Keep your brand or company secure by:
Keep your most advanced work and secrets away from any network.
Only use advanced US networks, US products for work that is in use and in public.
When new services, products, contracts are been considered don't store anything on servers, network facing hardware.
Hold design meetings in secure areas, don't bring in smart phones, devices. Keep vital encrypted notes on paper in that secure room.
Use a one time pad to send vital messages to distant staff. Use staff to move a message to staff globally, face to face, in person.
Use a networked company message board as a numbers station to broadcast information globally. Everyone looks at it everyday but the message is only for one person.
If you have the funding set up bait, a honey pot of digital ideas on US branded hardware that faces the internet as normal.
Pack it with the most amazing new ideas your competitors had, renamed as your own emerging products. Patents, secret bank accounts, staff lists, work with other nations. Make that server amazing. Use very different code names for emerging products and projects. See if anyone comes looking later for the same junk words or for the staff that are internal security risks on lists that are fake.
Set up a random safe house with trusted security teams for years based on that staff risk review. See if anyone tries to offer the fake staff member a new job, wants to be "friends", makes a cash offer or poses as your nations security services to do an interview...
Really simple counterintelligence that any nation or company can create.
That needs a lot of funding but protects against human and network methods.
Be aware of any new staff from other nations or your own nations new staff. New "friends" wanting a secure site tour. Physical site access can plant malware thats then collected later by hand.
Re "How long did the CIA know about this flaw"
The US goes down a list of flaw questions.
Is the US the only one using the same issue? Will other nations find it soon?
Are other groups in the wild using it now? Will AV software detect the flaw soon?
Can it be used against the USA if discovered without been noticed?
Will the USA be detected in a later code review or from code litter?
Can the flaw be proved to be the work of another nation when the US uses the same method?
After all that is worked out, the USA will keep the flaw or find some way to get it fixed if it is a risk to the USA.
Re "How many other unpatched flaws are in the Vault 7"
That depends on the US and its public budget for its clandestine services per year and the cost per flaw created or found? How much can be coded for or created for the US clandestine services per year per budget?
100 well crafted methods? To cover a year of changing consumer, prosumer and professional product lines globally of all brands the US has interest in?
Other methods need physical access to place methods and or physical access to collect the resulting data.
Create too many really unique methods in the wild and many groups start noticing the flow of data and the cost of nation funded staging servers.
Too much expert code litter starts to point to national funding. Loss of methods to other nations, cults, faith groups, other nations trusted police, "trusted" NATO or EU nations, criminals using the same methods later might also keep the flaw count down per year. The US likes to track who got their code later and is using it and how it leaked. If not a lot of other nations, groups would be using the same methods back in the USA for their own political or national advantage.
Other "trusted" nations might leak to the press and interesting nations then stop using that US crypto or US hardware. Low count, good quality that collects all.
Re: "warehouse to be backdoored prior to shipment to final destination"
Tailored Access Operations (TAO)
"Photos of an NSA “upgrade” factory show Cisco router getting implant" (5/15/2014) https://arstechnica.com/tech-p...
GCHQ, NSA, CIA have different ideas on what they want and why.
In some nations the NSA might be working with a national telco over decades. So it is safe for the NSA to use a that nations gov staff as they more loyal to the NSA than their own nation over generations.
In other nations the telco network might still be staffed with people who are totally loyal to their own nation. So that big dump of data back to a domestic staging server network might be detected. Code litter from another nations malware is left to fool any contractors or other gov investigators.
Other methods are needed.
The CIA might have a trusted local person sneak into a building under the cover of been new staff, a friend or more than a new friend to a long term staff member. Physical access gets past any network security and trusted devices can be altered on site and data collected by a person later on site. No internet link needed but physical device access is needed to alter code and then collect the result. No code litter is found.
Or just send a command to a US brand's hardware and collect it all with the internet.
Different methods for different nations and if staff are still loyal to their own nation.
The US gov can detect the use of hidden volumes. They may not want to tell the world they can decrypt consumer crypto.
But they are happy to show a court that encryption was used to secure data.
