Slashdot Mirror


The Quintessential Sentry Gun

mollyhackit writes "Aaron and Ezra built an automatic sentry gun using an airsoft gun, some hobby servos and a webcam.The camera automatically identifies and tracks targets. They tested it on each other to make sure it worked; video included!"

276 comments

  1. what?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now all we need is a shark and s victum^H^H^H^H^Htester.

  2. OUch.... by Jeff+Benjamin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I feel sorry for the server. 8MB video file linked in the article description.

    1. Re:OUch.... by CableModemSniper · · Score: 2, Informative

      They coral cached the video link.

      --
      Why not fork?
  3. Cubicle Defense Mechanism by No+Salvation · · Score: 5, Funny

    I doubt there is a single person here who didn't think, "hmmm I could use one of these in my cubicle."

    --
    I'm agneglectic, too lazy to care if there is a God.
    1. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by Sorthum · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thinkgeek offers one that shoots foam discs.

      I prefer to put more of a hurting on the marketing weasels though. Explaining the tiger pit to management was a bit of a challenge, though...

    2. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by BrynM · · Score: 4, Informative
      Thinkgeek offers one that shoots foam discs.
      (homer)
      mmmmmm.... toys
      mmmmmmmmm.... linky...
      (/homer)
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    3. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      Damn... If I had the money I'd get it.... Now once I have the money, it will be gone due to slashdotting. There should be some cardinal rules here... Discontinued items should not be slashdotted....

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    4. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by binarybum · · Score: 1

      yeah, but it doesn't track. one burst of amo, then it's all over. with a tracking one, you could set it to conserve ammo by firing every five minutes, it would annoy/scare the hell out people or pets.

      --
      ôó
    5. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by jonfelder · · Score: 4, Informative

      I bought the one on Thinkgeek. As someone else mentioned, it doesn't track. It's still cool, but has a big problem. The flicker of flourescent lighting triggers the motion sensor on it.

      Makes it kind of lame in an office environment.

    6. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that shit is aimed manually and about all it can be used for is a cubicle

    7. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by Sorthum · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the feedback-- you just saved me some money.

    8. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I doubt there is a single person here who didn't think, "hmmm I could use one of these in my cubicle."

      Just those of us without cubicles. I was thinking more along the lines of, "hmmm, I could use one of these , but with a taser gun, mounted on the roof of my vehicle to shoot small animals that want to put paw prints all over it." Then I was thinking, "hmmm, I wonder if anyone from PETA is going to read this post."

      --
      I8-D
    9. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      Of course you could get the foam disc one for friends and then get one of the BB gun types for the "marketing weasels". The only problem is working out the software to differentiate between the two. If your company uses some sort of RFID ID cards (that is a little redundant) it might be pretty easy.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    10. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by ozbon · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more of "I could use one of those as an anti-burglar device (for car or house) - fit it with paintballs instead, and cocver the perp in paint"

      But then, I get warned about that kind of thought quite a lot. Ah well...

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    11. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was thinking the whole paintball thing as well. Just like Team Fortress Classic (which I still love and play). This would add some serious fun to paintball matches, with each team getting one SG, playing Capture the Flag, and a hit means you sit out for 5 minutes. Literally TFC in the real world. Man, where do I sign up?

      Now if someone could built a device that would let me actually rocket jump. And survive. ;)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    12. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 1
    13. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that, except it was Air Force. That was 20 years ago, and I'm pretty sure they don't take 40 year olds now. Besides, I'm pretty sure I would not survive a rocket jump from one of those suckers....

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    14. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah- I want about 40,000 of these, with real P90s, on the Arizona border.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    15. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would rather read a badly spelled insightful comment than an asenine correctly spelled one.

      I haven't been able to decide if you write "asenine" intentionally. Maybe that makes your sig a badly spelled insightful comment? Just in case you don't get the mistake, it is "asinine".

    16. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      I've often wondered why they don't have something similar to this mounted on the bottom of attack helicopters. Perhaps it could be programmed to shoot two shots at every target below that looks like a human. Wouldn't that be an efficient way of taking out enemies who have hand-held rockets and similar weapons?

      If you know where there are a group of hostiles, you just turn the mechanism on and fly over.

    17. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by emilng · · Score: 1


      Man... you really hate people from Utah. Don't you?

    18. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Southern border. I hate those who take advantage of this country's generosity to do damage with meth and nukes. MS13 needs to be eliminated- and since that gang is entirely made up of Mexican Illegal Immigrants, the easest way to do so is at the border.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    19. Re:Cubicle Defense Mechanism by FingerDemon · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that would work, but then the first time you leave it on and fly over a parking lot that has flickering fluorescent lamps it would trigger the motion sensor and put two shots in every hapless victim who happened to be walking to or from their car.

      Might be tough talking your way out of that one.

      --

      "Contrarily the lookaside buffer might not be the panacea... "
  4. Wow, almost like TFC by DoubleRing · · Score: 2

    All you'd need is the characteristic beeping. Now, instead of Counter-Strike scenarios for airsoft games, will we be seeing TFC scenarios too?

    I wonder if the gun they used is rapid firing (refrains from downloading movie in order to save them some bandwidth).

    --
    Before you die, you see DoubleRing...
    1. Re:Wow, almost like TFC by TelJanin · · Score: 1

      The movie is via coral cache. And yes, the gun seems to be full auto.

    2. Re:Wow, almost like TFC by Grey_14 · · Score: 1

      They used a P90, so yes heh, it's pretty fast firing.

  5. Where's the Dispenser by jtwJGuevara · · Score: 4, Funny

    And my engy script for "bind e +detdispenser"

    1. Re:Where's the Dispenser by pinchhazard · · Score: 1

      bind mouse3 +detdispenser

      Put it on the way to the flag, wait for the "Enemies are using your dispenser!" and click!

      --
      Do you love freedom??? Do you love freedom!!! DO YOU LOVE FREEDOM!!!!!!!!
    2. Re:Where's the Dispenser by goldspider · · Score: 1

      GodDAMN! Those were the days, weren't they?? I can still remember all the GPA points I pissed away in college doing exactly that for days on end.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    3. Re:Where's the Dispenser by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      haha, oh my god, thank you.
      hahaha, enemies are using MY dispenser.
      haha, i remember all the newbies.
      to think they could use my dispenser.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    4. Re:Where's the Dispenser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best... Game... Ever. ETF was fun for a while, but it just isn't quite the same.

    5. Re:Where's the Dispenser by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      And let it get MIRVd? no way. Hide it somewhere sneaky like the shadow after 2fort5 spiral, then when the enemy kills you, your sentry, and your other basement defense, you can time it and det it as he goes up. Granted, I played q/tf, Valve really screwed up the dungeony feel. 2fort was practically monolit, no hiding in shadows as the enemys defense stands next to you, no hiding pipes..just run around with their overpowered hwguy ac cannon. Guess thats just Valve's MO though. (take good mod, remove the skillgap, make it more marketable)

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    6. Re:Where's the Dispenser by Jamu · · Score: 1

      When it was slow on 2fort you could try and work out which corridor to the flag room the enemy scout would try next, and place your dispenser accordingly. I once got a scout six times in a row. He gave up after that. I even asked if he'd like to visit again. But he'd developed such a fear of my dispenser that claiming I'd filled it with chocolate bars didn't help.

      I spent way too much time in the basement of 2fort. Still there's nothing like hearing "he's gone down the spiral" on com and lobbing a primed EMP grenade around that first corner. Except, perhaps, watching scout parts fly back out of a corridor after a close encounter with a dispenser.

      --
      Who ordered that?
    7. Re:Where's the Dispenser by Pharmboy · · Score: 1



      98% of the time, I play engy, and have since 1998. Had our own servers (4) for over 4 years even. Still love 2fort, although a decent defense should always be able to prevent any caps in that map.

      You put the dispensor in the upper elevator room, so it blocks the doorway (have to duck/jump to get over). They don't see it until they hit it, because they are trying to get out of the ramp room quickly. Building the SG in the left close corner as you enter is nice for once he kills the dispensor with his nailgun on the way in, still running too fast to pay attention. Great way for just one man to limit their movement to the hall ramps, *if* you are a good engy.

      </engineer>

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  6. Just because Slashdot is now CSS... by bc90021 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...doesn't mean that everyone's bandwidth is going to be less. What's with linking a video in the story? Sadism? ;)

    1. Re:Just because Slashdot is now CSS... by Lank · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nope, this was on Hackaday earlier today, which is a slightly less frequented site than Slashdot. By the way, if you want your karma to go through the roof, just visit Hackaday occasionally and then submit the story here. I've been seeing quite a bit of redundancy lately!

      --
      Gotta get me one of these!
    2. Re:Just because Slashdot is now CSS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a coral cache link, is it not?

    3. Re:Just because Slashdot is now CSS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      link for you per your sig

      http://www.comlinks.com/bagley/mb050811.htm

      just reading it in an opened tab and saw your sig, enjoy

    4. Re:Just because Slashdot is now CSS... by metaomni · · Score: 1

      I'm a BU student and I could just feel the campus bandwidth seizing up... it's gonna be a bloody night for the CS department.

  7. Needs one more thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hook it up to facial recognition software, put it on a mobile chasis, and then you've got something.

    1. Re:Needs one more thing by superpulpsicle · · Score: 5, Funny

      Homeowner: He's a criminal I swear.

      Police: Looks like a dead mailman to me.

      Homeowner: Radar must have seen those free aol CDs.

      Police: You shot him with 1 million bbs.

      Homeowner: I didn't. Sentry did. Bad firmware. Bad!

    2. Re:Needs one more thing by chrispl · · Score: 1

      ...got something that can find Sarah Connor.

      I usually don't but I did today.

