Slashdot Mirror


Water Cooling an Xbox 360

An anonymous reader writes "HardOCP has done it once again. They have an article running down the process of water cooling an Xbox 360, and with surprising effectiveness and remarkable styling." From the article: "We had plans to water cool an Xbox 360 for over a year now. Little did we know that not only will this water cooling project be more fun than the original, but it may even be practical. Imagine that. With reports of heat related issues and a heat sink that can get almost too hot to touch after marathon gaming sessions, the Xbox 360 water cooling project now had a sense of purpose. We bought a retail Xbox 360 specifically for this project. The minute we got it back to the [H] labs we tore into it and, with a little help from the fine folks at Koolance, we have put together a water cooling solution that will handle anything the Xbox 360 can throw at it and literally knock your socks off." Actual implimentation with hand-holding. Hexus.net was discussing a kit to do this a few days ago.

213 comments

  1. you are fucking kidding right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    what a absolute waste of time this project is....

    And the guys that wrote it don't even know that heat-sinks are supposed to get hot...!

    1. Re:you are fucking kidding right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do modders always go compete ape shit over stupid stuff like this? I have an Xbox 360 and it works. It just works. No it doesn't have water cooling. I also did case mod it, and it still works! Yes, some people have had problems. Just don't put the power supply in a bad place and you'll be fine. Water cooling for PC's may make sense because there are different types of PC's. Right now an Xbox 360 is just a 360, and if you follow instructions and have a bit of common sense, you'll be fine. It either plays the game or it doesn't. A water cooling system isn't just unecessary, it's stupid.

    2. Re:you are fucking kidding right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can water cool most appliances. My overclocked microwave can do 3 minute popcorn in 2:52!

  2. Some other crazy ideas by jaygatsby27 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about a small fan or maybe, just maybe, not shoving the whole thing into a tiny space with no ventilation.

    1. Re:Some other crazy ideas by kfg · · Score: 1

      I've found just shoving in a bathtub full of icewater works a treat.

      KFG

    2. Re:Some other crazy ideas by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      If by icewater, you mean Fluorinert, then yes it works like a treat.

      The problem of swapping discs has yet to be resolved though.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Some other crazy ideas by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to the 120mm fan that sits in the bottom of the watercooling enclosure? Because, you know, that's a fan. That moves air.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    4. Re:Some other crazy ideas by kfg · · Score: 1

      If by icewater, you mean Fluorinert . . .

      Ummmm, nooooooooooooooooo.

      KFG

  3. Re:Gee... by JonN · · Score: 1

    Actually, that article which you are calling The Dupe, was a story about HEXUS.gaming recieving pictures and information that a company had created a watercooler for the XB360. The difference here, is that HardOCP has internal pictures, a guide on do it yourself, and final results that we can prove.

    --
    do.what.promptcmds
  4. Cooling by rfinnvik · · Score: 3, Funny

    The standard 360 cooler uses liquid to transfer heat more efficiently from the CPU/GPU afaik. Maybe in the next revision they should consider taking this idea further and add a radiator and pump... :)

    1. Re:Cooling by Admiral+Frosty · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can only imagine what might go wrong with Microsoft putting water-cooling in a major console. They failed a simple power brick...

    2. Re:Cooling by rfinnvik · · Score: 1

      Something tells me it'd leave a mess on the carpet...

    3. Re:Cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be the point of that? Solids (i.e, copper) conduct heat better than liquids do. The only reason you'd ever want to use a liquid to transfer heat is if it was able to cycle.

    4. Re:Cooling by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They failed a simple power brick...

      Typical Slashdot piss-on-Microsoft attitude. Microsoft likely had no part in designing the power brick; for one, they don't have the expertise to design an active-PFC swtiched-mode high-wattage power supply.

      Now, we can certainly fault Microsoft for not testing their vendor's product sufficently, but the fact is that 95% of XBOX 360s are chugging along perfectly fine.

    5. Re:Cooling by Admiral+Frosty · · Score: 1

      Your right. I was just kidding along with a common joke. It's hard to have a joke without misunderstanding SOMETHING...

    6. Re:Cooling by rseuhs · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Typical Slashdot piss-on-Microsoft attitude. Microsoft likely had no part in designing the power brick;

      Typical Microsoft-fanboyism.

      The moment Microsoft puts any component into a box that has the label "Microsoft" on it, they are responsible.

      Yeah, I know, for the typical "it's not Microsoft's fault" - apologist, reponsibility is a strange and alien concept.

      But essentially it comes down to this:

      It doesn't matter wether Microsoft had a part in designing the power brick.

      They are responsible to make sure the thing works. Yes, that means if some supplier screwed up it's still Microsoft's repsonsibility to do some minimal quality control so that the broken units don't get shipped.

    7. Re:Cooling by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      If you had bothered to actually read my post rather than label me a "Microsoft-fanboy" based on a single quote, then you would realize that I acknowledged Microsoft's responsibility to ensure that they ship a quality product. Indeed, everything in the XBOX 360 was manufactured by someone other than Microsoft.

      However, my post stands - while you can fault Microsoft for shipping a poor PSU, the grandparent's point that Microsoft can't be trusted because they cannot design a power supply is simply incorrect. If anything, the PSU issue indicates a lack of QA, not a lack of design prowess.

      Moreover, without real data it is impossible to determine exactly how much of a problem the power supply actually is. Power supplies are complex devices, and even with good QA they are one of the most failure-prone components of any system.

      Once again, Slashdot never ceases to amaze by moderating a Microsoft-trashing post to the roof.

  5. Technically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not a dupe - It is a Howto. What was presented before was just the man page.

  6. Re:Gee... by PlasticMonkey · · Score: 1

    Nope, you'll find that it doesn't strike again.

    This is an actual watercooling solution.

    Think before you type, and all that...

  7. Re:Gee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a friggin dupe if the article summary acknowledges that a similar article was posted before.

    And besides, that lame Hexus article had what, TWO pictures? With no description or explanation? Right, it's a dupe alright.

  8. Pre-emptive Dupe Joke? by sglider · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The editor beat all of us to the punch by pre-empting our cries of "Dupe!".

    --
    War isn't about who's right. It's about who's left.
    1. Re:Pre-emptive Dupe Joke? by Heembo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the original did not have the detailed and free instructions like the previous, so I think this is a very cool and useful post.

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
  9. Re:XBOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You fail.
    Twice.

  10. Today XBox cooling, tomorrow, WMD by tjstork · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, I have a grim admiration of anyone that would devote so much time to water cooling an x-box. I only hope that the people with such time and talent do not devote their energies to darker activities. Today, those guys are cooling x-box 360s, but tomorrow, they'll be working on nuclear weapons, writing spyware, or working on Windows, depending on which pays the most.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Today XBox cooling, tomorrow, WMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please turnover that tinfoil hat ...

    2. Re:Today XBox cooling, tomorrow, WMD by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      Jeez, you must really hate those guys to try and get them on the Homeland Security watchlist like that.

    3. Re:Today XBox cooling, tomorrow, WMD by valkraider · · Score: 1
      Today, those guys are cooling x-box 360s, but tomorrow, they'll be working on nuclear weapons, writing spyware, or working on Windows
      Jeez, you must really hate those guys to try and get them on the Homeland Security watchlist like that.
      You're right... We never should have said they would work on Windows...
    4. Re:Today XBox cooling, tomorrow, WMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Windows IS a threat to National Security (TM)... Last I checked botnets weren't running on Linux et al.

  11. sigh.... by Quick+Sick+Nick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do modders always go compete ape shit over stupid stuff like this? I have an Xbox 360 and it works. It just works. No it doesn't have water cooling. I also did case mod it, and it still works! Yes, some people have had problems. Just don't put the power supply in a bad place and you'll be fine. Water cooling for PC's may make sense because there are different types of PC's. Right now an Xbox 360 is just a 360, and if you follow instructions and have a bit of common sense, you'll be fine. It either plays the game or it doesn't. A water cooling system isn't just unecessary, it's stupid.

    1. Re:sigh.... by JonN · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Next time please RTFA and you will see that the guys over at HardOCP agree. Here you go, since you seem too lazy to learn about what you are commenting on:

      "Four years ago next month we built the world's first water cooled Xbox. At the time, a lot of people asked us why we would want to water cool an Xbox, mostly because they didn't understand the motivation behind it. The fact of the matter was that the standard heat sink on the 700MHz Intel processor would barely get hot under normal use and surely didn't warrant the performance offered by a custom water cooling kit. At the time, we did it simply because no one else had done it and "because we could." That was our motivation then and that is partially our motivation now.