Can they detect how many volumes and the type of filesystem alteration that could be induced with a password?
A few 100 to 10's per year per product cycle? It depends on the average price and the clandestine budget for buying on the open market per year.
Say a budget range for a good exclusive deal per zero day for a new OS or device in the 100 of apps/code/access products?
Thats the positive side that still looks corporate. Its hard to tell who is buying in the mix of buyers globally.
A flood of gov/mil cash in the wild would stand out even with a lot of US/UK front companies every y ear doing the malware buying.
The negative side ensuring no US or UK brand has the skills to find the issue and fix the issue days or months later.
If the security services buy too much in the wild, too many people start to notice and others want that payment or try to follow the payment front.
Other teams then start looking for the funding and find payment methods, staging servers. So the numbers are kept low per year to hide the mil/gov origins.
Also to avoid the better AV efforts and other security professionals from reading chat about too many big new cash payments.
Some are networked, some need a human to place the malware and collect the results.
A lot of different products are needed but too much and its detected by a wider community interested in every aspect of computer security.
Its their web, the world wide wiretap. From a smart phone to a Room 641A https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
So be aware of how the security services seek out your data.
The NSA and GCHQ will try and add their hardware your hardware as a brand imports hardware.
One at a hardware level in a company any network belongs to the security services.
CIA, MI5 also understand the human dimension. Social engineering or a new relationship, new staff.
The amazing new friend, skilled new staff member, potential client who wants a site tour.
Expect devices that will be part of the existing hardware (smart phone) and will pass any expected network usage detection efforts. The security services will alter your hotels networked TV. Staff will have their smart phone, tablet, computer packed with gov malware.
Data might be stored locally for another human to pick up. No use of any network to remove data. The hardware might be altered by a human and then a network is used to collect later. So not always expect to see a new unexpected upload. A human might place the malware and then collect any results. No litter to find.
So a company watching its networks and devices might not see any network changes at all or just "expected" user/staff data going out later.
How to keep your patents ideas, inventions, banking, designs secure from the USA and UK?
Use a one time pad for that very important message. Don't reuse the one time pad code, consider sending staff out to deliver an important message in person.
Only use the internet network for reaching consumers. Don't allow smart phones or other devices near advanced product development.
Be aware of offers of random friendship at a gym, bar, club, art gallery, business or sports event, cult, faith by very friendly strangers. The distraction could be used to add malware to your smartphone physically so no network trace will show any changes in usage.
Secure your internet servers that interact with consumers to the best new standards that users can still access.
Get any emerging product work away from computers, return to paper and secure face to face meetings for creative ideas.
Don't allow smart phones or watch devices to secure meetings.
Keep all new friends or random staff with consumer electronics from wondering around any secure areas.
Once all that is in place and working, get your legal team ready for a NSL. Understand that a lot of malware can be networked or can be entered by a human.
Could be ex and former staff selling mi/gov grade product to their cult, faith, embassy, other parts of the US gov, the private sector.
Once the devices got handed out to NATO nations, the different EU nation police forces all their ex and former staff can sell the US product to the private sector.
The US is now been flooded with its own products as once very secret tech finds its way into every embassy and the private sector.
Other nations front companies, US dual citizens helping their real nations.
The UK had the same issues. Some ore gov, mil other are just random efforts by different groups.
What the UK did can often show what could be in the USA.
Fake Mobile Phone Towers Operating In The UK (09 June 2015) http://news.sky.com/story/fake...
UK Cops Using Fake Mobile Phone Tower to Intercept Calls, Shut Off Phones (10.31.11) https://www.wired.com/2011/10/...
Fake mobile phone towers discovered in London: Stingrays come to the UK (6/11/2015) https://arstechnica.com/tech-p...
The other US side would be to track US police, city workers to ensure they did not have a task force on any emerging private sector products or services.
Once a map of every phone in a wide city area was tracked, tracking undercover officials would be easy given a lack of digital counter surveillance training.
New "staff" or users reporting back into a government building every few days or weeks for a set time would be very easy to map.
