Slashdot Mirror


Bon Jovi Tries New Approach To Fight Piracy

Dudio writes "80s-era rock band Bon Jovi is taking a novel approach to fighting piracy of their upcoming album, Bounce. Retail CDs will be distributed with a unique serial number with which the purchaser can register in order to receive such exclusives as prioritized concert ticket purchases and unreleased music. Finally, somebody in the entertainment industry is attempting to adapt to the changing market rather than rushing to protect an outdated business model." All Bon Jovi jokes aside, it is nice to see a fresh approach.

489 comments

  1. Good Job! by Locke!Erasmus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Locke!Erasmus feels that this is a prudent and wise course of action for Bon Jovi to take. I only hope that they will keep some records on whether they profit from this strategy, and how much they profit. Hopefully, if it works, we will see more labels/artists try new tactics such as this one instead of simply threatening to DOS people who are running a P2P application.

    --
    I should have picked out the nickname Demosthenes!Tecumseh.
    1. Re:Good Job! by dragoncortez · · Score: 1

      I agree. It would be great if more artists would try similar methods to promote anti-piracy, at least that way we might not have to hear about how evil the RIAA is every other day here on Slashdot.

      --
      Making stupid comments so you don't have to.
    2. Re:Good Job! by macdaddy357 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Both of Bon Jovi's fans should eat this up!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    3. Re:Good Job! by DESADE · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thank goodness!!! I proposed this idea to a digital music list almost two years ago hoping that things would evolve this way. The labels could marginalize piracy if they approached the problem intelligently.

      The Nature of Demand
      It seems to me one of the key problems facing the music industry in the
      digital age is the "commodity" approach to marketing music. Who was the
      genius that first determined that the real product is a piece of plastic?
      When I buy a CD, it's not because I simply want to be able to play the music
      at my leisure. At the core of every music purchase is a connection between
      the artist and the consumer. For some, it's an association of ideals. For
      others, it may be image, lust, identity, craft or a myriad of other
      possibilities. This is the real nature of demand in this business and it's
      being completely ignored under the current model.

      Pissing Off the Consumer
      This whole idea came to me as I was driving to work one day listening to
      "Celebrity Skin." I'm on my third copy now and it irks my hide a little each
      time I buy a CD that I have previously owned. Especially considering the
      fact that I know so little money is going to the artist.

      Why can't I just buy personal rights to the piece of work and pay a media
      fee for whatever form of media I choose as a playback device? If I lose the
      CD, why can't I just pay a reasonable media fee to replace it? Why can't I
      be a patron of the artist rather than a consumer of plastic? The value of a
      CD is in the beauty of the work, not in its physical manifestation.

      In a Perfect World
      I'd pay $25 bucks for a CD. It would come with a serial number. I'd go to a
      Web site managed by the artist or their representatives and register. Once
      registered, I'd be able to download the CD in MP3 format. Maybe I'd get
      access to a couple of bonus tracks as well. Maybe I'd like a second copy of
      the CD or a tape for my car. I'd be able to buy a second copy for 5-7 bucks.
      Call it a media fee.

      A Different Approach
      Now here's the real power of this model. Now that I've registered, the
      artist can send me an email telling me about what's going on in their
      creative life every now and then. Maybe I'd be able to get an early copy of
      the next album in MP3 format for pre-ordering. Maybe the artist could send
      me a link to some live tracks from concerts or some things they have been
      playing around with in the studio between major releases. Maybe they could
      point me to a couple of older albums I might be interested in. Maybe once I
      have purchased the rights to three albums I would achieve "distinguished
      patron" status that allows me special access to other material. That's
      value. Now I feel like I have a relationship with the artist. Now I feel
      like a patron who helps support the artist so they can spend their time
      working on their art. Now the artist has a direct way to build a
      relationship with me the fan. Foster that relationship and the artist is
      meeting the real demand of a music consumer.

      Maybe when the artist comes to town, they can put on a special show at a
      small venue for "distinguished patrons." I think a show like this would be
      good for the artist and the patron. The artist would know they are
      performing for a select group that appreciates their craft and has shown it
      by supporting them. The patron gets to see his or her favorite artist up
      close and personal. The patron would be willing to pay a higher price as
      well. The next day, maybe a special commerative t-shirt would be available
      at the web site when the patron logs in.

      Also, think about how valuable the database would be.

      Watch the Money Roll In
      So under this scenario, I'd probably spend at least a couple hundred bucks
      with an artist. Under the current model, I might have shelled out $100 for a
      CD and a couple of concert tickets. Why allow labels to take so much money
      for "managing" the artist, when what they really should be doing is managing
      the relationship with between the artist and the patron? The marketing
      potential under this model is a no brainer. Some might abuse it, some might
      manage it well. At the end of the day, it's the relationship that counts.
      Piss off your registered fan base with a load of spam and chances are the
      fan won't cough up any more dough. Provide a real value to registering and
      watch the money roll in. The better an artist manages the relationship, the
      more money they make. Make the management earn their keep for a change.

      This Kills the Napter Problem
      Piracy will never go away. Instead of trying to limit access to an artist's
      work, why not take a different approach... provide real value for paying for
      the work. Why would I spend hours trolling Napster for bad MP3's encoded at
      different bit rates and labeled with no common format when I can just buy
      the CD and have access to clean copies encoded at a high bit rate for my
      desktop machine and maybe another set encoded at a low bit rate for my car
      or portable player? Napster's cool, but face it, it's still a
      pain-in-the-ass. Today's average MP3 collection is a sloppy mess. Why would
      I pirate when buying the work and registering offers me real value? Sure
      some people will pirate. Face it folks, it's going to happen no matter what.
      The loss from piracy would be more than covered by the additional revenue.
      This would also go a long way to killing the demand for used CD's.

      Eviscerate The Damn Middlemen
      I'm offended that the record companies skim off such a disproportionate
      amount of income from the process compared to the value they inject into the
      transaction. They get away with it because they control the distribution
      channel. That control is dying and all the industry seems to want to do is
      come up with another way to protect it. Wake up! Fans are pissed off.
      Artists are pissed off. Everyone is sick and tired of paying twenty bucks
      for a CD and knowing that the artist only ends up with a buck or two. That's
      why everyone is sucking songs off of Napster. We're all tired of feeding
      your machine. Let go and start fresh. Didn't most people in the business get
      into management or promotion or whatever because they loved music? Wouldn't
      it be nice to get back to that rather than working in a system that is
      basically a leech feeding upon both artist and consumer?

      Someday Soon
      An new act is going to make it big direct. No label. No management. No
      distribution deal. Self-financed. Self-promoted. Self-Published. Another
      possibility is a major act going direct successfully. The day is coming soon
      and when it happens, a lot of people in this business are going to face a
      rude wake-up call. Why not make a deal now while you still have a chance?

    4. Re:Good Job! by Disevidence · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Honest World -

      If it fails, they made shitty music which wasn't marketed well.

      If it succeeds, its due to better music and perhaps the added incentive of the aforementioned offer.

      Marketing world -

      If it fails, its due to blatant piracy

      If it succeeds, it didn't succeed enough. Piracy was still rampant.

      --
      Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
    5. Re:Good Job! by Mupp252 · · Score: 1

      Yea, all five of them.

    6. Re:Good Job! by Locke!Erasmus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I'll tell you one thing - I've already decided I'm not going to download the music. I will buy the CD instead.

      --
      I should have picked out the nickname Demosthenes!Tecumseh.
    7. Re:Good Job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YEah!!!

      I can again start listening to My BJ CD's again.

      I kinda put him on ice after he showed up on that stupid show.

      Way to go!!

    8. Re:Good Job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if the original cost $5-7 bucks, that would be a perfect world. The burden of creating duplicates should be on you, but the possibility to do so should exist without any complications from any form of copy protection.

    9. Re:Good Job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, all five of both of them!

    10. Re:Good Job! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      Wait ... you're going to combat piracy by doubling the price of CDs, and then offering other services which may or may not be of benefit to the customer? I fully support the record industry's right to set CD prices at whatever they want, but I hardly think that doubling the price is going to be a good business move. (I don't have the money to buy many as it is; at $25 a pop, I'll stick with my current collection.)

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    11. Re:Good Job! by afidel · · Score: 2

      I've never said this before but I wish I had a mod point to give here. This is probably the best post I've seen on Slashdot and I have been here since before accounts were added, it is interesting, insightfull, on topic all at the same time.
      p.s.
      I have been cruising at 50 karma for about 9 months or so and have been soaking karma points like a whore on a race from 0-50, but I have never once had mod privlidges, what gives?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    12. Re:Good Job! by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Mod points aren't given often to liars.. been here since before accounts yet your account # is 530433? yeah good one

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    13. Re:Good Job! by tahpot · · Score: 2

      This is incredibly funny. I spent 5 hours yesterday looking for your original post because I wanted to spread your ideas around the internet. Due to my vague recollection of the post and poor slashdot searching facilities :P I couldn't find it.
      Good job in posting it again! Thanks.

      I'm pissed off at wasting 5hrs though.

    14. Re:Good Job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The $25 price point is not bad for some areas of the world or for some stores HMV or Virgin come to mind. Cds aren't $12 everywhere.

    15. Re:Good Job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you just admitted to like a million people that you are going to buy the new Bon Jovi cd when it comes out!!

    16. Re:Good Job! by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Why?

      It's an interesting approach to what the RIAA sees as the problem (piracy), but it does nothing to address the real problem (cost) as it exists for the consumer. Consider this "product activation" for music. Still seem like a good idea?

    17. Re:Good Job! by Locke!Erasmus · · Score: 1

      It's something different and new, and I want to encourage that. I understand that daftpunk tried it...however, you do have a convincing argument about the pricing.

      --
      I should have picked out the nickname Demosthenes!Tecumseh.
    18. Re:Good Job! by DESADE · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the kind words. I really do believe in this idea, even though I don't think I did it justice in my original rant. When it first ocurred to me, I found the list where the industry talks digital and threw it out there. It got some interesting response, but nobody seemed to take it and run. This was back when everyone and their mother was launching a new company in digital music and I got a lot of "well, get the VC and build it" type comments. That wasn't my goal. I was just hoping to offer what I thought would be a viable model in the digital age.

      For some reason, the concept generated a lot of buzz in Europe.

      Last, I know it's rather arrogant to post the same comment in two discussions relating to the same topic, but I thought it relevant. Not trying to beat a dead horse.

    19. Re:Good Job! by afidel · · Score: 2

      I was at RIT in the fall of 1997 and frequently visited slashdot back when it was hosted on robs server.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    20. Re:Good Job! by gadlaw · · Score: 1

      No no no. I will not pay $25 dollars for a CD. Maybe I'll pay that much for a good DVD that I really want but not that much for a CD. At $12.99 to $16.99 they are really pushing it now. For that amount of money I do want my liner notes, perhaps some lyrics and any other bonus that will give me the warm fuzzies about the artist and label. Oh yes, and already at those prices I buy fewer CD's than I've ever bought.

      --
      Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
    21. Re:Good Job! by LarsG · · Score: 2

      Desade, mind if I forward that thing to a bunch of places? (Oh, and the list you sent it to two years ago - was it the beef noodle soup thingie?)

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
    22. Re:Good Job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $25 for a CD? No freaking way the CDs are worth that much and quite frankly they're just not even worth the $5 to $7 'media fee' these days. What a laugh. $5 to $7 for each format that I want? No way. It smells like a screw job to me.

    23. Re:Good Job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the goo goo dolls already did this with the release of "gutterflower" in April 2002. They even did a similar members only section with "Ego, Opinion, Art and Commerce" in 2001 but you couldn't get tickets on that.

    24. Re:Good Job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Posting anon. as it's off-topic:)

      At one point /. restricted moderation to the top 75% of user ID's (among other restrictions); I don't know if this is still the case though, but if so I think they've only just hit 600,000 or so, which would mean you'd have to have a UID smaller than 450,000 to be eligible.

      I don't get to moderate anywhere near as much as I did, and I have a low-5-digits UID, if that's any consolation :)

    25. Re:Good Job! by kayakgreg · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just be a little more careful with your stuff?

    26. Re:Good Job! by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1
      Maybe $25 is just an example, or its not US dollars. I don't think that's really the point.

      I think the point is that the business is looked at in terms of moving CDs and not in terms of owning the right to the intellectual property, and the poster proposes including a larger relationship with the artist as well. While this may not be the right relationship for all artists, it is an idea that is worth considering.

      Especially when you take the long term view of music, or you are a collector or a student of music. $12.99 is probably a fair price for the latest pop recording, since it is essentially disposable music, worthless over time, and the relationship with the artist is meaningless (since they probably look as music as a stepping stone to movies or flying into space). But as someone who has purchased Miles Davis "Kind of Blue" 3 times now (LP, LP to replace worn out LP, then CD) and knows I will probably have to purchase it again as SACD or whatever the next technology is comes out, the idea of a "subscription" to the music has appeal to me.

      The corporate boy bands and other creations of the studios would continue to sit on pallets at the Price Club for 12 bucks a pop, and you'd throw them away or give them to the church rummage sale a few years later. Some acts (top orchestras, jazz greats, Pink Floyd) that create timeless stuff would seek the new method as a way of building fan bases and loyalty to the artist (and maybe the label?). And some acts would show they have legs or become important past their pop starts (Rolling Stones? Motown?) and might migrate from the "pop" pricing to the "art" pricing over time.

      I would gladly pay larger fees (even subsriptions) for the rights to media upgrades as the technology changes or better access to concerts than the Ticketmaster scam.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    27. Re:Good Job! by DESADE · · Score: 2

      LarG,

      Do as you wish. Embellish, paraphrase, whatever you like. Any you're right about the list. That was the perfect forum. Comprised of people on both sides of the issue that really care about fixing this damn mess.

      As an aside, I saw a post from Brad King (he covers this stuff for Wired and is a regular on the soup list) hinting about the next wave of CD's. I't possible something like this may be in the works among the major labels. Very watered down and still restrictive on personal rights, but it will be interesting to see if the rumors pan out.

    28. Re:Good Job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been reading (and once in a while posting to) /. since before they had accounts, and I still don't have an account.

      So what?

    29. Re:Good Job! by ordinarius · · Score: 1

      Interesting read, but can we stop abusing the word artist? Screaming into a microphone does not an artist make. Sticking 'dance', 'love', 'baby', 'yeah-yeah-yeah' together in random order does not an artist make. Is there something wrong with the title professional musician?

      Ditto for actors. If I read about/listen to one more actor calling themselves an artist I'm going to be sick.

      Enough. Sorry, you hit a nerve.

      - Ordinarius

  2. What will they blame it on when this doesn't sell? by sys$manager · · Score: 3, Funny

    It must be piracy because everyone wants to buy new records from a rock band that is 15 years out of date.

    Or will they go down in a blaze of glory?

  3. Amen to that by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

    Well, it's good to see someone fighting it in a novel way, but will it make much difference?

    The guy downloading it for free probably wouldn't buy it in the first place, much less go to a concert.

    Some people do illegal things just because they can.

    Side note: That flag in my back pocket thing Sambora did was in bad taste.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:Amen to that by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Sure, some people are just criminals at heart, but haven't the surveys been showing that the biggest "pirates" are also the biggest "fans"? If this is true, then I'd expect that the people most likely to DL the album for free would be the same people who'd want extra band goodies and concerts. So suddenly Bon Jovi is rewarding their fans for liking them (and voting with their wallets), while protecting their (debatable) revenue stream, and wisely ignoring the minority of haters (who don't really make up much of their listener-base anyway, and won't make much of a difference one way or the other).

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:Amen to that by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Interesting
      "The guy downloading it for free probably wouldn't buy it in the first place, much less go to a concert."

      Of course. But I think a better point is that someone in the industry is realising that the real money maker will NOT be CDs in the coming years. They are starting to cultivate the market for concerts instead. This priority ticket purchasing with CDs would probably cause people who would never have considered going to concerts to buy concert tickets.

      And live concerts, I do believe, will be the real money makers in the future as opposed to CD sales.

      THANK YOU Bon Jovi et al for rewarding purchases of the CD with real perks, as opposed to assuming the purchase is a copyright infringement waiting to happen.

    3. Re:Amen to that by dspeyer · · Score: 1
      And live concerts, I do believe, will be the real money makers in the future as opposed to CD sales.

      Live concerts are already the primary source of income for artists. They get barely anything from CDs or merchandising, except in a handful of extraordinary cases. There's some figures here.

      Any artist who has enough legal status to make their own decisions will probably start using recordings as a way to boost concert attendance -- yeah, both of them.

    4. Re:Amen to that by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      Concerts have always been the real money maker for those who deserve the money...

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    5. Re:Amen to that by rowanxmas · · Score: 1

      Concerts will be money makers in the future!!

      According to rough calculation:
      The Gorge Ampitheater in George, Washington seats 20,000
      A Dave Matthews Band ticket costs an average of $50
      They play for 3 nights
      20,000 * 50 * 3 = 3,000,000

      Not too bad for working less than 3 hours a night.

    6. Re:Amen to that by geekoid · · Score: 2

      again. not true.
      I have downloaded music, then gone and bought the CD.
      I have also downloaded music, then dleted it because I didn't enjoy it.

      ON an unrelated note, can somebody please tell me who I need to contact so that /. will fix there American flag icon?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Amen to that by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      What about me, I've downloaded every Bon Jovi song I like, and I'm still looking for more. Despite this, I gladly paid for a DVD of a concert (which by the way has an incredible version of Runaway which is not to be found on P2P networks). I also would gladly pay to go to a concert. Concerts are much higher on my purchase list than a CD because I concert is something I will remember.

      The same applies to other artists I download. I would gladly pay to see them in concert and other such events.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    8. Re:Amen to that by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Subtract out venue costs and it's less than 3 million, but the point is well taken. And on top of that, the music industry as a whole will benifit from this because people who can't make real music, and rely on the studio to clean up their sound when it's all over will fail miserably, while people who can perform and create music people will enjoy will rise to the tops.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    9. Re:Amen to that by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      The guy downloading it for free probably wouldn't buy it in the first place, much less go to a concert.

      Let's see, a recording artist makes a record, it goes gold, and he ends up in debt to the label. Or a recording artist goes on tour and actually gets to collect a significant amount of the ticket price. Do I better support the artist by attending a show or buying an album?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Amen to that by fishbowl · · Score: 2
      "Concerts have always been the real money maker for those who deserve the money..."

      And even for some who do not:

      $5000+ for two tickets to New Years' Eve?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    11. Re:Amen to that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, at up to $100 or so for a concert ticket these days I think they are already the big money maker :-)

    12. Re:Amen to that by fricto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I managed an indipendant record label, and a friend of mine worked for Sony in A$R - live concerts HAVE ALWAYS BEEN the real money makers, this is the spin on the piracy debate they've tried to hide.

    13. Re:Amen to that by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Not too bad for working less than 3 hours a night."

      What you're paying for is the probably 50+ YEARS total practice, training, shitty unpaid gigs, rehearsal, and the honing of the individual artists' skills, all of which together have created a band which you want to go and see. The three hours is the time your butt is in the seat, not the "working".

    14. Re:Amen to that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Let's see, a recording artist makes a record, it goes gold, and he ends up in debt to the label. Or a recording artist goes on tour and actually gets to collect a significant amount of the ticket price. Do I better support the artist by attending a show or buying an album?"

      You're using your cognitative dissonance to convince yourself that you aren't a thief, and that in some small way, you are supporting the band by stealing it's music...please stop, it makes you look like a fool.

    15. Re:Amen to that by turtle-spin · · Score: 1

      I hope that this is the start of a different way at looking at what the music industry has to provide to the consumer other than the music itself. From the look of this approach Bon Jovi would seem to want to try and sell the idea on the basis that you are buying into a more complete package (music + value add). For someone who just wants to rip off a Bon Jovi song then I dont know if it would make any difference, but it does give a lot more incentive to fork over the money if you are actually getting something distinctly different from a CDR some kid at school is passing around.

    16. Re:Amen to that by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      i've done that.. concerts are much better way of spending $$$ to music than buying cd's. you would be surprised how many people DO download music and go then to buy the real cd. however this doesn't apply to fans of most mainstream huge pop successes.

      besides, in the concert you get to see if the artist is money's worth to donate money to it's recording company.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    17. Re:Amen to that by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      Yeah, saying a concert is only 3 hours work is a stupid as saying The Empire Strikes Back was only 2hours, 8 minutes of work.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    18. Re:Amen to that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that also happens to be slightly similar to saying it only took you 5 minutes to check IMDB.com and write this post. The reality is it took you a lifetime of strenuous social engineering for us to enjoy that incredibly insightful piece of information. Of course, by 'social engineering' I mean 'you're a huge geek'.

    19. Re:Amen to that by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      And that also happens to be slightly similar to saying it only took you 5 minutes to check IMDB.com and write this post. The reality is it took you a lifetime of strenuous social engineering for us to enjoy that incredibly insightful piece of information. Of course, by 'social engineering' I mean 'you're a huge geek'.

      Hah. it only took me 10 seconds to find out how long ESB is, and I didn't use IMDB.com. Everybody knows that a Real Geek need only grab the tape/DVD from the stack next to his computer to find out. I am indeed a Huge Geek.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  4. Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by blazin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It sounds like he's not really trying to combat piracy, per se, but more encourage people to buy the CD for the perks and benefits that would come of it.

    Sounds like a great idea... Do something where people want to buy your CD more than trying to make it impossible for them to copy it.

    I hope it works for him.

  5. Re:Finally... by ArGeRuS · · Score: 0

    doh!!!

  6. We need this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We dont need no Macrovision copy protection schemes ( which are widely cracked already ) !

    Go Bon Jovi go! And they still rock!

    1. Re:We need this! by Deadric · · Score: 1

      Goo Goo Dolls have implemented this already. Check it out.

  7. Congrats by Warped-Reality · · Score: 1

    Even though i don't really like their music, it's nice to see someone who's actually somewhat popular to be doing this.

    --
    This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    1. Re:Congrats by cosmosis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, lets not forget the efforts and foresigth of people like David Bowie who is totally hip to the values of Slashdot. He feels that copyright will be obsolete in 10 years, and he thinks its a good idea.

    2. Re:Congrats by Warped-Reality · · Score: 1

      Yes, but my point was there are 200x more Bon Jovi fans right now than there are david bowie fans.

