Slashdot Mirror


China Files Case Against Intel's Wireless Network

Krishna Dagli writes "China has launched a case against American chipmaker Intel's near-monopoly on encryption standards for wireless local area network (WLAN) equipment, state press reported Monday."

274 comments

  1. Can we? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can we all just ignore this story until xinhua / china decide to release some information on what (specifically), the IEEE is supposed to have done?

    -1 Lack of detail.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Can we? by PRC+Banker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FTFA: It is about abuse of a monopoly. Could have a lot of beef, or could not, but to answer your question:

      China has accused the makers of the technology developed by the chipmaking giant Intel of unethical behaviour and has asked the International Standards Organization (ISO) to review the case, Xinhua news reported.

      It says that the American Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), actual makers of the technology, broke ISO rules when its national bodies voted on new technology to mend security loopholes in the WLAN standard.

      China now wants the ISO to investigate the fast-track process to determine "whether the ethical and procedural rules and principles have indeed been violated and whether the ballots have been unfairly influenced by those ethical and procedural violations".

      That is what has been done, it chose new technology and in doing so apparently broke rules on voting for procedures.

      --
      Oh.
    2. Re:Can we? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      grandparent is right. Xinhua doesn't know how to write stories, but it knows how to write propaganda.

  2. china? whaa? by rootofevil · · Score: 1, Insightful

    since when does china care about patent law?

    also, how is it intels fault theyve put a ton of money into researching it? (that may be slightly ignorant of the actual facts, but if they wrote the standards, it stands to reason they created it)

    --
    turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    1. Re:china? whaa? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      since when does china care about patent law?

      Nothing to do with patent law.

      Short version. IEEE submitted 80211i, China submitted WAPI to ISO to be international wireless encryption standards. IEEE won, WAPI lost. China is complaining that IEEE did something bad during the lead up to the voting process. No news sources are reporting what that something was as far as I can see.

      So we have nebulous claims of interference in the ISO process. No more, no less.

      (I'm not sure whether I dislike/distrust Intel or China more)

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    2. Re:china? whaa? by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Just like every other country, they only worry about it when they think their IP has been violated....

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    3. Re:china? whaa? by Browncoat · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      I don't tend to trust giant companies, and I don't tend to trust Communist governments. That said, I think the lesser evil is Intel, because China can wreak more on several fronts, including the tech industries.

      It looks to me like China is whining because things didn't go their way.

      --
      "Curse your sudden, but inevitable betrayal!"
    4. Re:china? whaa? by oringo · · Score: 1

      Just like any other average /. poster, the moment you see something on China and IP, China is always the pirater. Despite the facts (that you don't know about) that Chinese laws DOES protect patent filed in China, this story has nothing to do with patent violation.

      China simply doesn't want foreign companies to hold the dominant IP on one of the network infrastructure protocols, as doing so would mean that billions of Chinese customers would have to pay a foreign orgazination (IEEE and Intel) a royalty fee on every single 802.11 product they purchase (and believe it or not, they DO pay through the manufacturers).

      So why does China care to make their own standard an international standard? Because Intel doesn't give a damn to China's standard, unless it is made official IEEE. Intel will continue to sell Intel's standard to China as long as Intel's standard is the IEE standard protocol. And they sell a whole lot of 802.11 devices every year.

    5. Re:china? whaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can anything be both a standard and patented? Surely the whole point of standards is that they are international benchmarks. Fine if Intel won the IEEE bidding to have their method adopted for international use everyone should recognise it and be happy. At which point any patent claims Intel have to methods are null and void. How can you have a *STANDARD* and still profess to control it? It makes no sense. And it wouldn't matter if the Chinese WAPI standard had been adopted, by the same token they would have to drop all claims to control it.

      In other words what I am saying is that these so called "standards" are bullshit. They are no more than a way for large companies to *force* their already dubiously patented processes on the market under the pretense of concensual recognition.

      It should be the law that for anything to even be considered as an international standard it must already be open source and patent free.

    6. Re:china? whaa? by JulesLt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Intel hasn't (to my knowledge) killed anyone protesting against it, in full view of the world's cameras, just because it can.

      --
      'Capitalists of the world, unite! Oh ... you have' (League Against Tedium)
    7. Re:china? whaa? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Intel hasn't (to my knowledge) killed anyone protesting against it, in full view of the world's cameras, just because it can.

      Good point.

      You're quite right that China has behaved far more atrociously than intel.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    8. Re:china? whaa? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Is an ISO certified tech actualy pattenable? I mean if itis the standard, Can they collect royalties? It would seem that it some things were industry standards, the concept outside and indevidual implementation should be open.

      I've often wondered about this. IEEE and I think ISO are two different groups. Even if it isn't, The types of software pattents we are seeing could includ the entire standard. I'm not sure if that is right (moraly or legaly).

    9. Re:china? whaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the choice between a country doing what it does to (in its views) protect its society & way of life and a company doing what it does for profit, id prefer a bad country any day.

    10. Re:china? whaa? by Nutria · · Score: 1
      It looks to me like China is whining because things didn't go their way.

      The mind-blowingly stunning part is that Communists are complaining about someone else's monopoly...
      he believes China's WAPI standard lost the ISO fast-track vote because the current WLAN market is dominated by Intel and voting for WAPI may hurt the interests of the monopoly group owning the existing technology.
      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    11. Re:china? whaa? by Gadzinka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Others have already pointed out that this case has nothing to do with patents, but I'll answer this question anyway:

      since when does china care about patent law?

      Since about the same time as US.

      As long as the international balance on Copyrights, Patents etc disfavoured US, it had blissfully ignored them. But as soon as it looked that the trend is reversing usians started to cry foul and became the biggest proponent of the Intelectual Property in the world.

      We have this stupid saying in Poland: "Kali steal cow, good did, cow steal from Kali, bad did"[1].

      Robert

      [1] grammar intentionally bad, as in Polish original, since it comes from novel by Henryk Sienkiewicz and was supposed to emulate African speaking broken Polish

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    12. Re:china? whaa? by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Despite the demonization of corporations (particularly multinationals), few of them (maybe Union Carbide as an example) can approach the atrocity level of even the "nicest" nation...

    13. Re:china? whaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How blind.. just because you dont use a gun doesnt mean you arent responsible for atrocities.

      The Aluminium Company of America sold aluminium to the Nazis during WW2 to build tanks and other weapons.

      Many companies produce deadly waste that gets released into the environment.

      How many of these companies have actually attempted to reduce the emissions from their factories and manufacturing processes.

      How many people are injured or killed in factories making Nike footwear, or clothing for corporations each year, while being treated worse than animals, being paid as little as 20 cents per hour.

      Haliburton & other companies started a war for profit.

      So please dont even try to claim these companies are any better than these "nice" nations. It just shows your ignorance.

      Taking a life, or exploiting one is just as bad wether its for money or some beliefs.

    14. Re:china? whaa? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      How many people are injured or killed in factories making Nike footwear, or clothing for corporations each year, while being treated worse than animals, being paid as little as 20 cents per hour.

      Hey, they're just taking advantage of local labor standards. Maybe even Chinese labor standards.

    15. Re:china? whaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So its ok to condemn china for its human rights violations but its not ok to hold others to the same standard?

      I guess money is a good reason to destroy lives.

      Is terrorism ok if its for money?

      Is murder?

    16. Re:china? whaa? by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

      What's so mind blowing about it? It's not like standards are public in the way TV's NTSC was. They're corporate property. FM is perfect example, an open protocol being supplanted by IBOC, a transmission scheme owned by a single corporate consortium. A license to print money for generations. Corporatists or Communists, pick your poison.

    17. Re:china? whaa? by afidel · · Score: 1

      ISO and IEEE require RAND (reasonable and non discriminatory) licensing for patented tech in their standards. MPEG, JPEG, and other common media formats are full of patented tech but they are also ISO standards that simply require standardized licensing fees to implement commercially.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    18. Re:china? whaa? by afidel · · Score: 1

      China gave up being Communists in all but name when the national assembly voted to restore personal property rights (not that they ever tried all that hard in the first place).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    19. Re:china? whaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, I also prefer a bad country that tries to preserve it's dictatorial, human-rights-abusing, dissident-executing way of life to a bad company anyday. The 25 million killed under Mao are just history anyways; Intel's abuses are far worse.

      Apologies to all whose sarcasm detectors are set to "sensitive".

    20. Re:china? whaa? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Is terrorism ok if its for money?

      OK? OK? Have you no moral sense whatsoever? Or must you submit every ethical dilemma to "Ask Slashdot?".

      Maybe you should consider the following questions before posing such questions.
      What's terrorism?
      What's "ok"?
      What does "for money" mean?

      And don't go quoting the dictionary, Mr Anonymous Coward. Plagiarists will receive a failing grade.

    21. Re:china? whaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, Intel does support the United States and Israel, two of the worst human rights violators.

    22. Re:china? whaa? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      When I read your first line I thought, "Does this idiot not understand the difference in standards of the subject under discussion?" Then I read the rest and realized you didn't. Shame.

    23. Re:china? whaa? by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      Actually, FM wasn't open until after its inventor died.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    24. Re:china? whaa? by Shelled · · Score: 1

      But still long before it was implemented. :)

    25. Re:china? whaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Difference in standards?! The world has to follow your judgement in this matter, right? China bad and US corporations good, right!! Union Carbide killed 50,000 Indians in Bhopal, India in a matter of days not to mention the hundreds of millions killed by western "civilization" over the past 3-4 centuries all over Asia, Africa and Americas.

    26. Re:china? whaa? by Zerathdune · · Score: 1

      As true as that may be, and as much as I agree with both of you, I feel obligated to note the fallacy of the whole, "Well he did something worse!" argument. I imagine the claims are bullshit, but just because china has done worse doesn't mean intel gets a get out of jail free card.

      --
      No single raindrop believes that it is responsible for the storm.
    27. Re:china? whaa? by really? · · Score: 1

      Not yet... as far as you know. ;-)

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    28. Re:china? whaa? by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      How blind.. just because you dont use a gun doesnt mean you arent responsible for atrocities.
      The Aluminium Company of America sold aluminium to the Nazis during WW2 to build tanks and other weapons.


      True, well done so far.

      Many companies produce deadly waste that gets released into the environment.

      Vague as hell - what on earth is 'Deadly Waste'? Water could be considered deadly waste since it's possible to drown in it. You ever thrown a battery in to the regular bin before or brought an old television or computer for disposal? Most companies are responsible regards their waste output. Some behave like arseholes but that's a minority like with people. Some people consider Farenheit 911 to be a ground-breaking documentary that exposes the truth that the people have the right to know. This doesn't mean that all people are gullible. Not all companies are Union Carbide.

      How many people are injured or killed in factories making Nike footwear, or clothing for corporations each year, while being treated worse than animals, being paid as little as 20 cents per hour.

      If Nike are eating their employees or using them for medical experiments that you are correct when you say that Nike treat their workers (or equal to) worse than animals.You're right though that Nike have a pretty bad track record when it comes to their overseas factories. Regards injuries in factories over the past year - no idea but probably a higher rate than you'd see in Western factories. Deaths - none as far as I can see.

      Haliburton & other companies started a war for profit.

      Corportations are bad because they like make money and they have these big buildings and they're all corporationy and they sell stuff etc.... Nah, just kidding. You got a source and who are these other companies? If you'd been born 20 years earlier you'd be blaming the CIA for running the world. If you were born 60 years ago you'd be blaming a secret society of Jewish bankers. Haliburton haven't started any wars as far as I'm aware, they just tend to profit from them.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
  3. Well call the kettle black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    *China* is accusing Intel of unethical behavior?!

    Hah!

    1. Re:Well call the kettle black... by iced_773 · · Score: 1


      I find it especially amusing because China is communist. That is, in theory they are supposed to have a total monopoly on EVERYTHING.

    2. Re:Well call the kettle black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Interesting that an American (and I'm sure that you are, being that your type tend to be egotistical loudmouthes) would laugh at the idea of unethical behaviour inside your own borders. In fact it would seem that unethical behaviour is pretty much standard at all levels of government in the U.S., from the president himself, all the way down to the marine slaughtering civilians in Iraq (yet another big court case, what a surprise).

      How does it feel to be among the most universally reviled people in history?

    3. Re:Well call the kettle black... by Trigun · · Score: 1

      It's only unethical behaviour if you lose.

    4. Re:Well call the kettle black... by eraser.cpp · · Score: 1

      Pretty good, actually.

    5. Re:Well call the kettle black... by Browncoat · · Score: 1

      Yes, I also found this quite hilarious. It's the "Do as I say, not as I do" mentality.

      --
      "Curse your sudden, but inevitable betrayal!"
    6. Re:Well call the kettle black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't trust Intel but choosing between the lesser of the evil I'd pick Intel over China anyday. From someone of Asian descent.

    7. Re:Well call the kettle black... by xutopia · · Score: 1

      Oh get over yourself! No one is perfect! The USA has been condemned by NGOs for as long as they exist on their lack of respect for human rights too. Ask a Chinese man what country is doing horrible as far as human rights is concerned and he might point you to the USA. That being said we can all improve and if these lawsuits bring to light what needs to be fixed then it can only be good for us in the long run!