      --
      What post? The one you're carrying inside your rusty innards!
    3. Re:Needs one more thing by Frogbert · · Score: 5, Funny
      Hook it up to facial recognition software, put it on a mobile chasis, and then you've got something.
      Yeah and perhaps some sort of powerful shield, and replace the gun with some sort of Sharkbrand(tm) Laser and add a speaker that barks "exterminate" or something. We could call it a doorleck or darlink, I don't know I'll let marketing figure it out.
    4. Re:Needs one more thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it...

    5. Re:Needs one more thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Dalek is a foe of Dr. Who (The longest running Sci-Fi series. British Guy in a Police Box running through Time and Space.). It is a robotic covered "mass of hideous evil" that would roll around yelling "Exterminate" while shooting things with its laser.

      Thank you for attending Sci-Fi History 101, Class Dismissed!

  8. How about by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1, Funny

    How about:

        - a Linux implementation, with OpenGL?
        - a beowulf cluster of these :)

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:How about by HackingYodel · · Score: 1

      I found another cool project that could help a coder roll their own at http://www.raphnet.net/programmation/laserspotcam/ laserspotcam_en.php

      "Laserspotcam is designed to run on Linux. It uses the video4linux API for for video capture and sdl for the display. It is released under the terms of the GPL license."

      Sorry, no help with the cluster though. ;)

    2. Re:How about by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      Beowulf cluster with cooperative tactics. One fires and then the neighbors fire in rapid succession after tracking any efforts to dodge. That sounds tasty.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    3. Re:How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For what it's worth, 3 students did the same thing in 2003 using Linux, OpenGL, and a paintball gun for their Robotics project.

      Could track a person, decide when to fire, and even had manual override for controlling the motors (pan, tilt, fire) by hand.

    4. Re:How about by hcdejong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Swap the sissy weapon for a Gatling gun, and at least you'll be able to generate a Beowulf cluster of bullets...

  9. Little brothers ARE good for something! by imunfair · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love how he used his little brother to test it.

    "Just go stand out there in front of my sentry gun so I can see if it works"

    At least he was nice enough to have him wear a paintball mask, some brothers wouldnt be nearly so kind. :)

    1. Re:Little brothers ARE good for something! by BrynM · · Score: 5, Funny
      I love how he used his little brother to test it.
      I was thinking of how many little brothers will know genuine fear after seeing the video while I was watching it. Being a big brother, I lauged my ass off as soon as the gun started firing. I suddenly wonder what my little sister is up to...
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    2. Re:Little brothers ARE good for something! by Namronorman · · Score: 1

      Wow. If I had this I don't think I ever would have left home! No offense to little brothers in general, but I could easily see myself talking my little brother into doing this.

      --
      $fortune
      Tomorrow has been canceled due to lack of interest.
    3. Re:Little brothers ARE good for something! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep this up and you will become the little brother...

    4. Re:Little brothers ARE good for something! by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of when I was a teen, and the lawn mower wouldn't start. Didn't have a little brother, but usually had a friend inexperienced enough to hold the spark plug while I cranked, so I could see if it was getting fire. Only can do that once per friend. :)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    5. Re:Little brothers ARE good for something! by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah. First rule of hacking: deal with dangerous objects safely, e.g. if you are making nitroglycerine, you do it in an ice bath.

      I'm not sure that this meets the standard though. The paintball mask isn't designed to stop a BB, although it probably will if its from a low velocity gun. According to the specs for this gun, the muzzle velocity is 200-280 fps. This is fairly low, but since the paintball mask isn't really designed for this, I think it's unnecessarily risky. They should have used a low velocity paintball gun.

      A BB in the eye is very bad. From a medical journal article: "Although most BB and pellet guns fire low-velocity missiles (muzzle velocity: 1,000 feet per second [fps]), they are still fast enough to penetrate the cranium, abdomen, thorax, and paranasal sinuses. (2-6) Approximately 80% of these weapons have muzzle velocities greater than 350 fps, and 50% have velocities of 500 to 930 fps. (1) A pellet velocity of only 150 fps is necessary to penetrate human skin, and a velocity of only 200 fps is necessary to fracture bone. (7)"

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:Little brothers ARE good for something! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least he was nice enough to have him wear a paintball mask, some brothers wouldnt be nearly so kind. :)

      Actually it was an AirSoft mask but you're close. Most paintball masks have large holes that AirSoft guns can shoot through.

      AirSoft guns are BB guns and you play like paintball except without the paint. It's much cheaper and the smaller/lighter BB's go a lot more straight than the paintballs. And the guns are really cool. Modeled after real guns. Some are no close that you can barely tell the difference between the real thing and the AirSoft version.

    7. Re:Little brothers ARE good for something! by Kyaphas · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's an airsoft gun. The bb's are 6mm plastic. Much less inertia and penetration capability. Not that he doesn't still need a mask, but they're not as powerful as your run-of-the-mill 4.5mm steel bb's.

      --
      ---- The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. -Thomas Jefferson
    8. Re:Little brothers ARE good for something! by SlamMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Close, but not quite. 1) Paintballs are normally fired in the 300 fps range. 2) despite what the summary says, this thing is an airsoft gun; it fires airsoft pellets, not BBs. Airsoft pellets are light plastic, BBs are a significantly denser metal.

      Also, no such thing as a low velocity paintball gun. The speed of a paintball is handled through flow an adjustable air flow regulation on the gun. The speed of a fired ball is checked on a chronograph, and the air flow of the paintball gun is adjusted to make the ball fire with acceptable range for whatever field you're planing on.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    9. Re:Little brothers ARE good for something! by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

      These are plastic 6mm BBs. I can attest from experience they will not penetrate normal human skin.

      --
      http://blog.grcm.net/
    10. Re:Little brothers ARE good for something! by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 1
      if you are making nitroglycerine, you do it in an ice bath.

      Is that so your remaining internal organs will be in transplantable condition when the medics eventually come to what's left of your house?

  10. Just freakin' perfect. by Talinom · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now that we know what am aimbot looks like can I buy some PunkBuster clothing now?

    --
    "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    1. Re:Just freakin' perfect. by CrankyOG · · Score: 1

      For the sentry gun to werar, yes.

      --
      [ ]Clever sig [X]Lame sig
  11. The nerds are wall to wall down there by millisa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Guns A and B. Tracking and firing on multiple targets.

    They must be wall to wall in there. Look at those ammo counters go. It's a shooting gallery down there.

    B gun's dry. Twenty on A. Ten. Five. That's it.

    They're at the fire door.

    Man, listen to that.

    Twenty meters and closing. Fifteen. C and D guns down about fifty percent.

    How many?

    Can't tell. Lots. D gun's down to twenty. Ten. It's out.

    They retreated. The guns stopped them.

    Yeah. But look...

    Newt time then can walk right up and knock.

    But they don't know that. They're probably looking for other ways to get in. That'll take them awhile.

    1. Re:The nerds are wall to wall down there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's from Aliens, fool.

    2. Re:The nerds are wall to wall down there by roseblood · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about the guns from Mike Chritons _CONGO_ myself. But the dialog didn't quite fit. So...what's this from ?

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    3. Re:The nerds are wall to wall down there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe. Glad someone else caught it. If only I could figure out which extended directors silver plus remix edition this scene is from; I found it once but never again :P

  12. Airsoft? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    Nerf maybe, I can see this a lawsuit waiting to happen.

    Hint hint . .

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Airsoft? by Axess+Denyd · · Score: 1

      A classic example of why Europe needs to be destroyed.

      Another burglar sued him for "lost wages".

      --
      ---- Watch out for snakes!
  13. awesome by Madd+Scientist · · Score: 4, Interesting
    wow, one of the first times i've clicked a "video included" link that actually worked. nice server.

    their image processing is pretty much perfect, so i'm assuming they took some liberties such as assuming the target is wearing a bright white shirt. show me this thing firing on someone in camo.

    1. Re:awesome by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

      Regardless, it is still pretty impresive.

    2. Re:awesome by Madd+Scientist · · Score: 0

      yeah, for the off chance that our enemie is wearing bright white tee's.... runnin around yellin about I'M MIKE JOOOOOOOOOONES. this tech is worthless until it works on camo. don't even whisper about it until it works on camo.

    3. Re:awesome by blackcoot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you don't need white to be the cue. i've seen similar things which cue off motion alone, in which case the camouflage won't help you (other moving things could, however, confuse it). in fact, cueing off motion alone makes things quite a bit easier --- no need to track (pick out the biggest blob of foreground pixels, aim at the middle, fire)

    4. Re:awesome by justzisguy · · Score: 1

      What about using an infrared camera with the same motion algorithm? Seems to me that it would be pretty tricky to mask your heat signature while cruising through the jungle/desert/wherever you install this.

    5. Re:awesome by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      Actually it's doubly impressive because it was on Fark earlier and it withstood that too.

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    6. Re:awesome by Wwolmack · · Score: 1

      The video worked because its been coralized.

      Just add .nyud.net:8090 to the end of any domain, and it'll pass through the cache. Pretty neat stuff.

    7. Re:awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Infrared would most certainly work, even at low visibility such as in fog, smoke or darkness.

    8. Re:awesome by Svet-Am · · Score: 1

      that's pretty much the best idea. cammo at night and you cannot even easily detect motion for the camera. however, with infrared, the target will stick out like a sore thumb. i think this guy's on to something that the military will be distinctly interested in.

      i mean, he's effectively done the hard work. now just clean up his design a bit, write it all to an FPGA or (maybe) even a PIC and you're off to the races with a nice, neat embedded package.

      --
      [move .sig! for great justice, take off every .sig!]
  14. Just a hunch... by 0rionx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm guessing that here in the U.S. you probably wouldn't be able to get away with keeping one of those in your home or business, since booby-trapping of any kind is illegal in almost every state: http://dictionary.law.com/default2.asp?selected=87 On the other hand, usually one is only held liable for injuries caused by a booby trap on one's property, so I suppose with some modification this could make for a nice non-dangerous way to deter burglars and such.

