I use Linux. I can recompile my kernel and take out most of the things I don't need (I leave it in or build it as a module if I am not sure). But I do not know what it means to stat my kernel nor how to do it.
Can anyone provide a reference, as this seems like it could be quite useful.
No...you would need a diverse population, otherwise this scenario will develop:
Help Wanted Computer professional with 15+ years of experience in the following: C, C++, Java, TCP/IP, Windows, AIX, Solaris, VAX, Assembler, VB, HP-UX, AS/400, Cryptography, AI, and be willing to serve coffee to the boss.
Minimum Educational Requirements: 3 PhD's in Computer Science.
Must be willing to live in antartica 6 or more months per year.
Her "story" fits the exact same formula as the other "testimonials" on Microsoft's site. She didn't do this on her own. It was a marketing campaign orchestrated by MS and their PR firm.
If she was some "rogue contractor" than I guess so was the little boy and the other testimonials on their site too. Odd, how they all write with the same style and flair, isn't it?
And I seriously question RedHat and other Linux company's business models. Pay alot of money to develop software, give it away for free, hope people are kind enough to buy the boxed version? I know they sell various support services too, but will that actually be enough to pay the rent?
I have heard this alot, but I think the logic is flawed. If, as Microsoft and others say, the TCO is much higher and the original purchase/license price is "just a fraction of the total cost", doesn't it follow that there is much more money in services and support than the sale of software?
For every $1 a company spends on software, don't they spend $5 or $10 or $20 dollars on service and support?
Re:Interaction, not Merging
on
Phoenix 0.3 Is Out
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
If you do a custom install of Mozilla instead of typical or everything, you can deselect everything except "Navigator".
Even then it is too big of a footprint/resource hog (IMO), but at least you don't have the extras you speak of.
PGP has two P's, GPG only has one. According to the Gartner Group, 83% of CIO's surveyed said that having 2 P's was vital to their business and something they would implement in the next 18 months.
Seriously, though, PGP has a user interface that mere mortals can use. GPG doesn't (or at least didn't last time I tried it).
I see. So, if I have an interest in farming, it would be OK (and somehow useful) for me to do a review on whether or not a Corvette makes a good tool for plowing.
What is the logic for evaluating the desktop/gui of something that isn't designed for such, and therefore, logically, does not have much emphasis or time dedicated to it?
In order for a review of something to be useful, it should focus on what the tool is designed to do, not what your "interest" is.
The Windows benchmark is running on a DL580 as well. That being said, your statement is valid. The systems are NOT identical. Click on the executive summary links at the bottom of each and you will see the detailed hardware specs for each.
Also, the clients are not only different in number, but the Linux clients are running a faster CPU as well (1400 Mhz vs. 1000 Mhz).
The only conclusion I think we can draw is that Linux plays "in the same ballpark" as Windows, performance-wise.
Slashdot Mirror
The top industries supporting Thomas M. Davis III are:
1 Computer Equipment & Services $40,250
ADAM SMITH (D-WA)
Top Contributors
1 Microsoft Corp $22,900
The other two don't seem to stand out like these two do.
I use Linux. I can recompile my kernel and take out most of the things I don't need (I leave it in or build it as a module if I am not sure). But I do not know what it means to stat my kernel nor how to do it.
Can anyone provide a reference, as this seems like it could be quite useful.
No...you would need a diverse population, otherwise this scenario will develop:
Help Wanted
Computer professional with 15+ years of experience in the following: C, C++, Java, TCP/IP, Windows, AIX, Solaris, VAX, Assembler, VB, HP-UX, AS/400, Cryptography, AI, and be willing to serve coffee to the boss.
Minimum Educational Requirements: 3 PhD's in Computer Science.
Must be willing to live in antartica 6 or more months per year.
Maximum salary: $6.50/hour
LOL. You are not alone:
k b; en-us;Q300366
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=
So when the 12 xbox owners purchase all 10 software titles, what does microsoft due after selling out all 120 units?