    8. Re:Well call the kettle black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had half a nerve cell in your head you'd realize that the grandparent was laughing at the hypocrisy of China.

      Moron.

    9. Re:Well call the kettle black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Ask a Chinese man what country is doing horrible as far as human rights is concerned and he might point you to the USA.

      Sure, because he won't have a clue about terrible things happening in his country, but know about every terrible thing the US has done. That said, your whole comment is bullshit as Intel is not the USA.

    10. Re:Well call the kettle black... by msh104 · · Score: 1

      well, and he in turn was laughing at the hypocrisy of the american people who are laughing at the hypocrisy of the chinese people. :p

    11. Re:Well call the kettle black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All things considered, our dogs eat better than your children, so I think we're doing fine.

    12. Re:Well call the kettle black... by rainman_bc · · Score: 1
      Ask a Chinese man what country is doing horrible as far as human rights is concerned and he might point you to the USA.

      A chinese man has no relevance in the rest of the world, for a Chinese man only hears what his governement tells him. For reference see:


      •    
      • Tianenman Square

      •    
      • Tibet

      •    
      • Taiwan


      Furthermore, in China, you simply do not speak out against the state for fear of retribution, as in most communist states.

      In America, you are free to voice your opinion - you don't (usually) go to jail for it. Someone might call you "Anti-American", but that's about where it ends.
      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    13. Re:Well call the kettle black... by Aardpig · · Score: 1, Insightful
      • Kent State
      • Tuskagee
      • Abu Ghraib
      • Gitmo
      • Fallujah
      • Haditha
      • ...
      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    14. Re:Well call the kettle black... by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Difference is the US doesn't deny this to its citizens. A chinese person doesn't know anything other than what the Chinese government tells them.

      You guys even re-elected Dubya knowing full well all of the BS that he's pulled.

      And in the US, articles this one are available for you to read and form your own opinion.

      Chinese don't have that option. Take a look at what Google Images host from:
      google.cn

      vs:
      google.ca

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    15. Re:Well call the kettle black... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "Difference is the US doesn't deny this to its citizens."

      Do you think that difference is worth a hill of beans?

      "You guys even re-elected Dubya knowing full well all of the BS that he's pulled."

      Still scratching my head over that one. You see we americans are a funny bunch. For a lot of us making sure the gays never got married was more important then torture.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    16. Re:Well call the kettle black... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Maybe we did, or maybe Diebold made a choice for us in Ohio.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    17. Re:Well call the kettle black... by miffo.swe · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Thats like if the US accused anyone of torture or killing civilians! Ohh the horror!

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    18. Re:Well call the kettle black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please, none of those even come close to the atrocities China has committed against it's citizens. Why bother?

    19. Re:Well call the kettle black... by click2005 · · Score: 1

      They never elected him.. compromised Diebold voting machines did.

      Besides.. if enough of the media says "dubya is not a murdering terrorist" often enough, the prozac addicted sheep will start to believe it. They'll believe anything.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    20. Re:Well call the kettle black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans laugh at your hate, or are completely unaware of it.

      America is finally starting up its manifest destiny again with Iraq. Eventually, when the dollar goes to shit and the world starts running out of oil, we'll bomb everybody and then: game over.

    21. Re:Well call the kettle black... by A.Gideon · · Score: 1

      "Difference is the US doesn't deny this to its citizens."

      Do you think that difference is worth a hill of beans?


      I do. So does the current administration. That's why they're now looking to prosecute reporters that "hurt national security" by telling Americans the truth about our government.

    22. Re:Well call the kettle black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow...
      It's not torture, it's not even what most of us went through to get into a frat, grow up.

    23. Re:Well call the kettle black... by jj102 · · Score: 1

      To me it is you americans dont know anything other than what the government tells you. Look at your short history, how many ur own ppl were killed coz of political issues, how many other countries and ppl have you invaded and murdered? Take a good study of your own history first. Im a chinese, i see things from both inside and outside the country, and believe me, we chinese are not as ignorant as yourself.

    24. Re:Well call the kettle black... by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Just a small note; I am Canadian. I have some Chinese friends.

      Nice try though.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  4. Because China plays fairly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another example of CHINA flexing it's future economic strength?

    1. Re:Because China plays fairly! by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Whaddayamean 'future'? Have a look at the enormous trade imbalance between the USA and China! China lost the wars against Europe a couple hundred years ago and then Japan and Mao did them in again twice more in the last century, but they have made a huge comeback lately.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  5. Another anti-China article by Pao|o · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Isn't anyone getting bored with all the anti-China articles posted on /.? It's as if everyone is trying to outnumber the anti-Microsoft ones.

    I think it's great that China is taking a stand on Intel's near-monopoly on wireless tech. I think we need more incompatible specifications to incite more innovation, etc, etc.

    1. Re:Another anti-China article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.... that's like saying "Isn't everyone sick of hearing about Darfur?" (or Iraq).
      The Chinese gov't has done and is doing very bad things and these need to be brought to light. That way they might be held accountable for their wrongdoings and not just seen as the next gold rush for american businesses. Just b/c they might have done one good thing, doesn't mean they ARE good

    2. Re:Another anti-China article by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      And nobody will be trying to contain his hysterical laughter as China is going against patents, monopolies and immoral political or economical behaviour. Their accusations contain a fair bit of irony, much like the thief suing the locksmith.

    3. Re:Another anti-China article by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Have any examples of good articles on china?

    4. Re:Another anti-China article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. All of my good articles are on paper.

    5. Re:Another anti-China article by Dan+Farina · · Score: 1

      How about when the Chinese launched a man into orbit? I recall this being reported on slashdot...seems positive to me.

    6. Re:Another anti-China article by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      I ma not sure if one should consider this article biaised toward or against China. Comments are, of course, that's what they are for, but I read the article as "economical mammoth attacks industrial mammoth" and fail to see a bias.

      I think too it is great that monopolies are fought. And if it is unethical protagonists that fight them, well, at least they are good for something.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    7. Re:Another anti-China article by Blinocac200sx · · Score: 0

      I'm halfway surprised to find a Chinese propaganda agent on slashdot. But I guess if you're a good Chi-Com they'll allow you such liberties in order to defend the motherland.

  6. In other news ... by garoush · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... the world has lunched a case against China's near-monopoly on copyright abuse, human rights, cheap label, ...

    --

    Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
    1. Re:In other news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the US Government and it's financial backers are feeling as if they're constantly getting second billing in these departments. I mean, honorable mention in "creation of abusive IP laws" and the second-billing status on the treatment of prisioners, um, I mean enemy combatants, is not where the leader of the free world should be. Time to take those cheap bastards on the other side of the Pacific down a notch!

    2. Re:In other news ... by madcow_bg · · Score: 1

      ... which was promptly dismissed due to prior art of the Nazi and the current users of this copyright known as US breethes freely again.

    3. Re:In other news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abusive IP laws? Don't make me laugh. Someone needs to actually learn a thing or two about how IP is protected in the United States before saying something so absurd. What you've learned about patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, non-disclosure agreements, etc. from Slashdot is probably a) wrong and b) incomplete ... at best.

  7. This is like Freddy Vs Jason by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Funny

    Evil against Evil. Although I'd argue that since Intel doesn't sell the organs of executed political prisoners, they are the lesser evil.

    So, I guess that makes Intel the Jason in this conflict.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:This is like Freddy Vs Jason by wenit · · Score: 1

      Would it be better if they just trashed the organs?

    2. Re:This is like Freddy Vs Jason by Browncoat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It is debasing the value of human life, in my opinion. It's not about wasting organs, it's about the fact that China kills political prisoners and they shouldn't have those organs in the first place.

      Also, it's illegal to buy or sell organs in most countries, so it's contributing to the black market problem.

      --
      "Curse your sudden, but inevitable betrayal!"
    3. Re:This is like Freddy Vs Jason by alfs+boner · · Score: 1
      --
      Listen p*ssy. I'm sure your the same homo that posted earlier about alf's boner and you just want to remain anonymous fo
    4. Re:This is like Freddy Vs Jason by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

      So, I guess that makes Intel the Jason in this conflict.

      What are trying to say that "Intel is a mindless zombie". Well, that does explain the pentium 4 processor and integrated video.

      --
      You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
    5. Re:This is like Freddy Vs Jason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What exactly makes Intel evil? The fact that AMD says so?

    6. Re:This is like Freddy Vs Jason by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      Also, it's illegal to buy or sell organs in most countries, so it's contributing to the black market problem.

      However there's a little problem. Too many people on the demand side choose to become criminals if their other option is to become dead. So until the anti-stem-cell religious nuts stop being a roadblock and the research goes forward a sufficiently long step in creating of replacement complex organs, the organ black market will stay thriving.

    7. Re:This is like Freddy Vs Jason by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Would it be better if they just trashed the organs?

      Read this.

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  8. Open standards by Nerdfest · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... and in 2003 tried to force multinationals wanting to sell wireless computer equipment to support its proprietary and secret encryption standard called WAPI.

    Exactly how is it better to replace one proprietary standard with another. If they were serious about this, perhaps proposing an open standard would be a bit more constructive.

    1. Re:Open standards by stevew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The thing is - the WAPI standard was a "secret" while the IEEE standard simply isn't. Intel and other multinationals would have to yield their intellectual property to chineese companies to support the WAPI standard. THAT is what the
      companies gripped about.

      As for the IEEE - it ISN'T just an American body. The truth is that it has an American aspect (that is certainly large and powerful), but IEEE is an INTERNATIONAL organization. How do I know? - I was a member for 15 years. I've even been involved in IEEE standards creation slightly. This is usually done by company representatives. So if Chineese companies were to send representation to IEEE standards efforts, they would have some influence in same.

      You're as likely to Siemens or Alcatel, etc involved in these bodies as you are to see Intel, etc. It is more appropriately a mechanism mostly staffed by professional engineers representing their company's interests that create IEEE standards.

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
    2. Re:Open standards by antiMStroll · · Score: 1
      "The thing is - the WAPI standard was a "secret" while the IEEE standard simply isn't. Intel and other multinationals would have to yield their intellectual property to chineese companies to support the WAPI standard. THAT is what the companies gripped about."

      Sorry, you sound genuine and knowledgeable but this doesn't parse. China's 'closed' WAPI required disseminating intellectual property, IEEE's 'open' protocol didn't?

  9. Try this... by Otter · · Score: 1

    Here's a more helpful link, that also a) isn't a verbatim AFP story with irritating advertising "links" and b) doesn't have a current forum thread on "The future and the ways of the "Jew"" (which is even more moronic than it sounds -- how dimwitted do you have to be to spell "rich" with a "t"?).

    1. Re:Try this... by stickfigure · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. You'll notice it's a .cn domain, so ... ahem... slightly biased. None the less, by accusing the IEEE of "organizing a conspiracy against the China-developed WAPI, insulting China and other national bodies, and intimidation and threats." it's hard to take the claims seriously. If AMD was complaining about some move of Intel's and one of their arguments was "they insulted us!" it would rightly drown out all their other claims with our laughter. I realize that China is a face focused culture, but seriously. They should do what every other competitor to a standard does, build their product and let the market decide. Hell, they're requiring it for all wireless devices in China. I'm sure SOMEONE will pick up their standard just to get their business. If it really is better, then people outside of China will want to use it too. If, as our American conspiracy theorists predict, it's just a Chinese government backdoor into wireless encryption, then it will never catch on because no one outside of their country will want it.

    2. Re:Try this... by peterfa · · Score: 0

      I actually thought of that myself when I read about it. It was the first thing that came to mind. I figured that there was some kind of backdoor that allows China to easily decrypt communication and spy on people. That's why they require all people in China to use it. If they had Americans using it, they could spy on Americans... though I really have no idea why they would want to do that.

    3. Re:Try this... by pep11 · · Score: 1

      which is even more moronic than it sounds -- how dimwitted do you have to be to spell "rich" with a "t"?
       

      well, may you remind me how to spell rich ...
      in chinese
    4. Re:Try this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? PhysOrg.com is not (AFAICT) Chinese, nor (AFAICT) is the moron whose spelling I was ridiculing. If you are "yfh", and a non-native English speaker, I apologize for calling you a dimwit, when you're merely an incoherent, anti-semitic lunatic. If you're not him, I completely fail to see your point.

    5. Re:Try this... by Otter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd noticed the "insulting China" bit also. I think one of the posts here hit it on the nose -- the issue is a grievance over alleged improprieties in the standards review process, nothing more.

    6. Re:Try this... by pep11 · · Score: 1

      I don't know this guy but as you guessed he could be a non-native English speaker.
      That was my point.

    7. Re:Try this... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >nothing more.

      Could it be that they haven't given up on WAPI? Can they get the vote revisited?

      (How could a secret algorithm ever have become an ISO standard anyway?)

    8. Re:Try this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many asian Languages can you speak, understand, write and type.

      None I am to assume.

      Grow up.

