No, you're right. I don't go to the bank to have a lovely little conversation with the teller about the weather and the local sports team. I go to the bank to either 1.) Get Money, or 2.) Leave Money... These two jobs are perfectly suited to a machine, and in theory the machine should cost less to operate and thus lower banking costs... That's the theory anyway. The only problem I have with ATMs is that they seem to attract morons who can't operate them, and end up taking even longer than going to a human teller... Same thing with self-checkout at the supermarket. Outstanding idea -- I can get through those things in about 1/4 the time it would take even in the express lane. However, the problem arises that anybody over 40 can't seem to work them, and if you're behind someone over 60, well, just forget about it...
No, the 6502 was designed by Motorola and manufactured by MOS Tech. Besides, he's using enhanced 2e's which sported a 65c02 which was designed by Western Design Center...
could be evidence that Mars once had a thicker atmosphere and was able to have more water on its surface
They say this about everything they discover about Mars... Just replace the headline with "Scientists discover XXX on Mars, which could indicate that Mars once had water."
It's true that you may not have personally demonstrated it, but it's possible that you CAN personally demonstrate it.
How do you know this? Are you just assuming, did someone else tell you, or have you personally done it? Do you simply believe, on faith, that you can do it? Someone else did it, you say? How do you know? You saw it on TV? You read it in a book? Your friend did it? None of those things proves it can be done. You do it -- then you have proven to yourself, and only yourself that it can be done.
All of your examples COULD be reproduced, in theory.
How do you know this? Are you assuming, did someone tell you this, or have you actually personally done them? Until you've done it personally, you don't know for sure if it can be reproduced. Even if you've seen it done on TV, even if you've seen it done live, you don't know. Until you've done it personally, you don't know for sure if it can be reproduced. It sounds to me like you believe they can be reproduced, on faith... That sounds a lot like religion...
It is still completely possible for Google to use hashed passwords to authenticate users and only "save" the plain password in a "write only" file (text or separate database) with the unhashed passwords...
In Utah that might be considered normal
Just wait until they invent a bluetooth nose stylus
No, you're right. I don't go to the bank to have a lovely little conversation with the teller about the weather and the local sports team. I go to the bank to either 1.) Get Money, or 2.) Leave Money... These two jobs are perfectly suited to a machine, and in theory the machine should cost less to operate and thus lower banking costs... That's the theory anyway. The only problem I have with ATMs is that they seem to attract morons who can't operate them, and end up taking even longer than going to a human teller... Same thing with self-checkout at the supermarket. Outstanding idea -- I can get through those things in about 1/4 the time it would take even in the express lane. However, the problem arises that anybody over 40 can't seem to work them, and if you're behind someone over 60, well, just forget about it...
I agree. The patent seems appropriate for the time period. If it was so obvious to Woz, why didn't they contest the patent?
Apple II == 6502 CPU from Commodore Semiconductor
No, the 6502 was designed by Motorola and manufactured by MOS Tech. Besides, he's using enhanced 2e's which sported a 65c02 which was designed by Western Design Center...
WTF does this have to do with news for nerds
Well if you don't know, then you're clearly not nerdy enough.
could be evidence that Mars once had a thicker atmosphere and was able to have more water on its surface
They say this about everything they discover about Mars... Just replace the headline with "Scientists discover XXX on Mars, which could indicate that Mars once had water."
The people who thought this up should be fired in my opinion.
Well that will help the unemployment problem for sure.
Some kind of Dalek conspiracy?
Every day I get a corporate client asking me why they can't just keep their money in a bank.
Do they have a good chili recipe?
My internet is just a series of tubes, so all you need to do is measure the distance the hamster travels in the tube. Simple.
It's true that you may not have personally demonstrated it, but it's possible that you CAN personally demonstrate it.
How do you know this? Are you just assuming, did someone else tell you, or have you personally done it? Do you simply believe, on faith, that you can do it? Someone else did it, you say? How do you know? You saw it on TV? You read it in a book? Your friend did it? None of those things proves it can be done. You do it -- then you have proven to yourself, and only yourself that it can be done.
All of your examples COULD be reproduced, in theory.
How do you know this? Are you assuming, did someone tell you this, or have you actually personally done them? Until you've done it personally, you don't know for sure if it can be reproduced. Even if you've seen it done on TV, even if you've seen it done live, you don't know. Until you've done it personally, you don't know for sure if it can be reproduced. It sounds to me like you believe they can be reproduced, on faith... That sounds a lot like religion...
If I want, I can educate myself enough to perform the necessary steps to produce quantum entanglement.
How do you know this? Or are you just assuming... How do you know that you can't educate yourself enough to perform a resurrection?
It is still completely possible for Google to use hashed passwords to authenticate users and only "save" the plain password in a "write only" file (text or separate database) with the unhashed passwords...
Wtf is a write-only file? Is that like a unicorn?
would be against shareholder's interests
God forbid a company does something against the shareholders' interests
the whole scenario is so complex that showing its compatibility with the Phong model must already be regarded as a remarkable achievement.
I think what is remarkable is that the monolith is able to make its effect on the probes look identical to phong shading.
"I have a truly marvelous demonstration of this proposition which this margin is too narrow to contain..."
No surprise. Pinky and The Brain couldn't ever perform either...
All it takes is one accident, and you've got a disaster on your hands
You can say this about anything.
then no, you can't do that
As soon as you utter that phrase, whatever it is you're talking about ceases to be free.
anything is going to have signs of life in it!
Except maybe congress
Actually, that's the perfect password. Nobody would ever suspect it.
First-open-source-space-game-that-runs-on-a-PDP-1-that-would-later-be-emulated-on-Java