Discretionary income after food, living costs, tax can't go as far as it once did in the past?
People are getting bored with all the content?
The extra political content in new shows is getting to be less fun?
The quality of plot creation is now so low other types of entertainment get the spending?
Different streaming media is now more fun from the internet?
Look to the states that enforce laws and rules about tent cities, RV parking and trash in the street.
They don't have such problems. Their cities stay clean and attract investment.
Its a city police politics problem. Find out why the city police do not to enforce laws. Parking laws. Trash laws. Camping laws. Waste laws.
AC humans would start looking at other humans as the police issue. A news report that tells everyone that it was computers makes that deep search go away.
Police informants deep in criminal networks are safe as everyone thinks it was the computers.
Informants that stay in place can then report on the next use of crypto.
Police had to act fast before criminals suspected and questioned other criminals about helping the police.
Better to tell everyone that it was "computers" and protect other well placed human informants working for the police.
The police can then control the results now rather and unexpected results of finding actual decades of well placed human informants.
Informants who can always find out what the next crypto products is:)
AC the problem is who is filling in the postal vote and who is filling in the postal vote many times.
An illegal migrant voting many times?
A political party sending in 10000 extra postal votes under names that should not be voting any more?
Showing photo ID should remove a lot of extra voting and illegal migrant voting.
Removing easy postal voting allows everyone in the election to witness the voting process and the later counting.
The German government getting reports of every use of online accounts and sending police out to interview the people who commented on the news?
That kind of nationalisation AC?
Citizens show their photo ID. Vote on paper thats counted in front of representatives of the different political parties and people standing for election.
No postal voting except for mil and for people who have a very good reason for why they can vote on the day.
That removes a lot of the voting by illegal migrants, non citizens.
Voting more than one time.
Using another persons name to vote again.
Finding 200% of a local population was allowed to vote again.
Block sites and brands a person in the EU wants to use globally to ensure EU taxes get paid?
Replace non EU services products with EU only services and then force all EU users to enjoy EU taxed services.
The US brands offer a user account for "free".
A EU service has to pay to protect the data in the EU and pay a EU service tax? Thats not "free".
An educated workforce that needs a wage to keep working.
When all the profits are lost to a new EU tax the value in the "educated workforce" is lost.
Move to another advanced nation with better workers and a tax rate that welcomes investment and jobs.
How much more tax are an average advanced nations "educated workforce" really worth?
Some of the profits? Most of the profits? A total loss of all profit in that nation just to keep the "educated workforce" ?
Would a company seeking low taxes to get the maximum profit now want to change to making a loss under a new EU tax?
you can't tax something that can move out of the nation and out of the EU.
Tax needs a captive product/service that has to stay in that nation.
Low taxation is what attracted US brands to parts of the EU.
When the EU places new tax the same US brands will just look for better tax rates globally.
When the only attractive offer to stay in a nation was a low tax rate, don't remove the one thing keeping a brand in your nation.
Look up for a blimp collecting 24/7 domestically not just for the National Tactical Integration Office.
A light plane doing a repeating pattern over a city collecting all on phone use.
Down the street see the FBI camera in a utility poles.
Private and city CCTV working together to track every face and pattern of movement.
Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response team looking over who is using transport between US cities.
Faces of drivers and passengers getting collected down many of the main roads and all tunnels and bridges.
New PRISM like networks working with big US brands removing all consumer encryption and giving all resulting data to the US gov/mil.
Add another bigger notch.
The correct way to hold the phone has to be tested for this time.
Then staff have to draw the art to show how the phone should be held.
So the consumer can enjoy the speed of the connection.
Ensure PRISM v 2.0 is fully supported for more governments.
Most advance nations facing a new area of science usually find the very best people they have, give them jobs and money.
Advance nations quickly work out if they can support a project over years of decades.
The "budget" part for science when not at war usually sets some real world limits on expert staffing and the amount of new equipment.
So take the science "budget" and consider how much can go towards one new project.
Find the very best people and see if they get any results over years, a few decades within that amount of science spending.
Why would any advanced nation staff any long term project with below average staff for decades and still expect results?
Advance nations with the best skills have an ability to look after projects over decades and see if their spending is getting real world results.
Tax payers money is not unlimited in most nations. Getting another nation or nations to keep on investing is not unlimited if no results are found.
Private investment would also like to see some results in the short to long term for their money.
That all needs the very best staff in advanced nations who can show they can manage "science" and who have decades of getting results for such investments.
By governments looking after tax payers money every year. By investors expecting a return at some later date on their investment.
Slashdot Mirror
keys?
Discretionary income after food, living costs, tax can't go as far as it once did in the past?
People are getting bored with all the content?
The extra political content in new shows is getting to be less fun?
The quality of plot creation is now so low other types of entertainment get the spending?
Different streaming media is now more fun from the internet?
When MS has a problem your games are the only things to have to consider.
Do work on real OS.