  10. Will cause trouble in DC. by DAldredge · · Score: 2

    Our elected leaders in DC will not know what to do about this as it presents a major problem for them. That is who do they support?

      Big Business or China?

      Since most of them in DC (GOPer & DEMs) are in love with both whose side do they support?

    1. Re:Will cause trouble in DC. by linzeal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whichever one gives them more mad props and foil-wrapped bricks of money.

    2. Re:Will cause trouble in DC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just come right out and say it... You think that DC will do whatever the Jews say to do. Filthy Antisemite!

    3. Re:Will cause trouble in DC. by eraser.cpp · · Score: 4, Informative

      Colin Powell spoke with Chinese trade officials a while back and got them to halt a program that would have required WiFi equipment being sold in China to support WAPI. The program also would have required foreign companies to partner with a Chinese firm before entering the market.

      http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/04/05/HNbarret tochina_1.html?source=rss&url=http://www.infoworld .com/article/04/04/05/HNbarrettochina_1.html

      FTA: "The U.S. government has also weighed in on the issue. U.S. Secretary of Commerce Donald Evans, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick, sent a letter to senior Chinese government officials in March expressing concern over the implementation of China's WLAN standard and that the move created a dangerous precedent for using standards as a barrier to international trade."

  11. Waiting for the DVD... by crazyjeremy · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is to be a 90 minute DVD about this issue. It will be released in the U.S. in July for $14.99 or get it now, burned to a cd... from a Chinese convenience shop near you.

  12. Re:Suit against intel? by hyfe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Stands to reason, any country that kills its own populace certainly would do something like this.

    Yeah, it's about time they grew up and started killing other countries' populace like the grown-ups are.

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
  13. I have this feeling too (mod parent up) by bobamu · · Score: 1

    it's often interesting to see the reaction of powerful folks not getting what they want on demand.

    Seems like the toys are getting thrown straight out of the pram.

    Or is this significant of something deeper going on?

  14. They don't like real crypto. by jthill · · Score: 1
    The important part is what they want reconsidered:
    China in 2003 tried to force multinationals wanting to sell wireless computer equipment to support its proprietary and secret encryption
    What they say Intel did is irrelevant to them and us.
    --
    As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    1. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What they say Intel did is irrelevant to them and us.

      Yes, yes, China's motives are quite obvious.

      But what they say intel did has some merit don't you think? After all, if Intel did something against ISOs rules, then we may be looking at WAPI as the new standard.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    2. Re:They don't like real crypto. by khallow · · Score: 1
      But what they say intel did has some merit don't you think? After all, if Intel did something against ISOs rules, then we may be looking at WAPI as the new standard.

      Even if WAPI (the Chinese government backed organization) is correct in its accusations, it doesn't mean that WAPI should be adopted as a standard. Presumably, the voting process would be repeated, assuming of course that the Chinese go through with that.

    3. Re:They don't like real crypto. by jthill · · Score: 1

      Merit I don't know. Afaict we don't know what they say Intel did, but it's going to amount to backroom negotiations waawaawaa. Cases like that are political, not technical. Any public discussion of the merits will be lies staged by at least one side, worthless to anyone who wants to know what's actually going on, and the Chinese were going to find something. That's why I said "irrelevant".

      --
      As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    4. Re:They don't like real crypto. by jthill · · Score: 2, Interesting
      God. I just read the People's Daily article someone else here linked. Intel's crimes
      included organizing a conspiracy against the China-developed WAPI, insulting China and other national bodies, and intimidation and threats.

      "Insulting". You have to read the article to really get a sense of it. I don't know how much of it's a show and how much of it is really that they ... feel they've lost face. Ok. It's real. Face matters in Chinese culture, a lot, and this is a combination of homegrown startup tech and nascent national status. By our standards, they subordinate truth to status even in rational endeavors, that's as contemptible coming from them as it is from our own politicians, and you can just see the feedback loop closing. Pray for some genuine diplomats, everybody's going to need them.

      I wouldn't know enough to tell without some serious books-hitting — and since it's secret tech nobody has the facts anyway — but imagine the possible irony here: what if WAPI really is better? That's just too delicious. The unfeeling consumer-of-good-stories in me almost hopes it's true.

      --
      As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    5. Re:They don't like real crypto. by sumdumass · · Score: 1
      included organizing a conspiracy against the China-developed WAPI, insulting China and other national bodies, and intimidation and threats.
      Well, why it isn't insane ravings about how they got screwed, in diplomatic speek, it is quite hard. It maybe that who ever filed the suite or released details did so as if they were opening diplomatic dialogs. Could it be that Intel is so big they are treated as diplomats in china?

      I agree with all that you are saying. I just wanted to add that maybe the problems were sumerized and presented as if it was trying to gain the attention of the state department too. In either case, they don't want to make any blunt statments or demands. It leaves alot of room for diplomats to work things out without losing face. And as you said, face is important to alot of leaders and people. Specialy in that area of the world.
    6. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1, Informative

      Face matters in Chinese culture, a lot,

      Nah you're thinking about Japan. Face doesn't matter a damn to the Chinese, they left that behind along with the bowing after the "popular revolution", too like the older imperialistic ways (I know whereof I speak, I learned most of my Mandarin in China). Whats happening here is that China has been believing its own propaganda too much, and honestly believed the rest of the world would bend over because of the innate superiority of their offering and the fact that China is the centre of the world. Lollers. Now the harsh reality is catching up, they are throwing a tantrum.

      Its really quite entertaining to watch the heavy handed buffoons they have in charge over there try to maneuver on the world stage; less bull in china shop than one legged man in a three legged race. Apologies to those whose sensibilites are offended by these facts, having been raised on the mysterious ways of the orient served up with a big dollop of hollywood fat, but there you have it.

    7. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Y0tsuya · · Score: 1

      Agreed, "face" these days is something the Chinese tosses out at foreigners to make them feel guilty over whatever faux pas they feel like inventing at that moment. In case people haven't noticed, Chinese people treat each other like crap. They lost the concept of face, morality, and social propriety during the mass insanity of the Cultural Revolution. I'm not sure they've gotten it back yet.

    8. Re:They don't like real crypto. by yog · · Score: 1

      China's success is primarily due to a ferocious exploitation of their labor market by Hong Kongers, Taiwanese, Japanese, and Americans.

      Now the mainland Chinese are patting themselves on the back, taking all the credit for their economic success, when in fact they have an obsolete oligarchy of Communist cadres ruling over a cynical populace burned out from ten years of cultural revolution that followed 40 years of communism.

      It's no wonder that today they are issuing these clumsy, heavy-handed proclamations dripping with an alarming degree of contempt for the rest of the world.

      Some of these less informed forum participants can crow about how Intel is "just as bad" or America used to be "just as bad" but let them go live in China for a while and see what a morally bankrupt country it has become.

      I learned my Mandarin in Taiwan and while no place is perfect, they at least preserved some of the grace and beauty of classical Chinese culture. No wonder Peking is aiming 700 missiles at them, and more on the way....

      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    9. Re:They don't like real crypto. by jthill · · Score: 1
      Nah you're thinking about Japan. Face doesn't matter a damn to the Chinese, they left that behind along with the bowing after the "popular revolution"
      I relied on my mental trivia file for that remark; it's usually pretty good. So I read your remark, blushed, and googled "chinese culture face status important". At least wasn't alone in my ignorance.
      --
      As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    10. Re:They don't like real crypto. by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Really? I'm Chinese, living in China, and I can say that it still matters. Really, losing face just means that you are making yourself look like a fool. However, maybe you don't think it actually exists anymore because you are a foreigner living in China, and think that you are singled out for this sort of thing. No, it happens to Chinese too, like me. Actually, "losing face" seems to be interpreted more as loss of dignity nowadays, at least in my family.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    11. Re:They don't like real crypto. by 808140 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know whereof you speak? I call bullshit. I've lived in China for almost half a decade now, I speak Mandarin at a nearly native level, and I can tell you that face means a great deal to the Chinese. You are guilty of the very mistake you accuse the OP of making: conflating Japanese and Chinese culture. The Japanese and the Chinese both have very strong notions of face, but as with so many other things that seem at first glance to be shared by these two wildly different cultures, they are not the same.

      To say that you learned "most of your Mandarin in China" to me seems like a clever way of making the Slashdot masses consider you an authority. Clever because it deliberately omits how much Mandarin you know -- and without knowing anything at all about you I would bet a great deal that it's nearly zilch. Why? Because in order to learn to speak a language well, you must do more than take classes and read books -- you must interact on a personal level with speakers of that language. For someone who presumably does not have native prowess in a language closely related to Mandarin, the language is relatively difficult to learn, which would imply that, if you spoke the language well, you must have spent a lot of time interacting with Chinese people. As someone who has been doing this for quite some time now, I think I can state with reasonable certitude that no one open-minded enough to undertake this would come away from the experience with as narrow-minded and unnuanced an understanding as you appear to have.

      Mandarin has so many face-related terms and sayings it is absolutely staggering. I can't speak with any authority on the Japanese interpretation, but I did study the Japanese language for five years while in school and I wasn't exposed to anywhere near the same lexical diversity. But I'll freely admit that I never spoke Japanese well, whereas I speak Mandarin very well.

      Another poster said that the Chinese "treat each other like shit", or somesuch, but to me this is a classic example of a westerner using western metrics of politeness and propriety to judge the actions of people with a fundamentally different cultural background. Something similar occurs with the Japanese. There is a fascination with all things Japanese in the geek community -- I'll admit I don't understand it well myself -- but I'm frequently told by all sorts of people that the Japanese are exceptionally polite and well mannered. This is a tremendously two dimensional way of looking at an entire population of people.

      Let's make one thing clear here: the percentage of assholes in any particular group is relatively constant. What makes a person an asshole is their intent -- their knowing willingness to insult, degrade, or upset others. A westerner not familiar with Chinese social norms observes inter-Chinese interaction and is surprised by their apparent penchant to treat each other like dirt. What he does not understand is that many things not acceptable in western culture (and even here I am generalizing, as neither Chinese nor Western culture as such are homogenous at all) are acceptable in Chinese culture, and vice-versa. In China, a Chinese person says something to someone else and thinks nothing of it -- he does not consider it rude and did not have any malicious intent whatsoever, and in turn the person who hears it thinks little of it. The same situation, but in the West: exactly the same words are exchanged, but the listener becomes tremendously upset, because in the context of western culture, saying such a thing is a violation of accepted social norms and as such only someone with malicious intent would say them. Conversely, the Chinese often say that westerners don't need much face, by which they mean that they are not hao mianzi, that we put up with all sorts of insulting situations that no Chinese person would ever put up with. I've been involved in street fights on several occasions because of face.

      To get back to the Japanese, Westerners

    12. Re:They don't like real crypto. by arivanov · · Score: 1

      The article is actually a piece of propaganda in its own right. While I am also allergic to Chinese standards efforts the article definitely distorts some of the facts. So let's put them right for a start.

      • Their standard proposal was not secret. It was an ISO submission for f*** sake. How that can be secret?
      • It is not any more proprietary than the current standard. The only difference is that in the current standard you have to shell out royalties to Intel and a few others while in their standard you have to shell royalties to them.

      As far as the technical merits of the proposals, the Chinese one was of comparable security, probably more lightweight implementation though much more quirks on the edges. Disclaimer:I am not WLAN chipset engineer and I do not have either standard proposal in front of me so this is IIRC when following the discussion.. IIRC it is an apples vs oranges similar to TD-CDMA vs FD-CDMA. Both have their merits, and while the Chinese proposal in both cases was more quirky it was not technically inferior. In the CDMA case both ended up in the standard.

      What the article omits is the politics behind this:

      • The current standard procedure in the computer world (not the Internet, just the hardware bit) is rigged towards American representation. While the IEEE is supposedly a National Standards body it ends up being "the" global standards body. How many Ethernet standards have gone further than IEEE to become an ISO? How many wireless? How many... ad naseum.
      • The Chinese submitted their proposal to ISO for the primary reason to force a reconsideration of the "globality" of the IEEE. They lost. Regardless of any strings pulled by Americans behind the scenes (and I bet there were a few), the ISO did not pick up a losing fight when it saw one.

      While I strongly dislike the actual background behind this case I wish the Chinese good luck on this one. Realistically it will not help them anyway. Still, anything that tries to put the things right as far as what is a national standard and what is a global standard is a good thing.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    13. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I call bullshit. I've lived in China for almost half a decade now, I speak Mandarin at a nearly native level, and I can tell you that face means a great deal to the Chinese. You are guilty of the very mistake you accuse the OP of making: conflating Japanese and Chinese culture.

      Well I honestly don't know where you've been hiding for the last five years, so I can't call anything, but thats because I prefer to stick to the facts I know. Face means as muich to the Chinese as it does to a westerner, in that no one likes to be made to look a fool. The OP was referring to the convoluted and elaborate rules of "face" present in Japanese culture, of which you appear to be totally unaware. If you had been aware, you wouldn't have made that comparison.

      and without knowing anything at all about you I would bet a great deal that it's nearly zilch.