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    3. Re:Congrats by theNetImp · · Score: 0

      I highly doubt that. Bowie has a HUGE fan base still. Just as big as jonny boy's

    4. Re:Congrats by MrSeb · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Bowie's the second richest musician in the world, only behind Paul McCartney.

      As if he cares about copyright :)

    5. Re:Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      David Bowie kicks ass. How can someone be so damn cool?

      David Bowie's insight is inspiring. I hope I get to see him perform some day...

    6. Re:Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He feels that copyright will be obsolete in 10 years, and he thinks its a good idea.

      Yes, now that he's already rich.

  8. Bon Jovi??? by tsmit · · Score: 3, Funny


    Never heard of him.

    --
    Yes, my girlfriend is a BitchX
    1. Re:Bon Jovi??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sang at the last Olympics opening ceremony.

    2. Re:Bon Jovi??? by unicron · · Score: 2

      He's the guy in the sample at the end of the live version of Orbital's Halcyon where they loop his "Shot to the Heart" with Balinda Carlisle's "Heaven is a place on Earth"..

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    3. Re:Bon Jovi??? by Deagol · · Score: 2

      He was the plumber in the last season of Ally McBeal, wasn't he? :)

    4. Re:Bon Jovi??? by EverDense · · Score: 1

      He was the plumber in the last season of Ally McBeal, wasn't he? :)

      You watch Ally McBeal?

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    5. Re:Bon Jovi??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Him??? Crikey, always thought they were a girl band.

    6. Re:Bon Jovi??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >He was the plumber in the last season of Ally McBeal, wasn't he? :)

      Yes. He also had a cameo appearance in an episode of "Sex and the City", as one of Carrie's short lived affairs.

    7. Re:Bon Jovi??? by NNKK · · Score: 1

      THEM. Never heard of THEM... Jon has been trying to gently drill this into the heads of the media for 20 years. Jon Bon Jovi is distinct from Bon Jovi.

      The band was called Bon Jovi to capitalize on the publicity John Bongiovi got when Runaway hit the airwaves in 83. The spelling was modified at the record company's "suggestion" to reduce its ethnicity.

      Bon Jovi is a band. By 'coincidence', as it were, their frontman's stage name is Jon Bon Jovi.

  9. Unreleased Music?!? by carambola5 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    such exclusives as prioritized concert ticket purchases and unreleased music.

    Um, yeah. Unreleased until it's released to the paying customers, who then pass it off to the non-paying "customers." The prioritized ticket thing, on the other hand, actually makes sense.
    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
    1. Re:Unreleased Music?!? by Locke!Erasmus · · Score: 1

      it's actually a fairly interesting concept of bundling different products together. I agree that the unreleased music thing will probably flop, but the concept of prioritized ticket purchases or maybe even discounted tickets is actually a neat idea. I hope it works out well for Bon Jovi and I hope that other artists will try it out!

      --
      I should have picked out the nickname Demosthenes!Tecumseh.
    2. Re:Unreleased Music?!? by tsmit · · Score: 3, Funny

      Really, what type of music from Bon Jovi is unrealeased? I mean...really.

      I'd be all excited about an unreleased single from Pink Floyd...but, Bon Jovi?


      What, are they going to remix "Living on a Prayer"?

      And now, the previously unreleased version of "Living on a Prayer", with Busta Rhymes singing backup.

      Please.

      --
      Yes, my girlfriend is a BitchX
    3. Re:Unreleased Music?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now, the previously unreleased version of "Learning to Fly," with John Bon Jovi signing backup.

      I love Floyd, just had to add my WAC.

    4. Re:Unreleased Music?!? by Mononoke · · Score: 2, Funny
      with John Bon Jovi signing backup.
      Wow! A version for the deaf?

      I thought the deaf lucky enough just by not having to hear JBJ.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    5. Re:Unreleased Music?!? by jbf · · Score: 2

      ...and you could embed the unique serial number in any downloaded music via the then-in-vogue watermarking scheme. Since it's hard to do this with pressed CDs, this seems like the ideal way to snag leaked serial numbers...

    6. Re:Unreleased Music?!? by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Actualy, this is another incentive. Instead of having to wade through the garbage of files on Kazza et al to find the appropriate version of the song, I'm guarenteed a highquality, accurate file. That's worth it to me.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  10. They stink... by briglass · · Score: 0, Troll

    Post it again when a band I care about does it.

    --

    ----
    "Those who quote others are more likely to one day be quoted" -Tom Planter
    1. Re:They stink... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, i dont think the beatles are gonna be releasing any new albums anytime soon.

    2. Re:They stink... by greenius · · Score: 1

      Maybe the problem is that people don't care about any bands any more... it could be because we're getting older, or it could be that music from new bands is just not very good and music from old bands is just more of the same tired stuff.

      I can't even be bothered to pirate it... let alone pay for it.

      --
      I copied this sig from someone else (but where did they get it from?)
  11. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by Locke!Erasmus · · Score: 1

    o/~ take my hand and we'll make it i swear ohhhhh-ohhhhh livin' on a prayer ~/o

    --
    I should have picked out the nickname Demosthenes!Tecumseh.
  12. Nice idea but i doubt it'll work by grahamsz · · Score: 2

    Anyone that likes bon jon enough to care about priority concern ticket sales is going to buy his albums anyway.

    It's a step in the right direction, but doesn't seem like a very big one.

    Why not just make the cd cost $5 instead!?

    1. Re:Nice idea but i doubt it'll work by Locke!Erasmus · · Score: 1

      Because there's that whole issue of the Label execs have to take home something like 18 million each from the sale of the CD. Oops, that was sposed to be a secret.

      --
      I should have picked out the nickname Demosthenes!Tecumseh.
    2. Re:Nice idea but i doubt it'll work by Nutrimentia · · Score: 1

      Bon Jovi isn't the headliner in the US that he was in the 80's but his band has been going strong and making a living from their work for the last decade. They have a big following in Japan (my current locale) and perhaps in other countries as well. Remember, just because someone isn't as big as Britney and eminimem doesn't mean that they aren't popular in their own right.

    3. Re:Nice idea but i doubt it'll work by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 0

      Why not just make the cd cost $5 instead!?

      Record companies have a right to charge whatever they feel is necessary to cover their costs and give them a fair profit. Nobody is forcing you to buy $20 CDs. Say you're a software programmer and want to make a living and I say I'll only pay $50 for your program you spent a year working on when the average price of similar programs is $200. Are you going to be silly enough to fall for that?

    4. Re:Nice idea but i doubt it'll work by grahamsz · · Score: 2

      Well at the end of the day I only buy the cd's of bands I really like because of their current price. Things I kinda like I'll usually download or share from a friend (sorry riaa) and maybe i'll grow to like them and buy their next cd.

      However if cds were only $5 then i'd probably buy more than 4 times as many as I do today - That way I'd hear a cool song on the radio and wouldn't think twice about picking up the album.

      It's the same with that one movie studio that was considering releasing dvd's at that price point. They'd do away with blockbuster and probably make just as much money by selling many times more copies.

      As it happens I am a software developer and placing your product price is a tradeoff against how many copies you expect to sell at a given price point.

      If a personal use copy of MS Office were $30 then i'd buy it... but instead I use Staroffice/Openoffice which is maybe only 90% as good but cheap/free.

      Surely there are other people in the same boat. And yes, I do buy good shareware products - 2 in the last 6 months - because they were excellent products at a good price.

  13. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    15 years out of date?

    If you start adding up CD sales for the 80's and 90's together, Bon Jovi is the #1 rock act. Across all genres, they were only beat out by Garth Brooks.

    I could understand 5 years out of date, but the numbers say 15 is a little much.

  14. huh? by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 5, Funny

    What Bon Jovi jokes?

    Triumph the Insult Comic Dog: Bon Jovi you are filming a new vampire movie, yes?
    Bon Jovi: Yes I am...
    Triumph: At last a role that requires you to suck...

    --
    "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
    1. Re:huh? by br0ck · · Score: 1

      Best.. Triumph.. Video.. Ever!!





      For me to poop on!

    2. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For most people, there are not enough hours in the day, but they're not Burt Ward. "People will come around our house and say, 'I can't believe how much living is going on here!'" he says with a laugh. That's because the erstwhile Boy Wonder, from the hit 1960s series "Batman," only sleeps three hours daily, from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. "When you're up twice as much as other people, it's like having two lives." So what does Ward, 56, do with his extra life? He spends his nights working on projects for his visual effects company named, appropriately, Boy Wonder Visual Effects, which he formed in July 2001, after more than a decade of study and frustration at the lack of roles coming his way. There may not be a lot going on for Ward in front of the camera, but Boy Wonder has worked on more than 20 movies to date (including 2001's "Legally Blonde" and the upcoming action-adventure film "Bulletproof Monk," starring Chow Yun-Fat). "This is a transition to becoming a major player in the visual effects world," Ward says proudly. Ward and his wife, Tracy, 40 (whom he met in 1989 when her father, the late corporate raider Victor Posner, sent her to take over Ward's educational video company; they married in 1990), also rescue abandoned Great Danes. In 1994, after moving from Los Angeles to rural Riverside County, the couple and their daughter, Melody, now 11, learned about the number of Great Danes in the area that needed homes. "With a Great Dane, if you take it to a shelter, it's too big for the cages and people are scared of a big dog even though they're sweet, and they're put to death," he explains. The family's 4,000-square-foot home and five acres of land became a refuge for the dogs; Ward estimates they have found homes for more than 3,500 in eight years. Even with his other pursuits, Ward has not given up acting entirely. In November, he will team up with "Batman" costar Adam West in the CBS movie "Back to the Batcave: The True Adventures of Adam West and Burt Ward," in which the former Caped Crusaders will fight crime once more -- but as themselves. "This is a bigger production than anything we did on 'Batman,'" Ward says. Ward has fond memories of his experience filming the "Batman" series, a period that he chronicled in a 1985 tell-all book, "Boy Wonder: My Life in Tights." "We partied together, we got in messes together," he says of his friendship with West. "It was a lot of fun." What wasn't fun was wearing his Robin outfit. "Those were the python pants -- they nearly squeezed me to death. And the cape strangled me," he says. Almost 40 years after debuting on "Batman," Ward, who is now a grandfather -- his daughter Lisa, 35, from his first marriage, has two kids, Kevin, 10, and Katy, 8 -- is content with the way his life has unfolded. "I'm very, very happy. I have a wonderful family, I have the most wonderful people I work with," he says. "I'm the kid in the candy store."
    3. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May zero flea-ridden eskimos obtain a License To Kill Bon Jovis while defecating on your dried up front porch.

      May an english quart of lice infested half-elected officials, half-Teletubbies get high by smoking Bon Jovis encrusted party poppers while polishing your ingrown closet.

      May 666 ill-tempered telemarketers spit on Bon Jovis after having to amputate your lice-infested swimming trunks.

      May an english quart of furry extra-terrestrials insert cheese into Bon Jovis within your space-aged umbrella.

      May a gallon of insane taxi drivers sing the rap song "I like big Bon Jovis" to beer after pledging allegiance to your cross-dressing Prime Number Shitting Bear.

      May a hell of a lot of moist crocodile hunters hide the truth from Bon Jovis while rummaging through your maximum dosage of July issue of Vintage Robot Porn Monthly.

      May a gross of killer construction workers talk smack about Bon Jovis while tinkering with your shorn scrotum.

      May an english quart of ill-tempered garbage men view a B-movie called Attack of the Killer Bon Jovis while worshiping your closet.

      Generator

    4. Re:huh? by Lysol · · Score: 1

      That was one of the funniest Triumph skits i ever saw. We were laughing our asses off in the office - multiple times. I even burned it on cd. Uh, er, nevermind, I didn't burn nuthin..

      The star wars skit is great too. he he..

  15. DMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't dave mathews band do this already with Busted Stuff?

  16. This is old news... by jimmajamma · · Score: 1

    Daft Punk did it with Discovery.

    Who would copy a Bon Jovi album anyway, seems like a waste of time.

    1. Re:This is old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, really. The only people that would even think about listening to him would need a time machine and travel from the 80's just to hear it.

    2. Re:This is old news... by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1
      Who would copy a Bon Jovi album anyway
      ashish_paigwal@fileshare, CoolWatch@KaZaA, DarkHawk35@KaZaA....and the list goes on...lol.
      --
      Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
    3. Re:This is old news... by tssm0n0 · · Score: 1

      Someone wanted to use this idea "one more time"

  17. Coming soon to a warez site near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming soon to a glam rock warez site near you...

    Bon Jovi Serialz and CD Key Creatorz!.

  18. I dunno... by jerdenn · · Score: 1

    This whole thing sounds like Bad Medicine to me...

    -jerdenn

    1. Re:I dunno... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      How convenient! Bad Medicine is what I need! Does it need to be shaken up?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but give him a break -- He's just trying to find Something For The Pain

  19. I gotta say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I think they're living on a prayer.

  20. Back to the 70s by cDarwin · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I remember when I bought Dark Side of the Moon back in the '70s. It came with a really cool poster and a bunch of truly groovy stickers that you couldn't get anywhere else. It added a lot to the value of the album.


    Dark Side of the Moon was a top 40 record for five years running.

    --

    --
    Socrates was asked where he was from. He replied not "Athens," but "The world."

    1. Re:Back to the 70s by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      Dark side of the Moon was on Billboard top 100 for something like 20 years.

      I still get TCH flashbacks from hearing any song off that album. :-)

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Back to the 70s by cDarwin · · Score: 2
      "I still get TCH flashbacks from hearing any song off that album. :-)"


      Wow, you must have inhaled :)

      --

      --
      Socrates was asked where he was from. He replied not "Athens," but "The world."

    3. Re:Back to the 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err, it's THC, not TCH, and you don't get flashbacks from it. LSD, now that gives you flashbacks.

    4. Re:Back to the 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm ... posters are the obvious explanation then.

      Wouldn't have had anything to do with the actual music :)

    5. Re:Back to the 70s by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Wow, you must have inhaled :)

      Inhaled, ingested, absorbed through the skin, suppositories, slow I.V. drip, whatever worked.

      Ever scrape a resin joint off the inside windscreen of your car? %-}

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    6. Re:Back to the 70s by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      LSD, now that gives you flashbacks.

      Yea, LDS, whatever. No fsking sense of ha ha have you, young grasshopper?

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    7. Re:Back to the 70s by anjrober · · Score: 1

      LOL! off the windshield, that's a riot!

    8. Re:Back to the 70s by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      (cheech):How's my drivin man?

      (chong):I think we're parked man.

      Not just a movie, words to live by! Who needs to see through the windscreen?

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    9. Re:Back to the 70s by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the album had great artwork and an insert with more artwork and liner notes. Yes liner notes, something that most bands today know nothing about.
      Lyrics (of course more than 50% of the bands today don't write their own music or lyrics, so they couldn't add lyrics to their insert) and artwork and photos, etc... adorned almost every album from the early Beatles to the last Zeppelin album. Original artwork, reproduced works...

      It would be nice to get more than 12 songs on a shiny disc for $18.99.

      I suspect if bands began adding inserts, posters, registration numbers for concert tickets, anything really, people would be a little more motivated to "PURCHASE" albums, rather than downloading. However, there are still those people who (rightfully in my view) refuse to pay $18.99 for something that isn't worth more than $10. So, Napster-like services will remain extremely popular.

    10. Re:Back to the 70s by dogfart · · Score: 1
      Then there was the Jefferson Airplane album Long John Silver that folded into a stashbox.

      And Cheech and Chong's Big Bambu came with an extra large sized rolling paper. Took 3 "lids" (that's ounces of marijuana) to fill it up

      Those were the days....

      --

      "dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no dope"

    11. Re:Back to the 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or 29.95 for the disc in question. yes I saw it for that... And then remembered it was release YEARS ago and they are milking it. 10-12 bucks maybe I would pay for it, but 30?!

    12. Re:Back to the 70s by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      No way in hell that:

      a) "Dark Side of the Moon" would be published today.

      b) Pink Floyd would be signed by a major label today.

      I'd like an original "Wish You Were Here" with the nifty black cellophane cover.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    13. Re:Back to the 70s by jjv411 · · Score: 1

      The 70s?!?!?? Who was around way back then?

    14. Re:Back to the 70s by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I still get TCH flashbacks from hearing any song off that album. :-)

      TCH...is that anything like LDS?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    15. Re:Back to the 70s by garcia · · Score: 2

      I bought Kottonmouth Kings a few years back '98/99 maybe? It came w/a free t-shirt (You Got that Kottonmouth Feeling?) and a video.

      They weren't top 40 but it wasn't from piracy I am sure ;)

    16. Re:Back to the 70s by ajs · · Score: 2

      Dark Side of the Moon was a masterpiece album (regardless of taste in music, the craftsmanship of everything in that album was astounding). _That_ is the reason that it was on the charts for so long. In 1988, I bought it and listened for the first time, and it blew me away. I don't _like_ all of the music on it, and some of it took years to become relevant to me, but I'm in awe of the work.

      I can say that about _nothing_ today. What artist puts out masterfuly crafted albums of songs that explore the human condition? No, today music labels push music that fits a particular market and is bland enough within that market to keep everyone from thinking too much about who's feeding it to them.

      Just do yourself a favor and stop listening.

      Go back and buy some strange stuff from the 60s or 70s at a used music store. Find a seller on the net who can get you things from the music scenes in other countries (a friend of mine points out that 1960s south-american psych-pop is awesome stuff).

      The world is your musical oyster, grab the horseradish and let it slide! :-)

    17. Re:Back to the 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alice Cooper's School's Out - Early copies had the record inserted in a pair of pink panties and the album jacket folded out into a cardboard school desk.

      Black Oak Arkansas - One album had a (serialized) deed that entitled every purchaser to a square inch of land in Heaven, Arkansas, from a tract that they bought.

      Many bands put albums out on colored vinyl.

      But posters (a la Pink Floyd) were the best prize.

    18. Re:Back to the 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh yes. I myself have acquired falsely groovy Pink Floyd stickers. Imagine the disappointment when you discover these stickers that, in the store, appear to be groovy, but then you get them home and they were falsely groovy the whole time.

    19. Re:Back to the 70s by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      I bought a Meatloaf Greatest Hits collection despite the fact that I had already downloaded the songs for the simple reason that the cover art was amazing.

      I bought an Eagles CD full of live recordings of their songs, even though I could have easily found them elsewhere, because I like to have original copies, and because as I found out afterwards there were some cool notes on the concert.

      I have seen very few new CDs that offer these items. Most just have a cover art and nothing else, no lyrics, nor notes, no additional art, nothing.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    20. Re:Back to the 70s by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Wasn't "Wish You Were Here" all about the music industry and how it was a souless corporation that sucked you dry?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    21. Re:Back to the 70s by cDarwin · · Score: 2

      Dark Side of the Moon was a masterpiece album (regardless of taste in music, the craftsmanship of everything in that album was astounding). _That_ is the reason that it was on the charts for so long.

      This is absolutely true. I have been listening to this album regularly for almost thirty years, and I still can't get enough of it. It's the "Apocalypse Now" of music.

      Still, given the choice of either buying or downloading, I would still choose to buy this album partly because of the artwork that it's bundled with.

      Cheers
      --

      --
      Socrates was asked where he was from. He replied not "Athens," but "The world."

    22. Re:Back to the 70s by NewWazoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm going to go out on a limb here, and ask if you've listened to any Tool lately. :)

      Every single one of Tool's albums (with the sole exception of Opiate - it's more of a "garage" album) is masterfully produced and explores some very deep topics - Jungian "breaking through" and connecting with the Freudian alter-ego in AEnima, and dealing with prison rape in Undertow. Much of what you've said applies directly to Tool's music - regardless of musical taste (it may be a little "heavy metal" for some) it's amazing work, all of it.

      While they're becoming more and more of a commercial success, Tool is still one of the best bands around. And they're coming to Tallahassee Nov. 7! w00t! (Sorry, I degress...) ...and remember, this is coming from someone who almost solely listens to pre-1980 music. :) I live off Zep, Sabbath, Tull, etc (along with the likes of James Taylor, Crosby Stills Nash and Young, and the Beatles). Give AEnima and Undertow a shot - you may be suprised.

      Brandon

    23. Re:Back to the 70s by hobgadling · · Score: 1

      I'd like an original "Wish You Were Here" with the nifty black cellophane cover.

      Although I can't seem to find it there now, there's a great Japanese import of Wish You Were Here that I got from cdnow when they were having and import sale in March. It comes in the black cellophane, with the cd inside a slipcase thats a shrunken version of the original lp case. It even comes with a mini postcard, like the original.

      On your other comments, I agree completely. The state that music is in today is despicable. Unfortunately for those of us who actually love music, the will of the masses tends to win out, and the masses have no idea what good music is, despite the many instances in history where it actually has hit them over the head.

      --Hob

      --
      All good technology should be used to piss off people's parents. --Neil Gaiman
    24. Re:Back to the 70s by east+coast · · Score: 1

      "Dark Side of the Moon was a masterpiece album (regardless of taste in music, the craftsmanship of everything in that album was astounding). _That_ is the reason that it was on the charts for so long. In 1988, I bought it and listened for the first time, and it blew me away. I don't _like_ all of the music on it, and some of it took years to become relevant to me, but I'm in awe of the work. I can say that about _nothing_ today." Open up your ears, jerky, there's still tons of good music out there. DSotM may have been great but music sure as hell didn't end in 1973. It's nearly thirty years later and hundreds of thousands of albums have come out. If you can't find one substantial album in all of that I'd think the problem isn't the music, it's the listener. "Just do yourself a favor and stop listening." Stop looking and you'll never find... "What artist puts out masterfuly crafted albums of songs that explore the human condition? No, today music labels push music"... Ah, I see the problem... If it's not at Tower Records, has no video on MTV/VH1 or doesn't make the local top 40 station it must be crap...

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    25. Re:Back to the 70s by gaudior · · Score: 2
      ... By the Way, Which one's Pink?...

      - Have a Cigar

    26. Re:Back to the 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Every single one of Tool's albums (with the sole exception of Opiate - it's more of a "garage" album) is masterfully produced and explores some very deep topics - Jungian "breaking through" and connecting with the Freudian alter-ego in AEnima, and dealing with prison rape in Undertow.

