Slashdot Mirror


Flexible Body Armor

dotmax writes "One item to pop out of the Turin Winter Olympics is the use of flexible body armor. Similar to silly putty, this shear rate material is flexible under normal load and hardens under impact. Sounds expensive, but could offer some great alternatives for traditional hard shelled impact gear in active sports and military applications."

210 comments

  1. Meh... Color me unimpressed. by XorNand · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Skiwear company Spyder, based in Colorado, US, developed racing suits incorporating d3o along the shins and forearms and offered members of the US and Canadian Olympic alpine ski teams the chance to try them out several months ago. "Now they love it and won't ski without it," claims Richard Palmer, CEO of UK-based d3o Labs, which developed the material.
    I don't get it. What's the advantage of using flexible armor on body parts that don't flex? If it works as advertised, seems like this product would be more useful on the torso, back, neck, or near joints. Maybe I'm just jaded, but I'd bet that the skiers really couldn't care less about it. The CEO, on the other hand, now gets to brag about his new technology being used in the Olympics. Cycling and golf is full of this type of crap--technology and jargon used more as a marketing tool than to really enhance the product's performance.
    --
    Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    1. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Jelloman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's the advantage of using flexible armor on body parts that don't flex?

      Try telling a downhill skiier crashing into a wall at over 100 MPH that there are body parts that don't flex. I'm sure they'll happily believe you and give up their armor.

    2. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Kelbear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please don't think I'm trying to be mean here. Assume a friendly tone:P

      But I don't quite follow. The grandparent poster was skeptical about the value of flexible armor over parts that should never bend. If your shin is bending significantly, your shin's probably broken.

      Flexible armor is useful over flexing parts of your body so that you can get maximum utility. Like a flexible elbow pad, it'd let you bend your elbow easier and more powerfully. But over your non-bending shin, you'd just want the strongest protection possible here right? Shouldn't be any cases where your shin is bending.

    3. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try telling a downhill skiier crashing into a wall at over 100 MPH that there are body parts that don't flex. I'm sure they'll happily believe you and give up their armor.

      He means that you could just use non-flexibile armor in those areas since they don't flex normally.

      Regular shin and forearm armor would do just fine in the same place.

    4. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm. I think the parent was implying that for non-flexible body parts, regular (ie. rigid) body armor would be more than adequate.

    5. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are advantages to having something flexible against your skin that will harden on impact. One of those is comfort. Hard plastic guards aren't comfortable and are very obvious (and more than likely hurt aerodynamics). In addition the forearms have muscles on them which if you use your muscles at all tend to flex and expand. Having a flexible soft guard on those body parts would be incredible.

    6. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by dogugotw · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ever wear shin pads or arm protectors? Ever notice that they need to be strapped on and chafe like a SOB? I'd love to get my hands on something like this. Built into an undersuit, moves with you, no staps, lightweight and instant protection when you hit something. I'd like to know that my non-moving bones (shins, radius/ulna, skull) were wrapped in protection when the jerk in an SUV cuts in front of my motorcycle and takes me down.

      FWIW, this stuff sounds like what happens to a semi-liquid mix of cornstarch and water. Slide your hand in and it drops into the fluid; hit it hard and no penetration at all.

    7. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by RevWhite · · Score: 0

      I would imagine that those rigid guards probably rub the skin and chafe it, thus making something that is not normally rigid one hell of a lot more comfortable.

      --
      Hey, can I bum a sig?
    8. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Mahou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeh but those areas have muscles don't they? flexible armor would be better than hard armor in allowing the muscles more freedom to move while flexing without needing to the make the hard armor loose right? the bone of my shin is just a narrow part of my leg, and my forearm isn't a column of calcium either. doesn't the rest of it need protection too?

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    9. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      A shin may be rigid, but it sits between two joints. Any movement in those joints will jostle the armor over the shin. Also, a shin is backed by a great big muscle that moves around quite a bit. Both factors will make wearing rigid armor annoying.

    10. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a rider too, that's one of the first things I thought of when seeing this article.

      Also: I think the word for that type of fluid is 'dilatant'.

    11. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Try telling a downhill skiier crashing into a wall at over 100 MPH that there are body parts that don't flex.

      I doubt this stuff is going to have much protection against hitting a wall at 100MPH. The article says that racers are using this stuff on their arms and legs to protect against hitting the poles. I'm sure without protection hitting those poles as hard as they do is going to hurt like hell. If you hit a wall at 100mph, no amount of body armour is going to save you, as all your internal organs are going to be crushed in the impact.

      --
      AccountKiller
    12. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by eonlabs · · Score: 2

      Have you ever had a rigid shin guard strapped to your leg. If you have, you realize that after a short time, it starts to abraid your leg, because while your shin bone itself is not stretching and deforming, the skin around it is constantly moving. It's particularly obvious in the old rollerblades with the plastic tops that would strap over your shins. If the material can flow some, that means that not only will it be a close to perfect fit, but if it happens to shift off of your leg because you've jogged it out of place, it will re-form to the contours of your body and CONTINUE to be a perfect fit.

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
    13. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      Having non-flexable armor, even on non-flexing parts of the body, allows for faster and easier movement. Think about it, a space suit has flexable material at every human joint, but it is still a pain to manuver in.

    14. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by pdbogen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I second this. I can't *wait* until this stuff gets into motorcycle gear. Gloves that turn to rigid gauntlets when I hit the pavement == win.

    15. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Having been a ski racer my self, i can tell you the hard armor binds often. The forarm guards need to twist as you twist your arm (remember the forarm is made of two bones not one, it is NOT rigid!) AND the shin guards need to flex as you move forward and backward.

      The guards on the shins go from the outside of the hard plastic boot to ABOVE your knee.

      I would have loved to have had hard armor built into my suit, so i didn't have to strap something on top every time. I would love to see them add this armor to the shoulders on thefront, back, and outsides because in higher speed races this is what takes the majority of the force.

    16. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Scarblac · · Score: 4, Informative

      But I don't quite follow. The grandparent poster was skeptical about the value of flexible armor over parts that should never bend. If your shin is bending significantly, your shin's probably broken.

      Close your left hand over your right lower arm. Now turn move your hand left and right, up and down, flex the muscles... that thing moves a lot. The shin likewise has muscles and two bones in it. Apparently the sporters like this flexible thing better than rigid protectors, so it seems to help.

      Why the poster calls this "body armor" i'm not sure though, according to TFA this is purely about shin and arm protection, the areas that get into contact with the sticks during slalom skiing.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    17. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      The thing is, though, you might as well use rigid armor on the places that are not meant to flex. The flexibility is only useful for articulated joints that normally need to remain movable. Everywhere else, you can probably do better with rigid armor.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    18. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by violent.ed · · Score: 1

      It depends on how expensive this armor would be, and how effective it is at protecting non-moving body parts. If the same ammount of this material, that could compare to or protect as well as a standardly used pad, costs less, why not use it?

      --
      - You're not paranoid, they really are after you.
    19. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by MindStalker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well PopSci also had an article about it (the print version, it should be on the web version in a few days). Apparently they are putting it into helmets it allows for a flexable beanie type hat to become a hardhat when nessesary. According to the article it wouldn't be good enough for a motocycle helmet but would be perfect for speeds skating for example.

    20. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by bjason82 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Well said, no need for me to write a comment... You've already expressed my point well enough. So in other words... Ditto!

    21. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But I don't quite follow. The grandparent poster was skeptical about the value of flexible armor over parts that should never bend. If your shin is bending significantly, your shin's probably broken.

      Consider putting it over your upper arm. Your bicep flexes, the bone underneath does not. But if you've ever hit a gate at high speed, you'd LOVE some armor over your upper arm.
      A rigid plate works, but is much harder to work with. A flexible plate, that moves as your muscles contract, would be a lot better.

      Your tibia doesn't flex (a lot), but the skin and muscle between the bone and the outside world does.