      I'm not going to get in a pissing match about levels of Mandarin, you seem to be more full of urine than me; you appear to be attacking me for a full paragraph there without any basis whatsoever, except that your opinions conflict with my observations. Thats called an ad-hominem. And for the record, I speak over eight languages with a varying degree of fluency, including some I can almost guarantee you have never heard of.

      Mandarin has so many face-related terms and sayings it is absolutely staggering.

      So has English. Egg on his face, brass balls, guts, gung ho, I could give you a few hundred. Your point?

      the Chinese "treat each other like shit", or somesuch, but to me this is a classic example of a westerner using western metrics of politeness and propriety to judge the actions of people with a fundamentally different cultural background.

      Treated like shit is treated like shit. Just because you were raised up in a community of slave owners doesn't make it right.

      There is a fascination with all things Japanese in the geek community -- I'll admit I don't understand it well myself ... but I'm frequently told by all sorts of people that the Japanese are exceptionally polite and well mannered.

      Hot chicks and cosplay. Yes its a simplistic way of looking at a culture. It is not the entirety of their views however and you would do well to educate yourself as to what those views are before you go making accusations. Thats what I would call a tremendously two dimensional way of looking at "the geek community".

      the percentage of assholes in any particular group is relatively constant. What makes a person an asshole is their intent -- their knowing willingness to insult, degrade, or upset others.

      Not only is that not true, it occurs to me that people tend to be assholes based on how they view you. So your metrics here are off from the start. But carry on.

      The same situation, but in the West: exactly the same words are exchanged, but the listener becomes tremendously upset, because in the context of western culture, saying such a thing is a violation of accepted social norms and as such only someone with malicious intent would say them.

      Bollocks. Here in Ireland, you want to hear some of the locals, they would make a sailor blush. Thats also part of western culture, because you see the west consists of more than just America... Are we back to those two dimensional views?

      demonstrating, I hope, that it is not that the Japanese are polite per se but rather that Westerners observing them lack the necessary knowledge to accurately describe them as such.

      Why are we running down the Japanese now? Why are they even in this discussion? And the chinese have just as much of the same problem, during saint patricks day they have a great laugh at all the Irish running around wearing green hats. If you have lived in China, you'll know what that means. Not that anyone gives a rats ass over here.

      Believe me when I say that the concept of face is important to the Chine

    14. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Well to qualify my remark, I should say that the concept of face as it is commonly understood by western cultures (ie the Japanese concept of face) doesn't exist in China. What you have is more of a keeping up with the Joneses, who has the better ferrari sort of thing, which exists everywhere, and is not unique to China, nor to asians. Was that not what you were referring to?

    15. Re:They don't like real crypto. by jj102 · · Score: 1

      errr... Darkman, that was not he was referring to. I think you and 808140 were talking about the same "face concept", the only difference is that you dont think China has what you called the Japanese concept of face. The face issue exists everywhere, its a human nature. Do you really think in China, ppl only think that they are losing faces because they have worse cars or sth similiar? If so, you know too little about china, you are narrow-minded and ignorant...

    16. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Just because you were raised up in a community of slave owners doesn't make it right.

      The G.P. is correct. You have spent virtually no time in China & have no understanding of Chinese culture.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    17. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 0

      errr... Darkman, that was not he was referring to.

      I'll let him answer that one, if you don't mind. Its too late in the day to be backtracking over an obvious meaning like that, however.

      Do you really think in China, ppl only think that they are losing faces because they have worse cars or sth similiar? If so, you know too little about china, you are narrow-minded and ignorant...

      Do you realise that this comment makes little to no sense? Are you chinese, by any chance?

    18. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Yeah nice one, another scryer with his crystal ball. And by the way, I never said China was a slave owning culture, that was an exampli gratia of cultural low ground. Try harder. Try again.

    19. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arguing on the internet is like competing in the special olympics.

    20. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Yeah nice one, another scryer with his crystal ball. And by the way, I never said China was a slave owning culture, that was an exampli gratia of cultural low ground. Try harder. Try again.

      Oh, right, I just imagined I read: Just because you were raised up in a community of slave owners doesn't make it right.

      I note you haven't told us how much time you've spent in China yet.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    21. Re:They don't like real crypto. by jthill · · Score: 1
      The OP was referring to the convoluted and elaborate rules of "face" present in Japanese culture At last, something I'm certain of. The OP was not.
      --
      As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    22. Re:They don't like real crypto. by hckrdave · · Score: 0

      Desire is irrelevent Need is irrelevent Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

    23. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      You read it all right, not your imagination. How you interpret that is entirely your own decision, not mine. I know how I meant it, maybe I should have added a few caveats for the overly pedantic or hard of grammar. I note you have added nothing constructive to this conversation yet.

    24. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Hold up your hand in front of your face, palm outwards. At eye level. Just do it. See your wrist? Thats the width of my penis, my little asian friend. :D

      Okay, so that was trolling. He started it.

    25. Re:They don't like real crypto. by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      LOL.

      > Whats happening here is that China has been believing its own
      > propaganda too much

      Nobody in China really believes in the propaganda. Just like how you wouldn't believe in what your elected president says before the election. Or like how much you'd trust your mass media (you don't trust them to provide accurate information do you?)

      > honestly believed the rest of the world would bend over because of the innate
      > superiority of their offering and the fact that China is the centre of the world

      Are you living in the 19th century? Anybody with some basic knowledge of modern Chinese history knows that the Chinese learnt this lesson the hard way a hundred years ago. Do you seriously believe that anyone at all in China literally uses "zhong gwo" as such?

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    26. Re:They don't like real crypto. by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      > Treated like shit is treated like shit.

      I'm sorry if you were treated like shit by any Chinese persons. I would venture to think that if you didn't treat others like shit and didn't act like an asshole, they wouldn't treat you as such.

      > Not only is that not true, it occurs to me that people tend to
      > be assholes based on how they view you.

      Aha! That's why you're being such an asshole.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    27. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Not content with calling me an ignorant asshole in another thread, he splits the thread. Well Cindy Fong, I'm not an American, and I do trust the media in my country to give me an accurate representation, because they have no reason to be biased either way. Lets put it like this, search for "tiananmen square" on google.cn and come burbling to me about media suppression then. Ignorance and arrogance go hand in hand, and the Chinese have a surplus of both, fuelled by propaganda and an incredible degree of brainwashing. Maybe you might want to export some along with the cheap underwear? I mean since advanced chipsets are too complicated to understand, that is, even if you steal the prototypes.

    28. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      You're a real hard man when you're hiding behind a keyboard, Cindy.

    29. Re:They don't like real crypto. by lxt518052 · · Score: 1
      I'm not an American, and I do trust the media in my country to give me an accurate representation, because they have no reason to be biased either way.

      By saying that, you look just as naive as those only believe what Fox news tells. No source is 100% reliable. Western mass media are good at reporting domestic news. They are better with the facts. But when it comes to a far and foreign country, the media are just as biased as some government controlled sources, more or less. Like Fong said, we've learned that the hard way.

      Lets put it like this, search for "tiananmen square" on google.cn and come burbling to me about media suppression then.

      So you think we don't know this? How naive! Independent thinkers never put their trust on any single source, or sources. They never easily assume anything. Many intelligent Chinese people are well aware of the censorship, and we have fought our ways to poke holes through the system. As for those Chinese living outside the mainland, alternative sources are just finger taps away, in Chinese and English alike. These alternative sources present very different views on the same event and we have long got used to the exposure to different sources, each has its own bias. But when pieced together, they give us a fidel view of the real world. In addition, don't underestimate what word of mouth in spreading information.

      There's a important fact worth mentioning though. A huge gap exists between English and Chinese free media in the perception of events happening. There are insightful reports about China in your mass media, thanks to the good journalism tradition in the west. However, for most of China-related news, the western media are somewhat distant, shallow and full of opinionated interpretations, which are far from the truth.

      Of course, without comparison, you wouldn't know anything about that. Being bilingual is our advantage.

      Ignorance and arrogance go hand in hand,

      In your case, I think this is very true.

      and the Chinese have a surplus of both, fuelled by propaganda and an incredible degree of brainwashing.

      Another exposure of your simplistic world view. Have you ever learn anything from others posts?

      Maybe you might want to export some along with the cheap underwear? I mean since advanced chipsets are too complicated to understand, that is, even if you steal the prototypes.

      Again, out-dated impression. Do you know how many Chinese engineers working in the Silicon Valley as IC designers? Do you know the percentage of chipsets made by Chinese manufacturers in Taiwan, Shanghai and Beijing every year?

      Ignorance is not a problem, as long as one is modest enough to learn. But arrogance is, for it reinforces the false believes and prevent people from getting close to the truth. Wake up, dude. Time is changing, don't pretend you don't see it.

      --
      People who dislike China tend to mention Tiananmen Square a lot, but they always forget the Tank Man is also a Chinese.
    30. Re:They don't like real crypto. by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Do you know the percentage of chipsets made by Chinese manufacturers in Taiwan, Shanghai and Beijing every year?

      What you mean like the stolen ones they were too ignorant to reverse engineer? Idiot.

  15. So.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does that explain Americans with the same behavior?

  16. Re:Suit against intel? by ArghBlarg · · Score: 1

    Stands to reason, any country that kills its own populace certainly would do something like this.

    And how is any country with military and intelligence organizations running out of control any different?

    (Couldn't resist.)

    --
    ERROR 144 - REBOOT ?
  17. Cult of death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you worship corpses so much? Do you believe that they will rise up (resurect) in whatever shape they happen to be at some point in the future?

    1. Re:Cult of death? by RobertLTux · · Score: 2, Funny

      actually a good chunk of Non catholic Christians do believe in a bodily resurection
      (catholics have thier own problems and jewish folks also think its not Kosher)

      besides its RUDE to yank chunks of a person out without their permission.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    2. Re:Cult of death? by m_hemaly · · Score: 1

      Oh tough choice: die of a horrible liver deterioration disease vs be rude to a dead person. Public call to everyone: when I die, please be rude to me.

    3. Re:Cult of death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read TFA (something no Slashdotter would do, of course), you would see that their speed at matching organs indicates to them that prisoners are being selected for execution *because* they happen to have organs that match someone in need of an organ.

      In short, that they're killing people for their organs. That plus the fact that the government isn't accountable to anyone, and the fact that they can and do imprison whomsoever they please, makes it even worse.

      They're killing innocent people for their organs, because they need their organs (not due to any "crime" they've committed). At this point, the only thing I believe is that the Chinese government wants to save face, not that they will crack down on anything.

  18. China just wants to eavesdrop by Chemkook · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    I think China simply wants to eavesdrop.
    I would not trust Chinese encryption, would you?

    China can save the world if only they would make
    cheap solar panels that run air conditioners.

    I am in the market for a solar powered air conditioner that
    is environmetally friendly.

    Using coal to generate electricity is just not helping the problem.

    1. Re:China just wants to eavesdrop by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

      If all the Chinese want to do is eavesdrop, please pick up your telephone, dial any number, and let the NSA know that you feel much safer because of your government's security measures.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    2. Re:China just wants to eavesdrop by Paolone · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Funny how can you say the same about U.S.A.

    3. Re:China just wants to eavesdrop by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1
      I would not trust Chinese encryption, would you?

      I don't trust any encryption system that isn't open and well-analyzed, regardless of the country of origin.

      That said, I'm sure that some Chinese people are capable of developing strong cryptography. They broke SHA-1, after all.

  19. Bizarre by Qwavel · · Score: 1

    China could have many legit beefs and concerns with regards to western companies (eg. the near-monopoly of Windows on the desktop), so why are they complaining about an IEEE standard supported and implemented by many vendors?

    I'm guessing that some person who's company developed the Chinese alternative has an uncle on the Politburo.

    If this is the case, it's a shame - there is so much that our governments could do for us if they weren't so corrupt. If this is not the case, then I hope someone will explain what is going on.

  20. it's all about WAPI by totalctrl · · Score: 1
  21. Grow up. by Lally+Singh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Note to slashdot repliers: Enough with the ad hominem attacks. If you don't like what China's doing, talk about what they're doing, not what you like/dislike about China.

    We've all got our personal opinions on politics and the politics of technology, but if our words are to mean anything, we've got to appeal to higher standards.

    --
    Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    1. Re:Grow up. by CodeBuster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      but if our words are to mean anything, we've got to appeal to higher standards

      What? Slashdot appeal to a higher standard? What do you think this is Fox News? Surely you jest.

    2. Re:Grow up. by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

      It's okay, most people in America don't even know why they hate China. Aside from being an authoritarian government, China hasn't done much worse than the United States has in terms of attacking non-threatening countries, violating human rights, unfair trade policies, etc... People are just eating up the media's need to find a villian in this world. These days, China can't do anything right.

      There seems to be some anti-communist, racist, and/or anti-foreign element to this, similar to the anti-French sentiment. Let's first worry about our own country first before we poke our noses into the "ethics" of another.

    3. Re:Grow up. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Well done for saying that - it's good someone did.

      But it won't make any difference - we'll get the same sort of drivel next time a story on China, or India, or Europe, or Australia comes around :-/

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    4. Re:Grow up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An ad hominem attack is only a fallacy if it is used to attack an argument which could be independently verified.