      Prison rape is deep? Well, maybe physically, but not philosophically...

      BTW, Lateralus sucked.

    27. Re:Back to the 70s by dacarr · · Score: 1
      Logical moderation: +1 insightful!

      I still remember a number of records came with similar perks: Styx' Grand Illusion also had a poster, Floyd's recent re-release of Ummagumma contained a poster of the original album cover, and Emerson Lake and Palmer even had an oddly-cut record sleeve for Brain Salad Surgery designed around the Giger art they used for the album cover.

      Bon Jovi seems to have the right idea, throw a few perks into the album and see what happens.

      It's not a new model, but it works. It's sort of like the free coffeemaker when you sign up for Gevalia Coffee, or hell, even the privilege of just going in around lunch hour and eating off of the sample trays at your local Costco. They even do it with DVD's - you get features you won't even come anywhere near if you use a VHS, that typically add to the flavor. (Consider The Matrix on DVD versus VHS.) It's a marketing gimmick that, AFAICT, was pioneered by Ron Popeil as such, and it's just crazy enough to work.

      For a better perspective, go fishing and watch the kinds of bait that draw more fish.

      --
      This sig no verb.
    28. Re:Back to the 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As with everything else in pop music, you've gotta look to the Beatles. Sgt Pepper had a bunch of gimmes included with it. I remember my sister sticking the glasses on her wall.

    29. Re:Back to the 70s by XorNand · · Score: 2



      Yup, yup... Like "The Wall", WYWH was a personally motivated by Roger Waters. The album is about making it to the top and missing the old days with Sid Barrett. Sid was the original guitarist and the intial creative leader before he kinda lost it, mentally. Check out "Saucer Full Of Secrets" to hear some Sid stuff. Then in the mid-80's Waters split with the rest of the members in a nasty battle. Today PF is a mere shadow of what they used to be, in my opinion (listen to the lyrics of the newer stuff -- they're meaningless). They've been making music for over 40 years. Sadly, I think it's time for them to let go.

      :: sigh :: I think the PF story would make an awesome movie, if done right.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    30. Re:Back to the 70s by Rocinante · · Score: 1

      What artist puts out masterfuly crafted albums of songs that explore the human condition?

      Marillion
      Dream Theater
      Belle & Sebastian
      Dark Tranquility
      Wilco
      Opeth

      etc & etc, I'm not going to list any more, but you get the point: you're a fool if you don't think any worthwhile music is being made these days. I'll grant you that there's a difference, which is that Pink Floyd got played on the popular radio, and none of these bands have any chance of that, but that hardly means they don't exist. (And don't get me wrong, the RIAA can have my copies of Dark Side Of The Moon and Close To The Edge when they pry them from my cold, dead hands, but musical evolution didn't screech to a halt in the early 70's.)

      Tell you what: I'll check out some 60's South-American psych-pop if you'll check out some 00's Scandinavian black/death metal.

      --
      Just trying to open someone's head! I mean "mind!" Open someone's mind, um, to the possibilities! With explosives!
    31. Re:Back to the 70s by liquidsin · · Score: 2

      If you're into Tool, check out A Perfect Circle, which is a side project Maynard did with one of the guitar techs from Tool. They opened for Nine Inch Nails on the Fragility tour. They're almost as good live as Tool.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    32. Re:Back to the 70s by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I might have to look around for that CD. Thanks for the heads up.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    33. Re:Back to the 70s by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Beat me to it...if you have never listened to Brave by Marillion - do so now.

    34. Re:Back to the 70s by NorthDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Today's recipe for being a sucessfull group:

      - Include baby baby 10x in each song
      - Take the good ol' I love you and I want you back theme, stir a bit, remix...
      - Color your hair, put a lot of gel in there and shake well.
      - Travel almost undress, thus revealing your new 100% remolded boobs (or totally fake skin tan)
      - Move your back a lot
      - Find a kewl nick-name
      obligatory... - ??? - succeedddd!!!! /obligatory


      Now, why are people not buying albums anymore?!?

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    35. Re:Back to the 70s by btlzu2 · · Score: 1

      A mantra to repeat:
      Radiohead, OK Computer.
      Radiohead, Kid A.
      Radiohead, OK Computer.
      Radiohead, Kid A.
      Radiohead, OK Computer.
      Radiohead, Kid A.

      Both CDs shame DSOTM.

      --
      Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead.
    36. Re:Back to the 70s by Dylan2000 · · Score: 1

      Man, if you're going to tell somebody something about Pink Floyd get it right! :)

      There's only one Syd Barrett song on A Saucerful of Secrets, 'Jugband Blues', David Gilmour had already replaced him when they were making that album. Piper at the Gates of dawn OTOH is almost 100% Syd and an amazing album, recorded at Abbey Road in Studio 1, at the same time that the Beatles were recording Sgt. Pepper's in Studio 2. Syd Barrett was a big infulence on David Bowie and just about every mid-90's indie guitar band. But nobody who's really listened to that second album actually liked it. Corporal Clegg??

      Wish You Were Here was a group album, it really wasn't until The Wall that Roger became the boss of it all.

      The rest is right though :)

      Like you say it was about Syd Barrett being mad and no longer there and it was also about the music industry 'machine', making some unique and talented kid rich and famous, and turning them into a 'product', (think Britney spears but talented) just like all the others. For a big profit. duh.

      The line 'By the way, which one's Pink?' is something the record company exec asks them after telling them how much he loves them and how he's such a fan, then it turns out he thinks Pink Floyd is the singer's name or something. Evil record company drone! These are brilliantly profound and insightful lyrics when you're 16. They seem a bit self-important to me now but yeah its basically about record companies hijacking talented peoples' lives and careers to get rich off them, so be careful and don't just sign any old contract and don't expect the record company to care about you in any way other that whether you're profitable or not. This was just after they made one of the biggest albums in history so they must have heard a hell of a lot of offers from greedy people. Lucky they were rich already :)

      --
      Build your own website - full service homepage system your m
    37. Re:Back to the 70s by nolife · · Score: 1

      Floyd's recent re-release of Ummagumma contained a poster of the original album cover

      Just a poster? I still have the double album in my attic that I bought in the 1980 time frame. Too bad I don't have a record player! I've rebought almost every PF release I had on vinyl because I can handle mp3 for general listening but not for kicking back at the home stero and enjoying the music. A lot of my older early-mid 80's punk and metal favorites like Agnostic Front, Mercyful Fate, Slayer etc.. had shitty quality anyway so a non-compressed cd would not help. I've rebought some but others I never will. IMHO I own the albums so I do not see a problem with finding the mp3.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    38. Re:Back to the 70s by jred · · Score: 2

      All the kool kids. Not like the brats of today.

      Tthhhbbtt! :)

      Actually, "Whip It" was the first non-country song I ever heard, whenever that was put out.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    39. Re:Back to the 70s by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1

      I wouldnt say they shame it. Rather, i would say they are a contemporary equivalent. Radiohead, in my opinion, is as experimental and talented as PF, but in a more modern way.

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    40. Re:Back to the 70s by TotallyUseless · · Score: 2

      Quaker Oats actually started this type of marketing, believe it or not. They would give away things such as pots/pans and other merchandise with proofs of purchase, were the first to put coupons in newspapers, and offer things like money back guarantees. They basically kicked off consumerism as we know it.

      It's amazing what you can learn watching Connections.

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    41. Re:Back to the 70s by Animixer · · Score: 1

      I just picked up a copy of DSotM on vinyl at a used records store in Lowell, MA. It was $15, but the album appeared totally mint, and it still has the posters and stickers inside (unstuck, unpush-pinned). Even the cover is in excellent shape, but I've got some sort of nick half-way through 'any colour you like'. Pisses me off...I can't see anything there, but my player apparently does. :)

      Of course, I've got several masters on CD, Mobile Fidelity being the best, but those are almost all scratched beyond repair because they were played so much in my car player. Looks like I'll be buying a 4th.

      I really wish that once I 'purchased' a specific recording, I could get replacement media at a nominal fee.

      --
      man tunefs | grep fish
    42. Re:Back to the 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You do know what "Tool" refers to, don't you?

      Yeah, that's real deep, man. I think I saw that scrawled on the toilet stalls in middle school.

    43. Re:Back to the 70s by superyooser · · Score: 1
      What artist puts out masterfuly crafted albums of songs that explore the human condition?

      Lots of them. You're just looking in the wrong places.

      Check out the Grassroots Music label. They have good stuff.

    44. Re:Back to the 70s by Rocinante · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Get Afraid Of Sunlight while you're at it. Seriously, everbody: get these albums RIGHT NOW. The fact that you've never heard them negates anything worthwhile or valuable you've ever done, and reduces your entire existance to an vapid, pointless semblance of life. No exaggeration; they're really that good.

      Anyway, before some anorak corrects me: I do realize that Marillion got played on the radio in Europe back in the 80's. It's just a crock that they can't get played these days; Map Of The World and Between You And Me would make such fantastic radio fodder. It's a shame that the suits at Clear Channel have forgotten that it's possible for a song to be accessible and fun, but also musically interesting. I guess it probably has to do with the fact that not many 13-year-old girls would find Steve Rothery cute.

      --
      Just trying to open someone's head! I mean "mind!" Open someone's mind, um, to the possibilities! With explosives!
    45. Re:Back to the 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Many bands put albums out on colored vinyl.

      I have some colored vynil. The Influents album "Check Please" is red. Green Day's single of "Waiting" was released on pink vynil and also Green Day's single of "Warning" was released on orange/translucent vynil.

    46. Re:Back to the 70s by kinga · · Score: 1

      Fine, I'll list a few more for you:

      Katatonia
      Nevermore

      and, slightly more in keeping with the prog theme,

      Spock's Beard
      Transatlantic

      Good taste, BTW, but I'm still not sure about that 60s South American psych-pop :)

    47. Re:Back to the 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      now that gives you flashbacks.

      That is anti-drug propaganda bullshit. Any intense psychological experience can cause later flashbacks, e.g. an accident or involvement in war. LSD is a pretty big psychological experience, but to all extents and purposes it's harmless. "Flashbacks" is a buzzword that I think a lot of folk don't understand. For LSD, they are pretty damn rare (i.e. practically nonexistent), unless you take it everyday for several years. If you take any drug to excess, what do you expect?

      Next you'll be talking about the kid who thought he could fly and jumped of a bridge. Look at all the idiots that die while drunk. Most pedestrians injured by traffic were intoxicated at the time. But hey, an organisation funded by Budweiser wouldn't lie about the "evils" of drugs, would they...?

    48. Re:Back to the 70s by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I wonder if the p2p networks could get slashdotted? That would only be good for them, more users, more shares...

    49. Re:Back to the 70s by verch · · Score: 1

      Eh. I'll give you Welcome To The Machine, but I think as a whole its more about missing Syd and the good old days. Before the record company got in the way was a a factor I'm sure, but I think Syd was the main thing. The video screens at every Roger show for the past few years have featured images of Syd while shine on is played.

    50. Re:Back to the 70s by ajs · · Score: 2

      Tell you what: I'll check out some 60's South-American psych-pop if you'll check out some 00's Scandinavian black/death metal.

      Deal.

      Yeah, I know there's a lot of good "underground" music. That same friend of mine I mentioned has a band of his own that I think is very creative (woefully psych just isn't my thing). The problem is that there used to be a decently rewarding career path for the most creative and talented of those underground bands. Today, that career path is locked out by the fact that broadcast music and retail sales are 99+% locked out by large labels and companies like Clearstation.

      I guess I was a little too abstract in my post, but I don't think you and I really disagree on this point.

    51. Re:Back to the 70s by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Getting way off topic here, but I know the first time my wife saw a picture of H, she was all gaga.

      Then again, they do have a lot of fun and lack that angst that you seem to need today to make it.

      Probably what I miss the most about 80s music, and at least like about Britney Spears - they seem to be having fun doing it.

      Anyway - definatly get Afraid of Sunlight as well. If you heard Marillion in the 80's (not that it's bad) and din't like their sound, these two albums are a departure from the old "punchy synth" sound. One of the tracks on Afraid is even just in mono...real cool.

    52. Re:Back to the 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, did I wander into the audiophile wanking chat?

      Jeez, seriously, I'm all for great sound, but this whole
      collecting vinyl and then nick-picking about the minutia
      is a quick way make yourself really old.

      Sounds like you could save a lot of money by getting
      a CD burner instead of so many copies of the same CD
      (or do you think that only the 'original' CD has the true
      fidelity?)

  21. Like one of their lyrics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just "living on a prayer".

  22. Aside by tunabomber · · Score: 5, Funny

    But...I already feel like NOT pirating Bon Jovi music.

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    1. Re:Aside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already feel like NOT pirating Bon Jovi music

      Yup. My first reaction when I heard this was "I think Bon Jovi's best method of stopping piracy was being Bon Jovi."

  23. Bon Jovi Tries New Approach To Fight Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a startling announcement today, Bon Jovi has announed a new method to try to fight copyright infringement.

    "Well, we saw the the best music was what was being coppied the most," Bon Jovi said in a press conference today, "So we decided that if we make our next CD complete crap, nobody will want to illegially copy it."

    "But won't you loose money when people realize your CD is horrible?"

    "No. We'll just say it's the fault of Kazaa and sue them for millions. We can't loose!"

    1. Re:Bon Jovi Tries New Approach To Fight Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, you had me until the familiar slashdot typo: "We can't loose!" It's LOSE people. One 'o'.

    2. Re:Bon Jovi Tries New Approach To Fight Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and that post brought to you by the letter L for LOOOOOOOOOOSEEEEEEEEEEER!

    3. Re:Bon Jovi Tries New Approach To Fight Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We can't loose" is just the kind of think Bon Jovi would say

  24. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are such a fuckin loser. Kill yourself.

  25. How does this fight piracy? by geekee · · Score: 1

    How does putting an easy-to-find serial number that a consumer can optionally use to register a purchase fight piracy? Answer, not a damn thing. It doesn't change the fact that you can still rip and distribute the musci anonymously p2p.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
    1. Re:How does this fight piracy? by fanatic · · Score: 2

      I think the theory is that it adds something of value, that can't be ripped and distributed, to the CD.

      --
      "that's not encryption - it's a new perl script that I'm working on..." - from some Matrix parody
  26. Holograms next... by philipsblows · · Score: 2

    I wonder if we will start seeing something like the hologram certificates that came with windows install CDs, or maybe even the new holographic CDs themselves.

    Eventually, one could just buy a site license for a particular artist's music, and receive upgrades for a nominal charge. Of course, if you buy a new CD player (or equivalent), you'll have to re-register.

    All kidding aside, this sounds like an interesting idea (whether BJ is first with or not) and I hope similar creative ideas become popular over the more draconian RIAA plans we've been hearing about.

    1. Re:Holograms next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you really should be careful of how you use the the letters "BJ".

    2. Re:Holograms next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those nice stiff certificates make good roach, you telling me we were supposed to keep em?

      Perhaps you can tell us why we need to keep these 'certificates' in a safe place, it doesn't worry me any that pirates made microsoft and windows what it is today.

      Tax on the few for the benefit of the majority, or is Ms's game something else, only time can tell.

    3. Re:Holograms next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree about the site license thing. I've been patiently waiting for years now for Garbage to release 2.0.1.

      "This release patches a problem with a snare sample on 'Sleep Together'. Please apply the following diff to your mp3's: [snip]"

      It would be the coolest thing ever if bands brought out 'patch' cd's designed to replace given tracks on a release album that for some reason they feel differently about now. Would bring the sort of continuity we see in software to music...

      B.

  27. Been done by TheFnCrow · · Score: 1

    Daft Punk did this last year. Daft Punk - Discovery came with this credit card looking thing with a 16 digit number on it. That number you could use to download exclusive remixes and such.

    Sasha's artist album, Airdrawndagger, has a similar thing, where you can use the number to get live sets and so forth.

    This is by no means a new concept.

    1. Re:Been done by CmdrPinkTaco · · Score: 1

      while not a new concept, it is nice to see such "main stream" (ok, maybe has been main stream) acts looking into a new approach. When I bought the Airdrawndagger CD, I knew that the man-like was on to something. Carlie May's Chill Out Album is at least using new marketing approaches to keep the fans off of soul seek and in the record stores.

      --
      Please give your mod points to others, Im at the cap. They will appreciate it more
    2. Re:Been done by Sinistar2k · · Score: 2

      Crystal Method also did this for their Tweekend release.

  28. All Bon Jovi jokes aside... by Snarfvs+Maximvs · · Score: 1

    What??!! I never agreed to that!

    How about limited-edition official Jon Bon Jovi Hair Clippings included in every CD?

    --
    -----------------------

    To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.

  29. Not sure if this will work. . . by greylouser · · Score: 1
    It seems to me like this isn't necessarily an effective tool to fight unauthorized copying. If they're giving away free songs on the web to those who bought the CD, then those songs will soon be made available via less-than-legitimate channels. And would you buy an $18 lottery ticket for a $50 concert? Or spend that money for "messages from the band"?

    I respect what Bon Jovi is trying to do here - it really is a refreshing change from accusations of "piracy!", but I'm just not sure how effective it'll be.

  30. been there, done that... by hummer357 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    this stuff has been done by the French before!

    you got a registration card/number if you bought Daft Punk's album Discovery, with which you could sign in on their site, and download a lot of goodies, etc..

    bad news, jon-boy, they were first... in 1997!

    five years too late to be a first...

  31. If only... by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    This is exactly the stance I've been hoping the whole music industry takes. I'd love to buy a CD and show my support... except they need a new option when you register:

    I bought this CD for-

    [ ] the music
    [ ] the principle

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:If only... by Xerithane · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bought this CD for-

      [ ] the music
      [ ] the principle


      Just remember, even if you do buy the Bon Jovi CD on principle, your friends will still lose respect for you.

      "I bought it for the principle!" just doesn't sound right.

      In other news, Kenny G announced his new piracy-defeating measures by releasing another CD. His plans entail marketing only to the over-80 market, who still call computers televisions. In a recent interview, he seemed very excited to demonstrate that piracy only affects good musicians. When asked about Bon Jovi, Kenny G said they were planning a duet in which would be titled, "Kenny G and Bon Jovi: A tribute to the corpses who used to listen to us" and marketed under the pretense of expected zero piracy.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  32. -1 OT Bon Jovi Joke (It had to be done) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Four Catholic mothers were having coffee together discussing how important their children are.
    The first one tells her friends, "My son is a priest. When he walks into room, everyone calls him 'Father.'"

    The second Catholic woman chirps, "Well, my son is a bishop. Whenever he walks into a room, people say 'Your Grace'."

    The third Catholic woman says smugly, "Well, not to put you down, but MY son is a Cardinal. Whenever he walks into a room, people say, 'Your Eminence'."

    The fourth Catholic woman sips her coffee in silence. The first three women give her this subtle Well . . . ?

    Mrs. B. replies, "My son is Jon Bon Jovi. Whenever he walks into a room, people say, "Oh my God. . ."

    1. Re:-1 OT Bon Jovi Joke (It had to be done) by gurnb · · Score: 1

      HA!
      That's Funny. I was actually more entertained by this post than by any actual Bon Jovi CD.

      It's to bad the post didn't have a unique ID that I could use to d/l some cool 'UNRELEASED' jokes about other 80's Hair Bands!

      --
      "This must be a Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays."
  33. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Daft Punk put a credit card sized card inside their CD with a unique number were you could download MP3 singles of remixes and live versions of the song from a special website.

  34. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn man, Blaze of Glory was an awesome song!

    I'm going to go download it of Kazaa right now!

  35. Bon Jovi is Great, that's why I'll buy. by rowanxmas · · Score: 1

    Bon Jovi, like many other bands out there (mainly small bands like Death Cab for Cutie, Built to Spill, bigger bands like ACDC, and DMB ) put out really great music (if you disagree, come to my house at new years and see 100+ people in togas singing "It's my life" ). I Buy their CDs because I like the bands, I pirate other bands becasue I don't like them as much. But I also like free stuff, so this is a win-win situation for me.

    1. Re:Bon Jovi is Great, that's why I'll buy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "come to my house at new years and see 100+ people in togas singing "It's my life""

      No, thanks, but I'll stay right here.
      Sounds like a fate worse than death.

    2. Re:Bon Jovi is Great, that's why I'll buy. by freeefalln · · Score: 1

      This cant be true?! Someone else on Slashdot that knows of Death Cab For Cutie and Built to Spill! Man , I thought i was the only one. I was totally expecting the, "all indie bands suck" comment from someone else in response to your post. rock on man, listen to what you like. By reading your post, you have better taste than 95% of America.

    3. Re:Bon Jovi is Great, that's why I'll buy. by rowanxmas · · Score: 1

      That's what living in Seattle and listening to KEXP everyday will get you.

  36. I hope he doesn't get by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

    shot down in a blaze of glory.

    Sorry folks. I'll be here all week.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
    1. Re:I hope he doesn't get by Rikardon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm... this needs a '-1 Groaner' moderation option. Too bad. =)

  37. Daft Punk by clinko · · Score: 2

    Daft punk's discovery cd did this a long while back by including a credit card w/a serial # on it. If you bought the cd you could go to their website, login, and download live videos etc.

    Really kool stuff...

    I think it said "Daft Club" on it.

  38. bon jovi jokes? by trelanexiph · · Score: 1

    Really... he isn't that bad. consider the crap the industry tries to pawn off as music. The boy bands and britney spear(me)s comes to mind immediately, don't bash semi-decent bands when there are so many horrible ones to beat on.