      We had plans to water cool an Xbox 360 for over a year now. Little did we know that not only will this water cooling project be more fun than the original, but it may even be practical. Imagine that. With reports of heat related issues and a heat sink that can get almost too hot to touch after marathon gaming sessions, the Xbox 360 water cooling project now had a sense of purpose. We bought a retail Xbox 360 specifically for this project. The minute we got it back to the [H] labs we tore into it and, with a little help from the fine folks at Koolance, we have put together a water cooling solution that will handle anything the Xbox 360 can throw at it and literally knock your socks off."

      --
      do.what.promptcmds
    2. Re:sigh.... by pavera · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "it just works"
      then you go on to qualify your it just works statement by saying you have to put the power supply in a "good" place...
      This is a piece of consumer electronics. Do you consider a DVD player to be broken if you have to lay the cables in just the right way?
      What about a TV? Heck even a computer, switch, or router? I can't believe you're defending the xbox 360. Having to pay attention to where cables/exhaust fans are located on a piece of consumer electronics is unacceptable.

    3. Re:sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "then you go on to qualify your it just works statement by saying you have to put the power supply in a "good" place..."

      And by 'good' he meant 'not recomended against in the manual'. Like, not on carpet, wedged between the TV and cabinet, or under your cat.

      In other words, he's saying that it just works if you follow the damn instructions, and dosent if you dont. Then you came along and complained that it dosent 'just work' if people have to follow the instructions. Uhhh... right.

    4. Re:sigh.... by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      First, I don't think there is a real overheating problem. My 360 that I got on release day sits in a closed component rack. No heat problems. The power brick is on the carpet under a nice layer of cables like all the others. No heat problems.

      I think some people got some defective units which MS is fixing. They are doing more than I've seen any other consumer electronic company do by overnighting boxes and paying shipping both ways.

      As for other devices... Most modern computers can't be put in a closed area. My desk has a nice closed spot for a mid-tower but it gets HOT. My cable DVR gets real hot in my rack and after killing 3 of the previous model it was determined that was the problem. It's getting more and more common to have to worry about these things even on consumer electronics.

    5. Re:sigh.... by conJunk · · Score: 1

      i don't know why you'd even bother trying to argue with this clown (the GP)... some people get doing things cuz they're cool to do, and some people don't so much... some folks like to use stuff, and some folks would rather tinker a bit... the GP isn't likely to be a coder either, i'd guess (although i'm really curious if that guess is right or not)... i think this is mostly a personality-type thing

    6. Re:sigh.... by romeo_in_blk_jeans · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually...

      Exhaust clearance is something that people who own component audio systems have had in the back of their mind for a couple dozen years now. Just because you haven't heard of it doesn't mean it's a new phenominon.

      If you find yourself worked up into a frothing tizzy over the fact that you can't hide your power supply under your oven while you're baking shit and expect proper operation, you have no right to own a console.

      Word.

    7. Re:sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having to pay attention to where cables/exhaust fans are located on a piece of consumer electronics is unacceptable.

      WTF

      Where is common sense? If you place your computer inside your closet, and it eventually self-combust, is it the fault of the manufacture?

      Gosh.

    8. Re:sigh.... by asphole · · Score: 1

      I get what you are saying but I feel like my 360 "just works" as well. What about a switch or other piece of equipment that can experience interference if the ethernet cable is to close to another power source? What about a monitor or television that you keep to close to a large speaker? You've never had trouble with an electronic device that doesn't work because of interference from another device close by?

      Not everything Microsoft does is great but you sound like a hater. I'm surprised you didn't spell it with the $

    9. Re:sigh.... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      This is a piece of consumer electronics. Do you consider a DVD player to be broken if you have to lay the cables in just the right way?

      Does a DVD player have 500+ million logic transistors? A high-clocked triple-core PowerPC CPU and a high-clocked ATI GPU?

      High-end computers use lots of power. They have for some time now. You would never put a high-end gaming PC in an enclosed space.

      The XBOX 360 manual makes it abundantly clear that the system needs ventilation. Certainly, some of the problems have been caused by incorrectly attached heatsinks, fan failures, or defective power supplies. But, you know what? At my former company, about 1 in 20 of the NVIDIA Quadro cards we purchased were defective - generally because the heatsink shim prevented adequete die contact. It's not easy to dissipate 200W+ in a box significantly smaller than a traditional PC.

      The good thing about having an external brick for the 360 is that it will become smaller and more efficent as time goes on.

    10. Re:sigh.... by balthan · · Score: 4, Funny

      isn't just unecessary, it's stupid.

      Welcome to slashdot, you must be new here.

    11. Re:sigh.... by masdog · · Score: 1

      I think I read this exact same post somewhere before. It looks very familiar.

      Oh yeah. It was here: http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=172884&t hreshold=-1&commentsort=0&tid=211&tid=137&mode=thr ead&pid=14387922#14387998

    12. Re:sigh.... by Quick+Sick+Nick · · Score: 1

      I did read it. And it still seems stupid. My Xbox works, and if yours doesn't, return it. Don't break it open and put a new cooling system in it.

    13. Re:sigh.... by Quick+Sick+Nick · · Score: 1

      Hello there, although you may think I'm a clown :( I am not a complete n00b to the mod scene, I had a modded Xbox with a 120 GB hard drive (still not banned from xbox live believe it or not) loaded with movies, games, emulators....

      I also build computers for fun and to take pride in a nice setup. However, I get USE out of everything I buy. I think an xbox 360 is worth $400, I think a kick ass computer is worth $2000, but I most certainly would not break open my xbox 360, void my warrenty, and have this huge ugly ass radiator next to my xbox just to make it a bit cooler (which in my case is no added benefit). Interesting, yes, but not something I would spend money on.

    14. Re:sigh.... by gclef · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, you'll have to turn in your geek card now.

    15. Re:sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for being one of the few with a little sense. I can't imagine how many great consumer devices would never have come to market if they all had to work in whatever environment the consumer expected them to.
          I know at least two people who put a 5.1 receiver in an enclosed space since that's where their old stereo worked. Thankfully in one case the receiver kept shutting down before cooking itself.

    16. Re:sigh.... by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I've had problems with many pieces of consumer equipment. Cable boxes and satellite receivers especially get very hot if you don't put them where they can get ventilation. Had the same problem with certain VCRs and DVD players and TiVO-type things. Also many component stereo systems, if you cross certain wires can give you literally shit sound, not just to audiophiles. And you have to let the amp and sometimes receiver in a stereo system have ventilation depending on the power usage.

      Anything can be slightly finicky. Just because you have to be careful enough so you don't overheat the external power supply on a 360 doesn't mean anything. You have to do the same for a Gamecube, though the GC probably doesn't have as hot of a PS.

      Also, I will probably never get a 360, since I don't like the types of games they offer. It's a nice system but not for me.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    17. Re:sigh.... by Riddlefox · · Score: 1
      I think this snippet from the article is more relevant:

      After we colored the case, we reassembled it and set out to test the unit the best we could without actual CPU/GPU die temps. The best way we knew to get temperatures from the system was to take readings from the back of the motherboard, directly under the CPU and GPU while the system was running. We used a temperature probe taped to the back of the motherboard and these are the results:

      With stock Xbox 360 cooling, after an hour of Quake 4, the back of the motherboard temperature was 150.8F ( 66C ).

      With the water cooled Xbox 360, after an hour of Quake 4, the back of the motherboard was a full 50F cooler than stock cooling at 101F ( 38.4C ).

      It seems to me that a 50 degree reduction in temperature is, one way or another, useful.

    18. Re:sigh.... by AgentDib · · Score: 1

      I definitely concur with you in that the 360 launch was very poorly represented in a few key genres, especially adventure/rpg. I think we can be a little optimistic about this, however, because of the historical trends regarding the release of new consoles. They have historically shipped with a large proportion of action/arcade style games for a couple of reasons, most importantly design time. The desire for manufactures to stress highlighting the improved capabilities for their machines with a heavy focus on graphics shouldn't be overlooked either - look at the N64 launch in particular. I doubt Microsoft will ever have the RPG focus of Sony, but they certainly have not neglected it. A few of my favorite RPG's over the last couple of years have been on the XBOX, such as Fable, Kotor, Jade Empire, X-Men Legends and Arx Fatalis. Indigo Propechy had a terrific story in particular. There are a few 360 titles coming fairly soon that have perked my interest, such as Elder Scrolls IV, Lost Odyssey, and Mass Effect. By the time the PS3 is out and the xbox 360 drops in price I expect there will be a reasonably large handful of games that feature terrific stories.