      Pointing out that someone (or some country!) has a history of lying, among other things, is a very valid argument against believing any unsupported claims they may make!

    5. Re:Grow up. by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      Honestly I'm really sick and tired of reading people slamming China in every possible opportunity in /. Are these posts really /. worthy or is it just yet another weekly-China-beating activity that has to happen on /. or are these just filler posts that has to happen on a slow news day? Editors/cowboys and such, please think again before allowing these kind of posts.

    6. Re:Grow up. by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      It's really disappointing. I thought /. readers are more than regular-joe fox news watchers.

    7. Re:Grow up. by slashdotnickname · · Score: 0, Redundant

      but if our words are to mean anything, we've got to appeal to higher standards.

      Welcome to the Internet, you must be new here.

    8. Re:Grow up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you don't like what China's doing, talk about what they're doing, not what you like/dislike about China.

      They put too much MSG in their food.

      So there.

    9. Re:Grow up. by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Why, because we should just roll over and allow a "standard" with no independent review, and outside foresight to be determining international standards? Especially considering that the nation creating the standards has a well-known history of spying and firewalling their own people to ensure they don't read "objectionable" material. I'm sorry, but china's actions in this case are suspicious and should be scrutinized.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    10. Re:Grow up. by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

      :-) Fair enough.

      Still, the Net will be what we choose it to be.

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    11. Re:Grow up. by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Tell you what, when they drop the number off offical excutions down from 5000, and the number of summary excutions (read: shot in head on the street) down to 0, we can all stop bashing them, M'kay?

      That does not include just plain old fashioned jack boot thugs making people disappear in the middle of the night.

      Check AI' site if you want to know more.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  22. Fuck China! by Bohemoth2 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Certain people deserve ad homminem atacks and China is one of them. Cencorship is bulshit period!

    1. Re:Fuck China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is spelling, apparently.

      *shrug*

  23. so, whatever technical topics you have by totalctrl · · Score: 1

    if they are about china, they all converge to the cencorship? hmmm. interesting logic.

  24. yup, i second that fuck china comment by Nondescrypt · · Score: 0, Troll

    so... Fuck China.

    1. Re:yup, i second that fuck china comment by qzulla · · Score: 1

      Where did the hardware in your favorite box come from? The odds are it is from China.

      qz

    2. Re:yup, i second that fuck china comment by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      Only on slashdot:

      Favourite box = a computing device.

      Everywhere else a favourite box is surely meatspace.

      (mine still came from China, so I guess shouldn't talk here)

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    3. Re:yup, i second that fuck china comment by qzulla · · Score: 1

      If you only knew about a friend of mine and his trials and tribulations with his downstairs neighbor...

      qz

  25. Re:Suit against intel? by eraser.cpp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Reverse engineer? 802.11i is an open standard, and it seems like Intel was defending that in the face of what would have been a proprietary standard that China would stand to benefit from.

  26. Re:Suit against intel? by radicalnerd · · Score: 1

    Stands to reason, any country that kills its own populace certainly would do something like this.

    come on, what civilized country hasn't oppressed and tortured people before? can you say: japanese internment, chinese/japanese antiforeignism in california, segregation, cuba (where we had concentration camps during the spanish american war), the philippines...

    that said, i agree with the first statement. this is probably a result of governments pushing technological standards to gain international standing.

    okay, mod me down

  27. Chinese Hypocrisy by reporter · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This legal action that Beijing has taken against Intel is not the first instance of Chinese hypocrisy.

    Consider the princelings of China. They and their parents are members of the Chinese communist party. These princelings live, for long stretches, in the West and enjoy its freedoms and prosperity. Yet, the parents of the princelings fully support and enforce the draconian Chinese "laws" that crush human rights in China.

    I have personally met some of these princelings.

    Do they realize their hypocrisy? Yes. Do they care? No.

    Here is another, more damning, example. In 2001 in Northern California, the Chinese consulate in San Francisco sponsored an anti-Falun-Gong meeting conducted in Santa Clara, California. Chinese students from San Jose State University, Stanford University, and other neighboring universities, attended the meeting. The Chinese student associations at the respective universities fully supported the anti-Falun-Gong meeting.

    These Chinese students enjoy the freedom and prosperity in the West but, actually, support the draconian Chinese "laws" that crush human rights in China.

    Do they realize their hypocrisy? Yes. Do they care? No.

    By now, you should realize that the authoritarian government in China exists for one reason: the majority of Chinese either support the authoritarian government or are indifferent to it.

    1. Re:Chinese Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Americans are just as guilty of hypocracy. We have a democracy but overthrow democratically elected governments only to install dictators (i.e. Pinochet) or support dictators (i.e. Saddam). Then we go kill people for fun in Iraq and attempt to justify the lies of our administration. So excuse me for pointing out that Americans are just as guilty of the crap you are accusing the Chinese of. I'd at least hope that you'd look in the mirror before poitning this crap out.

    2. Re:Chinese Hypocrisy by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      By now, you should realize that the authoritarian government in China exists for one reason: the majority of Chinese either support the authoritarian government or are indifferent to it.

      Hmmm...And we single out China. How could that possibly be when we could easily paint an identical picture in the "other" hemisphere? Strange that those people don't realize their hypocrisy. I guess that "eye for an eye" thing has already made them blind. Could it be that the intent of your post was to point that out a bit more subtly than I ever could? If it was, cool. If not, then I can't help but to ask the question.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Chinese Hypocrisy by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      The so-called 'hypocrisy' is no different than any other country - all play their own game. Tell me about NAFTA, that it's a free-trade agreement. Yet it's free for the US not for Canada or Mexico. Yap about 'free-market' economy vs 'communist planned' economy. For a moment do you think the US government do not speak on behalf of the big corporations? In most cases they really don't have to because the big corp got enough dough to fight it out themselves. If the problem becomes too big for a corp or industry to handle, the US send armies.

    4. Re:Chinese Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hypocrisy?! Two words: Bechtel. Haliburton.

      Patriotism - in extreme forms often confused with blindness.

    5. Re:Chinese Hypocrisy by A.Gideon · · Score: 1

      Patriotism - in extreme forms often confused with blindness.

      I think the word you're seeking is jingoism.

    6. Re:Chinese Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      flaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaammmmmmmmmmmmmeeeeeeee baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiiittttttttt ttttttt!!!

    7. Re:Chinese Hypocrisy by kamapuaa · · Score: 0
      Here is another, more damning, example. In 2001 in Northern California, the Chinese consulate in San Francisco sponsored an anti-Falun-Gong meeting conducted in Santa Clara, California. Chinese students from San Jose State University, Stanford University, and other neighboring universities, attended the meeting. The Chinese student associations at the respective universities fully supported the anti-Falun-Gong meeting.

      Why is this at all an example of hypocricy? I am an American working for a computer company in China. I do not support everything the Chinese government does. I would even say I strongly disagree with some of its policies, and frequently talk about it. For that matter, when I was in the US, I also did not support everything the US was doing, if to a lesser extent - are people allowed to disagree if they were born in the country, but not if they attend college in the country?

      Living in a country does not at all imply you can not disagree with its policies, and I can't help but think that's a one-way colonial attitude.

      I also think Falun Gong is a more complex issue than most Westerners believe. They are thoroughly a wacky-ass cult, and a new wacky-ass cult with political leanings would not be allowed to become powerful in any Western Country - and I'd even say, justifiably so. I don't think the Black Panthers or Branch Davidians are perfect comparisons, but you see what I mean.

      It's been a little more than a hundred years since millions of people in China were killed in a revolution led by a wacky-ass cult whose leader claimed to be the brother (and organ recipient) of Jesus. The revolution got so big because it was supported by Westerners intent on weakening China...you can understand how US people blindly going on about the Falun Gong cult would be a hot-button issue to internationalist Chinese.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    8. Re:Chinese Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this comments about Chinese Hypocrisy don't really hold much water considering USA has done in the war on terror. I think if the Falungong was founded in USA it would be branded a cult. Just because the Chinese Government branded them dissidents does not make them champions of democracy.

      Yes I know The Chinese Government is not as good as it can be. Do you dare say that your government is ideal

    9. Re:Chinese Hypocrisy by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      It's pretty much the same kind of abuse we receive from the Islamic countries on the "politically correct" terms. No, no, you can't say this is the fault of Islam, just extremists!

      They're all just exploiting our laws and the weaknesses of our culture for their own gain.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    10. Re:Chinese Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh why not...we have a wacky ass cult in charge ehre in the U.S.A.

      they're called evangelical christians

    11. Re:Chinese Hypocrisy by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      They are thoroughly a wacky-ass cult, and a new wacky-ass cult with political leanings would not be allowed to become powerful in any Western Country

      Look into Scientology.

  28. Talking about disgusting atrocities in a nice tone by Nondescrypt · · Score: 0, Troll

    before modding down the F**K china posts, please consider my point of view here.
    Some things China does are completely UNacceptable, but since we complain,
    they don't change anything & then we kinda say "we tried" & just accept their behaviour.
    Eventually we become used to it & we are no longer even bothered
    when we hear about whats going on there. It Becomes Normal. thats just china, what can you do.
    Thats why it's important to hear & say FUCK CHINA - in CAPS none the less
    it's not OK, & unless we keep making noise about this stuff,
    it WILL be coming to a neighbourhood near you,
    oh yes, it will....

  29. "locksmith" and "thief" by totalctrl · · Score: 1

    are not a good and a bad label to judge a person. i believe they are used to judge what a person is doing on a per-case basis. a locksmith could steal too.

    1. Re:"locksmith" and "thief" by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Although you're right, I think China is clearly the "thief" on this one, suing the locksmith for not providing detailed descriptions of his locks. The assumption "if they had the specs, they'd already copied it" is not far fetched...

  30. Why the surprise.... by ibm1130 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course they're upset since it means they can't foist their backdoors on anyone without an immense amount of difficulty. Would you trust Beijing gummint encryption?

    1. Re:Why the surprise.... by wookie+geek · · Score: 1

      So this is somehow different than the backdoor in the encryption scheme that HP foisted off on everyone? The one that they immediately turned over to law enforcement on rquest? Get real.

    2. Re:Why the surprise.... by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, yeah, I actually do trust Bejing more than a whole zoo of other countries. China does have a shaky history regarding personal freedoms, but life in most of China is orders of magnitude better than in most of Africa and many other parts of Asia. Also bear in mind that China has *never* attacked Western Europe or America. Militarily and economically, China is an allied force and a friend of America and Europe. That is the reality of the matter. Of course there are things they can improve, but they have come a long way in the latter half of the last century.

      Now look at Africa, with hell-holes like Central African Republic, Chad, Somalia, Zimbabwe and so on. Several countries in Africa do not even have a government and exist only on paper maps, they do not exist in reality as a country. They have no infrastructure, no roads, no railways, no hospitals, no schools, no clean water, but they do have a seat in the UN, where a nephew of a local war lord can spout off against developed countries...

      Bah, humbug!

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    3. Re:Why the surprise.... by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      After thinking about it for a second, it's in the Chinese governement's best interest to know who's using the Internet. If you connect to a secure wireless network, you need to have a key, so someone has to know who you are. You can't arrest dissidents if any idiot with a wireless card can connect to the Internet anonymously.

      I'm not saying I agree with how they could use it, but it is in their best interest to have secure wireless.

      I dislike the idea of backdoors in general, but in this situation, it probably doesn't matter too much. It's just as likely (perhaps even more) that Intel's protocol has backdoors and it's almost guaranteed that, if it's there, the US government, the Chinese government, and any other government who asks will get access to it. If WAPI has a back door, the only people with access will be the Chinese government, and it seems unlikely they'll be in a hurry to give out access to it. At least with the Chinese government you know that they're spying, and you know what they're looking for. It's unfortunate for the Chinese people, but they can take it up with the Chinese government.

      Again, I'm not saying I agree with China's policies, but WAPI might not be as bad as all the people screaming about it simply because it's from China.

    4. Re:Why the surprise.... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, I actually do trust Bejing more than a whole zoo of other countries.

      Thats like saying herpes is better than aids. Go herpes!

    5. Re:Why the surprise.... by Wolfier · · Score: 1

      A less relevant question - if, say, Singapore is submitting an encryption standard, would you trust it?

    6. Re:Why the surprise.... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      Several countries in Africa do not even have a government and exist only on paper maps, they do not exist in reality as a country.
      Out of curiosity - Somalia is pretty much as you've described, but what are the others (you mentioned "several")?
    7. Re:Why the surprise.... by makomk · · Score: 1

      Now look at Africa, with hell-holes like Central African Republic, Chad, Somalia, Zimbabwe and so on. Several countries in Africa do not even have a government and exist only on paper maps, they do not exist in reality as a country. They have no infrastructure, no roads, no railways, no hospitals, no schools, no clean water, but they do have a seat in the UN, where a nephew of a local war lord can spout off against developed countries... On the other hand, there's Somaliland - it has a stable government (they even had some actual, non-dubious, elections recently), proper infrastructure, and everything - but no other country recognises it exists. Officially, it's still considered part of Somalia - which is a very good example of a country which exists only on paper (no central government, mostly run by local warlords, deteriorating infrastructure, etc...)