    22. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by ArcSecond · · Score: 1

      That was the first thing I thought when I saw this: finally a good semi-smart material for motorcycle armour. Gibsonesque, whut?

      --

      I've got a bad attitude and karma to burn. Go ahead. Mod me down.

    23. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hopefully this stuff brings us back to sword fights ala Dune.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    24. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by iphayd · · Score: 1

      I see two things that make this look very enticing.

      1) It is most likely lighter than hardened armor.
      2) While a shin won't bend, it will most likely twist and the muscles flex. This armor allows the user to have protection without gaps that would normally allow the user to move their bodies the way they need to to get down the hill fastest.

    25. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by hazem · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you hit a wall at 100mph, no amount of body armour is going to save you, as all your internal organs are going to be crushed in the impact.

      And that's why skiers whould wear personal airbags!

    26. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Pleb'a.nz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point is, that they use them on "non-flexible parts" as an additional exo-skeleton to their skeleton to help strengthen limbs on impact so they dont break.

      I.e., you come hurtling at a wall.. you smack your shin on the corner.. the armour hardens to reduce impact inertia, therefore reducing impact on the bone and reducing the chances of a breakage. It's not bruises that kill the skiiers career, it's shattered bones :)

    27. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Jerk in an SUV or even a Honda Civic (helmetcam video)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    28. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 1

      Stephensonesque, I'm thinkin. :-)

      What was in Hiro's armor? Some kind of sintered unobtanium?

    29. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Forget price - I have two more important questions :
      1. Does it stop bullets?
      2. Does it come in black?

      If the answer to those two questions is yes, count me in for one if the price tag is less than five digits.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    30. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by shadowlordseth · · Score: 0

      You know you're really going to use those gloves to punch in the window on Honda Civics!

    31. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Madd+Scientist · · Score: 0

      impact you're find... drag it on the pavement and it's soft material... down to your skin in no time.

    32. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just an observation.

      The following people in that video caused that accident:

      -The white van in the HOV lane impeaded the flow of traffic, unexpectedly slowed down in the express lane, probably to rubber neck at the slow traffic in the right lanes. Either that or he grossly overestimated in his responce to the slowing down of the traffic in front.

      -The red car in the HOV lane (the impactor) was impatent and attempted to stomp on the gas to perform a last second pass on the right. Was probably too busy looking in the mirror trying to clear the motorcyclist and did not notice nor expect the white van to suddenly slow down to oogle the traffic. When he finally did notice, he slammed on the brakes, locking them up, and attempted to swearve, launching him into an uncontrolled skid.

      -The RV in the 2nd right lane was not paying attention and cut off the otherwise wide open escape route of the silver car in the right lane.

      The following people attempted to prevent the accident:

      -The motorcyclist shifted her position in order to avoid the hit.

      -The silver car in the right lane attempted to move as far to the right as he could without hitting the RV.

      -The car following the motorcyclist left enough following distance and had enough presence of mind to stop.

    33. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
      And that's why skiers whould wear personal airbags!

      Sounds like a government mandate just waiting to happen. Won't somebody think of the children?

    34. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Only Xtreme downhill skiiers have pistes with walls on !

      but perhaps you missed THE OPENING SENTENCE :

      A futuristic flexible material that instantly hardens into armour upon impact will protect US and Canadian skiers from injury on the slalom runs at this year's Winter Olympics.

      RTFA idiot

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    35. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      try re-reading the opening sentence again with my emphasis :

      A futuristic flexible material that instantly hardens into armour upon impact will protect US and Canadian skiers from injury on the slalom runs at this year's Winter Olympics.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    36. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So you cover this stuff with a material that doesn't wear away easily. Like Kevlar.

    37. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Maybe not. I don't know for sure, but it seems plausible that as the material hit each small ridge of the pavement, that small part would harden since it's still an impact, just on a very small area.

    38. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a government mandate just waiting to happen. Won't somebody think of the children?

      Nah, they weigh too much.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    39. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by themysteryman73 · · Score: 0
      Close your left hand over your right lower arm. Now turn move your hand left and right, up and down, flex the muscles... that thing moves a lot. The shin likewise has muscles and two bones in it. Apparently the sporters like this flexible thing better than rigid protectors, so it seems to help.

      Anyone else find it ironic that only one person pointed out that it's not just your knees that move in your legs? :P

    40. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by famous_unknown · · Score: 1
      What's the advantage of using flexible armor on body parts that don't flex? If it works as advertised, seems like this product would be more useful on the torso, back, neck, or near joints. Maybe I'm just jaded, but I'd bet that the skiers really couldn't care less about it.
      The reason this flexible armour is and the shins and forearms is because of the events the athletes are competing in: the Slalom and Giant Slalom events. These involve skiing through, at very high speeds, series of gates that mark the progress through the course. By "gating" or striking the flexible gates with a glancing blow as they pass, the skier can make thier way down the hill much faster than avoiding the gate entirely. The impact is on the skiers' shins and forearms, so this armour would be very much appreciated. Check out some of the slalom highlights on Google Video if you want to the the gating technique.
    41. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Barryke · · Score: 2, Funny

      lol lets not use that gloves for boxing.

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    42. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Tintagel · · Score: 1

      Cornstarch and water is *exactly* what it's like. I met the d3o guys in London and played with the material. It's an incredibly soft gel that your fingers sink into with no pressure; but hit it and it's like hard rubber.

      They can vary the elasticity. The material I saw was incredibly elastic, it stretched out to just nothing at all with no effort.

    43. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Synthetic spider silk weave, I believe. And sintered aerogel.

    44. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by NumbThumb · · Score: 1

      so, does it stop glas blades?

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this 120 chars is too small to contain.
    45. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, damn fat kids always crashing on the mountain...

    46. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by AlgebraicRing · · Score: 1


      Stand in front of a curb and drop onto your shins so that your shins impact the curb. With enough weight on your shins, you could snap them in half due to the shearing pressure. If you have armor on, the armor takes the low area, high pressure impact of the curb and spreads it out over a much wider area of the shin. This reduces the shearing force on the shin, turning a "fall onto a curb" into a "fall on the street" and reduces the risk of breaking a bone.

      Hmm now that I think about it, this flexible armor is going to have to go stiff in regions which are both near and far from the site of impact to spread out the force of the impact. If it just hardens at the site of impact then there is no protection from hitting things like metal bars and curbs which would break bones.

    47. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I'm a catcher, and let me tell you, those shin guards are a pain in the ass, not to mention time-consuming to take off an on -- I hate being on-deck with 2 out because of it.
      I'd love something like this for baseball or softball.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    48. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by layer3switch · · Score: 1

      Close your left hand over your right lower arm. Now turn move your hand left and right, up and down, flex the muscles... that thing moves a lot.

      Umm.. come again? All I feel is some pulse and bone twitching...

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    49. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Well said, my friend, well said.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    50. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      The sword has to go in sufficiently slowly else it causes the armor to harden?

    51. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by philo_enyce · · Score: 1
      Well PopSci also had an article about it (the print version, it should be on the web version in a few days).

      and we can look froward to a dupe about this stuff then...

      philo

    52. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by dogugotw · · Score: 1

      Gearing up for riding(*) is all about layers - close to the skin, something to absorb moisture, then the semi-fluid armor, then leather for abrasion. No rider wears just one type of protection if they're at all serious about what they do.

      (*) Actually we 'dress for the fall, not the ride'.

    53. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by VolciMaster · · Score: 1
      What's the advantage of using flexible armor on body parts that don't flex?

      Umm.. have you seen the slalom skiers? They're striking those gates pretty hard.

    54. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by DonGar · · Score: 1

      I have to say the dislocated finger slowing my typing agrees with you. My gloves have lots of abrasion protection, but nothing to help with 'bad flexing'.

      Anything that makes the gear more comfortable (but equally safe) is good. If it's comfortable enough to wear as normal clothing that's the really big win. Not as much suit up time before every ride would help a lot, and make people (including me) more likely to really use the gear all the time for every ride.

