Slashdot Mirror


The Physics of Superman

eieken writes "The physics of Superman mostly belong in the realm of comic books, but some scientists decided to give their input on the matter. The article tells of 'a scientific experiment in which a researcher put several chickens in a centrifuge and raised them in twice-normal gravity for months at a time. When they emerged, the chickens were stronger and had larger bones and muscles, and greater endurance. In other words, they were superchickens.' Do they have human sized centrifuges?"

421 comments

  1. Question... by crazyjeremy · · Score: 4, Funny

    But can the superchickens fly now?

    1. Re:Question... by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't these physicist have anything better to do than make super strong dizzy chickens?

      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    2. Re:Question... by Blymie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Chickens can fly, they just have their wings clipped to prevent this.

      http://www.omlet.co.uk/guide/guide.php?view=Chicke ns&cat=Chicken%20Care&sub=wing%20clipping

    3. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah yea, he is modded that way 'cause we all know they can fly. . . .can they fly with bigger bones and bulk yo.

    4. Re:Question... by simdan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if they would have adapted their balance while in the centrifuge. Only to have it thrown off when placed on stationary land.

      Scientist, "Um, Frank? Are they all supposed to be walking to the left all the time with thier heads upside down?"

      Hate to see such a chicken lay an egg......

    5. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Almost all breeds of chickens (especially domesticated) cannot really fly... at least not like you see pigeons, doves, swallows, etc. fly. It is more of a semi-powered unstable glide and they can only maintain it for relatively short distances.

      The can "fly" just enough to get up into the relatively low branches of trees, over tall fences, gliding down from heights and of course as a method of faster escape at ground level.

    6. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not really. I've seen wild turkeys haul ass for short distances -- like 2 foot ball fields, and roost in high branches. bet chickens could do the same. sparrow no. fly, for sure.

    7. Re:Question... by VolciMaster · · Score: 1
      But can the superchickens fly now?

      "We need more thrust!"

    8. Re:Question... by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 2, Informative

      My chickens didn't have their wings clipped, and they could still barely fly. They could make it into 10 foot high branches without too much of a problem. They were also incredibly good at evading my attempts to catch them, flying into trees, decks, roofs...

    9. Re:Question... by toxcspdrmn · · Score: 1

      The book mentioned in TFA is Great Mambo Chicken and the Transhuman Condition - Science Slightly Over the Edge by Ed Regis. It's a little dated now but it is an entertaining introduction to fields such as cryonics and nanotechnology.

      --
      "E pur si muove!" - attributed to Galileo Galilei, 1564-1642
    10. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are like my chickens they don't do it in a single jump, chickens are smarter than they act, they jump to lower branches first before going ~20ft up. (I have tall trees). Anyone with chickens can look at a rooster struting about and know they could never fly with those funny shaped wings, and over sized heads.

    11. Re:Question... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 5, Funny
      But can the superchickens fly now?

      Not only can they fly, but they think nothing of beating up Klingon chickens. These chickens are so bad, they'll rip off their drumsticks and smack you upside the head with them. These chickens are so strong, you have to fry them in 40 weight motor oil. These are SERIOUS chickens.

    12. Re:Question... by swillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Chickens can fly

      Not really. Chickens can fly for very short distances and limited heights. They can get over fences and travel maybe 40 feet at a time. After one such "long" flight, they can barely get off the ground and prefer to run.

      they just have their wings clipped to prevent this.

      Chickens that are kept outdoors in pens without high walls have their wings clipped. I don't know what the minimum "safe" wall height is, but most unroofed outdoor pens I've seen use wire mesh about seven feet high. Smaller pens can use shorter walls because the chickens need quite a bit of horizontal room to reach their maximum height above ground. Wing clipping doesn't actually reduce their wings' lift much, mainly it just removes the ends of the primary feathers which are necessary for controlled flight. Chicken flight is pretty erratic and wild at best, and without those feather tips they just can't control it at all.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    13. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ohh yeah it says so on the internet so it must be true!!!
      They dont mean it literaly when they say fly in that article.
      It scares me that so many people have come to the conclution that chickens can fly because and article used the word to describe chickens jumping fences and running away.
      Please for god's sake dont read the bible. and get out and away from the computer a bit okay? you can only get smarter from it.

    14. Re:Question... by jd · · Score: 1

      There is a restraunt in England that has as a menu item "freshly laid fried eggs", though I guess in this case they would be scrambled.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    15. Re:Question... by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 5, Funny
      Chickens can fly

      Not really. Chickens can fly...

      'Nuff said.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    16. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more curious about the eye-beams.

    17. Re:Question... by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's called falling...with style.

    18. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The solution in three words: solid rocket boosters.

    19. Re:Question... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the Turkey Give-away in "WKRP in Cincinnatti" where they gave away live turkeys by dropping them from the helicopter ... but turkeys can't fly.

    20. Re:Question... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Screw the frying them in motor oil. When are they going to cross chickens with octopii?

      I want more chicken wings per chicken. Mmm ... chicken wings ...

      8 wings, 8 legs - 16 pieces of snacking goodnesssss per bird.

    21. Re:Question... by hackstraw · · Score: 1


      Chickens are shitty birds that are fat, and get fat relatively quickly, and a side benefit, they lay eggs too. Perfect for domestication, and selectively bred for thousands of years to make them fatter and get fat quicker (do a search for the nasty super chickens that make McNuggets in 6-8 weeks).

      Humans are smart/lazy (and not very good animals either) and we pick easy prey to eat with little muss or fuss to eat them.

    22. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      My buddy had some chickens, just wild yard hens... we were boozin one day and kept bugging him to let us kill one. He finally agreed. We made spears out of knives duct taped to broken hockey sticks, a cheap ass bow with cheap ass arrows, basically any weapons we could create out of the contents of his garage. We spent hours chasing those fuckers around. I finally caught one by just climbing up a tree and grabbing the bastard. We chopped his head off and watched the body flop around for a while. If you could rewrite lord of the flies to be with drunken idiots in redneck town, it would have been that... only piggy was a chicken. I want a shot at these super chickens.

    23. Re:Question... by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      Oh that's why i broke my teeth today on those damn nuggets ...

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    24. Re:Question... by Joebert · · Score: 1

      We don't call him Colonel Sanders for nuthin, he went through hell to get that recipe.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    25. Re:Question... by jlarocco · · Score: 4, Funny
      But can the superchickens fly now?

      Possibly, but in any case, here are some facts:

      1. Super-chickens are chickens.
      2. Super-chickens fight all the time.
      3. The purpose of the super-chicken is to flip out and kill people.

      Super-chickens can kill anyone they want! Super-chickens cut off heads ALL the time and don't even think twice about it. These chickens are so crazy and awesome that they flip out ALL the time. I heard that there was this super-chicken who was eating at a diner. And when some dude bit into a drumstick the super-chicken killed the whole town. My friend Mark said that he saw a super-chicken totally uppercut some kid just because the kid opened a window.

    26. Re:Question... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1, Funny
      When are they going to cross chickens with octopii?
      Once they actually find an octopius.
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    27. Re:Question... by thelonestranger · · Score: 1

      Not only can they fly but they have laser vision and can bend steel bars in their beaks.

      --
      To err is human. To forgive is not company policy.
    28. Re:Question... by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 5, Funny

      A the risk of going off topic

      When I was at school one of the Biology teachers (let's call him Mr Mudie) was covering the topic of "Birds 'n Flight 'n Stuff" and he borrowed a quail from the city university. Quail tend to be more on the 'flutter' rather than 'soar' end of the flight scale. So, Mr Mudie has this quail in his hands and says (I paraphrase) "..and of course quail don't fly so well" and launches the bird high into the air...

      It went up..... ...and came down. With a thud and without a single solitary flap. Stone dead. Ooops.

      Of course, he proved his point - they don't fly so well

      --
      Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
    29. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I really read 'chickens have their wings dipped' the first time I read your post. Time to go for another round of coffee! ;-)

    30. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thats why I prefer lion meat, followed by cougar tartar and a cobra heart smoothy.

    31. Re:Question... by sgbett · · Score: 0

      I hear there is an elf about town who will help you out for the reasonable fee of a one small jar!

      --
      Invaders must die
    32. Re:Question... by packeteer · · Score: 3, Informative

      IHRC (I have raised chickens). Chickens with clipped wings can still make very high jumps when flapping their wings hard. They also can maintain a near verticle glide when jumping off of a high space. Chickens with clipped wings can often jump over fences or most high barriers they just cant maintain flight for extended periods.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    33. Re:Question... by Bozdune · · Score: 1

      You and your buddies, come on over. I have some fish in a barrel for you to practice on next.

    34. Re:Question... by Random+Destruction · · Score: 5, Funny
      They also can maintain a near verticle glide when jumping off of a high space.

      Me too. It's called falling.
      --
      :x
    35. Re:Question... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, however, super-chickens are *not* mammals...

      Chris Mattern

    36. Re:Question... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      It's falling...with style!

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    37. Re:Question... by JohhnyTHM · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's time to call Chuck Norris!

    38. Re:Question... by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      It's flying boneless chicken I'm worried about.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    39. Re:Question... by m0nstr42 · · Score: 1

      "It's called falling...with style."

      "The Guide says there is an art to flying, [...] or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." - Douglas Adams (Life, The Universe, and Everything)

    40. Re:Question... by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 1

      He could always start a second career running Thanksgiving promotions for radio stations.

    41. Re:Question... by orasio · · Score: 1

      It is more of a semi-powered unstable glide and they can only maintain it for relatively short distances.

      The same kind of stuff was said about Santos Dumont, or the Wright brothers.

    42. Re:Question... by 14CharUsername · · Score: 1

      No, but they can leap over tall coops in a single bound.

    43. Re:Question... by jocknerd · · Score: 1

      One of the funniest tv episodes. EVER. I laughed my ass off and I was only around 13 at the time.

    44. Re:Question... by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Super-chickens can kill anyone they want!

      Except Chuck Norris, of course.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    45. Re:Question... by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      Make perfectly spherical chickens.

    46. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chickens can fly

      Not really. Chickens can fly...

      'Nuff said.


      As God is my witness, I thought Turkeys could fly.
    47. Re:Question... by Dreamlandlocal · · Score: 1

      I bet I can "verticle glide" too - if I could just get to that "high space"

    48. Re:Question... by IAmTheDave · · Score: 1
      The same kind of stuff was said about Santos Dumont, or the Wright brothers.

      And with a big push in chicken ingenuity (and perhaps, you know, a research grant or two from the chicken federal government) one day chickens may perfect flight!!

      Sorry, I didn't have mod points, but I found parent's post pretty damned funny.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    49. Re:Question... by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

      A researcher is doing an experiment on frogs. He takes a normal frog, and yells "Jump, froggie jump!". The frog makes an amazing jump of about thirteen feet. Experimenter writes in his notebook, "Frog with four legs, jumps four meters."

      Then he chops of one of the frog's legs, and yells "Jump froggie, jump!" The frog jumps just about ten feet, and the experimenter writes in his notebook: "Frog with three legs, jumps three meters."

      He repeats this process twice more, with the frog jumping six, then just over three feet, and writing the results in his notebook. Finally he chops the last leg off, and yells "Jump, froggie, jump!" No response. So he repeats, "Jump froggie jump!". Still no response. Finally he yells at the top of his lungs: "JUMP FROGGIE, JUMP!". Still the frog does not move.

      So he writes in his notebook: "Frog with no legs is deaf."

      We can conclude that clipping the chickens' wings disables the inbuilt navigation systems that birds have; in short, a chicken with no wings has no sense of direction. After all, what is flying but throwing yourself at the ground, and missing.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    50. Re:Question... by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      My understanding that the main reason chickens can't fly well is that they are over-weight and their wings are under-exercised. We feed them all they want, so they get big and juicy and offer no exercise for their wings. Surprise surprise, they weigh too much to fly.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    51. Re:Question... by brother_b · · Score: 1

      Turkeys can fly, just not well. I've seen turkeys up in the tops of trees and almost had one crash through a windshield once when it decided to fly across the road. Of course, I'm referring to the wild variety.

    52. Re:Question... by brother_b · · Score: 1

      Is an octopius a pope with 8 heads?

    53. Re:Question... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      No, that would be the Hydrapope.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    54. Re:Question... by Camshaft_90 · · Score: 0

      Take-off optional.....Landing mandatory!!!!

      --
      JH
    55. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why you only clip ONE wing.
      I've raised (and fought) chickens too.

      g.

    56. Re:Question... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Wild turkeys are not domesticated, well-fed, fat, round, bowling balls with wings for a bird 1/3 its size.

      Ahh, "They're hitting the ground like wet sacks of cement!"

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    57. Re:Question... by wordsofwisedumb · · Score: 1

      I believe those walls are as much to help keep the predators out as they are to keep the chickens in.

    58. Re:Question... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I thought that was a water pope?

      Oh, wait, that's an Aquapope.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    59. Re:Question... by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

      No I'm quite certain your statement is incorrect, we used to raise chickens. We never clipped their wings. they could not fly. It is possible that something other then domesticated chickens usually used to eat and produce eggs can fly , but the ones used for normal commercial purposes can at best glide a few yards after flapping vigorously into the air.

      --
      âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
    60. Re:Question... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you do realize the chickens of the U.S. are hugely obese. In southeast asia I've seen very lean chickens, had the same profile and build as a large robin or sparrow, I didn't even recognize what they until I saw their heads up close (and of course they crowed just like chicken). They could fly quite far, a couple hundred feet or more.

    61. Re:Question... by brjndr · · Score: 1

      You seem to be referring to Ninja Chickens, or Chickinjas. Chickinjas are a fierce group, the silent assassins of the chicken world. I knew this chickinja, his name is Cluck. When Cluck found out the old farmer was planning to make a fryer of him, Cluck ripped of the farmers arms and pushed him off a roof. I'm telling you, chickinjas are viscous, you don't ever want to mess with one. Chickinjas also have special moves. They can throw a shuriken and then jump on top of it, and right before it hits you they peck your eyes out. Never give a chickinja a reason to be mad at you.

      Cluck looks forward to killing you soon.

    62. Re:Question... by todorb · · Score: 0

      no, but supercows can!

    63. Re:Question... by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 1

      No - the TSA will confiscate them.

      --
      Squirrel!
    64. Re:Question... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      I just tagged this article as "dizzychickens".

      I probably won't get to use that one again. But you never know.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    65. Re:Question... by georgewad · · Score: 1

      'as god is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.'
      Funniest KRP Ever

      --
      Karma: It's not just a good idea. It's the law.
    66. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chickens are shitty birds that are fat, and get fat relatively quickly, and a side benefit, they lay eggs too.

      Most Red State Americans are shitty people that are fat, and get fat relatively quickly, and as a side benefit, have lots of kids too.

    67. Re:Question... by Red+Weasel · · Score: 1

      for the chickens?

      --
      ..which just shows that the human brain is ill-adapted for thinking and was probably designed for cooling the blood-T P
    68. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a clever quote. Imagine that, throwing yourself at the ground and missing. Gave me quite a chuckle did that one.

      You've piqued my interest. I shall now seek out this curious tome which neither I nor the rest of /. has read forty-two times over already, producing a such a familiarity that we reference it at the drop of a hat, such as in, say, a thread about a chicken's (in)ability to fly. I look forward to reading this obscure text.