Another aspect would be to counter any journalist trying undercover work. Their origin and return to their place of work would be detected if they ever had two working phones with them. Their undercover story phone and their journalist phone.
Other tracking could counter bloggers and web 2.0 attempts by citizen journalism to enter political parties or party political fund raising.
They might make an error with two phones in use. One they used for undercover work in the past, one they use for their blog.
Lack of cash could see device reuse and very easy tracking.
Also the meeting of any gov worker, federal official, contractor, mil, political staff with any journalist would be tracked by the mil, gov, party, contractor. A vast database of journalist. A political and private sector version of the NSA's FIRSTFRUIT.
The Most Intriguing Spy Stories From 166 Internal NSA Reports (May 17 2016) https://theintercept.com/2016/...
“.. over 5,000 insecurity-related records” ranging from “espionage damage assessments” to “liaison exchanges.”
Someone is not tracking the fake networks for some reason. Political over, mil, police or gov use? Gov workers detect the fake cell products and nothing is done?
Re "rely on senior staff to a concerning degree when it comes to tech challenges"
Interview people and see if they have the skills needed.
"Rely on senior staff" could be the only skill they are good at and it got them a job.
The background story, did their past education show any of the same "rely on others" issues?
Its a skill thats worked on over years.
The revolution for the NSA contractor was to offer the NSA desktop computer CPU's on a fast network.
The US collect it all policy resulted in data that needed to be sorted. A huge new network of desktop CPU's packaged to look like a classic super computer was a great idea to win a long term contract with.
The hardware was cheap, the new network support needed was expensive. Win, win for a private sector contractor.
The other emerging issue for the NSA is Australia, Canada and the GCHQ can buy the same methods and do not need NSA staff to help other 5 eye nations with bespoke US branded NSA export grade super computers.
So other nations are collecting all, breaking codes and using low cost computer networks regional that no longer need constant direct NSA oversight and support.
The other issue for the NSA is US universities are just giving every US CPU design away as its created by US graduates.
A lot of other nations university students get to study into the USA. Some hold over cold war State department policy to make the US look nice?
The US university system is addicted to the profits from such students? The CIA hopes to turn some of the students from Chain in the USA so that spy policy is worth the total loss of decades of US super computer plans?
Only the NSA can see the epic fail in giving decades once secret US CPU plans to any other nations students who attend a top US university.
Did the CIA actually turn a few students from China over the decades and the results from a few very well placed US spies in China that counter the NSA/GCHQ digital collection results?
The more public question of a super computer gap will restore a funding balance. Think of the Army and Navy code breaking of the 1930's. Two sides of the US gov/mil working on the same issue and not sharing.
The super computer gap news is just the public face of such issues.
China is taking a lot of very slow consumer chips and making a fast networked computer system.
Only the USA has the university graduates to design a real super computer with super computer ready CPU designs.
China is doing what contractors sold the NSA in the 1980's. A lot of desktop CPU's on a really fast network can do some super computer like work on a lot of data.
Great for the contractors selling a support service to the NSA.
An easy hardware solution for China to get fast results if the question can be worked on with a more limited set of maths on a networked system.
If the US wants to win the supercomputer race, just redefine what a real super computer is again.
A fast network of consumer cpu's is not a real supercomputer anymore.
With a new ranking standard the USA is number one again.
The US likes its sovereign immunity. Any US worker in another nation would usually be covered by some treaty or policy with that nations security services.
Been invited in and been given full immunity. A US spy hut, camp, base, building to spy from would be legally protected.
This will be a great selling point of any new search engine product or brand.
A search engine that still searches the internet and shows results to the user.
Freedom of speech, freedom after speech and the freedom to search the internet.
The product is staying in the EU and Germany.
The sale pitch is a global ban on searching and search results.
A backlist of sites just for German users might not always work.
So whitelist all the internet results.
Its cheaper to censor globally than to try and censor for one language, a nation and still risk court in Germany.
So create a global push to report and ban history by SJW and that needed global ban looks like a user request.
The brand can keep selling products and services in Germany.
Other nations, kingdoms, brands will soon ask their SJW to create lists of topics to ban.