      --
      plus-good, double-plus-good
    55. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by xaque · · Score: 1

      All I feel is some bone twitching...

    56. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Actually we 'dress for the fall, not the ride'.

      Great tag line!

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  2. This stuff does look really cool. by Shag · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since it only hardens on impact, could it also be used in hand weaponry?

    "Honest, officer, we just came across him and he was beaten to a pulp. You can search us, go ahead, we ain't got nothin' but our gym towels..."

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    1. Re:This stuff does look really cool. by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 5, Funny

      One more reason to never leave the home without your towel.

    2. Re:This stuff does look really cool. by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you up, but there isn't a "beating me to the joke" option.

    3. Re:This stuff does look really cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Did you bring your towels?

      Yes Towlie.

      ...

      Wanna get high?

      No towlie.

    4. Re:This stuff does look really cool. by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      Jesus though so, too. (Obviously, now they have his towel on display, in Turin.)

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    5. Re:This stuff does look really cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You took a page out of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy didn't you?

  3. impressive? by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 3, Funny

    I might be impressed, but only if it uses a Holtzman Fields somehow....

    1. Re:impressive? by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Funny

      you'd have to watch out for slow blades and kids with laser pointers though.

    2. Re:impressive? by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      True, but it would definitely make downhill skiing more entertaining.

    3. Re:impressive? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Better make sure the field is off when you go to the store checkout, or you'll really pay for it! Beep beep *BOOM*!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  4. How good is it? by garrett714 · · Score: 1

    Does it harden just right around the area of impact, or a larger overall surface as to actually deaden the blow? If it just hardens around the area of impact then it isn't much help.

    1. Re:How good is it? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Well, considering that it IS being used, and seems to be quite effective, I'd think that the answer to your comment is that it's not just the point of impact.
      Maybe this is why people don't like hanging out with geeks... no fucking common sense.

    2. Re:How good is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read TFA, "da ahmoh" uses the energy wave of the impact to strengthen the chemical bonds between the molecules. Considering the wave would propagate itself out from the impact area, the area of protection would be larger than the area of impact.

  5. any reason by LiquidMind · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    any particular reason these suits vaguely resemble that of spiderman's?
    could this be some geek-inventor's (redundant, i know) idea of making his childhood dream of being a superhero come true?

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
    1. Re:any reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i guess you didnt read the caption stating that that specific suit was by the company spyder....

    2. Re:any reason by Meostro · · Score: 2, Informative
      any particular reason these suits vaguely resemble that of spiderman's?
      From TFA:
      Skiwear company Spyder, based in Colorado, US, developed racing suits incorporating d3o along the shins and forearms...
    3. Re:any reason by Lesrahpem · · Score: 1

      It also sounds like this technology functions like the body armor most Eldar use in Warhammer 40k. It's really more of a semi-popular sci-fi concept, which is where a lot of these ideas come from.

  6. "Good jib Jimbo!" *slap* by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Hehe, I guess they shouldn't be giving anyone wearing this a slap on the shoulder after a win: He/She will instantly be packaged in a concrete cocoon!*

    *Disclaimer: May be exaggerated

  7. Not for military really.. except maybe supplement by luvirini · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The things that happen when struck by a bullet or shrapnel are different than a skier hitting the ground. This material could perhaps help to make the impact plates, but the actual stopping of the penetration will likely need "normal means"

  8. Spy cameras? by eMartin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now when spies want to copy documents, they can just tear off a piece of their armor and press it against the pages.

    1. Re:Spy cameras? by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      So it's Silly Putty?

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  9. Viagra Replacement? by Jelloman · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, 98% of women polled can't wait until they start making condoms out of this stuff.

    1. Re:Viagra Replacement? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I plan on penetrating flexi-armor chastity belts with one of those

    2. Re:Viagra Replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but only if they like to get slammed HARD.

  10. Difficult to measure material's properties? by maynard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But Phil Green, research director at d3o Labs, says it is difficult to precisely measure the material's properties because the hardening effect only last as long as the impact itself.

    Certainly a researcher could take a sample of this material and strike it with increasing force using a material with known hardness. That might get them an answer beyond: "we don't know." I'm skeptical of this material's utility in a military application. Particularly as body armor against high velocity bullets and shrapnel. Woven carbon and Kevlar seem still unmatched in its capacity to take a high impact round. But, like I said, an assault riffle and a material sample could answer that question in minutes...

    1. Re:Difficult to measure material's properties? by luvirini · · Score: 1

      That is why the statement is like that.. they do not want to know how crappy their product it.

    2. Re:Difficult to measure material's properties? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      How about using it in hard hats or safety boots (currently steel toed)

      There's a lot of applications for this type of material
      Woven carbon and Kevlar seem still unmatched in its capacity to take a high impact round.
      But I don't think it'll replace Kevlar & carbon fiber.

      Even the Army's current Kevlar helmets won't actually stop any military rounds. If you're lucky, the bullet will come in at an angle and get deflected, but that's about all the use those heavy helmets are good for. Deflecting bullets and working as a hard hat.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Difficult to measure material's properties? by gizmonic · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. And I doubt this would be a replacement for typical body armor. But, if this material works, why not make the BDU out of it? Make it a supplement to normal armor, not a replacement, and you end up with a little extra protection and benefit with no loss of flexibility and no increased weight. Seems like a win win except possibly for the cost. Granted this doesn't take into account other issues such as surviving the wear and tear a BDU will go through in its lifespan, etc... But it can't hurt to look at a bit...

      --
      WWJD?
      JWRTFM!
    4. Re:Difficult to measure material's properties? by ronanbear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The strain rate hardening effect is velocity dependent but also requires time. As body armour is wouldn't be fast enough to stop a bullet. Hence it hasn't been used yet in military armour. It could be developed to have been ballistic properties. For example using it in conjunction with kevlar/ceramic armour might allow for lighter more flexible armour. There's probably a whole lot of development needed before that happens. It might be useful for other applications such as light armour to stop knives, clubs etc. For the moment sporting applications such as the ribcap allows this to occupy a place between tradional hard armour and soft padding. Sports like baseball, soccer and rugby could really benefit.

      --
      the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
    5. Re:Difficult to measure material's properties? by maynard · · Score: 1

      Sure. The material may be a dramatic advance. Conducting a few experiments might even tell the researcher enough to make a factual statement on its physical properties. *sigh* I was just annoyed by that quote in the article. As if by saying, "well - it's tough to measure its properties - but hey, this shit's pretty cool!" Bah.

      But your point is well taken.

    6. Re:Difficult to measure material's properties? by stevelinton · · Score: 1

      It might have a role as a layer in composite armour. You could imagine it inside the Kevlar to reduce bruising.

    7. Re:Difficult to measure material's properties? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Even the Army's current Kevlar helmets won't actually stop any military rounds. If you're lucky, the bullet will come in at an angle and get deflected, but that's about all the use those heavy helmets are good for.
      The real advantage of the Kevlar helmets is protecting from shrapnel, not high velocity rounds from a rifle.

      Also, the majority of shots from a rifle that hit the Kevlar will hit it at an angle because the thing is round. Most shots will in fact be deflected, though the wearer is usually left with a concussion.

      Finally, the helmets are good for when the vehicle hits an IED or rolls over and the people inside get tossed around.
    8. Re:Difficult to measure material's properties? by MrScience · · Score: 1

      I read a PDF on the internet (can't find it now) that contained pictures of non-Newtonian-enhanced fabrics exposed to varying forces by sharp and dull metal spikes. The highest-forced test had some penetration... but ended up bending their spike!

      Wish I could track it down.

      --

      You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

  11. Iain M. Banks by F34nor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like gel suit armor. Let's hope you like your suits personality.

    1. Re:Iain M. Banks by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      Iain M. Banks' gelsuits are, if I'm not mistaken, fields, not materials.

      Besides, being in a gas giant atmospheres in a suit like this (if it could withstand it) would quickly lose its charm once you figured out you could barely move at all due to the strain of moving about.

