It is still exhibitionism if you expose yourself to willing observers. It follows that this is still a violation of privacy even if you give permission.
More competition is good, Intel pretty much sat on their hands for the last long while. In my workstation I really don't care if it is 200W or 10W CPU, but I do care how long I have to wait for something to compute.
Do they still randomly confiscate contents of your accounts? I guess since this is a credit card product, now they will also have an ability to max the credit card for you.
I control my PC and its drivers. Insofar as you know, I only use a controller and nothing else is connected to it. I even post on/. with a controller. If you load anything trying to look at my drivers, you will be looking at the inside of VM.
At least in case of Valve/PC, any crossplay will quickly turn into massacre. For example, in FPS keyboard and mouse players of moderate skill would dominate competition-level console players. The same would hold in RTS or any other game where skill element revolves around player control.
He wrote that women are less able to deal with stress, and thus there are fewer of them in stressful jobs. That's clearly saying that women are less capable of handling stress. He even proposes reducing stress as a way to mitigate this reduced capability.
This is again creative re-interpretation of what was said. Did you skip reading the entire paragraph where he goes about populations and demographics.
What was actually said, backed by published literature, that on average women are less willing to deal with stressful environments and as a results make a choice to work in less stressful environments.
What puzzles me is massive opposition to Google paper from feminists. How is less stress, more flexible hours, and so on bad for anyone? This paper basically states "Less slave-driving will get more women in tech". We can't have less slave-driving, right?
This guy takes the conclusion from them that women are inherently less capable than the men.
The article did no such thing. You will have to stretch definition of 'capable' in unusual ways to make such claim. To summarize the article, it states that men on average are more focused on status while women are more focused on relationships. Neither of these would fit traditional definition of capable.
Reasonable discussion looks something like this: Your conclusions are based on faulty data, study A and B was debunked by X, Y, and Z.
This is not what happened.
What happened is approximately like this: Personal insults. Outright lies. Straw man take downs.
Even your response, reasonably civil, assumes that James Damore only cited Wikipedia. This is not the case. He cited peer reviewed articles from respectable journals. I understand actually reading what he wrote might end up getting you expelled from your social group, but you can still do it in secret. This way you won't sound quite as misinformed to anyone who read the article.
Slashdot Mirror
It is still exhibitionism if you expose yourself to willing observers. It follows that this is still a violation of privacy even if you give permission.
While this program is a horrible violation of privacy, as long as the entire program is opt-in it is acceptable.
That way readers know who the Holy fucking Mary he is.
This rule, like many others, don't apply to Trump.
Sure, I am also using laptop. It is plugged in 99% of the time. Even on the plane you now have power outlets to charge your electronics.
More competition is good, Intel pretty much sat on their hands for the last long while. In my workstation I really don't care if it is 200W or 10W CPU, but I do care how long I have to wait for something to compute.
At least until you turn 50.
The best paid developers with most job security are ones maintaining critical legacy systems written in Cobol and Fortran.
Do they still randomly confiscate contents of your accounts? I guess since this is a credit card product, now they will also have an ability to max the credit card for you.
I don't always code, but when I code I write assembly code directly in binary.
This is no forking joking matter, don't dongle it up.
This has not stopped dirty console peasants in the past.
I control my PC and its drivers. Insofar as you know, I only use a controller and nothing else is connected to it. I even post on /. with a controller. If you load anything trying to look at my drivers, you will be looking at the inside of VM.
At least in case of Valve/PC, any crossplay will quickly turn into massacre. For example, in FPS keyboard and mouse players of moderate skill would dominate competition-level console players. The same would hold in RTS or any other game where skill element revolves around player control.
Are we also going to get 'beheading' button next to 'like'?
Fortunately, there are rarely surprise endings.
Unless you woke up due to a bright flash, checking for #1 is irrelevant.
Next Apple project - flailing around and reheating Job's leftover ideas. They need someone with vision or accept that they are a commodity supplier.
The next day after telemetry collection goes live:
Firefox now renders porn 1000% faster using 50% less memory and supports up to 999 tabs. Every other feature was removed.
Internet of Things moved to Internet of Insecure Things and now to Internet of Legally Screwed Things.
Why would anyone buy IoT after this is a mystery.
I live outside CA, and have not experienced this. Cult of youth is not everywhere.
Something fishy going on here, but I can't quite put my finger on it.
Your are in violation of my patent on shitposting on /. Cease and desist.
It also has 'the' article in there somewhere. Really? Even for you, taking 6 words out of entire article out of context is low mark.
Try reading what actual scientists in the field say about this .
He wrote that women are less able to deal with stress, and thus there are fewer of them in stressful jobs. That's clearly saying that women are less capable of handling stress. He even proposes reducing stress as a way to mitigate this reduced capability.
This is again creative re-interpretation of what was said. Did you skip reading the entire paragraph where he goes about populations and demographics.
What was actually said, backed by published literature, that on average women are less willing to deal with stressful environments and as a results make a choice to work in less stressful environments.
What puzzles me is massive opposition to Google paper from feminists. How is less stress, more flexible hours, and so on bad for anyone? This paper basically states "Less slave-driving will get more women in tech". We can't have less slave-driving, right?
This guy takes the conclusion from them that women are inherently less capable than the men.
The article did no such thing. You will have to stretch definition of 'capable' in unusual ways to make such claim. To summarize the article, it states that men on average are more focused on status while women are more focused on relationships. Neither of these would fit traditional definition of capable.
Reasonable discussion looks something like this:
Your conclusions are based on faulty data, study A and B was debunked by X, Y, and Z.
This is not what happened.
What happened is approximately like this:
Personal insults. Outright lies. Straw man take downs.
Even your response, reasonably civil, assumes that James Damore only cited Wikipedia. This is not the case. He cited peer reviewed articles from respectable journals.
I understand actually reading what he wrote might end up getting you expelled from your social group, but you can still do it in secret. This way you won't sound quite as misinformed to anyone who read the article.