Make a list for SJW and they will ban it. Follow the investor funding and the suggestions of any monarchy, security organisation, theocracy, cult or brand.
Cartoons that confront a faith or cult. Blasphemy.
Comment China, Tiananmen Square and questioning any of the Communist leadership over the decades.
GCHQ in the UK might not like to see public comment on their documents once published.
"Master spy behind Snoopers’ Charter wants to gag leakers, journalists" (3/3/2017) https://arstechnica.co.uk/tech...
Germany will want to ban any public comment on its illegal immigration policy.
In the USA Ag-gag the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... or the Strategic lawsuit against public participation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
SJW will be happy to enforce any and all such policies. Report and ban any mention of history or policy.
Do encryption on the Android device and only use the iPhone to network with. When the security services try to get the decoded message all they get is the iPhone passing encrypted messages. Speed for complex encryption and decryption without the big brand trust issues.
Who is going to import a GMO crop for any real currency?
The product that has value needs a nice GMO free logo and can meet other standards to get importers interested.
Once a brand finds organic certified, GMO free, local farmers can work out some nice export deals or just ensure access to different export markets.
As a framer or as a local coop, GMO free has some global export value.
Without been GMO free a product only has national value or limited export to some nations who may not pay much as a food product.
Flood the area with two methods.
The first to enter or reset the device hardware. A command to reset or default using unexpected hardware access.
The sound does not have to be complex or need malware like bandwidth, just enough to alter the device settings to make it network receptive.
The second network in the same area is just a flood of classic malware for that brand and version of device finding a now wide open default device wide open on normal networks with all the bandwidth needed for more complex OS alterations.
Once infected, the device reverts to the expected user configuration.
Slashdot Mirror
Keep your brand or company secure by:
Keep your most advanced work and secrets away from any network.
Only use advanced US networks, US products for work that is in use and in public.
When new services, products, contracts are been considered don't store anything on servers, network facing hardware.
Hold design meetings in secure areas, don't bring in smart phones, devices. Keep vital encrypted notes on paper in that secure room.
Use a one time pad to send vital messages to distant staff. Use staff to move a message to staff globally, face to face, in person.
Use a networked company message board as a numbers station to broadcast information globally. Everyone looks at it everyday but the message is only for one person.
If you have the funding set up bait, a honey pot of digital ideas on US branded hardware that faces the internet as normal.
Pack it with the most amazing new ideas your competitors had, renamed as your own emerging products. Patents, secret bank accounts, staff lists, work with other nations. Make that server amazing. Use very different code names for emerging products and projects. See if anyone comes looking later for the same junk words or for the staff that are internal security risks on lists that are fake.
Set up a random safe house with trusted security teams for years based on that staff risk review. See if anyone tries to offer the fake staff member a new job, wants to be "friends", makes a cash offer or poses as your nations security services to do an interview...
Really simple counterintelligence that any nation or company can create.
That needs a lot of funding but protects against human and network methods.
Be aware of any new staff from other nations or your own nations new staff. New "friends" wanting a secure site tour. Physical site access can plant malware thats then collected later by hand.
Re "How long did the CIA know about this flaw"
The US goes down a list of flaw questions.
Is the US the only one using the same issue? Will other nations find it soon?
Are other groups in the wild using it now? Will AV software detect the flaw soon?
Can it be used against the USA if discovered without been noticed?
Will the USA be detected in a later code review or from code litter?
Can the flaw be proved to be the work of another nation when the US uses the same method?
After all that is worked out, the USA will keep the flaw or find some way to get it fixed if it is a risk to the USA.
Re "How many other unpatched flaws are in the Vault 7"
That depends on the US and its public budget for its clandestine services per year and the cost per flaw created or found? How much can be coded for or created for the US clandestine services per year per budget?
100 well crafted methods? To cover a year of changing consumer, prosumer and professional product lines globally of all brands the US has interest in?
Other methods need physical access to place methods and or physical access to collect the resulting data.
Create too many really unique methods in the wild and many groups start noticing the flow of data and the cost of nation funded staging servers.