    1. Re:Just a hunch... by E8086 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is it still considered booby-trapping if you put up a "trespassers will be shot" sign? Just be sure to turn it off around mail time, don't want to hit the USPS/UPS/FedEX/DHL person delivering your new hdd or motherboard or notification of lawsuit from the person you hit the day before.

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    2. Re:Just a hunch... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      since booby-trapping of any kind is illegal in almost every state:

      Although the implementation as shown is an illegal booby-trap, that need not be the case. A little software work could add a feature for a human operator (security guard in a central location) to watch the video and nominate specific targets for shooting. (Probably if they had already disregarded intercom commands to back away from the door).

      Configurations like that would render it just another firearm operated by a human who holds the liability for unjustified shootings. Or, to make it even safer, load it up with indelible paintballs to mark suspects for later apprehension. (Not pepper, though, that's too lethal!)

    3. Re:Just a hunch... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Ok, I parsed that sentence into "just be sure to turn [the sign] off around mail time" and thought 'you sicko.' before reading the rest. sicko.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:Just a hunch... by 0rionx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Although I can't say for sure, I'm told by a cop friend of mine that any kind of "unmanned, unattended" booby trap is considered illegal. Basically, anything that doesn't discriminate, but just fires away. If I'm not mistaken, I believe part of the reason for these laws is a result of people who have maimed or killed either themselves or a family member with their homemade traps. Additionally, if firefighters or police officers have to break into your home in an emergency, the last thing they want to have to worry about is some auto-turret that's gonna start pelting them with airsoft bullets. Non-lethal, sure, but most law enforcement officers I know would take a very dim view of such a set-up just on principle.

    5. Re:Just a hunch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, many booby traps are legal in many jurisdictions. The problem comes when intending to maim or kill through theft deterrents that the law places a greater weight upon the life of a tresasser over protection of property. The big catch is that if you are home, then you are protecting yourself and your home, which is given great leniency under the 'castle doctrine'. Basically the Castle Doctrine says you can kill/do serious injury to protect when you are on your own property (and there is a resonably perceived threat to the person, not the property). You may not kill or use lethal implements (firearms, bolt guns, lethal voltage, trained attack dogs, etc) in protecting property upon which there is no person to be protected. Use of lethal weapons carries the intent to kill or maim, even if carefully constructed to not kill (i.e. pointing a boobtrap gun at feet).

      Now isn't that clear as mud?

    6. Re:Just a hunch... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the airsoft version is just good enough to maybe put an eye out. OTOH, a magazine-fed version of a "bean-bag" gun could have been useful recently in New Orleans.

      Personally, I would favor a Benelli full-auto 12 gage with a detachable box magazine, since a GE mini-gun has far too high a rate of fire.

    7. Re:Just a hunch... by E8086 · · Score: 1

      It's funny for the first 5min until you really think about it. It's kind of funny in concept and seeing that guy running away in pain because he didn't have enough chest padding. The only useful use I can think of is if you own a painball capture the flag course. An automated turret could be mounted above/near the flag. Then you'd need some team beacons to avoid friendly fire and aid with aiming, RF/WiFi/Bluetooth/other. As for home "defence" it's no more useful than the Laptop Gun in Perfect Dark, useless when it expends it's ammo in 2-3sec and when someone sees it. Once the robber saw it you'd be out a perfectly good airsoft gun. You'd be better off with a hidden cameras with montion sensor focused on the most likely points of entry. So when the police arrive you can give them a picture of the criminal instead of telling them to duck as you attempt to deactive your home-made "security system".

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    8. Re:Just a hunch... by ari_j · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Don't listen to cop friends about the law - cops know how to police, not how to answer legal questions. That said, this one got it right. And it's not just due to injuring yourself, but because it is indiscriminate in who it shoots. The law tends to refer to "spring guns" as they were usually set up using a string, a spring, and a gun pointed at a window or a gate. What happened too often were situations where you set it up to catch a burglar, but some kid loses his baseball in your yard and gets his leg blown off.

      Somewhere in this thread, someone asked about a "Trespassers Will Be Shot" sign. While such a sign is a nice warning, you still have to do the shooting, yourself. An indiscriminate shooting machine is not acceptable, because not all entries of your property that you didn't personally authorize are truly trespassing - the kid with the baseball is questionable as to necessity to retrieve his property, but it could be grandma, the police, a lost Jesuit, or your wife.

      There has to be a human conscience that decides whether or not to pull the trigger. Now, if you added face-recognition software, you could make the argument that it is not indiscriminate in what it shoots at, but I think that the law would be very reluctant to agree with you and you'd mostly be making that argument to Bubba to try to confuse him enough that he loses his erection.

    9. Re:Just a hunch... by Boronx · · Score: 1

      There should be a lot of experience with lately since Meth labs are often booby trapped.

    10. Re:Just a hunch... by AGMW · · Score: 1
      You'd be better off with a hidden cameras with montion sensor focused on the most likely points of entry. So when the police arrive you can give them a picture of the criminal instead of telling them to duck as you attempt to deactive your home-made "security system".

      The best CCTV security cameras detect motion to switch themselves on, then point the cameras at the motion, then make a noise. The noise makes the purp look to see what the noise is, and you get a nice full-face picture of the wannabe burglar!

      Works a treat, every time. If the purps get wise and don't look, then when it's you creaping up with your cricket bat (a baseball bat would be an acceptable alternative for our US friends) you can whack 'em on the noddle and they can end up in yer gimp basket for a month or two before you hand 'em over to the police. ("Why's he walking like John Wayne, sir?" ... "He didn't look when he heard a noise officer!").

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    11. Re:Just a hunch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My name is Bubba you insensitive clod!

    12. Re:Just a hunch... by vertinox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While such a sign is a nice warning, you still have to do the shooting, yourself. An indiscriminate shooting machine is not acceptable, because not all entries of your property that you didn't personally authorize are truly trespassing

      What about a machine that warns you that it is about to fire? Fires a warning shoot and then explains you have 60 seconds to vacate the property.

      In truth indiscriminate shooting weapons would be military applications in which it didn't matter who you killed. Like those special facilities that have signs that say "lethal force has been authorized" or a less than compasionate government wanted to have easy ways to control the border.

      Actually come to think of it... Didn't the DDR have automatic sentry guns on the Berlin wall? If not, I'm sure they would have used them if such a technology became available.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  15. It's a true aimbot by DoubleRing · · Score: 4, Funny

    Software tracked, mechanically aimed! Hax0r!!!!

    --
    Before you die, you see DoubleRing...
  16. "If we stand still it can't see us..." by ecko3437 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is awesome. I am already excited at the idea of building several of these and having a large scale airsoft battle in my woods behind my house over several acres.

    Though, I wonder how well it tracks for people who aren't wearing white ;) If I'm wearing camo or something and I'm out in the woods, will it pick me up? If I'm wearing a green shirt and its out on my lawn will it still target me or maybe just my pants?

    --
    -Eric Smith
    1. Re:"If we stand still it can't see us..." by anethema · · Score: 1

      Sure, just what ever you do, dont wear chaps: http://www.bandbleather.com/product/149.jpg

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    2. Re:"If we stand still it can't see us..." by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      If I'm wearing camo or something and I'm out in the woods, will it pick me up? If I'm wearing a green shirt and its out on my lawn will it still target me or maybe just my pants?

            Best alien-probe post ever!

    3. Re:"If we stand still it can't see us..." by Redwin · · Score: 1

      will it still target me or maybe just my pants?

      Adjusting aim... just below waistline, should be a vital target spot...

      --
      Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.
  17. OK, Tell Me This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what the hell is this "^H^H^H^H^H"? Is that the sound of Zonk blowing all the other "editors" at a staff meeting?

  18. Problem Solved by VATechTigger · · Score: 0

    excellent way for these fine geeks to repel icky women from their lairs..............

  19. Buy your own by nick13245 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ThinkGeek sells an "office safe" version of this:
    http://www.thinkgeek.com/cubegoodies/toys/71bc/M/

    1. Re:Buy your own by Axess+Denyd · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does not appear to aim, though.

      The target tracking is the best part.

      --
      ---- Watch out for snakes!
    2. Re:Buy your own by RFC959 · · Score: 1

      That's true. A true hacker could, however, combine the Lazer Trip Wire, the Room Defender, and the Pan/Tilt Network Camera. (I think they used to have a face-tracking camera, which would have been perfect, but it doesn't seem to be there now.)

    3. Re:Buy your own by mink · · Score: 1

      Sounds like trap design in the game Evil Genius.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  20. Re:Hackaday? by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 1

    I'll give you one guess as to where the link in the story summary takes you. Ya know, most true stories are reported elsewhere first. Otherwise, we'd just have to make up stuff to submit, and hope that turns out to be true.

    --
    I am not left-handed, either!
  21. Coming soon to a DOD sat near you! by weighn · · Score: 2, Funny

    quick...defend freedom and liberty now...GPL the source!

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  22. Boo hoo by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't want to live in a world with an anit-computer-aimed-airsot-booby-trap law.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  23. Re:Hackaday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm DUHH it's linked to hackaday.

  24. All we need now... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

    ...is John Connor!

    1. Re:All we need now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You laugh now but we'll see who's laughing when this thing becomes self-aware...

  25. About time by the+pickle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    About time that technology caught up with the Janus Syndicate. *turns around and hits the power button on the N64*...

    p

    1. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what you are talking about, but at least you aren't claiming that GoldenEye 007 was the first or the definitive game with automated gun turrets.

  26. welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new sentry gun wielding overlords

  27. you'll shoot your eye out by E8086 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's all fun and games until someone gets shot in the eye, about 50 times if it empties the magazine on you. Then it's even funnier to everyone else if you get it on camera.