      Reality is screwy sometimes. International politics is worse.

    8. Re:Why the surprise.... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, Bejing is a lesser evil, and they are reforming. Other places are much worse and are regressing.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    9. Re:Why the surprise.... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Somalia, Chad and Central African Republic have no government as far as I know. Angola still has a civil war. Ethiopia has a civil war. Congo doesn't really control all its territory, only a few small spots are under 'government' control. Madagascar used to be a pirate haven for centuries and is still best avoided. Mozambique doesn't have much of a government either and doesn't control all its territory...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    10. Re:Why the surprise.... by hopethisnickisnottak · · Score: 1

      Also bear in mind that China has *never* attacked Western Europe or America. Militarily and economically, China is an allied force and a friend of America and Europe.


      Yes. They've only attacked
      1. Tibet
      2. India
      3. Korea
      4. Vietnam

      Besides, they've only threatened Taiwan so far.
      But that's ok. These are all Asian countries, so it's ok to attack them.

      --
      -Shaunak
    11. Re:Why the surprise.... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Yup, there has been struggles in Asia, but I don't know the whole story - who provoked whom. Also, if a large country invades a smaller neighbour in order to squash a civil war or depose a cruel tyrant, then that is more of a regional policing effort than a war.

      If however, we look at China's record in the last 50 years only, then it is OK and getting better I think.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  31. Re:Suit against intel? by X.25 · · Score: 1

    Stands to reason, any country that kills its own populace certainly would do something like this.

    As opposed to countries that systematically kill population of other countries (uh, who might that be)?

  32. China Really Shouldn't be Complaining by CodeBuster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The US Government should tell the Chinese that we will start giving a damn about whether an Intel monopoly hurts their homegrown wireless industry when they start giving a damn about all the software piracy and intellectual property theft going on in their country.

    1. Re:China Really Shouldn't be Complaining by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      The US Government should tell the Chinese that we will start giving a damn about whether an Intel monopoly hurts their homegrown wireless industry when they start giving a damn about all the software piracy and intellectual property theft going on in their country.

      And this is marked Flamebait why? Ah! Because it uses the word "piracy," which touched too close to home for many of the mods here. Not minding ripping off entertainment makes for strange bedfellows, doesn't it?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:China Really Shouldn't be Complaining by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe because it uses the phrase "intellectual property theft", which has no legal meaning and serves no purpose other than to inflame people. If you want to talk about copyright infringement, but accurate phrases like "copyright infringement" or "illegal copying" don't get the emotional response you're looking for, so you switch to loaded and inaccurate phrases instead, you should expect to get modded down.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    3. Re:China Really Shouldn't be Complaining by Shadyman · · Score: 1

      Yarrrrr! Thar be tha booty!

    4. Re:China Really Shouldn't be Complaining by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      When you steal someone's IP, what would you call it?

      Webster's:
      2. to appropriate (ideas, credit, words, etc.) without right or acknowledgment.

    5. Re:China Really Shouldn't be Complaining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyrights and patents don't exist in a Communist society, as everything is owned by the state. They also don't exist in a Capitalist society because they are government backed restrictions on the market.

      You also can't steal intellectual property, it isn't tangible there for it can't go missing.

    6. Re:China Really Shouldn't be Complaining by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      When you steal someone's IP, what would you call it?
      A very broad patent.

      1)patent in very broad terms.
      2)Wait until someone invents something that fits within these terms.
      3)Sue.
      4)Profit!
    7. Re:China Really Shouldn't be Complaining by jj102 · · Score: 1

      funny if you look at the figures http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060523/ap_on_hi_te/so ftware_piracy, the total lost sales due to piracy in 2005 in the US was $6.9 billion, $3.9 billion in China and $3.2 billion in France. And the countries with the highest piracy rates, according to the study, were Vietnam, 90 percent; Zimbabwe, 90 percent, Indonesia, 87 percent, and China and Pakistan, both at 86 percent, Ukraine 85 percent, Russia 83 percent. China is not the worst country in both list, why keep attacking? -_-!!

    8. Re:China Really Shouldn't be Complaining by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      When every post you make shows what a pompous dick you are, what do you call it? A Slashdot troll!

    9. Re:China Really Shouldn't be Complaining by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      I would use an accurate, neutral phrase like "copyright infringement", "patent infringement", etc. The term stealing implies that someone is being deprived of something (which is why stealing is wrong in the first place, after all), not to mention the obvious emotional connotations, and the term intellectual property treats three or more very different forms of legal monopoly as if they were the same.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  33. Re:Suit against intel? by corrosive_nf · · Score: 1

    yeah link to the site that claims there were no hijackers.

  34. can't trust wireless encryption anyway by penguin-collective · · Score: 2, Informative

    It doesn't really matter what wireless encryption standards one uses, you can't trust them anyway. First of all, the companies involved have already demonstrated their incompetence with WEP. Second, I think at this point you have to assume that any encryption that's encoded in a chip has a backdoor in it and that a significant number of people will know about it.

    If you want secure wireless communications, you have to use software encryption implemented in open source software.

    1. Re:can't trust wireless encryption anyway by swillden · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really matter what wireless encryption standards one uses, you can't trust them anyway. First of all, the companies involved have already demonstrated their incompetence with WEP.

      You're wrong. Yes, WEP was lousy, but the companies involved did learn the necessary lesson. Unlike with WEP, the newer standards were thoroughly reviewed by serious cryptographers and security experts, and no significant defects have been found. That doesn't mean there aren't any, but it does mean that it's extremely unlikely that there are. The WEP designers made a mistake that even a clueless amateur should not have made (failing to discard the first n bytes of the RC4 keystream after a rekeying operation). WPA, WPA2, etc. contain no such gaffes, nor do they have any other detectable weaknesses.

      The bottom line is that the mistake made with WEP was to rely on in-house expertise. That mistake was not repeated.

      Second, I think at this point you have to assume that any encryption that's encoded in a chip has a backdoor in it and that a significant number of people will know about it.

      I feel like I should say something to this, but I can't think of anything.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  35. Suit against intel?-Bullies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yeah, it's about time they grew up and started killing other countries' populace like the grown-ups are."

    Like Tibet.

    1. Re:Suit against intel?-Bullies. by hyfe · · Score: 1
      Like Tibet.

      Ahh, but according to China there's no such thing as Tibet; there's only China :)

      Kinda like the with Turks and the Kurds. "Repressing Kurds? Never, there is no such things as Kurds! Only Turks! ... and Turks who falsely claim to be Kurdish, but we're improsening them like that liers they are!"

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    2. Re:Suit against intel?-Bullies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, but according to China there's no such thing as Tibet; there's only China :)

      Any bets on what it will be when they enforce the "One China" policy and take over Taiwan?

  36. HAHAHAHAHA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU HAVE FAILED IT!

  37. Saw this already on "24" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't they kidnap Paul Otellini and tell him that 18 months ago he screwed their wireless networking domination to allow free standards?

    Don't worry, Craig Barrett will rescue him, while Andy Grove masterminds the coverup, all while on a "Moore's Law " tour of east Asia.

  38. see times are changing by icepick72 · · Score: 2, Funny
    China now wants the ISO to investigate the fast-track process to determine "whether the ethical and procedural rules and principles have indeed been violated

    Legalize and the right to a democratic networking standard .... China is indeed becoming more westernized all the time ... hahahaha ... I love it.

  39. Its the IEEE they really have the gripe with... by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As they appear to be suggesting that the IEEE "leant" on ISO to stop the Chinese Wifi standard becoming accepted. Because a large part of this was from Intel, and lets face it suing the IEEE is going to look REAL dumb, they've decided to go after the big bad wolf.

    I love the idea of clandestine meetings around ISO and IEEE meetings, more people would go if that was true!

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Its the IEEE they really have the gripe with... by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      Expensive hotels and high class hookers ...

      Where do i sign up to be an IEEE member????

    2. Re:Its the IEEE they really have the gripe with... by Frenchy_2001 · · Score: 1

      I love the idea of clandestine meetings around ISO and IEEE meetings, more people would go if that was true!
      Of course there are "clandestine meeting. Those are just meeting between the same people, but not reported to the ISO/IEEE, whether those people discussed IEEE business or not. They are called "private" meetings and happen in every group, professional or not.

      When you have a group of friends, if you go out with only a subset of those, but talk about business concerning everyone and making decisions about those, do you necessarilly report it to the rest of the group? This is the kind of behavior that is fine with friends, but should not happen in a standard organization. That round of golf you play with a coworker cannot serve as decision making time, as the others could not voice their opinion. This is their complaint.

  40. Re:china? whaa? Huhh? Welll... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Maybe they DON'T for the most part (until it starts to HURT them....), but maybe this is tit-for-tat as regards the recent lame-assed US assault on Lenovo.

    The US arms of government and maybe even a few tech companies worried about losing business to Lenovo. When it was IBM they competed with, it would have probably been unpatriotic to bash IBM. It CERtainly would have been economical suicide, for IBM could have brough all resources to bear against such companies.

    But, with it being Lenovo, and with all the patriotism/nationalism drivel sloshing around the planet, it's easy to blame or accuse a Chinese laptop company of being a threat to US national security.

    Well, now Lenovo, and other Chinese tech companies, can via the Chinese government make noise through tech channels. At least they're doing it in the right channels, or so it seems.

    So, if the US can ban or cause wrinkles for Lenovo and other aspiring companies (particularly when the hardware is made mostly in the US and in Mexico) trying to sell in and outside the US, then it's fair game for China to call the standards into question. Just enough to make people look up and question whether the IEEE has some actual or tenuous link to US NSA hunger for backdoors and data traps...

    Unfounded or not, it wouldn't hurt to look for and block those traps. If they're found to exist, then China can cause a majjjoooorrrr storm without expending too many resources at the national level (as opposed to the business level).

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  41. Re:Talking about disgusting atrocities in a nice t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then why do people take so much offence when people say 'Fuck USA', or the government?

    I'll always stand up to Bush's imperialism, why aren't the American people.

  42. Where are the nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the end of 2003, WPA gear was pretty widespread: Most broadcom routers like the Linksys WRT54G, for example. Since WPA implemented most of 802.11i (WPA2), while 802.11i was finalized, it just shows that China is just doing a bit of nationalistic shoving. Does it really matter? Nope. And the chest beating slashdot jocks aren't much better.

  43. Re:Suit against intel? by iritant · · Score: 1

    Why does any of this matter? Intel-based processors are going to support 802.11i no matter what the ITU has to say, and China is going to mandate whatever they're going to mandate, again no matter what the ITU has to say. Isn't this just a matter of face?

  44. Re:Suit against intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, they have - namely in Tibet, Vietnam, Korea and Cambodia.

  45. Stanford Chinese Student Association by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I am a Stanford alumni and have some familiarity with the Chinese student association (CSA) at Stanford University.

    During the entire existence of the CSA, it almost never staged any demonstration demanding justice. No demonstrations condemned Beijing's treatment of thousands of Tibetans. No demonstrations condemned Beijing's treatment of thousands of prisoners, whose organs were harvested for sale to Taiwanese customers. No demonstrations condemned Chinese treatment of workers in Chinese factories. (By contrast, numerous student groups of American citizens in American universities in the USA have criticized the actions of the American government in Iraq, Cambodia, etc.)

    The only time that the CSA held a demonstration was right after the American air force accidentally bombed the Chinese embassy, killing 2 Chinese spies in Serbia. The spies were relaying telemetry to the Serbian military.

    You tell me. Is there a difference between American morality and Chinese "morality"?

    Anyone can verify my claims. Just consult old articles from the "Stanford Daily" around the time of the Serbian incident. The CSA was f*cking silent except that one time.

    Then, in 2001, carloads of these hypocrites attend an anti-Falun-Gong meeting in Santa Clara, California.

    If that is not the definition of F*CKER, then I do not know what is.

    1. Re:Stanford Chinese Student Association by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see. There are many groups in America who won't lift a finger to criticize their government, no matter how atrocious it acts against others, yet they will attack those who demonstrate against the government as "un-American". I'm not sure what your point is. If it's a numbers game to you, then you won't convince me of anything.

      The only time that the CSA held a demonstration was right after the American air force accidentally bombed the Chinese embassy, killing 2 Chinese spies in Serbia. The spies were relaying telemetry to the Serbian military.

      So then, it wasn't an accident? Or was it?

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Stanford Chinese Student Association by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the time, the United States apologized up and down for the "misunderstanding." It later came to light that it was indeed intentional.

  46. Nothing new by DeltaQH · · Score: 0, Insightful

    They submitted something, it was voted and it was rejected.

    They dit not get away with what they wanted and complained that something was not fair.

    I think they are just not used to a democratic process.

    Nothing new here, move on.

  47. Re:Suit against intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks to me like ISO just was not bribable and IEEE was not for sale either...

