Slashdot Mirror


Seven-Ounce Linux 'Wrist PC'

An anonymous reader writes "A European research and development firm has announced a seven-ounce, wrist-worn wearable computer with a 2.2 x 2.8-inch color touchscreen. Eurotech's WWPC (wrist-worn PC) runs Linux or Windows, offers a wealth of standard PC interfaces (WLAN, Bluetooth, IrDA, USB, SD-card, etc), and has patented technology that puts the device to sleep when the user drops their arm. It can detect motionless user states, and serve as a location-transmitting beacon, thanks to a built-in GPS receiver and 'dead reckoning' technology. The company also claims six hours of battery life under 'fully operational' conditions."

250 comments

  1. Cool Beans by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    It targets emergency rescue, security, healthcare, maintenance, logistics, and "many other" applications.

    Many other==geeking which may be further qualified as: Listening to you MP3s, watching videos, playing games, wandering around various cons talking to it and having it respond "by your command", "I can't do that, Dave", "danger, Will Robinson", or actually trying to impress the heck out of that jerk executive with his Ferrari laptop that he's not such hot stuff anymore. Alas, ...

    Availability

    Eurotech describes the WWPC as a "user-centric, ubiquitous computing" concept, suggesting that the device is not yet available in product form. The company did not respond to availability enquires by publication time.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Cool Beans by PFI_Optix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The application I'd like to see it in is IT. With wifi, that thing could replace the tech's laptop and greatly reduce their load.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    2. Re:Cool Beans by richdun · · Score: 1

      So what if it is available in "product form" yet? It's not like a company would talk about something and never release it.

    3. Re:Cool Beans by rm69990 · · Score: 1

      I move, on average, by hand, over 3000 gallons of liquid each day. I'm sure the tech will be just fine carrying around his laptop :-P

    4. Re:Cool Beans by Fred_A · · Score: 5, Funny

      Moving it from the bar to your mouth doesn't count !

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    5. Re:Cool Beans by rm69990 · · Score: 1

      You ever tried moving 3000+ gallons of dairy products, every single day? And that's just part of my job. Not all Slashdotters work behind a computer all day, just to let you know.

    6. Re:Cool Beans by robbkidd · · Score: 3, Funny

      The "product form" is much too heavy for the mobility needs of the modern user. The "vapor form" is substantially lighter.

    7. Re:Cool Beans by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Many other" applications also include: not getting laid.

    8. Re:Cool Beans by MindKata · · Score: 0

      "ever tried moving 3000+ gallons of dairy products"?

      Does that make you a Slashdot geek speak style cow farmer then?

      In which case, using a wearable computer would be a bit difficuit during milking time. :)

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    9. Re:Cool Beans by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      What dairy you work at?

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    10. Re:Cool Beans by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I have a pump in the field out back that right now is moving 220 gallons a minute (water problems on the land this time of the year). All I have to move is about 4 gallons a day to far, far exceed your workload. I call it 'working smarter.' heh

    11. Re:Cool Beans by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      (I meant, four gallons of gasoline)

    12. Re:Cool Beans by Stuy+2+MIT · · Score: 1

      You sound pretty sore about it. This is twice you posted that.. Maybe you would LIKE to work behind a computer all day? :)

    13. Re:Cool Beans by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 5, Funny

      Think of it as a modern wrist-worn contraceptive that has few, if any, medical side effects.

    14. Re:Cool Beans by rm69990 · · Score: 1

      I work in a warehouse, Dairy comes in, we move it around preparing for it to be shipping to the grocery orders. It's up in Canada.

    15. Re:Cool Beans by rm69990 · · Score: 1

      *grocery stores I meant to say.

    16. Re:Cool Beans by rm69990 · · Score: 1

      No, I posted the first time because someone was saying tech's wouldn't have to carry around a laptop anymore (wouldn't want them to strain their back or anything), and I merely pointed out and said I move thousands of gallons of liquid a day by hand, I'm sure the tech can handle a laptop. Then someone made a comment about it being alcohol that I drink, which I found kind of insulting, cause I got the impression he was mocking my job (I could be off base though) so I explained to him in more detail what exactly it is I do. Understand? Oh, and btw, if I was stuck behind a computer all day at work, I would probably hang myself, no offence.

    17. Re:Cool Beans by rm69990 · · Score: 1

      Ah, well if you can explain to me how to somehow get full 4L Jugs of milk, ready for sale, to go through a pumping system, and without even denting them a bit, I'm all ears :) I work in a warehouse, milk comes in from the suppliers, we prepare the orders for them to be shipped to the different grocery stores.

    18. Re:Cool Beans by Bloater · · Score: 1

      Imagine it connected to a barcode reader on your fingertip. Scan, tap, scan, tap, scan, tap... "Load em up boys!"

      Paperwork? Who needs paperwork - just press send.

    19. Re:Cool Beans by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Why bother? Its much easier to use something like a Vocollect unit with a small barcode scanner. What's with all the tapping? Besides, your average Distribution Center is remarkably automated (in the computing, rather than the robotic (for the most part) sense) these days. If it wasn't, my company wouldn't even exist.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    20. Re:Cool Beans by rm69990 · · Score: 1

      Not quite that easy. I'll use an unrealistic example. If you have 20 skids of 2%, 10 skids of 1% in the warehouse, and I get an order in from the local grocery store that they want half a skid of each, then the skids need to be re-arranged, no? Or do you honestly think grocery stores order a single pallet of each kind of milk? Trust me, they don't have the storage for that. Nevermind the fact that no store orders the same amount of milk and the same kinds each day, so the skids have to be prepared as the orders come in.

      But if you want to go even further, I also worked at Wal-Mart as a kid, in the grocery section. My primary job was ordering the milk and keeping the dairy section running. There I also moved at least 1500 gallons of milk a day, because Wal-Mart is an innefficient piece of shit company (won't bother going into that right now though).

    21. Re:Cool Beans by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      It'd better not be released as a real product yet. That thing is HEUG!! I mean, that'd be like wearing xbox around on your wrist. An xbox that would completely drain its batteries by lunchtime no less.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    22. Re:Cool Beans by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      To be fair, reading through this whole thread, you do sound awfully defensive of your job. Don't get me wrong, I'm grateful for you (I manage a coffee shop that lives and dies by its milk shipments), but take it easy, we're not all after you.

    23. Re:Cool Beans by nevernamed · · Score: 1

      lol, yeah it's a cool device, but does it turn off the chicks? I'd be interested to see what this turns out to be like :-)

    24. Re:Cool Beans by AlterTick · · Score: 1
      I work in a warehouse, Dairy comes in, we move it around preparing for it to be shipping to the grocery orders. It's up in Canada.

      Oh sure, the famous nerd dodge, "you wouldn't know her, she's in Canada"...

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
    25. Re:Cool Beans by AlterTick · · Score: 1
      To be fair, reading through this whole thread, you do sound awfully defensive of your job.

      I think he was reacting to all those armchair geniuses who think the only reason any work is still done by hand is because people don't have someone as smart as them around to institute automation. Few things are more laughable than someone attempting to suggest process engineering improvements based on a three sentence aside.

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
    26. Re:Cool Beans by rm69990 · · Score: 1

      Lol, I was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and have lived in Alberta all of my life. You are aware that only about 5% of the world's population lives in the States, right? And are you also aware that Slashdot is in-fact accessible from the rest of the world? And yes, people do actually live in Canada, it's not just a myth. Look over my comment history, I've been pretty consistent as to where I live. Would you like me to take a picture the next time I'm working, post it to Imageshack, and send you the link? :-P (Sorry, have to give you a hard time. It's weird, people have such a hard time believing that I do in-fact live in Canada. I don't find it all that shocking myself).

      Cheers

    27. Re:Cool Beans by rm69990 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And as a follow-up, before people start making jokes.

      1) Yes, Canada does have the internet. We have had it for almost as long as the States, and on average, we actually have better internet connections up here than you guys do.

      2) No, not all Canadians say "eh". You guys are thinking of Eastern Canadians. I live in Western Canada. Although I do know a guy from Eastern Canada who says eh a lot, it's kind of funny.

      3) No, our heads don't flap around when we talk (thanks a lot South Park) :-P

      4) No, we don't live in igloos. Some natives in the very north, largely uninhabited part of the country, do, but most of us have never even seen an igloo outside of film.