  39. Whatever Happened to Burt Ward? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For most people, there are not enough hours in the day, but they're not Burt Ward. "People will come around our house and say, 'I can't believe how much living is going on here!'" he says with a laugh.
    That's because the erstwhile Boy Wonder, from the hit 1960s series "Batman," only sleeps three hours daily, from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. "When you're up twice as much as other people, it's like having two lives."
    So what does Ward, 56, do with his extra life? He spends his nights working on projects for his visual effects company named, appropriately, Boy Wonder Visual Effects, which he formed in July 2001, after more than a decade of study and frustration at the lack of roles coming his way.
    There may not be a lot going on for Ward in front of the camera, but Boy Wonder has worked on more than 20 movies to date (including 2001's "Legally Blonde" and the upcoming action-adventure film "Bulletproof Monk," starring Chow Yun-Fat). "This is a transition to becoming a major player in the visual effects world," Ward says proudly.
    Ward and his wife, Tracy, 40 (whom he met in 1989 when her father, the late corporate raider Victor Posner, sent her to take over Ward's educational video company; they married in 1990), also rescue abandoned Great Danes. In 1994, after moving from Los Angeles to rural Riverside County, the couple and their daughter, Melody, now 11, learned about the number of Great Danes in the area that needed homes. "With a Great Dane, if you take it to a shelter, it's too big for the cages and people are scared of a big dog even though they're sweet, and they're put to death," he explains. The family's 4,000-square-foot home and five acres of land became a refuge for the dogs; Ward estimates they have found homes for more than 3,500 in eight years.
    Even with his other pursuits, Ward has not given up acting entirely. In November, he will team up with "Batman" costar Adam West in the CBS movie "Back to the Batcave: The True Adventures of Adam West and Burt Ward," in which the former Caped Crusaders will fight crime once more -- but as themselves. "This is a bigger production than anything we did on 'Batman,'" Ward says.
    Ward has fond memories of his experience filming the "Batman" series, a period that he chronicled in a 1985 tell-all book, "Boy Wonder: My Life in Tights." "We partied together, we got in messes together," he says of his friendship with West. "It was a lot of fun." What wasn't fun was wearing his Robin outfit. "Those were the python pants -- they nearly squeezed me to death. And the cape strangled me," he says.
    Almost 40 years after debuting on "Batman," Ward, who is now a grandfather -- his daughter Lisa, 35, from his first marriage, has two kids, Kevin, 10, and Katy, 8 -- is content with the way his life has unfolded. "I'm very, very happy. I have a wonderful family, I have the most wonderful people I work with," he says. "I'm the kid in the candy store."

  40. Resale by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    what happens to the peopel, who resale the disks later? can the remove there registration?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Resale by jhernand · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by, "what happens to [them]?" Nothing. What should happen? Only the original purchaser gets the extras, obviously.

    2. Re:Resale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they peopel cn chek four typos

    3. Re:Resale by geekoid · · Score: 2

      soory. bt sumtymes I gut cared aweigh an tipe to faust.

      stoopod spelling Nazi.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Resale by geekoid · · Score: 2

      does the original register continue to get benefits after they sell the CD? or take the CD back to the original store?

      I just see some potential abuse, is all.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Resale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If he's a "spelling nazi," you're an illiteracy nazi. Get bent, imbecile.

    6. Re:Resale by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      There's always abuse, no matter what. Lot's of gammers bought Zone of the Enders just for the Metal Gear Solid Demo, and when MGS came out, back to the store ZOE went.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    7. Re:Resale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "what happens to the peopel, who resale the disks later? can the remove there registration?"
      See people, this is what happens when you post while drunk.
    8. Re:Resale by lewiscr · · Score: 1
      I only post while drunk. Its almost noon here, I'd better get started.

      :-)

  41. CD package prizes by RichMan · · Score: 1

    AKA Macdonalds monopoly game style collect and win or instant prizes. Backstage passes. Front row seats. Prizes distributed by artist or by company.

    Winners of passes are free publicity for the tour and CD buying:
    "Bobby Joe from Timbucktoo is going backstage with Megadeath at the concert in Ourtown. The backstage pass was won from a purchase of a CD at Spinners."

    1. Re:CD package prizes by leviramsey · · Score: 1
      "Bobby Joe from Timbucktoo is going backstage with Megadeath at the concert in Ourtown. The backstage pass was won from a purchase of a CD at Spinners."

      Uh, somehow I doubt Bobby Joe will be getting Megadeth backstage passes, as Megadeth is no more, thanks to Dave Mustaine's little "injury". We'll see three new Metallica studio albums before Megadeth plays another show.

      That said, have you heard the snippets of the new Metallica album in the video clips from the studio they've released? I've got a good feeling about the new stuff...

    2. Re:CD package prizes by satterth · · Score: 1

      Megadeth

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
  42. Slippery When Wet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

    ...for the record, and all.

  43. so what? by zoftie · · Score: 2

    Any medium to small time artists and few unfortunate to have negotiation with large reputation, don't get jack for CDs.
    Pirating CDs is good for the band, because you get to like the music and go to their concerts
    when and if they visit your stomping grounds.
    You go to concert, buy a shirt or two, and band
    gets rich from you liking the music that way.
    If you buy CDs, unless they are by Michael Jackson and alike, the rich part goes to RIAA
    friends, and jack squat to artists.

  44. Not exactly a novel approach.... by DavesError · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Daft Punk had something similar with their Discovery album. You got a card in the case with a number, and using that number you could register and receive access to songs and remixes and things that you couldn't really find anywhere else.

    It wasn't exactly advanced tickets, but it was something that you could only get with the purchase of the cd. And I wish more artist and record labels would move in this direction instead of worrying about something that is in reality helping their sales.

  45. Raise your Hands! by Dave_B93 · · Score: 1
    They should really just figure out a way to make every song illegally recorded off the CD be Bon Jovi's "Raise your Hands!"

    I was stuck in a car listening to only that this weekend, and I never want to hear the song again.

    Of course that might defeat the purpose of the protection. Turning people off Bon Jovi instead of making them buy the CD. :)

  46. No thanks! by mrklin · · Score: 1

    Most of us are concerned about our privacy. Yet, this allows the record company to know via this unique serial number that 1) we bought the CD, 2) how much we may have paid for it, 3) the geographical location/store which we bought it from, and 4) whatever demographical data we chose to provide. The record company should be applauded for coming up with this marketing idea but I do not think this is a win for consumer, IMHO.

  47. Free Stuff by FatHogByTheAss · · Score: 2

    ...for not stealing my music!

    Imagin that.

    --

    --
    You sure got a purty mouth...

    1. Re:Free Stuff by Iron+Clad+Burrito · · Score: 1

      'til those "benefits" get distro'd all over the net, anyway.

      I'm interested in seeing how it turns out, with the feeling it won't last too long. The RIAA thinks it has struck gold with the copy-protected CDs and, if it gets passed, the ability to DOS with impunity.

      Caring about those who "do it right" (in their estimation, people who buy CDs and don't use P2P) is secondary to them, right behind the little green pieces of paper. Why reward those who are simply doing what the law requires them to do?

  48. winning the war on music piracy... by rob-fu · · Score: 1

    'Oh, we're halfway there...'

    *ducks*

    In all seriousness, are there a lot of Bon Jovi fans under 30? I remember when Bon Jovi came out, and I was a kid, and I thought they were dumb. I also thought they were gay because that was funny at that point in time. Life was so easy back then.

    1. Re:winning the war on music piracy... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      25. Fan. And I just started listening to his stuff about a year ago.

      Ah, yes. The good old days when everything was gay, except Vanilla Ice. Someone remind me why I liked him?

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    2. Re:winning the war on music piracy... by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, are there a lot of Bon Jovi fans under 30?

      I would certainly think so. I'm under 30, and Bon Jovi (and old style metal / hard rock in general ) were still "cool" or "in" or "hip" or what-the-fuck-ever, through my senior year in H.S. Freshmen that year would have been 13/14 depending on when their birthday's fell... that was 11 years ago, and that style of music went out of vogue shortly after I graduated... so, I figure there are plenty of Bon Jovi fans from about 24/25 and up...

      Bon Jovi's last album seemed to do pretty well, even getting some video time on MTV, and since MTV caters to the younger crowd, apparently there are quite a few fairly young Bon Jovi fans.

      Life was so easy back then.

      Wasn't it, though?

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    3. Re:winning the war on music piracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "are there a lot of Bon Jovi fans under 30?"

      yes, they all are.

      oh, age? i'm sorry, i thought you meant IQ.

    4. Re:winning the war on music piracy... by 0bilix · · Score: 1

      27.
      Bon Jovi fan.
      Went to their concert at the old Wembley Stadium in London a couple of years back. I don't really mind whether you think that they are crap/too old/not 'trendy' enough ... they sure as hell know how to put on a great live show.
      And hey, at least they write and perform their own music. That puts them several steps about most of so-called 'musicians' dominating the charts today IMO.

    5. Re:winning the war on music piracy... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes. The good old days when everything was gay, except Vanilla Ice. Someone remind me why I liked him? Because you are a homosexual wigger wannabe?

    6. Re:winning the war on music piracy... by NNKK · · Score: 1

      16 year old serious fan of Bon Jovi here. Flipped past VH-1 right before Crush was released in 2000 and landed on the It's My Life video. I about had a heart attack, somebody was playing actual rock. And it had made it onto the current music video stations.

      I fall into the slightly unusual catagory, though. I'm a 16 year old male from the U.S.. There's a larger selection of younger fans outside the U.S..

    7. Re:winning the war on music piracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, high school freshmen are 13/14 every year.

    8. Re:winning the war on music piracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sahahahahahaha!!!##!

      Oh my god ahahahahahahahaha!!!!
      my sides are bursting in pain from laughing so hard at your very novel humour! Why oh why has no one ever thought of that before? That was hilarious!

      You sir are a comical genius

    9. Re:winning the war on music piracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you forgot to post anonymously before performing slander in public.

      Your a jackass.

  49. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people rather like good music, versus just what happens to be popular. Bon Jovi can actually play their instruments, versus bang them on the ground like most metal bands (70's era guitar smashing jokes aside), and they certainly produce better music than Brittany "When It Comes to Music I Have Great Boobs" Speares and her wanna-be's.

  50. Value-Added by DaytonCIM · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's refreshing to hear of a "retail-minded" band that is adding value to their CD in order to combat piracy. I like the idea of "perks" for those people who purchase the CD.

    Hopefully, this will do well and maybe the industry will begin looking at alternative ideas, those that benefit the customer, rather than punishing, to combat piracy.

    Then again pigs may fly over my house...

    1. Re:Value-Added by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2

      Offering perks should sell more CDs whether there is piracy or not. In fact, I don't think piracy ever entered their minds, only marketing. Even if I liked Bon Jovi, this would not be enough to make me stop boycotting the recording industry.

      --
      How ya like dat?
  51. This is nothing new... by Rai · · Score: 1

    Sasha did this will the released of his album, Airdrawndagger. Each CD contains a unique code that lets you access exclusive remixes and such from his site.

  52. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by Sirch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Daft Punk put a credit card sized card inside their CD with a unique number were you could download MP3 singles of remixes and live versions of the song from a special website.


    So the people who bought the CD could trade those as well?

  53. Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad Bon Jovi tried this out. Total sales of 0 aren't going to help us know if it worked or not.

  54. I don't get it. by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2

    So they now want you to submit personal information to marketing teams who provide you extra opportunities to spend your money with them?

    Isn't like like registering a piece of software so you can recieve technical support and advanced information on new features and upgrades?

    What on earth does this have to do with piracy?

  55. I've said this before... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    The problem is that the whole retail package of the CD hasn't been maximized as an artform.

    A good record is about more than just the music coming from the speakers- it's about the whole experience- nice packaging and artful liner notes make me a lot more inclined to own the real deal.

    At the moment, the majority of CD's have the same cheap plastic jewel cases and liner notes that serve little more than a label that tells you what you're buying.

    1. Re:I've said this before... by Ashish+Kulkarni · · Score: 1

      exactly. I wouldn't mind shelling out money for the high cost of CDs if they had some really useful content along with it, something like the "intro" or "making of" stuff that appears on DVDs. This can make you more intrested in the music. I listen to a lot of classical music, which does generally carry content like this, and I like to read it while I'm listening to the CD :-)

    2. Re:I've said this before... by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Like the Special Edition Star Wars soundtracks. 2 CDs and they came with a *book* of note by John Williams about the composition of the music. Very interesting to read.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  56. pirate version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too bad I already downloaded the full record ;-)

  57. Don't care for the music but like the guy by Deanasc · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From what I hear Jon Bon Jovi is a nice guy. I remember when you couldn't turn on the TV without seeing him. Then I remember when the hair became a joke. This guy has been to the top and slid down to the bottom. Lately he's been working his way steadily back up. I say good for him.

    Another reason to like him is he married his high school sweetheart and stayed married through the rise and fall and so far for his second trip up the success ladder.

    Anyway this seems like the kind of thing a real musician would do for his fans. Certainly not the lawsuit slinging behavior some other hair metal rockstars have shown their fans.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    1. Re:Don't care for the music but like the guy by pgilman · · Score: 1

      "From what I hear Jon Bon Jovi is a nice guy."

      i used to be a land surveyor. i met mr. bon jovi while doing some work near his (old) home (in rumson, nj); he was an arrogant jerk to me and my coworkers. typical rich guy "i'm-better-than-you-out-of-my-way-peon" attitude.

      bruce springsteen (who also has a home in rumson), on the other hand, was a very nice guy when i did some work on his property.

      i'm not a fan of either, musically, but mr. springsteen demonstrated that it is possible to be rich and famous without being an asshole. mr. bon jovi did not.

      --
      if i'm a grammar nazi, you're an illiteracy nazi.
    2. Re:Don't care for the music but like the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ive got to agree with you there. it made me want to puke to see some fading generic self opinionated rawk band (forgeet the name - met-riaa-licker or something) try and put the banjax on a new paradigm.

      only bands with filler albums have anything to hide from online music distribution. the online sales method means 1 decent track = $1 (or less sometimes), so decent artists get rewarded for a greater proliferation of quality material.

      i think bon jovi is at least taking positive steps to try and sell his cds, not blaming pirates for his averageness (which to be fair imo , he mostly is), and declining sales.

      good luck jon, i hope you flog enough of these new cds to retire (soon maybe ??)

    3. Re:Don't care for the music but like the guy by cluge · · Score: 2

      Never met Bon Jovi, but did meet Bruce Springsteen. Let's just say I'm glad you had a nice experience. He was in a cry baby mood the day I met him in Miami.

      I think the moral of the story is, you can catch anybody on a bad day, and that people change. If Bruce is still the same way or in the same mood that he was when I met him, he would be wearing depends now.

      cluge

      --
      "Science is about ego as much as it is about discovery and truth " - I said it, so sue me.
    4. Re:Don't care for the music but like the guy by chegosaurus · · Score: 2

      Remeber the band Skid Row, who JBJ took under his wing, took on tour, promoted, then stiffed for every penny they earned?

      When they tried to get their money JBJ turned nastier still and threw a heap of litigation at them. I think the Skid Row singer is still forbidden to talk about JBJ in interviews.

    5. Re:Don't care for the music but like the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahhh now I understand!

      is that why Skid Rows second album sucked worse than brittany spears? The emotional turmoil must have stifled the creative ability.

  58. hmmm by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    well, even though I never liked bon jovi, this is an interesting idea.

    although after seeing jon bon jovi's interview on leno a while after he was on ally mcbeal - the guy is an absolute moron. self centered over the hill idiot.

    so its safe to say that this is *not* jon bon jovi's idea - and I would like to give credit to the person who came up with this plan.

    but seeing as how jon bon jovi is (as previously stated) a fool - I wonder what the hidden catches are.

    Hey jon bon jovi - you're not a rock star (as you said way too many times in your leno interview) you're a has been that has been sold a novel idea on the release of your(?) new CD.

    real musicians actually write all their own stuff - which is rare in the industry these days.

  59. Hey! C4n 50m3ne m41L m3 thE K3yG3N? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny

    I need the keygen for Bon Jovi 1.0. Reply "me too" if you n33d it too. Many thanks to the CR3W!

    1. Re:Hey! C4n 50m3ne m41L m3 thE K3yG3N? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "I need the keygen for Bon Jovi 1.0. Reply "me too" if you n33d it too. Many thanks to the CR3W!"

      It wouldn't be that hard to generate a valid #: Start with 0000000000000001, then 0000000000000011, then 0000000000000010, then 0000000000000111, then 0000000000000110, and so on. I bet you crack it within an hour. =)

    2. Re:Hey! C4n 50m3ne m41L m3 thE K3yG3N? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hid the key gen at the bottom of the lake near you. It's really well hidden, but you'll know when you find it....say 'hello' to the crew of the Andrea Gail when you see them...

    3. Re:Hey! C4n 50m3ne m41L m3 thE K3yG3N? by utahjazz · · Score: 2, Funny

      1,3,2,7,6...?

      Ah yes, an oft overlooked cousin of the 'brute force attack', this 'retarded tantrum attack' was orinially invented by monkeys attempting to reproduce Hamlet on a typewriter.

  60. ban jovi by solferino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    why not pass on bon jovi and go for the much cooler 5 piece banjo ensemble ban jovi?

    can't find a website for these guys, but here's a place where you can buy their cd

    no real affiliation to th band in question - just heard them play once at an underground music festival in taiwan (they are american)

    1. Re:ban jovi by Surt · · Score: 2

      Are they poor at math, or did one of their members die or something?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:ban jovi by dafozzee · · Score: 0

      When in Rome, learn to count like a Roman:

      V = 5
      VI = 6

      Thus, ban joVI would be a 6 piece banjo ensemble...Sheesh.. some people!

  61. Great, just great by BurritoWarrior · · Score: 2

    Now I have to cancel my subscription to the RIAA backed online music sites.

    Make up your minds already!

  62. Why the need for a *new* approach? by Jerry+Talton · · Score: 1

    Their previous strategy of releasing crappy music has been working pretty well so far, hasn't it?

  63. Counting Crows are doing the same thing by cpfeifer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you buy the new Counting Crows CD (and you should, because it's quite good) it gives you access to a secret bit of their site with unreleased tracks and whatnot. Makes for an interesting reverse engineering project.

    --
    it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
    1. Re:Counting Crows are doing the same thing by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

      Again, this is "value-added" to the album.

      "Get something by purchasing our album, that you couldn't possibly get by downloading."

      The music industry sees downloading as a "problem," when in fact they should see (treat) it as competition. If the industry stepped up and spent half of the money they spend "combating" Napster sites on adding value to albums (in the form of posters, liner notes, inserts, giveaways, etc...) they might see a distinct change in consumer attitudes toward downloading.

    2. Re:Counting Crows are doing the same thing by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Q: Do you think the RIAA and the government should be going after the Napsters of the world they way they are?
      AD (as in Adam Duritz): Yeah, I do. I'll tell you why....well, I don't know. The fact is, it is illegal, so if you want to go after Napster, you can go after Napster. But there's always going to be another one. It's just too easy to make them. I mean, now there are nine Napsters, or 20 Napsters. What I didn't like about Napster was the way they took on that mob mentality. Because you know you're doing something wrong, right? Let's face it: Everybody loved it, but let's not lie about it. It was wrong. So don't pretend that you're the Great White Hope, or that you're this great rebel, because the only people you're ripping off are the artists you supposedly love.
      And what I really hated about Shawn Fanning and those guys is that they really whipped up a mob mentality toward the artists who spoke out against them, as if they were these rich corporate types. You know, Lars Ulrich was this guy who had the decency and the guts to speak out, and they really jumped on him. I thought, "Man, that is so wrong." I mean, do what you want to do, be a fan, whatever. I'm cool with that. But where do you get off lecturing him when you know you're wrong. It's just too easy to shout somebody down when you have the majority with you. I always feel like that's wrong, no matter whether you're Napster and MTV, or whether you're Joe McCarthy at the Communist trials in the '50s. It's just too easy to shout someone down when everyone's on your side. It's always wrong. It's just never right to be in a mob. Never.
      But, I don't know, the government...See, I really think it's just a world. I mean, we've got countries, and they're not going anywhere. But they're just these things we made up. Really, it's just a world. We've made up these countries, and I'm not sure how much good they've done us. It's just because our nature is to become a mob and gang up on each other, so we make these boundaries to sort of scare ourselves into not doing it. Maybe it's the only way we keep ourselves from slaughtering each other daily. And we still do that, but the great thing about the Web is that it's sort of this untamed thing. It crosses all natural boundaries, it is lawless. It just doesn't belong to anybody. There are no rules, in a world that's so obsessed with rules, there aren't any. I kind of think that's cool. I really do appreciate that part of it. And regardless of what I think about things like Napster, I'd be really hesitant to involve our government, because I'm hard pressed to think of examples in which our government gets involved and does a particularly good job of it. They generally step in there and do it all wrong. Because who are they, really? Where are their interests? They're not with me and you. They just generally aren't. If the government had to choose between me and your and Universal/Vivendi - and I've got nothing against my record company, they've been great to me - but they're going to choose Universal/Vivendi.
      The perfect example was when the record companies got that law passed that music was a work-for-hire a couple of years ago, and they did it effortlessly even though it was clearly unconstitutional and wrong. The fact is that all it takes is a vote of the government, and when you're the biggest company in the world, it's easy. It's not that hard to get it passed. We're an unorganized group of artists, you know? It couldn't be more unorganized. Thank God for people like Sheryl (Crow), Don Henley, and people that organized against it. But we're not the union types. It's not in our nature to be organized, and to be, like, a union. It's not the nature of anyone in this business to do it. As a result, the companies run roughshod over us at times. I'm very lucky, you know? I'm part of a very, very small percentage of people who do what I do who make a living at it. Generally, they've made it almost impossible to make a living doing what we do. Very hard. You get paid almost no money, percentage-wise. So if you're small, you just can't do it.
    3. Re:Counting Crows are doing the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To the users who are posting this material elsewhere, illegally, we might add: The purpose and intention of this secret site is not to promote duplicate sales of the album, it is to make up for the lack of bonus tracks on the US copies of Hard Candy. We feel it is only fair to reward people who bought the US version of the CD, as the international fans were rewarded with bonus tracks. Obviously we are not concerned with the trading of these files in a discreet manner, as we ARE posting mp3's (which you can trade via file sharing applications). What we ARE concerned with is giving these files to people who have the US version of the album FIRST, on a reliable, fast, and FREE host. This is no way limits the spread of this exclusive content, but it gives priority to the fans who bought the US version of the CD.

      If users continue to abuse this privilege by directly linking to these files, posting hacks into the secret site, or duplicating the site elsewhere, the solution will be simple. The secret site will just be shut down. So then, unfortunately, no one will have any of this content via this site OR file sharing applications.

      Please let us know about users who are abusing this service by emailing us at webmaster@countingcrows.com. You will be doing yourself and other fans a favor by keeping this site up and running.

