Slashdot Mirror


User: alexo

alexo's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,441
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,441

  1. Re:3 Hours A Day on Kid Health Experts Attack Video Game Summer Camp · · Score: 1

    We go hunting the national pest, it's called [...] They who shit on everything.

    We're allowed to hunt government officials?
    Damn... Where do I get my license?

  2. Told ya... on Terry Childs Found Guilty · · Score: 1

    Told ya.

  3. Re:It's not the abuses... it's the coverups. on Pope Rails Against the Internet and Transparency · · Score: 1

    A corrupt lawyer gets disbarred.

    [citation needed]

  4. Re:If you don't like it don't buy it on Final Fight Brings Restrictive DRM To the PS3 · · Score: 1

    Friends don't let friends buy Sony.

  5. Re:Origin of Privacy on Google Street View Logs Wi-Fi Networks, MAC Addresses · · Score: 1

    Oh dear, I wish he hadn't said that. I hope he does too. Even quoted a bit out of context (it was possibly a flip tagline), when you direct activities at the biggest datalogger around and have capabilities that most people regard as extremely penetrating, you just do not say anything that might scare people. Bad for business.

    Google does not do business with "people", they do business with other corporations.

    It's like saying that McDonalds shouldn't scare the cows.

  6. Re:Ignorance abounds indeed on Google Street View Logs Wi-Fi Networks, MAC Addresses · · Score: 1

    ITS IN PUBLIC. ANYTHING IN PUBLIC IS, wait for it, PUBLIC!!!!!!!!!

    It doesn't matter if you collect just one little bit of public information or you collect every single piece of public information. It's public. You have no right to expect privacy IN PUBLIC.

    So stalking is now legal?

  7. Re:2.5 Inverse-Square Law. on SETI To Release Data To the Public · · Score: 1

    Plus, they'll be decades old.

    Decades? I am not sure you are aware of the enormous distances involved.

  8. Re:Who cares? on Cox Discontinues Usenet, Starting In June · · Score: 1

    Because a clunky web interface controlled by a single provider that has no killfiling, offline storage or syntax highlighting is clearly better than Usenet diversity.

    Never claimed it was better, just that you won't be cut off from your favourite content.

  9. Re:Hilarity on Adobe Stops Development For iPhone · · Score: 3, Funny

    But when has Apple ever taken an open-source project, cleaned it up with bugfixes and lots of other improvements, and put a proprietary wrapper around it for ease-of-use?

    Samba? Webkit? CUPS?

    iWhoosh...

  10. Re:Who cares? on Cox Discontinues Usenet, Starting In June · · Score: 1

    The standard discussion forums for a great many tech communities are still on Usenet: comp.lang.python, comp.text.tex and gnu.emacs.gnus are just a few that I read daily.

    No newsreader needed.

  11. Re:Who cares? on Cox Discontinues Usenet, Starting In June · · Score: 1

    Or get a vanity domain for less than $10/year.

  12. Re:In other news... on Steve Jobs Recommends Android For Fans of Porn · · Score: 1

    Uhm, adults have sex.
    Show us the evidence ...

    My evidence is... You!
    (Unless you're a product of agamogenesis)

  13. Moral responsibility on Steve Jobs Recommends Android For Fans of Porn · · Score: 1

    "We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone."

    On the other hand, I have a moral responsibility to keep my money away from Apple.

  14. Re:Okay on Steve Jobs Recommends Android For Fans of Porn · · Score: 1

    Graphic violence is not supposed to make you want to be violent.

    Graphic violence desensitizes you to violence.

  15. He's fucked on Fate of Terry Childs Now In Jury's Hands · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wait, you mean his fate is in the hands of 12 clueless "average" citizens?
    He is truly fucked.

  16. Re:Chiropractor fixed my long-standing back proble on British Chiropractors Drop Case Against Simon Singh · · Score: 1

    Every time I hurt, my wife suggests I go to a chiropractor. But I don't -- because I don't know who I can trust. How do I know it's not some quack? How do you find that "really skilled person" and know you have one of those "very specific problems in the back?"

    My current theory is to ask them what they can cure. If they say suggest wacko things like cancer and ear aches, I'll go somewhere else. You'd think there would be a better way, though, wouldn't you?

    I suggest finding one who is also a practising MD.

    I used the services of Dr. Jeffery Balon (both as an MD and as a chiropractor) when he was working in a clinic near my workplace. I once Googled him on a whim and found out that he was actively involved in debunking the claim that chiropractic manipulation can cure asthma.

    Unfortunately, he's back to Ottawa.

  17. Re:I might be able to help on Woman Claims Wii Fit Caused Persistent Sexual Arousal Syndrome · · Score: 1

    I suspect that the people who joke about the lack of sex after marriage are the people who screwed up somewhere along the way and aren't getting any anymore.

