Exept for close analogy with German Forces in WWII I do not see there anything really bad.
If US dollars were signed with "In God We Trust", why US weapons cannot contain Bible citations? At least something inspirational for soldiers who must keep their humanity.
Wow... I do not want hackers to control a plane when I will be in it... Imagine the situation, when hackers will take control over airport control center.
I have had remote work in foreign IT company. As one of standard requirements was having encrypted disk with all working materials.
Except for this one case, I never encountered any user at any company encrypting anything.
100% security is impossible. Any data you transmit or store on a physical device can be recovered, regardless of encryption.
Well, you are right. But if you will use strong modern encryption algorithms your data will be recovered only by your grandsons, believe me.
Additionally, there are some other methods of information protection, steganography for example. Together with encryption it reduces chances to recover your information almost to zero.
Check BDV DataHider or some similar software for example.
It is interesting, because IE always considered most vulnerable browser and one of main Firefox advantages considered low level of vulnerability.
For me it looks that most popular software always are most vulnerable.
Now when Firefox is almost as popular as IE (on my site 34% of visitors uses Firefox and 36% uses IE) Firefox becomes highly vulnerable.
WoW is not popular here in Ukraine. But we have a lot of problems with other popular on-line and off-line games.
Children take out a stuffs from the house and sell them to buy some hours of game in computer club. I know some teenagers who make crime for the same reason - yes, here in my town! May be they have missed their trainings of willpower? Or, may be we must wait for something? Of course, they should take responsibility for their acts...
There are some ways:
1. Views of ads.
2. Clicks on ads.
3. Actions.
The first one still alive. Even if you do not click on the ads, you may read it and it may have effect of "reminder" or "positive opinion building".
Second: you will have visitor. Even if your visitor will not do any action, he may click on ads on YOUR site, tell somebody about your site or return later to do any action.
Third does not require explanations.
So, what will be most logical scheme for payment?
Payment = Vp * Vc + Cp * Cc + Ap * Ac
Vp - price of one viewing of ads (e.g. $0.0001) Vc - count of ads viewing. Cp - price of one click on ads (e.g. $0.1) Cc - count of clicks. Ap - price of one action (e.g. $5.0) Ac - count of actions from ads.
1. Microsoft's employees uses Google instead of MSN for search. 2. Some engineers from Microsoft moving to Google. 3. Bill Gates will left Microsoft soon.
As Google grows and start giant projects (like Google Earth) it requires more and more resources. It is natural if they start building own computers, it will be the base for new projects.
I like Google because they are not afraid of global large-scale projects.
I like Firefox very much. It works much faster and consumes less resorces then IE. But with every release it becomes more and more heavy, and will reach IE soon.
So, lets start to close the black holes one by one. I am too young to die!
I hope, it have nano-price as well?
Exept for close analogy with German Forces in WWII I do not see there anything really bad. If US dollars were signed with "In God We Trust", why US weapons cannot contain Bible citations? At least something inspirational for soldiers who must keep their humanity.
Yeah, in statistics of my site Microsoft bots are most active visitors. Really, they crawl site hundreds times more often than Googlebot.
Wow... I do not want hackers to control a plane when I will be in it... Imagine the situation, when hackers will take control over airport control center.
Sounds like something copypasted from StarTrek :)
I have had remote work in foreign IT company. As one of standard requirements was having encrypted disk with all working materials. Except for this one case, I never encountered any user at any company encrypting anything.
Will you sell the space on your back when there will be no free space on animals? Looks like quite old idea, Matrix has better one...
Many companies do something absolutely unusable just to be famous because of such lists. What other can be the purpose of so stupid things?
Wow! I asked myself: "Why I receiving much less SPAM this year than several years ago?" Now I have the answer. Thank you, Good Guys!
100% security is impossible. Any data you transmit or store on a physical device can be recovered, regardless of encryption.
Well, you are right. But if you will use strong modern encryption algorithms your data will be recovered only by your grandsons, believe me. Additionally, there are some other methods of information protection, steganography for example. Together with encryption it reduces chances to recover your information almost to zero. Check BDV DataHider or some similar software for example.
It is interesting, because IE always considered most vulnerable browser and one of main Firefox advantages considered low level of vulnerability. For me it looks that most popular software always are most vulnerable. Now when Firefox is almost as popular as IE (on my site 34% of visitors uses Firefox and 36% uses IE) Firefox becomes highly vulnerable.
Hey man, move to Windows better!
It can't be immediately. It requires some time for people to understand the project, discuss it one with another and then make a decision.
WoW is not popular here in Ukraine. But we have a lot of problems with other popular on-line and off-line games. Children take out a stuffs from the house and sell them to buy some hours of game in computer club. I know some teenagers who make crime for the same reason - yes, here in my town! May be they have missed their trainings of willpower? Or, may be we must wait for something? Of course, they should take responsibility for their acts...
The care of social education is shifted on parental shoulders.
But most of them do not think about it at all.
How advertising effect can be measured?
There are some ways:
1. Views of ads.
2. Clicks on ads.
3. Actions.
The first one still alive. Even if you do not click on the ads, you may read it and it may have effect of "reminder" or "positive opinion building".
Second: you will have visitor. Even if your visitor will not do any action, he may click on ads on YOUR site, tell somebody about your site or return later to do any action.
Third does not require explanations.
So, what will be most logical scheme for payment?
Payment = Vp * Vc + Cp * Cc + Ap * Ac
Vp - price of one viewing of ads (e.g. $0.0001)
Vc - count of ads viewing.
Cp - price of one click on ads (e.g. $0.1)
Cc - count of clicks.
Ap - price of one action (e.g. $5.0)
Ac - count of actions from ads.
1. The Super-Chicken becomes a usual chicken after life during some time in normal conditions. 2. Children of the Super-Chicken are usual chickens.
This article must be entitled as "Dentist's Drill Killer", I think 8)
I agree with you. It is just promotional phrase. It is so rare, when one product or service completely replace another one.
1. Microsoft's employees uses Google instead of MSN for search.
2. Some engineers from Microsoft moving to Google.
3. Bill Gates will left Microsoft soon.
So, may we expect OS from Google in a far future?
Nice site! I like the translation in English... But may I ask them to include Ukrainian translation as well?
As Google grows and start giant projects (like Google Earth) it requires more and more resources. It is natural if they start building own computers, it will be the base for new projects. I like Google because they are not afraid of global large-scale projects.
I use it since its first release. Now it loads much longer.
I like Firefox very much. It works much faster and consumes less resorces then IE. But with every release it becomes more and more heavy, and will reach IE soon.