Imagine the news report result that has to be removed and the way a person has to present their "reason" for removal.
The next generation should never be able to find the name as a search result:
Police actions and resulting court reports.
The role a person named in the media played in a nations once hidden chemical, nuclear, biological weapons production line? News about testing?
How to describe that news report as a right to be forgotten?
Consumers are expected to consume on Apple products with voice and by clicking.
The people creating apps sold to Apple consumers use very different computers.
The safety of bringing a new tax on new "cars" to their state.
Attracting that new car investment in a safe way is the gov top concern.
Just like the film industry was attracted to move to the west of the USA.
Changes to art work?
Every part of a plot has to be SJW pre approved before publication?
Type of characters? Number of characters?
More languages and faiths in every game?
The US gov goes full "Letter of marque" on Ireland? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Other nations will sit up and take note of what US brands and the US gov will do.
That allowing any US brand in opens their legal system up to many different US laws.
So set up a company in the correct legal way and get to push another nations laws deep into the US legal system?
Enforce blasphemy laws in the USA? No saying bad things about a cult, faith?
Enforce another nations liable laws that are totally different from US free speech protections?
Move in some powerful German laws on the way history is presented and can be talked about in the USA?
AC the "the actual physical location of the server is irrelevant" is all about another nations privacy laws.
Who wants to invite any big US brand into their nation if the US brand is just going to use US law to bypass any and all local privacy laws?
Using a US brand in another nation is not like becoming a part of the US legal system.
When the federal government is allowed to set rules about one part of the internet, they can set rules about all the internet.
To tell what part of the USA gets what quality of internet, when and for how much.
To promote brands that support one side of US politics above their competition.
To make any new networking more federally regulated for brands that do not support one side of US politics.
To ensure areas that vote for one side of US politics keep getting services.
Areas that did not note vote for one side of US politics are blocked from getting much better services.
To try and push for a return of a Fairness Doctrine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... over the federally regulated parts of the internet under new branding of social justice, political correctness.
Everyone gets to keep their telco monopoly and their paper insulated wireline for many years.
Want to build a new network? Federal NN like rules could set in and demand "poor" areas get the same network for "free" from any brand trying to build a community network.
Federal control over any community, city, state networking project that will make existing monopoly paper insisted wireline look slow.
Only a big political party and the federal government will be allowed to lift poor networking.
New brands and the private sector is not going to be allowed to get the funding and another party the votes for network innovation.
Changes to rules like the NN rules keep the internet under federal control to keep funding, party political donations and federal oversight.
No city, state is going to escape paper insulated wireline monopolies without understanding it was the federal gov and one side of US political party that approved that upgrade.
The other side of US politics is allowing local brands and communities to build out innovative new fast networking as needed will fewer federal NN rules.
Such states and cities attract new brands, innovation and grow. More jobs for people in the USA, a message of growth spreads.
The party lines are between federal NN rules and cities and states getting on with their own networks. Communities all over the USA finally escaping federally supported paper insulated wireline monopolies.
In China a person would risk their job, pension, to get and stay in housing, education, ability to legally stay in a city, ability to use the internet, ability to get a new job. They risk jail time for online comments.
What would the CIA and NSA do with information on a person of interest in China?
Follow them and see what they do? A trip to Macau? Into gambling while been a Chinese official and having access to public money?
The CIA makes an offer in Macau to anyone in Macau they think is interesting.
The risk works in both directions. How many trusted officials return to China from Macau working for the CIA?
The US brand that invests in China has to follow the rule of law in China.
The NSA and GCHQ get more insight into China with every year the US/UK is granted networks deeper into China.
re " has spent the last few years performing false-flag cyber-attacks"
Russia is to be so skilled at all things cyber, yet get detected for years? Thats not very good cyber.
Re "made based on secret evidence have so far turned out to be legit."
Bear code?
Ip range?
Time of day?
Code litter?
People talking to the US media is not "evidence".
Back to talking points about the "GRU" again? The GRU is not the KGB, FSB. The GRU often mentioned in the US media is the foreign military intelligence agency. A military intelligence agency is not going to give away methods getting found doing cyber with Bear code, an ip range, having its code litter found in real time.
Nobody would risk their own military intelligence agency methods on cyber that gets discovered in real time.
Nobody in the USA would tell another nations military intelligence agency that they got caught doing cyber in real time.
Such information is never given to the media in real time as it is kept secret. Such detection is kept secret for decades and decades as not to give away US methods.
When reading about "cyber" with "secret evidence" in real time as a few sentences in the media, its all fiction.
The skills gap is between the person who creates server farm code and who looks after the landscaping around the server centre.
People who are up at 2 am to swap hardware out. People who can read a log and follow commands until experts are on site.
Someone who can read back from a set of questions for a support call all day but have some understanding of a complex issue emerging.
Thats often all thats needed. Someone at 1 am who is trustworthy on site to swap out hardware.
Someone who can read a log, work until staff, a contractor is on site.
Free from federal NN rules.
The freedom for communities to innovate again. To build their own networks.
The freedom to talk about why federal NN rules held back network competition.
Slashdot Mirror
Imagine the news report result that has to be removed and the way a person has to present their "reason" for removal.
The next generation should never be able to find the name as a search result:
Police actions and resulting court reports.
The role a person named in the media played in a nations once hidden chemical, nuclear, biological weapons production line? News about testing?
How to describe that news report as a right to be forgotten?
Consumers are expected to consume on Apple products with voice and by clicking.
The people creating apps sold to Apple consumers use very different computers.
Facial recognition of everyone at the home. Voice print too. Great for knowing who is who on the mic later.
walks on the moon and talks of God.
