Last year my uncle has been the subject of his ex-lover's efforts to destroy his reputation on TV, Philippine newspapers & local blogosphere in a bid to get their child back, win in the court of popular opinion & for money. His ex-lover used her media & political connection to go on live TV to accuse my uncle of being a murderer, land grabber, gangster, etc (basically making him out as a Hannibal Lector if he was a lawyer) and told people to look him up on the Internet. Seeming she couldnt mention his name due to legal reasons she had to mention a Philippine Army General who harassed our family 15 years ago as a key word so people would know who he was.
You see my uncle is a lawyer who is a giant question mark in the mainstream media & the general public and it doesnt help his name shows up in a lot of court decisions posted on our government's Supreme Court website. For the curious by-stander who just happened to have a casual interest you would automically assume my uncle was truelly that "evil" seeming he was mentioned in so many contraversial Supreme Court cases. I do not blame people making such brash assumptions seeming court documents are long, wordy & use very legalistic terms that would cause any non-lawyer to scratch his head and make wild guesses. It is far easier to trust a female celebrity guesting on the local equivalent of the Oprah who bashes my uncle as the devil than to make the effort to get the whole unvarnished truth through court documents.
Because of these lengthy legal papers people automatically think all the things the ex-lover said was true, that he was a real monster.
If only people took the time to read the legal papers they'd see that the ex-lover was manipulating them. It pisses me off that the ex-lover had to dredge up our family feud & shame that legally ended with a Philippine Supreme Court decision back in 1991. I will probably never forgive her for that.
I can relate to the Korean fellow whose reputation was tarnished because of very malicious rumors & half truths spread by those who make assumptions.
I know a lot of people dont like lawyers but please, no taste-less jokes that lawyers deserve this kind of flack. I also know by not including links my post doesnt pack the punch that would really make the discussion & I apologize.
What'll happen to the Comedy Central's Colbert Report & the Daily Show if the FCC starts cracking down on "fake news" shows? I know both shows do not features "paid for by businesses or interest groups" but put a humorous spin on the day's news.
With all the flak they're getting from "outsourcing" it is understandable the Indian govt would want to protect their citizens from the nasty words of layed-off American employees whose jobs were sent to Mumbai!
Blah blah... Yahoo China follows local laws & censors. Blah blah... Google China follows local laws & censors. Americas & other democracies are outraged and yet not dare do an all out embargo or else goods will skyrocket in price so they go after businesses that follows the legitimate laws of China.
Isn't anyone getting bored with all the anti-China articles posted on/.? It's as if everyone is trying to outnumber the anti-Microsoft ones.
I think it's great that China is taking a stand on Intel's near-monopoly on wireless tech. I think we need more incompatible specifications to incite more innovation, etc, etc.
That China is a sovereign country with its own set of rules & customs. It has the right to determine it's own destiny without need of approval from the West.
Maybe Bush was wrong all along. Maybe he should've invaded Vulcan for WMDs & terrorists. Nevermind they have the galaxy's largest supply of Methanol reserves. Must liberate the alcohol cause God told me so!
Apple moved this year's WWDC from July to August thus the need for Microsoft to delay & rewrite 60% of Vista so it can copy all the new geewhiz features of OS X 10.5 Leopard.
Anyone who disagrees with me is a Microsoft fanboy.;)
Slashdot Mirror
What will this mean for Apple's update to Airport Extreme/Express? This makes me a sad panda. :(
Huh? What does that mean?
Last year my uncle has been the subject of his ex-lover's efforts to destroy his reputation on TV, Philippine newspapers & local blogosphere in a bid to get their child back, win in the court of popular opinion & for money. His ex-lover used her media & political connection to go on live TV to accuse my uncle of being a murderer, land grabber, gangster, etc (basically making him out as a Hannibal Lector if he was a lawyer) and told people to look him up on the Internet. Seeming she couldnt mention his name due to legal reasons she had to mention a Philippine Army General who harassed our family 15 years ago as a key word so people would know who he was.