  12. One more problem.. by jollyroger1210 · · Score: 1

    Is it me, or could this just be one more problem that will plague the Xbox360?

    --
    Purple, because ice cream has no bones.
  13. 40 lashes with a dictionary by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Funny
    we have put together a water cooling solution that will handle anything the Xbox 360 can throw at it and literally knock your socks off.

    I fail to see how a water cooling system would do any sock-knocking. I guess they don't actually know what the word literally means (hint: it isn't a superlative nor does it simply add emphasis).

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    1. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Queue clueless slashdotters who have no understanding of semantics with their cries of "but language evolves."

    2. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the fucking dictionary yourself you moron. It has two meanings, and the parent's usage has been used by such writers as Jane Austen, Mark Twain and James Joyce. If you are going to be a pendantic prick, at least be right.

      http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/literally should set you straight.

      See http://www.slate.com/id/2129105/ for more info.

    3. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Surt · · Score: 0

      Here's a couple of links explaining that in fact the OP's usage was correct:
      http://www.usingenglish.com/reference/idioms/knock +your+socks+off.html
      http://www.word-detective.com/021804.html

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! And before the "but English is an evolving language" jackasses jump on you, I have to ask: If we "evolve" the word "literally" into yet another generic superlative used in metaphor, then how do we express the notion of "No, really, take what I'm saying at face value, with no metaphorical interpretation"?

      The word "actually" has already lost any such meaning (i.e. if the article had said "... and actually knock your socks off", very few people would likely complain). Don't take the proper meaning of "literally" away from me, dammit!

      (Note that I'm not really that much of a grammar Nazi. I did, after all, use "evolve" as a transitive verb, though I did so in quotes to imply ironic usage.)

    5. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... you lose.

      The grandparent poster has no problem with the phrase "knock your socks off" when used as an idiom. However, the word "literally" implies that there is no idiom going on. Socks which were once on feet are no longer on feet, as they have been removed by force. The original poster's use would have been correct had they excluded the word "literally", or if they had substituted it with a legitimate superlative, such as "really" or perhaps the (now less popular) slang "totally". Really, the use of the idiom provides a decent level of hyperbole anyway, so a (correctly used) superlative wouldn't add anything, in my opinion.

    6. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by iamdrscience · · Score: 1
      I fail to see how a water cooling system would do any sock-knocking. I guess they don't actually know what the word literally means
      Yeah, but maybe it's for the best, I mean, who would buy this thing if the advertising copy said it would "figuratively knock your socks off".
    7. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Angostura · · Score: 1

      No. You have missed the point - the poster wasn't complaining about a misuse of the phrase 'knock your socks off' - (s)he was complaining about the use of the word 'literally' when the OP meant 'metaphorically'.

      At least, I hope the OP meant that. I suppose it is possible that the water cooling kit could explode extravagantly. ... of course, I'm not a pedant in the true sense of the word.

    8. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by thesandtiger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps there is an upcoming adaptor for the 360 that gives it very powerful cybernetic arms that can throw things at the water cooling system hard enough to send shockwaves rippling through space and time, waves that will go back through history to the point where you were about to put on your socks and slap you upside your head, making you say "Huh? What was that?" and thus distracting you from your sock donning, thus not only essentially knocking your socks off, but erasing from all existence any memory that you had, at one time, even had them on.

      But noooo, you couldn't give them the benefit of the doubt - you have to assume that, rather than making hardware so powerful it can alter history, they just don't know what the word means. Such negativity!

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    9. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok

    10. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Begone you prescriptionist! and your prescriptionist dictionary too!

      Prescriptionist? WTF are you talking about? When you preface a figure of speech with "literally", what you're saying is "(figure of speech) occurred, and I don't mean that as a figure of speech". Nobody's fucking socks got knocked off, so "literally" is the wrong fucking word.

      ...using "they" with a singular antecedent

      They: the writer, editor, webmaster, etc.; essentially the collective group of people who had the opportunity-- nay, the responsibility of proofreading the material. But they are clearly not entirely literate.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    11. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll just use the word "Virtually" which will mean literaly, unlike today which means... um... what were we talking about again?

    12. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by mscnln · · Score: 1

      Prescriptionist? WTF are you talking about?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prescription_and_desc ription
      In linguistics, prescription is the laying down or prescribing of normative rules for a language.

      If what you're doing doesn't qualify as such, then I don't know what does.

      When you preface a figure of speech with "literally", what you're saying is "(figure of speech) occurred, and I don't mean that as a figure of speech".

      No, obviously that's not what the author was saying. Using the word "literally" to add emphasis is common usage, and given that you understood clearly the intent of the author, it seems that it was an adequate choice of words.

      Oh, and I can play the prescriptionist game too...

      To whom were you talking about the use of literally? Me?
      If not, you should have said, "When one prefaces..."
      And if I'm not mistaken, we use the American punctuation rules on slashdot, so put those commas back behind those quotation marks.

      I probably haven't convinced you, but at least I hope you see that prescription is ultimately a waste of time.

    13. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      When you preface a figure of speech with "literally", what you're saying is "(figure of speech) occurred, and I don't mean that as a figure of speech". Nobody's fucking socks got knocked off

      When you say "fucking socks", do you mean that as a figure of speech, or literally?

    14. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess they don't actually know what the word literally means (hint: it isn't a superlative nor does it simply add emphasis).
       
      Maybe you are the one that needs the 40 lashes with a dictionary (hint: before you suggest someone use a dictionary, maybe you should check first.)

    15. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When you say "fucking socks", do you mean that as a figure of speech, or literally?

      S/he may very well have meant it literally, as in those stupid socks that the guys in bad porn flicks always seem to be wearing, even when they are wearing nothing else. Those are "fucking socks."

    16. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Interesting
      In linguistics, prescription is the laying down or prescribing of normative rules for a language.

      If what you're doing doesn't qualify as such, then I don't know what does.

      I'm not saying that usage of the word "literally" is wrong because the dictionary says it is. I'm saying it's wrong because it's opposite of the common usage. Point is, the entire value of language is its commonality. Traditional prescriptivism is railing against uses of "ain't" not in place of "am not", or the splitting of infinitives. "Incorrect" usages like that do not cause ambiguity, they're simply nitpicks by absolutists.

      Using the word "literally" to add emphasis is common usage,

      Hogwash. It's a common error, but common usage is still primarily the correct way.

      and given that you understood clearly the intent of the author, it seems that it was an adequate choice of words.

      Just because an error is common doesn't make it not an error. My recognition of the error doesn't make it not an error. There is a descriptive definition of the word as we, the english speaking public, use it, and it isn't for emphasis. See, "descriptivists" can be as bad as prescriptivists when they defend every illiterate dumbfuck's utter misuse of a word. "Literally knock your socks off" is an easy one to spot as wrong because there does not exist anything that literally knocks off socks. But what if they said "literally burning down the house", intending it as emphasis? Pretty fucking ambiguous. It's fucking wrong because "literally" has a specific common usage that doesn't just vanish because some crackhead with a web site doesn't know how the rest of us use it.

      And if I'm not mistaken, we use the American punctuation rules on slashdot, so put those commas back behind those quotation marks.

      I use "programming" punctuation rules, i.e. if the fragment quoted didn't have punctuation originally, then the period at the end of my sentence has no business weaseling its way into that character string as it's part of MY words, not THEIRS. It doesn't matter, though. The important thing is that no meaning is lost.

      I probably haven't convinced you, but at least I hope you see that prescription is ultimately a waste of time.

      Oh, indeed I accept that trying to stem the tide of illiteracy is pointless.
      I just don't agree that I'm being prescriptive.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    17. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come to #linguistics on freenode and we can battle this out :)

    18. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by gkhan1 · · Score: 1

      Actually this is a completly accetable use of the word literally. Please read http://www.slate.com/id/2129105/ Language evolves and words change meaning depending on usage. That word has literally been turned inside out.