      5) No, we're not all "goofy".

      6) No, we don't sit around and drink and smoke pot 24/7.

      If I've missed anything, let me know :-P

    28. Re:Cool Beans by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      applications also include: not getting laid.

      That's a feature. The Wrist PC uses one of those "Shake to charge" generators, so how else do you reckon they get six hours of use?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    29. Re:Cool Beans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lighten up, francis.

    30. Re:Cool Beans by Railer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, if it's shake to charge and works off of habitual masterbation, I'm Golden! :)

    31. Re:Cool Beans by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Eh, what are you complaining aboot? (sorry, couldn't resist)

      I, for one, refuse to believe your propoganda. Hell, as a South-Shore-residing Masshole, I refuse to believe that indoor plumbing exists west of I-495, and certainly not Internet access. :D

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    32. Re:Cool Beans by halltk1983 · · Score: 1

      Dude, the predator used one, and he was totally awesome. I totally thin he could've gotten laid!

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    33. Re:Cool Beans by blaksaga · · Score: 1

      Ummm...UPS already has a wearable barcode reader like that in their warehouses. In the furniture warehouse I work in, we have handhelds.

    34. Re:Cool Beans by raider_red · · Score: 1

      I don't know. A couple of girls at work would probably go for a guy with that kind of gadget-cred. (I work in a semiconductor design center. Everyone's a geek.)

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    35. Re:Cool Beans by freeweed · · Score: 1

      To be fair, most all Canadians say "eh", we just don't realize it. It's not as noticable out west, but believe me - our American friends pick up on it almost immediately. Out west it's more of a subvocal grunt than a true spoken word, but it's there.

      (Born and raised westerner, first Winnipeg, currently Calgary)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    36. Re:Cool Beans by jacquems · · Score: 1
      "Many other" applications also include: not getting laid.

      Depends what kind of partner you're hoping to attract. Something like this may be just the thing to get a geek girl to spend more time with you (if only to check out your cool new toy). From there, it's just a matter of recognizing the opportunity and playing your cards right. Think of it as a non-verbal geek pick-up line. It sure beats "you look lovely by the light of the CRT".

    37. Re:Cool Beans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pfffft. I routinely move over 20000lbs of weight only in my hour long exercise routine, and I do it nearly every day, and when I don't do that I do aerobic excersise, and I find it quite refreshing... I'm fit, but it's not that hard, there are people who do much more.

      A little math tells me that it makes for a power consumption of 200W, so in the course of an hour I would require at least~180kilocalories, but of course my body and my muscles are nowhere close to 100% efficient. I've previously estimated that my workout is good for burning 500 calories, I'd say that's close. 3000 gallons of milk is a bit over 20000lbs. Assuming you lift every gallon of milk an average of a half meter high (that's what I used for my calculations, and I think that's generous as sometimes machines lift the weight higher), then your work for the day is roughly equivalent to my workout for an hour. If I kept up the pace all day, I'd never make it, but I'd also have lifted the equivalent of a fully loaded F-14 Tomcat 3 feet vertically assuming I did. That's pretty impressive I think. Spreading that work out across a whole 8 hour day, however, would be a cakewalk.

    38. Re:Cool Beans by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Would you like me to take a picture the next time I'm working, post it to Imageshack, and send you the link?

      You really believe any Slashdotter would be naive enough to click on a .ca picture link?

    39. Re:Cool Beans by babbling · · Score: 1

      Woohoo. That sounds awesome. I have just one question, though.

      Mine is telling me "connection could not be established". Now we're late, and I still can't get the damn thing to send. What should I do? On the old system, I could've written this down and we'd have been on our way 10 minutes ago!

    40. Re:Cool Beans by fritzk3 · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the discussion point of whether all Canadians are born knowing how to play hockey. That, and whether the entire country is prepared to apologize for Bryan Adams. Other than those two points, I think you've just aboot got it covered. ;)

      --
      All your sig are belong to us.
  2. But wait, there's more ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative


    A European research and development firm has announced a seven-ounce, wrist-worn wearable computer concept with the possibility of a 2.2 x 2.8-inch color touchscreen. Eurotech's WWPC (wrist-worn PC) would run Linux or Windows, offer a wealth of standard PC interfaces (WLAN, Bluetooth, IrDA, USB, SD-card, etc), and has patented technology that could put the device to sleep when the user drops their arm. It would be able to detect motionless user states, and serve as a location-transmitting beacon, thanks to a built-in GPS receiver and 'dead reckoning' technology. The company also claims six hours of battery life under 'fully operational' conditions."

    there we go, fixed that summary for you

    FTA:
    Eurotech describes the WWPC as a "user-centric, ubiquitous computing" concept, suggesting that the device is not yet available in product form. The company did not respond to availability enquires by publication time.


    so stick this on the Duke Nukem wish list

    1. Re:But wait, there's more ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong. The device is already built, so the sentences in original summary are right. It can do all the things stated there.

      Offtopic: It will run Linux first as you can't find suitable MS Windows distro.

  3. Hmmm... by croddy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmmm... This thing i wear on my wrist says they're not poisonous!

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Hmmm... This thing i wear on my wrist says they're not poisonous!

      Mama!

    2. Re:Hmmm... by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      If we get bored, I've got Tetris on this thing.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  4. All features tell me one thing.. by mayhemt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Defnite ban from using in flights, & @workplaces.

  5. Neat! by corychristison · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I think this could go far... but I suppose that is my opinion.

    I actually had a thought of a miniature wrist-type PC with bluetooth. Transmit between your watch and a "full" system and be able to share documents, etc. That'd be neat. :-)

    1. Re:Neat! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I want a watch with Bluetooth which syncs my appointments and automatically sets alarms. I always have my watch, I don't always have my PDA.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    2. Re:Neat! by electrichamster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My dream for a long time has been a dumb-terminal bluetooth watch - Normally it acts as a watch, but when your bluetooth enabled mp3 player/laptop/phone connect, it acts as a dumb display/controller for them.

      I can but dream.

    3. Re:Neat! by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I want a watch with Bluetooth which syncs my appointments and automatically sets alarms.
      That seems like a pain in the ass. If the alarm goes off for the time your appointment is set to, what good is it? You're already late unless you already got there on time. If your watch sounds an alarm before your appointment to allow you travel time, then you've got another problem because not all appointments require the same amount of travel time (i.e. meeting a friend across town vs. going to a meeting just one floor up from you) so you've got to double the amount of times you have to set for your appointments in order to get your watch to sound at the right time, you've got to set the time of the appointment and the time that you want the alarm to go off. At this point you might as well just be setting your watch manually anyways because it would take just as long to punch the times into your PDA manually.
    4. Re:Neat! by Ender_Stonebender · · Score: 1

      Include GPS on the device. Have named locations linked to GPS coordinates. Increase the amount of time before the appointment that the alarm goes off with the distance from the appointment's location. Problem solved!

      The biggest difficulty in the first two parts is fitting a GPS device into a watch that's also a PC. The third part is tricky and will probably need to be able to vary somewhat to handle individual difference in travel speed and preferences.

      --
      Loose things are easy to lose. You're getting your hair cut. They're going there to see their aunt.
    5. Re:Neat! by badriram · · Score: 1

      I think you might be looking the Microsoft SPOT watchs.... It lets you remotely sync calendar, get rss feeds and a lot more. Never used it personally, but have a couple of friends that do love it. But since you are on slashdot, a MS solution might not cut it.... but i think that is the only one

    6. Re:Neat! by 1tsm3 · · Score: 1

      Extreme nitpick detected!!! Destroy!!

      Well if you consider Outlook, which is the most commonly used calendar app in corps, it lets you set how many mins ahead of the appointment you want a reminder. THAT would help here. Just don't over think when there are much simpler solutions. All he asked for was a watch that would "beep" when ever his PC/PDA would have "beep"ed.

      --
      -ItsME
    7. Re:Neat! by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      i use sync my cellphone with outlook, i tend to have my phone near me more often than my watch.

    8. Re:Neat! by Capacitance · · Score: 1

      I dunno what PDA you're using, but all the appointments on my Palm and on OS X, and I assume everywhere else allow setting both a time, and an alarm some time relative to the start of the appointment... so, your watch could say '10 minutes till Monday Meeting', or whatever when the alarm rang...