      Many Thanks,
      CountingCrows.com

    4. Re:Counting Crows are doing the same thing by cpfeifer · · Score: 2

      Yeah, saw this on the site. So why didn't the extra tracks make the US version, when they did make the international version?

      --
      it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
    5. Re:Counting Crows are doing the same thing by kubrick · · Score: 1

      This post is released under the GPL. Is yours?

      I'd like to see how you managed that, given that you copied and pasted it from somewhere else, uncredited.

      Somewhat ironic in a discussion about IP...

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    6. Re:Counting Crows are doing the same thing by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      I'd like to see how you managed that, given that you copied and pasted it from somewhere else, uncredited.

      It was credited. Adam Duritz said it, as I mentioned.

      Somewhat ironic in a discussion about IP...

      Really, why you not expect a discussion about IP to have examples of copyright infringement in it?

  64. Not necessarily new by GrimGrinningGhost · · Score: 1

    This isn't the first time a band has done something similar. The Black Crows' album Lions was released with an insert containing a serial number. This number allowed the user to download one or two concerts from their website. Also the latest Dave Matthews band release contained a DVD with some extra content and access to hidden content on their website. I think this a good trend.

  65. Prince sorta kinda does this. by Brigadier · · Score: 2



    you can pay a anual fee for access to teh site that has interview concert tickets, unreleased music. If this concept was implimented like BonJovi has I think it woudl work. The serial number gives you an exclusive access to the site ( it would finally justify the cost of CD's) then fans could get access to exclusive offerengs thus bring the artists and fan closer. Almost makes me wish I thought of it.

    1. Re:Prince sorta kinda does this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you can pay a anual fee for access to teh site that has interview concert tickets, unreleased music.
      Yeah, but then you'd actually have to listen to Prince...
    2. Re:Prince sorta kinda does this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pr1nc3 r00les j00 biznach!
      h3 1s 3l33t haX0r kn0w1ng th3 sc3n3!!!

  66. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by geekster · · Score: 1

    As opposed to just buying a cd for... uhm, the music?

  67. Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Problem: RIAA products overpriced given what you get, people don't want to pay for them.
    Sympton: People pirate the music instead.

    Solution: Add value to the CD that makes people more willing to buy it.

    The RIAA in the past has been trying to cure the symptoms, without attacking the core problem. This is a MAJOR step in the right direction.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by geekee · · Score: 1

      Guess what. The average price someone wants to pay for something, regardless of its value, is zero. Consumers alone do not dictate the price of music. The producers have something to say about it as well. If you this its overpriced, you have the option to not buy it, but you don't have the option to steal it. If it weren't for piracy, the RIAA wouldn't care about protecting their IP. This would mean we could make "fair-use" copies for ourselves without any interference. I'm surpirsed /. members aren't taking a more active stance against priacy if they want to easily make copies of copyrighted material for their own use.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    2. Re:Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      No, cause the RIAA went balistic over cassette tapes too, because those were supposed to destroy the industry, bring it to it's knees and ruin music. The RIAA want's to be the sole provider of music, venues and listening options. I guarentee if the RIAA owned the MP3 codec, they would tag on a licence fee and not care about MP3s anymore.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    3. Re:Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, and here I was thinking that you could lower the price of the CD instead of trying to increase it's value the way you you think you are. US dollars is the only 'value' that matters to me on a purchase.

    4. Re:Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by ericsink · · Score: 1

      No, this is a MINOR step in the right direction.

      --
      Eric Sink
      Software Craftsman
    5. Re:Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by spitzak · · Score: 2
      The price of pirating music is not zero. There is a price of guilt (I'm not joking, though for some people guilt is really cheap). More importantly there is the price of the time it takes to locate and download a usable version.

      Because this price is not zero, your argument is wrong. It is not impossible for the RIAA to sell for less than this price. They can also raise the price in legal ways by going after the people who post the music so it gets harder to find.

    6. Re:Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by richieb · · Score: 2
      Guess what. The average price someone wants to pay for something, regardless of its value, is zero.

      Not true. I'm willing to pay a price that I feel is fair. But I don't want to pay, if I'm being ripped off.

      For example, I buy a lot of old jazz recordings. Why should I pay $15 for a CD of music that's 50 years old, when I know the CD costs 50 cents and that the artists is not getting anything.

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    7. Re:Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by geekee · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying you're not willing to pay more than zero for something. I'm saying that if someone was selling a product for $1 and someone was selling the exact same product for $0, you'd pick the one that was $0. People want to pay the minimum amount for something. Simple economic principle.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    8. Re:Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by geekee · · Score: 1

      If an RIAA member has an exclusive contract with an artist and owns the copyright to that music, it IS, by law, the sole provider of that music. That is between the artist and the label. The consumer doesn't get to say anything about it. Whether or not the RIAA can predict the future accurately is irrelevant. What is relevant is that are people obtaining unlawful copies of RIAA music. The answer is yes. And if the RIAA decides to buy the mp3 patent from the current owner, they also have the right to charge fees for mp3 players and recorders. If you don't like the way they do business, boycott their products.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    9. Re:Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by geekee · · Score: 1

      I didn't say the price for pirating music was zero. I said that consumers don't want to pay anything for a product or service. Of course, producers would like to charge an infinite amount. It is up to the two to agree on a fair price. Anyway, just because piracy cost time and effort, doesn't mean it should be an economic factor in deciding the price of music. By that arguement, you're proving the RIAA case, because whatever effect priacy has on the cost of music is lost revenue for the RIAA. That is why they are spending all the money on the lawyers. The just want a cheap solution to stop piracy. If that mean strong encryption of every cd, that will be the future since it's their product to sell. If you don't like it, start your own record label and make your own policies. That's the American way, anyway.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    10. Re:Curing the problem, not the symptoms. by geekee · · Score: 1

      Your solution for the RIAA is like telling Walmart they should discourage shoplifting by handing out coupons for free stuff at McDonalds to people when they purchase products. Sure it may make a small dent in shoplifting, but it doesn't make shoplifting morally right. The added value to the purchasers at Walmart is ultimately paid by them anyway, assuming Walmart's making a profit. Therefore, they're paying extra to discourage shoplifters. Doesn't sound like a very fair solution to me.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
  68. cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to go look for those mp3s on kazaa

  69. Bad Religion by Terminus0 · · Score: 0

    I believe Bad Religion was actually giving anyone who sent in a proof of purchase of their CD a free ticket to their next concert in the area. For them this was really a great idea, considering a large portion of their following is based on their live shows, since the don't get much airplay.

    Concepts like this are the kind of thing that would really make me want to buy a CD. Hell, I barely even like Bad Religion and I wanted to buy their CD jsut because it got me a free ticket to a concert.

  70. Also addresses "Used CD" Threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something not mentioned is that this can address the "Used CD" threat. This may of special interest to a band with a lot of "legacy content".

  71. Been there, done that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Daft Punk did it before with Discovery as did The Crystal Method with Tweekend.
    Both of these are over a year old...why is this just becoming news?

  72. Plastikman by cpeterso · · Score: 2


    and Plastikman's "Sheet One" album came with a (dud) sheet of acid .

  73. Nice 1 sided look at it. Not. Fact is people buy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then there are many more that actually do purchase CDs. I purchase them for the artwork, physical media, and the ability to encode the music at whatever bitrate I need to for each situation.

    I think that in general a majority of people who like a group, buy their media.

    There will always be file trading, but honestly iI doubt it discrourages fans of the bands from purchasing CDs(which is what the groups are targeting anyway).

  74. the Tragically Hip has done this before by blonde+rser · · Score: 2, Redundant

    When you by the Hip album "In Violet Light" you get membership to The Hip Club. Membership includes things like free bonus tracks of unreleased and live material, exclusive merchandise only available to THC members, first in line ticket access to select shows... Sounds like more new ground being broken by Canadians and credit being given to Americans.

    1. Re:the Tragically Hip has done this before by ryan1825 · · Score: 1

      word... i was going to post about this but it's good to see someone else picked up on this as well... the method has truned out well for me, i love the advance tickets

    2. Re:the Tragically Hip has done this before by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      Um. I don't think you could really say the Hip started it either.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  75. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by blazin · · Score: 2

    The point is, if you're not going to buy the CD, you're not going to buy the CD. At least this way, people who actually shelled out the money for the CD don't have to jump through hoops to get it to play on the computer or in the car, or wherever they want, plus, as an added bonus, they get some extras from an artists whose music they enjoy anyway.

    If someone really enjoys Bon Jovi or and they also enjoy but they are short on budget, then it may come down to getting the one with the extras. Or maybe they'll decide that they'd rather get both and forego a few Happy Meals.

    If a CD provides more than just music, then there's more incentive to buy the CD than just Kazaa it.

  76. changing with the times by Wedge1212 · · Score: 1

    its nice to see some artists changing with the times. I was considering downloading this CD...but i just may buy it for two reasons 1. it'll prolly be cheap 2. atleast this band is being some what innovative despite the resistance to change in the record maffia.

    --
    See Sig! See Sig Zig! Zig Sig Zig!!!!!
  77. Dave Matthews Band by dspiral7 · · Score: 1

    I bought there last CD (busted Stuff) because it came with a DVD with a 5.1 video,live performances, and some enhanced stuff. And it was still cheaper that most of the other new releases sitting beside it. I am all for extra's!

    --
    Whats your Favorite song or artist? YourFavMusi
  78. This could only work for bigger acts? Ask /. ! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    I don't see how this would work for a smaller band, since smaller shows aren't usually sold out, they (usually) don't have a relationship with the ticket seller, and unreleased music would be spread as soon as one file trader gets it.

    Pehaps this could be submitted as an 'ask slashdot' (and promptly rejected), but what could a smaller band do to promote CD's in the face of file sharing? An old band I was in made little refrigerator magnets (by hand with markers!) for anyone who came to a show. What is something that is cheap and scalable, includeable in a cd, yet adds value (assuming the music doesn't suck :) to a CD purchase?

    What you you want to see?

    1. Re:This could only work for bigger acts? Ask /. ! by Hagakure · · Score: 1

      the music i listen to is already one up on the big guys.. cds, tapes and records come in handmade packages, numbered editions, special inserts, etc.. some of these items are true relics and anyone who cares about the band a slight bit more than just "the music" wants to own these pieces of art that happen to contain a record/tape/cd.

      i run a small label doing exactly this sort of thing.. of the three releases coming out at the end of this month, inserts for one were cut, silkscreened and numbered by me, another has hand-sewn silkscreened cloth bags protecting it and stamped inserts and the other was all hand-painted and assembled by me.. yes, it takes time, and yes, the editions are small.. but its worth it to be in touch with your fans and artists..

      if anyone cares, http://noise.sinkhole.net/ is muh website, with mp3 clips.

      --


      If this is Heaven I'm bailin out! I cant tolerate this ol tin-tub, so fulla trash and rats...
  79. must have smoke a shitload.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because its THC not TCH
    stupid hippie

  80. -1 Violating instructions in post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shot through the heart/ And you're to blame/ Darling, you give buying music/ a good name Had to be done, even though it's not even funny. I was just going to explode if I didn't post that.

  81. Building one hell of a mailing list by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 2

    A company could get a bundle for selling the customer list from registrations. You'd have some seriously targeted advertising possibilities.

  82. hah by FallLine · · Score: 2

    I don't know about that. Very funny, yes, but I think the one where he "interviewed" the starwars fans waiting outside the theater is the best.

    1. Re:hah by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      That was hilarious. I've even talked to that guy "Blackwolf the Dragonmaster" once (before he was on TV)

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    2. Re:hah by MadAhab · · Score: 2
      Right on. I nearly pissed myself when he reminded the black Gandalf to finish his filet o fish, and when he told the pregnant star wars fan that on the child's birth, to remind him that's the last time he'd see female genitalia.

      Now that I've buried this in a slightly OT post, I'l say what I really have to say. I talked with Bon Jovi's producer at the height of Napster, and he was all bummed because he depends on royalties for his income. I reminded him that at the dawn of radio it wasn't as if some nirvana of record companies and radio stations magically enriched deserving and popular artists: people put music out there until the law compelled all parties to find a way to compensate copyright holders (not necessarily the "artists") and permit play of music recordings in public. He didn't really seem to buy it. I'll state for the record that I'm pretty much pro-Napster and pro-non-commercial distribution. I'm also radically FOR paying artists: I buy tons of music, as much as I can afford to, so I call bullshit when you say I'm enjoying the smell of a fish I didn't buy. I'm glad to see that people are actually attempting to find creative ways to get their fans money (because fans WANT to pay money; that's the only thing that prevents rampant piracy) and discourage piracy by those who might actually be willing to pay for something, without killing the tremendous promotional value of letting people hear music they aren't sure they want to pay for. Tambourine , fooey.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
  83. arrests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ahh i remember when sheet one came out and i started hearing stories of people getting arrested and their cd's getting sent down to the lab while they waited in jail
    hahah

  84. Bon Jovi by dspiral7 · · Score: 1

    Didn't Bon Jovi and Bruce Springsteen just sue a bar for playing there songs on the jukebox and not paying royalties? I know Bruce Springsteen was involved for sure, but I cant remember who the other artist was.Please correct me if I am wrong, but come on, isnt that a little ridiculous?

    --
    Whats your Favorite song or artist? YourFavMusi
  85. BR by netrat · · Score: 1

    Bad religion did a similiar thing when they released their New America album back in 2000. Everyone who bought a copy got a free ticket to one of their shows. Great idea.

  86. Bon Jovi thinks..... by iggly_iguana · · Score: 1

    that their low sales are due to the pirating of their music?

    Poor guys....

  87. Done before - Canada's TTH by xipho · · Score: 1


    This isn't too novel. The Tragically Hip's latest CD (thehip.com) "In Violet Light" comes with a credit-card like card (only available with purchase). Allows for discounts, prizes etc.

    --

    only infrmatn esentil to understandn mst b tranmitd
  88. photocopying books by retsop-emitemos · · Score: 1

    Much as I dislike the idea of digital rights management, it seems to me that the entertainment industry has a valid concern about music being available without being paid for. My premise: if I buy a book and allow all my friends to make photocopies of the whole book, that is a clear infringement of the rights of the author and/or publisher. It seems to me that anyone who agrees with the above premise would have to agree that my making a copy of a CD/DVD for my friends would be an infringement. Is there a difference between the ethicality of the two situations? (I don't see one). So, either (a) all the people who are in favor of free music availability reject the above premise or (b) I am missing something here. This has always puzzled me in the debate about making digital content available online. Sorry if this particular example has already been discussed to death.

    1. Re:photocopying books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, quite the contrary - IMO this example is rather ignored.

      It seems that the pro-piracy movement wants to say "no, we're not stealing" by comparing MAKING COPIES of songs/software with ILLEGALLY REMOVING cars/property/etc.

      Quite simply, these are not the same thing. Kazaa/Napster/Gnutella/Whatever users, you are right in this claim.

      But they never compare with illegally photoCOPYING books, violating patent rights by COPYING designs, infringing trademarks by COPYING them into your own work, etc.

      Kazaa/Napster/Gnutella/Whatever users, you are violating laws, because you do not respect intellectual property rights of the creators.

      --
      Just because you can, doesn't mean that you are allowed to...

  89. This is Not New by healy · · Score: 1

    The Black Crowes provided a serial in their cd "lions". It game exclusive access to streaming live shows & let you burn one full set from a show.
    The Crystal Method also had a serial in their "tweekend" cd (though it was only in the limited edition) that gave you special access on their website for extra content / media.

    --
    "Jesus saves sinners...and redeems them for valuable coupons"
  90. copycatting the Black Crowes by WickedClean · · Score: 1

    On the last Black Crowes album, Lions, they did the same thing. It came with a unique number encoded on the CD and you could use it go on their site and download 2 full length live concerts. Of course, the quality was low but its the thought that counts. After getting the two, you can listen to them online in streaming audio. It was a nice touch.

    --
    ...All I can say is that my life is pretty strange...
  91. Total BS by Glanz · · Score: 1

    Bon Jovi sucks as far as their capitalistic roots...!
    This is total bullshit, as is all forms of control! Yes I am a freesoft geek!!!!! If it's not free, get it off the net and do us all a favor! There are enough suits trying to tell us what to do, think, spend, in our daily lives. And if you don't like this opinion..... just suk!

    --
    Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
  92. wearing it out by CresentCityRon · · Score: 1

    I had read somewhere (trouser press or NY Rocker) that the reason DSoftM lasted so long on the charts is because people who bought the disc kept wearing it out then running out and getting another!

    If true then it is amazing.

  93. The Tragically Hip by Hydro-X · · Score: 1

    The latest CD from The Tragically Hip (one of Canada's greatest bands and national music icons, though relatively unknown in the US) has the same concept. In every copy of the latest CD, In Violet Light, there's a membership card to The Hip Club (THC...). From what I've read, it gives you access to the 'Members Only' section of their website. On it, there's apparently live and unreleased demo tracks. I don't have the CD however. I haven't been able to drag myself to a music store. Maybe someone who has it can provide more details?

  94. Bon Jovi who? by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    who is Bon Jovi?

    Can't help it I got The BOss cds thats all I need

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
    1. Re:Bon Jovi who? by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Search for the following songs:

      "It's My Life"
      "Livin on a Prayer"
      "You Give Love a Bad Name
      "Captain Crash and the Beauty Queen From Mars"
      "Runaway"
      "Bad Medicine"
      "Wanted Dead or Alive"

      that should get you started

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  95. Remember, this is the RIAA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are the ones who tried to shut down used CD stores, and oppose all fair use, such as making digital copies of music you own for personal use on other devices.

    I will absolutely guarantee you that registration and its benefits are for the original purchaser only.

  96. What about the 2nd hand market ? by Roxus · · Score: 1

    It's a perfectly legal purchase, but you won't be able to get @ the extras, becoz someone else has already used the serial number ?

  97. A little different from fighting piracy IMHO by foqn1bo · · Score: 5, Interesting



    While I'm sure tactics like this are advertised as anti-piracy measures, I'm excited about this as a sales technique. The online community(slashdot especially) has been talking for quite some time about the relative value of copyright when it comes to music recordings. A very common response has been one which suggests that in order to assure sales, a retailer/merchant/distributor/manufacturer needs to give a prospective buyer a good reason to purchase.

    The traditional extension to that idea I've come across here is that in most transactions the consumer is paying for a service rendered. For example, a new car was built by a factory and an ordinary consumer cannot make his own. Same goes for computer parts, TVs, and many types of clothes. The consumer has discovered, through the advent of consumer digital media devices(esp computers), that the act of taking an existing digital audio recording and duplicating it is trivial and practically mundane. The artist(who only has to record the album once) does a lot more work than the record company copying it, particularly within the boundries of the insane amount of elbow grease that goes into writing/recording/touring.

    You may think Bon Jovi is the lamest crap on earth, but in my opinion this strategy not only sounds like an effective solution but a vote of confidence for consumers. For once a recording institution is admitting that it needs to work to keep it's customers loyal instead of the other way around.

    1. Re:A little different from fighting piracy IMHO by merriam · · Score: 1
      I'm excited about this as a sales technique.

      Are you new here, or have you just had a job interview?

      this strategy not only sounds like an effective solution but a vote of confidence for consumers

      Is this a slashdot comment or a press release?

      a recording institution is admitting that it needs to work to keep it's customers loyal instead of the other way around

      Its customers need to work to keep it loyal?

      It needs to keep its customers from admitting that they work?

  98. Bon Jovi is going by geekoid · · Score: 2

    to buy a fleet of spanish Galleons, and combat piracy throughout the Caribean.

    When ask why, his Parrot said "SQUAWK!"

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  99. Now if only... by Hagakure · · Score: 1

    he'd adapt to changing fashion rather than trying to protect an outdated hairstyle!

    back on topic... anybody got a keygen for this thing yet?

    --


    If this is Heaven I'm bailin out! I cant tolerate this ol tin-tub, so fulla trash and rats...
  100. Tough decision by SIGFPE · · Score: 2

    And I think I can resolve it. Maybe I'll buy the album to encourage others to do the same and then immediately sell it so I don't have to actually listen to it.

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  101. It's Direct Marketing just for a "live chat"! by mekkab · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Read the article (I thought of submitting this too!)
    This isn't JUST to combat piracy, but they are collecting more detailed marketing information, such that in the future it will be easier for sales to hit their target without "wasting" money on promo's that don't work; be they airplay at the wrong time, or video exposure on VH1...

    SO let me get thsi straight: I pay money, I sign up online, they get a WHOLE lot of personal data (I wonder if they ask for household income?), and I get a newsletter and maybe the chance to talk to the band and maybe a first crack at buying over-priced concert tickets at an arena where the pre-selected seats are all nose-bleeders?

    SIGN ME UP!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:It's Direct Marketing just for a "live chat"! by Coplan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The reality is that even if it were as bad as you think it is, its more likely to work than the negative combat techniques.

      Enforcement through perks is always better than enforcement through military tactics. Rather, I should say it works more efficiently without as much controversy.

      It may not be perfect, but its a step in the right direction. If nothing else, it does cut down on the backlash. And lord knows, you get the RIAA and anyone else in a screaming match, you might as well be back in third grade. Nothing productive truly comes from backlash, aside from the obvious statement that people are pissed off. We already know that. So steps like this need to be made in order to find the most widely selected solution.

  102. The Hip already did this... by Linegod · · Score: 1

    Same thing that The Tragically Hip did with their last album In Violet Light. Canadians beat you to the punch again....

    --
    -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
  103. Err.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you disagree, come to my house at new years and see 100+ people in togas singing "It's my life"

    Thanks for the offer, but I'd rather smear my genitalia with fish paste and dangle them in a pool of hungry piranhas.

    Have a good night though!

  104. Whining Crows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See, all the bands that suck are doing it!

  105. Yada yada yada by Cirrius · · Score: 1

    Yeah it's been done before by a few different bands, nothing new, Bon Jovi is just the first to be publicizing it...I guess they are trying to see their name in print without the word "sucks" right after.