    Either that or they're Monty Python fans.

    MR. HARRY BLACKITT: Look at them, bloody Catholics, filling the bloody world up with bloody people they can't afford to bloody feed.

    MRS. BLACKITT: What are we dear?

    MR. BLACKITT: Protestant, and fiercely proud of it.

    MRS. BLACKITT: Hmm. Well, why do they have so many children?

    MR. BLACKITT: Because... every time they have sexual intercourse, they have to have a baby.

    MRS. BLACKITT: But it's the same with us, Harry.

    MR. BLACKITT: What do you mean?

    MRS. BLACKITT: Well, I mean, we've got two children, and we've had sexual intercourse twice.

  18. Re:I might be able to help on Woman Claims Wii Fit Caused Persistent Sexual Arousal Syndrome · · Score: 1

    I would have to agree. I've been married 8 years and have 3 kids. If I wouldn't have gotten (fixed) we'd have 6 or so kids by now..... It doesn't have to stop after marrage, if you know what I mean....

    You mean that during these 8 years you had sex 3 times before you were fixed and 3 times after?

  19. Re:The 40 hour work week is God given on How Many Hours a Week Can You Program? · · Score: 1

    I personally detest the idea of Unions and I'm glad programmers have avoided them. In most unions, your potential raise is dependent on all the other union members in your department. You also don't negotiate raises, your union lawyers/reps do. No thank you.

    That is not the idea of unions, just the implementation that you happen to be familiar with.

    Sort of like saying that you detest the idea of democracy based on the examples of Berlusconi and the "Change you can believe in" fiasco.

  20. Re:Oh great... on The Pirate Party of Canada Is Official · · Score: 1

    If you have a particular issue that you want to advance in a first-past-the-post democracy, the correct move is to identify which of the major parties is most receptive to your goal, and organize within that party. Form an organization, raise money, make noise. If you're a visible constituency within a major party (and can be counted on to bring in votes, donations, and volunteers) then they will have reason to differentiate themselves by embracing your issue.

    Since both the Liberals and the Conservatives are "too big to give a flying fuck about anything but their own self interest" that leaves only the NDP.
    At the least, join the Greens. I'm sure you guys are smart enough to hammer out a mutually accepted platform.
    Plus, you get to call yourself "The Green Pirates".

  21. Re:Oh great... on The Pirate Party of Canada Is Official · · Score: 1

    And that's why first-past-the-post systems are pretty stupid.

    s/stupid/corrupt.

    I'm continually amazed by how US and UK politics can be so fucked up.

    Bug closed as "will not fix". Reason: system functions as designed.

  22. Re:I see lousy coders.... everywhere on How To Find Bad Programmers · · Score: 1

    if you put "C/C++" on your resume, I guarantee my first technical question is going to be, "What's the difference between C and C++?"

    My first reaction would be to say that the expression C/C++ is undefined in both C and C++.

  23. Re:Firefox lite. on Why Mozilla Needs To Go Into Survival Mode · · Score: 1

    Have you investigated your browsing habits? Because, In my experience, opening 20+ pages with 5-10 images each (art, I swear!) ends up eating a lot a memory. Memory usage depends on your browsing habits as well.

    Seems to me that the memory taken by the images is not getting returned to the system.

  24. Re:They explain why on Evolution, Big Bang Polls Omitted From NSF Report · · Score: 1

    As a Christian, I see evidence of God working today, just as the Bible says He will work. I see people who I know well who have had illnesses who are prayed for and are healed of what ails them without any medical intervention (but after medical tests confirming their condition).

    As a scientifically-minded person, I too see people pray to YHWH and recover. I also see people pray to Allah and recover, people who do not pray at all and recover, people who pray and do not recover (even after medical intervention) and people who neither pray nor recover. From this I conclude that I have not seen evidence linking prayer and recovery.

    I see lives freed from addiction after prayer.

    I saw lives freed from addiction after a making commitment.

    I see people's hearts and lifestyles dramatically changed when they accept Christ as savior.

    I see people's hearts and lifestyles dramatically changed when they join a cult.

    Not a single one of these is a proof of creation. But each of these is evidence that God exists and is still going about business just as the Bible declares He will.

    It is evidence of selection bias, nothing more.

  25. Re:Irrelevant words on Obama Unveils New Nuclear Doctrine · · Score: 1

    > How many of our enemies *are* in compliance?
    None, by definition.

    > Is the US in compliance?
    Yes, by definition.

    > Who gets to determine who is in non-compliance anyway?
    The US.

    > Why should anyone believe the US wouldn't nuke someone it that it really wanted to anyway?
    Not believing constitutes non-compliance.