  12. how silleh by legallyillegal · · Score: 1

    is it made out of silly putty? too bad it didn't save allison forsyth's knee

    --
    ?giS
  13. Just like Ringworld Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Impact armour.

    1. Re:Just like Ringworld Engineers by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Or the suit the As-A-Shade-Of-Purple-Grey was wearing in The Flying Sorcerers.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Just like Ringworld Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My DM always told me that's how robes of protection work

    3. Re:Just like Ringworld Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean "As-a-mauve" don't you?

    4. Re:Just like Ringworld Engineers by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      No.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  14. Re:Not for military really.. except maybe suppleme by eis271828 · · Score: 1

    That's why there's another topic of research dealing with shear thickening fluid. I particularly like Norman Wagner's research here. Basically, we could make full body armor, but the number of layers of kevlar required is too many to make it very flexible or breathable. This is helping to solve that while keeping or improving the protection.

  15. Could be great for inline skating, etc by JRock911 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I do a lot of inline skating and I can see where this stuff could be revolutionary for outdoor inlining, skateboarding, etc.

    Personally, I don't wear pads because they're uncomfortable. I do wear a helmet and palm sliders, which are supposed to help keep your palms from getting skinned up in an actual fall by serving as a buffer between your palms and the asphalt. In theory, they work pretty good. When you fall going upwards of 30MPH, they aren't a lot of help. Once you hit the ground, even if you initially brace with your palms, momentum is pretty much going to send you wherever it wants.

    Being able to wear a long sleeved shirt or pants made of this stuff to help protect the knees and elbows would be huge. I have a road rash spot on my elbow now from a fall last weekend. Granted I don't fall much.. that was the first time in over a year I've had a crash and it was a very minor crash but even still, I'd probably wear this stuff for safety if it was available and not terribly bulky. Most inliners who are serious wear skin suits or jerseys so substituting this stuff would pretty much have no downsides as long as, like I said, it wasn't too bulky.

    On the flip side, most skateboarders want to look "extreme" so this stuff might not be a huge hit with them. I personally like my skin intact, however.

  16. Sounds like non-Newtonian fluid by Meostro · · Score: 4, Informative

    Looks like they use a Non-Newtonian fluid, that's the type of material that has these properties.

    This was one of the cooler demonstration in my HS chemistry class, the teacher made up a big batch of water + corn starch, and was playing with it like mud, squishing it around and whatnot. Then he beat the hell out of it, and it just sat there and didn't splash, it looked (and sounded) like it was a solid sheet. It was odd to see something that was very dynamic under low force, but static under high force.

    It's like a seatbelt, if you yank it hard it locks up, but if you pull gently it will extend.

    1. Re:Sounds like non-Newtonian fluid by MustardMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's an entire field that deals with studying the properties of these and similar "weird" materials. It's called soft condensed matter. It happens to be the field in which I'm currently working ;)

      Corn starch is the standard example almost everyone uses when trying to describe our field to laymen. The other one we use a lot is the term "squishy physics", but that one sometimes gets us mocked by the ignorant who think "nuclear physics" is for smart people and "squishy physics" is for the dumbasses.

    2. Re:Sounds like non-Newtonian fluid by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      Non-newtonian only means that a liquid can change volume under pressure to some extent. That is all. Common examples of non-newtonian liquids are blood and paint.

      This material has a very unusual hardening property. Possibly it is a non-newtonian liquid, but if it is, then that is not what is remarkable about it.

      Tor

    3. Re:Sounds like non-Newtonian fluid by Rostin · · Score: 1

      No, the parent is correct. The Wikipedia article he linked to explains it pretty well. It even uses the corn starch mixture he was talking about as an example.

  17. custard by joe+155 · · Score: 1

    It seems to have the same properties to custard powder, so it you want to know what its like you can play with it yourself... it does sound like a more practicle set up though, also if it could stop a bullet it would be useful to put under body armour (and could go over the head)... the only problem is the impact which would break all the bones in that area... hmm, could even be worse than a through and through...

    anywho, about the custard, if you mix custard powder with water (I'm not sure of exact quantities) you can make a substance which is liquid and you can move your hand through but if you puntch it it'll go hard and your hand won't be able to get through it... you can also make it into a ball and then hold it in your hand and watch it melt... tis cool.

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    1. Re:custard by JPyObjC+Dude · · Score: 1

      I had the same thought.

      I still remember the day that my dad showed me this. I freaked! ... The Super Baker ... With his trusty custard armor he valiently sets forth to defend the rights (and density) of pastry chefs everywhere!

  18. powdered glass by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The original bullet-resistant vest was flexible. It was made of powdered glass, flexible until hit hard, at which point it would stiffen up and spread the force of the impact.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:powdered glass by danharan · · Score: 1

      That must have been heavy as hell... and were if the bullet ever went through, would it carry bits of glass with it?

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    2. Re:powdered glass by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      hat must have been heavy as hell... and were if the bullet ever went through, would it carry bits of glass with it?

      You'll note they no longer use that kind of vest.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  19. The point of flexible armour by xfletch · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What's the advantage of using flexible armor on body parts that don't flex?

    Having rigid plates even on parts of the body that flex less is bulky and cumbersome. Flexible armour is a great concept - far less noticable in normal conditions than some of the rigid ski body armour solutions e.g. Dainese

    BTW For the pseudo science and some nice pictures of 'molecules' see the 3DO website

  20. pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had this technology since puberty. More of a weapon, though.

  21. The article referenced military uses by maynard · · Score: 1

    and implied it had a future as military body armor, then a researcher stated that no one knew exactly how tough the material was because it was difficult to test. That was the part I quoted, and then responded to.

  22. Needs to be like Flubber by coastin · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Similar to silly putty"

    If it were more like Flubber (if you remember this you are an old geek) the projectiles would bounce back at the source.

    --
    I lost my sig...
    1. Re:Needs to be like Flubber by noamsml · · Score: 1

      Uh, i'm 15 and I remember Flubber. Shitty movie, though.

    2. Re:Needs to be like Flubber by coastin · · Score: 1

      Thank you, that makes me feel 15 again. I guess that means no beer for me now though!

      --
      I lost my sig...
    3. Re:Needs to be like Flubber by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      Assumably, GP is speaking of the 1961 film The Absent Minded Professor, rather than the 1997 film Flubber, a remake of the original with Robin Williams.

      Get off my lawn.

    4. Re:Needs to be like Flubber by noamsml · · Score: 1

      Oops, didn't know there was an original :-S.

    5. Re:Needs to be like Flubber by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

      S'awright - I'm trying to forget there was a remake.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    6. Re:Needs to be like Flubber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's allright; the original was pretty bad too.

      But the flubber concept is nifty. I wish somebody could produce a decent movie out of it. There was a nifty Asimov (I think) short story about a substance that, when bounced, would produce a small chemical reaction that made it produce more rebound energy than it absorbed. Which meant that with every bounce, it would go higher and higher, with disasterous results.

    7. Re:Needs to be like Flubber by noamsml · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that cause it to eventually lose all of the chemical that made it bounce?

  23. ATTENTION IDIOT MOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dune is never offtopic.
    --sincerely, someone other than the poster

  24. Unimpressive. by B5_geek · · Score: 1

    Louis Wu unavailable for comment.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
  25. Motorcycle Armor by dissonant2005 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like it would be perfect for use in motorcycle jackets and suits, assuming it's also reasonably abrasion resistant. Anyone have any idea if this stuff would pass muster for CE certification?

    1. Re:Motorcycle Armor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have similar stuff in motorcycle armor already, although perhaps this stuff is better. Take a look at the memory foam armor here:

      http://www.newenough.com/faq_armor_types.htm

      I wear the stuff and find it very comfortable.

  26. It will never sell by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking about how the material becomes rigid - how do you get guys to put on a condom that then has to be hit with a hammer?

    Well, I guess some men would like it (shudder).

    myke

  27. Oobleck by retendo · · Score: 1

    We played with cornstarch and water when I was in school too. The teacher called it Oobleck. It was our job to scientifically test the substance and try to determine what it was. That's exactly what I thought about when I read this article.