    19. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      (hint: it isn't a superlative nor does it simply add emphasis)

      Sounds like those people who complain about using the word "really." They conveniently forget about the word "very", which comes from the same root as Latin veritas, "truth", and its English derivatives (e.g., verify).

      Very, really, truly, literally (according to the meaning in the words), honestly, indeed (= in deed), etc. all mean rougly the same thing: in actuality. The difference is how acceptable they are when used as an intensifier.

      And at least they make some sort of sense (this is so like ___ that it might almost be true!), unlike expletives, which most of the time have absolutely nothing to do with the situation (and if you're pedantic enough to take them literally, no pun intended, they're sometimes humorous).

    20. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      Here's a couple of links explaining that in fact you're an idiot.

      Actually I don't have any links. I just wanted to say that. Anyway, the use of "literally" invalidates the use of idioms afterward. Sorry.

    21. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by izomiac · · Score: 1

      People using the word "literally" figuratively is my pet peeve. It's true that language evolves, but is anybody noticing a trend... Real-ly, true-ly, and ver-y (veritas) have essentially become meaningless. Perhaps people should learn what words mean before using them so that we don't have to keep inventing new words to replace the ones that people have ignorantly made meaningless.

    22. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pass the bong, Bogart.

    23. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Using the word "literally" to add emphasis is common usage

      And saying "Where you at?" is also common these days. Would you do that in any professional communication?
      What it comes down to is that not every use of a word is a correct one. Yes this is "prescriptionist". I suppose a good term to use here is "vulgar". I think it describes certain things that are considered to be "common usage" fairly well.

      And if I'm not mistaken, we use the American punctuation rules on slashdot, so put those commas back behind those quotation marks.

      I guess what it really comes down to is what makes sense.
      Saying "It literally burned my house down" should mean that you no longer have a house. It burnt down. If it doesn't then how are you ever going to find out if his house burnt down? What if he's using words like actually, truly and really for "emphasis" as well? Where does it end?
      The issue is that it is a barrier to effective communication.
      As for parenthesis, I believe that the American system by itself is broken. At times it too becomes a barrier to effective communication. IMO should be considered acceptable to place punctuation inside a quotation as shorthand:
      Joe said, "Let's go."
      It should ALSO be consider acceptable to place it outside:
      Carrie typed, "For once in my life".

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    24. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by m50d · · Score: 1
      When you preface a figure of speech with "literally", what you're saying is "(figure of speech) occurred, and I don't mean that as a figure of speech".

      That's what it *used to* mean. These days it's just emphasis.

      --
      I am trolling
    25. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Politburo · · Score: 1

      I am reminded of the great wisdom of David Cross:

      "Dude, it was so funny I literally shit my pants!"

      "Well, what did you do?"

      "What do you mean, dude? I was laughing..."

      "I mean, what did you do with your shitty pants?"

      "No, dude, I didn't REALLY shit my pants, I LITERALLY shit my pants!"

    26. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps people should learn what words mean before using them so that we don't have to keep inventing new words to replace the ones that people have ignorantly made meaningless.

      Totally!

    27. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Jesus+2.0 · · Score: 1

      The typical response, including from dictionaries and from articles showing examples from well-respected writers of a hundred years ago, is that "Literally has two meanings: 'not figurative' and 'an intensifier for true statements'".

      Which is all well and good. But also, unfortunately, bullshit.

      Literally is not used as an intensifier for true statements. It is used to mean "figuratively".

      That is, there are two actual usages:

      (1) Preceding a claim that sounds like it may be exaggerated or figurative, it is used to mean "The following is true and neither exaggerated or figurative".

      (2) Preceding a claim that sounds like it may be exaggerated or figurative, it is used to mean "The following is true but exaggerated or figurative".

      People do not use "literally" to merely precede arbitrary true statements. They only use it to precede true statements that sound like they may be exaggerated or figurative.

      Hence, the typical argument that it's merely an intensifier for true statements is apologist bullshit.

      Yes, Mark Twain used it. He used it incorrectly.

    28. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Jesus+2.0 · · Score: 1

      I should correct myself:

      I don't honestly believe that Mark Twain used the term incorrectly. I do, however, honestly believe that he used it to mean "figuratively" - not to mean "(intensifier)".

      And that's fine with me, which is why I'm correcting myself here. I'm far from a prescriptivist. Languages change; that is the natural way of things. Our language has changed so that literal now has two meanings:

      (1) Literal
      (2) Figurative

      And that's fine with me. What bothers me, is the claim of the apologists that the two meanings are:

      (1) Literal
      (2) (intensifier)

      That's bullshit. It's an attempt to fit the facts to a theory, instead of a theory to the facts. "Literal" means "figurative". Either complain about it, as the original poster did, or deal with it. Don't go into this bullshit wishy-washy apologist mode.

    29. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Surt · · Score: 1
      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    30. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Surt · · Score: 1
      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    31. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Surt · · Score: 1

      The actual definition of literally, though, does allow for the OP's usage:

      http://www.answers.com/literally&r=67
      http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/literally

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    32. Re:40 lashes with a dictionary by Surt · · Score: 1

      Note to mods & metamods: busted for using overrated on an unmoderated post.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  14. Bad Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A game console that benefits from being water cooled, have its power supply dangled from a string, and can't even be slightly moved while there is a disk inside smacks of terrible industrial design. This is not a console, it's an unweildy, ill-conceived, ill-executed beast that seems to actually hate its users.

    People say Apple users blindly ignore any and all flaws with Apple products, but Apple users have nothing on XBox fanboys. The thing could spew out radioactive mist and they'd still be forgiving Microsoft because OMG teh grafix are teh r0xx0rz!!!!11

    1. Re:Bad Design by ScrewMaster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ... it's an unweildy, ill-conceived, ill-executed beast that seems to actually hate its users.

      Are you talking about Windows XP or the XBox?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Bad Design by geekwithsoul · · Score: 1

      Why does it have to be "Windows XP or the XBox"? Can't it be both? Actually, if you throw in Office XP, MS Exchange, and every other MS product, can't it apply to all of them?

    3. Re:Bad Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither. I'm talking about Linux.

    4. Re:Bad Design by Admiral+Frosty · · Score: 1

      It came from Redmond..

    5. Re:Bad Design by BrockH01 · · Score: 1

      He He :)

      --
      To shreds you say...
  15. way too many images by Cannedbread · · Score: 0
  16. *Literally* Knock My Socks Off, eh? by venomkid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With what, water pressure?

    *grumblegrumble*

    --
    vk.
    1. Re:*Literally* Knock My Socks Off, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No water, they just shocked the shit out of themselves the first time they plugged the Xbox back in.

  17. Aww... by Psykus · · Score: 4, Funny

    "With reports of heat related issues and a heat sink that can get almost too hot to touch after marathon gaming sessions.."

    I just love touching the heatsink after a good session of gaming, and now I can't with the Xbox 360; I gotta get this product now!

    1. Re:Aww... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      And, actually ... a heat sink that gets almost too hot for a person to touch isn't particularly hot by silicon standards anyway.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Aww... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Unless by "too hot to touch" it means "you literally can't touch it because your flesh and bone will burn completely just by getting near it".

      Then it's hot.

    3. Re:Aww... by HoboMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless you're using their definition of "literally," in which case it would mean it's kind of hot.

      --
      Remember kids, tin foil doesn't work, so use LeadHat.
  18. Re:Gee... by kentrel · · Score: 1

    Hey, I thought it was a dupe too... until I read the article.. oh doh! :)

  19. Cooling the wrong components? by Hunter-Killer · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's the PSU that overheats, causing the majority of recent problems.

    But hey, if you'd rather spend ~180 on a water cooling system instead of not stuffing the power block deep inside a cabinet, more power to you. ;)

  20. Something interesting: by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    They hook the hs/waterblocks up in series. So the hot fluid from the first processor is attempting to cool the second processor.

    This seems a bit scary to me. The processors really get that hot, then shooting the exhaust fluid from one over the other isn't going to do as much good as they might expect.