      But really, very clever of you.

    69. Re:Question... by emandres · · Score: 2, Informative

      If anybody didn't catch the reference, it's referring to Real Ultimate Power.

      --
      The only way to tell the difference between a hamster and a gerbil is that the hamster has more white meat.
    70. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It went up..... ...and came down. With a thud and without a single solitary flap. Stone dead. Ooops.

      Don't worry, it's just pining for the fjords :-)

    71. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's Eyebeam got to do with it?

    72. Re:Question... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      To be fair, their lack of flying ability has a good bit to do with how they are raised, along with the ability being breed out of them.

      I've raised a large number of ducks as well as chickens. The ducks had a similar limited ability of flight. Why? They were only a few generations from wild ducks...

      Well, they (like the chickens) were vastly overfeed compared to their wild counterparts. They were essentially too obese to fly.

      Also, they were kept couped up for much of their growing years, and never got a chance/need to properly exercise and build up the chest and wing muscles like they would have in a wild environment.

      A domesticated chicken would have a lot better flight ability than you think if they were raised in wild conditions.

    73. Re:Question... by Johnyy_Bravo · · Score: 1

      Chickens can fly with clipped wings, it just takes more effort for them. The solution to this is supposed to be to clip *one* wing only, so that any attempt to fly is lopsided and ends up abortive.
      The strangest thing was that our blasted chickens learnt to flap one wing faster than the other and ended up just as able to escape their enclosure as their non-clipped friends!

      --
      In the event of my death, I wish to donate my Karma.
    74. Re:Question... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I've had chickens fly hundreds of feet. The smaller ones can indeed fly, some breeds can fly quite well. Some (like the Silkie) cannot fly at all. The fat chickens don't fly very well at all (duh). Chickens you raise for food generally get feed designed for maximum weight gain. Chickens you raise for fun, if you let then eat what they want (grass, grub, ants, vegetables, etc.) will be very lean and will be able to fly. Also, the chickens you raise for meat tend to be chickens which have been selectively bred to obtain the most breast tissue for maximum return on the dollar. Those varieties will hardly be able to get off the ground at all. Lean chickens, such as the leghorn, fly quite well. There are also smaller chicken breeds which resemble pheasants (can pheasants and chickens crossbreed) which can fly extremely well.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    75. Re:Question... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      "Oh, the humanity."

    76. Re:Question... by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      Some types of Bantams (minichickens with desighner bred plumage for show) are light and strong enough to do some pretty good flying.

    77. Re:Question... by TwelveInches · · Score: 0

      I grew up with chickens at my house- they can't fly very far. No match for a dog or cat, anyway.

    78. Re:Question... by m0nstr42 · · Score: 1

      I shall now seek out this curious tome which neither I nor the rest of /. has read forty-two times over already, producing a such a familiarity that we reference it at the drop of a hat, such as in, say, a thread about a chicken's (in)ability to fly.

      Let me be the first to welcome our new non-flying chicken overlords. But do they linux? Imagine a beowolf cluster of chickens.

      Yeesh.

  2. its that time again... by freemywrld · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it time to welcome our new super-chicken overlords?

    1. Re:its that time again... by JuzzFunky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does anyone know who was the first person to welcome our new overlords on slashdot was?
      ...just wondering

      --
      Unexpect the expected!
    2. Re:its that time again... by jdbartlett · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, but if you like, you can go through all 10,600 Google results for "welcome our new * overlords":

      http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aslashdot.org +%22welcome+our+new+*+overlords%22

    3. Re:its that time again... by g-doo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why did the superchicken cross the road?

    4. Re:its that time again... by sanman2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      To get to that phonebooth on the other side? :D

    5. Re:its that time again... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      No - for the same reason a regular chicken crosses the road - its stapled to the kid's skull.

    6. Re:its that time again... by gnomino · · Score: 1

      If only we had some Kryptonite...

    7. Re:its that time again... by Gyga · · Score: 3, Informative

      Using slashdot search and ordering by date, and clicking next 30 I got http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?cid=441212 2&sid=41804 on Tuesday October 08, 2002. But it appears to not be the first. Google doesn't show all the results either. The one I link to does follow the simpson quote exactly. (talks of insects)

      A wider search of overlords gives the same post

      This one http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7988&c id=736976 from Monday October 02, 2000 (I think) is linked from wikipedia. It offers apologies to The Simpsons. Wikipedia claims it is the first know use. (talks of fungus)

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    8. Re:its that time again... by PRC+Banker · · Score: 1

      Why did the superchicken cross the road?

      To avoid KFC.

      --
      Oh.
    9. Re:its that time again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After the joke has been told more than 10,000 times, does anyone think it's just a little played out?

      Wait, I forgot, you'll get modded up for making it regardless of any actual humor.

    10. Re:its that time again... by mrogers · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the information, a T-800 has been dispatched to correct the error.

    11. Re:its that time again... by AndroSyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one welcome our new joke playing out overlords.

    12. Re:its that time again... by espinafre · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

    13. Re:its that time again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But can anyone find the first one?

  3. Ah, good old Super Chicken by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

    And here I thought Fred's super sauce was the reason for super chickens.....

    http://www.digital-sledgehammer.com/superchicken/l yrics.htm

    Yet another great reason to live in Pittsburgh.....

    --
    -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
  4. Web server by mh101 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like they should have put their web server in the centrifuge as well...

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
    1. Re:Web server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did. When they took it out it snapped IIS in two.

  5. Obligatory by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's difficult to tell from this vantage point whether they will consume the captive earth men or merely enslave them. One thing is for certain: there is no stopping them; the chickens will soon be here. And I for one welcome our new centrifuge generated superchicken overlords.

    --
    ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
    1. Re:Obligatory by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Simpsons, what don't they cover.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    2. Re:Obligatory by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      I figure I will just get if over with and hail our new chicken masters. If forced to toil in their underground maize mines, I'd like to be at least a foreman.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    3. Re:Obligatory by loose_cannon_gamer · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new centrifuge generated superchicken overlords.


      That has to be the single most silly sentence I've read in a loong time. Laughed right out loud at that, I did. Thanks. :)

      --
      In Soviet Russia, us are belong to all your base.
  6. No news... by benjaminperdomo · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Sayan of Planet Vegeta know it for a long time...

    1. Re:No news... by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      I was thinking also of the Jinxians from Larry Niven's "Known Space" universe. First introduced in the novel World of Ptaavs (now in print as part of the Three Books of Known Space omnibus), the Jinxians are short and stocky from growing up on a world with gravity much higher than on Earth. The same planet of Jinx gives us the "bandersnatchi", one of Niven's most interesting alien race, who are not only massively mascular from the gravity, but have been genetically engineered to have chromosomes much larger than that of humans in order to protect against cosmic radiation.

    2. Re:No news... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Reflexes, too, if you follow one of the character premises in Gordon Dickson's "Hour of the Horde". The chief of a local band of losers came from a high-gravity planet. He wasn't particularly massive, but he was fast. The idea was that if you fell down on such a planet, you'd better have uber reflexes or you'd break bones in the fall.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    3. Re:No news... by bsartist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speaking of Larry Niven - he wrote about the difficulties Superman and Lois Lane would have in an essay called Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    4. Re:No news... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Alan Moore's Tom Strong character was raised in a high-gravity environment.

    5. Re:No news... by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Informative
      he idea was that if you fell down on such a planet, you'd better have uber reflexes or you'd break bones in the fall.

      The ultimate high-g planet is the super-jovian Mesklin, in Hal Clement's Mission of Gravity. At the poles it was about 600g. The natives were centipede-like, obviously very strong and fast, but they had no clear idea of "falling". If you dropped something, it disappeared and reappeared on the ground, smashed or squashed flat. More extreme, the astronomer Frank Drake imagined life on a neutron star, based on nuclear reactions rather than chemical, microscopic and extremely fast. Robert Forward did a couple of novels using that idea.

    6. Re:No news... by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      There is also the book "Flux" by Stephen BAxter, which is based in his future universe where we decide to go to war with a super powerful 5b yr old civilisation...so nothing unusual there!

      in this "humans" were built into a neutron star, they would use photons to "smell" (slow light due to high high density), although i cant remember what they use to see - it was an amazing book, as they were less than a micron tall...eventually they find out that the reason for their existence was to build engines into the neutron star (build a wormhole gateway, oipen other end to space = highly compressed matter suddenly decompressing, rocket engine...) which was then used as a weapon agains this enemy.

      You find out through other books that this super powerful race are building a super massive blackhole (cue Muse fans) - seriously, they are steering GALAXIES into this thing - with the aim of spinning it up until it the event horizon disappears - there s a theory that a massive blac hole (which will have a large event horizon and therefore v low tidal stresses compared to a 3 sun mass one) which is spun would lose its event horizon, meaing you could enter it and go...well noone knows. The aliens are using this to escape from our universe...

      Very very cool series of books, although v hard sci fi - Baxter is a double PhD and knows his stuff.

    7. Re:No news... by kalirion · · Score: 1

      And I personally was thinking of the Hyperion series by Dan Simmons, in which there were human inhabitted planets with gravities up to 1.7g (that particular one had relatively few people on it.) But one planet with 1.3g was known for its short, stocky, muscular residents.

    8. Re:No news... by pvjr · · Score: 1

      I wondered how long before someone remembered it;)

    9. Re:No news... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      We assume they'd be shorter on a higher g planet (assuming no deliberate genetic changes). But is that the case? They'd be shorter because it's "harder for bones to grow upward"? At the cellular level, that difference in gravity isn't even noticeable.

      And, long-term, fighting against gravity is a small downside, but the upside of tallness greatly outweighs it, or else we wouldn't be as relatively gigantic as we are.

      It's true that more severe gravities, 4x-10x+, would offer much more problems with simply falling down, but that would also tend to evolve organisms that are better at recovering/avoiding stumbles, and are tougher so as to absorb simple falls better.

      Nah, predicting a shorter race on a mildly higher g planet I'd consider evidence for something made up precisely because that would not be the case, especially for a transplanted species like humans, even after a million years of evolution.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    10. Re:No news... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      I thought Simmons mentioned in passing that the heavy-worlders in Hyperion were genetically engineered. Being shorter perhaps in making falls less disastrous, but so would being more flexible. I always imagined a real heavy-worlder would be wiry like a spring, not stocky like a brick.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    11. Re:No news... by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that the only geneticaly engineered humans were the Outers - the group who broke away from the rest of humanity to live their entire lives in space. Some of them were even engineered to have "solar sail"-type wings, and so forth. Some of the "ordinary" humans did choose to get biomods, to make themselves look like animals hybrids for example, but that was more plastic surgery than genetic engineering.

  7. For more along the lines of the summary... by Nybarius · · Score: 5, Informative

    see the book "The Physics of Superheroes". It's about exactly what you would expect.

  8. Not about the book? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I saw the title, I was sure that this story was going to be about the recent book .

  9. I wonder where you approach the limit..... by groslyunderpaid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You could only get so much bigger (bones, muscle, etc) before it wasn't an advantage anymore, right? I mean, growing something in higher gravity so that it creates a stronger 'infrastructure' (for lack of a better term) would only be beneficial up to a certain point, at which point the weight of said 'infrastructure' would weight you down so as to defeat the purpose....

    1. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by Detritus · · Score: 1

      It's also energy and nutrients that aren't being spent on more productive matters, like making more chickens.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by BewireNomali · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed. Also, the increased density is in response to the forces from an altered environment. Assuming the organism to be adaptive, then those "powers" would slowly be lost in the earth's environment, no? Akin to the way astronauts lose muscle tissue when they go into space, no matter how much they exercise.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    3. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by idlemachine · · Score: 1

      It didn't seem to hold back Tom Strong at all :)

    4. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by Raindance · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You've got to think that somewhere in the world atheletes are training using high-G centerfuges. For better or worse, legal or illegal, it'd be effective.

    5. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by naoursla · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually some professional athletes train in low oxygen environments to give them more stamina in normal oxygen environments.

    6. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually some professional athletes train in low oxygen environments to give them more stamina in normal oxygen environments.

      Low oxygen environments are also known as "big-ass mountains".

    7. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by fossa · · Score: 2, Informative

      I recently read Human Acclimatization and Adaptation to Stresses. The article explains, unsurprisingly in retrospect, that altitude training has different effects on different people. Some are helped, some remain the same or worsen. But the majority of athletic improvement should be attributed to the other big condition of a high altitude camp: the absence of stresses of normal life. The article also suggested that an athlete often ends up unintentionally training less intensley due do the difficulties of low oxygen. Upon returning to sea level, the athlete is well rested not from any changes due to low oxygen but due to the unintentional taper, and thus improves performance. Another interesting fact mentioned was "with elite athletes, training effects are so specific that there is no beneficial carry-over of circulatory improvements in one activity to another". For example, improvements in running do not translate to improvements in cycling; I'm interested in a more in-depth explanation of that phenomenon.

    8. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      How do you think Yao Ming was created?

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    9. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by localman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good point... of course it depends what context you're in. If your goal is to lift heavy things all things all the time, the extra bulk will be useful all of the time. More realistically if you need to move quickly sometimes, it would becomes a burden. So what's an advantage depends on the needs.

      In fact, since this study indicates our bodies strengthen and weaken based on the average load, I'll go ahead and guess that the size and strength we develop to is "about right" for our particular usage pattern. In other words, going about your day to day activities your body will adjust to "about right" muscle and bone strength, so as to handle most tasks easily and not waste too much effort building infrastructure that won't be needed often if ever.

      Of course, many of us seem to disagree with the natural results. Though in reality I sit at a computer most of the day and have little need for muscular development, I exercise a couple times a week to fool my body into thinking I need a little extra bone and muscle tissue.

      Cheers.

    10. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by nephridium · · Score: 1

      The increased amount of hemoglobin (that's what the oxigen docks on) is measurable. There may be all those positive psychological effects, but the pure physical improvement (increased oxigen level) due to acclimatization is undeniable. Just have a look at the Sherpas in the Himalayans - whereas the tourist have problems even walking in that high an altitude, the Sherpas ascend the montains packed like mules.

      --


      And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
    11. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes one wonder what possible health problems these chickens might face. I have a hard time believing that you could simply centrifuge some chickens without having a few consequences on the side... and no I am not talking about PETA, I am talking about things like the life span of the chickens and possibly problems with the circulatory system. I think the long term effects of these things need to be studied as well to determine if this is actually a good thing or not.

    12. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      You can get them quite a lot stronger before reaching the crushing strength of bone, which is essentially a slightly porous form of rock.

      The cardiovascular damage alone from the necessarily higher blood pressure to get blood to the brain of someone standing up at 2 g's is begging to kill them pretty quickly..

    13. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by Don853 · · Score: 1

      The chinese government got together a tall woman basketball player and a tall man basketball player, and 'encouraged' them to get married and have a huge baby?

    14. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Generally, the training regimen is 'train low, sleep high' -- ride (for the large number of elite cyclists who do this) or run at low altitude/high pressure, and recover at high altitude/low pressure. This is usually done by using hypobaric chambers at sealevel exercise, although some people do commute to make this work. There is a weakest-link assumption: improving your oxygen-carrying capability by sleeping at high altitude does nothing to improve your heart's strength or any of a number of other possible limitations, so if that's what's keeping you back the altitude training will do very little to make you more competitive.

