no, those are the easy parts... getting the control lines for the giant balloon that can't go over 1000 feet was the hard part. now that we completed that final step, the space elevator should be done in a week. call me.
now we do the same and both of our countries are at the hands of the software developers programming the AI... yeah, real step forward guys. even battlebots got cancelled... this isn't a good idea. didn't anyone see terminator?
yeah, for the off chance that our enemie is wearing bright white tee's.... runnin around yellin about I'M MIKE JOOOOOOOOOONES. this tech is worthless until it works on camo. don't even whisper about it until it works on camo.
wow, one of the first times i've clicked a "video included" link that actually worked. nice server.
their image processing is pretty much perfect, so i'm assuming they took some liberties such as assuming the target is wearing a bright white shirt. show me this thing firing on someone in camo.
dude, you just proved you were wrong. if it approaches the GS point as the the counterweight increases, then put an infinate counterweight on. then it goes right at the GS point.
I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THIS for certain hot topics in the US. imagine if it was set up like this, every year people vote freely online for which items should be put to public PAY elections. so lets say the top 52 items go to public online pay elections which occur weekly. for that topic of suggestion for new law, all of the info will be provided online with the best debaters on each side given 5 minutes to explain their case. the videos are free. as much information that is possible will be provided... this means ALL information. unfiltered. unchecked. the userbase will have a moderation and voting so the most legitimate details are ranked up so they will be seen. if you care about public voting, then spend 20 minutes a week, and make an informed opinion, but ONLY IF YOU CARE, because voting costs $1. $1, the fiat paper sensation sweeping the nation is the exact figure to charge when asking the question "is this worth ANYTHING to me"... if it is, then it should cost at least $1. that is what should define the value of a dollar. granted a gumball is essentially worthless, but change can still be provided and level of worthlessness is also variable from 0 to 100 cents. so, you charge a buck... make 52 INFORMED decisions about CREATING NEW LAWS at any level of government, or ELIMINATING COMPLETELY OLD LAWS. very important rule: CHANGING of laws is not allowed, and if a law is chosen to be eliminated a flag can be set if a new law which must go in effect before this law is officially eliminated... anyways, even if the laws didn't actually become law, but were green lighted to priority issues that must be simply voted to approve or deny, to pass, at least 61% must approve or deny. if that doesn't happen, then the issue will be revoted on every week until that does happen. if the public choses too they can run the same thing through again assuming it is the top 52 issues for the next year.
THE PARENT POST CHANGES NOTHING AND MEANS NEXT TO NOTHING!
This is just another stupid donkey that doesn't want you to pay attention to the facts.
if our current law says no first strike, and bush strikes first, then regardless of the outcome, bush and EVERYONE CONNECTED TO BUSH lose out bigtime because bush broke the stated law. if the law changes, then bush will not be getting pressured by everyone connected to him to not use the big pearly button under his right armrest (that is the new place they keep it). anyways, believe him, or believe me... but just believe. the truth is out there.
yeah.... so it's totally worth it to make any subsequent design 100 times harder. real bright. did you used to work at nasa?
i say the design is bad because it makes implementation difficult and also has a huge flaw, and you just point out the huge flaw isn't VERY likely to be exploited by conditions... and thus the original design is OK?
people like you are why these moronic designs are probably getting through the pipeline over there at nasDUHHHHHHH.
they need to hire some new blood. these 60 year old donkeys they got with these 60 year old ideas just got to go. why the christ wouldn't you make the sensors able to communicate with EVERY other node? they do realize that if a large ring shaped problem occurred in the net that the inner nodes could never communicate with the outer nodes. there is no reason to do things this way and it doesn't make the problem any more fail safe, it just makes the solution to any problem based on this data that much more prone to special cases. dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb.
"Can Microsoft Out-Google Google?" well, no, not if they want to continue out microsofting anyone else. the business models just don't interoperate, and are mostly conflicting... all exept the google search appliance, so maybe microsoft can get that business away from them, but thats about it.
does anyone else realize that the only reason this is news is because some schmoe was searching online for "katrina" and came across this pointless story?