AC its not a change. The USA does not need malware, it has what PRISM was, a direct path in and out.
Look to the states that enforce laws and rules about tent cities, RV parking and trash in the street.
They don't have such problems. Their cities stay clean and attract investment.
Its a city police politics problem. Find out why the city police do not to enforce laws. Parking laws. Trash laws. Camping laws. Waste laws.
Bigger lens. Best lens. Make image of self and friends look great with best lens. The notch allows for space needed to add the best lens.
AC humans would start looking at other humans as the police issue. A news report that tells everyone that it was computers makes that deep search go away.
Police informants deep in criminal networks are safe as everyone thinks it was the computers.
Informants that stay in place can then report on the next use of crypto.
Police had to act fast before criminals suspected and questioned other criminals about helping the police.
:)
Better to tell everyone that it was "computers" and protect other well placed human informants working for the police.
The police can then control the results now rather and unexpected results of finding actual decades of well placed human informants.
Informants who can always find out what the next crypto products is
AC 3 nations already not want the tax. Thats not a very unified EU position re your "either do as they are told or".
AC the problem is who is filling in the postal vote and who is filling in the postal vote many times.
An illegal migrant voting many times?
A political party sending in 10000 extra postal votes under names that should not be voting any more?
Showing photo ID should remove a lot of extra voting and illegal migrant voting.
Removing easy postal voting allows everyone in the election to witness the voting process and the later counting.
The German government getting reports of every use of online accounts and sending police out to interview the people who commented on the news?
That kind of nationalisation AC?
Citizens show their photo ID. Vote on paper thats counted in front of representatives of the different political parties and people standing for election.
No postal voting except for mil and for people who have a very good reason for why they can vote on the day.
That removes a lot of the voting by illegal migrants, non citizens.
Voting more than one time.
Using another persons name to vote again.
Finding 200% of a local population was allowed to vote again.
Block sites and brands a person in the EU wants to use globally to ensure EU taxes get paid?
Replace non EU services products with EU only services and then force all EU users to enjoy EU taxed services.
The US brands offer a user account for "free".
A EU service has to pay to protect the data in the EU and pay a EU service tax? Thats not "free".
An educated workforce that needs a wage to keep working. When all the profits are lost to a new EU tax the value in the "educated workforce" is lost.
Move to another advanced nation with better workers and a tax rate that welcomes investment and jobs.
How much more tax are an average advanced nations "educated workforce" really worth?
Some of the profits? Most of the profits? A total loss of all profit in that nation just to keep the "educated workforce" ?
Would a company seeking low taxes to get the maximum profit now want to change to making a loss under a new EU tax?
you can't tax something that can move out of the nation and out of the EU.
Tax needs a captive product/service that has to stay in that nation.
Low taxation is what attracted US brands to parts of the EU.
When the EU places new tax the same US brands will just look for better tax rates globally.
When the only attractive offer to stay in a nation was a low tax rate, don't remove the one thing keeping a brand in your nation.
Thats why people kept on buying Intel.
Enjoy MS for video games. Find a real OS for anything interesting.
Project SHAMROCK https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and Project MINARET https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... show the domestic spying goes back generations with no protections against collect it all.
Look up for a blimp collecting 24/7 domestically not just for the National Tactical Integration Office.
A light plane doing a repeating pattern over a city collecting all on phone use.
Down the street see the FBI camera in a utility poles.
Private and city CCTV working together to track every face and pattern of movement.
Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response team looking over who is using transport between US cities.
Faces of drivers and passengers getting collected down many of the main roads and all tunnels and bridges.
New PRISM like networks working with big US brands removing all consumer encryption and giving all resulting data to the US gov/mil.
PRISM for your data not just your OS and communications.
Put all the plot in the trailer. People will want to go to see the movie if the trailer was so creative.
Add another bigger notch.
The correct way to hold the phone has to be tested for this time.
Then staff have to draw the art to show how the phone should be held.
So the consumer can enjoy the speed of the connection.
Ensure PRISM v 2.0 is fully supported for more governments.
All the better to push more ads on users with.
But if that is turned off then the ads don't work.
Most advance nations facing a new area of science usually find the very best people they have, give them jobs and money.
Advance nations quickly work out if they can support a project over years of decades.
The "budget" part for science when not at war usually sets some real world limits on expert staffing and the amount of new equipment.
So take the science "budget" and consider how much can go towards one new project.
Find the very best people and see if they get any results over years, a few decades within that amount of science spending.
Why would any advanced nation staff any long term project with below average staff for decades and still expect results?
Advance nations with the best skills have an ability to look after projects over decades and see if their spending is getting real world results.
Tax payers money is not unlimited in most nations. Getting another nation or nations to keep on investing is not unlimited if no results are found.
Private investment would also like to see some results in the short to long term for their money.
That all needs the very best staff in advanced nations who can show they can manage "science" and who have decades of getting results for such investments.
By governments looking after tax payers money every year. By investors expecting a return at some later date on their investment.