It might not seem like a lot, but when the distro is free then even such a small fee is too much. The only other option is to pay a large one time fee that could otherwise pay a developer to work on Ubuntu for a whole year! So it costs money to distribute software that pays MP3s.
If Ubuntu ignored this, it could be sued in nations like the U.S. where this patent is valid. Either Ubuntu would have to pay up or the developers could never set foot in a country with such patent laws ever again (not reasonable). So because it costs money, Ubuntu has no MP3 support.
Now take this situation, and multiply it times every type of restricted software out there (that isn't a free like OGG) and you see what the situation is. So in order to spend money on developers, not laywers, Ubuntu has to avoid touching these codecs. Even an easier way to install them such as "click here to install" would make Ubuntu an accessory to a crime in many nations.
This is why its important to support open codecs and standards. But Ubuntu can't provide restricted software, or make it any easier because of the law.
I remember a guy (in New Zealand) was selling CD cleaner and people were drinking it like alcohol, and claimed it had the same effect as alcohol, but without the hangover. Does anyone remember what it was? It wasn't GHB (Fantasy), and definatly not diethanol (ethylene glycol). I keep thinking it was 1,4 Dibutanol. Any ideas anyone?
I don't think you would be able to organically synthesise anything and then expect to put it 5% in a aqueous solution, and STILL make it for less than $1 a bottle.
I'm a little late, and now I can't. Not that I want to really read the article. I'm just a little bored. I'm sure its the same. If you're not going to read it, don't go to it. I've learnt my lesson now. I hope everyone will learn from me.
Anyone want to post a link of a movie of it running? I want to compare it to the Novell xgl demo. I can't get a feel for the desktop without a demo movie.
If they want to give tech, not game, then how come there is no discussion on Linux...eg, what kernel, will they update the kernel over its life, how will sony contribute to kernel development etc. Those aren't good examples, but us/.ers want to hear this stuff. Its possible I'm out of the loop, so flame tastefully if I am!
The GPL licence spreads faster and easier than the BSD licence, which is the point of the extra restrictions. Uptake by hardware manufactures is therefore better if they are uptaking GPL licenced firmware than BSD firmware.
The arguement is redundant, however, as XORP could be forked to be GPL, if I'm not mistaken.
The problem with this is that Evolution and Speciation aren't science. They're just more faith based explainations for things that human beings can't possibly ever know with certainty.
You're confusing the lab sciences (physics, chemistry, some biology) with the field sciences (geology, geography, some biology). All use the scientific method to determine the most reasonable explanation by Occam's Razor. Darwin's speciation is accepted as reliable because it can be demonstrated in the field many different ways, in the same way geologists look at rock structure and determine geological activity in the past. Speciation is not easy to demonstrate in a lab setting, but I remember reading in the National Geographic about an article entitled 'Was Darwin Wrong?' where laboratory evidence for speciation was discovered. Unfortunatly, the link is only a summary.
We could always just demand that Evolution and Speciation be taught in religious courses, but I don't think we care enough to do that. Its not like science is just going to go away if we ignore it.
Slashdot Mirror
Below is the reason why Ubuntu lacks media support for closed codecs "out of the box."
A single example will be used- MP3's.
The group that holds the patent on MP3's demands that for each player with MP3 support a 75 cent fee must be paid:
http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/index.html
It might not seem like a lot, but when the distro is free then even such a small fee is too much. The only other option is to pay a large one time fee that could otherwise pay a developer to work on Ubuntu for a whole year! So it costs money to distribute software that pays MP3s.
If Ubuntu ignored this, it could be sued in nations like the U.S. where this patent is valid. Either Ubuntu would have to pay up or the developers could never set foot in a country with such patent laws ever again (not reasonable). So because it costs money, Ubuntu has no MP3 support.
Now take this situation, and multiply it times every type of restricted software out there (that isn't a free like OGG) and you see what the situation is. So in order to spend money on developers, not laywers, Ubuntu has to avoid touching these codecs. Even an easier way to install them such as "click here to install" would make Ubuntu an accessory to a crime in many nations.
This is why its important to support open codecs and standards. But Ubuntu can't provide restricted software, or make it any easier because of the law.
cheers mate. I was going crazy!
I remember a guy (in New Zealand) was selling CD cleaner and people were drinking it like alcohol, and claimed it had the same effect as alcohol, but without the hangover. Does anyone remember what it was? It wasn't GHB (Fantasy), and definatly not diethanol (ethylene glycol). I keep thinking it was 1,4 Dibutanol. Any ideas anyone?
I don't think you would be able to organically synthesise anything and then expect to put it 5% in a aqueous solution, and STILL make it for less than $1 a bottle.
I'm a little late, and now I can't. Not that I want to really read the article. I'm just a little bored. I'm sure its the same. If you're not going to read it, don't go to it. I've learnt my lesson now. I hope everyone will learn from me.
Anyone want to post a link of a movie of it running? I want to compare it to the Novell xgl demo. I can't get a feel for the desktop without a demo movie.
If they want to give tech, not game, then how come there is no discussion on Linux...eg, what kernel, will they update the kernel over its life, how will sony contribute to kernel development etc. Those aren't good examples, but us /.ers want to hear this stuff. Its possible I'm out of the loop, so flame tastefully if I am!
Why can't science proceed for capitalistic gains? It seems to have worked in chemistry for the last 100 years.
system is to get the AI to play tic-tac-toe against itself. I saw it on a documentary ages ago. I think.
because I would prolly buy it. I'll never try and buy a game from these crazy Germans ever again.
when I wear a wireless headset for my phone. Well, I hope that's what they're laughing at.
until someone realises that Ritalin sets off the sensor, due the the similarities of their structure.
I won't be able to afford new games until at least April!
Thats almost as good. If you can browse the net on your phone, it would be the same thing.
j/k
The GPL licence spreads faster and easier than the BSD licence, which is the point of the extra restrictions. Uptake by hardware manufactures is therefore better if they are uptaking GPL licenced firmware than BSD firmware.
The arguement is redundant, however, as XORP could be forked to be GPL, if I'm not mistaken.
If RMS is reading, you'd agree no?
does it run linux?
http://www.allofmp3.com/
...an explaination to the book 'the Bell curve'.
Empty the deep fryer into this container, and those big macs into this bag!
Any evidence for the 'spontaneous generation' of life would be a scientific achievement rivalling Darwin's achievements.
You're confusing the lab sciences (physics, chemistry, some biology) with the field sciences (geology, geography, some biology). All use the scientific method to determine the most reasonable explanation by Occam's Razor. Darwin's speciation is accepted as reliable because it can be demonstrated in the field many different ways, in the same way geologists look at rock structure and determine geological activity in the past. Speciation is not easy to demonstrate in a lab setting, but I remember reading in the National Geographic about an article entitled 'Was Darwin Wrong?' where laboratory evidence for speciation was discovered. Unfortunatly, the link is only a summary.
http://www7.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0411/featur e1/
We could always just demand that Evolution and Speciation be taught in religious courses, but I don't think we care enough to do that. Its not like science is just going to go away if we ignore it.
Thats all the graphical installer I need!
but I just kept being pestered to! I come here to get AWAY from Gamespot.