    Still, awsome bit of home engineering.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Something interesting: by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Water has an enormously high heat capacity. In a typical water cooling system the water after a hot component (the CPU for example), is unlikely to be more than a degree warmer than the water before it.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:Something interesting: by kimvette · · Score: 2, Insightful

      . . . and the water cooling your car's internal engine is cooling the intake manifold, then the heads and then the block. Many times the amount of heat that you're dealing with in any PC power supply(according to howstuffworks, a gallon of gasoline contains the equivalent of 60 kilowatt hours worth of energy. If you're burning a gallon of gasoline per hour, you need to dissipate at least 75% of that much energy in waste heat. That's downright scary, considering that expansion/contraction needs to be constrainted to a couple thousandths of an inch for any given moving part!

      Why do I mention this? As a comparison - cooling them in series isn't that big of deal when you're talking about a 180W power supply and 3/8" tubing, and ANY type of radiator to actually dissipate the heat. Given restrictions introduced by typical automotive thermostats, the effective flow for coolant in an automotive system won't be much better than the 3/8" tubing used in the XBox cooler for this article (in fact the auto thermostat is designed to restrict water flow, both to increase heat transfer and to help prevent the pump from bursting the radiator at high RPMs).

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    3. Re:Something interesting: by SheeEttin · · Score: 0

      Actually, at the moment, all games only use the first processor. Until games that need lots of processing power come out, they other two are useless.

  21. Water Cooled from the start by RickPartin · · Score: 1

    What is preventing a console or even a computer manufacturer from including water cooling themselves? Is there not a way to cheaply and safely mass produce it?

    1. Re:Water Cooled from the start by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      Some models of the Apple PowerMac G5 are indeed liquid-cooled from stock. I've got no evidence, but I imagine that some Alienware PC's may also feature this sort of esoteric cooling.

      Not to mention some Cray supercomputers which were, IIRC, literally submersed in some kind of coolant.

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    2. Re:Water Cooled from the start by dow · · Score: 1

      I thought a few people were speculating this was a potential way to get the last few hundred mhz out of silicon, before everything goes dual core, but it seems the associated risk with water and electric doesn't fill everyone with confidence.

      And chilling the cpu's down with industrial coolers is possible, for a few more mhz.

      As for the crays, possibly, but you may be thinking of the computers submerged in mineral oil (or vegetable oil or whatever.. stfw.) These are cool, and make the water cooled xbox look like old hat, never mind sock knocking off.

    3. Re:Water Cooled from the start by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, the SH4 CPU in the Dreamcast console was water-cooled.

    4. Re:Water Cooled from the start by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      Nope - I opened mine up many times, no watercooling there.

      Unless you mean that someone did it as a project. But the stock Dreamcast had no watercooling.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    5. Re:Water Cooled from the start by visgoth · · Score: 1

      Certain models of Cray computers were cooled using fluorinert. Its rather expensive stuff, probably out of the reach of most hobbyists.

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    6. Re:Water Cooled from the start by jcnnghm · · Score: 1
      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    7. Re:Water Cooled from the start by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      I've looked this up a couple of times in the past, and many people seem to believe it was water-cooled. However, when I checked before my last posting above, I did see a mention that only some DCs had water-cooling, not all of them.

      But there's plenty of mentions of it to be found via Google - for instance.

      Interestingly there is some confusion on whether the early models were water-cooled and Sega switched to air-cooling later, or the other way around.

      (Btw, I admit the evidence above is hardly empirical)

    8. Re:Water Cooled from the start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see, $180 for a change from 151 degrees to 101 degrees.
      This must change the MTBF by what, from 10 years to 12 years?
      360 thermal design is adequate. Any more money spent on a thermal circle jerk and the stockholders should be shooting someone....

  22. I don't get it... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't understand why this project was undertaken to begin with. Ok, the Xbox 360 gets hot and the power supply can overhead we understand that. If the original Xbox power supply and unit are overheating it's the job of Microsoft to fix the problem.

    I am not trying to troll, but my socks aren't going to be knocked off when someone has to modify their console to operate as originally intended...

    1. Re:I don't get it... by JonN · · Score: 1
      The first two paragraphs from TFA explain it. Please read the article before criticizing the content:

      "Four years ago next month we built the world's first water cooled Xbox. At the time, a lot of people asked us why we would want to water cool an Xbox, mostly because they didn't understand the motivation behind it. The fact of the matter was that the standard heat sink on the 700MHz Intel processor would barely get hot under normal use and surely didn't warrant the performance offered by a custom water cooling kit. At the time, we did it simply because no one else had done it and "because we could." That was our motivation then and that is partially our motivation now.

      We had plans to water cool an Xbox 360 for over a year now. Little did we know that not only will this water cooling project be more fun than the original, but it may even be practical. Imagine that. With reports of heat related issues and a heat sink that can get almost too hot to touch after marathon gaming sessions, the Xbox 360 water cooling project now had a sense of purpose. We bought a retail Xbox 360 specifically for this project. The minute we got it back to the [H] labs we tore into it and, with a little help from the fine folks at Koolance, we have put together a water cooling solution that will handle anything the Xbox 360 can throw at it and literally knock your socks off."

      --
      do.what.promptcmds
    2. Re:I don't get it... by Varkias · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well I look at it like they did this for a few reasons.
      1) For people who already bought an XBox 360 and cannot wait for MS to "fix the problem"
      2) It's a cool thing to do.
      3) Third parties can see that watercooling an XBox 360 is possible and will release kits that people can use.

      But yes in a perfect world MS should fix the problem, it's not 100% guaranteed that they will though. Power to the people.

    3. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not trying to troll, but my socks aren't going to be knocked off when someone has to modify their console to operate as originally intended...

      Dude, socks will fly off when a MS product will operate as originally intended!

    4. Re:I don't get it... by conJunk · · Score: 1
      emphasis mine:
      1) For people who already bought an XBox 360 and cannot wait for MS to "fix the problem"
      2) It's a cool thing to do.
      3) Third parties can see that watercooling an XBox 360 is possible and will release kits that people can use.

      'nuff said, yo

    5. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2) It's a cool thing to do.

      Oh, you kill me!

    6. Re:I don't get it... by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      To fix the problem would require going back in time and getting the hardware together sooner. The failures and limited shipments are all due to Microsoft basically sending an email out in February 2005, subject: "We should really get started on that Xbox360 thing..."

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    7. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it's not being used in the space intended...

    8. Re:I don't get it... by oneils · · Score: 1
      Dude, socks will fly off when a MS product will operate as originally intended!
      Literally!
  23. most imp question by vivek7006 · · Score: 0, Troll

    we have put together a water cooling solution that will handle anything the Xbox 360 can throw at it

    But does it run GNU/Linux?

    1. Re:most imp question by nxcho · · Score: 1

      Just wait and see... http://www.free60.org/ ... (but i dont really see the point to install linux to every piece of hardware that looks slightly similar to a computer (like xbox, toasters, lizards, broomsticks and so on and so forth...))

      --
      When asked why, the answer is almost always: "It's 2014".
  24. Koolance Commercial by eander315 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They used all Koolance products throughout, with no discussion at all about why they used those particular parts when several other better ones are available. This really doesn't seem that useful anyway unless you pipe the water through the power supply. Even the most intrepid of the PC water cooling community are wary of doing that.

    1. Re:Koolance Commercial by Chmarr · · Score: 1
      hey used all Koolance products throughout [...] when several other better ones are available.
      Because they had boxes and boxes of koolance products laying around, unused, because they're so inferior :)
    2. Re:Koolance Commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i believe the article mentioned that they liked the low profile blocks of koolace, that's why.

    3. Re:Koolance Commercial by damiam · · Score: 1

      I didn't RTFA, but the summary implies Koolance gave them the parts for free.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  25. literally by erice · · Score: 1

    we have put together a water cooling solution that will handle anything the Xbox 360 can throw at it and literally knock your socks off.

    Thanks, but I prefer cooling systems that do not explode or otherwise interact with the users clothing in a violent manner.

    Though, I must admit, a device that can disrobe the user does have potential for porn.....

  26. HardOCP knocks my socks off, literally by Legendre · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, the authors command of english literally knocks my socks off!!

  27. Dupe? by teklob · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Slashdot has done it once again. They have an article running down the process of water cooling an Xbox 360" http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/31/ 1414248&tid=211&tid=222

    1. Re:Dupe? by KrisW · · Score: 1

      Scroll up and you'll see:

      Actual implimentation with hand-holding. Hexus.net was discussing a kit to do this a few days ago.