  48. Can we all get along? by amightywind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Note to slashdot repliers: Enough with the ad hominem attacks. If you don't like what China's doing, talk about what they're doing, not what you like/dislike about China.

    Because you reply to no post in particular, and because there is variation of opinion on this topic one could argue that your predictable appeal is ad hominem as well. Strong well supported opinions should be welcome on this forum. "Can we call get along" pablum such as yours just takes up space.

    I personally find China's accusation of collusion to be laughable. China cannot easily establish technical standards because (deservedly) no one trusts them.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Can we all get along? by m50d · · Score: 1

      Because you reply to no post in particular, and because there is variation of opinion on this topic one could argue that your predictable appeal is ad hominem as well.

      Erm, look at the threads above this at a normal threshold. No variation of opinion I can see.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Can we all get along? by Zerathdune · · Score: 1
      China cannot easily establish technical standards because (deservedly) no one trusts them.

      ...and because they're going against the rules of what defines an ISO standard. But focus on the matter at hand. Don't throw everything they've ever done wrong in their face when it isn't relavent. You cannot, for example, say that because I don't work out, I'm wrong when I say that you should. I may be a hypocrite, but that doesn't make my statement wrong. Argue against their point based on the issue at hand. Hey, I think that was the GP's point. Maybe you missed that.

      Because you reply to no post in particular, and because there is variation of opinion on this topic one could argue that your predictable appeal is ad hominem as well.

      Care to show me how? Before we get too thick into this, I'll throw this in, just in case you don't actually know what ad hominem means:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

      He's not attacking a person, he's attacking an argument. That is precisely the opposite of ad hominem.

      if this thing is hard for you to avoid doing, ask yourself, what would I think of this if "some person" said this.

      --
      No single raindrop believes that it is responsible for the storm.
  49. Usless comment on ISO by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    It's International Organization for Standardization, despite what the article says.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  50. Suit against intel?-Face saving videos. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Isn't this just a matter of face?"

    Much like VHS vs Beta.

  51. Your Rights Online by GeorgeMonroy · · Score: 0

    This should be part of your rights online. I welcome our Chinese monopoly Chinese human rights violation overlords. :P

    --
    You got the touch!
  52. Point of Grandparent Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    grumpfucker wrote, "The so-called 'hypocrisy' is no different than any other country - all play their own game."

    On the contrary, there are differences of hypocrisy. The magnitude of Chinese hypocrisy is shocking.

    Further, this particular form of hypocrisy is not exhibited by the American public in general. The typical Chinese supports human rights only for himself but does not give a damn about the human rights of others.

    By contrast, the typical American supports human rights for both herself and others.

    That is the core difference between American morality and Chinese "morality". Look closely at the membership of college branches of Amnesty International (AI). Ethnic Chinese of the first and second generation are overrepresented at engineering colleges and business colleges but are shockingly underrepresented at meetings of AI. If any Slashdotter doubts what I say, I encourage him to prove me wrong! Walk into the next weekly meeting of AI at your local college. You will likely see no Chinese at that meeting.

    F*ck Chinese society.

    1. Re:Point of Grandparent Post by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      Further, this particular form of hypocrisy is not exhibited by the American public in general. The typical Chinese supports human rights only for himself but does not give a damn about the human rights of others. Funny you're telling us about hypocrisy. AI has done great things in the world and you're carrying this kind of attitude attending their meeting? Good luck Mr. Coward. I'm sure you can save the world with that attitude.

    2. Re:Point of Grandparent Post by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      grumpfucker wrote, "The so-called 'hypocrisy' is no different than any other country - all play their own game."

      On the contrary, there are differences of hypocrisy. The magnitude of Chinese hypocrisy is shocking.


      This is nitpicky, but for the record: 'on the contrary' means that the truth is the opposite of what you're referring to. The contrary would be that the so-called hypocracy *IS* different to any other country. Your point is one of magnitude, not opposites. Don't misuse the term. :-)

    3. Re:Point of Grandparent Post by A.Gideon · · Score: 1

      By contrast, the typical American supports human rights for both herself and others.

      Unless the others include homosexuals that want to marry or pregnant women that don't want to be. Opposition to rights for these people can apparently be used to entice people to vote who'd otherwise not care enough about America to do so.

      Anyone would be reviled in the US in public for forming an organization against civil rights for (for example) Blacks or the Irish. But homosexuals and pregnant women are apparently fair game. They're the real others today.

    4. Re:Point of Grandparent Post by muyuubyou · · Score: 1

      My bad.

      I didn't get the memo about (homosexual or not) marriage being a human right. Same for murder.

    5. Re:Point of Grandparent Post by arodland · · Score: 1

      In case you haven't figured it out yet, the people of the US have ceased to be represented in any meaningful way by their country's public policy, or media, or anything. Don't pretend to know what real people think. Most of them are more reasonable. Unwilling to try to improve their situation, I'll grant you, but not actively trying to be the kind of dickwad that the country as a whole appears as.

  53. Re:Falun Gong are pacifists by Oldav · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No prizes for guessing where you are from, no doubt the former land of the free and home of the brave. The cowards are the people who started the war and gave away their rights due to fear. Any brain fuc*ked moron can use violence-it takes brains you so obviously lack to be a pacifist. Crawl back under your rock as*hole. The US-Land of the facist and home of the coward.(Oh yes and the murdering, incompetant, cowardly army)

  54. Falun Gong by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

    To be honest I put Falun Gong in the same bucket as scientology, another cult of personality, so in a way I can see why it is being suppressed by the Chinese. Not that I support killing anyone for their beliefs, but it is the time-honoured solution, and apparently one of those few traditions China has not let go of...

  55. Re:all the encryption.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, no extra offtopic modifier?

  56. NAFTA? by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

    Tell me about NAFTA, that it's a free-trade agreement. Yet it's free for the US not for Canada or Mexico.

    Come now, NAFTA is just as advantageous for large Mexican and Canadian firms as it is for large US firms.

    That is, after all, what it's attempting to be: A benefit for the largest of corporations in North America, at the expense of the US and Canadian working class.

    See, given the wage equalizing effect it has (bringing US, Canadian, and Mexican wages for various types of work toward an average between the countries, its most positive effect (excluding on corporations and the super-rich) is on Mexican laborers (who now stand to make $1 an hour instead of $0.50, for example). Contrast this with American workers, who now command less wages and job security because of their new easier replaceability ("No strikes, no raises, no benefits, or we'll just lay off all your asses and move this factory to Mexico").

    So basically I'm saying NAFTA isn't lopsided in favor of Americans; it's lopsided in favor of the rich. Greed is usually surprisingly blind to petty issues like nationality, race, religion, and culture. Example: the US's Business Party, I mean, Republican Party's constant whoring of itself to the Christian Right.

    1. Re:NAFTA? by dryeo · · Score: 2, Informative

      While everything you say is true, NAFTA has still been more advantageous for America. Just look at the softwood lumber dispute (http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/HET/Softwood/). Basiclly America stole $5billion through illegal tarifs on lumber and even with losing court case after court case refused to be honourable. They have finally decide to give back a couple of billion but it still leaves a bad taste about America and how they honour treaties.
      Also there are very few large Canadian firms anymore as they all have been bought out by American firms.
      What I really laugh at are the poor Australians who even after seeing how America keeps its word went and signed a free trade agreement.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    2. Re:NAFTA? by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      Interesting...Sorry about my country's bad behavior when it comes to treaties and such.

      Also there are very few large Canadian firms anymore as they all have been bought out by American firms.

      That's a bummer. That really leads to mass homogenization—kind of like all the regional firms that have been snapped up (in huge mergers) into national firms, within the US...especially in areas like telecoms, grocery retailing, and financial services. You have my sympathy there.

    3. Re:NAFTA? by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      No I'm not saying NAFTA is lopsided in favor for US, but the fact is when dispute comes along, the US gov. simply ignore NAFTA and iron-fisted its way and put the issue into arbitration. US gov. wants Canadian's oil/water but not softwood/beef/wheat - pay the tariff at the next cashier, please.

  57. Hypocrisy by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    The Chinese should be ones to talk. They are usually far from perfect!

  58. Chinese Gov't just looking for leverage by jjn1056 · · Score: 1

    They just want leverage against Intel in order to get a better licensing agreement. Or possibly they want some sort of backdoor for snooping encrypted traffic. Believe me, the Chinese gov't is not interested in the fairness or unfairness of monopoly.

    --
    Peace, or Not?
  59. brains by r00t · · Score: 1

    Brains are in short supply for pacifists too.

    The truly brainy people knew from the start that war would be bad. They also haven't forgotten that avoiding war could have been far more costly.

    We'll never be able to try the alternative to see how bad it would have been. Such is life.

  60. Launched a case = an appeal at ISO by eggboard · · Score: 1

    The Xinhua report is particularly odd because it says China "launched a case," which implies legal action, possibly in an international venue. But if you read on, they filed two appeals alleging ethical violations. These violations, according to reports over the last few months, include people suggesting that unless China publishes their entire specification for WAPI, that there might be elements in the standard that enable backdoors, etc. China doesn't want to publish but they want to be a standard. That's a problem.

    I've been writing about this for years over at Wi-Fi Networking News, and what's interesting is that when I suggest a Chinese government sponsored proprietary standard might have the ability to be tapped very easily, I get a lot of interesting comments posted about how I'm paranoid. Today's post on this set of appeals has seen a good mix of comments.

    --
    Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
  61. Re:Suit against intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iraq create its own problems by invading Kuwait.

  62. in other news.. by lon3st4r · · Score: 0
    in other news, Intel files a case against China for setting up a chinese-origin employee network in their campus. the network is neither open, nor standards based. the organisation has not been able to reverse engineer, decrypt and figure out the verbal chatter being broadcast from this foriegn-language encrypted network. it is believed that emergency help is being sought from network monitors and verbal translators.

    * lon3st4r *

  63. How good is WAPI encryption? by mlush · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the chinese goverment would love to have a WiFi standard that they could easily eavesdrop on

  64. Re:Offtopic, but I'll bite. by Technician · · Score: 1

    I am in the market for a solar powered air conditioner that
    is environmetally friendly.


    You are looking for a very large array. Bring lots of bucks. You are looking for a large battery to cover overcast days. Bring lots of bucks. You are looking for a high effeciency air conditioner to reduce the size of the needed solar panels and battery. Visit Home Depot. You are looking for an effecient way to get the DC power to AC power with little power lost. Bring lots of bucks and look up Outback Power Systems.

    Do research of off grid living. Most people off grid look to better insulation and other cooling methods instead of a large energy sucking heat pump to remove unwanted heat. Reducing heat build-up in the first place is the first step. Start with effecient appliances and lighting. Use a laptop. Use heat storage to keep daytime heat peaks down.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  65. Re:Suit against intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..and the most dumb nation worldwide came to solve the problem. Of course the problem wasn't solved but many others ocurred.

  66. China and World Standards by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    Whether it is Yahoo helping the Chinese Communist government oppress its own people by turning them over for imprisonment for comments posted on websites, or companies like Intel, who set worldwide standards for connection and communication being acted against over their standards, the force of the massively growing Chinese economy is shaking freedom and rights worldwide. Even if China somehow doesn't come to set worldwide standards (it will) companies will make capitalistic decisions not to maintain two standards, one western and free, the other Chinese and destructive of rights. The Chinese standard will probably prevail due to the extent of their market and greed. This "blowback" from dealing with China is very disturbing.

    I suggest that those who complain about how "unfairly" China is being treated in this kind of discussion may be Chinese. Not all of course, but I have to wonder about someone who equates anti-communism with "racism."

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  67. Did they really just say that? by Andy+Somnifac · · Score: 1

    China has accused the makers of the technology developed by the chipmaking giant Intel of unethical behaviour... Did I really just see China accusing others of ethical violations? I wonder when the last time Intel employees were jailed/killed/"disappeared" because they didn't agree with their employer...

  68. Look who's talking by lxt518052 · · Score: 1
    And by the way, I never said China was a slave owning culture, that was an exampli gratia of cultural low ground.

    And now you're pretending the innocent finally? After insulting the Chinese all together in your posts and arrogantly dismissing others' patient explanation to you about subtle differences between Western and Chinese culture, huh?

    I am a Chinese, now living in the UK. I've seen assholes in China and I've seen assholes here. I would never view the English or the Irish as rogue nations when the drunk asshole I met on the street happened to be an English or Irish. That's something we called racisim, in the East and West alike.

    I don't know about 808140, but I agree with what he said. Even if he were indeed a Chinese, which I'd be very glad to learn, that does not make his point less valid.

    You might have been to China. But your presumptious attitude has failed you when you had a wonderful chance to learn and appreciate the greatness of another culture. Your narrow-minded superiority made you a victim of ignorance. I really feel sorry for you.

    If you feel upset about whatever China is doing in changing the world, my advice would be, "dig a hole in your basement, and live in there for the rest of your life. No internet, no TV, and no newspaper, as those will inevitably bring you the news you don't like."

    Finally, following your logic of accusing 808140, I suspect you work for Intel, who's heavy-handed monopoly has got a blow from its former friend Dell. Let's accept it. times change. We Chinese have learned that, have you?