Germany puts it brands on the moon and talks of the optics of branding.
The safety of bringing a new tax on new "cars" to their state.
Attracting that new car investment in a safe way is the gov top concern.
Just like the film industry was attracted to move to the west of the USA.
It will be electric pods with German regulations.
Want to "drive" out to a protest event? No "car" for that activity on that day.
All the work is done is low wage nations.
No Ada?
Changes to art work?
Every part of a plot has to be SJW pre approved before publication?
Type of characters? Number of characters?
More languages and faiths in every game?
The US gov goes full "Letter of marque" on Ireland? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Other nations will sit up and take note of what US brands and the US gov will do.
That allowing any US brand in opens their legal system up to many different US laws.
The US can go back to its past and enforce a trade deal and laws onto the EU?
United States expedition to Korea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Go full Perry Expedition into Ireland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ?
AC if the USA wins this and can "enforce" US laws in the EU?
Wait for the EU to start enforcing EU laws in the USA for their EU brands.
So set up a company in the correct legal way and get to push another nations laws deep into the US legal system?
Enforce blasphemy laws in the USA? No saying bad things about a cult, faith?
Enforce another nations liable laws that are totally different from US free speech protections?
Move in some powerful German laws on the way history is presented and can be talked about in the USA?
AC the "the actual physical location of the server is irrelevant" is all about another nations privacy laws.
Who wants to invite any big US brand into their nation if the US brand is just going to use US law to bypass any and all local privacy laws?
Using a US brand in another nation is not like becoming a part of the US legal system.
1980's rich person from a wealthy family has issues with new money https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
When the federal government is allowed to set rules about one part of the internet, they can set rules about all the internet.
To tell what part of the USA gets what quality of internet, when and for how much.
To promote brands that support one side of US politics above their competition.
To make any new networking more federally regulated for brands that do not support one side of US politics.
To ensure areas that vote for one side of US politics keep getting services.
Areas that did not note vote for one side of US politics are blocked from getting much better services.
To try and push for a return of a Fairness Doctrine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... over the federally regulated parts of the internet under new branding of social justice, political correctness.
Everyone gets to keep their telco monopoly and their paper insulated wireline for many years.
Want to build a new network? Federal NN like rules could set in and demand "poor" areas get the same network for "free" from any brand trying to build a community network.
Federal control over any community, city, state networking project that will make existing monopoly paper insisted wireline look slow.
Only a big political party and the federal government will be allowed to lift poor networking.
New brands and the private sector is not going to be allowed to get the funding and another party the votes for network innovation.
Changes to rules like the NN rules keep the internet under federal control to keep funding, party political donations and federal oversight.
No city, state is going to escape paper insulated wireline monopolies without understanding it was the federal gov and one side of US political party that approved that upgrade.
The other side of US politics is allowing local brands and communities to build out innovative new fast networking as needed will fewer federal NN rules.
Such states and cities attract new brands, innovation and grow. More jobs for people in the USA, a message of growth spreads.
The party lines are between federal NN rules and cities and states getting on with their own networks. Communities all over the USA finally escaping federally supported paper insulated wireline monopolies.
A live mic and cam with the hood and trunk locked down.
PRISM.
4K and 3D. With 5G. VR? More free cloud? All from a thinner cell phone. Games and a photo from software linked 5 lens to make one image.
+1 for that AC. The power stays on for the community when needed.
In China a person would risk their job, pension, to get and stay in housing, education, ability to legally stay in a city, ability to use the internet, ability to get a new job.
They risk jail time for online comments.
What would the CIA and NSA do with information on a person of interest in China?
Follow them and see what they do? A trip to Macau? Into gambling while been a Chinese official and having access to public money?
The CIA makes an offer in Macau to anyone in Macau they think is interesting.
The risk works in both directions. How many trusted officials return to China from Macau working for the CIA?
The US brand that invests in China has to follow the rule of law in China.
The NSA and GCHQ get more insight into China with every year the US/UK is granted networks deeper into China.
re " has spent the last few years performing false-flag cyber-attacks"
Russia is to be so skilled at all things cyber, yet get detected for years? Thats not very good cyber.
Re "made based on secret evidence have so far turned out to be legit."
Bear code?
Ip range?
Time of day?
Code litter?
People talking to the US media is not "evidence".
Back to talking points about the "GRU" again? The GRU is not the KGB, FSB. The GRU often mentioned in the US media is the foreign military intelligence agency.
A military intelligence agency is not going to give away methods getting found doing cyber with Bear code, an ip range, having its code litter found in real time.
Nobody would risk their own military intelligence agency methods on cyber that gets discovered in real time.
Nobody in the USA would tell another nations military intelligence agency that they got caught doing cyber in real time. Such information is never given to the media in real time as it is kept secret. Such detection is kept secret for decades and decades as not to give away US methods.
When reading about "cyber" with "secret evidence" in real time as a few sentences in the media, its all fiction.
The skills gap is between the person who creates server farm code and who looks after the landscaping around the server centre.
People who are up at 2 am to swap hardware out. People who can read a log and follow commands until experts are on site.
Someone who can read back from a set of questions for a support call all day but have some understanding of a complex issue emerging.
Think of the past and the approved calculator and related textbook sales.
Now its GUI code, robot kits and approved software.
Thats often all thats needed. Someone at 1 am who is trustworthy on site to swap out hardware.
Someone who can read a log, work until staff, a contractor is on site.
Free from federal NN rules.
The freedom for communities to innovate again. To build their own networks.
The freedom to talk about why federal NN rules held back network competition.