      --


      "Think you can take me? Go ahead on. It's your move." --Joe Don Baker in Final Justice
  28. Other version of water cooling by saskboy · · Score: 0, Troll

    I tell people who consider buying a Disc scratching, power brick overheating, no-games-included, Xbox 1 incompatible, Xbox 360 to go jump in a lake.

    Are video games that important to people that they need the newest console when there are already more games made than you could play in a year for every other console plus computers, and you'd spend less money buying all of them than an Xbox 360 with games? [Ok that last bit was a little exageration, to rile up your blood.]

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:Other version of water cooling by pl1ght · · Score: 0

      Yes. And if you actually had done some reading, you would have found that Gamefly was quoted as saying, they have hardly received any discs with scratches. They were just issuing a warning that if you scratch a disc you are responsible. BTW, your power brick only overheats if you sit it on a rug etc. Also to counter your no games included point. They include demos of 4 360 games, and about 25 xbox live arcade games, including one full version. Show me another console that comes close to that. Take your hatred(or envy) of 360 owners elsewhere.

    2. Re:Other version of water cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what lame justifications. You can't sit your PSU on a rug? bwahahahahaha, great design there... BTW demos of games don't count as release titles (the ones that are out suck). You would really have to be a prize fool to buy an Xbox360 now, and even more so to actually be proud of it.

    3. Re:Other version of water cooling by pant · · Score: 1

      To some people, yes they are that important. It seems a litle nuts to me, but yes, its that important. I'm an avid gamer, a pc one at that. I spent $1800 US putting together a new system recently, but that's what I do. Some people rice out their cars. Some people put together their ultimate home stereo. Some people lavish their cash on a band while touring; I recently saw Paul Mcartney in concert where there were two (Hot!!)Brazilian chicks determined to follow him around the world.

      It's ok to snicker a bit to yourself, but good God, everyone has their kick, would you freak about someone, God forbid, putting siding on their house at a cost of thousands of dollars, or buying a Caddilac(sp?)? How about an RV? How about a software engineer that is paid 60k a year, gosh!!! contributing to free software.

    4. Re:Other version of water cooling by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Calm down, I was only throwing water on the enthusiasm of Xbox 360 fanboys. I was unaware that demos and arcade games were provided. Now that I know that Pong is probably available, it makes the basic 360 worth buying.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  29. Even the geeks are lawyers now by geekwithsoul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the site:

    " (Warning! Any mod that requires removing the cover of your new $400 game console voids your warranty. Period. The use of tools such as pliers, screwdrivers, and power drills within close proximity of the internal components of your Xbox 360 can result in user error that could ultimately render you console inoperative. It goes without saying that [H]ardOCP assumes no responsibility for any damage that may occur to you or your Xbox 360 if you attempt this mod on your own. Having said that, all the cool kids are doing it.)

    If "it goes without saying," why say it at all?

    1. Re:Even the geeks are lawyers now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >If "it goes without saying," why say it at all?

      Because the article is targeted towards americans?

    2. Re:Even the geeks are lawyers now by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The presumption is that some people are much stupider than they would first appear. No doubt the same reasoning behind the bright red label on my blow dryer's line cord: "WARN CHILDREN OF THE RISK OF DEATH". Of course, it leaves open what the actual cause of death might be ... a particularly thickheaded individual might think that simply drying one's hair could be fatal. Probably it's just a disclaimer that their legal staff makes them include, although the fact that such disclaimers are considered necessary is kinda scary in its own right.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Even the geeks are lawyers now by Chaffar · · Score: 1
      If "it goes without saying," why say it at all?

      because frivolous lawsuits are as American as apple pie, that's why. Five lines will save you years of headache, not all of us can afford to reply to emails the same way Anakata does...

    4. Re:Even the geeks are lawyers now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i would simply tell someone who broke it to go fuck them selves.

      "try and sue me you little bitch"

      there is nothing to be scared of.

    5. Re:Even the geeks are lawyers now by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "If "it goes without saying," why say it at all?"

      Likewise, "within close proximity." The word proximity means "The state, quality, sense, or fact of being near or next; closeness."

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
  30. You've obviously never had an Xbox360 fall on you. by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had one fall on my leg.

    It ripped my flesh to the bone, knocked my sock off, broke my big toe and killed my cat.

    damn you Microsoft
    DAMN YOU

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  31. Re:XBOX by -Pyth0nx- · · Score: 1, Funny

    I didn't realize you people post so fast... This is harder than I thought. >____

  32. SWEET by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm now inspired to water cool my GAME BOY ADVANCED! Next will be my Texas Instuments Calculator and Timex Expedition digital watch! Water Cooling makes everything better.

    --
    MadOgre.com
    1. Re:SWEET by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Overclock your TI calculator
      http://richfiles.solarbotics.net/Turbo.html

      I'm not sure you'd want to overclock your watch...

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:SWEET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm now inspired to water cool my GAME BOY ADVANCED!

      Its GAME BOY ADVANCE, not GAME BOY ADVANCED! When I used to work at Wal-Mart I got so sick and tired of those "valued customers" making themselves look like an idiot cause they can't read the huge sign directly above the gameboys correctly. Ughh... nightmares....

    3. Re:SWEET by Admiral+Frosty · · Score: 1

      Last year I overclocked my dog. It was funny to see Fluffles act at 3X. But then smoke started coming out of his ears. He caught fire shortly after. I need a water cooling kit for dogs...

    4. Re:SWEET by Upphew · · Score: 0

      No, it makes everything just cooler... hopefully.

    5. Re:SWEET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely - I just water cooled my water cooler and it's much better!

  33. Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, water cools you!

  34. I read the article... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    I am willing to grant that this is a pretty cool mod, if you want to call it that and an excellent example of ingenuity and resourcefulness. However, I still feel that the overall attempt is nothing more than a fix for a flawed product, a flaw that Microsoft needs to address and fix. I don't expect to buy a game console only to have to purchase an external cooling unit to make it function as originally intended.

    1. Re:I read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original intention was clearly unrelated to any overheating issues. The mod was done entirely for the 'cool factor.'

  35. Um...actually... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the damn thing rocks. No problems, stunning graphics...and its a pretty bitchen mp3 player if you plug a USB hard drive plugged into it, which kind of makes up for them trying to lock you into windows boxen by not supporting smb, in favor of some doubtless cheesy and unreliable streaming server software on your XP computer.

    Sure it gets hot...its a goddam supercomputer in a breadbox.

    It will eat disks if you wobble it while its on, but with the rotational velocity of that disk at howevermany rpms its spinning, thats not surprising. I find very little need to wobble it while its on, so this is not a problem for me.

    I run linux, and agree that Microsoft is the devil, but at 720p on my old projector, the 360 games are so beautiful that it brings just a tear to my eye.

    Oh, and I got mine off ebay, for $625, with shipping. Just because I wanted it, now, and didn't feel like waiting in line. I'd have paid it at the store if there were no lines...it really is worth it to me...but I have a lot of disposable income for such foolishness, so I suppose I'm atypical.

    Meanwhile, YOU, Mr. Anonymous economically disadvantaged troll, are playing on some newly sucky old system, or dropped 2 grand on a hot gaming pc, which you can't wobble while you have the dvd spinning, either.

    Therefore, u R teh SUX0RS. I shall now perform an interperative dance of mockery in your general direction. Woo! Woo! .... Woo! Woo!

    1. Re:Um...actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it gets hot...its a goddam supercomputer in a breadbox.

      Three 3.2ghz processors managing about a teraflop altogether would have been a decent "supercomputer" in about 1996/1997. Blue Gene/L, the current world's fastest supercomputer, runs about 300 teraflops.

      Perhaps under the same government regulation that considerd Playstation 2 systems "Supercomputer" the XBox 360 is a "supercomputer".

    2. Re:Um...actually... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "...its a goddam supercomputer in a breadbox."

      I smell a new marketing slogan. You should sell that to Microsoft!

    3. Re:Um...actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, don't bother trying. We just saw it, thanks for the free slogan! In exchange we won't sue you for posting what is now a vital component of our advertising system.

      Have a pleasant day!
      M.S.

  36. What exactly is it 'throwing?' by gelfling · · Score: 1

    I mean this is a game console, yes? Does it smell like ozone? Is the case getting hot? Does it need a case fan that moves a 1000cfm? What exactly is it 'throwing' at the design? I understand "just because it's there to do" projects, but what's the point here? Does it run that much hotter than the underlying PC hardware it is?

