement is false.
  124. Poll ideas by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    Slashdot was looking for poll ideas. This question seem perfect as a poll!

  125. Concert tickets by IHTFISP · · Score: 1

    Everything else is just a recording.

    --
    Error: NSE - No Signature Error
  126. Google Music is highly underrated by rayjaymor85 · · Score: 2

    Their subscription service is awesome, you can upload your own MP3s, and if you have a terrible mobile plan like me you can actually download music to your phone to listen offline.

  127. Spotify and Bandcamp by Davisrox101 · · Score: 1

    I buy and stream music, I stream music that is not on Bandcamp and I stream music for finding new artists that are similar to the ones I like.

    1. Re:Spotify and Bandcamp by Davisrox101 · · Score: 1

      I also use streaming for studying and remembering for exams

  128. All of the Above, except Spotify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dual & AR turntables; Denon & Mitsubishi cassette decks; Akai reel-reel tape deck; EPI & Altec speakers; Yamaha tuner; Sony DVD player standing in for a CD Player that needs repair; Denon & Topping amps; small mixer for production work. LPs, CDs, DVDs, cassette & reel tapes, MP3s, FLACs, WAVs, Pipedreams, AudiophileStream (320K), BBC3, RTE Lyric, KFAT, ... and a Windows 7 computer because Windows 10 on it had too much latency - broke up the sound - and had to be reverted. Would like an Internet Radio tuner, but they're hard to find - though I could always use the spare laptop that has VLC on it, or a tiny (size of a router) HP thing I saw the other day. I AM NOT AN AUDIOPHILE - all of this is decent mid-fi and mostly older equipment but sounds good to my well-used ears.

    AFAIAC streaming is like a radio broadcast - here today, gone in a millisecond. In general, not worth paying for, though XM/Sirius for the car has its attractions. Nice background music, and close to (320K stream slightly better than) good FM radio quality, but if I really want to LISTEN to something I drag out the LP or tape or CD. Though WHY are so many streams so heavily compressed? Over-the-air that makes some sense due to the relatively high noise floor, but really isn't needed with digital. With some "HD Radio" streams, I can even hear the compressor pumping - the conventional FM (if available in my area) sounds better.

  129. Pandora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Works well enough, never switched to Spotify like so many others have.

    Still got lots of CDs kicking around, but don't by them anymore. They're all relics from back when the economy was good. In today's bad economy, I don't buy any music. The spare money just isn't there to be throwing around on things I don't need.

  130. Spotify w/ offline play, Echo integration by abramN · · Score: 1

    I use Spotify all the time! In my car I have an ipod touch that syncs with my wifi when the car is in the garage. It's set to play music offline, so I can add music to my library from any Spotify client, and voila - it's in my car the next day. (my car is a bit older, w/o bluetooth, and I had to get an ipod dock installed so I can control from my steering wheel). In the house, I have an Amazon Echo in the living room and a Dot in the bedroom. Both will play with either voice control or you can remotely control Spotify from a tablet or other client. There's also a Spotify client on the PS4, so I can listen to music while playing Doom. The catalog is great as well; I can almost always find what interests me.

  131. SomaFM and Bandcamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's commercial free and listener supported. I donate $2.99 per month. I get Indie Pop, Alternative Rock, Country, Folk, 70's, 80's, and some electronic for whatever mood I'm in. Now if I hear a musician I like and they have an album/song on Bandcamp, then I support them a little more with a more direct purchase. I spend about $7 to $10 a month there. A month of music is around $10 to $13 a month for me. Back in the CD days, I'd spend twice that or more.

  132. Spotify with my mp3 collection imported by bobbutts · · Score: 1

    The size of the spotify catalog is great for discovery and filling friend's requests. It nicely synchronizes my music including my imported tracks to my devices makes it worth the premium.

  133. Mostly stream for new sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I want to hear something new, I listen to 8tracks, Soundcloud, and sometimes Bandcamp. For non-contemporary classical, I go with web radio - favorite is Hungarian site. When music is interrupted with news or talk or announcements, the language is so impenetrable to my ears that it's easy to "listen over". And sometimes archive dot org. (mostly for the grateful oldies.)

  134. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  135. none? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    I occasionally use iTunes "internet radio" and listen to channels like: "Astra (they have like 8) and "Proton Radio".
    Why anyone is using an inter net streaming service is beyond me.

    I friend I know is paying 10 to 20 Euros per month to "upgrade" their internet service to be able to listen to streaming services when she actually simply could buy the music at iTunes (or where ever).

    On very rare occasions, when I remember a name of a band, I check youtube ...

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  136. Google Play Music by tanimislam · · Score: 0

    My personal favorite is Google Play Music. I upload all my old songs, and subsequent new songs, using the gmusicapi Python module under the hood. I can then stream my music in my car while driving.

  137. Smartphones Good for "Backup" / Listening w/o Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Rental" services are convenient for some things, but not always practical, waste mobile data, etc, as you mentioned. That said, where I work, we can have no electronic devices of any kind (or thumb drives, or CDs, etc) but we are allowed to stream to our workstations. Thus, I am glad to have Google & Amazon services. Google holds a copy of my personal music library (free up to a paltry 50,000 tracks!), while I use Amazon's Prime Music (an incidental 'extra' with my Prime Shipping subscription) for new material...which I tend to buy if I enjoy. It integrates with my Echo, which I received as a gift. And the Echo went from a "why the heck would I ever use this?" device to something I love and use every day, especially in the kitchen.

    By the way, I have a 200Gb microSD card in my smart phone. It quite easily makes my entire music collection utterly portable -- no internet required! -- and, as a bonus, is another copy of my library as part of my backup schema. What a far cry from playing short 8-bit sound files through the serial port speaker dongle on my first PC.

  138. google play listen now, youtube, mp3 collection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google play listen now, youtube, mp3 collection

    never pay for music, especially if it is older than your grown children.