    It was really cool, it was gooey and would flow easily. They we would slam it down on a desk and it would crack, then flow back together. I'm not sure what would cause these properties, do we have a chemist in the house who would care to explain?

  28. It would make for interesting armor... by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

    ...just pick out your favorite newspaper cartoon, press the armor on it, and presto! You're riding into battle with your favorite character. Forget "Death From Above". Nothing says combat like Peanuts or Foxtrot.

    --
    -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
  29. Re:Not for military really.. except maybe suppleme by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

    However, Green believes it may be possible to alter the properties of d3o for new impact-protection and anti-trauma applications. "There are certainly opportunities to dabble with the chemistry and enhance the effect," Even if it can't stop bullets right now, the future may be a diffrent storey. The article also says they haven't been able to find a way to adaquately test it's hardness yet. It would be interesting to see the results of a test involving d3o and a 9mm round. Even if it dosn't stop something like a 30-30. or a .762, it would still be better than Kevlar because of the vast improvement in flexability.

    --
    Someone save me from this sanity.
  30. Can it stop a bullet/Ka-bar? by weremook · · Score: 1

    I've been meaning to upgrade my Batsuit.

  31. Re:"Good jib Jimbo!" *slap* by Musc · · Score: 1

    This isn't magic and it isn't some kind of mechanical device.
    It is chemistry. The entire suit will not become a concrete coccoon because you tap him on the back.
    Rather, the area near where you hit, so the shoulder and maybe part of the neck and arm and upper torso,
    that is the only part that would harden. Furthermore, it will soften up again soon as the slap is over.

    Though that would be cool if the whole thing became a concrete shell instantly. That would probably
    help in more catastrophic crashes.

    --
    Hamsters are at least as feathery as penguins. HamLix
  32. Which Olympics? by qodfathr · · Score: 0, Troll

    Talk about clever marketing -- maybe they found some drunk shroud tourists to run around in their material. I'd be FAR more impressed if real athletes at the Torino Olympics were wearing this stuff.

    --
    Yes, it's true. This man has no dick.
    1. Re:Which Olympics? by xeeazgk · · Score: 1

      Ummm...

      toItalian(Turin) == Torino

      Yeah, nice try though.

    2. Re:Which Olympics? by damsa · · Score: 1

      City is called Turin in English, but NBC for some reason decided to call the city Torino. If you watch the CBC, they still call it Turin.

  33. Thinkgeek's "Smart Mass" by Exaton · · Score: 1
    "this shear rate material is flexible under normal load and hardens under impact"

    That reminds me a lot of Thinkgeek's Smart Mass Thinking Putty. Any connection ?

  34. Larry Niven's impact armor by Bombula · · Score: 1

    Larry Niven featured this concept in sci-fi in Ringworld (1970) - he called it 'Impact Armor' as I recall. Was he the first? Can anyone reference an earlier prediction of this technology?

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:Larry Niven's impact armor by jkinney3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      John Brunner's "Stand On Zanzibar", 1968 Hugo Award winner. The item was called "karatands". A soft glove-like material until hardening on impact.
      This is a truly oustanding book that should be digested by geeks everywhere. The political and social points are even more relevant today that 30+ years ago.

    2. Re:Larry Niven's impact armor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Niven is still first. His "flexible armor suit" from The Soft Weapon was published in 1967.

    3. Re:Larry Niven's impact armor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is typical of slashdot editing; here is a post that makes a significant point based on the original post, and it is designated as "below the threshold" of notice. Why bother posting?

  35. I used to ski race as a kid... by tetromino · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...and frankly, this flexible armor sounds great. The reason you want some kind of protection is that you (sometimes in speed events, very often in slalom) run into gates (the plastic poles stuck in the snow that you have to turn around) with various parts of your body. Since you are going fast, and you are wearing a thin aerodynamic racing suit, it hurts like hell. So, if you don't feel like getting hurt, you strap on some plastic shin and arm guards, sort of like an Ancient Greek warrior with his greaves. Anyway, these plastic guards really are not the ideal solution. They chafe (since you are strapping them on tight, and the muscles and skin under the straps are constantly moving). They limit your motions quite a bit. They are, frankly, uncomfortable. And if you are doing speed events, they kill your aerodynamics.

    So, as far as I am concerned, flexible armor is totally the way to go. Hopefully FIS won't ban it.

  36. $14,000 Hammers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why would the Pentagon buy American troops more expensive body armor, just because it works better, when they don't even buy the cheaper stuff that's better than nothing? Maybe a few $BILLION for the defense contractors to "test" it, but none to actually support our troops in the line of fire.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:$14,000 Hammers by tlynch001 · · Score: 0
      boo hoo hoo when I was a soldier we didn't have any of that fancy body armor and we still managed to hold the soviet horde at bay AND capture Grenada.

      Luckily they have things like the Finance Corp for bellyachers.

    2. Re:$14,000 Hammers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You have my thanks for all those Soviet bullets and bombs you took in the Cold War. But remember that Reagan's awarding more medals to our Grenada invaders than there were soldiers was pretty expensive.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  37. Very useful by xeeazgk · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want to get all my underwear made out of this stuff. That way I'll never have to wear a cup for sports.

    It would also help for when I want to be impertinent to feminists.

  38. Re:Not for military really.. except maybe suppleme by Firehed · · Score: 1

    It may not stop bullets, but it could make riot shields outdated if you're now invulnerable to Riot Rocks. Though I'd question how much it would help against a molotov. Dunno, but if it were me putting my life on the line, I'd want any protection offered to me.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  39. given enough eyeballs, all references are shallow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FWIW, this stuff sounds like what happens to a semi-liquid mix of cornstarch and water. Slide your hand in and it drops into the fluid; hit it hard and no penetration at all.

    That's oobleck you mean.

  40. Stand On Zanzibar by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    "Trigger Rigid" armor. Right out of the book. John Brunner was the 1960s answer to Jules Verne.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  41. Getting the wrong impression by wrook · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think people are getting the wrong impression here. This is put into suits for slalom and super G athletes. It's not to protect you from a fall, but to protect you from the flags that whip you when you go around them. It's not going to save you when you crash into a tree. It's going to stop you from getting bruises on your arms and legs when you hit the flags.

    Cool idea. But probably not particularly practical in other applications (maybe useful for kendo??? -- but the armour's way cool, so why change :-) )

    1. Re:Getting the wrong impression by renoX · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about fencing, especially saber where it hurts quite a bit.

      I remember that as a kid our fencing teacher was always saying to go fast but without weight in saber fencing, but the reality is that kids go 'banzaï' with the saber and that you have to put an additionnal sweat shirt to reduce the pain.

      Being wacked with a slalom pole or a saber seems similar so it should work for the body, of course not the helmet..

  42. Karatand by oren · · Score: 1

    Nobody reads the old classics any more... "Stand on Zanzibar", by John Brunner - a book very much worth reading.

    At any rate, like the book mentions in passing... just make a glove out of this material. I think the book's version was a half-glove (covering the palm and only part of the fingers) so you can do delicate work with your hands, but if you threw a fist or simply chopped... instant brass knuckles at the point of contact.

    Depending on how good this material is, a full body suit may be incredibly useful in a hand-to-hand combat situation, for anyone using a "hard" martial art - karate, kickboxing etc. Less so for "soft" martial arts like Judo and Aikido, I suppose. And if you can improve it some, it might make bullet proof clothing more comfortable (today's vests are a pain).

    So, definitely coming soon to a black ops armoury near you... I don't know about Wall-Mart though. Give it a decade or two.

    1. Re:Karatand by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      This stuff sounds like the impact gel armour described in Shadowrun.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    2. Re:Karatand by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Depending on how good this material is, a full body suit may be incredibly useful in a hand-to-hand combat situation, for anyone using a "hard" martial art - karate, kickboxing etc.

      It would certainly be useful in training.