    --
    F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    1. Re:you'll shoot your eye out by bronney · · Score: 0

      Dude,

      Airsoft players live by the #1 strict rule to wear eyes protection at all times. This is global. And he's not "some kid" that just thought cool let's do it.

      On the booby trap option though, I would love to shoot a burglar's eyes out. This This is what happens when you don't have full face protections at around 2 joules, close range.

    2. Re:you'll shoot your eye out by E8086 · · Score: 1

      "Airsoft players live by the #1 strict rule to wear eyes protection at all times."
      I hope you got the reference to "A Christmas Story"

      yes, always use proper safety equipment and gun control at all times, use both hands and always treat it as if it is loaded. I see the face mask and cup but can't tell if he has any chest protection. If I were to do that at thay range I'd have at least a layer of cardboard(worked for targets at 10') and maybe a layer of bubble wrap under it. And don't even think of going near one if you've been drinking and firing randomly at people and objects. I have a small welt on the back of my calf because some fool let another drunken fool get a hold of his gun and ammo. It was from about 20', nothing near as bad as the picture but they'll still leave a mark. Some people need to understand that even though they're made of plastic and are painted orage they are NOT toys. If you want to play go find an NES with Zapper and go play Duckhunt or Hogan's Alley.

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    3. Re:you'll shoot your eye out by bronney · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately there are too many fools who don't think the same way as we do. They realy think they're just toys eventhough they've seen the damage it can do to a coke can. And whenever we tried to give some sense into the safety issue, they'll put us off and say yeah whatever.

      I would not play with anyone like that, at least not to my private games.

  28. My eyes, my eyes! by modecx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Heck, tie it to the garden hose, can't get much more non-lethal than that... Unless it's 40 below in Minnesota or something. It'd be great for keeping the neighbor's cats from shitting in the garden, and it would also be great for Jehovah's Witnesses and people who listen to John Tesh.

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    1. Re:My eyes, my eyes! by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      I prefer marshmellows. They are non-lethal projectiles ( yes, there is case law, but I don't have it on me).

      And, if you just NEED to shoot a hard projectile, you can freeze them!

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:My eyes, my eyes! by modecx · · Score: 1

      Hrm, marshmallows... And scalding hot chocolate! I can see it now! I need go file a patent on MJHPs (Marshmallow Jacketed Hollow Points) so I can capitolize on all the would-be confectioner/assassins in the world. It's gonna make millions!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  29. mirror by jaredmauch · · Score: 3, Informative
    here 8MB Quicktime. on my historically fast host.

    If you're in Asia use this link.

  30. The Army will be all over this by tjlsmith · · Score: 1

    like ugly on an ape. Auto guns are effective though - I remember in Unreal, Half-Life and Duke Nukem 3D, auto guns were a pain in the ass to get by, and almost always killed you first time you met them.

    --
    Mumia Abu-Jamal is *laughably guilty*. Check the evidence.
    1. Re:The Army will be all over this by jacen_sunstrider · · Score: 1

      System Shock II's sentry guns on the Rickenbacker were by far the worst I had to fight. Though, I was just a piddly hacker who didn't see the virtue of working on weapon cyber mods until the last augementation part.

    2. Re:The Army will be all over this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what makes you think they don't already have something like this, or at least in the works? With so much $$$ floating around in military research and automated / remote weapon systems I'd say it's a pretty good bet. Now imagine this with an M-60, or even better (worse?), a .50 caliber machine gun or a Gatling minigun.

    3. Re:The Army will be all over this by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      HL2: They are easy. Tip over, grab some cover, throw a grenade... you can usually spot it before you enter its fire range. Sure they are great as support weapon (when you don't have time to fight the sentry gun, being too busy fighting enemies near it), and they work nicely as a "surprise" in hidden places, but only idiots like combine have trouble with them (running straight upstream the fire), for the player they are just too easy. Unless of course the authors of the game make them exceptionally durable to damage.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    4. Re:The Army will be all over this by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I can't speak for every piece of the Army, but I know we have remote controled machineguns in various calibers. best I know of is a .50 cal that gets mounted to the top of a HMMWV, so that the gunner doesn't have to expose himself to enemy fire at all, that I saw while I was in Iraq. he just sits inside looking at a monitor and controling it with a joystick. I kind of wish I had had one, but we only had the one for our battalion, so I had to shoot threats the old fashioned way.

      I remember reading on some (public, unclassified) site that we have at least prototypes of remote controled robots with various calibers of automatic weapons, ranging from 9mm to 7.62mm.

      I don't think the Army's that interested in completely automated systems, but remote controlled turrets is something Uncle Sam would dig.

    5. Re:The Army will be all over this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nosc.mil has examples of these from SPAWAR Systems Center, San Diego... " here's a nice image of their fully-automated mobile turret that fires 13 rounds/second.

    6. Re:The Army will be all over this by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Moving one step closer to war being nothing more than an MMORPG.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    7. Re:The Army will be all over this by Harald74 · · Score: 1

      Or this one.

      --
      A)bort, R)etry or S)elf-destruct?
    8. Re:The Army will be all over this by angrist · · Score: 1

      NO, they wont.

      You would NEVER be able to get a safety release for this kind of thing. All weapons have a 'man in the loop' that determines what is or is not a target, and fires the weapon.

      The only application I could see is this; using software to autodetect and track moving objects, but still having a soldier give the firing command (save him flipping a joystick back and forth all the time).

    9. Re:The Army will be all over this by olman · · Score: 1

      And here I was thinking Germans had several remote-controlled MGs in their panzers toward the end of the war.. And in STuG-IV etc and not in some exotic limited manufacturing vehicles too.

      Then again, they had periscopes for tank commander too. Something US army adopted with .. Oh, M1A2. Nobody said they can't recognize a good idea when they see one!

    10. Re:The Army will be all over this by Molochi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Phalanx has been around for a long time, since the '80s I think. The navy uses it to shoot missles out of the sky with a 20mm Vulcan cannon. If you've played BF2, it's that gun mounted on the aircraft carrier. Except in RL it's automated.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    11. Re:The Army will be all over this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't think the army's that interested in completely automated systems?

      http://www.army.mil/fcs/

    12. Re:The Army will be all over this by Chuckaluphagus · · Score: 1

      When I visited the Checkpoint Charlie Museum in Berlin, there was an exhibit on automatic sentry guns that East Germany put up on their side of the wall to prevent people from escaping into West Berlin. They were pulled after a public outcry when one attempting escapee was shot over fifty times by automatic guns but lived, essentially crippled for life. The rationale given for pulling the sentry guns was that it was more ethical to have a human marksman kill you in one or two shots than have an inaccurate machine riddle you with bullets but let you live a broken wreck.

    13. Re:The Army will be all over this by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      In a similar vein. The navy has had the CIWS radar and FLIR guided Gatling guns for quite a long time. They have completely automated tracking and fire control.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    14. Re:The Army will be all over this by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      Good point, I'd forgotten about those things. I'd imagine that for the AEGIS and similar systems that a human gunner would be undesirable. Last thing they want is for some stressed-out petty officer that's been on watch for the last 24 hours and is pumped full of adrenaline to be on the gun and fail to destroy an inbound missle. I mean, with most Navy operations, it's not like those guys have to worry too much about hitting a civilian or a friendly while they're out at sea.

    15. Re:The Army will be all over this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so land mines don't count as weapons now? The US never signed the ICBL and continues to use and produce them.

    16. Re:The Army will be all over this by xycadium · · Score: 1

      In the movie Congo, they used robotic machine guns that were very entertaining to watch. They set them up around a camp site to protect them at night.

      I've been wanting to make something like for as long as I can remember but never had the time or knowledge enough to get the job done. One of these days.

  31. Would sure look cool on by Korbeau · · Score: 2, Funny

    garden dwarfs.

    I'm all for Open Source Warfare!

  32. Here you go . . . by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The Scarecrow. Doesn't aim, just waits for victim to walk by before "firing", but should do the trick.

    http://smarthome.com/6120.html

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:Here you go . . . by modecx · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, I've seen that before, and yeah, that's neat and all... This is the same idea on another level of geekdom, though! Plus you've got to love that you'll likely hit your victim with a good blast of water rather than probably scaring them off with the noise before they get wet!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  33. CTRL-H Defined by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 4, Informative

    CTRL-H is the UNIX-standard control code for a backspace. It's used in this case for humorous effect or sarcasm.

    Example: He is stupid^H^H^H^H^H^Hcool --> "He is cool", but that's not what you originally typed, hence the humor or sarcasm.

    UNIX 101 is over for today. Class dismissed.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:CTRL-H Defined by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Informative

      Right, but the "joke" originates from actual incidents of old terminal programs storing the ^H rather than erasing the previous character. Occasionally, BBSes would have backspace set to something other than ^H. When someone would post a message, and they sent the ^H sig, their own terminals echoed a backspace, but the remote BBS simply logged the ^H as part of their post.

    2. Re:CTRL-H Defined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicely done. Now, for the bonus points, explain to him why 8 out of 10 /. stories hit digg.com the day before they show up here.

      Like this one.

    3. Re:CTRL-H Defined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because this is dupe from slashdot yesterday

    4. Re:CTRL-H Defined by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a freak^H^H^H^H^H geeky^H^H^H^H^H cool thing to know!

    5. Re:CTRL-H Defined by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently, UNIX 101 was not over for the day...

    6. Re:CTRL-H Defined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it showed up at hackaday.com on the 21st
      http://www.hackaday.com/entry/1234000427059760/

    7. Re:CTRL-H Defined by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

      Some things are probably better left unknown.

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    8. Re:CTRL-H Defined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! What an asshole^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hasshole^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hasshole you are!

    9. Re:CTRL-H Defined by zlogic · · Score: 1

      I think that if you press BACKSPACE when Linux is loading, you'll get ^H in the terminal in the place where you pressed the key.