      For setting alarms, my PDA is _way_ easier to schedule an alarm on than my watch... I'd be surprised if it was any different... easier still is to type an appointment on my laptop, and sync it over...

      I keep thinking that it would be nice to have a wearable computer setup with, say, a laptop in your backpack that displays on your watch, and on a small pda-sized display, etc.

      This device could allow for doing something along the lines of dynamically advancing alarms depending on how far away you are from your appointment, but getting that sort of thing right would be involved.

      --
      -- Martin
  6. yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it run linux?

    1. Re:yeah but by Kwiik · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well, who cares!?.. it supports Vista!

      Or supposedly, if they plan to market this saying it runs "Windows" over the next couple of years.

      --
      Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
    2. Re:yeah but by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      No, it runs a version of Windows CE, seeing as it has 64 MB of RAM.

    3. Re:yeah but by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      >> does it run linux?

      Given the enthusiasm of Linux's support base, I think it's safe to say that pretty much any device with a processor and RAM will run it sooner or later.

      About to install Ubuntu on my iBook. First time for me for Linux.

  7. The best feature of course by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the article:
    "It...has flexible left- or right-handed straps"

    That, or add-in another $500 for image stabilisation. Pencils down.

    1. Re:The best feature of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's talking about PORN!

  8. From the Article by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Through reuse of the popular Faraday Flashlight mechanism, as long as you keep surfing porn, the battery remains charged."

    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
  9. Looks, well... by DancesWithBlowTorch · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who would ever wear such a thing? It looks ridiculous. Completely style-free. The girls would laugh at you.

    Oh wait...

    1. Re:Looks, well... by Tweekster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats what they said about bluetooth earpieces... oh wait, i still laugh at those people.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    2. Re:Looks, well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you wear the linux wrist pc AND the bluetooth earpiece while riding your Segway carrying the Dungeon Masters Guide, then the chicks will see you are the man.

    3. Re:Looks, well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really like it! It's got a real 'hardware' look about it :-)
      However, I would need the toggleable stealth suit, jet boots and BFG to go with it though ;-D
      Oh, and a 100 GHZ encrypted communicator for "get me outa here NOW!" moments.. LOL

    4. Re:Looks, well... by khendar · · Score: 1

      More ridiculous than wearing an ipod strapped to your arm ? I think not.

      --
      "When does Munich Station arrive at this train?" -- Albert Einstein
    5. Re:Looks, well... by smackdotcom · · Score: 1

      You're new here, aren't you?

      --

      In a world without walls, there is no need for Windows.

    6. Re:Looks, well... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      Apparently this chick would.

  10. Hmmm...motion detection? by maillemaker · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...it can detect motionless user states...

    But can it detect fap-fap-fap-fap-fap motion?

    Perhaps it will usher in a new era of pr0n?

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:Hmmm...motion detection? by jacquems · · Score: 1
      But can it detect fap-fap-fap-fap-fap motion?
      Perhaps it will usher in a new era of pr0n?

      Obviously you would have to wear this on the idle hand. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to see your pr0n. (Should I be worried that I think about these things?)

  11. Nice Wrist thingy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But can you tell me what time it is?

    1. Re:Nice Wrist thingy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's time to get a Linux wristwatch.

  12. Watch that supports wifi? by farker+haiku · · Score: 4, Funny



    According to its website, Eurotech's corporate strategy is to "define and penetrate new and emerging markets."

    I didn't realize that my neighbor's WEP encrypted access point qualified as an emerging market, but hey.

    --
    Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
  13. Featured on "What not to wear..." by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Stuff to wear to guarantee you'll not get laid if going to a bar.

    This must be something that tops that list haha...

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  14. Pocket PC in a new Shape by Vapon · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just a Pocket PC strapped onto a wrist, with some extra outlets and GPS built in?

    1. Re:Pocket PC in a new Shape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whilst it may be an obvious pun, the only chip that the could consider for this has got to be an ARM:http://www.arm.com

    2. Re:Pocket PC in a new Shape by MacGabhain · · Score: 1

      Nah. This is more like and OLD pocket PC trapped to your wrist. Haven't seen stats like that above $300 in quite a while. They probably bought a bunch of surplus HP 315s, like mine, who's screen stopped accepting touch imput in less than a year. Not that I'm bitter.

  15. Nerdy response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    According to its website, Eurotech's corporate strategy is to "define and penetrate new and emerging markets." I didn't realize that my neighbor's WEP encrypted access point qualified as an emerging market, but hey.

    Spoken like a true nerd. Most individuals of the male persuasion would have said "I didn't realize that my neighbors wife qualified as an emerging market". This being /., we get the nerd version. Oh well, more neighbor's wives for the rest of us, w00t!

  16. Not comfortable... by onthefenceman · · Score: 4, Funny

    This device does not look comfortable at all - from the artist's rendition it wraps around at least 1/3 of the forearm and half the length from the wrist to the elbow.

    I would imagine it feels similar to wearing a cast...or maybe an arm-mounted chastity belt.

    --
    Have you seen my stapler?
    1. Re:Not comfortable... by op12 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...or maybe an arm-mounted chastity belt.

      And somehow creates an identical effect!

    2. Re:Not comfortable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >...or maybe an arm-mounted chastity belt.

      I expect it will be extremely effective in this function.

    3. Re:Not comfortable... by ArikTheRed · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just don't do any heavy processing. I can just imagine the seering heat causing the device to fuse to my wrist. I always wanted to be a cyborg, but not that way, man.

  17. Strap on PDA. by AnonymousPrick · · Score: 1
    Who would ever wear such a thing? It looks ridiculous. Completely style-free. The girls would laugh at you.

    That's what it looks like to me. I was thinking it was maybe the size of one those diver's watches or something that big, but NOT as big as it is! I guess I've been slanted by "Dick Tracy". I guess that dates me too.

    --
    Saturday is April 1. Slashdot will be shut down. Sorry for the inconvenience.
  18. Why always on the back of the wrist? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Reference picture

    I don't understand why they always insist on designing wearable computers like this to work from the back of the wrist the same way a wristwatch is worn. It would be far more ergonomic to turn your hand palm-up, and it would have the added benefit of giving the screen a measure of protection as it wouldn't be sticking out from your arm.

    This is a very cool device, though. I'd buy one if I had the money and could see a practical use for it.

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    1. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by AnonymousPrick · · Score: 3, Funny
      I don't understand why they always insist on designing wearable computers like this to work from the back of the wrist the same way a wristwatch is worn.

      That's interesting. For me, the best place would be strapped to my penis.

      You can pee and check email, it'll make it look bigger ( and square), and it's the best place for viewing porn!

      --
      Saturday is April 1. Slashdot will be shut down. Sorry for the inconvenience.
    2. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but I'm not sure they make straps that big. :D (hey, if we're gonna be juvenile, we might as well do it right!) Besides, I don't know about you, but I don't like to stare at my...uhh...self...while viewing porn.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    3. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      Another benefit for having it face palm-up would be that something could stick out the side that would use the fingers on that arm. You wouldn't have a lot of maneuvarability; mainly just a button for up and one for down, but it would be useful to leave the other hand free for other stuff.

      You could make a cloth thing that would be worn around the palm that would interact with the fingers and send signals (using something not made of cloth, obviously).

      Now I'm getting mental images of someone wearing one of these, and then stick their hand in the air and making the "Spiderman shooting web" gesture and it plays the Spider-man theme.

      (Or some sort of devil music. To each their own.)

    4. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that is true. People originally wore their watches on the top of their wrist because they are comfortable that way. Hold your arm against your body with the wrist facing up, then turn it over. You can feel it takes more effort to do it upside down with palm up.

    5. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by AnonymousPrick · · Score: 1
      Besides, I don't know about you, but I don't like to stare at my...uhh...self...while viewing porn.

      Yeah, I see your point and it would get in the way, now, wouldn't it? Ok, scratch that product idea off.

      I'm going to work on my anal TV now.

      In the dictionary, under juvenile, you'll see my picture!

      --
      Saturday is April 1. Slashdot will be shut down. Sorry for the inconvenience.
    6. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by tradiuz · · Score: 1

      All I can think of now is the POWERGLOVE!