      I'm not serious enough at running to qualify as 'elite' certainly, but it's been my experience as a fairly high-level, high altitude bike racer that I can outrun almost anyone I know at low altitudes, and anyone, including some pretty damn good runners, at high altitudes. (I spend a lot of time riding/training in Leadville, Colorado, at 3600 meters elevation.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    15. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by raddan · · Score: 1

      I don't have the book at hand, so I can't give you an exact citation, but in Noakes' Lore of Running (I have the 1991 edition), he notes that high-altitude training has been shown mainly to benefit athletes who compete at altitude, but that the benefits of training at high altitude and competing at sea level are small enough to be disputable. He adds that after the 1968 Mexico City Olympic Games, where U.S. runners were thrashed due to heat and altitude, U.S. runners picked up altitude training, but that the data that they've accumlated since then has lead them to believe that you really should tailor your training to the venue. If you enjoy training or exercise science, pick up this excellent book.

    16. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

      And some athletes train in high oxygen environments so as to strenghten their muscles by forcing more oxygen into them. One method is wearing an oxygen mask and exercising at the bottom of a swimming pool, simulating an ultra low altitude.

  10. No wringing their necks! by psyclo · · Score: 4, Funny

    My grandma used to kill chickens by twirling them over her head to break the necks, then throwing them down. Like to see her try that with a "superchicken"!
    Can't you just see it? Hank comes outside to find his wife, and there the is, cornered in the hen house. "Look out Hank! That one by the door knows judo or something!"

    --
    =======================
    Psyclo, the dark night.
    Mike, the computer geek.
    1. Re:No wringing their necks! by robbak · · Score: 1

      I keep telling ye: Dey is Organized!

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    2. Re:No wringing their necks! by idontneedanickname · · Score: 1

      Actually the twirling over the head bit is to make blood leave their head, the goal being to make things less painful for the chicken. I'm not sure if they actually lose consciousness but they certainly become light-headed/less aware.

    3. Re:No wringing their necks! by psyclo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the explanation. I was a kid, so wasn't sure about the why. All I know is she took great pleasure in throwing the chicken near wherever I was standing. The darned thing would run around (I know, like a chicken with its head cut off), but the head was still *barely* attached. It would be flopping to one side while the chicken ran all over. I would scream and try to run away from the chicken. My dear old grandma would laugh her darned head off at me.
      Was that cruelty to animals, small children, or both? All I know is that once I recovered, I got to eat some really good Louisiana fried chicken. Yummy.

      --
      =======================
      Psyclo, the dark night.
      Mike, the computer geek.
  11. About Flying by MBCook · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That chicken thing is just weird. That must have been a while ago, I don't see how anyone could get the ethical approval to do something like that. Just how would you keep the chickens in for months at a time anyway? How would you feed them and such? Do you stop the thing for a moment, do what you need, then start it back up?

    That said, the article comments on Superman flying. I read somewhere recently (some list of facts about Superman) some interesting stuff. One of the things was that "Faster than a speeding bullet... more powerful than a locomotive..." stuff was not part of the original Superman comics, it was apparently made up for a radio show. But more interesting to me, apparently Superman COULDN'T fly. He was able to jump REALLY HIGH. You know, "able leap tall buildings in a single bound." At some point that somehow turned into flying (this was a bulleted list of facts type thing, so it didn't expand on these).

    There was a special on TLC, Discovery, Science Channel, or some such recently about the physics of Superman. I didn't see it (I'm sure it will be re-run), but I remember from a commercial that they said it would actually be MORE PAINFUL for Lois to be caught by Superman than to simply fall to her death. I don't know why, you'd have to watch to find out I guess.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:About Flying by ampathee · · Score: 2, Interesting
      it would actually be MORE PAINFUL for Lois to be caught by Superman than to simply fall to her death. I don't know why,


      I'd imagine that he flies upwards really fast, while she falls down at her terminal velocity. Then he catches her - with double or more the impact of her hitting the (stationary) ground - since the relative velocity would be so much larger.

      Like hitting an oncoming car as opposed to a parked one.
    2. Re:About Flying by kc32 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would assume it's because she's still alive to feel it rather than being killed instantly.

    3. Re:About Flying by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another must-read on the physics of superheroes is Niven's "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex". Unless you're heavily humour-impared though, please don't read it while dining on a bowl of soup.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    4. Re:About Flying by samu0086 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ampathee is exactly correct. The physicist in the show suggested that while Lois would travel at her terminal velocity downward, Superman would be flying at an extreme velocity in the opposite direction. He guessed that Superman would be flying at ~100x faster than Lois would be falling down, or 120,000 mph in order to grab her (since he had to run to a spot, change clothes into Superman, and fly to grab her all the while Lois is falling at 9.8 m/s^2). It would be awesome to see Superman accidentally slice Lois in half in an attempt to save her, they must save that shot for the Directors Cut.

      --
      Mild-mannered college student by day, DinoPark Tycoon by night.
    5. Re:About Flying by matts-reign · · Score: 1

      This was on the discovery channel and is being played every other day it seems.

      There was some very interesting things said about Superman's powers; things I didn't even think about, like how hard it would be for him to control his power, and that he should end up bouncing around like we do on the moon.

      Lois would have more pain because of the speed superman would have to be moving sideways and up to fly in and catch her. If he did it right by accellerating to her speed then slowly decelerating her it could be done though.

      --
      Waffles rock.
    6. Re:About Flying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That chicken thing is just weird. That must have been a while ago, I don't see how anyone could get the ethical approval to do something like that. Just how would you keep the chickens in for months at a time anyway? How would you feed them and such? Do you stop the thing for a moment, do what you need, then start it back up?

      I dunno, I figure you'd get the same effect if you put the food on a hill that the chickens would have to climb to get to it.

      You know, the Bill Clinton exercise method...

    7. Re:About Flying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well seeing how quickly Superman can accelerate and deccelerate, I assume he'd change his velocity at the right moment to match hers when the catch occurs.

    8. Re:About Flying by dynamo52 · · Score: 1
      It would be awesome to see Superman accidentally slice Lois in half in an attempt to save her, they must save that shot for the Directors Cut

      Ever watch Happy Tree Friends? Apparently, they have more respect for the laws of physics than Superman

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    9. Re:About Flying by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      In the movies, it's well established that when you fly with Supes, he shares his negation of Kepler's and Newton's universe with anything he touches. Remember Lois flying fingertip-a-fingertip with him? When he lifts an entire landmass in Superman Returns, he HAS to cancel gravity for the entire mass, at least to a point, otherwise he'd just bore a hole through it when he pushes up. When he catches Lois, he simply cancels her motion with no deceleration. How? I dunno, he's from a planet with powers and abilities far beyond those of mortal men. The real universe is so damned strange that a solar-powered Kryptonian is no problem for me anymore.

      And Superman started flying on the Superman radio program. They changed the comic to fit the radio show!

    10. Re:About Flying by dynamo52 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I rmembered that episode differently. It's still funny though.

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    11. Re:About Flying by dynamo52 · · Score: 1

      Ok, here is the episode I was thinking of.

      Happy Tree Friends

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    12. Re:About Flying by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      He guessed that Superman would be flying at ~100x faster than Lois would be falling down, or 120,000 mph in order to grab her... It would be awesome to see Superman accidentally slice Lois in half in an attempt to save her

      Obviously, Since Lois isn't killed in the many times Superman has caught her; he DOES travel at extreme speed to get there, THEN he matches her velocity, grabs her, and and decelerates. Since he must have some personal anti-gravity field to fly the way he does, possibly he can extend this to cover her so he could then just stop instantaneously without splattering her. Regardless, she can't be falling faster than terminal velocity, 54 m/s, so he could slow her down in about one second at 5g, (or even half a second at 10g if necessary), quite survivable for a human. Though I recall he has caught people very close to the ground, which would mean an extreme deceleration, so let's assume his anti-gravity is in effect.

    13. Re:About Flying by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      It follows that Superman must cancel inertia -- or perhaps be a form of flesh energised by the Arisians, and the whole Krypton thing there to put us off the track. I think he's really Dr. Nels Bergenholm in disguise -- possibly Eukonidor.

      We miss you, Dr. Smith

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    14. Re:About Flying by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      I don't see how anyone could get the ethical approval to do something like that
      Ah! The innocence of youth. But I think that when you grow up and see the outside world you're going to get one hell of a shock.
      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    15. Re:About Flying by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      This was on the discovery channel and is being played every other day it seems.

      It's sad how the "science" media whores itself out to promote the latest Hollywood fantasies. Remember similar content-free stories about possibilities of giant apes lving on islands a year ago? Of course, Slashdot is always happy to oblige big media by pretendng these are actual news.

    16. Re:About Flying by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Superman COULDN'T fly. He was able to jump REALLY HIGH. You know, "able leap tall buildings in a single bound.

      Of course, this is how the Incredible Hulk does it; jumps like a giant flea.

    17. Re:About Flying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That must have been a while ago, I don't see how anyone could get the ethical approval to do something like that"

      you really dont have a clue how animals are treated? its a crop and is treated as such and they are filled with crushed dead chickens industrial waste and homons and grow so big that their legs breake but it dosent mather because they are so cramped that they cant move anyways only leasure is picking each other to blod so why give them a floor when you can have them on bars so their waste can be transported away and why stop there you can even have bars on bars so their waste has to travel through other "floors" with chickens no problem for its just for humans consumtion which is to stupid to realize anything else than how to swap bits.

      The question is more how can YOU ethical approve eating chicken?!?!?

    18. Re:About Flying by Dunarie · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The question is more how can YOU ethical approve eating chicken?!?!?"

      Cause they are tastey?

    19. Re:About Flying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I eat chicken in protest of poor spelling and grammar. Oh, and also to protest the use of multiple punctuation marks. Stop killing the chickens.

    20. Re:About Flying by chgros · · Score: 1

      it would actually be MORE PAINFUL for Lois to be caught by Superman than to simply fall to her death. I don't know why
      Imagine a speeding bullet. That HURTS.
      Now imagine if it goes faster. And is the weight of Superman.

    21. Re:About Flying by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      When Lois plunges into the pavement the force is spread over a significant area of her body. When she plunges into Superman's arms the force is only spread over the area of his arms that are in contact with her. It's not force, but pressure (force over area) that hurts.

      Superman could reduce that by meeting Lois in midair and slowing her down over a bit more distance but he's usually depicted showing off his strength and strong arming the catch.

    22. Re:About Flying by fido_dogstoyevsky · · Score: 1

      ...He guessed that Superman would be flying at ~100x faster than Lois would be falling down, or 120,000 mph in order to grab her (since he had to run to a spot, change clothes into Superman, and fly to grab her all the while Lois is falling at 9.8 m/s^2)...

      And nothing was said about the heat generated by a body at Mach 170 (dunno how to estimate it, but I'm almost willing to bet folding money it'd be more than a gentle warmth)?

      What? Suspend disbelief? It's just a comic?

      --
      It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
    23. Re:About Flying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was some very interesting things said about Superman's powers; things I didn't even think about, like how hard it would be for him to control his power, and that he should end up bouncing around like we do on the moon.

      First, astronauts bounce around on the moon not because they can't control their walking, but because it's a mobility advantage. Those suits are bulky and stiff, and it helps if you don't have to move so much. Bouncing 1 meter and using your energy only twice to do so is better than walking a meter and shuffling along, right? Humans can lift heavy weights and then turn around and do precision work like carving, painting, drawing, tying fly fishing lures, etc. It's not that far of a stretch to say that a guy who can do super stuff can also get along doing normal stuff also.

      Lois would have more pain because of the speed superman would have to be moving sideways and up to fly in and catch her. If he did it right by accellerating to her speed then slowly decelerating her it could be done though.

      Yeah, and he can accelerate like crazy, too. Who's to say that he dosen't alter his speed the instant before he does his heroic act and then decelerate the would-be victim in time frame that is survivable by humans? This is usually what the movies depict, and the effect would not be observable by humans.

    24. Re:About Flying by shawb · · Score: 1

      It would be more painful due to pressure. Superman's hands have a lot less surface area than the ground she would have hit. Combine that with the fact that he's usually flying UP vs the ground staying still. True, he could apply the force over a longer time and move down while slowly slowing her down, but that's not how it appears in the movies.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    25. Re:About Flying by hyfe · · Score: 1
      I didn't see it (I'm sure it will be re-run), but I remember from a commercial that they said it would actually be MORE PAINFUL for Lois to be caught by Superman than to simply fall to her death. I don't know why, you'd have to watch to find out I guess.
      Obviously, if he was flying upwards, and not matching her speed downwards as he should have, the impact will be greater.

      I mean, image that your retarded friend is out running. You're sitting by your house relaxing. He sees you and starts running towards you. Now, your retarded friend is quite retarded, and has trouble stopping, and at current heading, he's going to run into a bush! Having watched superman physics, you know that falling into somebody arms saves people instantly, so you, the freakingly huge football player you are, start sprinting towards him, holding your arms out so he magically won't be hurt.. and then you ram him, with full force, and watch surprised as he's reduced to a confused mass of blood and bones..

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    26. Re:About Flying by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      Superman actually has a...a...reality distortion field?

      Steve Jobs is Superman!

    27. Re:About Flying by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

      You mean stop killing the English language, right?

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    28. Re:About Flying by thefirelane · · Score: 1

      it would actually be MORE PAINFUL for Lois to be caught by Superman than to simply fall to her death. I don't know why, you'd have to watch to find out I guess.

      I immagine it is because superman is usually flying up to meet her, so it is additional force being transmitted into her body, instead of a stationary object.

      Of course, if he flies up really fast, then matchs her speed down, grabs her, then brakes... no problem. Hopefully she's falling off a really tall building though, to allow for all that time.

    29. Re:About Flying by thechao · · Score: 1

      As for Lois Lane? I was just 'splainin' this to my girlfriend: she still has all of her downward velocity. Falling into Superman's super-arms is no different than falling onto the concrete; in fact, this is something all the last-second-saves-from-falling fail to take into account: Lois still comes to a sudden halt. The reason it would be *more* painful? It's the difference between falling off a ladder onto the floor, and falling off of a ladder onto monkey-bars: less surface area.

    30. Re:About Flying by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere recently (some list of facts about Superman) some interesting stuff. One of the things was that "Faster than a speeding bullet... more powerful than a locomotive..." stuff was not part of the original Superman comics, it was apparently made up for a radio show. But more interesting to me, apparently Superman COULDN'T fly. He was able to jump REALLY HIGH. You know, "able leap tall buildings in a single bound." At some point that somehow turned into flying (this was a bulleted list of facts type thing, so it didn't expand on these).

      I just wrote about this to someone else before I saw your post, but hey, since you're asking...

      Originally, superman was from a planet called Krypton that had a gravity ten times that of earth. Therefore, the inhabitants of Krypton had a body adapted to this environment, which meant that on earth, they could jump really high, and were very strong and tough.