Too much expert code litter starts to point to national funding. Loss of methods to other nations, cults, faith groups, other nations trusted police, "trusted" NATO or EU nations, criminals using the same methods later might also keep the flaw count down per year. The US likes to track who got their code later and is using it and how it leaked.
If not a lot of other nations, groups would be using the same methods back in the USA for their own political or national advantage.
Other "trusted" nations might leak to the press and interesting nations then stop using that US crypto or US hardware. Low count, good quality that collects all.
Re: "warehouse to be backdoored prior to shipment to final destination"
Tailored Access Operations (TAO)
"Photos of an NSA “upgrade” factory show Cisco router getting implant" (5/15/2014)
https://arstechnica.com/tech-p...
GCHQ, NSA, CIA have different ideas on what they want and why.
In some nations the NSA might be working with a national telco over decades. So it is safe for the NSA to use a that nations gov staff as they more loyal to the NSA than their own nation over generations.
In other nations the telco network might still be staffed with people who are totally loyal to their own nation. So that big dump of data back to a domestic staging server network might be detected. Code litter from another nations malware is left to fool any contractors or other gov investigators.
Other methods are needed.
The CIA might have a trusted local person sneak into a building under the cover of been new staff, a friend or more than a new friend to a long term staff member. Physical access gets past any network security and trusted devices can be altered on site and data collected by a person later on site. No internet link needed but physical device access is needed to alter code and then collect the result. No code litter is found.
Or just send a command to a US brand's hardware and collect it all with the internet.
Different methods for different nations and if staff are still loyal to their own nation.
The US gov can detect the use of hidden volumes. They may not want to tell the world they can decrypt consumer crypto.
But they are happy to show a court that encryption was used to secure data.
Can they detect how many volumes and the type of filesystem alteration that could be induced with a password?
"Know Your Language"
http://programmer.97things.ore...
"Learn the Platform"
http://programmer.97things.ore...
A few 100 to 10's per year per product cycle? It depends on the average price and the clandestine budget for buying on the open market per year.
Say a budget range for a good exclusive deal per zero day for a new OS or device in the 100 of apps/code/access products?
Thats the positive side that still looks corporate. Its hard to tell who is buying in the mix of buyers globally.
A flood of gov/mil cash in the wild would stand out even with a lot of US/UK front companies every y ear doing the malware buying.
The negative side ensuring no US or UK brand has the skills to find the issue and fix the issue days or months later.
If the security services buy too much in the wild, too many people start to notice and others want that payment or try to follow the payment front.
Other teams then start looking for the funding and find payment methods, staging servers. So the numbers are kept low per year to hide the mil/gov origins.
Also to avoid the better AV efforts and other security professionals from reading chat about too many big new cash payments.
Some are networked, some need a human to place the malware and collect the results.
A lot of different products are needed but too much and its detected by a wider community interested in every aspect of computer security.
Its their web, the world wide wiretap. From a smart phone to a Room 641A https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
So be aware of how the security services seek out your data.
The NSA and GCHQ will try and add their hardware your hardware as a brand imports hardware.
One at a hardware level in a company any network belongs to the security services.
CIA, MI5 also understand the human dimension. Social engineering or a new relationship, new staff.
The amazing new friend, skilled new staff member, potential client who wants a site tour.
Expect devices that will be part of the existing hardware (smart phone) and will pass any expected network usage detection efforts. The security services will alter your hotels networked TV. Staff will have their smart phone, tablet, computer packed with gov malware.
Data might be stored locally for another human to pick up. No use of any network to remove data. The hardware might be altered by a human and then a network is used to collect later. So not always expect to see a new unexpected upload. A human might place the malware and then collect any results. No litter to find.
So a company watching its networks and devices might not see any network changes at all or just "expected" user/staff data going out later.
How to keep your patents ideas, inventions, banking, designs secure from the USA and UK?
Use a one time pad for that very important message. Don't reuse the one time pad code, consider sending staff out to deliver an important message in person.
Only use the internet network for reaching consumers. Don't allow smart phones or other devices near advanced product development.