    7. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      Against my body, yes. But with a touch screen you'll need to hold it away from your body...and to do that palm-down, you have to lift your elbow and hold your entire arm up. Doing it palm-up would just require you to lift your forearm, reducing fatigue.

      I find palm-up more comfortable, so there :p

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    8. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      With the way technology is going I'd guess that pretty soon we wouldn't need any additional physical interface: the device could use imaging, or perhaps even read the movement of muscles in the forearm.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    9. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 1

      > and it would have the added benefit of giving the screen a measure of protection as it wouldn't be sticking out from your arm.

      I've tried both ways with my watches, and I get more scratches with the top towards me.
      I guess I'm just not as careful bumping against my cell phone, belt, reacking in pocket, etc. as I should be.
      (And I like not having to move my watch in order to handle something large.)

    10. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Informative
      The picture you've linked does not have the wearable on the back or the wrist. It has it on the side of the wrist in such a way that you would not need to turn your arm at all for it to be used. The protruding portion of the device would point directly at your side.

      I'm sure that end users are not their target market. This could be a useful form factor for industrial handheld computers. It will be too bulky and ugly for people to wear in everyday use, unless they start making this thing like a sandbenders:
      "I like your computer," she said. "It looks like it was made by Indians or something."

      Chia looked down at her sandbenders. Turned off the red switch. "Coral," she said. "These are turquoise. The ones that look like ivory are the inside of a kind of nut. Renewable."

      "The rest is silver?"

      "Aluminum," Chia said. "They melt old cans they dig up on the beach cast it in sand molds. These panels are micarta. That's linen with this resin in it."
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    11. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by mj_sklar · · Score: 1

      The picture you posted makes it look like the screen is more on the side of this wrist than the top or the bottom. As a tall, lanky geek, this worries me some; What if my wrist isn't thick enough to wear it?

      --
      The wii is the revolution, comrade! ...use the fucking wiimote or I'll gut you like a fish!!!
    12. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Well, for one, why not make some kind of a control glove for that hand?

      Not as big and clumsy as the VR ones, but a simple sensor in the middle of the palm that registers contact with each finger. (I presume everyone can touch the middle of the palm with each finger, although I've been wrong before when making assumptions based on my joints.)
      Even better, one sensor at the middle of the palm and one sensor for each finger at the base of said finger. That gives us ten differrent commands for the passive hand, not including possible combinations of fingers, double taps etc. - maybe even limited (or not so limited) one-hand usage.

      I somehow get the feeling more geeks will start wearing pocket watches again...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    13. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I find the *side* of the arm the most comfortable, then the top (as a watch). Palm up for me at least requires constant muscle tension to maintain, unlike the others.

    14. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh! I love that book. Kinda went strange places, but Gibson's books always do. Ever read his collaboration novel set in Babbage's time? Really interesting speculation on the way history might have gone if a "pre-silicon" era computing machine had been completed and operable.

    15. Re:Why always on the back of the wrist? by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This is a very cool device, though. I'd buy one if I had the money and could see a practical use for it.

      Those two observations are the death knell of most any product.

      Anything you can't justify actually paying the money for and whose actual purpose is cloudy is doomed to failure.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  19. Touch Screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So with a 2" touch screen, and roughly .5 sq inch finger tip, that gives me 16 touch recognition points on the screen? :-)

    1. Re:Touch Screen? by eclectro · · Score: 2, Funny

      So with a 2" touch screen, and roughly .5 sq inch finger tip, that gives me 16 touch recognition points on the screen? :-)

      Dufus, that's why it comes with the toothpick.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  20. Any alarms? by jmartens · · Score: 2, Funny

    "puts the device to sleep when the user drops their arm."
    Hmmmm, will it detect if the user raises his arms to defend himself from people who are trying to steel his lunch money?

    --
    Now that's a death ray!
    1. Re:Any alarms? by Zerbs · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm more concerned about the Italians... they won't get nearly as long of battery life the way they talk with their hands.

      --
      "22 astronauts were born in Ohio. What is it about your state that makes people want to flee the Earth?" Stephen Colbert
    2. Re:Any alarms? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      N, by that point it would be detecting the position of the mugger's arm, which it would find itself strapped around and loaded with.. er... mugger stuff.

  21. luckily (in a chinese sense) I broke my hp ipaq 4150 and have a
    small computer board to work with to show these retard designers
    how its done... probably using a folding ir keyboard, optically coupling it to the board.
    small pans under each half, one for circuit, other for pop out screen...
    yeah a computer that fits in my pocket finally...can't wait till my 624 mhz
    dell x51v breaks...

    --
    I tip toe like rats on vouge runnways.
  22. Heavier Wrists! by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's what we need, for the geeken to build up their biceps - if you know what I mean! ;-)

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:Heavier Wrists! by electrichamster · · Score: 0, Troll

      Learn to capitalise and use punctuation, you fuck.

  23. Reminds me of an old show by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I think it was called ARK2? Back in the early 80's... They ran around in this cool looking Mobile Home thing with an observation bubble on top.., and had a little car like thing to 'scout' about..

    Show sucked, but the 'stuff' was cool.

    Always wanted to build one of those 'scout cars' :)

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Reminds me of an old show by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      Wow, I remember that show. It was 1978, Ark II

      The main actor, Terry Lester, had a depressing career. He moved on from Ark II to do single appearances in Eight is Enough, Dallas, Santa Barbara, Voyager, JAG, Walker Texas Ranger, and Diagnosis Murder.

      Oh, and he was in KISS meets the Phantom of the Park.

      He died a couple years ago, and now I'm sad.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    2. Re:Reminds me of an old show by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. First thing I thought of. Other thing I remember about ARK II is that the costumes were so similar to the ones on Space:1999 I (as an 8 year old child) was convinced the shows were in the same "universe".

      Absolutely no connection really, but they both had a lot of similar gadgets too...

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  24. More Like ArmWatch by supra · · Score: 1

    More like an ArmWatch (C) than a WristWatch. First thing I thought of was: this has nothing to do w/ my wrist.

    --
    On a computer or under a hood.
    1. Re:More Like ArmWatch by winse · · Score: 1

      yeah it's like "Star Command this is Buzz Lightyear... do you read me?"

      --
      this sig is deprecated
    2. Re:More Like ArmWatch by jimwelch · · Score: 1

      Argg! Run for your life! It's Battlestar Galactica 1980!!!!

      --
      Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
  25. A computer can function on 7 ounces??? by LeonGeeste · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How is that possible? Word processing takes 30 megs of RAM, minimum. Access the internet? That'll be a 100, plus maybe 50 megs of storage space.

    Wait, you mean there was a time when word processing didn't require that much computational power? I'll be damned!

    --
    Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    1. Re:A computer can function on 7 ounces??? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Note- EMBEDDED LINUX or WINDOWS CE. These are operating systems designed to work in minimum memory. For instance, unlike Microsoft Word 2003, Pocket Word 2002 is perfectly capable of editing a document IN PLACE on the virutal disk without making a second copy in memory, and executing entirely out of ROM, thus using almost no Program Memory at all.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  26. It does other things! by clamantis · · Score: 1

    obligatory Seinfeld quote:

    Jerry: "Dad, I'm sorry."
    Morty: "You should be! How could you spend two hundred dollars on a tip calculator?!"
    Jerry: "It does other things!"

  27. Not new by marshallh · · Score: 1

    1. This is a concept. A neat one at that, but a concept.
    2. This has been tried before, called the onHand Wrist PC. It was developed by Seiko and released in Japan, and later in USA to less fanfare. It was ultimately a failure, little more than a novelty. Fossil also tried a Palm-based watch. It flopped. 3. What is the benefit of clamping a PC to your wrist, risking damage to it when you can put a Palm/Pocket PC in your shirt / pants pocket? Lots of neat ideas but little practicality. How does this offer a huge leap forward past Palm/Pocket PCs?

    1. Re:Not new by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't. You really want this product now? Get some glue and straps and make yourself one out of a PocketPC. In fact, I might just try that. It wouldn't take too much to do so.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Not new by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      What is the benefit of clamping a PC to your wrist...