      As the years went by, they quickly exhausted the interresting stories they could write about these powers, and added more and more. However, the most dramatic changes occured during world war two, when the comic book industry was taken over by the military as part of the propaganda for the war effort. This is when Superman went from "Fighting a neverending battle for truth, and justice!" to "Fighting a neverending battle for truth, justice, and the American Way!" and when he started to fly. You can see it happen by watching the (excellent) Fleischer superman cartoons from the early forties. They started production before the US went to war, and you see a clear break in storytelling after pearl harbour (all of a sudden every other story is about superman punching buck-toothed, coke-bottle glasses wearing, evil japs).

      It's a phenomenon as old as language and storytelling, but I like to call it the Dragonball Effect because that story has the most extreme display of incremental power growth (and Son Goku is a healthy mix of an old chineese legend and of superman). Basically, you need a tough villain to make your story entertaining, and your hero needs to be tougher. But then, you need tougher opponent next time around, so you beef up the hero. Rinse, repeat, you end up with a character so strong he's moving stars with his bare hands.

      Over the years, the powers of superman have grown and waned. Because once a character gets too powerfull, the stories become less interresting. This is what happened in the early eighties, they downgraded superman's powers in a storyline called "Crisis on infinate earth". Therefore, you'll have people referring to pre-crisis and post-crisis superman as an indicator of how strong he is.

      They retconed ("retrocactive continuity", contracted and used as a verb), his origin to explain his new power, giving him the "red sun/yellow sun" explanation later on. And since he's getting his power from solar radiation, they eventually rationalised his increase in power as a factor of the time he spends exposed to the radiation, making him a solar-battery.

      As for catching Lois, yes, flying up to catch her as she falls is similar to a car hitting another parked as opposed to a head-on collision of moving cars: Their velocities add up.
      To explain away this annoying tidbit, and other related details such as why his suit doesn't break, they added that superman has an invulnerability field that extends a few milimiters from his body, and to any body in contact with his. That was a retcon that erased the gravity expanation.

      P.S. The Dragonball Effect is also visible in religions: Gods get stronger as their followers learn more about the world their deities govern.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    31. Re:About Flying by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      He not only cancels inertia, he can grant it as well. That's how he flies.

      We've now a concept that can explain his invulnerability. Nothing can pentrate his skin because he automatically kills the motion of the object dead in space relative to his body, no matter how fast it moves. Ditto radiation. Hm. Not only can he add inertia/kinetic energy, but electromagnetic energy as well, from his eyes. Probably can do it anyway he likes, but is just accustomed to using his eyes.

      How would he do it? Maybe he simply moves energy around, kinetic and electromagnetic, to suit his will. It probably also is a involuntary evolved reflex built into his nervous system. His body ALWAYS is soft and squishy, as far as he's concerned, but throw a tire iron at him and it stops dead a micrometer from his skin. He throws a punch, and he adds kinetic energy to the target -- not his fist -- and causes the usual damage. The process is unnoticeable by him; it just happends. Using this ability, virtually nothing is beyond his capabilities. He could take a hit from an atomic bomb. He could punch a hole throgh the planet. Fly through the sun.

      He doesn't usually feel pain because energy beyond a tolerated level can't reach his skin; no physical force can touch him beyond yet another tolerated level. He can get a tummy ache, and age, and all the usual nonsense, however.

      Now: how does he breath in space? IS he breathing?

    32. Re:About Flying by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      And:

      Heat vision is just moving thermal energy around, ditto cold breath.

      And the mystery of how he cuts his hair is solved! He does it himself. He's always just meat and bone to himself -- if he wants to be.

      Kryptonite just messes with whatever biological/mental process he uses to pull off his tricks. He doesn't become human-powered when exposed -- he just loses his exemption from the laws we obey.

    33. Re:About Flying by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Had a notion about his breathing in space. His manipulation of energy might extend to creating an O2-CO2 recycling loop in his lungs. He just has to hold his breath, or maybe his manipulation of inertia subconciously extends to the molecules expelled from his mouth and nose and other orifices -- he just makes them "fly" back to his respiratory system, and also maintain a basic air pressure around his body so he doesnt blow all his blood vessels.

      Krypton must have been a really hostile planet that let something like Kal El evolve.

  12. Super Chicken? by jcostantino · · Score: 4, Funny

    Super Grover unavailable for comment.

    --
    Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    1. Re:Super Chicken? by ManoSinistra · · Score: 0

      SSUUPPP!!! ... ER CHICKEN!!

    2. Re:Super Chicken? by BrynM · · Score: 1

      They've been running these modified chicken experiments the 60's. I wonder if Henson coopted their research to enhance Grover.

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    3. Re:Super Chicken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Grover
      Amazing what you'll find in Wikipedia...

  13. Another weird thing about those superchickens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently they tasted just like Christopher Reeve.

    1. Re:Another weird thing about those superchickens by BryanL · · Score: 1

      Now that's just in bad taste.

  14. But.... by Kohath · · Score: 1

    But do they taste super?

  15. Humping Lois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If Superman humped Lois and discharged, would those projectiles do her damage?

    1. Re:Humping Lois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      See Larry Niven's Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex

      Basically, since orgasm can be described as a 'pleasurable seizure', Superman would rip Lois apart while blowing the top of her head off.

    2. Re:Humping Lois by schon · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about if he used a kryptonite condom?

      (cue scene from Mallrats.)

    3. Re:Humping Lois by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Then he'd die along with the independant contractors on the at the time unfinished second Death Star.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:Humping Lois by Mushdot · · Score: 1
      That reminds me of a joke i once heard...

      One day Superman is flying along minding his own business when he sees Wonderwoman in her house, laid on her bed naked with her legs apart.

      Superman stops and thinks "im faster than a speeding bullet, I could get in there, have some fun and be gone before she even knew what happened"

      So he does. Quick as a flash he goes in through her bedroom window, has his wicked way and flys off chuckling to himself.

      "Did you feel something then?" asked Wonderwoman

      "No but my arse really hurts" replied the Invisible man.

    5. Re:Humping Lois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kevin Bacon's character tells this joke in the movie "Hollow Man"

    6. Re:Humping Lois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That joke was written on a cave wall in france.

    7. Re:Humping Lois by everphilski · · Score: 1

      but they'd get whats coming to them. An independant contractor always considers the risks involved before taking a job ...

      OH LOOK, ITS THAT KID ON THE ESCALATOR AGAIN!

  16. Yes, but... by patio11 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... it turns out super takes like chicken.

    1. Re:Yes, but... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of an old joke: A guy is driving around somewhere out in the country when a very large, six-legged chicken runs past. Curious, he follows the chicken until it goes into a farm yard. He knocks on the farmhouse door and talks to the farmer:

      Driver: "Did I really just see a six-legged chicken run in here?? I was doing 50mph and it passed me like I was standing still!"

      Farmer: "Yep. We figured everyone likes drumsticks, so we started a special breeding program."

      Driver: "So, what do they taste like??"

      Farmer: "Dunno. We haven't been able to catch one..."

  17. That's not Superman... by cargoculture · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's Tom Strong.

  18. Do they have human sized centrifuges? by rjamestaylor · · Score: 0, Redundant
    NASA is working on it:
    To do this, Paloski will put astronauts in a centrifuge. While they lie comfortably on their sides (the astronauts are tested one at a time), the device spins at varying rates of speed forward and back.
    The right spin produces the Right Stuff? Why not!
    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    1. Re:Do they have human sized centrifuges? by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      and the Left spin produces the Left Stuff?

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
  19. Human Sized Centrifuges by clragon · · Score: 1
    "Do they have human sized centrifuges?"

    Don't astronauts use centrifuges to train?
    1. Re:Human Sized Centrifuges by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      You beat me to my comment. For something a little less interesting, you could always go to Epcot:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mission:_SPACE

  20. Did they duck? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    When a handgun is thrown at them do they duck?

    1. Re:Did they duck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they just chicken out.

  21. I just want to know... by Danga · · Score: 1

    So when they turned the centrifuge off and took the chickens out were they able to walk straight or did they resemble a drunken person trying to walk like the guy in the following video http://www.videotiger.com/funnydrunkmanvideo.shtml ? I hope they recorded when they took the chickens out and will sometime post it on the internet!

    --
    Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    1. Re:I just want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have a weak grasp of physics

    2. Re:I just want to know... by Danga · · Score: 1

      Spinning for weeks on end would not make you dizzy?

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
  22. Dark meat vs. Light by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, did the superchickens have more dark meat on them, or light? Parts that get exercised (thighs) are darker than parts that don't (breast on a non-flying chicken). I can see this at Wegman's now, "boneless thighs from free-range, hormone-free, pre-centrifuged, SuperChickens".

    --
    the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    1. Re:Dark meat vs. Light by balloonhead · · Score: 1

      Light v dark is not (much) related to exercise. It is more to do with what kind of muscle is there - 'slow twitch' versus 'fast twitch'.

      Postural muscles (used a lot, don't need to be too quick) are slow twitch and darker. Fast twitch are usually for things like arms (flying in birds).

      Neither are pure fast or slow - just varying amounts of each.

      Explains why some people are sprinters and others are distance runners - they have more or less proportions of each.

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  23. News for nerds? by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How did "Do they have human sized centrifuges?" every get posted?

    Finally checked out digg - man /. has fallen so far from what it once was...

    1. Re:News for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, /. has fallen pretty far. Maybe if you stopped posting the rest of us could actually have an intelligent conversation for a change.

  24. " put several chickens in a centrifuge " by Luveno · · Score: 1

    Not only stronger, but probably really dizzy as well.

  25. Oh man, I am so old! by gooman · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you find yourself in danger,

    When you're threatened by a stranger,

    When it looks like you will take a lickin',

    There is someone waiting,

    Who will hurry up and rescue you,

    just Call for Super Chicken!

    Fred, if you're afraid you'll have to overlook it,

    Besides you knew the job was dangerous when you took it

    He will drink his super sauce

    And throw the bad guys for a loss

    And he will bring them in alive and kickin'

    There is one thing you should learn

    When there is no one else to turn to

    Call for Super Chicken!

    --
    "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
  26. Bandersnatch by wowbagger · · Score: 1
    Don't forget the Bandersnach were also:
    • A single celled organism
    • Had large, tasty brains (at least, tasty if you are a Thrint - I don't know if any of the races of Known Space had tried them, though I wouldn't put it past the Kzinti).
    • Were totally immune to any forms of telepathic suggestion or probing.
    • Were genetically engineered by the Tnuctip to act as spies against the Thrint.
    • Consented to be hunted for money, as long as the hunters' tanks didn't give them too much of an advantage. Often, the hunters became the hunted - that was part of the deal.

  27. Yea yea... by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Funny

    *mumbles something about welcoming centrifuge raised chicken overlords*

    --
    I hate printers.
  28. Re:Oh man, I am so old! by syrinx · · Score: 1

    Beat me to it.

    And I'm not even that old, but my dad introduced me to it. :)

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  29. Please, think of chickens by hierro · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everytime you mod me down, a scientist centrifuges a chicken.


    Please, think of chickens.

    1. Re:Please, think of chickens by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Every time you make an error in adapting that joke, a Goa'uld kills an article.
      THINK OF THE ARTICLES!

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  30. Yes, but... by ManoSinistra · · Score: 0
    When they emerged, the chickens were stronger and had larger bones and muscles, and greater endurance. In other words, they were superchickens.
    Yes, but can they run Lin... eh... nevermind.
  31. ah jeez... by aleksiel · · Score: 1

    not this shit again!

  32. If you want to wax intellectual about Superman by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

    by the food court:

    T.S. Quint: But they're engaged.

    Brodie: Doesn't matter, can't happen.

    T.S. Quint: Why not? It's bound to come up.

    Brodie: It's impossible, Lois could never have Superman's baby. Do you think her fallopian tubes could handle the sperm? I guarantee you he blows a load like a shotgun right through her back. What about her womb? Do you think it's strong enough to carry her child?

    T.S. Quint: Sure, why not?

    Brodie: He's an alien, for Christ sake. His Kyrptonian biological makeup is enhanced by earth's yellow sun. If Lois gets a tan the kid could kick right through her stomach. Only someone like Wonder Woman has a strong enough uterus to carry his kid. The only way he could bang regular chicks is with a kryptonite condom. That would kill him.

    T.S. Quint: How is it that I go from the verge of hot Floridian sex with Brandi to man of steel coital debates with you in the food court?



    Transporter_ii

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
    1. Re:If you want to wax intellectual about Superman by qyiet · · Score: 1

      Brodie: He's an alien, for Christ sake. His Kyrptonian biological makeup is enhanced by earth's yellow sun. If Lois gets a tan the kid could kick right through her stomach. Only someone like Wonder Woman has a strong enough uterus to carry his kid. The only way he could bang regular chicks is with a kryptonite condom. That would kill him.

      When Lex pulled out the tube of kryptonite and said "do you know what this is" in superman returns all I could think was "kryptonite condom". -Qyiet

  33. Answer... by s74n13y · · Score: 1

    The physicists of Planet Vegeta know why, you'd have to simply fall to jump REALLY HIGH. You could only get the chickens in the centrifuge to see as to their death. I thought Fred's super chickens looked like that. Just how would the weight you feed them in the chickens (in the superchickens) fly now? And here I thought Fred's super chickens look like they should have to watch or simply fall to jump REALLY HIGH. You could get the matter settled quickly. The Sayan of the captive earth men or merely enslave them. One of said 'infrastructure' (for lack of a while ago), I sang for a radio show. But can the chickens in which point that "Faster than a special on TLC, Discovery, Science Channel", or merely enslave them? One at a time anyway? How would you get down so that somehow they turned into flying anvils? (this was not part of Superman). I don't see how anyone could, but especially not about Superman. Something interesting to defeat the captive earth men or something interesting to be here. And I guess the physics of the realm of the original Superman flying. I read somewhere recently about the article telling of the matter. The Sayan of facts type thing, so as well... It's difficult to give their input. One thing is for a while ago, and I don't see how it would only be beneficial to give up their web server in twice-normal gravity as well.

    1. Re:Answer... by Kyace · · Score: 1

      What? You saw flying anvils on TLC? And something about DragonBall. While I didn't completely understand the parent post, I will reply with "Not flying: falling, with style!"

  34. Discovery channel has something on this.. by JFMulder · · Score: 1

    I don't know if Discovery Channel in the States has it right now, but two weeks ago Discovery Channel Canada had a documentary called The Science of Superman and went through the details on how the powers from the man of steel actually worked. Most of them were plausible, namely the super strengh as well as the cold-breath. It was really interresting how his powers could be explained through physics. The fact that Krypton was super dense really made scientific sense for Duperman's powers when he got to earth.

    1. Re:Discovery channel has something on this.. by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      there's a book called 'the physics of startrek' along the same line, and it's quite nice.

  35. Flying physics by zephc · · Score: 1

    Though never shown, I figured Superman would just flap his feet very rapidly to generate thrust, like any of us swimming, but far more powerful.

    That's how I do it, anyway. Up, up and away!

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    1. Re:Flying physics by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      That was a dream. The fact that you were only wearing underwear should have been a clue.

  36. SUPERCOMPUTING utiliz to model physics of Superman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just in... scientists at the San Diego SUPERCOMPUTER center have dedicated several processing units to modeling Kryptonian physical capacities.

    Work is proceeding at a slow pace, as technicians are forced to lift aside the capes on the SUPERCOMPUTERS to configure them.