Slashdot Mirror
impact you're find... drag it on the pavement and it's soft material... down to your skin in no time.
how the fuck can you get so excited over weather equipment?
why is EA Sports in charge again?
the.... EDGE. you are so fucking dumb. how could anything be more ON TOPIC you computer humping fag?
the message: i will spear you at wrestlemania.
no, those are the easy parts... getting the control lines for the giant balloon that can't go over 1000 feet was the hard part. now that we completed that final step, the space elevator should be done in a week. call me.
i thought the whole point of p2p was to shrare copyrighted mp3s? am i missing something?
why didn't the robots just climb up the safety lines instead?
now i understand slashdot moderation... the most logical arguement from the opposition = flamebait. once again, real smart guys.
now we do the same and both of our countries are at the hands of the software developers programming the AI... yeah, real step forward guys. even battlebots got cancelled... this isn't a good idea. didn't anyone see terminator?
yeah, for the off chance that our enemie is wearing bright white tee's.... runnin around yellin about I'M MIKE JOOOOOOOOOONES. this tech is worthless until it works on camo. don't even whisper about it until it works on camo.
their image processing is pretty much perfect, so i'm assuming they took some liberties such as assuming the target is wearing a bright white shirt. show me this thing firing on someone in camo.
dude, you just proved you were wrong. if it approaches the GS point as the the counterweight increases, then put an infinate counterweight on. then it goes right at the GS point.
would that be the TeraGrid U2? i don't like the red power button on it.
I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THIS for certain hot topics in the US. imagine if it was set up like this, every year people vote freely online for which items should be put to public PAY elections. so lets say the top 52 items go to public online pay elections which occur weekly. for that topic of suggestion for new law, all of the info will be provided online with the best debaters on each side given 5 minutes to explain their case. the videos are free. as much information that is possible will be provided... this means ALL information. unfiltered. unchecked. the userbase will have a moderation and voting so the most legitimate details are ranked up so they will be seen. if you care about public voting, then spend 20 minutes a week, and make an informed opinion, but ONLY IF YOU CARE, because voting costs $1. $1, the fiat paper sensation sweeping the nation is the exact figure to charge when asking the question "is this worth ANYTHING to me"... if it is, then it should cost at least $1. that is what should define the value of a dollar. granted a gumball is essentially worthless, but change can still be provided and level of worthlessness is also variable from 0 to 100 cents. so, you charge a buck... make 52 INFORMED decisions about CREATING NEW LAWS at any level of government, or ELIMINATING COMPLETELY OLD LAWS. very important rule: CHANGING of laws is not allowed, and if a law is chosen to be eliminated a flag can be set if a new law which must go in effect before this law is officially eliminated... anyways, even if the laws didn't actually become law, but were green lighted to priority issues that must be simply voted to approve or deny, to pass, at least 61% must approve or deny. if that doesn't happen, then the issue will be revoted on every week until that does happen. if the public choses too they can run the same thing through again assuming it is the top 52 issues for the next year.
i really hate when people confuse network latency with CPU latency or driver latency or poor software running on the application layer.
i was just trying to razz the other guy...
This is just another stupid donkey that doesn't want you to pay attention to the facts.
if our current law says no first strike, and bush strikes first, then regardless of the outcome, bush and EVERYONE CONNECTED TO BUSH lose out bigtime because bush broke the stated law. if the law changes, then bush will not be getting pressured by everyone connected to him to not use the big pearly button under his right armrest (that is the new place they keep it). anyways, believe him, or believe me... but just believe. the truth is out there.
i say the design is bad because it makes implementation difficult and also has a huge flaw, and you just point out the huge flaw isn't VERY likely to be exploited by conditions... and thus the original design is OK?
people like you are why these moronic designs are probably getting through the pipeline over there at nasDUHHHHHHH.
i'm out.
they need to hire some new blood. these 60 year old donkeys they got with these 60 year old ideas just got to go. why the christ wouldn't you make the sensors able to communicate with EVERY other node? they do realize that if a large ring shaped problem occurred in the net that the inner nodes could never communicate with the outer nodes. there is no reason to do things this way and it doesn't make the problem any more fail safe, it just makes the solution to any problem based on this data that much more prone to special cases. dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb.
blow something up?
"Can Microsoft Out-Google Google?" well, no, not if they want to continue out microsofting anyone else. the business models just don't interoperate, and are mostly conflicting... all exept the google search appliance, so maybe microsoft can get that business away from them, but thats about it.
i feel the same way about all my theories... maybe this guy is on to something....
does anyone else realize that the only reason this is news is because some schmoe was searching online for "katrina" and came across this pointless story?
... he was just pointing out how stupid it was to link to his content as part of their corporate website... your list doesn't apply at all.