      Well, I'd assume that it's been made rugged enough to withstand most torture. But the biggest benefit...the medical field. Or any field that requires you to use both hands a lot. But especially the medical field if you could also cram some diagnostic equipment into the thing at the same time. Think about the glove device used in Earth2 that you waved over a body and got instant vitals, xray images, and whatever else a field medic would need. Ok, all that will take a while to cram in there, but imagine a nurse in a hospital being able to walk up to a patient's bed, having instant access to their medical information, be able to take their vitals without a whole slew of equipment to drag around, and still have both hands free at all times. That could be feasible now. Wearable computers are a geek's dream, but the practical applications are far more reaching then just out-geeking the guy in the next cube...

  28. I get laughed at by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 0

    when I wear a wireless headset for my phone. Well, I hope that's what they're laughing at.

  29. why Why WhY WHY WHY... by spagetti_code · · Score: 2, Insightful
    802.11b

    Chips are readily available for g and that support WPA. Really - imagine walking around the city wearing one a wireless device that is trivially crackable - you are just asking for trouble.

    At least with a g chip that supports WPA, you can downgrade to WEP if you *really* want to run around with your pants down.

    1. Re:why Why WhY WHY WHY... by soloha · · Score: 1

      what does the chipset have to do with the encryption method? i have a Linksys "b" router thats over four years old. A firmware upgrade gave me the ability to use WPA (and more). not to mention that on Linux, the encryption is provided by the driver or even third party software.

  30. Open Source MI5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will they release the homing beacon add-on and the remote detonators?

    Oh, yeah... and the frickin laser beam?

  31. Come in... by Finnegar · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Detective Tracy!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Dicktracy.jpg

    We're living in the future of the '30s...

  32. Futurama cosplayers rejoice.. by NekoXP · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now you can have the best Leela costume ever!

    1. Re:Futurama cosplayers rejoice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Hercules from Roddenberry's Andromeda!

    2. Re:Futurama cosplayers rejoice.. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Why have a Leela costume when you could have a Leela costume? Rowr.

      Chris Mattern

    3. Re:Futurama cosplayers rejoice.. by NekoXP · · Score: 1

      As cute as most of The Doctor's companions are/were, she's not got a wrist computer has she?!

  33. Sweaty forearm by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    The thing is half the length of the display dummy's forearm. And it holds 6 hours worth of battery power, most of which is going to be turned into heat.

    This couldn't be comfortable.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  34. wow, this is awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had no idea I could just draw shit in 3DSMax, make up things it might do and get it posted on Slashdot like it's some kind of actual product.

    I'm goin' home and drawing up my new hovercar. It may have top speeds of up to 300mph, and will be able to run on hydrogen, propane or the laughter of children.

    1. Re:wow, this is awesome by cplusplus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think that thing is vapor-wear.

      --
      "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
    2. Re:wow, this is awesome by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      Sure, the laughter of children seems like a good, clean source of power, but you have to take in to account pumping and storage costs, and also the cleanup afterwards.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  35. Dead reckoning? by Itninja · · Score: 0

    How could 'dead reckoning' even be possible with a computer? It would have to know if you were walking, running, walking backwards, turning left/right, etc.
    A car nav system can do it, but only because it's wired into the vechicle inself.

    I guess you could tell the computer what your doing:
    "KITT! I need ya' buddy! I'm walking 45 feet forward at 3 fps. Calculate where I'll be when I get there!"

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Dead reckoning? by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      DIdn't you know that electronic motion sensors capable of estimating speed, direction, etc, are in production?

    2. Re:Dead reckoning? by x2A · · Score: 1

      "I'm walking 45 feet forward at 3 fps."

      Duh, real life is MUCH smoother than 3 frames per second! :-p

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    3. Re:Dead reckoning? by Itninja · · Score: 0

      In production? I would need to see that to beleive it. How could any solely electronic device determine speed, direction, etc. without a point of reference (ie. GPS Sat.)?

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  36. Flagrant false advertising... by link_mmc · · Score: 1

    From the article, "weighs seven ounces (200 grams) without straps/batteries." What's the point of spec'ing the weight of this thing without batteries?

    1. Re:Flagrant false advertising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's the point spec'ing the weight when it doesn't even actually physically exist in any form?

    2. Re:Flagrant false advertising... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Battery weight would be a total guess. The hypothetical batteries to this concept for a device can vary widely in weight depending on what they decide to make them out of, and how expensive they're willing to go.

  37. Pr0n usage? by Jtheletter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Having this thing attached to your wrist is gonna make it really hard to look at the screen while you're... oh wait, I can just put it on my other arm. Nevermind.

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:Pr0n usage? by kpainter · · Score: 1

      Alternately, this is a perfect application for Image Stabilization technology

    2. Re:Pr0n usage? by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      But then how do you press the buttons.... wait.... Nevermind.

      --
      -
    3. Re:Pr0n usage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      oh wait, I can just put it on my other arm
      Your StrongARM?
    4. Re:Pr0n usage? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally, the instant I read your comment XMMS switched to a song calld "Touch and Go"...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  38. Patented? by ozbird · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... and has patented technology that puts the device to sleep when the user drops their arm.

    In other words, a mercury switch.

  39. Xybernaut will sue them into oblivion by eronysis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Doesn't Xybernaut still have submarine patents on near every wearable computin device? I know one of thier submarines technically covered digital wristwatches...

    1. Re:Xybernaut will sue them into oblivion by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Don't be ridiculous! You KNOW the USPTO would never allow somebody to patent something that had already been invented! Or something that was completely obvious!

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  40. 2 problems by IflyRC · · Score: 1

    I already wear glasses - this will just make my eye sight that much worse. Also, I think my fingers are too big for the keyboard

  41. Not vaporware by apharov · · Score: 5, Informative

    Having worked part-time at Eurotech I've seen a working version of this device and it seemed to have all the external features claimed in the article. It was running Linux and I used it with the touchscreen. It also had an USB connector and a memory card slot.

    I was not working on the device so I do have any exact information about the project or its status. However, it is definately not vaporware as in Duke Nukem Forever, but rather a working physical device.


    Disclaimer: all views and observations are mine and not representative of Eurotech.

    1. Re:Not vaporware by Rac3r5 · · Score: 1

      good to know :)

    2. Re:Not vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do I know youre not vaporware?

    3. Re:Not vaporware by jzeejunk · · Score: 2, Funny

      hm... tell us when you can post comments on slashdot using that device

      --
      sarchasm
    4. Re:Not vaporware by diJenerate · · Score: 1

      apharov,
      Do you have any contacts at that company who you could pass information on to for me with regard to the WWPC?

      If so from your experience, is this company likely to be interested in integration of new proprietary technologies from 3rd party companies into its products or is this Europe's equivalent to Sony Electronics Corp?

      diJenerate

    5. Re:Not vaporware by apharov · · Score: 1

      I recommend contacting info(at)eurotech(dot)it as that seems to be referred in the Eurotech press release.

  42. But... by Kittie+Rose · · Score: 1

    Does it have a built in laser-wrist watch?

    --
    EpiAdv - if you like Pokey the Penguin, try this comic!
  43. wearable? by rhesuspieces00 · · Score: 2

    ok, we need to have a discussion on the meaning of "wearable." i could put backpack straps on any dell at best buy and it would be "wearable." the question is whether i am willing to wear it, not whether i am capable of wearing it.

    1. Re:wearable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when does Best Buy sell Dell?

  44. DUH? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 0

    Who would ever wear such a thing? It looks ridiculous. Completely style-free. The girls would laugh at you.

    Everybody here is a nerd, girls are already laughing at us so why should we care what kind of a fashion statement that thing makes? Now take your beer and go back to the sports forum....

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:DUH? by Zarel · · Score: 1

      I believe that's what the grandparent post was implying with its "Oh wait..." comment.

      --
      Want a high quality FOSS RTS game? Try Warzone 2100!
    2. Re:DUH? by x2A · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself! I happen to compensate by doing drugs... ...nothing cooler than doing drugs...

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  45. Noy only that... by fimion · · Score: 1

    ... but it can tell time too!

  46. Wrist Computer? by cve · · Score: 1

    Looking at the illustration of the device in use, I'd say 'Forearm Computer' is more appropriate.

  47. Well how about... by frostilucus · · Score: 1

    An add on of a thermo-nuclear device so we _all_ can be the Predator! Fat chance for Arnold to save the day then.

  48. pants down? by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least with a g chip that supports WPA, you can downgrade to WEP

    At last! A serious post unrelated to porn jokes, I think!

    if you *really* want to run around with your pants down.

