Slashdot Mirror


User: john83

john83's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
469
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 469

  1. Re:The really pathetic part of this... on '55 Science Paper Retracted to Thwart Creationists · · Score: 1
  2. Re:xkcd on Remains of Shattered Moon Found in Saturn's Rings · · Score: 1

    There's only been about 300 of them, but the author seems to be very much in tune with the /. crowd. There are only so many popular nerdy themes! I thoroughly recommend you browse through his archive - it's a very fun hour or so. Now, off to the String theory video thread to see if anyone's posted this yet.

    In an unrelated note, posters warning of possible raptor entry points have appeared in my building recently. (It's not my doing.)

  3. Re:This is disheartening on Scientist Are Working to 'Steer' Hurricanes · · Score: 1

    Imagine the Slashdot posts on the "Man invents fire" story.

    Requires fuel. Less light than the daytime. Lame.

    But does it run Linux?
  4. Re:Aliasing on Radiohead May Have Made $6-$10 Million on Name-Your Cost Album · · Score: 1

    Two words for you: reconstruction filter. And, for the record, I am an electronic engineer.

  5. Re:Not as Altruistic as First Appears on Radiohead May Have Made $6-$10 Million on Name-Your Cost Album · · Score: 1

    *cough* an audio CD is sampled at 44.1 kHz, not 32 kHz Ah, so I was wrong about the number. It only contains frequencies up to ~22kHz, which is sensible in light of the human auditory range I mentioned in my earlier post.

    This is why I don't read /. so much any more. Lots of people know the numbers, but too few know what they mean.
  6. Re:From Caltech via the Wayback Machine on Mythbusters to Test Cockroach Radiation Myth · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would love to see the National Institute for Standards and Technology establish the standard "reference cockroach". Bah! They'd only over-specify it. Kernighan & Richie's cockroaches are entirely good enough for most uses.
  7. Re:Not as Altruistic as First Appears on Radiohead May Have Made $6-$10 Million on Name-Your Cost Album · · Score: 1

    160kbps is, I think, good for perfect reconstruction up to 20kHz. A typical person can hear up to 16kHz-22kHz, with the upper end of that range relatively rare. I approve of the redundancy of a CD (32kHz) but I really don't think it matters very much.

  8. Re:Cockroaches, harmed in the making of broadcast? on Mythbusters to Test Cockroach Radiation Myth · · Score: 1

    if you accept there claim without substantiation, you have failed to apply scientific priciples yourself. I refuse to listen to scientific criticism from someone who doesn't distinguish between the homophones of 'their'.
  9. Re:Its still not PIRACY on Radiohead May Have Made $6-$10 Million on Name-Your Cost Album · · Score: 1

    You know, words do evolve in meaning over time. Trying to win an argument through etymological fallacy only proves your level of desperation. I tend to agree. The Orwellian practice of labelling something in a particular way to make it more or less palatable to the public is pathetic. We should subject anyone who does something like that to rendition, regime change, piracy, liberation... whatever means are necessary to stamp it out. It's our patriotic duty.
  10. Re:Shatner is out? on Paramount Casts New James T. Kirk · · Score: 1

    All I can say is, after his performance in 'Hulk', hearing about Eric Bana being cast in anything makes me cringe. Unless he's being cast in to a pit of boiling lava. Carbonite. I'd like to see him cast in carbonite.

    No, wait, wrong franchise...
  11. Re:Yeah, that would show them on Canadian Mint Claims Rights To Words "One Cent" · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd be more inclined to drop it to them from a great height.

  12. Re:Pants? on Man Claims iPod Set His Pants Aflame · · Score: 1

    british(pants,trousers) <=> american(underwear,pants) Yeah, I've never really gotten this. When I was growing up, it was irish(underpants, pants), which seems like a far more consistent system than either of those.
  13. Re:Compared to adaptive optics? on Sharpest Images With "Lucky" Telescope · · Score: 1

    Both are employed pretty heavily by advanced "Amateur" astronomers. I put amateur in quotes because people at the high end of the hobby may have setups costing $50,000-$100,000+ dollars, going up to as much as people are willing to spend. There are several companies (http://www.sbig.com/ for example) that specialize in producing imaging equipment and software for these setups. It's pretty amazing what these people are able to do. I attended a lecture a year or two ago by a respected academic in adaptive optics (Chris Dainty, for the curious). He described efforts to put together an AO kit for amateur astronomers. I think he said that he wasn't able to get it under a few thousand Euro. It's not a cheap science, for sure.
  14. Re:*Not to scale on Star Wars Fan Puts Himself in Carbonite · · Score: 1

    But how do you name... that which has no life? Oh, it's life all right Jim, but not as we know it.
  15. Re:Dangerous on How To Turn a Mini Maglite Into a Laser · · Score: 1

    No problem. He just need to wait until a reply gets modded up +5 Informative. That's a sure way to guarantee that anything posted on Slashdot will be accurate, with correct precision, and not be filled with crackpot theories, right? The badgers told him not to.
  16. Re:Let the Swiss sue J&J on American Red Cross Sued For Using a Red Cross · · Score: 2, Interesting

    More to the point, J&J were established in 1886; the American Red Cross have been around five years longer. How the hell J&J claim any rights over a symbol used before they were established? And if yes, why the hell hasn't that law been changed yet?

  17. Re:listen to ads? on Google Shows Off Ad-Supported Cell Phone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In Ireland, no one pays for incoming calls - the caller pays for everything.

    This kind of reminds me of what people describe early cable TV as being like - you paid a fee so there were no ads. Then, after a while, you still paid, but you also got ads. I don't want to see the reverse happening here - first free phone with ads, then paid phone with ads. Still, maybe competition can keep that possibility away.

  18. Re:Methodology on IE Dropping, Now Near 70% In Europe · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    Methodology: Firefox's use rate corresponds to the totality of Firefox visits during the period in relation to the entirety of visits, all browsers taken together. They don't explain what "visits" means. Does it mean visits to *their* site? Did they poll a random number of site owners? I'm sorry, but unless they can provide some supporting information, then these statistics are meaningless. From TFA: "Perimeter of 95,827 websites".
  19. Re:Isn't all time travel impossible? on Testing Einstein's 'Spooky Action at a Distance' · · Score: 1

    Relative to what?

  20. Re:Other sources of true random numbers on True Random Number Generator Goes Online · · Score: 1

    That second one isn't truly random. It correlates with certain financial measures.

  21. Re:Hello World on FBI Remotely Installs Spyware to Trace Bomb Threat · · Score: 1

    I don't buy it. This is the FBI. These guys can barely tie their own shoelaces but you think they can hack computers? I laugh. How hard is it to pay someone who can?
  22. Re:hmm. on Farscape (Kinda) Returns · · Score: 1

    You forgot 'forensics'-heavy cop shows.

  23. Re:Hello World on FBI Remotely Installs Spyware to Trace Bomb Threat · · Score: 1

    There are more than that even. They track down crackers. I'm sure they put some of them to use afterwards.

  24. Re:indeed on Microsoft Patents the Mother of All Adware · · Score: 1

    And, um, exactly when has this stopped them (or any other tech company *cough*Amazon*cough*) from obtaining a patent before? That's going to intimidate Google how? That trick only works when the other guy doesn't have the money and resources to fight.
  25. Re:photonic crystals ? on Chameleon Liquid Could Replace LCDs · · Score: 1

    Photonic crystals is a respectable field of research, though it's still fairly theoretical. Am I the only one who isn't at all impressed when some piece of actual technology sounds like some made up thing from some fantasy novel or elderly sci-fi series?