  106. novel approach... by DrStrangeLoop · · Score: 1

    Daft Punk [french band] did a similar thing with their "Discovery" album... included was a unique personal access code which would allow you to download remixes and other stuff from their site.
    and contrary to bon jovi, the only things which squeal horribly in their music are the 303's ;)

    daft punk btw never allowed pictures of themselves to be released, they wore galactica style helmets for interviews. [unlike jon bon, who, as it seems, still tries to push his personality to the masses as a b-movie actor]

    -strangeloop

  107. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by Verence · · Score: 2, Informative

    Only with a bit of effort. It used a 'digital wallet' or something of the sort. Some Windows program in order to download them and open them with a special app.

    It was nicely done, but they tried to make the player too hip/unusable for my tastes.

    --

    ... that's all i wrote...
  108. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by kootch · · Score: 1

    it seems like people aren't buying CD's or Happy Meals at McD's sucky economy all around it seems.

  109. CD file sharing and piracy by Daimaou · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really hate when people compare the sharing of mp3 files to software piracy. Why? Because the two are totally different.

    Music has been broadcast over the airwaves for years and years and then some more years. For most of those years, there has existed the technology to copy those songs onto cassette tapes and other mediums and listen to those songs at a later time; and numerous times.

    Growing up, I always recorded my favorite songs off the radio; and I believe, just like recording a TV show, it was perfectly fine for me to do so. In fact, wasn't it Sony, one of the companies that is now whining about music sharing, that sold me the ability to record radio broadcasts? Why, I believe it was!

    Since the radio reaches nearly every corner of our country and nearly everone owns the technology to record that music, I don't see a difference between that and sharing an mp3 file with your friends, other than you get to cut out the retarded DJ who always talks over the song like some dimwit fart.

    A couple more interesting things to note, in Japan, they have stores that will rent you CDs, for a couple hundred yen, in much the same way American's rent VHS and DVD movies. Those same stores also sell very specialized cassette tapes so you can record the CD instead of having to pay around $30.00 for it. Since the stores are not owned by the record companies, I don't see a difference between this and sharing mp3s with your friends (other than you've cut out the middle man).

    Also, you most public libraries will loan you music CDs for free.

    On the otherhand, software has NEVER been broadcast over public airwaves or freely distributed in your public library. Nor are there stores that will rent you software and then the media to use to copy it. Nor has the means to copy software ever been commercially provided with the copying of software being its primary marketed function.

    I think that the record industry is too damn stupid to provide their customers with a product in the form their customers demand and I think they are using an apples to oranges comparison of software piracy to sharing music to force the governments to pass laws that maintain the status quo of their current, obviously undesirable, business plans.

    And all of that is why I hate hearing music sharing compared to software piracy.

    1. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by stubear · · Score: 2

      "Since the radio reaches nearly every corner of our country and nearly everone owns the technology to record that music, I don't see a difference between that and sharing an mp3 file with your friends, other than you get to cut out the retarded DJ who always talks over the song like some dimwit fart."

      For starters you could never record the entire album off the radio. Radio stations rarely spin the entire album and when I say rarely I mean rarely.

      Next, even with radios using CDs and you recording onto the bext tape possible you still had an inferior copy which would degrade over time. MP3s can be recorded at high bitrates making them effectively equivalent to CD and they do not degrade over time.

      This doesn't even go over the copyright issues you face. Radio stations pay licensing fees to broadcast the music they play. Napster and their kin did not. They would have never taken off if they had to. Individuals do not license the rights to distribute music, they are only allowed to make personal copies for themselves. When you place a song onto Napster or soem other P2P network you are distributing intellectual property illegally.

    2. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I really hate when people compare the sharing of mp3 files to software piracy. Why? Because the two are totally different.

      Yeah, one (music), is an art, while the other (software) isn't. So Federal copyright protection of one (music) is Constitutional, and copyright protect of the other (software) isn't.

    3. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by tahpot · · Score: 1

      In Australia here, there's a couple of places I know of where I can hire video games... They also sell cd burners, and appear to do a fantastic CD-R trade.

    4. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note the key difference: you were recording from ${publicly available source} for your own personal use - Legal; You distribute copies of the recording - Illegal.

      This holds true for cassette tapes as much as for digital piracy (mp3s). In fact this battle was first had when Sony,etc, introduced the tapes: their function (and the reason they were not immediately withdrawn from public sale) was to allow you to record programmes for your own private usage, or to allow you to record yourself (your own intellectual property which you are free to distribute).

      Software is just like Music: someone took the time to create it so you could be happy with it. Just because there are some bands who make music freely available, doesn't mean that you can expect all music to be free. Just because there are some developers who make software freely available, doesn't mean that you can expect all software to be free.

      What about Symantec Ghost(TM) Corporate Edition 7.5

      From the Symantec Ghost central management console, IT managers can remotely clone any Windows NT or Windows 2000 workstation. The console can also be used to quickly deploy whole application packages or specific PC changes such as registry changes or desktop settings as well as to migrate user "personalities" including PC settings and data.

      A product designed and marketed as a software copying tool
      Seems like they also sell software...

      Many libraries loan software. Just like videos and audio, some libraries charge for the service, while others are government funded.

    5. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 1

      Entire albums on the radio? I believe that K-She 95 still plays one or two entire albums through every Sunday night around here. I'm usually not out in my car at that time, so I've not heard them in a while, but I think they only interrupt the albums 2 or 3 times for commercials.

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
    6. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      Radio stations pay licensing fees to broadcast the music they play.

      Um, sure. Radio stations pay miniscule fees to labels that pay massive sums to "promoters" that pay massive sums to the radio stations so that the radio station will play the music.

      So legally, yes, there is a difference. De facto, however, the only difference between Napster and ClearChannel is that the record labels have to pay ClearChannel, and Napster was supplied to them for free. Of course, on Napster, you get to choose what you listen to, and on ClearChannel, the record labels get to choose.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    7. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by evbergen · · Score: 3, Informative
      On the otherhand, software has NEVER been broadcast over public airwaves
      Why, it has! Here in the Netherlands in the 80's, you had the NOS Hobbyscoop, a radio programme on public radio that broadcast home computer software. It used a standard for compatible BASIC programs, called BASICODE. It was basically a 'shared library' with well-known subroutines at well-known line numbers.

      You'd record the part with the awful sounds on your cassette recorder, and then you could load it onto your Spectrum or C64 or MSX. Loads of fun!
      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. (Mark Twain)
    8. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by Star+Stealing+Girl · · Score: 1
      Also, you most public libraries will loan you music CDs for free.

      On the otherhand, software has NEVER been broadcast over public airwaves or freely distributed in your public library. Nor are there stores that will rent you software and then the media to use to copy it.

      Not true. Back in the late 80's, our public library had lots of software available for loan. And it wasn't crappy software either. Their collections included a wide assortment of Infocom text adventure games, which were really hard to find at the time because they were no longer being sold in stores. I used to check-out my limit of 4 every week. I miss those days...

      --
      All my money went to Nigeria and all I got was this lousy sig. . .
    9. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by Daimaou · · Score: 2

      Note the key difference: you were recording from ${publicly available source} for your own personal use - Legal; You distribute copies of the recording - Illegal.

      You miss my point. Actually, most of the comments here have missed my point. Radio is not broadcast solely to you and then you illegally distribute it to your friends. It is broadcast to EVERYONE at the same time. Therefore, if somebody wants to hear a song, they can call the radio station and ask them to play it. When the radio station does, then they can record it. In effect, music is free. This isn't the case with current commercial software products (notice I'm not talking about freeware, open source, etc.) It is possible for the whole of the United States (which is where I'm talking about) to record the same song off the radio. This is not true by any stretch of the imagination of software. Radio is free, comercial software isn't. Therefore, I don't see how you can logically draw a parallell between the piracy of something that isn't and never has been broadcast freely (such as current Microsoft products) to something that is broadcast freely to everybody everyday.

    10. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by Chuk · · Score: 1

      On the otherhand, software has NEVER been broadcast over public airwaves or freely distributed in your public library.

      I work in a public library, and people check out software from us all the time.

      --
      chuk
    11. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by stanmann · · Score: 1

      I must take exception to your ludicrous suggestion that software is not art. As a software developer, I know that software/algorithm creation is as much an art as stringing together notes to create melody, harmony and rhythm. Some software is also artistic in its final form, however all software is art in its algorithmic creation.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    12. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by drxenos · · Score: 0

      Never say never unless you know what you are taking about. There was some experimentation with transmitting software over the radio in the '80s. Also, the public library in my home town DID have a small collection (same time period) of software that could be checked out like books can. This was back when TRS-80, Apple ][, et. al. where popular.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    13. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by drxenos · · Score: 0

      Yes, you can record it. This hitch is that you cannot then give that recording away. That would be illegal.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    14. Re:CD file sharing and piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh.. i don't know where you live but my public library has lots of software. Maybe a couple years old and pretty beat up but i've checked it out before. Especially the language learning software, that doesn't matter if it's 10 years old. Maybe you should check your local library

  110. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by MoneyT · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I would, because I prefer rock, espesialy good rock, to rap and shit

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  111. Nothing new. by Inominate · · Score: 1

    Daft Punk did the same thing on thier last CD.

  112. A much more effective anti-piracy feature is by pbox · · Score: 2, Funny

    A much more effective anti-piracy feature built in to Bon Jovi's brand new album is that it is such a crap that no one will want to listen to it let alone copy it or download it. It keeps piracy at practically zero level.

    --
    Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
  113. Re:Don't you guys get it? by symbolic · · Score: 2


    Bon Jovi doesn't appreciate the fact that people would steal his music, so he's pandering to those who would consider it. This is why I think that even if the business model changed, pirated music would be every bit as much a problem as it is today. The RIAA is used as a scapegoat to justify theft, even if it's against the wishes of an artist that so many 'fans' claim to support.

  114. Not feel like Buying Bon Jovi Music by larzgold · · Score: 1

    Think about it, they have been one of the best selling bands in the past 15 years. So those who said "I don't feel like buying Bon Jovi" or "I never bought a Bon Jovi" album may be in the minority. How many people drove in their cars and cranked the radio any time Living with a Prayer came on.

    I do happen to be one of the few who will admit I do like them and will buy the next album. In fact their music has gotten better with age. I also will most likely see them in concert. So they are not the beatles, nor do they have Alan Parsons engineering them (he did both abbey road and dark side of the moon) but they never claimed to be. They are 4 1/2 (Huey is the 1/2) guys from NJ who put on a great live show (if you have not seen them you are missing something) They may not be Queen live, but they are maybe the best out there now. They tour often, and for as long as people will got see them live.

    IMHO they are sticking their necks out, they know after the success of the last album that they could be easily forgotten, and they have started the publicity show in motion (NFL, live shows around the world) There are very few bands who know how to promote like they do (The Stone, Aerosmith and Kiss who I think do it better) But if they don't get people to sign up, or buy the album, other bands that are starting out may have no chance. Also they may become the laughing stock that most people say they are. As record companies are getting pushed by artists for better deals, they are going to be less likely to take chances on smaller bands.

    I could ramble on, but I think I have done enough damange to my rep.

    Larzgold

  115. Re:Don't you guys get it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In general,

    Album sales support the RIAA

    Concert Sales support Artists.

  116. Serial Number = Watermark? by mini+me · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Conspiracy Theory: Little do these people know, their serial number is embedded into the audio tracks on the CD. When distributed on the internet these wartermarks can be matched against the contact information used for signing up for the free merchendise. Therefore the person who distributed the audio on the internet will be known.

    Well that probably isn't the plan here, but who knows what the future will hole.

    1. Re:Serial Number = Watermark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This method is useful for identifying who first ripped a disc, but this begs a question:

      Are you infringing copyright by compressing music and then running a file server which serves, along with many others, the watermarked files?

      Or does the infringement occur when someone downloads something that they are not entitled to?

      I would think the blame rests with the latter party, though I'm the first to admit that this assumption is based on common sense, and as such, is unlikely to be supported by law. I suppose we'll have to ask a lawyer.

    2. Re:Serial Number = Watermark? by signingis · · Score: 1


      Any watermark or serializing would be destroyed in the conversion process. So there. ;p

      --

      I prefer a void in conversation to a vacuous one.
  117. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by jjsjeff · · Score: 1

    Shot to the heart and you're to blame, you give love a bad name!

  118. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by sys$manager · · Score: 1

    The ironing is delicious.

  119. Must buy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe I must buy this album simply because of this situation.

    This is the "better than free" concept in action.

    Good job!

  120. Artists versus fat cats by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 2

    I'm sure we'll see more of this. It will be the artists who will adapt to new business models, not the fat cats. The cigar-chomping execs are too enamoured of the status quo to want to evolve. So it will be the musicians pushing the envelope. Jon Bon Jovi, unlike some other musicians (*cough*Metallica*cough*) actually gets it. Bravo, Jon!

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    1. Re:Artists versus fat cats by napoleone · · Score: 1

      Save your money up for when you grow old, got to keep playin' that rock and roll. The year 1980, thought $100 tickets were a crime. The group the Greatful Dead, who made their money off live music not the recordings. Their music was bootleged to high heaven and they kept on coming.

      --
      mem in MMII
  121. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just Kazaa it.

    Yeah, like Kazaa is a comprehensive, high-availability, high-speed catalog with every song anyone wants at their fingertips.

    Meanwhile, back on planet Earth...

  122. Toad the Wet Concert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last original CD that Toad The Wet Sprocket released (Coil) had a very good reason to actually buy it. If you bought the CD you got a ticket for a free show they were doing in your city. Buy 2 CD's get 2 tickets. Offer lasted until tickets were gone. Toad called it the Fan Appreciation Tour. 3-4 months later they went and did their usual tour in support of the CD.

    BJ (or his marketing folks) have a good idea that I believe we'll soon see implimented on a wider scale. Artists who are close to their fan base get a lot more honest input than ones that are further removed. This input tells them their CD prices are too high, so they attempt to offer stuff along w/the CD to make it more worthwhile to buy.

  123. Too bad a good band didn't do this by bigfatlamer · · Score: 1

    I think this is a great idea and a legitimate response to the idea that artists should get paid for their work by the people who consume that work. If only a band that people who regularly leech music take it from would do such a thing then we could really determine just how good a plan this is.

    As it is, I personally would pay good money NOT to get unreleased Bon Jovi tunes. With the released stuff as bad as it is, how much ass must the unreleased tracks suck.

    E

    --
    There's one thing computing teaches you, and that's that there's no point to remembering everything.
    --Doug Copland
    1. Re:Too bad a good band didn't do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so cool...I can make fun of people because I don't need a clue to do so.

      Hey fuckwad - ever search on Fasttrack for Bon Jovi songs - a fuckload out there.

      Just cause it's taking bandwidth away from eminem or whatever shit people seem to think is cool doesn't mean there are not a lot of people who are into it.

      Then again, as most Bon Jovi fans are probably in their 30's, they can afford just to buy the damn album instead of leeching off the net wishing they could get laid.

  124. One more time.... by Kibo · · Score: 2

    Daft Punk already did it.

    All kinds of cool remixes and blends of their songs, almost enough for another CD. Needless to say, that's the kind of value I appreciate. But again that's something that makes Daft Punk cool, and says nothing positive about the RIAA. Some bands like to give back.

    As far as Bon Jovi goes, Young Guns is fine as a diversion maybe once a year, other than that they should have left their butt rock back in 1988. Christ first Bon Jovi, then Axel Rose and four dudes who call themselves Guns and Roses, I await the return of Winger with baited breath...no that's rising bile.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    1. Re:One more time.... by VivianC · · Score: 3

      The Dave Matthews Band did this with the CD Busted Stuff a couple months ago. They even included a DVD with more material. All this for only $9.99 on the release date and $11.99 the rest of the week (Best Buy, Chicago).

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
    2. Re:One more time.... by cakoose · · Score: 1

      Wow! Why aren't the parent post's links followed by "[domain.name]"? Is his karma super high.

  125. Def Leppard: X Similar Deal by luckycat007 · · Score: 1

    Another 80s band did something similar on their latest release, X. There is some encryption key available on the CD that software reads, opening up some new content on the web site (making of videos, some other stuff). By the way it's a good album (imho).

  126. This sure beats extra-cost fan clubs. by dbirchall · · Score: 4, Insightful
    During the '90s, I was relatively involved with a band that never got quite as big as Bon Jovi did, but still sold millions of albums. (Those who know me know who the band is.)

    At the beginning of the decade, they were asking some amount for lifetime membership in their fanclub. I don't remember the amount, but it was between $15 and $35. Got you a bunch of stickers, a newsletter, etc.

    By the end of the decade, they were asking around $35 a year for a glossy magazine-style newsletter, preferential ticket sales, and backstage potential. (They were also selling 1/10th the albums.)

    Doing it this way makes a lot of sense to me. Instead of charging extra to join the fanclub, put those unique codes on everything, and let folks punch in codes for everything they buy. Bought the CD? Yeah, we can hook you up with good seats at a good price. Bought the last five CD's, plus posters, videos and t-shirts? Front row center, baby!

    Reward the folks who are dedicated to you, and all that stuff.

  127. Sheep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not combatting piracy.
    This is not value-added.

    You are not getting free concert tickets, you are getting priority in buying them.

    So if you're a fan of a band's older music & want to see them in concert first or if you just want to go to a concert with your friends, you *have* to buy the new CD first, because everyone else did and that's the only way you can get tickets.

    This also means the biggest pop bands can sell their CD's for $20 U.S. and teenies will still buy them so they can go to the concert.

  128. Its a better solution for the record companies by Mr.+McD · · Score: 1

    This is really a much better solution than the stoopid copy protected CD's that only work on Windows PC's. Whats funny about this solution is that not only do the buyers get perks, the marketing data on this could be potentially huge for the record comapnies. They could probably find a way to determine how many times you listen to the songs in your PC, trade MP3's, go to shows, etc.,etc.. But the nice part is that YOU don't have to register.

  129. Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Won't the unreleased stuff get pirated too? Thanks bon jovi!

  130. Music is moving air, no bits. by hangel · · Score: 1

    As per The Stones. They know where the real money is.

  131. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rap > bon jovi

  132. The Dog puppet vs. Bon Jovi video... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Now this is some great Bon Jovi with the Dog puppet.

    PoopOnBonJovi

  133. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by geekster · · Score: 1

    Yeah, ok. I guess what I was lashing out against was that I imagined that all bands would have to make big multimedia productions instead of just doing what do, play music.

    But I see your point, I'd also rather have record companys get of honest buyers back than all these cripplewares they've been trying.

    I just don't hope it becomes a requirement for an artis to start doing more than just the music.

    On weezers new album Maladroit there's some extra contents in form of video clips. I just wish it didn't have that stupid fullscreen menu on autorun.

  134. I tried, but I couldn't do it. by CustomDesigned · · Score: 2, Funny
    This is a trend that really needs encouragement. So, despite the fact that I can't stand modern rock, I went to their web site for some 30 second samples to see if I could bring myself to buy a CD as a vote of confidence.

    With the first sample, I had to cover my ears, and now I've got my David Bellugi early rennaisance CD on to clear out my eardrums. I'm truly sorry, but someone that actually likes this stuff will have to take up the slack.

    1. Re:I tried, but I couldn't do it. by Supergrass · · Score: 1

      Modern rock? Uhh...I guess you don't listen to much contemporary music hehehehehehehe.

      (modern rock being the label for the alternative genre, before it was alternative)

      --
      Wherever there's a will, there's a motorway.
  135. Drinking the Kool-Ade Again, Eh? by guttentag · · Score: 2
    Retail CDs will be distributed with a unique serial number with which the purchaser can register in order to receive such exclusives as prioritized concert ticket purchases and unreleased music.
    Slashdotters should know better: registration is not a perk! Registration requires you to divulge information about yourself from which the record company can make additional profit.

    There's nothing extra being offered here.

    "Unique serial numbers" come with every AOL disk, but that doesn't make them any more valuable. It's a tracking tool for AOL that's also designed to make the mindless masses think they're getting into some secret club.

    Bon Jovi says that registering will give you "the chance" to buy concert tickets before they go on sale to the public. But guess what? If you and 3 million other fans who bought the album have all registered, you're competing with each other for tickets. I'd say that makes that ticket sale pretty public. This is simply an effort to disenfranchise people who don't buy the latest album AND divulge whatever information the record company wants. Suddenly you're paying more (not just the price of the album, but with your personal info too) to see concerts, and you think you're getting more.

    "Unreleased music" means music that wasn't good enough to make it onto the album. If the record company thought they were good enough to sell, it would have included them on the album instead of the other crap (most albums have 1-3 good songs at most, and the rest is just crap -- this unreleased music is the stuff that was worse than the crap).

    Bon Jovi also promises access to exclusive areas of BonJovi.com. What a load of crap. Anything of value that shows up in this "exclusive area" is going to end up on Gnutella or Geocities within hours.

    Step away from the Kool-Ade, people.

  136. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by Disevidence · · Score: 1

    You eat your clothes?

    --
    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  137. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by GrBear · · Score: 1

    Oh suuuure.. now ya tell me. When I bought their Discovery cd, the website listed on the card said it was only going to be Windows compatible, so I pitched the card as I'm running MacOS X.

    Bastards!

  138. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, according to the RIAA's database, their albums are still generating multi-platinum sales.

  139. Old(er) idea, but definitely the way to go by pelxer · · Score: 1

    I'm currently an MBA student < author ducks to avoid thrown items >, and this is actually an old idea. Lots of articles have been thrown around, and in academic circles this method has long been regarded as the only possible solution. Why? Because hackers tend to be smarter than the average bear, and can get around most encryption.

    I'm no fan of John Bon, but good for him. And Metallica sucks.

  140. Morals aside, there is another thing to consider by fricto · · Score: 1

    Recorded music has, since its invention, been a tool for increasing the take at live shows. Live shows are the money makers. The RIAA tries to spin this fact away, but very few bands/artists are making money on the album sales because very few try to (it's be nice but) the show is the money maker.


    So do we have a new tool to pack bodies into shows? Increase value in the album purchase, increase albums purchased and excite people in going to the show probably equals more people at the shows. Is a floundering band using morals of the moment to hide a cash machine? May we call a duck a duck? There isn't anything wrong with it - even eighties rockers have to eat (I guess).


    This has become perverted in recent years (see also 'commodification'), but I sleep better at night holding out hope that "American Idol" will be the wake up call we need.

  141. Counting Crows did this with their new album by adrew · · Score: 1

    They have a secret site that will only (easily) launch from the link provided from within a Flash file on the CD.