    Alas. No such luck.

  49. Cool use (if this thing actually gets made) by biendamon · · Score: 1

    Ultra-mobile storage! Think about it... You carry around, on your wrist, all your most important files and a (presumably secured) file server to serve them up. Just walk into a room with Bluetooth-enabled computers, and you've got all your files (OK, pr0n) right there!

  50. not that big - not for a dive watch by dindi · · Score: 1

    Once you start diving you realize, that your motocross gearbag is not heavy, your paintball gear bag is not that big and heavy at all, even with the backup gun.

    With the recognition of how much stuff you can/have to hang on yourself, you also tend to wear bigger and bigger watches and computers ....

    That device does not seem to be bigger than your modern dive computer (e.g. Uwatec smart) , and yes, people wear things that size, and there are screen protectors that cost a few bucks to save a few hundred (many times $1k) ..

    Nowadays i find myself wearing the Polar 710i heart rate monitor as a watch. Beleive me it is not a little watch but after my dive watch it feels like a light wrist-wrap... Maybe some more diving with a compass, a backup timer, a dive computer, all strapped to my arm and i won't notice something like a wrist computer added to my bracelet collection on the land part of the earth.

    Oh well, but do I need one? I doubt. My pda barely gets any use, my laptop is permanently on my wife's table. I guess i do not want to mobile compute as much as I thought before. Usually a GPS and a phone in my pocket does satisfy my background radiation.

    1. Re:not that big - not for a dive watch by The+Waxed+Yak · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it. That thing is outright dainty compared to my VR3 dive computers.

    2. Re:not that big - not for a dive watch by dindi · · Score: 1

      oooh crap :) that VR3 is a nice piece .... I am diving with a simple uwatec aladdin, that is NO-DECO and only Nitrox.

      I guess for my 20-30m dives it is fairly enough for now :) besides i just went broke getting 2 sets of dive gear (everything from finc to BCD to regs) for me and my wife....

  51. Today's elaborately useless product award by netsavior · · Score: 1

    winn4r!

  52. Only 6 Hours !!! by paco3791 · · Score: 1

    I know that this sounds pretty good for a device like this but I see a couple problems:

    1. Like the rest of the specs on this device, this battery life figure is probably pure vapor.

    2. Mobile power technology (battery's/fuel cells, and lower power consumption by the device) is going to have to advance by a couple orders of magnitude before "ubuiquitous computing" can really come into its own.

    The idea is interesting, but I have a hard enough time keeping my cell phone and MP3 player charged as it is. When we can have "full function" use times in days or weeks, instead of hours, then I'll get excited.

  53. missing required features by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I'm going to wear something that big and geeky on my wrist (I don't even wear a watch anymore, since the advent of the cellphone), it'd better have two features I'm used to wrist cuffs having from tv shows:

    1) make me invisible (Galactica 1980)
    2) deflect bullets (Wonder Woman)

  54. Why specifically a linux wrist pc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The summary itself says "windows or linux". Is it not newsworthy if it's open-ended?

  55. I'm waiting for the iwrist by mrraven · · Score: 1

    Then chicks will love me.

    Oh wait...

    --
    Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
  56. Spyware popups on Slashdot? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Offtopic I know, but anyway...

    I just opened up this article in Opera (for the record, I have no other tabs open) and immediately I got a popup window, which in itself had a JavaScript prompt for WinFixer. WinFixer, for those who don't know, is a horrible spyware program which pretends to be a system tune-up program but is really fucking annoying malware that likes to pop up in your system tray every 3 seconds and demand you pay for it. This gets really annoying, really fast, and cleaning it up is a task in and of itself (I tried once but gave up after 3 hours and just reinstalled Windows 2000, then XP after many complaints with a warning that any more problems would get the person concerned straight back down to 2K...nothing since :)

    Anyway, I digress. I guess the main point is: why does Slashdot have popup ads for known spyware? I would have expected this on many other websites, but Slashdot? No way.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  57. "I'm Robert Patrick, and I approve of this message by brian0918 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Judging from the picture in the article, even the T-1000 likes this new gadget. He can keep all of his "detailed files" on the wearable PC, allowing him to be "a more efficient killer."

  58. Sounds klunky by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    I just threw my 'massive' stainless steel case and band Gruen wristwatch onto a scale and it weights 5.3 ounces. And it's heavy and takes awhile to get used to wearing but is a wonderful basic 'analog' watch (and came with a 14 year warranty- what else can you buy at WalMart that comes with a 14 year warranty??)

    I suspect, since this 7 ounce monster isn't as dense as a beefy stainless steel case and wristband analog watch, that it's not only heavy, it's probably also significantly bigger in dimensions.

    Doesn't sound practical enough to me.

  59. More than just a computer by davidc · · Score: 2, Funny

    I may not speak for everyone, but I certainly would not entertain wearing something on my wrist that weighs nearly half a pound...

    Still, one could always use it as an exercise aid, or as a substitute for 'brass knuckles'

  60. forget about the bar by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    This would guarantee you wouldn't get laid even if you were going home to your wife!

  61. patented technology ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a c*io watch which can be set to turn on the backlight automatically when I turn/raise my wrist into horizontal position, and if it [the watch] doesn't move for a time then it turns the digital clock off only the clock hands will move. So, how's their on/off/sleep-by-hand/wrist-position patented again ?

  62. Like my iPaq, but cooler and more expensive :-) by wertarbyte · · Score: 4, Informative

    If this photo is correct (looks a little bit strange), the device runs GPE, a pretty nice handheld interface used by several linux handheld derivates and based on GTK+. Since GPE uses a real XServer, porting applications is quite easy (you can even run them remote), as opposed to OPIE, which uses the framebuffer directly. Nokia's maemo platform has many similarities to GPE, I hope that both projects profit from each other.

    --
    Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
  63. This HAS to be useful for masturbation SOMEHOW... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... it goes on your wrist and can detect motion...

  64. A patented what now by Mixel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and has patented technology that puts the device to sleep when the user drops their arm

    Erm, also known as a... tilt switch? not enough? try 3 switches, one for each dimension. still wanting? use one for each DOF. no? Measure some arm drops, run them through a an auto-correlating neural net and compare with input data. Seriously, I see no reason to patent this stuff.

    I reckon that either they've created something totally ingenious that they can sell the rights to for a whole lot more than they can make out of wrist PCs (unlikely), or they patented something that is bloody obvious already.

  65. 802.11b has nothing to do with WPA by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They are two seperate issues. There's absolutely no reason you can't do WPA or even the full 802.11i with a 802.11b only chipset. The reason you don't see a lot of vendor support for WPA on old 802.11b chipsets is simply because vendors are lazy and don't want to backport the WPA support to older, largely abandoned chipsets.

    --
    AccountKiller
  66. A better design by uberjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My dream wearable computer would have all the guts contained in a belt, a bluetooth enabled display in a HUD projected on my glasses.

    Modern PDAs have an awful lot of power these days, more so than my pentium pro desktop from a few years ago. Where they fall flat IMO is in the display. I can't get much done with a 3 by 4 inch display. But if all the batteries, memory, and processor spread out around my waist, I wouldn't really notice the weight, and a full screen translucent display in front of my eyes that no one else can see would be pretty cool.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    1. Re:A better design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice idea. Just don't complain about the pain when you try to use your eye as a touch screen and stick a pen in it.

    2. Re:A better design by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      think about the bandwidth?

      I don't think bluetooth would be appropriate, I doubt it could support the volume of data required.
      you'd have to drop the refresh rate to something hideously slow.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  67. Missing feature by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    It'd be nice if they add an analog watch as part of this wrist pc.

  68. Like IBM's Linux watch? by eMartin · · Score: 4, Informative

    "I've seen a working version of this device and it seemed to have all the external features claimed in the article."

    IBM had a working Linux watch years ago, and plenty of people saw it working, but it still became vaporware.

    http://www.research.ibm.com/WearableComputing/linu xwatch/linuxwatch.html

    1. Re:Like IBM's Linux watch? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Is it vapourware if they created it and it works, and their are a lot of pictures on that site proving the fact. Just because you can't buy it, doesn't make it vapourware.

  69. Seven-Ounce Linux 'Wrist PC' ... by hvatum · · Score: 1

    for about the price of seven ounces of weed.