    10. Re:CTRL-H Defined by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Yeah, now the question remains what a vtester is exactly.

  34. Now what would be cool... by scovetta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Colleges have that robo-cup competition. I think they could get a little more advanced with something like this. Each team has a bunch (maybe 10) autonomous vehicles that have a webcam, paintball gun, laptop, battery, etc. Capture the flags, robot-style.

    I'd tune it to watch that on TV. Until the robots get smarter and take over the world. We wouldn't have a chance. Until their batteries died, at least.

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
    1. Re:Now what would be cool... by Yakman · · Score: 1

      I'd tune it to watch that on TV. Until the robots get smarter and take over the world. We wouldn't have a chance. Until their batteries died, at least.

      They might figure out they can use humans as giant batteries and farm us! Of course they'd need to figure out some way to keep our minds busy while they do this...

    2. Re:Now what would be cool... by phxbadash · · Score: 1

      Hook the guys up to 24-hour pr0n and the women up to 24/7 HGTV/Cooking channel...problem solved.

  35. Re:Hackaday? by bloko · · Score: 0

    Ahh lovely commenting i got for not clicking the link in the article. Since i had already read it yesterday my bad.

    --
    I gave the bat commader a high five.
  36. Second Amendment meta-discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let's just summarize the inevitable right-to-bear-arms discussion here and get it over with, shall we?

    First, somebody will suggest how cool this would be with real guns; then a European will wring their hands at how any sane person could have the notion of automatically shooting other people or even possessing such things at all; an American will call the European a socialistic pansy; another American will call the first American a rabid, foaming gun-nut who should be put in a concentration camp with the other bad people; and finally links to statistics will be posted, proving that guns are both the cause of and solution to violent crime, in addition to being psychosis-inducing penis substitutes which should be carefully controlled for the children.

    1. Re:Second Amendment meta-discussion by deaddrunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Europeans are quite a bloodthirsty lot, you should see our history.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    2. Re:Second Amendment meta-discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Living in Germany now, I can only say all of these comments above seem really stupid and misplaced. In the old days, East Germany booby-trapped the area around the Berlin wall with automatic shotguns. Actually a number of people lost their lives because of this.

      I don't feel particularly attached to the European views and I am not a pacifist. Given the above, I still find this type of entertainment rather disgusting.

    3. Re:Second Amendment meta-discussion by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Please don't confuse the English with Europeans. It's your "allies" who have the little problem with guns. Here on the continent you buy 'em in supermarkets and you don't need even have to declare ownership of a double barreled shotgun.

      Brits = raving gun phobiacs.
      Yanks = raving gun fetishists.
      Euros = hey, it's just a tool.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    4. Re:Second Amendment meta-discussion by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

      No, it's just the British media that have a problem with guns. I shoot, and hunt, and I'm as and can't fucking STAND the bullshit our government lets through. I'm incredibly British in nature, but have lived around the world enough that I understand the dire position Brits allow themselves to be in and I'm ashamed of my government, and my country.

      I must confess, in my place in France, I have a gun rack, with a variety of rifles and shotguns, all of which I bought locally, no license, nothing (admittedly in the Dordogne - farmer country) - and I go grousing and the like all the time. In the UK I have to keep my rifle and gun in a locked case in a locked metal walled room with 3 locks, and I'm not allowed to transport them on public transport, or in public view, and am limited on the amount of ammunition I can buy per annum.

      Not entirely sure what the restrictions achieve - I could still go down to Brixton or parts of Notting Hill and pick up a handgun from some dodgy rastafarian.

    5. Re:Second Amendment meta-discussion by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      In which country can you buy guns in a supermarket ...?
      In Germany you certainly can't , The police may carry guns but they are only allowed to use them if they are shot at first.
      I haven't been to a French supermarket in a while .. but i certainly would of noticed a gun .
      You can't buy them in Austrian supermarkets.
      I didn't see any last time i was Poland (couple of weeks ago)
      You can't in Spain
      IIRC you can't get them in Belgium (not sure)
      Holland does not have them

      Perhaps some countries in the Europe allow it , but i know for a fact that a great many have strict gun control and not a relaxed attitude to them .

      The only reasons your allowed a gun in most EU nations is for the purposes of hunting , culling and farming (putting animals down ) with some strict controls (and this includes the UK ).

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    6. Re:Second Amendment meta-discussion by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1
      In which country can you buy guns in a supermarket?
      Where were you looking? In rural areas of France large supermarkets (e.g. E. Leclerc) sell hunting guns.
      Perhaps some countries in the Europe allow it , but i know for a fact that a great many have strict gun control and not a relaxed attitude to them .
      So, you know that a great many of European countries have strict gun control. Do you have a cite for the laws? Which countries? What does "strict gun control" mean?

      For information here is the law in France. Some detail:

      • Armes en vente libre sans déclaration: (Arms free for sale without even a declaration:)

        Armes de 5e catégorie (armes de chasse):
        fusils, carabines et canardières à canon lisse, tirant un coup par canon (non repeating shotguns, single or multiple barrel)

      • Armes soumises à déclaration (arms that have to be declared to the police, but you don't need to ask for a license):

        Hunting rifles, repeating shotguns, target pistols &c

      • Arms that need a license:

        1st category: military pistols & rifles.

        4th category: pistols for personal defence &c, short barrelled shotguns, rifles with more than 10 rounds in the magazine.

      Not exactly draconian. (see previous reply for experience of a Brit in France).
      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    7. Re:Second Amendment meta-discussion by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Whoops, forgot to mention that you also need a license for 2nd category weapons:

      Tanks, warships, fighter aircraft & c

      And that it can be difficult to get a license for some 1st category weapons: ... grenades / torpilles / missiles - engins nucléaires ...

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    8. Re:Second Amendment meta-discussion by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

        Well I have mainly been in and around larger population areas in france so i do admit i could have missed them there.
        but that is just france not Europe ;) which was my point . Europe has many varied laws dependant ont he country
      http://www.germany-info.org/relaunch/info/consular _services/customs/firearms.html
      for example in germany has a great deal of controll (which exempts in certain incidences hunters etc.)

      for example of some of the exemptions
      General exceptions, in particular to the licence requirement for carrying weapons (Waffen&#173;schein), apply in one's own home, business premises or fenced-in property; a legally acquired and held weapon may be carried in these places, ready to fire, without official authorization. This privilege also applies to the home, business premises or fenced-in property of another person (with their consent). A weapon may also be transported on unavoidable journeys directly relating to the purpose for which it was acquired. One may also fire one's weapon at licensed shooting ranges without a licence of one's own.
       
      Under the general rules of criminal law, one may also fire one's weapon in self-defence, to defend another or if justified by necessity.
      necessity in this context basicaly means they are attempting to stab you or shoot you .
      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    9. Re:Second Amendment meta-discussion by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Ok, so those are the exceptions for waving your gun around.

      Now what are the laws about owning a gun, which was the subject of conversation up to now.

      My point was that most Americans seem to think ('cos the obsessive brits tell 'em) that guns are VERBOTEN in Yurp.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    10. Re:Second Amendment meta-discussion by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Ok, so the German laws seem rather stricter than the French (what a supprise) and somewhat over the top (seperate licenses for ownership, transportation and firing guns) but we're still not talking about a UK style ban.

      Does anyone have any idea how easy/hard it is to get these licenses?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    11. Re:Second Amendment meta-discussion by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

      Not sure about Germany - it was bloody hard to get a gun license in the UK - I got my explosives license with trivial ease, however - just went to the post office and got the form. Total absence of logic.

  37. Mod parent Alien 3 by william_w_bush · · Score: 1

    People might not get the reference otherwise.

    --
    The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
  38. lame... by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lame...it hasn't even been upgraded to a level 3 with a rocket launcher attached.

    1. Re:lame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they haven't even caught on to building it on top of a dispenser and then removing the dispenser - instant hover-gun!

    2. Re:lame... by Null537 · · Score: 1

      The engineer is on his way back, he had to get more ammo.

  39. Some things money can't buy... by jpellino · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lazy susan bearing - $3 at Big Lots.
    Raggedy PIII to run the controllers - $50 on eBay.
    Video of your little brother running like a frightened baby bunny while being peppered with BBs for all the world to see on the internet - Priceless.

    Call me when they swap in the paintball rig and it can feature recognize Jehovah's Witnesses.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Some things money can't buy... by blincoln · · Score: 2, Funny

      and it can feature recognize Jehovah's Witnesses.

      SENTRY GUN (vocoder effect): Please put down your religious crusade. You have twenty seconds to comply.

      DICK JONES: I suggest you do as it says, Mr. Kinney.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    2. Re:Some things money can't buy... by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      I didn't download the video (feeling benevolent today), but that's pretty harsh, even if he was an annoying little brat. I shot myself with a $1.90 plastic airsoft at about 3' away. just to see what it felt like, and the answer was yes, it hurts like hell. It was a half an hour before the stinging stopped and I had a huge angry red welt for several days.

      On a completely unrelated note, if it works for airsoft there's no reason why it can't work with real bullets. Obvious safety and legal issues aside, I get the feeling that someone somewhere is going to build a genuine honest-to-god automated gun turret. Maybe a relatively sophisicated gang or drug ring...

    3. Re:Some things money can't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheap airsoft springer - $45
      Bag of BBs - $15
      Protective glasses - $15
      Watching above poster refering to airsoft as 'paintball' in front of a crowd of airsoft players - Priceless

    4. Re:Some things money can't buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Call me when they swap in the paintball rig and it can feature recognize Jehovah's Witnesses.

      Just point to your sentry and tell the person at the door; "10 second delay, 30 foot range" and shut the door.