    --
    People who dislike China tend to mention Tiananmen Square a lot, but they always forget the Tank Man is also a Chinese.
    1. Re:Look who's talking by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Right. If you could just pick one point and then stick to it like a good man, it might help you out a little. I guess the old propaganda school isn't up to much in the arena of intellectual debating, huh? :D I'll do my best to track down the main threads, you can work it out yourself from there.

      And now you're pretending the innocent finally? After insulting the Chinese all together in your posts

      I call em like I see em, son. I have no need to claim innocence, since I was never guilty in the first place, of whatever crime you seem to be accusing me of. Probably one of your infamous "thought crimes".

      I've seen assholes in China and I've seen assholes here.

      I wager you have, at that.

      you had a wonderful chance to learn and appreciate the greatness of another culture

      And how very great it is. Any culture that feels the need to mow down defenceless students in cold blood, invade sovereign nations, lock up the very minds of its own citizens, and then tries to fob off its genocidal lies as the truth, how mighty that nation is. Oh no wait, my mistake, it makes me sick.

      I really feel sorry for you.

      The feeling is entirely mutual.

      If you feel upset about whatever China is doing in changing the world

      Ah, China changing the world. You mean Taiwanese and Hong Kongese industrialists and investors pumping capital into the backward mainland changing the world. The last time Chairman Mao "Syphillitic Paedophile" Zedong tried to change anything, how many Chinese died?

      Finally, following your logic of accusing 808140, I suspect you work for Intel,

      Yes but the jolly part is I am not in China, so you can't have the jackbooted thugs kick down my door.

    2. Re:Look who's talking by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      > I call em like I see em, son. I have no need to claim innocence, since I was never
      > guilty in the first place, of whatever crime you seem to be accusing me of.
      > Probably one of your infamous "thought crimes".
      Sure you never committed any crime, but the GP never said you were. It's just that your claim that all Chinese treat others like shit makes you an ignorant asshole, no matter how you claim "innocence" to an unneccessary insult to at least a fourth of the whole world.

      > You mean Taiwanese and Hong Kongese industrialists and investors pumping
      > capital into the backward mainland changing the world.
      This makes me laugh. I'm live in Hong Kong, and basically a large part of our economy depends on the mainland. It's the mainland who is pumping capital into Hong Kong's economy. From what I know, Taiwan has a similar dependence on the mainland, instead of the other way round.

      You still think China is the way it is three decades ago. Sure you're free to believe so, just in case you also that believe the world is flat and angels guide the movement of the stars which revolve around the Earth.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    3. Re:Look who's talking by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      . It's just that your claim that all Chinese treat others like shit makes you an ignorant asshole

      See how easy it is to act tough on the internet? Well, big man, why don't you show me a link to where I said that. Show me the link. No? Maybe you might try reading the comments before forming noises from your gaseous extrusions next time. As to the rest of it, its about as well formed as your initial comments.

    4. Re:Look who's talking by lxt518052 · · Score: 1
      Right. If you could just pick one point and then stick to it like a good man, it might help you out a little. I guess the old propaganda school isn't up to much in the arena of intellectual debating, huh? :D I'll do my best to track down the main threads, you can work it out yourself from there.

      What do you mean by "track down the main thread"? The article is about China's case against Intel in regarding to wireless network encryption standards. All you did is picking at China and pretending you know everything about it. Sadly, the more you talk, the more you expose to everybody about your ignorance. If you call this "intellectual debate", you're living in your own world.

      I call em like I see em, son. I have no need to claim innocence, since I was never guilty in the first place, of whatever crime you seem to be accusing me of. Probably one of your infamous "thought crimes". Let others be the judge. For your convenience, I just googled the word "racism" for you.

      definition: racialism is a form of discrimination based on race, especially the belief that one race is superior to another. Racism may be expressed individually and consciously, throughxplicit thoughts, feelings, or acts, or socially and unconsciously, through institutions that promote inequality between races.

      However you try to insinuate, it won't help you out of this. If you could listen and learn something from others at the beginning, you could've avoided being such an asshole. Pathetically, all we see here is a self-righteous bigot's refusal of enlightment from others.

      And how very great it is. Any culture that feels the need to mow down defenceless students in cold blood, invade sovereign nations, lock up the very minds of its own citizens, and then tries to fob off its genocidal lies as the truth, how mighty that nation is. Oh no wait, my mistake, it makes me sick.

      I knew it. Every time someone like you running out of true thought, they resort to the tragic event at Tiananmen Square, in the hope that demeaning the opponent would give them the moral superiority. On the contrary, it just, again, exposed your ignorance of history. Every nation has its darkside at some point in the history. How does slave trade or burning witches sound to you? How about the shooting of civilians by the US troops and local police in Kabul as we saw it in the news yesterday?

      Don't take me wrong. I have no intention to defend the CCP's wrong doings. Actually, I was there in the protesting crowd in 1989 and I believe it's going to be rectified in not so far future. If you'd followed what's happening in Chinese politics like I do, you'd know that the new CCP leaders are carefully attempting to distant theirselves from the generation in power at that time. I have good reason to believe things are changing for the better in China. It's the result of the efforts of free thinking Chinese people, domestic and abroad. It's also a indirect consequence of rapid economy growth in the last decade.

      Guess it's a waste of time explaining that to you. You can't even distiguish the people from the regime, can you? "Intellectual debater"?

      Yes but the jolly part is I am not in China, so you can't have the jackbooted thugs kick down my door.

      Fortunately we don't have you in China, or you'd probably be one of those jackbooted thugs. Given the narrow-minded thinking you've demonstrated very well to us here, it's very likely you'd be brainwashed by some propaganda machine and turning your gun at the free thinking people.

      --
      People who dislike China tend to mention Tiananmen Square a lot, but they always forget the Tank Man is also a Chinese.
    5. Re:Look who's talking by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      This is great.

      Sadly, the more you talk, the more you expose to everybody about your ignorance.

      Thats funny I was just thinking the same...

      Let others be the judge.

      Yes, you'd like that wouldn't you? Sorry, but we respect the rights of individuals to have free speech around here. Might be an alien concept, but give it a bit of thought, it grows on you.

      you could've avoided being such an asshole. Pathetically, all we see here is a self-righteous bigot's refusal of enlightment from others.

      Oh enlighten me to the superiority of your ways. From what I see so far from you, you have much to teach in the art of the baseless argument, oh mastah.

      they resort to the tragic event at Tiananmen Square, in the hope that demeaning the opponent would give them the moral superiority...waffle...How does slave trade or burning witches sound to you? How about the shooting of civilians by the US troops and local police in Kabul as we saw it in the news yesterday?

      This is going to rock your kasbah, sparky, but I'm not American. Don't live there, don't especially want to. So that makes you racist and jumping to far more ill informed conclusions than I ever have. Oh and the square is just one incident of many, and one which I seriously doubt you attended. Besides, whats a rampant racist like me doing learning eight languages? Obviously its to better abuse the natives! Ahhhh I am enlightened.

      You can't even distiguish the people from the regime, can you? "Intellectual debater"?...you'd probably be one of those jackbooted thugs...it's very likely you'd be brainwashed by some propaganda machine and turning your gun at the free thinking people.

      I'm wondering where you are drawing these conclusions from. My original statement was that the leaders of China are heavy handed buffoons whose tantrums are shameful to their country. How do you pull your ideas from that? Thus far you have been bellowing, cursing, throwing insults about like water, making false assumptions, and in short, throwing a tantrum.

      Which merely underlines my original point nicely. I need more foes like you.

    6. Re:Look who's talking by lxt518052 · · Score: 1
      Yes, you'd like that wouldn't you? Sorry, but we respect the rights of individuals to have free speech around here. Might be an alien concept, but give it a bit of thought, it grows on you.

      Funny what makes you think free speech is your exclusive patent? Many Chinese like me, learned this long ago, not from textbooks, but from the brutal reality of history. Culture Revolution has given us 1st-hand experience about the importance of free speech and the underlying principle of equality. However, I seriously doubt you really grasp that at all. From your posts, whenever anyone experss an opinion you don't like, you dismiss it as bollocks or baseless arguments. Deep down, that is a sign of lacking spirit of equality. I wonder what you'd do to your opponents if you were given some Big Brother power one day.

      Oh enlighten me to the superiority of your ways. From what I see so far from you, you have much to teach in the art of the baseless argument, oh mastah.

      I've never claimed superiority of my ways. What I advocate is to respect and appreciate the greatness of other cultures. It is you who assumes the superiority of your way and insult people from other background than you. And yes, you are the one constantly makes arguments based on the "facts you know", which unfortunately, when it comes to other cultures, either are false, obsolete and second-hand, or simply amount to a very small fraction of reality.

      they resort to the tragic event at Tiananmen Square, in the hope that demeaning the opponent would give them the moral superiority...waffle...How does slave trade or burning witches sound to you? How about the shooting of civilians by the US troops and local police in Kabul as we saw it in the news yesterday?

      You can't even distiguish the people from the regime, can you? "Intellectual debater"?...you'd probably be one of those jackbooted thugs...it's very likely you'd be brainwashed by some propaganda machine and turning your gun at the free thinking people.

      Will you stop distorting others comments and putting words in my mouth please? As far as I am aware, free speech does not include inventing speeches for others. Or maybe it's your patented version of free speech. Then I have nothing to say.

      This is going to rock your kasbah, sparky, but I'm not American. Don't live there, don't especially want to. So that makes you racist and jumping to far more ill informed conclusions than I ever have.

      So when I explicitly mentions US troops, you think I'm a racist against Americans? That is a wonderful way of distortion. We didn't even have this during the Culture Revolution!

      Let me repeat my point here, in case you can't read properly in English. "Every nation has its darkside at some point in the history. How does slave trade or burning witches sound to you? How about the shooting of civilians by the US troops and local police in Kabul as we saw it in the news yesterday?" If you still can't grasp that, I really don't know how you manage your job at Intel. Or do you?

      Oh and the square is just one incident of many, and one which I seriously doubt you attended.

      How much do you know about things happened there in 1989, beyond limited western media coverage? Have you ever bothered to research into the backgrounds and aftermath? What sources have you consulted? Tell me, what is "fan3 guan1dao3", for example? You can just assume, but I experienced those days myself, I read numerous articles, books about it and I still don't think I know enough to make a judgement. As for your doubt, believe it or not. I can't care less.

      Besides, whats a rampant racist like me doing learning eight languages? Obviously its to better abuse the natives! Ahhhh I am enlightened.

      Knowing a few more phrases than "nihao" alone does not make you understand Mandarin. Same is true about other languages you claim to have learnt. You need to appreciate the underlying culture. I'm s

      --
      People who dislike China tend to mention Tiananmen Square a lot, but they always forget the Tank Man is also a Chinese.
    7. Re:Look who's talking by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      whenever anyone experss an opinion you don't like, you dismiss it as bollocks or baseless arguments.

      You see, here's your underlying problem, my underendowed asian friend. If you don't want debate, you really shouldn't be posting to slashdot. And when someone offers you superior arguments, you throw a tantrum, which amounts to "YOU SAME TING! YOU SAME TING!". Which merely reinforces my point.

      You expressly ignore the very first comment I made on this subject, which talks about the "heavy handed buffoons" they have in charge over there, a fine Chinese tradition going back to chairman mao syphillis-in-ze-dong and earlier. You keep talking about national darksides, and while I can see why that might weigh heavily on your mind, it sadly just isn't applicable to me. No witch burnings, no slave trade, no US big-wang troops.

      The only thing you are doing right now is proving me right, without any assistance from me whatsoever. When it comes to being abusive, like you, I can dish it out with the best of them, but frankly this whole discussion has started to loop over and over like a broken record, and I see no point in continuing it further. You have no argument except insult, and the bottom line is, you're starting to bore the shit out of me. So take your tedious insults, your low brow insinuations, and your knuckle dragging tantrums, and stop bringing the name of china into shame. More shame, I mean.

      I will say this for China though. Damn fine women. And they appreciate a good big wang, as well. :D

    8. Re:Look who's talking by lxt518052 · · Score: 1
      To this point, you've proven youself a hopeless, pathetic scum.

      Well, you've proven that to many others when you replied to 808140, haven't you?

      --
      People who dislike China tend to mention Tiananmen Square a lot, but they always forget the Tank Man is also a Chinese.
    9. Re:Look who's talking by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Syphilis. How does it feel to know that the "great leader" and chairman was influenced in his actions by a sexually transmitted disease? Wow, an entire culture founded on an STD that drives people mad. That explains a lot.

  69. Free Tibet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't listen to any of China's bullshit before they leave Tibet.

  70. China is complaining about what? by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 1

    Does anybody remember tiananmen Square, when the army ran down a guy with a tank? They are complaining about the IEEE breaking the rules. They should write their congressman. Oh wait, they don't have any.

    --
    Mean what you say...say what you mean.
  71. China concerned with ethics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait everyone, this has to be a first. China has an ethical problem...

    I'm surprised their government had time to put any work into this during their heavy schedule of human rights abuses.