    --
    Netbooks, they come with Linux or a $3 copy of Windows. Either way, Microsoft loses.
    1. Re:Seven-Ounce Linux 'Wrist PC' ... by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

      Price largely depends on quality. 7 oz of waht i smoke costs $2100us(retail, not wholesale). Of course, it's always free* to grow it.


      *as in weed, not speech.

  70. You Will All Own One! by Mr.+Lucas+Brice · · Score: 1

    You scoff, but one day you will all own one of these wrist computers! They will help you plot the course of your jetpacks and flying cars. They will have a force field that will protect you from cosmic rays and all hostile alien life forms.

  71. Probably not intended for geeks by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1
    I doubt this is intended as an everyday fashion accessory. This is probably more suited for warehouse workers doing inventory, people interacting with customers on the go (like the rental car return guys at most airports,) hospital employees and so forth.

    There are a lot of markets that use (or could use) something like this. Something that is very hard to drop would be good in that market segment.

    Heck, even McDonald's (in USA at least) has a handheld device for inventory-taking purposes and another one for standing out in the drive thru taking orders.

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  72. Predator... by armus · · Score: 1

    when i get mine, i hope it comes with the same programs as the 'Predator' had on his. i can just see it counting down now... *BEEP, BEEP, BEEP, BEEP* -armus

  73. Hit F12. Click "Block unwanted pop-ups". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (see subj.) I haven't seen any pop-ups in Opera for a while.

    1. Re:Hit F12. Click "Block unwanted pop-ups". by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      I just checked and that's enabled. Any other thoughts?

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  74. Imagine Grendel with a Beowulf cluster of these by Burz · · Score: 1

    ...on its arms.

    Even cooler!

  75. Why does it have to be wearable? by Zakabog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why does it have to be wearable? I'd much rather have a PDA that doesn't attach to me wrist, fits nicely inside of it's case, which also fits nicely inside my pocket. When I want to use it, I take it out of my pocket and flip the case open. If I'm on a crowded subway, it's much less likely to get scratched or damaged, plus no one will see it and think "That guy has money, I should go mug him." I really can't see any practical use for a wearable PDA, at least if it wasn't so hideous I'd understand.

  76. Looks like the wrist communicator from Star Trek, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like the wrist communicator from star trek the motion picture.

    Isn't that something that Paramount might see and start demanding payment on?

  77. Life imitates Futurama by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of that forearm thing that Leela on Futurama wore.

  78. The big problem with wearable computing... by Castar · · Score: 1

    ...isn't the computer, it's the display. Or maybe the power source. Anyway, we have a lot of computers that are small enough to be wearable pretty easily. What we don't have is a good available head-mounted display that you can use while walking around, for the full gargoyle effect. And also we're missing a good power supply that will last through a full day (well, depending on how many batteries you're willing to carry around, I guess...)

    This looks cool anyway, but I know from looking into getting a wearable that the machine itself is the easy part.

    --
    I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
  79. Predator by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, but does it include a self-destruct device that can destroy enough rainforest to cover 300 city blocks?

    -Peter

  80. Its huge by sinij · · Score: 1

    This thing is larger than tricorder in original Star Treck series! Also why put touchscreen on this device when better alternatives, like Wearable Display available?

  81. Bright Career Path by Tipa · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And who says there isn't any future in the milk-moving-by-hand industry...

    1. Re:Bright Career Path by rm69990 · · Score: 1

      I'm using it to pay to put myself through school. Unlike a lot of my friends, I don't have rich parents that can pay for it for me. Thanks for the nice insult though, greatly appreciated.

  82. Idea for a wristwatch cell phone by mozkill · · Score: 1

    If you put your left thumb and pointer finger together and hold them up to your ear hole, you will notice that your mouth is right at your wrist (where a watch band would be).

    I suggest putting a microphone on the inside part of the watch and then put a pull-string earpiece that you hold in your ear with your thumb and pointer finger.

    This is the ultimate ergonomic wrist watch cell phone. It doesnt exist yet, but I am sure that it will now that I have spilled my beans!

    jonthorwilliams AT yahoo dot com

    --

    -- Betting on the survival of the media industry is a serious risk. I advise investing elsewhere.
  83. for jerk geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "has patented technology that puts the device to sleep when the user drops their arm"

    Obviously aimed at geeks, it should also have a patent to enhance the kinetic energy produced while the user drops their arm, but moves it rigorously back and forth , front and back while watching futurama-slash-porn in their mothers basement, as the power produced could power 5 other similiar wathes too.

  84. Embedded Linux == Linux, WinCE != Windows by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    An important differece between Embedded Linux and Linux is that it uses the same source for the kernel, whereas the WinCE source is completely different from Windows. The only real Linux difference is in userland. You won't be running KDE on one of these!

    Where this makes a difference is that with an embedded Linux device you get the full security etc that you expect of big-iron Linux,whereas WinCE security is not even as good as Windows. Security is an increasingly important issue with promiscuous devices like PDA.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Embedded Linux == Linux, WinCE != Windows by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, just about any embedded, ROM-based OS, with ROM-based applications, is by definition more secure than a disk based OS for trival use. No matter what, you can always hard reset and be back to start in about 60 seconds. And with my Wince machine, I back it up daily onto a CF card, with three days worth of backups in my pocket at all times. Even if I'm running off of a solar panel on a three week camping trip, I can be back up and running in under 5 minutes. Try doing that with any desktop OS.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  85. Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine an octopus cluster of these!

  86. How soon until... by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    How soon until this has wireless internet and a decent hard drive? I really want to run VOIP wirelessly. Just think, they could put a little headset on a retractable wire!

  87. How much does it weight WITH batteries? by pornking · · Score: 1

    Why do we care how much it weighs without batteries or a strap? If it's 7 ounces without, then it will probably be at least a pound. These are not optional accessories. It's going to get heavy real fast.

    --
    pornking
  88. Cluster by peterfa · · Score: 1

    I'm ganna' make a beowolf cluster out of a bunch of them. I'll looke like a nerd, but I'll be able to crack your encrypted files in seconds.

  89. I'm SO getting Laid!!!! by deathpulse · · Score: 1

    You expect a COMMENT to that subject? Read the article smartguy....

  90. Bah, kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    <geezer>...kids these days, buncha wimps! Walking around with their 2 microgram nanochip implants! Why, back in the day, we had to carry 7 OUNCE wrist PCs, strapped to our ARMS, uphill, BOTH ways, in the snow, with BADGERS gnawing our ankles. And that was just to get to the mill, where we had to work 5 HOURS a week! And we liked it!</geezer>

  91. Yummy! Tastes like vaporware! by kimvette · · Score: 1

    Is this the dot-com bubble all over again?

    1. Announce product with neat ideas
    2. IPO
    3. Have nothing to show but drawings and a slick slide presentation
    4. PROFIT!

    Seriously now - I go for watches with lot of functionality -- usually flight computers. I had a Seiko flight computer, got sick of it because it was so clunky and gave it away, then I got a Citizen flight computer, slightly less clunky, but gave it to my brother. I am about to buy a Pulsar flight computer, but will probably get sick of THAT, too. They just don't make good watches in a small package. . .

    . . . Which brings us to what amounts to a Linux watch. Neat idea, and I'd love to have the kind of functionality Leela (Futurama!) seems to have on her wrist thingy, but the thing would be SO annoying to wear. Why don't they just put together a Linux PDA, PocketPC-sized with USB Host, SD, and CF support, and go with a larger screen and biometric scanner? That way, it could be slightly larger, not so annoying, money would go into functionality, capacity, faster CPU, or more power capacity (longer runtime!) rather than figuring out how to get it to stay on someone's wrist? This is the kind of "watch" I'd get fed up with after just one day, no matter how much functionality they can cram into it.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  92. Dual Wrist Device by MacFury · · Score: 1

    It would be nice if someone were to come out with a half qwerty keyboard that attached to your other wrist. You could put your left hand over your right wrist to type on this keyboard while having a decent view of the display. Put in a little joystick that would rest underneath your thumb and you'd have a functional mouse.

  93. I want one! by wpegden · · Score: 1

    It has patented technology! It must be really high-tech and very well designed.