You see my uncle is a lawyer who is a giant question mark in the mainstream media & the general public and it doesnt help his name shows up in a lot of court decisions posted on our government's Supreme Court website. For the curious by-stander who just happened to have a casual interest you would automically assume my uncle was truelly that "evil" seeming he was mentioned in so many contraversial Supreme Court cases. I do not blame people making such brash assumptions seeming court documents are long, wordy & use very legalistic terms that would cause any non-lawyer to scratch his head and make wild guesses. It is far easier to trust a female celebrity guesting on the local equivalent of the Oprah who bashes my uncle as the devil than to make the effort to get the whole unvarnished truth through court documents.
Because of these lengthy legal papers people automatically think all the things the ex-lover said was true, that he was a real monster.
If only people took the time to read the legal papers they'd see that the ex-lover was manipulating them. It pisses me off that the ex-lover had to dredge up our family feud & shame that legally ended with a Philippine Supreme Court decision back in 1991. I will probably never forgive her for that.
I can relate to the Korean fellow whose reputation was tarnished because of very malicious rumors & half truths spread by those who make assumptions.
I know a lot of people dont like lawyers but please, no taste-less jokes that lawyers deserve this kind of flack. I also know by not including links my post doesnt pack the punch that would really make the discussion & I apologize.
What'll happen to the Comedy Central's Colbert Report & the Daily Show if the FCC starts cracking down on "fake news" shows? I know both shows do not features "paid for by businesses or interest groups" but put a humorous spin on the day's news.
Tiger was also leaked a couple of years ago.
:)
Who didn't see this coming? Expect Apple Legal to have a field day with this one.
Curious that this statement was made during the Bush administration
baduy
Oh please, i'm sure you've looked at porn more than enough not to objectify women. :)
this makes sense actually. if you start forcing your personal morals on others those oppose often vote with their feet and walk away.
With all the flak they're getting from "outsourcing" it is understandable the Indian govt would want to protect their citizens from the nasty words of layed-off American employees whose jobs were sent to Mumbai!
Dont go to http://pinoyexchange.com/
I already make my own gold nuggets at home and sometimes, if i have too, outside. ;)
Take for example the last 3 "People Power Revolution" the Philippines undergone. Different political face but same political body.
... Sky people! Look up the sky, it's a bird, it's a plane! It's Superman!
if only they diverted a fraction of that amount to my charity, me. ;)
http://hoopsdonuts.com/
Apple's Macc Mini does this already so it can keep it's really small size, small.
Blah blah... Yahoo China follows local laws & censors. Blah blah... Google China follows local laws & censors. Americas & other democracies are outraged and yet not dare do an all out embargo or else goods will skyrocket in price so they go after businesses that follows the legitimate laws of China.
Isn't anyone getting bored with all the anti-China articles posted on /.? It's as if everyone is trying to outnumber the anti-Microsoft ones.
I think it's great that China is taking a stand on Intel's near-monopoly on wireless tech. I think we need more incompatible specifications to incite more innovation, etc, etc.
Isn't this a repost from a few months back? I guess all that partEing made the geeks lap in memory. ;)
After everything's said and done he has bills as well you know!
That China is a sovereign country with its own set of rules & customs. It has the right to determine it's own destiny without need of approval from the West.
There's a reason why they call it BETA. Some people are just so stupid.
Maybe Bush was wrong all along. Maybe he should've invaded Vulcan for WMDs & terrorists. Nevermind they have the galaxy's largest supply of Methanol reserves. Must liberate the alcohol cause God told me so!
Apple moved this year's WWDC from July to August thus the need for Microsoft to delay & rewrite 60% of Vista so it can copy all the new geewhiz features of OS X 10.5 Leopard.
;)
Anyone who disagrees with me is a Microsoft fanboy.
idiot. you just dont know anything. you may as well destroy your account here. shesh
More Australian Companies Outsource to India & the Philippines