      In striking arts there are three options for sparring without getting seriously hurt:

      1. rely on your partner to not stike full force and to limit target areas. However, accidents happen - you move in when your sparring partner doesn't expect it and you walk right into a full force kick. Ouch.
      2. wear pads on your hands and feet. (This is the option we usually use.) This limits what techniques can be used but does allow a more realistic training in how to take a blow.
      3. wear armor on your target areas, such as the chest protector used in Olympic Tae Kwon Do. I've done karate tournaments that used these, they're rather awkward and you can't bend your body very much while wearing one, but they do allow for a wider variety of techniques to be thrown.

      So yeah, I'd love to have a "soft armor" vest that I could move around in but would stiffen up to protect my ribs from getting cracked. If the price were reasonable every karate dojo would buy a couple.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    3. Re:Karatand by try_anything · · Score: 1

      Nobody I know (read: no techies) read Stand on Zanzibar, but I get the feeling that it's required reading at internet and media companies. Mr. and Mrs. Everywhere are scarily close, and Gmail is making them closer. What happens when every citizen's internet connection becomes a flattering, subtly manipulative mirror?

  43. Re:Not for military really.. except maybe suppleme by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1
    Actually, this stuff may work better than you think. Have you seen the episode of Mythbusters where they shoot high powered rifles into water? Amazingly, the faster the bullet, the more protection you got from the water, since the fluid tended to cause the bullets to disintegrate.

    I could imagine stuff like this acting like a fluid and work better than traditional plate armor. It would definitely be an interesting experiment.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  44. Useless for skiing by WRoach · · Score: 1

    First, protective gear is useless for downhill skiing since you don't to hit anything as it will slow you down. And if you fall, you want to be as loose as possible to avoid injuries. All you'll hit is a set of nets anyway. For GS skiing this might be usefull for arm and thigh pads but the protective padding actually used already does the job. For SL this would be useless too as molded shin pads do an awesome job. They don't get in the way and you never think about them during you runs. I would be very surprised a racer would express a strong interest for that product. I race and I really don't feel any need for this. On the other hand, as previously stated this could be extremely usefull for other sports and activities, but not skiing.

    1. Re:Useless for skiing by Forbman · · Score: 1

      AFter watching some of the crashes in the downhill, having some of this stuff on your hips, shoulders and lower back probably would be helpful. Slamming onto the ground at speed (50-60-70 mph) has got to hurt whatever hits the ground first. The downhillers are racing on some pretty icy snow, not soft fluffy powder. Also, on your pointy spots, (hips, shoulders), you might also want something ablative...

      For GS and Slalom, if you suck at knocking poles away, it might be nice to have on your hips and shoulders, too.

    2. Re:Useless for skiing by bjtuna · · Score: 1

      I also race, and I'll amend that this might be useful for SG.

    3. Re:Useless for skiing by TwoScoopsOfPig · · Score: 1

      Other sports such as skate-/snowboarding, as well as a helmet liner for almost anything.
      I'm all for more stuff between my skull and the ground.

      --
      #include <disclaimer.h>
      #include <beer.h>
  45. Reaction time in the material by Elfich47 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For body armor purpses:
    The material's reaction time is probably related to how fast the shock-wave of the hit travels through the material. For the sake of arguement: The of the impact shockwave travels through the suit at the same speed sounds travels in water (sound is a shockwave). So it travels roughly 1482 m/s. So the shockwave would take roughly 0.0001 seconds to travel across my entire chest. Modern bullets can travel roughly the same speeds. In that same 0.0001 seconds a bullet would be several inches behind me.
    So here comes the messy part: Can this kind of stuff protect a person from gunfire?
    So a bullet hits a person wearing this stuff. In the first 10^-6 of a second the bullet travels .0004 (four ten-thousands) of an inch into me. In the same time the armor hardens in an circle with a radius of .0004in (For the sake of arguement a very thin bullet). In the next millionth of a second the bullet travels an additional .0004 of an inch into the target. The armor now also has a circle of .0008in in diameter. The affected area starts to grow rather quickly.
    Time Depth/Shockwave Area Affected
    0.000050: 0.2000: 0.1256637061
    0.000100: 0.4000: 0.5026548246
    0.000150: 0.6000: 1.1309733553
    0.000200: 0.8000: 2.0106192983
    0.000250: 1.0000: 3.1415926536
    0.000300: 1.2000: 4.5238934212
    0.000350: 1.4000: 6.1575216010
    0.000400: 1.6000: 8.0424771932
    0.000450: 1.8000: 10.1787601976
    In the time it takes the bullet to travel 1 inch into the body enough of the armor has hardened to cover 3 square inches of the target's body. Now the bullet has to deform or move that much more material in order to continue its trip in. Most likely the person could end up with a weird dent in their body where the bullet hit. This is of course dependant upon when the material fails and stops giving protection and how fast the shockwave travels through the material.
    Considering that though: I'd rather have a dent in my body then a hole.
    Currently the ski suits are used to protect against impacts against relatively flexible things at speeds above sixty miles per hour. So for the athletes to approve of it, it has to work pretty quickly and revert pretty quickly. You are in contact with gates for hundredths of a second and if the armor/fluid reacts fast enough for the athletes to notice and approve, you know the army is going to buy a suit and shoot at it to see what the results are going to be. Imagine the next round of (Disposable) ceramic armor plates that is sent to the troops in Iraq is coated in that stuff and it improves survivability.
    Hell, coat the inside of the flak vests in the stuff and have it sent to the firing range for testing. The army always loves things that do the following: improved force protection with less weight. While the army is a giant monolithic beuracracy it does actually get things done once in a while.

    --
    Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
    1. Re:Reaction time in the material by Elfich47 · · Score: 1

      I lbew my math a little bit on the time line with the spread sheet but the underlying idea is still there.

      --
      Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
    2. Re:Reaction time in the material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is Pi doing in there?

  46. Might be useful for bikers by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    Because you never know when someone is going to do something really really stupid! (steaming video) FYI: Dawn, the rider, escaped without broken bones thanks, in part, to good gear with armor. (I'm not going link her site for slashdotting on top of all the people who saw the video who checked to see if she was okay.)

    I guess it wouldn't do for helmet padding, which compresses to suck up the force that would otherwise go to the head. (Easier to buy a new helmet than a new head.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Might be useful for bikers by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Wow, I watched that video.. and the Honda just locked up his brakes for no good reason.

      Proof that there needs to be a yearly drivers test to keep your license.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Might be useful for bikers by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Another driver gave a report that the civic driver had been an aggressive jerk (note that he was a single person in the HOV [high occupancy] lane). My guess is that he wanted to slip over a lane, accelerated, looked right, looked forward and noticed the car in front was slowing, *oh sheet*ed, mashed the brakes and skidded. And then claimed he was stopped 2.6 seconds after he started to skid when "she hit me". An inexpensive solid-state flash helmetcam that keeps the last 30+ minutes of recording would have a lot buyers right now.

      If this flexible armor is soft and comfortable normally, it might encourage more people to wear it all the time, as well as covering more areas. (Although the t-shirt and beanie/no helmet crowd will probably keep trying for a Darwin.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Might be useful for bikers by McTaggart · · Score: 1
      Wait a second...

      They actually test what you do in emergencies where you live? Damn, I'm moving there. I only need to clock up another couple of hours before I'm let loose on the roads and I have never once been told or tested on what to do in any kind of emergency. Hell, I never even had to park forwards. Then people wonder why new drivers are the most common demographic to die on the roads.

      For reference I live in Western Australia. You answer a (dead easy) multi-choice test to get your learners permit and then pass a practical test which involves driving around the suburbs. Then you have to clock up 25 hours and pass a computerised 'hazard perception test' which basically involves telling the computer when you would brake or change lanes.

    4. Re:Might be useful for bikers by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      If you take Driver's Ed you're told what to do in certain situations.

      You can take a Defencive Driving course to learn a lot about keeping yourself and the drivers around you safe.