  37. Earth is the 'centrifuge' by mi · · Score: 1

    If, having grown up here on Earth, you travel to a place with lower gravity (like Moon), you will be a superman.

    Other example exist too — some athletes excercise at high altitudes to adjust their bodies to lower oxygen levels. When they then compete at (just above) sea level, they have an advantage.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Earth is the 'centrifuge' by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that after extended periods of lower gravity, there is bone loss and muscle atrophy. That is the problem with extended space flight.

  38. Just out of curiosity... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't feel like dredging my memory for the proper physics formulas, so maybe some bored physics student can help me out. Let's say I wanted to live in 2x gravity on Earth for a few months (or years), for the healthful aspects.

    So I build a huge centrifuge shaped like a bowl, with a track at a certain angle. You'd like to spin the track at a speed and angle such that I get a simulated 2x gravity, while having the angle such that my weight would be perpendicular to the apparent floor. You'd build walls perpendicular to the track (and a parallel ceiling) as well so that things would seem normal.

    So how wide would the track need to be, and what angle would you need, so as to have an approximately normal environment? Obviously if the ring is too small, you'll get different forces on each part of your body and you'll notice it. There's probably no good psychological data on what size you "need", so let's see some numbers at different sizes, and see what would seem reasonable.

    Also, is there any problem with this scenerio? I've never heard of it being done, which means maybe there's something I'm missing as far as practicality.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Just out of curiosity... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      I always called that gadget a carousel. They would work nicely on the moon to simulate 1G gravity to keep people in shape. Well done. They'd have to be pretty big to avoid motion sickness.

    2. Re:Just out of curiosity... by rcw-home · · Score: 1
      and what angle would you need

      The angle for 2 G's would be 60 degrees. The cosine of 60 degrees is .5.

    3. Re:Just out of curiosity... by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      Expense

      Remember, this would take a huge bunch of machinery that would have to be working 24/7 for months or years at a time. Something goes wrong, you go flying off at high speed in the middle of a bunch of shrapnel.

      Not easy to make work, let alone work safe.

    4. Re:Just out of curiosity... by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problems are,

      accleration gradient - you don't want very much of one or your balance will be all screwy.
      coriolis "force" - a result of the transformation to a rotating reference frame. You want to minimize this as well, for balance reasons.

      Fortunately the solution to both is to increase R. Unfortunately, this limits where you can place your rotating habitat and increase the cost to power it.

      So some practical numbers: (i'm not sure how to do the coriolis part, but the rest is pretty easy)

      Suppose we took the land for the cancelled superconductiong supercollider in Texas. It had a radus of approximately 14 km. To get a net force of 2g, we need a rotational acceleration of 1.73g, since we already have gravity working for us. So you'd need to have a tangential velocity of 350 mph. The difference in acceleration between your head and your feet would be of the order 2e-5 g, so I don't think you'd notice much.

      Perhaps if your habitat was a well-lubricated train you could do it. Certainly there have been very fast electric trains before, and over much longer distances than an 80 mile circuit. I would suggest a hanging monorail design so you could achieve multiple accelerations without having to completely redesign the bank angle every time.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Just out of curiosity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, i remember from pysics classes that you'd need a ring space station about a half mile in diameter to keep from having constant vertigo.

    6. Re:Just out of curiosity... by ajdecon · · Score: 1

      I'm too tired to do the math, but as for disadvantages: living in 2x gravity for a long time would put a tremendous stress on your body. A short fall, maybe even simply tripping, could result in broken bones. Your heart would have to work much harder, possibly weakening it in the long term; your risk for cardiac problems would certainly increase. And so on.

      In the long run, your heart would get used to it and your bones might get stronger, but some damage would almost certainly be done. OTOH, you'd likely emerge much stronger physically; but unless you worked out quite a bit, you'd stand no chance of keeping it long-term in "low" gravity.

      --
      "Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself." -Richard Feynman
    7. Re:Just out of curiosity... by A_Pryd3 · · Score: 1

      Or you could try attching weights to your body and all extremeties, that would achieve the same goal for much less effort than lets say, building a giant centrifuge.

      I believe it's called weight training.[sarcasm]

    8. Re:Just out of curiosity... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      How did the physiologists/physicists figure that out though? What data did they have to conclude that say a quarter-mile ring would be too small to prevent vertigo?

    9. Re:Just out of curiosity... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      How goddamned boring would it be to live in a spinning tube for a year? That's assuming you had the money to:

      1) buy the land to build the thing on
      2) build the thing
      3) hired enough tustworthy people to maintain it (without stopping it somehow!) so it didn't seize up one night and smash you against the wall breaking all your bones
      4) hired enough people to keep you fed, watered and entertained
      5) somehow plumbed in a toilet, which I'm sure would be an engineering challenge.

      And I'm not even counting the numerous lawsuits, building permits, and other legal and social (and moral? how long are you keeping the kid in there?) challenges to the project.

  39. Larry Niven by tacarat · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I remember reading his analysis about Superman and reproduction. Delving into the possiblity of reproducing with Supergirl (ruled out; Krypotonian incest bad) and killing Lois accidentally during sex (sperm that's more powerful than a locomotive, faster than a speeding bullet, etc...). http://www.larryniven.org/

    I might have to go dig that book back up and see if I can warp some minds...

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    1. Re:Larry Niven by emurphy42 · · Score: 4, Informative
    2. Re:Larry Niven by nephridium · · Score: 1
      [Superman's] humanoid frame is doubtless the result of parallel evolution, as the marsupials of Australia resemble their mammalian counterparts.

      So instead of sixpack abs Superman has a pouch which he could use to store a sixpack of beer? Frankly trying to explain Superman with Science tends to get a bit absurd. Marsupials and other mammals are still even within the same animal class (i.e. they share most of their genes). A species on another planet (quite possibly not even having chromosomes as we know them) evolving x-ray vision, flight etc. yet at the same time turns out to appear indistinguishable from humans - convergent evolution? - The boundaries between fantasy and science fiction are blurred, yet Superman can pretty safely be categorized on the fantasy side.

      --


      And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
  40. Text Book? by Griffith · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this new finding will need to be added to the next edition of The Physics of Superheroes

  41. Feedback anyone? by MasterC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I assume by virtue of inclusion that the bit about growing chickens in higher gravity yields stronger muslces and bigger bones is of some surprise. Why would you not think biology has feedback? I know we humans like to pride outselves on things we invent but mother nature has been at it for many more years.

    Your respiratory rate is determined by the level of carbon dioxide present in your blood (not oxygen). Feedback.

    Your heart rate has a normal rate but can be altered by hormones like adrenaline (fight-or-flight response). Feedback....in a more long-about sort of way.

    Blood glucose levels plays a part in hunger which leads to eating which restores glucose. Feedback.

    Immobility or lack of exercise can lead to atrophy of the muscles but can be restored by using them. Feedback.

    Astronauts have to exercise in microgravity to also prevent atrophy. Feedback.

    So if a chicken grows up in high gravity then why shouldn't it have higher muscle strength and bigger bones.

    Nevermind the bulk of the /. summary is about the chicken when the chicken part is only at the end of the article, but thought I'd point it out. It seemed rather shocking to eieken to warrant dominating the summary about the chicken.

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:Feedback anyone? by Omega+Blue · · Score: 1

      Very true. All living things are regulated by negative feeback loops.

      Negative feeback loops bring things back to built-in fixed points while positive feedback loops just make things run out of control. For example, an increase in carbon dioxide level in your blood causes you to breathe harder, thus getting rid of the carbon dioxide faster. As the level of carbon dioxide in your blood decreases your breathing rate also decreases.

    2. Re:Feedback anyone? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Your respiratory rate is determined by the level of carbon dioxide present in your blood (not oxygen). Feedback.

      So born Himalayans are not stronger when they travel to lower altitudes? I've moved a few thousand feet up over the past months and have noticed that typing my Slashdot login has become more difficult to do.

    3. Re:Feedback anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Immobility or lack of exercise can lead to atrophy of the muscles but can be restored by using them.

      I'm experiencing that right now!

      Some time in your forties, the lens in your eye gets less and less plastic, until you can't focus at all. That's when you need reading glasses. I wore reading glasses over my contact lenses for the last 3 years (before that I pulled my nearsightedness glasses down my nose to focus).

      I got a CrystaLens implant in my left eye a week and a half ago (I have super eyes now, and they're getting better; at present my distance vision 20-16 and shooting for 20-10. My eyes were worse than 20-400 before the operation). I'm just getting to where I can read, but it's a strain and I can only read for maybe a half hour at a time before I can't focus.

      The eye surgeon has given me eye exersizes to strengthen the unused focusing muscles in my eye.

      There is a drawback to having better eyesight than a 20 year old; God gives geezers bad eyes for a reason. Beer goggles are a lot more expensive now, and I'm going to have to get a younger girlfriend!

  42. This experiment depended on experiments in STS-107 by guardiangod · · Score: 1
    Wow, I was just reading the article absent-mindedly until this paragraph caught my eyes:

    By spinning astronauts and then testing them in the "balance booth," Paloski hopes to learn how to facilitate the transition from one state to another. His subjects will be crewmembers of shuttle mission STS-107, which is slated for launch in January 2003. "We plan to test these astronauts both before and after the mission," he says.

    Damn.

  43. Quoth Mitch Hedberg: by mpathetiq · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think a rotisserie is like a really morbid ferris wheel for chickens. It's a strange piece of machinery... "We will take the chicken, kill it, impale it, and then rotate it. And I'll be damned if I'm not hungry! Because spinning chicken carcasses make my mouth water! I like dizzy chicken. With a side of potatoes of some sort."

    1. Re:Quoth Mitch Hedberg: by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      With a side of potatoes of some sort.

      I believe the technical term around here is "hot grits".

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Quoth Mitch Hedberg: by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Mitch was a really funny guy.

    3. Re:Quoth Mitch Hedberg: by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude, grits are corn, not potatoes.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    4. Re:Quoth Mitch Hedberg: by monkaduck · · Score: 1

      It's hard to believe he's been dead over a year.

      --
      Napalm is nature's toothpaste
    5. Re:Quoth Mitch Hedberg: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so hard considering his drug use.

    6. Re:Quoth Mitch Hedberg: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and Soylent Green is people.

    7. Re:Quoth Mitch Hedberg: by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Dude, grits are corn, not potatoes.

      Well I'll be damned. I didn't even know it was an actual food item... I think I've only heard the term here on Slashdot. :)

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  44. Development of Supermans Powers Over Time by David_Shultz · · Score: 5, Informative

    For anyone interested in the development of Supermans powers as the series progressed, check out this website:

    http://www.johnath.com/~david/etc/superman.html

    As other posters have mentioned, yes, it is true that he started without flying ability -he could leap only one eighth of a mile. The development of his powers is actually quite staggering, going from what nowadays would be a lesser superhero, to being one of the most powerful superheroes in the combined comic book multiverse.

    1. Re:Development of Supermans Powers Over Time by AJWM · · Score: 1

      For a much more detailed look at the evolution of Superman's powers -- and the character and backstory in general -- there's a pretty detailed history on the Superman Comics website (which includes reprints of various issues over the ages).

      I grew up on the "silver age" Superman, which pretty much matches the movies. Jerry Siegel was back at DC Comics then, and SF writers like Edmond Hamilton and Otto Binder were contributing. A real SF twist on a lot of the stories back then, and set the backstory for much that came later.

      --
      -- Alastair
    2. Re:Development of Supermans Powers Over Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he could leap only one eighth of a mile.

      Is that all? Pfft, what a pussy.

    3. Re:Development of Supermans Powers Over Time by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Yes, and Lois Lane still smells like a hairless ape to him. Check out the old Larry Niven essay, "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex" for some fun ideas about why Clark as a teenager had to keep fixing the roof after he did what all teenagers do in their bedroom.

  45. This isn't new, really ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    it was done with rats and other animals decades ago. Still ... chickens. It is pretty funny.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  46. In addition by phorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    I picked up the book "The Science of Superman" some time ago. Not a bad read, and it goes into the details of how Superman's powers might stem from the differential in intensity of the earth/krypton sun, gravity, etc.

    1. Re:In addition by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Informative

      the book "The Science of Superman" some time ago. Not a bad read, and it goes into the details of how Superman's powers might stem from the differential in intensity of the earth/krypton sun, gravity, etc.

      I don't know that book, but I know my superheroes.
      Did the book mention that originally, Supes was from the planet Krypton, where the gravity is 10 times that of earth, and therefore he was super strong and could jump really high, and super tough?

      As the years went by, he had more and more powers added to his repertoir, and so they retconed his origin to that of solar radiations giving him the ability to shoot lasers from his eyes, to fly and to see through objects.

      But at first, he was just a super-strong man, not the god he later turned into.

      P.S. The first time superman flew was to go punch some evil japanese spies that stole a plane.
      P.P.S. And that's when "and the American Way" was added to his list of things he figths for. Ah, propaganda, ain't it just so much fun?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  47. weight vests in track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no idea if this is still used in training, but back in high school track days we had weighted vests and ankle weights we had to wear all the time. IIRC the vests weighed 16 lbs and the ankle weights were about 2 per. Then joe sadist coach made us run out to the beach and run in hip deep water. Then up and down sand dunes. Then you were required to *run home*, which for me was considerable miles living out of town in the country.

    As soon as I got a job I *quit* track......

  48. Whatever you do, don't swing a sword at them by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've heard rumors to the effect that if you attack them with a sword repeatedly, it will send a call out to dozens of other superchickens which will all attack you until you flee indoors or scroll to the next area.

    1. Re:Whatever you do, don't swing a sword at them by Skrynkelberg · · Score: 1

      In addition, seeing all those chickens at once will slow everything down to a crawl until you manage to escape. Not only are they super chickens, they have time-warping abilities too!

    2. Re:Whatever you do, don't swing a sword at them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who don't get this, it's a reference to Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past for the SNES. When you attacked a chicken repeatedly with your sword, eventually you would be attacked by a bunch of chickens until you left the screen. It also worked in Link's Awakening for the gameboy, and possibly other Zelda games that I'm not aware of.

  49. No more chicken to order? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are these superchickens docile, or does this mark the end of the era of the subservient chicken?

  50. Greek Mythology by Kittenman · · Score: 1

    .. may be relevant. Zeus (aka Jupiter in the Roman pantheon) had several children to Human mothers. If Zeus = superhuman and assuming that the ancient greek fallopian tubes were roughly similar to Lois Lanes, then I think they have a chance. Debating Greek mythological reproduction is no less stupid than debating comic book hero reproduction. Well, IMHO. (There's also cases of Zeus turning into a swan, or bull. Let's see Superman try that).

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
  51. 'Superchickens' by DarkIye · · Score: 1
    In other words, they were superchickens.
    No, they weren't 'superchickens', they were just stronger chickens with larger bones and muscles, like TFA says. Not unlike putting a human being in a training program at high altitude, the only thing differentiating these chickens from normal ones is that they get slightly more action.
    1. Re:'Superchickens' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think that's rabbits you have in mind

  52. time travel by llZENll · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "If he was gone two hours (flying at the speed of light), by the time he returned the world would be over."

    Wouldn't he return in 2 hours?

    1. Re:time travel by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      If he was flying AT the speed of light... whos 2 hours is he flying for?