Be aware of offers of random friendship at a gym, bar, club, art gallery, business or sports event, cult, faith by very friendly strangers.
The distraction could be used to add malware to your smartphone physically so no network trace will show any changes in usage.
Secure your internet servers that interact with consumers to the best new standards that users can still access.
Get any emerging product work away from computers, return to paper and secure face to face meetings for creative ideas.
Don't allow smart phones or watch devices to secure meetings.
Keep all new friends or random staff with consumer electronics from wondering around any secure areas.
Once all that is in place and working, get your legal team ready for a NSL. Understand that a lot of malware can be networked or can be entered by a human.
Could be ex and former staff selling mi/gov grade product to their cult, faith, embassy, other parts of the US gov, the private sector.
Once the devices got handed out to NATO nations, the different EU nation police forces all their ex and former staff can sell the US product to the private sector.
The US is now been flooded with its own products as once very secret tech finds its way into every embassy and the private sector.
Other nations front companies, US dual citizens helping their real nations.
The UK had the same issues. Some ore gov, mil other are just random efforts by different groups.
What the UK did can often show what could be in the USA.
Fake Mobile Phone Towers Operating In The UK (09 June 2015)
http://news.sky.com/story/fake...
UK Cops Using Fake Mobile Phone Tower to Intercept Calls, Shut Off Phones (10.31.11)
https://www.wired.com/2011/10/...
Fake mobile phone towers discovered in London: Stingrays come to the UK (6/11/2015)
https://arstechnica.com/tech-p...
The other US side would be to track US police, city workers to ensure they did not have a task force on any emerging private sector products or services.
Once a map of every phone in a wide city area was tracked, tracking undercover officials would be easy given a lack of digital counter surveillance training.
New "staff" or users reporting back into a government building every few days or weeks for a set time would be very easy to map.
Another aspect would be to counter any journalist trying undercover work. Their origin and return to their place of work would be detected if they ever had two working phones with them. Their undercover story phone and their journalist phone.
Other tracking could counter bloggers and web 2.0 attempts by citizen journalism to enter political parties or party political fund raising.
They might make an error with two phones in use. One they used for undercover work in the past, one they use for their blog.
Lack of cash could see device reuse and very easy tracking.
Also the meeting of any gov worker, federal official, contractor, mil, political staff with any journalist would be tracked by the mil, gov, party, contractor. A vast database of journalist. A political and private sector version of the NSA's FIRSTFRUIT.
The Most Intriguing Spy Stories From 166 Internal NSA Reports (May 17 2016)
https://theintercept.com/2016/...
“.. over 5,000 insecurity-related records” ranging from “espionage damage assessments” to “liaison exchanges.”
Someone is not tracking the fake networks for some reason. Political over, mil, police or gov use? Gov workers detect the fake cell products and nothing is done?
Get a fast router with good VPN support to pass all ethernet networking.
Re "rely on senior staff to a concerning degree when it comes to tech challenges"
Interview people and see if they have the skills needed.
"Rely on senior staff" could be the only skill they are good at and it got them a job.
The background story, did their past education show any of the same "rely on others" issues?
Its a skill thats worked on over years.
re "Stop banging that drum"
I was thinking more of what the NSA learned around the Project THOTH decade, 1984-88.
The revolution for the NSA contractor was to offer the NSA desktop computer CPU's on a fast network.
The US collect it all policy resulted in data that needed to be sorted. A huge new network of desktop CPU's packaged to look like a classic super computer was a great idea to win a long term contract with.
The hardware was cheap, the new network support needed was expensive. Win, win for a private sector contractor.
The other emerging issue for the NSA is Australia, Canada and the GCHQ can buy the same methods and do not need NSA staff to help other 5 eye nations with bespoke US branded NSA export grade super computers.
So other nations are collecting all, breaking codes and using low cost computer networks regional that no longer need constant direct NSA oversight and support.
The other issue for the NSA is US universities are just giving every US CPU design away as its created by US graduates.
A lot of other nations university students get to study into the USA. Some hold over cold war State department policy to make the US look nice?