      Rule #1 is don't act like that Civic driver. Before you start changing lanes, make sure you won't hit anything.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    5. Re:Might be useful for bikers by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Annual would be too much expense. A more reasonable middle ground would be annual testing until you hit 21, then every 3-8 years after that. After the age of 60 or 70, it could scale back down to every 2-3 years.

      I'm somewhat surprised that the insurance industry hasn't started offering (even mandating for cheaper rates?) taking a short 10-15 hour Driver's Ed refresher course every few years. Heck, you can hit the high points of defensive driving in an hour or two and most of that would be new information to a lot of drivers. Even 5-10 hours might be overkill.

      Sure, you can't *make* people learn, but to teach them via Driver's Ed in their late teens and then never refresh that training is a bit foolhardy.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  47. Current body armor by Elfich47 · · Score: 1

    If you get hit in a current body armor vest (SWAT, police, etc, military armor is another ball of wax), odds are on that you will get a couple of broken ribs when your vest soaks up the bullet. But then you have a couple of broken ribs and can heal up. The other option is not as fun.

    --
    Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
  48. Flexible means energy transfer by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Inflexible means that all the energy gets quickly trasnferred to the contact points of whatever is inflexible. Flexible means some energy is being stored in the deformation of the flexible material and gets released as the material goes back in shape.

  49. Used with Kevlar. by pavon · · Score: 1

    I can't seem to find the article right now, but I remember reading about researchers who were looking at incorporating non-newtonian fluids like this into kevlar jackets. The material was basically cosmetic wax mixed with nano-silicate particles, and became solid under pressure. When you worked the material into a fabric it would act as armor, and what better fabric to work it into than kevlar. Most bullet-proof jackets are not entirely kevlar, and have solid plates over critical areas. The preliminary tests done showed that if you worked this material into the kevlar, you could get rid of the plates, and almost half the thickness, and it would offer the same protection as current jackets. Alternately, you could keep the thickness and improve the level of protection.

    Obligatory: That is what I recall from reading, human memory is not perfect.

  50. Re laser pointers by tygt · · Score: 1

    That would be a mistake they only made once!

  51. +1 Interesting just the same $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . .. ..

  52. Re:Not for military really.. except maybe suppleme by swv3752 · · Score: 1

    It is not the kevlar that is a problem but the metal (or ceramic) plates use in the vest. If it is possible to make a suit with kevlar layered over the d3o, it would make current body armour obsolete.

    --
    Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  53. Hard != Protective by textnode · · Score: 1

    The only benefit of a hard material in protective clothing is to prevent piercing injuries. I'd say that the risk of piercing injuries in skiing is remote. For sports where a non-piercing, high-force / high speed impact must be projected against you use clothing containing materials which crumple, absorbing the impact and reducing the force imparted to the wearers body. A company providing this material to a skier and promoting it in this way is generating FUD.

    1. Re:Hard != Protective by Savantissimo · · Score: 2, Informative

      It isn't primarily the hardness but the stiffness that prevents blunt impact injury in armor design. The impulse is distributed over a wide area so that the peak force is less than the threshold for bruising. Crumpling is used in secondary foam in helmets (which does not contact the wearer directly). In helmets, the outer shell, the resilient inner foam and the skull provide the force-spreading function. Crumpling is not relevant to armor design since the purpose is not to absorb the energy but to distribute it, and crumpling material would be far too bulky for ski armor anyway.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    2. Re:Hard != Protective by bjtuna · · Score: 2, Informative

      These suits provide protective padding for RACERS so they don't suffer bruises or breaks when the hit the gates. These suits are NOT for crashes.

      I am a competitive alpine ski racer. Watch the slalom (SL) events in the Olympics and you will see that every athlete wears hard protective equipment on his poles (to protect his hands), his shins, and usually on his head. This is because the tightest, shortest, fastest line down the course involves literally running over the gate. The athlete generally "cross-blocks" the gate, meaning his feet are on the correct side of the pole and angled outward, while his body is upright with the pole directly in his path; he simultaneously hits the gate with the protector on the front of his pole ("pole guards") and his shin guards. Furthermore, he's wearing a lycra speed suit that's got padding in several key areas including the front of the forearms, the back of the thighs, the deltoid area of the upper back, and the bicep area of the upper arm. This is to provide protection for when the athlete performs an "inside clear" instead of a cross-block, or if he loses his rhythm or something else that causes him to hit a gate where he's not wearing molded plastic armor.

      Or you could have just read the article.

  54. Neat but... why? by dbucowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Another potential application may be sound-proofing. The propagation of sound waves should generate a similar strain to an impact, so it may be feasible to create a material that becomes more sound proof in response to increasing noise. "It could have some very interesting, unexplored properties," Green says.


    Kinda cool, but what is the point of scaleable soundproofing? If you want something to be soundproof, why would it need to ever increase or decrease sound proofability? Why not just make it as soundproof as possible from the start?
    --
    This just in! 3 out of 4 people make up 75% of the population.
    1. Re:Neat but... why? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Hearing protection. You want to be able to hear sounds at normal volumes but attenuate any loud transient sounds, like weapons being fired. The problem with most hearing protection is that it attenuates everything.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Neat but... why? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      How about earmuffs while hunting? No shot no soundproofing and you can hear the woods. When you fire the muffs become soundproof and protecct you ears?

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    3. Re:Neat but... why? by engagebot · · Score: 1

      I've already had these for a couple years, and they're great. Check out Dillon Precision. They've got a mic and a volume control on the outside of each muff, with a small speaker on the inside of the muff. Just a simple audio compressor (more specifically, a gate). About a hundred bucks.

      --
      Han shot first.
  55. When can we get this for ordinary underwear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This kind of thing could be handy in many hazardous environments (possibly including just big cities 8-) ) where it would be desirable for something that repels the stabbing knife, thrown stone, or whatnot... It would be handy for avoiding injury if one were attacked also with fists or the like. If your clothing were made this way, it might blunt many threats.
        The current versions are unlikely to stop bullets or give invulnerability to knives, but they might make some attacks less deadly. Also if one were in an auto collision, might not such garb keep one a bit safer? If it were widely used, some airbags might be less important. Considering that the explosive there is considered a major pollutant, that is another possible advantage.

  56. A suggestion for you... by Captain+Entendre · · Score: 1
    Personally, I don't wear pads [....] I have a road rash spot on my elbow now from a fall last weekend.

    I personally like my skin intact, however.

    You know, pads might help with that. I find them much less uncomfortable than road rash.

    1. Re:A suggestion for you... by JRock911 · · Score: 1

      Thats probably true however I logged over 1200 miles skating last year without a crash and routinely skate distances of 20+ miles and sometimes up to 40-50 miles. Pads just aren't comfortable for me and you really won't find any hardcore marathon skaters wearing them for that reason. Pads are great for rec skaters but they just aren't practicle for long distances as they are hot, they rub and just aren't comfortable.

      But yea.. having skin is a plus :)

    2. Re:A suggestion for you... by Captain+Entendre · · Score: 1

      Ah, now I get the 'uncomfortable' issue. I ride parks and pipes, where the discomfort is less of an issue and the crashes are more of an issue.

    3. Re:A suggestion for you... by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1
      I wear pads and I normally skate 15-30 miles in the hot SoCal sun.

      I haven't had a fall in 2 years, but 6 years ago I fell without pads and had to have my elbow replaced (wires, bolts, etc.). Not fun.

      I'm not saying everyone should wear pads, just know you are taking a bigger risk than just road rash without them.

      That said, if this new suit is cool enough and strong enough to replace my pads, I'd be willing to spend $$$ on it. The elbow cost me $6000...

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
  57. Re:Not for military really.. except maybe suppleme by willy_me · · Score: 1
    The kevlar is mainly used for shrapnel and such. It has little impact on a full metal jacket round. The metal plate protects against the round. It's unlikely that d3o will ever match the stopping power of a metal plate.