    You can download high-quality 192kbps MP3's from the Secret Site.

  142. Who listens to these guys??? by Hyped01 · · Score: 1
    This is definitely at least a start, and possibly a good one, but as too many other people have said and the record companies have ignored, mp3s can be beneficial to bands and artists.

    Iron Maiden members and their producer all agree that artists need to get paid for their music - but - also agree that mp3's and the net can be a great thing. Bruce Dickinson (lead singer) was recently told by a fan that the fan made a bunch of CDs of one of the tracks of their newest album and gave them away to friends to promote them and what did he think about that - was it a good idea?

    The convo:

    Bruce, How important do you think word of mouth is today to help out band. With the internet today it seems much easier to communicate with people. I also tried to do my part and print up 500 fliers and copied the song wicker man on 50 cds and handed them out to help out your new record here in tennessee. Do you think if more fans did this sort of thing it would help?
    Tj Fowler
    Tennessee

    Bruce answered: "Good God yes - you deserve a medal."

    I know it was what got me to listen to them... (Not TJ, but tapes of their music given to me... "Run to the Hills" made me fall in love with their music - I was in Jamaica at the time... looked everywhere to find it, and eventually found Somewhere in Time (different album) snatched it up and knew I found my newest favorite band of all time... and between their no compromising attitude towards their music and their directness and honesty with their fans, they still are).

    An RIAA supported/supporting band woulda had the poor guy in chains. Good thing Maiden fans know what Maiden is all about.

    The point of this next section is (my love of Maiden aside) to dipsute any claim the record companies have about how such things affect sales... since Maiden has numbers they could only dream their "Create a Band of the Month" crap had... all without label support. When last have you heard Maiden get air time? Or seen ads for them? Or seen their albums on the New Releases wall? Even with a DVD, 1 new album and 2 new compilations this past two years...

    200 gold and platinum records, 14 of 17 albums in the top 10. All in the top 20. Most in the top 5. Sellout tours worldwide - including 250,000 at Rock in Rio III and the entire Year 2000/2001 concert series. Madison Square Garden NY in record time.

    Apparently if album sales are so amazing, and they still (23 years after forming) sell out not some or most, but all of their concerts, then maybe the record companies should listen to their approach.

    Among things other than their standing on mp3's, CD copies, etc, they also have a big common premise behind their music...

    You dont have to like Maiden - even a little - to respect it: Be who they are, "F*K everyone who wants them to be something else". They stay true to who they are - which earns them no support from the record labels who want some nice pliable band to promote (Metallica anyone?) - but then again, which one sells out every concert and still gets top 10 album sales? Oh... wait... not Metallica anymore...

    It's time the record companies go many steps... not just the one Bon Jovi and Aerosmith took with this new initiative... but also let artists to THEIR job the way THEY know how. It's the best way to weed out the crap, and have megasellers like Iron Maiden who WITHOUT label support STILL crush the BackDoor Boys and N'Syuck.

    --

    WebMaster:
    BinFeeds
    XXX Thumbnailed Image Newsgroups but

  143. so did others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the tragically hip did something like this with their latest album, "in violet light." they threw in a membership card ot the hip club ("THC" - cute) which had a number you could use to unlock their club website, where you could get stuff like inside news, concert tickets, club members-only stuff (like being in their next video), and a couple of mp3s. and you know what? it worked. IVL is one of the 4 CDs i've bought (not counting gifts for other people) in the past 2 years.

    of course, the other side of the coin is this: i probably would have bought it anyway, because the hip is one of my favorite bands. and of course, i burned the CD (including the extra tracks) for a friend of mine because she wanted it.

    1. Re:so did others by Jardine · · Score: 1

      And if you live in Canada (like most Hip fans), there was a legal way to make that copy. If the person who's getting the copy is the one who burns it (possibly just hitting the burn button), it's legal. That's why we pay a 21 cent levy on CDRs.

    2. Re:so did others by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually it isn't. The CPCC (Canadian Private Copying Collective) has managed the enviable (for the RIAA) task of charging you for nothing. The copyright law in Canada was only recently ammended to allow copying "for personal use". Previously, this was appearently illegal. In ammending the act, the government placed a levy on all blank media to compensate the recording industry or "unauthorized copies", which includes EVERYTHING, not just actual music piracy.

      Now, the CPCC is trying to extend this welfare project to flash memory (for MP3 players), DVD-R (HA!), and small removable and non-removable hard drives - by the megabyte (seriously!). It doesn't take a genius to see that they are pushing for a levy on all digital storage.

      In a related issue, a different copyright welfare lobby is pushing for a levy on all internet access. Seriously. These crooks make the RIAA and MPAA look stupid by comparison. While the XXIA's are buying laws that nobody can enforce, the CPCC has been raking in the dough. Myself, I'd prefer the bullshit law (since I can ignore it).

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  144. Daft Punk did something similiar by shoptroll · · Score: 1

    Daft Punk did something similiar almost 1.5 years ago with their album 'Discovery'. People who bought the album got a little credit-card like access card that had a id on it that allowed the buyer access to a special music program that allowed them to download remixes and other content from their website. Originally the tracks were encrypted or something, so you could only play them in their music player, but around March they converted everything to mp3 and ditched the player in favor of using php as an authentication method for their website. I thought this was a great idea, since people who bought the albums got a little bit extra in return.

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  145. It's not a new concept by kwatters · · Score: 1

    Korn did the same thing with their latest release, "The Untouchables." That was back in June. Upon buying the CD you received a special code to enter in the website for a free subscription to their special members service--i.e. first access to concert tickets, exclusive video and interviews, etc. It was actually a nice "incentive," not some thrown-together cheap offer.

  146. "Unreleased Music" by ogre2112 · · Score: 1

    The tickets are good and all, but the "unreleased music"...

    Won't that just be pirated?

    Anyway, good to see them get the ball rolling on something other than hiring more lawyers.

  147. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by shoptroll · · Score: 1

    Actually, they changed the system... They chucked the InterTrust Wallet thingy, made a real site with php and you use your card to get in there and download the music in mp3 rather than the InterTrust proprietary format they had going for a while.

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  148. Already done! by Jetson · · Score: 2

    Rather than waiting to see how the plan works out for Bon Jovi, why not ask Daft Punk? They did it on their "Discovery" album in 2001. The CD came with a credit card (16 digits, expiry date, etc.) that is used to access the www.daftcard.com site.

  149. daft punk's "exclusives" was so poorly executed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Daft Punk put a credit card sized card inside their CD with a unique number were you could download MP3 singles of remixes and live versions of the song from a special website.
    And it sucked. First off, it required installing a "wallet" like service in windows. I'm sure it was evil. It wasn't "normal" music, it was "secure" music, playable only in their player (so it wasn't mp3s). and you know what? it phoned home, about usage, and so forth. And it was a one shot deal. I still have the card lying around somewhere, but I couldn't register again, too bad I had to reinstall eh Daft Punk?

    The perks _could_ have been nice, but they had to go and fuck them up. I want normal perks, give me cool wallpapers. normal mp3s. I'll still buy the cd, even if someone who bought the cd, begins to share the "exclusive" stuff. I'd rather pirate forever, then to feel bound to some app. and the whole security was just offending, "hey, I bought your stuff, dont treat me like shit"....

    grrr...
  150. add me to by khuber · · Score: 1
    the this totally sucks list.

    Pentium IDs were bad, but CD IDs are good? Come on.

    When I buy a book or a magazine or whatever I don't want it to point to me for its existence. I sell my CD and some dude pirates it and they track it back to me? Hey maybe the Windows CD player can send this ID to RIAA every time I play it and then they can send "targetted" junk mail/email to me.

    Consumers shouldn't put up with this privacy invasion just so the wealthy recording cartel can squeeze a few extra bucks out of people. They can get stuffed.

    -Kevin

  151. I buy stuff for the principle by pardasaniman · · Score: 1

    It shuts up all the MS geeks at my school who depend on piracy. They simply leave me alone, thus, leaving people who have a life to talk to me.

  152. Is this a bad thing? by PhxBlue · · Score: 2

    Seriously, a plan to strip the anonymity from the people who "rip and share" this stuff may be the best deterrent to copyright violators that the RIAA can accomplish. Think about it, when was the last time you saw members of PWA put their real names, addresses, phone numbers, etc., in something they warezed?

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  153. Whoa... by mshomphe · · Score: 3, Funny

    they're halfway there...

    --
    She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
  154. Umm... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    Finally, somebody in the entertainment industry is attempting to adapt to the changing market rather than rushing to protect an outdated business model.

    Isn't DRM adapting to the changing market rather than rushing to protect an outdated business model?

  155. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way it would combat piracy is if the serial number is somehow tied into the CD so that when you burned it to MP3 or OGG the serial number could be identified and traced back to you. I don't see a way of them doing this (well, they could embed something in certain frequencies, but that isn't what this article indicates).

    The best way to convince people to buy more CD's is to drop the price. A single CD costs as much as a phone line or a couple weeks worth of bus tickets or half of a cable ISP bill. Not to mention, your average kid has to work about 6 hours at a minimum wage job (or more) just to afford a CD (after taxes).

  156. Try this by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

    Ok, here is an interesting experiment that should tell you once and for all way the major labels are losing revenue. Go to a place that sells CDs, not a music store (they may carry minor and local labels, which could skew results). Try Target or Walmart (you would be amazed how much mainstream music Walmart sells). Check out the end-cap where they display the top sellers. See anything appealing? Those are the discounted ones, so you can find a $12 - $15 "bargain". Come on, those are the TOP SELLING CDs. Can't you see ANYTHING you like. Ok, fine. Look around down the isle. Now you should find something good. Ok, now you are checking out the $18 stuff. There are a lot of CDs there, just fund the genre you're most interested in. Keep looking, there must be SOMETHING... They've got Rock, and Pop, and Hip-Hop, Country and Gospel (well, Walmart may call it "religious"). Keep looking! No, I don't think there is a "classical" anymore, but look, there is an "Alternative" section! ... Now that was stupid! You aren't supposed to ask the Walmart clerk what it's supposed to be an alternative *TO* !!! Ok, I know there is a lot of crap here. Just keep looking. There are plenty of choices (!) here... there must be something. Look! Right There! The new Dave Matthews band. Oh, you already have that. Well, look, over there -> There's that old Led Zeppelin album you used to play the crap out of. I know you do, but you should have it on CD now. Oh, already have it on CD, too... Ok, well there must be something here. Um, gosh. Look, you're just a BAD example, that's all. You just have the WRONG TASTE. You're skewing the results. It's PIRACY! I'm telling you... that's it! People WANT this stuff, they just STEAL it! That's why we can't sell it! The selection is FINE! The selection is EXCELLENT!!! **PIRACY** is killing us!! It's PIRACY! I'm telling you !!! ARRGGGHHHH!!!!

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  157. daft punk/discovery by cdf12345 · · Score: 2

    Daft punk did this with last years release of 'Discovery'. Each cd had a faux credit card with a number that allowed access to daftclub.com where b-sides, remixes and other things were offered.

    So lets give credit where its due.

    --
    Chicago2600.net more than a lifestyle, its a survival trait.
  158. Bon Jovi Sales Scheme by Shrike9 · · Score: 1

    If I can't copy MY purchased CD into my iPod, I'll live with the old ones I already own. New artists generally suck, and the RIAA sucks more. It's probably not going to overcome all these years of current fair use practices. As for Bon Jovi, OK band for those teenage years when you're brains are on hormone overload.

  159. Re: Good Job! But live concerts suck.... by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Live concerts would be cool if I didn't receive hearing damage after 2 minutes. I can't say for sure if Bon Jovi is considerate of their listener's ears, but some how I doubt it.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  160. That's not all! by mofolotopo · · Score: 1

    They've taken the most effective of all anti-piracy measuers...

    SUCKING.

  161. Real adaptation/innovation by phyjcowl · · Score: 1

    to our changing reality is not what Bon Jovi is doing. If you would like a good example of what is possible, you should rely on creative individuals like Einstürzende Neubauten. They are really thinking about ways to connect their music and creative processes with the people that are most interested. Their site has an excellent audio message by Blixa Bargeld about their plans.

  162. Added incentive! by ctar · · Score: 1

    This is my obligatory 'added incentive' post which I have been making to many related stories...This is the only way the dinosaur music industry will be able to compete with file sharing: ADDED INCENTIVE! If they can't offer the convenience which filesharing provides (even for a reasonable fee) then they'll have to give people some incentive to buy CD's. (lower price, added bonuses, MORE VALUE!)

  163. eh... by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 1

    it won't be hard to guess the serial numbers, though.... either 1 or 2, depending on the sales

    --
    sig - .
  164. Toad the Wet Sprocket Did this 5 Years ago by weston · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Toad the Wet Sprocket did this 5 years ago. May of 1997 was the release date for their album Coil. If you bought Coil, you got two special bonuses:

    1. A free ticket to a promo tour they were doing for the album
    2. When you visited their website with the CD in the drive, you could play a hidden track on the CD. There was a contest, too -- the first person to correctly identify all the lyrics from this song won a signed guitar.


    The result: my brother and sister and I bought four copies for the three of us and a friend we would take to the concert. Ticket prices were usually well above the $12.99 promo price for the CD. Even though I had access to a burner and blank CDs cheaply, it simply didn't make sense NOT to buy the CDs with the ticket incentive. The multimedia was nice, too.

  165. good news by kangolo · · Score: 1
    good news ........
    FOR ME TO POOP ON!!!
    Triumph the insult comic dog
  166. no more piracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Retail CDs will be distributed with a unique serial number with which the purchaser can register in order to receive such exclusives as prioritized concert ticket purchases and unreleased music.

    Wow, if that stops piracy then why not release the whole thing that way, not just the unreleased music!

  167. Piracy? by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 0

    Mmmmm...Is piracy really a problem for Bon Jovi?

  168. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would, because I prefer Cock, espesialy good Cock, to rap and shit

  169. Not the first by roc_machine · · Score: 1

    The Tragically Hip started their "Hip Club" back in June. Buy the CD, get a membership card that contains a PIN number, and get access to the Hip Club.

    More info Here.

  170. Not that new... by fooguy · · Score: 2

    The Goo Goo Dolls last CD did a similar thing. You needed to buy the CD to access the "Member's Only" section of the website. Once there, you got special videos and song downloads, and the passwords to preorder tickets from Ticketbastard for their concert.

    I admit, I bought the CD when I did to preorder tickets (great seats), but I would have bought it eventually.

    --
    "All I ever wanted was to see Larry Wall give Bill Gates a Perl necklace."
    http://www.eisenschmidt.org/jweisen
  171. Tragically Hip... been there, done that. by oasman · · Score: 1

    The Hip (possible the world's most underrated band) did this on their recent CD. You actually got a kewl credit card with your hip number on it (great... ANOTHER credit card).

    It's great to see bands are adapting. Too bad RIAA lacks the strategic initiative to benefit from change.

    --
    Mike Oas
  172. obligatory mst3k reference by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    Reminds me of a bit in an episode of Mystery Science Theatre 3000:

    (Joel is standing by huge array of keyboards, Crow enters, holding sandwich)

    Joel: Oh, hiya, Crow...
    Crow: Oh hi, whatcha doing?
    Joel: Oh, we were just inspired by the cool New Age music of this movie, so we decided to use the Wall O' Keyboards to make our own great new New Age music, you wanna help?
    Crow: Sure, uh, what can I do?
    Joel: Well, I could teach you how to play the keyboards
    Crow: Will it take long?
    Joel: No, of course not, come on over here. Here, check this out, okay, put your hand over here.
    Crow: Okay.
    Joel: Put your finger down, see?
    Crow: Like that? (puts finger on a random key, a single note is heard) Oh!
    Joel: Yeah, you're playing a New Age chord now, okay? Just like Yanni. Alright now, put another finger down.
    Crow: Okay. (presses another random key, a second note plays with first one, and persists throughout the rest of the scene)
    Joel: See, now you're playing a Yanni lick, now hold it down for an hour...
    Crow: Yeah?
    Joel: Now hold it down...until you get a record contract from Windham Hill!
    Crow: OH, hey cool! Servo, check it out, it's my new New Age Yanni lick! Uh, Joel, hold down my new New Age Yanni lick, I gotta put my sandwich down.
    Joel: Okay, got it. (holds it)
    Crow: This music's kind of dull, isn't it?
    Joel: Yeah, but it's a good way to make a lot of money without a big initial investment. (lights dim, 'music' swells, Cambot zooms in on Tom Servo)
    Tom: (clears throat loudly) Okay... (in laid back DJ voice) And now, 'Music From Some Guys In Space.' Tonight on 'Music From Some Guys In Space,' more fine new New Age music and sounds from super-progressive Bay Area New Age keyboardist, Joel Robinson. Joel will be accompanied on the Wall O' Keyboards by veteran minimalist Crow T. Robot. We invite you to sit back and enjoy more repetitive New Age music, as we cruise the spaceways. Come along, fellow travelers, and enjoy 'Music...From...Some Guys...In Space.

    --

    c-hack.com |
  173. I guess "sucking" won't prevent piracy. by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    But wait, I thought Britney already proved that. I guess this is just confirmation.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  174. Daft Punk did this with Discovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daft Punk tried this approach with the last album they produced - "Discovery". It came with a credit card and you entered that on the web and got extra bits such as remixes, unrealeased songs and a specific Daft branded media player.

  175. Re: Good Job! But live concerts suck.... by Kelvin+Zero · · Score: 1

    I've been to well over 500 concerts in my years and I always carry earplugs.

    A decent set that reduces the noise but doesn't totally kill quality can be had for under $5 a pair. It's so worth the effort as almost all decent bands are even better live.

    Just a suggestion.

  176. This isn't the way they are fighting piracy by cphenry · · Score: 1

    I would imagine that they aren't the first arist to do this, but if you pre-purchase the cd at amazon, you get access to it via a streaming feed. Unfortunately I think you need MS Media Player.

    What's interesting, though, is that you get access to the entire album several weeks before its released, which is another cool way of promoting the purchase of the CD, especially for fans who would buy it when it was release anyway. And yes, I am a Bon Jovi fan, and yes, I already made my purchase.

  177. bounce the CD by ProfKyne · · Score: 2

    As far as stopping piracy is concerned, Bon Jovi's performance in Times Square during that first football game pretty much ensured that I wouldn't be pirating this album ... the song is terrible.

    --
    "First you gotta do the truffle shuffle."
  178. DVD approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the fact that the CD industry is finally adding something more to their product. With the advent of DivX; you would think that people would slow down their DVD purchasing, but people now buy the DVD's for the extras. People like extas, and although this is a meager extra; it's an extra none the less.

  179. A Step in the Right Direction by chip2000 · · Score: 1

    This might have been mentioned before, but I thought I'd throw in my opinion.

    The RIAA, despite how the Slashdot community portrays it, is really there to support record industries and [perhaps] their artists. Now, we can get off on as many capitalistic rants as we want (I share some anti-capitalism views), but the fact is, we live in a capitalist society (which DOES give us a lot of freedom) and companies need and want to make more money. The RIAA is simply trying to give recording artists and [more specifically] record labels their money back.

    We might say 'whats the difference between x billion dollars and x-2 billion dollars' but this can account for jobs lost, lower salaries, whatnot. By downloading pirated music, (I'm not saying this is necessarily evil) you dont 'get back' at the CEOs of the recording industry, you 'get back' at the lower-paid workers by cutting their salaries and causing them to lose their jobs.

    Now despite all that, I think this is definitely a step in the right direction. No matter what, people are going to pirate music the way it is now, and if the record industry can use this fact to give 'free samples' out to everyone and then offer an incentive to buy the CD itself (such as what Bon Jovi is offering here) then everyone from the CEOs to the lower-paid workers to the consumer benefits.

    Instead of hating the RIAA, we should do our best to support initiatives like this one and change the recording industry (and everything about it) for the better.

    --

    Logic is the ultimate device.
  180. I don't see anything wrong with this method... by DaWorm · · Score: 1

    I don't really listen to Bon Jovi and my last Bon Jovi album was New Jersey when I was in High School. I have never watched Bon Jovi in my entire life and probably never will.

    BUT if I get priority stuff for buying their CD, then that would be an incentive not only to the fans but to prospective fans as well or those looking for a bit of 80s nostalgia (although some new Bon Jovi stuff on radio is good).

    This method is a step forward towards acceptance instead of rebellion.

    --
    Alea jacta est!
  181. Re:daft punk's "exclusives" was so poorly executed by The+G+Man · · Score: 1

    FYI, not sure when, but they changed it completely. Now you just put in your code and download any of several mp3s you want, no program, no nothing. Why don't you check it out?

    --

    Quoth the zombie, braaaaaaaains
  182. DMB too by limited · · Score: 1

    Dave Matthews also tried a similar approach on his new (semi) CD, Busted Stuff. Along with the actual CD release (which contained 90% leaked songs, another story entirely) a DVD with concert footage and special features, was included along with a sticker. It made a great incentive to actually buy the CD. However, I was disappointed at the quality of the DVD music video, its quality was way off.

  183. Re:Back to the 70s - Don't make me yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radiohead is utter dross compared to Pink Floyds mediocre work (Animals, Final Cut, perhaps), let alone a classic like DSOTM. I wouldn't even say I'm a huge Pink Floyd fan.
    Face it. Pop/Rock music (in all its' incarnations) peaked in 1976, plateaued through the early eighties and has gone downhill ever since.
    Radiohead, Oasis, Puff Daddy, Limp Bizcut, Linkin Park, et all are right up there with, well, Bon Jovi.

  184. But How Effective? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be willing to bet record companys won't go to far lengths to make their cd-keys hard to figure out. It takes one key-maker and you have people into the service who didn't pay, and people who did pay who can't get in. Just sounds like more trouble then it's worth to me.