  37. Armchair engineering by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Insightful
    With reports of heat related issues and a heat sink that can get almost too hot to touch after marathon gaming sessions

    If 'almost too hot to touch' is below the specs for the processor's operating temperature range...it doesn't matter how hot it feels to the user.

    It never ceases to amaze me how people with no training will second-guess the basic competency of others with degrees in their field. Yes, the power supply gets too hot if placed on a rug...but that doesn't mean the xbox itself isn't designed properly. Probably just means that they didn't do a lot of testing in people's homes with the bricks on rugs and such; from what I understand, the problem is pretty rare even if you don't "cool" the brick.

    I also love the egotistical "we drive 'em hard" implied in the "marathon gaming" bits- as if they're HARDCORE users who STRESS the xbox beyond its limits. I guarantee Microsoft had units running benchmarks/game demos for WEEKS at a time doing burn-in...

    1. Re:Armchair engineering by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Whilst they may be below their maximum operating temp, some electical components age badly with heat.

      Processors will undergo electromigration much more rapidly, and electrolytic capacitors will dry out. Both will significantly shorten the life of a console.

    2. Re:Armchair engineering by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If 'almost too hot to touch' is below the specs for the processor's operating temperature range...it doesn't matter how hot it feels to the user.

      First, I have to mention the obvious. The heatsink is going to be COOLER than the processor itself. (That's the whole reason it works as a heat sink.) If the heatsink is below the maximum temp for the processor it doesn't actually mean you're safe. Without knowing the thermal resistances for everything, you simply cannot say whether you're safe or not. Especially thetaCS, the case to heatsink thermal resistance.

      Second, even if you're within specs IT DOES MATTER for reliability reasons.

      Even notice how many motherboards die because those big electrolytic caps sitting next to the CPU fail? The failure rate of components is quite signifcantly affected by temperature. For example, an electrolytic capacitor might be rated for 8,000 hrs at 75 C but that increases to 32,000 hours at 55 C. The same is true (but generally to a lesser degree) for virtually all components.

      There are also other little niceities like a lower operating temperature meaning a lower leakage current.

      It never ceases to amaze me how people with no training will second-guess the basic competency of others with degrees in their field.

      It never ceases to amaze me how pompus us people with degrees can be.

      I also love the egotistical "we drive 'em hard" implied in the "marathon gaming" bits- as if they're HARDCORE users who STRESS the xbox beyond its limits.

      I find this obnoxious too.

      I guarantee Microsoft had units running benchmarks/game demos for WEEKS at a time doing burn-in...

      Me too, but I certainly DON'T guarantee what the results of that test were. Maybe the results projected that many xboxes would barely outlast their warranty coverage. We don't know. The only thing we can guess is that they were reasonably sure it wouldnt' fail in a manner where it had to be replaced within the warranty period.

      On one hand, you would think people could do their job.

      On the other hand look at the nice power cords microsoft sent out to 1st gen Xbox owners so their houses don't get burnt down. Could these be those same guys with degrees you're talking about?

      People with degrees in their field make mistakes all the time. I'm not saying these guys found one, but acting as if it's crazy to question someone because they may have a degree is out of line.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  38. Re:For the love of... by Melfina · · Score: 2
    As opposed of watching a standard format DVD on your TV by using an xbox/ps2/dvd player without an adapter.

    Fanboys for any system, for any sort, have no right to complain about other fanboys.

    --
    :3 rawr.
  39. Does it include... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Funny

    watercooling the power supply? :P

  40. 80 lashes with a dictionary by h4ter · · Score: 1
    Please note, Mr. Stickler:
    By the late 17th century, though, literally was being used as an intensifier for true statements. The Oxford English Dictionary cites Dryden and Pope for this sense; Jane Austen, in Sanditon, wrote of a stormy night that, "We had been literally rocked in our bed." In these examples, literally is used for the sake of emphasis alone.
    And truly figurative usage had been exhibited by James Fenimore Cooper, Thackeray, Dickens, and Thoreau. And:
    ...no one seems to have objected to the [figurative] usage until the early 20th century.
    It's a "Janus word". There are plenty you use all the time.

    Please see this article (and a dictionary).
    1. Re:80 lashes with a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I read the Jane Austen quote that you provided, I think she is saying that she actually felt the bed move. Therefore, she was "literally" rocked in her bed and is using literally correctly. Why, what did you think she meant?

  41. Re:XBOX by paulius_g · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Return to kindergarten, "dogg".

  42. Xbox 360...whoa learn how to use a computer first by psyph3r · · Score: 1

    I keep hearing about water cooling an xbox 360. I think that is about as necesary as water cooling an emachine, they are both cheap computers designed to sell to idiots who can't run a real one. Get a real/quality computer, learn how to use it, then start talking about water cooling and other modding. until then, enjoy playing on your wannabe consol and PC...because it isn't either in my eyes.

  43. Yes. *Literally* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please see: this.

  44. sad by mj2k · · Score: 4, Informative

    it's sad that after all the hype, MS seemingly ignored such a basic component as verifying that internal components remain within thermal limits. I should be able to leave my xbox 360 on overnight without having to worry about it overheating, and I shouldn't have to resort to water-cooling the 360 to ensure it operates properly. Props to those who got this to work, but a user who spends 300+ bucks on a console shouldn't have to make the choice of voiding their warranty (and spending extra to put a cooling sys together) in order to keeep their 360 operating within thermal specs, or risk overheating and failure in the future. MS never seems to quite get it, they made a _huge_ deal pre-release about the chassis being smaller and more attractive (especially those stupid swappable front covers), yet all the hardcore gamers I know would prefer a stable system with great performance to an attractive POS that overheats when you leave it running overnight.

    1. Re:sad by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I should be able to leave my xbox 360 on overnight without having to worry about it overheating, and I shouldn't have to resort to water-cooling the 360 to ensure it operates properly.

      You can and you don't. Seriously, don't believe everything you read (including this, I guess).

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
  45. Problem is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is that only the latter will bring more power to the SYSTEM. So either way, power to me is irrelevant.

  46. Silocon chips altogether. by peterfa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They way I see it silicon chip technology is hitting a wall. The wall is heat.

    Back in the day, chips like these processors today would be dreams. It's amazing how certain dreams never succeed and amazing things never dreamt become reality. The Internet was not dreamt, but it has come. The flying car does not exist in the practically and computer chips are doing nightmarish speeds. The same happens with large cities.

    Most cities are not designed to become large. the result is extremely tight roads and impracticalities. The solution is all kinds of crazy technologies. Computer chips are following this path.

    The silicon chip is largely inefficient in my opinion since it produces so much heat. Large cooling devices are needed now. Though a dream it may be, the basic technology that makes computer chips, specifically the CPUs, need to be changed out to more efficient technologies. I hope for optical computers in my day. If done properly, the optics could allow for extreme speeds and cooler temperatures. Optics don't cause cross-talk so wide busses that are really close to eachother could run at ultra-high frequencies (in data transmission, not in color) for near flawless function.

    The XBox 360 may be designed with a poor implementation of cooling, but it is not the only device that produces a lot of heat. I don't like Microsoft myself, but I certainly don't blame Microsoft for producing a high heat device. Though they should have added a better cooling device.

    Ultimately, we are hitting the wall, and Microsoft is taking some heat (sorry). AMD may produce a cooler chip, but I think a new technology is needed to advance the old fashioned silocon-transistor-metal based chips. Add optical technology (again, a dream) and free ourselves of this burden.

  47. it just works *FOR NOW* by vlad_petric · · Score: 2, Informative
    Unmodded, the temperature after a couple of hours of Quake 4 was ~150F. With watter cooling it got to ~100F. Such a dramatic change in temperature can greatly increase the lifetime of the system.

    XBOX360 is an awesome gaming platform, but it's pretty clear that the first version is doing poorly power- and cooling-wise.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:it just works *FOR NOW* by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's only 65 degress celcius. Which isn't really that hot. I don't think that a chip running at that temp would have any problems in the long run. PC processors run at that temp all the time. It might feel a little hot to the touch, but nothing metal, silicon and other chip materials shouldn't be able to handle.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:it just works *FOR NOW* by rseuhs · · Score: 1
      Take a closer look:

      With stock Xbox 360 cooling, after an hour of Quake 4, the back of the motherboard temperature was 150.8F ( 66C ).