    5. Re:Some things money can't buy... by VvScythevV · · Score: 1

      Generally I think that you're supposed to be at least 20 feet away from a person to shoot them according the rules of a few different airsoft fields I've been to - at 20 feet you get a painful sting, possible broken skin and a welt for certain but with a mask on, you won't take any serious damage. And really, I'm certain there are people with real sentry guns. It's not a new idea, we've seen auto-tracking guns in movies and games for ages so it's almost a guarantee that someone had one created. This article and video just show you how simple it is if you have some know-how.

      --
      -- Reality is for people who lack imagination.
  40. I want the news first here! by MrArmyAnt · · Score: 0

    This was on i-hacked earlier today, like in the morning.

    1. Re:I want the news first here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That comment's already been made. I want to hear comments first from you!

  41. make a real sentry gun by Barbarian · · Score: 1

    Now someone just needs to do this with a belt-fed M249, with a much wider base tripod (and shorter) so it will not fall over.

  42. Damn the Combine by RealErmine · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone else notice that, at least in the first trial on the video, it even sounds almost the same as the sentry guns in HL2? Very cool work.

    --
    Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
  43. finally!!! by xutopia · · Score: 1

    a solution to all those alley cats in my backyard! I'd much prefer the sound of a machine gun to the sound of those cats fighting!

    1. Re:Finally!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *golf claps like an excited little school girl*

      I don't think you quite know what "golf clap" is.

  44. Finally!!! by Wazukkithemaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Something useful on Slashdot :)

    P.S. was that friggin night vision on the last test shot?

    "It had him when he was in the shadows too..."

    "AHHHH!!!!"

    Lets break that down for you guys...

    Step 1)Robots.
    Step 2)Add Airsoft Guns.
    Step 3)Find Younger Siblings
    Step 4)... (explicative deleted)
    Step 5)Profit!!!

    Brilliant... *golf claps like an excited little school girl*

    --
    Live according to the Categorical Imperative. If the Categorical Imperative tells you not to live by it... ignore it
  45. It's actually from Aliens (the second one) by millisa · · Score: 1

    Well, except for the part about Newt Time . . . I like newts.

    1. Re:It's actually from Aliens (the second one) by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      I like Newt too. The picture is a little old, but she turned into a cute chick.

  46. Don't shoot your garden dwarfs, bounce them! by Whizzmo2 · · Score: 1

    Remember, if you bounce them 6 times, they give you a powerup!

    Jardinains, baby!

  47. Slow Slashdot by CajunLuke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is is just me, or is Slashdot now incredibly slow?

    1. Re:Slow Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move to Firefox. MSIE has buggy, extremely slow support for long DIV-based webpages. In contrast, Firefox sucks for huge table-based pages (D but really shines with the ones like upgraded Slashdot.

    2. Re:Slow Slashdot by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Move to Firefox. MSIE has buggy, extremely slow support for long DIV-based webpages.

      I'm using IE and I'm not seeing any real difference in load speeds, perhaps a bit faster if anything.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    3. Re:Slow Slashdot by CajunLuke · · Score: 1

      I'm using Safari.

  48. Weekend off thanks to /.! by BBrown · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cheers to my roommate for finally getting his turret some accolade!

    Unfortunately, he had the poor foresight to host it on the main computer science server here.

    So, thanks /., for giving me the weekend off. I won't be doing any coding once this gets popular. ;)

  49. Umm by sagenumen · · Score: 0

    hackaday.com called...they want Wednesday's news back.

  50. proof of a slow day... by FredThompson · · Score: 0

    ...another copied story from hackaday.

    Please, someone, I beg you, finish out the day with a story about Beowulf clusters running MythTV, SETI and something about creation/evolution.

    1. Re:proof of a slow day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly, how dare they post a story from a website we may never have seen? You'd think the editors would understand the rule of journalism which states that you may never report a story that another journalist has ever reported....

      Wait, did I just defend the editors? /me goes for a shower

  51. Save the servers.. by Atypic · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Use the torrent.

    --
    -- Odd Rune Strommen
  52. What a wonderful device for farmers! by t0qer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I grew up on several orchards as a kid. We were pretty much encouraged to wander the cherry, prune orchards from the age of 6 and shoot anything that moves.

    There's other devices for scaring off varmints. Natural predators like hawks, percussion guns, dogs, sprinkler systems connected to motion detectors, but nothing quite as eleborate and precise as this.

    The only downside I see it that the BB's aren't biodegradable, but why do they have to be made out of plastic? Perhaps a system that delivers fertalizer pellets and or water. That way you would be scaring off birds as well giving the plants nutrients.

    This may have been a crazy tangent of a post, but I'm just throwing out a possible commercial app for this if folks are looking for it.

    1. Re:What a wonderful device for farmers! by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I'm really surprised this is a BB-gun and not a 308.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:What a wonderful device for farmers! by ImustDIE · · Score: 1

      They do make biodegradable airsoft BBs (in fact I think most are). I play matches on public land out here (southern cali) and all they require of us is that we play far from the road and use biodegradable BBs.

    3. Re:What a wonderful device for farmers! by wintersynth · · Score: 1

      You can buy biodegradable 6mm BB's at Walmart. The only problem is I wouldn't want to shoot an animal in the eye.

    4. Re:What a wonderful device for farmers! by Belseth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Postman gets shot by pellets. Back at the post office the nitrates in the fertilizer sets off bomb detectors. Postman desperately tries to explain about a farmer shooting him with fertilizer pellets during the cavity search. The 300lb security guard for some reason doesn't believe his. Homeland Security declares victory in war against terror and sends the Postman to Gitmo where's he's forced to convert to Islam and winds up being deported to Iraq. On the bright side the farm is looking really green this year.

    5. Re:What a wonderful device for farmers! by bronney · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We can't use fertilizer pellets because of how delicate these "toys" are built. The bb is fired with an compress air suction system based on a motor turning gears; which in turn run a piston back, and releasing that piston on a spring to the nozzle to fire.

      Anything that's not soild and hard will get deformed or sucked into the cylinder and mess up your gun. And don't start the "hey but there are paintball airsoft gun" thing. They break faster.

      There are biodegradable bb as siblings suggests. But on the contrary most are NOT biodegradable. The package says "bio-friendly" which is mis-leading. For some examples of biodegradable bb's check this: http://www.airsoftmechanics.com/reviews.php?aid=15 &page=3

      But the problem with bio-bb's are that they are not offered in the same weight-range as the non-bio-bb. Depends how you tune your gun, the wind condition, and the slopes, .25g vs .20g really makes a difference in battles. Another problem is the consistency of the bb's diameter. Bad tolerance = jammed gun. And the hardness of the pellets. Soft pellets or brittle pellets = jammed guns again.

      These so called "toys" (I quoted toys cuz they're not really toys hehe) are expensive if you dig deep, and you wouldn't want a frag bb in your piston and gears.

    6. Re:What a wonderful device for farmers! by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      There are different types of BB gun:

      - Motor driven as you suggest
      - Manual powered compressed air
      - Gas powered

      I would have thought the second two would fire fertiliser pellets without breaking them, the main problem I can see would be that the pellets would need to be an (almost) perfect sphere so that the gas/compressed air doesn't escape around the sides of the pellet. However, using a gas powered gun could prove expensive in a farming type environment (how much do big tanks of gas cost these days??) and using a manual powered compressed air type gun would cause problems in delivering the force to reload (compress the air) after each shot.

      BTW: I saw a BB mini-gun in Hong Kong ages ago, that thing would look great on something like this! Although at HK$40,000 (about £3.5k at the time) I think I'd prefer to by a few gadgets.

      Haydn.

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    7. Re:What a wonderful device for farmers! by bronney · · Score: 0

      Haydn, Thanks for filling in :)

      I am in Hong Kong btw and if you guessed it I am also an airsoft junky hehe. What a place to stay for this sport eh? The mini's you suggested are $600 - $800 hkd now here. So if you'd like to come get one now's the time. However, they're very weak and turning those into turrets would mean you can only cover a small area when spraying the fertilizers.

      The "inventor"'s choice of a P90 is the best choice for power/size. Also for mounting consideration, good job!

      The point on air leaking from the side of the bb is also valid, however I am less concern of that than when it jams your gun, taking you out of action. Again, gun jamming is very unlikely unless your barrel is really tight and the bb is really thick. But considering the fertilizer might dent and chip off inside the barrel, the barrel would get dirty pretty quickly and jam things eventually.

      These are mostly my concerns and if someone invented fertilizer bb that equals the performance of plastic bb, while keeping the price at 1.5x the current plastic bb price, I'd be happy to give mother nature a shot, no pun.

    8. Re:What a wonderful device for farmers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Says a lot about SOP in the US Army.

      It *should* be "if you don't *know* what it is, hold fire".

      It *seems* to be "if you don't *know* it is a friendly, have a shot".

    9. Re:What a wonderful device for farmers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, everyone into postal services are aliens anyway

    10. Re:What a wonderful device for farmers! by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      Sadly I live in the UK now - don't think customs would like me bringing in a replica mini-gun ;P

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    11. Re:What a wonderful device for farmers! by east+coast · · Score: 1

      I'm really surprised this is a BB-gun and not a 308

      Actually, the P90 shoots the 5.7mm FN round, not 308.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    12. Re:What a wonderful device for farmers! by bronney · · Score: 1

      sorry to drag this off topic, but the UK customs do let people bring in airsoft guns. My mate just brought his guns back to the UK for school. I am on arniesairsoft and know the UK scene pretty well hehe.

  53. you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all dorks..

  54. I already saw this in ALIENS by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    the second movie.

    But that one ran out of ammo pretty quick and aliens killed all the humans.

    1. Re:I already saw this in ALIENS by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      For anyone intending to re-watch Aliens because they don't remember this part, the sentry gun scene was only in the directors cut. Oh, and IIRC one of the guns ran out of ammo, the other had a couple of bullets left but the aliens had been scared off by then.

      Haydn.

      p.s: Great movie!

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    2. Re:I already saw this in ALIENS by NidStyles · · Score: 0

      You are aware that anyone that knows what you are talking about should know that Aliens was the second one already. Alien was the first one, notice the lack of the "s" in the first one.

      --
      Yes, I said it.
  55. too much work by twitter · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Yeah, I winced when I read this:

    I started by learning Microsoft's DirectShow technology and utilizing the OpenCV library according to the tutorial by R. Laganiere to access the pixels being sent by my web cam. If you try to use the tutorial, you'll have to use the new library paths for DirectX 9 because the ones in the tutorial are a little outdated.

    Microsoft, the choice of terrorists everywhere. Born, raised and trained (if you call DirectX familiarization a training) right here in the USA.

    Last summer was ... last month and M$ has already changed enough for you to need new libraries. Ugh.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:too much work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderators: Please note that the above AC is a known fanatical stalker who posts the same fucking message to every single post made by this twitter twit. It doesn't matter what the twitter writes, the AC'll find a way to scrape in some pointless twitter bashing. While nobody expects us to love twitter in any way, the AC's particularly tepid style of protesting that his repeated boring posts are somehow a "community service" is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, the above AC is the type of person that should not be part of the open/free speech community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free speech.

      etc., etc.

      Parent is boring. Mod him down.

  56. Oh look another ripoff from hack a day by mauriceh · · Score: 1

    Maybe Slashddot could just put a big link at the top of the page to the hack a day site instead of constantly ripping their stories?
    http://www.hackaday.com/

    --
    Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
    1. Re:Oh look another ripoff from hack a day by webjonesin · · Score: 1

      well...the site is blocked at my office...i'll see it when i get home tonite.

  57. Pretty easy really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you have to do is keep track of the background, which doesn't change much. Then anything else is the person. Combine that with dead simple motion detection like Sum[change in pixel RGB]/npixels and you get much better recognition than shown on their pages. I've done this in Java for a door webcam where the image window pops up when somebody stands outside (which incidentally you'd never guess how many people just do random stuff like dance to their ipod outside of a generic numbered door). It's easy, and I was maxing out the webcam in terms of FPS (~26), decoding jpeg images, *and* being a proxy webcam http server since the webcam would bog down. The real story here is the computer-controlled turrets, not the recognition software.

  58. USNA Sentry Tanks by KylePflug · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They had stuff like this at the US Naval Academy when I was there for the summer seminar a couple of years ago. IIRC, it was infra-red as opposed to motion-tracking, and was mounted on remote-control/autonomous tank tread things. It was paintball instead of airsoft, but same idea. I understand they use them on plebes in the last phase of Sea Trials.

    They also had a shoulder-mounted paintball gun that tracked with the suit's helmet and could be fired via a small remote that you hold in your hand, or hwatever. Nifty stuff.

  59. mirror of the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mirroring the video to relieve some of the server burden from the lone host providing access to this video.

    http://www.youtube.com/?v=Ef9xk-kypEo

  60. Re:The Army will be all over this... except by L.Bob.Rife · · Score: 1

    Friendly fire can be a real bummer.

    This technology has been feasible for many many years for the Pentagon. Do you really think 2 guys with a $100 budget discovered something the Pentagon with hundreds of billions of research dollars missed?

  61. Wow, by justin12345 · · Score: 1

    Damn, someone is about to be very rich, I think.

    --
    Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
  62. Re:Second Amendment *meta*-discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...sounds like a mefi member. We don't take kindly to your kind 'round here. With your long, elaborate feats of wit and humor requiring knowledge of sociopolitiacal structures to identify the punchline. If you don't leave now, we will send you to soviet russia with a korean grandmother covered in hot grits.

  63. What were they thinking? by Alioth · · Score: 1

    What were their parents thinking giving the guy the name "Ezra Rasmussen"? That name is a hell of a mouthful to say...

  64. Excellent defense vs extremely white enemies by yppiz · · Score: 1
    This is a nice hack, but as a do-it-yourself sentry, well, it'll keep you very safe from intruders wearing bright white clothing. From the video, it looks like their software looks for the brightest region, and then aims at the center of that region.

    It's a cool hack.

    --Pat

  65. You know... by Auraiken · · Score: 1

    that sounds a lot like they ripped off half of the Predator equipment 0.o

    Which, if you think about it... is pretty cool.

  66. Oh yes, all Europeans are so anti-guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why the worlds biggest and best arms manufacturers are all American, Glock, Steyr, Heckler and Koch, FN...

    1. Re:Oh yes, all Europeans are so anti-guns by swb · · Score: 1

      FN wouldn't be in the arms business if American John Browning hadn't gotten sick of Winchester and taken his designs to Belgium and given FN something to make besides bicycles. A lot of the stuff for Sig-Sauer pistols are made here or in Canada; I'm not even sure if many of the components are imported at all.

      And you've forgotten Remington, Winchester, Ruger, Colt and Smith & Wesson on your list. And then there's other important niche makers, like Kimber and Kahr. I'm not entirely sure what the relationship is between US Browning and FN, but I think most High Powers in the US are made here.

      Taurus makes a ton of weapons, too, and is neither American nor European.

      And most of the European gun makers wouldn't be making guns if the US wasn't buying them. The lion's share of Glocks end up in the US, I think FN still makes the US SAW, and we seem to buy an awful lot of HK MP5s.

      I'm not sure who buys stuff from Steyr; do they even have a current civilian product?

  67. Parent is a troll by madaxe42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Have you ever even been to Europe? Why assume that all Europeans are socialistic pansies? I'm a brit, I go and watch cuddly little foxes get mauled to death by beagles, and I shoot at the poor little birdies with a 12 bore. Oh, and deer. If you cared to do your research, you'd realise that there's a large chunk of British (and European) population who have absolutely no problem with bearing arms, because there's not really a reason not to.
    Sure, we have tighter gun control over here (for the most part - go to Kiev and you can pick up Kalashkinovs for about £15 - and then go shoot radioactive boars in the woods!), but it doesn't make all Europeans socialistic pansies.
    The media over here tends to be just as reactionary as it it can be in the states - did you ever hear about Tony Martin & Brendan Fearon? Interesting case - the left wing, proletariat media villified Tony Martin, and managed to drag public opinion in such a direction that it led to the banning of bloodsports and the like in the country - merely by raising enough bile in people who have nothing better to do with their time than whinge and bitch about things they don't know or understand.

    This has turned into more of a rant than I intended. Basically, democracy is inherently flawed - why should people who have no connection to hunting and the like be able to make any kind of a decision on the basis of whether it's right or wrong? Which brings me onto my next point - why are politicians allowed to make decisions that scientists should be making? Why are the public allowed to pressurise governments into banning scientific progress because they disagree with it because they don't understand it?!

    Anyway, back to my point. Not all europeans are whining lefty bureaucrats - in fact, the majority aren't - it's just that the whining lefty 'crats always get into government, because unfortunately the proles will do whatever the media tells them to think, and Murdoch enjoys a left wing government, as it promotes further circulation of his 'Banner' (think fountainhead).

    Ok, really rant over now.

    1. Re:Parent is a troll by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

      800 Years old, I am.

    2. Re:Parent is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Have you ever even been to Europe? Why assume that all Europeans are socialistic pansies?

      Hey, why even assume that European socialists are pansies? In the US you tend to call the bleeding heart liberals "socialist." Here in Europe we are truer to our ideals and our hearts most certainly doesn't bleed.

    3. Re:Parent is a troll by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Gee and over here they call Murdoch a Right winger

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  68. Parent is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Circular reasoning, you have.

  69. Tracking insects by ursg · · Score: 1

    I wonder... would it be possible to build an automatic insect-tracking sensor using an array of microphoness, that automatically classifies insects by their sound-spectrum and locates them within the room by calculating their position from the phase-differences?

    The Algorithms would be essentially the same as the ones used for nautical sonar tracking (of which a Free implementation exists). So all I'd need would be a strong Laser on an automatic turret. Or whatever I like to shoot at them litte bastards.

  70. More than a little horrified. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only person who was revolted by this - and that so many people on this website thought it was a cool hack? I wish more people would think about what it actually means to make a device that is a weapon, designed to hurt and kill other people. Why is making a new weapon a cool thing? Why would something that could more efficiently hurt and kill people a cool thing?

    What is wrong with so many people nowadays?

  71. It's all fun and games by mitsuhama · · Score: 1

    Till someone loses an eye.

    1. Re:It's all fun and games by 't+is+DjiM · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of this silly joke I was told:

      Airsoft bullets are indeed very dangerous when you get hit by one of them in your eye.
      Fridges however, are deadly if you get hit by one in your eye...

      --
      --Use ant to make .war
    2. Re:It's all fun and games by Grey_14 · · Score: 1

      Then it's a game, Find the eye!

  72. A serious application by CrazyMik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, this may be a little out there, but... what if you built one of these with a bit more, ok a whole lot more, image recgonnition and used it to fight invasive species in Australia? Could it be done?

    A few hundred of these suckers could fry all the Cane Toads. Put some lasers on them to blind the frogs and they would die from starvation. Or maybe microwave them (but they might jump away). You could do the same thing for rabits and foxes.

    Or pest control. Have it fry rats, or better yet, have it fry cockroaches, although I am sure they would develop a way to survive.

    Maybe this could be an open-source project to save Australian wildlife.

  73. Genius! by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

    Link directly to an 8.1MB file in the slashdot post! Apparently their server could handle it, but it's kinda mean, doncha think?

  74. Only tracks White by shadow_slicer · · Score: 1

    If you watch the video, it only tracks the white of the t-shirt. You can see this in the second part of the video where it shows the tracking area (which mostly consists of a rectangle around the shirt). So it can only attack people wearing bright white clothing.
    While this is neat, it's not quite "The Quintessential Sentry Gun". Call me when you get better human-shape recognition....

    ...
    So remember kids, when you go out burgularizing, Don't Wear White.

  75. I, for one by zlogic · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new automatic sentry gun overlords.

  76. C64 did that, too. by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, that was relevant to systems other than UNIX. Any Commodore 64 BBS that utilized the Commodore-specific key codes for graphics and color did the same thing.

    So, yes, UNIX 101 was over. You were in the Personal Computer Telecommunications History class. :P

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  77. Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this the sentry gun made as it was intended, or did Acrid- nerf it yet again to appeal to the clannies whining about the use of defense instead of learning how to properly play the Cyborg?

    Oh, wait... reality != Weapons Factory.

  78. Already have auto-sentries by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Self-replicating, self-repairing, independent targeting capability, alert and attack modes, built in night vision system, able to navigate complicated terrain features and function in any weather.

    A rottweiler named Jaws and a Belgium Shepherd.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  79. Back when I was new around here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought ^H^H meant *cough* *cough*

  80. Could have saved some time.... by ASP · · Score: 1

    And just used one of these trackerpods.

  81. Automatic mosquito killa by SpeedyGonz · · Score: 1

    You reached the same conclusion than I. :)

    Problem I see with this is resolution. I thought of sound (as you did), sub-millimetric radar . . .

    But, IMHO, the best solution would be those mosquito magnets they sell in outdoor equipment shops, you put it on a box with one hole (to serve both as ventilation and trap entrance) , and in that hole an IR beam that triggers a laser zapper, just inside the hole. Its: a) contained, no laser scorches all around the house; b) relatively easy/cheap to implement, less variables in the process.

  82. Actually, it is the Director's Cut of Aliens by fuzznutz · · Score: 2, Informative

    The theatrical version cut the sentry guns scene, along with a bunch of other important points.

  83. Why not use an infrared camera instead? by Redfrost · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would it be easier using an infrared camera instead of a normal web cam? Then you just aim in on the moving heat source instead of trying to analyze whole screenfuls of data. I'm just imagining a blue-ish background with a bright red shape moving around on the screen...then it wouldn't really matter if the person is wearing bright clothing or dark clothing.

    Or am I way off base here?

    1. Re:Why not use an infrared camera instead? by n17ikh · · Score: 1

      That would work well, and wouldn't need any source of IR light to run, however, far infrared cameras are VERY expensive - think thousands of dollars for every piece of IR firefighting gear I've seen. They would have the added problem of firing at anything hot - you need better detection and intelligent kill sensing so your automated sentry guns don't sit there and perforate a newly dead car engine that's 2000F while the relatively cold 98F people run up to it and turn it off. Also you run into desert situations in the sun where the people are colder than the surroundings - you really would have to have motion detection and shoot at anything that moves. For your average office situation - shoot the marketroid, if you will - it would be fine, if you don't mind spending money.

      Remember, to see heat you need "far IR" cameras which detect IR that is umm... far from the visible spectrum. A "near IR" camera is what Nightshot and your average night vision goggles work with, and it detects the IR that is almost red. With these you can't see heat, you just see light. Those wouldn't work well at all for our purpose, other than the fact that they're dark green on a light green background and thus you'd just have to filter to black and white to get good outlines - but you can do that with a color CMOS anyways and then you get cool color AVI files for all the internet to see.

      --
      Hard work pays off tomorrow, but procrastination pays off NOW!
  84. Are you sure this is not from Aliens? As in nr 2 by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    It is the Alien vs Marines movie, or rather Aliens eat Marines movie.

    It appears in the book and is after they get stranded on the planet. They are basically sealing themselves into the medical lab hoping for rescue to arrive before becoming dinner. It all goes bad when they realise the local reactor is going to blow long before they can be rescued.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  85. Amateurs by CrankyOG · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's how the pros do it. This is from

    http://www.mediacen.navy.mil/pubs/allhands/jan00/p g48.htm

    Phalanx Close-In Weapons System (CIWS) The Phalanx CIWS combines a 20mm Gatling gun with search and tracking radar to provide surface ships with terminal defense against anti-ship missiles. The system underwent operational tests and evaluation on board USS Bigelow (DD 942) in 1977 and went into production in 1978 with the first systems installed aboard USS Coral Sea (CV 43) in 1980. The original versions used rounds made from depleted uranium that have since been replaced by tungsten rounds. Caliber: 20mm/53 Rate of Fire: 1,000-3,000 rounds/min. Muzzle Velocity: 3,650 ft./sec Range: 6,000 yds. Manufacturer: Hughes Missile Systems Company

    --
    [ ]Clever sig [X]Lame sig
    1. Re:Amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope they've given that system some serious upgrades since 1987 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Stark_(FFG-31).

  86. Ezra??? by lbmouse · · Score: 1

    Poor guy deserves to be put out of his misery.

  87. Damn kids can't play fair by EosDominus · · Score: 1

    Always hated kids who needed cheats, oh well I'm making a scope for my airsoft gun that lets me see all walls as wireframes.

  88. Use ^W to indicate word deletion by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Informative
    Wow, what a freak^H^H^H^H^H geeky^H^H^H^H^H cool thing to know!
    To delete entire words in UNIX/Linux, you can use "^W" (i.e., "CTRL+W" in MS-speak).
    So you could have typed
    Wow, what a freak^W geeky^Wcool thing to know!
    or
    Wow, what a freak geeky^W^Wcool thing to know!
    for an equivalent, but even geekier, humorous effect.
    (Note also that you shouldn't have a space after the "^W", because "^W" deletes back only to, but not including, the previous space.
    Similarly, in your original example, you should have omitted the spaces after each of your "^H" sequnces, or made each six long, instead of only five.)
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    1. Re:Use ^W to indicate word deletion by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      ^W is even geekier?

      Damn, what does also knowing that ^U is "delete to start of line" make me?

  89. Don't remove the orange tips on the guns! by rvw14 · · Score: 1

    My younger brothers are really into airsoft. They only problem was they removed the little orange tips on the guns to make them look real, and then went and played in a public park. When the police showed up with real guns and arrested them it wasn't so fun. Luckily they all got off with a stern warning and a small fine (all involved were minors at the time).

    1. Re:Don't remove the orange tips on the guns! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the mid eighties, I used to go to school with a bunch of rich kids. One kid's father did business with a movie company, and he got his hands on some "blowback" prop guns (the kid didn't really explain to me what they were, just that they were very realistic and noisy). Of course, this man gave the "toys" to his kids. They of course proceeded to run around a local Dunkin' Doughnuts parking lot with what appeared to be an uzi, a 9mm, and a shotgun, blasting away at each other. The owners called the cops, and about half a dozen cars showed up.

      They were very annoyed, but they confiscated the guns and sent the kids home. The father wasn't amused...

  90. Exactly by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

    I have no doubt that militaries around the world have experimented with (and perhaps even deployed) sentry guns, but this is something any halfway intelligent thug with an old computer and a AK-47 can throw together. I could see some very powerful uses for this in guerilla warfare, gang warfare, and for drug runners. For a few hundred bucks (less if they steal the supplies), these guys can protect their turf, protect their stash, set up ambushes for their rivals, etc.

  91. Read much? by jpellino · · Score: 1

    I never referred to airsoft as paintball - I said call me when they SWAP IN the paintball rig - cuz it's a much better effect on those black Jehovah's Witnesses' suits.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Read much? by jalspach · · Score: 1

      Paintball...swapped in.

      Like many others, I did not attempt to view the video of the airsoft hack but, the link below shows a similar idea, although with a paint ball gun, which tracks very quickly. This also looks to be more sturdy.

      http://www.robot.net/shootback.html

      Sorry, but there is no Jehovah's Witness recognition (that I know of). Just tell all your friends to knock and slave this to the door bell!

      James

  92. You are so incorrect... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    The Navy, at least, has many weapon systems that are capable of automatically detecting and engaging targets. Someone else in this thread mentioned PHALANX, which is an automatic air defense gun. Turn it on, set it to AAW AUTO, and it shoots anything it deems to be a threat to the ship (to be a threat, a target has to be airborne, closing the ship at a certain rate, and no further than about a mile away).

    Also, AEGIS, the combat system installed in cruisers and guided missile destroyers, can be placed in an AUTO SPECIAL mode, which does somewhat the same thing, except it launches surface to air missiles. This is rarely done, but the capability is there.

    Sean

  93. Re:Are you sure this is not from Aliens? As in nr by Fweeky · · Score: 1

    Yup, Aliens. The scene in the movie was quite weak so didn't make it to the theatrical release, but you can still see it (among other deleted scenes) in the Special Edition DVD (R2 at least).

  94. Re: Knowledge of ^W vs ^U as Geekiness indicator by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    what does also knowing that ^U is "delete to start of line" make me?
    Not as geeky as someone who knows about ^W.
    Why?
    Because ^U meant "delete line" long before ^W meant "delete word".
    In fact, ^U as line delete originated at DEC, I believe, and was used in their systems (e.g., DOS 7 for PDP-11 in 1974, where I personally remember using it) long before it was used in UNIX.
    (I think that DEC also originated using ^C as the process interrupt character (whereas UNIX originally used DEL (and I still use DEL myself to this day)).)
    In addition, ^W originated in the Berkeley version of UNIX first (probably in the vi editor before the TTY drivers), and only later made it into UNIX in general.

    Oh, and in case you are wondering, the original standard character erase and line erase characters in UNIX (which are now ^H (or BACKSPACE) and ^U) were # and @, respectively.
    This made it a pain to write C preprocessing statements in ed, the line editor that preceded ex and vi.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  95. Red Green by QMO · · Score: 1

    Red Green made a personal rocket-pack once.
    It didn't turn out, but it might give you some ideas to start.

    (Wish I had a link)

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.