  185. Re:Mobile Fidelity being the best by Technician · · Score: 2

    I agree on Mobile Fidelity, but I bought it for another reason, a pristine original. Both of mine are before CD's (12 inch) and have only been played twice to enjoy while putting them on tape for the car. (one of them is Dark Side of the Moon which is an awsome pressing) I put it on the best tape avaliable at the time and have worn out one copy. The other still gets played from time to time. At this rate the original will have seen a needle in the groove about 6 times by the time I retire. Much of my music gets the same treatment. It's an investment. The industry has no intrest in replacing just the worn out media for the performance instead of selling you a new lisence for the same content. Until that changes, I will continue to protect my investment. I learned early on (8 tracks and pre-recorded tapes, & LP's) that the media does not last forever. I am now in the process of transferring the remainder of my pre-recorded cassettes (lots of lost pads to replace) to CD to preserve whats left. I would love to trade in my tape collection for CD's for just the cost of the media. That does not appear to be an option however, so I have to do it myself.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  186. Re: Good Job! But live concerts suck.... by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Thanks, I've used earplugs with limited success. It kind of seems backwards to go to a place for musical enjoyment, and have to plug my ears so I can enjoy it.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  187. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, they sell alot of records, that dosen't mean they're any good or anything... N*SYNC sells records, but do you think they are good? *I'm just waiting on people to start complaining about the number of times each day someone downloads a Slayer or Messuggah song...*

  188. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

    Go buy a Zakk Wylde album, or an old Slayer album, and then tell me who can play their instruments. Sambora hasn't has a fresh lick in a decade... Zakk Wylde's been playing just as long, and can still solo better than the majority of people on earth.

    --
    --Forest C. Adcock--
  189. Free Software at the Library by Ramuh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On the otherhand, software has NEVER been broadcast over public airwaves or freely distributed in your public library. Nor are there stores that will rent you software and then the media to use to copy it. Nor has the means to copy software ever been commercially provided with the copying of software being its primary marketed function.
    outstanding idea. why isn't there free software (ie: debian, slackware, or [insert your favorite distro here]) available from libraries?
    This would be a great way to introduce adventurous people to free software et al. Also, it would give FS a larger presence in the education field.
    get out and visit your local library today...

    --
    //radiotakeover.
    .for indep
  190. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by nulleffect · · Score: 1

    it's just VBR MP3s now.
    no special players.

  191. d00d! i needz bon jovi serialz! by mr_gerbik · · Score: 3, Funny

    is this going to be the future of warez? i think i'll start working on my bon jovi serial generator now.

    -gerbik

  192. What about quality? by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

    Bitch all you want about CD piracy, I want the "artists" to actually have a CD full of good songs. Most CD's only have two or three good songs on them and the rest is o.k. at best. I feel like we get ripped off because we pay $12-$18 for a few good songs. So maybe a good model would be to produce some quality material first.

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  193. Re:Pentium IDs were bad, but CD IDs are good? by Technician · · Score: 2

    I think the record companies are too cheap to go the the expense of remastering for single copy pressings. So far the CD's are mass pressed and the number is on a seprate card just like the early Windows CD keys. (any valid key for the disks.)

    Office 97 is the first one I know of that does protect an install using the CD serial number. I found this when a 52X CD tossed a disk and trashed it. Later when upgrading the hardware, I tried to uninstall office to legaly transfer it from one machine to another. The office worker upgraded and passed along the old hardware & OS. I thought it pretty stupid to require the original CD to uninstall a program. Even though there were many CD's in the office of the same software (legal original copies) none of the other copies would uninstall Office 97 because it wanted the copy of the CD with the original serial number. Now there is an illegal copy simply because it will not uninstall, because the scratched CD is in a drawer for proof of ownership of the install on the new machine. The transfer was done using another copy that is installed on another machine. So the transfer was done usning the wrong copy of media (the correct CD key however) and the uninstallable copy. We tried to uninstall it. We should ask the BSA how to uninstall the extra instalation. Maybe they can tell us how (without formatting the drive and having to reinstall everything else) and replace the damaged media for us. The anti piracy feature is preventing an uninstall of a legal copy to transfer it.
    Due to this experiance fighting locks with a broken key (scratched install CD) on products, we are looking at more user friendly office software. This was a consideration in not upgrading the software by the same vendor.
    I personally never install anything from orignal CD's to prevent losses. I install from a working copy and keep the originals locked up.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  194. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by Scipher · · Score: 1

    This was actually an incentive for me to purchase the Discovery album, as I had been waiting for a decent reason to pay $30 for a CD (They are quite expensive in .au).

    Open the case, low and behold there was no access card for the website. Tried to return the CD, but as it had been opened, I was kindly refused. I felt cheated, although the album was good to listen to. BTW I purchased the album from HMV - a large international music retailer.

    I haven't worked up enough patience to purchase new CDs since - sticking to second hand is good enough.

    With all my CDs I rip them and add to my collection. For me, the physical disk and case are not heavily connected to the music, and I feel that providing a more personal way of connecting with the artist (ie: new content on the web) can provide much more lasting value to a listener.

    Just my 0.0109219 USD

  195. Somebody is finally in tune... by Mulletproof · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, seriously... Besides going cold turkey internet, subscriber base and everything that goes with a downloading service, what Bon Jovi is doing is THE ONLY way to lure fans back from the brink of piracy. it's all about added value and so far, the labels have been doing nothing but subtractive value marketing. MP3 added value because I could at very least burn my own CDs, let alone ~ahem~ sample them before I buy. You can damn near do anything to MP3. There is so much added value in the digital format it's pathetic and the best the Labels can think of is encryption and new media formats? Not to stroke myself, but me and others have been saying this for years now-- The only way to combat this if you aren't going to move away from CDs is pack in shit with the CDs. Autographed guitar pics, tickets (their method is probably easier) and other stuff you simply can't get online. hell, I might just buy the CD as a show of support. This is actually one submission I totally agree with... Somebody is finally doing something right here, so support the bad man (it's like that 'going to a crappy video game movie' thing to 'support the cause').

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  196. Serial Number = Watermark? [NO!!] by Mr+S1n · · Score: 1

    Every CD is stamped from the same master copy. There is nothing unique about any CD stamped from the same master, they are all identical.

    1. Re:Serial Number = Watermark? [NO!!] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They CAN embed individual Licence numbers
      into the audio tracks... and those
      identifying numbers are NOT lost during the
      conversion process !!!

      RIAA wins again..

  197. Yadda... by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    When the long day is over and it's all said and done, Aunt Betty tucked in her bed while your singing yourself a lullaby in the closet, maybe, just maybe you might admit to yourself somewhere around 70%-80% of the people who use MP3 probably engage in the defined act of piracy; Downloading media they don't own with no intention of paying for some, if not all of it. You may not do it, or even like it, but the fact is that Mp3 is starting to becoming a synonomis with pirate as hacker is to some teenage idiot looking to crack a system because curosity killed the chicken before it counted all it's eggs that crossed the road and curiosity is my only crime. Yah. Yes, I honestly believe those percentages because I believe people are that weak, lazy and hypocritical (myself included).

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Yadda... by horza · · Score: 2

      you might admit to yourself somewhere around 70%-80% of the people who use MP3 probably engage in the defined act of piracy; Downloading media they don't own with no intention of paying for some, if not all of it.

      Throwing around percentages is all very well but you can't boil down such a complex issue into a simple number imho. For instance say 70%-80% of people _are_ downloading copyrighted music... is that music they would have otherwise bought? I know that 90+% of the music I download is just to listen to what it's like, and it gets wiped to make space on my hard drive pretty quickly. I would never have bought it at any price, so it certainly doesn't count as a lost sale for a record company. All the decent stuff I listen to regularly I have the original on CD, despite having listened to it first on a burned CD (I tend to wait for a CD to come down to ~8ukp before buying it, which I consider the reasonable price I am prepared to pay).

      It is very much like, as the parent poster said, a time-shifted radio for the consumer. Do you think the consumer ever thinks about the overheads of running a radio station? About the license fees a radio station pays? Nope, they just flick a button and it comes on. Much like Napster et al.

      Yes, I honestly believe those percentages because I believe people are that weak, lazy and hypocritical (myself included).

      What a sad take on life :-( I believe the percentage may be true as people have more freedom to explore new music they may not have otherwise heard, they are expanding themselves culturally, and are learning to define their own tastes through having real choice as opposed to being told by blanket marketing what they should and shouldn't listen to. Sure artists have to make a living, but listening to music is appreciating those good at their art. Listening to music is not a cold business transaction.

      Phillip.

  198. Weee! Law Enforcement! by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    And don't come crying to us when you stumble upon a key that has already been used, the computer notes it, your phone/IP tagged and a SWAT team/RIAA Shock trooper combo squad busts down your door and subjects you to a very harsh scolding.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  199. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by NNKK · · Score: 1

    Apparently a number of people do. Including me.

    And since we're going with the song quotes today...

    Blame it on the love of Rock & Roll!

  200. Offspring, Jimmy Eat World and others did same.... by Pr0xY · · Score: 1

    many bands such as The Offspring and Jimmy Eat World have offered exclusives based on buying the cd many times before, it's a good motivator if you are a fan of the band and are into getting extras.

    Lots of bands understand how widespread mp3s are and embrass it...for example i know of several major bands that wanted to release there entire album via website but there label wouldn't let them casue it would kill sales.

    I guess for the artists, it just boils down to how greedy you are, and the irony is that it's bands that act less greedy that I have less of a problem going out and buying the cd just to show my support.

    proxy

  201. Ally McBeal??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never heard of her.

  202. Best Bon Jovi Joke from Beavis by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Isn't that Bridget Fonda?

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  203. Prince NPG Music Club kinda does this already by ziggr · · Score: 1

    For $100/year, you get stuff from Prince. Last year it was MP3 and QuickTime downloads, including his latest CD. This year it's physical CD shipments and first dibs on concert tickets.

    You pay the artist (or The Artist), the money doesn't go through the RIAA's accounting filters, so once the bandwidth and purple guitar bills are paid, it's money in Prince's pocket (unless he's wearing those pants without a backside: no pockets).

  204. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 1

    Actually, going back a ways, Sarah MacLachlan put a link to a special part of her website on her 1997 album Surfacing. Of course, if you copy both the data and audio parts, you'd still get it, but that's harder to do, and you'd not likely find the data part on the Internet file sharing services.

    Of course, the data part of the album recommends Windows 95 or MacOS 7.6. Might not be too usable nowadays, and that part of her website may be long gone.

    --
    "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
  205. Well here's a no brainer concept.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....to reducing piracy. Something that might actually have a snowball's chance in hell to work. Try lowering the damned price to a level thats fair - like $6.99. $8.99 for the artists that actually write their own songs, too. Maybe then I might buy an album.

    It also can't hurt to get some artists that actually have talent besides swearing every other word, remix and copy sounds from other songs, or run that tired, lame retro pseudo 70's shit.

    It's high time that someone should make a new sound and take music in a new direction instead of the utter lack of direction it has now. God knows that it's been IMHO 5 years since anyone actually tried something.

  206. It's not just about fighting piracy. by Tsuzuki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's about getting people to buy the damn album - pure and simple sales. If that means less people pirate it, all the better.

    Working in a promotional company has exposed me to a fair bit of how marketing and sales operate, and "new and innovative" is what every client always wants, no matter how much or how little they're willing to pay for the resulting premiums (ie. toys) or services.

    Most of you would be physically sick if you saw some of the promotions that are being planned in the name of kids (and their parents) maintaining the market share of certain fast food and cereal companies. Sony Ericsson phones and POX were advertised in unique and innocuous ways that increased their "cool" factor.

    These promotions are ways to add perceived value to a product, which are a big part of increasing sales. We all complain about the price of CDs, whether we choose to buy them or not. Don't you think it's about time we started to at least feel like we got more value out of them?

    People who solely download music are being conceited if they think approaches like this have been generated in direct retaliation to piracy. It may be one of many reasons to carry out a promotion like this, but gathering valuable market research data and generating sales full stop are far more lucrative reasons to do it.

    (Regarding market research: a large company will probably keep your under lock and key for themselves so they know how to target future promotions. A company that provides free services is far more likely to sell information about you to others without asking you.)

    All that said, the first value-added CD I ever bought was a Pitch Shifter album. Not only did it have two small multimedia clips on it, the last two tracks of the album were made up of royalty-free samples they'd created of the album itself. They were full stereo, neatly separated, there to be ripped and used however the buyer pleased. The only "condition" of their use was that you sent the band what you'd done with it later. I think I bought it in about 1995...

  207. Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve Vai (Frank Zappa, Steve Vai), Dimebag Darrel (Pantera/Gasoline), Dave Moustain (Megadeth)... The list goes on and on... Frankly, I just hate 80's hair metal, and feel the members of any band featured on an 80's rock collection should be punished by death.

  208. Is it necessary? by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    I thought simply "Being Bon Jovi" would have been sufficient deterrent against piracy?

  209. Dave Matthews Band did it by nmx · · Score: 1

    As someone mentioned, Dave Matthews Band already did this with "Busted Stuff," and even included a bonus DVD with live footage, for a very low price ($9.99 on sale!) The problem is that to register on their website for the exclusive content, you are forced to join RCA's (their label's) mailing list. Close but no thanks.

    --
    "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try."
  210. They are not the first do do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daft Punk did this almost 2 years ago and I have seen others do the same.

  211. Ugh, that's a frickin' HORRIBLE idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I buy an albumn because it has good tracks on it.
    I do not buy an albumn because i give 2 tosses about the "artiste". I can safely say that the only people i own more than one albumn of is the Wu-Tang clan and De La Soul.

    I refuse to pay $5-7 for other copies of CD's. I copy my CD onto my mini-disc player and delete out the crap tracks i don't want to hear.

    I also refuse to be forced to pay extra for a bog standard CD just so i can get some crappy e-mail sent to me. I'd be getting about 300 e-mails a month from all the different "artistes".

    "special commerative t-shirt" That alone makes me want to vomit.
    Also, think about how valuable the database would be. Even suggesting that makes me want to hit you. Not only am i supposed to pay extra for stuff they also get to track me too?

  212. Re:Amen to that (offtopic) by TheLostOne · · Score: 1

    man.. the Gorge is THE place to be :)

    I bummed rides/bused halfway across the country to get there for a few concerts ... when the sun starts to set behind the canyon and the marshells start to hum all the hours in the greyhound seem worth it :P

    --


    '..that kernel panicked like a nun in a crack house!'
  213. Not to mention "In Through The Door" by AnnaBlack · · Score: 1

    And of course Led Zeppelin's In Through The Out Door LP had a "magic paint" inner sleeve... For the generation that don't know what I mean, one of those where you paint with water and the colours magically appear. Apparently unpainted versions are worth a lot more than painted ones. Damn my little brother and his wanton paintbrush...

    But the serious point here (if there is one) is that buying that LP was more than just the music. It was the pictures, the sleeve, the lyrics... the whole "I am a LZ fan" thing. Having the mp3s to hand is only a way of listening to the music and doesn't replace that experience.

  214. There's another anti-piracy measure on there too by bindster · · Score: 1

    The primary method they're using to deter piracy is putting bad music made by a washed up 80s band on the CD.

    --
    WARNING: DO NOT LET DR. MARIO TOUCH YOUR GENITALS. HE IS NOT A REAL DOCTOR.
  215. Daft Punk did this a couple of years ago by Pointdexter · · Score: 1

    When Daft Punk released Discovery a couple of years ago every copy had a card with a unique serial number on it. You can still go to the Daft Club website and download exclusive tracks etc. using your serial number :)

    --
    Party Time: Excellent
  216. Offspring already did this... by Builder · · Score: 2

    The Offspring already did this on their latest album (Conspiracy of One).

    Noting new to see here.. Move along.

  217. Huh?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who likes Bon Jovi anyway? :)

  218. Done before (Re:Good Job!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Froufrou have already done something similar (look at http://froufrou.cymbalism.com)

  219. A huge step foward. by kko · · Score: 1

    It's the reason I bought a bunch of copies of Half-Life: added value. A couple friends of mine had pirate copies of HL and they went through the single player missions in a couple of days, but when another friend of mine bought a legal version and told them about WON they immediately bought legal versions. As for me, I wasn't into playing games anymore, until I was introduced to CStrike. Then I bought a bunch of copies for the PC's at home.
    Bon Jovi's taking a great step, intead of treating their "customers" as thieves they're adding some great value to the purchase of a legal copy.
    Yet, the real "evolution" here is coming to terms with the fact that those who copy your album off the net are most likely not going to spend a cent on your ass. Why spend so much money on protected cd's, suing napster, etc... if those people are not going to create revenue anyways.
    Now I'm not supporting stealing, but artists and labels should try to think of downloaders as people who are lent CD's by their friends. If they really like what they listen, it's highly probable that they'll spend money on that cd.

    --
    No, seriously, I just come here for the articles.
  220. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by cpfeifer · · Score: 2

    Here's an entry from Moby's journal where he claims that bands with technically savvy audiences don't do well in the charts because their fans rip & burn their CDs. I guess he's a little bitter about '18' not doing as well as 'Play'.

    My $.02: I listened to '18' on MP3 with full intention of buying the album if I like it (I did this with Play), and I just didn't like it. IMHO, it sounded lik 'Play' warmed over, and didn't do much for me. So I didn't buy it, and I deleted the MP3s.

    --
    it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
  221. New Bon Jovi Album by rat7307 · · Score: 1

    please ............Wont somebody think about the CHILDREN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    cruel and unusual punishment indeed......

    --
    Burma?
  222. Hmmmm, that's odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The big bands generally go on tours to promote a new CD. Where's the logic in that?

  223. Daft Punk by pinbot · · Score: 1

    Did this two years ago witht he release of discovery. It came with a credit card style membership card that allowed you access to special features.

  224. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
    Tried to return the CD, but as it had been opened, I was kindly refused. I felt cheated

    You were cheated. If the box said the card should be there and it wasn't, they'll have violated some sort of trade descriptions act, or whatever the Oz equivalent law is. You were missold a defective product. You just didn't complain loudly enough, a lot of stores try to fob everyone off first time they complain. Jeez, how are you to know that the card isn't there until you open it? It's like selling a DVD player were the box only actually had a couple of bricks in it. Do you think that opening that box voids any consumer rights you have?

    Have you still got the receipt? If so, speak to a local consumer rights group. Failing that, get the tracks of a p2p network. Whatever your feelings on file-sharing, you are morally entitled to these.

  225. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  226. Not so brand new idea by nsebban · · Score: 1


    The French techno band Daft Punk also did this 2 years ago. The ID gave an access to restricted parts of their website.

    --
    ____
    nico
    Nico-Live
  227. Snooked. by Gray · · Score: 2

    Daft Punk did it over a year ago with their Daft Card. Every CD came with a credit card type bit thing with a unique serial. Punch the serial into the website and get content.

    I suspect what's really happened here is somebody at Bon Jovi's label is very clever and figured out a way to get a big hard plug on Slashdot.

  228. The punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are caught copying bon jovi, he will come to your house and sleep over.

  229. Already been done by Drazil · · Score: 1

    The Tragically Hip used this same idea with their release of 'In Violet Light' this summer. You could register online using a serial number packaged with the CD. Registration provided access to bonus tracks, unreleased live material and early access to concert tickets. Pretty cool.

  230. it has been done... by marshmeli · · Score: 1

    Dave Matthews Band also did that this summer with Busted Stuff and the band even offered a link to a live webcast of their Hartfort, CT show.

  231. Adding value by techstar25 · · Score: 2

    I always felt that since manufacturing costs are going down, but CD prices are not, they should give us a little more with the CDs we buy. The Dave Matthews Band's latest album "Busted Stuff"(which has been floating around the internet for a year under the name "The Lillywhite Sessions")was released packaged with a free DVD which had two great live performances, and one song (audio only) in 5.1. It was sort of a DVD "single" if you will. It gave fans a real reason to buy even though just about everybody had already downloaded the same songs on the internet. That's smart marketing.

  232. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rap sucks asss

  233. Re:Combatting piracy? I don't think so... by Verence · · Score: 1

    Oh? Wonderful. Thanks for the notice... now I just need to find that card.

    --

    ... that's all i wrote...
  234. This isnt a new idea... by lordvolt2k · · Score: 1

    Daft Punk did it with Discovery. You recieved a credit-card like card, with which you used the number on it to download music, videos, and more.
    The cd itself was not copy protected as far as I could tell, it worked in everything I had.

  235. Right. by serutan · · Score: 2

    Jon B J, can you say "Duh?"

  236. The most shocking thing by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    The thing that is really shocking is that someone would want to pirate Bon Jovi.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  237. Non-event by freeride · · Score: 0

    Lots of bands have been selling CDs with bonus material for a long time -- Gorillaz had a key to access stuff on their website last year. Is this really news? Besides, does this really discourage "piracy"? Encouragement to buy the CD doesn't equate to discouragement to rip it later or download some MP3s to hear it before you buy.

  238. Sooo......there are people stealing Bon Jovi? by cyberdog6 · · Score: 1

    i mean.... i know it should be free, but that's just because it sucks, right?

    --
    Evil is the money of all root....
  239. I disagree by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    Art is aesthetic in nature, whereas software is functional in nature. There may be art underlying the actual code, such as the layout of the icons on the screen (and obviously the icons themselves), but the algorithms themselves are merely functional. This becomes clear when you consider software such as database software or webserving software, where the artistry is absent completely and only the functionality remains.

  240. Re:What will they blame it on when this doesn't se by mrjive · · Score: 1

    Maybe it (18) would have sold better if it didn't suck so bad.

    It's quite obvious by listening to it that he's simply trying to cash in on what made Play so successful...to the point that he used the same sounds (string samples, etc), and even similar melodies and chord progressions.

    --
    If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. -George Carlin
  241. Too late.... by mrjive · · Score: 1

    All this is in vein though, since the album has been floating around on the net as mp3 for over a week already.

    Still....you can't blame them for trying.

    --
    If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. -George Carlin
  242. Black Crowes by jambalaya · · Score: 1

    The Black Crowes did this with their Lions cd. You put the cd into your computer and it would bring up an application that let you download entire concerts from that tour, already sized to fit on cds. You could only download a certain number of concerts, but you could stream as many as you like.

  243. new approach? by daevt · · Score: 1

    new approach? what about there old approach? they kept me from pirating their music already by placing it well below my "crap tolerance threshold."

  244. Re:Back to the 70s - Don't make me yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radiohead, Oasis, Puff Daddy, Limp Bizcut, Linkin Park, et all are right up there with, well, Bon Jovi.

    With a statement like that using Radiohead in the same sentence as Puff Daddy and Bon Jovi, you have shown your utter ignorance.