Answer:
Their "Chieft Software Architect" is a meglomaniacal control freak.
Her "story" fits the exact same formula as the other "testimonials" on Microsoft's site. She didn't do this on her own. It was a marketing campaign orchestrated by MS and their PR firm.
If she was some "rogue contractor" than I guess so was the little boy and the other testimonials on their site too. Odd, how they all write with the same style and flair, isn't it?
Does MS really believe we are THIS dumb?
And I seriously question RedHat and other Linux company's business models. Pay alot of money to develop software, give it away for free, hope people are kind enough to buy the boxed version? I know they sell various support services too, but will that actually be enough to pay the rent?
I have heard this alot, but I think the logic is flawed. If, as Microsoft and others say, the TCO is much higher and the original purchase/license price is "just a fraction of the total cost", doesn't it follow that there is much more money in services and support than the sale of software?
For every $1 a company spends on software, don't they spend $5 or $10 or $20 dollars on service and support?
If you do a custom install of Mozilla instead of typical or everything, you can deselect everything except "Navigator".
Even then it is too big of a footprint/resource hog (IMO), but at least you don't have the extras you speak of.
It isn't supposed to exist...I guess I need to write Bumfuck, ND to get through to the slashdot crowd.
Yeah, except even the one in Spazebo, North Dakota is busy at 3:46 a.m. on a Tuesday.
PGP has two P's, GPG only has one. According to the Gartner Group, 83% of CIO's surveyed said that having 2 P's was vital to their business and something they would implement in the next 18 months. Seriously, though, PGP has a user interface that mere mortals can use. GPG doesn't (or at least didn't last time I tried it).
How about those who actually own the pipes and routers decide?
:-)
You mean those nice fellas over at Worldcom?
I see. So, if I have an interest in farming, it would be OK (and somehow useful) for me to do a review on whether or not a Corvette makes a good tool for plowing.
What is the logic for evaluating the desktop/gui of something that isn't designed for such, and therefore, logically, does not have much emphasis or time dedicated to it?
In order for a review of something to be useful, it should focus on what the tool is designed to do, not what your "interest" is.
All of her (his? its?) articles are completely myopic, focusing on "how nice/useable" is this as a desktop.
Evaluating Irix on its UI alone is completely useless.
Britney sure looks fine on that page!
Kinda makes me wish I really was a pirate. I sure would like to pillage that pumpkin!
This is news for nerds, right?
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
New bookmarks:p ://security.microsoft.com/routers
http://nouters.windowsupdate.com
htt
New Licensing:
Your router subscription has expired. Would you like to pay another $79 dollars for the next 12 months?
New Animation:
Paperclip: Hi! I see your trying to access the internet. Can I help you?
New Monitoring:
We have deteted a P2P application running on your network. Your router has been disabled. Please call 1-800-RIAA-Pal to correct this.
New Dialog boxes:
You are using an inferior browser. Are you SURE you want to do this? [Yes] [No]
The Windows benchmark is running on a DL580 as well. That being said, your statement is valid. The systems are NOT identical. Click on the executive summary links at the bottom of each and you will see the detailed hardware specs for each.
Also, the clients are not only different in number, but the Linux clients are running a faster CPU as well (1400 Mhz vs. 1000 Mhz).
The only conclusion I think we can draw is that Linux plays "in the same ballpark" as Windows, performance-wise.
Thank you. I will present the FCC rules to the board for their next meeting.
I owe you one.
They have macrovision too. You can not record anything that your get from the video OnDemand service.
:(
Cablevision is the worst. I lobbied my coop board so I could get a dish and was rejected.
It's Cablevision or broadcast only for me.
Now I have to cancel my subscription to the RIAA backed online music sites.
Make up your minds already!
Me too.
Or Century.
The last time the Red Sox won, they had Civil War veterans in the stands.
Yes. He said that the Marklar on the Marklar was better than using Marklar on Marklar because Marklar has lower overhead than Marklar.