The US university system is addicted to the profits from such students? The CIA hopes to turn some of the students from Chain in the USA so that spy policy is worth the total loss of decades of US super computer plans?
Only the NSA can see the epic fail in giving decades once secret US CPU plans to any other nations students who attend a top US university.
Did the CIA actually turn a few students from China over the decades and the results from a few very well placed US spies in China that counter the NSA/GCHQ digital collection results?
The more public question of a super computer gap will restore a funding balance. Think of the Army and Navy code breaking of the 1930's. Two sides of the US gov/mil working on the same issue and not sharing.
The super computer gap news is just the public face of such issues.
China is taking a lot of very slow consumer chips and making a fast networked computer system.
Only the USA has the university graduates to design a real super computer with super computer ready CPU designs.
China is doing what contractors sold the NSA in the 1980's. A lot of desktop CPU's on a really fast network can do some super computer like work on a lot of data.
Great for the contractors selling a support service to the NSA.
An easy hardware solution for China to get fast results if the question can be worked on with a more limited set of maths on a networked system.
If the US wants to win the supercomputer race, just redefine what a real super computer is again.
A fast network of consumer cpu's is not a real supercomputer anymore.
With a new ranking standard the USA is number one again.
A spy in WW2 kept a book of all their past messages in code and the plain text with them .... as they felt they had to file everything.
AC did you miss the Vault 7 news? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Look at East and West Germany.
"More women work in east than west: Study" (14 January 2015)
https://www.thelocal.de/201501...
The US likes its sovereign immunity. Any US worker in another nation would usually be covered by some treaty or policy with that nations security services.
Been invited in and been given full immunity. A US spy hut, camp, base, building to spy from would be legally protected.
This will be a great selling point of any new search engine product or brand.
A search engine that still searches the internet and shows results to the user.
Freedom of speech, freedom after speech and the freedom to search the internet.
The product is staying in the EU and Germany.
The sale pitch is a global ban on searching and search results.
A backlist of sites just for German users might not always work.
So whitelist all the internet results.
Its cheaper to censor globally than to try and censor for one language, a nation and still risk court in Germany.
So create a global push to report and ban history by SJW and that needed global ban looks like a user request.
The brand can keep selling products and services in Germany.
Other nations, kingdoms, brands will soon ask their SJW to create lists of topics to ban.
Make a list for SJW and they will ban it. Follow the investor funding and the suggestions of any monarchy, security organisation, theocracy, cult or brand.
Cartoons that confront a faith or cult. Blasphemy.
Comment China, Tiananmen Square and questioning any of the Communist leadership over the decades.
GCHQ in the UK might not like to see public comment on their documents once published.
"Master spy behind Snoopers’ Charter wants to gag leakers, journalists" (3/3/2017)
https://arstechnica.co.uk/tech...
Germany will want to ban any public comment on its illegal immigration policy.
In the USA Ag-gag the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... or the Strategic lawsuit against public participation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
SJW will be happy to enforce any and all such policies. Report and ban any mention of history or policy.
Project MINARET https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"The GCHQ handed over intercepted data of Americans to the U.S. government."
Do encryption on the Android device and only use the iPhone to network with. When the security services try to get the decoded message all they get is the iPhone passing encrypted messages. Speed for complex encryption and decryption without the big brand trust issues.
Who is going to import a GMO crop for any real currency?
The product that has value needs a nice GMO free logo and can meet other standards to get importers interested.
Once a brand finds organic certified, GMO free, local farmers can work out some nice export deals or just ensure access to different export markets.
As a framer or as a local coop, GMO free has some global export value.
Without been GMO free a product only has national value or limited export to some nations who may not pay much as a food product.
Flood the area with two methods.
The first to enter or reset the device hardware. A command to reset or default using unexpected hardware access.
The sound does not have to be complex or need malware like bandwidth, just enough to alter the device settings to make it network receptive.
The second network in the same area is just a flood of classic malware for that brand and version of device finding a now wide open default device wide open on normal networks with all the bandwidth needed for more complex OS alterations.
Once infected, the device reverts to the expected user configuration.