  94. For non-Imperial users by Professor+J+Frink · · Score: 1

    A European research and development firm has announced a two hundred gramme, wrist-worn wearable computer with a 72 x 55-millimetre colour touchscreen. Eurotech's WWPC (wrist-worn PC) runs Linux or Windows, offers a wealth of standard PC interfaces (WLAN, Bluetooth, IrDA, USB, SD-card, etc), and has patented technology that puts the device to sleep when the user drops their arm. It can detect motionless user states, and serve as a location-transmitting beacon, thanks to a built-in GPS receiver and 'dead reckoning' technology. The company also claims six hours of battery life under 'fully operational' conditions.

    --
    "Don't get mad, get a monkey!"
  95. Like the Palm watch by cgenman · · Score: 1

    The palm-based Fossil Abacus was vaporware for a long time. Then it came out, and nobody noticed.

    You can pick one up for 50 clams, if you don't mind strapping a cube to your wrist. And pecking at a screen not much larger than a postage stamp.

    1. Re:Like the Palm watch by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      Cube? The Abacus version isn't all that big. Grow some wrists. :-)

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  96. Which brings about a new concept! by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

    ...rebooting one's F$#%ing watch because it crashed. Anyone up for 0-day watch expliots?

  97. Is anyone else irritated by ... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... mobile product descriptions that talk about weight without the heaviest components. TFA states The WWPC weighs seven ounces (200 grams) without straps/batteries, Eurotech says. I will bet the batteries are the heaviest component, Seven ounce total weight for a device I carry around on my wrist might be bearable. However, I will bet the total weight is over 15 ounces and I could only imagine wearing that if I was a muscle builder.

  98. Dick Tracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All it needs is a camera and Dick Tracy will finally get his watch!

  99. Developer states it is only a concept (vaporware) by potuncle · · Score: 1
    "Eurotech describes the WWPC as a "user-centric, ubiquitous computing" concept, suggesting that the device is not yet available in product form."
    I'm announcing a tabletop fusion-powered electrical generator. I've got many details about it and even some pictures. But, I admit it is only a concept and not yet available in product form.
  100. COOL BEINGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is in the state of being cool, it is in a cool state of being, it IS COOL. COOL BEINGS

    cool beans? is like human beans?

  101. Deja Vu by 1.21GW · · Score: 0

    This reminds me so much of the Nintendo Power Glove! Awesome! http://www.gamerevolution.com/oldsite/articles/ran ts/powerglove.jpg

  102. Distributed Computing by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I don't want to have to heft the extra computing and batteries on my wrist. Why does the wristputer have to do anything but display and expose buttons/knobs/touchscreen? WiFi to a belt CPU and belt WWAN, wireless earphones. Maybe the entire belt volume dedicated to the non-UI parts, as well as battery, distributed around the waist.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  103. ScuttleMonkey fucks up once again! by __aabwba5127 · · Score: 0

    I don't want to be a bitch, but come on, the moron who chose this story doesn't deserve to be an editor on slashdot, especially after all the articles on impossible sources of energy he's been peddling....

  104. Embedded Linux Kernel != Linux Kernel by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    The fact that embedded Linux and non-embedded Linux are derived from the same source code pool doesn't say much about functionality. The issue is what actually ends up in the binary. Depending on how limited the resources are on the embedded target, the resulting kernel may be quite limited compared to what you would typically expect.

    In any case, no device is going to useful with only a kernel, so the real issue is overall functionality of the product.

  105. Not intended for general consumer use... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    Stop thinking in terms of YOUR using it.

    Think in terms of something that would have ALL the service manuals for a company's products- a field engineer's tool.
    Think in terms of a device for rescue operations- a GPS tied into a central database, etc. with a VoIP comm net.

    For these, while having a pocket based device is acceptable, a ruggedized wrist based device would probably* be better.

    To be sure, some will want one (Hell, I'd like to have one of them- it's a flippin' gadget after all... :-), but you or I isn't really the markets they're envisioning this for- but the tech, etc. could probably be re-purposed for a hand-held unit that can be put in a pocket.

    ------
    * I say that because I couldn't say for 100% certainty that they would be better or that something where it's an eye-tap HUD based interface wouldn't be superior to that.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Not intended for general consumer use... by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      But what makes a wearable version any better? I understand a pair of glasses that have a HUD because they're always in your sight, plus they're hands free. This device doesn't make sense though because if you have to lift up your wrist to see the device anyway why not just go the extra 2" and take it out of your pocket? It does everything a PDA can do, plus you can't put it in your pocket cause it's too big, plus it's ugly, plus it's more expensive than a normal PDA and some duct tape, plus it doesn't even exist yet. It sounds like a dream gadget. I'd rather just attach a strap to a PDA and use that as a wrist device.

  106. Yeah, great marketing move. by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    "Eurotech's WWPC (wrist-worn PC) runs Linux or Windows, offers a wealth of standard PC interfaces (WLAN, Bluetooth, IrDA, USB, SD-card, etc), and has patented technology that puts the device to sleep when the user drops their arm."

    "This girl is smart and pretty, has nice round, firm breasts, likes oral, anal, takes it between the tits, and best of all, her herpes cause bumps in her vagina, provides extra stimulation during intercourse."

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  107. Is noone else worried by montyzooooma · · Score: 1

    ..that the picture in the article shows it being used by a T-1000 terminator?

  108. I guess that makes... by wjsteele · · Score: 1

    a standard QWERTY Keyboard out of the question! I hate devices that limit me to a one handed keyboard!

    By they way, how is this different then strapping an iPaq to my arm? Really - I see no benefit other than reducing ones (slight) chance of getting "any."

    Bill

    --
    It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
  109. There are several problems with this device by DrXym · · Score: 1
    A neat device but it has a few problems:
    1. It looks stupid. Any person wearing this in a non-professional capacity may as well have "asshole" stamped on their head. Being a nerd is not a profession.
    2. It's heavy and the posture required to use it for any length of time is silly. Try holding an empty coffee mug the way the screenshot shows the device being used for a minute. Bet your arm starts to ache. This thing would definitely have to be able to prop up on a table.
    3. All the buttons are on the right hand side. Too bad for lefties who want to use their device. They'll have to reach over the screen to push a button and possibly obscure whatever it was that was prompting them to push the button in the first place. That or they'll have this hunk o' crap on their writing hand.

    I wouldn't pooh pooh such a device completely, after all it might have some profession use, especially in another form factor, but its hard to say what that use it might be to professionals. I imagine that no cop or fireman is going to want this thing clanging off everything while they're doing their jobs.

  110. Pr0n? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine someone masturbating while looking at his/her wristwatch.

    Eurotech, what a lousy name. Maybe they never heard of eurotrash.

  111. Great, but I don't play Sims... by DeadRoman · · Score: 0

    Looks to me like this thing actually only works in some strange blue tinged Sims universe after looking at the artwork in the article. I think I'll pass on it since I'd much prefer something based in reality.

  112. Add Telephone and Video Display interface by fedrive · · Score: 1

    like the Japanese and now your talking.

  113. Fossil's PalmOS watch is actually quite slick. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    The Fossil and Fossil/Abacus watch models failed because of timing (Fossil took too long to get them to market), not because of a lack of utility. You can get them on eBay for around US$50, or at places like Tiger Direct, and they can be extremely useful devices if all you need is a 66MHz DragonBall SuperVZ-powered B&W Palm running PalmOS 4.1.

    Both models are effectively a super-fast Palm m105 (3-4 times faster) with 4MB of Flash ROM sitting on your wrist.

    A watch running DateBK3, Parens, BigClock, Pilot-DB, and Yotta is actually pretty useful. No color, Bluetooth, no MP3 playing or other fancy stuff, but it can beam stuff back and forth to other palms via its IR port, and it can play almost all the old Palm games that I've fed it.

    Learn more about the Abacus and Fossil watches here. :-)

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  114. Wrist pc by JerryLs · · Score: 1

    So let me get this straight, if the wearer drops dead they will know where you are?

    --
    Ad Astra Per Asper
  115. You wear a computer on your wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But that means I can't switch hands.

  116. Excalibrate by NaDrew · · Score: 1

    The artists' conception images of this remind me greatly of the "Excalibrate" wrist computer worn by the hero in the otherwise utterly forgettable The Dungeonmaster (more here). If this one can zap the bad guys and rescue the girl, we're all set.

    --
    Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE