The difference is that you can test intoxication. The cell user lap-texting will lie and say they weren't, making it impossible to prove in court.
They often do prove it where there are fatalities. Tying up the times that texts are sent and received with the journey (time left, traffic, cameras passed) etc. Too time consuming for most cases but it can be done
By default, when the tree dies, it will rot and return all that CO2 back to the air. So it's not really a solution unless you sequester the wood after the tree dies.
One of the more crazy ideas I have read is to make charcoal then bury it in old coal mines!
Drunk drive once: death penalty. Drive over the limit: death penalty. Avoid paying your taxes: death penalty. Jay walking: death penaly. Use drugs: death penalty. You are a facsist.
Its a shame it doesn't comment on front-lit e-ink displays (e.g. paperwhite). I would think these would be better than backlit displays, but not as good as unlit displays or books,
The harvesting and storage of naturally occurring ice was so successful that, for a somewhat surprising amount of time, it made manufactured ice uneconomic and, for an even longer period, on-site refrigeration hardware a very niche item(even after ice manufactured on large scale ammonia based systems replaced harvested ice, it still fed the same local market of that natural ice deliveries had)..
I don't know if it was the same in the USA but my dad tells me that dry ice was used for quite a long time after electric refrigerators were available because the electric supply was unreliable. Mind you he did live in Wales!
Somewhat later they'll put up insurance for human drivers.
This makes not sense at all. Why would they increase insurance for humans? Do you think humans will become more dangerous and reckless than they are now?
I can see this happening through increased costs of accidents. There seems to be a trend towards increased litigation anyway, and once self-driving cars become the norm there will be an assumption that there is culpability on the part of the driver. They chose to drive themselves, despite having a safer option, so crashing and injuring others will be seen as something that could have been avoided. There is much likely to be a punitive element to compensation.
Back in the 60s and 70s they used to say that computerisation would give increased leisure time, with many of us working a 4 day week with a 7 hour day. I read that the predicted reduction in employment happened. The only problem is that it is shared out in such a way that some people can't get work or have to work on "zero hours" contracts for whatever time is available. The rest are over-worked and spend even longer in the office than they did in the 60s and 70s.
So they could come up with a cream that lets you remain wrinkle-free until you are past your nineties, but at the expense of being unable to tolerate prolonged exposure to sunlight?
Don't tell me, the other side effect is the development of fangs and a desire to drink blood.
If being connected to land by underwater ridges gave right of ownership the map would look very different. Besides which it looks as though the other end of the ridge connects to the Siberian Shelf. Push this argument too far and you could find out that Russia owns Greenland!
In other news Britain makes claim to Northern Ireland, Jersey, Guernsy and the Falkland Islands based on "undersea Geography". And the British crown will refuse to discuss the matter.
Why stop there - we could claim the whole Afro-Eurasia landmass.
There you go again with your infantile hatred. You've probably met more Muslims than you realise, and none of them wanted to kill you. Get a grip - you sound like a scared child throwing a tantrum.
So you're saying that if a Muslim held me hostage they would probably be nice and not have bad intentions? I think you need to get a grip if you think that hostage takers are likely to be nice. Of course from your previous comments I can see that it may be that your logic skills have been insufficient for you to comprehend the statement. Just to be clear it means:
I would prefer to be taken hostage by someone who (is a hostage taker AND is a wack-job)
to someone who (is a hostage taker AND is a Muslim)
Terrorists kidnap, behead, murder and rape people everyday. No one cares. Muslims force non-Muslims to live under conditions much worse than than apartheid and no one says a word. Palestinians explicitly target civilians in unprovoked attacks because the burden of peaceful coexistence isn't compatible with their need to humiliate and persecute filthy infidels. It would be nice is we could fight our wars honorably. It would be nice if we didn't have to fight at all. It would be nice if I could turn on TV to a news station for a year, and for once, not hear about Muslims murdering people while they gloat live on TV every single time. It would be nice if the left-wing media didn't immediately blame everyone but the actual terrorists.
Sometimes you have to do bad things to evil people or they will do much worse to you or your love ones. People will blame you. They will say you are evil. They will say you provoked all of this. No amount of logic or truth will ever make them see the reality of your situation. You will be blamed no matter what you do. The terrorists will always be "innocent." You will persecuted because they are cowardly hypocrites who will always blame the person who refuses to be a victim.
Have a happy Christmas and don't be a bloody terrorists.
Very true, but we don't win by becoming like Muslims ourselves.
which would require blocking server to server traffic
Since SMTP allows forwarding by other servers this would require deep packet inspection.
The difference is that you can test intoxication. The cell user lap-texting will lie and say they weren't, making it impossible to prove in court.
They often do prove it where there are fatalities. Tying up the times that texts are sent and received with the journey (time left, traffic, cameras passed) etc. Too time consuming for most cases but it can be done
By default, when the tree dies, it will rot and return all that CO2 back to the air. So it's not really a solution unless you sequester the wood after the tree dies.
One of the more crazy ideas I have read is to make charcoal then bury it in old coal mines!
Drunk drive once: death penalty. Drive over the limit: death penalty. Avoid paying your taxes: death penalty. Jay walking: death penaly. Use drugs: death penalty. You are a facsist.
You just criticised Mein Führer. Death penalty
What next? The school could be treating everyone equally regardless of race, gender, or background. Surely this must be stopped ;-)
My landline doesn't have text - how are you going to get my information or money for your service?
From what I see in the responses - If I don't have text, than the place you work for is useless to me.
If your landline doesn't do text to speech and you don't have a mobile number or email address you are probably too small a demographic to worry about
You could just knock yourself unconscious with it.
Or watch porn until you exhaust yourself
Its a shame it doesn't comment on front-lit e-ink displays (e.g. paperwhite). I would think these would be better than backlit displays, but not as good as unlit displays or books,
The spy agency has suffered "significant" damage in its ability to monitor and capture serious organized criminals
can't they just pick up the trail again when they come out of the mosque?
Frankfurt is where they think the Lockerbie bomb got into the baggage system. You'd think they would have learned.
The harvesting and storage of naturally occurring ice was so successful that, for a somewhat surprising amount of time, it made manufactured ice uneconomic and, for an even longer period, on-site refrigeration hardware a very niche item(even after ice manufactured on large scale ammonia based systems replaced harvested ice, it still fed the same local market of that natural ice deliveries had)..
I don't know if it was the same in the USA but my dad tells me that dry ice was used for quite a long time after electric refrigerators were available because the electric supply was unreliable. Mind you he did live in Wales!
Same thing happened when they outlawed dancing.
I thought you were joking, but its true.
Google may be shooting themselves in the foot when it comes to things like Google Analytics. Finding out what pages people come from is very useful
Somewhat later they'll put up insurance for human drivers.
This makes not sense at all. Why would they increase insurance for humans? Do you think humans will become more dangerous and reckless than they are now?
I can see this happening through increased costs of accidents. There seems to be a trend towards increased litigation anyway, and once self-driving cars become the norm there will be an assumption that there is culpability on the part of the driver. They chose to drive themselves, despite having a safer option, so crashing and injuring others will be seen as something that could have been avoided. There is much likely to be a punitive element to compensation.
Who cleans the toilets on the starship Enterprise?
Nobody. That's why they have so much trouble with Cling-ons
Back in the 60s and 70s they used to say that computerisation would give increased leisure time, with many of us working a 4 day week with a 7 hour day. I read that the predicted reduction in employment happened. The only problem is that it is shared out in such a way that some people can't get work or have to work on "zero hours" contracts for whatever time is available. The rest are over-worked and spend even longer in the office than they did in the 60s and 70s.
So they could come up with a cream that lets you remain wrinkle-free until you are past your nineties, but at the expense of being unable to tolerate prolonged exposure to sunlight?
Don't tell me, the other side effect is the development of fangs and a desire to drink blood.
I've been waiting for it...
It sort of implies its instant messaging, which wouldn't be too impressive.
If being connected to land by underwater ridges gave right of ownership the map would look very different. Besides which it looks as though the other end of the ridge connects to the Siberian Shelf. Push this argument too far and you could find out that Russia owns Greenland!
In other news Britain makes claim to Northern Ireland, Jersey, Guernsy and the Falkland Islands based on "undersea Geography". And the British crown will refuse to discuss the matter.
Why stop there - we could claim the whole Afro-Eurasia landmass.
My wife and I would rather go back to sending messages by carrier pigeon than become BT customers ever again. Our EE phone contracts won't be renewed.
Apart from British Gas (obviously), BT are the worst company in the UK.
You must have overlooked G4S
There you go again with your infantile hatred. You've probably met more Muslims than you realise, and none of them wanted to kill you. Get a grip - you sound like a scared child throwing a tantrum.
So you're saying that if a Muslim held me hostage they would probably be nice and not have bad intentions? I think you need to get a grip if you think that hostage takers are likely to be nice. Of course from your previous comments I can see that it may be that your logic skills have been insufficient for you to comprehend the statement. Just to be clear it means:
I would prefer to be taken hostage by someone who (is a hostage taker AND is a wack-job)
to someone who (is a hostage taker AND is a Muslim)
a single wack-job
The hostages aren't even dead yet and our islamist apologists have already played it down.
I'd rather be held captive by a whack job than a Muslim. Someone might be able to persuade the whack job that he was acting wrongly.
Terrorists kidnap, behead, murder and rape people everyday. No one cares. Muslims force non-Muslims to live under conditions much worse than than apartheid and no one says a word. Palestinians explicitly target civilians in unprovoked attacks because the burden of peaceful coexistence isn't compatible with their need to humiliate and persecute filthy infidels. It would be nice is we could fight our wars honorably. It would be nice if we didn't have to fight at all. It would be nice if I could turn on TV to a news station for a year, and for once, not hear about Muslims murdering people while they gloat live on TV every single time. It would be nice if the left-wing media didn't immediately blame everyone but the actual terrorists.
Sometimes you have to do bad things to evil people or they will do much worse to you or your love ones. People will blame you. They will say you are evil. They will say you provoked all of this. No amount of logic or truth will ever make them see the reality of your situation. You will be blamed no matter what you do. The terrorists will always be "innocent." You will persecuted because they are cowardly hypocrites who will always blame the person who refuses to be a victim.
Have a happy Christmas and don't be a bloody terrorists.
Very true, but we don't win by becoming like Muslims ourselves.