    2. Re:time travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, time will be identicle for him and the rest of the world. The theory of relitivity is just that, a theory. Students should aslo be taught Intellignet Time-Keeping (I.T.K.). I'm not saying that any specific god or gods are keeping check on the flow of time, but that people should be open to the idea that an Intelligent Designer of the universe is also making sure time flows in an understandable, non-confusing manner!

    3. Re:time travel by Zygamorph · · Score: 3, Informative

      They're alluding to the time dilation effect in general and/or special relativity.

      Basically if you are travelling close to the speed of light relative to some other point ( say earth), then time slows down for you relative to the time flow at the other point. The effect is:

      sqrt( 1- ((v**2) / (c**2)))

      Where v is your velocity and c is the speed of light. So if you get really close to the speed of light time slows down for you a lot.

      I'm assuming that when they say comes back in two hours they mean from Superman's time frame and not the earth's.

      Its also sometimes called the twin paradox. Take a pair of twins, put one in a space ship and fly it close to the speed of light in a round trip that ends up back on earth. Their ages are now different even though they both travelled close to the speed of light relative to each other. See here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox for a better expalanation.

    4. Re:time travel by JasonBee · · Score: 1

      Oh you!

      Your argument makes so little sense I'm ashamed you even bothered.

      Theories like General Relativity have proofs, and they gave us understanding of such simple things as the "bomb", Radioisotopes, and Lasers, which existed largely on paper before its creation. So your "theory" stance holds water like a paper bag.

      Try using intelligent design theory to make a better radio transmitter or extend a valuable current technology. Better yet I need this intelligent designer to try and take credit for manmade super technologies that didn't exist 3000 years ago. Bleh.

      When you're done I have some books on logic I want you to read.

      Cheers!

      JB

    5. Re:time travel by scribblej · · Score: 1

      JB - have a sense of humor.

      "Intelligent Time Keeping?"

      He's obviously making fun of those intelligent design idiots.

  53. Not quite a centrifuge but.. by DarrylKegger · · Score: 1

    probably just as scientific, remember Conan the Destroyer? or the barbarian or pastry chef i cant remember. Anyway he was just a standard slave who was tied to a hand driven mill that he pushed around and around and around until he became the governor of Kaifornya! Laughing time is ovah.

  54. Larry Niven is wrong by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, Superman Returns proves Larry Niven is wrong.

    His entire argument hinges on the assumption that the Kryptonian nervous system behaves just like the human immune system. Since Superman can see things and react in bullet-time or faster and he can sort out millions of audio signals independently, neither of which a human can do, Niven makes an irrecoverable mistake in his essay. In fact the speed of reaction Superman exhibits is faster than our neurotransmitters can even signal, so Kryptonian neurophysiology has to be completely different, perhaps optical or even quantum in nature. Given that he's powered by the Sun, I'd lean more towards an optical nervous system.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Larry Niven is wrong by Itchy+Rich · · Score: 4, Funny

      Given that he's powered by the Sun, I'd lean more towards an optical nervous system.

      I'd lean more towards getting out more.

    2. Re:Larry Niven is wrong by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I'd lean more towards getting out more.

      Dude, you're mocking somebody on Slashdot. Consider the irony.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  55. Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by clockwise_music · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In Melbourne (Australia), we have an amusement park named "Luna Park" that had a really cool ride called the Gravitron, that looked like this. It was essentially a human sized centrifuge, where you walked in, and lay down against a padded mat that was lying on the wall. Then the ride would start, the thing would speed up and the the g's would start building up and press you against the wall.

    Which enabled you to do stupid things like go upside down and have your face stretched. It was cool and my favourite ride at that age. Perhaps it contributed to my huge bone density and muscle strength of later years :)

    Not sure if it is still there... anyone know? Anyone remember this?

    1. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      That thing was pretty common as a fairground ride in the USA, and I'm pretty sure I saw one when I was in Rome. It's not especially powerful though - it tops out at about 2 G's.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    2. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had something similar here in a traveling fair that came to town once a year. I know it increased my reflexes, because inevitably some SOB lost his cookies and you had leap out of the way of it :D

    3. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by B2382F29 · · Score: 1

      Luna Park?

      I'm gonna go build my own theme park. With blackjack. And hookers. In fact, forget the park.

      --
      Move Sig. For great justice.
    4. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by D4MO · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked in one of those for a whole summer once. I was that dude in the centre with the speed button. So I basically spent about 12 hours a day spinning for about 4 months. The trick to not getting totally fucked up was not to move your head outside the plane of rotation. Move head left and right, fine, but if you moved up and down it was trippy. At the end of every ride, someone would always ask why I wasn't sticking to the walls...

      The amusement park was right beside a beach so I'd get chicks coming in with their two piece bikini's. At a certain speed of rotation, the panel you lean against would slide up. At this speed and force, a lot of the women couldn't lift their arms and hands away from beside them - they were as good as pinned down. It took me a few weeks, but I pefected tweaking the speed just right to have those panels slide up and down repeatedly. And in doing so, I managed to "jiggle" many a breast out from under a bikini top!

      Yeah, I'll go to hell, but damn, it made the job worthwhile ;)

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    5. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you remember the episode of Prisoner where the freak goes to Luna park? I don't think she went on the Gravitron though! lol

    6. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      ...and I bet the rides where you succeded with your little ploy were of much longer in duration than usual.

    7. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It took me a few weeks, but I pefected tweaking the speed just right to have those panels slide up and down repeatedly. And in doing so, I managed to "jiggle" many a breast out from under a bikini top!

      That's hilarious! You lucky bastard, that must have been awesome. Maybe that explains your fetish for abnormally flat breasts...

    8. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by D4MO · · Score: 1

      Damn right :) It was when they started to vomit I then knew it was time to stop. OT, weird, but you have the same name and my house mate, would the R stand for Roche perchance?

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    9. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by theantipop · · Score: 1
      Score:5, Interesting

      Why do I now see many a Slashdotter applying for similar jobs across the world?

    10. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teach me oh great one!

    11. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by Syypher · · Score: 1

      You are my god!

    12. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D4MO, you magnificent bastard.

    13. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      no, if he provided a link to some jpegs then he would be our god

    14. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by mclaincausey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've never heard of a literate carnie, much less one capable of getting on the Internet. I call bull$hit!!

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
    15. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by D4MO · · Score: 1

      It was first year student summer / travel work (studying E&E engineering) and really didn't care what I did as long as it was fun.

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    16. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by Ertman · · Score: 1

      I think that this guy must have been raised in a centrifuge.

    17. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by FrenchSilk · · Score: 1
      There are a few of us. While I wasn't a carnie for long, I did run the Gun Ball game for a few weeks in California. I am now a tech writer, which doesn't make me literate exactly, as you might know if you read many software manuals.

      Our game was rigged, by the way. It wasn't until the fourth day on the job that anyone knocked down the pyramid of plactic cylinders and won a prize. I was so astonished and confused, I honestly didn't know what to do. I just stood there staring for the longest time.

      I also learned that the stereotype of the crooked ex-con carnie was right on the money, by the way. Everyone cheated everyone else all the time, all the way up the money chain.

    18. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by Ykant · · Score: 1

      And finally, the man behind the DOA physics engine reveals himself...

      --
      Spelling, grammar, punctuation? We need something that checks logic.
    19. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Just what the world needs - slashdot carnies.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    20. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You. The. Man.

      Make a web site out of it, add a web cam and forum, and I'm there.

  56. Right, but... by denttford · · Score: 1

    How do they taste?

    --

    Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
  57. But... by mrjah · · Score: 1

    ...Do the superchickens have large talons?

  58. Aw right by idonthack · · Score: 1
    the only thing differentiating these chickens from normal ones is that they get slightly more action.
    Gigidy! Gigidy-goo!
    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  59. Why we don't do this with people ... by IanDanforth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The attempt has been made to put humans in this kind of plus G environment. People loose so much bone mass during space flight the idea was to build as much bone as possible before leaving earth and then let people fall back to normal.

    Unfortunately our sense of balance is directly tied into G, specifically the acceleration of liquids in one G. When you're in a high G environment your inner ear believes that a small turn of the head is an increadibly rapid and vicious turn. What results is increadible nausea and an inability to function, and since it takes months at high G to build bone this idea is limited in its applications. While people are able to adapt relatively quickly to freefall this is not so easy with Hyper-G.

    -Ian

    1. Re:Why we don't do this with people ... by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      I thought it had more to do with the rotation involved in increasing the G force. I've been on the Gravitron in AU (mentioned by someone earlier). If you keep you head pointed to the center, everything is fine. But, turn your head to the side, and you are suddenly aware that you are spinning around and around and around and .... which of course, you are.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  60. His time or yours? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Moderators who modded you Insightful must not have read up much on relativity - When you say "gone for two hours" the answer to the question is - his time our yours?

    If that's two hours of his time, no he would not be back in two hours...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:His time or yours? by MaXiMiUS · · Score: 0

      Then I ask: how long would 2 hours be for him? I mean, he's travelling through space so logically we're talking 2 earth hours, correct? I fail to see how people can translate 2 hours of lightspeed travel into the end of existance as we know it.

      --
      It's never just a game when you're winning. - George Carlin
    2. Re:His time or yours? by JasonBee · · Score: 1
  61. centrifuge? by cool_arrow · · Score: 1

    Centrifuge? No thanks. I prefer to increase my gravity the old fashioned way - with food, beer, and sitting around.

  62. Superheroes aren't science fiction by ObligatoryUserName · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems to be a common misconception that superheroes are science fiction. Like Star Wars, they're Science Fiction Flavored, but they aren't really stories about science.

    It can be a fun framework for discusion, but (stating the obvious here) realism is no more important to these stories than it is to Harry Potter or King Arthur.

    Talking about realism is more relevant when the story is science fiction instead of fantasy dressed up like science fiction.

    While I enjoy fantasy stories, it seems unfortunate they have eclipsed science fiction by appropriating the settings and conventions.

    1. Re:Superheroes aren't science fiction by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Superheroes (at least in comics) are different from fantasy too. Most good fantasy at least tries to be internally consistent; that is, fantasy world may operate under different physical laws than the real world, but they try to maintain consistency in regard to those rules. Comics seem to not have such hard-and-fast rules, which is why they often contain ret-con.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  63. Superman!?!?! by XchristX · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hi,

      I am the president of the Linear Momentum Anti-Defamation League, and I must protest the screening of Superman. It is a blatant disrespect for the Laws of Physics and restores the traditional anti-physicist canards of the "motion-libel" that the laws of Physics can be violated with impunity.

    Regards,
    President

    Motto: To stop the defamation of the Laws of Physics. To restore mathematical sanity for all.

    --
    l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  64. The excerpt from the Great Mambo Chicken book by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want to read more details, use the "Inside Book" search on Amazon within the Great Mambo Chicken.

    From the search results link above, visit pages 54 and 55 - the sidebars navigate to the next and previous pages.

    No I have no affilate link in there (that I am aware of) - call me crazy.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The excerpt from the Great Mambo Chicken book by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 1

      Cool, someone else has come across that book. Ah it brings back all those warm fuzzy zeitgeisty feelings just thinking about it.

      --
      I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
  65. Man of Steel, Larry Niven's take by 0WaitState · · Score: 2, Informative

    No discussion of the Physics of Superman is complete without this analysis of why Superman can't have sex.

    --

    Remain calm! All is well!
    1. Re:Man of Steel, Larry Niven's take by justthisdude · · Score: 1

      Oh great, now there is an image stuck in my brain of two superchickens flocking....

      --
      "I love his boyish charm, but I hate his childishness" - Leela
    2. Re:Man of Steel, Larry Niven's take by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "No discussion of the Physics of Superman is complete without this analysis of why Superman can't have sex."

      I think he can, its just a question of whether he'll get repeat sex what with the whole "faster than a speeding bullet" thing.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  66. ObNiven by trawg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The obligatory reference to Larry Niven's classic "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex" in which he describes some of the problems involved in a Kryptonian/Human relationship:

    http://www.rawbw.com/~svw/superman.html (first Google link)

    1. Re:ObNiven by maubp · · Score: 1

      Larry Niven did a great job with Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex.

      http://www.rawbw.com/~svw/superman.html

      Some of the best lines including this one on ejaculation:
      One can imagine that the Kent home in Smallville was riddled with holes during Superboy's puberty. And why did Lana Lang never notice that?

      Incidentally, SuperMan would need to get hold of some gold kryptonite if he ever wanted to try artificial insemination (as sex with a mere human is out). Read the whole thing though - its worth it.

    2. Re:ObNiven by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      There's a new enemy of Superman, an evil blonde kryptonian guy whose name I don't remember now, who in an official DC history wanna try sex with human women. Since he, being an extreme racist (or should we say "speciist"?), despises humans, he doesn't try to be nice to the girls, and the result is bloodly messy, to say the least. One can only conclude that in doing this with his wife Superman is extra careful.

      I also remember that this "OMG!!! Would it be the case that I can't have sex?!?!?" dilemma was discussed in some Smallville episode, but I don't follow the series so I don't know how the issue was solved there.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
  67. Yes... by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...but the chickens wouldn't know that. Besides, what you really want to do is spin them up, keep them at high speed until ready for the supermarket, then hit the brakes. The bones'll be large enough that you won't get fragments everywhere, it would be painless for the chicken, and I'm certain you could make a fortune selling the slow-motion video to students.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  68. Billywitchdoctor.com feel more comfortable... by k3vlar · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean ultra-mega-hyper chicken? Shh! He is legend!

    --
    Unlike porn, which yada yada rimshot hey-ooh!
  69. flying ability by rolyatknarf · · Score: 1

    From the article----""The flying always bothered me,'' admits Richard Muller, a professor of astrophysics at Cal and a Superman fan. "I think what he really does is leap and guide himself along the air currents. Or, if you can't really rule out flying, maybe he has a mechanism for somehow forcing air backward ----" Isn't that called farting?

  70. wtf ? physics profs...really ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with regards to the xray vision and mirror statements... are these guys so damn dumb...???

    ppl see off reflected rays and your eyes act as the receiver and the object itself is the reflector ...
    nowhere has it been stated that he generates/uses xrays itself. It is called xray vision to illustrate the effect being similar to xrays..i.e penetrate through layers.
    anyway, it is very conceivable (given everything else) that he just uses rays of varying wavelenghts/frequencies that each can penetrate through varying thickness. and based on how/when they reflect back, he can figure out the shape and placement of the object....

  71. Ask any serious body builder by Solr_Flare · · Score: 1

    Once you go beyond a certain point, even before you start "weighing too much" you start to lose a lot of mobility due to the bulk and tension of your muscles. It also can cause a whole host of health problems. Its basically the polar opposite of being way too fat. There are extremes in both directions where problems arise once you cross a certain point. Like most things in life, ideeally you want to be somewhere in the middle.

    --
    You are who you are, let no one tell you different. But, never close your mind to a new point of view.
  72. National Geographic by Lithgon · · Score: 1

    National Geographic just did a show on the physics of Superman and trying to explain his superpowers. I found it quite interesting.