    However, d3o could be very useful in non-military bullet proof vests. Currently, a round can be stopped by kevlar but it still penetrates the body and effectively immobilizes whoever gets hit. A layer of d3o could help dissipate the energy over a larger area and prevent serious damage as a result of an impact. Police officers could greatly benefit from such a product.

  58. Re:"Good jib Jimbo!" *slap* by dteichman2 · · Score: 1

    You could probably pull that off by adding a CO2 canister inside. When the catastrophic impact occurs, pressure over the suit increases via the CO2, which causes the suit to become hard everywhere.

    --


    Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
  59. Cornflour by Jetboy01 · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of something a teacher showed us in school a long time ago!

    Take as much cornflour as you can get your hands on, and apply about the same amount of water then mix... you'll end up with a paste that is liquid if you pour it, and solid if you punch it.

    http://physics.about.com/od/fluidphysicsexperiment s/a/cornflour.htm

  60. Measuring Protection by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    From TA:

    "Phil Green, research director at d3o Labs, says it is difficult to precisely measure the material's properties because the hardening effect only last as long as the impact itself."

    So put something soft (like putty or a melon) under it, whack it with a pole, remove the armor and see how much damage was done. Repeat with other types of armor for comparison.

  61. TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article doesn't mention military applications at all.

  62. One step closer to... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

    Combined with those hydraulic leg braces that were posted a few months ago (the ones that let the user carry like an extra 200 lbs - for about 5 minutes), this will bring us one step closer to making Fallout style "Power Armor" a reality!

  63. Why shots penetrating the vest is a Bad Thing. by Fluffy+the+attack+ki · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let us assume that you are about to be shot in the chest with a 12 gauge 3.5" super-magnum slug, which is overkill for anything short of a bear, or maybe a truck. Let's also assume that you have the option of either wearing the thinnest vest that will stop that slug or nothing at all.

    If you wear the vest then when the slug hits it'll dump all it's energy into your chest. You'll sustain massive blunt trauma on the level of getting smacked with a sledgehammer. Lots of broken ribs, lots of bruising, possibly some organ damage and internal bleeding, if you're hit near the heart maybe death.

    If you DON'T wear the vest then the slug enters the front of your chest, dumps part of it's energy into your tasty meats, exits your back, and continues on it's way into whatever was behind you. It breaks any ribs it hits near, creates a big ol' permanent cavity through whatever organs are in the way, and paints the wall behind you a lovely shade of red.

    I don't know about you, but I think I'll take my chances with the vest TYVM. If I could get the vest lined with some of this stuff to help soak up some of the blow then even better.

  64. Kids play by zuesse · · Score: 1

    Used to play with stuff like this when I was a kid.
    Mix corn starch and water together ( heavy on the Corn Starch).
    The stuff is solid as a rock when sudden force is applied but
    freely flows in the absence of resistence.

    --


    What great fortune for rulers that men do not think.
  65. Similar to corn starch by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Corn starch has the same property... If you mix it with water, it'll be a gooey paste when it's not moving, but you can pick it up and roll it into a ball, and as long as you keep rolling it, it'll firm up... as soon as it stops moving, it turns back into goo...

  66. ooblek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like corn starch and water to me

  67. Snow Crash deja vu by Ibiwan · · Score: 1

    Bah, Hiro had this stuff a long time ago --

    "Where his body has bony extremities, the suit has sintered armorgel:
    feels like gritty jello, protects like a stack of telephone books."

    --
    -- //no comment
  68. Article summary is wrong - as usual by deacon · · Score: 1
    The article summary dances around giving a useful description of this material, uses almost all the relevant buzzwords, but in an incomplete manner, and then smegs off at the last moment.

    This is a material which changes it's properties depending on HOW FAST you try to deform it. Specifically, this material is capable of changing from a soft, gooey phase, to a rigid, hard phase instantly just because you attempt to deform the material more quickly than the rate at which the gooey to rigid transformation occurs.

    If perfected, this material could be a soft lining to a vest which moves easily with the wearer, but hardens over a large area when struck with a high-speed object such as a bullet, thus spreading out the energy of the impact.

    As a sports protector, this material could be soft over your shins or arms (or whole body, like the body-bag style motorcycle suit), but stiffen on impact when you fall, and the rate of stiffening and the ultimate stiffness could be large enough such that it is just as effective as a hard, heavy guard over your shin/arm which spreads out the load over a big enough area so that you are not injured at all.

    As another poster correctly points out, this is the big motha of non-newtonian fluids.

    If perfected, this could be the ultimate in comfort for the given protection level.

  69. Re:"Good jib Jimbo!" *slap* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    great. I can see someone using that to create a new device to deal with impotence. Like we don't have enough already. Pills, shots, pumps, etc....WTF do we have so many advertisements for remedies a limp dick? The Baby Boomers need to cope with the fact that they're getting old and stop being so sex obsessed. Every other generation before them dealt with the fact that getting a hard on is more difficult with age. They need to grow up.

  70. See this clip from a recent NY Times article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By contrast, the downhill and slalom skiers continue to seem dated in throwback jumpsuits that are less ironically Old School than old, with the sad gauche quality of the 70's ski wear one still sees at places like St. Moritz. With their shinguards and awkward pinnies, with their ham thighs vacuum-packed into Lycra jumpsuits printed with spider webs, the American ski team seems stylistically linked to the days of Spider Sabitch, who made the Web his signature motif.

  71. Usages by Phoenix · · Score: 1

    Actually my local SCA group is trying to contact the makers of the armor to see if we can get our hands on a suit of the stuff for our heavy combat. We'd still use traditional metal armor over the suit, but the advantages for full coverage over areas where armor is light or perhaps missing due to a malfunction are considerable.

    Basicaly if it'll protect a skier zipping downhill and whacking into a fiberglass pole, then it ought to help a SCAdian against another chap with bit of a stick.

    Phoenix

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
  72. Kill 'em by Abolo · · Score: 1

    "look mammy, I got a new floppy sword", and bam, her head in on the ground!

  73. The slow blade penetrates the shield by aeon00100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, this stuff would be awesome for paintball armor.

  74. Re:Not for military really.. except maybe suppleme by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it'll work as padding for the armor plates to reduce the bruises caused by a bullet hitting the armor plate?

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  75. Stronger armors by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 1

    I hope this one will be stronger than the one we have seen in Chaplin'a "The Great Dicator" movie along with that new parachute model.

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  76. "Thixotropic" by whitroth · · Score: 1

    It's not a Brand New Invention, just an improvement on things that have been known for a long time. I, for example, learned the word - thixotropic - from my boss 35 years ago, when I worked in a chenical/ceramic research lab.

            mark

  77. Old is new again by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    I heard about this kind of armor 10 years ago. Only it was found in high-priced motorcycle clothing. One of my friends had just bought a new zoom-splat, and was excited buy the new "geek biker" clothes he had also bought. The jacket and gloves he bought had a similar putty inside them that would harden on impact. We offered to test the system by beating on him with a bat, but he declined. -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  78. As usual, three days behind the story by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    Yup, you guessed. I'm going to grumble. I submitted this story 3 DAYS AGO and had it rejected:

    Armor for the Olympic skier Wednesday February 15, @12:43PM Rejected

    Not only was the story rejected but the one which has now been accepted, 3 DAYS LATE, is the same story!

    Keep up the good work folks. I'm sure someday we'll see stories about that new operating system that is all the rage. You know the one I mean. Windows 95.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:As usual, three days behind the story by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      Forget it, Wombat. It's Slashdottown.

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  79. Re:Not for military really.. except maybe suppleme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a quick correction. .762 would imply caliber, which would make it just over 3/4 of an inch in diameter. In other words, HUGE. I'm pretty sure there is nothing that would stop a round like that. Even if it did exist, the impact of such a round would probably just about liquify your insides. The parent post was, I'm sure, refering to a 7.62mm round. The diameter used by the AK-47. The most common example of a 7.62mm diameter round would be a .308.

    Just a note. Not a bash on the parent as he probably just misplaced the decimal point.