      The temperatures on the electronic components themselves is higher than that (most notably CPU and GPU, but other components also create heat)

      It looks like XBox360 is designed at the limit of all components (even the power brick) and one small "issue" can put it over the edge. (And "issue" can mean anything from user error to dust collecting)

  48. Has it really come to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do we really need such an ineffecient video game console that we need to water cool it? Somebody's gonna get electrocuted.

  49. Overclocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They didn't even overclock it? Fucking Pussys

  50. Re:You've obviously never had an Xbox360 fall on y by quietlysubversive · · Score: 1

    "I had one fall on my leg. It ripped my flesh to the bone, knocked my sock off, broke my big toe and killed my cat."

    that wasn't the xbox - it was the power brick :-(

    --
    ----(o)----
  51. Water Cooler VS. Refrigerator w/ holes in the door by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    We used:
    Two GPU-180-L06 video/GPU water blocks (link)
    One HX-360 radiator (link)
    One Control Board (link)
    One 120mm fan (link)
    One LED display panel (link)
    12ft of 3/8" hose
    Standard 110v to 12v wall adapter

    Now one has to consider if the time spent building and the cost of these materials could be more cheaply and easily reproduced by buying a compact refrigerator and drilling holes in it for the wiring?

    You would just need a drill and one of these: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0009WNPEW/002-28 77125-6416806?v=glance&n=284507

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  52. Liquid cooling should provide less noise by Cardcaddy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you own a Xbox 360 you will quickly realize how loud the two case fans are. The liquid cooling modification if done properly will make a huge difference in the noise level provided you can remove, replace, or slow down the stock fans.

    1. Re:Liquid cooling should provide less noise by watership · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's the case fans that are loud but the DVD drive itself. The drive spinning up seems to be the loudest thing. This might be due to the air holes being right above the drive enclosure. The second the disk is ejected or the game stops, the console gets quieter. I doubt the heat goes away that fast and the fans would slow down right away.

    2. Re:Liquid cooling should provide less noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XBox 360: Best When Not Played

    3. Re:Liquid cooling should provide less noise by watership · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Best when not played? How well researched your opinion is. The xbox 360 is QUIETER than my quiet case PC. The xbox 360 is also much faster. It's just not as silent as say, the PS2 is.

    4. Re:Liquid cooling should provide less noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a thought; While you're playing your console, try turning the speakers up enough to cover the tiny case fans' noise.

  53. Re:You've obviously never had an Xbox360 fall on y by ForteMaster · · Score: 1

    Obviously you ignored the "Watch for Falling Xboxen" sign.

  54. Language, it's a virus... by pegr · · Score: 1

    Gawd, I literally hate it when people misuse the word "literally"...

    (socks not withstanding)

    1. Re:Language, it's a virus... by peektwice · · Score: 1

      I think the poster meant that his socks physically flew off his feet, literally, actually, oh...and for real. With the size of the fan used on the external cooler (ex-heater) this is entirely possible.

      --
      Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
  55. This was already reviewed on digg. I mean come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot seems to be falling behind I mean, this was up like 2-3 days ago.

  56. Awww i dont know about this by oztiks · · Score: 1

    Wasnt microsoft trying to make the xbox slim and less bulkier then the xbox 1?

    So then -

    a) Watercooling the processor with its own little fridge like system and
    b) Having the power supply jump 2x the size (see http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/31/ 1414248&tid=211&tid=222)

    Man its going to be a pain in the ass to cart this unit over to your mates place for a weekend gaming session.

  57. rings a bell by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    Have you ever met a true audiophile? The performance of their systems is not only directly proportional to the cables used, but they also have to lay the cables the "right" way, isolate the room the "right" way, load media the "right" way. Heck, for a lot of them even the power supplied in your perfectly fine wall outlet is just NOT GOOD ENOUGH and causing nausea.

    Now, does this rings a bell to you? ;)

    1. Re:rings a bell by rseuhs · · Score: 1

      That all falls under "esoteric belief", nothing else. The system is not "broken" in any way if you ignore everything you listed and it will actually make no audible difference. (except isolating the room the right way and setting the boxes in correct positions, that does make a difference - but special cables and power supplies is just esoteric nonsense bordering fraud.)

    2. Re:rings a bell by stecoop · · Score: 1

      You did read the lay the cables the "right" way right?

      What if you lay a audio cables next to a florescent light, run them parallel to AC lines, or run the across the floor on top of the carpet. Each example in this list has varying amounts of static which but include what to avoid in order to run it the "right" way. I can assure you that putting the boxes in the right place will not negate the effect of the static from poor placement of the cables. You would be better to do it "right" instead of looking at arrangement or isolating the room; the static from a ground loop or ac hum is unbearable.

      Hopefully he wasn't talking about using monster cables but using the "proper" cables for the job.

  58. Concern for Microsoft's IP by jkevin99 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Stories like this represent a clear violation the EULA, illegal taking of Microsoft's IP, and probably violate the DMCA as well.

    Of course, if you just give $4,000 to the RIAA lawyers then it wiill go away...

  59. Sure, but can it unscratch your games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No? Well, at least the bubbling can amuse you while you're waiting for Microsoft to acknowledge its latest crapfest.

  60. Better than that little blue box? by themysteryman73 · · Score: 0
    I wonder if this will work better than that little blue "XBox 360 watercooling" mystery box posted from Hexus.net the other day...

    I know painting a car red makes it go faster, but I can't remember if knowing how something works makes it better or worse...

  61. Water Cooling What??? by Hexzero · · Score: 0, Troll

    Looks like a damn Xbox with a colostomy bag.... >>> Can the articles get any worse? Do duplicate articles belong on /.? Get a clue

  62. Re:Water Cooler VS. Refrigerator w/ holes in the d by bprime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not an uncommon comment. However, consider that most fridges have to work very hard to keep even lukewarm contents cool. The fridge that you linked to would burn out with a "warm" object inside of it because the thermostat would be running the refridgeration cycle continuously due to the heat given off by the xbox.

  63. I need to switch jobs.. by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

    .. and become a "review" site, so I can get free crap and attempt to destro-- I mean, improve it.

    --
    Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  64. It's people like you by MixmastaKooz · · Score: 1

    that make me regret not buying a 360 when I had the chance: I was at a Costco and they had the premium setup (and an additional wireless controllers plus PGR3) for $480 and they had plenty of them with no line: two weeks before Christmas. I should have bought it and sold it on e-bay! Dang!

    1. Re:It's people like you by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking of doing some PS3 scalping myself...the guy that sold me my 360 had sold another one a couple weeks before for $900. Us GenXers got the cash now, and still love dem games.

  65. Re:You've obviously never had an Xbox360 fall on y by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

    >>I had one fall on my leg.

    >>It ripped my flesh to the bone, knocked my sock off, broke my big toe and killed my cat.

    This spells doom for Micro$oft, doom Doom DOOM dOOm!!! As soon as the public is aware that the XBox360 is causing severe lascerations, minor fractures and feline fatalities it's the end of the road for Micro$oft.

    Don't buy the marketing hype that it's a large scale release of a complex consumer product, the occaisonal dead cat is expected and unavoidable, and that these are all vary rare and isolated instances.

    THE XBOX360 IS A CAT KILLER!!!

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  66. Lazy, you guys are. by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

    Lazy bastards, grab some ammonia and a compression pump and do this right. (It's funny. Laugh.)

    --
    ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
  67. But it voids the warranty! by telchine · · Score: 1

    So the creators of this device claim that the x-box can overheat and possibly break. However, by installing this device, they claim it voids the warranty.

    Forgive me if I'm being dumb, but rather than fork out a load of dosh preventing the problem, I'd rather wait for the Xbox to break and get a shiny new one courtesy of Microsoft.

  68. Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Having to pay attention to where cables/exhaust fans are located on a piece of consumer electronics is unacceptable"

    That is the most foolish statement I have read in a long, long time.
    All electronics need ventilation. Ever seen a Server room? Do you think there is a reason they have extra cooling for them? Why didn't the manufactures simply design it better so I could put it into my oven instead? Because you're an idiot that's why.

  69. Nothing but a publicity stunt.

    The only part of the Xbox360 that overheats is the power brick. The console itself does not overheat.

  70. I'll show you water-cooling by Trogre · · Score: 1

    *Tosses XBox360 in harbour*

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife