Whether its the attachment of a Creative Commons type license, or putting together some sort of cooperative (performer-owned) "recording label" that would represent their rights, once this is done, and this license, or label grants rights for free Internet play, subsequent contracts with Warner coudn't reach back to this earlier content any more than they could to that owned by a smaller label.
That assumes they release it on a "label" to begin with. Let's go with this scenario: I make a song, I put it on the internet without anything denoting it being licensed in any way. Then, I get signed to Warner, and they want that song. I just had that song go from "Have fun with it" status to "You're screwed if you're playing it" status without anyone knowing.
Now, take another scenario: I release a song on CC. I change one knob on a synth slightly, rerecord, and have a contract with Warner for the song. Who the hell is gonna be able to tell the difference?
I think they're going for abnormal driving conditions. Out in the middle of nowhere, at high temperature, going over 3k miles in 6 days. That not a trip people drive all the time.
Also, it's for a competition. Not for you to buy.
People who are 'good at math' are more likely to analyze the law exactly as written and determine logically whether or not he actually violated the law as written.
People who are good at math aren't writing the laws, it's people who are good at bullshitting via words.
Update mechanism for everything on the App Store:
1) Open iTunes.
2) Hit Update on Applications "Page".
3) Sync iPhone.
So, there's no update mechanism present?
The best way, in that case, would be to scan on the way out and then on the way back in. Then you know that person isn't legally here, and can be barred from entering more easily.
Definitely against this though. Why would this do absolutely ANYTHING to help us?
Do you want that bug/security fix, regardless of browser? I thought so.
How about that major update? Gonna hold off on that one till it's a little bit more stable/faster/whatever? Hey, I guess you had the choice with FF. IE8 doesn't give you a chance. There's the difference.
..somehow get congress to stop their continuous feeding at the trough of corporate lobbyists... Congress doesn't want to stop feeding on the trough. It's in their best interest, in the form of donations, to continue getting their money. They are, after all, only their for their reelection, and not really there for the people.
Jon Stewart, however, has the point that they bring up a news story, without levels of bias so thick you can't see through to the actual truth, and then make fun of it going for them. Of course, they're aiming at the twits who would watch ads. But for those who would rather get an overview of important events (and be entertained in the process) than be bombarded with useless detail (such as on cable news), Stewart's the best option.
Slashdot Mirror
Whether its the attachment of a Creative Commons type license, or putting together some sort of cooperative (performer-owned) "recording label" that would represent their rights, once this is done, and this license, or label grants rights for free Internet play, subsequent contracts with Warner coudn't reach back to this earlier content any more than they could to that owned by a smaller label.
That assumes they release it on a "label" to begin with. Let's go with this scenario: I make a song, I put it on the internet without anything denoting it being licensed in any way. Then, I get signed to Warner, and they want that song. I just had that song go from "Have fun with it" status to "You're screwed if you're playing it" status without anyone knowing.
Now, take another scenario: I release a song on CC. I change one knob on a synth slightly, rerecord, and have a contract with Warner for the song. Who the hell is gonna be able to tell the difference?
I think they're going for abnormal driving conditions. Out in the middle of nowhere, at high temperature, going over 3k miles in 6 days. That not a trip people drive all the time. Also, it's for a competition. Not for you to buy.
Yeah, because the entire thing is, he told them the results as they came in. He wrote that all over the place.
People who are 'good at math' are more likely to analyze the law exactly as written and determine logically whether or not he actually violated the law as written.
People who are good at math aren't writing the laws, it's people who are good at bullshitting via words.
You can point to more than half the tags in HTML and say that....
Doesn't matter if anyone is an idiot or not. They're making money.
0
Owning the world's most efficient production car?
I prefer writing viruses to steal information. It's just so hard to get someone to fill out those damn Paypal lookalike forms.....
Time to code a level in my game that you need to hack to get to where there's only a person in a room watching a rape scene on tv.....
Don't get people thinking about how old they are.....
The 5th amendment said it saw nothing.
Fixed that for ya.
By that logic....
Drinking = good
Driving = great
Drinking and Driving = Horrible
Above system of equations = travesty of justice
Update mechanism for everything on the App Store: 1) Open iTunes. 2) Hit Update on Applications "Page". 3) Sync iPhone. So, there's no update mechanism present?
Server Cheapness != Data Center Cheapness
Only if they can figure out how to find that Legendary Armor when you don't have the luxury of being revived on a raid....
Yay! Let's imitate major news networks!
Yeah...next time, ask yourself how many of these incidents actually succeeded.
Democrats support corporate bailouts, drug wars, terror wars, etc. The American people do not.
It's politicians in general that support these.
The best way, in that case, would be to scan on the way out and then on the way back in. Then you know that person isn't legally here, and can be barred from entering more easily. Definitely against this though. Why would this do absolutely ANYTHING to help us?
Do you want that bug/security fix, regardless of browser? I thought so. How about that major update? Gonna hold off on that one till it's a little bit more stable/faster/whatever? Hey, I guess you had the choice with FF. IE8 doesn't give you a chance. There's the difference.
I dont think anyone was saying that new businesses weren't being hurt...
..somehow get congress to stop their continuous feeding at the trough of corporate lobbyists... Congress doesn't want to stop feeding on the trough. It's in their best interest, in the form of donations, to continue getting their money. They are, after all, only their for their reelection, and not really there for the people.How do pigs glowing green passing genes lead to the future of breeding pigs for organs? Does the connection not show itself to anyone else?
Jon Stewart, however, has the point that they bring up a news story, without levels of bias so thick you can't see through to the actual truth, and then make fun of it going for them. Of course, they're aiming at the twits who would watch ads. But for those who would rather get an overview of important events (and be entertained in the process) than be bombarded with useless detail (such as on cable news), Stewart's the best option.