  73. I Had a Problem Set Like This Once... by SonOfFlubber · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I was an undergrad taking lower division Newtonian Physics my prof assigned a problem set along the lines of:

    "Superman: the man of steel. Faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, able to leap tall buildings in a single bound:
    1) Calculate Superman's kinetic energy to go faster than the bullet
    2) Determine the amount of work Superman would do pushing against the locomotive to make it go backwards 1 km on a level track
    3) Compute the impulse generated by Superman to leap a tall building

    Most of the class did OK, I got all the answers in the ballpark, but one student had answers that were an order of magnitude greater than anybody elses'. When the prof asked the student why his answers were so high, he replied "Well, it seems as if I used a higher mass than anybody else - you DID say that Superman was the man of steel, didn't you?"

    He got full credit.

    1. Re:I Had a Problem Set Like This Once... by nuggz · · Score: 1

      The mass of superman is irrelevant to the amount of work required to push the locomotive.

  74. Pool Table by Joebert · · Score: 1

    All this talk about super chickens, spinning, gravity, large bones, dinosaurs, hollow bones of birds, kinda makes me think of playing pool, & I wonder, is there little creatures on my pool balls & how can I talk to them ?

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  75. More importantly... by design.sound · · Score: 1

    How did they taste?

  76. Digg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one cares. If I wanted to go read a poorly done Slashdot clone ran by rejects from Myspace, I'd go read, well, Digg. I don't. That's why we're at Slashdot, not Digg.

    I guess what I'm just trying to say is STFU and GTFO.

  77. DragonBall Z, Goku and Vegeta by Soong · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They started training at 10 times earth gravity, and were well up over a hundred in just a couple villain intermissions worth of training.

    So yeah, train hard, get strong. (as long as you don't break yourself in the process)

    Maybe the interesting thing here is not that the chickens got stronger, but that 2g was within their biological limits.

    --
    Start Running Better Polls
  78. Further Reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For centrifuged chickens, Great Mambo Chicken And The Transhuman Condition by Ed Regis. For horny Superman, Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex by Larry Niven.

  79. Taste?? by Spiralin · · Score: 1

    So, uhh, what does beefed up chicken taste like?

    1. Re:Taste?? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      tastes kind of like chicken....

  80. Wait... by S.P.B.Wylie · · Score: 2

    Can a chicken really do anything "in style"?

    --
    I give bread to the poor, they call me a saint.
    I ask why the poor have no bread, they call me a communist.
  81. My various thoughts... by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    While reading some Tesla information, it did come across my mind that it should be physically possible, if figured out how, to do the stuff Superman does, more or less.

  82. Human centrifuges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know whether it was mentioned before, but centrifuges for humans do exist. They are widely used to torture pilots and astronauts with g-forces encountered during flight maneuvers or during a shuttle/rocket start. One of them was also used in an attempt to kill James Bond (Sean Connery in...forgot which one). And there was a patent that claimed to facilitate childbirth by putting mom-to-be into a centrifuge...

  83. But ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    ... it still tastes like chicken, right ?

  84. Exclusive! Picture of the Super Chicken! by IsThisWorking · · Score: 1
  85. Superman as an Energy Being by Bombula · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Whenever you hear one of these physics of Superman debates where they ask MIT physicists or whatever, the assumption is always that Superman has his abilities because he has a super version of a human body. So he's super strong and super fast because his muscles are super powerful, and so on. But if this is the case and he's constrained by the ordinary laws of physics, then everything about him from strength to flight to x-ray vision is totally implausible.

    However, if you escape from the assumption that he's some fancy biological being, then things change completely. In my mind, Superman is a being composed of energy. His appearance is just a convenient form, a shell. Kryptonian technology seems to be advanced enough for this to be plausible, and it also rids us of the unlikely coincidence that Kryptonians and humans happen to look exactly the same.

    Composed of energy and manipulating forces, all of Superman's powers become plausible - as energy, flight makes sense, speed makes sense, and strength could be the transmutation of energy into forces. With Kryptonian technology, it might be possible to create force fields of two dimensions (planes, or surfaces) or three dimensions (volumes, or zones), which you could also view as curving space. Then things like lifting a car by its bumper would make sense, whereas with human phyics you'd just rip the bumper of. And as for lifting continents, if the force required to lift a continent was applied to an area the size of your hand it would pass through any known substance as easily as we pass through air. Strength-by-force-field is the only thing that makes any sense.

    Kryptonite also makes more sense with Superman as an energy being. Maybe it gives off some weird particles that interfer with Superman's ability to transmute energy into gravitons or other force particles. Superman being solar-powered makes better sense this way too. And obviously heat vision, x-ray vision, and flying at cose to the speed of light make more sense for an energy being than for a material being.

    Well, that's my uberdorkiness binge for the day.

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:Superman as an Energy Being by CmdrGravy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think if you take your theory a little further and make the assumption that Superman is in fact a fictional character and lives soley in our imaginations where anything is possible regardless of any laws of physics, or anything else, you may get closer to discovering Supermans true nature.

    2. Re:Superman as an Energy Being by Don853 · · Score: 1

      He's the star child! [Arthur C. Clarke]

    3. Re:Superman as an Energy Being by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...also rids us of the unlikely coincidence that Kryptonians and humans happen to look exactly the same.

      This is the "suspension of disbelief" problem I always had with a lot of science fiction movies and TV shows. Gladly, written fiction seldom had this problem.

      Looking at this one planet, there aren't any two unrelated species that look at all like each other. Even dogs; you have great danes and chihuauas, the chuahuas with their bugged out eyes and the horse-sized danes. Felines even more so - your gransma's tabby, vs a lion.

      Look at the difference between a rotweiller and a spider. Or a spider and a squid, or a chimp and a jellyfish.

      And these are on the same planet! The idea that ET would look anything at all like us is just stupid; even in the movie E.T., you had a biped with two arms and hands - preposterous. ET looks more like us than chimpanses do!

      Star Trek finally explained it away (albeit unconvincingly, to me). Star Wars didn't do too bad, but there's not an alien anywhere in the 6 movie series that doesn't have a wierder looking earth creature somewhere on the planet.

      If we run acrooss intelligent life on some other planet, we may not even recognize that it's alive, let alone that it's intelligent.

      I think my favorite ET was in Asimov's short story Playboy and the Slime Gods. I think maybe Asimov did space aliens so much better than other science fiction writers was because he was a professor of biochemistry, with a PhD to back him up in it.

      That never kept him from being (purposely) silly, however. Read Pate de Fois Gras, for example.

    4. Re:Superman as an Energy Being by mcguiver · · Score: 1

      Just because Superman can fly doesn't mean he has to be some other type of life form. All he has to do is eat a large amount of beans and he can release hot gasses at a high rate of speed. Not much different from the standard jet engine.

    5. Re:Superman as an Energy Being by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In my mind, Superman is a being composed of energy.
      So are you. So am I. So are my cats. So what? Einstein proved over 100 years ago that matter and energy are equivalent; everything that exists is "composed of" energy/matter. They're the same thing.

      Composed of energy and manipulating forces
      Just like everything else in the universe? :-)

      Strength-by-force-field is the only thing that makes any sense

      Of course it is! That's because force fields are so cool that the universe is already made out of them! 99.9% of all matter is composed of empty space, with a few tiny, tiny little particles floating around in it. The way the forces that act on those particles behave determines the nature of "solid matter" as we know it.


      Reality is stranger than fiction, you know... :-)

    6. Re:Superman as an Energy Being by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      SPOILER WARNING

      I have some problems with that explanation.

      But if this is the case and he's constrained by the ordinary laws of physics, then everything about him from strength to flight to x-ray vision is totally implausible.

      Is it really? I don't see how having an intelligent energy being is more believable than having a physical being capable of measuring neutrino radiation or storing massive amounts of energy. Remember, he gets his energy from our sun, could be a lot of raw energy there, maybe in some form we can't even measure.

      His appearance is just a convenient form, a shell.

      He has a son by Lois Lane -- how is that possible if he's energy?

      A much more highly evolved human makes more sense, especially when if he really was just energy, why would he bother living as a human? Why have we never seen him change shapes, if it's just a shell?

      Then things like lifting a car by its bumper would make sense, whereas with human phyics you'd just rip the bumper of. And as for lifting continents, if the force required to lift a continent was applied to an area the size of your hand it would pass through any known substance as easily as we pass through air.

      Or you could acknowledge that these are mostly mistakes on the part of whichever bit of fiction has him lifting the car -- did that happen in this movie? I think he was mostly lifting it by the chassis...

      Lifting a continent, well, I seem to recall that it still wasn't anywhere near the size of a continent -- more like a small island. Is that still impossible? Remember, too, the continent is made of Kryptonian crystal, which could easily be much stronger than any known material.

      Kryptonite also makes more sense with Superman as an energy being. Maybe it gives off some weird particles that interfer with Superman's ability to transmute energy into gravitons or other force particles.

      ... it doesn't just make him human, it kills him. And it can't be good for normal humans, either. Maybe he's allergic?

      Superman being solar-powered makes better sense this way too.

      Or he's just incredibly efficient at storing energy, which is not the same as being energy.

      And obviously heat vision, x-ray vision, and flying at cose to the speed of light make more sense for an energy being than for a material being.

      Heat vision: infrared laser. X-ray vision: detecting neutrinos. Flying close to the speed of light: energy flies at the speed of light.

      I'll admit, it makes sense that he's not entirely flesh and bones as we know it. But he does bleed (when gang-beaten and stabbed with kryptonite). It makes a lot more sense to me that he's what humans might evolve into, but that while his physical body is significantly different than ours, it's still very much physical matter, even if there's somehow a thermonuclear reaction going on inside.

      Or, if you want to get religious about it, Superman is not like God (as Lex Luthor would have us believe), but more like Jesus -- very much one of us, very much an american, "dies" for our sins (I wasn't the only one who thought he looked a bit crucified while falling from space to Central Park), and yet also "divine" -- can do things that we can't really imagine how he'd be able to, like completely defying gravity and taking a bullet to the eye without blinking (literally!)... an energy being would be much more like God, sort of just floating up there, glowing, maybe able to synthesize a weird-sounding voice, but otherwise just causing stuff to just happen.

      Unfortunately, his father is another Kryptonian. That kind of rules that theory out -- his father is neither god-the-energy-being nor human. And he has a son, though that's not far off if you buy the DaVinci Code. And I was raised Jewish anyway.

      And yes, I'm capable of suspending disbelief, but I also feel the need to binge on dorkness.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    7. Re:Superman as an Energy Being by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Really, anybody with sufficient abs can fly, at least according to Dr. McNinja. The muscles form an organic jetpack.

      Superman has good abs, right?

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  86. surely.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being on the planet it could only ever be 1g

  87. we know what happens by m874t232 · · Score: 1

    That's roughly what obese people are doing to their body; they don't increase gravity, but they do increase body mass. You can also simulate this with weight vests.

    It does increase muscle mass, but other long term results are joint problems and problems with the circulatory system. Your body is optimized for a particular total body mass in standard gravity. It can adapt to some degree, but if you deviate too far, things stop working.

    1. Re:we know what happens by mhollis · · Score: 1

      We also know what happens to normal chickens in normal gravity. I raised chickens on a farm in New Hampshire quite some time ago and these chickens were "roasters" bred and fed to grow to the size of a small turkey. They got really big.

      In fact they got so heavy that their bones twisted and they could not walk well.

      This strongly suggests that, since Superman was developed from a race of people who lived in high gravity, the makeup of their bones and joints was significantly different as compared to ours. While muscles might atrophy in lighter gravity, the underlying skelatal structure and capabilities would enable some pretty great feats of strength.

      The original Superman could only "leap over tall buildings in a single bound." The flying thing came about later and it is absolutely non-scientific as is the use of the cape to "protect" him from airless space travel. While we could benefit from the development of stronger muscles by using weight suits and centrifuges, anything that doubled our weight would certainly cause problems. Additionally, children who have softer bones are not supposed to lift weights until they are of a certain age, so being raised in a centrifuge would certainly be injurious to humans.

      The story about the super chickens is about using a different animal with significantly different bone strength-to-weight than we have. It doesn't really translate well to humans.

      --
      Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  88. Speaking of superman and spinning... by famebait · · Score: 1

    If you run the centrifuge backwards, do they come out as eggs? And if so, super strong eggs, or super weak eggs?

    --
    sudo ergo sum
  89. Human centrifuges exist by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
    Do they have human sized centrifuges?

    Yes, Six Flags Magic Mountain has one, and it's parodied as the "Maternafuge" in Futurama. It's about the only thing in California that makes me want to vomit for a reason other than disgust.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  90. no match for chuck by sprudel · · Score: 1

    As long as the centrifuge does not also make them superintelligent, these chickens are no match for Chuck Norris.

  91. Douglas Adams got it. by Punboy · · Score: 1

    Superman falls, and simply misses the ground.

    --
    If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  92. While You Are Playing With G... by PrinceOfDorkness · · Score: 1

    Based on the fine article, I like the anti-gravity approach to explain flying, since it's something we don't have too good a handle on how to do. If we find a way to explain flying by playing around with G, can we use the same principle to play around with c? It's been a while since I had college physics, so I do not immediately recall, but I am sure you could find some equation to tie G to c.

    As Q once said on the Enterprise, "Well just change G..."

  93. Kryptonite by Terminus32 · · Score: 0

    What was their reaction to it?

    --
    http://nathanlindsell.blogspot.com/
  94. Some minor things by badevlad · · Score: 1

    1. The Super-Chicken becomes a usual chicken after life during some time in normal conditions. 2. Children of the Super-Chicken are usual chickens.

  95. Old news by deathstar778 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Goku and Vegeta already did this a long time ago in DragonBall Z or GT... at 500G.

  96. Not so much Superman by smchris · · Score: 1

    The article tells of 'a scientific experiment in which a researcher put several chickens in a centrifuge and raised them in twice-normal gravity for months at a time. When they emerged, the chickens were stronger and had larger bones and muscles, and greater endurance.

    Andromeda's Dylan Hunt maybe.

  97. Next grant proposal by bushwahd · · Score: 1

    The scientists are now seeking a grant from NSF to hire a post-doc to scrape the accumulated chicken poop off the outer wall of the centrifuge.

  98. Moviementary by Ohiosan · · Score: 1
  99. Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
    Not sure if it is still there... anyone know? Anyone remember this?

    I can remember going along to Luna park as a kid. It was much better then (or seemed that way, I actually enjoyed the royal show as well in those days).

    My wife and I went along about four years ago, right before our son was born. It was at night after a company christmas party up the road. The Gravitron was still running then so we had a ride. I was most interested in D4MO's post. I must try to get my wife to go back, in summer.

  100. He's using a superchicken to measure it. by tinkerton · · Score: 1

    Okay that's enough, who said that?

  101. As seen on Seinfeld by dizzy+tunez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does Superman have superhumor? Or, if he became a dad, would he then become Superdad?

    --
    "If you loved me, you`d all kill yourselves today"
    Spider Jerusalem
  102. Human centrifuges by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do they have human sized centrifuges?

    Yes.

  103. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  104. I think people are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but what do they taste like?

  105. overweight people by contrapunctus · · Score: 1

    So in other words, overweight people have superlegs...

    1. Re:overweight people by mh101 · · Score: 1

      I was watching a show a few weeks back on The Learning Channel about a woman who weighed 600+ lbs, and I was amazed to see that she actually could walk. Granted, she could only walk for very short periods of time just to get from her bed to her wheelchair for example, but I was thinking about how strong her legs must be to be able to support that much weight and not collapse as soon as she stood up.

      --
      Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
    2. Re:overweight people by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

      Having lost 80lbs so far i would have to say that some of my muscles are pretty well developed. I kinda feel like Goku, only fatter...... /sigh

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  106. These findings do not suprise me in the least... by biz0r · · Score: 1

    It has been long known that stresses on the body cause it to adapt. For instance, I lift weights pretty seriously. I went to a sports medicine doctor last year to diagnose an issue I was having with my right shoulder. I had ex-ray scans taken of my upper torso and the shoulder. The doctor put my scans up and said he could tell I weight trained...I was told my bone density was much higher than that of a 'normal' man.

    So congrats, they figured out that training an animal will cause its body to adapt and grow stronger in response. This is physical training 101, not some new fangled discovery.

    --
    /* sig */
  107. Re:Oh man, I am so old! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget Kung Fu Chicken!

    He's the dude who's Chinese Food!

    If you call, he'll come for a poultry sum!

  108. They're more a menace than a benefit in real life by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    In real life, superheroes would be a nightmare to deal with. Just once, I'd love to see a comic book that dealt humorously with the consequences of superheroes like The Flash in real life. I can see it now:

    Flash: "Here's your purse back, lady!"
    Lady: "You destroyed two city blocks!"
    Flash: "No need to thank me..."
    Lady: "The sonic booms alone shattered hundreds of windows!"
    Flash: "Serving the citizenry is all the thanks I need!"
    Lady: "At least a dozen people were killed by the falling glass!"
    Flash: "Remember, all you have to do is call and the JLA will be there."
    Lady: "Not to mention the cracked building foundations, the destroyed cars, the pavement damage..."
    Flash: "Well, I'm off to save another citizen from the scourge of crime!"
    Lady: "...those two people standing near your path who burst into flame..."

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  109. Darn Us... by VorpalRodent · · Score: 1
    Is it just me, or do we have a nasty habit as humans in creating the things that will be our downfall? Whether it be creating computers that start World War III, or our discovery and breeding of viruses that turn us into zombies, or now our creation of super-chickens, we always seem to have a hand in our own destruction.

    Surely we can just learn our lesson and stop this nonsense...

    --
    Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
  110. No, but they do *FRY* pretty well by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Thank you folks, I'll be here all week. Don't forget to try out our potato bar, the finest in all Des Moines!

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  111. Military applications by Frightening · · Score: 1

    There are none, except maybe if you can convince a few thousand good men to step in a centrifuge and spend a week spinning like..well, like super chickens!

    *smacks head

    Like superman!

  112. only one explanation why superman can fly by shadownine · · Score: 2, Funny

    The man has a serious GAS problem, you can always see him lean his but out just a little before he takes off. Same thing goes when he levitate, it's just one constant steady flow of but wind. If a person were on krypton then they would be able to smell the difference, but on earth superman's gas emits no odor. The same theory can be applied to his super speed, i'm still working on the other abilities.

    1. Re:only one explanation why superman can fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to spell BUTT...

  113. Turkish Twist / Rotor by DragonHawk · · Score: 1
    "a really cool ride called the Gravitron"

    I grew up near an ammusement park that had a ride call the "Turkish Twist". Apparently, that was their own name for what the manufactuer calls "The Rotor". It was much like a Gravitron, but more powerful. It was kind of like being on the inside of a giant washing machine tub. The walls were completely vertical, and padded with a thin layer of rubber. You stood against, and got stuck to, the wall. Once up to speed, the floor dropped down, but you stayed stuck to the wall.

    Google found a computer model of a Rotor, too.

    One of the weird things (aside from being stuck to a wall in mid-air) was that, once up to speed, my perception was that the whole world had turned sideways. I didn't feel like I was spinning at all. I guess that rotation really messes with one's inner ear.

    All the Gravitrons I've been on were tame in comparison.
    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:Turkish Twist / Rotor by It's+all+Krista's+Fa · · Score: 1

      Gravitrons are actually more forceful than Rotors or Round-Ups.

      --
      It's all Krista's Fault.
  114. KFSC? by mh101 · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for the first Kentucky Fried Super Chicken shop to open!

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  115. Don't bother reading by Brix+Braxton · · Score: 1

    Ok - so the teaser on Slashdot points out the Chicken experiment - in fact, the whole quote on Slashdot is all they say about this Chicken experiment - so don't bother reading if you thought the Chicken thing sounded interesting because the rest of the article is common sense stuff.

    --
    www.wildpad.com
  116. Offtpic response by JasonBee · · Score: 1

    Here's an idea - I know this is way offtopic.

    We need a wikispellchecker webservice to correct common misspellings like "loose" above - which should be "lose" of course. This service sould be rolled into a bot that trolls websites and intelligently corrects all the problems words. I won't ask it to go after grammar - fo shizzle...

    It's trite, stupid and silly for anyone to obsess of spelling, but it's like blackflies...too many biting at once and you lose your mind.

    Sorry for the "induglence".

    JB

  117. Re:They're more a menace than a benefit in real li by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

    That's why I liked The Incredibles so much, they had some negative consequences. Also it was hilarious and the animation was beautiful.

    --
    Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  118. Superchicken? Wassamatta U? by humble.fool · · Score: 1

    When you find yourself in danger,
    When you're threatened by a stranger,
    When it looks like you will take a lickin',
    (puk, puk, puk, puk)
    There is someone waiting,
    Who will hurry up and rescue you,
    just Call for Super Chicken!

    --
    Being anonymous is not cowardice.
  119. Think short term... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... yes very short term and lots of hot oil!

  120. Superman's Outfit by nick13245 · · Score: 1

    While I know Superman is invincible, I never understood how his cloths never got damaged. Are they imported from another planet?

    1. Re:Superman's Outfit by JeffElkins · · Score: 0

      >While I know Superman is invincible, I never understood how his cloths >never got damaged. Are they imported from another planet?

      Yes. According to silver age canon, Ma Kent unravelled his Kryptonian swaddling clothes and used the yarn to make indestructible outfits.

      --
      Why is all the good stuff already modded 5, when I have mod points?
    2. Re:Superman's Outfit by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

      I wonder HOW they made his outfit out of this stuff, since they couldn't cut it...

      --
      The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  121. NASA Hypergravity Experiment by GoRK · · Score: 2

    Since nobody seems to have answered the original question of "Why aren't we trying this with humans?" -- The answer is that "We are. And it doesn't work that well."

    If you search for "NASA Hypergravity" on Google, you will find all kinds of data about the experiments, all kinds of crackpots talking about becoming super-strong or the like and this interesting Wired article written by one of the participants. If you don't want to dig too deep, check out the article. It's a pretty good summary from the inside out.

  122. Chuck Norris was raised in a centrifuge? by Fedarkyn · · Score: 1

    that would explain a lot :)

  123. It depends on the type of chicken. by Naruki · · Score: 1

    Bantams, now, they are pretty good fliers.

    1. Re:It depends on the type of chicken. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly Slashdotter, Batman can't really fly. You mean Superman

  124. Stan Lee and The Hulk by airship · · Score: 1

    I understand that Stan Lee was intrigued by Superman's early leaping limitation, and incorporated that power into the Hulk. Unlike DC, Lee always tried to make his superheroes 'plausible' and to give them limitations. He said it made for more interesting stories.

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  125. RTFA - Fiction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The article does not tell of "a scientific experiment" -- the article has half a sentence of "a book about" a scientific experiment in the story's plot.

    Growing muscles through gravity should be submitted to SCI-FI next time....

  126. Human ramifications of super-chicken experiments. by Healthbolt · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the ramifications of this experiment are for human rehabilitation practices. Could I be rebuilt someday, bigger, faster, stronger?

    --
    I'm no healthnut, but I'm interested: www.healthbolt.net
  127. Ummmm.... problem. by bahwi · · Score: 1

    But superman wasn't raised in super high gravity! Only born in it.

    We've shown our astronauts can deteriorate after time in space(in zero to very low G), and superman's been on earth longer than anyone's been in space.

    Oh yeah, and what about crystals growing into continents without consuming matter and weighing very little? :)

  128. SPOILER WARNING by Wampus+Aurelius · · Score: 1

    Or rather, throw a big spoiler warning on the article. It reveals a plot development from Superman Returns, in case anyone hasn't seen the movie and wants to not know the ending beforehand.

  129. Re:They're more a menace than a benefit in real li by AlexV · · Score: 1

    "Thank you, mysterious heros - the value of the gemerald you saved is slightly greater than the cost of the damage you caused to this mueseum. A net gain for our great city!"

    (Futurama)

  130. Not dead, just resting after a long squawk. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    It went up..... ...and came down. With a thud and without a single solitary flap. Stone dead. Ooops.

    Perhaps it was just resting. All shagged out after a long squawk.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  131. Ob Napoleon Dynamite... by weston · · Score: 1

    Do the Chickens have Large Talons?

  132. live high, train low by raygundan · · Score: 1

    Although the older methodology was to do your training at high altitude, this is no longer accepted as the "best" way to take advantage of this. The current training wisdom says that the best thing to do is to live at high altitude (or live/sleep in a low-oxygen house or tent) and do your training at sea level.

    You get all the physical adaptions you get at altitude, but by doing your training at sea level, you can train harder.

    http://sportsci.org/traintech/altitude/wgh.html

  133. Re:Oh man, I am so old! by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

    When criminals in this world appear,
    And break the laws that they should fear,
    And frighten all who see or hear,
    The cry goes up both far and near for

    Underdog,
    Underdog,
    Underdog,
    Underdog.

    Speed of lightning, roar of thunder,
    Fighting all who rob or plunder
    Underdog, Underdog.

    When in this world the headlines read
    Of those who's hearts are filled with greed
    And rob and steal from those in need.
    To right this wrong with blinding speed goes

    Underdog,
    Underdog,
    Underdog,
    Underdog.

    Speed of lightning, roar of thunder,
    Fighting all who rob or plunder
    Underdog, Underdog.

  134. This cow is approaching the limit by raygundan · · Score: 1


    http://fig.cox.miami.edu/~cmallery/150/neuro/belgi an.blue.jpg

    You can do a google image search for "Belgian Blue." These cattle have some sort of crazy genetic quirk that makes them grow muscles like mad. And trust me, you do NOT want to see them when they're angry.

    It's not just the chickens that are developing superpowers. This breed is clearly the start of some sort of Bovine X-Men. Throw in flying squirrels, bat sonar, electric eels, chameleons, shape-and-color changing squid, etc... and you'll quickly realize we don't have long before today's modern superanimals will rise up and destroy us.

  135. My karma is going to hell for this... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    ... super boobies?

    Couldn't resist...

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  136. first photo by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1
    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  137. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A scientifically proven way to enlarge the size of your cock!

  138. Pigs by jagdish · · Score: 1

    Roger Waters made pigs fly in '77, so whats the big deal now?

  139. Barry Bonds* by dkoulomzin · · Score: 1

    Breaking news: Barry Bonds allegedly spent time in a centerfuge sometime between 1997 and 1998.

    --
    Thou shalt not begin a subject line or post with the word "Umm".
  140. Prior Art by MadMagician · · Score: 1
  141. Re: Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the plan. I'm from Texas and most southern folk like myself figure we can't just kill you blueballers, since it's illegal and such. So, we'll just eat all your food and overtake your cities by overpopulation instead. And for the few remaining blueballers who survive, well, we'll just have ourselves a soylent blue barbeque. Stupid yankees...

  142. Re:They're more a menace than a benefit in real li by Nybarius · · Score: 1

    There actually was a comic book like that, called "Damage Control". It was about a team of lawyers and such whose sole duty was to clean up after comic book heroes afterwards. Also, She Hulk oftentimes takes Superhero cases. Harvey Birdman is largely a rip-off of this idea.

  143. Re:They're more a menace than a benefit in real li by Nybarius · · Score: 1

    There was a book like that, called "Damage Control". It was about an agency whose sole duty was to clean up the messes left by superheroes. Also, She-Hulk (in her capacity as a lawyer) oftentime takes Superhero cases; Harvey Birdman is largely derived from this idea.

  144. Re: Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm from Texas and most southern folk like myself figure we can't just kill you blueballers
    Based on previous experience I would agree. You can't kill us. Last time you tried we destroyed your armies, burned your cities and turned your government over to your former slaves.
  145. KFC by Jobeson · · Score: 2, Funny

    15 years from now at your local KFC... Hi, yes I would like to order 1 bucket of Extra crispy Super Chicken

    --
    Well Im gona go do something... and by something I mean nothing but doing nothing away from my computer counts as someth
  146. Q: Do they have human sized centrifuges? by macraig · · Score: 2, Funny

    A: Yes, there's a ride a Magic Mountain in southern California, but I don't know that they'd keep it running for you months at a time, and it would cost you a bloody fortune in ride tickets and daily admission. :-)

  147. Waste of time.. by Chadhulhu · · Score: 1

    Yay! what a great day in science. Curing a disease..nahhh.. Crwating life sustaining technology???... phfft.. Let's make heavy chickens.. Yay!!! What a waste of time. It is a comic, it doesn't have to be explained. Just like Star trek, or BSG, or Star Wars. It is entertainment. *rolls eyes* i am going back to my comics. Talk to me when they cure something or other.

    --
    i do not suffer from Insanity... I revel in it.
  148. Gravitron vs Rotor by DragonHawk · · Score: 1
    "Gravitrons are actually more forceful than Rotors or Round-Ups."

    That's an interesting claim. On what do you base it?

    I only have my own personal experience to go on. I've ridden the Turkish Twist (Rotor) at Canobie, and maybe two or three Gravitrons. The Gravitrons were all much milder. Now, both rides have a manual speed control for the operator, so personal experience may not reflect the actual maximums the rides are capable of. However, I also note that Twist stuck you to a vertical wall, while the Gravitron used an inclined bench on rails. That would seem to imply the Gravitron is weaker (needing more "help" to overcome gravity).
    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  149. Our domestic cat is unaware that she has higher by vortexau · · Score: 1

    . . limits! Seriously, our younger cat has higher than normal muscle developement. Her body mass (weight) is at least double that of any ordinary domestic cat of a similar size, and her muscletone matches that of pigdogs and bull-mastiffs. When she leaps, she exerts minimum (controlled) force to achieve her objective - similar to that of an astronaut performing a leap 18 inches high on the moon. She walks with the slow measured stride of a panther MANY times larger than her size.

    In play she charges our older cat just to leap just clear over at the crucial moment. Apart from flight, and vision powers, she would appear to be a super-cat. No centrafuge was used in her upbringing.
    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  150. About catching in flight. by vortexau · · Score: 1

    In the ORIGINAL 'Superman the movie' (1978), Superman startles a thief climbing the exterior of a building using suction cups. The 'cat burgler' falls whereon Superman dives after him and positions himself in the thief's path. When the falling thief reaches his waiting arms, Superman matches the speed of the thief's descent so as to avoid any problem of whiplash.

    That's the only safe way to catch a falling human being.

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  151. Dragonball Z by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this how the trained for fighting in Dragonball Z? Sit in a capsule that was 10g and train?